All Episodes
Previous Next
March 23, 2018 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
21:52
Mike Hosts Alex Jones Show with Jim Marrs, UN small arms treaty
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yeah, during the break, we made a Mylar thermal blanket poncho for a little police figurine guy here.
And we're showing that on camera right now.
There he is.
Look at that.
He's got his anti-drone Terminator...
Countermeasure Poncho.
That's on screen at PrisonPlanet.tv.
You can't miss this stuff, folks.
If you're listening on the radio, you gotta get the archived videos later by becoming a PrisonPlanet.tv member.
You know, the props are just priceless here, I gotta tell you.
This is literally running around the office with a pair of scissors, which apparently is dangerous, I think.
There's probably a health agency that's going to cite us for doing that here at the Alex Jones Studios.
All right, all comedy aside, because we always have to have that element here, next is definitely not a funny issue.
Which is the...
Oh, man, it's too funny.
Which is the UN Small Arms Treaty, and we've got Jim Mars joining us by phone.
He's the author of numerous books, including a book that should have been called A Zombie Nation, but instead it was...
I'll let Jim tell you the story.
But he joins us right now by phone to chime in on the UN treaty, the Small Arms Treaty.
And Jim Mars, one of my favorite guests to have on, knows so much about these realms and the whole history of the attacks on liberty and freedom.
He joins us right now by phone.
Jim, welcome to the show.
Hey, Mike.
It's always a pleasure to be with you.
Hey, it's great to have you on.
I always love having you on the show.
What's on your mind these days?
What's on your radar screen, so to speak?
Well, I am finishing up the editing on my new book which should be out after the first of the year called Our Occulted History.
Occulted history.
Yeah.
Now, just so everybody understands, I think one of the first sentences in the book says, now, let's get this straight.
This book is not about werewolves, vampires, or devil worshippers, okay?
I'm using the word occulted in the astronomical sense.
When the moon eclipses the sun, that's called an occultation.
And it simply means hidden.
Or masked.
So it's, what is our hidden history?
What has been hidden from it?
And I think it's going to be a real eye-opening read to a lot of people.
Absolutely.
I do want to recommend your other books, The Trillion Dollar Conspiracy and, of course, Rise of the Fourth Reich.
Your books are just extremely well-documented, Jim.
I mean, extremely well-documented.
You are one of the best investigative journalists out there today, and I really enjoy your books.
But let's get right into...
I'm sorry?
Well, I was just going to say, yeah, and I think people need to understand, if you really want to be an educated person, forget the newspapers and the TV. They're all owned and controlled by one of about five major corporations that have interlocking directorships.
So in other words, a handful of people are controlling everything you see and hear.
If you really want to know what's going on, read major books, okay?
And the reason I say this is we haven't got time and you wouldn't even want to hear How many hoops I have to jump through just to get something published by a major publisher?
They have nitpicking editors and they have legal staffs that go through it with a fine-tooth comb.
How do you know this?
How do you know that?
Have you got more than one source?
Can you prove this?
Can you prove that?
Okay?
But that's good, because when you read a major book from a major publisher, and it's got an index, it's got footnotes, then you know that it's been gone over by a number of people, and you're probably getting the straight stuff.
There are a number of websites now that tout, send us your press release, and we'll make sure it gets to the whole media.
I could name off a few, but you know what I'm talking about, Mike, right?
Oh, yeah, and most of the time the media just rewrites the corporate press releases, slaps their own name on it, and releases it as factual news without checking a single fact.
That was my point.
I was reading the other day a fellow who works for one of these outfits, and he says it used to be that they would at least rewrite these press releases that had come in from corporations and companies.
He said, but he's noticed in lately, That he sees his own press releases and he knows they're his because he wrote them and they're in his words and they're just being repeated by the so-called news media.
Word for word, it is absolutely incredible.
But that's how we get news on the TV of things like mercury in vaccines is good for your children, didn't you know?
It boosts their immune system.
We should have more mercury.
Yeah, a little aspartame will hurt you.
Yeah, exactly.
And you know what?
Some of this stuff is probably true.
Like a little aspartame might not hurt you, but the problem is it's cumulative.
It just keeps building up your system into your systems.
Well, sure.
I mean, there's so many myths out there that the mainstream media pushes.
And by the way, we're going to get to this UN treaty in just a second, but I have a comment here.
You know, one of the myths is that war is great for the economy.
It's great.
So, you know, I always say to people who, and a lot of people believe that, people who are smart enough to know better, I always say to them, well, great, then why don't we just bomb all our own cities and we'll experience total abundance by rebuilding them?
Hey, that's true.
That's true.
It'd be an instant urban renewal program.
Yeah.
You start with some cluster bombs and cutter charges, and then you go in and you start rebuilding everything.
Yeah, it's just such a fallacy.
But let's get to the big issue today.
The big arms thing, yeah.
For one thing, I'm sure your listeners are probably well aware of this small arms treaty and the fact that they're still negotiating up in New York.
But I can guarantee you that just like City Hall, when they have a city council meeting and they come out and they say, we've approved this, we haven't approved that, we're looking into this, that's all been done ahead of time.
Okay?
Sure.
There's real negotiations going on behind the scenes somewhere.
But anyway, I'm sure that you and your listeners are pretty well aware of what's happening and why.
But let's talk about, you know, let's look a little deeper and see what's really going on here.
There are those who are arguing, well, it's no big thing.
It only talks about, they're only trying to curb the illegal international arms trade, whatever they're doing.
Right, that's the cover story.
It won't affect law-abiding firearms owners.
At one level, and in technicality, that may be true, okay?
But this is just another foot in the door.
Have we all forgotten when they first came up with NAFTA, okay, Free Trade Association, and they're going, oh, it'll be good for business, and it'll be good for jobs, and it's not going to be any big deal, and yada, yada, and they ran that on through.
And of course, there was a handful of voices, such as Ross Perot, who was saying there's going to be a giant sucking sound, and all the jobs are going to Mexico and heading south.
And everybody said, oh, what a conspiracy theorist, what a paranoid.
Well, it turns out he's true.
He's absolutely right, and this is the same thing.
This is just another foot in the door.
Oh, it's not a big deal.
Well, right now it's not, but then another year or two, I mean, first off, you go back and you find out that the Republicans, and during the time of the George W. Bush administration, back up until 2009, they said, no, we don't want any part of this.
This is infringing on our sovereignty, and that it will eventually, you know, emasculate the Second Amendment.
No, it was Hillary Clinton and Obama in 2009 that said, no, no, we'll talk, you know, and I think to give them, you know, all due credit and to try to lean towards their side as much as I can.
They may have thought that, well, we'll go ahead and participate with this, and that way, if we're participating in it, we can help guide it, and we can help see to it that nothing too untoward happens.
But, of course, I think you and I both know that's not it at all.
Well, their intentions are to disarm the public.
In fact, every world government says, if you really ask them, if they answer honestly, often behind closed doors, that Private ownership of firearms is a threat to the domination and the monopolization of power of that nation's government.
They don't want anybody to be armed.
Exactly.
That's what it's all about.
And, in fact, this is now the biggest stumbling block to the plan for a new world order, is the fact that so many Americans have guns.
But I'll tell you something.
Here's what's really dark about all this.
Is that what it's going to lead to is violence, and it's going to lead to perhaps even civil war.
You mean if they try to actually take away?
Yeah, if they try to implement it, you know, that's when people are going to hunker down.
I know right here in Texas, and you know as well as I do, there are people here in Texas, when they come to take their guns, there's going to be firefights, okay?
Oh, absolutely.
It's going to be Waco to the 20th power.
But what about the foreign troops issue?
So a lot of people think, well, U.S. troops and U.S. National Guard won't engage in that, and there's a lot of evidence that at least half of the people won't.
But the foreign troops would do it.
But that's why we have all these foreign troops in this country right now.
Right, right.
What happened to the East German Army?
Okay, when communism collapsed, did they just all go home?
No, they were still in the army.
Well, I came over here.
They're in New Mexico.
What about Russian spasmist troops?
They're over here, too.
But how many troops are really here?
I've never seen personally reliable figures on how many are here.
I mean, it would take millions at some point, it would seem like.
No, no, it wouldn't take millions.
All they've got to do is just corral the big cities.
And that's why if armed violence does take place, I see the urban centers versus the suburban and rural areas.
And that's why they're making all this preparation to turn the cities into concentration camps, essentially.
Homeland Security is coming around and funneling money, billions, to the state and to the state transportation departments to put in traffic lights where there used to be a four-way stop sign.
Well, and don't forget the DHS bulletproof checkpoint booths and all the hollow point ammo and all that.
But, and you know, you say, oh, that's good.
We've got a new traffic light here.
But if you look, you also got RFID chip readers and cameras and facial recognition software.
It's all a company of that, okay?
So that you're not going to be able to go two blocks from your home without them knowing where you are and what you're doing.
Also, Jim, in Texas, they're stringing up all these cables in between the median of the highway so you can't turn around if you come up on a checkpoint.
Exactly.
That's going in all over the place.
And all you've got to do is ask yourself, hey, wait a minute.
Government's broke.
Half the people are broke.
Everybody's hurting for money.
Why are they spending these millions and millions and millions of dollars to putting up these steel cables and concrete dividers so that you can't turn around on a freeway?
I don't know about you, maybe I'm wrong, but I haven't noticed a huge problem with people trying to make a U-turn on a freeway.
No, I've never seen it happen, even in the areas where they're putting up the cables.
Let me ask you this.
So Larry Bell from Forbes magazine recently wrote that this U.N. small arms treaty, quote, if passed by the U.N. and ratified by our Senate, would almost certainly force the U.S. to do these following five things.
And he lists five things, and of course one of them is to ban the trade, sale, and ownership agreement.
weapons, which is just basically every farmer's rifle and every pistol that is out there, you know, create an international gun registry, override national sovereignty, confiscate and destroy all unauthorized civilian firearms.
So, but how, I mean, I just can't imagine Jim, this actually, I can't imagine anyone successfully doing this, at least not in Texas.
They could probably get away with it in maybe Chicago, of course, or Massachusetts or places like that, but not in Arizona, not in Northern California, Oregon, not in Montana, Wyoming, Florida, the whole Midwest.
I mean, come on.
You know, people who think that, well, they'll pass this law, and everybody will just give up their guns, and the local cops will come around and say, okay, this is illegal now, so you're going to have to give me all your guns.
You know, no, that ain't going to happen.
It's not going to happen.
Okay, what's going to happen, though, is that they will use this to start a series of Of raids, just like they're doing on unprocessed milk, right?
Yes.
Milk, for God's sake.
Yes.
Okay?
So if they can get armed SWAT teams to go after milk farmers, do you think they're going to have any trouble sending them after somebody's got a big cache of guns?
All right?
And, of course, the people go, oh, that's terrible, but, oh, well, I don't have, all I've got is a hunting rifle and a self-protection pistol.
You know, they won't come after me.
But when they start doing this, then, like you said, people in the states you mentioned, they're going to start buckling down.
They're going to go, no, and I mean no, and there's going to be gunfights, and then there's going to be civil unrest.
But that's what they want.
That's what Alex always explains, right?
They want that.
Then they can declare martial law, and all bets are off.
And then they can say it's the gun owners who are the terrorists, it's the gun owners who shot the police or the sheriff or whoever it was.
Oh, they shot Trayvon.
Oh, my God.
So take up everybody's gun.
And what they never point out is that Trayvon Martin, that story, that went all over the country.
It's still being covered.
And it just went on and on and on and on.
And yet since the first year, there have been thousands of people who have saved themselves and their property because they had a gun and they fought off a robber or an attacker.
Oh, absolutely.
You never hear those stories.
You never hear those stories.
No, and I can tell you from being in Central Texas and talking to ranchers and interviewing ranchers, you know, a rifle is a tool on a ranch.
Absolutely.
It's not a weapon.
It is a tool.
You can't raise chickens.
You can't raise livestock without a rifle to protect them from predators.
And then there's the whole property theft issue.
A lot of ranches, they get equipment stolen.
I mean, tractors, big equipment.
And they need a rifle, they need a pistol, they need a shotgun as a tool of farming.
If they give those things up, Jim, they're out of business.
And their herds and flocks will be eaten by predators.
Exactly.
And you're talking to the choir here because all about the country.
Yeah, I know.
Okay?
And I mean, a rifle is as necessary as a shovel.
Absolutely.
Okay?
can't you?
Yeah, I suppose you could.
Oh, well, let's outlaw shovels then.
You know, it's how stupid this whole thing is.
It's just insane.
And the thing is that the framers of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, they truly understood That's why the Second Amendment has really nothing to do with hunting or sports shooting or target plunking.
It has everything to do.
All you got to do is read the Federalist Papers, read the thoughts, letters of those guys who framed the Constitution, and they said it is the right and the duty of the public to be armed so that they could resist a tyrannical government.
Exactly.
But here's the thing I don't get.
I want to ask you this.
How on earth would anybody in the U.S. government go along with the U.N. telling us what to do on this?
But I mean, partially I know the answer.
For example, the World Trade Organization just banned the labeling of the country of origin for meat products in U.S. grocery stores.
How did they do that?
That's not a U.S. action.
So you say, how in the work do they do that?
Listen, I've been at it long enough that four years ago, I would have bet you good money that about half the laws and half the policies and half the things we're doing today could not be done.
And yet it's been done because people have been dumbed down.
People have been And they've been distracted by mass media.
And they, in fact, without getting too paranoid, there's even high-tech gadgetry, the HARP systems, the Gwentower.
Oh, yeah.
They're actually using advanced technology to mess with our heads.
We were just talking about drones in the last segment, Jim.
Will you stay with us for one more segment?
I have more questions for you.
This is happening, folks.
Let's talk about the drone crash in Maryland.
Alright, we'll talk about that.
Stay with us right here on the Alex Jones Show.
We'll be right back with Jim Mars and much more straight ahead.
Alright, continuing here on this Monday on the Alex Jones Show, this is Mike Adams filling in.
We're joined now by guest Jim Mars, author, researcher, observer of human history.
And hey Jim, do you have your Mylar space blanket poncho to be invisible to thermal imaging cameras on surveillance drones?
Oh yeah, yeah, yeah.
Actually I do, somewhere.
Yeah, you might have to whip that out someday.
We have all kinds of interesting props here on the show.
Well, no, here's the thing.
You go back to late last year, and the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office north of Houston announced that they were buying a $300,000 drone.
They call it a Shadowhawk helicopter that had the capacity, had the capability of carrying weapons.
It also carries a camera, a heat-seeking device.
And they said, oh, well, it's only going to be used for hunting criminals running from the police, you know, as well as drug investigations.
See, if it's not protecting women and children, then it's to fight drugs.
Yes.
And critics immediately said, well, hey, this could prove a hazard to air traffic and possibly even the public on the ground, never mind the privacy considerations.
And they said, oh, no, no, no, it'll be fine.
And yet, early this year, they were going to test a police-only test in Montgomery County, and they lost control of their little drone that smashed into their armored tank called the Bearcat.
Okay, so now, but it gets worse, all right?
Because just last month, near Salisbury, Maryland, a full-scale Global Hawk drone, belonging to the Navy, it's like about a million and a half dollars worth, crashed.
Into tributary of the Natakoki River near Salisbury, Maryland.
And they said, the Navy said, well, fatalities or injuries are, quote, unlikely.
Well, that's great.
What happens if it crashes into a housing development?
Well, there's the article on screen for those watching.
Yeah, Navy drone crashes.
But, you know, Jim, I've seen footage of small drones, almost micro drones.
This is the way they're really going for surveillance, is these little micro drones that can actually fly in formation.
They can construct things like building almost Legos in cooperation.
They can fly into your house, down the hallway, up the stairs, and they can transmit camera images live back to you.
I mean, they can actually explore your entire house with a little multi-rotor micro-drone.
That's happening today.
That exists now.
That's off-the-shelf technology.
It is.
Well, here's my plan, okay?
If one of these things flies over my house, I'm going to grab a shotgun and just bring it down.
If it comes into my house, I'm going to swat it with a lid fly swatter.
When they come and get upset about it, I'm going to say, well, I thought it was something, one of them E-Rabs, one of them terrorists.
I think they said, hey, good Americans, we'd never spy on each other, would we?
It's got to be an enemy device, so I just thought I was being patriotic, and I took it out.
There you go.
Well, I mentioned one of the countermeasures is going to be what I call drone-seeking drones, where civilians can build drones that are designed to fly at high speed into the other drone and thereby bring them both down.
Jim, we're almost out of time.
Any final thoughts to wrap it up?
Yeah, there's also this.
A group of computer researchers at the University of Texas at Austin had $1,000 worth of computer parts, and they claimed they could hack into a government drone.
And Homeland Security Department officials said, no, prove it.
And they did.
Got it wrong, Jim.
Thanks for being on the show, Jim.
That's Jim Mars, everybody.
▲
Export Selection