All Episodes
Previous Next
May 13, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
28:47
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. interviewed by Mike Adams.
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And particularly, you know, there was Pfizer data, a six-month Pfizer data released this week, Mike, that showed that the rate of fatal heart attack following vaccination is three times the rate of the vaccination actually saving you from COVID-19.
So you have three times the chance of getting a fatal heart attack if you do over your life being saved from COVID-19 vaccine. - Welcome to Brighton Conversations I'm Mike Adams, the founder of brighteon.com.
Today, we're joined again by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
He's the author of what I consider to be a bombshell new book that's just about out.
It's called The Real Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates' Big Pharma and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.
It's authored by his organization, Children's Health Defense, which is doing extraordinary work Thank you, sir, for joining me today.
It's always an honor to have you on.
Thanks, Mike.
Thanks for having me.
Well, absolutely.
Now, I appreciate, I know you're on a tight schedule.
I always appreciate your time.
A couple things I want to cover with you today, but first, could you update us?
I believe Children's Health Defense has filed a lawsuit against Rutgers and their vaccine mandate.
Can you give us any details about that lawsuit and how you expect that to go?
Actually, last week, Mike, on Friday, we not only filed that lawsuit, but Against Rutgers on behalf of students who are being ordered to take an emergency use vaccine prior to attending school that does not have approval, that's a violation of federal law.
Under the federal law, you are not allowed to use any kind of coercion to force people to take emergency use authorized drugs of any kind.
We're raising that issue at Rutgers the same day.
We got a very, very big victory against 5G in front of the Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. It's a suit that we've been fighting for a year, and actually much longer than that.
That suit is the FCC-approved Wi-Fi, essentially radiation, Based upon a 1996 decision, when we knew very, very little about the harms from wireless radiation, and we now know that wireless radiation is associated with cancers, but many, many other harms, the permeation of the blood-brain barrier.
It actually alters DNA. It destroys cell structure.
It caused a whole range of really devastating injuries, and some people are very, very sensitive to it, about 10% of the population.
It kills bees, it destroys birds, it destroys plants.
And FCC's current regulation is that Wireless cannot be regulated until it's shown to actually raise the temperature of your organs.
In other words, it's microwaving you.
And until it actually starts cooking you, you can't regulate it.
And we now know, we knew even back then, that wireless went out.
The Russians, who know a lot about wireless, they've been studying it longer than we have.
There's now tens of, literally tens of thousands of studies that show that it's horrendously dangerous.
In Russia, the maximum exposure levels are about one one-thousandth of what we allow in this country.
And, you know, in Russia, they don't let children use cell phones at school.
They regulate.
They're very, very carefully regulated.
And there's ways for the industry to To reduce the radiation levels, but there's no incentive for doing that because the FCC has just let them do it.
And we submitted to the court 11,000 pages of the studies, and the court came back and said, yeah, a telecom has never looked at these studies.
The FCC has never forced them.
The FCC is a captive agency.
The decision also said the same thing about FDA, which is significant for all of our other work, because we've been telling people that FDA is a captive agency.
It gets 50% of its budget from the pharmaceutical industry, and it does what industry tells it to do.
It's not protecting the public.
It's a sock puppet for the industry that it's supposed to regulate.
And here the court said essentially the same thing, that FDA has dropped the ball, FCC has dropped the ball.
And that wireless is not being regulated in this country the way it ought to be.
And this decision that we want has really far-reaching implications because the wireless industry has gone into all these municipalities across the United States and signed contracts with them to put antennas everywhere, saying to them that the antennas are safe.
And now the court has been said, you've never done those studies.
You don't know that they are safe.
And the burden is now going to be on industry to show that they're safe, and there's hundreds of billions of dollars at stake.
So this is a really, really important lawsuit, and it's an important victory for children's health defense.
So we, the same day that we fired Rutgers, we got back this tremendous holding from the Court of Appeals.
And, you know, it's very encouraging for me, Mike, because it shows that Even when there are powerful interests at stake, you can persuade certain courts in this country to actually look at the science, and that gives me a lot of hope.
Well, this theme that you're talking about here, though, it's extraordinary that the United States is unique among first world nations around the world in that U.S. regulators allow consumers in the U.S. to be exposed to really orders of magnitude,
higher concentrations of toxins, whether we're talking about electromagnetic radiation or glyphosate, I mean, look at glyphosate standards, if you could even call them that, in the US, there's almost no real practical limit of glyphosate in foods versus the EU, where glyphosate is extremely controlled, tightly restricted.
I've looked at all the documentation myself.
Similar situation with Canada.
Why is it that, in your view, that regulators in the United States see the American people as a kind of toxin dumping ground to dump toxic food and toxic radiation and toxic vaccines and all these things that have tighter quality controls in many other countries around the world?
I was on the trial team that tried to The Roundup case, and, you know, we won the three decisions, including the final decision, which was the $2.2 billion verdict, jury verdict, for a family, a couple that had both gotten a non-Hodgkin's diploma from home gardening with the life of SA. And we just settled the, you know, Monsanto has now agreed not to sell the life of SA for home gardening in this country.
Let me add one thing about wireless, which I think is important for Americans, but I think your audience particularly will find this important.
And then before we talk about life and say, you see all these ads on television, like, about these companies, telecom, you know, Verizon, et cetera, telling you these very glossy ads saying 5G is coming to your neighborhood.
We're going to have wall-to-wall carpeted 5G all over the country.
And you look at those ads and you say, hey, that's really good.
My life is really going to change.
They're telling me something great is going to happen with 5G. And then you start thinking about it and say, what does that mean?
You know, am I going to be able to download the video game 10 seconds faster?
And the truth is, it does nothing for you if they are not installing this system To improve lives of everyday Americans.
The reason that they're installing this system is it's a surveillance device and it's a data harvesting device.
We're living in the wild, wild west right now of data.
And it's like back in the old days when a wildcatter could put down a well anywhere he wanted and suck out oil for free.
All of our data is now available for free and it's been available for a while.
Alexis, you think you have Alexis in your house and that she's working for you?
She's not working for you.
She's working for Bill Gates.
She's recording every time you cough, every time you blow your nose.
When you talk about needing a new mattress, when you talk about the artist that you love, she is recording that, and that data is going online.
And what's happened in the past is this data, because we have these devices, you have your GPS on your watch.
On your cell phone, they have the ability to know it.
Everywhere you are, all day long, everywhere you shop, to listen to your conversations, to know what you like and what you don't like, to know what kind of advertisements work on you, what are the magic words that make you buy something, how sick are you, how fast is your heart going, etc.
They have the ability now to harvest all that data.
They have not, until now, been able to transport it.
And then to send it to an analytics center where they can break it down and monetize it and then sell it to companies to whom it is valuable.
But your free data has a tremendous value.
And Bill Gates now is putting up 60,000 satellites.
He believes, he brags, that he will be able to look at every square inch of the planet 24 hours a day.
Two million antennas are now going up in space, you know, Elon Musk and all these other companies, and they're literally looking, surveilling, watching everything that you do all day long.
And, you know, if you do something they don't like, if you don't take a vaccine, if you go surfing, you know, a year ago, I pointed this out, the crazy thing early in the pandemic, they made it illegal to surf.
And a lot of surfers went out and the police went down to the beach in Malibu up there and were handing out $1,000 tickets to each one of them.
Well, now you wouldn't need the police to go down there.
Visualization recognition systems, you have GPS, you're going to know somebody if this guy was illegally surfing.
And what they're transitioning down now to digital currency and They're going to know every transaction you make, every time you buy chewing gum or you buy cigarettes, and they're going to be able to tax it.
The banks are going to be able to take their share of it, but they are also, more importantly, I'm going to be able to starve you to death and cut off your funding if you're disobedient.
If you don't take a vaccine, if you don't do what you're told, they don't need to send the cops down to the beach.
They now know because they've got the facial recognition.
They know where you've been all day.
And they are going to be able to punish you.
And that ultimately is what this is all about.
And our lawsuit is a really important step.
And slowing down is, you know, total surveillance state we're headed to.
You've hit on so many really crucial issues there.
I thank you for bringing those up.
I want to ask your response to one particular issue there, but I just want to remind viewers of your book.
It's called The Real Anthony Fauci, and it is coming out, looks like now, looks like it's November?
Yeah, November 9th is what Amazon is currently stating.
So I just want to let people know they can pre-order it, and that helps support your work and your organization, just in terms of getting publicity and moving the book up on bestseller lists.
And that's what's important here.
It's not about the revenue.
It's about the recognition of the message.
Moving up on the bestseller list.
Exactly.
I want to repeat, which you know, I don't make any money in this book.
All my profits are...
No, go directly to Children's Health Defense, but it's really important that we make this book.
We now have about 15,000 sales that we can get out of 20 or even 30.
The New York Times will have to put it number one on their bestseller list, which will really irritate them so well.
Okay, fantastic.
And also, your publisher has been kind enough to send me, I think, a chapter from your book, which I'm about to publish.
So I'll remind people of that so they can check out, I think, one of the most important sections of it, and then they can get the book for the rest of the story.
But what you just said about the telecom infrastructure being a surveillance grid and then potentially then being used to monitor where you are at all times and cut off your access to even grocery stores if you're not obedient to the vaccine demands of the system.
And those demands continue to expand, it seems.
They're going to have a third booster shot and a fourth and a fifth and who knows how many.
But think about this, folks.
In California, they've already announced that in order to go into certain retail establishments, you have to have a vaccine passport, which the media, you know, for years said that would never happen.
That was a conspiracy theory.
Now it's California policy.
But they can expand that to grocery stores.
And then furthermore, and my question to you is...
Black Americans are only roughly about one out of four black Americans are currently vaccinated, I think, because they're very wise to the history of government medical experiments.
But you look at black neighborhoods, which are already in many cases called food deserts, lack of access to nutritious food, a lot of focus on fast food or convenience store food in many of these areas, especially low-income areas.
And then you have to ask, is the federal government seriously vaccinated?
Going to require or limit the access of black Americans to healthy, nutritious food because they won't comply with vaccine mandates?
Is that going to happen?
You know, actually, Kevin Jenkins, who is the president of the Urban Health Coalition, he's an extraordinary African-American leader and has been one of our closest allies on this issue.
He works very closely with children's health.
But he published in The Defender of An article last week brought up this issue exactly, and he said these are Jim Crow laws.
The demographic with the lowest vaccination rate are blacks, which is about 25-28%, but in New York City, where de Blasio has now passed a law saying you can't go to the gym, you can't get on public transportation, you can't go to a grocery store, you can't go to a bar.
The people who this is really targeting are Blacks, and he's compared...
Blasio to George Wallace saying, segregation now, segregation forever.
If you don't comply, if you're disobedient, we're going to punish you.
But it's illegal.
You cannot compel people.
And we saw in the Nuremberg Protocol, this is in the law.
And you cannot, federal law says, you cannot use any kind of coercion Afford somebody to participate in a medical experiment.
And that's what this is.
This is an unapproved product.
It's illegal for them to do it.
And let me just say one other thing about the surveillance.
Bill Gates right now is building a city in Arizona of, I think, 60,000 people.
And it's a company town.
And the purpose of that town Is just to work in a giant data center.
Take all the data from all of these new power lines and new 5G systems around the country that they can harvest and then subject it to analytics and sell it to retailers and other people who want to sell you stuff.
And, you know, we're...
These systems are allowing the government to watch you And it's allowing billionaires to harvest your most valuable assets, which is your data, for free.
To steal it from you and then sell products back to you based upon what your data says.
Exactly, exactly.
But getting to what you said before, I have a question.
Do you feel a sense of confidence that any kind of legal process can compel The local or national governments of the world to follow the law.
Because you just said it's illegal what they're doing.
And you're right.
We know that.
But they are ignoring the laws.
They're just blatantly ignoring the laws.
And the question is, what can compel them to follow the laws that are very clear and that are already on the books?
They're mandating experimental medical injections.
Even a new platform, the mRNA platform, even has never been...
Tested or proven efficacious in humans.
Do you have faith in the court system here?
How do we stop this?
You know, the court system, we had such a great result in the Court of Appeals, and that kind of restored some of my faith in the court system.
In the lower courts, particularly in California, it's really hard to challenge any of this, but In the courts in the other state, I think we're going to get good results.
I think people need to stand up and say, I am not going to take an emergency use vaccine because I'm being intimidated into it.
If you fire me for not taking it, or if you deny me some other right, I'm going to sue you.
And flood these colleges with lawsuits.
Flood the local schools and high schools with lawsuits and make them spend their budget fighting hundreds and hundreds of lawsuits.
You know, for your listeners, it's important to understand the people who really ought to be our best advocates on here and could be most effective at this are the state attorney generals.
And particularly in the red states, I think 28 Republican attorney generals.
And most of them are aware of this.
You know, most of them are On the side of medical freedom, and you should contact your attorney general and say, look, we want you to stand up for this.
Most of those attorney generals want to be governor, and they are usually willing to take risks, willing to throw the dice and to do things that other public officials have been serving about.
And they have tremendous power for protecting individual rights.
What happens, what about when the FDA grants, fraudulently probably, full approval to the Pfizer vaccine, which we're anticipating may happen in the first half of September or even shortly after Labor Day, then Doesn't that take away one of the key arguments that even you and I might be making, which is that it's experimental use only right now.
Aren't they going to say then, well, no, it's approved now.
That proves it's safe and effective.
Therefore, you can't say no.
How does that change the legal challenge?
We think that we have a decent case, pretty good case, against them if they do that because they have not been through phase three trial.
So usually you can't...
The usual process is you go through phase one, phase two, phase three, and the phase three takes two or three years because you're looking for long-term effects, negative effects of these medical interventions.
We're seeing a lot of oncologists are reporting that cancer rates are now exploding in people who got these vaccines.
And we need to look at that signal and to take it seriously.
It may or may not be related.
But they're seeing, but oncologists, anecdotally, are reporting this from all over the country right now.
And, you know, we need to look at that.
And FDA is supposed to be looking at many other injuries, like autoimmune injuries and neurodevelopmental injuries and long-term, long diagnostic horizons, long incubation periods.
Where you will not see that signal for two or three or four or five years.
And so I have to cut things short.
And particularly, you know, there was Pfizer data, a six-month Pfizer data released this week, Mike, that showed that the rate of fatal heart attack following vaccination is three times the The rate of the vaccination actually saving you from COVID death.
So you have three times the chance of getting a fatal heart attack as you do of your life being saved from COVID for that vaccine.
So I don't think, you know, if you actually had somebody look at the data, the other thing that What FDA is going to try to do is they're going to try to approve the vaccine without the VRBPAC panel meeting.
This is the, you know, the Committee on Biologics Vaccines and Related Biologic Products Advisory Committee.
It's called VRBPAC. And normally for every other vaccine that's been approved, the FDA brings this to BRBAC, and BRBAC has to look at it and vote on it.
It's not independent science.
Most of them are on Johnny Fauci's payroll, but they have personal reputations at stake.
They can't just look like a rubber stamp.
And what FDA is going to try to do is to approve this two weeks from now.
Without going to VRBAC, it's going to be the first time they've ever done that with a vaccine.
So I think there's ways for us to challenge it.
Children's health insurance will suit them.
If they try to do that and, you know, we'll see what happens.
Well, that's a big piece of news right here.
Children's Health Defense will sue to stop the FDA if they bypass that panel.
And it seems that they're going to take all kinds of shortcuts, which really just proves the point that it's still experimental.
Even if they call it approved, they haven't gone through the normal traditional approval process or clinical trial processes that would be required.
I mean, they've taken shortcuts and then they claim they're not taking shortcuts.
Actually, they also did something really sleazy, which is they unblinded the trial last month.
So they really are no longer, even though technically the trial has to go to 2023 and the Moderna trial in 2022 officially, that's the end of it.
Usually you don't unblind the child to the end.
They've unblinded it now.
It basically got rid of the placebo group.
I'm blinding it.
They told all the people who were getting placebo, you were getting a placebo, and they offered to get the vaccine.
That's incredible.
So they've just destroyed any medium-term or long-term data that would emerge.
Exactly.
The whole thing is transparently corrupt.
Well, absolutely.
I mean, look, you know, I have a private company.
If I operated my food science lab, let's say, with that kind of fraud, you know, the FTC would arrest me.
But yet they can do it every day.
In the drug companies, even Pfizer submitting its booster shot data to the FDA. Well, Pfizer ran the clinical trials for the Pfizer booster.
FDA didn't run any trials.
They didn't have they didn't look at it independently.
It's all self-serving corruption, it looks like.
And also, it's not really a regulatory agency.
The HHS is making money on these vaccines.
The HHS owns patents for these vaccines.
The FDA gets half of its budget from pharmaceutical companies.
These are not Regulatory agencies, they are arms of the industry.
They're subsidiaries, they're indentured servants and subsidiaries to the pharmaceutical industry, and they're pretending to be regulators, but they aren't.
They don't do regulation, and above all, they do not do public health.
That is not the business they're in.
They're in the job of marketing pharmaceuticals.
Well, it's like health and human services.
They're not in the health, they're not on the side of humans, and they're not serving anyone except themselves.
It's incredible.
Well, I want to thank you for your time here today.
Any last thoughts you want to leave us with as we wrap up today's interview?
Just another plug for your pre-publication version.
Go to Amazon right now.
Help us get number one on the New York Times bestseller list by buying your Christmas restaurant early.
I had a copy of the real Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Big Pharma, the global war against human rights and human health and hypocrisy.
Okay, that's it.
The book, The Real Anthony Fauci.
And I want a signed copy from you, by the way.
Yeah.
Okay, got to get that instant collector's item.
I'll save it forever.
So thank you for all your work and all that you're doing.
And folks, visit childrenshealthdefense.org for the Defender newsletter with sometimes daily information and updates.
Definitely check out the book, Amazon and Barnes& Noble.
And thank you so much, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., for joining me today.
God bless you, and we'll talk again soon.
Thank you, Mike.
All right, take care.
Survival Nutrition is our new free audiobook that you can download right now from survivalnutrition.com.
In this nearly eight-hour audiobook, you will learn life-saving secrets of how to use food, nutrients, plant molecules, trace minerals, and chemical compounds to save your life.
even in a total collapse scenario.
I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and I'm the author of Survival Nutrition.
I founded and run a multi-million dollar food science laboratory, and I'm the author of the best-selling science book, Food Forensics.
I'm also a prepper, a patriot, and a survivalist.
I can teach you how to survive what's coming by growing your own food, medicine, and antibiotics that can help keep you healthy and alive even during the worst of times.
At survivalnutrition.com, you'll be able to instantly download the full, free audiobook as MP3 files.
▲
Export Selection