All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
April 2, 2026 - Lionel Nation
44:48
TPUSA Explodes If Tyler Robinson Walks Free – Turning Point USA Chaos Incoming!
|

Time Text
Approaching A Fascinating Case 00:14:50
Good evening, dear friend.
We are approaching, well, not approaching, we are in the middle of, in the midst of, one of the most fascinating cases I have ever seen.
I'm trying to think of the last time that I and we were part of a scrum, a movement, a revolution, a, I don't know what the, I don't know what the particular phrase is, but this movement that we are seeing, which is so incredible.
It started initially with obviously Candace and her popularity.
She was very, very interesting, and I thought it was interesting regarding Brigitte McCrone, but that's not something that we weren't as participatory in and regarding as we are now.
And what's interesting about that is we watch this, but now we're involved in this.
We are a part of this.
We are in the.
This maelstrom, this riot, this scrum, this consortium, this cadre, this I don't know what you want to call them.
It's wonderful.
And what's interesting is that the level of, between Baron Coleman and Candace, the amount of research is ungodly.
I don't know how, I can't imagine they're working by themselves.
There's just no way.
Just the firepower of collating this evidence.
But I've never seen such depth regarding people, organizations, levels.
Candace tonight, in her, the Brigham Young, the Mormon connection, Utah, Romney, the hospital, CIA.
Dear God.
Unbelievable.
I sometimes step back and I'm just.
Absolutely gobsmacked, waylaid by the complexity and by how complicated this is.
It is beyond fascinating.
And when Candace says, We're going to take a week off because we're going to research, dear God, she pulls this together every single day.
And Barron, too, by the way, to have much respect for him.
Much, much, much respect.
So we're looking at some interesting folks.
I want to.
I think you just opportunity maybe to meet more.
I'm in conversations with Jimmy Dore.
I wonder, we're going to meet, we're going to collaborate.
I'm also, I just got off the horn, not on the phone, but the email with.
Coach Colin, who I think is just terrific.
Each of them have a different flavor and a different way of looking at it.
And it's phenomenal.
It's like being in a band and you're playing with some of the best musicians and they have a take on this.
Mine is obviously more sterile.
It's courtroom.
And that's the most important part.
Everything else is terrific.
What Candace was talking about today.
would never come into a courtroom in the least because it's not germane to any material issue.
It doesn't.
See, court is a very, very simple thing.
Remember the old days, there was a notion, the idea of the speakeasy.
You'd knock on the door and they would slide this little thing and you'd say, Jerry sent me.
Nope, that's not it.
Lamont sent me.
Nope.
Candace sent me.
You're in.
Same person.
Different code word.
Different reference.
That's what this is.
That's the interesting part.
That's the rules of evidence.
And the prosecutor tees it up.
He's the one coming to me.
He's coming to me.
He's a comic telling me a joke.
And I can either react.
I get it or I don't.
I can't help him with a punchline.
I can't fill in the blanks.
I can't maybe assist him.
No.
He hit me with this rendition of the facts.
He's in charge.
He had all the time in the world to think about this.
He could have charged, you know, Tyler with anything, however he wanted to do it.
This is the best he can do.
Okay, fine.
Okay, fine.
That's okay.
Do it.
And that's what we're talking about.
And it's beautiful.
And I was watching this, Andrew Colvin.
Oh, these TPUSA people.
First of all, these are not bright people.
These are not bright people.
From a PR point of view, one of the things I don't understand is, you know, they are quasi.
Religious in setup.
They're almost like a church, but you think they would say, listen, we're putting all of our faith in the Lord, in Jesus, in God.
We trust that they will, the Trinity will guide this accordingly.
I'm not invested in Tyler Robinson being convicted if he's not guilty.
If the evidence doesn't show it, and if a guilty verdict would be contrary to the rules of due process, I, as a Christian, cannot say, Yeah.
So I don't know.
I may know a lot, but I don't know as much as the investigators.
I don't know as much as the FBI.
So why are they so invested in this?
Why are they so invested?
It is unseemly.
They're so stupid.
Same thing with NumNuts, with Erica.
Why is she doing this?
They could say, I'm not a prosecutor.
We have a job to do.
We have an organization to run.
And you would think, as I've told you a million times, they should continue on and proceed with the future of TPUSA and not this.
They should act as though they care about spreading the word of Charlie, not in convicting him.
Why do they want him convicted?
What do they know?
Are they aware of the facts of the case?
And by the way, she was the one who said, I forgive him.
And then she files a motion for a speedy trial.
She wants him summarily dispatched.
The level of hypocrisy is beyond anything you have ever heard.
Going back to Candace tonight, can you imagine all these people listening to her?
And she talked about that talent agency, which is a front for CIA recruiting.
And I wish they would say, do you have an idea of who this woman is?
Who is it?
How does she know this?
She's flashing pictures, and this one went to BYU, and this one went to high school with this one, and Romney's daughter, and Romney, and this, and the doctor, and he was described in terms of the emergency room at this.
And somebody says, Excuse me, yes, do you know who this woman is?
Yes, who is she?
How does she know this about us?
Look at Lori, by the way.
I hope Eric's mother's okay.
Lori Franz, remember her.
Each corporation, each.
Each limited liability corporation, each corporation, everything, they knew everything.
It was eerie, unbelievable.
They knew everything.
This is just, I've never seen anything like this.
And today, when we were doing this, which I'm going to explain to you today again, TPUSA is going to, there's a real good chance that this guy's going to be acquitted.
Acquitted.
Acquitted.
Remember, and don't lose sight of what I'm saying.
Not because he didn't do anything, because they can't prove anything.
And I'm not trying to hedge my bets.
I'm not trying to say he did anything.
I don't know.
That's not the way our system works.
You have to prove it.
He didn't have to prove anything.
Nothing.
And I was watching, somebody sent me this thing from Fox News.
What are these people about?
They said, well, we're talking today, somebody from FBI or ATF, and he said, Just because it is, oh, he said it's incorrect to say that there is no evidence of this merely because the fragment, the bullet fragment, did not match.
That doesn't mean there's no evidence.
It just means, well, what?
Or that doesn't prove he didn't do anything.
That just, it's normal.
It's very normal not to have a match.
What difference?
Tell that to a jury.
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I know we haven't connected this rifle, but.
It's very common for this to happen.
So just take that into account.
It's very common.
So consider it as though it had been connected.
Please.
Now, I'm going to give you this example.
And the word is Patsy.
Donovan, by the way, says Candace Owens taking a week off to look into the Romney angle.
Oh, my God.
I know she is just.
Oh.
She is, there's nothing like her.
Nothing.
I've never seen anything like her.
And when people say, you know, a lot of folks don't have the intellectual wherewithal, the ability to keep focused, people are having no problem whatsoever keeping focus with this.
None whatsoever.
And the more minutiae, the better.
But I want you to understand something.
And see if you can just step back for a moment, and I want you to ask your friends this because I want to give you some stuff you should ask friends of yours because you might meet somebody.
This morning or this afternoon, we met at noon.
We did a two part thing, which I kind of like that because I like when I'm talking to you, I like the fact that I see you, I know you're there.
It changes my perspective as opposed to me just speaking into this void and then later on hoping somebody understands it.
In any event.
The jury is going to be sitting there, and they're going to say as follows.
Ladies and gentlemen, let's assume I'm the prosecutor.
We want you to find that the state of Utah, the people of Utah, the province, whatever it is, of Utah, has proved beyond and to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt that that man, Tyler Robinson, did on the 10th day of September, did.
With malice aforethought and premeditation, did, and now we're going to say, what do I say?
Did a keel Charlie Kirk?
How?
By gunshot.
Really?
Yes.
And we want you to find that we have proved this case beyond.
A reasonable doubt.
That Tyler Robinson, that man, was at UVU in, you always have to say, did all this happen in the county or whatever?
Yes, because you have to establish venue.
You have to make sure, because this state attorney or this prosecutor, this DA, only has jurisdiction in this area.
So you have to say this.
Lionel, I'm a big fan of yours and Lynn Blessings.
Thank you, Ivan.
Thank you, sir.
I'm a big fan of my wife, too, who is beyond.
Wait till you see when she talks about AI slop and AI psychosis.
She has a brand new video coming up at Lin's Warriors.
Just putting it up right now, finishing touches.
Please watch.
So anyway, so we had some people today, some were getting upset.
They said, I'm a conspiracy theorist, I'm a clown, or whatever.
Okay.
That means I'm winning here.
So these people are going to be asking themselves, how is it exactly, how is it exactly that we might find, for example, I can't say you are charged with killing so and so.
How?
I don't know.
Just, you just did.
Well, why is that important?
Because we may not have a gun.
We may not have the rifle, the rifle, the Mauser 98 or whatever it is.
We might not have that.
And you have to ask the question.
I think it might be better for the defense to say Judge, if you cannot connect that rifle to this event, keep it out.
Don't bring it up.
Don't say Mauser.
Don't show something with a telescopic sight on it.
Because you might as well put a bazooka.
What if he put a bazooka up there?
That's not connected either.
Look at this.
Ivan just gifted five memberships.
Thank you, Ivan.
Thank you, sir.
Imagine if they did this.
If they said, we have one of those elephant guns.
Remember that with a big muzzle?
One of these things like from Elmer Fudd, these big hunting.
That's not either.
Well, what if you put that there?
There is no connection to this.
I'm going to say this again.
There is no connection of the rifle to anything.
Nothing.
No Connection To The Gunshot 00:02:44
They said, well, the.
There's DNA on it.
So what?
I keep saying there's DNA on a lint brush.
What does that have to do with anything?
This wasn't used in it either.
Well, there was DNA.
Yes, there was, you know, there was Tyler's DNA and other people's DNA.
It's his gun.
And we also don't know, was it fired?
Is there any residue on Tyler's arm or cheek or clothing?
We have no idea.
But there's no connection.
But the bullet shells, the shells where the writing was, were of the same caliber that would have fit that rifle.
So what?
It's a 30-odd six.
Do you know how many 30-odd sixes there are?
Do you know?
Do you see what they're doing?
So the jury is saying, why are you bringing up this rifle?
Because we know something.
Well, what do you know?
Well, we know that in this case, we know that one.
So, I, as a defense lawyer, I'm going to say, I want you, Your Honor, I'm going to suppress this.
I don't want a picture of that.
I don't want you to bring that rifle in.
They may see that big rifle, that gun with a scope, and they might say, Aha, that's what they did.
There's no connection.
Do you understand what I'm saying?
There is no connection.
And they say, well, how do you know there's a connection?
How do you know?
Well, it was because it was his.
How do you know it was his?
How do you know it wasn't planted?
How do you know anything?
How do you know this is Tyler's weapon?
How do you know this?
I don't know.
No one knows this.
No one knows this.
That's the part which is the most critical about this.
No one knows this.
So, why are you going?
So, don't be surprised if the court decides you're not going to say it at all.
Period.
You're not going to mention it.
And if you're not going to mention it, the defense may say, don't bring it up at all.
So, there goes your case.
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we want you to find him guilty of, well, how did he die?
Ah.
Oh, gunshot, moon.
Yeah, gunshot.
Gunshot, yeah.
A gunshot?
What kind of gun?
Well, we'd rather not say.
We've been instructed by the judge, and by the way, it may be even impossible to do this.
We've been instructed by the judge not to bring up the gun, not to bring up the rifle.
Why We Cannot Mention The Rifle 00:11:25
Really?
Why?
Well,.
We can't tell you.
We can't tell you that the reason is because there's no connection to it.
Now, let me ask this question.
Stop for a second.
New question, new point, new everything.
Ready for this?
Okay.
Let's assume that you, the next day on September the 11th, on September the 11th of last year, let's say you walked into a local police station and let's say that you decided.
That you are going to turn yourself in.
You hear what I'm saying?
You're going to turn yourself in.
And Donovan says Can the defense release these 600,000 documents in the public for freelance research?
Would it be admissible?
It's a very interesting question.
I know nothing, unless it is something that is considered, for whatever reason, classified or part of some kind of, I don't know, maybe there's some trade secret or something that.
Probably not.
Now, why you'd want to do that, I don't know.
But I will tell you this much.
What I would do is I would flood.
I would say, if you would like to be a part of our team, look at this, send a video or whatever, a handheld video to us and tell us what you see.
We have more people who are experts, who were in war, who were in the military, who know more about this than you can possibly imagine.
More than you can possibly imagine.
And it would be perfect for this.
Perfect.
So go ahead, flood it.
Why not?
You got nothing to hide.
Didn't I look good?
I got nothing to hide.
Why?
We didn't do it.
Okay.
We're also going to get into the issue, and I can only surmise what I'm hearing is, and what people have suggested, is that he didn't confess to anybody.
That when he says, Look, they're after me.
They're after me.
And I don't know what to do.
And a friend or somebody says, You better turn yourself in because if they find you on the street or if they find you out and about, they might do you in.
So you mount it and say, you know what?
It's a good idea.
That's a very, very good idea.
I might do that.
If there's no confession, if there's no confession, now remember also, if he doesn't, provided he lives this long, if he doesn't take the stand, which most people, you can almost bet he's not going to take the stand.
But can you imagine if not only he takes the stand, but his father said he never confessed to this?
He was there.
He didn't particularly, maybe he didn't like it.
Maybe he didn't like it.
Charlie, I don't know.
But he never confessed to us.
Why do you keep saying he confessed to us?
He never did.
It never happened.
What are you talking about?
Oh, yes, he did.
No, he didn't.
Did you ever see him confess at the police station?
Did you ever see any videotape of that?
Did you ever see that where you sign your name and you wave Miranda?
You knowingly and intelligently wave.
You sign this.
You say, I am telling you right now, I have nothing to do with it.
I signed it.
You got that?
Did you ever see anything about that?
You ever see that picture?
Like you see where they're at this table, this stark room, and they say, You know, Tyler, can I get you some water?
Do you have a lawyer?
Would you like to talk to somebody?
No.
What happened?
Many people, believe it or not, want to tell you.
We don't know anything.
And if there's no confession, or if the confession is knocked out because it violates some rules, then what do you have?
Nothing.
What?
Nothing.
And this, this, this, um, Colvet and all these TPUSA people are saying, Oh, no, no, we have a good authority that this case is open and shut.
We don't need the rifle.
Really?
Okay.
Well, what do you have?
Wow.
Admissions.
Not so fast.
But let me ask you this question to make the point.
You walk in and you say, I am Laura Floyd.
Here I am.
I am Laura Floyd.
I'm Hillbilly.
Nice to meet you.
Is this a police station?
Yes.
I did it?
What?
Charlie Kirk.
I did it.
You did it?
I did it.
How'd you do it?
Don't you want me to read your rights?
Yeah, okay.
Do you think this case is as big as the OJ case?
Bigger.
Bigger in terms of the complexity of the issue.
Because in this case, he may very well, or many people are of the opinion, he didn't do anything.
OJ, we knew he did it.
What was interesting about OJ was the flash and the glamour and all these other people that were involved in it.
But he, by the way, he was important.
He's different.
He's very, very different in this particular case.
He didn't, he did not.
We don't think he did either.
It's a different story.
Just let me tell you, if he's acquitted, they will, Colvet and these guys are going to just lose their minds.
And Erica, I don't even know what she's going to do.
And I'm thinking, why do you even care about this?
Your success is not contingent upon this.
Why are you so interested in finding him guilty?
It's unseemly.
Why are you doing this?
Why are you doing this?
But let me go back again.
Laura Floyd walks in and says, I'm a, I was there and I shot Charlie.
Arrest me.
What would the police do?
Do you have a gun?
No, neither do you.
When that gun is suppressed, Or when any reference is made to it, the jury is going to be advised, is going to be instructed that there's no connection.
So in my invisible gun, it wasn't connected either.
But I did it.
So you have to take my word for it.
And I'm confessing.
He confessed theoretically to his father.
I'm confessing to you, the police.
Arrest me.
Take me in.
They're not going to do it.
Why?
Because he's got to be the guy.
He's got to be the guy.
Why?
Because that's apparently how this narrative is going to run out.
That's how it works.
He's the guy.
You see what I'm saying?
They are hell bent on him.
He's got to be found.
So let's go back again.
What do we have?
We have a gun?
Nope.
What if we have no confession?
Well, what else is there?
How is the prosecutor going to put in a case?
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we want you to find him not guilty because of what?
Because he might have made a text or texted his gay boyfriend and may have said something about, I did or I'm involved.
Upon which he, our friend, would say, Oh, no, no, no.
Tyler would say, Oh, no, no, I didn't say that.
No.
Whereupon you either get the Discord or whatever it was, Discord or whatever the ISP is, or a group of these people, I should say, and we say, I want you to provide to us everything chain of custody, the exact information regarding records that you have on this account.
What was there?
What was.
The actual text messages.
Is it from his phone?
Are all, and you have your forensic person read it and determine whether that's the case.
You don't just take their word for it.
Do you understand that what the prosecutor did at first was they just gave summaries, they didn't give the information, they gave summaries.
They said the following is what we think.
We have a rifle and we have a Ballistics.
I don't know if they ever did it.
We have a confession.
We have a family member.
That's it.
Okay.
Okay.
Try going to court by saying we have a confession, but no weapon.
And we can't talk about the weapon.
I mean, you can talk about what happened to Charlie.
You could have the medical examiner say, well, he was shot.
Or, or, or, and this is another one.
There may be a countervailing, kind of a version, if you will, of the truth that comes forward and says he wasn't at all shot with a rifle.
He was shot by something else.
There is a woman I've seen who she's online and others have said this, that they believe that there might have been some kind of a microphone or something that either blew up or did something which provided this.
I want to know what the actual cause of death was.
What was it?
Where did the putative, the alleged round, where did it hit?
See, what I'm asking, it may sound kind of dry, and I recognize it.
That's exactly the way it's going to be.
If I have my way, if I was doing this, I would end up giving the prosecutor nothing.
They would have nothing, zero, nothing.
And if they lose this case, people are not going to say, well, they obviously had some problems.
The evidence did not match up.
They're going to say, no.
No, no, no.
You're going to say, there's something very dastardly.
There's something very sinister.
There's something very wrong about this.
It is beyond wrong.
That's what you're going to say.
And Erica's going to say, well, Erica, what happened?
Uh, uh, uh, What do you have to say about that, Erica?
What about you, Colvet?
What about these other people?
What about this?
Well, it was, how about the fact that the gun didn't connect?
Not that they suppressed it, but that there was no evidence that they even, that you couldn't take anything from it, use this particular fragment, and evaluate it.
You have nothing.
What were you cheering about?
This is a 22-year-old man.
You're a Christian woman.
Why are you cheering?
Where was the evidence?
You should have said, this man doesn't even deserve to be here.
There's no evidence here.
Where Is The Evidence 00:05:23
None.
None that you can use.
Why are you so hell bent, Erica?
Who told you?
What did you see?
What do you know?
Why do you think he did this?
Tell me.
This is what I'd love to hear.
Where do you get this from?
It's not open and shut.
Nobody said, hey, there he is.
And the thing which I understand bothers people is that when you don't have evidence that can be used, you kind of fill in the blanks and say, oh, come on, come on, there's no come on here.
I want to also, if I could, tell you something which is really, really important.
Just a time out, I want you to hear this.
The Supreme Court ruled 8 to 1, yesterday, I believe, 8 to 1.
There was a case, a Colorado case, a Colorado statute prevented.
I know I'm changing the subject, but I want you to hear this prevented, prohibited, proscribed, disallowed, forbade, or forbade.
Any psychiatrist or anybody talking about conversion therapy, did you hear this?
You cannot bring up conversion therapy.
You cannot claim that you can take somebody who is gay and Change their sexuality, that you can talk them out of it.
Not only can you not say it, we hold it, we are prohibiting you from doing it.
You cannot do this.
The Supreme Court said, and Gorsuch wrote the opinion, the majority said, this is not a doctor and physical treatment where you might or might not say, you know, bloodletting and leeches, the licensing board doesn't particularly care for that.
But this is somebody who is providing his.
Ideas, his thoughts regarding what's the best way to handle this.
And we in the court are not going to tell them that they can't do this.
We're not going to tell them, this is very important, that they can't say this.
This is against eight to one.
Kitanji Brown Jackson or Jackson Brown, I forget, is of the said she was the lone dissenter.
Kagan, Sotomayor, they all agreed.
Do you hear what I'm saying?
Speech.
Thought, treatment in terms of speech.
You can reverse your homosexuality by prayer.
If that's my thing, I don't think that works necessarily, but who am I?
What do I know?
But if that's what you want to say, that's what they can deliver.
You hear what I'm saying?
This was one of the biggest cases ever.
You need a little good news.
That is the best news ever for those of you who are First Amendment scholars, as am I.
So, my friends, This thing is rolling along.
We haven't even.
They're going to definitely continue the case until September or whatever, this six months at least.
They turned over, they dumped every piece of paper, maybe in existence, just dumped it on them by virtue of some thumb drive and said, here it is.
Here's your stuff.
And people are going to have to go through this and review it.
And thank God for ChatGPD, they can at least help collate it and go through it and realize it.
So this, I'll bet you anything that this prosecutor was thinking, I don't want this.
This is a dog.
I don't have anything so far.
I don't.
Nobody saw this.
Nobody can point him out.
The only thing we have is a very vague confession to his girlfriend and maybe a father.
I don't know.
They're going to refute that.
That's it.
Tell me you understand.
Now, I'm not suggesting that's good or bad or I'm happy or I like it.
I'm not saying that.
People will weigh in and they don't know what to say.
They say, You're a conspiracy theorist.
You're saying, Here we go again with that.
That's the most ridiculous.
Why are you saying conspiracy theorists?
Why?
Why in the name of God are you doing that?
And it's one of those things which is just beyond incredibly funny.
Funny, but sad.
He is going to walk.
I don't know how they.
I don't.
Where is this other evidence?
Unless he gave the most explicit confession that we've never seen.
Where is the evidence?
It's not there.
Period.
End of discussion.
It's not there.
Do you know what would happen?
If you heard, we the jury, and the above entitled, above captioned indictment or charge, find the defendant, Tyler Robinson, not guilty, so say we all.
And they're going to go right to Erica.
And Instead of her saying, well, justice was served, I guess they take it up with a trial judge.
It's Not There Period 00:02:28
I don't know what to tell you.
But we have things to do.
She's not going to say that.
She's going to say, this was about Charlie.
And she's going to go into her act and do the usual thing, you know, dabbing her eyes and that sort of thing.
That's where she's going.
And I'm telling you right now, it is going to be one of the most unseemly things you have ever seen.
The difference between conspiracy and truth is six months.
True, true.
That's a very popular phrase.
True.
You know, there's no conspiracy here at all because he acted alone.
He was a lone gunman.
A lone gunman.
So, my friends, as we see this, we are seeing everything about TPUSA unravel the hierarchy.
Candace introduced today the hierarchy in terms of who was at this hospital, who was there, who was responsible.
The interconnections are not even.
It's beyond anything I even thought was possible.
I want you also to understand, I'm not in here necessarily pulling for Tyler.
That's not what I'm doing.
I'm not saying, hey, this is great.
I have nothing in for Tyler.
That's not my thing.
I want the truth in this whole thing.
Brad Rung says, oh, there we go.
Brad says, Rachel Maddow's 53, Hockey Hall of Famer Scott Stevens 62, singer Susan Boyle.
Remember her from.
Quite the Looker, 65.
Filmmaker Barry Sonnenfell, 73.
Actor Annette O'Toole, 74.
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, 76.
And actress Allie McGraw, 87 years old.
Thank you, Brad.
Love means never having to say you're sorry.
So, a phenomenal case so far.
As I was saying, what Candace is doing, what Barron is doing, what others have done to show you.
If nothing else, the inner woven facts, the series of, I guess you'd call it maybe, a series of, oh,
Phenomenal Complexity And Coincidence 00:04:24
coincidences, things that are interesting, the level of complexity of these people, if for nothing else, if they do not How do I say this?
If Erica, excuse me, if Candace and others do nothing else, they will say, Hey, TPUSA.
These people, including Erica, who says something to the effect who applauded, she says, It's even better now that Charlie's, I don't know what, she made some cockamamie because she just talks complete blather.
What's critical to note more than anything else is that TPUSA is going to see a cabal, a rat's nest, a Gordian knot, a ball of wax of people so disparate, so problematic that you're going to think to yourself, how in the name of God do they ever, ever?
Did anybody know they were there?
Did you know TPUSA, apparently, if you believe this, was this not mobbed up, but inteled up?
This is the part that people are just beyond.
They cannot believe what is happening.
They cannot believe how this is.
I mean, they've never seen anything like this.
And they never knew this.
That's the part that gets all this money you were saying.
All this money.
This very well could have been a spook.
This could have been a, for lack of a better word, this could have been a.
A CIA front.
All of you wonderful people who gave money, all of you wonderful people who gave money, all of you people who listened to the call, who said, I want to be a part of this, you might have been inadvertently contributing to what amounts to this artificial level of, I don't know what the word is, but this group of people who just are beyond anything anybody's ever seen before.
It blows my mind.
And what I think people don't understand or they don't grasp right now is that many people are going to say, We had no idea it was this kind of mobbed up.
Did you think this?
I keep trying to remember what I thought when I first weighed into this, when I first became aware of it, when I first found myself.
Oops, how do I?
Let me turn this down.
When I first found myself kind of in the position of this, I didn't really understand.
Exactly what was going on.
I thought, well, you know, whatever.
But now I'm finding out that this was almost like a subsidiary of Langley.
Every single thing that Erica Kirk has ever done in her lifetime, every single thing, every organization, every group, let me see if I can change this right now, everything she has done, everything has been connected in some way to somebody else.
There we go.
Everything, everything.
Her mother, her father, fathers, everything.
Her life has been this slithering, protean, very, very complicated world of deception.
Everything.
Saying one thing, believing another.
So connected to Intel.
So connected to CIA.
So connected up to and including that.
Industrial movie she did on EMP.
Not to mention the lies she said about either men or drinking, every single thing.
And when she saw Charlie, people are realizing she got her hooks into him, and then she never thought that Erica or Baron or other people would come along and use this unbelievable superhuman research ability, this arm, to find out every single thing about her.
Beyond Anything You Can Imagine 00:03:30
It's Beyond anything.
Beyond anything.
I'm telling you.
She never knew it.
Every day she says, How did they do this?
I didn't think anybody knew about that.
And she's not done.
She's going to have to COVID and other people and all the other people that have rubbed her the wrong way.
This is like nothing you've ever seen.
And after all is said and done, with the slightest defense work, because number one is that when they said there is no connection, I'm surprised somebody didn't just.
Plant something.
I'm surprised somebody did not, in some instance, take a rifle, take a round, and thank God for their integrity, take a round, recreate it, fire it earlier, dig it out of wherever it was, and use that shard or that something that shows some type of connection, maybe not perfect, but something because this is without connection.
You don't understand this.
There is nothing here.
So, this, I keep thinking mobbed up, this inteled up group of people.
All of these folks who are so, now we find out, so connected to CIA, all of them happen to be connected to one of the most profoundly important and critical and obvious murders in the history of our country.
And, and, what's even more important, there's no evidence of any connection between this lauded, praised rifle and the death.
Unbelievable.
This is not guilty.
This is not guilty because there is reasonable doubt.
Not because he's innocent, not because he's a saint, but there is reasonable doubt.
So, my friends, this is exactly where we are going to be.
Tomorrow, I'm going to be going more in about what's happening, what you can expect, where is this going, and also watch the deconstruction and the contamination of TPUSA.
Why are they so invested in this guy?
I don't understand it.
Because what you're doing is these are very Very unsmart people, very basic, who just figure they've enjoyed the ride for so long, they honestly believe we don't need Charlie for this.
We don't need him.
We don't need Charlie for this.
And they're going to find out, oh, yes, they did.
Remember, are they going to be able, the prosecution, to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt?
Uh-uh.
And that, my friend, is not guilty.
That's not a technicality.
That's the Fifth Amendment.
That's the Constitution.
Thank you, dear friends.
Thank you for the wonderful gifts tonight.
Thank you for your super chats.
Thank you for your support.
It means more than you can imagine.
Please like this video, subscribe to the channel.
Also, thank you for following my beloved Mrs. L at Lynn's Warriors.
And just imagine what they're saying at TPUSA.
What are they going to do?
They're counting on this, and I don't really know why.
They should be absenting themselves from this trial.
In any event, my friend, thank you so very much.
Have a great and glorious night.
We'll see you tomorrow.
Thank you so much.
Your kindness is without peer.
It means the most to me.
We'll talk to each other tomorrow.
And don't forget until then, remember the monkey's dead.
The show's over sue you.
That, that.
Export Selection