EP171: LOOMERED: Hamas Sympathizer Fired From White House Religious Liberty Commission
Laura Loomer exposes Carrie Prashan Buller, a fired White House Religious Liberty Commission member, for wearing a Palestinian flag, pushing pro-Hamas claims like Israel’s "Gaza genocide," and attacking Jewish panelists while ignoring Christian persecution—13M+ Christians killed annually by Islamic forces. Loomer ties Buller to Candace Owens’ conspiracy theories (e.g., Trump controlled by Israel) and Krislam, a alleged alliance to silence Jewish voices, questioning why religious liberty platforms prioritize anti-Zionism over documented Islamic violence. Meanwhile, Loomer’s Super Bowl criticism of Bad Bunny’s Spanish-only halftime show—$6,800 avg. ticket cost—sparked backlash, but she frames it as a deliberate assault on English-speaking assimilationists, comparing it to Epstein files weaponized by Democrats (Ilhan Omar, AOC) ahead of 2026 midterms. The episode ties cultural shifts, political agendas, and religious hypocrisy into a broader pattern of anti-American and anti-Jewish rhetoric. [Automatically generated summary]
Good evening and welcome to tonight's episode of Loomer Unleashed.
I'm your host, Laura Loomer.
We are live right now on Rumble and X.
So please be sure that you head on over to rumble.com slash Laura Loomer, rumble.com slash Laura Loomer, or be sure that you head on over to X. Follow me on X at Laura Loomer, also at Loomer Unleashed.
The stream is pinned at the top of my X account.
So be sure that you repost the live link, share it, like this episode, share this episode, and that way other people can watch and comment while we are live.
Lots to talk about tonight.
One of the things that's really captivated my attention this week, though, we're going to lead with this tonight because it just, this seems to be a weekly occurrence.
Every week, there seems to be another individual who wants to use religion as a way to become a social media influencer and to gain attention.
And it seems like, you know, there's this new class of influencers in America who have decided that they're going to get popular podcasts or they're going to gain followers online because they're going to create a brand around themselves that's focused on bashing Jewish people and blaming Israel for all of their problems, right?
So if they're not successful in life, blame the Jews.
If they don't get the job that they want, it must be Israel's fault.
If you get called out for being on a religious committee because your behavior is inappropriate, well, you're just going to blame the Jews or blame Israel.
Well, what am I talking about exactly?
Earlier this week, you may have had the misfortune of seeing the viral clips from the White House Religious Liberties Committee meeting in which multiple members of this White House Religious Liberties Commission met to discuss.
They were supposed to be talking about religious persecution.
They're supposed to be talking about religious persecution and ways to preserve religious freedom in America.
This wasn't a discussion about religious persecution around the world.
This wasn't a discussion about Middle East policy.
This was a conversation about ways that religious leaders can work together to preserve religious freedom in the United States.
This committee was established under the Trump administration.
And the head of this committee is a guy by the name of Dan Patrick, who is the lieutenant governor of Texas.
And from my understanding, Dan Patrick had asked President Trump if he could be in charge of this committee because he wanted to lead the White House Religious Liberties Commission.
And President Trump apparently said yes.
So back in May of 2025, I spoke about this committee because in May of 2025, the White House, if you recall, and I believe I posted a very long, extensive tweet and report about this too, and we can get this up.
Back in May of 2025, the White House announced its members for this religious liberty commission and just the various different faith leaders who were going to be sitting on this commission.
Now, they had all types of people.
They had Jews, they had Catholics, they had Christians, they had Muslims.
And when I originally reported on this, And I posted about this the other day on my on my ex account.
When I originally reported on this, I broke a story about the fact that a convicted Islamic terrorist had been appointed to the White House Religious Liberties Commission.
And in addition to a convicted Islamic terrorist being appointed to the commission, there were two other jihadist Muslims who had ties to Islamic terrorists and terrorist organizations who had been appointed to this commission.
Now, I brought this up to PPO, the Office of PPO, personnel, policy office, and I brought this up to the White House.
And I was told, wow, thanks so much for bringing this to our attention.
We had no idea.
It just, it's a constant reminder of the vetting crisis that continues to happen.
And look, I've been very vocal about the lack of vetting.
And the reality is, is that President Trump isn't the one who's going around picking these people to be on the committee.
What happened is you have people who are tasked with assigning people to these committee positions.
And it's not like President Trump hand-selected the people on this committee.
That's not what happened.
But somebody in his administration did.
And, you know, I thought it was bad enough when they appointed convicted Islamic terrorists and Muslim jihadis who have sympathies to Islamic terrorist organizations like Hamas.
And some of you might be thinking, oh, come on now, Laura, that's a little hyperbolic.
They didn't appoint a convicted terrorist to the commission.
Yes, they actually did.
And we're going to get into that today because, again, it's part of this larger crisis of, you know, lack of vetting.
And to this day, even though I identified this and I broke this story, I was the first to break this story back in May of 2025.
It still has not been addressed.
And in addition to having Islamic terrorists and Hamas sympathizers serving on this Religious Liberties Commission, you also have people who recently converted to Catholicism or a woman, I should say, not people.
And look, I think Catholics should be on the committee.
I don't see why Catholics would not be on the committee.
But we should have real Catholics on the committee, just like we should have real Christians and real Jews and real Hindus on the committee.
I don't really think it's appropriate for Muslims to be on the committee, given the fact that Islam doesn't even believe in religious liberty.
If we're talking about religious liberty, we need to understand that Islam is an etology.
And as an etiology, Islam explicitly calls for the death of all non-Muslims.
And so it doesn't really make sense for Muslims, like devout Muslims to serve on this committee.
Because if you're a Muslim, well, you do not believe in religious freedom.
You don't believe in religious tolerance because the Quran explicitly calls for the killing of non-Muslims or non-believers, as they call it in Islam.
So I find it to be a little bit of an oxymoron to have a Muslim sitting on a religious liberties commission.
Now they're going to say, well, Laura, you know, not all Muslims are terrorists.
Okay, well, maybe, right?
Maybe.
But the Muslims who are sitting on this commission, not only is one of them a convicted terrorist, but the rest of them all have ties to documented Islamic terrorist organizations.
And we're going to go through this right now.
This is a story I broke back in May.
Islamic jihadists who traveled to Pakistan to train an Islamic terror camp and served 20 years in prison in the U.S. for jihadist terrorist activities has now been listed as a member of the White House Advisory Board of Lay Leaders, which was announced underneath this White House Religious Liberties Commission back in May on the official White House website.
Just when I thought the vetting crisis at the White House couldn't get any worse, I'm now literally having a heart attack over today's announcement.
Again, this was my report from May.
So I want to remind you of this because the individual who has since been removed from the Religious Liberties Commission is claiming that she was removed because she's a Catholic, even though she showed up simping for Palestinians and sympathizers of Hamas and was using her position to push Hamas propaganda while wearing a Palestinian flag.
Again, we're not having a commission over Middle Eastern politics or persecution around the world or whatever it may be.
We're having a conversation about religious freedom in the United States of America and we don't wear the Palestinian flag here in America.
A literal Muslim Brotherhood Hamas jihadist named Ishmael Royer, who was found by the DOJ to have traveled to Pakistan to train in a terrorist camp and who was part of the Virginia Jihadi Network that trained Islamic terrorists to attack America and was investigated by the FBI, is now on the White House Advisory Board of Lay Leaders that was announced today.
In 2003, Royer was indicted on terrorism-related charges, including conspiracy to levy war against the United States and providing material support to al-Qaeda and LET terrorist organization.
He pled guilty in 2004 to aiding and abetting the use of firearms and explosives, receiving a 20-year sentence and serving 13 years.
Today, the White House announced on their website that the Trump administration has named their advisory board members to the Religious Liberty Commission.
This was likely not done by President Trump, but instead his staff.
It's the latest example of the White House vetting crisis.
I highly doubt President Trump was even involved in this.
I'm willing to bet he was not involved in that this was a vetting failure by his staff.
One of the individuals named to the White House Advisory Board of Lay Leaders is Ishmael Royer.
Ishmael Royer, born Randall Todd Royer, is an American convert to Islam with a history of terrorism-related activities that raises serious concerns about his suitability for a position on the Trump advisory board.
In the 1990s, Royer embraced Islam and became involved in Muslim advocacy, but his experiences fighting in the Bosnian War and engaging with Lakshar al-Taiba in Pakistan in 2000 marked a turn towards jihadi militancy.
His activities with LET, a U.S.-designated terrorist organization, included propaganda, firing at Indian positions in Kashmir, and possessing weapons, demonstrating a commitment to violent jihadist causes.
Post-9-11, Royer was a key figure in the Virginia Jihad Network, organizing paintball training and facilitating travel to LET camps for weapons training, with some members aiming to support the Taliban against U.S. forces.
His guilty plea in 2004 acknowledged facilitating others' access to LET training and supporting Taliban efforts.
Royer was released from prison in 2017 and has a long documented history of enabling terrorist activities and supporting jihadist causes.
Uh, remains a significant concern for an advisory role.
And then, of course, I go into talking about why he was unfit to serve on this board.
And you can scroll down some more.
And those are the receipts right there.
You can see Ishmael Royer serves on the director of Islam and Religious Freedom Action team.
He converted to Islam.
He studied.
And then, of course, he's on the advisory board committee.
And we're going to get into Carrie Prison Bohler momentarily.
But I wanted to highlight this because if you go back to the tweet that I just showed you up on the screen and you scroll down, I said, but wait, there's more.
Two other jihadists as well.
You had Ishmael Royer, and then you had Sheikh Hamza Yusuf.
And if you scroll down, I get into his background as well.
He taught at Zaituna College, which was co-founded by Hamza Yusuf.
It teaches Sharia law.
Again, you can go into all of this.
Why Many Americans Reject Political Zionism00:15:06
In a 1996 speech to ICNA, Yusuf described the United States as a country that has little to be proud of its past and less to be proud of in the present.
ICNA is a Muslim Brotherhood organization and was listed in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism trial as our nation's largest terrorism financing trial.
After 9-11, the FBI showed up to Yusuf's house to question him over his pro-jihad remarks.
He was viewed as such a threat that he was questioned by the FBI in the critical days after 9-11.
Okay, so somebody who was actually interrogated by the FBI in the days after the 9-11 Islamic terrorist attacks in our country was also put on this White House Religious Liberty Commission.
So obviously there's some kind of Islamic infiltration happening here where individuals who have an affinity for Islamic terrorism put individuals with ties to Islamic terrorists on the White House Religious Liberty Commission.
Now, what does that have to do with what I'm about to talk about tonight?
Well, this is obviously the subject of the news this week, the White House Religious Liberty Commission.
But this time you have a woman by the name of Carrie Prashan Buller.
You know, this is a woman.
I don't know, she was like a beauty queen, if that's what you want to call her.
She participated in some pageants, seems to have multiple personalities, shapeshifts her political views depending on the weather.
And doing some research on her, it appears that she also has some sex tapes, right?
There's the first thing you see when you type her name online is her denying being in a sex tape and then later admitting that she was in a sex tape.
So she claims to be a Catholic.
Again, I don't really know many Catholics who are in sex tapes.
I don't know.
I don't know any Catholics that are in sex tapes, actually.
In Islam, that's enough to get you stoned to death.
It's considered quite haram.
But earlier this week, we saw an absolute disgrace unfold at the White House Religious Liberty Committee meeting when we saw this woman by the name of Carrie Prashon Buller, a former beauty queen with no real life accomplishments.
I mean, I don't know, wearing a bathing suit on stage really isn't exactly an accomplishment.
I wouldn't say that it's something that, you know, I'm like, wow, what have you done in life?
Oh, I'm a beauty queen.
I don't consider it to be an accomplishment, but who knows?
Maybe some people do.
I personally don't.
But we watched her hijack the White House Religious Liberties Commission meeting to harass Jewish panelists and to push pro-Hamas rhetoric.
And she immediately sat down and it appeared that she was reading like scripted lines.
And now we know that they were talking points given to her by Palestinian activists because when she sat down and started questioning the attendees at the committee meeting, including evangelical Christians and Jewish individuals, she put on her Palestinian flag in a very provocative manner and then proceeded.
You could see here, there's a photo of her wearing a Palestinian flag, which again, like we're in the United States of America.
She's on Twitter right now crying because she's since been fired from the commission after she was reported for being a total Jew hater and an Islamic terror sympathizer.
But she's also talking about how the Trump administration is not America first and that they're mega, make Israel great again, right?
That's what she's calling it.
She's calling it Israel first.
But she seems to be the only attendee that showed up wearing a foreign flag.
So I don't understand.
She says that she cares about the United States of America and America first, but then she showed up to the White House Religious Liberty Commission meeting wearing a Palestinian flag.
So why don't we just go ahead and play this?
It's about a seven-minute long clip.
You could see this tirade of her harassing attendees.
She only harassed the Jews and the evangelical Christians.
And she appears to be like one of the Candace Owens wine moms.
You know, these women that just sit around, they don't really have jobs.
Maybe they're housewives.
They think they're doing something all day while they sit at home and do nothing.
I don't know.
I can't imagine doing that, but I have to feel productive.
And I'm not saying that being a housewife isn't a job, but like there's this new breed of women who think that sitting at home drinking boxed wine while their husbands work all day and then them watching Candace Owens and like, you know, making fun of Charlie Kirk's widow, who tragically lost her husband in an assassination.
They think that cheering on some woman who displays signs of paranoid schizophrenia and waking up and thinking about how they can blame everything that goes wrong in the world on Jewish people or Israel is very bizarre.
Like there needs to be some kind of a case study on these women, middle-aged women, who seem to think that it's like an accomplishment to sit there and cheer on Candace Owens while she has these schizophrenic rants on her podcast all day.
It's very bizarre, but apparently Kerry Persian Buller is one of these women who thinks that Israel murdered Charlie Kirk.
She thinks that a secret cabal of Jewish spies met in the Hamptons to plot the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
She brought that up during this religious meeting as well.
And she seems to think that Islam is a religion of peace.
And she also seems to think that the Israelis are like eating children, like eating children and killing children.
I mean, very bizarre stuff, like very weird conspiracy theories, blood libel, very very weird claims coming out of the individuals that are supporting this woman, this Kari Persian Buller.
I mean, just really insane rhetoric about Israelis, the Israeli government, Jewish people.
And she believes this stuff.
And somehow she got placed on this White House religious committee alongside, I don't know, the other members who, as I just showed you, include a convicted Islamic terrorist who was plotting to engage with the Taliban.
And then two other jihadist Muslim individuals who often talked about how much they hate America, one of whom was actually questioned by the FBI for possible involvement in the 9-11 terrorist attacks in the aftermath of 9-11.
So let's go ahead and play this.
Again, it's pretty disturbing.
If you haven't seen the clip, this is all over the place now because she's since been fired following, I guess, my lead on this.
I feel like there needs to be a little bit more moral clarity from the individuals overseeing these commissions.
And it wasn't until I really pressed the issue that Kerry Prajan Bolar, I mean, it wasn't just me, it was a lot of people, but it seems like I had to be quite aggressive in pressing for her to be held accountable by the Trump administration.
And now she's crying and saying that the Trump administration hates Catholics.
She says that they hate Christians, that they hate Muslims.
You describe very painful experiences at UCLA, and I take that very serious.
At the same time, many of the students who I've spoken to personally who created those encampments say that they were protesting the killing of tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians in Gaza and their university's financial ties to that war.
So I need to ask you, in a country built on religious liberty and the First Amendment, do you believe someone can stand firmly against anti-Semitism, including what you experienced, and at the same time condemn the mass killing of Palestinians in Gaza or reject political Zionism or not support the political state of Israel?
Or do you believe that speaking out about what many Americans view as genocide in Gaza should be treated as anti-Semitic?
Because in my view, the United States cannot and must not make loyalty to a particular theology about Israel a litmus test for protected speech or moral legitimacy.
I don't need, I'm not going to assist them in setting a double standard for the Israeli government and the Jewish people as they fight to defend themselves.
These were students calling for intifada within days after October 7th, before Israel had even entered Gaza.
So it's not about them and they're using Palestinian civilian death, which is horrendous and horrible.
They're using it as a prop.
And it doesn't matter.
My religious beliefs are violated.
You don't get to block me because I'm Zionist and a Jew.
I'm really grateful that we're having this discussion because I think this is a topic that is really affecting so many Americans.
Rabbi Shapiro, he's based in New York.
I invited him here today, but he's not here today.
He says, and I would love your opinion on this, American Jews are increasingly treated as less fully American.
Our loyalty question, our belonging made conditional, because Zionist ideology falsely claims Israel is the nation state of Jews everywhere and that every Jew is nationally tied to it.
He says, this framing is anti-Semitic at its core.
It strips us of our identity as Americans, recasts us as foreigners in our own country, and arms anti-Semites with accusations of divided loyalties and collective guilt for actions we neither chose nor control.
No other foreign country does this.
No sovereign state claims to politically represent an entire worldwide group defined by religion or heritage and bind its members to its deeds.
Yet Jews alone bear this unique, unjust burden.
That dangerous lie must be rejected openly and firmly.
The remedy is clear.
Civic education that teaches unconditional American belonging through citizenship alone, not ethnicity, heritage, or any fabricated foreign tie.
We are Americans, full stop, and we reject any doctrine that treats us otherwise.
You describe very painful experiences at UCLA, and I take that very serious.
At the same time, many of the students who I've spoken to personally who created those encampments say that they were protesting the killing of tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians in Gaza and their university's financial ties to that war.
So I need to ask you, in a country built on religious liberty in the First Amendment, do you believe someone can stand firmly against anti-Semitism, including what you experienced, and at the same time condemn the mass killing of Palestinians in Gaza or reject political Zionism or not support the political state of Israel?
Or do you believe that speaking out about what many Americans view as genocide in Gaza should be treated as anti-Semitic?
Because in my view, the United States cannot and must not make loyalty to a particular theology about Israel a litmus test for protected speech or moral legitimacy.
I'm really grateful that we're having this discussion because I think this is a topic that is really affecting so many Americans.
Rabbi Shapiro, he's based in New York.
I invited him here today, but he's not here today.
He says, and I would love your opinion on this, American Jews are increasingly treated as less fully American.
Our loyalty question, our belonging made conditional, because Zionist ideology falsely claims Israel is the nation state of Jews everywhere and that every Jew is nationally tied to it.
He says, this framing is anti-Semitic at its core.
It strips us of our identity as Americans, recasts us as foreigners in our own country, and arms anti-Semites with accusations of divided loyalties and collective guilt for actions we neither chose nor control.
No other foreign country does this.
No sovereign state claims to politically represent an entire worldwide group defined by religion or heritage and bind its members to its deeds.
Yet Jews alone bear this unique, unjust burden.
That dangerous lie must be rejected openly and firmly.
The remedy is clear.
Civic education that teaches unconditional American belonging through citizenship alone, not ethnicity, heritage, or any fabricated foreign tie.
We are Americans, full stop, and we reject any doctrine that treats us otherwise.
And undoubtedly, one does not have to support the specific policies of the government of Israel, but to not support the right of Israel to exist, which is what anti-Zionists do, while not taking that same stand to the 28 Muslim countries and 13 Christian countries in this world, is a double standard, is hypocrisy, and is absolutely anti-Semitism.
I just want to say God forbid was anything like that said.
But if the Jewish people are the only people that you deny the right to have its own state, that is absolutely a double standard hypocrisy and anti-Semitism.
As I said, anti-Zionism by denying the right of the Jews to have their own state while not saying the same for any other peoples, that is a double standard hypocrisy and anti-Semitism.
But what I'm saying is if somebody has, if somebody states an anti-Zion, if somebody says they're an anti-Zionist, they are saying about themselves that they have a double standard and hypocrisy, and they're taking anti-Semitic positions.
So as you can see, just completely inappropriate, harassing them.
I don't understand what this has to do with anything.
Like, okay, yeah, if she doesn't like Israel, great.
She doesn't like Israel.
But what does that have to do with an American-based Religious Liberty Commission meeting?
It doesn't.
It doesn't have anything to do with anything.
This was a committee that was supposed to be focused on restoring religious freedom and preserving religious liberty in the United States of America.
And here she is putting a Palestinian flag on her shirt, talking about Middle East policy.
And then, you know, it's not even the whole clip.
I mean, there's more clips as well where she started harassing Seth Dillon from the Babylon B, asking him what he was doing in the Hamptons.
That's a reference, of course, to Candace Owens's conspiracy theory.
I don't know if we have that clip, but again, another outrageous moment during this hearing where she started harassing Seth Dillon.
And, oh, answer the question, Seth.
Why were you in the Hamptons?
Why are you in the Hamptons?
And this is, for those of you that don't know what she's referring to, Candace Owens came up with this big conspiracy about how, you know, and a lot of her supporters, there's been a million different theories, right?
First, she said it was like the Jews that killed Charlie.
Then she said it was Egyptians that were tracking Erica Kirk.
And now she's suggesting that Erica Kirk killed her husband.
And at one point in time, when she was telling everybody that Israel killed Charlie Kirk or suggesting that Israel killed Charlie Kirk, she had promoted this conspiracy theory that all of these Jews met up, like a secret cabal of Jews met up in the Hamptons to pressure Charlie Kirk into, you know, deplatforming certain people and to pressure Charlie Kirk into not speaking out about Israel.
And she made it sound like it was some pressure meeting where people were just bullying Charlie Kirk and ganging up on Charlie Kirk.
And she really whipped everybody up into a frenzy when in reality, this was a meeting of Jewish leaders and they weren't all Jews as well.
Some of them were evangelical Christians and they met in the Hamptons and they discussed a variety of different topics.
And I believe that Bill Ackman was one of the hosts.
But Candace decided to turn this into some really big conspiracy theory to make people think that Israel killed Charlie Kirk to the point where the prime minister of Israel actually issued a statement about this because the conspiracy was so out of control.
Well, Candace has no evidence for anything that she claimed, right?
She has no evidence to this day that Israel killed Charlie Kirk, which is why now she's saying things like, oh, Erica Kirk should have to go in front of an interrogator.
She should have to be interrogated by the police over the assassination of her husband.
I thought Israel killed Charlie Kirk.
Now we're talking about Erica Kirk killing Charlie Kirk.
So you could see that when Seth Dillon, throughout this committee meeting, was asked about anti-Semitism, he cited Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson as examples of people who were promoting anti-Semitism in America.
And then Carrie immediately proceeded to attack Seth for criticizing Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson and said, oh, don't criticize Candace Owens.
So look, I already showed you from May of 2025 when they created this Religious Liberty Commission.
They already appointed a convicted Islamic terrorist.
They already appointed individuals who were interrogated by the FBI after 9-11 over their suspicion, perhaps possibly being involved in the 9-11 Islamic terrorist attacks.
And then they appoint a woman that is a Candace Owens fangirl, despite the fact that Candace Owens spews nonstop conspiracies and lies and attacks the president nonstop.
Suggests that President Trump is a pedophile, suggests that President Trump is controlled by Israel, says that President Trump is losing his mind, just constantly attacks the president, undermines his administration.
And yet this woman is professing herself as some kind of Candace Owens fangirl, right?
There seems to be a bunch of these women that, you know, they call them box wine moms.
You know, these women that sit in front of the TV all day and they stay home, they do nothing, and then they watch their little soap operas and that's their life, right?
They maybe go to brunch on the weekends, maybe they go to Pilates and then they sit home and they watch their podcast and then they have their group chats with their friends.
And then I guess they take care of their kids.
Some of them have nannies.
I don't really know what these women do all day, but it's like this very kind of socialite lifestyle where, you know, it's very carefree and you're just sitting around gossiping all day, right?
Very much like a reality TV style lifestyle.
And this is really the main audience that Candace Owens appeals to is the boxed wine mother audience.
That's the demographic that I would call it.
It's like the moms that sit around and drink boxed wine.
And if you know what I'm talking about, you can comment in the chat.
But if you don't have this idea or this concept of a boxed wine mom in your mind, it's very easy.
You can look it up.
There's a million examples of it online.
Just think of kind of like, you know, the Ditzy woman whose husband is at work all day busting his ass, like the country club mom that just sits around all day, doesn't really do anything, and just sits on her ass, eats bonbons all day, and drinks boxed wine.
Do you know, you know what I'm talking about?
That's the audience that Candace Owens appeals to.
So somebody said, I prefer boxed vodka.
You get the point, though.
You get the point.
And so she's promoting these conspiracy theories, like actual conspiracy theories that have been proven to be conspiracy theories during this White House Religious Liberty Committee meeting.
Like, how does Seth Dillon being in the Hamptons have anything to do with restoring religious liberty in America?
How does wearing a Palestinian flag have anything to do with restoring religious liberty in America?
Right.
So we're going to get into her statement after the fact because she's since been fired from the Religious Liberty Commission.
And now she's crying and saying that the Trump administration hates Christians and, oh, I was fired.
I was removed because I'm a Catholic.
And then she says she's not really removed because she's not going to believe she's removed until President Trump tells her in writing that she's removed.
Go ahead and listen to this clip and tell me, what does this have to do with religious liberty in America?
Babylon B wouldn't exist if you didn't have freedom of speech, and I'm full supportive of that.
You said platforms are an issue which I assume you are referring to X. Are you saying that Elon and heads of platforms need to censor speech that they determine as anti-Semitic?
And if so, by what definition do they censor?
Would that definition censor this verse from the Bible?
The Jews who killed both the Lord Jesus and their own prophets and drove us out and don't please God and are contrary to all men.
I think you may have misheard what I said about platforms.
I said platforms are not the problem.
Promotion is the problem.
So what I advocate for, I actually personally advocated for Nick Fuentes to be reinstated on X when Elon took it over, not because I like what he has to say, but because I love that he has the right to say it.
So even these ideas that I steadfastly oppose, I think the solution to them is to push back on them.
Better speech, more speech, good speech in response to bad speech.
So you may have just misunderstood what I was saying there about the platforms.
I have heard a lot of examples of harmful words and protests, but aren't we free in this nation to have the right to protest protected by the First Amendment?
As I said, Seth, you know, love free speech, as do I.
So words are protected.
What I am concerned about is what further legislation do we need around free speech?
You will not have me challenge anyone's right to speak.
I support Seth on that.
But when you match speech with conduct, criminal conduct, such as blocking access to someone's right to go to school along with the speech, then you cross a line where there may be a criminal activity where the affirmative defense of free speech no longer exists.
We had a lot of discussion about a school that I'm embarrassed that I went to, UCLA Law School.
We heard what was going on.
I was sitting there cringing because it was true.
And we have people who were blocked access.
Speech, I am all good for that.
Going back to what I originally said, all those charges in which the line was crossed, where it went from speech to conduct, believe it or not, the local prosecutor dismissed all those charges, the criminal charges.
So that is why I am saying this problem is really on a local level.
But I will support anyone's right on speech.
It is when they match it with conduct that might cross the line and would be considered criminal in and of itself.
Well, first of all, Title VI is a funding law that should be used.
Title VII is very critical, Civil Rights Act 1965, which allows employees who are facing discriminatory misconduct to seek action.
Even union organizations can be used for Title VII.
Those were the two that I was referring to.
And what is a great weapon, which I have learned, is that Jewish faculty members in public unions are being denied right to participate.
That's a Title VII action.
So what I'm saying is under the rubric of what is currently in existence, civil rights laws, I think the rights of Jewish Americans can be defended, can be executed properly.
And if I was making any recommendation, there should be litigation under those two sections, Title VI and Title VII.
Charlie was invited and was open to having debates about anything, including whether or not we should be supporting Israel, for example, in the current war.
He's open to having those conversations.
And he was very strongly irritated by people making those accusations at him by simply saying that we should be willing to have these conversations because he didn't view that as crossing a line into anti-Semitism.
Neither do I, up to a point.
There are people who try to conceal their anti-Semitism under the guise of merely criticizing Israel.
And you can see they're not merely criticizing Israel.
But Charlie wasn't an anti-Semite, not even close, the opposite.
She admitted that Candace Owens was her friend and that she watches her religiously.
And then she was even booed by the audience.
There was another portion of this hearing, which she dominated.
It's so funny.
She likes to say that the hearing was dominated by discussion over Israel.
She's the individual that dominated this hearing.
You barely heard anybody else speak during this hearing because all you could hear during the hearing was this woman, Carrie Prison Bowler, over talking everybody, asking a million questions that had nothing to do with the United States of America and obsessing over another country, obsessing over another country while wearing another country's pin.
It's gaslighting.
It's gaslighting.
And because of her belligerent outbursts during this hearing, her very passive-aggressive remarks, she was actually shut down.
She was asked to stop by Dan Patrick, who, as I said before, is in charge of the White House Religious Liberty Committee meeting.
And then in the aftermath, multiple of these attendees who were aggressively questioned and harassed by Carrie Proujan Buller made statements condemning what she did, including an individual by the name of Shabbos Kastenbaum.
And he actually issued a response to her on video.
We can go ahead and play that momentarily.
And then it just really kind of went to this back and forth.
Is she talking about Hamas hijacking all of the aid and refusing to give it to the Palestinian people?
Or is she talking about Hamas going around murdering civilians?
Like, what is she talking about?
The war is over.
The war is over, and all the hostages have been either returned or the bodies have been returned to Israel.
What is she talking about exactly?
It just shows such ignorance.
She doesn't even understand the state of the geopolitical situation right now between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.
The war is over.
The war is over.
President Trump ended it.
President Trump ended this war.
But she doesn't understand this because she's a puppet.
Ani, which is literally translated as thankful am I.
And the rabbinic commentators are always puzzled by that phraseology because it should not be mode, ani, thankful am I, but ani mode, I am thankful.
And the lesson we learn is before we can say anything, before we go about our day, the very first thing is we must show appreciation.
So before I even get to the testimony, I just want to say what a remarkable breath of fresh air this commission and this hearing is.
As an individual who registered to vote as a Democrat the day I turned 18, nobody's perfect, we could not get help from the Biden-Harris administration.
They did not lift a finger as American students were being denied access to education on their college campuses.
And I remember on the campaign trail when President Trump said that religious liberties would be a priority when he gets into office.
And this is a testament to the fact that the promises made on the campaign trail have in fact become promises kept.
All of you on this commission are a testament to that.
Many of the individuals in this room, like Martin Marx, like Jennifer Korn, like Leo Terrell, like Harmique Dylan, like Dr. Sebastian Gorka, you have been fighting the fight that I wish the previous administration would have cared to fight as well.
So, first and foremost, thank you for doing this.
The second point I want to say is that in 1790, President George Washington writes a letter to the largest Jewish community in the United States, numbering 25 families in Newport, Rhode Island.
And he says, here in the United States, we want you, as descendants of Abraham, to come to our country and practice your faith, because in his own words, quote, bigotry will be granted no sanction and persecution no assistance.
And how shocked and how embarrassed and how appalled would President Washington and President Adams and President Jefferson and founding fathers be today to know that in the 21st century, American students and American citizens were denied access to education because of their religious identity, and the people denying them that access were those who were allegedly in the upper echelons of our society, the most elite, the most progressive, the most well-educated.
Why do we care about Harvard and UCLA and Columbia and Penn and all these other morally bankrupt institutions?
It's because these are institutions that purport to train the next generation of American leaders.
And by and large, they're not wrong.
Statistically speaking, it's not an exaggeration at all to state I probably sat in a room at Harvard with a future congressman, a future senator, even a future president of the United States.
And if these are America's future policymakers, if these are America's future judges and jurors, if these are America's future authors of the books your kids and grandkids will read, who are taught to hate Western civilization, to hate the founding of our country, and to hate other people based on their religious identity, then this is no longer simply a Jewy issue or an anti-Semitism issue, but this is an issue that cuts at the core of our American democracy, our liberal values, and our Western civilization.
And I have to say, even though, of course, this hearing is focused on anti-Semitism, and I will get to that, I promise I started a timer, but I do want to say that when chants at Oklahoma State of F the Mormons are being sprung out, that is an attack against the Jewish community.
It's obviously an attack against the Mormon community, but it's also an attack on every single American.
When we have in Long Beach, California, just a week ago, a Catholic school being vandalized to the point whereby they can't even renovate the school anymore, that is not merely an attack on the Catholic community, but it's an attack on the Jewish community, and it's an attack on every single American.
And that unfortunately brings me to Harvard University.
I will, in the interest of time, skip to October 7th, which was not only the largest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, but it was also a massacre in which 45 American citizens were butchered by the rapist Islamic regime of Hamas.
And I just want to quote what was happening on the night of October 7th amongst the most educated, the most elite, and the most progressive of our society.
Quote: Two days after Hamas's deadly attack on Israel last year, senior administrators at Harvard University wrestled with how to respond.
Drafting a public statement, They edited out the word violent to describe the attack when a dean complained that it, quote, sounded like assigning blame.
They debated whether to explicitly disown a declaration by some Harvard student groups that Israel was responsible for the violence, but ultimately they decided not to.
And when they did eventually come out with their statement, it did not, in fact, include the word violent.
The largest demonstration I saw at Harvard University was a few days after October 7th, where a masked student gets up in front of a thousand students and professors and he says, Hamas, which is the only time Hamas was mentioned, is not a terrorist group.
We will look upon them as freedom fighters.
Who are we to condemn the resistance?
And note the immediate reaction is of the a thousand students and professors, thunderous applause, not one thing to challenge, to condemn, to walk out of that statement.
It is no coincidence, therefore, that two weeks after that statement, a Jewish-Israeli student was physically assaulted on Harvard Business School.
You can watch the footage, it's free on YouTube.
The assailants of that attack, one of them was awarded a $65,000 fellowship by Harvard Law School to intern at the Council on American Islamic Relations, which has noted ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.
And the other assailant was given the honor of being class marshal at Harvard's graduation.
It's no coincidence that three weeks after that, an Israeli student at Harvard was told by her professor to leave the classroom because her nationality made other students uncomfortable.
It's no coincidence that a month after that, a Jewish-American citizen at Harvard was spat on for wearing a yarmulke.
It is no coincidence that three weeks after that, a Harvard employee vandalized all of our hostage posters, writing on Kfir Beebas, a nine-month-old baby who was kidnapped, quote, his head is still on, where is the evidence?
Who then wrote on Noah Argumani, another kidnapped Jewish victim, that Jews are best friends with Jeffrey Epstein, who then challenged me to debate him in a secluded underpass as to whether Jews orchestrated 9-11 and then posted a video of him waving a machete with a picture of my face, saying he wants to fight, he's coming after more than blood, and he's coming after the Zionist mafia.
And perhaps the icing on the cake is of the dozens of phone calls and emails we sent to Harvard University simply inquiring about his employment status, to this day they have not once responded to us.
It is inconceivable that any other minority group would be treated with the disdain, the disregard, and the contempt that Harvard has historically, routinely, and consistently treated its Jewish student population.
But to me, I can forgive and forget there is one thing I will not forgive and I will not forget, and that was the encampments.
Forget about the fact that these students chanted for a globalized intifad at all hours of the day.
Forget about the fact that they violated all time, place, and manner restrictions.
Forget about the fact that some American Jewish students were actually living on Airbnbs off campus because they didn't want to be confronted each day.
Every single time I went to class, I cut through my own campus.
Every time I did that, masked students who decided to name themselves safety marshals, when they would see me and other visibly Jewish students approaching, they would take out their phones and they would start following us on our way to class and they would start recording us.
And we would ask them to stop, but they would never respond.
And we told the president of the university and the president of the United States, but again, his mental acuity was questionable at the time.
We told him that American students were being followed on their way to class as a result of their religious identity.
And not only did the president of the university, Alan Garber, who is still the president of the university today, not only did he never respond to our concerns, he actually told the encampment leaders, if you agree to pack up your tents, we will allow you to meet with the Harvard Management Corporation, which oversees Harvard's $59 billion endowment, to discuss divestment from Israel.
If you agree to pack up your tents, we will allow you to meet with senior Harvard faculty to discuss the establishment of a Palestinian study center.
And of the hundreds of students who took part in the encampments who violated internal Harvard policy and followed American students on their way to class, zero were expelled, zero were suspended, or zero were disciplined in any measurable way.
The message that Alan Garber told American students was: if you call for an intifada loud enough, and if you follow American Jewish students long enough, and if you vandalize enough private property, at one point, the encampment students at Harvard University tried using bolt cutters to try to break open the locks on Harvard's gates.
Says President Alan Garber, if you do all of those things, we will grant you a seat at the table, which is why we filed a civil rights lawsuit against the university.
We are the first lawsuit of its kind pertaining to the civil rights violations of Jewish students on a college campus to be allowed to go to trial.
I'm very proud of the fact that there are currently seven lawsuits brought by Jewish students across this country that have cited Kestenbound v. Harvard as legal precedent.
And as it pertains to recommendations, because I know I'm out of time, any institution of higher learning that violates the civil rights of any group based on gender, based on religion, based on ethnicity, it does not entitle itself to American taxpayer funding.
If you truly want to help, and I know all of you do, especially our president, you would continue to do what you currently are doing, which is ensuring that Harvard University does not receive a penny of American taxpayer money in perpetuity ever, ever again.
You would ensure that any institution that violates the rights of Christians or Jews, any religious group, does not afford themselves the right to American taxpayer money.
It is that simple.
We would ensure that students who come to this country who are not American citizens, who do not believe in the values of the West, who, like Mahmoud Khalil, call for the eradication of Western civilization, do not allow themselves, are not allowed within 50 feet of this country.
They are not Americans.
They do not stand by American ideals, and we have no obligation to bring them into our country.
And I will end by how I opened, which is an attack on one Christian is an attack on one Jew, and an attack on one Jew is an attack on one Christian.
And post-Charlie Kirk, who is a remarkable role model, not just for me, but for millions of young men and women across this country, there has been a dearth of role models, of people who tell young people the value, the importance, the meaningfulness of having religion in their lives.
And I would encourage as well that this commission seriously look into the ways that we can encourage Gen Z men in particular to be better as it pertains to their religious affiliation.
America was founded predominantly by Christians, by a shared Hebraic tradition and Judeo-Christian values.
And I know as an Orthodox Jew, America would be a much stronger and better country if more young Christian men went to church, if more young Christian men studied and learned the New Testament and the Old Testament, and if young Christian men believed and learnt the values and teachings of Jesus.
So I want to thank all of you for doing what the previous administration did not do and recognizing the fundamental importance of religious liberation on the U.S.
I'm going to show you the statements that she's made since being removed from the committee, saying that the committee hates Christians, they hate Catholics, that the only thing they talked about was Jews.
Well, you can see here the individual who was on video just now, his name is Shabbos Kassenbaum.
And this was his response to Kerry Prajan Bowler, who attacked the committee attendees and said that the entire committee was hijacked over discussion about Israel and Jews, which is not true.
That's what she decided to do with her time.
She decided to hijack the committee meeting to talk about Israel and Jews.
When in fact, if you listen to Chavez's testimony, he clearly said that he wants more young men to go to church.
He wants more young men to learn the Christian foundings of our country and reject foreign funding on American campuses.
And like he said, at no point did I mention Israel, Zionism, Ga, Gaza, Bibi, or the Middle East.
His entire testimony was focused on the United States of America.
And then he correctly points out, you used the last four minutes of the hearing after you spent nearly the entire time texting to pivot to Israel.
She was texting because, as you can see, she didn't have any questions of her own.
She's a puppet.
She was probably texting with Candace Owens.
I mean, I'm willing to bet that if you were to look at her text log, she was probably texting with Candace Owens or she was texting with some Islamic organization.
We already know that she showed up with a group of Palestinian Muslims who are tied to a terrorist organization.
We're going to get into that as well.
I know I'm not just saying, oh, they're Palestinian.
They're tied to terrorism.
One of the individuals who she showed up with is a member of a Palestinian organization who has a founding member whose cousin literally blew up a bus in Israel in a suicide bombing.
So again, not making this up.
And it goes back to my original opening about how this White House Religious Liberty Committee, I don't know who appointed these people underneath President Trump's committee, but they clearly didn't do any vetting because you have people like Carrie Prajan Bolar, who one look at her social media and you can see the woman's a total nutjob reposting all the Charlie Kirk assassination conspiracy theories, a convicted Islamic terrorist as a member.
You have multiple jihadist Muslims who were appointed as members.
And it just makes you wonder who did the vetting for this committee.
Definitely wasn't me, because I'll tell you right now, none of those people would have been on the committee if I was in charge of the committee.
Basic vetting, basic vetting.
He goes on to say, this is precisely what Matt Walsh calls Israel derangement syndrome.
Yeah, it is.
Cut four new to Israel.
Thanks, Jews, killed Jesus.
Support Candace Owens.
I literally don't care.
He says, I care about the civil rights violations perpetuated by American colleges against Christians and Jews, a point she never even addressed.
And it's true.
He didn't talk about Israel.
She talked about Israel.
The commission is supposed to be focused on the United States of America, not Israel, but the lack of respect at institutions in the United States of America, especially on college campuses, for people of faith.
Christian students getting harassed, being told that they're going to be punished if they pray or if they read the Bible in school.
Jewish students getting harassed, being told that they have to go back to Israel, that they're not really American because they're Jewish.
Pro-Hamas encampments being allowed to take place on college campuses in which students are physically assaulted and attacked.
This is what the commission was supposed to address about bringing America back to a place of faith.
But as you can see from these multiple clips, Carrie did not respect the guidelines.
And so she was removed.
Let's go ahead and get Dan Patrick's statement pulled up because, you know, this is just now creating a firestorm of conspiracies online from people who support Carrie, her allies.
She has, it's kind of interesting, right?
I've talked about this extensively on the show in the past.
What you have now is this weird coalition of Muslims and I would call them fake Catholics because I know a lot of great Catholics.
I think Catholic people are fantastic.
Some of my closest friends are Christian.
I have no problem with Christian people.
I've gone to church with my Christian friends before.
I have no problem, no problem with Christians or Catholics.
I don't know where this idea has been.
You know, I don't even know where this idea originated from.
This idea that, oh, Laura Loomer hates Christians, Laura Loomer hates Catholics.
Absolutely not true.
I simply am pointing out the fact that there's this unholy alliance between a bunch of these influencers who call themselves devout Catholics and their promotion of Islam.
You see that during this hearing, Carrie Buller also used her time to falsely accuse the Jewish attendees of being Islamophobic because they referred to the actions of Hamas on October 7th as Islamic barbarism.
And then she said, Oh, I'd like to ask you to refrain from making Islamophobic remarks.
That's what she said.
She thinks that speaking out against October 7th is Islamophobic.
Well, there's a lot of these instances now of these social media influencers who call themselves Catholic.
And I think we may even have that clip of her, you know, calling somebody out, accusing them of being Islamophobic.
But there's a lot of these instances we've seen lately of these people that profess Christianity.
They profess Catholicism.
They are actually bastardizing the teachings of Christianity and Catholicism to preach hatred against Jewish people and the state of Israel.
Now, I'm not saying you have to be a fan of Israel.
I'm not saying that you have to be pro-Israel to be a Catholic or to be a Christian.
But if you spend your time spreading blood libel and aligning yourself as a Christian or Catholic with Islam while pretending that Jews in America are your biggest enemy, while Muslims are your biggest ally, you are doing a disservice to Christianity because Christians are currently undeniably the most persecuted people in the entire world.
There is no group of people outside of Christians who are more persecuted than Christian people.
Millions of Christians every single year are being slaughtered.
And who are they being slaughtered by?
Not by Jews, not by Mormons, not by Hindus.
No, they're getting slaughtered by Muslims in the Middle East.
They are getting displaced by Muslims in the Middle East who are killing Christians by the millions every single year, which is why now Christians are and always have been the most persecuted people in the world.
So you have to ask yourself: if you are a devout Christian, a devout Catholic, and you're sitting on the Religious Liberties Commission, why would you use your opportunity, if you care about Christianity so much, to attack Jewish people in Israel when you could have used your opportunity to raise awareness about the persecution of Christians in Nigeria or the persecution of Christians in Syria who are being slaughtered by Jolani's forces?
Why would you not use this time to speak up for the Christians who were harassed in Minnesota by a bunch of anti-ISE protesters?
This was the opportunity to speak up about Christian persecution.
But she couldn't help herself.
She had to talk about Islamophobia and how much she hates Israel and how much she hates Jewish people.
And undoubtedly, and one does not have to support the specific policies of the government of Israel, but to not support the right of Israel to exist, which is what anti-Zionists do, while not taking that same stand to the 28 Muslim countries and 13 Christian countries in this world, is a double standard, is hypocrisy, and is absolutely anti-Semitism.
How is it Islamophobic to say that there's 56 Muslim countries in the world in one tiny little Jewish state?
And if you allow for Christians and you say that America is a Christian country, which it is, and then you say that Muslims are entitled to 56 Muslim countries in the world, but Jewish people are the only people who are not entitled to a Jewish state.
Yeah, that is the definition of anti-Semitism.
And then she says, oh, that's an Islamophobic comment.
Please refrain from making Islamophobic remarks today on the panel.
How is that Islamophobic?
And also, she's a Christian.
Why is she so concerned about Islamophobia when Islam calls for the killing of non-Muslims, including Christians and Jewish people?
What kind of Christian or Catholic is this woman?
How can you call yourself a Christian or a Catholic when you simp for Islam?
I mean, really, how can you call yourself a Christian or a Catholic when you simp for Islam?
Another individual who does this, who has a large following, who calls himself a devout Catholic, while at the same time talks about how Jewish people have no humanity, they're committing a genocide.
Christian people are about, you know, preserving life, talking about how you have to oppose the war in Gaza because, well, you know, it's a very anti-life movement.
Innocent people are dying.
Another one of these hypocrites who likes to bastardize religion and manipulate true Catholicism is Nick Fuentes.
Nick Fuentes, take a listen to Nick Fuentes' recent episode in which he was asked whether or not he stands with the protesters in Iran and he said that they deserve to be slaughtered.
I know you don't support the Iranian revolution, but would you be interested in doing a show with leaders of the revolution, at least one live from Iran?
So Nick Fuentes claims to be a devout Catholic, says he so America first, yet he's simping for the Ayatollah who chants death to America and wants to assassinate President Trump.
And now all of a sudden, Nick says, I want to talk to the Iranians.
I want to talk to the Ayatollah.
I'd rather talk to the Qataris, knowing that the Qataris would love to have Nick Fuentes on their payroll if he's not already on their payroll.
I mean, we've already seen that the Iranians, while they were mass murdering all of these protesters, they were airing people like Tucker Carlson and Candace Hohens and Nick Fuentes on Iranian state TV to justify their cause.
They were playing Nick Fuentes on Iranian state TV in the aftermath of President Trump bombing Iran's nuclear facilities.
So who knows?
Maybe he already is getting paid by the Iranians.
Maybe he is getting paid by the Qataris.
But if you truly are pro-life and as a Catholic or a Christian, you are commanded and called upon by God to stand with people who are suffering and to speak out against perceived concepts of genocide and injustice.
And you are to show humanity and humility to the downtrodden.
Why is Nick Fuentes saying, fuck the protesters, fuck the revolution?
I'd rather hang out with the Ayatollah.
These people deserve to be killed.
I hope they get crushed.
That's not a very Christian thing to say, is it?
I'm not a Christian, but that's not a very Christian thing to say.
It's also not a very Jewish thing to say.
It's not a very decent thing to say.
It doesn't matter if you are religious or not.
It's just not a very decent thing to say.
To wish for innocent people to be mass murdered by a brutal Islamic regime while you claim to be a devout Catholic, surely Nick Fuentes is intelligent enough to know that Christians are the most persecuted people in the world and they're being persecuted by Muslims.
So, you know, we have a lot of people in our country right now who want to use religion as a shield.
They are trying to poison the minds of great young men and women who subscribe to Christianity, Catholicism, and they want to poison their minds to make them think that being a true Christian, being a true Catholic means hating Jewish people.
That's just not true.
It's just not true.
And I think that Catholics, and I think that devout Christians have a moral obligation to stand up against this, to stand up against this manipulation and distortion of their faith, because it's a dangerous fusion.
It's an unholy alliance, this idea of Krislam.
What is Krizlam?
It's this idea that Christianity and Islam are united as one in an effort to defeat Jewish people.
That's the concept of Krislam.
So now you're seeing all of these Islamic organizations and all these Islamic groups, a lot of charities, 501c3s.
There's a ton of them.
There are so many of these Islamic charities in America, right?
So many of them, Isna, ICNA, Islamic Relief, you name it.
So many.
Tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and whatnot.
There are so many of these groups that are now doing outrage to Catholics and to Christians, and they are retweeting and posting these Catholic individuals who are standing with Islamic regimes, attacking Jews, calling Jews the synagogue of Satan, calling for the eradication of Israel, and claiming that President Trump's religious committee is Islamophobic and anti-Christian and anti-Catholic.
If it was Islamophobic, why did he appoint three Muslims?
Three Muslims who never should have been appointed at the beginning at all.
I mean, I already showed you these people have ties to terrorism.
One of them is even a convicted terrorist.
So how is it Islamophobic?
I don't understand.
How is it anti-Catholic?
How is it anti-Christian when the entire purpose of this committee is to focus on restoring religious rights and freedoms to people in the United States of America who have had their rights infringed upon in America, not in Gaza, in the United States of America?
So if you are a Catholic or you are a Christian, you need to be on high alert.
This has already happened in the Jewish community where stupid rabbis invited Muslims into synagogues for interfaith dialogue.
And now you have these Jews.
It's like a suicidal mentality where you have some Jews, especially Democrat Jews, voting for their own demise, voting for people like Zoran Mamdami, aligning with Islamic groups because they think, oh, wow, we can unite with these people.
No.
No.
This is why hate crimes against Jewish people in New York have increased by over 300% since Zoran Mandami has been elected as mayor of New York City.
This is why, okay?
This is what happens when you elect Muslims.
If Christians wish to preserve themselves and Catholics wish to preserve themselves, why are you propping up Islam?
Why are you propping up brutal Islamic regimes when your people are the most persecuted people in the entire world?
Catholics and Christians, they need to stand together.
They need to unite and they need to push back against this infiltration by these Islamic propagandists.
And you don't even have to be a Muslim to be an Islamic propagandist.
As I showed you, there's a lot of these individuals.
Carrie, Prajan Bowler, and Nick Fuentes are two of them.
People who claim to be devout Catholics, and yet they're pushing Islamic propaganda in an effort to unite Catholics and Muslims to persecute Jewish people and to carry out a holy war against Jewish people when in reality, Jews and Christians are united and Jews and Christians share values that have preserved Western civilization.
And it's Islam that seeks to kill all infidels, to kill and subjugate all non-Muslims and seeks to undermine Western civilization.
Go ahead and put your comments in the chat.
We need to be aware of Chris Lam.
We need to oppose Chris Lam.
If you are aware of any interfaith moments that are taking place in your church or wherever it may be that is promoting Chris Lam, this alliance between Islam and Christianity, Islam and Catholicism, you need to start speaking out about it because it's incredibly dangerous.
And it has no place here in the United States of America.
It has no place in the church.
It has no place in the church because Islam is the greatest threat to Christianity.
And if anybody who calls themselves a Catholic or a Christian is trying to bring more Islam into America and wants more interfaith with Islam, they are working against Christian people all around the world who are suffering greatly, suffering greatly at the hands of Islamic regimes, like the people in Iran.
Like the people in Iran.
Put your comments in the chat.
I'd like to thank the sponsor of tonight's episode of Loomer Unleashed, Kirk Elliott Precious Metals.
unidentified
I mean, where the heck is she been?
She has no money.
She's poor.
She's broke.
She has no money.
She didn't invest in gold.
That's what happened.
I heard she lives in some kind of haunted house.
You ain't got no money working at some fat food restaurant or family.
It's really interesting how both sides of the political spectrum are using the Epstein Isles or the Epstein files, excuse me, to push their agenda.
You have Republicans who are in the files.
You have Democrats who are in the files.
Neither wants to take responsibility for themselves being in the files.
And when I say files, I mean, look, we already had discussions on the show about what it means to be in a file.
A file could be an email.
But I find that when you don't address something and you let it fester, it creates conspiracies.
And so do I think that everybody who's mentioned in Jeffrey Epstein's emails is a pedophile?
Absolutely not.
I do not.
But I also think that there's no harm in people admitting, oh, yeah, well, you know, I communicated with Jeffrey Epstein because of this, or oh, I met him at this time and day, or oh, I was here.
Oh, I was on my friend's boat and they passed by the island.
There's always an explanation for everything.
And I guess I would just wish that people whose names are in the files would just provide a basic explanation instead of allowing for conspiracies to spread, because I think that most people would believe them if they were to just come out and give a reasonable explanation.
I mean, you got to give people the benefit of the doubt until they show you that they don't deserve it.
But what is really interesting is how the Democrats are trying to use the Epstein files as a way to perpetuate another hoax against Donald Trump in an effort to get him impeached.
And we already see that, you know, we're poised to lose the House and the Senate going into the 2026 midterm elections.
And I do believe, and I've said this before, that the Epstein files is the new Russia collusion hoax.
I don't think that everything in the Epstein files is a hoax, but what I'm saying is that the Democrats are going to use the Epstein files as their new obsessive talking point, just like the Russia collusion hoax is what they focused on during the first term.
The Epstein files is what they're going to focus on going forward.
But they don't want to address the people on their own side of the aisle who are in the Epstein files, including the people that are currently funding them.
Loomer Unleashed this week caught up with several representatives, including Thomas Massey, Ilhan O'Marr, AOC, and Eric Swalwell to ask them about the Epstein files and whether or not they would return the money that was given by, given to the Democrat Party, the DCC, the Democrat Congressional Committee.
And you see that, according to these FEC records, the two biggest donors this election season for the Democrats are George Soros, surprise, surprise, and Reid Hoffman, the co-founder of LinkedIn.
Now, Reed Hoffman was a Jeffrey Epstein associate.
On the previous episode of Loomer Unleashed, we went through his emails and you could see that he was very close with Jeffrey Epstein, asking him for tax advice, traveling with him, visiting Epstein Island.
And yet, the Democrats are more than happy to continue taking all of his money.
So while they go around and they've accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars this election season from Reed Hoffman, who was an associate of Jeffrey Epstein, they have never once apologized for this.
And they have continued to take Reed Hoffman's hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations.
And then while they falsely accuse President Trump of being a pedophile, they themselves are refusing to give the money back and they won't address why they took so much money from Jeffrey Epstein associate Reed Hoffman.
Why don't we go ahead and play the clip of Ilhan Omar being confronted?
We have several of these clips, Ilhan O'Marr, Eric Swalwell, but I just find her demeanor to be interesting.
We ask her to comment on whether or not she thinks the DCCC should return the donations from Reid Hoffman that they've received this election season thus far.
And she proceeds to not answer the question.
And then she continues by falsely accusing President Trump of being a pedophile.
Will you call on the DCC to return their donations from Epstein Associate Reid Hoffman?
Why do congressional Democrats continue to attack Republicans over their associations with Epstein when Democrat mega donors like Reid Hoffman are the ones who actually went to the island?
Are you sure you don't want to call on the DCC to return their Epstein donations from Epstein Associate Reid Hoffman, Congressman?
Now there's even some anti-Trump Republicans who want to use these anti-Trump talking points to attack the Trump administration over the Epstein files.
We saw yesterday tensions were pretty high during Pam Bondi's hearing in Congress and she sparred quite publicly with Congressman Thomas Massey who's currently being primaried in Kentucky and President Trump of course just recently endorsed Thomas Massey's GOP opponent.
Massey aggressively challenged Attorney General Pam Bondi regarding redactions in the Epstein files specifically citing the name of Les Wexner.
He engaged in a hyperbolic grandstanding screaming that the issue was bigger than Watergate.
So again, it's not just Democrats who are trying to deflect from their own supporters and their own financial backers, but you also have people that are resentful towards the Trump administration because President Trump doesn't want them in office anymore who are trying to put all of the blame of the Epstein files on President Trump.
And as you know from watching Lumer Unleash and seeing our videos confronting Thomas Massey on a weekly basis, he has referred to President Trump as a pedophile enabler and a pedophile protector.
Now, your assistant depart your deputy attorney general said, oh, well, he appears hundreds of times in the files, but he doesn't appear in this file until I forced you to release it, where he's listed as a co-conspirator, not to tax evasion, but to child sex trafficking, not to prostitution, not to money laundering, child sex trafficking.
And then finally, what we have here is the third exhibit that I have is emblematic of the FD302 release.
These are the documents that we need that you're holding on to and over-redacting because they have the names of the men who are implicated.
How do we know?
Because the survivors gave testimony to the FBI and it's in there.
And what happens when you go to the portal at the DOJ to look at what's behind this redaction?
Another redaction.
So we can't even see them.
And then there's some of these files you've pulled down from the website that we will never see because we can't search the redactions.
So I have several questions for you.
Who's responsible?
Are you able to track who and your organization made this massive failure and release the victims' names?
Are you able to track who it was that obscured Les Wexner's name as a co-conspirator in an FBI document?
If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other Massey is doing everything in his power alongside people like Marjorie Trader Green, who's already left Congress, to smear the Trump administration, attack Trump administration officials, falsely insinuate that President Trump is a pedophile.
And he's even attacking independent journalists who ask him for comment on this.
Earlier this week and the week prior as well, Loomer and Leech GC correspondent Charles Downs actually caught up with Thomas Massey and confronted him.
And he crashed out multiple times.
And he seems to think that he's in the right because he got in a little zinger.
He got in a zinger.
And now all of his little groupies online are saying, wow, that was actually such a great comeback from Thomas Massey.
Well, not really, not really, because when it's shown in his district, voters are disgusted.
Voters are disgusted.
And it shows the polling shows that since Thomas Massey has started berating the administration over Jeffrey Epstein and falsely accusing President Trump of protecting pedophiles, his poll numbers have drastically decreased, have drastically decreased.
Because it turns out the MAGA base doesn't like when their president is falsely accused of being a pedophile.
And then we caught up with him again this week as well, where he had a total meltdown, absolute crazy eyes to a point where people are now screenshotting the photo and plastering it all over the internet because he just looks so crazy.
Congressman Massey, in the last week, you would have called on President Trump to apologize to Barack Obama, and you're standing here with Congressman Conna at a press conference implying that the president is a pedophile protector.
Are you hating on Trump to try off your CNN?
unidentified
I didn't crack out the blockers you're wearing off.
And he says the things that he says because members of Congress, when they're testifying, especially, have immunity from defamation.
And so you'll notice that a lot of these different members of Congress will make these false accusations against President Trump.
Like one of them today, and we posted this clip on Loomer and Leash earlier today as well.
Ted Liu during the hearing made up some crazy story about how, oh, I heard this story, and you can go to the Loomer and Leash Checks account and see it yourself.
I heard this story about how a young underage girl was, you know, having sex with President Trump.
Foreign Congressman Ted Liu, who I believe was born in Taiwan, told a fantasy tale during Pan Bonnie's hearing accusing President Trump of raping people with Jeffrey Epstein.
Liu only became more deranged as he then implied that Trump and Epstein murdered people.
A girl said she was raped by Donald Trump and Epstein.
She later had her head blown off and officers at the scene said that could not have been a suicide.
According to who?
He's just making things up with the hopes that these clips will go viral ahead of the midterm elections because members of Congress are protected from slanderous lawsuits while conducting oversight.
So they can make up any crazy shit that they want.
They could say whatever the hell they want and they're not going to get sued because they could say, well, I was doing oversight.
So you have a foreign-born congressman now, Democrat, of course, lying, accusing Trump of raping somebody, and then the girl being murdered and implicating President Trump and Jeffrey Epstein and raping this girl and having her murdered.
But, you know, and regardless of what people think about Pam Bondi and whether she's doing a good job or not, you have to admit, it's totally deranged behavior from Ted Lieu to be making these accusations.
It's deranged behavior for Thomas Massey to be making these accusations for Rokana, for Marjorie Trader Greene.
Attorney General Bondi, you apologize to the survivors in your opening statement for what they went through at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein.
Will you turn to them now and apologize for what your Department of Justice has put them through with the unabsolutely unacceptable release of the Epstein files and their information?
How come none of these Democrats cared about the Epstein files when Joe Biden was president?
It's kind of interesting, isn't it?
Again, this is the new Russia collusion hoax.
I'm not saying that the Epstein files are a complete hoax.
What I'm saying is that the Democrats don't have any policies.
They got their asses kicked in 2024, and now they have to just make up lies about the president being a pedophile and his administration officials being pedophiles so that they could enrage people enough to vote Democrat in the 2026 midterms.
It's pretty shameful.
It's only going to get worse.
The Epstein hysteria is only going to get worse, you guys.
Moving on now.
The media is going crazy on me this week.
Going crazy on a lot of people, actually.
Turns out the American people didn't want to watch a Super Bowl in all Spanish.
Wow.
Go figure.
Now, I speak Spanish, but I find it to be really interesting how I just made some comments.
I was watching the Super Bowl halftime show.
I don't really watch football, but because I'm a journalist and I want to be informed, I watch everything that's going on because I need to know what's happening.
And so I watched the regular Super Bowl halftime show with Bad Bunny.
It was horrible.
And then I also watched the Turning Point USA halftime show just to compare them and kind of, you know, see the differences.
And the media is now going crazy on me because, well, I posted that I said that it wasn't a performance.
It was a political statement and that it was not in English and it wasn't wide enough for me.
And what I meant by that, when I said it's not wide enough for me, I'm saying that, look, America is a majority white country.
And at the end of the day, it is a Christian country.
And what I find to be really interesting is how our culture, right, our white American culture, white European American culture is being completely replaced and overrun by people who don't speak English, people who want to force foreigners upon us, people who want to celebrate and embrace illegal immigrants, and people who refuse to assimilate.
Now, Bad Bunny was the halftime show performer.
And if you watched any of the clips, you'd see that the beginning scene from his Super Bowl halftime show was him dancing in a field of crops with a bunch of Hispanic crop workers.
In my opinion, that's a reference to illegal alien crop workers.
Because what do we know about Bad Bunny?
He told everybody that he opposes ICE.
He wants everybody to learn Spanish so they could understand his Super Bowl halftime show performance, which was all in Spanish, not a word of English.
And he said, oh, well, you have a few months to learn Spanish.
How about you speak English?
How about you speak English?
And the worst part about it, the worst part about this humiliation ritual, and I posted this and my clip has since received over 16 million views online because it pissed so many people off.
During this Super Bowl performance, Bad Bunny decided that he was going to have a procession of about 20 foreign flags instead of just waving the American flag.
Let's go ahead and play the clip.
So not only does he disrespect everybody in America by doing his entire performance in Spanish, but he also decides to end his performance while beginning his performance with a scene of a bunch of illegal alien crop workers.
He ended his performance by having a bunch of foreign flags on stage.
Now, I said this and the internet went crazy.
I don't know why they went crazy, but apparently my comments were so controversial and everybody was talking about what I said.
All the Hispanic publications, all the news broadcasters, what I said was true.
Must have struck a nerve.
Must have struck a nerve.
Loomer on Bad Bunny Super Bowl to Super Bowl show.
NFL should apologize to the American people.
You can scroll down.
That's what I said.
I said that the NFL needs to apologize.
They said conservative activist Laura Loomer on Sunday said the NFL should apologize for Bad Bunny's halftime performance at the Super Bowl, which featured a tour of Puerto Rican culture and flags from Latin American countries.
It's the Super Bowl in the United States of America where we speak English.
Hello.
It featured a tour of Puerto Rican culture and flags from Latin American countries.
Now, somebody please answer this question.
Why are we having a tour of Latin American flags if we are in the United States of America for the Super Bowl, which is supposed to be one of the most prominent celebrations of American culture every year in the United States of America outside of the 4th of July?
Outside of the 4th of July, I'd say that the Super Bowl is supposed to be a big celebration of American culture.
I didn't even watch football and I put the Super Bowl on.
But unless you speak Spanish, you're not going to understand anything in the halftime show.
And you have people that paid thousands and thousands of dollars.
It's very expensive to go to the Super Bowl.
I think they said that the average ticket price was like $6,800.
Okay.
It's a lot of money for your average person.
It's very expensive to go.
And just think about all these poor people who booked Super Bowl tickets.
Maybe people saved up all year to go.
You have people like that that it's their dream.
They spend all this money to go.
They spend all this money to go to the Super Bowl only to not understand anything.
And there were all these videos that people were posting on social media from inside the stadium where people were just like looking around, like, what the fuck is this?
Like, what's going on?
I don't know what's going on right now.
I mean, you have people just like looking so confused.
They should apologize for the black national anthem.
They should apologize for the degenerate performance in which Bad Bunny's talking about.
I got a, I call my auntie.
Like, the song is like, I asked my aunt or I spoke to my aunt.
And there were actually some really funny videos that people posted on TikTok.
I think we can actually find these on X and play them for you.
And now several members of Congress have decided to file complaints with the FCC because they're like, oh, well, if you were to translate this song into English, all it talks about is getting your dick sucked and like fucking as many girls as possible.
Excuse my language, but that's like the words that he would use, did use, but in Spanish.
Like, yeah, I fucked this girl from Mexico and I fucked this girl from Brazil and I fucked this girl from Colombia and then I fucked your sister and then I fucked this Cuban girl and then I fucked this other girl.
It's like, it's like literally going through the entire world.
That's why they had all the international flags there to represent all the women that he fucked.
That's what all the flags were for.
You understand?
It was a political statement for all of the illegal aliens from all of those countries that we have living in America.
And it was also a statement to represent all the different countries of the women that he said he had sex with in the beginning of his performance.
It's degeneracy.
It's disgusting.
Here was another scene I posted about this.
And then people attacked me.
They're like, oh, she's so stupid.
I said, oh, well, if he's Puerto Rican, how come he didn't bring awareness to the power crisis, the electrical grid crisis in Puerto Rico by dancing on top of a power station?
And they're like, oh, you're so stupid.
That's what he did.
Well, unless you speak Spanish, how are you supposed to know that's what he did?
If you don't speak Spanish, how as an American citizen would you understand what he was trying to reference if you're unfamiliar with the power grid crisis in Puerto Rico?
How is your average person supposed to know this, right?
So all these people started attacking me when I posted my tweet.
They're like, you're so stupid.
You're so stupid.
That's of course what he was trying to do.
But he did it in Spanish.
So how are all these Americans who maybe they would be very interested in this Puerto Rican electrical grid crisis and the fact that there's rolling blackouts in Puerto Rico and billions of dollars have been wasted and spent on trying to rebuild the electrical grid in Puerto Rico only for it to be embezzled by consultants and lawyers at the expense of the Puerto Rican people.
And we've talked about that extensively here on Loomer Unleashed.
I actually interviewed an individual who made an entire documentary about this a couple months ago.
But it watched this clip.
Would you know and post your comments in the chat?
Would you know that this was about Puerto Rico's electrical crisis?
You're just watching this and it's in Spanish.
Go ahead and play the clip.
So please enlighten me and post in the chat.
How many of you knew that he was talking about the electrical grid in Puerto Rico?
Someone said I thought he was just thrusting in the air.
Yeah, you would just think that he was thrusting, thrusting his cock in the air, thrusting his cock in the air.
You wouldn't know unless it was in English or you spoke Spanish.
So again, I had a lot of issues with this and there's a lot of really funny videos online of people posting the English version of the song just so that you can see how degenerate is.
So uh, let's go ahead and play a couple of those clips, because you just have to listen to the lyrics in English to see how degenerate and crazy it is.
And then you're like, oh wow, why did Roger Goodell choose this to be the halftime show?
If this was in English, this never would have been approved at all.
This never would have been approved.
Let's go ahead and play this clip.
unidentified
Hey, so my NTSB, why I got so many girlfriends?
Hey, a lot of girlfriends.
Today I got one and tomorrow I got another one, but I never marry yo, my NTSB.
Why I got so many girlfriends?
Hey, a lot of girlfriends.
Today I got one and tomorrow got another one.
Man, I think I want to take them all to the VIP.
To the VIP hey, where they could be my anti.
I'm about to take a selfie and say cheese.
They smile if they already been with me in the VIP.
I was laughing so hard when people were posting these English versions because it's just so degenerate.
There's another clip I'm about to play for you now too, where this guy is singing in his car while wearing a little straw hat, trying to pretend like he's one of the workers um, that were displayed, one of these illegal alien workers that was featured in the beginning when they were picking the crop.
So here's this clip.
It's about two to three minutes long and you can hear the um, the English translation of the song, hey.
unidentified
So my anti asked me why I got so many girlfriends?
Flaw Hustler is like, holy shit, those are the real lyrics.
Yeah, those are the real lyrics.
Those are the real lyrics.
If you don't believe me, go look it up.
I think it's like TT Me Pregunto.
That's a song.
And you can put it into Google Translate.
And you can see it for yourself.
Those are the real lyrics.
Very degenerate.
So, yes, I stand by what I said.
But people just went absolutely ballistic on me.
You can see these tweets that I posted.
Just look at how many views they got.
People went crazy on me because of my reporting on the Super Bowl.
Let's go ahead and get these clips up.
Here's one of them.
I said the humiliation ritual continues.
You can scroll down.
Over a million views.
People went crazy because I was talking about how after the Bad Bunny performance, there was this Spanish broadcaster who was talking about how it brought tears to his eyes to see that Spanish was aired during the entire halftime show.
And it showed that the Hispanic population was really taking over America.
So you can scroll up a bit.
You can see the tweet that I posted.
He's talking about how amazing it was that Bad Bunny hijacked this because the Super Bowl was America's most important party.
And he said that it was so great that he hijacked the party by only speaking in Spanish.
So they're openly talking about replacing us, talking about how great it is that, oh, wow, we successfully made America's most important cultural event of the year in sports.
We successfully made it an all-Spanish event.
Wow, amazing.
It's so great that we don't assimilate in America.
How amazing.
How wonderful that we don't speak any English.
Why don't we just give embassy then to all 65 million illegal aliens?
And then America's national language can be Spanish.
Go ahead and listen to this clip.
Wow, it's so amazing.
At the most important party for Americans, he only spoke in Spanish.
None of these gringos, none of these white people understood anything he was saying.
We forced the white man to take an L.
We forced the white man to take an L and bend to all the Hispanics.
It's gross.
It's gross.
And it's a sign of cultural decay.
Look, I speak Spanish.
There's nothing wrong with, you know, learning another language.
But we don't have Spanish as our national language here in the United States of America.
I know that if it were up to all the open borders advocates here, we would all be speaking Spanish and Arabic.
Okay.
And then English, of course, would maybe be third.
We'd be speaking Spanish, we'd be speaking Arabic, we'd be speaking Chinese, and then maybe they would have proficiency in English, depending on where you live.
It doesn't really seem like a lot of schools these days want to prioritize or emphasize proficiency in English, but that's what we're dealing with.
Here's the other tweet I posted about it not being wide enough for me.
You can see here, people went absolutely crazy, but they go crazy because they speak the truth.
8.7 million views.
8.7 million views because I said illegal aliens and Latin hookers twerking at the Super Bowl.
Not a single white person or English translation at the Super Bowl.
This isn't wide enough for me.
Can't even watch the Super Bowl anymore because immigrants have literally ruined everything.
Very true.
I stand by what I said.
Again, very triggering to people because when you speak the truth about these things and you point out the fact that, oh, wow, look at those people like picking all the crops.
So we were told we weren't allowed to have ICE enforcement at the Super Bowl, which is one of the largest human trafficking events every single year in the United States of America.
But when you actually have an IQ that's high enough to like pick up on the symbolism, like I do, they go crazy on you.
You're not supposed to notice these things.
You're not supposed to notice, right?
They don't like when you notice.
And I notice, I notice when they're trying to subvert us.
I notice when they're trying to push these little symbols of illegal alien symbolism into our mainstream cultural sporting event here in the United States of America.
I know what they're trying to do when they open up the scene with a bunch of people in straw hats with dark skin picking corn.
Especially when Bad Bunny says that he doesn't like President Trump and he hates immigration officials and he doesn't support ICE.
That was a political statement.
That was not just a show in Spanish.
That was a political statement.
And the scene opened with a bunch of what was supposed to be.
I'm not saying that the people who were actually there were illegal aliens, but they were supposed to be representative of illegal alien farm workers.
That's what that was about.
And you can see even President Trump hated the halftime show too.
He said that the halftime show was absolutely terrible.
One of the worst ever.
It makes no sense.
It's an affront to greatness of America and doesn't represent our standards of success, creativity, or excellence.
Nobody understands a word this guy is saying and the dancing is disgusting, especially for young children that are watching from throughout the USA and all over the world.
Yeah, there's like a bunch of hookers.
And I said it.
I mean, I said it a bit more bluntly than the president did, but you got a bunch of girls like twerking, twerking, twerk.
And I can't twerk.
Well, even if I wanted to twerk, I couldn't twerk.
I'm sitting in a chair right now, but you know what it is.
Like, you know, the booties up everywhere and the little thongs shaking their ass, shaking their tits, shaking everything, just making everything shake.
Twerk, twerk, twerk.
You know what it is.
I don't need to show you.
It's degenerate.
It's gross.
Not a single white person on that stage, just a bunch of brown and black women shaking their asses.
Which is also degrading to minority women because, well, we shouldn't be putting minority women in a box like that.
We shouldn't be putting women in a box like that and saying that this is your destiny here.
Latin American culture is shaking your ass.
Latin American culture means being a whore.
Is that what you're trying to say?
Does Latin American culture mean being loose?
Is that what you're trying to convey when you say that this is a symbol of Hispanic culture in America?
Because I know a lot of classy Latin women and classy black women that are not up there shaking their ass and shaking their tits and, you know, bending over so the whole world can see their hoo-has, you know?
Like hoo-ha central.
I remember when I was a kid and Janet Jackson's nipple popped out and it was such a scandal.
Like they never seen a pair of tits in their life before.
Her nipple was on TV.
I can't believe it.
My child.
My child is scarred for life.
My child is scarred for life because my child saw her nipple.
It was like the biggest scandal.
You could see Justin Timberlake's face, like, oh, shit, we're going to get fined.
Oh, shit.
We're going to get canceled because a little nipple action at the Super Bowl.
Everybody went crazy over nipple.
Do you remember that?
You could type in it online.
The Janet Jackson nipple controversy at the Super Bowl.
Type in Super Bowl Halftime Controversy in Wikipedia.
The Super Bowl Halftime Show, which was broadcast live on February 1st, 2004 from Houston, Texas, is notable for a moment when Janet Jackson's right breast and nipple adorned with a nipple shield was exposed by Justin Timberlake to the viewing public.
The incident, sometimes referred to as Nipple Gate or Janet Gate, led to an immediate crackdown and widespread discourse on perceived indecency in broadcasting.
So people went crazy because her nipple fell out, right?
Like, whoops, my nip.
Showing.
And I have to be a little humorous about this because in this day and age, it's like everybody's nipples are everywhere these days.
You know, women are out there showing up to the Grammys with their tits out with little pasties and a little wire.
And we're told, wow, this is high fashion.
Wow, you showed up naked.
unidentified
You have a piece of mesh and tinfoil covering your nipple and your vagina.
Please tell us who is the impeccable designer that designed this amazing piece of fashion that you're blessing us with today at the Met Gala or the Grammys or the Oscars.
Please show us.
I mean, we just saw this with this woman here, this like Chanel or Chappelle Rowan.
I don't even know who the hell this woman is, but look at her nipples are out.
She like showed up to the what was those?
I don't even know.
Is this the Grammys the other day?
This was just the other day.
The other day, this happened, right?
To show you how far we've come.
Everybody's freaking out about Janet Jackson's nipples, her nipples at the Super Bowl in 2004.
And yet, no one says a word about this woman, Chappelle Rhines, nipples hanging out.
Like literally, she's got her nipples pierced, and then she has no top on and then has like cloth hanging from her nipples.
And this was broadcast on TV, and nobody said a word about it.
And then we're supposed to be okay after everybody freaks out about Janet Jackson's nipples, and we're lectured for years on end for 20 years.
We're lectured almost 21 years.
We're lectured about indecency at the Super Bowl because of Janet Jackson's nipples.
And then you have a bunch of Latin women shaking their hoo-has, shaking their tits, shaking their ass on screen.
Please, please.
There's nothing decent about any of this.
There's nothing decent about any of it.
And you can see here, this is from the Grammys the other day.
So look how far we've gone.
We once had a Super Bowl where it was Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake.
But again, her nipple came out and everybody acted like it was the end of the world.
And yet now we have people bending over.
And it's like, if you were to literally like tilt your head a little bit, you could see the inside of her uterus.
Need to put a little bit more clothing on.
Not exactly family friendly, just degenerate.
And look at, I'm not a, I'm not, what do they call those people?
I'm not a prude by any means whatsoever.
I'm not sitting here like, oh, yeah, you know, you got to be buttoned up.
Put your burqa on.
Put your put your hijab on.
We're going to sewn you if you show your nipples.
Like, look, if you've got a nice body, yeah, whatever.
Wear some clothing sometimes that accentuates your body.
But the entire Super Bowl was very degenerate.
And it's supposed to be a family-friendly event.
It is supposed to be a family-friendly event.
And people are more focused on me pointing out the fact that they had images of illegal alien crop workers and a bunch of Latin American prostitutes or women who look like prostitutes dancing instead of actually focusing on the degeneracy.
They want to focus on me.
And they, I mean, there were so many, so many articles written about my commentary on the Super Bowl.
It's like, I'm just laying in bed eating a salad, minding my own business, watching the Super Bowl halftime show, tweeting my thoughts.
Who knew that it would cause such a controversy?
A MAGA woman made a bunch of racist Super Bowl comments.
And the internet is dragging her.
Oh, yes.
The internet is dragging me.
I'm so scared.
I'm so scared.
I'm so sad, you guys.
I'm so sad.
unidentified
A bunch of liberals think I'm a racist because they said there weren't enough white people at the Super Bowl.
There was not a single white person on stage aside from Lady Gaga.
It's not racist.
It's true.
We're supposed to be a majority white country.
Where are the white people?
It's the Super Bowl.
It's not racist.
It's true.
It's also true about the illegal aliens and the Latin hookers twerking.
She went on to question: what the hell is this illegal alien farm worker non-English shit on my TV?
Well, that's what I said.
I wanted to know.
And then she suggested someone should call in an ice raid because Bad Bunny's performance held up the flags of every country within the Americas.
Yes, I did.
I said that.
And I stand by what I said.
Her post quickly drew backlash from those who called Bloomers Takes atrocious and disgusting, as well as from those who felt she needed a lesson in both geography and history.
I don't need a lesson in geography.
I'm not saying that Bad Bunny is a foreigner.
I'm pointing out the fact that those flags are not the American flag.
And the only flag that you're supposed to show at the Super Bowl is an American flag.
That's the only flag that you're supposed to show.
Outside of your sports team's flags, right?
The different teams that are playing.
Those are the only three flags that are supposed to be at a Super Bowl.
Not supposed to have all these foreign flags.
This is the United States of America.
So who knew that in the year 2026, it would be considered racist to say that you don't want foreign flags at the Super Bowl.
Who knew?
It's pretty crazy.
It's only going to get worse, you guys.
Today, the Trump administration announced that they're pulling out of Minnesota.
They're not going to be conducting any more immigration raids in Minnesota.
It's only going to get worse because it doesn't seem like mass deportations are accelerating.
So we're probably going to continue seeing this trend of a bunch of foreign flags at the Super Bowl, unfortunately.
Unfortunately.
Which reminds me on the previous episode of Loomer Unleashed.
I showed you about these amazing t-shirts from the base department.shop.
Base Department.shop.
You have to check out this shirt.
This has got to be one of the coolest shirts, the funniest shirts I've ever seen.
You could scroll down.
They also have it in hats and sweatshirts too.
Have a nice day.
If you support ICE and immigration enforcement like I do, you need to get yourself one of these shirts.
You get it from base department.shop.
Base department.shop.
Have a nice day.
Little smiley face with the ice hat.
Have a nice day.
Just wear that shirt wherever you go.
People are going to read it.
It's going to trigger people so badly.
I love this shirt.
I love the sweater.
I love the hat.
I love the mug.
Liberal tear served over ice.
May Greenland America.
Lots of great merch on this website.
My favorite are the Have a Nice Day shirts.
And then, of course, I love the Maduro hoodies too.
Unbothered.
In my lane, focus flourishing.
The photo of Maduro on the helicopter after he was captured by U.S. special forces.
So you got to get yourself one of these shirts, you guys.
Go to basedepartment.shop, base department.
Base department.shop.
Base department.shop.
It's a mouthful.
It's a mouthful.
It's like a little tongue twister.
Base department.
Take the call.
I like it.
It's a lot of base merch.
It's unique merch.
You see everybody always selling a lot of the same stuff, but I like this site.
I just recently found this site and I think they have really cute merch.
So Valentine's Day is this weekend.
unidentified
You could order it for your order for your significant other.
Well, I hope that whatever you guys are doing, you have a nice Valentine's Day weekend.
Someone said, You've never been in a long-term relationship, have you, Laura?
Not true.
I'm engaged, getting married soon.
Been in a long-term relationship for a while now.
So I just not super into Valentine's Day.
I'm engaged.
For me, it's just another day.
Personally, I think that people get so crazy over Valentine's Day.
So many people break up over Valentine's Day too.
I saw something that said that Valentine's Day is actually one of the most popular breakup days too, because people get like so triggered that my boyfriend didn't spend time with me.
My girlfriend didn't spend time with me.
They didn't buy me the gifts I wanted.
And then it leads to breakups or somebody has to work and they can't spend Valentine's Day with their partner and then they just like go crazy.
Apparently, it's a really big breakup day.
Approximately 12% to 23% of couples experience a breakup around Valentine's Day.
Did you know that?
With a significant spike occurring in the days immediately before and after February 14th.
Yep.
It's considered a peak time for dumping, driven by financial pressure, dissatisfaction, or a desire to avoid fake romantic gestures.
So it's a big breakup day.
Also, everybody's going on spring break too.
So, you know, a lot of people who don't want to be in committed relationships, they always end up dumping their significant others oftentimes right before spring break.
So I don't know.
unidentified
I just find it to be like a very hokey day, but love is in the air.
Valentine's Day is designed to make people feel bad about themselves.
It is.
It's designed to make you feel like you don't make enough money, that you didn't get the best gift, that you could have done more, that you're inadequate because you're not in love.
You don't have a partner.
Every single day is supposed to be Valentine's Day if you love who you're with.
You're supposed to love and celebrate your partner every single day.
Your girlfriend, your boyfriend, your spouse, whoever that may be.
So don't feel sad and depressed if you don't do anything fun for Valentine's Day this weekend.
And if you are in a relationship, happy Valentine's to you and your loved ones.
I hope you have a fantastic day.
It's just another day.
Don't be sad.
That's my little emotional pep talk for everybody because I always see people like posting online on Valentine's Day about how they're depressed because they're not in a relationship or they didn't get anything.
And it's like, I feel like so many people feel so pressured and they're meant to feel sad on Valentine's Day.
And it's just, we don't want people feeling sad.
We don't want people feeling sad on Valentine's Day.
Be immune to the psyops.
Anyway, with that, thank you so much for tuning into tonight's episode of Loomer Unleashed.
I hope you learned something new.
Hope you found it to be informative.
Be sure that you repost the live link.
If you tuned in late, you can re-watch the replay on rumble.com/slash Laura Loomer.
Hit the green follow button.
Hit the green follow button.
Download the Rumble app to your phone.
Enable notifications on your phone.
Be sure you're following me on X at Laura Loomer, on X at Loomer Unleashed.
And also follow me for all of my breaking news reports at loomered.com.
Lumerd.com is my website where I publish all of my breaking news reports.
Every single day, there's our story about Thomas Massey and his Trump derangement syndrome.
Every single day, there's reports that are published.
If you want to support my work, you can click the donate button on my website.
If you have a tip, if you're a whistleblower, if you want to submit information to my website, go ahead and fill out the tip line on my website as well.
On the drop-down button, tip line.
Whatever you want to do, send me a message.
I check the tip line every single day.
And I encourage you to contact the tip line if you have information about a lawmaker or some kind of scandal, some kind of story, or if you just want to send me information that you think I should be aware of.
I check that tip line every single day, and I'm always very eager to hear from all of you.
So, with that, thank you so much for tuning in to tonight's episode of Loomer Unleashed.
I hope you all have a wonderful weekend and happy Valentine's to all of you.
I love you.
If I'm the only person to tell you I love you this weekend, just know I mean it from the bottom of my heart.
I love you.
I appreciate you for all of your support.
I couldn't do what I do without you.
Have a fantastic weekend, and I will see you next week for another episode of Loomer Unleashed.