All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
April 2, 2026 - Lionel Nation
48:32
Tyler Robinson NOT GUILTY? Rifle Bullet NO MATCH = No Proof, No Confession! Prosecution CRUSHED
|

Time Text
Glitch Apology and Reality Check 00:03:11
All right, my friends, we are back to reality.
Let me apologize for that glitch.
I hope we have things back under control.
I think I corrected it.
First, before I begin anything, is this to your liking?
Am I coming across loud and clear without any glitches, any psychomotor problems that might impede upon your ability to enjoy the full context of my particular message today?
I'm not going to proceed.
A lesson until I get the word from people that you are happy and satisfied with this, and that I, in no way, am providing any type of individual problems for you because you know how this is.
And by the way, I appreciate your assiduousness in explicating, in limbing, and expatiating the particular problems that you find.
So there we go.
Now we're doing well.
Very good.
Very good.
Now, first and foremost, I must begin again by saying that everyone.
Not everyone, but a lot of people are just off the charts from what is happening right here.
I mean, off the charts.
TPUSA is having people on to repeat this, and not just TPUSA, but other people as well.
Just because, just because there are, just because there is no evidence of bullet fragments, just because there is nothing there, just because.
The bullet or the casings are not in any way retrievable, does not mean that he wasn't shot by that weapon.
You following this?
You hear this?
Just because there's no evidence that this weapon and the fragments found are in any way connected, just because.
It doesn't exist because either they were disintegrated, because the round itself is made to implode or explode or to expand.
Just because of that, that doesn't mean that that rifle did not shoot that round.
You hearing this?
You understand that?
Do you understand how preposterous that is?
Tell a jury that.
Just because, just because there's no, just because the evidence or the bullet round was somehow destroyed during the course of this does not mean.
So therefore, what?
What would you like us to do, Mr. Prosecutor?
What would you like us to do, TPUSA?
What would you like us to do, everybody else?
Would you like us to what?
Disregard that and say, I'm just going to assume it's from that rifle.
Because there's a distinction between the bullet did not match and the bullet does not exist.
The Pregnant Woman Testimony 00:02:47
Are you following this?
What difference does it make?
You're the jury.
Excuse me, yes.
Are you going to give us the evidence?
Thank you so much, me.
I'm sorry.
I don't want to mispronounce.
Thank you very much.
Are you going to provide to us a connection?
No.
No.
Sometimes things don't matter.
As I was trying to allude before, let's say you see somebody who is pregnant and they come to you and they say they're pregnant.
And you say that they're pregnant.
And he says, by the way, let me show you something.
You know what I've got here?
This did a home pregnancy test, assuming I'm the woman.
And why you want to tell if your home is pregnant or not, I have no idea.
And this is the test.
And look at the test.
The test says negative.
I'm not pregnant?
Is that what that means?
I'm not pregnant.
Is that what that means?
No.
The two have nothing to do with each other.
Okay.
Now, let's assume that I'm looking at this and I haven't seen the mother who was pregnant.
And I look at this test and I'm saying, well, I would venture to say that this is negative because that's all I have.
If.
You, let's assume you, let's assume Fred or mining or any of you fine people.
Let's assume that you, millicenten, let's assume that you are pulled over for drunk driving.
You blow into the machine, and the results of what you actually blow into the sample is off the chart 0.35, which would probably mean you were dead.
But let's assume.
0.35.
And you are just out of your mind.
And I blow into the machine and it says, or you blow it to it, it says 0.35.
A new world's record.
Great.
Then when we go to print everything out, it shuts down.
And I lost everything.
I lost the breath test, the data, the ticket, that slip that you use, everything.
It's all gone.
It doesn't exist.
Let's say there's no other chance to do another sample.
There's no other.
And I go to court and I have to explain to people that you were driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent your normal faculties were impaired.
Circumstantial Evidence Explained 00:15:24
Well, I might have independent evidence, I guess, because people can refuse and obviously they can be found guilty, but there's no evidence there.
Am I supposed to go to the jury and say, now listen, I know we don't have any evidence, but it's not because the evidence doesn't exist.
Something went wrong.
So I want you to just imagine, take our word for it, that this person blew a 0.35.
Okay?
Just because you don't have the evidence here doesn't mean, see, these things happen.
Sometimes they just, uh-huh, okay.
Well, that's terrific, but we're jurors.
Where's the evidence?
Like I said, you might have independent evidence.
You might have something else.
So, right now, the jury is going to be told now, listen, there's this gun.
And by the way, it's going to be interesting.
Do you do a motion in limonade to ask the judge, don't bring this gun up?
Why?
Because there's no connection.
The defense may say, don't bring this gun up because they're going to see this high powered Mauser 98 or whatever it is.
And they're going to look at this and they're going to say, huh.
But since there's no connection, for whatever reason, we want you to not bring this up, or maybe the defense wants to bring it up.
My advice always is don't bring anything up you don't need.
Don't make this complicated.
But what people are saying now is that the people who hate Candace love Tyler.
And the people who like Candace, so to speak, are rooting for Tyler.
And I know that's a very broad kind of a thing, but this is ridiculous.
This is broken down into the most insane confusion and argument, missing the point completely.
And I'm here to help you out with this one.
I'm here to help you out.
Whether the bullet around is shattered, Shadoobie, shattered by impact, whether it was designed to shatter, whatever.
There is no evidence, no proof that any bullet from that rifle is in Charlie.
Period.
No bullet, no match, no nothing.
Does that make any sense?
Do we all agree?
There is no evidence, none.
There is no evidence that that bullet from that rifle is in him.
There is no evidence of any connection between that rifle and Charlie.
Nothing.
Nothing.
The suspect may have owned it.
The suspect assumed may have brought it.
The suspect may have handprints or fingerprints on his own rifle, along with other people as well.
But do we all agree there's nothing to do with it?
This is a lint brush.
This has nothing to do with the dispatch and the tragic unaliving of Charlie.
I'm not going to introduce this in evidence.
Why?
Because there's no connection.
Yeah, but trust me, this had something to do with it.
Prove it.
Well, you got to take my word for it.
Okay.
They're getting upset because you're, well, just because, oh, who was it?
Somebody who was on Fox or something?
They said, well, it's very common for there not to be any evidence of any bullet fragment.
It's very common.
You know, sometimes it goes in and it explodes.
Sometimes, depending upon the particular type of round, it's intended to expand.
There aren't any grooves.
There aren't any, uh huh.
Okay.
So, why did you check it?
Well, we check it anyway.
So, what you're saying is, There was no connection between that rifle and Charlie Kirk, right?
Yeah, nothing.
Nothing.
No match, no proof, not guilty.
No confession.
No, nothing.
We'll get to that in a moment.
Does this make any sense?
Does this make any sense?
And people have a hard time.
They, honest to God, don't understand.
Now, here we go, and we got to do this.
You are a fraud.
Now, why is that?
Now, this is the thing which we normally do.
And by the way, I appreciate this.
And I ask people, come on, Fuller, come on, just have a seat.
Let's turn down the anger and tell me, what have I said to you just now that's fraudulent?
It's not my rules.
This is what they told me.
I'm not there.
They're telling me this.
Tell me what I've said that's wrong.
Tell me.
Many cases have been made on circumstantial evidence.
I agree.
Thank you.
Appears to be a patsy, though.
Now, circumstantial evidence is an interesting case.
Circumstantial evidence may or may not apply here.
Let me give you the idea of what circumstantial evidence is.
And that's a good point.
There's kind of direct evidence where you could say, I saw him.
I saw, felt, touched, smelled.
It was an experiential thing.
I saw this.
Or something hit me, or whatever.
Circumstantial evidence would be this.
This is what we, this is the classic law school definition.
It snows.
You go to bed.
When you go, you look outside, there's nothing there, just snow, beautiful snow.
You wake up in the morning and there's deer tracks or tracks of some animal.
Ah, there was an animal there.
I didn't see him, but I see the evidence of it.
You wake up in the morning and the ground is wet.
It rained.
I didn't see it raining, but this is what happens.
Circumstantial evidence might be difficult in this.
I want you to ask right now do me a favor.
Do me a favor, please.
This is important.
Tell me.
Tell me.
Tell me what evidence, if we move the rifle out of the, because there is no connection to this rifle and the murder of Charlie.
None.
You understand this, right?
I like when somebody says, This is my favorite.
The shell casing.
You mean the brass?
You mean the brass?
Where it was etched into the brass?
Is that what you're talking about?
You think that's going to do anything?
I don't have a weapon, but I've got brass.
This is take that, Charlie.
I've got the brass, whatever.
Is that what you think?
Is that what?
Tell me.
Now think about this.
Is that what people are suggesting?
Are you suggesting it's the brass?
Case that you'll find.
Remember, there's the round itself, there's the bullet, and then there's the brass casing that it fits into where the powder is.
Is that what you're suggesting?
Is that what you're suggesting?
You want to go to court with that?
You want to go ahead?
Go ahead.
Go to court with that one.
That's a good one.
Ladies and gentlemen, why?
Well, we found, well, you see, there's this brass here.
And maybe you can even show that.
Oh, look, the firing pin might have matched.
Huh?
Yeah.
Okay.
Terrific.
Well, this might have been from that rifle.
At some time in the past, maybe this was put inside and fired from this at some time in the past.
That's interesting.
Do you think that's going to establish anything?
You understand this?
Let me try this again.
Fred, bless his heart, Fred, but the brass had his manifesto scribbled all over it.
So what?
That's it.
What if there was a.38 caliber?
Brass, then you go, Well, that's for a pistol, or doesn't matter either.
What if his notebook was there?
What if what does that have to do?
What I'm saying is, you can take this rifle, you can take this and throw it away, disconnect it completely.
There is no evidence whatsoever connecting him to the round to whatever it was that killed him.
And by the way, further examination may indicate maybe it's not brass, maybe it's lead from something else.
This is very, very simple.
There is nothing to it.
Look at this poor one.
And I'm sorry to say this.
This is a.
They have the rifle too.
Okay.
They have a rifle.
They could have last roll call.
They could have a bazooka.
They could have a machine gun.
They could have had a derringer, a dirk, nunchucks.
They could have had everything.
There's no connection.
The jury's going to say, Excuse me, sir or ma'am, why are you showing me this rifle?
Well, that's his rifle.
What does this rifle have to do with Charlie?
Well, he owned it.
Okay.
He owned a rifle?
Yeah.
Okay.
All right.
And what about the rifle?
Well, that's the rifle that was used to kill Charlie.
Well, why are you saying that?
Well, because it's obvious.
Well, what's your connection?
Prove it.
Oh, I can't prove it.
But you have to take my word for it.
It's logical.
It makes sense.
You understand how ridiculous this is?
I mean, I'm sorry.
I know people are trying to.
And I know people are trying so hard because in their minds they're saying, I've got to convict this person, which is terrific.
Maybe you do hate him.
I don't care.
I mean, it's up to you.
But the jury's going to say, What do you want?
What do you give me this rifle for?
Don't you understand?
There was a rifle.
He was on the roof.
There was a shot fired.
That rifle probably. fired a round into Charlie and it disintegrated.
And this brass that was found behind, that was there.
And it's his.
Is it possible that somebody went into Charlie's home?
I know this sounds crazy.
And somebody got this rifle and planted it there.
What?
Nobody could ever do that, right?
Of course not.
Of course not.
But if I gave that, disprove that.
Disprove that.
Disprove the possibility that this was planted.
Disprove it.
This rifle that they couldn't find, that dogs couldn't find.
Dogs, some of the most trained dogs looking for bombs and explosives and all that.
But we're supposed to look to the way, oh, come on.
Come on.
That's what you're saying, right?
And I know because you're just.
Look at this.
Lionel is based.
I think you mean biased?
Not by.
I am biased by the truth.
You sound ridiculous with the grand conspiracy.
You see where we're going?
These are just ad hominems.
You're not.
There's no evidence of we've won.
I just won this argument.
I would pray, absolutely pray that the next time I'm in court, you're my adversary.
Because a judge would say, Excuse me, why are you saying this, sir or madam?
Why are you just, why is your refutation an attack against cold counsel?
Well, he's part of a conspiracy.
Well, why?
Well, I don't have any proof why.
All I know is that all you people are crazy.
You're into this.
Conspiracy.
Well, what's the conspiracy?
I don't know what the conspiracy is.
All I know is that, as far as I'm concerned, this Tyler killed Charlie.
That's it.
And all you keep asking for is proof.
Proof.
You want proof.
Proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Why do we even have a trial?
You keep wanting this trial.
Why do we have trials?
You know and I know what happened.
Why are we doing this?
Let's just find him guilty.
Come on.
Because what happens is you're just some Candace Owens acolyte.
That's what you are.
Brasilia Brasilia Brasilera Mia says, Don't you just love the sheep that will listen to the fake narrative regardless of facts?
Oh, Carla, absolutely.
These are people who supposedly believe in this wonderful thing called the Constitution.
Ladies and gentlemen, I want you to find him guilty.
Why?
Well, he confessed.
Confess to what?
Well, he confessed to this.
Let me ask you something.
Let me ask you this.
Let's say that you were to be there.
Let's assume, let's say Thomas or Brasileira, let's say you were there that day.
You were there.
You were there.
You took pictures and you were there at the scene.
Okay?
Let me ask you a question.
Hear me out.
You were there at the scene.
Immediately after this happened, you get in the car and you go to the police station.
You say, I want to turn myself in.
What?
I did it.
I did what?
I'm responsible.
I was there.
I was, I'm involved in this.
I'm the assailant.
I did it.
You did it?
Yes.
Okay.
And I'll sign it right now.
Should they arrest you and charge you and put you on trial if you said it?
Because, because if you were to find him guilty without any of this evidence, just based upon what he said, then you should be able to go in and mimic him and go in and say, you know what?
Forget this.
I didn't tell my parents.
I didn't tell my friend.
I went directly to the police.
I said, I did it.
Lock me up, put me in, throw me in jail.
Confession Without Proof 00:12:26
What about that?
Is it just a matter of just saying, I did it?
Well, you know, do you know how many people, you probably don't know this, and this may be a shock.
Do you know how many people called the police?
Do you know how many people called the police or probably told others and said, I did it?
Remember that crazy guy at first who was a distraction?
I don't know what that fellow was about, but I don't know what he said.
What is it about this man?
You're saying, well, the reason why is because they told me he's the guy.
They told me.
So let me ask you something.
What if he says, what if he said, yeah, I said that.
Is his confession alone or whatever he said, let's assume he said it.
Would you as a jury, you could say, well, that's good enough.
Find him guilty.
He confessed.
He confessed.
Okay, excuse me, what about me?
I confessed too.
That same day, I went to the police.
He confessed to his parents.
I went to the police.
What about me?
Why don't I count?
I want you to find me guilty.
Well, I texted people too.
Would you like to see my text?
Same day.
And I wrote these.
Hey, so and so, I did it.
I was responsible.
Sorry about this.
Remember, what he did was he said after the fact.
I could have said, had he done a lot of these things before, how he said, hey, I'm on my way to do someone in, that might be a little different.
But answer my question.
You have two people here.
He confessed and I confessed.
Why didn't they charge me?
Well, because you don't have a trans girlfriend.
Well, that's true.
I don't have that.
I don't have the guy with the woolly hip.
And we don't know where your rifle is.
But we know where his rifle is.
Yeah, but you can't connect the rifle with what happened.
It's just a rifle.
What if there were two rifles there?
What if they went and took every gun that he owned?
What if you took a gun that.
You see what I'm saying?
You're asking a jury to go back and find this guy guilty for what?
What's the evidence?
Beyond a reasonable doubt?
And then, and then, and put it this way this may not be, they may not even bring this, they may not bring this rifle up at all.
The judge could very well say, Based upon the totality of the circumstances, based upon what I'm seeing, based upon the fact that it's not connected to anything.
I mean, it was there, I guess they found it.
Did they actually check to see whether it was fired?
I don't know.
Did they ever check to see that GSR, that gunshot residue?
They used to call it paraffin and nitrogen.
Did they ever do that to find out whether he was in my.
Don't know.
Okay.
See what is, you have, many people have banked their case.
It's Tyler.
That's it.
I know he did it.
And for no other reason, for no other reason than because this is their team.
Their team says it's him.
And you know that if it's not, you know who's going to benefit?
Candace.
This is her guy.
And if she wins this, she wins again.
She's right again.
Brasiliera Mia says he may very well end up finished.
If credible evidence emerges, they will ensure he is silenced before he can speak the truth or explain why he was involved.
Oh, it's funny you say that.
If ever there was somebody who absolutely screamed, screamed for do him in, because remember, if he goes away, this is all moot.
It's done.
If something happens where he is.
Made to look like he was self unalived, a la our friend Jeffrey.
It could very well be like people say, Well, that's it.
That says it 100%.
That's it right there.
See, we were right the whole time.
That Candace is wrong.
Why would somebody do that if they were innocent?
And you're going to say all kinds of things.
This is, people don't know anything about not only that, but kind of the way the courtrooms work.
See, they also think that because.
They have ideas, and I've heard this, and I'm not in a position to argue that this was the left.
This was Kash Patel or the FBI or this was TPUSA or this was ERICA or this was Israel or Germany or the United States or the deep state.
Yeah, that's it.
And people will say, that's what happened.
And that hypothesis will blend into, that's what happened.
There's no evidence of it, it doesn't have to be evidence.
I know what happened.
I know what happened.
Really?
Can you prove it?
Why do you keep asking whether I can prove it?
Because in our system, you've got to prove it.
Innocent until proven guilty means that the prosecution has to prove it.
You don't have to say anything.
You don't have to put anything out there.
Nothing.
You don't have to say anything.
And if for some reason this judge says, you know what?
I'm going to suppress this.
Yoda, a Yoda duck says bias equals admiration for someone acting authentically.
Or based, I guess it is.
Based or biased?
Interesting.
Now, remember, I think the world of Candace and everybody else in that matter, I don't care what Candace says.
This has nothing to do with Candace.
Nothing.
Or Barron or anybody else.
Nothing.
Ian Carroll, nothing.
I don't care about that.
It makes no difference whatsoever.
Nothing.
I may be able to sit there and say, now let's go beyond what happened.
Sometimes we're, it's funny, O.J. Simpson, we knew he killed these people.
But can you prove it?
Oh, it's a different story.
Can you prove it?
That's our system says you got to prove it.
But we know he did it.
Oh, I could tell you exactly how it happened.
But how do I prove something just because I kind of know what happened?
We know that JFK was killed probably as part of a conspiracy, a cabal, whether it's the deep state, whether it's the CIA, FBI, whether it's who knows.
But we know what happened.
We know it.
We know it.
But can you prove it?
No.
No.
Can't prove it.
There's no evidence of it, but we know what happened.
Just because we can't prove it doesn't mean we don't know.
And that's true.
That's absolutely true.
If you know that somebody, let's assume that you know there's a criminal, a mob member, somebody who's on the stand, or somebody who's being charged, and all the witnesses are somehow disappeared and all of the evidence goes bye bye, what does that mean?
In law, civil and criminal, sometimes there's something called spoliation, where people will injure, interestingly enough, they will destroy the evidence.
We had a case one time where there was a case involving an alleged civil rights violation, and there was a concern, turned out not to be, but there was a concern that the videotape, which is normally kept, was not there, as in the case of Epstein, how that tape wasn't there.
Later on, something was retrieved.
There's ways around this.
You can say, well, we can go before a judge and ask for some kind of sanction motion, a jury instruction.
But the bottom line is simply this it's not there.
I told you, let's assume I'm a prosecutor and I have evidence of a 0.35 blood alcohol level or blood alcohol content, BAC, 0.35.
And after it's done, something malfunctions.
It doesn't work, it breaks down, it clears.
And it's gone.
The evidence is gone.
Or it's lost in the mail.
What do I do?
I can't prove my case, but I know what I saw.
I know you did.
And I know I was there.
I know you did.
But you can't read off what you remember seeing.
It doesn't work like that.
Yeah, but I was there.
I think I reeked of alcohol.
Go ahead and say that.
You can say what you smelled.
Maybe you can say he was acting weird, whatever.
That information you have, you can't bring it up.
Why?
It doesn't exist.
It's not there.
And there is no connection between that rifle and the bullet or the fragment or whatever's found inside Charlie.
Von Reichen says Do you believe that Eric is completely unaware of the boom plan?
Is it E R E K?
Erica?
Is that what you mean, Erica?
You understand this?
And by the way, this is something about Lionel is all about the truth.
Thank you for that, but not really.
I know that the truth is one thing.
It's I'm after what you can prove.
The Fifth Amendment says innocent until proven guilty.
I don't really know who's involved.
It could be anybody.
I honestly, yeah, Erica, I don't think Erica knew anything.
Of course not.
I'm telling you right now, you've got a very, very, if I had to guess, this has nothing to do with a criminal trial.
Nothing to do.
This is just my opinion.
But if I had to, if you had to show, if you had to prove, or you had to indicate some kind of a connection to proving either Erika, TPUSA, Israel, Mossad, Bibi Netanyahu, Kash Patel, Donald Trump, that might say, you know what?
That might make sense.
That could very well be, they would have an incentive.
Cui bono, qui protests, they would benefit for sure.
Absolutely.
What evidence is here?
Nothing.
Nothing.
Yeah, but don't you understand that Charlie was saying some pretty interesting things, some pretty, pretty tough stuff about the president and war with Iran.
And that's true.
He sure did.
And a lot of people didn't like that.
So, what does that mean?
Well, that might be a great motivator.
But there's got to be a connection.
What about that?
What about that?
What about this?
There are a lot of people in TPUSA worried about this Doge report.
They knew, Charlie knew, there was some shenanigans going on.
He didn't like what he was seeing.
He didn't like what was going on.
He thought, where's my money?
I'm going to bring this one.
Aha!
Therefore, maybe somebody in TPUSA.
That could be a very good motivation.
Any proof of that?
No.
No.
Could be.
Maybe you've got Tyler, whatever his face saying, I hate that guy.
I want to.
You know, there's a, you'll hear sometimes people will say that Iran, quote, Iran, or somebody said, Death to America.
And they say, aha.
Motive Behind the Shenanigans 00:12:08
And I say, well, that's not the rarest of things, but what does that mean?
Who said that?
We say, anyway.
So some things, some stories or some facts are interesting from a political point of view.
They might go for a detective.
You know, when you read a detective novel, you don't care about reasonable doubt, you don't care about anything.
You don't.
But what's happening is that when you get to court, it's a different story.
And that's the point I'm trying to tell you.
This is my area.
This is my conjecture and everything else.
You could, some of the deep dives are fantastic.
What Candace has done is Baron as well.
You know, the tarmac hug and Mitchell, Mitch Snow and Fort Huachuca.
That's fantastic.
Has nothing to do with this.
Can't introduce that.
What does that have to do with it?
Issue number one, Mr. Prosecutor, this is all up to you.
Can you prove beyond and to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt, every reasonable doubt, beyond up to moral certainty?
There's all kinds of variations, but can you believe it?
That Tyler Robinson was responsible for Charlie Kirk's death.
Premeditated, malice aforethought, premeditated.
Can you?
Yes.
How do you plan to do that?
We found some shell casings.
Okay.
What about the rifle?
Well, we'd rather not talk about it.
But that's a long story.
What about it?
Well, for reasons that's of nobody's fault, we can't connect the rifle to.
Oh, I see.
So that.
That fragment that was found inside Charlie, that's, well, no.
Where'd that come from?
I don't know.
Is it from the wifi?
Probably.
Is it a bullet fragment?
And by the way, you haven't seen anything yet until you get the report.
And there's some forensic pathologist, some ME medical examiner who signs off on it.
And you give it to an expert, your expert, and say, read through this.
What do you see?
Ooh, look at this.
Here's something nobody knew about.
Here's something we didn't know.
Do we have any pictures?
Show us the picture.
Let me see this, the wound cleaned up.
Let me see it.
Have you ever, if you've ever seen it, especially whatever their stabbings, they take a piece of doweling like a stick, like one of these, and you will see it to show the angles.
They will connect entrance with exit to show you where it's coming from.
I don't even know if that's possible.
And if you look to somebody and say, Would you please show me the retrieved fragments?
If somebody looks at it, I don't know what these are.
These don't even resemble anything involving what would have been around.
I don't know what this is.
This is metal.
I don't know what this is.
May we look at this?
May we analyze this?
Sure.
Guess what?
That's not lead or that's not whatever it is.
This may be something.
You, we don't know anything.
Remember this analogy.
We're standing outside a theater, excuse me, a stadium, and we're trying to guess the score by listening to the sound of the crowd.
It's.
Impossible.
We don't know anything yet.
We think we know.
And then these other people, oh, everybody's too.
Well, I was in military.
It could be a 222 762.
It could be 35 36.
It could be this.
It could be a mouse.
It could be a 222 223 255 222 121.
And a lot of times they just want to show you look how much I know.
Look at me.
I'm covered in tattoos.
I was in the special forces or I was Delta or I was a SEAL Team 6.
I'm a warrior.
This is my podcast.
This is me.
I know what I'm talking about.
Drop the tattoos, got my tattoos.
And I'm not making fun of anybody, but say, okay.
What does this have to do with court?
I don't know about court, but I'm going to show you all that you need to know about a rival.
And then I'm constantly hit with, well, I've been a hunter and I shot with a 30 out of 6.
If that bullet would have hit you, your head would have come clean off.
It's okay.
So what are you saying?
Wow, it wasn't a 30 out of 6.
I don't care.
What do you mean you don't care?
I don't care what it was.
I'm not, they didn't say it was a 30 out of 6.
They didn't say nothing.
They just showed, I think they showed this rifle.
And maybe the best thing is to have them say, to put this into evidence and have me just destroy it and just say, for Tyler's benefit, there's no connection at all.
And have the jury say, well, there's no connection of anything as opposed to let's keep the evidence out.
Let's keep the gun out completely.
Then what do you do?
You got a confession.
Goes back to what I said.
What if I confessed?
What if you confessed and you were there?
Why doesn't your confess take?
Same evidence with you.
You wrote some stuff.
You've got a rifle.
They didn't bring your rifle.
You've got rifles.
You could have done it, let's say.
See, forget everything else.
And when Candace goes up and she kind of snarls and she's beautifully sarcastic and sardonic, this drives people nuts.
That's what this is about.
It has nothing to do with whether nobody cares about Tyler Robinson, one way or the other.
Nobody does this.
Yoda Duck says, Is there any report of whether the rifle fired at all?
That's a great question.
That's what I ask.
I don't know.
That's a start.
What if somebody says, Yeah, there's residue.
It was fired.
When was it fired?
I don't know.
Maybe there's a way of telling it by the newness of the deposit.
I have no earthly idea.
It'd be hell.
What about did anybody check to see whether he fired anything?
There's no pictures.
Do we have any.
Any video of Tyler confessing?
I want to see the confession.
I want to see what the parents are saying.
See, a lot of people are saying they brought him in because they were worried that he was going to perhaps meet some police officer who goes to their house and does something horrible, maybe in the middle of the night.
Who knows?
That's what they were concerned with.
At three o'clock in the morning, there's a bang on the door and they take him out.
See, we don't know anything.
There could be the most incriminating piece of evidence or evidence of pieces that we don't know anything about.
What I'm trying to tell you is, and I know people get very, very upset.
Oh, you're a conspiracy theory.
You're a liar.
This is internet.
Get this stuff all the time.
There are people who just get very upset.
They get so upset.
They have no interest.
And it's just, it's a fight.
I don't think, do you really think anybody cares about Tyler Robinson?
Seriously, other than Tyler Robinson, does anybody care about him?
Does this?
Or do you care about him?
When I say I care about him, I care about somebody on trial.
But what interests me is that we are lied to constantly.
We're lied to about Epstein.
We're lied to about everybody.
I'm tired of being lied to.
And it's not so much who these people are, it's the fact that you're doing this again to me.
You're bringing them up.
And you're putting me in the position of wondering again is anybody telling me the truth?
So if it's Tyler or if it's whoever it is.
There was a case a while back Casey Anthony.
Remember this?
Casey Anthony had a daughter, Kaylee Anthony, I believe, a little beautiful girl.
And they found her skull.
It was in a pond or something, just a skull.
No evidence of the skull, no evidence of gunshot wound, trauma, nothing.
And as you know, don't forget the four sources of death Nash, natural, accidental, suicide, homicide.
And when they did this, when they.
When they were involved and they were doing these investigations and all this kind of jazz, what happened was I predicted, I was on TV at the time, I said, She's going to be found not guilty because you can't even prove if it was a homicide.
You don't know anything.
You have a skull.
That's all there was.
And then they said, Yeah, but there was a cadaver dog made a finding or alerted to what they believed to be the smell of death or decomposition in the trunk of the car.
Courts ruled that's not admissible.
What does that mean?
What does that mean?
Can you tell human versus animal, whatever?
No.
So I predicted, I said that she is going to be found not guilty.
Now, do I believe she killed her?
Yes, of course.
Can they prove it?
No.
Uh uh.
Nope.
George Zimmerman, Trayvon Martin, remember that?
This drove people crazy.
They said they're going to find him not guilty.
This time using a defense, it was something called the Stand Your Ground defense in Florida.
And I don't want to sound like these people.
You know, a lot of people said, you know, I've been saying this since day one.
You know, when I first heard this, I said, and I told you, I said this is, and people love to do this because people love to, you know, you got to be braggadocious.
But what I'm telling you is very, very simple.
And I know people get very upset.
And you can see this.
There are people that get very upset.
They get very angry.
They call me a conspiracy theorist.
It's like, well, there's really no conspiracy.
I mean, no, there is no conspiracy because you can't prove it.
Can't prove any of this stuff.
But I want you to think about this.
I want you to go back and ask yourself this question What if you were there and you decided to confess yourself?
What's the difference between your confession that you made up and Charlie's, excuse me, Tyler's, provided he really did confess?
Because people say, well, you know, there's a confession.
What good is a confession?
Confession of what?
I know this is difficult.
I know it's counterintuitive.
I know it doesn't seem to make sense, but I know what I'm talking about.
And I have no love loss from this guy, he is probably somebody I would not like or care for.
I think these people are weird.
And the girlfriend, boyfriend with the fuzzy, I'm tired of these people.
But that's not the issue.
That's not the issue at all, period.
It's not a matter of the question is can you prove this thing?
Nope.
Can you prove it?
Nope.
No, can't prove anything.
You can't even prove whether he shot him or whether he even possessed a weapon that was even used or fired towards him.
And by the way, in a way that's good, because let me ask you this what if it was another rifle and another angle?
And what if our friend, what if this is not a legal defense, but what if Tyler had nothing to do with this?
What if he was just kind of a patsy, kind of brought in just for the case, just for there?
What if it was somebody else?
Maybe the reason why they also don't want you to show one connection is that you'll find out wait a minute, there's another rifle and it does have its identifiable.
And by God, even though we don't have grooves and striations and rotations and all this, it's still pretty good.
See, we don't want this.
We don't want there to be anything that is remotely identifiable because it very well could be another shooter from another place and that he was just there.
Do you think that was Tyler on the roof?
The Patsy Theory 00:02:32
Do we know this for sure?
That's not the issue.
You could say, I was there.
Yeah.
If you were there, stipulate to it.
See, I was there.
I never said I wasn't.
A lot of people were there.
All those other people were there.
You're talking to them?
Somebody, there was somebody there that day who did this.
And you're only talking to me?
You mean to tell me out of all the people?
How many, how many calls have you received, Detective so-and-so, from people claiming to have done this?
You never talked to them.
Why is Tyler so special?
What is with Tyler?
Why?
And for the last time, if you picked up the phone that day and called the police and said, I did it, they'd say, ah, I got it.
Or would they say, we're sending somebody right over.
If they really didn't know who it was, if they really didn't have an active interest in proving him, they would do that.
But they didn't do that.
Now, is that provable?
Uh-uh.
Now remember, if there's something else out there, let's see it.
If he did it, fine.
Justice, truth.
Can you prove it?
That's all.
So, don't get upset.
I know a lot of people get upset.
We're all friends here.
We're not arguing.
This is not politics.
This isn't who's right or who's wrong.
It's not about Trump or Candace and nothing to do with it.
Not saying that.
We have to be dispassionate.
That's all.
That's simple.
So, my friends, I thank you.
Thank you so, so, so very, very much.
And by the way, remember something I couldn't care less.
Not I could care less.
I couldn't.
Be the first person on your block never to say, I could care less.
Doesn't make any sense.
It never did.
And don't be upset if people come, because remember, listen, if you have an open forum, they're entitled to say their speech.
And by the way, they can probably do more to focus us on reality than anybody else can.
That's all.
All right, my dear friends, have a great and a glorious day.
I am going to be back this Eve for a follow up on this.
I'll be reading some other stuff and keeping up to speed.
Thank you so much for watching.
Thank you so much for your very kind words and your contributions and your super chats and the like.
And don't forget to follow Mrs. L at Lynn's Warriors on YouTube.
A great site, great and critical issues.
All right, my friends, until we see each other tonight, remember monkey's dead, shows over sue you.
That, that.
Export Selection