All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 3, 2020 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
01:09:34
Situation Update, Dec. 3rd - Trump invokes foreign interference provision of 2018 EO
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
From the flight deck, this is your captain speaking.
Welcome to Election Airlines Flight 2020.
We are seeing some biblical weather ahead, so prepare for political turbulence.
Please return your seats to their most upright and uncomfortable position.
And while you're there, please lick the tray table with your bare tongue, because, frankly, that's the only way we can spread the COVID. If you look out the right side of the plane, you will see a convoy of CIA charter flights ferrying deep state traders to Gitmo.
You don't see that every day.
And on the left side of the plane, you'll notice that's Sidney Powell in a saddle riding a gargantuan military bomb with a trailing parachute zeroing in on Washington, D.C. There she goes.
Ride him, girl!
Yippee-ki-yay, mother...
Speaking of anatomy, it is time to bury your face between your legs and assume the constitutional crash position.
This plane is going down.
All right there, folks.
All right, welcome to the Situation Update.
It is December 3rd.
This is a Thursday, 2020.
This is Mike Adams here, the Health Ranger.
Thank you for joining me.
Wow, we are going to rocket into some bizarre areas here today, so strap yourselves down or strap in, whatever you're doing.
It's probably involving straps, or it should, because of what we're about to unfold here today.
Now, we've got some major issues to unravel here.
President Trump had a big presentation today, about a 45-minute speech.
Or thereabouts.
And he said some very important qualifying things.
There are some statements that actually set some things into motion in Washington, D.C. And as I was listening to that, I noticed that There was a section that had some very particular legal language that reminded me of something.
I had to go back and check my notes.
This is why it's good to be a deep dive researcher into all this stuff.
And it turns out that Trump invoked a section of the September 12, 2018 executive order in his presentation today.
In fact, he invoked a lot of very important things that we're going to talk about.
He took this election dispute out of the realm of just, you know, vote mistakes and inadvertent things into the realm of criminal fraud and foreign interference in U.S. elections.
So if you're wondering why did he give that speech today, I'm going to explain exactly, exactly why.
It had nothing to do with informing the American people of what's going on.
It had everything to do with setting things in motion in Washington, D.C.
Also, we've got an update for you about Gina Haspel, excuse me, and what she did during her visit to Gitmo.
It was not an entertainment visit.
She was not there on vacation.
What happened?
Well, it has huge implications for what's going to go down in front of the Supreme Court.
I've also, I'm going to cover a little bit about Breitbart's attack on Lin Wood.
Which took place last night.
Linwood and Sidney Powell gave a kind of a rally in Georgia yesterday.
It was pretty well attended.
It was great.
I watched a lot of it.
But Linwood is under attack for his history of supporting Democrats for office.
However, the attacks against Linwood are unfair.
I'm going to cover that today.
Also, more evidence of fraud.
We have more whistleblowers.
A lot of evidence keeps coming out day after day after day.
And there are now very solid efforts underway by members of Congress to thwart the Electoral College system.
If it can't solve this vote fraud because the state governors are corrupt, Then guess what?
There are other options and there are members of Congress who are now actively working on those options that can overrule this on January 6th, even if the results on January 14th come in for Biden.
So that's what we're going to be covering today, and thank you for joining me.
Okay, let's begin with the Gina Haspel flight to Gitmo.
A little extra vacation time?
A little paid vacation at the top of the CIA? No.
Let's say the threat of interrogation.
It's an all-expenses-paid interrogation.
And she turned very quickly, and I've mentioned this before, she confessed to everything.
I'm told by a source now that the flight logs of flights to Gitmo show that John Brennan...
Also made a visit to Gitmo and Nancy Pelosi as well, probably because of her ties to the Dominion voting machine and Smartmatic company, her family's financial ties, you know, as shareholders, for example.
And so a number of people have gone to Gitmo and it may explain why some of those people are kind of quiet, relatively quiet at the moment.
Now, there were false rumors out there that, for example, Barack Obama was arrested for treason.
Just a bogus rumor.
That did not happen.
Other rumors that said Gina Haspel had been killed.
That also did not happen.
And rumors like Biden is wearing an arrest ankle bracelet.
I don't believe that rumor.
I don't know for sure that that's false, but I doubt it.
I think he's wearing a medical boot for reasons that we mentioned in the last couple of days.
But what I have learned is that...
You know how Sidney Powell is qualified as a military tribunal judge?
Well, it turns out that when you call a military tribunal into existence during...
An alternative constitution time of events, i.e.
the emergency constitution.
Then you get to pick the judges that are part of that tribunal.
So when or if this goes into military tribunals, and if indeed Sidney Powell is one of the judges, as is rumored that she may be, I'm sure there would be many others as well.
I don't think that she's the only person who can do that job.
But whoever it is gets to pick the judges.
And I don't know how military trials work in terms of who are the possible judges, but they're not going to be civilian judges.
They're not going to pull them out of the civilian courts because the whole point of military tribunals is to have an independent system of law that can overrule corrupt civilian systems.
So we should expect that If there is a military tribunal or a series of them, which there's a fairly good chance that that's where this is going, then those judges are going to be very, very, well, harsh, shall we say, and we could see people convicted of treason, a lot of people.
In fact, I hope we do see people convicted of treason because there are a lot of treasonous actors out there who need to be sentenced for their treason, but that's just my opinion.
I guess we'll let the military tribunal judges deal with that.
Now, let's get to the Trump speech today, because this was really critical, what he unleashed.
This 46-minute speech that was obviously, you know, prepared...
Trump was obviously reading a teleprompter.
He had clearly approved this before, and it was edited.
Some of the camera angles were edited.
So to make sure that he didn't have any mistakes in this final compilation, there's nothing wrong with that.
I'm just saying that this wasn't an off-the-cuff Trump impromptu thing.
This was very carefully scripted.
And there were many sections of this that were obviously written by White House attorneys or Trump's lawyers that achieved certain specific purposes that are necessary to lead us into things like a military authority recount of the ballots all across the country or at least in the swing states.
Now, let me read to you just a few of the key statements that Trump made during this White House speech.
And by the way, of course, the left-wing media, the communist media, CNN, they refuse to air this and all of them refuse to air this because they don't want people to know that There are mountains of fraud that are now obvious in this election, and Trump is aware of them, and Trump is invoking that evidence, and he is doing so to lay the groundwork in preparation to take certain specific types of legal actions and potentially national security actions.
So Trump says, quote,"...as president, I have no higher duty than to defend the laws and the Constitution of the United States." That is why I am determined to protect our election system, which is now under coordinated assault and siege.
So right there, and that was near the very beginning of his speech, he's saying that his job is to uphold the Constitution and And that this assault on the election system is, quote, assault and siege.
Now these are terms that are associated with acts of war.
Siege is an act of war.
These are not just sloppy metaphors.
This is Trump saying...
That he has to uphold the Constitution, which means that he's going to have to take certain actions to remedy the fraud in this election that he's about to lay out during the rest of this speech.
So he continues, quote, So now this is also a criminal subject.
This is not just inadvertent.
Oh, we accidentally, you know, double-counted these ballots in the machines, and oh, we slipped them in those counting machines again and again and again.
Whoa, accident after accident.
No, this is illegal deliberate fraud.
So Trump continues, and if that's the case, the results of the individual swing states must be overturned and overturned immediately.
So he's talking about the remedy of this fraud is to overturn the election.
Now, I know that kind of seems obvious, but it's critical that the president assert this as one of the key necessary remedies.
As you'll see, this plays into where this goes, either under military authority or the Supreme Court later on.
He continues then, quote, the Democrats had this election rigged right from the beginning.
They use the pandemic as an excuse to mail out tens of millions of ballots, which led to a big part of the fraud, and there is no one happier than China.
Now, why does he invoke China?
Because he's laying the groundwork for international or foreign interference in this election.
So China interfered in this election by designing or engineering and then releasing the coronavirus.
Which was used as the excuse by Democrat governors especially to print, to mass print and mass mail out tens of millions of ballots, many of which were not requested by the voters.
And this enabled them to flood the country with ballots and then to also hide the introduction of fraudulent ballots that came off printing presses both in Mexico and China that were then added to the votes and driven across state lines by postal workers and so on that we've talked about.
And so he's naming China.
He's saying that the pandemic was part of election interference.
So he's establishing now that this election is in violation of his September 12, 2018 executive order that speaks to election interference.
But he continues.
There's much more here.
Quote, the evidence is overwhelming.
The fraud that we've collected in recent weeks is overwhelming, having to do with our election.
In fact, he says, there is still plenty of time to certify the correct winner of the election, and that's what we're fighting to do.
So this is just a statement to let people know that he's not out of time.
There is plenty of time to certify the correct winner, which obviously is Trump, and that that's what the White House is working toward.
Now, he then goes on to call for a full forensic audit.
To ensure that only legal ballots from lawfully registered voters are included in the count.
He says, quote, the reason for this is clear.
They were not verifying signatures because they know the ballots have not been filled out by the voters in whose names they were cast.
So here he is referring to deliberate, systematic ballots.
A criminal fraud, criminal election fraud, and he demands a full forensic audit.
He says that's the only way to solve this situation, is to have a full review of ballot envelopes which contain the signatures.
Now, previously he has said that state officials cannot be trusted to do this.
So when he's calling for a forensic audit, who is he implying must be Invoked or recruited to carry out that audit.
The answer, of course, is the military.
You have to bring in soldiers to seize the ballots and to independently count them.
Otherwise, you're just going to get the same fraudulent recounts.
So remember how yesterday we were talking about the We the People conference and attorney Lynn Wood calling for, quote, limited martial law, where they said Trump should order a new election.
Well, Trump kind of dismissed that idea today, says there's not really time to do a whole new election.
And besides, he says, I won the last one.
So he doesn't want a new election, but I think he is setting the stage to invoke military authority to seize all the ballots under national security.
This is what he's laying the groundwork for, and he continues.
There's more to this.
He says, quote, dramatically eroding the integrity of our elections was the Democrats' number one priority.
For a simple reason.
This is Trump speaking.
For a simple reason.
They wanted to steal the 2020 presidential election.
All of the Democrat efforts to expand mail-in balloting laid the groundwork for the systematic and pervasive fraud that occurred in this election.
All right.
Now, he's really getting into the tough language.
This is criminal fraud.
This was coordinated by the Democrat Party.
Their intention was to commit the fraud and to steal the election.
And that mail-in balloting, which is tied to the pandemic, which is tied to China, which is a foreign actor, even you could say a strategic enemy of the United States, is behind all of this.
Right?
And then, about 30 minutes into the speech, here's what he says.
This is the bombshell.
If you know what you're listening for, this is specific language that was written by Trump's attorneys.
Quote, the only conceivable reason why you would block common sense measures to verify legal eligibility for voting is you are trying to encourage, enable, solicit, or carry out fraud.
Now, I want you to pay attention to that phrase.
You are trying to encourage, enable, solicit, or carry out fraud.
It is important, he continues, for Americans to understand that these destructive changes to our election laws were not a necessary response to the pandemic.
The pandemic simply gave the Democrats an excuse to do what they were trying to do for many, many years.
Now, this specific language that says the Democrats were engaged in this deliberate fraud And that they resisted all of these efforts to properly affirm the eligibility of voters.
This language where he says that those Democrats are trying to encourage, enable, solicit, or carry out fraud.
Where does this ring a bell?
And it goes to the September 12, 2018 Executive Order, Section 2, Subsection A, Subsection 2.
So it's 2A2. Which is discussing who will have all their assets seized for engaging in foreign interference in the U.S. election.
Okay?
So this section is describing who is going to be seized, have all their assets seized, who's going to be shut down, which could include corporations, by the way, such as tech companies or media companies.
So in Section 2, Subsection A, 2, A1 says...
It's people to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election.
Boom.
Got it?
So in other words, in Trump's speech, where he says that the only reason why Democrats would block these common sense measures to verify legal eligibility is because they're trying to encourage, enable, solicit, or carry out fraud.
And then in the executive order from September 12th of 2018, specifically talks about people who have, quote, directly or indirectly engaged in, comma, sponsored, comma, concealed, comma, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election.
So, I realize I just said that twice, but I'm just trying to be clear about pulling these pieces together.
In other words, the purpose of Trump's speech to America was not...
To really inform the American people, it was, in fact, to communicate, to lay the legal framework to invoke the September 12, 2018 executive order.
Because the speech says that that order now applies to the Democrats.
because the Democrats engage in foreign interference and fraud, criminal fraud, and that there are elements of the Democrats' support infrastructure, which includes CNN and Facebook and Twitter, for example, that have, quote, directly or indirectly for example, that have, quote, directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise have been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election.
Now, when you have Twitter blocking, canceling the accounts of individual whistleblowers who have come forward in Michigan, in Pennsylvania, in Arizona, who are saying, yes, I saw the fraud, massive fraud, I saw the machines connecting to Frankfurt.
You know, I saw the foreign interference.
And then Twitter bans them.
Guess what that qualifies for?
Concealed.
And that's Section 2, Subsection A, Subsection 1.
Any organization to have indirectly or directly engaged in, quote, concealed or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference.
That's Twitter.
And by the way, in the definition section of that executive order from 2018, it specifically says that anywhere in the order where it refers to persons, the word persons means corporations, non-profits, limited partnerships.
I forgot all the things, but basically it's every organization that you could think of.
So this does not apply only to people.
This applies to corporations as well.
So what was really happening...
Trump's speech was that Trump was affirming and laying down for the historical record that, yes, these Democrat-tied corporations and individuals and institutions, they are guilty of being complicit in foreign interference in U.S. elections.
They are complicit in it.
Okay?
So, In addition to that, Trump, of course, asserted the right to nullify the election based on the overwhelming evidence of fraud.
Now, this is setting up Trump and the military option, which is increasingly looking like the only option that may work here, to be able to then cite this speech by President Trump and cite the 2018 executive order to say, oh, guess what?
We're coming to shut you down, Twitter.
You know, us, the federal marshals or military police or whoever does this might be U.S. Marines for all we know.
Or, hey, CNN, we're coming to shut you down.
You engage in foreign interference.
You're complicit in the concealment of foreign interference in U.S. elections.
Boom.
Right?
And then you have the whole issue of military tribunals and trips to Gitmo and all these other things that we've been talking about.
But I want you to understand that A lot of people will hear Trump's speech and they will read it just as it is on the surface.
Just parsing the sentences.
Oh, Trump means this and that.
Point A, point B, point C. But actually, it's kind of like reading the Bible.
The Bible has multiple layers of messages.
There's the literal translation of what's happening.
Oh, it's telling a story.
But then behind the story, there's a purpose.
And the same thing is true in this Trump speech.
I'm not saying that Trump's speech is like the Bible, but they both have multiple layers of meaning, is all I'm saying.
It's not like Trump's speech is scripture.
No, it's actually part of a battle plan.
This is a declaration of who the enemies are.
And this is necessary for people like Chris Miller inside the DOD, you know, the Secretary of Defense, to be able to cite this speech Remember,
quote, Now remember what General McInerney said the other day.
In one of his many interviews, McInerney said that Trump has, because he took an oath to defend the Constitution, he has a duty to never give up the White House to someone who's controlled by a foreign enemy.
A foreign enemy that Trump specifically named in this speech, i.e.
China.
And you know, of course, that Trump's team and the DOD and the NSA, they have all the goods on Joe Biden.
Remember that Joe Biden was designated a national security threat earlier this year.
So they know all about the Bidens.
They know all about the money from China.
They know all about the money from Ukraine and so on.
They've got all the hard drives of Hunter Biden.
And even if the media won't print stories about that, people inside the DOD and the NSA have all of that information.
What that means is that Trump is asserting that he cannot turn over the White House to someone controlled by an enemy of the United States because that would violate Trump's own sworn oath to the Constitution.
Because remember that oath of office, and in many ways is similar to an oath that soldiers take and members of law enforcement take, says that you must defend The United States of America and the United States Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Joe Biden is recognized as a domestic enemy against the United States because of his ties to Communist China, the same country that built and released the coronavirus that was part of the plot to carry out election fraud in the United States.
So you see how Trump is establishing this.
It's almost like a legal argument in front of the Supreme Court Although that's not who he was speaking to today.
But he's laying out and connecting the pieces.
And so when Sidney Powell goes to the Supreme Court, which is likely to happen at some point here in the next few weeks, I wouldn't be overly freaked out about the December 14th milestone slash deadline that She may not be in front of SCOTUS by that time.
It's hard to say.
Or maybe she is, but they haven't rendered a decision by that time.
But when she's in front of the Supreme Court, you can bet she's going to lay out this argument, but with way more evidence from the 305th Military Intelligence Battalion.
And her argument in front of the court is going to be Something very similar to this to say, yes, you know, there's a systematic coordinated election fraud and an attempt to overthrow the United States government using foreign interference and domestic complicity with that foreign interference in a way that is a direct threat to the national security of the United States of America and all those who uphold and defend the Constitution.
And then Sidney Powell will drop bombshells.
Bombshells that we haven't seen yet because, of course, they're being saved for that exact event.
Now, with that said, let me bring in something else that's relevant to all this, which is that Gina Haspel's rumored confession probably goes something like this.
Now, this is just a guess, but...
We are told that she offered a confession of sorts and is cooperating with the Trump administration.
I would imagine that the number one most important piece of information they extracted from Gina Haspel, also known as Bloody Gina, because she's a pro-torture CIA head who's had many other people tortured.
The only piece of information that really mattered is Gina Haspel saying, yes, She ran the server farm in Frankfurt, and the server farm did, in fact, carry out election fraud with vote stuffing in real time on that early morning of November 4th.
This was when the hundreds of thousands of votes were dumped into Wisconsin and Michigan and Pennsylvania and so on.
So this evidence, this confession evidence, Would, in my mind, qualify as, quote, biblical if it were presented in front of SCOTUS, right?
Now then, I mean, that's the game changer.
That's kind of like game, set, match right there, right?
If you're in front of the Supreme Court and you're Sidney Powell and you say, you know, hear ye, hear ye, justices.
I don't know how that works in front of the Supreme Court, but we're just going to have a little old English fun with this.
Here's a confession from the CIA director who says that, in fact, she confesses to running the server farm that stuffed the votes in these swing states.
And it's kind of like, at that point, Sidney Powell can say something like, and that's it, bitches!
It's like, you don't need to hear anything else.
Because the justices are going to say, Thomas...
It's kind of, that's all I need to hear.
Boom, that's it, right?
Same thing with Kavanaugh, you know, Alito, Gorsuch, Barrett, only the five that matter.
Heck, even Roberts might have to get on board with this.
We'll see.
But it's kind of like, this is it.
This is the admission of massive election fraud, vote theft, foreign interference.
You know, the CIA's charter does not allow it to operate in the United States, by the way.
And it has no authorization, obviously, to interfere in U.S. elections.
Although, notably, the CIA has been authorized to interfere in elections of other nations for many, many years doing the same thing.
That now they just turn those weapons against us.
But at that point, SCOTUS has to say, well, guess what?
We are going to say that the election results in those swing states, yep, it's, quote, irredeemably tainted.
It cannot be remedied, and we hereby order that this election revert to Congress.
Congress is going to have to make the decision at this point, and then it becomes a one-state-equals-one-vote situation, and then Trump wins very easily in that contest.
Oh, and by the way, I forgot to tell you this.
If this comes out before the Georgia runoff election, what happens to Georgia's runoff election?
The answer is, it gets canceled.
It gets canceled because the Supreme Court will have nullified the state results of Georgia if Georgia is one of the states that the CIA admits to have targeted.
And it was.
It was one of those states.
So the fact that the Dominion voting machines rigged, even if it's only 3% of the votes in Georgia, or started off candidates with that extra 35,000 that we've heard of happening in Arizona and other places, well, then Georgia's election also has to be ruled invalid.
And frankly...
I believe at this point, if this happens with the Supreme Court, Trump would then need to order the military to go in and seize all the physical ballots in Georgia and have a recount in Georgia, which would absolutely give Perdue and Loeffler the greater than 50% which would absolutely give Perdue and Loeffler the greater than 50% victory that they need to nullify the runoff
So that's how the GOP maintains control of the Senate, and that's how we beat the election fraud in Georgia, is by not having a runoff election, not allowing them to steal it again.
But this will require either a Supreme Court decision, as I mentioned, or Trump activating military authority over elections, minimally in the swing states, but possibly nationwide.
Now, in terms of evidence that Sidney Powell is likely to present before the Supreme Court, and this is just my analysis, so I don't have any special line to Sidney Powell.
I wish I did.
I wish I had a Sidney Powell red phone.
Wouldn't that be awesome?
You pick it up and Sidney Powell's on the other end.
You can ask her anything.
That would be awesome, but she's kind of busy.
We don't have that.
I just call it like the Powell party line, you know?
But here's what she's likely to present based on what we know so far.
Number one is what I just mentioned, Gina Haspel's rumored confession, if indeed that has been extracted from her.
But secondly, Dominion executives confessing to engineering backdoors into the systems.
Now, haven't you noticed, isn't it interesting that all the Dominion executives have vanished?
They've gone dark.
And part of the information that I've been receiving is that certain Dominion executives were part of these rendition flights.
They were charged with enabling foreign interference in a U.S. election, which is an act of cyber warfare against the United States.
So that is military authority.
And again, according to my sources, some Dominion executives have already been put on these flights and aggressively questioned, we'll say.
And have offered up confessions.
So this is not 100% confirmed.
Nothing ever is these days, it seems.
But this is from a reliable source that has been mostly right in the past.
Not always right, but mostly right.
And it is consistent with what we observe about Dominion executives all trying to run and hide and delete their online profiles and run as fast as possible, which that alone tells you something, of course, because If Dominion voting systems had nothing to hide, wouldn't they welcome all the scrutiny?
Wouldn't they gladly join all the questioning?
Wouldn't they say, yeah, scrub all our machines?
Here's the source code.
Here's the hard drives.
Do a forensic analysis.
We have nothing to hide.
Every vote is perfect, right?
Isn't that what they would do?
If they weren't rigging the election, but instead you get nothing but resistance from these people, right?
They're like, oh, you can't see our machines.
That's protected, you know, trade secrets.
And you can't look at our hard drives.
No, we're going to wipe them clean.
You can't talk to us.
We're not going to show up at your hearings.
Are these the actions of a company that's innocent or a company that's guilty?
Hmm.
Well, none of that really matters if we already have confessions from certain people tied to Dominion, does it?
And I believe we do.
So that is part of the evidence to be presented to SCOTUS. Another piece of evidence that we learned from Colonel Phil Waldron just the other day is that the packet analysis results from the White Hats who intercepted the traffic from Dominion voting systems as they were talking back and forth to the CIA server farm in Frankfurt.
This must have included the specific instructions from the CIA servers to add the hundreds of thousands of votes in real time I come from a programming background, owned a software company, and I run software R&D projects even today.
And from what I've seen so far in looking at the data exchange formats of these voting machines, they mostly use Something called an XML format.
It's just a plain text metadata tagged format where fields are named such as, you know, a vote ID and then there's an integer and then it's a slash vote ID to close that field.
And then there's another field, you know, value or whatever.
It's very likely...
That the CIA server farms, when they accessed these Dominion tabulation machines remotely, that the commands that they sent, they had to send very specific commands in order to alter the vote count in real time and add hundreds of thousands of votes for Joe Biden, which is where those blue lines went straight up in the middle of the night.
Those commands...
are probably not very sophisticated commands.
They're probably either simple SQL query commands such as, you know, insert this value into this row or they are XML data files that are dumped into a directory that's parsed by the tabulation machine in order to add votes or move votes or delete votes.
Either way, because the, quote, White Hats, which means the NSA and the DOD, cyber warfare people, because the White Hats have all the traffic and have all the packets, according to Holdren, what this means is they have the specific instructions that were issued to the tabulation machines to add the hundreds of thousands of votes.
And this means Sidney Powell can actually In front of the Supreme Court, she can roll in this giant whiteboard, let's say, a poster, and say, here's the command.
You know, at 4.57 a.m., this command came out of this IP address from this server in Frankfurt, and it said, insert 220,000 rows for Joe Biden into this Dominion machine at this IP address, and we have the commands, and here they are.
Boom, it's the transaction list.
It's kind of like finding the fake set of accounting books for the mafia.
It's like, here's where we paid off this hitman, and here's where we bought off these drug dealers.
And that's pretty much what it is.
And if you think about it, that evidence...
Which has chain of custody certification by the DOD itself.
You know, they'll have experts there testifying from the 305th Military Intelligence Battalion.
That evidence combined with Gina Haspel's confession to say, yes, we rigged it.
We did it.
We did it from Frankfurt.
We did it.
That is irrefutable.
Oh, and on top of that, I forgot to mention, they also have the physical servers that they seized from Frankfurt.
So those physical servers, remember, seized in the firefight.
Five U.S. Army personnel soldiers died.
One CIA officer was reportedly killed.
And that's where they actually seized Gina Haspel and put her on a flight, right from there.
She was there defending that server farm.
And some of her personal bodyguards apparently were shot and killed.
As happens when lead starts flying.
But They've got those servers.
And so those servers, and remember how there were U.S. law enforcement officials on site during the raid in order to establish chain of custody, so that that chain of custody can be certified all the way from the moment of seizure back to the United States and then presented as evidence before a court of law, such as the Supreme Court.
So imagine the strength of this case.
Again, Sidney Powell in front of the Supreme Court says, hey, justices.
Again, I'm going a little casual on this.
Hey, Thomas, how's it going?
Here's what I got.
We got a confession from Haspel.
We got a confession from Dominion executives.
We have the packet analysis from the NSA and the DOD that have the instructions of adding the votes from the servers in Frankfurt, and we seize the servers, which have log files, And on top of that, we can readily see,
even from an outside analysis, that it is statistically impossible that all these votes could appear magically in this little time frame because the ballot scanning machines can't even physically scan that many ballots in that time window.
It's physically impossible that these are legitimate votes.
And those fake votes from Frankfurt aren't even tied to physical ballots.
So in that scenario...
Every one of those conservative justices, remember, every one of them has been viciously attacked and smeared by Democrats.
They tried to destroy Thomas.
They tried to destroy Kavanaugh.
They tried to destroy Barrett and Gorsuch to some extent as well.
They really went after Kavanaugh, bad, and Thomas.
Even before we knew that was their pattern, they really went after Thomas back in the 90s, I think that was.
And with the same blueprint, by the way, you know, same game they played against Kavanaugh.
Every one of these conservative justices, they're going to find a legal reason to rule in favor of Trump, but trust me, in their hearts, it's going to be a giant F you to the Democrats.
That's what this is going to be.
Because they're human.
They're human.
They got totally destroyed and discredited and smeared and blamed for things they didn't do.
I mean, they blamed Kavanaugh.
They said he was running a rape train.
I mean, come on!
This is insane!
But none of the witnesses were there.
They couldn't recall anything.
I mean, no one ever saw him.
It's just baseless accusations, right?
Believe me, Kavanaugh's human.
He remembers who tried to screw him.
And if he gets a chance, We're good to go.
They must follow the rule of law.
Yeah, but Supreme Court justices can interpret the law in a multitude of ways as we have seen.
Trust me, they're going to find a way to interpret it in a way that destroys the Democrat Party if they get that chance.
So the real question right here is whether a case can be properly structured and presented before the Supreme Court in time.
That's the only question on the civil side of this.
And Sidney Powell is an expert in lawfare and structuring complaints so that they can be brought before the Supreme Court in a way that, as Alan Keyes said recently, boxes them in.
It boxes in the justices so that they must decide in a way that is aligned with the United States Constitution, which is their only job, by the way.
And if the proper complaint is structured properly, Presented properly with the evidence that I just mentioned, then SCOTUS has no choice but to render this decision.
Now, importantly, the decision by SCOTUS will have, of course, national implications.
So this is why we should celebrate the fact that, for example, the 11th District Court actually dismissed Lynn Wood's case in Georgia.
They did not issue a ruling.
Had they issued a ruling even in favor of Lynn Wood, then that 11th District decision would have only applied to the territory covered by the 11th District, 11th Circuit, I should say.
Instead, they dismissed the case.
So Lynn Wood then is probably right now filing for emergency acceptance of the case by the Supreme Court.
Well, that is to our advantage because we...
Because when the Supreme Court then rules on that case, that ruling sets a national precedent and may in fact invalidate or render as unconstitutional elections in other swing states that suffered from the same problems or failures, the same structural fraud basically. that ruling sets a national precedent and may in fact The same structural fraud, basically.
So this is why we want all cases to be dismissed locally as quickly as possible and to be dismissed in circuit courts as quickly as possible.
So they get to SCOTUS and then SCOTUS decisions have national context.
So all of this so far is talking about The civil side of this.
Let me give you just a little bit more about some of the evidence that's emerging.
I want to encourage you also to read theepochtimes.com because they're covering all this evidence as it's coming out, and it's a lot.
It's even hard to keep up with it.
For example, Trump attorneys are now saying that 40,000 people voted twice in Nevada.
So they're filing a lawsuit to deal with that.
If that's overturned, probably Trump wins Nevada.
I mean, everywhere you look, Once there's scrutiny on something and these situations are corrected, it's always in favor of Trump because the fraud was always, 100% of the time, the fraud was in favor of Biden.
That's how you know it wasn't random or inadvertent.
We also have Patty McMurray, a Detroit poll watcher who saw massive election fraud in Michigan.
And This is, she's got an affidavit that describes what are called multiple first-hand accounts showing the mistreatment of Republican poll workers.
I'm going to read you this from an article that I think was in the Epoch Times.
Quote, McMurray said just when the military ballots were brought in, the poll watchers and challengers were told to take a break.
The Democrat workers had food and seating provided inside the room.
Republicans, on the other hand, had to go to a room upstairs.
In that one, it's kind of like, It's kind of like a Rosa Parks moment here, isn't it?
Like, oh, blacks have to go to the back of the bus.
Republicans have to go upstairs.
You can't watch the count.
So McMurray then also detailed what she saw once she got inside the counting room.
Quote, not one of the military ballots was a registered voter.
And the ballots looked like they were all exactly the same Xerox copies of the ballot.
They were all for Biden across the board.
There wasn't a single Trump vote.
And none of the voters were registered.
They had to manually enter the names and addresses and a birth date of 2020.
January 1, 2020, which would override the system and allow them to enter non-registered voters.
Just wow.
Just wow after wow after wow.
They're just Xeroxing a bunch of ballots for Biden and then entering dates of January 1, 2020, which means that a lot of these Biden voters aren't even one year old.
Babies for Biden.
Infants for Joe.
Got to be careful.
You get him too close to him.
He might start sniffing them all.
That's the kind of guy he is, but that's how they got him into the system.
Baby sniffing Joe.
Like most politicians kiss babies.
Joe is a little more intimate than that.
Sadly.
Now, members of Congress are planning to challenge the electoral college vote.
So Matt Gaetz, Congressman Gaetz, says that Congress is interested in forcing a debate about whether to accept the state's electors in the swing states where the vote fraud occurred.
And he said to the media yesterday, quote, nothing is off the table.
And then Rep.
Mo Brooks of Alabama, who we've mentioned before, is now confirming yet again that he is planning to challenge the Electoral College votes When Congress certifies the election on January 6th.
Now, as you may recall, all that's required is one member of the House and one member of the Senate stand up and say, we don't accept these results or we challenge these results.
Now, Mo Brooks, here's something interesting.
Mo Brooks has a bit of a different view of how this plays out at this point.
This gets into some intricacies of the Constitution.
Brooks says that SCOTUS cannot overturn electoral votes.
And he's even talking about the fact that the Supreme Court really can't save the election here.
I think he's wrong.
I mean, maybe he knows more than I do about this, but it's clear from precedent that, in fact, the Supreme Court can decertify or retroactively nullify certifications of election.
So I'm not sure why he's thinking that SCOTUS can't overturn electoral votes.
Absolutely, SCOTUS can overturn elections, and then that affects the electoral votes.
But Brooks says, quote, A lot of time is being wasted in court.
The Supreme Court does not have the lawful authority to determine whether to accept or reject a state's electoral college submissions, he says.
Under the United States Constitution, that's the job and duty of elected officials.
And so it's the Congress, United States Congress, that's the final judge and jury of whether to accept or reject these electoral college submissions by states and to elect who the president and vice president of the United States might be.
And so he continues, if a House member and a senator objects to the submission of Electoral College votes by any state, that immediately triggers a House floor vote and a Senate floor vote on whether to accept or reject those Electoral College votes submitted by that particular state.
And he says, quote, the amount of debate on the House and Senate floor is limited to two hours under federal law.
Now, what Brooks has said before, Is that the Constitution is unclear about how that House floor vote is structured?
Is it a vote among the members of the House, the 435?
Or is it a vote with one state equals one vote, which is specifically mentioned elsewhere in the Constitution for remedies for when the Electoral College does not itself result in the selection of a clear winner?
And he said before, this was a couple of weeks ago, that he said he's going to argue during this time, which I'm sure everything will be frantic on the floor of the House, he's going to argue that the vote for whether or not to accept the Electoral College votes from any particular disputed state, that vote on the floor should be one state equals one vote.
That's what he's going to argue.
I'm not sure he's going to be successful in that argument, though.
In fact, I kind of doubt it.
I kind of suspect that, given that Pelosi is there, That she's going to overrule that and say, no, every member gets a vote.
However, wildcard, what if Pelosi has been put on a flight to Gitmo, which is one of the, say, not fully confirmed rumors, but information sources that's out there.
What if Pelosi has been shown proof of all of her financial ties to China?
And her family's criminal fraud and business entities and financial ties to other countries, maybe Ukraine, other things.
And even just, frankly, domestic fraud in the state of California.
What if Pelosi was put on a flight and someone sat her down and said, Hey, Nancy, check out this folder.
You know, like an Agent Smith style thing.
Like in front of Neo, like, we've had our eyes on you.
Want to take a peek at this folder?
You've been very busy.
And then Nancy Pelosi says, okay, what do you want me, what do you need me to do?
Maybe the answer to that, and this is just pure conjecture, but maybe the answer to that is when this thing comes up for a vote on January 6th, don't object to Representative Brooks and his assertion that it should be one state equals one vote.
Now, I'm just guessing on that.
That's just a guess.
But there are wild cards at play here.
And Trump's administration has a lot of dirt on a lot of people all throughout the whole system, and there's no question that some of that dirt is on Pelosi because she basically shovels dirt out of the back of her car as she's driving down the road.
She's got a trail of dirt, not even that hard to find if you know anything about her level of corruption.
So don't forget that in this scenario, by the way, if this gets kicked back to Congress by SCOTUS, For a vote on who's the president.
Don't forget that the Senate votes for the vice president.
The House, on a one-state-equals-one-vote basis, votes for the president.
So it is possible, if this Georgia election goes through, you know, the runoff election, and if the Democrats steal that, then they would have a majority in the Senate.
And even if the House voted for President Trump, the Senate could elect Kamala Harris as the Vice President.
I mentioned this a few days ago, and some people found it a little unbelievable, but you could literally have a Trump-Harris administration, which I would imagine would largely consist of Kamala Harris being locked in a room with a bunch of Legos.
Like, hey!
Occupy your time over here.
We're going to actually run the country outside of this room.
Something like that.
Harris would not be happy with that, but she would be shut out of the process.
She'd probably be running around the White House with an ice pick trying to stab Trump, you know, just so she could seize power.
She would do anything.
But that's the situation that actually could occur here based on where all this is going.
Okay, let me go to a couple other minor points here.
Number one, the Breitbart attack on Lin Wood.
Breitbart is, just so you know, Breitbart, how to characterize them.
Breitbart is pro-vaccine and pro-Big Pharma.
And there's a lot of great patriots at Breitbart.
And without Breitbart, probably President Trump would never have been elected president in 2016.
So Breitbart's done a lot of great work over the years here.
But isn't it interesting they are attacking Lin Wood for being a former Democrat?
And that's their whole hit piece on him.
They're saying, oh, Lin Wood gave money to Democrats and he voted for Democrats and he never voted for Trump and blah, blah, blah.
The very name Breitbart, people, refers to Andrew Breitbart, a former Democrat, turned conservative.
Who launched Breitbart.com?
I mean, he used to work for hardcore leftists like Ariana Huffington.
He learned how to become a writer and a publisher under Huffington, you know, of Huffington Post.
I mean, you can't get more left.
Well, maybe you can now with AOC, but Huffington is pretty far left.
That's where Breitbart came from.
So for the editors at Breitbart.com today to say, well, Lin Wood can't be trusted because he used to be a Democrat.
It's like, look in the mirror, folks.
Why don't you welcome Lin Wood?
Why don't you welcome him to, I wouldn't even say the GOP, Because I don't even consider myself.
I'm not a member of the GOP. I'm not into party politics.
I'm into liberty and America and truth and real justice.
And that's what Lin Wood believes in as well.
And I don't care that Lin Wood voted for Democrats in the past.
All the more reason to welcome him over to the side of liberty now.
Because we are experiencing a mass awakening.
Of a lot of former Democrats that are leaving the Democrat Party, walking away from the Democrat Party.
Well, if Breitbart's going to run a hit piece on them all the time, doesn't that kind of disincentivize people from leaving the Democrat Party?
I mean, you leave the party and then Breitbart attacks you when you're trying to save the country?
So, you know, shame on Breitbart for this one.
You need to understand the history of your own founder, Andrew Breitbart.
And by the way, the other part of the hit piece from Breitbart on Lin Wood, and I consider Lin Wood to be a great American hero, okay?
Just like Sidney Powell.
They are fantastic people.
Lin Wood representing Kyle Rittenhouse in his Second Amendment defense, and Lin Wood's also going to be representing the McCloskeys, that couple from St.
Louis that We're good to go.
Part of the attack against Linwood was that Linwood and Sidney Powell had a kind of a rally yesterday.
And during that rally, Linwood said, where are the Senate candidates, Loeffler and Perdue of Georgia?
Where are they?
They should be here at the rally.
They should be here.
They should be demanding...
An investigation into the fraud.
They should be demanding a criminal investigation into corrupt Governor Kemp, for example.
Where are they?
And then Lin Wood said that those GOP senators, they don't deserve your vote until they earn it.
And they should be here right now earning your vote.
And then Breitbart twisted that and said that Lin Wood was encouraging Republicans to refrain from voting for Loeffler.
And Purdue.
But that's not really what he was saying.
I heard it.
I was watching it live.
And all I heard from Lin Wood was that, hey, where are these senators?
They should be here fighting for honest elections.
And they're not here.
Because they're part of the system.
And I agree with Lin Wood.
Why isn't every GOP senator and member of Congress and candidate and governor, every member of the GOP should be up in arms right now calling out the massive fraud, the overwhelming fraud, saying, we do not accept this.
This is foreign interference.
The Democrats cheated.
And yet, most of the GOP, and this is what Lin Wood is pointing out, most of the GOP are spineless cowards.
They're afraid of bad press.
They're afraid of being criticized in the Washington Post, so afraid of mean words.
So they're willing to let their country be lost because they don't want mean words to be printed about them.
Really?
Really?
Well, guess what?
The rest of us are fighting through the mean words.
We don't give a crap.
We don't let mean words stop us.
Lin Wood doesn't let mean words stop him.
If he did, he would have been a loser a long time ago.
You think Sidney Powell is going to be dissuaded by mean words from the New York Times?
You know, some of these Democrat publications are out there saying that she's mentally ill.
You think she sits there in a room and cries herself to sleep and says, we lost!
They said I'm mentally ill!
No!
She's strapping on cowboy boots with spurs!
You know?
She's putting on her revolvers on both hips.
She's getting ready for a showdown.
Loading up, you know, the six-shot pistols with the.44 Magnum rounds.
She's going at them!
She's not letting mean words stop her.
I don't get what it is about these GOP people.
But I do recall that some marine biologists said they discovered a new species of jellyfish off the coast of Oregon, I think it was.
And I immediately thought, yeah, it's called the GOP. It's a whole new species of jellyfish that can contort themselves into a jelly-like substance.
Anytime there's a reporter around.
It's just incredible.
And they can, you know, they can squirm and pulse and swim their way across the political ocean, swish, swish, swish, get a little bit where they want to go.
Oh, get elected, maybe get some campaign contributions from, you know...
A bomb-making company, swish, swish, swish, floating around, flying around, and then they can say things.
Oh, we represent the people.
Oh, yeah, we're here for you.
We're pro-Second Amendment, swish, swish.
Yeah, we want strong borders, swish, swish.
And then all of a sudden, there's a reporter that comes along and says, hey, we're going to write mean things about you.
And then suddenly, boom, collapse into a jellyfish.
Oh, my God, we'll say whatever you want.
We'll do whatever you want.
That's the GOP. They're not even really human.
Just some kind of jelly creature.
It's like jellyfish from Jelly Island or something.
So much jelly makes you hungry for peanut butter.
These people are not...
They have no backbone.
I'm not sure you qualify as human if you don't have a spine, right?
I mean, to be human would include a spine.
And if you're male, maybe a set of balls.
But none of these people have that.
In fact, dare I say, in a kind of a salute to transgenderism, I think Sidney Powell has more balls than most male GOP members.
How about that?
She's more of a cowboy than those jellyfish creatures.
They never learned how to cowboy up, did they?
I mean, there's some of them, like Matt Gaetz and Jim Jordan and so on, and Rand Paul.
That guy's got some gumption.
But most of these GOP people, if you stepped on them accidentally in a hallway, there would be a squishing sound.
Oh my God, was that you, Congressman?
I'm so sorry.
Let's see if someone can get a squeegee and put you back together again.
I know, it's crazy.
Okay, finally, last point of this podcast.
I want you to note that stealing the election...
Is relatively easy to do because they don't have to follow any laws.
They don't have to follow any rules.
They just make it up as they go along.
They do whatever they want.
So stealing it is easy.
Proving the theft is hard because you have to follow the rule of law.
You have to follow the rules of evidence.
You have to catch them in the act.
It's much more difficult and it's going to take some time.
So have some patience for this.
And because this could take a few more weeks.
This could take all the way to January 20th for all we know.
And in the big picture, I don't know when Trump is going to invoke the national security option.
I know that he's under pressure to do so.
It's a lot of pressure for him to declare martial law, invoke the Insurrection Act, and so on.
And granted, even I've said he's absolutely preparing to do that.
He is aligning the DOD for that.
He's laying the groundwork to do that.
But I believe that in Trump's mind, he wants the courts to rule him as the winner through the civil court system, because he doesn't want to deal with being painted as a military dictator, and he doesn't want to deal with the radical left-wing uprising that would certainly be very, well, animated, we should say, if Trump invokes the military option.
So, but timing's critical.
You can't wait for the courts forever.
And I don't know how long it's going to take the Supreme Court to ponder their case.
Hence, the need for the strongest evidence possible because the more evidence that you have, or I should say the stronger the evidence is, it seems that maybe the more quickly the Supreme Court could arrive at the obvious conclusion.
Whereas if your evidence is wishy-washy, it might take them a lot more time to try to figure out, try to sort through that.
But hey, if you've got a confession from Gina Haspel and Dominion Voting Systems executives, full-on confessions, it's kind of an open and shut case.
It's just a formality of how they write it up, how they render the decision.
So go Sidney Powell.
And defendingtherepublic.org is her website if you want to make a donation to her.
And if you want to support Lin Wood, it's the Fight Back Foundation.
I keep forgetting that.
It's fightback.law.
That's it.
I think fightback.law.
And that's where you can donate to him unless you hate people who were former Democrats for whatever reason.
Hey, I welcome everybody who's fighting for America.
And even if you go back to my past, when I was in college, I was more of a liberal.
I wasn't politically active, but I was definitely more progressive-minded.
I became more conservative over time as I operated in reality instead of a college campus.
In my case, it was four and a half years.
I don't mean to get sidetracked into a personal thing.
I actually went to college for four and a half years.
Because I couldn't decide my major for so long, I ended up with so many minors.
A minor in economics, a minor in mathematics.
I took classes in anthropology and then microbiology, genetics, and literature.
And so I ended up with an interdisciplinary degree in technical writing.
And at one time I thought I was going to be a film writer.
But you never know how things are going to happen.
In any case, I would have qualified as probably a liberal at that time.
So we got to welcome people who come to their senses, right?
Got to welcome those people.
We are the party of inclusion.
Well, I'm not even going to say the GOP. Look, okay, final thought.
I don't even consider Trump to be a member of the GOP, frankly.
And I am not supporting the GOP. I'm supporting Trump and people who support him.
Some of them happen to be GOP members, you know, like Rand Paul and Matt Gaetz and so on.
But if Trump leaves the GOP and forms the Trump Party, I'm with the Trump Party, period.
The GOP has done nothing for us.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Useless.
Lin Wood is fighting for us.
And he's a former Democrat.
So I'm with people like Lin Wood, and I'm with people like Sidney Powell, and I'm with Trump.
Wherever they go, whatever labels they want to put on their party, their name, that's fine.
I'm with them because they are warriors, and I'm a warrior, and we must all become warriors if we're going to fight for this country and achieve victory against the enemies that are trying to bring this nation down.
And all of those GOP bureaucrats and elected officials If I had my wish, I would sweep them all up in a giant fishing net and throw those jellyfish back into the ocean where they belong.
Goodbye.
Swish your way back into the deep.
We don't need you because you're not doing anything for America.
The GOP is useless, as we've seen.
So, Team Trump is the answer here.
Hardcore, determined, dedicated, intelligent, passionate Americans are the answer.
That's like you and me.
And that's why we, we the people, are going to turn this thing around with Trump's help.
Okay?
That's the plan.
So I'll continue to bring you updates each day.
And I thank you for listening today.
And if you want to support what we're doing, check out healthrangerstore.com and also visit brighteon.com and brighteon.social.
You can follow me there.
That's the alternative to Twitter and Facebook, brighteon.social, just like that.
Type it in your browser.
And I'm tweeting there late at night.
We've got about 20,000 patriots there.
Who are engaged in conversation about these issues and much more.
A lot of news hounds that are there.
In fact, I use it as a source for intelligence about breaking news and so on.
So check it out.
Brighteon.social Thank you for listening.
God bless America.
God bless you for your role, for your part in helping us achieve victory.
Take care.
Survival Nutrition is our new free audiobook that you can download right now from survivalnutrition.com In this nearly eight-hour audiobook, you will learn life-saving secrets of how to use food, nutrients, plant molecules, trace minerals, and chemical compounds to save your life, even in a total collapse scenario.
I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and I'm the author of Survival Nutrition.
I founded and run a multi-million dollar food science laboratory, and I'm the author of the best-selling science book, Food Forensics.
I'm also a prepper, a patriot, and a survivalist.
Just in case we lose the power grid.
▲
Export Selection