All Episodes
Previous Next
April 3, 2025 - Lionel Nation
15:18
Oliver Stone Stunned as Jasmine Crockett MOCKS JFK Assassination Probe
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The storm is coming.
Markets are crashing.
Banks are closing.
When the economy collapses, how will you survive?
You need a plan.
Cash, gold, bitcoin, dirty man safes keep your assets hidden underground at a secret location ready for any crisis.
Don't wait for disaster to strike.
Get your Dirty Man safe today.
Use promo code DIRTY10 for 10% off your order.
Disaster can strike when least expected.
Wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes.
They can instantly turn your world upside down.
Dirty Man underground safes is a safeguard against chaos.
Hidden below, your valuables remain protected no matter what.
Prepare for the unexpected.
Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off and secure peace of mind for you and your family.
Dirty Man safe.
When disaster hits, security isn't optional.
When uncertainty strikes, peace of mind is priceless.
Dirty Man underground safes protects what matters most.
Discreetly designed, these safes are where innovation meets reliability, keeping your valuables close yet secure.
Be ready for anything.
Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off today and take the first step towards safeguarding your future.
Dirty Man Safe.
Because protecting your family starts with protecting what you treasure.
No matter when anybody tries.
I mean, God bless them.
They're trying to get to the bottom of the JFK thing.
But just recognize one thing.
You're not going to get to the bottom.
You're not going to learn anything.
It's not going to happen.
But what's interesting is the deflection doctrine that this Jasmine Crockett maintains.
And the collective left in their contempt for history, truth, and accountability.
It blows my mind.
This is what she said, quote, What I find funny about this hearing is that the Republicans are here relitigating whether CIA agents lied 60 years ago.
This is what she scoffed at.
Lied?
No, they didn't about lying.
How about the fact that they were here to find out whether they killed the president?
Whether they killed him?
Not whether they lied.
Maybe they lied about killing him.
And she delivered her signature brand of dismissive sarcasm.
Do you not understand this?
Would you say the same thing about Martin Luther King?
This is a serious congressional hearing.
This is at least the government trying under President Trump to get to the bottom of something.
I know you don't understand it.
I know you don't get it.
So let's pause right there.
This wasn't a comedy club.
This was a United States House of Representatives hearing.
A hearing that was addressing the very foundations of public trust.
And distrust, constitutional limits on government power, and yes, the actions of intelligence agencies whose influence on both foreign and domestic policy remain both enormous and largely unchecked today.
Yeah, yeah, 62 years ago, almost.
Yeah, yeah, you're right.
You're right, Jasmine, that's it.
But for Jasmine, it's all just a punchline.
Relitigating?
We've never heard the truth.
We're still reeling from this.
An American president gunned down at high noon in front of everybody?
And this usual sneering at historical truth isn't just insulting, it's dangerous.
And I want you to listen to me.
It's dangerous.
And no, I'm not overreacting.
She's absolutely frightening when you think about this.
This re-litigating?
She talks about how I was a lawyer and I know about chain of cuts.
Dude, what are you talking about?
Because yes, yes, yes, Congress absolutely should be investigating whether the CIA lied 60 years ago about killing or knowing who killed or being a part of killing our president.
And the same thing goes with MLK and RFK and everybody else.
Because the implications don't stop there.
If our intelligence agencies lie to the American people then about war, about foreign plots, about the death of a beloved president, what makes you or anyone think they've stopped now?
This is just...
Accountability doesn't have an expiration date, Jasmine.
Justice doesn't come with a 60-year statute of limitations.
Or you're trying to make an idea like, well, why aren't we as concerned about the signal app or what?
It's incredible.
And the Constitution, our beloved Constitution, certainly doesn't expire just because it's inconvenient to Jasmine Crockett.
I mean, you see, this is a laughing matter to the...
Radical left.
And he was one of theirs!
He was the king of the left.
When left had some substance.
When the left wasn't talking about castration and puberty blockers.
Jasmine Crockett's comment isn't just a stray soundbite.
It's a window into the modern left's playbook that dismisses, deflects, and derails anything of substance.
Now, she's faced with a hearing that actually dared.
There to examine the role of intelligence agencies, among others, and being in concert with the mob and a bunch of other folks, the military, the mob, the deep state, the police state, the intel state, the shadow government, and particularly the CIA.
And Alan Dulles, and we've been talking about this, in what might be the most historical cover-up of all time.
Jasmine Crockett...
Chose not to engage with the evidence or the concern of millions of Americans who believe their government owes in the truth.
No, instead, she rolled her eyes at the past and tried to pivot or switch the conversation toward a different scandal.
The leaked chat messages among national security officials that allegedly included classified discussions And the accidental addition, I guess, of a journalist.
And what's the real reason?
Because it might, it might, it might embarrass Trump.
That's it.
Yes, of course, that's a serious issue.
And of course, we've all but forgotten that.
And yes, Congress should look into it.
But nobody cares.
It's over.
But that's not the point here.
That's not the point per usual.
That's not it.
What Jasmine Crockett was engaging in was classic whataboutism.
What about that?
What about this?
Let's change the subject.
See, this is the left's favorite tool when they're caught in a corner, when they don't know what to say.
Rather than address the substance of the hearing, whether the CIA and its agents deceived the American people during Cold War and assassinated the president or were critically a part of it.
No, no.
She attempts to discredit the entire inquiry by labeling it A Republican obsession.
Some kind of retroactive fantasy.
A distraction from real issues.
Can you believe this?
John Kennedy?
Mr. Civil Rights?
John Kennedy?
I'm not trying to say that one president's assassination over it, but you would think.
See, that's the real comedy here.
This is a member of Congress mocking a hearing about government lies while trying to Redirect us towards another example of government dysfunction.
What about that?
You can't make this up.
Every time she opens her mouth, you know it's going to be another jaw-dropper.
And I guess my question is, listen, Jazz, if the past doesn't matter, what does?
What is important?
You always want people to understand about...
Reparations in the past and changing history in the past.
Okay, I'm telling you right now.
What about this history?
Here's what the radical left doesn't want to admit.
The American people care deeply about the past.
It's called history.
Last time I checked.
Because they understand something that Crockett and her colleagues, I guess in the performative progressive caucus, seem to forget.
The past explains the present.
The past reveals patterns.
The past is the playbook of the permanent bureaucracy.
Past is prologue.
I mean, how many times do we have to tell you this?
If the CIA was at all involved, if it had a hand in misleading the public, in manipulating the media, or in orchestrating Outcomes, including the underlying investigation, namely the assassination, that shaped American history even 60 years ago, Jasmine, that is not only relevant, it's essential to understand today's political landscape.
It's that simple.
This isn't about nostalgia or conspiracy.
It's about trust.
Trust.
When institutions break that trust, they don't get to bury it and call it history.
They owe the public answers.
And Congress has a duty to ask the hard questions.
That's what you're supposed to do.
Especially when the fourth estate, once of course the watchdog of democracy theoretically, once the fourth estate has rolled over.
And it's nothing but a proxy for the deep state.
It's mind-boggling what Jasmine Crockett and her ilk They just don't get it the way they think it's laughable.
See, this is a master class in deflection.
After her flippant dismissal of Republican concerns, Jasmine attempted to shift the spotlight onto the alleged mishandling of classified material in a chat thread among top national security officials.
Again, what about this?
Let's switch it over here.
She expressed concern that a journalist was accidentally added to the conversation.
Nobody cares about this.
Now let's be clear.
That situation is outrageous and it deserves scrutiny and it has been and nobody cares.
Does anybody say to themselves, do you remember where you were when you heard about that Signal Pete Hegseth story?
No!
Everybody who was alive remembers where they were when they found that news.
When the whole world was red-pilled, when our innocence was shattered.
But let's not pretend that Jasmine suddenly became an advocate for national security and oversight.
Come on, stop it.
This is the same member of Congress, the same one, who routinely rails against over-policing.
But, and yet...
And still wants to defund the institutions responsible for intelligence gathering and internal accountability in the first place.
Unless, of course, they're going after political opponents, then it's groovy.
No, no, no, no.
This wasn't a principled pivot, as they say.
It was a PR pivot.
And we know what it is.
There's another word for it.
A little bit rougher.
It was an attempt to change the subject, Jasmine, and point herself, you know, as the grown-up in the room, while effectively...
In effect, and actually telling the American people, move along, nothing to see here.
Who cares about the CIA in 1963?
Well, we care.
I care.
The world cares.
We care because government lies.
And government lies, the noun, once institutionalized, once forgotten, becomes policy.
We care because truth matters to us.
Even when it's old or inconvenient or buried beneath decades of red tape.
Let me tell you something.
We care because leaders who sneer and just dismiss oversight today will be the very ones rewriting history tomorrow.
That's the truth.
And I'm not trying to be overdone with this one.
You see, the real question, my friend, the real question is this.
Who's laughing now?
What makes this moment so unbelievable isn't just that Crockett said this.
It's what he reveals about the larger democratic strategy.
Treat conservative investigations as jokes.
Treat whistleblowers as nuisances.
And treat historical truth as a threat.
See, this is important.
It's why the media barely blinked.
It's why no major Democrat challenged her remarks.
Nobody!
And it's why millions of Americans, millions, feel that the system isn't just broken, it's rigged.
It's not working.
Jasmine Crockett, this child, this benighted moonbat, didn't come to that hearing to ask questions.
She came to perform.
She came with catch.
Catchphrases and deflections and gotcha moments.
She didn't want to dig for the truth.
She couldn't care less.
She wanted camera time.
Face time.
But in doing so, she told us everything we need to know.
My dear friend, my dear fellow patriot, the truth isn't a priority.
History isn't sacred.
And public trust, it's just something to roll your eyes at, right?
Is that it?
Is that about it?
And listen to me.
When a member of Congress mocks, chides, dismisses an effort to hold the CIA accountable for possible deception, while casually pivoting and deflecting to another national security scandal, as if it's all part of the same circus, it tells us one thing.
One thing.
They're not here to serve the people.
They're here to protect the narrative.
And they'll rewrite the past if it means staying in power.
They'll rewrite the past, even if it means staying in power in the present.
And Jasmine may think it's funny to relitigate the sins of intelligence agencies, but the American people aren't laughing.
I'm not laughing.
Are you?
You think this is funny?
They're watching.
They're remembering.
And come November, they might just start holding Congress accountable too.
Let's see who gets primaried, Ms. Crockett.
So what do you think, my friend?
What's your take?
What's your feel?
Do me a favor.
Please like this video.
Subscribe to the channel.
Hit that little bell so you're notified of live streams and new videos.
And answer the questions that I presented to you.
▲
Export Selection