All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 29, 2025 - Lionel Nation
23:44
TARGETING CANDACE: The Plot to Destroy Her

TARGETING CANDACE: The Plot to Destroy Her

|

Time Text
Energy bills are rising at a historic rate and there's no end in sight.
Talk to enough people and you'll soon realize nearly everyone's shocked at their recent electricity bills.
Some studies reveal energy costs have skyrocketed by as high as 60% in as little as two years.
That's why tens of thousands are installing this magical little device from savepowerbills.com to help slash their energy bills.
This sophisticated gadget stabilizes electrical currents, reduces dirty electricity, and helps protect your appliances and electronics.
Simply plug it into your home's wall outlet to help lower energy consumption and ultimately help reduce your power bills every month.
Countless five-star reviews back up the notion that this device is one of the most efficient ways to save money while beating the greedy power companies.
But there's more.
If you order now, you'll also receive 65% off.
Fast shipping within the USA, hassle-free returns, and last but not least, a 60-day satisfaction guarantee.
Just go to savepowerbills.com to take advantage of this limited time deal before they sell out.
Once again, that's savepowerbills.com.
Dear friend, let me explain this yet again, perhaps in a different way, but with many the same theme.
What is happening, still happening to Candace Owens right now, looks less like criticism and more like a coordinated character demolition.
And once you slow down and actually look at it, the pattern becomes impossible to ignore because nearly everything being thrown at her, everything avoids her arguments entirely and instead fixates whether on her state of mind, her stability, her supposed unraveling, her tone, her psychology, her motivation,
her intentions, anything except anything but the substance of what she is saying.
And that is the tell.
Because when people believe an argument is weak, they attack the argument.
This is axiomatic.
They quote it, they break it down, they explain it, and they explain why it fails.
They do not obsessively speculate about whether the person making the argument has gone crazy or is nuts.
And yet, and yet that is almost the entire media posture toward Candace Owens right now.
Headline after headline suggesting she's spiraling, unhinged, dangerous, irresponsible, while almost nothing actually engages the claims she's raising or the evidence adduced.
And if you doubt that, try this simple test.
Search for coverage that praises what she is saying or even neutrally examines it.
Go ahead.
I'll wait.
Or maybe something that seriously disputes it point by point and see how hard it is to find anything.
Because what you mostly get is noise and mockery and concern trolling and psychological framing.
And that should worry, seriously, worry anyone, anyone who still believes that public debate is worth something.
That public debate is supposed to be about ideas rather than extermination of an individual by reputation.
Because this is not how confident systems behave.
This is how threatened folks and organizations and systems, in essence, behave.
And it feels eerily familiar to anyone who lived through the early years when uncomfortable questions were treated not as challenges to be answered, but instead as dangers to be suppressed.
Does this sound familiar?
Huh?
Of course it does.
And that is why so many people keeping, or keep rather drawing, parallels to past moments, I know I am, when inquiring itself became the enemy.
Because the same moves are being used again.
Label the speaker unstable.
Warn others.
Warn them away.
Isolate them socially.
Make association costly.
Repeat the stigma until it sticks.
And never actually settle the question of whether they might be right about anything.
And what makes this even more unsettling is how broad the attack has become.
With, I guess, figures and folks who otherwise despise each other suddenly, suddenly converging on the same target.
Laura Loomer, Ben Shapiro, even Alex Jones, all in different ways circling Candace Owens, denouncing her, warning us about her, calling for investigations or consequences against her.
Somebody even said the president has to do something, has to do something.
What does that mean?
And that convergence should give people pause, should scare you.
It's not because these individuals agree on much, but because when wildly different factions and organizations suddenly align against one voice, it often says more about the threat that that voice poses than about the alleged wrongdoing.
And what is that threat?
What is that threat precisely?
It's not that Candace Owens has perfect arguments.
Of course not.
No serious thinker does.
That's not even the point.
It's that she has independence plus scale and money.
Money.
Not money money, but performance money, metrics money, followers money, value.
She's loaded.
She's the bell of the ball.
And you know who created that?
They did.
She doesn't need permission from anyone to ask a question.
She doesn't rely on a single platform.
She doesn't answer to donors or committees.
That's the critical part.
Don't ever misunderestimate that one, as George Bush said.
And she has an audience large enough that silencing her would matter.
And that is the key distinction.
History is full of people saying strange or wrong things, okay?
But very few of them attract a level of sustained hostility because most of them can be ignored.
You know, the internet has taught us that ignoring someone, and this is something that I've always advocated by ignoring someone is the fastest way to make them disappear.
Attention is oxygen.
And yet, Candace Owens cannot be ignored.
And that is why the response is escalation rather than debate.
And you see, once you notice that, then the behavior starts to look less like some organic outrage and more like panic, sustained, controlled, organized panic.
And that panic spills over onto others too.
Because Tucker Carlson now finds himself labeled everything from a secret foreign Islamist agent to a crypto extremist of one kind or another, some Qatari agent.
And once again, the content of what he says is secondary to the effort to poison the audience against him personally.
And the irony is brutal.
Because every time this happens, every single time this happens, their numbers go up, their reach expands, their relevance increases, and the very people trying to erase them end up amplifying them, which suggests a profound misunderstanding of how modern media works.
Because in a world of abundance, dear friend, where anyone can publish and where anyone can pretty much say what they want, and where audiences choose freely, credibility is not enforced from above.
It's negotiated in public.
And attacks that look coordinated or hysterical backfire.
They signal weaknesses.
They tell audiences that something important is being touched.
It's being zeroed on.
And people aren't stupid.
Oh, no, no, no, no.
They remember other moments when they were told not to ask questions, to trust the science.
Quit fighting this.
When they were mocked instead of answered, when they were warned for their own good.
And many, many of those warnings later turned out to be wrong or self-serving.
And that memory lingers.
We don't forget that one.
So when they see Candace Owens being treated this way now with heightened hatred, I mean never, nobody even talks about the claims she's making.
It's always about her.
Read them.
Read the art.
Just read the headlines.
They don't say she's wrong about this witness or she's wrong about timelines.
No, it's what's wrong with her.
She's unglued.
Who can control her?
Even people who don't agree with her start paying attention.
They say, wait, Because they recognize the pattern that we've all seen before.
And that's why the constant invocation of mental instability is so revealing.
It's the oldest trick, the oldest move in the book.
And if you can't defeat the claim, undermine the claimant.
Make fun of them.
If you can't disprove the idea, discredit the mind.
And it is striking how little has changed over decades.
Because whether it was artists or filmmakers or activists or journalists in earlier eras, the same tactic keeps reappearing.
And people who once warned loudly about censorship, remember those folks?
Now they seem comfortable with censorship as long as the target is someone they find inconvenient or problematic.
And that, my friend, is where the hypocrisy becomes impossible to ignore.
Because free speech is easy to defend when it protects your side, your way of life, when it supplements your way of thinking.
And it's harder to supplement and to back when it protects someone else who is outperforming you.
And that is what this feels like.
Not a principled stand, but some kind of a turf war, a scramble by people who sense that their influence is slipping and are trying to reassert some kind of control by force of this consensus.
And the strangest part is how little curiosity there is about questions that Candace Owens is raising.
I keep saying this.
Because if they were truly absurd, if they were Energy bills are rising at a historic rate and there's no end in sight.
That's why tens of thousands are using this amazing little device from savepowerbills.com.
It's a small but smart gadget that stabilizes electrical currents, reduces dirty electricity, and helps protect your electronics.
Just plug it into your home's wall outlet to help lower energy consumption and ultimately help reduce your power bills every month.
Order now to get 65% off plus many free bonuses before they sell out by going to savepowerbills.com.
That's savepowerbills.com.
Order now.
Nuts.
The fastest way to expose that will be to let her talk, to let her show her work, to let errors pile up and address those errors.
But instead, what we're seeing is preemptive strikes, source smearing, before audiences even hear the evidence or the source or the specifics produced.
See, warnings issued in advance and moral framing designed to make listening itself feel dangerous.
Don't listen to her.
Whatever she says, it's wrong.
Don't even bother.
Just go someplace else.
She's crazy.
Don't listen to her.
What is she saying?
I don't know what she's saying, but she's crazy.
And that tells you the real goal isn't to win an argument.
It's to stop one from happening.
And that should alarm anyone, anyone right now who still believes public life should be governed by reason rather than intimidation.
Because today it is Candace Owens.
Tomorrow it will be someone else.
Could be you.
You see, the machinery doesn't care whom it runs over.
It only cares that it keeps moving.
And once it's normalized, that certain people must be erased rather than debated.
Once you get used to the fact that certain people can be targeted, the circle always widens.
And that's why so many people watching this feel uneasy, even if they disagree with her.
Because they understand.
They understand something very simple.
They understand that this is bigger than one person.
It is about whether independence is still allowed.
It's about whether independence is allowed when it becomes successful, whether speech is tolerated only when it's small and de minimis, and whether the same people who once mocked cancel culture, remember them, have now quietly rebuilt it under a different name, under new ownership.
And the most telling detail of all is how personal and vicious the attacks have become.
The jokes, the insults, the speculation about sanity and motivation and the endless repetition of labels.
Because that is what happens when the argument itself is no longer the battlefield.
And meanwhile, meanwhile, my friend, the inimitable, the ineffable Candace Owens keeps doing the one things that drives her critics nuts.
She keeps talking to her base, to her audience, to her fans and her acolytes.
Keeps producing content, she keeps attracting attention and she keeps refusing to submit.
And the more they swing in her, the clearer it becomes.
The clearer it becomes that this is not about protecting the public or defending the truth, whatever that, whatever the truth is, it's about eliminating a rival who can't be controlled.
And that is why this moment listen to me, that's why this moment feels different and and heavier and more desperate, because it's not just disagreement, that's what I'm saying.
It's an attempt to erase her.
This this, this erasure carried out in public, and anyone who still cares about open debate and free expression and free speech should be asking themselves why this level of force is even being used, why the attacks are so uniform in tone, even even when they come from different camps why, why and why so few people seem willing to simply say,
here is what she got wrong and here's why this is what she said, that's wrong.
Here's what the evidence is, because the absence of that simple response speaks louder than any headline and it suggests that, beneath all the shouting and the screaming, there is a deep, very deep fear of what happens when one person with a camera and a voice and a microphone and a large audience refuses to play by the old rules, who refuses to give in, because once that door is open,
it can't be closed again and the system, the system that depended on obedience and scarcity, knows it.
And I'm also going to say something which I want you to listen to very carefully.
You know, I have no reason to to believe this or to.
I can't prove this, so I speculate it.
But I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of her biggest adversaries are being paid by someone.
Remember USAID did it.
We've we heard about them.
USAID did it in 2016 or so.
Moby, you know, the musician said that he was approached or paid, or whatever, by he called it the CIA, by CIA, by Intel to to, to use, to provide his platform for propaganda purposes against or regarding Russia Gate or Russia involvement, or Russia collusion, or whatever it was.
Think about how smart this is.
Let's say this, this little ball, is your a very powerful medium of some big promoter, five million, five million followers.
What if I went to?
This person said, listen, we'll buy this from you, we'll rent this for you.
It's our little secret.
Give us, give us this, we'll give it back, we'll produce your content, but we're going to use your system.
Years ago, a friend of mine who's kind of a in the organization from the boys you know what I mean said to me.
He said, do you ever wonder why the government doesn't shut down the mafia or motorcycle gangs or whatever it is, or the, the various Chinese triads or Albanians?
Or do you ever wonder why?
He says they could do it in a heartbeat, but they don't.
They want our system, they want to be able to use our networks.
And he said this line I'll never forget, they want to put their blood in our veins.
So I'm just wondering, when all of a sudden you have people who really kind of don't get along, like Laura Loomer, and even though there's some internecine fighting, Laura Loomer and Alex Jones and Ben Shapiro, and I can't figure out Megan Kelly,
but whoever these people are, all of a sudden, these people who just never got along with anything, now all of a sudden they're showing, and I can mention some other influencers, showing this, all of them big, big, you know, money, a number of people, all of them are showing this kind of a coordinated, choreographed hatred against Canvas.
I can't prove this, but I wouldn't be surprised if somebody said, hey, listen, join the team.
If you don't like what she's doing anyway, join our team.
Don't be surprised.
Remember how years ago Rob Reiner and Ben Midler and Robert De Niro, all of a sudden, these people were producing comment like 24-7.
How did that, why?
Because he had big numbers.
And remember Rob Reiner, after Trump, he, Trump won, he basically wiped out his chat bus, whatever his Twitter then, I guess.
And he had to go to rehab.
Rehab to relax.
Rehab isn't a spa.
I mean, I can't prove any of this.
I'm just merely telling you, admittedly, it's speculation.
But would it surprise you?
Hell no.
Don't think it, don't think, remember, take somebody with a big, a big viewer base and say, let's borrow this.
It's like your address is, your email list.
And we'll put out the content for a while and we'll pay you.
We'll put our blood in your veins.
Think about that.
So anyway, my friends, more to think about.
Because this is bigger than Candace, bigger than the issue.
Notice we never talk about the individual allegations.
Let me thank you.
Let me also thank you right now, my friends, for following my wife at Lynn's Warriors.
She is reporting about what's going on with kids and TikTok, AI, what's going on with different online, how big tech is fighting, fighting tooth and nail any attempt to protect children.
Nobody wants to shut down the internet.
But remember something.
Think about this very quickly.
Internet supposedly says, Section 230, we can't get involved in this.
We can't do this.
We can't let anything affect the intellectual integrity of the platform.
But if you said anything about ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine or anything pro-Trump, they would shut you down in a heartbeat.
But they can't stop CSAM child sexual abuse material.
Come on.
Why do they want your kids?
I think you know why.
Eyes wide shut, baby.
Just saying.
So thank you for following her at Lynn's Warriors.
Because our battle is everywhere.
Because what are we doing?
Whether it's about Candace, whether it's about children, whether it's anything, it's about what makes America America.
It's about the First Amendment.
It's about being an American.
And for those of you who are not Americans, you're across the pond, as they say, it's about being a citizen of the world who appreciates and loves and cherishes the ability to have unedited, unimpeded freedom of speech.
Now that's it, my friend.
Thank you so much for watching.
Please like this video.
Subscribe to the channel.
Subscribe, subscribe, subscribe.
Hit that little bell so you're notified of live streams and new videos.
And I've got some questions for you to consider.
And I thank you so much.
In any event, have a great and a glorious and a noble day.
▲
Export Selection