Zach Vorhies reveals how Project Veritas is changing the world through TRUTH and transparency
|
Time
Text
This has moved beyond just, you know, misguided ideology and Trump derangement syndrome.
This is now active insurrection.
This is now active sedition and possibly treason.
And now that I know about it, I have a responsibility to let the authorities know.
And if I don't, Then now I'm part of the conspiracy through silence.
So, what did you do?
I decided that I needed to go and let the public know that this was happening because I didn't want what happened in China and what happened in Russia and what happened in, you know, Vietnam You know, to happen to America, which was a communist revolution, where a sizable chunk of the population gets murdered.
And so, you know, reading through the works of Andrew Soshenitsyn, who wrote the Gulag Archipelago, 1700 page book, I didn't read the whole thing, but, you know, but I read enough to find out how to stop such a thing.
Which was, you can head these things off at the beginning if you just form resistance and you disclose the plans to the population of what's coming down the pipeline.
And if you resist, then you have a fighting chance.
And so I realized, wow, I'm one of the few people at Google who is now a conservative.
I mean, I consider myself a liberal, but, you know, liberalism is now a conservative value.
I'm fully awake.
I know what a communist revolution is.
And I'm in a position of being able to let the people know about this.
And so I started searching through my network to figure out who I could trust to disclose this to the American public.
And...
I got in contact with some Polish people who had a friend that worked in Breitbart and that friend who worked at Breitbart sat on the board for Project Veritas.
And so they're like, you know what?
This story is so deep and so complex that really what you need to do is you need to go through Project Veritas.
Breitbart is not the one that can handle this.
We just don't have, that's just our gig.
Like they don't do long form stuff.
They do quick stories, you know, drip, drip, drip.
And so I got in contact with Project Veritas.
I explained to them what I had in the documents.
And at this point, they hadn't really done, like, the whistleblower thing.
They were still doing, like, undercover reporting.
But they sent out...
I'm an undercover journalist to sort of listen to my story in person and get these documents in hand and sort of evaluate it.
And this person ended up establishing a friendship with me.
Turns out that this person knew about communism as much as I did.
And perhaps even more.
And I went, wow, this guy's a really solid individual.
And so I realized that You know, this was someone that wasn't faking it, that was genuine, that knew what was coming down the pipeline, and he trusted James O'Keefe with his life.
And so I said, you know what?
If you trust James this much, then, you know, have at it.
Here's all the documents.
Give them to Project Veritas and, you know, do whatever you're going to do.
Just make it so that Google can't point the finger back at me and, you know, and say, oh, this is what Zach did, right?
And so, they did all that.
They delivered it, and then, sort of, like, all of a sudden, Project Veritas had a turn, and they said, actually, we're not going to pursue this Google story right now.
We're actually going to pursue Twitter.
And then my guy started doing a Twitter op and I kind of helped with that Twitter op a little bit.
And you might remember about how there was a whole bunch of undercover stuff catching the employees at a party, you know, talking about how like half of America was scum and backwards and how they needed to just like censor them.
And so I was like tangentially involved with that operation.
But not that much.
And then I was like, okay, well now that they've done this, it's been very successful.
I hope that they get back onto the Google thing.
But then it sort of went cold.
And then the guy that was helping me got parted ways with the company.
What ended up happening was that there was some sort of deep state attack on Google, I'm sorry, on Project Veritas, and there was a calling of a whole bunch of people that were sort of in league with that.
Like, they tried to take over the company and unseat James O'Keefe from Power, and there was questions about whether my handler guy that was taking my information might have been part of that.
So they actually thought that And this isn't really talked about a lot, this side of the story, that my evidence might have actually been poison.
And so they let it go cold for a while because it was so out there that James was like, I suspect this might actually be fake.
It wasn't until like a year later when they were doing an undercover interview Of a Google employee that coincidentally happened to work on machine learning fairness.
And was telling James O'Keefe all the things that I had been talking about.
And James O'Keefe went, wow, this thing really is real.
And so they went back and they took a second look at all these documents and they went, oh my God, this is everything.
And we knew about it a year ago.
And so they took the human intelligence that I had provided.
And this human intelligence was the...
The individuals that were really key to this, you know, machine learning fairness and this race-based equity transformation of the company.
And Project Veritas decided that they were going to start doing sting operations on these individuals.
And one of them in particular, her name was Zhen Jinai.
I remember that one, yeah.
They got her a few drinks down in a Mexican bar, and then she casually mentioned that Google shouldn't be broken up because only a company the size of Google could stop the next Trump situation in 2020.
Wow!
This is a whole admission on camera.
That Google was intending to stop the Trump situation.
They were going to meddle in elections.
Now, we may be able to give her the benefit of the doubt.
Maybe she doesn't represent the The opinions of Google as a whole, right?
And, you know, Google had an opportunity to, you know, fire this individual, but they ended up not.
In fact, they coddled her, which is a crime in itself, right?
So, here's Project Veritas.
They've got this gen genie.
They basically got her on camera saying what I've been telling them for like the last couple of years and admitting to it.
And so, It's now June of 2017.
There's been several waves of censorship.
There's now been a huge wave of censorship, particularly within YouTube.
And it's like another apocalypse that they're having where they're kicking people off and they're demonetizing them.
Mostly conservative pro-Trump channels.
Exactly.
And at this point, I'm like, well, I can't stand this anymore.
I don't know whether Project Veritas is actually going to move on this.
They certainly haven't been responding to any of my questions about whether this is happening or not.
So I can't stand being in the Billy of the Beast.
I don't want to participate in this really corrupt and evil system anymore.
And I decided that I'm going to start I'm going to start the exiting process.
And so I announced to my manager that I'm going to quit and I'm going to resign.
And as I'm writing my resignation letter, I get an email from Project Veritas.
And it's from this guy named Joe Halderman, who's a producer there.
He's like, hey, Zach, why don't you...
Read this transcript and tell us what you think.
And it was the transcript of Jen and I talking about reading the election.
And I read it.
And I went, oh my god!
Like, you've totally nailed it!
You've caught that!
And so I get on the phone and I go on this rant, which I sometimes do, and I tell Project Veritas all the wonderful things about how this is going to change America and how they finally have been able to nail it.
And they tell me, Zach, this is perfect.
Would you be willing to come to New York and say that on camera?
Wow, what great timing.
You caught me as I was writing this resignation letter.
And so I said, you know what?
Absolutely.
So I got off the phone, I handed this resignation letter, and I resigned.
And the next day...
Oh, and immediately when I offer the resignation letter, there's like this two-week thing that's going to happen, right?
Where you're rolling off the team officially.
Well, immediately Google puts me on an investigative...
on investigation.
By their network security team of global operations.
And it's like this big thing, oh, global operations, network security teams.
And so they're like, hey, Zach, you've been looking at some really interesting sites.
Like, can we talk with you with HR? And I went, nope!
I am resigning and I'm not going to deal with any more things.
I don't like what you guys are doing.
I'm not going to participate in any more things.
I'm out.
So wait a minute.
How much does Google monitor the activities of their own employees?
I mean, does Google have its own internal police division or something?
Yeah, of course.
But here's the thing.
It's really hard to find the needle in the haystack.
And what I think happens is that they just sort of collect all the information by default and then retroactively look at things when something becomes, like, notable.
And so, hey, there's this guy leading, and he's told his manager that he doesn't like the censorship, so let's just do an investigation.
And so, oh, wow, look, he's looked at some things that we flagged as sensitive in the past.
Let's go talk to the guy.
And so, even though Google has eyes everywhere, they don't have a really cohesive structure of analyzing all this data.
And so, you know, essentially, this is what I believe happened to me, is that they retroactively realized that I had looked at a bunch of documents, and so now they're going to, you know, ask me a bunch of questions.
I say no, and then boom, my access to the company, like, ends, and they're like, well, you're fired.
Or rather, we're accepting your resignation immediately.
And so I'm like, yeah, I don't care.
I'm about to blow the whistle anyway.
So I fly to New York.
James O'Keefe immediately has me go to their studio.
They rig me up, and they have me disclose that night and get me on film.
Which is probably a good idea.
There's less of a time to have second thoughts if you do it right away.
But I do it undercover.
I've got a shadow, I've got this raincoat on, I've got this hat on, and then they black out my face and they change my voice to try to hide this a little bit from what Google is able to ascertain about who was doing this.
And so I blow the whistle, they do this whole production, and it sets the internet on fire.
And for the rest of the week, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, it's the only thing the internet is talking about.
Because they had my disclosure, which I describe what Google's really trying to do.
They've got this video of Jenge and I talking about rigging the election in 2020.
And it's the hot topic.
It's what everyone was talking about.
Now, what I had done in order to sort of hide my identity is, you know, one is cover myself in shade, but two, I only described two, we only disclosed two pages of Google's internal communications.
And that essentially was the four-step process of how Google wants to program You know, you, you know, the Google search user.
And so they printed them out.
They showed it on television.
And I had this feeling that, well, you know, my identity is, I've got plausible benignibility now.
And after that disclosure hit, I decided, hey, I'm not going to disclose any more documents.
Like, Project Veritas wanted to drop the whole thing.
I said, no, I had this bad feeling that it might be vindictive, and I wanted to make sure that I was doing things that were morally just, and I didn't want to, like, have some sort of vengeance fantasy where, you know, I'd get back at Google for...
All the censorship that they made me endure as I worked for the company.
And so I was like, I'm going to give Google the ability to not come after me, and I'm going to walk away.
I'm going to, you know, not engage in any more of this destructive teardown.
I'm going to instead engage in doing what I like doing best, which is building, building software.
And so I wiped my hands up, and I walked away feeling that I had a clean break.
But then Google decided that they were going to come after me again.
And Google decided that they were going to engage in legal warfare, which I call lawfare, and get a very high-priced collection of attorneys, this law firm, to start trying to get all of my personal data so that they could figure out what exactly it was that I had.
And they ask all these questions like, what data did you retain from Google?
Who did you talk to about this information?
But wait, hold on a second.
At what point did they realize it was you?
Like right away?
I think they had an idea that it was me.
All of my coworkers, you know, going reviews of me were removed.
From my LinkedIn.
So I think they all had an idea that it was me.
And I kind of left, like leaked out a little bit of like how I felt about Google through the years.
So I think they were like, I think this is Zach, right?
Yeah.
And I knew that that was going to happen.
I always wanted to have enough plausible deniability so that, um, I mean, how much possible deniability is there?
This thing came a week after I... It disclosed and dropped a week after I left.
Yeah, I want to hear more details about how Google threatened you.
However...
At the same time, you know, in the interest of time here, I need to ask you about your Stop It Burning project and also get your opinion.
What do you think the United States of America, let's say, or perhaps President Trump, what should a society do to stop what Google is becoming?
Which is a, I mean, I'll describe it as like a Skynet type of very dangerous system of authoritarian control and censorship.
What should be done to stop Google?
This video was made possible by Brighteon.com.
After being deplatformed by YouTube, I built Brighteon.com so that we can speak.
All voices of dissent are welcome.
Join Brighteon.com now, post your videos today, and start building an audience there where you will not be censored.