Laura Loomer argues Democrats and radical left influencers like Hassan Piker are orchestrating a "Podcastistan" campaign to manufacture consent for assassination culture. She claims figures such as Piker, who allegedly stated America deserved 9/11, and allies like Zora Mamdani are being amplified by algorithms and foreign actors to normalize violence against capitalists and Jews. Loomer warns that if Democrats regain the House in 2026, they will weaponize committees to obstruct Trump, potentially leading to civil war and the violent destruction of the American empire through state-sanctioned radicalism. [Automatically generated summary]
We are live right now on rumble.comslash Laura Loomer.
Rumble.comslash Laura Loomer.
Be sure that you hit the green follow button, download the Rumble app, enable notifications on your phone so that you never miss an episode when I go live.
Also, be sure that you're following me on X at Laura Loomer and on X at Loomer Unleashed.
Lots to talk about.
This week has been.
Quite an eye opening week as it pertains to the future of the two party political system here in America.
It's not just a problem that's unique to the Democrats.
It's also happening in the Republican Party.
And of course, what I'm talking about is the radicalization of party leadership and the refusal of party leadership to condemn extremist elements.
And of course, just the overall problem of horseshoe theory.
We have now seen, and we've been talking about this a lot here on Loomer Unleashed over the last several months, really over the last two years, how the woke Reich and the radical left, well, Of course, they always find a way to meet in the middle somehow.
And that's what's happening.
And as the woke Reich and the radical left keep repeating each other's talking points, they continue to pollute the minds of, I guess you could call them innocent bystanders, innocent viewers, casual viewers, or just people who are general consumers of conservative right wing political commentary.
And unfortunately, if you are as online as I am, if you are on X or you're on social media, you have seen the way that the algorithm on social media rewards this behavior.
And of course, by this behavior, I'm talking about saying extreme things, being as radical as possible, being as extreme as possible, because the algorithm is designed to continue and further engagement.
And so if somebody is saying something really vile or really violent or Very anti Semitic, or they're advocating for political violence, for example.
We're going to get into some of these Iranian accounts that are, for some reason, allowed to post this AI content on X advocating for the killing of President Trump, or whether it's Candace Owens attacking Erica Kirk, or whether it's Dan Bilzerian putting out campaign t shirts for his new congressional campaign, choking Jewish people out, whatever it may be.
The most radical content gets pushed to the top of everybody's timelines these days.
And that, of course, is having an impact on the overall discourse within the political right and the political left.
And now both parties are having to deal with this extreme faction that is, I wouldn't say popular, but they are loud.
And you don't necessarily need to be popular in order to have your content seen.
So, they like to claim that these people are kingmakers.
Of course, by these people, I'm talking about people like Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson.
And then on the radical left, you have the Young Turks and you have your Hassan Pikers.
And you have a lot of these various podcasters on the left and the so called right, who their goal now is to say the most outrageous thing as possible.
And every single week, it's like a competition between who can one up each other.
And there's actually this really interesting video that was put out by this organization called Canary Mission.
And a lot of different accounts have been posting videos like this.
I actually reshared this video the other day.
And it shows you how the radical left, like your typical experience, your typical example of somebody on the radical left, in this case, an Anna Kasparian or Cenk Uyghur from the Young Turks, and then contrasting them with somebody like a Nick Fuentes, who I don't know why people call him right wing.
He's more leftist of anything, telling people to vote for Democrats, telling people not to vote for Donald Trump.
Now he's saying he's okay with open borders.
That's leftism, right?
Nothing conservative about any of that.
But they literally have the same exact talking points.
And I've been talking about this for a very long time now, how the woke Reich and the radical left, uh, really have joined forces to parrot the same talking points.
And I don't think that it's organic.
I personally think that all of these people have been working together for quite some time now, not just to undermine President Donald Trump, but to undermine, uh, party leadership, to undermine the two party system, to undermine, uh, just, uh, Social cohesion to push a pro Islamic, anti evangelical, anti Jewish message here in America, because of course that targets the largest GOP voting bloc.
And well, if you target the largest GOP voting bloc, you're not going to have GOP majorities.
And the reason why this is becoming so concerning is because now it's not just relegated to the fringe, to the fringe of societies.
These viewpoints are being spread on a mainstream level by some of the largest.
Podcasters in our country.
And the big question is how is it that all of these podcasters happen to have the exact same talking points?
It is statistically impossible, right?
If you were to compare all of the various talking points and all of these sound bites from these different podcasts, statistically impossible to have the exact same phrasing, the exact same terminology at the exact same time on these podcasts.
But what these video clippers and these various videos being posted by people like Milk Bar, which is a popular account that makes a lot of these video comparison clips, or the Canary Mission account, is the fact that the most radical elements in the left and then the so called far right, right?
They call me far right, but those who are considered to be on polar opposites are saying the exact same thing.
I want to go ahead and play this clip for you as an example.
And you can see for yourself, this isn't a conspiracy theory.
This isn't me just trying to have guilt by association.
It's becoming very evident that this is a coordinated messaging campaign and it's being done as a way to make podcasters kind of the arbiters of truth.
And there's a term for this now, if you haven't heard it, it's called Podcastistan.
So, obviously, podcast world, right?
Like Podcastistan.
And there's this idea that.
You know, you have these people who are just so terminally online.
And since Twitter is not real life.
People that spend so much time on social media are kind of divorced from the reality of the real world.
But there's a lot of elected officials and leaders who seem to be afflicted because they themselves are residents of podcastistan.
And there's this big debate about whether or not any of these people have any real influence on voters in the real world or whether or not it's all artificially boosted by the algorithm, uh, for the sake of pushing rage bait because the algorithm rewards people through monetization.
If they say the most outrageous things, because the algorithm is designed to boost viral clips as a way to generate ad revenue for the platforms.
And then, of course, now they have these content creator programs where the creators themselves are getting a piece of this revenue.
So people are motivated and incentivized financially to say the most radical thing possible.
And you have to ask yourself, and a lot of people are asking themselves these days, does Tucker Carlson really believe the stuff he's saying?
Does Candace Owens really believe the stuff that she's saying about Erica Kirk?
And Some people think they do, some people think they don't.
But at the end of the day, there's no denying the fact that this is a coordinated messaging campaign.
And you'll notice that these people in the woke Reich and the radical left also are repeating the same talking points that are being repeated by RT, Russian state television, or Iranian state television.
Or now we've seen the same talking points as a lot of these Iranian state embassy accounts that are pushing out Epstein conspiracy theory talking points.
Anti Trump propaganda and also anti Israel, anti American propaganda as well, trying to make it seem like the United States surrendered to Iran.
So, you tell me coincidence, coincidence, mind reading, or coordination?
We've been saying it for a long time.
We've been saying it for a long time.
Many of us have been saying this for a long time that this is a coordinated movement, that people are getting paid a lot of money, coordinated messaging.
You know, it's really interesting to me because I produce six hours of content per week, I have a small team.
But a lot goes into this, right?
A lot goes into producing the content for your shows.
And what I find to be really interesting too is how a lot of these people, while they're traveling and they're jet setting and they're going on interviews, they have the time somehow to be producing their own shows and having the same exact talking points and then boosting each other on social media at the same time and getting their clips out and doing all this work.
Like, clearly, If you have a full schedule during the day, you're also not having time or you don't have the time to be writing your own messaging, right?
That's why I don't do a daily show because I don't have time every single day of the week to write three hours of my content every single day, right?
I space it out because I need to prepare my show document.
And it's not like I'm reading from a teleprompter, but I'm just explaining this to the audience so that they understand from a production standpoint how it works.
You see, when you're at Fox News or you're at MSNBC or you're at CNN, everything is written for you.
So you come in, you have no hair and makeup done, and you're like, all right, what am I doing today?
And then you have a whole team of producers that sit down with you, and they're like, all right, you're going to talk about this, and this is the A block, and the B block, and the C block, and the D block.
And then we're going to have you do this, and then you're going to say this.
This is your guest, and then we're going to cut to you here, and you're going to do a live shot.
You're done.
You sit in the chair, they do your hair, they do your makeup, and that's how it goes.
For me, right, I come up with my own stories.
I report on the news and then I have my producer who puts it all in a document for me, right, explaining to you how this process works.
And it's not scripted, okay?
Nothing is scripted.
There's no teleprompter, there's no talking points.
It's me talking straight for about two and a half, three hours.
But what's really interesting to me is how these people are able, right?
They have their shows and they do it for hours and hours and hours every single day.
And then they have this content, but meanwhile, they're constantly doing other things.
And part of me wonders who's giving them their talking points?
Who is writing their scripts for them?
Because clearly they have a script.
Clearly, these people are reading from a script.
If you're watching my show, you're not going to be able to find clips of other people saying the exact same thing that I'm saying because I'm not fed talking points.
I'm not fed a script.
Nobody is sitting there writing a script for me and saying, all right, this is what you're going to say today.
You're going to read from the teleprompter, you're going to read from these scripts.
But clearly, as I just showed you, and as this Canary Mission video showed you, and as we've seen from other clips with comparison videos, side by sides of people like Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson and Carrie Prashawn and Megyn Kelly, it's not a coincidence that these people are using the same phrases, the same words with the same inflection in their voice.
Somebody is writing all of this content.
And the question is who?
Who's writing it?
Who's paying for it?
Because to have somebody writing this for you and producing all this content and clipping for you around the clock is astronomically expensive, right?
Astronomically expensive.
I already know how expensive it is just to do six hours of live content per week.
And so there's no way that somebody isn't paying for this.
I'm telling you from a broadcast media perspective, as somebody who is in this industry and knows how much time it takes to prepare a show, you can't just go and stream and turn your camera on.
And not prepare.
When I do my shows, right, on Tuesdays and Thursdays, I'm doing it today because I had other things I needed to take care of yesterday.
Generally speaking, the preparation process for the show begins the day before, right?
Collecting my stories, collecting my clips, getting my show doc prepared, and then most of the day before I record my show.
So, how is it that somebody is able to do that every single day for hours on end, unless of course the research is being done for them and the content is being written for them?
Did anybody ever stop to ask themselves, like, how they're able to say, wow, I got this new tip or, oh, wow, I got this new report, unless of course somebody is writing it for them?
Unless of course somebody is writing it for them.
So, I think that that's what really needs to be exposed.
And that's what people really need to investigate is who, whether it be The producer, the production company, or the entity, or the foreign government, whoever it may be, which entity is providing all of these people with identical talking points that are being recycled and also boosted?
You'll notice that they also love to like repost each other and they always love to share each other's clips.
And then you'll notice that there are certain foreign accounts, whether it be Turkey, Iran, Russia, that boost this content that is posted by these woke right and also radical left podcasters.
Who are all saying the same thing.
And so you may think that we're on opposing sides here, but at the end of the day, these people are not on opposing ideological sides of the aisle.
In fact, they are literally saying the same exact message.
They are on the same team.
So you need to stop viewing this as a woke Reich and radical left issue.
They are all on the same team, whether you want to call them all radical leftists or you want to call all of them members of the woke Reich, they are all using.
Podcasts in this world, they call it podcastistan now because so many people get their news from these podcasts.
They have taken advantage of the fact that there is a segment of society, not majority of society, but a very large segment of society that exclusively consumes all of their content from social media and from podcasts.
And now you see the Democrats ahead of 2026 finally catching on.
Now, this was a tactic that was utilized by Donald Trump on the campaign trail going into the 2024 presidential election.
When he started to go on a lot more podcasts, people were like, oh, wow, like how's President Trump getting on all these mainstream podcasts?
And meanwhile, the Democrats weren't really able to get on a lot of these podcasts, remember?
And then you saw President Trump on Joe Rogan, you saw President Trump on Theo Vaughn, you saw President Trump on Andrew Schultz, you saw President Trump on all types of different political podcasts, cultural podcasts, you had President Trump going on comedy shows, on late night shows.
Whatever it may be, President Trump was talking to every single content creator.
And if he wasn't talking to content creators, then his staff and his campaign surrogates were certainly talking to all content creators.
So after the 2024 presidential election, there was an article that came out.
And I forget which publication published it exactly, but there was an article that came out and they talked about it on the mainstream media too, because it was just so ridiculous about how the Democrats realized that they had.
Lost the culture.
So for the first time ever, you know, we had always heard that it was the Democrats that had control of culture and that the Republicans were kind of behind.
The Republicans had actually successfully in 2024 taken over culture.
And, you know, there were articles written about how they had lost the culture war.
But then there was an article that came out that said that Democrat strategists were teaching Democrats, this was after Trump had been inaugurated, how to be cool.
And they were getting all this coaching.
We talked about this on the show last year when this article came out.
But essentially, they were holding these briefings and they were, and there were articles written about how influencers are pushing out media for Democrat candidates to.
The Hill has an article about this now as well.
But they're trying to co opt this GOP strategy that was used and it was quite effective for President Trump in 2024.
And they had this article and they were talking about it on the news a couple months ago about how Democrats were paying big money and hiring all these PR firms and consultants to teach them how to be cool, like losing weight and styling their clothes better, how to be more casual.
And then you started to see Democrats like Hakeem Jeffries wearing Jordans and wearing workout clothes, like sitting on the sidewalk.
Sitting on the sidewalk filming videos.
And now all of a sudden, you see all of these very disheveled Democrats all on Ozempic, and they appear to have updated their wardrobe.
And now they're going on podcasts and they're dropping the F bomb and they're saying things like, yeah, fuck Trump or fuck ICE.
And they're using profanity because they're trying to appeal to like a Zoomer base and they're trying to seem like they're not lawmakers, but that they're just regular people.
And you'll notice that a lot more of these reps and Let me know in the chat if you've noticed this because I've certainly noticed this.
They're starting to film cell phone videos, they're starting to post more on social media, they're supposed to be a little bit more casual in their communication style, and they're also starting to be more lax in terms of allowing for content creators to come to their office.
They're also now campaigning with content creators.
I think that on the right, you see this with people like Benny Johnson, where Benny Johnson will show up, or Warren will show up, and they'll be at campaign events and they'll be broadcasting.
Or you'll see like Benny Johnson there for a follow along, or, you know, it's not just Benny Johnson.
That's just an example of how conservatives do this.
But now you're seeing it on the left.
And one of the most, I guess you could say, well known podcasters or streamers for that matter, who the Democrats are now campaigning with in an effort to appeal, not just to Zoomers and a younger audience, but also to move the Democrat Party to a more full blown mask off communist state, which is, of course, the topic of our discussion tonight.
Is Hassan Piker.
And now we've been talking about Hassan Piker on the show for quite some time now, really, for the last several years, showing and documenting how radical Hassan Piker is, whether it's him abusing his dog on live stream, saying that America deserves 9 11, calling for Rick Scott to be murdered, saying that capitalists deserve to be murdered, saying all types of crazy things, saying that his favorite flag is the Hezbollah flag, saying that he would vote for Hamas over anybody else.
I mean, we actually have a video compilation.
Of some of the most radical things that Hassan Piker has said.
We can actually get that video pulled up on the screen here and play it.
But that's who the Democrats are using.
So just as the Republicans have campaigned in 2024 with podcasters, the Democrats now, of course, are using Hassan Piker to try to appeal to this younger audience because in 2028, Zoomers are in fact projected to replace boomers as the dominant voting bloc.
I sent this video to my producer.
We gotta just get this video up on the screen here.
But, uh.
But you've seen over the last several weeks, a lot of these Democrats have been confronted by Loomer Unleashed up on the Hill.
We've asked them to condemn the rhetoric of Hassan Piker.
They refused to do so.
But yet, of course, during the 2024 campaign, when I was traveling with President Trump on the campaign trail, every single week, the Republicans were like, oh, well, do you disavow Laura Loomer?
Will you disavow Laura Loomer?
Meanwhile, I've never said anything as radical as somebody like a Hassan Piker.
This has now created such a divide in the Democrat Party.
In fact, they're having debates about this on CNN.
And there was even an article that just came out in the New York Times about how Hassan Piker is not the enemy.
Let's go ahead and get this article pulled up on the screen.
So, this caused quite an outrage the other day.
The New York Times, they've since changed the title after so much outrage and so much pushback.
But it says, Hassan Piker is not the enemy.
And you can scroll down.
You can see it was published by Ezra Klein of the New York Times.
And They're trying to mainstream Hassan Piker.
Now, why would they want to mainstream somebody like a Hassan Piker, who is the most radical streamer I can think of in the radical left or on the Democrat side of the aisle?
Because they want to make it acceptable for the Democrat Party to not have to campaign on moderate policies, but to campaign on open assassination culture, calling for their political enemies to be brutally killed and murdered in the streets.
And to use profanity and encourage violence everywhere they go, because that's how they think they're going to not just take over in 2026, but how they're also going to govern our country if they are successful in taking power in 2026, making President Trump a lame duck president, impeaching him, removing him from office, jailing him, and then, I don't know, stealing elections from that point on and for eternity.
And then we're never going to have Republicans get elected ever again.
It's just going to be total control by the Democrats who are going to pack the Supreme Court.
And then, of course, they'll give statehood to Puerto Rico.
And then, after that, the Democrats will give citizenship or amnesty to all of the 65 million illegal aliens in our country.
And we'll never have Republicans elected in this country ever again.
So, that is why, of course, you see the New York Times giving these glowing reviews to Hassan Piker, who's openly praising Hezbollah.
You can go up and see the title of this.
And it's so shocking, right?
They say Hassan Piker is not the enemy.
Well, if somebody is saying that you should kill.
The U.S. Senator, or that America deserved 9 11, and that their favorite flag is the Hezbollah flag, and that they would choose Hezbollah and Hamas over Israel any day of the week.
I think they actually are enemy.
Hezbollah and Hamas are designated Islamic terrorist organizations.
And last time I checked, that means that they are an enemy of the United States of America.
So I would say that Hassan Piker is definitely the enemy.
But you see him here, they're trying to make it look like he has all the support from all these young people.
He's smiling there with Abdul Al Sayed, who's a United States Senate campaign Muslim, of course.
So I'm sure he also agrees that America deserved 9 11, like the majority of Muslims believe.
You can continue scrolling down in this article.
And it says, after the 2024 elections, there was a panic among Democrats about the absence of a liberal Joe Rogan.
Could one be found?
Could one be created?
And again, this goes to my point about after the 2024 election, because Joe Rogan, of course, then endorses President Trump right before the presidential election.
And for the first time ever, most of the popular podcasters, just period, just across all sides of the political aisle, doesn't matter, non political podcasts, political podcasts, They all endorsed Donald Trump, especially in the aftermath of the Butler assassination attempt.
And so now the Democrats are trying to fill that void.
And they can't really find people who are willing to put their entire brand on the line for the Democrat Party, as radical as they are.
Because, well, when you have a very large podcast like a Joe Rogan, for example, you have Republican viewers, you have independent viewers, and you have Democrat viewers.
And so if you want somebody to be as radical as you are, And I say, as radical as you are in saying things like America deserves 9 11.
Now, I don't agree with a lot of what Joe Rogan says, but I would like to believe that Joe Rogan would never say America deserves 9 11.
I think that Joe Rogan can make a lot of stupid comments, but I don't think that Joe Rogan would ever be saying things like, oh, I love Hezbollah and Hamas.
And I think that my favorite flag is the Hezbollah flag.
And oh, I would vote for Hamas over Israel any single day of the year.
I don't think that Joe Rogan is that far left, even if he does have some outbursts at times and makes comments about the president, criticizes the president, and can be a liberal at times.
So you have to manufacture consent.
You have to manufacture consent for your radical ideas by creating the illusion through the manipulation of algorithms with bots, for example, with foreign manipulation online.
And now in this case, creating this idea and, In the Democrat Party, that it's okay.
It's now okay for lawmakers to say that Hamas is cool and Hezbollah is great and we should be cheering for Iran or cheering for China or oh, we should be traveling to Cuba and praising Cuban communists and we should be praising Mao.
And that is exactly what is happening when you have the New York Times say Hassan Piker is not the enemy.
They are trying to manufacture consent so that all of these fake ass Democrats who are pretending to be moderates, who are actually liberals and communists, and who say things like, oh, it's okay.
We can vote for an attorney general in Virginia who says he wants to shoot his opponent's children in the head, right?
Really, that actually happened.
The Democrats refused to condemn it.
And now we have an attorney general in the state of Virginia who actually said that it's okay to.
Shoot the opponent's children in the head.
You can look that up.
You could even verify all this information for yourself.
I'm not making this up.
But you have to manufacture consent for assassination culture if you are going to actually have a full blown communist revolution in America.
And that is why you're seeing Ivy League institutions and mainstream politicians, Democrat Party leadership embrace these jihadists and communist figures who.
Cheer on people like Luigi Mangione, a murderer who shot the CEO of United Healthcare in the back.
And now he's like a martyr to these people, right?
Like they're cheering him on and they're saying that he is an idol of class warfare.
And they are calling for other individuals of wealth and power and status in our country to be murdered.
And no, I'm not exaggerating.
Hassan Piker, in his own words, has said that we should kill capitalists and have the streets of America.
Run red with their blood.
And so when people are like, oh my God, I can't believe that the Democrats are campaigning with Hassan Piker.
I can't believe it.
I can't believe it.
And yes, he actually said that too.
Again, I actually provide the receipts, unlike people who talk shit about me online 24 7 and people who make crazy accusations about President Trump and the Republican Party nonstop.
I actually provide the receipts in real time about the people who I'm criticizing.
So just to indulge you and to Further prove how psychotic it is that the Democrats are trying to manufacture consent for assassination culture by literally using bots and amplification and basically allowing for big tech social media companies to get away with violating their own terms of service by platforming people who are encouraging domestic terrorism and encouraging violence, which is, of course, a violation of terms of service anywhere else.
Understand they are manufacturing consent for assassination culture.
Now, I'm sure.
Somewhere down the road, a few months from now, maybe in 2027, after we'd lose the midterms, people will steal that terminology from me and they'll wake up and they'll realize that's exactly what's happening.
Not just this, really got kicked off with the murder of Brian Thompson, the CEO of United Healthcare, but then it became an entire movement on steroids following the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Now, I don't know if Candace Owens is getting paid.
I suspect she is getting paid by.
People who are working on the same operation with people like Nick Fuentes and Anna Kasparian and the other Young Turks and Tucker Carlson and the other bad actors that you can, you know, see for yourself who are engaged in pushing out this absolutely absurd rage bait meant to radicalize people and again desensitize people to assassination culture.
Now, today, during some of these defense hearings for Tyler Robinson, who of course is the assassin of Charlie Kirk, you saw Candace Owens online almost acting as an agent for Tyler Robinson's defense team, saying that, wow, well, the FBI is withholding evidence.
And if you don't know what I'm talking about, you can go and pull these tweets up for yourself and then it will start to make sense for you.
What I'm saying, this concept of manufacturing consent for assassination culture.
Can we get Candace's Tweets pulled up on the screen here from earlier today, so we can show the viewers what I'm talking about.
It's very coordinated and it's not just depraved, it's not just outlandish, it's not conspiratorial.
This is, in my opinion, a form of social engineering and psychological warfare by people on the same team.
It doesn't matter if they're traditionally right wing or left wing, because as we've seen, horseshoe theory remains undefeated.
I think that these people have been either bought off or they have come to some kind of agreement together, whether it be an agreement of political immunity or protection.
If the radical left takes over, whatever it may be.
But you can see here, this tweet here Tyler Robinson's defense is making perfectly reasonable requests to be granted a continuance because the ATF and FBI will not hand over files.
Let's open up the tweet, please.
They have had since September.
Erica's lawyers are fighting this continuance, they want the preliminary hearing to go forward.
They claim they have enough circumstantial evidence and they plan to object to some of the discovery requests anyway.
Why would they object to the discovery requests?
Why would they want the case to go forward without the FBI and ATF having produced the DNA data and chain of custody pertaining the very videos they plan to present at the probable cause hearing?
She says this is outrageous.
So they're saying it's outrageous.
This case should not go forward until the defense is given discovery that Kash Patel is withholding.
And of course, I asked her, is Tyler Robinson's defense team paying you?
So, just like we saw glorification of Luigi Mangione, and now he has a huge defense team and people writing him letters and women saying they want to be with him, and even men, because my understanding is Luigi Mangione is either bisexual or gay.
Fawning over this guy, Lumor Unleashed correspondent Charles Downs has literally captured people dressed up in Luigi Mangione costumes outside of Capitol Hill over the last year, glorifying Luigi Mangione, right?
We've seen Hassan Piker.
Glorify Luigi Mangione, who again murdered an innocent man while walking to a conference because, well, he didn't like how much health insurance cost.
Now, there's a lot of problems with the health insurance industry in America.
It doesn't mean you get to go out there and murder every single healthcare executive.
In many ways, Candace Owens is doing the same thing with Tyler Robinson.
She is trying to make people empathize with Tyler Robinson the same way people like Luigi Mangione and the Young Turks have tried to make people empathize with Luigi Mangione to make him out to be an innocent figure, somebody that you can sympathize with either through conspiracy theories or arguments of class warfare or arguments.
Based off of demonization and conspiracy peddling, which is what Candace Owens is doing as it pertains to her demonization of Erica Kirk and Turning Point USA.
It doesn't matter what the tactic is, it's the same goal at the end of the day.
Whether it's Hassan Piker, whether it's Candace Owens, whether it's Tucker Carlson, whatever it may be, these people are engaged in the glorification of assassination culture.
Now, I argued on last week's episode of Loomer Unleashed.
That Tucker is doing this with President Trump.
You see, President Trump has been accused of being the Antichrist by Tucker Carlson.
So calling somebody an Antichrist is very much like calling them Hitler or calling them a Nazi or calling them some other name that invokes the same type of emotional response.
I actually think it's worse than calling somebody a Nazi or calling somebody Hitler because it brings about feelings and Anxiety of end times.
And the only reason why somebody would want to label somebody like President Trump as an antichrist is if they were hoping that one of their lunatic followers would go out there and assassinate them, right?
Or carry out some type of very violent act to exude harm.
You see this in the way that Candace Owens recently said that Erica is like a robot and she doesn't know if Erica would bleed if somebody stabbed her with a knife and maybe somebody should find out.
And now we see Candace Owens' followers saying things like, oh, I volunteer to do this job.
Again, whether it's Tucker calling Trump the Antichrist, whether it's Hassan Piker calling for Republicans to be murdered and saying that the streets need to run red with the blood of capitalists, and we're going to play those clips for you, or it's Candace Owens insinuating that Erica is not real, Elon Musk is not real, these people are robots, and if you stabbed them with a knife, they wouldn't bleed.
This is glorification of assassination culture.
It is using podcasts with many people believe false amplification.
A viewership, whether it be through bots or inorganic cross promotion.
And we have these video clips.
I'm going to show you exactly what I'm talking about.
You can watch these clips for yourself and understand that this is an op.
Now, they're not just utilizing the same talking points as it pertains to Israel and the Jews and President Trump.
They are using the same arguments based off of the same philosophical arguments, conspiratorial arguments.
Arguments to get people into a mindset where they say, wow, we can live in a society where we consent to assassination culture if it justifies our desired outcome.
Now, some people may say, no, you're going too far.
You're going too far.
That's outrageous.
You can't say that.
Okay, well, then take a listen to these clips yourself and tell me.
If you notice a pattern, let's start with Hassan Piker calling for the streets to run red with capitalist blood.
And then we'll start with Candace Owens insinuating that if you stabbed Erica Kirk, she's a robot, she wouldn't bleed, almost like she's trying to incite somebody to find out.
And then let's play the clip of Tucker Carlson yet again insinuating and suggesting that President Trump is a demonic force and that he's possessed by demons and that President Trump himself is, in fact, the Antichrist.
unidentified
Well, my understanding is that the property owners who have properties there choose just not to rent it at all.
So, to a lot of Christians or people who know the Bible well and believe in it, these predictions in both the Old and the New Testament, and there are others, seem to fit what we were watching.
Here's a leader who's mocking the gods of his ancestors, mocking the God of gods, and exalting himself above them.
Could this be the Antichrist?
Well, who knows?
At least that's my conclusion.
Who knows?
We're also told repeatedly in the New Testament that you're not going to know.
That Jesus will return like a thief in the night, and you better be ready because you can't predict it.
But we're also told there are signs, and is this one of them?
Well, again, unclear.
This, by the way, fits the behavior of other leaders throughout history who saw themselves in a kind of rivalry with the gods of their people and sought to put themselves over those gods, exalt themselves above God.
That's actually pretty common.
That is really the definition of megalomania.
And it's happened before and will doubtless happen again.
But that's clearly what this is this is mockery of God by a temporal leader, by a man.
You heard him say, Oh, I want to kill Charlie Kirk.
And oh, if you stabbed Erica, she wouldn't bleed because she's a robot.
I want to kill Charlie in Minecraft.
Well, no, you don't want to kill Charlie in Minecraft.
You actually wanted Charlie Kirk to be killed, and somebody did kill Charlie Kirk.
And somebody might actually be crazed enough, especially some of these religious fanatics, to actually believe that Donald Trump is the Antichrist and that it's their duty.
To kill Donald Trump, to prevent the Antichrist from being on planet Earth.
So, again, I, this is the way I'm phrasing it.
And this is how I see it.
And I'm sure that this terminology will eventually be hijacked by others.
And, you know, again, they're probably going to steal my terminology.
It is what it is.
But I view this, I'll say it again, as manufacturing consent for.
Assassination culture.
We have gotten to a point where people don't believe anymore that their problems can be solved at the ballot box.
So there's now people pushing this concept that if your problems cannot be solved at the ballot box, they're going to be solved with a cartridge box.
And that's very dangerous because you see this with the radical left and people like Zoran Momdami, who is pushing this whole concept of.
class warfare, classism, like, oh, and we saw this too with Luigi Mangione as well.
And I said in the aftermath of the assassination of Brian Thompson, ahead of 2026, you're going to see that one of the biggest issues on the ballot is going to be classism and class warfare and class consciousness.
This concept of class consciousness, like, we are awakened.
And you see that these Jew haters and these Muslims and the Islamic sympathizers, they love to use that same terminology as the people who are pushing class consciousness.
We are awakened.
We are awakened to what the capitalists are doing.
We are not going to let these capitalists put their boots on our neck anymore.
We are awakened.
We are noticing.
We are noticers.
We are, we are Goyim.
Like they love to say that, right?
They love to say, we, the Goyim, are awakened.
We are noticing what the Jews are doing.
And they love to use this terminology to make it sound like it is a religious awakening, right?
Like you are truly being enlightened, almost like.
A religious force is entering your body and taking over, and you yourself are being enlightened on a spiritual and religious level.
So they're trying to make people feel like they're waking up to the fact that some people should be killed, right?
If you don't agree with their politics, you should go murder those capitalists, or like Hassan Piker said, you should go murder Charlie Kirk, or somebody should go stab Erica Kirk.
She's a robot and she won't bleed.
They're trying to make you feel like.
You will be protected by God, blessed by God, that it is your righteous duty to go out there and spill blood to avenge those who have either wronged you or those who they want to say are responsible for the political chaos or the political outcomes in our society.
And they use topics like Jeffrey Epstein and the Epstein list and the Iran war and Judaism.
As a way to radicalize people and to also try to excuse their promotion of, and even if they're just clipping somebody and talking about it on their show, right?
He streams on a platform called Kick and he goes around trying to recruit young men to join Islam and he talks about his desire to, you know, Killed the Jews.
Like he literally was chanting Kaibar, Kaibar, Yahya Hood, which was an Islamic battle cry by Muhammad, the prophet in Islam.
And in Islam, when Muslims are encouraged to chant Kaibar, Kaibar, Yahya Hood, they're encouraged to remember the battles and the war cries of Muhammad and all of his Islamic followers and his Islamic warfighters who pillaged all of these Jewish communities and Killed Jews and enslaved the women, raped the women.
And we have video footage as well.
I shared this the other day of Sneeko in New York City streaming himself with his encounter with a bunch of Muslim men, chanting this Islamic battle cry in the heart of Times Square.
And You can type it in online.
A lot of other people shared it as well.
But Sneeko is another individual who the radical left is trying to mainstream.
I've noticed that he started to become increasingly more political with his rhetoric.
Of course, Sneeko, during the presidential campaign, was trying to normalize Osama bin Laden.
He was saying things very much like Hassan Piker saying about how Hezbollah is great and Hamas is great.
He was sharing Osama bin Laden's letter.
To America.
And he even tweeted once that Osama bin Laden did nothing wrong.
Of course, Osama bin Laden was the mastermind of the 9 11 Islamic terrorist attacks.
And this is what they want to do they want to rewrite history and normalize incitement of violence and incitement of Islamic terrorism and domestic terrorism, whether it be Hassan Piker cheering on Hamas and Hezbollah, and people like Tucker Carlson saying Hamas is a political organization, and people like Candace Owens also running interference for Palestinian Islamic terrorist. organizations making it seem like nothing is worse than the state of Israel.
This is all being done so that people think, wow, well, if you can become a multimillionaire and be one of the most successful podcasters in America and run around saying things like Israel did 9-11 or that 9-11 was an inside job or that Hamas is good and Hezbollah is good, well, then I guess that I can also be a teacher and I could be a doctor and I can be a lawyer and I can run for office and I can say these things too.
And there's going to be an audience and I'm not going to be blacklisted because If CNN won't have me on for saying these things, then Candace Owens will, or Tucker Carlson will, or Sneeko will, or Nick Fuentes will.
And so they're building this whole podcast culture.
Again, podcastistan completely divorced from reality and what is socially acceptable in the real world outside of this astro turfed, engagement driven, you know, like algorithm boosted bot world that everybody lives in on social media.
And they're making people think that they can mainstream these abhorrent views and literally manufacture consent because perception is reality.
Manufacturing consent by deceiving people, manipulating reality.
It's a form of information warfare using bots, making people think, wow, this person said kill the Jews and they got 100,000 likes on their post.
Wow, maybe there's something to that.
This person said that Hamas is actually better than Israel and they got a million views.
Wow, this is okay to say.
Manufacturing consent for supporting Islamic terrorism and political violence.
I want to go ahead and play these two clips of Sneeko before I bring Loomer Unleashed DC correspondent Charles Downs on to the program to talk about his own experience confronting lawmakers up on the Hill and their refusal to even disavow the efforts by the Democrat Party to mainstream support for Islamic terrorism, to mainstream support for a lot of this radical activity.
But again, Sneeko is somebody who has a six figure Per month deal with Kik, a live streaming platform.
And now you have people like AOC interacting with Sneeko.
Sneeko is posting all these videos trying to normalize AOC.
He's also promoting a lot of these woke radical left podcasters being tweeted by a lot of these podcasters as well.
And he is actually meeting with international world leaders, including a video today he posted of himself riding in the car with the prime minister of Malaysia.
I want to go ahead first and play the clip of him.
In New York City, chanting Khyber Khyber Yahya Hood.
And then we'll, of course, transition to this video of him with the prime minister of Malaysia because people think, oh, wow, well, I can also go and advocate for Islamic terrorism and I can also call for the killing of Jews and I can also praise Osama bin Laden and say that Israel did 9 11 and say terrible things about Israel and America and President Trump and cheer for Iran in the middle of a war.
And I too will be able to meet with world leaders.
Like there used to be a sense of decorum.
Quorum and boundaries where people were like, Oh, you know, that's a step too far, or Oh, don't say that publicly because you're going to hurt your career or you're going to not be able to advance professionally.
But now they're trying to build this ecosystem by deceiving people in Podcastistan into thinking that this is going to be tolerated in the real world.
And Twitter and Podcastistan is just not real world.
That's just not the real world that we're living in.
Yeah, why is the prime minister of Malaysia in a car with Sneeko?
And who's connecting Sneeko, a Muslim streamer, with the prime minister of Malaysia?
Like, who is organizing the connections and the interviews with these people, like these streamers who are getting into contact with these politicians, candidates for Senate, candidates for Congress, presidential candidates, foreign leaders?
Like, who is establishing these?
Connections because I highly doubt that the prime minister of Malaysia is just watching Sneeko's stream, right?
And again, as I said before, they're trying to mainstream this.
They're trying to familiarize everybody with these podcasters because they're going to use these podcasters to brainwash the youth so that they can actually elect a squad member as president of the United States, somebody like an AOC, for example.
And what did Sneeko just start doing the other day on his social media?
Well, Sneeko, who is saying that, oh, Kaiba Kaiba Yahoo, like, Literally reciting Muhammad's battle cry to murder Jews, he's posting propaganda videos for AOC, right?
Posting propaganda videos for AOC.
Here he's like posting videos, like glorifying her, making her out to be, you know, some kind of like sex object, some kind of, you know, person to be admired.
They're trying to use the most radical, communist, violent, and pro Islam influencers out there and streamers and podcasters to amplify their messaging so that it's mainstream by 2028.
So that by mainstream, nobody's going to flinch when they say, oh, a candidate is campaigning with someone who said Israel did 9 11 or that 9 11 was an inside job or that Hezbollah and Hamas are great and that their favorite flag is the Hezbollah flag.
It's just going to be like, okay, and, or there's going to have been so many Democrats who have been on podcasts with these people that the Democrat Party isn't going to be able to condemn one person for doing it because they'd have to condemn their entire party.
That's what we're dealing with here.
So understand that this process before the midterms and going into 2028 is leading to, again, you understand this terminology, internalize it, memorize it, start reciting it.
They are trying to use.
The manipulation of the algorithm, algorithmic manipulation, whether that be by bots or false amplification of extreme content by programming the algorithm to further boost content that is outrageous or extreme,
so that they can, again, this is what you need to memorize manufacture consent for assassination culture, because these people want you to take to the streets for a revolution.
That's what communism is all about, right?
They want to talk about their revolution.
They want their comrades to join them in their revolution.
And so, how do you have a revolution?
You don't have a revolution at the ballot box, you have a revolution with the cartridge box.
And those aren't my words, those are their words.
And yet, that message is still very jarring to a lot of people in America.
But as the older generation that has been able to experience the American dream continues to die off and Zoomers continue to replace Boomers as the largest voting block in America, you're going to see an increase in this nihilistic rhetoric.
And you're going to see, as the cost of living and the cost of just everything in general continues to go up, you're going to see more people sympathize and empathize with these radical talking points and the calls for.
Open socialist and communist candidates running for office, like we saw with Zoran Momdami, who also campaigned with Hassan Piker, right?
And then you're going to start to see major American institutions, including our Ivy League educational institutions, welcome people like Hassan Piker, who's calling for capitalists to be murdered in the streets.
First of all, all those little communist kids that are going to Yale.
Yeah, their parents are capitalists, sweetie.
How do you think that your parents can afford to pay your tuition of nearly $93,000 per year, more than most Americans make, sweetheart?
It's because mommy and daddy are capitalists and they probably vote Republican.
So again, more hypocrisy from the rules for the not for me people.
But it's very dangerous because they are able to really radicalize a lot of people and make them believe that this is their religion.
They have made them believe that Podcastistan is their country.
And whatever the crazy message or the crazy mantra or the crazy scripture, when I say scripture, I'm talking about these people literally have God complexes.
People like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, they genuinely think that they are representatives of the church.
They think that they themselves.
Have more religious authority than the Pope himself.
These people really honestly think that they are like not just thought leaders in the realm of politics and cultural affairs, but they really do believe that they are themselves religious leaders in our society.
And that is a dangerous mix because that is laying the groundwork for essentially, it's like a cult, really.
Podcast Assan is their country.
And their conspiracy theories are their religion.
And this is how you have cults.
And really, a lot of these people do have cult like followings that just process all of the propaganda and the conspiracies.
Like, look at Candace Owens followers, for example.
I posted a clip earlier this morning of your typical Candace Owens follower.
Literally, this crazy guy wearing a mask talking about how, oh, yeah, like, what are you going to do to silence Candace Owens?
There's going to be a million of us.
Erica Kirk is a lying whore.
And, You know, just saying very violent, deranged comments.
And like I said, they've been able to whip people up.
We have that video actually.
We can get that video loaded and you can just see it as an example.
They've been able to radicalize people just through their podcast so much.
And what's the end goal?
Like, what is going to be the end goal of all of these viewers and cult like followers who.
Hang on to these people and their every word, right?
Like, what is going to be the outcome?
It's not going to be anything good.
I'll tell you that.
It's not going to be anything good.
Here's a video right here.
And then we'll move on to our interview with Charles just to show you what I'm talking about.
Because some people say, oh, you know, this is free speech.
People are allowed to have an opinion.
Just because somebody has a different opinion than you doesn't mean that they're crazy.
I don't know.
You tell me, does this seem like a mentally sound person to you?
And when you multiply this by, You know, two, three, five million, just look at how many millions of viewers these people are getting on their views.
You ask yourself, like, what's going to happen if people like this acquire political power and what are they going to do?
And what does it say for the state of our country?
If people who are, they don't really seem to be psychologically sound, they seem to have a thirst for political violence, they seem to be embracing and not just promoting, but again, manufacturing consent for assassination culture.
What is our society going to look like?
And are we going to start seeing vigilanteism on the streets of America?
We're going to stomp on you the same way we stomped on the fucking libtard.
Do you understand what I'm telling you?
And let's just give you fucking morons the benefit of a doubt real quick.
Let's just say that you are somehow successful in bankrupting Candace and destroying her podcast.
Millions of us are going to speak on her behalf.
You understand that?
And then what are you going to do?
You're going to run to the federal government.
You're gonna run to the FBI and cry and say they're saying bad things about Erica Kirk.
That's right.
I said something bad about Erica.
Now what?
She's a demonic fucking whore.
Now what?
She's a fucking fake, lying, Jezebel bitch who dressed up like a hooker laughing with men one week after her husband was fucking killed because she's a fucking demonic cunt.
Now what?
What are you gonna do now?
If you don't like the first amendment in this fucking country, get the fuck out of our country.
Vile, absolutely vile, but this is what they're trying to mainstream.
And they want, you'll notice that people like Ilhan Omar now praising Marjorie Trader Green, and Ilhan Omar is praising people like Candace Owens as well.
There was a clip that I shared yesterday on my ex account, and it was an MSNBC clip of Ilhan Omar praising Candace Owens and praising Marjorie Trader Green.
Now, I bring this up because Now, Ilhan Omar was also campaigning with Hassan Piker, and we have that clip as well.
And we're going to be discussing this with Charles tonight.
But notice what is happening.
Notice what is happening.
They are not just trying to normalize assassination culture, but they're trying to normalize the dehumanization of really the largest GOP voting bloc in America through religious bigotry, right?
Attacks on evangelicals, attacks on Jews, combined with Uh, calls for political violence, and then you combine that too with this kind of like visceral rage that is invoked by a lot of the anti-Semitism, and also you combine that with the Islamic ideology, which is what a lot of these people are doing, whether it's Ilhan Omar, Hassan Piker, or Abdul Al-Sayed, or Rashida Tlaib, you name it, right?
Um, it's not going to be a good outcome when you combine conspiracy theories with anti-Jewish, anti-Christian.
Bigotry, and then you sprinkle the Islamic ideology on top, and then you give mainstream acceptance to people talking about how they love Islamic terrorism, how everybody who disagrees with the American government should go out there and build bombs, and that it's okay to murder your enemies for the sake of advancing your political causes.
Like, if this continues to become the mainstream message in America, and party leadership on both sides of the aisle do not force their members to disavow this, we are going to have Enormous amounts of political violence and probably even a civil war in America is my prediction by 2028 if this continues down this trajectory.
So, somebody who knows this all too well, having been a victim of political violence himself, being physically attacked by Antifa, but also who is on the Hill every single day talking to members of Congress, asking them these questions, asking them whether or not they're going to disavow this rhetoric, asking them why they're campaigning with people making these types of anti American pro terror comments.
Is Loomer Unleashed DC correspondent Charles Downs himself?
Charles, thank you so much for joining me on the program tonight.
Really appreciate it.
Now, of course, you know, showed a lot of video clips there.
We have your video clips as well from your interactions with lawmakers up on the Hill over the last few months, last few weeks.
But We have been warning, right, at Lumor Unleashed for the last two years that this is coming since October 7th.
The glorification of Hamas, the glorification of Hezbollah, the refusal of lawmakers on the left and the right, really, to condemn the waving of the flag of the Iranian regime, and also to refuse to condemn the presence of Luigi Mangione fanboys and fangirls at many of these protests and events that Democrat lawmakers themselves have been speaking at.
If you go back and you look at all of our clips and all of our content, we've been warning now for about two years that this is all being done in preparation for 2026 and 2028 to normalize class consciousness and also to manufacture consent for assassination culture.
So I wanted to invite you on the program tonight to share your thoughts and your observations because it seems like the deliberate mainstreaming of people like Nick Fuentes and Hassan Piker and Candace Owens and Others who, and Dan Bilzerian now who's running for Congress in Florida, who are on the record making comments, advocating for violence, saying things that would incite violence if somebody crazy enough were to internalize the content.
It seems like that's where we're headed as a society.
And thanks for having me on, Laura, to talk about this very important subject of, I guess, essentially Ilhan Omar and her friends completely taking over the Democrat Party and what that has resulted in, which is what we've been talking about.
Woke right podcasters trying to infiltrate the GOP because, like you said, that's the only way.
And personally, it's crazy to see it on Capitol Hill almost every day.
You know, Ilhan, people are asking, what's Ilhan like in person?
And I like to tell people, she walks around with a sense of self entitlement because she knows the Democrat Party belongs to her and she knows that she can say and do whatever she wants.
And more importantly, her little friends like Rashida Tlaib, AOC, Summer Lee, they can say and do whatever they want.
And they don't have to worry about any repercussions from Hakeem Jeffries because, you know, Ilhan and AOC are the real people pulling Hakeem's, I guess, puppet strings along with the nice people like Reed Hoffman and George Soros and all those crazy people.
So, yeah, let's get into it because people need to understand it's not just crazy rhetoric.
Like, the policies they want to push if they win the midterms could actually directly affect you, like, Financially, I think President Trump talked about it physically and physically, too.
They're talking about they're campaigning with people who are talking about killing capitalists and murdering people in the streets.
And you know, you had the footage there of Hassan Piker saying that we want to murder capitalists.
I'll play it again just because then we're going to play the clip of Ilhan Omar on the stream with Hassan Piker this week.
But again, this is these are people who are going to be in Democrat Party leadership now that Ilhan Omar has been in Congress since 2019, right?
She's She's going to be a part of Democrat Party leadership in senior positions on committees if the Democrats end up taking back the House, and especially in decision making positions involving workplace rights and financial committees.
And you have to ask yourself what does that mean for non communist Americans, people who don't subscribe to communism in America, when Ilhan Omar is campaigning with this guy?
unidentified
Well, my understanding is that the property owners who have properties there choose just not to rent it at all.
This man should know there is no way that they are denaturalizing and deporting Mamdani or me or any of the People that they're constantly telling their base they're going to do that.
I mean, some of them, I think, are elated at the prospect of like having someone to bully, like a vulnerable population or marginalized community member to attack over and over again.
It sometimes feels like they're desperate for a person to look down at.
Rather than demand change that would improve their lives.
This is what we're now dealing with, unfortunately, this inorganic alliance between people who were categorically opposed to each other.
I'm talking about Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, for example.
And now these women are praising each other.
And if anybody thinks that this is organic, they are sorely mistaken.
Here is a clip of MTG.
From 2024, in which she tweeted herself, I just introduced a resolution to censure Ilhan Omar for her treasonous statements that she is serving as a foreign agent for a foreign country.
Now, before MTG decided to go completely woke and turn on Trump, and now she's like simping for Islam and simping for Sharia law and pretending like Sharia law doesn't exist, she used to call me and ask me to assist her with her speeches and To help her with content.
And in fact, I have a tweet to back this up.
I posted this a long time ago.
You can see highlighting this when MTG started attacking me with live.
And I even said, you can get this tweet pulled up.
I just sent it to the producer.
How she used to call me, begging me to write her one liners that she could read in Congress about Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib.
And now she's acting like a leftist, calling me racist over a funny joke.
Now I bring this up because you have to see the transition from these people where.
You know, she went from saying Laura is so amazing for exposing Ilhan Omar, who married her brother.
That's what real journalism is.
I need Laura in Congress alongside me because she's an America First patriot to now aligning with Ilhan Omar, who she previously called a foreign agent on the floor of the house, to now calling me a foreign agent and saying that I'm working against the interests of America.
And now Ilhan Omar, of course, is united with MTG.
I mean, this does not.
Seem natural.
And it's important for people to understand that it is not natural.
Let's go ahead and play this clip of MTG introducing her resolution in 2024, just so you can see the shift.
Representative Ilhan Omar of Somalia, I mean Minnesota, whereas elected members of Congress take an oath to bear true faith and allegiance to the United States without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion,
whereas Representative Ilhan Omar took an oath of allegiance to the United States upon becoming a citizen, declaring, I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, Potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen.
Whereas on January 27, 2024, Representative Omar gave remarks at an event in Minneapolis in which she made treasonous statements.
Whereas Representative Omar said she has spoken to many Somalians who asked her to intercede for the Somali government by pressuring the United States government into certain actions.
Whereas Representative Omar assured the Somalians she spoke to, the U.S. government will only do what Somalians in the U.S. tell them to do.
They will do what we want and nothing else.
They must follow our orders, and that is how we will safeguard the interests of Somalia.
Whereas Representative Omar continued, for as long as I am in U.S. Congress, Somalia will never be in danger.
Its waters will not be stolen by Ethiopia or others.
Sleep in comfort, knowing I am here to protect the interest of Somalia from inside the U.S. system.
Whereas George Washington warned in his farewell address of 1796 to guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism, and further declared citizens by birth or choice of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections.
The name of American, which belongs to you, in your national capacity must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local discriminations.
Whereas these statements by Representative Omar clearly violate the oath she took as an elected member of Congress to defend and protect the United States Constitution.
Whereas Representative Omar has exhibited the treasonous tendencies George Washington warned about.
actions must be condemned by all members of Congress who adhere to the oath they took upon assuming office.
And whereas by openly admitting her efforts to advance Somalia's interest using her position as a United States representative, Representative Omar has revealed herself to be a foreign agent acting on behalf of a foreign government.
Now therefore be it resolved that Representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota be censured.
Representative Ilhan Omar forthwith present herself in the well of the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure.
Representative Ilhan Omar be censored with the public reading of this resolution by the Speaker and Representative Ilhan Omar be and is hereby removed from the Committee of the Budget and the Committee on Education and the Workforce.
So then we have this clip of Ilhan Omar on the Breakfast Club this week, welcoming MTG, who you saw that video from 2024, reading the resolution on the floor of the house, calling for Omar to be censured for being a foreign agent to another country.
Okay, so MTG says that Ilhan Omar, in her own words, is a foreign agent working on behalf of another country.
And then now you have Ilhan Omar.
Praising MTG and welcoming her to her side.
So, by that logic and these video clips where you see these women speaking in their own words, logically, now we have to assume that MTG is literally conspiring with Islamic foreign agents to undermine President Trump and to push this toxic woke right ideology in America.
Let's go ahead and play this clip of Ilhan Omar on The Breakfast Club.
No, I mean, my point is, This, if you were let astray and you are adult enough, honest enough to say, I was wrong into believing that this was the right direction for our country, and I want to join you all because I now understand that you had it right, I'm like, welcome.
I'm glad you finally got here because we believe that we are on the right side of history.
And so if You know, this person that was leading this mega movement that has been about division, that has been about conspiracy theories, that has been about, you know, figuring out who is American and who, you know, is not, depending on what their political opinions were, is now saying, no, actually, the person who made us believe and called us to this movement is the person who is an American,
who is the person who doesn't want the best interest for all Americans in this country.
And I want to join those that now, that I now understand want the best for all of us.
So she says that she wants to censor you because you are a foreign agent, but now you're saying all of a sudden that MTG wants the best for you and the rest of us.
Like, this isn't the most obvious example of how these people are all complete sellouts and that there's clearly a shit ton of money flowing around to make people who absolutely hated each other come together to join forces to undermine our country and undermine President Trump.
You caught up with Ilhan Omar recently and you asked her whether or not she would condemn.
Hassan Piker for his remarks in which he said that America deserved 9 11.
I believe we have that clip if we can get that clip pulled up and loaded.
Again, you saw during the video that I recently played of MTG reading her resolution on the floor in 2024, talking about how she wanted to censure Ilhan Omar for being a foreign agent, right?
So now, unless she was lying back then, MTG now, if she aligns with Ilhan Omar, which clearly Ilhan Omar has said that they are aligned, that means that MTG is willingly and knowingly aligning with foreign Islamic agents who she herself says has more loyalty to Somalia and Islamic terrorist organizations.
These are MTG's own words, right?
You can pull these videos up for yourself to undermine President Trump, to go on CNN, to smear President Trump, and to spread lies about our allies.
So that she can continue aiding the Democrats in their efforts of taking back the House in 2026, so that President Trump can be impeached and his family can be imprisoned or investigated for eternity.
I mean, really, ultimately, that's their goal.
That's what they're going to do in the end when they take back the House.
And I say when, because unfortunately, I think that right now the Democrats are set to take back the House.
When you're walking around on Capitol Hill, because I know that you also confronted Summer Lee, who campaigned with Abdul Al Sayed.
I know we can get that clip pulled up as well.
Because this isn't just unique to Ilhan Omar.
We have video footage of you.
Confronting Summer Lee recently, asking her whether or not she would condemn these remarks, why she was campaigning with Hassan Piker.
And unlike El Hadamar, Summer Lee actually had a discussion with you.
Let's go ahead and get that clip pulled up.
But what are you finding before we play this clip?
What are you finding when you confront members of Congress or when you have conversations with them?
Is this the new norm up on Capitol Hill?
Are they all just going to shield each other from actually having to hold Hassan?
Hiker accountable for his behavior, for his rhetoric.
Do you think that it's been normalized up to the level of Democrat Party leadership that it's now acceptable to campaign with somebody who says America deserves 9 11?
What is your perception of this as someone who's on the Hill speaking with lawmakers every single day?
Maybe they'll start making programming with Hassan Piker and what's that lady?
Miss Rachel.
Miss Rachel and Hassan Piker.
Miss Rachel and Zoramam Dami Hassan Pike are making videos together talking about how P is for Palestine, G is for genocide, K is for kill, J is for Jews.
So, I mean, that's what's coming, right?
And I hate to sound hyperbolic, but sadly, this is not hyperbolic, right?
Like, this is literally what our future is going to look like if these people get into these positions because they must know that the targeted audience for these people and these streamers are.
Young kids, middle school kids, teenagers, many of these mini children, right?
Not even teenagers who are consuming this content online because parents, unfortunately, these days use iPads and computers as kind of like virtual babysitters.
And so you have this whole subset of youth in America, whether they be 10 year olds, 11 year olds, 12 year olds, all the way up to high school kids and college kids who are literally consuming this slop, Islamic slop, communist slop, saying that it's okay to go murder capitalists in the street.
Have the streets run red with their blood, all the way up to Ivy League institutions.
And so we're told that these Ivy Leagues, right?
This is the cream of the crop, the best of the best.
And for decades now, for generations, we've been told that everybody should aspire to go to an Ivy League institution.
Now, Elise Stefanik, who's a friend of mine and she's going to be coming on the show in the coming weeks to talk about her new book, just came out with a new book titled Poisoned Ivies.
She sent me an advanced copy, actually.
And I bring this up because the book itself exposes this institutional rot.
It exposes the rot within these universities themselves, showing how from the very top of these elite institutions Harvard, Yale, UPenn, Columbia, Brown, you name it, all of the top, most expensive, most prestigious universities in our country, Princeton, have all been co opted with foreign money, right?
A lot of it Islamic money.
And they are now allowing for these open communists and Marxists and Islamic movements promoting jihad and Communism to take place on these campuses, even though a communist would never be able to afford tuition at a university like this, where, again, tuition is about $93,000 per year when you include housing and food at a place like Yale.
We see that this garbage, which is now being mainstreamed by Democrat politicians who hold key positions on major committees that are going to have a serious impact in the lives of Americans, are inviting These radicals who are inciting violence and promoting Islamic terrorism to Ivy League institutions.
This week, as I reported last week, the Yale Political Union invited Hassan Piker to be their special guest.
Now, take a look at the reception that Hassan Piker received the standing ovation and wild applause that Hassan Piker, a communist jihadist who calls for capitalists to be murdered and says that he wanted Charlie Kirk to be killed and says that.
Rick Scott should be murdered, and that we should murder capitalists in the streets of America, and that Hezbollah is his favorite flag.
Look at how the students at Yale University received Hassan Piker.
What does that say, Charles, about the state of America, if that is considered one of the most elite institutions in America?
And I'm going to harp on Ilhan Omar being the ranking member of the subcommittee of workforce again for a second, because that's education as well.
And we discussed this too, Laura.
The committee has held hearings, I think this past summer, where some disloyal Republicans like Lisa McClane leaked stuff from universities, I believe it was Georgetown.
But if Omar gets control of this committee, you guys don't understand.
She can literally enforce education onto America.
And look at PBS the other day.
It just kind of like reinforces what I'm saying.
PBS had Elmo like teaching Arabic.
PBS was scared to do anything woke like a year ago, but now they're doing woke Arabic stuff.
Let's get that screenshot pulled up so people can see what you're talking about.
So, you know, there's been a lot of incidents over the last several years where the Elmo account from Sesame Street has been caught saying things like kill all Jews or tweeting out pro October 7th propaganda.
And they said, oh, no, our accounts got hacked.
It was an accident.
And they deny it, they deny it, they deny it.
But I don't really think it was an accident, honestly.
I think that the Sesame Street and the Elmo accounts are run by Muslims and people who are sympathetic to Hamas, and they just don't want people knowing because how else can you explain what they just tweeted out the other day?
Here's Sesame Street, which is supposed to be American programming, saying the word of the day again, this was yesterday.
The word of the day is Habibi.
Happy Arab American Heritage Month from Rami Youssef, Elmo, and all of your friends on Sesame Street.
Rami Youssef, who, of course, if you go online and you look up Rami Youssef, you'll see that he recently held an event with Zoran Mamdami in New York City.
He's a comedian, he's an Egyptian actor and comedian.
And as I reported last year, he campaigned for Zoran Mamdami and he was actually on stage with Mahmoud Khalil, who's up for deportation, as you know, the Palestinian jihadi, pro Hamas supporter.
Who Zoram Dami has protected, who the Democrats have protected, who they've tried to make the face of their anti-ICE campaign in their efforts to further mainstream and glorify and normalize supporting Hamas and supporting Palestinian terrorism on U.S. soil.
So, again, if you think that it's an exaggeration that they're going to try to Islamify your children by having Ilhan Omar on this committee, which she's already on, and then if the Democrats take back the House, she will be the ranking member on that committee.
Just look at what they're doing with Sesame Street now.
This is supposed to be children's programming.
On PBS, right, which is supposed to be taxpayer funded programming.
And now they are trying to Islamify your children.
They are trying to Islamify your children by having Elmo teach your children Arabic, Habibi, or Arab, what did they call it?
Arab Heritage Month.
Or they said Arab American Heritage Month.
Why are we celebrating Arab American Heritage Month?
We're not a Muslim country.
We're not a Muslim country.
And then what does it say about Sesame Street and children's programming?
That they're having Rami Youssef, who campaigned with Mahmoud Khalil and Zoran Mamdami, hang out with Elmo and be the person to display and promote this message.
So I'm sure a lot of you are thinking like, oh, the Trump administration can hold them accountable.
Okay, let's say for the SIGA argument, God forbid, Democrats take back the House.
A year from now, the Trump administration, let's say for the SIGA argument, finds PBS or attempts to pull Sesame Street off the air.
Then what happens is everyone associated with that decision gets called into Ilhan Omar's committee for a hearing.
And what's going to happen is Ilhan will sit in her big chair and she'll just ask them questions.
Just random questions, I kid you not, for hours on hours on hours on end.
Until they get you, I gotcha, you lied to Congress, you're indicted, you're going to jail.
And that's the weaponization the Democrats are going to utilize to obstruct the Trump administration.
That's why I think networks like PBS now feel entitled, hey, we can go woke again.
Because if the Trump administration does do something, we think the Democrats are going to take the House back.
And then Ilhan will stand for us and she'll get whoever we need to get in trouble in trouble who could pull our wokeness down and.
They'll be too scared to do it.
So, yeah, let's just go for it.
And you can see this happening.
And that's why I think PBS and Sesame Street felt so entitled to celebrate Arab American Heritage Month because they know or they think Ilhan Omar is coming to basically run America's education.
We have a couple other clips from this event at Yale with Hassan Piker.
Again, American Institution of Education.
This is an Ivy League institution.
They say that this is the cream of the crop.
They tell you that if you're a parent, you.
Have to pay $93,000 a year for your child to attend Yale.
So here's a clip from the other evening when Hassan Piker was speaking at Yale University.
And ask yourself, is this the America that you want to live in?
And ask yourself why so many Democrats find it to be okay campaigning with this individual who is praising Mao, praising communism, saying America deserved 9 11, and explicitly calling for the end of the American empire.
Let's go ahead and get the clip up of.
Hassan Piker explicitly calling for the end of the American empire and warning that if we don't manage its retreat, it's going to come in a much more violent way.
Basically, saying that if you don't succumb to multipolarity and you don't allow for America to fail, then we are going to make sure America fails by having a violent revolution.
The part that he doesn't mention is that he's rooting for the destruction of the country.
The ideas that they're introducing now, this new socialist movement, and they get a lot of support.
Zahra Mandani, who's only been an American for about seven years, became a citizen, and he got elected on these platforms that totally disagree with our value system.
They don't want law and order, right?
If you work hard in this country, you get a good job, and you get a little bit of wealth, that the government should be able to strip that away and give it to someone else.
They don't believe in national defense.
They believe we should just allow the enemy in and deal with the consequences there.
That will destroy this country.
And they're rooting for it to take place because they believe that at our core, we're a racist country.
So, you get elected to office, you take your oath on the Constitution.
In this case, these Muslims are taking their oath of office on the Quran.
You're supposed to uphold the US Constitution and protect against enemies, both foreign and domestic.
So, how is it that any of these candidates campaigning with Hassan Piker can qualify to run for office or be considered legitimate, serious candidates when they're campaigning with a guy who is calling for the end of American supremacy, the end of the American empire, and is saying that if you don't give the communists what they want, we are going to have a violent revolution?
And another Democrat we've confronted on this subject is, as you guys know, Summer Lee.
And let's get into Summer Lee's committees.
Summer Lee is on the powerful Financial Services Committee with Rashida Tlaib, who also campaigned as a song piker.
And the Financial Services Committee is chaired by, if you can guess who, obviously like the ranking Democrat, so not chaired, but the top Democrat is Maxine Waters.
So we all know Maxine allows Summer Lee and Rashida Tlaib to do whatever they want on that committee.
So imagine someone like Summer Lee.
Who literally talked to us and said, doesn't want to disavow Piker for 9 11.
She was with Piker screaming impeach.
She made a disturbing comment with Piker on the car ride between events about October 7th.
And she's an avowed socialist.
She, along with Rashida Tlaib and angry Maxine Waters, could be controlling America's financial policy next year at this time.
And again, I know a lot of you are like, oh, but the Trump administration can override it.
While she campaigns with a guy who says, kill those communist motherfuckers, kill them in the streets, murder them, let their fucking blood spill all over the road.
So, do you really want somebody in charge of the Financial Services Committee who campaigns with a guy who says, kill those, kill those capitalists, kill those, kill those motherfuckers?
That's what he says.
We have the clip again, again.
People need to listen to this clip over and over and over again because if you don't believe in communism, you are a capitalist.
Most American citizens are.
Capitalists, because communism is still largely frowned upon and it is not the majority or mainstream ideology here in America.
The squad, of course, is trying to normalize it.
They're trying to, again, manufacture consent for communism.
We saw this with the election of Zoran Mandami, the way that they tried to, you know, use his filmmaker mother to create these very hipster like campaign commercials to make communism seem cool, right?
We said that Zoran Mandami was really going to be the The case study about whether or not they were going to be able to make people in the largest city in America swallow the idea of socialism and communism.
And I said this last year on the show.
I said, with Zora Mandami's campaign, is the manufacturing of consent.
Again, it's all about creating a reality because perception is reality.
That's why they have to use AI and they have to use filters and they have to use bots and they have to use false amplification and algorithm manipulation.
Perception is reality.
And I said, and we can pull the clips, but if you just go back and watch the archives of my show, you'll see for yourself, right?
We don't need to play the clips now.
But if you watch my shows from when I was covering the campaign, I called it early.
I said, Zoram Amdami is going to win.
And I said that they are trying to manufacture consent for socialism on the ballot in all 50 states.
And it's not just socialism.
It's straight up communism.
It's also Marxist jihad.
It's this idea of a red Green alliance, this unholy alliance between communism and Islamism in America.
Now, they have successfully manufactured consent by whether they stole the election or whether or not they just mobilized nearly 1 million Muslims who are living currently in New York City to come out and flood the polls to vote for Zoram Amdami.
They had their own little insurrection on election day, and now a Muslim communist is the mayor of America's largest city.
So, they have successfully manufactured consent for communism because, oh, well, if the mayor of America's largest city can be a communist, then, well, it's going to be socially acceptable now for the Democrats to point to an example of somebody.
Look, don't condemn me for running as a communist or a socialist Democrat Party leadership because Zoran Mandami did it and it worked.
So, they successfully manufactured consent for communism.
Now, what's the next step in order to have a bloody communist revolution, which is what all communists want?
Ultimately, if you live in a communist country, there's going to be bloodshed.
Communists have killed more people than anybody else on planet Earth.
The death toll of communists is over 100 million people.
Now, combine the death count of communism and Islam together, and you're talking about the most lethal and violent ideology, or at least the combination of ideologies, in the history of mankind, really, if you were to combine those forces of evil together.
So, what is the next logical step here?
You have manufactured consent for communism.
Now you need to manufacture consent for assassination culture.
And when you look in history, Charles, who are some of the most notorious figures, whether it be in communist China or whether it be in Nazi Germany, whoever it may be, just start listing them.
Who are some of the most notorious figures out there who essentially carried out state sponsored or state ordered assassination?
Mass assassinations, mass murder of people who did not comply with their ideology.
So then, so then, so then you said Stalin, Mao, Hitler.
We have a clip.
We actually have a clip of Hassan Piker speaking at Yale, quoting Mao, quoting Mao, quoting Mao.
So When I talk about how this is about manufacturing consent for assassination culture, people better wake up.
People better wake up because the Democrats have already manufactured consent to normalize the idea of a communist getting elected.
We already have the socialists and the squad.
They've completely taken over the Democrat Party.
We've proven this.
They have squad members working for the comm staff in Democrat Party leadership.
We've already exposed this with the Hamas supporter who runs the social media account, the Senate leadership.
Senate majority pack.
I've already exposed this, and people who watch my show are well aware of the fact that the most radical elements in the Democrat Party now control.
So now you have to take it to the next level.
You manufacture consent for communism.
How are you going to actually get dead Republicans?
How are you actually going to make the streets of America run red with blood?
How are you actually going to kill Donald Trump, right?
Because that's what they want.
They want to kill Donald Trump.
They tried before, they failed.
They want to kill Trump.
So, now how are you going to manufacture consent for assassination porn and assassination culture?
Well, of course, you're going to make it normal for the Democrats and people running for mainstream political office to campaign with a guy who is cheering on one of the biggest assassins in United States history, Mao himself.
Let's go ahead and play this clip from this week.
Hassan Piker at Yale University quoting Mao, praising Mao, glorifying Mao.
And then we're going to cut to the clip immediately.
So, talking about how reactionaries are paper tigers till they take action, literally inciting people to carry out acts of violence, calling people a paper tiger.
A paper tiger, for those who don't know what a paper tiger is, is somebody that just like talks a big talk like a paper tiger.
A tiger is supposed to be like an animal that's ferocious, an animal that can kill you, an animal that can maul you.
Draw blood, literally kill you, right?
If you encounter it out in the wild.
And the term paper tiger is used to describe people who like talk a big talk or they're just like on the outside roaring, but they're not actually like going to do anything like a paper, right?
Almost like an origami tiger.
You're not really going to be able to do much aside from maybe give them a paper cut instead of really drawing blood by attacking them and mauling their face and ripping out their heart or, you know, gouging out their jugular.
So this is clearly glorification of.
Not just communism, but assassination culture and glorification of people who murdered their political enemies and dissidents and people who didn't subscribe to communism.
Again, we see this again where Piker is once again telling his audience that the fall of the USSR was one of the greatest catastrophes of the 20th century and that the collapse of the Soviet Union caused incalculable harm because, well, he is mourning the defeat of.
Of communism.
He's mourning the defeat of communism and another brutal regime that was responsible for the killing and the subjugation of millions of people.
The fall of the USSR was one of the greatest catastrophes of the 20th century.
Just wait, listen, maybe you'll agree.
Not only was there incalculable harm done to every single country under its banner, Child prostitution, skyrocketing suicide rates, life expectancy plummeting.
But America was no longer contested around the globe.
And it is precisely because of the end to that multipolarity that we saw accelerated neoliberalism that is devastating every Western nation right now.
Unlimited and unchecked greed.
Our successes are leading to our own demise and the demise and collapse of the liberal system.
The U.S. has produced disaster after disaster after disaster.
We have Hassan favorably quoting Mao Zedong, Chinese communist dictator responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of people.
And we have this ideology, this communist ideology being celebrated at Yale University, where capitalist parents wealthy enough to send their children to an Ivy League institution where tuition is $93,000 per year, more than most Americans make every single year, and an institution that receives hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer funding from our federal government.
Now, if you thought that quoting Mao and mourning the Soviet Union was bad, Just wait until you hear what else he said to his viewers at the same event.
Let's go ahead and show this tweet.
I think we actually have the clip here of Hassan Piker admitting on stream that he actually was holding back his radical communist talking points because he thought that the Ivy League audience wouldn't be receptive.
He thought that the Ivy League audience would not be receptive.
This was a tweet from Leia Sapienti.
Let's go ahead and get this pulled up on the screen here.
So, Imagine that, thinking that you have to self censor yourself.
That was Hassan Piker self censoring himself, thinking that the Ivy League community wasn't going to be receptive.
But he found that the Ivy League community was, in fact, receptive to the glorification of the Soviet Union and the glorification of Chinese communism.
So again, talking about how, oh, well, I wasn't really expecting all these elite children of capitalists who are very privileged to be able to send their children to a school that costs almost $100,000 per year.
And I wasn't expecting them to agree with me and my psychotic rants about how I love Mao Zedong and I love the Soviet Union and I want to murder all these Republican capitalists and how we need to glorify Luigi Mangione.
But oh my God, turns out that the students that are.
Getting degrees at the most elite universities in America have the same ideology.
What does that say for America and our workforce going forward and the state of affairs for our country when we know that people are traditionally favored, right?
If they have the Ivy League name on their resume, a lot of times people get jobs just because they have this Ivy League stamp of approval or they have an Ivy League diploma, and then they get into political careers, they get into legal careers, they get accepted into law school, they go to the top law firms.
What does this mean for the state of America and our preservation of cultural values and the preservation of the American dream and our Constitution and everything that makes America great, that makes America free, that makes America have this sense of morality and allows America to proclaim itself as a moral authority on the world?
If this is the type of student that is going to be Produced or, dare I say, manufactured, right?
Manufactured at these Ivy League elite institutions that are more like communist indoctrination camps, really, at the end of the day.
That's what they are.
They're like communist ghettos, except it's not really a ghetto.
It's like a ghetto when you look at the mentality, but it's like a communist ghetto with luxury accommodations for $100,000 per year.
What does this say about the future of America, knowing that we're always told, oh, well, oh, I went to Harvard.
You know, everybody gets their dick sucked, right?
It's like this unfortunate series of events in our society where everybody who goes to an Ivy League, no matter how stupid they are or how radical they are or how elitist they are, it's like everybody sucks their dick, right?
And they just get to the top of the line and That's not good.
That's not good for America if the people who are, you know, metaphorically having their dick sucked by employers and companies and, you know, institutions of higher education or the employers,
right, in America's workforce are radicals, communists, people who hate America, people who want to celebrate these brutal ideologies and communist and Islamic dictatorships.
That have resulted in nothing but human suffering and death and destruction.
And going off what you're saying, Laura, if I interact with, I guess, Ivy Leaguers here in Washington, D.C., they either really love me and think I'm a genius, or they hate my guts and think I'm an idiot.
There's no in between.
And what's really scary building off of that is if Ilhan Omar and her Democrats win, obviously we've been talking about workforces education too.
She could work to ensure the Ivy League schools are filled with all the Mohammeds from Palestine, paid for by you, the American taxpayer, for, like, you know, refugee education.
And then there'll be no more, I guess, normal people left in the Ivy League schools.
And there'll all be crazy communist Muslims.
And Hassan Piker will get a 100% cheer rate instead of, what is it, like 70%?
Because we know that these universities love them.
That's what they want.
And that's what people need to start thinking.
It's very strategic.
They're not just picking random people to campaign with people like Hassan Piker.
They will create kind of like, The Biden administration did.
Do you remember during the Biden White House when they had a room designated for TikTok?
And then they were like, oh, well, these are some of the biggest content creators.
Like we started to see this obsession and the creation, right?
The foundation being laid for Podcastistan.
Again, Podcastistan is their country and conspiracy is their religion.
That's what I say.
And, you know, people are free to use that term.
That's what I've come up with.
But Podcastistan is their country, conspiracy is their religion.
And we saw this in the Biden administration where they started allowing for gay, trans, Muslim, communist influencers to have a room where they were making content at the White House, flashing people their tits, like doing these crazy trans videos, doing lots of crazy stunts at the White House.
We don't need to replay these memories and trigger everybody's PTSD.
I think we're all pretty traumatized still from living under the Biden regime.
But that being said, we all criticized how absurd it was when we saw this happening under the Biden regime.
It should be equally as disturbing now that it's happening, where the Democrats are trying to re engage these podcasters and these influencers for the sake of not just manufacturing consent for assassination culture and manufacturing consent on a national level for communism,
but also trying to mainstream these very violent, radical, anti American podcasters with no political background, no expertise.
No real life experience.
Like, I'm sorry, you don't really have real life experience when your job is to sit in front of a TV screen all day and say, fuck, and talk about how great communism is and play video games and have your little simp incel followers send you hundreds of thousands of dollars per month in donations and then get sponsorships.
And you're not really relating to the average American.
But what they're trying to do is not just manufacture consent and manufacture consent for communism and assassination culture.
They're trying to manufacture credibility, in my opinion.
They're trying to manufacture expertise so that they can then turn these podcasters who have these very fringe, astroturfed, many would say fake followings, many would argue foreign followings, many would say they're bot followings, manufacture a sense of authority or expertise so that they can then push these people onto mainstream media.
And put them on CNN or put them on MSNBC, MSDNC, and say, All right, now here to talk about President Trump's address or here to explain why we need to have communism in America as opposed to a constitutional republic is Hassan Piker.
And then they'll give him some crazy title, like he's just a Muslim communist streamer, but they'll say things like, Oh, renowned speaker or Democrat political strategist, right?
This is how it's done, where they gaslight people and they use their platforms to give people these titles that are really just a bunch of word salad.
And then they plant them at these institutions where, oh, well, of course he's credible.
Oh, he's just a streamer.
Oh, he's not just a streamer.
He spoke at Yale.
Oh, he was interviewed here.
He campaigned with Ilhan Omar or Abdul Al Sayed or Summer Lee.
They're trying to manufacture a sense of authority because how do you get to a state where.
You have communist dictators killing people, right, in the name of Chinese communism.
Or how do you get to a state like Nazi Germany, where you have somebody like Adolf Hitler amassing crowds, right?
And you have crowds of people like Zeke Isling, right?
Calling for, you know, calling for Jews to be killed, calling for Jews to be purged from society.
How do you manufacture consent for events like Kristallnacht when Jewish businesses were ravaged and?
And set ablaze, and the windows were broken, and Jews were rounded up and incarcerated and shipped off to Nazi death camps.
You have to have somebody with charisma.
You have to find somebody, whether it be a podcaster or a politician, to amass a following, right?
To amass a following, somebody who is going to be able to speak to the people directly and Make those people feel like they are able to connect with them on a visceral level, on an emotional level, to the point where that person is then able to convince those people.
And lead those people and their families and their friends and their community members into truly believing that you must go take to the streets to kill for what you believe in.
And that's how it starts, right?
It's the cult of personality.
And that is how they're able to have their revolutions it's a cult of personality where they pick a figure and they polarize that figure and they isolate that figure and they make that person revered and they start to.
Make them out to be more important than they actually are, whether it's putting them on TV or having politicians campaign with them so that they become a figure of authority and somebody who is considered acceptable.
So that, you know, five years from now or three years from now, when we're dealing with the presidential campaign, we see people campaigning with Hassan Piker and you see his followers going out and setting buildings on fire, like we just saw in California, where a Luigi Mangione supporter and a Hassan Piker supporter, who's a Muslim, literally set a paper factory on fire.
For the sake of pushing his communist agenda and attacking capitalist structures.
You can look it up and see for yourself, real story really happened.
You're not going to be receiving support if you condemn that, right?
You're not going to be receiving support and you are going to be the odd one out when you say, hold on a second, right?
History shows us that when you demonize a group of people and you say that it's okay to carry out violence against that group of people, or you start blaming a group of people like Jews or Christians, it leads to atrocities like the Holocaust.
Or hold on a second, history shows us that communism doesn't actually work and it's actually led to the death and the murder of over 100 million people.
Those people will then be completely shut out and ostracized and isolated because they are not going to be viewed as somebody who accepts the mainstream view.
And that's what's incredibly dangerous.
And you see this now taking place on CNN.
And I want to play this clip.
It's a little long, it's about eight minutes long.
But watch this debate on CNN where you have CNN contributors having like a 10 minute long debate where they're going back and forth with each other.
Over whether or not it's socially acceptable for the Democrat Party to be campaigning with Hassan Piker.
And one of the few people who actually spoke out about this was Dana Bash.
You saw Jay Tapper talking about this on CNN as well.
But Dana Bash was one of the few people at CNN who actually spoke out about this.
And she was lambasted, she was attacked.
And that's what led to the New York Times writing their article, Hassan Piker is not the enemy, because they are actively working to mainstream.
This insanity.
So, I believe we have the debate.
Let's please get this eight minute long debate up.
So, again, this is a longer clip, but just watch the mental gymnastics here and understand that the people that we view as crazy, like Jake Tapper and Dana Bash, they're actually now the moderates in this situation, trying to tell Democrats, hey, now you shouldn't be platforming these people who are calling for political violence.
This is something that we even find common ground with these so called moderate Democrats, although I wouldn't even call them moderate Democrats on.
And eventually, the radicals and the crazies are going to be the mainstream in this country.
And people like Dana Bash and people like Jake Tapper will not have jobs or positions anymore because they will be replaced by people who openly take to the airwaves to say, kill the Jews, kill the Christians, light their businesses on fire, kill Senator Brick Scott.
Kill Donald Trump, kill this person, kill this person, do this, light this person's house on fire.
And there's not going to be anybody to push back because people are too cowardly now to speak out about how the party establishment is openly nodding in approval as their party gets co opted by people who are praising communism and Islamic terrorism.
Might not be a household name, at least among adults, but ask your kids.
His new role as a midterm surrogate for some Democrats is proof that his political influence is expanding far beyond the streaming platform Twitch, where he has taken up residence.
He is, without question, an online influencer with nearly 3 million followers.
His rise as a prominent voice on the left is now driving a wedge between Democrats, and for good reason.
Hassan Piker's past and present is checkered with controversial, if not outrageous, if not bigoted, state comments like this one.
You know, it's Hassan Piker calling Orthodox Jews inbred.
Piker has also posted comments such as these where he unequivocally sides with Hamas.
Calling them the lesser of two evils compared to the government of Israel.
Piker has since apologized for his comments on 9 11, but he stood by the rest.
He's accusing others of taking him out of context.
In a Wall Street Journal op ed, the leaders of the Democratic think tank Third Way write, quote, Mr. Piker is anti American, anti women, anti Western, and anti Semitic.
No Democrat should engage with him.
All should seek to push him to the fringe where he belongs, unquote.
Hassan Piker has recently become an issue in Michigan.
It's home to a competitive three way Democratic primary for governor.
Dr. Abdul Al Sayyad, one of the three candidates and a former CNN commentator, announced that Piker will join him for two rallies in April.
His opponents quickly seized on that.
Slamming the decision is unacceptable, calling Piker not somebody that you should be campaigning with at a moment when there's clearly a lot of pain and trauma across our state.
Our Donnie O'Sullivan caught up with Piker over the weekend at a No Kings rally in New York and asked how he fits into the Democratic Party's future.
unidentified
You have become an issue within the Democratic Party yourself.
I mean, back to your first question, what it says about the party.
I think Dr. Abdullah Sayed is looking for a lane in a three way primary.
He is slightly behind in the polling.
And like a lot of Democrats and a lot of progressives, after the 2024 election, wants to connect with young people, connect with young men, go into the manosphere, go into the podcast space.
It just so happens that Hassan Piker is aligned with a lot of Dr. Abdullah Sayed's views on health care, on taxing.
The rich and billionaires, et cetera.
He is a Bernie AOC Zoran guy.
But with that, he has a long reputation of saying all of the things you just played here.
I was just talking to you before the segment.
I mean, I think it is a risk for Abdul Al Sayed to have him come into the state.
It's an obvious risk, but he is grasping for votes in a crowded three way primary in a state, Michigan, which you remember from 2024, both in the Democratic primary and the general election.
Has a lot of Arab and Muslim voters outside of Detroit, in Dearborn, in Dearborn Heights, and Democrats have been suffering there.
And I think he's trying to grab onto them.
He's doing rallies at Michigan and Michigan State, so he's trying to go after young people.
One thing I do want to point out, Jake, that you said in the intro that he's not a household name.
The Speaking with American Men project, which was launched to study young men by Democrats after 2024, pulled Hassan Piker's name among young men.
He's not well known at all.
About half of young people.
Don't know who he is.
And then his favorable rating, he's negative 9%.
He's underwater with faves.
Only 20% of young men have a favorable opinion of Hassan Piker.
And that's sort of why I say, is it worth the gamble to do this?
And Joni, in that Wall Street Journal op ed that I talked about, the think tank Third Way, they wrote, We're all for a big tent, but the Democratic Party needs to draw a line in the sand.
Hassan Piker and his fellow Jew haters belong on the other side.
Donia Sullivan, Piker, to respond to critics who call him anti Semitic, he quoted a few things that Piker had said, especially Zionist.
Dog or Zionist pig, or I think the actual quote was Zionist pig dog, whatever that means.
Yeah, I mean, what Piker does that a lot of people of his ilk do is they try to inoculate themselves against claims of Jew hatred by pointing it out in places that aren't them.
He's been very clear pointing things out on the right.
Oh, that's anti Semitism.
These are the tropes they use.
And then he'll use the exact same tropes and just sub Jew for Israel, which is the place where all Jews collectively have a connection to and is the homeland where more than 50% of Jews on planet Earth live.
So it's not, he would never say Jews control the media, but Israel controls the media.
And, you know, the Jews didn't pull us into the war with Iran and control the American government, but Israel does.
And so he's able to sort of get away with some of this stuff in these subtle ways when really his impact is just as harmful as any out and out anti Semite.
Just he's got a different name and he comes from a different wing of politics.
I think this gets to something important with this debate in Michigan.
It's different to go onto his podcast and joust over ideas.
I think seeing Josh Shapiro and Hassan Piker on his Twitch stream would be fascinating.
I think Josh Shapiro is smart and they would have a spirited debate, as they say in politics.
The difference is going out to campaign with somebody and the candidate, it's implicitly endorsing his views or suggesting, why don't you come to Michigan and campaign with me?
The difference.
I think candidates should be able to go on to podcasts with people who disagree with them.
But yeah, I mean, the politics of Israel heading into 2028 are going to be fascinating.
You're already seeing tons of Democrats kind of come out against AIPAC, but also defending Israel.
Gavin Newsom obviously had to walk back calling Israel an apartheid state.
The other thing that's a factor here the more Democrats engage with influencers heading into 2028, they're going to have to confront some views, things they might have said in the past.
I agree that they should be able to debate, but they have to come in clear eyed and know that they're there to debate and push back on these bad ideas, not to get chummy and have a fun conversation.
They're trying to, as they said, the more that they campaign with influencers going into 2028, the more they're going to have to respond to things that they've said in the past.
And so they're trying to make themselves immune to having to respond to any type of accusation or any type of claim.
And I guess they want us to live in a country, and the Democrat Party wants it to be so that they don't have to answer for anything that anybody who they campaign with has said.
But they want to continuously attack the right wing.
I just can't help but think about how I was so viciously attacked when President Trump said during the debate, they're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats.
And they decided to make me the focus of the newscast for two and a half weeks after the debate, demonizing me, lying about me, saying that I said 9 11 was an inside job.
I never said 9 11 was an inside job.
But you have Hassan Piker who said that America deserved 9 11, and they're okay with campaigning with Hassan Piker who says America deserved 9 11, but then they want to demonize me and President Trump.
Because they said, I said 9 11 was an inside job, which I never said.
So, this is being done so that they are able to get away with saying the most radical things.
They want to use the podcasters as a way to have almost like a human shield, right?
The way that Palestinians use children as a human shield in Gaza.
They want to use podcasters as a human shield so that they can get away with promoting and subsequently and tacitly endorsing these views like.
Support for Islamic terrorism, support for communism, and glorification of Hamas, and glorification of Iran and Hezbollah.
And again, the manufactured consent for assassination culture.
And I think that we're going to see more political assassinations.
I do.
Because when the Democrats campaign with people who say that it's okay to kill people who you disagree with, and they say that it's okay to murder people for their views, and that you should take to the streets to murder capitalists, I think that we probably will start to see more political assassinations as we head into 2028.
Because if the mainstream media was honest, they would be sprinting up the Capitol Hill steps to question Hakeem about Rashida Talib and Samir Lee and Ilhan Omar's behavior.
But they don't.
They want to ask Republicans about Laura, but they don't.
They want to ask Republicans about everybody who they campaign with and they want them to disavow, but then they say things like, oh, we're not in the business of disavowing.
I thought cancel culture was over after they spent years trying to cancel people and get them to disavow.
So, again, it's being used as a tool to normalize political violence and, again, assassination culture.
And I just don't really want to hear the Democrats complain about.
About the right wing accusing President Trump of campaigning with people during the midterms who have made controversial statements.
Because I can't really think of anything more controversial than glorifying Islamic terrorism, saying that you support Hamas and Hezbollah, and saying America deserves 9 11.
So if this is who the Democrats in key Senate races are going to be campaigning with, I think that the GOP should make it their midterm strategy to run campaign commercials with some of these highlight reels of things that.
He has said, and ask the Democrats if this is what their party represents, if this is what they are voting for, because people need to familiarize themselves.
Again, I don't think your average person, like Jake Tapper said, and I hate to even quote Jake Tapper, but I agree in that I don't think that Hassan Piker is a household name.
I think that this is something that is more niche for children and middle schoolers, high schoolers, and college age people.
But their goal is to.
Because perception is reality, to pretend like podcastistan is real life, right?
And so all these manipulated viewership numbers on social media, and of course, these influencers and a lot of these streamers, they're friends with the owners of these platforms too.
And so a lot of times they boost their numbers for them or they give them deals, even though they have banned people for violating terms of service.
For example, Hassan Piker, he abused his dog on stream.
He glorified terrorism and incited violence and called for people to be killed.
And if he was anybody else using Kik or Twitch, he would have been banned.
But he has a special deal with Twitch, right?
And knows, of course, the founders of Twitch and is friends with them.
And so they continue to give him a pass.
The Democrats' goal going into 2024 is to manufacture this consent for violence by creating it's like virtual reality in a sense, right?
We're living in the world of AI and virtual reality.
It's this virtual reality transplanted into the realm of politics where they want people to truly believe that podcastistan is real world.
that what you see in podcasts of Stan translates into real world and your conversations on the streets of America with everyday Americans and everyday voters.
But the reality is, is majority of Americans have never even heard of any of these people.
They do it with Hassan Piker, they do it with Candace Owens, with Tucker Carlson.
So it will be interesting to see how the Democrats fare.
Look, I believe the Democrats will probably win just because the Republicans have failed.
Aside from all of this influencer astroturfing and this faux reality that they're pushing, I think that the Democrats.
Will probably win the midterms just because the Republicans have not really fought hard enough to codify President Trump's America First agenda.
And I don't really think that a lot of the Republicans want President Trump to have a successful second term.
They want the Democrats to take back the House so that they can impeach him because this is the rhino's last big hoorah, right?
To get President Trump one last time on his way out because he's only in office for another two and a half years.
But with that being said, I think that we're also.
watching this same strategy play out in the midterms right now, where you have candidates who are very fringe, who are also radical running, like James Fishback is a perfect example of this in Florida, who have these very out there views, take these kind of anti American stances, alliances with very fringe figures, with jihadist figures, these unholy alliances, and yet they're being endorsed and platformed and astroturfed by people like Tucker Carlson.
It's the same strategy, and it will be really interesting to see if this strategy works during the midterm elections or if it falls flat on its face.
Will the American people rise above the algorithmic manipulation and the foreign influence operations to think for themselves, or will they allow for all of this propaganda and again, manufactured legitimacy, manufactured expertise, manufactured consent for both violence and communism?
Will they fall victim to that?
That's going to be like the big test study because billions of dollars is going into all of this influencer marketing and all these influencer propaganda campaigns, and clearly these foreign influence operations where you have like Turkish accounts and Qatari accounts, Iranian accounts, Russian accounts boosting, right?
Like you literally have the state media entities of these countries clipping these podcasters and boosting it on their own state run media accounts.
So we'll see what happens, but it's going to be interesting.
And when you have Zoran Mamdami going in, again, another person who campaigned with Hassan Piker.
Let's go ahead and play those clips of Zoran Mamdami.
Campaigning with Hassan Piker.
And then he was called out because Piker said America deserved 9 11.
And then Zoram Amdami pretended like he had no idea who Hassan Piker was.
But here they are campaigning.
This was before Mom Dami, of course, won his election to be mayor of New York City.
But now you have Mom Dami implementing these communist tax policies and talking about how he wants to tax the rich and drive the rich out of New York City and literally doxing them in his own videos for his mayoral office.
Showing where people live so that you can have this vigilantism, have somebody show up outside their building.
I mean, he literally is doxing Ken Griffin in this video that I'm about to show you after I show you this video of him campaigning with Hassan Piker.
But when you look at this concept of an Islamic communist mayor implementing the wealth tax on Christian and Jewish entrepreneurs, it really honestly is a modern day jizya.
It is a jizya tax implemented by a jihadi communist.
Look, I think many New Yorkers, far more than the political class would have you imagine, have been rightfully horrified by a genocide that they've seen over more than 15 months of.
I've long stood up for universal human rights and extending them to Palestinians because I think that any politics worth its salt has to be one that is universal, that doesn't draw an exception.
And in this country, we've drawn exceptions for far too long, especially when it comes to the application of it to Palestinians.
And I think that what's so frustrating about this is he's taking a real crisis of anti Semitism in our city and he's weaponizing it purely for personal gain.
And that's what he's done.
Time and time again, he puts himself before anything and in the process tries to mischaracterize any New Yorker standing up to say that.
Every single person deserves freedom and justice and safety.
I feel like maybe I'm wrong on this, but New Yorkers, as well as every American, values free speech and due process a lot more than the feelings of people that are falsely conflating an entire religion with an apartheid ethnostate that is doing a genocide.
The number one thing is to make the city affordable.
And the number one cost in New Yorkers' life when they're thinking about that is housing.
About two and a half million New Yorkers live in rent stabilized housing across New York City.
Their rent increases are set by the mayor.
This mayor has jacked their rent up 9%.
I would freeze their rent.
For close to two and a half million people, I would make the slowest buses in the country fast and free in our city, make them a model for this nation, and I would deliver universal childcare to New Yorkers, whether they're six weeks or five years of age.
And ultimately, it's using every tool the public sector has to make this a city people can afford.
Let's go ahead and get this up on the screen here.
Tax fight up as New York targets wealthy homeowners.
Mamdami says New York is following through on his campaign promise to tax the rich.
You can scroll down.
Growing push for higher taxes on wealthy homeowners in New York is intensifying debate over how far states should go to raise revenue as policymakers weigh the broader economic impact on investment, housing, and taxpayer behavior.
So, again, let's go ahead and play this video clip that Zoran Mamdami posted on his ex account on tax day, this tax day two days ago.
Bragging about how, and again, I want to emphasize that this is a mayor of New York City doxing, right?
A mayor of New York City who campaigned with a communist who called for capitalist blood to be shed on the streets of America, and a guy who glorified Luigi Mangione and said more people need to be like Luigi Mangione, basically like Hassan Piker saying more people need to go out there and kill people the way that Luigi Mangione killed people.
It's a form of vigilante justice, vigilanteism.
And you have Zoran Nandami using his funds, taxpayer funds through the city, to make a video talking about how when he ran for mayor, he said he was going to tax the rich and then literally doxing Ken Griffin, who I'm sure gets a lot of death threats, and showing his crazy communist followers who believe in basically replicating what Luigi Mangione did to the rich, doxing Ken Griffin's apartment or his penthouse condo in New York City.
When I ran for mayor, I said I was going to tax the rich.
Well, today, we're taxing the rich.
I'm thrilled to announce we've secured a pied-a-terre tax, the first in New York's history.
This is an annual fee on luxury properties worth more than $5 million, whose owners do not live full-time in the city.
Like for this penthouse, which hedge fund CEO Ken Griffin bought for $238 million.
This pied-a-terre tax is specifically designed for the richest of the rich, those who store their wealth in New York City real estate, but who don't actually live here.
But even so, they're able to reap the huge financial rewards of owning property in, dare I say, the greatest city in the world.
And most of the time, these units are sitting empty, since again, They don't actually live here.
This is a fundamentally unfair system that hurts working New Yorkers.
Now, it's coming to an end.
This tax will raise at least $500 million directly for the city.
It'll help fund things like free childcare, cleaner streets, and safer neighborhoods.
As mayor, I believe everyone has a role to play in contributing to our city, and some a little bit more than others.
So, essentially, demonizing people who have successfully pursued the American dream, doxing them on camera with taxpayer funds, and then saying that they're the reason why you don't have free health care, why you're paying so much money for rent, and blaming them for their own issues in life.
And some people are in those positions because they fell on hard times, or maybe they work hard and the cost of living has gone up.
But there's also a lot of deadbeats in our society.
Let's be honest.
There are a lot of people who are struggling to get by.
And there's a lot of people out there, like a lot of these trust fund kids or these.
Communists who show up to these meetings and they really do believe that they are entitled to get like UBI, for example, or they're entitled to get a check from the government every single month, or that they really do believe that they should make as much money as somebody who creates thousands of jobs, right?
In the community.
There are a lot of very entitled people on the radical left, in the radical left.
And that's, of course, why they're communists and socialists.
They want to spend other people's money.
But the problem with communism and socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money to spend.
And so Very dangerous what Zoram Amdami is doing with these videos, and he knows what he's doing.
I'm surprised that more people didn't call out his glorification of vigilantism because that's exactly what he's doing.
He's finding somebody who is a known target of the communists and the radical left, Ken Griffin, and like him or dislike him, it doesn't matter.
People shouldn't be going and pointing out exactly which building they live in.
That's how Brian Thompson was assassinated.
Somebody found out where he was staying in his hotel.
Because of a conference that he was speaking at that was right near the hotel.
And then Luigi Mangione waited for him to leave his hotel, scouted out the area, and shot him in the back several times, killing him, assassinating him in broad daylight.
So, very dangerous.
But as I said before, they manufactured the consent with a cult of personality, somebody like Zoran Mandami.
They did this with AOC as well, they did it with Bernie Sanders.
And they manufactured consent for communist policies with a cult of personality.
And now, subliminally, they're trying to manufacture consent for assassination culture.
And don't think for one second when he says tax the rich and doxes Ken Griffin that Zoran Mamdami, who openly campaigned with Hassan Piker, isn't trying to encourage somebody to go find Ken Griffin and literally wait for him and kill him, assassinate him.
I'm surprised Ken Griffin hasn't spoken out about this, honestly, because I find it to be absolutely abhorrent.
And I've criticized Ken Griffin before.
I'm not here to simp or white knight for Ken Griffin, but every single person of wealth and status in America should be worried if this is the climate that we're going to live in.
If you create jobs in America, if you are successful, if you are a successful entrepreneur, if you fulfill the American dream and you are wealthy, are these communists who get elected going to dox you and taxpayer funded?
Videos that they make to you know glorify and promote their communist agenda very, very dangerous and it's not being discussed enough.
Oh, I know, and I this is going to go down a very dark path.
Democrats keep winning if they win elections.
I could totally see like Obama, maybe the Pope, AOC, Bernie coming together for a nice little rally.
Just kind of pay your fair share.
You like your 401k, you can keep it too, and just rail about why we need to take everyone's money.
And they're gonna like phrase it conveniently.
We need to take the people's money, no matter how rich or poor they are, who voted for Donald Trump, who are mostly Protestant, mostly Jewish, because we need to punish them for what they did to America.
Taking their money is just.
It is just to take away the tax exemptions of evangelical churches.
It's just.
It's just.
I can see this coming a mile away, and it's horrifying and it's scary.
And people need to wake up to this fact.
And the very first, I guess, battle in this fight.
Is, I don't know what the midterm election day is exactly, but the first Tuesday in November is the first fight.
So most of these radical candidates are running in the primary election.
So more so than November, people need to pay attention to their upcoming primaries because that's how a lot of these radical candidates are going to make it into a general election, especially somebody like an Abdul El Sayed who campaigned, of course, with Hassan Piker in Michigan, as we recently reported.
Charles, is there anything else that you want to add about your coverage up on Capitol Hill and your tracking of these radical officials and your encounters with them before we close out tonight?
I know that we're going to be, Charles and I are going to be documenting all of the midterm races, and we continue to identify and report on the most radical elements within the Democrat Party and also the woke Reich.
My reporting has made its way to the president's desk, which, of course, is why the president is now.
Calling out, or largely one of the main reasons why President Trump is calling out members of the Woke Reich, including Megyn Kelly and Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones.
So that's great.
But you can continue following at the Charles Downs to see all of Charles's work up on the Hill as a Loomer Unleashed DC correspondent.
And also be sure that you're following the Loomer Unleashed account as well.
If you guys remember last year, they bust in a bunch of literal illegal immigrants wearing Casa t shirts to go scream about Trump outside the White House.
Where Jack Paul and Ilhan Omar and a bunch of other elected Democrats personally addressed them.
Well, with that, Charles, thank you so much for coming on tonight.
I really appreciate it.
Be sure that you're following Charles on X at the Charles Downs.
Give him a follow.
He does great work.
He's DC correspondent for Loomer Unleashed up on the hill.
And if you have a tip or a story that you want us to cover, be sure that you DM me on X at Laura Loomer.
You could DM the Loomer Unleashed account, and you can also DM Charles as well if you have any tips up on the hill.
You can also be sure that you're following me at loomered.com.
Loomered.com is my website where every single day we publish.
Exclusive articles and updates that you're not going to see anywhere else.
And you can submit a tip on the tip line on my website by clicking the drop down box and filling out the tip line on bloomer.com.
Every single day, we get amazing tips, and your anonymity and confidentiality is always protected if you request it when you submit your tip.
Also, if you want to support the work that we're doing, you can go to the website drop down link and click donate.
You can send me a check or you can click the donate now button.
Click the donate now button at the bottom there, and it will take you to a page where you can make a donation in support of my work.
Be sure that you're following me on X at Laura Loomer and also on X at Loomer Unleash.
And of course, subscribe to the Rumble chat, rumble.comslash Laura Loomer, rumble.comslash Laura Loomer.
I'll take two questions before we log out tonight, but be sure that you're following along this weekend because I'm going to be posting a lot of midterm coverage.
There is one POC high rise that foreigners use to park their money in to avoid taxes.
Will they pay taxes as foreigners, or is there a loophole for them?
Of course, they're not going to enforce this against the foreigners, right?
They want to selectively target wealthy conservatives, particularly wealthy white men and wealthy Jews, so that they can kick them out of the city.
Or tax them, take more of their money so that they can't use that money to fund conservative causes or pro-America causes.
This is all about threats and intimidation.
I doubt they're going to be targeting and taxing the wealthy leftists who donate, who also have multiple homes.
I'm sure George Soros has a home in New York City, right?
Are they going to be targeting the properties of Soros and their other Democrat donors who have penthouses in New York City too, and have beach homes in Malibu, California, and farms maybe, and other parts of the country or other parts of the world?
No, this is selective targeting, and they're targeting people who have the means to write very large checks to candidates.
We saw that Ken Griffin didn't really support President Trump, he supported Ron DeSantis.
But these are people who have the means to donate a lot of money to conservative causes and conservative presidential candidates, conservative congressional candidates, conservative gubernatorial candidates.
And this is all about using power acquired by communists and radical.
Democrats and also jihadist Muslims to threaten and intimidate and silence people who want to fund a resistance against their communist takeover of America.
Let's go back to the chat, see if anybody else has any questions.
Mostly just comments.
Brother Maynard said, When I was young, we used to hunt and kill commies at the order of American elected officials.
What has happened to my country?
Well, now the Commies are hunting you at the order of American elected officials.
Exactly.
And this goes back to something I previously said on the show before about how Joseph McCarthy was right.
We need to have McCarthyism in America.
Had people not demonized Joseph McCarthy for McCarthyism and what they called the Red Scare, then, well, maybe we wouldn't be dealing with this communist witch hunt in America right now where the communists are hunting us.
It's not the other way around where we should be hunting the communists.
The communists are now carrying out their witch hunts at the order of these.
Communist and Muslim officials who are acquiring power and hunting down law abiding Americans, patriotic Americans who love their country.
Because, well, as Hassan Piker just recently said at Yale, you're a paper tiger if you're just a reactionary, if you don't actually take to the streets to implement your communist revolution.
So you need to pay attention and realize that this isn't just inflammatory rhetoric.
This isn't just people campaigning for likes and clicks.
They are literally trying to, again, I'll say it again.
I said it a million times tonight.
Manufacture consent for communism.
They've already done that.
They manufacture consent for communism so that they can manufacture consent for assassination culture.
Okay, this is what they're doing.
And we have countless examples of this.
Luigi Mangione, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the attempted assassination of President Trump, and the communist assassination of those two young Jewish lovers and workers outside of the Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C., who were shot and killed while they were attending an event, a Jewish event, by a communist who shouted, Free Palestine.
So we're living in a world where they are now getting people to consent on a mainstream level.
By attaching themselves to mainstream politicians running in key senate races, key gubernatorial races, key congressional races, so that they can have widespread consent for assassination, so that when somebody powerful on the right gets killed, you see the same reaction that we saw after Charlie Kirk was killed, where people who are doctors and lawyers and teachers and professionals, even lawmakers themselves, celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
That is what they want.
They want that to be the mentality so that when They go out and they carry out their political killings, and their number one political killing is obviously President Donald Trump.
They will get people in the streets cheering instead of widespread condemnation.
And that's why we need to make sure that even if you are unhappy with the Republicans, and I'm unhappy, trust me, and even if you don't like a lot of the rhinos, you need to make sure that the Republicans win, or at least you put up a fighting chance for the Republicans to win the midterms, or else we will truly live in a culture where it has become socially acceptable to kill your political enemies.
So, With that, Charles, thank you so much for coming on the show tonight.
I really appreciate it.
Stay safe out there.
And for those of you who tuned in tonight, be sure you're following us on social media.