All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 29, 2024 - Lionel Nation
01:00:46
Trump's Courtroom Disasters Travails and Inadvertent Victories
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The storm is coming.
Markets are crashing.
Banks are closing.
When the economy collapses, how will you survive?
You need a plan.
Cash, gold, bitcoin, dirty man safes keep your assets hidden underground at a secret location ready for any crisis.
Don't wait for disaster to strike.
Get your Dirty Man safe today.
Use promo code DIRTY10 for 10% off your order.
Disaster can strike when least expected.
Wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes.
They can instantly turn your world upside down.
Dirty Man underground safes is a safeguard against chaos.
Hidden below, your valuables remain protected no matter what.
Prepare for the unexpected.
Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off and secure peace of mind for you and your family.
Dirty Man safe.
When disaster hits, security isn't optional.
When uncertainty strikes, peace of mind is priceless.
Dirty Man underground safes protects what matters most.
Discreetly designed, these safes are where innovation meets reliability, keeping your valuables close yet secure.
Be ready for anything.
Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off today and take the first step towards safeguarding your future.
Dirty Man Safe, because protecting your family starts with protecting what you treasure.
Good morning, my dear friend.
This is the Sunday version of this thing of ours.
January the 28th.
Welcome.
Hello.
A hearty hello and a hi-ho silver and a welcome to all of you great and glorious and beauteous individuals.
Wonderful.
Wonderful that you are.
And I say to you, dear friends, welcome to this moment.
This time for us to discuss topics which last night was one of the most fascinating as far as I'm concerned.
Your thoughts and comments regarding how Donald Trump fared during his travails this week.
And many of you had the most ardent and full-throated of defenses towards him.
And it's just, that's what makes it so wonderful.
And let me lend my expertise, because when it comes time to the trial part of this, I, well, I have a different view.
It veers from my, how do I say this?
It veers from my political.
Let me make sure everybody understands, and I think this is critical for you to understand my particular position regarding Donald Trump, okay?
Now, as you know, We have 282 days until the election.
282 days until the election.
That is one of the most important aspects, the most important considerations.
This is something which I have nothing but my complete and total focus is on 282 days until the election.
Okay?
Well, I did misspeak.
I did misspeak, just a minute.
I didn't lie, but I did misspeak.
I do have one thing which is of tremendous concern to me, and that is this coming Saturday night, February the 3rd, at the Cutting Room in New York City.
If you think this has been fun, and it is, you have not lived until we bring everybody in together.
Into a room where there is food and drink and merriment and the like.
And we are allowed to sit and to enjoy and to converse and to, dare I say, allow ourselves the chance to conviviate and celebrate this collective understanding that we have.
You have not lived until you've done this.
So let me just say this, my friend, tickets are available right here.
Please save time and money and insure your appearance because we're going to be talking about this at a level that you have never seen before.
Even Cat Williams could not possibly approximate what we're doing.
So, as I was saying, Donald Trump to me is, in many respects, truly an imperfect candidate.
A candidate who is boorish sometimes, problematic.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I understand.
I understand.
He's a lot of things to a lot of people.
He's, you know, what are you going to do?
He's just the way he is.
However, he is the chemotherapy.
He is the cancer drug.
He is the only thing that we have available.
The only thing that we have available to stop the horror that this administration, whatever you call this, whether it's liberal or whatever, I don't even know what this is.
I don't even think it's liberal.
It's just this contaminating strangeness.
I don't have any idea.
Of what this is.
I am an American citizen.
I worry about my country.
I worry about your future, our future.
I worry about just getting out of this insanity.
And Donald Trump is the chemotherapy to this.
He is the only candidate.
Whether you like him or not, and I say this with all due respect, you may not like him, and that's okay.
I'm not trying to convince you.
But right now, this world that we are living in is so demented, I cannot begin to put into context how horrid and how terrible it is.
Do you understand what I am saying?
Do you recognize what I am saying?
Okay, that's number one.
So just to let you know this.
I'm not here to tell you Donald Trump is okay, what he did was right.
I'm not here to say this.
I'm here to tell you there is nobody, Nikki Haley, there's nobody who has the boorishness.
Let me give you an example before we get back to this trial.
Many people have suggested, many people have suggested that in warfare, and in many respects, this is indeed warfare.
But in many respects, People have suggested, dear friends, that what we are looking at is something that is so frightening.
Let me see if I can explain this to you.
Throughout history, there have been generals who, for whatever reason, did not do well in real life, but did exemplarily well in battle.
U.S. Grant.
U.S. Grant.
Actually, Borm Hiram, I believe, Grant.
But anyway, U.S. Grant.
George Patton.
Matthew Ridgway.
Curtis LeMay.
George Patton, very quickly.
George Patton was considered to be an insubordinate Lunatic of the First Order.
I mean, dangerous.
But what he did, and this is important to understand, what he did was he decided to take mechanized armor, the cavalry, so to speak, and to use it in the offensive.
To not sit back and hold your line and wait for the bad guy, but to do something that nobody had done.
Curtis LeMay was using B-29s as dive bombers to implement, to use something that was there in a way nobody had ever done before.
George Marshall was the greatest general of all times, but Matthew Ridgway.
Who saved more lives in Korea.
This is a guy who was married, I don't know, three or four times.
He had, I don't know how many heart attacks, lived to be 95. He had a medical kit here and a grenade.
They called him Iron Tits, pardon my French.
One of the greatest generals ever.
But in real life, he was good, but not like this.
The genius was in warfare.
The genius was in to see how things are needed and to use unconventional, frankly sometimes scary, boorish types of approaches to things in ways that nobody had ever thought.
This is critical.
This is what...
Donald Trump does.
And you may not like that.
You may disagree with it.
I understand it.
I understand how you can disagree with it.
And that's separate.
I will spend more time telling you what Donald Trump has done that is wrong than what he has done that is right.
But this country needs him now.
This country needs him.
I wish there was somebody else.
I wish somehow there was some farm team where maybe there was somebody better than Trump.
Somebody who could actually do the...
I don't know.
I don't know what to tell you.
I wish there was somebody who could come along and...
But there isn't.
Now, that being said, I'm not here to be an apologist for Trump.
Please, vote your conscience.
Do whatever you want.
Utilize your freedom of the franchise before somebody takes it away from you.
But I want to talk about his behavior in the courtroom.
And he has nobody but himself to blame and his lawyers for the degree of horror of his case.
Not that it was completely his fault.
Listen to what he's posting on social, on this Truth Social.
Capital letters.
Again, I don't know.
You and I know what this means.
If immunity is not granted to a president, every president that leaves office will be immediately indicted by the opposing party.
Without complete immunity, a president of the United States would not be able to properly function.
Okay.
May I ask you a question, dear friends?
What do you think of a president who is charged, who is sued, for something that...
Predates his presidency.
It's a question that, and let's don't make it, let's not call it murder or something, but let's assume there's something that he did, which was before his presidency.
Should that president, upon leaving office, Provided the statute of limitations still applies.
Should a president enjoy the same liability and exposure that you have after he leaves office?
What do you think?
Should I make it simple?
Joe Biden.
If Joe Biden Prior to his taking office as president and not while vice president is found to have consorted consorted with the hang on a minute if he is found to have consorted with let's say foreign agents
China, if he is found at a time when he was not the president or vice president, and there is a, let's say he committed treason, let's say he committed something that is within the statute of limitations, should Joe Biden be subject to criminal prosecution now, or a prosecution or lawsuit now for behavior that occurred before, or Let's say after he leaves.
On January, let's say once Trump is inaugurated, on January the 20th of 2025, if the government,
if the Department of Justice finds that Joe Biden is in an ongoing criminal conspiracy with his brother and his son, Should Joe Biden be subject to criminal prosecution now?
I ask you.
Answer this.
It's a very simple question.
Don't change the subject.
If you find out that Joe Biden, prior to being president, and not when he was vice president, when he was not subject to any kind of immunity, Should he be subject to prosecution, yes or no, I ask you?
G says yes.
And I know people were saying, for example, our friend says, none of this matters.
Trump's charges and punishments are already predetermined.
Okay, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I understand.
I understand.
But please, focus on this one, because we have to come up with a rule of law.
And yes, I do agree that in many respects, what happens?
What happens to Trump is indeed only Trump.
Yes.
Right.
People want equal justice.
People want to be.
So if there is something, and I have a real, I have a very difficult time, I have something which is very, very, I think a bit of a problem.
And that is when somebody, first of all, is charged for things that happen.
Decades and decades and decades ago.
It's something which is a very difficult thing to understand.
When something is 20, when something is 25 years ago, 23 years, 30 years ago, 50 years ago, you know, we had a case here in New York City where there were Where Andrew Cuomo was responsible for lifting the statute of limitations.
And there were schools, Catholic schools, who I think were absolutely, by virtue of their action or inaction, whatever you want to call it, They were themselves, how do I say this?
They were themselves responsible for looking the other way in letting predator priests do terrible things to people.
But some of these happened 50 years ago.
And there were priests who were dead.
And there were current schools who said, I don't know who Father Finnegan is.
We don't know who he is.
And it really did happen.
And yes, I believe that these people were themselves absolutely positively violated and irreparably damaged by virtue of this.
But then again, from the due process point of view of the school, of the school themselves, people asked the question, which was important and very, very critical.
People asked the question, okay, but what about the individual who themselves was...
Was damaged.
They were too young to bring charges.
Maybe the parents were kind of in lockstep with the church.
Maybe they didn't want to make waves.
There are things that are awful.
We tried to watch something.
What's this called?
Woman Behind the Door?
Woman in the Wall.
Woman in the Wall.
We tried to watch this last night.
It was about the Magdalene laundries.
These terrible, terrible events that happened in Ireland.
This story.
Let me try to watch Griselda.
Oh, come on.
Please stop it.
Whenever somebody from this currency...
I remember Florida in the 80s and during that cocaine Wild West world and they never can do period pieces because they get somebody now who always has...
They look like Monty Rock III.
They do remakes of Scarface.
It's just horrible.
And by the way, Hollywood can never do a wig.
Hollywood can never do a wig.
They just can't.
They can't do a wig.
Anyway.
But I digress.
So I don't...
There's a very difficult thing.
Here's Trump.
Trump is asking 30 years ago?
And there's another thing people ask.
They're saying, why didn't you call the police?
And I, as a...
As a human, as a man, as a husband, as a member of society, I recognize that there are people who have to handle the intimacy and the embarrassment of sexual violation in their own way.
And there are some people who happen to want to look the other way.
They don't want to bring it up.
As E.G. Harrell says, I was born in the 40s.
We don't do this.
Okay, fine.
But you didn't call the police, but you're calling now.
And then there are victims who say stupid things, who say crazy things.
There is a woman who, for example, who might, in some type of a screen play later, talk about predation almost lustily, or I don't know.
I don't know how this works.
I'm not sure.
I'm not sure the best way.
But I do know that because, and this is human, because people for the most part love Donald Trump and enjoy him and feel rightfully so that he has been the subject of absolute justice in I mean, it's an onslaught.
To say that it's unfair, it belies the horror of this.
But I know that if this were Joe Biden, they would say, the hell with it.
Why?
Because I hate Joe Biden.
And I hate Hunter Biden.
And I hate everything about the Bidens.
And Hillary Clinton.
And if somebody could find something right now that shows are connected, Hillary Clinton with the suicide or the death of Vince Foster, everybody in this room would say, do it!
I don't care how long ago it was.
Do it!
There were people who wanted to keep going after Teddy Kennedy over and over regarding Mary Jo Kopechny.
We'll never get the story behind that one.
We will never.
Ever get the story behind Mary Jo Kopechny?
Never.
Do you hear what I'm saying?
Never.
There will never be.
Ever.
A resolution of that one.
Believe it or not, she could have been asleep in the back.
There were some who say that he might not have even known about it.
Anyway.
It comes down to simply this.
If you don't like the person, then you will want one particular system of justice.
You will bend the rules accordingly.
If you do like the person, you will say, wait a minute, this isn't fair.
That's the way human beings are.
One system.
One system.
That's it.
That is how we do this.
One system.
One system.
Do you hear what I'm saying?
One system.
This is the only way to do this.
One system.
And what is very difficult for people to realize is that Donald Trump showed so much contempt for the court, for the judge, for the defendant, for the jury, for everything.
Now, how did that...
What would the verdict be?
He went in there with a $5 million.
He had $5 million.
That was it.
The first case, defamation and the sexual assault, $5 million.
He leaves with $83 or whatever.
Because he didn't stop.
Now, can I tell you that it would not have been $83 million on its own?
No.
No.
But when you have Alina Haba, and I don't understand this thing.
People, to show you how demented we are, people will say, she's hot.
And I'm saying, do you understand what this man is looking at right now?
If your child was medevaced from a From a scene of an accident.
And your doctor came in to save your child's life.
And that doctor who was between your child and death, would you say, she's hot?
You wouldn't think about that.
But this is who we are today.
It's really not our fault because we're all demented.
We have been so habituated by social media.
We just don't know anything.
Not only that.
We don't know anything about how the system works.
Donald Trump walked in and took $5 million.
He should have been told, they already sued you for defamation.
They put you on notice.
They're trolling.
Kaplan, the lawyer, I don't want to say she's a Democratic activist, but she's connected.
Drive them crazy by never mentioning her name again.
Get off this truth social.
Stop with the capital letters.
Ignore it.
Talk about running the country.
Talk about running the country.
Sir, shut up!
He took five million dollars and then stormed out of the courtroom.
I don't know what I would have done.
Some lawyers would have maybe even withdrawn and said, I can't go through this.
And I sure as hell would have made it very clear to that judge, don't hold me against this.
Don't think I'm...
Alina Haber better never get anywhere near this other district.
I would have done everything to say, I apologize because I've got my reputation.
What if I've got to come back for this judge?
Or the other judges?
Weren't you Trump's lawyer?
Uh-huh.
Is that the way you let...
Is that the way you let your client act?
You don't understand.
What do you mean I don't understand?
You've got to have control of your client.
You're an officer of the court.
We may not want you around here anymore.
We're not too sure whether you're up to this task.
What if you have somebody else?
El Chapo was more respectful than this.
There were mobsters, killers, who never had an outburst.
Never!
Never!
Serial killers!
Jeffrey Dahmer acted like it was a parking ticket.
And this is something that people just can't get away from.
Edge says, by her own words, if they both entered the change rooms together, in my opinion, that becomes consenting, so therefore her claims are invalid.
No!
I thank you for your comment.
No!
If two people enter, if you go out on a date with somebody and you and she consent, To a date.
You and she consent to come to your home or apartment afterwards and you rape her?
And you rape her?
Are you going to say, well, they went off together?
No.
No.
No, no.
What you're saying is that might cause some doubt.
And if you think, do you think, Edge, that you're going to say, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I have a special instruction for you.
Mr. Trump testified, and Ms. Carroll testified, that both of them entered, let's say, a dressing room consensually.
Therefore, we're going to dismiss the case because rape, sexual battery, sexual assault, cannot occur because they both entered into a dressing room together.
Therefore, as a matter of law and as a matter of fact, I'm telling you that in no way could sexual battery have occurred.
What?
What?
You don't understand.
They went in together.
So what?
No, no, no, no.
It must have been invalid because they went into this dressing room together.
What?
And the jury who listened to her, the jury who sat there, we didn't.
The jury did.
We didn't.
The jury did.
We didn't.
The jury did.
That's the story.
The jury did.
The jury did.
They did this.
They did this.
The jury, they will tell you, we were there.
We watched her attitude.
We watched the way she looked.
We saw all this, all this stuff.
We looked.
Do you see?
Okay, fine.
This is the part, this is the thing, this is the part which I, and I appreciate what you're saying.
I appreciate how you're trying to point at something, but it could never work this way.
It doesn't, what you're saying, I'm sorry to say, does not work.
Barry Jenner says, they can sue for whatever amount because of tort laws?
Yeah.
But you have to be able to say there has to be some connection.
For example, if she had sued for a billion dollars, let me ask you, ask Alex Jones.
Did Alex Jones commit a billion dollars worth of defamation?
A billion?
They're going to have to look at compensatory damages.
You know, medical loss of, you know, stuff that you can actually quantify.
I lost my job, I have a physical, you know, that.
Compensatory, actual, out-of-pocket, provable.
And then compensatory damages, or punitive damages.
This is where the court says, oh, by the way, ladies, we've had punitive damages since the beginning of time.
If you feel, in particular, if you feel that these egregious moments were so bad, so horrible, so terrible, so out of the ordinary, so awful, so etc., etc., etc., etc.
And you want to really, really show these people your anger.
If you believe that Monsanto or Bayer or some company was extremely negligent by allowing glyphosate and cancer-causing chemicals to leach into the aquifers, if you believe If you believe that these people were so,
how do I say this, that this degree of horror was such that you have to go a little bit above and beyond to really show these people, really show these people what they did and how they hurt you and how they harmed you.
If you really, really, okay.
You got it?
Then you can order punitive damages.
This has been around since because it's called smart money or exemplary money.
Damages.
It's up to you.
They've got Alex Jones on a billion dollars.
Is that excessive?
I think an appellate court might say, no, that's a little bit much.
How about a trillion, a gazillion, a gajillion?
There comes a point where you say that's enough.
But if a jury, great deference is given this jury, and if you as a juror were allowed to sit there and say, I listened to what was the testimony from Joe Biden and his family, and the contempt that we feel, the complete disregard for the rule of law as exhibited by Joe Biden and his son, we order, we, whatever, a gajillion dollars, then you would say, well, that makes sense.
This is the way our system works.
You ask the jury to assess.
What do you think?
What do you think happened?
Lori says, born in conspiratorium, he should have paid her off.
Can he now?
Oh, they can settle.
Oh, absolutely.
They should have tried this.
I agree with you.
They're looking at...
One of the appellate issues is going to be, is the amount of punitive damages so great?
She was charged, what was it, 18 million?
No, it was 16 million and went to 18 million.
They're going to see whether the factor of 6 or 10 is okay.
They're going to also ask, and this is the most important.
And I think this makes the most sense.
How can you merely go into a case, it's almost like Trump did before this non-jury, this bench trial, where the issue of liability has already been determined and all we're doing is talking about damages.
This jury, this jury was told, don't worry about what the facts of this were.
Don't worry about the configuration of the Of the dressing rooms.
The judge could have said, and it's not that far, we're going to have a visit.
We're going to take the jury.
We're going to have the marshals.
We're going to drive to Bergdorf Goodman.
We're going to see the configuration and the setup of the rooms.
And we're going to have somebody testify and authenticate that, yes, this is how the...
Rooms were set up in 1996 or whatever it was.
That nothing has changed.
And then Alina Habba in her Louis Vuitton shoes or whatever it is, in her smart address, the hot lawyer, as you would say, can walk in and maybe later on say, now I want you to imagine, later in closing, this is where he walked in, saw her, and immediately...
If these were the facts of the case, went to this dressing room.
Look at where this was.
Look at where the dressing room was in configuration or in association with other dressing rooms.
They were right next to each other.
Why is this man the most well-known...
Everybody knows Donald Trump.
Why would he risk...
Being seen.
Isn't that Donald Trump?
Is he going into a...
I don't know the configuration of it, but let's assume you could just see.
What time was it?
Were there other people saying...
Did you ever go to a TJ Maxx dressing room where you got the number and their clothes are piled up?
I'm sure it's not the same, but there's all kinds of people there.
This jury never heard any of that.
What if, for example, the facts were this was, let's say, I don't know what time of the month it was, or excuse me, time of the year.
This was Christmas time.
But imagine a store of this caliber.
And by the way, the chances of him running into somebody he knows at one of the premier department stores on 57th and 5th, right there.
So he's going to walk in.
Donald Trump, right in the front, again, I'm assuming this, just met her.
Doesn't know her from Adam.
May have been.
Remember, somebody thought it was a picture of Marla Maples.
They're saying, oh, she's not my type, and then there is a picture of her when she was younger, and she's smiling, and she looked like Marla Maples, and somehow that was meant to mean, I don't even know what that was meant to mean, but in any event, they think that's a big deal.
Okay, fine.
That jury could have sat there and said, I'm not buying this.
So get it straight.
He walks in.
Somebody.
All these women.
All these people.
All these ladies who lunge.
Everybody.
The most.
The most.
Well, Mr. New York.
He was everybody.
He's on every New York Post.
He is the most famous person you've ever seen in your life.
And he decides that this overwhelming lust.
This sexual, raw attraction that he has for this woman is so great, so overpowering.
He has got to have sex with her now.
And not just sex, but rough, criminal, violent, inappropriate, in a dressing room next to all these other...
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, if that makes sense to you, do what you've got to do.
Because part of your deliberation is going to say, is this even possible?
Is this likely?
Is this nuts?
You don't have to say whether somebody's a liar.
This isn't about whether somebody made this up.
It's about did this and could this have happened?
Do you understand this?
Do you understand this?
And this is the part which is critical.
This is the part which is the most important.
I just want people to understand.
They never got this chance.
This was already litigated.
It was already determined.
This issue of liability was already determined.
Same thing for Alex.
Alex lost by default.
It was by default initially.
Do you see how this thing works?
Let me tell you something.
I have got...
I am...
There's a lot that's wrong with this.
A lot.
So all they were trying to...
So what exactly was Trump supposed to do?
Even Alina Haber, what was her case?
Now, what she did was she acted like a fool by basically saying, what about the DNA and the dress?
Don't bring this up.
This is a collateral issue that's already been determined.
Don't bring this up.
We've already...
Fine.
You don't spring it in front of the jury.
There's a point to be made there for that, though.
There's a point to be made.
There's something there.
There's some...
There's some rational part of this, a point to be made.
This is something which is, again, important.
But Trump, Trump sat there and basically made that jury hate him.
And it could have been done in a very sterile way.
They showed him.
Remember, that jury, that first jury, it was 5 million total.
Everything.
The defamation and the sexual violation.
Here, they couldn't wait.
Same thing with Rudy Giuliani.
They threw stuff at him.
Oh, he's got 184 million.
Now, it must have taken everything in this power.
And this Roberta Kaplan told him, we're putting you on notice.
If you do this again, we're going to come after you again.
But knowing him, knowing our good friend Donald Trump, he just doesn't, you know, he's...
I don't know.
Is he going to be able to...
In order to appeal this, if you want to appeal this, you might have to put up 20% of the amount.
I know for the first appeal, he has a bond, I believe, for that.
In this case, he has to put up some kind of a security in order for him to appeal.
You just don't appeal this in perpetuity.
There's at least a preliminary showing of correctness of verdict, if you will.
So he's looking at that.
This is, well, John Jelaine says, are we dealing with premeditated lawfare?
Of course we are.
But here's the thing, John.
You have lawfare.
In this case, with a...
And remember, it has been alleged that her case is bankrolled, that they went looking for these cases.
They went, anybody here have a...
There was an ad that runs on one of the local stations here in New York that said...
Dr. Hiram Gillespie was in private practice at this hospital and was reported to have sexually battered or abused X amount of women over X amount of time and blah blah blah blah.
And this man, this doctor or whatever it was, if you were a patient of his, If you were a patient of Dr. So-and-so, and if you came into contact, call this number.
And during the court cases, when New York extended the statute of limitations, people would say, if you were involved in any kind of a problem with whatever, okay, fine.
So, is it law fair?
Yes.
Yes.
Where does the motivation of a lawsuit come from?
Does that come into play?
No.
Because there's motivation to sue and motivation not to sue.
Why are you not suing on behalf of people?
Well, because this doctor so-and-so has been a family friend for years.
Oh, I see.
So you're not suing.
Lawfare is a fascinating concept.
It is being used now, especially liable, liable.
Do you know that there are cases where you read them all the time, I get these verdict reports.
A man left paralyzed by a tractor, trailer, whatever, $10 million.
Permanent paralysis, children, brain damage, $80 million, $100 million.
You don't see these verdicts.
And Rudy Giuliani, $180-whatever million?
And Alex, trillion?
I mean, what is it?
That's not a trillion.
A billion dollars?
Come on.
So, the answer, is it lawfare?
It's in the eye of the beholder.
Always has been.
Always has been.
What do you think about the tobacco lawsuits?
What do you think about when everybody went out and they started going after the tobacco companies?
By the way, they're still in business.
The tobacco companies where you deliberately put out a product that causes cancer.
Everybody and their mother knew that cigarettes cause cancer.
Do you see how this thing works?
It's fascinating, is it not?
Step back for one second, my friend.
Let's talk about our dear friends.
Speaking of somebody who...
Talk about lawfare.
Talk about somebody going after you.
The great Mike Lindell with some of the best products ever.
Our friends at MyPillow.com.
Promo code Lionel.
All right, my friend.
It's time to hail and salute our great friends at MyPillow.com.
And if you use promo code Lionel, you get a free gift.
No purchase necessary.
I know, I know, a free gift.
It's a tautology, so sue me.
But listen, listen carefully.
What are we talking about?
Giza Dream bed sheets.
MyPillow 2.0.
Sheets, slippers, percales, towels, quilts, bedspreads, mattresses, mattress covers, mattress toppers, linens.
Kitchen towels, bathrobes, name it!
Items to help you luxuriate and relax.
Think about it.
And they're monster sellers right now.
Listen to me.
Slippers.
My slippers.
Think about it.
What do they do with MyPillow?
They make things real soft and plush and comfy.
How perfect.
And when they apply that genius to slippers, look out.
Look out.
Look at the specials right now, but only if you use promo code LINEL.
So go to MyPillow.com slash Lionel.
Solid disverbial.
MyPillow.com slash Lionel.
Or call 800-645-4965.
Call right now and watch how fast Mike answers the phone.
MyPillow.com.
The best.
Now my friends, here's what happens.
Next.
We have the big case, which is also Very, very important, and that's a critical, critical, very, very, very, very critical case.
This is the New York case involving Tish James.
Now, this is the one that is absolutely mind-boggling.
There is a statute in New York.
Now, think about this.
Here you've got a defendant, Donald Trump.
Being accused by the plaintiff, E. Jean Carroll, who is saying, I was victimized.
In the case of Donald Trump in this New York court, there's nobody, there's nobody, no bank, no financial institution, no lending institution, nobody who said, he screwed us, he hurt us, we were damaged by and from him.
Think about this.
It's the most incredible thing in the world.
Nobody, but nobody, nobody is saying to us that they were damaged.
Nobody.
Nobody.
The state of New York, the Attorney General, on her own, on her own, is coming forth and saying such and such.
And nobody But nobody has ever said that they were harmed by Trump, they were hurt by Trump.
In fact, what they said was, it doesn't matter how Trump values or what form of valuation to use as to the worth of his properties, everybody always provides an independent form of valuation and review, irrespective of what you claim something is worth.
It doesn't make any sense.
Who's the victim?
Nobody.
That's the one that kills me.
I mean, it is nuts.
And they want to shut him down.
And that is as partisan.
You've got Tish James who said, I'm going to go after him.
She was elected as the Attorney General of New York to go after Trump.
That to me is unethical.
You've got a judge who, remember when he has his clerk right there and Trump sits there?
Again with Alina Haba, who I don't, listen, I'm sorry.
I want somebody to calm things down.
I don't want her to go out and to start slamming the judge.
Why are you doing this?
You're taking whatever remote chance you have of victory, and you're in a case where the judge is the sole trier of fact, the sole determinator of who is and who isn't liable, and you're insulting this judge.
And I'm wondering, why?
Why are you doing this?
Because she has to go on TV.
Because everybody today Wants to slam.
In the world of social media, the word of the day is slam.
So-and-so slams.
He was slammed.
The jury was slammed.
Everybody slammed.
Oh, it's the word.
Everybody wants to be slammed.
Oh, it just drives me nuts.
Social media has brought out and inspired insanity.
You've got to ask yourself the question, what lawyer, in their right mind, what lawyer?
One of these days, you know, you can lose a court case.
Take this guy, Engus, whatever his name is, this New York judge.
And you know he has friends and neighbors saying, what are you going to do about this?
Boy, they're really laying you out.
Well, we'll see about this.
To go out and think that you can say whatever you want.
That this is Megyn Kelly, or you can make fun of how somebody looks, or everything that brought you prominence in politics, you're doing now in a courtroom?
And nobody can tell you.
Makes you wonder why Taco Pena said, I'm leaving.
I'm out of here.
And this guy loves the light, the limelight, more than anybody.
Lori Cuck says, gotta go to church.
See you tonight.
Bless you all.
Bless your heart.
Pray for us, Lori.
Pray for us.
By the way, today, we might be doing a little, might be doing at 4 o 'clock.
We have an event, so I might do tonight's.
Please, always, always subscribe to this channel.
Always hit that little bell so you're notified because if I do a live video or something comes up or whatever it is, you've got to do this.
You've got to subscribe.
Subscriptions are critical.
We need you to always know what's going on.
And that, by the way, for some reason in today's, that's all that matters.
That's today's worth.
How many subs?
How many subs?
What about the quality of it?
Who cares about the quality?
It's the subs.
Okay, fine.
So anyway, that's neither here nor there as they say.
Now, my friends, what we have to also realize, we have to also understand, is something which is so, so, so monstrously important.
What is this going to do to the election?
How is this going to do?
How is this going to affect his stature?
His momentum?
His steam?
How will this affect it?
This is what's critical.
Critical!
He is going to be the nominee.
The Republican nominee.
The question is, Will he be allowed for round two, either by the electorate, by the people who control the votes, by the people who control the elections and who qualifies and what's certified?
Anybody's guess.
Joe Biden will not be the nominee.
It is ridiculous.
It strains...
Credulity to the point that you can't.
You can't.
He cannot in any way be, and I can't say this enough, he cannot be brought to the point of...
He cannot be...
How do I say this?
He cannot be...
Pushed.
Pushed.
Allowed.
I don't know.
This is where we just guess.
This is where we guess.
Let me say this again.
It is 282 days.
All I know is I will take Donald Trump no matter how he is, no matter what form he is in, no matter how he is hobbled, hurt, harmed.
It doesn't matter.
There is no Republican who even can come close.
Nikki Haley?
Don't even make me laugh.
Republicans, Democrats, out of the question.
Bobby Kennedy is a joke.
That is a joke.
All he's going to do is take votes away from Trump.
He's going to mimic Trump 100% in terms of Israel.
Who has apparently pled complete fealty to the same Israel approach that Trump would take, a la via Jared Kushner, and his anti-vax, even though it's not, does more to appeal to the Republican-Libertarian versus the left, who loves vaccines and loves draconian measures to limit our freedom and the like.
Today is Raul's 70th birthday.
Ladies and gentlemen, let us all stop right now and wish Raul Rodriguez a happy, happy birthday.
Send your love.
He's a member of the family and a treasured member of the family.
And to you, my friend, we say feliz cumpleaños.
To you, my friend, God bless you.
This is quite the year.
Mrs. L, you, what more can I say?
All right, dear friends.
Now, I said tonight we're probably going to start at 4. Well, yeah, 4. We have an event.
I'll tell you about this after the fact.
Not before, but I will tell you after the fact, so we'll see about that.
Please, I ask you, make sure you absolutely, positively, Sign up.
Please, please sign up, dear friends, for our...
What am I trying to say?
Subscribe, excuse me.
This is Mrs. L's Twitter.
She is about to release incredible information that you are going to see as to how kids, kids are being not only groomed, but people are instructed into how to...
To commit sextortion.
This is mind-boggling.
Subscribe to her.
Do what I say.
She is...
I'm saying this right now.
I'm saying this.
Do not attribute this to her.
There are so many phonies in the world of child protection.
Everybody now is a warrior.
Everybody his youth just grabbed onto that.
Okay, fine.
Can't stop it.
You know, they say that imitation is the greatest form of flattery.
Well, outright theft must be real complimentary.
The war against our kids is just out.
It's beyond imaginable.
She is the best voice there is.
So my friend, let me, oops, let me ask you, please, there it is.
One more time.
Sign up for her.
YouTube channel at Lynn's Warriors.
Lynn's, L-Y-N-N-S underscore Warriors.
And sign up for her.
Subscribe to her on YouTube at Lynn's Warriors as well.
This is critical.
And by the way, there's a lot of other people they mean well, but all they want to do is say, what do you think of my facelift today?
Am I hot?
And let me count how many times I say pedophile or pedophile.
That's it.
I'm sorry.
This is my opinion.
This is not about pedophiles.
This is about people who are using the system.
You know, we were watching this terrible Netflix show, Griselda.
Cocaine traffickers were not about liberal politics.
They weren't about mind expansion.
It was about money.
Slave masters were not racist.
They were into money.
A rapist is not a heterosexual.
How this word...
Just like slammed.
And hi guys.
Hey guys.
That is the...
Also, bruh.
Hey bruh.
Have you noticed any of you who have spent any time watching police vest camera videos?
Of miscreants being beaten up and arrested.
It's bruh, hey bruh.
Bruh, bruh, bruh, bruh, bruh, bruh.
Not bro, bruh.
Bruh, bruh, bruh, bruh, bruh, bruh.
To the point where I say, why are they doing it?
Well, that's where we are with this word pedophile.
It's become a part, this concatenation, this inculcation.
It's almost like a mantra.
And you're missing the point.
But it becomes, again, this whatever.
So there you have it.
My friends, tonight, I believe 4 o 'clock will be our next time.
Have a great and a glorious day.
And to you, Raul Rodriguez, happy, happy, happy, happy birthday to you.
Dear friend, we thank you.
Thank you.
Lori, thank you.
John, Jelaine, thank you.
Barry Taylor, Edge Dweller.
Thank you also.
And Steve Rezor, our new member, thank you as well, dear friends.
Have a great and a glorious and a wonderful day.
Remember, think for yourself.
Don't ever let anybody tell you, you know, what to think and what not to think.
And until we meet again later on today at 4 p.m., don't forget the monkey's dead.
The show's over.
Sue ya.
▲
Export Selection