All Episodes
Previous Next
May 11, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
44:27
JR Nyquist reveals latest details on China's plans to ATTACK the United States
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And this is one of the things I want to communicate to your listeners.
The Russians are trying to play the right wing in America, and the Chinese are trying to play the left wing in America.
And it's a scissor strategy to get us to fight.
You got people like Pat Buchanan who are saying that Putin is a good guy, he's really a Christian.
And then you got people over here, you got like Biden saying, oh, Xi is a good guy, you know, he's okay.
And you have these two narratives about who are the good guys and the bad guys.
Well, what that does is that allows both China and Russia leverage within the United States given different narratives that developed.
And I believe that the Chinese and Russian disinformation operatives developed both of these narratives and that they're working together behind closed doors, the Russians and Chinese.
There's lots of evidence of that.
Welcome, everyone, to Brightiam Conversations.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of brighteon.com.
And by popular request, we have returning, in record time, Jeff Nyquist.
jrnyquist.blog is his website, and he's just an incredibly brilliant analyst about geopolitics world events.
We're going to ask him today about the latest developments with China and Russia, the Russian Navy maneuvers off Hawaii, and things that are happening with Canada and the United States.
And Jeff, I've got to say welcome to the show, but everybody either tells me two things about you.
Number one, they need you to come on more because they can't sleep until they learn more from you about what's happening, or they can't watch you anymore because they can't sleep because of what you said last time.
So that's what I get from people.
Maybe I can give a little good news.
Maybe we'll try to say the glass is half full rather than half empty.
Well, you start out.
Tell us what you think, where we are, because there's a lot that's happened just last week.
To clarify, and I'm always trying to clarify it in my own head, you know, the Russian Chinese, you know about this big Russian exercise off Hawaii.
They say some of the Russian military units got within 35 miles of Hawaii, something like 20 Russian warships, submarines, and aircraft, long-range bombers involved, Northern Pacific.
This is a kind of in-your-face kind of thing that the Russians are doing.
Yeah.
This is showing that they can concentrate in the Pacific.
It's the largest Pacific exercise that the Russians have conducted since the Cold War ended.
So it's really significant.
They're flexing their muscles.
And one of the things that's become clear to me in the last few days is that I was talking to a military analyst, a military advisor to Congress, and he said, you know, whenever a country...
Is reaching a situation of instability.
These countries become nervous and increase their military.
Of course, he's talking about the United States being unstable.
And ever since we've had this election situation where we've had, you know, people said, this election count wasn't right.
This just doesn't seem right.
And so the United States really, with January 6th events and the kind of polarization we've had in the country, people are wondering whether our institutions still work anymore.
This is a whole other subtopic.
There's a KGB colonel taught at their KGB academy there named Igor Panarin.
Have you heard of that name?
No.
Igor Panarin was famous in 1998.
It came out that he was lecturing, and this has been his subject for many years, about a future civil war in the United States and a breakup.
Boy, did he get excited last November when our election turned out the way it did.
His scenario was always that immigration and economic problems, difficulties, and the political divide in the country, in America, would lead to a breakup of our country and to a civil war which would enable foreign intervention in that civil war.
This scenario has always been A factor.
It's been in the background of I think Russian and Chinese analysis.
You remember you had the war game that John Podesta ran for the Democrats last fall, where they talked about, you know, their war game was the election got stalemated in Michigan, and they had three blue states secede.
And those three blue states, they weren't Connecticut, New York, and Illinois.
They were California, Oregon, and Washington, the China-facing ones, the ones where all of our ports, where the Chinese access to the country is.
That really caught my attention at the time.
Our enemies are always, your enemies always, when he wants to do you in, he's always looking for a way in on you.
And I think what's happened is that we've, I think the good news is, we've dodged a number of bullets here, because certain things haven't come off the way the Chinese and their allies wanted.
Take, for example, the pandemic, and we probably want to talk about the Chinese defector, right?
Right.
Yes, absolutely.
You see, the thing is that if I'm that high level in the Chinese intelligence service, I'm not going to defect because I know I'm defecting to my own side, right?
Yeah, exactly.
But he went to the DIA, as I understand it.
Yeah, but still, look at the administration that's in power.
I mean, they can tell the DIA to send him back to China.
Right.
A person who wanted to defend their life would do that.
I mean, it's not probable.
Plus, the information he's relaying is, and this is damage control for China, he's saying the virus leaked from the lab.
That it was not intentionally deployed.
Right, right.
It's not an intentional leak.
It was leaked.
He's saying, oh, it just leaked.
They had an accident.
Well, that's reinforcing a certain narrative.
Just think what the Chinese would be willing to give up in terms of intelligence In order to make that narrative stick.
Oh, we didn't do it too on purpose.
We didn't do it too on purpose.
That's very important for them.
So important they sent this high-level guy over because I don't believe for a minute he's legitimate.
So wait a second.
So you're saying that he's really working for China, but agreed to, quote, defect.
And he's turned over a lot of things.
I saw the list, like Hunter Biden's hard drives, but those hard drives were already in the possession.
That's not new.
That's not news.
Exactly.
And he probably named the governors that are taking money from China, but that's been known under the Trump administration as well.
So what did he give us that's new?
That he knows the real scoop of how the virus got out.
And it was an accident, right?
I mean, this is such a high-level defector.
I mean, you don't see people at this level.
I mean, Jan Pachepa was the acting head of the Romanian Intelligence Service in the East Bloc who defected, you know, like 40 years ago.
But we've never, you know, at this level from China, uh-uh.
There's no way.
And the thing is, is that this is clear to me.
Look, you got Chinese New Year's?
You got this little window.
You incubate the virus in there.
Chinese New Year's is the most traveled day in the most traveled city in the world to get a virus out, to go out to the other continents.
And they did it on that day.
Are you telling me?
What is that?
A 1 in 100 chance to make that window?
You know, even if it's a 1 in 50 chance, I'm not believing in those kind of coincidental odds.
That virus was released.
It was incubated in Wuhan.
And then right after those flights went out, they closed the city down.
It was an operation.
They were spreading the virus.
And you know, you covered this, Mike.
This virus was much more lethal when it first came out.
It was killing doctors, nurses, dentists.
It was killing people.
You go to northern Italy and the way it killed people.
Then, just like this Luc Montagnier in France, this Nobel laureate said, well, if it's a chimera virus, and he said it was, it's going to rapidly mutate towards the common cold.
That's right, and that's exactly what it did, right?
So, and this is the thing, you know, made in China.
So the good news is their attack did not work out.
Maybe somebody didn't say the virus wasn't going to last this, you know, wait a minute, this virus, you know, it's not the Energizer Bunny.
It didn't keep killing.
They had to gin it up, you know.
But couldn't a person say that it did achieve its purpose of removing Trump from power, allowing the election to be rigged through mail-in voting fraud?
So China has their puppet seemingly in the Oval Office, Joe and Hunter Biden, But now with the Maricopa County audit, reportedly, from my sources, I've heard there are going to be 200,000 minimum ballots that are fraudulent or thrown out or nonexistent.
They existed in the machine, but they don't exist in physical ballots because somebody was rerunning the same ballots over and over.
Isn't there a chance that China could still get what it wants, which is a civil war in America coming out of the ballot audits?
Yeah, I think you've hit the nail on the head because what I've been mulling over the last few days is I've been really thinking about this.
The objective of China is to take over America without having to nuke us.
And I think, you know, you're looking at the vaccine.
We don't even know what that's going to do to this country.
And the really suspicious way they're wanting to force vaccinations on people who already have immunity, on children, on people who aren't going to be affected by this virus now.
You know, whenever somebody does something that doesn't make sense, And they're really trying, they're insistent, and they're not being logical.
It's like, there's a hidden agenda, right?
Who's pushing on them to push this virus?
Right.
Exactly.
And if you have, I think, with the...
I don't know what it's going to shake out to be.
I understand the number of people receiving the shots is decreasing rapidly.
So we're maybe reaching the point of the people that are willing to take the shots are taking them.
And then...
So...
Well, it's done.
Force the shots on people.
Yeah, they've vaccinated everybody that's willing to be vaccinated except at gunpoint.
So the number's about 65% of adults have taken one shot.
They're not, quote, fully vaccinated.
But across the entire population, those who are not fully vaccinated is somewhere under 45%.
Because they've only had one shot.
Is that all?
It's only 45% who've not been vaccinated?
I was looking at CDC numbers last night.
But remember, it's a two-shot thing.
So 65% of adults have had one shot, but from the entire population...
Like 45% or fewer have had both shots.
So it's less than half of America has been fully vaccinated.
See, on your show, I can talk about this.
And I did a little bit of an essay on it where I touched on the third part of a long essay that the censors wouldn't get all the way down there.
So I'm going to lay this out for you.
You know about Dr.
McCullough from Texas A&M. You know about his work.
Absolutely.
Yes.
He has made an extraordinary statement that he thinks that the vaccine is the second stage in the biological attack.
That's right.
I think that's a profound statement.
I think he may be right.
I've got a different way of getting to there than he does.
Yeah.
When you look at the secret speech of Chiao Chen, who talked about a biological attack on the US 20 years ago, this was a secret speech given to top Communist Party cadres by the Chinese Defense Minister about a future secret biological attack on America.
He gives the figure of the number of people they hope to kill in the attack.
Now, when he was talking, the population of the US was around 300 million.
So he was saying 100 to 200 million deaths.
This is what he was saying.
Now, I puzzled over that at the time because I've studied biological warfare and the only way you can get that level of death from a biological attack is like if you seed stable cold air masses in the winter with anthrax.
And those cold air masses come over.
You can kill about a third of the people in the path if they're not taking protection, right?
If there's no warning.
Because anthrax is the most lethal microorganism.
You breathe it, you get pulmonary anthrax, you're gone, you're toast.
You know, 98% fatal.
And I thought, you know, but if you did that, you would be caught, right?
Anthrax is not communicable.
It's a bacteria.
You got to breathe it.
They got to put the planes in the air to do it.
You see them putting the planes in the air.
So they can't do it that way.
This is a rapidly spreading viral pandemic.
Even if it was, you know, let's say it had 20% lethality.
And I don't know there's any viral pandemic that has that that wouldn't kill the host so fast it wouldn't spread anymore.
With the lockdowns and stuff, you're not going to kill 100 million to 200, 1 to 2.
There's no way you get to that number.
And so I started thinking about how do they think they're going to get to that big of a number without getting caught?
The vaccine.
A vaccine.
It's got to be.
And when you look at antibody-dependent enhancement, And you look at the effects of this thing and the fact that a coronavirus and the HIV virus and the malaria virus, the genetic components of this chimera virus are all the types that if you make a vaccine, it is likely to produce an ADE effect, which can be highly lethal.
Well, there's where you get to these numbers, right?
Right?
That's how you can get this big of a kill from a virus that even at its most lethal was only going to kill 7% of the population.
Right.
But they had to get the U.S. government on board to push the vaccine.
They had to get big tech to push it and also censor any report of vaccine side effects.
They had to get the science journals, medical journals, the CDC, the establishment.
But from our interview last time, as you said, you believe that communist China has infiltrated all of these institutions.
And so is that the explanation of how they did it?
Yeah.
Well, yes, I think so.
Look at how our vitamin precursors, how many of our medicines come from China.
How our reliance on the cheap China labor, this was their lure.
They could do things cheaper than us because they would pay their people less.
So this allure for big pharma and for a lot of our industries was too much.
So we became reliant on them for all kinds of materials.
And then this relationship began between our pharmaceutical companies, between our health, between our medical health.
I just talked to a Canadian politician this morning, and I was talking about You know, the information I had about the infiltration of our medical, and he said, oh yeah, they've got a major problem in Canada with the Chinese interfacing, with their level 4 lab and Wuhan being connected.
You know, I think you've covered or talked about that in the past, in the scandal that still is not resolved in Canada, he was telling me this morning.
And we've got the Fauci emails now.
But more than that, this interplay between our science and theirs that we opened ourselves up.
Look, if you talk to somebody at Emory University, there's massive numbers of Chinese.
I mean, it's between 12% and 15% of the staff of Emory is Chinese nationals.
Emory is the university in Atlanta that feeds the CDC. Right?
So how much is the CDC and the National Institutes of Health and on and on?
How much have they gotten in there?
And this one source I had, she said, it's not just Chinese nationals.
These are Chinese nationals from high party, high communist party backgrounds that we're talking about.
Yeah, and I just want to add, you know, we don't have anything against the people of China.
Someone happens to come to the United States from China doesn't mean they're a bad person.
In fact, the FBI just got caught in a court case falsely accusing a Chinese national who was an expert in welding technology, and they framed him.
And they accused him of espionage and they made it all up.
It was all false.
They destroyed his life and his career just because he was from China.
But as you say, it's different when people are from high-ranking Chinese military officials, you know, the People's Liberation Army family sending people over to infiltrate Emery.
To infiltrate the CDC to push vaccines that kill Americans.
That's what you're talking about.
I just want to be sure that our audience understands a distinction there.
I mean, health sabotage.
If we go back to the AIDS epidemic, you know, I did a lot of research because of this, what happened on AIDS, anti-immune deficiency syndrome.
To find out what was really went on there.
I don't think we really know whether AIDS was the HIV virus is the cause.
Because there is a Jane Tease, another scientist, very good information suggesting that African swine fever was the cause.
And you've got, of course, Peter Duisburg's work saying that, look, there's a combination of immune-destroying causes here, that retroviruses cannot do that.
And yet, Fauci, because of his position, administratively forced this is the scientific answer, this is really the solution.
Now, might be right, might not be.
I'm not a scientist in that field.
But isn't it interesting how it got politicized and how Fauci wanted to have an HIV vaccine back then and make everybody take it?
Wait a minute.
This is like deja vu all over again, right?
Yeah, well, and Dr.
Judy Mikovits says just blatantly that Fauci committed massive fraud during the AIDS epidemic.
And by the way, At that time, in the 1980s, the CDC was looking for more justification for funding, and they ran a narrative that said anybody can get AIDS. A straight heterosexual couple could just be hit with AIDS from casual contact, that it could just affect anybody.
That's the kind of quack science hysteria that we saw, just as you said, with the coronavirus here over the last year and a half or so.
It's the same playbook.
Yeah, and when you have something like global warming, science, quote-unquote, where you've got this consensus – well, I'm sorry, science doesn't operate on a consensus – Who had the consensus when Columbus wanted to go across the ocean and find out what was on the other side?
The fact of the matter is that science is advanced by people who break away from what is previously thought and discover something new.
You never have any progress with science if you just stick with what everybody thinks is true already.
You never make a new discovery.
Well, they're not even pretending that this is science anymore.
It's just highly politicized dogma at this point.
Even what, 18 scientists came out and admitted that they did not want to go along with Trump last year, so they downplayed the lab leak theory for political purposes because they didn't want to be grouped together with Trump, who they called a racist.
So anti-Trump hatred Cause these scientists to abandon evidence.
And that's proof right there that they're not driven by evidence.
They're driven by politics.
They admit it.
And this is how a system gets corrupted.
We talk about spiritual corruption.
There's also intellectual corruption, lack of intellectual integrity.
And there's kind of a principle here at work.
If you live a lie, It's going to catch up with you.
You're going to have psychological problems.
You're going to have family problems.
You're going to have legal problems.
And it's the same thing in politics, in a nation's life.
If the nation lives by lies, you're going to have a crisis.
A crisis where you're going to have to come to terms with those lies that you've believed.
And we have believed so many lies here.
I mean, The first and big one is that the Cold War ended in 1991 and communism was defeated.
No, it wasn't.
We were basically tricked and we wanted...
This is our own dishonesty.
You can't cheat an honest man, you know?
It's like we weren't entirely honest.
What did we do to win it?
We didn't triumph over them in Vietnam.
We didn't beat them in Angola.
They pulled out of Afghanistan themselves.
They did it.
They arranged this and they shifted their strategy to a very much a deception infiltration strategy.
So you get presidents like the Clintons, you get Obama, now you have Biden.
And you look at what these presidents do and they are always helping out Russia.
They're always helping.
Look at Russia was being crushed by energy prices.
He kills our pipeline and he's helping them build theirs, the Russians.
Right, right.
So it's like, wait a minute, I thought Trump was a Russian puppet.
You mean Biden was a Russian puppet all along?
But hold on, when you talk about America living a lie, I can't think of a bigger lie than the dollar.
You know, the global reserve currency, America just printing trillions like mad because the country can get away with it because of the global reserve status that obviously is going to end at some point.
But America locks down its own economy during the pandemic, pays people to not work, Produces almost nothing, has long supply lines that depend on China and Taiwan for microchips and other countries for everything else, Korea for appliances and car parts and everything.
And then, I mean, isn't this a lie that Americans can be just consumers and we can all get free stimulus money from bailout checks?
We can just spend, spend, spend, and we don't have to produce anything.
We don't have to work.
We don't have to have assets or...
I mean, isn't this lie going to end?
Yes, yes.
In fact, this whole scenario is foreseeable.
In 1909, the Italian historian of Rome, Guglielmo Ferraro, did a tour of the United States.
And he was asked about, you know, well, why did Rome have these civil wars?
Why did the Roman Empire fall?
And he said, well, you are vulnerable to this in a larger way in the long term.
Because he said, in Rome, what caused the civil wars were that you had one generation of Romans living better than the next.
And then you had a final generation that only lived better than the next by borrowing.
By going into debt.
He said once that debt became so massive that there was no chance of paying it, they just had to cannibalize themselves.
But with us, it's even worse because we have this enemy overseas that have scientifically looked at us, and they have dissected what our weaknesses are, and we've moved our entire industrial base from the United States to China to take advantage of that cheaper labor.
Without realizing that, wait a minute, my furnace here might not make it through the winter.
I might need a part.
That part's got to come from China.
Those parts stopped coming.
When did they stop coming?
My tractor that I need to do my farming is not...
I'm hearing from farmers here in the Midwest that they're desperate about their tractors.
Because if those parts aren't there for those tractors, how are they going to make the food?
They're not.
Supply chain breaks down.
Your food isn't there.
Well, and now tractors contain microchips, and you have the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company that makes I don't know what percent of all the world's microchips, and they're You know, blown out of the water in terms of they can't meet demand.
And they are, of course, at risk of a China invasion of Taiwan.
I mean, in fact, I want to ask you this.
I've heard differing opinions.
I think General Milley was saying that China couldn't possibly take Taiwan right now if they tried, but they're gaining ground on being able to.
What do you think China's capabilities are in terms of threatening Taiwan?
And what do you think they want to do?
An opposed landing against an island like that with the armed forces that Taiwan has, it's a very difficult proposition.
It's a very iffy one.
If you were to make it as a game, as a war game, you would find yourself probably losing as the Chinese half the time.
But it's uncertain.
They have weapons.
They could use weapons that we wouldn't think they'd use.
But I honestly do not believe they intend to invade Taiwan because if you read their strategic literature, they are focused on us.
And by the way, an island with the population of Taiwan surrounded by a body of water that the Chinese Navy controls, that island's going to have to surrender without a fight.
You don't need to invade it.
All you have to do is stop all the ship traffic to it.
And they're going to give up.
It's going to be a matter of months.
And they've got to give up.
So China has Taiwan.
All they have to do is assert their naval power and show that our Navy can't interfere with the blockade.
And it's a done deal.
So an invasion, an island like that, totally dependent for its food supply and a lot of its things that it needs from being shipped in, no, they don't ever need to invade it.
In fact, I think it's a total bluff, the idea that they're going to invade Taiwan.
No, they're focused on us.
Because if they take us out...
Well, yeah, I'm glad you brought that up, but a couple of points.
You know, America might oppose a Chinese naval blockade because America might say that Taiwan's microchip industry is a critical infrastructure supplier for even military products.
I'm sure our military is using Taiwan microchips, for example.
But secondly, couldn't Taiwan also, using land-based missiles, couldn't Taiwan threaten China with things like, hey, we'll launch missiles at the Three Gorges Dam?
Oh yes, they definitely already made that kind of threat.
And the Chinese said, oh, we'll nuke you over that.
Yeah, but then everybody loses.
No, it's not realistic.
They don't want to have this kind of battle.
The Chinese want the battle over in North America.
They want the battle against us.
They want to hurt us.
And they'd like it to be as painless as possible.
And that's why this whole scenario...
So the Civil War scenario, see, when you read, you go back and you read the defective literature, Russian, and you look at the Chinese unrestricted warfare stuff, they want to be able to attack us without seeming to attack us.
They want to be able to do this, like with the pandemic and cyber attacks and stuff, and take us all the way down.
And then when our economy is collapsing, we turn on each other, which is the Civil War scenario, and then they get invited in by one side to help, and then they're asked in.
We help them invade us.
Governor Newsom would be the one to ask for the Chinese, yeah.
Right.
Yeah, you got these crazy Californians, you know, this Canadian politician I talked to this morning said that they had people in Canada just like in California who regard the United States as the enemy and China as their ally.
You know, you got people like that in Canada, you got people like that in California that think of the flyover states, the red states as the enemy and the Chinese are preferable.
I mean, it's unbelievable, but I lived there for years and I knew people like that.
So it is a significant thing.
Well, what about China's own weaknesses?
You kind of started to mention that last time, and I've even seen op-eds saying that China's leader, Xi, may be facing an internal coup.
Yeah, that may be false information.
Whenever you hear about internal leadership problems in China, it's usually disinformation.
To throw you off.
You know, they want to say there's the hawks and the doves or the black dragons and the red dragons, whatever, and the white dragons.
You know, you can't trust any of that.
They played that game with the Russians.
But the real threat in China is the population, such a large population.
If for some reason they can't feed them, I don't know if we've talked about Grand Solar Minimum or not.
And what's happening with the sun, we'll know soon, so far, that this 25th solar cycle appears to have a weaker solar electromagnetic field that indicates further cooling.
We've already seen it, the event in Texas.
Last winter where you had the more freezing temperatures than I had here in the upper Midwest in the middle of winter, freezing out all those places in Texas, that was due to the instability in the jet stream where suddenly cold Arctic air can be pulled way far south and you get flooding in some areas and droughts and others.
Well, we've seen the Chinese government arresting and probably executing grain analysts who are reporting probably the truth about China's grain output being very low over the last year because of flooding and so on.
And we've seen China importing record amounts of food commodities from other countries around the world And apparently trying to cover up its own shortage.
So I understand what you're getting to.
How do they feed 1.4 billion people?
Last year, my understanding is, and I've looked for this, but I got it from a military source, that they were only able to domestically feed between 50 and 40 and 50 percent of the Chinese population.
They had to hunt up food on the world market to do that.
That's a desperate condition when you could have 700 million Chinese starving.
And you talk about a revolutionary condition.
When they had the Monder Minimum, one of the last Grand Solar Minimums, you had peasant rebellions in China.
You had cannibalism and mass starvation.
China is particularly affected by this condition.
And so their government knows this.
And they're in a very difficult position in terms of population food.
We think of our...
Here's the good news for us.
We're really vulnerable with this supply chain stuff.
They're also vulnerable on food.
Yeah, and just in case our listeners haven't connected the dots on this yet, I just want to mention the grand solar minimum results in less solar radiation reaching the surface of the earth, so food crops produce less yield.
And that's a global phenomenon, especially with colder temperatures and some severe weather conditions such as droughts or floods.
So that is hitting lots of countries, but as you say, China is particularly vulnerable to that.
It's kind of like, and the question in my mind, Jeff, is, What breaks first?
Yeah, well it's like I said, this information I talked to you about last time I was on the show, this Hong Kong businessman with the contacts in Beijing.
The original Chinese plan was they were going to go after us in 2035.
They conceived of passing us up militarily in 2027 and then doing what they're doing now in 2035.
And he said because of what Trump did with the trade talks, and it hurt them.
And then very possibly this grand solar minimum is a factor.
They also were ahead in their military buildup.
And they had really penetrated our system.
They figured they had to go.
They had to start this train moving now.
And I think what's interesting is what this businessman said.
He said, they're going when they're not fully ready.
Which means they're having problems, like the virus not working out the way they expected, like the Americans just aren't fighting each other like they were.
But they're trying.
Boy, are they trying.
Every day the media is pushing racial hatred and division.
I mean, it's just so desperate in our faces now.
Yeah, it is very desperate.
And then you have the Russians.
Now, last week you had the meeting between Putin and Biden, the summit, a very interesting summit, because clearly Putin was the one in control.
Biden was, what did he describe him, was it later as a puppy dog?
You know, he tried to describe him as an elder statesman during his press conference, but if you listen to Putin's press conference, oh, Putin was...
He had a few stumbles at first, but he was very polished.
He knew exactly what to say.
He blamed America for everything.
He blamed us for everything.
And he said when it came time to him being accused of being in charge of a police state and jailing Navalny, for example, in the riots, he said, look, I'm doing nothing different than what you do in America.
Look at January 6th.
You got people rotting in jail from that.
I mean, he had it so down.
He was so polished.
And this is one of the things I want to communicate to your listeners.
The Russians are trying to play the right wing in America, and the Chinese are trying to play the left wing in America.
And it's a scissor strategy to get us to fight.
And you got people like Pat Buchanan who are saying that Putin is a good guy, he's really a Christian.
And then you got people over here, you got like Biden saying, oh, Xi is a good guy, you know, he's okay.
And And you have these two narratives about who are the good guys and the bad guys.
Well, what that does is that allows both China and Russia leverage within the United States, given different narratives that developed.
But I believe that the Chinese and Russian disinformation operatives developed both of these narratives and that they're working together behind closed doors, the Russians and Chinese.
There's lots of evidence of that.
But that's only a temporary alliance, surely, because China and Russia, ultimately, they are at each other's throats.
You know, if they manage to take down America, they're going after each other next, aren't they?
Well, that doesn't do us any good.
No, I know, but...
That doesn't, but, you know, there is a book, and I recommend this book, Nevin Gusek.
The book is called Was Galitzin Right?
And...
Anatoly Galitzin was a KGB officer who defected in 1961, December.
He was in counterintelligence and he was part of a think tank that were working out the KGB's long-range strategy.
And he was in a lecture given by the head of the KGB at the time, General Alexander Shalepin.
And Shalepin's lecture was about the Tito-Stalin split.
The communist dictator of Yugoslavia and Stalin, the communist dictator of the USSR, they had a dispute.
And they broke with each other.
And the West went in and helped Tito.
They helped the communist country.
They even gave him weapons.
They gave him money.
They helped him out.
And what Shalepin said is, okay, well, we had this problem between these two communist countries.
What if we created a fake split so that the United States would come in and help the other communist country?
And then we would get a ton out of it because the U.S. would build up our ally themselves.
And at the end of the lecture, one of the guys raised his hand, Comrade General Shalepin, you know, what country would be the country we would have this fake split with?
And Shalepin said, China.
And that's what Galitzin brought forward.
It was very controversial when he defected and he relayed this information.
But Galitzin, in his own book, New Lies for Old, made extensive arguments that this was the case, that the Sino-Soviet split was exaggerated.
That they were cooperating all along, that they were coordinating their strategy even when they were enemies.
Now, I developed a piece of intelligence about this with Colonel Stanislav Lunev.
He spoke fluent Mandarin, and I had a long session with him in 1998.
And the key event, remember, with us opening to China was in 71 when Kissinger went to China.
And that was the beginning.
Then Nixon went, and then on and on it went to this normalization process where we ended up building them up.
Well, so the whole key thing is right before Kissinger went to China, the US had developed some kind of intelligence on China and what China was doing with Russia.
And it seems that part of this intelligence had to do with China and Russia arranging fake conflicts on their border.
So some of those border conflicts were being staged by Lin Biao, the head of the People's Liberation Army, and the Soviet General Staff.
Well, we get a defector, just like we get this defector now that's telling them that they didn't attack us on purpose with the virus.
We get a defector then.
And he says...
Lin Biao was only working with the Soviets to overthrow Mao.
That he was creating the fake border incidents with the Soviet Union so that Mao would go to his bunker and be gassed.
And the key proof of that was that Lin Biao, he fled China when his plot failed and he fled in his jet towards the Soviet Union and he was shot down over Mongolia And died in a plane crash in Mongolia.
So that's the story that we're supposed to believe, that Lin Biao was really a Soviet spy trying to overthrow Mao.
So the U.S. intelligence wanted to accept this.
So I said to Colonel Lunov, because he worked in China, I said, do you know anything about the conspiracy and death of Lin Biao?
And he said, yes, I had a friend who was at the crash site in Mongolia.
And I said, well, do tell.
And he said, well, everybody on the plane had been killed before they were put on the plane.
The pilot flew it over Mongolia and parachuted out and was picked up on the border and taken back to Beijing.
And I asked Colonel Unova, I said, okay, the Chinese accused your country, the Soviet Union, of plotting to overthrow Mao with Lin Biao.
And here you had the crash site that showed that Lin Biao wasn't fleeing towards the Soviet Union, which was like the finger of accusation.
Look, he's guilty.
He's fleeing towards...
And I said, so why did the Soviet Union keep secret the fact that Lin Piao's crash in Mongolia wasn't shot down by a Chinese fighter trying to escape, but it was staged?
Why did the Russians collaborate in that Chinese deception?
And he perked up, he said, I'd never thought of it before.
And that's when Lunyev decided he had to read Galitsyn and go back over this information.
So then, you know, and I said, well, did you see anything that showed that the Sino-Soviet split when you worked in China was fake?
I saw things.
That it was fake then.
So...
Jeff, we're almost out of time, but what you're describing, this global theater of false flag events and staged events and so on, and I want to mention two things.
Number one, you're familiar with game theory, two scorpions in a jar.
Now it seems like we have three scorpions in a jar, and every scorpion is hoping the other two will fight with each other.
And then also, you mentioned Kissinger in 1971 visiting China, and then official recognition switched from Taiwan to China.
Remember, that was also the year, I believe, that Nixon took us off the gold standard, or it was right around that time, which then led to the eventual coming collapse of the U.S. petrodollar as the global reserve currency.
And during all these decades, China's doing what?
Buying physical gold and preparing for a new...
A global currency hegemony.
And we're there now.
You know, we're there.
So, final thoughts.
And we've got to wrap this up.
I'm sorry.
Final thoughts.
Well, this is all about strategy and it's all about China and Russia and what we would call a new communist bloc coming after the United States trying to seal the deal and get rid of us.
And so what we need is we need awareness.
We need to understand who the enemy is.
We need to unite as Americans.
We can't fall for this civil war thing.
We can't fall for this, you know, good commie, bad commie, good Russia, good China, you know, bad China, whatever game.
We have to unite and we have to circle the wagons and we've got to start producing things here at home and not be relying on our enemies who can cut us off.
And we've got to fix this as a country.
We've got to get back together again.
Well said, which by the way, you mentioned Pat Buchanan earlier.
Pretty sure Pat Buchanan has been arguing for domestic production and economic protectionism for his entire life.
Turns out he was right about that.
Oh, he was right about that.
No, we cannot rely on our enemies for things, especially medicines, especially strategic materials, especially things that they keep our farm equipment going, you know.
Yep.
Yep.
Fascinating stuff.
Well, hold on.
I want to tell you something else right after we end the recording here.
But thank you, Jeff, for joining us.
It's always fascinating to speak with you.
Folks, the website is jrnyquist.blog to read Jeff's work.
It's very, very important.
And we'll ask you back on soon when you have more intel to share with us.
And again, thank you so much for joining us today.
It's always a pleasure to talk with you.
Thank you.
Survival Nutrition is our new free audio book that you can download right now from survivalnutrition.com.
In this nearly eight-hour audiobook, you will learn life-saving secrets of how to use food, nutrients, plant molecules, trace minerals, and chemical compounds to save your life, even in a total collapse scenario.
I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and I'm the author of Survival Nutrition.
I founded and run a multi-million dollar food science laboratory, and I'm the author of the best-selling science book, Food Forensics.
I'm also a prepper, a patriot, and a survivalist.
I can teach you how to survive what's coming by growing your own food, medicine, and antibiotics that can help keep you healthy and alive even during the worst of times.
At survivalnutrition.com, you'll be able to instantly download the full free audiobook as MP3 files.
▲
Export Selection