Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 24, 2023 - Lionel Nation

55:49

Ghislaine Maxwell/Jeffrey Epstein Case Explained in Depth — @LionelNation

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Disaster can strike when least expected.
	Wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes.
	They can instantly turn your world upside down.
	Dirty Man Underground Safes is a safeguard against chaos.
	Hidden below, your valuables remain protected no matter what.
	Prepare for the unexpected.
	Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off and secure peace of mind for you and your family.
	Dirty Man Safe.
	When disaster hits, security isn't optional.
	When uncertainty strikes, peace of mind is priceless.
	Dirty Man Underground Safes protects what matters most.
	Discreetly designed, these safes are where innovation meets reliability, keeping your valuables close yet secure.
	Be ready for anything.
	Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off today and take the first step towards safeguarding your future.
	Dirty Man Safe.
	Because protecting your family starts with protecting what you treasure.
	The storm is coming.
	Markets are crashing.
	Banks are closing.
	When the economy collapses, how will you survive?
	You need a plan.
	Cash, gold, bitcoin.
	Dirty Man Safes keep your assets hidden underground at a secret location ready for any crisis.
	Don't wait for disaster to strike.
	Get your dirty man safe today.
	Use promo code DIRTY10 for 10% off your order.
	thud
	Good day.
	I have been wanting to discuss this for a while.
	And I've been waiting for the right moment to do it.
	And the issue is Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
	And the latest news that you are hearing that is being reported regarding it.
	I just did two back-to-back.
	Parts one and parts two.
	On my private channel, going into excruciating detail.
	Excruciating.
	Bold, brash, naked questions regarding What you should be thinking and asking regarding this case, based upon different levels.
	What is being reported in the media, what is being reported in, I guess, other particular avenues, and how one goes about it.
	If you're not able to determine the truth of something, you don't make it up.
	You don't say, well, therefore, I think since this result would be tantalizing, I'm going to go along with this way.
	You don't do it like that.
	I want you to think like a homicide detective or a detective or a prosecutor or somebody, a district attorney.
	I want you to think.
	Think about what you can prove.
	Now, if you want to be a mystery writer, that's okay.
	If you want to just wax.
	Philosophic and enjoy.
	This could be this and maybe fine.
	But I'm going to tell you again how you approach this.
	And the first thing I want to do is to ask that you always subscribe to this channel.
	Like this channel.
	You've heard this.
	Everybody says it because there's a reason for it.
	And hit that little bell so you're notified of new videos and the like.
	It's critical that you do this.
	Critical.
	The word conspiracy theory has absolutely been, it's a subject of great fascination for me because of what it means to me as a lawyer versus what it means to you as a citizen.
	And conspiracy is basically a union, an agreement between two or more guilty people, and guilty people is a very important term because that excludes the police, but two or more guilty people who are involved in a confederation of sorts to bring about or to do something which is illegal.
	And it's usually kept quiet.
	It's obviously not.
	You can't have a conspiracy of people.
	I mean, you could.
	You could say, by the way, I want everybody to know we're plotting to traffic and drugs and just wanted everybody to know.
	It doesn't normally work like that just to bring you up to speed.
	But nonetheless, that is what a conspiracy is.
	And specifically, conspiracy...
	Remember, always look for definitions.
	Always look for definitions.
	Always, always, always look.
	This is under 18 U.S.C.
	371.
	Conspiracy.
	If two or more persons conspire, either to commit any offense against the United States or to defraud the U.S., blah, blah, blah.
	Conspire.
	The conspiracy.
	And...
	They don't really tell you too much about what a conspiracy is, but again, it is a confederation.
	It is an agreement between two guilty people.
	And the reason why I say two guilty people, let's say you're dealing with an undercover police officer, and the undercover police officer comes to you and says, hey, listen, do you want to, let's sell drugs, and you say, okay, and they arrest you for a conspiracy.
	Well, how are you conspiring with a cop?
	He would have never done this.
	So, in some jurisdictions, they say, no, it's going to be two guilty people, two people who are not police officers, etc., etc., etc.
	You got it?
	Good, good, good, good.
	Now, let's continue.
	I further looked, and I saw what the word conspiracy theory means in terms of common parlance.
	And I looked at Merriam-Webster.
	It defines two things.
	Number one, conspiracy theory is a theory that explains an event or set of circumstances as a result of a secret plot by usually powerful conspirators.
	That's interesting.
	Conspiracy theory is normally involving government or...
	You know, cadres of people versus just two ordinary schlubs who decide to pull something up.
	That's one theory.
	The other one is, and this is very interesting, the alternate theory is a theory asserting that a secret of great importance is being kept from the public.
	Now think about this one.
	Think about the implications of this.
	How many subjects, how many, how many How many theories asserting a secret of great importance is being kept from the public?
	Well, let me tell you something.
	I do not think it is at all unrealistic to think that any government is keeping a lot from the people, especially when it deals with war or national security.
	So, under this definition, which is very, very weird, if a government...
	Is keeping matters of great importance from you that are secret, or keeping secret matters of great importance, that's a conspiracy theory?
	This, by the way, is a means by which a lot of people confuse the term.
	It's become a general term for just an explanation of something that either is not accepted or has not been provided for by the government.
	Or by somebody else, it's an alternate theory.
	But you know that normally, when you say conspiracy theory, the focus, the focus on it is the belief system in kind of either a little bit of crackpot or baseless or unfounded.
	That's what people think.
	So understand that word.
	That word.
	That word.
	It is critical.
	And it's never meant what it means like today.
	You must be a student in euphemism before you are able to truly understand what is happening today.
	Okay?
	You got that?
	So understand that term.
	To me, conspiracy is a crime.
	And the theory of a crime means nothing.
	But I think differently than most people.
	Most people are not.
	Law trainer.
	It means something different to me.
	That's all.
	So let's put that aside because you're going to read this.
	In every story, somebody will say whenever there's something that's either unfounded or kind of crazy or daft or what have you.
	Now, if some people that are not liked by a lot of people conspire and they're a bad guy, Nobody will ever call that a conspiracy theory because it's the truth.
	So you see how that works?
	First and foremost, understand how that works.
	And also, this is my private channel.
	Let me just say this again.
	Let me just say this again.
	Very, very important.
	If you really want to see the deep part of this, go there.
	Now, next.
	And by the way, may I ask, who is new?
	Do we have any new folks today?
	Do we have any new...
	Is there anyone here right now who has never listened before, who is a first-timer, a first-timer to our efforts in the morning?
	Somebody here.
	Just let me know.
	I'm always curious.
	I like to know where people are from and kind of what they do and that sort of thing because it's very interesting because sometimes I'm always interested in...
	Getting new folks and new people involved.
	So let me know throughout the day who is and who is not real.
	Not real.
	New.
	Or real for that matter.
	Now.
	Anna.
	Anna, welcome.
	Oops.
	Anna is new.
	Anna is...
	Always have a case for your phone.
	How people do not have cases, I will never know.
	Do you ever have...
	Do you have these...
	Teenagers who have cracked glass.
	I don't understand that.
	Christos, the honeyman, is new as a veteran.
	Yes, indeed he is.
	Thank you.
	Now, let me go...
	Here's a new case.
	This is from CNN.
	Let me read this to you.
	CNN, this was published at 526 AM.
	This was written by Amy Cassidy and Lauren Saeed Morehouse.
	Convicted, and we're going to look at this, and we're going to maybe stop, and I'm going to point out, wait a minute, hold it, because I'm going to teach you how to think like a homicide detective, as a prosecutor, as a lawyer.
	Think very carefully.
	We always look for anything that doesn't explain, point to anything that assumes facts, not in evidence, anything that's repetitive, etc., etc.
	Let's go through it.
	Convicted child sex trafficker, Galate Maxwell.
	By the way, interesting, she was finally...
	They did up her case to child trafficking with nobody else, by the way.
	Just by herself.
	She trafficked by herself.
	All right.
	Has said a decades-old photograph of Prince Andrew with his sexual abuse accuser, Virginia Giuffre, is fake in a series of interviews from prison.
	The disgraced British socialite And you must use those particular words.
	She was a socialized, she's disgraced, the fallen, the low, the betrayed.
	Is currently serving a 20-year sentence in U.S. federal prison.
	She is in Connecticut, I believe now, but this was taken when she was in Florida.
	So I don't know how...
	I might be confused here.
	But anyway...
	She's in prison for carrying out a years-long scheme with her longtime confederate Jeffrey Epstein to groom and sexually abuse underage girls.
	Speaking from a Florida jail to UK...
	She's in Connecticut now, right?
	Is she in Connecticut now, honey?
	Okay.
	I'm sorry, who's in Connecticut?
	Ghislaine.
	No, she's in Florida.
	Oh, she's in Florida.
	No, no, no.
	She's in a very cushy Florida.
	Pardon me.
	I stand corrected.
	She's in Florida now.
	She was talking to Talk TV, which aired a special program.
	Why is she doing this?
	Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, ding.
	I don't know about this.
	Are all her appeals exhausted?
	Why would her lawyers do this?
	What's the point of this?
	I don't know.
	I don't know about this.
	I would say be very good.
	This is recorded.
	Everybody knows this is going on.
	Why is this being allowed?
	So just put this.
	Aside, and ask yourself, why is that?
	Again, if you've got any appeals, any chance of anything being done, anything, any chance of perhaps change, of exchanging prisoners, any requests that are out there, whatever.
	You've got to ask yourself, why are you doing that?
	That may not prove to be wise.
	But, she says, quote, I don't believe it is real for a second.
	In fact, I'm sure it's not.
	There has never been an original.
	I don't believe it happened, and certainly the way it described would be impossible.
	I don't have any memory of going to Tramp.
	I guess it's the club or whatever it is.
	Now, Prince Andrew, of course, you know who he is, denied Jouffre's allegation that he was introduced to her at London's Tramp nightclub in 2001, before the 17-year-old Jouffre was allegedly forced to perform a series of acts with the British Royal.
	Giffray filed a civil lawsuit in U.S. court in 2021 against Andrew, who was also known as Duke of York, alleging sexual abuses while she was a minor on multiple occasions.
	Andrew later settled out of court for an undisclosed figure without admitting any wrongdoing, and the case was dismissed.
	Still, the allegation against the senior royal severely tarnished his reputation.
	He stepped back from where he did.
	Okay, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	Now, it's very interesting.
	Maxwell appeared to show little remorse to Epstein's victims, offered no apology.
	Instead, she said the victims should take their disappointment and upset out on the authorities who allow the billionaire pedophile to die in prison.
	We'll get to that in a moment.
	Question number one.
	Where was she and why was she not used by the Andrew defense when he was settling his case?
	Number two, he says, there is no original.
	Where are the originals?
	This looks like, obviously, an old actual picture, a physical picture that was duplicated and what have you.
	Today, you realize that term, original picture, it has no currency today because of art.
	So that's a very interesting question.
	Where was this?
	Why did she not, or why was she not made available when it came to the authentication of the document?
	In every case, in every court, in every proceeding, when a document or a picture or anything is used, there has to be authentication.
	Meaning, somebody has to say, is this a true and accurate depiction?
	Of the event that occurred.
	And it's very simple.
	I don't think you need to have her there.
	It's an affidavit.
	And it works something like this.
	You can have your...
	You can say, Ms. Maxwell, yes.
	I'm handing you what's been marked as defense exhibit number one for identification.
	And I show it to opposing counsel for inspection and possible objection.
	Alright?
	Do you recognize this?
	No, I don't.
	What do you mean you don't?
	Well, I don't.
	I mean, I'm in this picture.
	Is this a true and accurate depiction of the event that took place?
	No.
	Why?
	I've never met her.
	I don't ever remember this happening.
	Is this your home?
	No.
	That's very critical.
	Very important.
	And very...
	Very necessary in the course of this.
	Why was this not brought up?
	Now, answer.
	Not knowing what's going on.
	Andrew's people could have said very simply, why?
	Because there was other information, other stuff.
	That was a part of it.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	But there were other aspects of this, other things which we had to talk about.
	Okay, fine.
	But right off the bat, I don't know about you, Andrew, as you know, who had that incredible interview where he said he does not suffer from bromodrosis, but he cannot sweat.
	Remember that BBC or whatever that interview was, which I don't think that was.
	Again, why was that allowed?
	I have no idea.
	Why is Ghislaine speaking and recording?
	I have no idea.
	Why is he speaking?
	I have no idea.
	Who would let him?
	Do this.
	Okay.
	Let me read this to you.
	Maxwell also told Talk TV that she believes Epstein was murdered.
	This is according to CNN, a conspiracy theory for which she offered no evidence.
	Authorities ruled Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while he was awaiting trial on federal charges, accusing him of sexually abusing underage girls.
	Regarding the victims, Maxwell said, I hope they have some closure via the judicial process that took place.
	Maxwell acknowledged during her sentencing last year that she had been convicted of the sex trafficking scheme but stopped short of taking responsibility.
	She did not testify in her own defense, which really would have been interesting.
	Now, let me stop right there and let me ask you to think about What I have just told you.
	Think about this.
	Think about the stories.
	Let me remind you of a few things which are very, very critical before we get deep, deep into the, not to the weeds, but very, very important.
	I want you to take into account the following, which is very important.
	Our sponsors.
	Let me go through this because they are wonderful people and we want to thank them for supporting us and we want to support them obviously as well.
	The first is our friends at ZStack.
	Right now, 15% off of ZStack for yourself during the flu season.
	Remember, we've talked about this repeatedly.
	And what do they have, of course?
	They have this wonderful compound, this wonderful elixir, that has C and zinc, of course, and D, D, which is a miracle, and quercetin, and bioflavonoids, and plant-based, bioavailable phytonutrients.
	That work wonders on fortifying the immune system because, please, I'm not being recriminatory, you do not eat correctly.
	Okay?
	You just don't.
	So that is it.
	Z-Stack, they are great.
	I entreat you.
	I ask you.
	Next, we talked about, in the event, what do you do in the event of an EMP attack, an electromagnetic pulse attack?
	Well, EMP Shield is here.
	And EMP Shield we have talked about repeatedly.
	And this is something which is just, I find, to be so...
	Fascinating.
	This is a veteran-owned company in the Midwest called EMP Shield.
	They've invented a device that not only protects your home and vehicle, but your other devices as well.
	Your RV and ham radio and etc.
	etc.
	They've undergone testing at Keystone Compliance, a military certified facility, and it's listed by the Department of Homeland Security.
	So let me stop right there.
	Please support, read, research.
	Use, always use the links that we provide and we thank you in advance.
	Now, let me go through and let me say, here are the questions I have to ask you.
	Let me also say to you, if you really want me to go through the reasons, here are the questions and here are the things that I want to tell you what are important and what are not important.
	First, Let's start off with the causes of death.
	Now, not really the cause of death, but maybe the types, the manner.
	There are actually five.
	Excuse me, but I want you to think about this acronym.
	NASH.
	Like Graham NASH.
	NASH.
	Natural, accidental, suicide, and homicide.
	Technically, there's unexplained, which, okay.
	In the case of, and this is one thing which years ago people sometimes took, people took, upset with, they did not like, but Kaylee Anthony, remember Kaylee Anthony?
	Casey Anthony's daughter.
	What was the evidence they found in Kaylee Anthony?
	They found a skeleton.
	That doesn't tell you anything.
	That doesn't tell you whether it is natural, accidental, suicide, homicide.
	It's unexplained.
	So how can you prove murder is homicide?
	That's what you have to prove against Casey Anthony.
	You found a skull.
	Now there would have been ways, there are these wonderful little...
	Not wonderful, but had she been drowned?
	Sometimes these diatoms, have you ever heard about diatoms?
	And I'm always looking at things.
	Remember, what I do, I look things up constantly.
	Diatoms.
	Diatoms are, these are these little...
	These are algae, little microalgae found in oceans, waterways.
	And if a person has been drowned, sometimes they can actually be absorbed into bone structure, which is really pushing it.
	But in that case, they couldn't prove anything.
	You have to prove homicide.
	Murder is homicide.
	Theoretically, Kaylee Anthony could have died from a heart attack.
	It's unlikely, but you don't know.
	The question number one is, what evidence we have of Mr. Epstein?
	Where are the results?
	Listen very carefully to that which was provided for by Michael Bodden, forensic pathologist, who was hired by the family to investigate this.
	Don't know what happened with that one.
	Question number one.
	Last night, he, I believe, He was on a Tucker Carlson show, which is a very interesting show, which gives you just an amuse-bouche.
	Just a little sampling.
	A little...
	It's like taking this, scraping off just a thin layer of the facts, giving it to you and saying, there, that's all you're going to get.
	I'm sorry to be so harsh, but it's...
	It's a morsel.
	It's an hors d 'oeuvre.
	It doesn't even come close to it.
	Yeah, long documentaries about things, but not that.
	Okay.
	What are you going to do?
	Question number one.
	What were the findings?
	What were the findings?
	What were the forensic findings regarding hyoid cartilage fracture?
	What were the findings regarding?
	And I explain this again in my private channel.
	What about hyoid bone?
	Hyoid is an interesting bone.
	It's the only bone, I think, that is not connected to anything.
	It's just kind of floating.
	It's under the mandible, towards the back of the throat.
	And in order to crush it, you need crushing pressure, really, not necessarily ligature.
	And by the way, another way you can crack it is that sometimes in football, people have had clotheslines and things like that.
	But that thyroid cartilage, particular hemorrhaging, the hemorrhagic flares in the sclera indicating pressure, normally consistent with homicide, etc., etc., etc., etc.
	There were the ligature marks.
	How deep were they?
	We don't know about the actual findings.
	So there's much that is not known.
	Much that is not known.
	And unless and until somebody can verify this, it remains unknown.
	Some say they have it, some say they don't.
	I don't know.
	That, as an investigative detective, is what I want to know.
	If there's no homicide, that's it.
	If the ligature, depending upon what was found, is not consistent with suicide, then we go back to square one, find out what it is.
	But as you know, most people, including Bill Barr and others, say, well, it was a homicide.
	And we don't know a lot of things, because if you recall correctly, there were the two...
	This jail here at MCC, it wasn't a prison, it was almost like a federal jail, like an administrative holding cell.
	They were either asleep, allegedly, and what have you.
	Next point I'm going to ask is, who was his cellmate?
	Nicholas Tartaglione.
	Who was Nicholas Tartaglione?
	Nicholas Tartaglione, or, to pronounce it correctly, Tartaglione.
	Like L-Y, G-L-I, like Yi Studenti, Yi, you know, Tartaglione.
	He was the ex-Westchester cop charged with facing the death penalty for quadruple homicide.
	Who was he?
	He was Mr. Epstein's cellmate.
	He later, and I was doing some research, according to the federal...
	Prison records?
	He's still in Brooklyn.
	He's at their version of CDC or whatever.
	He's there.
	And you can look at this online yourself.
	Why is he...
	Whatever happened to his case?
	They later said that they waived the death penalty on him.
	And one of the issues, one of the claims, was that he wanted the death penalty waived because he had mitigating...
	Mitigating facts in his favor, hence mitigation, that he assisted Mr. Epstein in his first, in his recorded first, I believe, failed suicide attempt.
	And he does not have that evidence because it was destroyed or what have you.
	So, for reasons that are not really clear, I don't even know where he is now.
	I don't know whatever happened to his trial.
	Did he plea?
	I have no idea.
	They put, And this is the next issue that I would be very concerned about if I were Epstein's family.
	Why would you put Jeffrey Epstein, a man of that stature, in a cell with a quadruple suspect, alleged, innocent to be proven guilty, an alleged cop, quadruple murder suspect, who has nothing to lose, who is facing the death penalty?
	Out of an abundance of caution from Mr. Epstein, I would have said, no, no, no, no, no.
	What are you doing?
	This is unsafe.
	He's unsafe at any speed, to use the Ralph Nader reference.
	When Sammy the Bull, when others said they were going to give testimony against John Gotti, they immediately removed him.
	You move him.
	You move this person.
	You take him out and you take him someplace nobody will ever find him.
	If this were a usual case, they could have taken Mr. Epstein too, let's say.
	And by the way, these are just questions that I have based upon the paucity of information.
	I am not alleging them to be true.
	I'm telling you.
	Questions, my take, my unique take, based upon the evidence that was provided, in part, by this finely researched CNN piece.
	Why would you not take him to some Butte, Montana, Clover Hill, Oregon, Federal, where nobody's there?
	And you put him in a room where they have detectors that can tell Temperature changes.
	That you have food that is checked and double-checked and, oh my God!
	And, depending upon body monitors, to make sure if there's any hint of suicidal tendencies, you're given the proverbial rubber, the padded cell, paper clothes.
	That cannot be used to suspend, to provide ligature in the case of hanging.
	Paper!
	And you're watched constantly.
	Years ago, years ago, in the era of the black arts, there was something called noose on a bun.
	They would even watch the food that was eaten and consumed because you can have something that is given in incremental amounts and then one day you Eat another version of it, and somehow some synergistic event takes place.
	The person is poisoned, but there's no resulting amounts, if you will, of chemicals.
	It might be elevated potassium or something like that.
	Anyway, that's not here, but this is in the past.
	So a lot of questions I'm thinking, and if I were the, if there was a lawsuit by the Epstein family, one of the questions I'm saying, why would you put this man, who is, I mean, I don't have to tell you his importance as a witness in a human trafficking case involving some of the biggest names known on this planet, you're going to put him in a cell with a quadruple homicide suspect?
	I don't know.
	I do not know.
	But that's for other people to decide.
	So we look at this and then we find out what is happening next.
	Here's another question I wish somebody would ask.
	And maybe CNN or the New York Times or Fox News or Tucker or somebody could go into this news.
	And you know what that news is?
	You know what I want to know?
	And I've been saying this.
	Forever.
	And I don't want to say people are repeating what I've said.
	I don't want to go and be that presumptuous.
	But people are saying exactly what I've been saying for the longest time.
	But before we begin, I want to say something right now.
	Again, our sponsors, whom we love and we thank.
	My Patriot Supply.
	Friend, and you are my friend.
	If you have not thoroughly My Patriot Supply is the largest,
	the most popular, the most famous food preparedness MyPillow MyPillow
	.com, promo code Lionel.
	And right now, believe it or not, I am learning that one of the biggest selling items of all time are their slippers.
	So go there, MyPillow.com, promo code Lionel.
	Use that promo code and get a free gift.
	I know, tautological, but nonetheless, it's important.
	Or you can call 800-645-4965.
	800-495.
	Excuse me, strike that.
	800-495.
	800-645-4965.
	800-645-4965.
	MyPillow.com.
	Promo code Lionel.
	They are simply, absolutely the best.
	And we thank you.
	Now, I want you to imagine you're in an investigative agency.
	Maybe you're aware...
	I'm the chief investigator, or the main prosecutor, or the DA, or whatever it is.
	And I want you to look at this.
	So we're going to look at a lot of stories.
	One, I'd like to ask, and we will never know, what specifically were the terms of the agreement, we're recapping now, of what Andrew signed with Virginia?
	Don't know.
	Don't know about this.
	Here's another one for you.
	This was...
	See what I'm doing right now?
	This is called research.
	Virginia Giuffre, in November of last year, she drops allegations against Alan Dershowitz because the woman who was a victim of convicted...
	Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein has agreed to drop allegations against Attorney Alan Dershowitz, saying she may have made a mistake when she also accused him of sexual abuse.
	Now, I'm not going to question that.
	It was settled.
	She may have made a mistake.
	We don't know what kind of a mistake.
	How do you confuse Alan Dershowitz with that?
	I don't know.
	We don't know.
	Nobody knows.
	But that was going on.
	And there also was, if I recall correctly, please correct me if I'm wrong, wasn't there a counterclaim made with David Boies?
	I forget.
	Alan Dershowitz said she was mistaken.
	She sued him.
	Counterclaim.
	Who knows?
	So that was going on.
	But she said, I may have made a mistake.
	Okay.
	Remember, it is the goal of litigation to settle.
	It is to go to make people whole and to say, if we can save you the time, the effort, the unimaginable cost of litigation, good for you.
	But this is Jouffre.
	She's over here.
	She's in the tangent.
	She's over here.
	She is the one who, by the way, is now claiming, or excuse me, she is being claimed by Kalei Maxwell that she...
	It wasn't in the picture.
	Okay, so it's very complicated, but keep in mind where this is going.
	So you've got the Dershowitz thing over here, irrelevant to this.
	You've got the Prince Andrew allegation.
	I say, Andrew, I don't know why you settled this thing, but the following could have also been.
	You could have said, well, just imagine, Virginia Jouffre could have said, well, Let's forget about this picture, shall we?
	Let's put this picture aside.
	I'm going to tell you something, or testify, that only I would know.
	Do you know what happens as of late, if you pursue this, when people start talking about particular physical traits that one may exhibit?
	Have you heard of this?
	Happened to Michael?
	Jackson case.
	I believe there were other cases.
	Famous folks who had men in particular who had whatever.
	Anyway, maybe that was one of many pieces of collective evidence that proved embarrassing and whatever.
	We don't know.
	Again, please like this.
	Only 175 likes is indeed de minimis.
	Okay, so you've got that there.
	What's the question I have?
	Here's the question I have.
	And again, I ask, invite CNN or anybody to ask this question, which I, as an observant scholar of this case, and again, I went into great detail on my own private channel, far deeper than this.
	Far more accusatory, dare I say.
	And I don't accuse somebody of something just because I think, oh, that would be neat.
	Number one, I must address this.
	I must address this.
	And let me say this to you.
	Because I love you and I respect you.
	There is a veritable, ceaseless end of a lot of people who are going online and saying, we now have the official list of everybody who was on the Epstein Plain or Epstein Island or who did this or that.
	Okay?
	You got that?
	We have this list.
	Aha, you say.
	Well, I would say, so what?
	If I represent any of these people, I'm saying, so what?
	What do you have?
	Well, I have a list here that shows the following people who were in Epstein grade.
	First and foremost, you must understand this.
	Jeffrey Epstein in New York City was a fixture for years.
	I saw him one time standing.
	On 5th Avenue, on 57th, right across from where Bergdorf Goodman is, standing there in the street, his place was not too far from there.
	He was a fixture.
	He vetted people in all types of Hollywood and academia.
	Members of the press and people would go.
	There's nothing against the law with that.
	He had dinner parties at his various estates, going on his plane.
	So what?
	That's nice, but I would advise anybody who said, yeah, I was there.
	You have people who lived, who worked in the various properties, on the properties, who said, I never saw anything.
	I I How is it that you can confuse merely having a guest list with somehow criminal culpability?
	See, this is where we need to teach people critical thinking.
	And there's no asterisk that says, yeah, this merely was on the plane, and this wasn't.
	That's not the question I have.
	What question do I have?
	What's the million-dollar question?
	The question is simply this.
	Based upon the testimony of everybody from Jufres to, I don't know if, but it's been suggested by her, that there were recordings, that these places were basically recording studios,
	planes and apartments and villas, where are the, undoubtedly, thousands of hours of, Perhaps information, data, recordings from what happened there.
	Nobody ever asks that question.
	Nobody.
	This is the most important thing.
	And maybe they don't want to.
	I can understand this.
	But if I was the head of the FBI, NSA, CIA, whatever, I'm going to say.
	Friends, we have had, by virtue of this list, of the people who just innocently frequented these various locales, if any of them were to have involved themselves in activity that could be blackmailable and they fall into the wrong hands, dear.
	Lord, what happens?
	I'll make it easy for you.
	This might make it...
	What happens if Putin, Xi Jinping, Macron, Erdogan, MBS, Mohammed bin Salman, what happens if they say, guess what I've got?
	I've got a box.
	Of thumb drives, you wouldn't believe what I've got here.
	Now, can we talk about this venture, or can I use this to perhaps maybe exert influence over you, to have you introduce me to someone, or to change, who knows?
	Nobody has discussed this.
	Nobody.
	Where could they be?
	Alan Dershowitz was the lawyer for some of...
	I don't know if he was just a general house counsel or whatever.
	Would he or would another lawyer be privy to that as attorney-client privilege?
	And does that matter?
	Does that information survive the death of the client?
	Very interesting information.
	I throw that out.
	That's the question I have.
	Virginia Joufray must know something about this.
	House keepers and technical advisors.
	There's a lot of people it takes to maintain those properties.
	That's a lot of stuff.
	Wires.
	And when you went in and searched, you obviously could see what was set up, if at all.
	Maybe there wasn't anything.
	Maybe nothing was recorded.
	I hope not.
	Next question I ask.
	When you are a person of incredible, humane, huge means, you are a billionaire, you have at your leisure, at your disposal, ex, well, sometimes even current, but ex-law enforcement folks who would advise you.
	And there isn't anyone, Worth their salt.
	Who would have ever said to either Prince Andrew or anybody, would not have warned them, be very careful in this place.
	We have heard, we know, everybody knows things, hear things.
	Remember, these are people who are connected to the The highest echelons of Intel, international and the like, who in their right mind would have ever said, yeah, I'll go on the plane with you.
	I'll even go see you.
	Maybe just go in there.
	Okay, maybe you didn't know.
	And I'll just leave it at that.
	Where is that information?
	And the final question, which nobody will talk about and nobody will answer.
	And maybe there is no.
	But this is what I, in my opinion, based upon my experience and my perspective, I've often imagined this scenario.
	How many women were totally alleged to have been victimized by underage and otherwise?
	Let's give me a number.
	200?
	Whatever.
	Give me a number.
	Let's just say over the years, let's say 100.
	Let's be very conservative.
	100 women who at the time were either Now remember, if you are over the age of consent, and you are consensually involving yourself, that's another story.
	We're not talking about that.
	I don't know what the federal law...
	It's very interesting.
	There's a jurisdictional issue there, because New York is one thing, but let's say you're in the islands, or you're on a plane, and is there such thing as...
	I'm sure there is sex trafficking, but is there prostitution?
	Is there assignation?
	I don't know.
	But aside from all that, the question I've always wanted is this.
	When you bring in someone who alleges something that happened, and you have had, and assume you have access to, let's say, some of these purported films or recordings and the like, or maybe not.
	Or maybe just pictures.
	And you ask victim one.
	Go through this.
	Do you see anyone here who at any time, based upon your recollection, take all the time you want, whoever committed a crime against you?
	Turn the page.
	Just like a photo pack.
	Just like the way they do it.
	You know, the line of that man.
	Do you know who he is?
	No.
	But I recognize him.
	Okay.
	Make a little note.
	Check.
	Continue going.
	Don't tell him who...
	Tell her who she is.
	Could be nobody.
	Might be nobody.
	Somebody slipped in as a control.
	Might have been, you know, a greenskeeper who agreed to be.
	Anyway, who knows?
	And then when you get done, you say, great, let me show you who this person is.
	The first person that you checked was this person.
	President of such and such.
	Corporation, company, country, whatever it is.
	Are you sure about that?
	Good.
	Investigate this one.
	Investigate this one.
	Because what is amazing to me, and I use this term, because I am amazed by this, that throughout all of this investigation, for years, decades of this horrible, unless all of these women either decline to prosecute, prefer not to prosecute, because you can't decline if you are the witness, victim of something.
	The prosecutor, the state, the government is the victim, not you.
	You can't decline.
	I mean, they take it into consideration.
	Nobody wants to go forward with a case with a victim who's not interested in this.
	But, unless they've settled out of court, don't want to get involved with it, put it behind them, great, I understand that.
	But assuming, why was Ghislaine Maxwell the only one ever charged out of this whole thing?
	The only person.
	You have to traffic with somebody else.
	There has to be somebody else.
	Where is this?
	And remember, it was during, I believe, the Biden administration when the Department of Justice added on, tacked on human trafficking.
	They did it.
	They did it.
	So there's so much here.
	There's also the way it plays in with Andrew.
	And the royals, what's going on with that?
	I don't know what lawsuits are currently going on.
	I don't know about the cellmate, whatever happened to him, I never know about.
	Now Galen, who, at this point, we know nothing.
	We just, and...
	Because we know nothing, we can't make up stuff.
	We can't extrapolate the facts.
	We can't say, well, therefore, I think it means such and such.
	I mean, you can conjure this up as many ways as you want.
	But it is fascinating.
	And what's interesting to note is simply this.
	Whenever you hear someone tell you that they are broaching the subject, more often than not, you're learning nothing new.
	But it sounds good.
	Will we ever find the truth behind this?
	Probably not.
	I've got so many, again, I can't say this again.
	On my own private channel, I have so many questions that I have asked from the beginning.
	From the beginning, I have wondered, How many times?
	How many issues?
	It's fascinating.
	But let me remind you, and let me say this again to you, which is so, so critical.
	It's important, and I see this all the time, sometimes people, especially who have not really done this before, they get very, very excited.
	And they get so excited that they just...
	I've heard it before, and you've heard it before.
	They just fill in the blanks.
	They just say, yeah, well, therefore, you know, it's so-and-so.
	And like I said, my favorite is we have the list.
	If the list is indeed authenticated, so what?
	What do you mean, so what?
	It doesn't mean anything.
	It doesn't mean anything.
	A lot of people will say, you know, I won.
	William Randolph Hearst, during his time, had his thing.
	Rich people have places where you invite friends.
	I don't know where people have been.
	Why do you think inviting people on a boat or why is it?
	And they have the list of all these stars.
	Okay.
	So what?
	It's called a demurrer versus a traverse.
	It's like, so what?
	Okay, assuming that's true, so what?
	That's it?
	That's your issue.
	You're not asking the right questions.
	And that's my beef.
	They're not asking the right questions.
	Well, here I go again, my friends, one more time.
	Follow my channel.
	Now, also, this is Mrs. L's channel.
	This is her YouTube channel.
	Go and see for yourself what this is.
	Great, great Great, valuable, incredibly valuable information regarding digital safety, which is something which we cannot say enough.
	By the way, let me also give you her Twitter account.
	I beseech and implore you to follow her on Twitter as the following.
	Okay?
	Now I'm going to say this one time.
	No, I'm not going to say this a bunch of times.
	I'm lying.
	It is very important for you to recognize the fact Going into the days of mysteries, you feel like mysteries and, you know, Columbo and whatever.
	To wait until the evidence is there to even promote the story.
	Wait and see if the evidence is even there.
	Don't fill in the blanks.
	Notice the difference between having a suspicion and having proof.
	Oh, suspicions left and right.
	Well, you know, gossip versus proof.
	Allegations versus proof.
	That's what I want.
	I love the proof.
	But the allegations are fun, too, because what you're doing as a detective, you're having suspicions and you're following them.
	It's like the difference between probable cause and reasonable doubt.
	Reasonable doubt are used to convict.
	Probable cause is to get a warrant or arrest somebody.
	That's part one.
	But the real issues, the real issues are fascinating.
	And let me also tell you, the reason why you're not going to hear them on regular TV is they don't have the time.
	They don't have the time, and they just don't care.
	Because you have to recognize this, and it's not their fault.
	They're not involved in telling you.
	This is a lot of people on cable in particular.
	They don't really have the time or the effort or the wherewithal.
	And really, the ratings don't permit kind of deep dives.
	So, to be fair, it's not their fault.
	But don't expect anybody to exhaustively go through this.
	The questions are fascinating.
	And what's even more fascinating are the questions no one's asking.
	Oh, I could go on forever.
	I could tell you stories about why aren't they doing this?
	Why is anyone asking this?
	This is the issue, not that.
	Again, what is it?
	It's critical thinking.
	Critical thinking sounds very, you know, highfalutin.
	We're going to leave it at that.
	My friends, always ask questions.
	Remember, critical thinking is the way to go.
	Have a great and a glorious day.
	Please follow the links that I have provided.
	Please support our sponsors.
	Please continue to watch us.
	Please subscribe to the channel.
	Please like.
	And I want to see your comments.
	Comment below.
	Give me your questions.
	I love your...
	Because the collective, the crowdsource genius that you provide and the questions you ask never cease to amaze me.
	All right, dear friends, we'll see you tomorrow, same bad time, same bad channel, 9 a.m. Eastern Time.

▲