Justice At Last: Are Biden, Clinton and Harris About to Be Indicted?
Justice At Last: Are Biden, Clinton and Harris About to Be Indicted?
March 12, 2025 - Lionel Nation
15:46
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| The storm is coming. | |
| Markets are crashing. | |
| Banks are closing. | |
| When the economy collapses, how will you survive? | |
| You need a plan. | |
| Cash, gold, bitcoin, dirty man safes keep your assets hidden underground at a secret location ready for any crisis. | |
| Don't wait for disaster to strike. | |
| Get your Dirty Man safe today. | |
| Use promo code DIRTY10 for 10% off your order. | |
| Disaster can strike when least expected. | |
| Wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes. | |
| They can instantly turn your world upside down. | |
| Dirty Man underground safes is a safeguard against chaos. | |
| Hidden below, your valuables remain protected no matter what. | |
| Prepare for the unexpected. | |
| Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off and secure peace of mind for you and your family. | |
| Dirty Man safe. | |
| When disaster hits, security isn't optional. | |
| When uncertainty strikes, peace of mind is priceless. | |
| Dirty Man underground safes protects what matters most. | |
| Discreetly designed, these safes are where innovation meets reliability, keeping your valuables close yet secure. | |
| Be ready for anything. | |
| Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off today and take the first step towards safeguarding your future. | |
| Dirty Man's safe because protecting your family starts with protecting what you treasure. | |
| You know, the question is, could Hillary Clinton or Bill Clinton or Joe Biden or Kamala Harris, could they actually be prosecuted or sued for anything today? | |
| Now, you know, and I know if the question is, If President Trump had not been president, the answer is, of course they can, of course. | |
| Yeah, but he goes, no, no, no, no, of course they can, because they went after Trump with, I mean, law had nothing to do with it. | |
| But let's look at the legal landscape. | |
| This is a question, could Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Kamala Harris face prosecution? | |
| And this is critical. | |
| Because as this political world and worldview and landscape shifts and changes under this new administration, the Trump MAGA world, there's now some very serious renewed discussions that have emerged about the legal vulnerabilities and liability and exposure of former high-ranking officials, particularly Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Kamala Harris. | |
| Is that even possible? | |
| Well, let me tell you something. | |
| With ongoing congressional investigations, new evidence surfacing, and state-level probes expanding the question of legal accountability, all this has moved beyond speculation into the oncoming traffic in Rome of possibility. | |
| You see, while political factors often determine the feasibility of such prosecutions, the statutory framework that we're talking about right now Remains a compelling aspect. | |
| You see, federal laws governing corruption, obstruction, racketeering, and violations of classified document handling are all relevant, ongoing inquiries, raising the possibility that legal actions could very well be pursued against these individuals. | |
| Let's talk about Joe Biden. | |
| Take Joe Biden, please! | |
| Financial corruption and the mishandling of classified documents. | |
| Okay. | |
| Now, despite his departure from office, and despite the fact, well, because of it, he never gave himself a pardon, federally otherwise, Joe Biden remains a central figure in all investigations surrounding foreign business dealings involving his family. | |
| The House Oversight Committee, now wielding full subpoena power, Has intensified its scrutiny of Biden's alleged involvement in business transactions tied to Burisma Holdings in Ukraine, CEFC China Energy, in which his son Biden, Hunter Biden that is, played a key role. | |
| You know all about that. | |
| Now, newly surfaced emails and financial records, remember Bobulinski and Tucker and all that? | |
| But they could bolster allegations of, ready for this? | |
| Conspiracy to Violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FCPA. | |
| A statute that prohibits U.S. officials from engaging in foreign payments with foreign entities. | |
| 15 U.S.C. | |
| 78. Got that? | |
| If evidence links Joe Biden to financial gains from these dealings, he could face criminal liability. | |
| Additionally, congressional investigators, I have pointed to potential bribery under 18 U.S.C. | |
| 201 should there be proof that Biden used his position to influence policies in exchange for financial benefits. | |
| And you've heard what Hunter has told others about the big guy. | |
| He basically was the bag man. | |
| And beyond financial concerns, Biden's handling of classified documents remains under strict scrutiny. | |
| His storage of sensitive materials at his Delaware residence, remember that? | |
| Particularly in an unsecured garage? | |
| Oh, that's raised serious, serious concerns about Espionage Act violations. | |
| 18 U.S.C. | |
| 793. | |
| Now, unlike President Trump's contested case involving presidential records, Biden's possession of classified documents... | |
| Dates back to his tenure as Vice President, when he lacked declassification authority. | |
| You see, the appointment, this is important, the appointment of a Trump-selected Attorney General could lead to an aggressive review of this matter, let's hope. | |
| And something tells me that Pamela Joe Bondi wants to get into the fray, especially with the accusations of her going light on Epstein, which is ridiculous. | |
| Now, on the civil front, several state attorneys general, Particularly in Texas and Florida have signaled the possibility of lawsuits holding Joe Biden accountable for the financial and security burdens imposed by his border policies, or lack thereof. | |
| Civil negligence claims could aim to recover damages related to law enforcement costs, immigration support services, and other state expenses linked to federal directives. | |
| Hillary Clinton. | |
| What about O 'Hill, the oven mitt fashionista? | |
| How about obstruction, racketeering, and foreign influence? | |
| You see, Hillary Clinton's legal vulnerabilities extend from her tenure as Secretary of State, and this is important, where past investigations enter her private email server. | |
| We know all about that. | |
| Remember with Sean Hannity? | |
| The bleach bit, bleach bit, bleach bit. | |
| Yes, yes, yes. | |
| It makes me wonder if Sean had a piece of that bleach bit action, because we sure knew about it, but in any event, remember the Clinton Foundation's donor network? | |
| All of this remaining points of controversy? | |
| Well, while the Obama-area DOJ declined to prosecute her, new evidence could breathe life into these cases, particularly under a more aggressive DOJ stance. | |
| And we have that. | |
| That I guarantee you. | |
| And the potential for obstruction of justice charges, 18 U.S.C. | |
| 1519, for example, that stems from the destruction of over 30,000 emails allegedly tied to official communications and foreign dealings. | |
| The Clinton Foundation's financial transactions, where large donations from foreign governments corresponded with policy decisions. | |
| See, that may support allegations of bribery, Under federal anti-corruption statutes, a broader investigation could extend into RICO investigations, 18 U.S.C. | |
| 1961, should a pattern of illicit activities be established within the Foundation's operations. | |
| And you have to also consider the following. | |
| The ongoing controversy surrounding Benghazi remains a civil liability issue. | |
| Families of the victims of the 2012 attack could refile lawsuits arguing that Clinton's negligence in handling security measures directly contributed to the deaths of US personnel. | |
| Now, while past attempts at criminal accountability failed, New litigation could reopen discussions and investigations on her decision-making during the crisis. | |
| Now, remember, there's other considerations too. | |
| Statutes of limitation, laches, pre-accusatory delay, but that can be addressed in other ways, which I will discuss in another video. | |
| What about Kemala? | |
| I mean, she's just a bumbling oaf. | |
| Could she be looking at something serious? | |
| Oh, yeah. | |
| Oh, yeah. | |
| You see, Kemala, her immigration policy and potential criminal negligence are very critical. | |
| You see, Kemala's role as border czar, oh yeah, she was called a border czar, placed her at the center of the border security crisis. | |
| Allegations that she intentionally failed to enforce immigration laws were right there. | |
| And despite holding executive authority, It could be the basis for violations of 8 U.S.C. | |
| 1324, aiding and abetting illegal immigration. | |
| Testimonies from whistleblowers within ICE and CBP suggest that directives from her and her office explicitly limited immigration enforcement. | |
| And this could theoretically potentially implicate her in conspiracy to violate federal immigration statutes. | |
| Now, you can laugh all you want. | |
| Remember, if this were Trump, they'd do it in a heartbeat. | |
| I mean, look at that hush money case. | |
| Where did that come from? | |
| They didn't have any problem with this. | |
| Well, they shouldn't have any problem with this one. | |
| You see, beyond immigration, we're talking about Kamala Harris' California Attorney General tenure also, which has drawn renewed interest, particularly regarding allegations of campaign finance violations. | |
| You see, my friends, Investigators may examine whether donor funds were improperly funneled into her presidential bid violating federal election laws, 52 U.S.C. | |
| 3101 to 3126. | |
| Additionally, any false statements made to Congress or federal authorities regarding these matters could very well be grounds for perjury charges under 18 U.S.C. | |
| 1621. | |
| Now, also keep in mind, states like Arizona and Texas could also explore civil lawsuits claiming inter alia that Harris's policies directly contributed to economic burdens, including law enforcement expenses, emergency medical costs, and increased crime rates, I should say. | |
| Now, should these lawsuits gain traction, they could expose her to significant financial penalties as well. | |
| Now, the path to prosecution, It's political and legal, and we must look at the considerations of both. | |
| The potential prosecution of Biden, Clinton, and Harris hinges on a few key factors. | |
| One, congressional investigations. | |
| With the House and the Senate in the hands of pro-Trump majority members, Republicans, namely, new revelations could provide sufficient cause for federal and state-level legal actions. | |
| Number two, Department of Justice and Independence is a factor. | |
| A Trump-appointed Attorney General would likely prioritize high-profile investigations into alleged Democratic corruption. | |
| Third consideration, state-level prosecutions. | |
| Presidential pardons only apply to federal crimes. | |
| Republican-led states could take legal action where applicable. | |
| And in particular, in matters of corruption, immigration policy, immigration policy failures, in essence, and economic damages. | |
| Next consideration, judicial oversight. | |
| The Supreme Court, now firmly 6-3 conservative, could play a crucial role in determining the constitutionality of past executive privileges, self-pardons, perhaps, and accountability measures. | |
| This is critical. | |
| Next, public sentiment and media influence play an incredible role. | |
| You see, pressures from conservative media outlets and independent journalists and grassroots organizations, this is critical. | |
| This could drive the demand for accountability and influencing legal momentum. | |
| So, taken as a whole, is justice on the horizon any real serious chance of incarceration or the like? | |
| While no prosecution is guaranteed, and there's no way to do it, for a variety and myriad of reasons, the legal pathways to holding Biden, Clinton, and Harris accountable are well defined, and certainly they're under existing federal statutes. | |
| The convergence of new congressional oversight, new investigative findings, and new judicial rulings could create, indeed, a scenario. | |
| Whether once powerful figures now face substantial and very serious legal and financial consequences. | |
| For those who have long called for an end to political immunity, like me, like you, the next phase of investigations could represent a defining moment in restoring accountability at the highest levels of government. | |
| Whether these... | |
| Cases moved forward will depend on the strength of the evidence, the resolve of prosecutors and others, and most of all, the political will to uphold the rule of law. | |
| As legal experts and juridical experts and the like and political observers continue to analyze and weigh in the unfolding developments, one thing is absolutely immutably clear. | |
| The post-Trump era will be anything but predictable. | |
| So what say you, my friend? | |
| What would you think if one day you woke up and you found out that Joe Biden had been indicted, and more importantly, had been convicted? | |
| Please subscribe to our channel. | |
| Please like this video. | |
| Please hit that little bell so you'll be notified of live streams and new videos, and whatever you do, I ask you. | |
| I beseech, implore, importune, and request. | |
| I entreat you to comment. | |
| Comment. | |
| What do you think? |
Export Selection