Laura Loomer and Raheem Kassam dissect Charlie Kirk's assassination, framing it as an existential crisis for free speech and a symptom of radicalized leftist terrorism. They condemn influencers like Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson for profiting from conspiracy theories while accusing Democrats of fostering violence through figures like Rashida Tlaib. The hosts promote Kassam's No Go Zones, argue for a "no-Muslim policy" in Congress, and warn that the MAGA movement risks becoming a "Hitler youth" organization under bad actors who prioritize enrichment over Western civilization. Ultimately, they assert that without principled successors, the movement may collapse after Trump's term. [Automatically generated summary]
So please be sure that you download the Rumble app, download the Rumble app on your phone and enable notifications.
Follow me, rumble.com slash Laura Loomer so that you never miss a live episode of my show.
When you download the app and you enable notifications, you will get a notification and you will never miss an episode of Loomer Unleashed because I know how much you hate listening, you hate missing episodes of my show.
For those of you who are watching on X, please be sure that you're following me on X at Laura Loomer and also on X at Loomer Unleashed.
Go ahead and retweet the live stream and be sure that you share the Rumble link as well.
All right, Raheem.
You know, it's kind of a tragic, still a tragic episode, right?
We're not really exactly going to be in such a great mood today.
It's not all gleeful and happy and, you know, positive vibes here on Loomer Unleashed.
It's been very dark for our country and also very dark for the conservative movement.
And I think just, you know, if you have humanity and you're not, and you're not a deranged leftist, it's been a dark week for the entire country.
So it's important that we have these conversations, though, about the state of our country.
And we focus on the negativity, not because we want to bring people down, but because we have to be honest about the state of affairs in our country and the state of affairs for the right, the state of affairs for our national security and the state of affairs for free speech.
And that's why I really wanted you to come on my show today because I couldn't think of anybody else who really has been there since day one, right?
When I think about people who have been on the ground as like a day one Trump supporter, people who are familiar with all the players and understand the dynamics and, you know, who said what 10 years ago, who's saying what now 10 years later.
And, you know, just kind of this overall toxic climate that is our current political landscape here in America.
And I wanted to have a conversation with you about what the assassination of Charlie Kirk and this increased heightened level of political violence in America means, not just for the MAGA movement, but also for the state of American politics.
Well, that's how I feel like this whole week has been just one big therapy session because, you know, not are we, not only are we grieving the assassination of Charlie Kirk, but we're also grieving, as you said, it's not just the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
It's the assassination of peaceful political discourse in America.
That's the assassination of America in a sense, because I mean, it's, I think that the reason why this is hitting people so hard.
And I wasn't super close with Charlie.
I've known Charlie for 11 years.
We had kind of, you know, a rocky relationship in the sense that I respected him.
But I mean, look, it's, you, you, you can't deny, and that's not, it's not badmouthing anybody to say this, turning point was more establishment, right?
Like they were the establishment conservative movement.
And so if you were more of a rabble-rouser or you were more controversial, you weren't exactly like welcomed with open arms at Turning Point.
I always respected Charlie.
I got along with Charlie just fine.
But, you know, for as somebody, you know, now examining just kind of the state of affairs in our country post-assassination, it's shocking to me to see how some people are just so incapable of having humanity for those they disagree with.
And I highlight my past with Charlie, you know, not to disparage anybody, but to show that this has hit me almost like I lost a family member or I lost a really close friend.
It's been very troubling to me.
I haven't slept much over this last week.
I've cried a lot.
And I've asked myself, like, why do I feel so sad about somebody who I wasn't very close with?
And it's because we're not just seeing the death of an innocent man, an innocent husband, and the death of an innocent father and somebody who led a massive political movement in America, but it's like the death of the death of what he stands for, but also the death of civility.
And this kind of really sad, kind of fearful feeling that people now have that it could be you.
You could be walking down the street and you don't have to be controversial.
And you could, I mean, does everybody now have to worry about a sniper, right?
Waiting out, waiting out, monitoring their every location.
It's just kind of like the death of civility, the death of the American way, and also the death of peace of mind as a conservative.
People can say what they want about me getting up in people's faces, but there's a big difference between being aggressive in your questioning and saying that you are glad somebody's dead.
But this is, but this is, you know, this is the point, you know, the conclusion I was making to my original point about, you know, seeing the trajectory that America's been on, you know, since I came of political awareness.
And that was, you know, that was 9-11.
That's what kind of got me interested in defending Western civilization in the first instance.
And, you know, being in politics, you know, you and I, you know, we just had lunch, right?
But, you know, we sit at lunch and we talk about sort of these things all the time, right?
Prices on our heads, demonization of us, demonetization, especially of you, you know, probably canceled women in the world, you know, maybe outside of Saudi Arabia or China.
And, you know, when I was working for Nigel Farage in UKIP in 2015, we were constantly threatened.
I was hit in the face with a ladder by a Greenpeace activist.
You know, these things, these assaults, this violence is almost so routine in our lives that we actually don't think twice about it.
And I know having spoken to some of Charlie's friends since the assassination, you know, they were always encouraging him to be safer, to put up bulletproof glass at these events and that sort of thing.
And he just didn't, he didn't want that glass, that thing between him and the audience.
He loved to connect with people.
And look, that's what I do, right?
Like when I'm at the restaurant, all I'm doing on an evening is pressing the flesh, going around, talking to people, making connections, introducing other people to one another.
And I think it's really important that we are able to talk freely about this threat.
And what's bothered me is that, look, you know, we're both Trump supporters.
This has been an ongoing issue for the last 10 years in our country.
I mean, longer than last 10 years.
But if you look at the beginning of the Trump administration, the first event that really kicked off the Trump administration was the night before the inauguration.
I think you and I both attended the deplorable.
And you had Antifa terrorists who were trying to put pipe bombs into the ventilation system of the venue of the deplorable, if you recall, physically assaulting people, attacking people, bashing people's heads in with bottles and shattering glass in people's faces, lighting the city on fire, saying that Trump was a fascist.
And what was written on the bullet casing from the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk?
Hey, fascists, catch this.
So fast forward 10 years.
And now we're only now having a discussion about designating Antifa as a terrorist organization or at least seeing action on that front.
Yesterday, President Trump made the announcement that Antifa is being designated as a terrorist organization.
But do you find it to be problematic that our own intel agencies and law enforcement agencies, even under the current Trump administration, are deciding to classify this assassin and this killer as a nihilistic violent extremist?
I'm going to get into a discussion about this because it seems like even now under the current Trump administration, while there is some condemnation of the political violence, people are still kind of tiptoeing around what this really is.
This is left-wing, Democrat, radical left political violence.
And I'm worried that if we allow for the FBI to call Tyler Robinson or the future, you know, tranny shooter that decides to kill an innocent person a nihilistic, violent extremist, we're taking away from what they truly are.
Yeah, firstly, their entire network, you know, the SPLC, media masses, all of these groups, have never had problems calling people like me and you right-wing extremists, right?
And have never had a problem putting targets on our heads as a result of that.
There have been times in my life where I've had to have armed security with me walking down the street as a result of being featured by the SPLC and things like that.
And you've also had to deal with Islamic threats too.
We're writing no-go zones and talking about what's happening in England now.
I mean, everybody's having these rallies to protest the Islamification of the UK.
And you were the one writing books about this.
10 years ago, right?
So I bring this up.
The reason why I have you on is because these new threats, right, they're not new.
Palestinian radicals attacking people, firebombing events, Muslims attacking businesses, threatening people in the streets of America, stabbing people, killing people, shooting people, Antifa calling people fascists.
This isn't new.
So what I'm getting at is that with the watered down language or the use of semantics to cover up what the threat has always been, the radical left.
I wonder if it's intentional, if this is deliberate, or if the party itself and the MACA movement that was always understanding of this radical leftist threat in the beginning and what it represented and who was behind it is now being watered down because after the 2024 election, the GOP has decided to become a big tent party.
Like, are we ever going to really be able to truly talk about what these threats are and who's behind them if we keep on presenting ourselves as the big tent coalition building party?
The pushback that somebody might offer you, I'm not doing it, but I'm playing devil's advocate here, that somebody might offer you about the nihilistic stuff is that they're trying to bring on law enforcement on this and making it overtly left or right wing.
A lot of these, you know, woolly law enforcement officers that are still in jobs they shouldn't be in in the first instance can get more on board with being active on something like that.
Now, listen, I particularly don't back it.
I think people who are not in favor of enforcing the law and in favor of, you know, look, what we've got is a transgender Bada Meinhof in America today is actually what we have, right?
That's what I would call it.
Now, I understand that I might be a little bit more too firm for that, but I think the very least you can.
Just repeat that, a transgender Bada Meinhof complex.
I mean, this was the communist terror cell that operated in Germany.
And, you know, these guys operate in the same way.
They have the, this guy was in a cell, right?
He was in his little Discord chat.
We know all of this.
He's not, I don't buy this thing, by the way.
I don't know if you do, but I don't buy this thing like, oh, it's radicalized on the internet.
Is that we're doing ourselves a disservice by allowing for our intel agencies and our politicians to say, oh, this is a new form of violence.
It's called nihilistic violence extremism.
No, this is Democrat propaganda.
This is Democrat radicalization.
This is what happens when your kids leave your supervision.
They grow up in a conservative household and then they go to school or they start interacting with youth who maybe didn't have the privilege of growing up in a conservative household and they become radicalized by the left.
This is not fringe.
This is not even, this is not even, I wouldn't even say radical.
This is now mainstream Democrat political viewpoint, political philosophy.
So to them, they don't think it's radical because this is literally what they believe.
I mean, we just saw the cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel's show and people are outraged because now the lines have been blurred.
They think that free speech is the same thing as incitement.
And these so-called democratic values of freedom of expression and free speech, whatever you want to call it, the ability to have peaceful public discourse, public assembly, everything that falls underneath the First Amendment.
The Democrats now want to conflate that with incitement.
And I think that conservatives have become so traumatized by being victimized, right, for four and a half to six years, cancel culture, like actual hardcore cancel culture, demonization, demonetization, debanking, you name it, total deplatforming on social media.
They did it to Donald Trump that even conservatives now are willing to roll over and say that violent speech is free speech.
And we need to be clear that the First Amendment does not protect incitement.
And the courts have been very clear.
The Supreme Court has been very clear.
Incitement is not free speech.
And what I worry about is that we have seen such an action from our government and such inaction from law enforcement in cracking down on these terror cells that have been growing in our country since the 50s and the 60s that people are now kind of numb, right?
And I think, you know, a lot of this, a lot of the Democrat online outrage over this is actually, they know that their time dominating the airwaves on late night TV and all of that is just, they're watching it go out the window.
I think I'm going to join the Democrat Party of America, right?
Like nobody's thinking that way in the country.
Nobody looks at it as a valid future for the country.
And they did it to themselves.
They did it with Biden, but they also did it with globalism and how they governed, right?
They took people's livelihoods and lives away from them.
Whether you're talking about the ordinary person working a 95 job, where you're thinking about America's farmers, where you're looking at, you know, how much it costs to live in a major American city and how terrible it is and unsafe it is.
The Democrats did this to themselves.
But I think what a lot of your audience will want to know is, Laura, what we can talk about the semantics and we can talk about the language of how we deal with this.
And that's why I'm saying it's time for them to stop beating around the bush by using these semantic terms like, oh, nihilistic violent extremism.
It's time to actually pinpoint the networks and completely shut them down, not just shut them down by banning them on social media.
And no, that's not cancel culture.
It's called accountability culture, right?
There's a big difference because now the left wants to accuse the GOP of promoting cancel culture and being against free speech.
But there's a big difference between cancel culture, which is rooted in malice, in my opinion, and accountability culture.
And accountability culture is facing consequences.
for your violent actions or your illegal actions.
That's not the same thing as cancel culture, right?
People who lack a moral compass, who lack a respect for law and order, of course, are going to play the victim and pretend like their accountability is a form of cancel culture.
So how are we going to shut these networks down?
Well, it's time for the Trump administration, in my opinion, to start making lists of every single group that is violating law and order.
What is the definition of violating law and order?
Well, aiding and abetting terrorism, okay, aiding and abetting illegal immigration, supporting illegal activity.
You could even be in violation of your 501c3 status by engaging in partisan political activity.
There are rules.
That's not free speech.
You don't have a free speech right as a 501c3 organization to do partisan political activity by getting a tax exempt status.
And so there are so many examples.
And we've been writing about it for 10 years.
I mean, how many articles do you have on your website documenting abuses of 501c3 statuses?
It's literally tax fraud when you think about it, right?
So people have been committing these crimes for years.
We have the evidence.
You could throw the book at these people.
And the way that we first shut them down is by stripping them of their 501c status.
Excuse me.
We need to have acting IRS director Scott Besson throw down a gauntlet and say, you know what?
Incitement to violence and support for radical activity is not going to be tolerated.
And it's certainly not going to be protected with a tax exempt status.
I am announcing today that we are stripping.
There should be thousands of these groups.
There's thousands of these organizations.
They have umbrella organizations.
And some of these groups are receiving grants from the federal government because of their 501c3 status.
And some of them are receiving grants from the organizations themselves that are receiving grants from the federal government.
And so aside from obviously doing criminal investigations with the law enforcement agencies and the DOJ and having their tax exempt statuses stripped of them, what else do you see as a viable means of the Trump administration targeting and pinpointing these terror networks?
You know, you're talking on the fringes on the peripheries of free speech.
We're not.
And I can give you examples of why that is not the case.
After January 6th, people who were not there, who were just saying, hey, it wasn't as big a deal as it's being made out to be, they lost their ability to fly TSA PRI.
You know, they stripped these people just for tweets they were making.
And they weren't there.
They didn't commit any criminal activity.
They weren't involved with it.
They weren't financially implicated in it at all.
That is where you are taking free, you're taking free speech head on and you're infringing on the First Amendment.
What we're talking about is going after criminal networks that are actually radicalizing people in this country.
If you want your son or daughter to go to university and get radicalized, shame on you.
So aside from cracking down on these tens of thousands of organizations that do have this 501c3 status, what are some other defunding mechanisms aside from perhaps enforcing more accountability measures at the university level by denying or revoking federal funding?
Normalization Of Cancel Culture00:06:40
unidentified
What do you see as the financial framework for debanking?
And I hate to say it, but these terms were used as counterterrorism measures.
It's important for people to know that these terms were never meant to be malicious.
They became malicious after the Democrat Party, really, if you want a history lesson on cancel culture.
Cancel culture was invented as a counterterrorism measure after 9-11.
These tools were utilized and developed by the law enforcement agencies like the CIA and the FBI and DHS to counter Islamic terrorist cells in America and to identify their recruitment networks on social media platforms and to debank them so that they were not able to fundraise off of terrorist propaganda.
That is what cancel culture was invented for and the purpose of cancel culture and things like debanking and deplatforming.
Now it's been weaponized by the radical left because, well, they believe that conservatives are terrorists.
We are not violent people, but they believe that because of who we support for president, Donald Trump, that we are terrorists.
They've said so themselves.
They believe that the Trump supporters who attended J6 are domestic terrorists.
We said that we saw the FBI director say that white Christian men are the biggest terror threat in our country, refused to say that Antifa was a terrorist organization when he testified before Congress.
And so that being said, how can we normalize things like cancel culture and debanking and deplatforming for their true purposes again and educate the masses on the true intention and purpose of these tools that were, like I said, created in the aftermath of 9-11 to combat terrorism.
And that's what we're here to talk about today.
Trump cracking down on radical left terror cells, because that's what these people are.
And Mrs. Miggins down the road sends her granddaughter, you know, whatever money to help go to this college because she thinks it's going to help her go out and get a job and whatever.
And she comes back with a, you know, a nose ring and pink hair and all of that.
Or she's flying the Palestinian flag of jihad and all of this.
I mean, you would expect, I mean, look back, America.
Look back to the men of the 20s and 30s and 40s and 50s.
And if you think that you can say, look those men dead in the eye and say, oh yeah, you would have tolerated that the same way we're tolerating it.
If you could actually think that way, there's something wrong with you.
I think that this country was built off the backs of people who were willing to take the tough decisions, you know, and get stuck in where it needed to happen.
There's a reason that I was attracted to America, not just because, you know, my country has become an Islamification cesspool, right?
But actually, America still stood for something.
When you used to come out at Dulles Airport, when I used to land on a plane from London, you would see a slew of American flags, the first thing you ever saw.
Well, look, I mean, I don't care, but, you know, if people want to talk about this, I've been debanked and I've been deplatformed and I know what it's like to have it used against me and be treated like a terrorist.
Remember when Facebook said that I was a dangerous individual and they put me in the same classification because these were counterterrorism initiatives.
This was a tool developed by the CIA and the FBI and DHS to be used against actual Islamic terrorists and groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda and, you know, the Taliban, whatever you want to call it.
These were supposed to be tools utilized to crack down on actual terror cells.
And yes, regardless of what you think about the FBI, the FBI has identified the fact that we have Hamas and Hezbollah terrorist cells all across our country.
These people came across our border.
Tom Homan told me about 2 million of these people, jihadis, came undetected.
They are living in our country, sleeper cells.
We don't even know.
We don't even know who these people are.
Over 2 million jihadists living in America that could be activated like that.
The FBI has identified ISIS in all 50 states.
We know that during the Obama administration and also during the last Trump administration, there were reports that came out that showed that Antifa was training with ISIS.
They were traveling abroad to places like Syria and doing weapons training with them.
So we know that these groups like Antifa are engaged in terrorist activity and they are trying to be terrorists.
They're not just, you know, affiliated with terrorists.
They are actively trying to mimic and replicate terrorist ideology because you wouldn't be traveling abroad to places like Syria and Afghanistan to do training with actual Islamic militants unless you truly wanted to have a militancy and your own communist militias here on the ground in American cities.
So it manifests itself in different ways now than it is that a sign for me as I get older because I'm like, God, one of these days, I got to get a grip on my temper.
One of these days I got to get a grip on my temper.
And I'll be the one to say it so that you don't have to deal with the blowback.
Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and I'm going to say it, Nick Fuentes, because I find his reaction to be disingenuous.
This is a guy who, you know, I know, I know him personally.
I know what it's like to be deplatformed.
I was sympathetic at first because I know what it's like to be viciously targeted and, you know, viciously silenced for your speech.
But you don't get to go around and, you know, tell your supporters to bring all their firepower, like direct quote, to Charlie Kirk and drive him off of every single college campus till he can no longer show his face and no longer feel safe showing his face and say that he's not a real Christian and then come around and pretend like you're not one of the mean people in this country who has created these inbred individuals on the right who are running around screeching about the Jews.
Whether Nick is actually, you know, being genuine in his so-called newfound compassion for Charlie Kirk, I don't know.
But there's no denying that people like Nick and people like Candace and people like Tucker have created a class in this country that is obsessed with not just talking about Jews, but talking about this delusional concept in their mind of this omnipresent Israeli influence that they think controls every single aspect of our society.
It is absolutely delusional.
I mean, I'm Jewish and I just want to know when I get to cash in my J card to, you know, get the 10 years of my life that was stolen from me back.
Am I going to get back pay for all the years of demonetization and all the years of debanking?
When you and I were just talking over lunch about how I still don't even have my social media accounts back, right?
So it's just ridiculous.
And it's just such an insult to people who actually are capable of having intellectual conversations.
And for those of you who may not know what we're talking about, we're talking about Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson's new theory that Israel, B.B. Netanyahu, came up with this theory and he decided that Charlie Kirk was turning into Nick Fuentes.
So he decided to send a Mossad assassin and he put a bullet in his neck.
He looks to be a radical leftist with a tranny, furry porn addiction who also either was acting either independently, but it doesn't look like he was acting independently of his trans lover.
But it looks like the motive of his assassination of Charlie Kirk was because he was engaged in a romantic relationship with a tranny.
And he thought that Charlie Kirk posed a threat to the trans community with what he called hate that can't be negotiated with.
We already know who the shooter is.
And it's just insane to me that people like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens are making it out to be some conspiracy theory as if the shooter's on the run.
You know, like the shooter was still on the run and we didn't know and they still hadn't captured the guy, then maybe I would be entertaining the idea that not that it was Mossad or Israel, but that it could have been like some kind of foreign professional hit squad or that there may be foreign influence or some kind of like paramilitary trained individual who had experience in getting away from law enforcement.
But the guy, the guy was turned in by his family members.
The father confirmed that the rifle that was used belonged to the grandfather.
You're not really, you're not really, you're not really like, you know, from a Muslim background.
You're actually like just a plant Rahim and you're actually just like a Mossad spy and you're here as a foreign agent to destabilize us with Zionist propaganda.
I mean, I know that for those watching, you're going to think, what the fuck is she saying?
This sounds crazy.
I wish that I was making this up, but this is literally what's coming out of the mouth of Candace Owens.
Today, she actually accused the New York Post of being a Mossad publication.
She said that.
She said that it's a Mossad publication because they wanted to get to the root of whether these smears against people like Bill Ackman or these smears against people at Turning Point USA were true.
This idea that Charlie Kirk was bribed with $150 million from Bibi Netanyahu.
And because he refused to take the money, Bibi sent a Mossad assassin and they shot him in the throat.
I don't think he's in a, I don't think that he's sending hit squads to America.
I mean, look, I think that he's in putting a very tough situation with what happened October 7th.
And it's got to be really hard being the prime minister of Israel surrounded by hostile Muslim neighbors.
I mean, it's very hard being the leader of the only Jewish state in the Middle East when everybody around you wants to kill you and you're constantly being gaslit by Muslims.
I don't particularly have any interest in our involvement in that, quite frankly.
I don't want to get involved in it, quite frankly.
But here's the deal.
I think the reason that people go down that kind of Candace Owens rabbit hole on this stuff is they're afraid of accepting the truth.
They're afraid of accepting the truth that on their watch, you know, the founders left America to you.
And on your watch, this stuff has happened.
I think people are shy and nervous and upset about accepting that they have failed, that actually in their country, this kind of radicalization is going on.
On their college campuses, in their streets, in their neighborhoods, in their communities, their children are dressing up like this.
Their children are involved with degeneracy.
Their children are going out and shooting other people for their political views and for their political speech.
And I think all of that other stuff is a distraction and it's particularly malicious distraction.
There is nothing you could lure me into a conversation about Israel and Palestine or whatever.
There is nothing that you could say about me that I go, oh, he's taken money for Barry Sega.
But what the conclusion that I'm coming at from all of this, and it's especially Candace would be, because she's so craven about the way she does this, is she is malicious the way she does it.
So I'll tell the whole story here just so everybody can see how disingenuous it is.
And so then we ended up getting invited.
I was, I had always been invited to the Horowitz Restoration Weekend conference.
I believe you've gone to Restoration Weekend as well.
And for those who don't know what Restoration Weekend is, it was a conference that was hosted by David Horowitz, who has since passed away tragically.
And it was hosted at the Breakers in Palm Beach.
And it was like, I would say a Zionist, but, you know, not entirely Zionist, but it was like a unification conference between people who are invested in saving the West and also preserving Israel and combating Islamic jihad.
And the commonality, the commonality was to talk about Islam.
That's where I went.
So it was a counter-jihad conference.
So, you know, I would say that, you know, it was probably better, but most, I would say that everybody who attended was a Zionist for the most part.
Like everybody who was an attendee, and there's nothing wrong with, I hate when people, you know, they get these facial expressions.
To be a Zionist means that you believe Israel has a right to exist.
That's what it means.
That's the definition of Zionism.
To be a Zionist means you do not believe that Israel should be nuked off the face of the public.
And we don't, I'm not saying that, I guess I did say everybody who attended is a Zionist, but most.
Most there's probably some people, but for the commonality, the reason why there were so many people there who were pro-Israel is because one of the main issues of discussion was, you know, counter-jihad initiatives.
Candace gets invited to this event.
Okay.
Mind you, at that time, she was just known as Red Pill Black.
Like her videos had gone viral.
She was a Democrat.
Her boyfriend, Ryan, was the one who really kind of like helped her write her scripts for her videos and helped her go viral as a conservative sensation.
Paul Joseph Watson, who you and I both know, started to platform her.
And as a result, you know, she went viral.
The conservatives love their token minorities, right?
They love the fact that, oh, wow, here's a young black woman.
So she was like the token black woman, really.
That's why she got invited to this conference, right?
There was nothing exceptional about her.
She just got invited because she was a black woman speaking out against black lives.
You know, she's, but she was a loud, conversational black young woman who was saying everything that these GOP donors wanted to hear from black people about the left.
So they were like, wow, this could be the next conservative rising star.
So they paid for her to fly out and she was on my flight and we were talking and she's like, oh, you know, I've never been to this conference before.
And I had been several times before because, you know, I had worked for O'Keefe and I had gone as the comms director to help him also fundraise and do his communications at this event.
It's a big event for donors to meet with people and to fund projects.
So I'm there and Charlie Kirk is there and I'm walking down the hallway and Candace is walking with me.
And all of a sudden, Charlie comes up and he starts talking to Candace.
And I swear to God, if you go back and you can look on X, I'm the one who broke the story.
He goes, wow, you're honestly so incredible.
He's like, we need to have you a turning point.
And he looks at the guy who he was there with.
I think it was like that guy, the William guy, the older guy who used to travel around with Charlie.
But there was like this older gentleman named Bill.
I forget his last name.
And he used to travel around with Charlie.
He was one of like the first people there at Turning Point USA.
Well, Bill pulled Candace aside with Charlie and Charlie then was having a private conversation with Bill.
And I was standing right next to him when he had it.
And he said, Oh, what should we do?
What do you think?
Like $77,000 a year?
Like that was a number, right?
And so I don't think that she was really making a lot of money at the time.
And the initial number that they threw out was, What if we gave you $77,000 a year and you came on as a Turning Point ambassador and you came to work with us?
And then she was shocked.
She was like, Oh, wow, you know, that would be so amazing.
And then from that moment on, they were like, deal, and they shook on it.
Well, I was there and I didn't realize that it was supposed to be private.
So I tweeted it and I said, Oh, Candace Owens is joining Turning Point USA.
And then shortly after that, Candace joined Turning Point.
I was there from the very beginning of when Candace joined Turning Point USA.
It was at a counter-jihad conference hosted by a Zionist Jew while Charlie Kirk was there to get money and raise money from Zionist Jews in attendance by talking about the work that he was doing on college campuses to raise awareness about hatred for Israel in America.
That's true.
That is a true story.
And that's how Candace Owens got hired.
Then shortly after she started working with Turning Point, she started working with Prager U, Dennis Prager, another Zionist Jew who gave her a platform.
She made millions of dollars working with Prager Yu, became an even bigger sensation.
And when she was working for Charlie before she started working at Prager U, is when Kanye West saw her video and said, I love the way that Candace Owens thinks.
I get a text message from Candace at like 10 o'clock in the morning, the day that he did that.
And she was like, oh my God, this is amazing.
Thanks so much for supporting me.
You know, you're one of the few people that actually supported me along this way.
And then she completely changed because, well, she started going around with Kanye West.
And then her and Charlie Kirk flew out to California and they went to TMZ headquarters with Charlie Kirk, right?
And I don't know if Kanye funded it, but she ended up getting, you know, large contributions from Lee Hanley, Lee and Alley Hanley, and all these Palm Beach donors.
Again, people who funded pro-Zionist causes on college campuses and within this movement.
They were attendees of the Restoration Weekend Conference.
So why do I bring this up?
Because Candace Owens is a product of Zionism.
Whether she wants to believe it or not, Candace Owens is a product of Zionist Jews.
Her entire career is the invention of Zionist Jewish money.
Whether she wants to be grateful for that or whether or not, you know, she wants to push her own form of revisionist history, Candace Owens was created by Jews.
She was.
She was a nobody living in Westchester County or, you know, she was living in, I think, like Stanford, Connecticut with her boyfriend.
And then she met Charlie and then went to Turning Point.
And it was kind of bizarre because, you know, I had gone out with her and her, her, her, her longtime boyfriend.
And then before I knew it, she was engaged to this guy.
And I was like, wait, I thought you guys, you know, I thought that you were still dating your boyfriend.
So that was another weird story, right?
Like it's this whole engagement with George Farmer.
Um, while I thought that she was still in a relationship, like maybe she broke up and I'm mistaken.
I don't know.
But from my understanding, she was very much involved with her longtime boyfriend when she met when she met George.
So I'm just bringing this up for context because her life has drastically, you know, taken a massive shift.
So she got all this enormous fame.
She had a show.
She made millions of dollars.
Let's talk about Ben Shapiro, too.
You know, she made all this money working for Ben Shapiro.
So for a woman that wants to go around blaming the Jews through everything, I've never seen her once say thank you to the Jews who invented her.
And yes, she owes everything to Zionist Jews because Candace Owens would not even have been accepted or platformed into mainstream conservative politics had it not been for Jewish money and had it not been for Zionist Jews who paid for her to attend the Restoration Weekend conference.
And David Horowitz, since Candace Owens wants to talk about people when they're dead, so they can't speak for themselves.
The Horror It's Restoration Restoration Weekend and Freedom Center, they wanted Candace Owens to return the Freedom Award that they gave her because they were so disgusted before David Horowitz passed away.
They were so disgusted with the shit that was coming out of her mouth about Jew, this, Israel, this.
So that is the history of Candace Owens.
And it is kind of ironic when you think about it because for a woman who wants to like massively, and then she, and then she met George.
She was dating a longtime boyfriend for, I don't know, seven, eight years.
She wrote about it in her book, how she got some mold infection and her whole face was ravaged by some disease.
And she was laying in a hospital bedroom.
And this guy, Ryan, who she had been dating long term, took care of her when her face was getting eaten alive by mold spurs.
You can go read about it.
She's posted photos online about it.
Why do I bring this up?
Because it wasn't until she started dating this guy, George, who, from my understanding, is a Catholic, right?
She was never really religious.
She was on the Joe Rogan show talking about how she was never religious.
And her whole identity changed when she started dating, or I guess, you know, it was just kind of like a rapid engagement to this guy named George Farmer, who is going to be the heir to a multi-billion dollar fortune.
So I don't understand.
Like, if Charlie Kirk is her friend, why does she find the need to go and make these episodes online, which she's clearly monetizing?
You know, she's making millions of dollars per year from her YouTube channel.
All the monetization.
I mean, if you get a video on YouTube that gets a million views, you get a check for $5,000 to $20,000, depending on your advertising deal with YouTube.
So think about all the episodes that she's made since Charlie's died and just add all that money up.
Is she going to give that money to Erica Kirk?
Is she going to give that money to Turning Point USA?
Who is she doing this for?
Why doesn't she just want to be graceful and silent and work to, if she really believes that there's some kind of conspiracy about Charlie Kirk's death, why doesn't she just want to work quietly with law enforcement and with the family?
Well, you know, it's interesting when you dive into the backgrounds of these people because, you know, she loves to talk about Brigitte McCrone and she loves to talk about how she's going to expose everybody.
But, you know, it's interesting.
Like a lot of people don't know this because they weren't there since day one, like you and I were.
But I was there.
I was literally there when she got her deal from Charlie Kirk.
Charlie came over and he's like, oh, you know, Candace, right?
And I was like, oh, yeah, you know, we were just on the same flight together.
And he, I think the number, if I recall correctly, was like $77,000.
It wasn't anything crazy, but then she got on board and obviously, you know, started making more money with them.
And then she started Blexit.
And then when Kanye West promoted her, she blew up and Turning Point had to pay her more money.
But she is a product of Jews.
And it's important for us to remember this when she's going around spreading blood libel.
I remember too, I was in Israel.
I was in Israel and I was at the embassy ceremony with Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens.
I was there.
I was literally there in Jerusalem at an event hosted by the RJC and Sheldon Adelson was there.
He was very ill at the time and they flew him out on a special plane that could, you know, be prepared if he had some kind of a medical emergency.
He was not doing well.
He was on oxygen.
He was in a wheelchair.
I have a photograph with him.
But I was there at this private event and they said that Sheldon Adelson really wanted to be there to see the official embassy get moved.
So Sheldon Adelson hosted this huge big event for RJC.
Mary Middleson was there.
Charlie Kirk was there.
I was there.
Candace Owens was there.
And it's so funny watching her now try to pretend like she, you know, always has always been so skeptical of Israel and Jews.
She was there telling everybody what a supporter she was of Israel when she testified in front of Congress and was accused of being a white supremacist.
Remember, she said, it was my greatest honor to travel 18 hours on a flight to go to Israel for the embassy move.
And I am a supporter of Jews.
Like her entire career has been using Jews to get on top, using Jews to surpass her challenges, using Jews to fund her career only to turn around and stab them in the back.
The vice president came out with a tweet yesterday that I thought was very important and impactful.
And he sort of just said, look, for all of the people who are feeling angst and anger and they have all this energy and look into something to do with it, it's just remember they haven't buried the guy yet.
And from my understanding, is the private funeral for the family is on Saturday.
And I don't know if you're going to the private funeral or not, but the private funeral is on Saturday and the memorial for the public is on Sunday.
But from my understanding, from what I've been told, his casket is not going to be there on Sunday because they have to get him in the ground.
I mean, a body can't really be out that long.
So, the fact that it's not like she's doing this after the fact, like, you know, oh, Charlie's been dead a year, and there's a lot of questions that I have about his death.
Not the massage blaming and, you know, the attacks on Bibi Nets and Yahoo, but I could understand people like coming up with conspiracy theories that the shooter was still on the run.
But he admitted it.
He admitted it in text messages.
He admitted it to his father.
He admitted it to his tranny, trune, furry lover, whatever you want to call it.
He apparently admitted it to over 20 people in Discord.
We've talked about Candace a lot, but it's also Tucker.
Tucker Carlson, I don't know if he's going through like a mental breakdown because his father just died.
And I don't know if he's coming to turns with the fact that his father was, you know, tied in with the CIA.
I don't know what's going on in Tucker Carlson's mind.
I don't know.
I don't know if he's having, you know, some kind of like mental breakdown, if he's getting late stage, you know, schizophrenia, right?
A lot of people develop these mental disorders late in life.
I'm not trying to be derogatory, you know.
I have family members who have schizophrenia.
It comes oftentimes at later stages in your life.
I'm not a psychiatrist, but there's something wrong.
Can we agree?
There's something very fucked up with Tucker Carlson.
He has really taken a deep, dark turn for the worse.
And I don't know if he's being funded, but we know he's being funded by Muslims.
I don't know if he's taking Qatari money.
We know that he's had Muslim investors.
We know that he's been traveling to the Middle East a lot.
I don't know what it is with Tucker, whether he's been completely bought out by Muslims and he's getting paid to say this.
But just like Candace is worth so much money through her marriage, unless they have some, you know, bulletproof prenuptial agreement, they have kids, right?
Makes it more complicated.
Tucker Carlson is worth more money now than he was when he was fired by Fox News.
He's worth like a billion dollars from his nicotine company and from his network, Tucker Carlson Network.
So what I don't understand is whatever happened to people just grieving and being silent and letting people have their gather their mental composure after losing somebody so tragically.
I mean, it's not normal.
This is not a normal way of grieving.
Generally speaking, I mean, we see Erica Kirk, of course, she pulled herself together and was able to deliver very touching remarks.
Yeah, amazing.
We wanted to hear from her, but she's gone quiet.
She's posting occasionally.
She's going through the steps of grieving.
That is grief.
Grief is not, oh, let me see how I can monetize my YouTube today by having 500,000 live viewers so that we can talk about whether or not Nets and Yahoo sent a sniper to murder Charlie Kirk.
It's just, there's something very distasteful about rich people making money off of their friend's body before it's even in the ground.
No, no, no, but it's especially more egregious given the fact that these people have the money to just go away for a week and shut the fuck up.
That's what I want to know.
I want you to go away and I want you to shut the fuck up for a week.
That's what I want.
I want you to go away and shut up.
I want you to be quiet and I want you to save your remarks for the speech.
Not because I want anything to be covered up.
I want you to have decency for the family.
I want you to have decency for the poor staff at TPUSA who are now being inundated with death threats and crazy people, followers of Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson online who are coming up with these insane theories.
You know, it's just like, why can't you just shut the fuck up and go away and grieve in normalcy?
Be a normal person.
It's like that meme, you know, with a woman shaking, shaking the why can't you be normal?
And I don't think people really realize that while they're doing this, they're making tons of money.
Like maybe you can explain this too, because I mean, I'm not able to monetize.
I mean, I have sponsors through Rumble, but in terms of like monetizing my content, aside from my subscriptions on X, I'm not monetized on YouTube or any of these other things.
So explain to people, because you know what it's like from being the editor-in-chief of National Pulse and also, I believe, Breitbart too, right?
And other publications too.
Just, and I'm not trying to talk to an audience that I think is dumbed down.
I don't think anybody's dumb.
I don't think that anybody watching is, you know, too dense to understand this, but I don't really think that people watching understand the gravity and the extent of this monetization.
Perhaps you can shed some context as a content creator and also as an editor-in-chief of a publication, like just how much money these news sites and how much money a website and how much money videos can be monetized.
You know, the national pulse relies on subscriptions to operate.
And we're, we are still to this day, especially because of our Wuhan lab coverage, especially because of our Peter Dashuk scoops with COVID and its origins.
My videos would get millions of views on X. Like if I go, when I confronted James Comey or something, that'd be like 20 million views, right?
Confronted Nikki Haley during the Iowa caucus.
I think that video got 47 million views, right?
If you have a video and I'm not able to post on YouTube, if I were to be posting that video, not on X, but instead on YouTube, and I were to get 1 million views, depending on my ad deal with YouTube.
And when I say ad deal, they assign certain ads to you and certain ads pay out higher CPMs.
Just like, you know, CPM for a website, same thing.
A video that gets a million views could bring in anywhere between $5,000 to $20,000 per video.
So if you have a daily show and you're clipping and you're making like 20 clips per show and you're posting each of those clips as a separate video and you have millions of subscribers and you're getting over a million views per little clip, not just episode, you could potentially be making upwards of $5 million a month on your YouTube channel.
I don't think people understand how much money some of these YouTubers are making.
Like Tim Poole makes an enormous amount of money on his YouTube channel, right?
Like, I don't think people understand how much money a single clip or a single episode is bringing in.
That's a lot of money.
Like 20,000 here, 20,000 there.
If you do 10 videos in a week and you're making $20,000 per video.
And if you do that every single year for years on end, I mean, every single day, excuse me, for years on end, that's what the monetization structure is.
And so these people have an advantage to say the most salacious, offensive shit out there because it's going to go viral.
Whether it's people who want to consume this dribble from Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson, or it's people like us who are looking at it like, can you believe these assholes just said this?
People are going to watch it and it's going to monetize and they're going to get rich.
No, seriously, for the stories that we've broken and the level of corruption that we've exposed and the terms that, you know, it's benefited the President of the United States – Like, that's the kind of reporting that you would get either a Pulitzer or you would get, I mean, and I'm not trying to sound fool of myself, just like the reporting I've done on my own, exposing all of the deep state actors at the Intel agency.
That's the kind of work that would warrant a presidential medal of freedom.
In a normal world where we weren't subjected to political bias.
The people that are fringe are now making millions of dollars a year spewing this bullshit, whether it's foreign money or whether it's organic, you know, monetized money.
While those of us who actually are doing real journalism and trying to preserve Western civilization have been told we're too extreme to be monetized.
Well, I hate to even have to bring it up because I just, this is, you know, this whole concept of like Christian grace and forgiveness.
It's why, you know, people will say, oh, well, you'll ever, you know, be a Christian.
It's why I'll never be a Christian.
You know, I'm not mocking anybody's faith, but I'll never be a Christian because I'm never going to give into this blind concept of forgiving your enemy and people that just say the most vile shit about you because, oh, you have to be a good, gracious, forgiving person.
I'm not about that life.
So, you know, I took a lot of heat because I was gracious, right?
I made the mistake of being gracious to Nick Fuentes.
I met Nick several years ago.
I've known Nick for like eight years or so, nine years.
And, you know, as somebody who was always subjected to cancel culture and censorship, I said, oh, it's wrong.
You know, he shouldn't be censored unless he's actually inciting violence, right?
There's a difference between free speech and incitement.
And I got a lot of heat for this because they're like, well, how could you defend a guy who's going around comparing the Holocaust to cookies?
How could you defend a guy who is, you know, saying all this shit about Jews as a Jew yourself?
And I was like, well, you know, I think that we need to rise above our personal feelings about issues and preserve free speech.
And it's important that we protect people's right to free speech outside of whether or not their speech is offensive.
And I, I, I really honestly felt this way.
And so I defended him.
I defended his right to free speech.
But I quickly realized, you know, it's not about free speech for Nick, right?
It's about, it's about manipulating relationships and it's about manipulating your influence or your access to people to tear people down.
And I realized that it didn't matter how nice you were to Nick or how gracious you were to him when he was being deplatformed or being debanked.
And, you know, he loves to go around with this whole shtick, I'm the most censored man in the world.
And, you know, I'm censored because of Jews.
And he'll, he'll go through this list of people who have been censored.
And I've noticed over the years, he would always leave me off the list.
Like he would never admit that I was censored.
He would never admit that Laura Loomer, who is a Zionist Jew, has been just as viciously as deplatformed as I was.
unidentified
And so that's when I just realized I was like, fuck this guy.
Is it his because he wants to perpetuate this lie that it's Jewish people who control the discourse in our political system in America and it's Jewish people who are leading the charge for cancel culture?
And if he were to be honest in that, I, as a Jewish woman, have been fighting just as hard for America first, that I have exposed mass migration, right?
I'm the one that got the Gaza visa shut down.
I'm the one that got the New York Times to do an entire spread on Haas, right?
Shining a light on Haias and everything that Haias was doing in the Darien Gap.
He doesn't want to admit this because it breaks and it shatters his entire narrative, his entire griff, which is his entire show, convincing people, radicalizing young men into thinking that all of their problems are because of Jews.
Every single problem that you have didn't get laid, blame a Jew, right?
Stepped in dog shit, blame a Jew.
Didn't get the job you wanted?
Blame a Jew.
Life sucks.
You fucked around.
You partied in school.
You didn't do anything.
And now you're a social reject and loser.
Blame Israel.
Like there's got to be some accountability.
And while I do agree that there's a lot of anti-white racism in America and, you know, there's a lot of censorship.
I, of course, have been subjected to it.
I'm 32 years old and I don't own a house.
And, you know, I'm not married.
I don't have a family yet.
I mean, soon, right?
But he's not the only person who has been afflicted by political persecution in America.
And I'm sick and tired of this narrative.
And quite frankly, the deliberate efforts to radicalize the youth in our country and to demonize an entire subset of people, Jewish people, to demonize an entire country, Israel, to demonize Donald Trump, to go around and tell people, don't vote for Donald Trump, vote for Kamala Harris, don't support Donald Trump.
Oh, we'd be better off today if Kamala Harris was in the White House.
You know, things like this, right?
I wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt, but then he just did this hard left pivot during the election season.
He was telling people not to support Trump.
He's been bashing President Trump every step of the way of the second Trump administration.
And I just realized like nothing good is going to come from me continuing to be this principled person that I've always been in saying, oh, you know, I feel bad for him because he was silenced.
There's got to be some personal accountability for his own behavior, right?
If you actually have been silenced and you actually have been censored, then you have an opportunity to actually bring people over.
But when you continue to push lies, when you continue to push conspiracies about the Jews in Israel, right?
You're doing it to yourself.
He has free speech.
He makes like $5,000 a night on his fucking super chats on his show.
He has just as much access to social media as I do.
X. That's it.
I'm not on YouTube.
I don't have access to YouTube.
I have Rumble and I have X, the same exact thing he has, but he's so aggrieved.
He has to go out there and say that he's the most aggrieved person in this country and that nobody else aside from him, nobody else aside from Nick has been threatened, has been silenced, who has been debanked, who has been put on a no fly list.
I mean, like, I've been, I've had my gun rights taken away, you know, so I've been targeted as well.
He's not the only person in this country.
And I'm just sick of it.
I'm sick of it.
I'm sick of being nice to people that don't deserve the grace.
And that's really the God's honest truth.
I'm just sick of it.
And I'm sick too, of just like Candace and Tucker.
I mean, because I was nice.
I was nice.
And it backfired.
It backfired in my face.
Yeah, being nice never did anything to me.
It lost me a lot of money.
Okay, a lot of donations from donors who told me that I was a traitor to my people for being a Jew, for defending him and his right to free speech.
He was never grateful.
Do you think he ever said thank you once?
I'm the person who gave him the information regarding who showed up to his house and tried to kill him when somebody showed up at his house with a gun.
I'm the one who gave him the chats and access to the information showing who organized this hit on him to report to the FBI.
Did he ever say thank you?
No, never said thank you.
Never, never publicly, you know, said this and said, decided to demonize me and attack me on his show.
So I'm just sick of it.
If he wants to have his free speech, go have your free speech.
Go live your life, go make your money.
That's it.
But I'm, I'm, aren't you just sick and tired of people who claim to be aggrieved and they they they they they they pretend to be so oppressed.
Like, where exactly is the oppression?
Where exactly, where exactly is the you know, the hardship?
And it's because I've just come to realize how many people I truly hate in this movement.
And I'm not trying to, I'm not trying to be malicious, but but this is not the same movement that I signed up for 10 years ago.
It's been co-opted by grifters.
We have Megan Kelly running around, pretending like she's like the mommy of the movement when she Trump over and tried to derail his entire presidency, like thinks that she can just storm on in and you know, dictate, oh, well, who, who's allowed to have a voice?
And oh, who's allowed to come on my show?
And oh, who's who's actually a credible voice for MAGA?
It's like, bitch, sit down.
You literally tried to destroy President Trump.
You literally tried to destroy our movement that we have today.
And I know this is going to sound like a therapy session, but I am so sick of all the grifters and the people who never really put any skin in the game, who now want to co-opt this movement for their own.
They want to turn it into like the modern day Hitler youth.
That's basically what it's turning into.
And we have to draw lines in the sand.
We have to have moral clarity and say this is not the movement that Donald Trump started.
Everybody knew that Donald Trump was, you know, what he was all about, right?
He was campaigning against Islam.
He was campaigning for saving Western civilization.
Before he was running for president, he was constantly speaking out about attacks in Israel.
He was constantly speaking out about the rise of Islamic terrorism.
And now you have these bad actors on the right who want to pretend like Donald Trump wasn't who he always was and always said he was.
Today, when he was in the UK with Kierstarmer, he goes, A lot of people want to move on from October 7th, but I can't forget what happened on October 7th, right?
People want to pretend like we don't have, like you said before, they want to pretend like the shit isn't happening in our own country.
This isn't about October 7th in Israel.
This isn't about Israel.
This is about the homegrown terrorism, domestic and foreign, that is happening here in America, the radicalization happening here in America.
And Israel, for people like Tucker and Candace and Nick, has become even Megan Kelly in some instances, has become a scapegoat, has become a delusional way of avoiding talking about the real political influence and the real political movement here in America to radicalize American youth,
to spread Islamic terrorism, to spread transgender terrorism, to spread radical left violence, and to really honestly destroy our country with what is known as the Red-Green Alliance.
And I'm just sick of it.
I don't know what this party is going to look like because it seems like our movement is being co-opted and being taken over by these shameless fucking grifters.
That's what they are.
They are shameless grifters.
And maybe that is going to sound unhinged to some people.
I don't really care because I've had enough.
I don't know if I want to continue after President Trump.
I don't.
I don't know what my life is going to look like after President Trump because I don't want to preserve a group of people who want to suck the life out of the MAGA movement to pervert the MAGA movement and to pervert the true intention of the MAGA America First agenda and to tarnish President Trump's legacy with their delusions of grandeur, thinking that they are going to be the ones to carry on the torch for Donald Trump.
Donald Trump is the only one in our country.
Donald Trump is the only one on the right who is truly irreplaceable.
And it's time for people to understand that.
It's time for everybody to get their egos in check and to understand there probably isn't going to be an heir to President Trump.
There isn't really anybody who is going to carry on the torch or the mantle of the MAGA movement.
We are going to watch a bastardization of the MAGA movement.
We're already watching it before our eyes.
We're going to watch a hijacking of the MAGA movement by bad actors who just want to griff their way to the top so that they can satisfy and satiate their egos that just continue to grow on a daily basis.
Look, we should get into the conversation of what you bring us to an important point, what happens after President Trump, right?
And, you know, if Bannon were sitting here with us, he'd be like, well, it's a good thing you don't have to worry about that for another eight years or whatever it is, right?
Yeah, I look, the difference is I'm seven years older than you and I've lived on both sides of the Atlantic and I've just become a little bit more stoic about it.
You know, I used to, if you don't mind me saying, rant and scream about it too.
And so, you know, all of these people are plotting against each other right now.
And as soon as the midterms are over with, they're going to be all stabbing each other in the back, trying to put their fundraising committees together, everything else like that.
But however, you have to remember what, you know, for the average person sitting at home, what they want is a cabinet that does seem, at least seem united, right?
Like they elected a government to do a certain, they elected a man to put together a government to do a certain job.
And the DOJ under Pam Bondi and all of this stuff that's going on under the surface, and you might not see it in the newspapers right now, like people sitting at home might not even know what I'm talking about.
But, you know, you look at the HP merger, you'd look at Ticketmaster and Live Nation.
You know, these are big corporate monopolies that actually people wanted President Trump in there to break apart these big corporate monopolies that have discriminated against people like you for so long, simply for your politics or because you're Jewish or whatever it is, right?
We all know about everybody's background and where they were before they got their money, how they got their money, what they did to get their money, who they fucked over along the way, who they maybe fucked along the way.
And so it's sickening to me to watch certain people rise.
And when I say rise, I mean like, you know, not rise in terms of popularity, but rise up as a, you know, as like a hostile force to try to take over the MAGA movement.
They pretend to be so righteous and they pretend like they're doing this because they want to save President Trump, but they're rising up to hijack the movement to turn it into something dark.
Nobody's going to vote for the Republican Party if you have a bunch of Hitler youth running around.
Okay.
That's what it's turning into.
Nobody's going to vote for a Republican Party that doesn't send anybody to jail and doesn't care about political accountability for political violence.
Okay.
We're not going to have elections in this country.
We're going to turn into Mexico where candidates give speeches and they get a bullet to the head.
And every single day you hear a new story about a new town mayor getting assassinated.
I mean, that's where we're heading.
If we don't start to actually have the adults in the room rise up and say, all right, you know, there's some boundaries here.
This is the leader of the movement.
This is who decides what the movement does.
This is who establishes what the platform for the movement is.
And if you want to defect from that, well, you're not in the movement.
This isn't some big tent charity.
I hate to say it.
We're not.
And I don't, I don't really understand why people, you know, want to live in a big tent.
Okay.
This isn't a fucking third world country.
Okay.
I want to be in like a five-star hotel or a nicely, a nicely decorated estate.
It doesn't have to be a mansion, a comfortable home with some decent, tasteful decor.
I mean, what is this whole talk about?
Oh, we're going to live in a tent.
Okay.
We're not third worlders.
We're not savages.
We're not cavemen.
We don't, we don't, we don't, we don't aspire to to live in a tent or describe ourselves as a tent.
And I'm not saying it should be like a country club where you have establishment elitists controlling the levers of power, but there do need to be some standards.
I'm sorry, but letting these lunatics rant and rave, they have their right to rant and rave all they want.
But is that really what we want people thinking is the public face of our party?
I mean, you know, people swanning around, you know, pro-abortion chicks swanning around in midtown Manhattan throwing parties and calling them make America hot again parties.
It's like that is not a movement that the rest of the country is going to want to support.
You are selling out your principles.
In many cases, they have no principles in the first instance.
We have people that hold us accountable for that sort of thing.
And, you know, not to say that you can't, not to say that we don't believe in the power of, you know, people's speech online, but for God's sake, understand the difference between a content creator who's out there for your click versus somebody who's trying to do this for the right reason to get you the actionable information you need, you know, when you need it.
Like as soon as it's humanly possible, as soon as it's humanly collaboratable.
I mean, when we let's bring it back to Charlie for a second, when I heard from my sources, you know, very close to Charlie that he had passed, I hit, I changed the headline on the article from Charlie Cook shot to Charlie Kirk assassinated.
And I reserved publishing it because I didn't know if his wife was there in the audience or if his wife was in Arizona.
I knew as soon as I saw the video that Charlie Kirk had died.
I know people I had been speaking with at Turning Point USA who knew and they had, I mean, the way it went down, from my understanding, is that his wife was in Arizona and they, you know, they have a private jet.
And that's how they were able to get to Utah is the donor's private jet to, you know, so that they could get there.
were from my understanding picked up by Secret Service because the Trump administration allowed for Secret Service to escort them to the hospital.
And Charlie was dead.
And they were trying to contain the message so that the family and the wife could be notified first, but he died instantaneously.
As soon as the bullet hit him, he died.
And the surgeon was able to detect a tiny pulse, right?
But the surgeon had said, and there was a guy last night, forget his name, who was in the car.
He says that he was in the car with Charlie and he was doing CPR on him in the car on the way to the hospital.
And he said his eyes had already, he was gone.
He was dead in the car.
And as soon as the bullet hit his neck, it pierced his spinal cord.
It tore through it.
And whether he had a pulse or not, he was brain dead.
And they said that even if, you know, he had been able to have a pulse and didn't lose as much blood, he would have been brain dead and paralyzed.
And so, you know, you, you had, I know exactly what you're talking about too.
They're like, oh, good news.
He's being stabilized right now and they're giving him blood.
Like you don't survive a shot.
I knew as soon as I saw the video from the side angle that Charlie Kirk had died.
Look, I understand why a lot of people out there have a trepidation towards people who are slightly more inclined to doing things in an old-fashioned journalistic way.
Whether that standard is not myself or Laura Luma, if you're watching this or if it's somebody else that you trust in, but remember, remember what the profit motive is for a lot of these people who are just trying to get your clicks.
And it just seems like this influencer culture and the way that it's, and I'm not throwing the Trump administration under the bus when I say this, but in a sense, the Trump administration, and this is one thing that I'll say that is critical, but I do believe this to be true.
And I don't care.
You know, people can get mad at me for saying this all they want.
The Trump administration has kind of, and I'm going to get heat for saying this, degraded what it means to be an independent journalist because they said that they wanted to support independent journalism And they wanted to welcome the new media seat, but most of the people who they've invited to take this new media seat, they're not really journalists.
They're people who maybe can say a few nice things for people in the admin.
I mean, they've invited people.
They invited one influencer who was going around saying that the Jews were running pedophile tunnels in New York City, right?
To go sit in this influencer briefing.
So it's kind of like a disrespect to the actual field of independent journalism, right?
It's a degradation of and a bastardization of what it means to be a true reporter because if everybody can now be a reporter, and I believe that you can, everybody can practice citizen journalism.
Everybody can, you know, take that role of a citizen journalist.
But when you get a White House press pass or, you know, you are elevated to the press room within the White House, you know, when I see influencers who get community noted more than they are actually right, sitting in the White House press room, and yet reporters like you and I are denied access to the White House press room because of, you know, whatever petty squabble somebody may have with us, it's concerning.
And it makes me wonder, like, what is the future of not just journalism, but also the future of the MAGA movement?
If half these people who are getting invited into the new media seat and half these people who are getting invited into the White House influencer room were like hardcore leftists six months ago.
Now they're trying to capitalize off of MAGA and Maha.
Like, what are we doing here?
Right.
What are we doing bringing these people into our movement?
And are we really going to allow such low-tier people to hijack and tarnish and destroy this movement that President Trump literally almost lost his life protecting and preserving, right?
I am worried.
I am terrified for what the legacy of President Trump is going to be because there are so many grifters who have now been welcomed into MAGA who are trying to, it's like a rat race, don't you think?
Like trying to vie for who's going to, who's going to control the narrative, who's going to be the top podcaster, who's going to be the top media personality post-Trump.
Why are all of the legacy media who lied, who frankly were responsible for the attacks on President Trump's life and the assassination of Charlie Kirk, if we're being totally honest?
The idea that I'm going to sit off to the side somewhere and ask you questions that I'm not going to get an answer to anyway, what a waste of time that would be for me.
And to her defense, I find Susie to actually be a very agreeable, kind woman.
She's always been very reasonable with me.
And I'll be honest with you, I've caught multiple people in the press room lying to my face multiple times.
And so, you know, I've been told, I've been told, you know, Susie Wiles went to the press room and said, give Laura Loomer and her staff press credentials.
And they told her, we'll do it.
Never did.
Ignored all my text messages.
So I actually would defend Susie Wiles, and I would say it's not Susie Wiles who's the problem, but it's, you know, it's the team of, there's a team of about, you know, six or seven people in the press shop, and a lot of them like to defy each other.
And, you know, they like to undermine each other with their petty squabbles.
They hired me four times and they wouldn't onboard me.
So it's the president of the United States who literally hired me four times.
So maybe I have witnessed insubordination at the highest levels.
I've witnessed insubordination against Susie Wiles, insubordination against President Trump, insubordination against other people as well who are in senior roles within the Trump administration.
And it's easy for people to attack people like Susie Wiles, but I will just say, you know, it's not Susie Wiles' job to issue out press credentials.
Like if Susie Wiles says, give a press credential to this person and then they say, okay, well, you know, I'm going to do it.
You're not going to get an argument from me, but I will say, I do find Susie Wiles to be a very nice person.
And I'm not attacking you for this.
I find a lot of people will use Susie.
And I'm not saying you're using her as a scapegoat.
But a lot of times, a lot of times online.
Yeah, because they're not going to say, Raheem, we don't like you, or we don't want to, you know, we don't want to have independent media because you're actually going to ask questions.
They all smile to my face and give me a hug when they see me.
And then they ignore my text messages when I'm at the wayhouse.
So look, it's, you know, goes both ways, right?
So all I'm saying is that it's a bit more complex.
We're going to continue this discussion, but before we continue, I want to take a moment to thank the sponsor of today's episode of Loomer Unleash, Kirk Elliott Precious Metals.
unidentified
Breaking news: Laura Loomer has been canceled.
The president of the United States has refused to take her phone calls as he suspects she is soon to be arrested.
Is Laura Loomer the most hated person on planet Earth?
We want to hear from you, the listener, and get your opinion on whether or not I tell you, I heard, I heard she got canceled.
Because I called Kirk Elliott Precious Metals and I learned how adding gold and silver to my portfolio is one of the safest ways to not just grow my finances, but to also protect them from the uncertainty of the future.
So I'm fine.
unidentified
Call economist Kirk Elliott at 720-605-3900 or schedule a call online at KEPM.com slash Loomer to learn how you can safely grow your retirement portfolio with precious metals.
And I guess my biggest worry is that, you know, his funeral service is going to be hijacked by these people pushing their own agendas.
I just hope they have enough shame and self-awareness to not use the actual memorial service to push their grotesque conspiracy theories and their talking points.
But, you know, it's a lot for people to think about.
And I think that you and I are kind of in the same boat and that, you know, we want to support President Trump and I'm fully committed to serving out the rest of this term.
But I really honestly don't know what the next three and a half years after, you know, after Trump is going to look like because I have yet to see anybody inspirational enough or principled enough to inspire me to fight as hard as I fought for President Trump to fight for them.
And it's going to be a test for the MAGA movement to see whether or not the MAGA movement is really going to survive after these next three and a half years or if people's greed and their desire to, you know, protect their self-preservation more than the preservation of our country and our values and President Trump's America First agenda, it's going to be a battle between what people think is more important.
So I appreciate you sharing your moral clarity on this issue.
But I was going to say, you know, the only thing that sort of changed about you is that I think you have become more important than ever before in this movement.
I think a lot of people will be listening to you talking about taking maybe a step back from it in a couple of years and lamenting that.
What I have to say to them, though, it's, you know, these are these, we live pretty thankless lives in the jobs we do.
And it's not like either of us particularly needs thanks, but once in a while, a slap on the back is so especially if you can be shot and killed by a sniper for doing this type of work.
I mean, it puts it into a whole new perspective when, you know, one of your own gets assassinated for simply having a conversation.
It's not like he was engaged in anything violent or, you know, engaged in any kind of conflict.
It's not like it was a carjacking or any kind of like really tragic, you know, like I was certainly tragic, but you know what I'm saying?
Like it wasn't some one-off incident, like, oh, he was in the south side of Chicago or D.C. and he got carjacked and, you know, got mugged and shot and killed by some thug.
He was assassinated doing what he loved.
He was assassinated next to a table full of hats that said make America great again in 47.
He was assassinated in the most barbaric and tragic way possible.
And it's a reminder of how you could literally be killed doing this work.
And, you know, it's not that I'm afraid to do this type of work, but if there are going to be people that want to hijack this movement and co-op this movement for the sake of their own personal enrichment and their own personal gain, as opposed to doing what's best for our country and the MAGA movement, then I don't know.
I don't know if I want anything to do with it after Trump.
My loyalty is to Trump.
My loyalty is not to the Republican Party or any of these other Yahoos and, you know, big tent politics who think that if only you'd be old enough by the next election, then we could just run you.
I know, actually, you're not the first person to say, oh, you should run.
But honestly, I don't know.
You couldn't really pay me to be president.
It's such a thankless job.
And, you know, I look at President Trump, who gets so much shit every single day.
And it's like he could just be playing golf in Scotland.
He could be, you know, at any of his resorts doing whatever, but he's fighting the good fight for our country.
And I don't know.
Maybe you see it.
Maybe, maybe I'm blind to it.
But I don't see anybody who has that level of sacrifice and that level of fight in them.
President Trump is truly irreplaceable.
And I'm afraid that the MAGA movement, and I'm going to, I know this is going to be controversial to say, I am afraid that the MAGA movement might just die when President Trump is no longer in office.
Because who, and maybe somebody will pop up, I don't know, maybe we'll see a miracle.
Who has what it takes to carry on the MAGA movement with integrity?
And yeah, you can read all of our work at thenationalpulse.com and just type into whatever social media platform you use, Raheem Kassam, R-A-H-E-E-M-K-A-S-S-A-M, and I'll pop up all over the place.
And I will say, I know it's been about 10 years or so about, right?
Maybe more, maybe less.
I don't know.
But I do think that your book, No Go Zones, is now extremely more relevant with the Islamification and the actual implementation of Sharia law in places like Texas.
And now people are waking up.
They used to call us kooks and crazy when we said that Sharia law was here in the West.
But if you are now starting to wake up to the threat of Islam and you're sick and tired, if you have Palestinian fatigue like Raheem and I have, if you have Palestinian fatigue and you want to learn about these no-go zones and the Islamification, I highly recommend you read Raheem's best-selling, wasn't it New York Times bestseller, right?
It was New York Times best-selling book, No Go Zones, right?
I couldn't tell you just how much stick I got for writing that book, how many threats I got, you know, all of it, but every single part of it has borne out.
Yeah, I might stop by for dinner because the food is so good.
So good.
Might stop by again.
But thanks for coming by and we will see you again.
Thank you.
We talked about ways that we can defund the radical left and crack down on the radical left and how President Trump has designated Antifa now as a terrorist organization.
But we still have this problem of some of the most radical Democrats of all occupying space within the halls of Congress.
And we've been documenting this extensively at Loomer Unleashed.
So my next guest joining me now to discuss the plague of radical left violence and the normalization and glorification of political violence and assassination culture in the halls of Congress is Charles Downs, my amazing Loomer Unleashed DC correspondent.
Like it was the most eye-opening week I think I've ever seen on Capitol Hill, to be completely honest with you.
None of the Democrats wanted to condemn violence.
So what they kind of did after the horrific assassination is a lot of them obviously put out statements like, oh, we condemn or we condone or whatever they say.
But then when you actually put a video camera in your face and asking questions like, hey, should Antifa be designated a terrorist organization?
They get really uncomfortable and laugh.
And I'm sure everyone saw that video of me and the nice lady from Michigan, Rashida Talib.
And Laura, as you were just recording your show, I was actually watching Rashida's hearing that just wrapped up.
And you won't believe what you just said.
She just said the United States of America under President Trump is experiencing a fascist takeover.
In the fight for civil rights, we can't be passive right now.
So don'tbody over there should take anything we say seriously, you know, like so personally as if we're attacking them.
No, we're attacking a process.
We're not attacking people here.
And I think it's really important.
We need to stand up against this.
Fascist takeover.
That's not a bad word.
It's a fact.
And here in D.C. and across the country, it is so incredibly important, Mr. Chair, that this committee does not allow rhetoric that defames or paints Washington C in a way that you all haven't really truly seen.
You're just reading it.
No, you're just reading it or something off of some.
Mish, you better hold yourself accountable, homeboy.
That's that like that Jasmine Crockett, ghetto bitch, ghetto fabulous, Shaniqua accent.
Let's go rewind.
We just have to show the absolute incivility and savageness of, I mean, look, I have to say, this is what happens when you allow for Muslims to hold office in America.
Muslims seem to have a defect.
And I know I'm going to get in trouble for saying this.
I don't really care anymore.
There is a defect with the Islamic population, whether people want to admit it or not.
You may think that it's a discriminatory thing to say.
You may think that it is a mean thing to say.
You may think that it's a bigoted thing to say.
If it's true, it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter how it makes you feel if it's true.
Every single Muslim who has ever been elected to office in the United States of America has one thing in common.
They're anti-American.
They have something else in common too.
They refuse to assimilate to our way of life.
Every single Muslim who serves in the United United States Congress or holds office in America today has some type of tie to a domestic or foreign Islamic terrorist organization.
It's a fact.
Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, Steve Ellison, Andre Carson, we have video of them refusing to condemn it.
And so when you look at just the absolute uncivilized, savage manner in which people like Rashida Tlaib behave in Congress, like screaming at the top of her lungs, trying to incite violence, knowing that the word fascist is what got Charlie Kirk assassinated by a tranny.
You have to ask yourself, how much longer are we going to tolerate the presence of Muslims in the Congress?
How much longer are we going to tolerate Muslims holding office and holding positions of power in our government before we have a serious conversation, either as a country or as the Republican Party, you know, separately from the country and the Democrats are not willing to join us in this conversation for the sake of protecting our national security about the threat that Muslims pose to our way of life.
I mean, how much more are we going to tolerate these people co-opting our institutions before action is taken by our elected officials or our law enforcement enforcement agencies to mass deport non-citizen Muslim populations from America and to censure the Muslims currently serving in Congress because of their promotion and their affinity of Islamic activity in America that is inherently pro-carrow.
I mean, we need to have that conversation.
I don't really care if people find it to be bigoted or they find it to be discriminatory.
Muslims should not be allowed to hold office in our country.
There's been a lot of discussion about faith this week, about American values, Judeo-Christian values.
Yes, the values that Charlie Kirk was preaching were Christian values, right?
He often talked about preserving the Judeo-Christian values of Western civilization.
Okay.
Notice you don't ever see a Muslim talking about preserving the Judeo-Christian values.
They don't ever take their oath of office on a Bible.
They take their oath of office on the Quran because their goal is using their political power and their access to our institutions to advance the cause of Islam.
Do we have the clips of Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib?
Let's go ahead and just play the clip of Charles confronting Ilhan Omar this week after she retweeted a video accusing Charlie Kirk of being a terrorist after he was killed.
Just to show you, just, again, another example.
I don't know how many examples we need to show you before people realize we need to have a no-Muslim policy, right?
I know this was originally described as an Islamic travel ban, as in a ban on certain countries.
We need to elevate that conversation to a no-Muslim elected official policy.
Okay.
We should not allow for Muslims to hold office in our country.
They do not share the same philosophical worldview as your typical American citizen.
They do not share the same ideological viewpoint and have the same framework as our founding fathers did when they thought of the vision of America and what it meant to preserve constitutional republic, democracy, our way of life here in America.
Our values, our constitution, our Bill of Rights is derived from the Bible.
So there really is a serious argument to be made in this country to have a no-Muslim policy when it comes to the electoral makeup of our Congress, the House, and the Senate.
I mean, it's really honestly becoming such a problem.
The most dangerous and radical and problematic members of Congress who are creating the biggest domestic and also foreign terror threat, setting us up for attacks from proxies, setting us up from attacks from people like Code Pink and these tranny terror cells and these Iranian proxy terrorist cells in Hamas and Hezbollah, it is the Muslim members of Congress.
I think it's important to point out too that some people on the right are like, oh, Talib and Omar are crazy.
They're not like normal Democrats.
No, everybody.
Democrat Party leadership, starting with brother Hakeem Jeffries himself, he never holds these people accountable.
And honestly, it's kind of remarkable how Rashida Tlaib can run around the halls of Congress, say whatever policy she wants, any crazy policy, go give crazy speeches.
And Hakeem defends her every time.
Look it up.
Literally, every time Rashida does something nuts or Ilhan does something nuts, Brother Hakeem's up there screaming racism, saying, oh, Ilhan and Rashida, they're not wrong.
MAGA's wrong.
MAGA's the problem.
MAGA this, MAGA that.
So a lot of people need to wake up that Democrat Party leadership is responsible.
And I think they enjoy empowering people like Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib.
And I tell people, it's my personal belief that Rashida runs the House Dems along with AOC and Crockett because for whatever reason, whatever AOC, Crockett, and Rashida want, that's what the House Dems produce.
Like, look at it.
Look at all their crazy policies.
that then every Democrat starts to embrace.
It's disgusting.
It's actually kind of remarkable to watch.
And looking at the Ilhan Omar video is a little funny.
I guess it's not really fun.
He's kind of messed up.
Story about all this.
So Ilhan, how we kind of confronted her was we were supposed to kind of confront her outside her committee hearing, but she was skipping those, right?
So basically, Democrat Party leadership was helping Ilhan, like running cover for her, telling her, oh, don't come to the committee hearings.
We won't hold you accountable for skipping your committee hearings, which by the way, that's a disgusting thing for the people of Minnesota.
They don't get represented at these important committee hearings because Democrat Party leadership allows Ilhan Omar to skip them so she doesn't have any blowback from the press.
So Ilhan skips the committee hearing and I'm like, okay, she skipped.
How are we going to get her?
And there's a lot of press outside, like waiting for her too.
So I kind of run down the house office building stairs because I don't want any of the media to follow me.
And then I run back up to her office on like the ninth floor.
So I finally run up to the ninth floor.
I'm out of breath.
And I'm like, hey, I'm just going to stand outside her office.
And this is like a shot in the dark.
Maybe this will work.
Maybe it won't.
Five minutes later, I kid you not.
Ilhan Omar comes walking down the hallway.
And that's how we get her.
But what's funny is Nancy Mace is Ilhan Omar's like congressional neighbor.
So after we confront Omar, Nancy, I think Nancy Mace is like campaign accounts.
Nancy Mace yesterday had a resolution to try to remove her from the committees and to censure her.
And the Republicans, four Republicans, actually stopped it.
So again, when we talk about accountability, usually it's the Republicans that get in the way of Republicans getting accountability in the aftermath of acts of political violence, which is why nothing ever changes.
And so we're going to talk about that as well.
But going to this point, Ilhan Omar doesn't want to answer any of these questions.
So do we have the video?
Let's go ahead and play the video clip so that people can just see this dynamic for themselves because right before or right after you confronted her, Nancy Mace ended up having the floor vote to try to censure Ilhan Omar and remove her from her committees for trashing Charlie Kirk, mocking the assassination of Charlie Kirk and sharing a video that called him a terrorist after he was assassinated.
Will you apologize for resharing a video right after Charlie Cook's assassination calling him a terrorist?
Will you apologize, Congresswoman?
Like Laura, the funny part, after we took that video, obviously the video itself isn't funny, super serious, But the funny part is after the video, Ilhan Omar started talking, tweeting, actually, you can look at these ex-posts at Nancy Mace saying, oh, you're the worst neighbor ever, yada, yada, yada.
And a lot of people on Hill told me Ilhan Omar believes, and this isn't true, I found her myself.
Ilhan Omar believes Nancy Mace told us when she'd be walking down a hallway and the whole feud just kind of blew up from there.
So yeah, you guys should check out Ilhan's ex-account.
It's also important to note, too, that where we confronted Tlaib, that area echoes very loudly.
So there's no way that Code Pink people didn't hear me say Antifa like four times before she walked over.
She heard and she knew what we were asking.
And I think that's so eye-opening.
And that's kind of why a lot of people are like, oh, why don't you like keep going?
That's kind of why I let it happen because I wanted people to see like, hey, look, we're pressing her hard.
And by the way, when Medea came over and bailed her out, you could tell I asked a question, asked it again, and she did her little like spiel to get out of it.
She's like, answer mine.
I answered hers and I go, answer mine.
And then right after I literally say, answer mine, I answered yours, the cold pink people literally come over and grab her.
And that's not eye-opening enough to see the, I guess, alliance between Antifa and the jihadists.
I don't know what else is.
And if you can't see that there's an alliance there from that video, then I'm sorry.
You're just hopeless.
You don't understand the threat that we're facing on the right and as Americans.
Well, Nancy Mason understands the threat, which is why she filed a resolution to try to censure Ilhan Omar, but unfortunately it was blocked by four Republicans.
Mr. Speaker, pursuant to clause 2A1 of Rule 9, I rise to give notice of my intent to raise a question of the privileges of the House.
The form of the resolution is as follows, House Resolution 713, censuring Representative Ilan Omar of Minnesota and removing her from the Committee on Education and Workforce and the Committee on the Budget.
Whereas Charlie Kirk was a lifelong advocate for freedom of speech, civil political discourse, and the political engagement of youth.
Whereas Charlie Kirk was a man of deep faith, a husband, and a father to two young children.
Whereas on September 10th, 2025, Charlie Kirk was assassinated on the campus of Utah Valley University while exercising his First Amendment right to freedom of speech.
Whereas on September 11th, 2025, one day after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, Representative Alan Omar gave an interview on Zatayo's town hall with Mehdi Hassan, in which she smeared Charlie Kirk and implied he was to blame for his own murder.
Whereas on September 12th, 2025, two days after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, Representative Alan Omar reposted a video on X, formerly known as Twitter, which disparaged the character of Charlie Kirk and those mourning his death.
Whereas the video Representative Alan Omar reposted on X states Charlie Kirk is dead.
And before the body got cold, the far right propped his corpse up as a cudgel for their holy war.
Whereas the video Representative Alan O'Marr reposted on X further states, don't be fooled.
These people don't give a single shit about Charlie Kirk.
They are just using his death to further their Christo-fascist agenda.
Whereas the video Representative Alan Omar reposted on X further states Charlie Kirk was a reprehensible human being.
He enacted his political agenda by preying on weak-minded people.
He took complex socioeconomic issues and simplified them by pointing fingers at outgroups, demonizing those groups, and seeking his massive following on them.
Whereas the video Representative Elon Omar reposted on X further states Charlie Kirk was a stochastic terrorist, an adamant transphobe.
He denied the genocide happening in Palestine.
He believed the subjugation of women, and in his last dying words, he was spewing racist dog whistles.
Whereas the video Representative Alan Omar reposted on X further states, Charlie Kirk was Dr. Frankenstein, and his monster shot him through the neck.
Whereas the video Representative Elon Omar reposted on X further blames Charlie Kirk for his own murder.
Whereas clause one of Rule 13 of the Rules of the House of Representatives provides a member, delegate, resident commissioner, officer, or employee of the House shall behave at all times in a manner that shall reflect credibility on the House.
Whereas Representative Alan Omar's actions in the wake of the assassination of Charlie Kirk are reprehensible and affect the dignity and integrity of the proceedings of the House and do not reflect the credibility on the House.
Now therefore be it resolved that Representative Ilan Omar of Minnesota be censured.
Representative Alan Omar forthwith present herself in the will of the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure.
Representative Alan Omar be censured with the public reading of this resolution by the Speaker and Representative Alan Omar B and is hereby removed from the Committee on Education and Workforce and removed from the Committee on the Budget of the House.
And if you want to see the video that she reposted, let's go ahead and play clip number 11 so that you can see the video posted by Omar calling Charlie Kirk a terrorist.
unidentified
Charlie Kirk's dead and before his body got cold, the far right propped his corpse up as a cudgel for their holy war.
I've never seen more people within the same sentence both condemn political violence and then immediately call for political violence against their opposition.
Don't be fooled.
These people don't give a single shit about Charlie Kirk.
They are just using his death to further their Christo-fascist agenda.
And before I continue, I need to say that this revisionist history about who Kirk was is just as perplexing.
I'm seeing all these heartfelt statements coming from Democratic politicians and celebrities applauding Kirk as some bastion of free speech and debate.
Kirk was a reprehensible human being.
He enacted his political agenda by preying upon weak-minded people.
He took complex socioeconomic issues and simplified them by pointing fingers at outgroups, demonizing those groups, and then sicking his massive following on them.
He was a sarcastic terrorist, an adamant transphobe.
He denied the genocide happening in Palestine.
He believed in the subjugation of women, and with his last dying words, he was spewing racist dog whistles.
Charlie Kirk was Dr. Frankenstein, and his monster shot him through the neck.
And all of that said, none of us should want to live in a society where these types of killings become the norm.
It's the sign of a sick and dying world, and we can both denounce this violence and also realize that Kirk and his ilks rhetoric are why it happens.
And you can see this rhetoric continuing after his death.
Far-right extremists are clogging social media, practically begging to use his death as an excuse to enact massive retributory violence against Democrats or liberals or leftists.
They are looking for any excuse to justify their desire to kill their opposition.
As of writing this, we have no idea why Kirk was shot, yet the fucking president of the United States is already using this as an opportunity to demonize his opposition.
The hypocrisy is astounding and terrifying in how callous and calculated it is.
These same folks begging for blood were silent when Democratic leader of the Minnesota House Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark were assassinated in their homes.
The president gave remarks from the Oval Office about Kirk's murder and said nothing about the three kids shot in a high school in Denver yesterday.
Republican commentators are outraged that people would make light of Kirk's death and laugh their asses off at Nancy Pelosi's husband being beaten with a hammer and still to this day mock the death of George Floyd.
And the reason is they don't actually give a fuck about the violence.
They don't care about Kirk's death.
The only thing they care about is winning, about using this situation as leverage to further their political agenda of turning this country into a Christo-fascist authoritarian state.
And the Democrats, by normalizing Kirk and cosplaying norms, are allowing them to cling to this martyr narrative.
The only thing that matters to these people is ensuring that the fictitious world they've created is the one that dominates, and they will hang the corpse of Charlie Kirk on their banner if it means that they'll win.
And now we're finding out that there's all these people that knew about the shooting beforehand and after the fact and didn't report him to the police because they were all talking about it in a Discord channel.
So we do know the motive, but Ilhan Amar likes to promote this type of radical left rhetoric.
She supports the trannies.
She supports, you know, all of these degenerate movements on the left that are incapable of living in a society with free speech because they don't know how to control their emotions because they have mental illness.
And they've been told that they're special and that they deserve to be celebrated for their mental illness.
And they've been told that, yes, there's other genders out there.
Yes, you can be a woman.
Yes, you can be a man.
When really we just need to reopen the mental institutions for all of these fucking freaks who think that they can go around pretending like, you know, they're a man or a woman when they're not.
Well, and I'm not advocating for suicide, but like, why don't these people just kill themselves instead of killing others?
Like, if you hate yourself that much because you're trans and you feel like nobody's going to accept you, and I'm not advocating for suicide, but like, wouldn't it just be a lot easier to kill yourself instead of killing other innocent people?
Like, I am not advocating for suicide.
I wish these people would go get mental health care.
But don't you think it's a little weird how they have to, like, surely Tyler Robinson knew that he was either going to get shot or he was going to get arrested and thrown in jail for the rest of his life.
Like, if you're going to throw your life away, why not just throw your own life away instead of throwing other innocent people's life away?
So I don't understand it.
Like, that just shows you that it truly is a mental illness, right?
Because a lot of times, like, the shooters end up killing themselves.
In this case, the shooter tried to make a run for it and was on the run for a couple of days.
But most of these trannies that end up shooting up schools, they shoot themselves in the head while, you know, they're carrying out their rampage.
But like, they clearly want to kill themselves.
So my point is, is, you know, there is never a discussion about like why these people haven't just killed themselves instead of going on a murderous rampage and killing others.
Like, why make it a murder-suicide when you could just make it a suicide?
It must be the drugs because nothing for the life of God, for the love of God, I will never understand why somebody who commits suicide wants to take other people out with them.
Like, again, I'm not advocating for suicide, okay?
I know that it's not moral to push people to kill themselves.
And I don't encourage anybody to kill themselves.
But if you are trying to kill yourself or you wake up one day and you want to kill yourself and you want to go out with a bang and kill other people before you kill yourself, like.
Right?
Like, what is the point of killing other innocent people?
If you're that unhappy to the point where you want to kill yourself, you should probably go get some psychiatric care.
Go see a professional so that you don't kill yourself.
But if you can't help yourself and you do want to kill yourself, like, again, I don't understand why they don't just kill themselves instead of killing others.
It's, it's a conversation that I think that we need to have.
And again, it's part of the psychosis.
It's part of the disorder.
It's part of the imbalance that's created when you pump your body full of these hormones, right?
You, you don't just become suicidal, but you also become murderous, right?
And I'm not saying that Tyler Robinson was taking trans hormones, right?
He was dating a tranny and he clearly was smart.
Like his parents said that he was smart.
He was no dummy.
He was capable of comprehending things, right?
He just decided that he was going to kill Charlie Kirk because he thought Charlie was hateful.
But there's no denying the trans connection.
He himself was not trans, but he was certainly involved in a sexual romantic relationship with a tranny and a furry.
And there's something to be said about that because if you're willing to date a tranny, in my opinion, you're just as mentally ill as the tranny.
Also, isn't it crazy how Candace Owens never talks about Lehon Omar and her little, oh, Israel killed Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories?
Isn't it so eye-opening that the biggest Hamas sympathizer in Congress reshared a video calling Charlie Kirk a terrorist because Charlie Kirk took Israel's side over Hamas.
And then like going back, I wanted to say this part about the trans drugs real quick.
I grew up a sports fan.
I love baseball.
The steroid era when I was a little kid, I don't know how to say this right.
I loved watching baseball during the steroid era, even though all those people were juiced up, right?
But if you read Jose Conseco's biography, he's one of the baseball players.
If you guys don't know sports, who got caught basically doping, he talks about how the testosterone, the HGH, the estrogen, yes, baseball players had to use estrogen when they were taking testosterone to mask that they were taking testosterone.
He basically writes, like, these drugs give you like a 24-7 high and they get addicted.
Barry Bonds' head, if y'all rejuiced, grew like three times one baseball offseason.
He came back and was like, how did his head get so big?
Barry Bonds' feet grew.
And there's a really famous, I guess, fight clip from the steroid era in baseball.
It was the Boston Red Sox versus the New York Yankees.
I believe Roger Clemens is pitching.
He says he didn't use steroids.
Other people say he did.
Long story short, he gets so angry, he throws a baseball at Alex Rodriguez's head.
Another guy who got caught using steroids says he didn't, but a lot of people think he did.
A-Rod then takes the bat and charges the mound and starts swinging at Roger Clemens.
This is an actual, like, look this up.
Red Sox Yankees fight.
I believe it's 2004.
A full-blown Roy rage.
So these drugs cause professional athletes who get paid millions of dollars a year to keep their bodies tone, but they can't control themselves and they're on these drugs.
And there's literal video evidence proving this.
But yes, let's give the same drugs to America's youth who aren't professional athletes.
It's safe for them, but not for professional athletes.
Social media, whatever the, whatever the FBI wants to call them, these not violent or these nihilistic, violent extremists.
So yes, it's a good comparison because you're right.
These types of hormones, any kind of hormone is going to destabilize your emotions and it's going to cause some kind of emotional imbalance or some kind of some kind of distortion for your normal emotional regulations.
And so whether you're taking these hormones or you're living with people, there's also a lot of science about how hormones and pheromones can be transmitted, right, through your skin and also through your bodily touch.
So in your hormones, if you're having sex with somebody, right?
Like they talk about pheromones, like people's pheromone connections and how it's their pheromones that cause them to have sexual attractions to each other.
They talk about women like having the same like menstrual cycle of their, you know, their pheromones match up because they ended up like spending so much time together.
So it's interesting, like what's the effect of spending time around somebody or being in a psychological, emotional, sexual relationship with somebody who is undergoing these hormones.
I mean, we don't know like if Tyler Robinson wanted to transition himself or if he was also talking about it or he was clearly gay, right?
Like having sex with a transgender, a man transitioning to a woman, you're clearly gay, right?
If you and his family said that he started to become more pro-gay and pro-trans.
So who knows?
I mean, maybe we're going to find out that he also was taking some kind of hormone.
We don't know.
But there is something to be said about these Democrats who like to say that there is no motive.
There is a motive and they will do anything.
They will keep on calling us fascists during congressional hearings.
They will keep on calling us racists.
They will keep on calling us terrorists.
They will do anything in their power if it means that they don't have to admit that they have inspired a generation of trans terrorists, of radical left Democrat terrorists.
And no, it's not nihilistic violent extremism.
It's Democrat violence.
It's assassination culture.
And it's 99.99% affiliated with the Democrat Party.
And going off that, Democrats in Congress, this is a little thing about baseball on a steroid era.
So when I was a kid, the thing that actually got me involved in politics was back in the day, I don't know if y'all remember this, when the professional baseball players like Mark McGuire and the best of the best, when we were all kids, they got called up to Congress to testify about their use of HDH, testosterone, and estrogen.
And obviously, all the baseball players lied to Congress and they're like, oh, no, we ain't used steroids, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Well, it comes out, obviously, a bunch of the players who testified use steroids, right?
And guess what happened to them?
The Congress tried to throw them in jail to set an example that these drugs are bad.
Now, fast forward, literally 15 years later, some of the same congressional Democrats, by the way, who chaired these committee hearings trying to throw professional baseball players in jail for using steroids, they're now advocating for trans people who aren't professional athletes to take the same drugs.
Now, that might be the most assigned thing I've ever heard, in my personal opinion.
The same people who said the drugs are too dangerous for the professional athletes and they're throwing them in jail are now trying to give them to your children.
That I think perfectly sums up the hypocrisy issue on the left, in my opinion.
Well, there's a lot of hypocrisy, and I'm sure that we're going to see it continue through these outrageous congressional hearings.
It's getting very heated.
It's getting very hot and heavy.
I'm sure that we're probably going to see more acts of political violence.
I don't think it's going to end with the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
And I'm sure that we're going to see more excuses, right, justifying the assassination of Charlie Kirk, like we've seen from the radical left, especially this weekend as everybody will be very emotional.
Tensions will be high as thousands of people flock to Arizona, Glendale, Arizona, for the memorial service of Charlie Kirk at the State Farm Arena.
And it's going to be interesting to see whether or not the media continues.
There's a lot of people that are getting canceled, a lot of people who are rightfully getting, you know, removed from their jobs, fired from their jobs, losing their show.
We saw Jimmy Kimmel yesterday got a show canceled for celebrating and glorifying assassination culture.
And so I will be in Arizona on the ground on Sunday for Charlie Kirk's memorial.
I will, you know, I don't want to say I'll be reporting live from the memorial because it's a memorial service, but I'm sure that, you know, I will give a debrief and I'm sure that, you know, a lot of media are going to be there as well.
I will be there to, you know, absorb the memorial, attend the memorial, pay my respects, but also, you know, to see the memorial in person.
And so since I'm going to be there, I'll be able to have an idea of how the radical left responds.
It will be interesting to see too if radical leftists tried getting tickets to sneak in so they could protest.
Especially I want to see you know if they're going to try to protest Charlie Kirk too.
That's going to be really disgusting if they try to do that.
So it's going to be really interesting to see what happens.
But with that, Charles, I want to thank you for all of your good work.
Keep up the good fight up on Capitol Hill, confronting all of these radical leftists.
Where do people follow you if they want to follow you on social media?
And we'll have a lot of, I guess, huge confrontations coming up because we all know the Democrats, someone's going to say something extremely awful and extremely stupid during Charlie Kirk's funeral.
Two to one odds, it's Elon Omar Rashida Talib.
And we all know it's going to be someone who's going to just say something so awful and you're just not going to back down.
And then we got Brother Hakeem.
He'll back them and be like, my members can say whatever they want.
Again, I want to thank Kirk Elliott Precious Metals for sponsoring tonight's episode of Loomer Unleashed.
Be sure that you check them out at kepm.com/slash Loomer.
Again, that's kepm.com/slash Loomer.
Or you, well, and the website too, they have a landing page.
If we want to get that landing page pulled up one last time for viewers to see, they've created a landing page for viewers of Loomer Unleashed.
You can contact them.
You can call them.
You can visit their website at the address listed above, kepm.com/slash loomer, or call their number at 720-605-3900.
Find out how you can invest in gold and silver today, diversify your portfolio, protect your financial future by investing in precious metals, gold and silver.