All Episodes
Previous Next
May 6, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
50:39
Interview: Leigh Dundas warns covid tyranny "almost a second Holocaust"
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
.
All right, welcome everybody to BrightTown.com, BrightTown Conversations.
Check out this one-minute video clip with Lee Dundas.
Here we go.
Lee Bendis, human rights attorney.
Let me be nothing if not clear.
You can call this any damn thing you want.
A vaccination verification system, a composite app in contract for $3.8 million buried in item 28.
We all know it when we see it.
It is a digital vaccine passport.
And there's a reason Clayton Chow shied away from it on camera the other night and said people think it's controversial.
Hell yes, it's controversial.
It is the beginning and the end of Nazi Germany.
It is show me your papers, please, before you pass.
It is an electronic dog collar.
And since when did Orange County become the People's Republic of China?
You won't need more saw ghettos.
I won't be able to leave my house because nobody will service me.
Are you really okay with big tech knowing every damn place you've been from Chipotle to the post office to Disneyland because you had to scan it every single time you left your house and do not for a second try to absolve yourselves saying, oh, the marketplace is going to do it.
It's on Costco.
It's on Disneyland.
We're not doing it.
That's like the guy who drove the cattle car to Auschwitz saying, there's no blood on my hands, unlike you all call it what it is.
This is a Nazi plan, and you are the Fourth Reich if you vote for it.
All right.
Was that awesome or what?
And guess what?
We've got Lee Dundas with us right here today joining us to talk about your health freedom.
She is a human rights attorney, part of a group called citizens-rights.org.
That's the URL. We've got a lot to talk about today.
Welcome, Lee.
It's great to have you on the show.
It's great to be here.
Thanks for having me.
Well, you made a lot of waves with that video and another three-minute speech you delivered at Orange County.
You're getting people's attention and people love you.
You're fiery.
You're informed.
You're arguing the right points.
Tell us, how has it been with this fight that you're in?
Well, I'm not sure any of us lawyers ever woke up and wanted to become the equivalent of a modern day rock star, but such is the world we're living in and when in Rome, right?
So, you know, I live in Orange County, California.
It's a traditionally conservative county.
It's a very sane county.
We love our elected officials on a normal year.
Or at least most of them.
But about 10-14 days ago, I woke up to watch my elected officials, or at least some of them, losing their mind.
I mean, we had our superintendent of schools and our local county health officer hatching a plan on a live Zoom call where parents were watching to turn our taxpayer-funded campuses into, you know, deployment centers, essentially, for a COVID-19 vaccine that killed every last parent and last animal.
And then they went one step further and they said, you know, we're going to try to find a way to legally sidestep informed parental consent.
I'm not sure what that would look like, but in my mind it conjured up images of the school nurse.
You know, bribing little Johnny after kindergarten recess with a pink donut, since that's what they're doing, you know, with adults, is giving him free gift cards and donuts.
Why wouldn't it work on the children, right?
Bribing little Johnny to go get a COVID shot that his parents would be none the wiser about when we've seen a skyrocketing of adverse events and deaths in the first quarter of this year compared to normal years where the only vaccines really being given are childhood vaccines and the occasional flu shot.
So I was a little upset about that.
Our Orange County Board of Education is on our side.
They were kind enough at the meeting to let me and about two or three hundred of my closest friends have public comment almost until midnight, giving voice to the fact that we thought this was not just a bad plan, but an immoral plan, as well as an illegal plan under international, federal and state law.
Well, that's where I really want to ask you, because that's your area of expertise.
Human rights, it seems to me that most people are aware that they own their own body, right?
At least that should be a fundamental human right.
And doesn't that mean then that a person gets to decide to say no to a government intervention that pierces their skin and injects them with experimental substances?
Let's start there.
Yeah, I mean, that is the essential nature of it.
You said it well, and I don't think I need to restate it, but The only thing I would add to that is that the last time, as I said in front of the Board of Ed, that any population decided in its wisdom to do experiments on children, of all people, on vulnerable populations, was the Third Reich.
And the reason we have the Nuremberg Codes is a direct result of that, where, you know, the international community, ironically led by the American judges who sat in judgment against the Nazi war criminals, including the doctor's trials where the doctors who conducted these experiments on children including the doctor's trials where the doctors who conducted these experiments on children were put in the hot seat
The upshot of that was the American community, the judicial community, and the rest of the world saying we are not going to experiment on people, and certainly not, without their absolute informed consent.
If you've got an experimental product, you're expected to give better informed consent than you would with the average product that's been, you know, signed off on by the FTA.
And that's where we're at right now.
I mean, I think a lot of your listeners may not know, well, a lot of your listeners might actually know, but a lot of the world seems to not understand this is a very experimental vaccine.
The reason they could never develop a coronavirus vaccine prior to 2020 is because every time they went to do the animal trials, you know, the little ferrets or whatever they injected would be perfectly fine for a little while.
And then when they got exposed to the virus in the wild, when their bodies were challenged by exposure to the full virus, which is when you think your little vaccine is going to ride into the glory of the day and defend you with all these antibodies you've built up.
Instead, what happened to the ferrets and the other lab animals is they basically turned on a cytokine storm, an inflammatory response that essentially nuked and liquefied their innards until they had to be put to death or died.
And I don't know if the masses in America, if they fully understood the dirty story of the attempts to develop and failed attempts to develop a coronavirus vaccine prior to today...
If they would be lining up in quite the numbers that they are now.
But certainly when it comes to kids, certainly when it comes to informed consent, there's a hard line in the sand that says, yes, you do own your body and no other people, including the government, do not get to experiment on you.
And if they do, it is only after a very fulsome and thorough informed consent that is to be had by the subject of the medical experiment, which is what this is.
Well, you brought up so many important points.
I've got a ton of questions for you here, but first, let me give out your website.
It's LeeDundas.com, and Lee is spelled L-E-I-G-H, I believe, LeeDundas.com, to check out your work.
But coming out of the history, you know, most people today, it seems, have forgotten history or maybe never learned it.
And wasn't it true that many of these mainstream scientists and doctors, you know, they would be called Dr.
today or whoever had PhDs and MD degrees, they were hanged to death or some of them were following the guilty verdict in trials concerning their crimes against humanity.
So there was a recognition that what they did was abhorrent to human dignity and human civilization and that it should never be repeated and that a message should be sent to the future.
And we are in that future now.
And the message from the 1940s was this shall never happen again.
And that society will kill anyone, any doctor, any PhD who conducts such experiments on human beings.
And here we are again, not that many years later, what, 70-something years later, we're doing it again.
We're doing, yeah, we're doing it again.
And, you know, the irony to me is, as I said during the board meeting, I think a lot of people didn't know this about me.
It's not like we wear our lineage on our sleeves, but I come from the Eastern European area.
The Hungarian lines, the Romanian lines, those are who my grandparents and great-grandparents were.
A good contingent of my family, the Romanian-Hungarian side, escaped earlier in the last century.
They were run out of Dodge on a rail or they were running for their lives away from the communist Red Terror death squads.
I think I'm going to go.
It is an unfortunate thing in my book, and I think anybody really who's got a brain, when instead of learning from history, we're condemned to repeating it.
And all of the Jewish people I know, all of the Romani people I know, all of the gypsy hordes and their lineage, I know a lot of Eastern Europeans.
I know a lot of refugees from communist countries in Southeast Asia as well.
And all of them are singing the same song and saying this is horrifying.
There are very similar parallels between the Third Reich or on the left, the communist totalitarian dictatorships that swept through their countries, and we would be wise if we would start waking up and taking a cue from that, taking a listen from that instead of ignoring it.
But instead, and this is absolutely inexcusable in my book, We've got the Anti-Defamation League or people like them and groups like them saying, we're going to silence you.
You don't have a First Amendment right to make parallels to Nazi Germany because it trivializes it.
Trivializes it?
You have blood on your hands at this point if you are a blue state governor who is forcing these vaccines onto your population without truly informed consent.
You're no different than the Third Reich in my book, and far be it from me to be silent.
We should be screaming about it lest we end up in a gas chamber again.
Well, and technically, if you look at the risk associated with the antibody-dependent enhancement, the ADE effect of these mRNA vaccines in particular, and you mentioned the ferrets and the animal trials, this effect has not yet emerged.
It may emerge in the fall.
It may kill, theoretically, we don't know, but it could kill Millions more than died in the Holocaust.
So we are not trivializing the Holocaust.
We are saying, let us not repeat it.
Let us not see millions killed with just insanity and medical experimentation and IG Farben and all of that.
Absolutely.
I mean, you've got two, at a minimum, two rounds of waves of death that could come from this experimental medical protocol.
One is a side effect that occurs right away, like the doctor in Florida that was head of his OBGYN department at the hospital, and instantly, within I think 24 or 48 hours, his white count went to zero, and they tried to save him over a period of two weeks and ultimately failed.
So you have side effects like that.
The guys who throw a clot, the thrombo, you know, all the blood clotting stuff, or who have a heart attack, or who have their white count wiped out, and nobody can keep them alive.
That's the first wave of death that we're seeing, an injury that we're seeing.
But you're absolutely correct.
The greater wave and the scarier wave may well be the one that's harder to spot, because cause and effect is not everybody's forte, and the passage of time makes it harder to spot true causation and true effect.
And that may be when they're challenged during flu season or exposure to other cold viruses later on this year, and suddenly their body does what the ferrets' bodies were doing, which is turn on the ADE symptomology.
You see a cytokine storm ensuing, and now the person is dying from a result of organ failure or, like, you know, their immune system attacking the body itself.
And maybe the person never puts two and two together.
And that's going to be aided and abetted, of course, by the doctors because we've got guys dying of heart attacks two hours after the shot.
And the authorities are going, oh, no, no, that was just a coincidence.
Coincidence, my foot.
That was not a coincidence.
But when you have a five-month delay, of course, they're going to be saying there was no relationship between the vaccine and And the actual untimely death of the person.
But the other thing we've got to talk about is the fact that the spike protein and what it does to the reproductive tract and the fertility, I mean, I don't know if you've looked at social media lately, but it's going on there like wildfire.
You've got...
Menopausal women who are suddenly getting their periods.
You've got women who've got their periods suddenly hemorrhaging, evacuating their uterine lining in total, like all at once, in full.
You've got every single pregnant woman who's on social media who has something to say about it, saying, I miscarried.
And these were people who didn't get the shot.
I mean, yeah, those are people who got the shot as well.
But this is around the people who did not get the shot and were simply exposed to other people who did get the shot, including two pharmacists who worked at the same location and And who miscarried within a week of each other and who had not themselves gotten the shot, but they're just giving the shout out to other people every day.
Wow.
You bring up so many issues.
I mean, that could be viral shedding or the shedding of even the antibody itself, just the spike protein, even the adenovirus shell.
Sherry Tenpenny talks about that and has a wonderful understanding of it.
But let me ask you about this.
As you are a human rights attorney, A very disturbing trend that I see right now is that when governments realize, and this could be a state government or the federal government, when they realize that there are limits to how much they can coerce people into doing things, such as taking a vaccine, they will enlist corporations as proxies.
To coerce people for them.
And I see the same thing with big tech is kind of like the government's censorship surrogate.
And now Biden announcing that they're going to pay small businesses to make sure that employees get vaccinated.
They're going to pay them for the days that the employees are at home recovering from side effects of the vaccine.
This is government.
Isn't this the definition of fascism, government, corporate collusion to deny human rights?
Well, as somebody who rewrote the political science book that my professor was in charge of publishing every two years in college, I would agree with you, yes.
I mean, it is the definition of that.
And you've got a corporate fascist, big tech censorship, the left so far left, the right is so far right.
They're all combining in the middle.
And you've got the corporations holding the bag and doing the dirty work.
One of the things that was most appalling to me this last week where Orange County lost its mind was You know, we started with the Board of Education.
Well, not the board, but the superintendent and the health officer trying to get our children vaccinated without our knowledge and, you know, using schools as public health clinics, essentially.
And then no sooner than we sort of fought that back, we had Orange County Board of Supervisors doing exactly what you just detailed, Mike.
They came out and were releasing a digital vaccination program.
But they had their health officer go on KTLA Channel 5 the day prior, and he admitted in front of all of KTLA's viewership, he said, you know, the digital vaccine passport terminology is very controversial.
So what Orange County Board of Supervisors did is they just renamed it and buried it on the agenda.
And that way, when the concerned citizens called the RINOs on our board and said, hey, are you talking about or voting on a digital vaccine passport tomorrow?
The secretary in the RINOs office could just say, nope, nope, we're not doing that because they had renamed it.
And then they had the audacity in the meeting itself to say, right before I laid into them, we were all waiting to speak our turn.
another 200, 300 people showed up on no notice.
And the one mayor of Costa Mesa who just took the vacant board of supervisors seat, Katrina Foley, she had the audacity to say, she said, you know, my friends, this is not a policy of exclusion.
And she said it with a straight face.
And every one of us who had a brain, including the clerks and the sheriffs who were like there to keep order, are looking at each other, you know, back and forth in the room and going, what the heck?
I mean, it was like South Park blinking on steroids, you know, blink, blink, blink, blink.
And my husband stood up and basically said, you know, this is a policy of exclusion.
And, you know, my take on it, although I didn't have time to say this, is, yeah, I'm sure Nazi Germany, when Hitler walked around with a straight face and said, we're not excluding anybody.
Now, everybody believed him as long as you were German.
That was a true statement as long as you were German.
Well, if you're the Jewish person in this little experiment, you are absolutely being excluded in wars.
You're being segregated and you're being marked, which is what a digital vaccine passport is.
It's a marking of the unvaccinated population so that any business, any entity, anybody outside your front door in the county can exclude you.
And what I said at the county, and I'll say it again for your audience, you don't need a Warsaw Ghetto at that point because you've got everybody locked in their own home because nobody will service me when I leave.
Well, exactly, exactly.
And isn't it fascinating how quickly people in positions of a little bit of power rose to tyranny?
I mean, when you try to study Nazi Germany, I remember as a child in school, in high school, thinking, how could people have been so evil?
How could they have assumed positions of power over others?
Guess what?
We're seeing it every day right now.
Every day, people, a little bit of power, boom, suddenly they're totalitarians and they're forcing you into life and death situations, including suicides from the mental health aspects of forced lockdowns.
That is not a trivial thing.
That's a violation of human rights, in my opinion.
What do you say?
I could not agree more.
I mean, you know, we all studied the Holocaust, or at least I like to think everybody did, although this year makes me wonder if people slept through their high school history class.
But I think most people are minimally, certainly of our age, familiar with the Holocaust, the fact that it really occurred.
And the takeaway from that is we should not ever be repeating history.
And how did so many million Germans turn a blind eye to what was going on with their Jewish neighbors?
And I think it was hard for everybody to really understand how that could have occurred.
Well, I got to say, living through 2020, I no longer find it hard to see how that would occur.
You've got People getting in shootouts in Gardena, California over a mask.
You've got women who are 20 dragging grandmothers out of a health food store in Long Beach, California a few months ago over a mask.
I was personally assaulted and nearly battered by a woman and her husband because I cannot wear a mask.
I go hypoxic.
That's the other thing.
People don't understand People with one lung, people who just had a lung transplant, people who had a heart transplant, people who are dying of lung cancer, people who had a lung embolism in the past, these are people who cannot wear a mask.
Maybe they want to, and they still cannot wear a mask.
Well, guess what, folks?
They have a right to go and shop just like you do, and it's not a reasonable accommodation to lock them in their houses for the rest of their lives just because you don't like the fact they don't have a mask on.
If you believe the mask is efficacious, you should have no problem with them shopping.
But of course, that's not what we're seeing.
And the lockdowns are absolutely insane.
There's actual medical journal articles out there that if your listeners want to Google it or if they read any of the letters on my nonprofit website, I quote to them, that say you are actually increasing the final size of the epidemic.
When you gauge in preemptive lockdowns, and what we're seeing from states that have opened up, countries that have always remained open versus countries that were locked down, or states that were locked down, is that not only are the statistics the same in many cases, the places that did not lock down are actually faring a little bit better.
And the mask wearing, just a quick point on that, and the social distancing that we're doing to our children, these are things that the ASPCA would have picked you up for and your local prosecutor would have arrested you for.
If you put your pet in a plexiglass cage and never let them be touched and put a mask over their little muzzle and kept them staked out in the kindergarten recess yard for hours at a time, seeing their little friendly puppy friends but never ever able to touch or interact, that kind of thing would have gotten you arrested prior to March of 2020.
Now we're doing it without blinking an eye.
Social distancing, and I'm almost wrapped up with my little rant here, but social distancing is a tool of the CIA.
It was created by the forerunner to the CIA in 1951 when our U.S. military intelligence met with their British counterparts and their Canadian counterparts at the Montreal Ritz-Carlton.
And they sat down for a week, these gentlemen did, and they tried to figure out the single most effective way of breaking down another human being.
And the commission studies on this, and what they rapidly realized is that the single most effective way of breaking somebody down is not physical torture, it's not sleep or food deprivation, It is social isolation and distancing.
And these are the things that triple litter agencies where I hire their former operatives and I run them into child brothels to gather intel for the organizations I work for.
These are the techniques that those guys are trained to do.
Why the hell we're deploying them against kindergarteners and third graders and freshmen in high school, I have no idea, but I can tell you something.
It works.
It worked on John McCain, who came back from the POW camps of Vietnam and said, do anything to me, including breaking all my long bones again, but do not put me in isolation.
And it also works on our children, which is why an 11-year-old in California right before Christmas blew their brains out on a Zoom call because, let's face it, guys, a Zoom TV call is not the same as education.
Aren't we all, in a way, POWs under this system?
I don't mean to diminish actual prisoners of previous wars, but it feels like we are all prisoners right now under a medical enslavement system.
And aren't we seeing POW-like mental health symptoms and disorders emerging from this?
Absolutely.
I mean, you can talk to a number of mental health professionals.
I know one who spoke out in April of last year to the Orange County Board of Education at their meeting, and he said he was already, at that point, seeing children and adults Who were agoraphobic, would not leave their house, would cry when you took their mask away from them, couldn't confront society without these aids.
You're seeing Stockholm Syndrome type symptoms, and I was a social psych.
That is my background, by the way, in college.
You're seeing a lot of that as well in the average population who is bonded to the people who are enforcing these draconian techniques on them and never once questioning it.
If you're If your viewers have never heard of the Stanley Milgram experiment, they'd be well served to go Google that, but I'll give you the brief on it.
Stanley Milgram was a researcher, a professor at Yale University in the early 1960s, and he wanted to see if what happened in Nazi Germany could happen again.
Were those millions of German people evil, or was there something in our hard wiring that predisposed them to to following orders and being blindly obedient and looking the other way even when the result of that was fatalities to their neighbors.
and he conceived of this experiment where he dragged in average people, you, me, housewives, doctors, lawyers, college students, gardeners, you name it, got him to come into his lab, paired him up with other people, and they were tasked with memorizing pairs of random words.
So I would say calendar, and Mike, you were supposed to say table, or I would say zebra, and you were supposed to say computer.
And then he would separate the couple and put one person in one booth, another person in another booth.
They could not see each other, but they had audio feed.
And then I was supposed to cue you and say zebra, and you were supposed to say computer.
And every time you got a question wrong, I was supposed to send you a little shot.
And there was a switchboard that went from like 9 volts, which is, you know, we've all licked a 9-volt battery.
It's uncomfortable, but it's not fatal.
All the way up in increasing increments to 450 volts, which, of course, is a fatal dose of electricity.
Unbeknownst to the actual person being studied, the guy giving wrong answers in the other booth didn't exist.
There were preformatted sounds of complaint and pain coming back, like, oh, ow, that really hurt.
You've got to quit shocking me with these gradiantly increasing voltages because I had a heart attack last year, and you're going to kill me if you keep this up.
And, you know, you went from, oh, to screaming to pleas and cries like that.
And it made a huge percentage of the study participants very uncomfortable.
And they would turn to the conductor of the experiment, the guy in the white lab coat who was a doctor – He had Dr.
So-and-so on his lab coat, and the person would say, hey, I can't keep shocking my buddy in that other room over a wrong answer on a memory quiz.
I'm not comfortable going on.
And the guy was tasked, the lab doctor was tasked with saying just three or four simple words back, you must continue.
And the question Stanley Milgram sought to answer is what percentage of Americans would nuke their neighbor to death over a wrong answer on a memory quiz just because a guy in a white lab coat with the word doctor in front of his name said he had to do it.
And when he ran this study by his colleagues, they laughed at him.
They said the only people who are going to continue up to the point of causing a fatality in that other room is Are the people who are sadists and psychopaths, 2% of the population.
And when he actually did the study, two-thirds of Americans were willing to continue throwing the switch, despite being very uncomfortable and knowing it was immoral, just because a guy in a white lab coat said they had to do it.
Every single person in the world needs to study that study, in my humble opinion.
We are hardwired to follow authority, and sometimes that's a good thing, like in the Cro-Magnon years.
But right now, especially if your authority isn't doing right by you, it is a very bad thing and it can be a fatal thing.
What's so shocking about that experiment, and you just gave the best description that I've ever heard of that experiment, by the way, is that we are walking around surrounded by people who are potential mass murderers as long as someone in a position of authority tells them to do so.
Literally, two out of every three people walking around in the grocery store would murder you if told to do so under the right context.
That's right.
And so when you think about, well, now they're saying in Michigan, put masks on two-year-olds.
Two- to four-year-old infants have to be masked.
Who's going to go along with that?
Well, hey, two-thirds of America would even murder those babies if they were told to by authority, frankly.
So putting a mask on would probably have even higher compliance.
I mean...
This is crazy, and part of what I try to do is break the belief in false authority.
Those authorities often are not qualified, and they make a mockery of science.
They do, and the mask ring is so harmful.
I mean, I'm sure your followers are largely logical people who can understand.
They don't contain the virus, but they do, of course, make you drown in your own CO2, which is a waste product.
And in the same way we would never eat the waste product of our digestive system, we should not be reconsuming the waste product of our respiratory system.
But there was a German neurobiologist who came out.
A woman is a PhD, MD, specialties in neurobiology, neurotoxicology, neuropharmacology.
Like, the woman knows her stuff when it comes to brain connections and how our brains work.
And she published a study right before Christmas, the quarter before Christmas, entitled The Wall Will Fall.
You can't find it on Google.
They've suppressed it.
But if you go to DuckDuckGo, you can pull a study.
And she said, masking of children is absolutely criminal.
Because what happens within about two to three minutes of a little bit of oxygen deprivation is you start to get permanent neural death, nerve connection death, in the hippocampus area of the brain, which frighteningly is never restored, even if you start breathing full oxygen again a few minutes later.
Wow.
Permanent nerve, neural death damage, brain damage to our children and ourselves to the extent we mask.
And when it comes to social distancing, another little-known study, in fact, social isolation and distancing doubles your risk of death if you're black.
It almost doubles it if you're white.
It creates poor sleep quality, impaired executive function and cognitive function, which is what you see with Alzheimer's patients.
They can't reason their way out of a paper bag.
They can't complete the puzzle.
They don't know how to get home.
Anxiety, all sorts of things like that.
But it is also the equivalent, social distancing is the equivalent of smoking 15 cigarettes a day.
Wow.
And, and, not or, and being an alcoholic.
And it destroys the part of your brain known as the ventral striatum, which is responsible for learning and for love.
And what I am saying is your parents in the audience would be better off giving their kid an ice pick to conduct a frontal lobotomy and a pack and a half of cigarettes and a fifth of Jack Daniels on the way into school than they would be doing what we're doing with the social distancing and the masking.
And I'm, I'm saying that a little bit facetiously, but not really, because when you do organic brain damage to the brain, when you take a bullet to the brain, nine times out of 10, something high like that, the surgeons can get that back out with very little long-term consequence to your brain.
When you actually kill the nerve connections in your brain, No dice.
Not if they're not going to come back.
These effects are documented and so they must be known by at least some of the people who are pushing these mandates.
And that brings me to the question that I'll pose to you.
If they know that it's causing brain damage and if they know the vaccines may cause a death wave later on, what is their real intention behind all of the lockdowns and the masks and the vaccines?
What are they actually trying to achieve?
Well, I think that's a very good answer, and I think it has but one, or a very good question, rather, and I think it really only has one answer.
And in my book, you know, just looking at the blue state governors, if you believe what the blue state governors like Whitmer and Newsom and Cuomo were saying earlier, you know, in the episode we've had, which is that COVID-19 is highly contagious and highly dangerous.
Okay, I think a lot of us take issue with that.
But taking them at face value.
Those gentlemen, and Michigan's governor, All of them proceeded, to my understanding, to put COVID positive patients into nursing homes.
They did.
And it doesn't matter if something's a little contagious or a lot contagious.
If you're 105 years old and you don't have an immune system because you're on 15 different drugs, half of which are immunosuppressants, a hangnail can kill you from sepsis.
The tiniest cold can kill you because you're old and you have no immune system.
So what the law says...
It doesn't matter if I intend to kill somebody or if I take a gun and shoot off in the Fourth of July party into a crowded room of people or get into my car after three DUIs and drive drunk again and mow down a bunch of people on the sidewalk.
What the law says is that is still murder because it was a foreseeable and completely extrapolatable, if you will, consequence of the reckless actions I took.
That's murder, too, in most states.
And that is a crime against humanity.
And in my humble opinion, we aren't doing any favors to ourselves by calling it anything less than that.
And all of the people that I just talked about should be standing trial for crimes against humanity, along with whoever else knows these vaccines are fatal, knows that these social distancing measures and masking measures can be fatal, and is deploying them anyway against people who don't know better.
We just recently saw a trial, George Floyd's death.
Former police officer Derek Chauvin found guilty on three different counts, three different charges for the murder of George Floyd.
And two things about this, I'd like you to comment on this.
Number one, where are the trials of the Tony Fauci's?
Who I believe have been involved in the deaths of far more than one person.
But secondly, the way Derek Chauvin could have been found innocent and got off of everything is if instead of putting his knee on George Floyd's neck, if he had just given George Floyd a vaccine and Floyd died, then he would have been innocent, right?
I mean, because that's the way it's judged today.
And it's crazy.
I mean, I'm saying it ironically.
It's crazy.
Yeah, it is crazy.
And I don't disagree.
I mean, you know, the death was tragic.
Do I believe there are racial disparities and gender disparities in America?
Absolutely.
For the viewers who don't know, prior to March of last year, I spent the better part of the last decade getting small children, none of whom were Caucasian, out of child brothels in Southeast Asia.
So I definitely have seen during the course of my career the racial and gender disparities and what that looks like in a variety of contexts.
But when you have people getting shots in their arms and dying two hours later of a heart attack or a stroke and the powers that be in their countries are saying that was not related, it makes you question cause and effect and how come cause and effect is said to hold in the context you just mentioned, it makes you question cause and effect and how come cause and effect is
But we're going to completely ignore that cause and effect when you have the word doctor in front of your name or you've held a position at the National Institute of Health or in these allergy and infectious disease forums that Fauci has inhabited for way too long.
in my opinion.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
And if we're going to start calling it like it is with cause and effect, we need to apply that same standard to vaccines that are killing people, to side effects that are turning on within a few hours of the vaccine, to the people who are not giving truly informed consent, to the people who are receiving these vaccines, to the poor who are being targeted in many states by the powers that be in those states as being the first culture or demographic who should receive these vaccines.
Explain to me how that is any different than the Tuskegee syphilis experiments.
You've got an experimental medical protocol.
You cannot argue that.
Nobody can argue with me on that because that is what it is under the Experimental Use Authorization right now.
That is an experimental medical protocol, and you are putting at the front of the line black and brown populations, impoverished populations, populations that do not speak or read English fluently and do not understand the risks.
That is a campaign, and it is not a campaign of equality, let me tell you that.
Well, you're exactly right.
I think Governor Newsom, a couple months ago, had said that he wanted to make sure that Latinos stepped up and got vaccinated, and there was a special emphasis, right, on Latino people.
Go ahead.
No, I was just going to say, I don't recall that, but I wouldn't be surprised, and I've certainly seen that in other states.
Yes, yes.
Well, a lot of talk about people of color moving to the front of the line.
And, you know, the people of color that I know are saying, ah, Tuskegee, you know, guess what?
We're going to sit back and watch this.
But even the application of masking is done in a way that mocks science.
And you mentioned South Park earlier.
It's like a South Park episode.
I saw a story today.
I don't know if it's the Oscars or one of these Hollywood shows, but they said that While the show is live on TV, the Hollywood actors in the audience, they won't be wearing masks, but they will put on their masks during the commercial breaks.
And I'm thinking, this is insane.
The virus doesn't know you're on a commercial break.
This makes no sense whatsoever.
I guess their faces are so important they have to not wear a mask while they're on TV. But then what happened to all your science?
Yeah.
Well, I mean, we're throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
I mean...
When you actually understand what the size of a virus particle is and that it's one one-thousandth the size of the holes in the masks, even the quote good masks, the surgical masks, that's like putting up a chain-link fence in your backyard and saying, oh, I'm going to keep all the flies and mosquitoes out.
All these actors and actresses are doing in every other person in a position of authority when they're masking up and doing their part, they're virtue signaling.
And that's another fancy name for bullying.
They're bullying the people who have not woken up yet, who have not had time to do their own research, or they don't have the skills to do their own research because they are language challenged, they are an immigrant population, they're working three jobs, they're a single parent, they have five children, and by the way, those children are now wrapped around their ankles or not during the day, and they have no internet connection, and they have no ability to log on to Zoom.
I mean, that's the other irony.
We've got a black superintendent of schools in our state Who has kept, you know, part and parcel with the teachers unions, kept our schools largely closed for the entirety of the year.
And when you look at the statistics, 40%, I think, of our children are poor.
And three out of four children in California of the nearly 10 million children we have are not white.
Those are the children who are at risk.
Those are the children in Southeast LA whose parents are not home, can't get them a computer because they don't own one, can't get them on their internet because they don't have it, and those children are now stuck at home four or five, seven at a time while mom is working two or three jobs and learning absolutely zero.
What the studies say is the summer slide effect where all kids get dumber over the summer, but especially those who don't have access to high-quality camps where those of us who are more privileged are able to avail ourselves of these camps that reinforce the learning the kids had during the year.
By the age of fifth grade, Mike, by 10 or 11, poor children, often racial minorities, are two to three years behind their Caucasian, more privileged counterparts just courtesy of the summer slide effect cumulatively speaking over the course of their five or ten years You've now had the schools functionally closed in many states for the better part of an entire year.
Explain to me how that's not going to be the death knell in these little kids' educations.
It is.
It is.
And if you actually care.
about children of color you would open the schools immediately but instead we have people of color who are superintendents keeping them closed because they know which side their bread is buttered on and the union is the one buttering their bread and they're not going to go against the union even though they say they really care about all these issues they don't or they would be opening the schools well it's it's it's like they're sacrificing an entire generation and you know You may trigger some of our viewers by using the term privilege in the context in which you used it, but that's okay.
But I think if we want to extend privilege to everybody, open the schools.
I meant economically privileged.
You've got a very big disparity between A doctor-lawyer family in Marin, Northern California, in a $5 million house, who, when the schools close down, can hire a private tutor or go to their place in Montana, like our governor was doing over the summer, so his four children were at the effect of all of his draconian orders.
That is a very big divide between that and a woman who does not speak English in the way I just described.
You have a disparity, and no matter how much the mother...
that was the latter one I described, wants to do well by her children and wants to avail herself of those types of services.
She just doesn't have the capacity to do so.
And those are the people with whom we should be most concerned.
They don't understand in many cases.
They lack informed consent, even if you give them a piece of paper in front of their face that they're signing on the dotted line of.
These are the populations we need to go out of our way to service when things like this go wrong and that we need to go out of our way to educate about the side effects of these vaccines and every other measure that we're deploying, be it a mask or a social distancing protocol.
I'm glad you explained that, and I completely agree with you.
It's as if the people running these schools that are shut down are saying on one hand, they're saying, oh, look how poor these poor people are.
And then on the other hand, let's keep them poor by locking down the schools.
And it's like, how are they supposed to escape these circumstances?
Because for many underprivileged people, we'll say low economic status people, That school, for a child, that may be the only good meal they get that day, for one thing.
That may be their only ability to gain some social interaction.
That may be their only escape route out of a community that otherwise would be hopeless to them by having an education over time.
And we've seen many success stories out of that, but you're right.
They're just locking them down to keep them poor and driving many of them to mental health symptoms and diagnoses.
Yeah, that's exactly what we're seeing.
And, you know, one of the things that is also of concern because of the work that I traditionally do when I'm not in a COVID year, for many people, you know, one out of three women in your audience has been sexually assaulted.
Those are the statistics in America and California.
And one in four to one in five men, although we know the statistics on men are heavily underreported.
In addition, there's whole segments of the population in children who are, you know, not sexually assaulted or sexually abused, but are just simply physically abused or emotionally abused or terrorized in their own homes.
And these are the children for whom school is a sanctuary, for whom school is a respite, for whom school is their stable place where their teacher gives a hoot and asks them, hey, little Johnny, how are you today?
What do you want to tell me?
Who will give them a hug?
Who will give them, you know, things that many abused kids never hear at home, which is you're worth something to me.
You got that right.
Well done.
Who get to hear, you know, these kids get to hear validation and praise and realize they are worth something, even though their parents don't think that.
Even though the people who were born to protect them are betraying them and perpetrating against them.
The schools are sanctuaries.
And when you have those schools closed, not only are those kids, you know, like ships without an anchor adrift in the sea, they have nowhere to escape the abuses.
They're often living in smaller homes or apartments, smaller places.
We know what that does.
You cram 20 mice into a tiny place.
They start fighting with each other.
They start trying to eat their young.
People don't do well sardined into small spaces.
And what you're doing right now by having the schools closed is sardining everybody into smaller places during the day.
The parents are working from home, the kids are working from home, or everybody's out of work and broke because they lost their job, but the kids are still home.
And if you've already got a family that's riding the edge of child abuse or isn't the healthiest of family dynamics in a good year, you have now just thrown a lit match into a powder keg that's going to go off.
And the school is the one place that can report that abuse and buffer against it and get those kids out.
We've taken away that lifeline from millions of children across America who rely on schools to feed them not just physically but to care for them and feed them emotionally and spiritually as well.
And these are people who claim to be protecting children, even as children themselves have the lowest risk of hospitalization or fatalities from COVID. Basically zero risk, very close to zero.
So they do not have that risk whatsoever.
Now, we've only got a few minutes left, so I want to turn to solutions and ask you to tell our audience what they could be doing or what you would encourage them to do.
Actions or speaking out or whatever.
In order to help resolve these issues that we've addressed here today?
Yeah, I think that this is almost a second holocaust at this point.
You've got all of the things in place.
You have, you know, blue state governors anyway who have closed non-essential businesses.
That was the first thing Hitler did.
Then he closed the schools.
That's also what the blue state governors have done.
Then he closed the churches, also done.
Then he marked the targeted population so he could segregate them and eventually do much worse to them.
And with the COVID digital vaccine passports, we're seeing that phase.
There's really only one step after that, and we all know what it is.
So we need to not repeat history.
And the simple fact of the matter is that as bad as the Holocaust was, as horrific as the Third Reich was, it was not the fault of Hitler.
Yeah, Hitler is not blameless, don't get me wrong.
He is an awful person, and he did awful things.
But the simple fact is he would have been just one man with a bad idea if millions of Germans had simply stood up and said, no, we aren't doing this.
So it is hugely incumbent upon the human race right now to not repeat the sins of Nazi Germany and every other totalitarian-type Holocaust we've experienced in the past.
And the way you do that is you stand up and you fight every injustice.
What Martin Luther King said is absolutely true here.
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
You fight every time somebody asks you to mask.
You fight every time somebody says you have to mask your child at school, at church, at volleyball, at horseback riding, at swim.
You fight every single time your school says they're going to social distance or put plexiglass dividers across the The tables.
You fight that.
And one of the ways you can fight that is by not reinventing the wheel.
Go to my nonprofit website, citizens-rights.org.
Go to the resource page.
Pull the letters I've been writing school boards and county boards for the last year.
Take my name off.
Put your name on or say, hey, my friend's a lawyer and this is what she told her school and this is what you're going to be facing if you don't get it right.
Quit getting it wrong.
Get it right.
You need to have people in your own county.
Every county should be creating a watchdog task force where One person is assigned to watch the PTA, watch the school board, every meeting, every agenda, make sure they're not burying items in there that are passports, that are, you know, horrible plans to vaccinate your children without your knowledge or turn your school into a vaccination center.
And as soon as you get wind that something like that is going on, you mobilize every single parent and everybody else in your community to Who is against that plan and you show up at that school board meeting, at that board of education meeting as we did here in Orange County last week and you fight it down.
And you explain to your elected politicians, they are elected.
They answer to you.
You are standing in their house, and they are going to answer to you.
And they walk that plan back, or they face the effects of that.
Every politician wants one thing, and that is to be reelected.
And if they believe they will not be reelected because they are making bad decisions and enough people are up in arms over it, they will start actually doing the right thing instead of the wrong thing.
And then if they don't, you start suing them.
Reach out to America's Frontline Doctors, Organizations I work with, Children's Health Defense, I work with both of those entities.
Find out who has a lawyer near you who will sue over this bad plan and force them to walk it back if community pressure doesn't do it first.
And don't think for a second.
You can't hold your own parades, your own rallies.
Local ordinances differ.
Sometimes there are restrictions upon, you know, voicing your First Amendment rights within a certain number of feet of an abortion clinic or of a county hall or of your elected mayor or your elected mayor.
You know, representative.
But if there are no such laws on the books, and this is not legal advice, I'm just telling you, check your laws on the books.
If there are no such laws on the books, you go where they are, and you make your voice heard, especially if they're not letting you make your voice heard at the county meeting, or they're making you Zoom in, or they're cutting the public comment out.
Find a different way to make your voice heard.
Always make your voice heard, and if we just stand up together, we will not repeat the sins of history.
Well said.
You've given a lot of great practical advice.
We're going to encourage people to follow what you just said.
Maybe do a little bullet point summary here on screen or something to help people with that.
Lee, you're a blessing to our world.
Thank you so much for your courage, your voice, your actions, what you're doing right now.
I want to tell you, you're an inspiration to others.
People are seeing you do it and then understanding, hey, I can do this too.
So you are affecting more people than you will ever know by standing up.
Thank you so much for what you're doing.
The pleasure is mine.
I'm going to keep doing it all summer, by the way.
Just a quick plug here.
I forgot to mention it to you when we started, Mike.
But I'm going on tour with Robert David Steele, Sasha Stone, Sheriff Mack, the constitutional sheriff, who gets law enforcement officers to abide by their oaths to the Constitution and not bad plans that governors rule on.
We're all going on tour this summer.
It's 90 cities, something like that, in about 110 days.
We're starting in Atlanta, Georgia, May 15th, I want to say.
And we're going to keep going all the way, every single state.
So Check out that tour schedule.
Reach out to me by way of email, leedundis.com.
You can sign up there to get more data or leed.esq at gmail.com.
That's my email.
And again, you'll get practical tips there as well as getting fired up on how you can fight your particular corner so we can win this together.
I did not know you were part of that tour.
We're helping to promote that tour as well.
Scott McKay is part of that tour.
That's right, exactly.
We're going to help publicize that and when your team is in Texas, we've got camera crews and so on.
So yeah, we're definitely supporting that.
That's awesome that you're on it.
Wow, that's quite a schedule.
90 cities, unreal.
Yeah, 90 cities.
We're going every single day, no days off.
Let me tell you, I think it's the most important thing I can do this summer.
I would not be spending almost four months away from my child and my husband.
So I encourage your people to come out and see all of us when we're in town.
We each bring something unique to it, but the common thread is we all believe in freedom.
We all believe these are dangerous times, and we all know this essential truth.
Together, we're going to win this.
We always have in the past.
The question is, how quickly can we contain the collateral damage?
And the sooner we all get on the same page, the better.
So I'll see you when I'm in Texas, Mike.
All right.
Well said, Lee.
Thank you so much for joining us today.
Thank you for all that you do.
This is Mike Adams, founder of Brighteon.com, and thank you for watching and sharing this video.
Take care, everybody.
Survival Nutrition is our new free audiobook that you can download right now from survivalnutrition.com.
In this nearly eight-hour audiobook, you will learn life-saving secrets of how to use food, nutrients, plant molecules, trace minerals, and chemical compounds to save your life, even in a total collapse scenario.
I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and I'm the author of Survival Nutrition.
I founded and run a multi-million dollar food science laboratory, and I'm the author of the best-selling science book, Food Forensics.
I'm also a prepper, a patriot, and a survivalist.
I can teach you how to survive what's coming by growing your own food, medicine, and antibiotics that can help keep you healthy and alive even during the worst of times.
At survivalnutrition.com, you'll be able to instantly download the full free audiobook as MP3 files.
Keep a copy of all these files on your local hard drive and print out the full guide just in case we lose the power grid.
▲
Export Selection