Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 23, 2025 - Loomer Unleashed - Laura Loomer

02:44:08

EP128: Iran's Nuclear Program Goes BOOM

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	There is a young female journalist, conservative journalist by the name of Laura Loomer.
	If America's men acted like Laura Loomer, our problems will be fixed in about five minutes.
	Chained herself to Twitter.
	She chained herself.
	Chained herself.
	Chained herself.
	sniff
	Good evening, and welcome to episode 128 of Loomer Unleashed.
	I'm your host, Laura Loomer.
	We are live right now on Rumble and X, so please be sure that you head on over to rumble.com slash Laura Loomer.
	Rumble.com slash Laura Loomer.
	Click the green follow button.
	Make sure that you download the Rumble app and then you can enable notifications on your phone so that you never miss an episode of Loomer Unleashed.
	Also, you can click the Get Loomered button and that will take you to my locals page where you can subscribe for $7 a month or $70 a year to support the broadcast and also the publication here at Loomer Unleashed.
	Also, we are live on X, so please be sure that you're following me on X at Laura Loomer and also on X at Loomer Unleashed.
	Lots to talk about tonight.
	Obviously, everybody is talking about the strike on Iran last night conducted by President Trump.
	Bravo to President Trump and our brave V2 pilots who dropped these bombs on Iran's three nuclear facilities.
	President Trump gave an address to the nation last night.
	We have his truth social post.
	We can pull his true social post up announcing this successful strike on Iran's nuclear facilities.
	He says, we've completed our very successful attack on the three nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordell, Nantaz, and Esfahan.
	All planes are now outside of Iran airspace.
	A full payload of bombs was dropped on the primary site of Fordelle.
	All planes are safely on their way home.
	Congratulations to our great American warriors.
	There is not another military in the world that could have done this.
	Now is the time for peace.
	Thank you for your attention to this matter.
	And there's been a lot of discussion, not just within the MAGA base, but just everyone in general as to whether or not this was the right decision to make.
	I personally think that it was the right decision to make.
	For some reason, there are a lot of conservatives online who voted for President Trump the first time, voted for President Trump the second time, and they're now falsely accusing him of being a wartime president.
	They're falsely accusing him of getting involved in another war when in reality, President Trump engaged in many military actions during his first term in office that didn't result in new wars.
	For example, he carried out an airstrike from Mar-a-Lago on Qasem Soleimani, an Iranian terrorist, killing him.
	He dropped a MOAB on terrorists from Afghanistan.
	He conducted strikes in Syria as a result of chemical attacks.
	He dropped bombs on al-Shabaab terrorists in Africa.
	I mean, there's many examples.
	Look at the raid on al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS, in which President Trump famously said he died like a dog.
	There are many acts of bombings, right?
	Attacks, airstrikes, whatever you want to call them, that have been carried out by the Trump administration during his first term.
	And now, you know, we're seeing this one in his second term.
	And ironically, a lot of the same people who are now coming out of the woodwork to attack President Trump, calling him a warmonger, calling him a neocon, saying that he broke his campaign promises.
	They were all cheering when President Trump killed Qasim Soleimani.
	These are the same people who were cheering when President Trump conducted airstrikes on al-Shabaab in Africa.
	These were the same people who cheered when President Trump conducted airstrikes on Russian contractors in Syria.
	These are the same people who cheered when President Trump hunted down the leader of ISIS and killed him.
	These are the same people who cheered when President Trump bombed the shit out of ISIS, as he promised he would do when he first ran for president and as he promised to continue to do.
	He effectively destroyed ISIS.
	So I just want to know where the hypocrisy is coming from.
	Just because you conduct a very coordinated strike, a very coordinated and strategic bombing on a location, you are making sure that there's no civilians who are targeted.
	You're solely targeting the nuclear facilities.
	I don't really understand why people are accusing President Trump of being a wartime president and dragging us into war when there's many examples of President Trump conducting very similar strikes.
	And all these people had no problem with it.
	They campaigned for him a second time around.
	Some of these people that weren't for Trump during his first term came around during the disastrous campaign of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris a second time around, and they said that they were endorsing and supporting President Trump.
	But, you know, if you've been following my ex account this week, then you see that there's more than meets the eye.
	What do I mean by that?
	Well, we already saw the FARA forms that I posted online that show that a lobbyist organized the interview, if that's even what you want to call it, between the prime minister of Qatar and Tucker Carlson.
	The lobbyist works for a company called Luminate Advisors, based out of Virginia, where they are paid $180,000 a month by Qatar to set up media and set up communications and interviews With conservative media personalities for the sake of influencing policy.
	So, Tucker Carlson obviously knew that he was engaged in Qatari propaganda when he agreed to do this interview.
	He flew all the way to Qatar, and the discussion during this interview, if that's even what you want to call it, I just call it straight up propaganda, Qatari propaganda, was the war in Iran.
	Now, what do we know about Qatar?
	We know that Qatar is funding Hamas and they're funding Hezbollah.
	They're funding these Iranian proxies.
	And why would Qatar be interested in having a well-known conservative podcaster, a well-known conservative media figure, used to work for Fox News before he was fired, curate propaganda for Qatar regarding Iran?
	Why would they want that?
	Why would Tucker Carlson agree to that if he was truly doing his job as a journalist?
	I'm a journalist.
	I do not take money from foreign governments to arrange meetings and interviews for the sake of influencing Americans into thinking more positively about another country.
	I'm a journalist.
	I don't have lobbyists telling me who to interview and arranging interviews for my show.
	That's not journalism.
	That is called propaganda.
	And it's also very deceptive.
	And not only is it deceptive, but it's un-American.
	And so I would just encourage a lot of you who are getting your news from Twitter, getting your news from social media to be very cautious about the sudden 180 that you're seeing from a lot of these so-called influencers and podcasters who have a anti-Trump tune all of a sudden out of the blue, who have over the years criticized the Iranian regime, who have stood with Israel, who have praised President Trump for being an anti-war president.
	Suddenly you're seeing a lot of these people shift their tune, shift their narrative, and they're attacking President Trump with falsehoods, saying that he's dragging us into war, saying that he's owned by Israel, saying things like he's a Jewish propagandist and that Israel controls our country.
	And yet, if you look at the things that some of these people like Tucker Carlson or Candace Owens or the Hodge twins or some of these other larger accounts online are saying, it was completely opposite several years ago to what they are saying now.
	And every single time I see people do such a pivot, I always ask, what changed, right?
	Are they being paid for these opinions?
	Are they getting paid to post?
	What is the real reason that their opinion has all of a sudden changed?
	Because President Trump hasn't changed.
	He's still the same guy who ran in 2016.
	He's still the same guy who ran in 2020.
	He's still the same guy who ran in 2024.
	President Trump has always promised that he was going to make sure Iran could not have a nuclear weapon.
	And so promises made, promises kept.
	And here we have President Trump's remarks.
	If you missed his remarks last night, it was very brief.
	It was about four minutes from the White House.
	And after he left the situation room, he gave these remarks at the White House with J.D. Vance and Pete Hegseth and Marco Rubio standing behind him.
	So let's go ahead and play the remarks for those of you who may have missed them because it's important for you to hear what President Trump said.
	Because as I said, there is a massive propaganda campaign going on right now.
	And I've never seen anything like this.
	I have never seen the amount of Russian, Chinese, and Iranian bot networks that are trying to, you know, convince people that the CCP is good, to convince people that the Iranian regime is good, to convince people that, you know, President Trump is owned by Israel.
	I have never seen so many bots.
	And how do I know they're bots?
	People will say, oh, well, how do you know these are bot accounts?
	Because it's not possible to make a post and then within 30 seconds of that post being live, having 500 comments that are all reiterating the same exact thing.
	Some of these posts are very long replies.
	It's not possible to type that fast and it's not possible for there to be 500 replies on a post within 30 seconds of a post being posted unless it is actively being attacked by bot networks.
	So let's go ahead and play President Trump's remarks.
	A short time ago, the U.S. military carried out massive precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime, Ford, Natans, and Isfahan.
	Everybody heard those names for years as they built this horribly destructive enterprise.
	Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror.
	Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success.
	Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.
	Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace.
	If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier.
	For 40 years, Iran has been saying, death to America, death to Israel.
	They have been killing our people, blowing off their arms, blowing off their legs with roadside bombs.
	That was their specialty.
	We lost over a thousand people, and hundreds of thousands throughout the Middle East and around the world have died as a direct result of their hate.
	In particular, so many were killed by their general, Qasem Soleimani.
	I decided a long time ago that I would not let this happen.
	It will not continue.
	I want to thank and congratulate Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu.
	We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before.
	And we've gone a long way to erasing this horrible threat to Israel.
	I want to thank the Israeli military for the wonderful job they've done.
	And most importantly, I want to congratulate the great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines tonight and all of the United States military on an operation the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades.
	Hopefully, we will no longer need their services in this capacity.
	I hope that's so.
	I also want to congratulate the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Raisenkaine, spectacular general, and all of the brilliant military minds involved in this attack.
	With all of that being said, this cannot continue.
	There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days.
	Remember, there are many targets left.
	Tonight's was the most difficult of them all by far, and perhaps the most lethal.
	But if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed, and skill.
	Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes.
	There's no military in the world that could have done what we did tonight, not even close.
	There has never been a military that could do what took place just a little while ago.
	Tomorrow, General Kane, Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, will have a press conference at 8 a.m.
	at the Pentagon.
	And I want to just thank everybody.
	And in particular, God, I want to just say we love you, God, and we love our great military.
	Protect them.
	God bless the Middle East.
	God bless Israel.
	And God bless America.
	Thank you very much.
	Thank you.
	Strong remarks from President Trump.
	And if you're watching the previous episode of Loomer Unleashed, then you know that we played the 17-minute long clip.
	And I read all the quotes of President Trump for years on end talking about how Iran must never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.
	And I just want to show you this interesting tweet that I posted earlier today so that you can see how phenomenal President Trump is and what a leader he is.
	We've been told since, you know, the 90s, right?
	Look at Bill Clinton.
	We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.
	Did that ever happen?
	No.
	George W. Bush, 2006.
	Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, period.
	Barack Obama, 2015.
	I have stated that Iran will never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon.
	Ironic, given that he helped them develop their nuclear program.
	Joe Biden, we will not allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon.
	2022.
	He gave Iran $16 billion and didn't even conduct an investigation into his own Iranian envoy who was essentially running a spy ring.
	And then Donald Trump, Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.
	Thank you for your attention to this matter.
	So President Trump is the only president that we have ever had who not only promised that Iran will never have a nuclear weapon, but he actually acted on it.
	And everybody knew when President Trump was campaigning that this was a promise that he made.
	What did they want him to do?
	Not complete this promise, not do good on his promise.
	So for these so-called conservatives who are now pretending like, oh, we didn't vote for this.
	We didn't vote for Donald Trump to strike Iran.
	We didn't vote for Donald Trump to strike these nuclear facilities.
	As J.D. Vance said this morning, we're not at war with Iran.
	We're at war with their nuclear program.
	We didn't bomb Iran.
	We bombed their nuclear facilities.
	And so when people say, oh, well, you are very critical, Laura, of Nikki Haley saying that we should bomb Iran.
	Well, there's a difference between just dropping bombs in an unrestricted manner on civilians for no purpose whatsoever, killing civilians, killing innocent people, and dropping bombs in a very coordinated and strategic strike that Pete Hagseth, our Secretary of Defense, said that it's been in the works for months, months of preparation.
	And so we have that clip.
	We can go ahead and play that clip.
	Let's go ahead and play clip number two.
	This is a plan that took months and weeks of positioning and preparation so that we could be ready when the President of the United States called.
	It took a great deal of precision.
	It involved misdirection and the highest of operational security.
	Our B-2s went in and out of downtown Tehran, not Tehran, excuse me, of these nuclear sites, in and out and back without the world knowing at all.
	In that way, it was historic.
	A strike that included the longest B-2 spirit bomber mission since 2001 and the first operational employment of the MOP, a massive ordnance penetrator.
	A lot of people are saying things like, well, you know, it's not America first.
	It's not America first that we got involved.
	It's not America first that we decided to strike Iran's nuclear facilities.
	I don't know what is more America first than making sure that genocidal Muslims who chant death to America can't obtain a nuclear weapon and potentially fire that nuclear weapon against the United States of America.
	If anything, all of these ingrates should be saying thank you to President Trump for saving us from a nuclear holocaust.
	And if people had any sense about them, they would be calling for Donald Trump to receive the Nobel Peace Prize for saving humanity from a nuclear holocaust.
	And yes, Iran did have access to nuclear weapons.
	Yes, Iran did develop nuclear weapons.
	President Trump said so himself.
	And look, they're saying, oh, well, you know, we're just repeating the time of Bush, weapons of mass destruction.
	Who was one of the biggest critics of President Bush and his claim that there were weapons of mass destruction?
	Who was one of the biggest critics of the invasion of Iraq and the invasion of Afghanistan?
	President Trump.
	Even before it was popular to do so, President Trump was anti-war.
	Even before it was popular to do so, he was calling for Bush to resign over the invasion of Iraq and the claim that there were weapons of mass destruction.
	And so President Trump is trusted.
	This is why we voted for President Trump, because he's a leader.
	He leads with strength.
	I trust President Trump.
	President Trump's not going to lie to the American people and tell the American people that Iran has nuclear capabilities if Iran does not have nuclear capabilities.
	So if people are unsatisfied, then they can leave.
	But again, a lot of the people that are sowing this discord are not true Trump supporters.
	As I discussed on my show the other day, these are people that came over from the coalition of Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr., Democrats, right?
	People that were always against President Trump up until about three months before the election when they decided, okay, Trump's going to make a deal with RFK.
	We're going to get our guy in the cabinet.
	He's going to address the issues with vaccines, which, you know, he's not addressing.
	So there's kind of been a bit of a 182 with regards to all the promises that RFK Jr. promised as it relates to make America healthy again.
	And Tulsi Gabbard was made the director of DNI.
	And we've gone over this.
	My last show, you can go and watch it.
	I showed all the receipts.
	Tulsi Gabbard called President Trump Saudi Arabia's bitch.
	Tulsi Gabbard said that President Trump lied about Iran when he said in 2020 Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
	He has not lied.
	President Trump has been saying Iran can never have a nuclear weapon since before he launched his presidential campaign 10 years ago.
	So it's important to understand that this is being done on purpose to destabilize the party, to draw people away from MAGA.
	Why would these Democrats want to draw people away from MAGA?
	Because they're trying to secure their own political future over the next 3.5 years.
	Look, it's very important for people to understand that Donald Trump is not going to be able to run for president again after these next 3.5 years.
	It's going to be the end of an era.
	We don't really have anybody in the GOP who has what it takes to be his heir.
	Donald Trump is irreplaceable.
	Donald Trump is one of a kind.
	Donald Trump is a world-class leader, and nobody is really going to be able to replicate his energy, his aura, or his leadership, or the inspiration that he has injected, not just into our own political sphere and our own political culture here in the United States of America, but really all around the world.
	How many candidates have we seen all around the world try to brand themselves as Trumpian candidates, right?
	Or they try to create their own version of make America great again, but in their own respective countries, right?
	We saw this with Malay, who was able to win his election in Argentina.
	We've seen it all around the world because Donald Trump is an iconic political figure.
	And so there's a lot of people that don't want the Republican Party to remain in power and they're trying to create chaos.
	They're trying to sow division so that we can get Democrats back in office or so that the MAGA base does not show up so that they basically suppress their own voter turnout.
	This is exactly what you voted for.
	You voted for Donald Trump, who said we're going to make sure Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.
	He gave them 60 days.
	They refused to comply.
	He tried to do this peacefully.
	He tried to do this without dropping bombs, but they refused to comply.
	And then they started chanting death to America and threatening to attack U.S. military bases.
	So as far as I'm concerned, Donald Trump already tried to address this in a peaceful manner.
	And it's not like he went out of his way to murder people.
	He clearly said he vetoed Netanyahu's plan to assassinate Khameni, the supreme leader of Iran.
	If Donald Trump really wanted regime change, and he said today that if Iran is not able to resolve their issues and, as he said, make Iran great again, then the people are going to have to take it upon themselves to implement regime change.
	He's not saying we're going to go in and do regime change.
	He's trying to allow Iran and their leaders and the people of Iran to make these decisions themselves.
	But they have not been compliant.
	They continue to oppress the people of Iran.
	They continue to chant death to America.
	They've turned off the internet in Iran so that the poor, oppressed people of Iran have no access to information and they're unable to see how weak their supreme leader is.
	They're unable to see the fact that the United States just took out their nuclear facilities.
	It's a very fragile state of affairs.
	And no, President Trump is not a warmonger, but if somebody doesn't come to the table when you offer them a peaceful solution, that's their problem.
	That's not your problem.
	And it becomes their problem because, you know, 90 million people should not have to suffer.
	And 400 million Americans should not have to live in fear of being attacked by Iranian proxies.
	They shouldn't have to live in fear of being struck by a nuclear weapon because these genocidal Muslims don't want to come to the table for a peace deal after President Trump has made countless attempts to bring them to the table.
	So as far as I'm concerned, President Trump is doing what is right for our country.
	Before we bring in our guests, I want to play this one clip from JD Vance explaining why they made the decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities and how we are not at war with Iran.
	Instead, we are at war with their nuclear program.
	Let's go ahead and play clip number 19. And most importantly, we trust what the intelligence was telling us about the Iranians stonewalling the negotiation.
	I think that is really the hidden story here and something the media has got to report a little bit more here is that the Iranians stopped negotiating in good faith.
	That was the real catalyst, I think, to what the president ultimately decided to do.
	If we were having a productive negotiation, I think that this could have gone in a much different pathway.
	Unfortunately, the Iranians decided to stonewall us and we saw the consequences of that last night.
	We're going to continue with our coverage on President Trump's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, but there's something else that I want to focus on and it's not really getting a lot of attention.
	And in my opinion, it's a very serious matter that is being hidden as a result of all of this chaos and conflict.
	You see, one of the things that I like to focus on when conflict breaks out, whether it's the Ukraine-Russia war or the conflict between Israel and Hamas or now this new conflict between Israel and Iran and the bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities, I always think to myself, what are our politicians trying to distract us from?
	I'm not talking about President Trump.
	I'm talking about members of Congress.
	I'm talking about the media.
	What are they trying to hide from us?
	What are things that they're trying to slip under the rug, hoping that we're not going to notice because we're so focused on the conflict and we're so focused on this debate and all the controversy online and all the attacks on President Trump and all of the division and all of these foreign influence networks that are trying to divide MAGA, trying to attack President Trump, trying to sow discord and distrust in the Trump administration.
	And one of those things that you all need to be aware of and you should contact your representatives about is Senator Tom Tillis's new piece of legislation that he quietly slipped into the Big Beautiful bill with the permission of Mike Johnson called Tackling Predatory Litigation Funding Act, Senate Bill 1821.
	And you probably are wondering how a lot of lawsuits are paid for against mega corporations when individuals, and I have experience with this because I've taken on companies like Google and Facebook and Twitter and Apple.
	A lot of you who've been watching my show for years now and following me know that I've sued some of the biggest corporations in our country.
	I'm still involved in litigation, actually.
	And my RICO case is actually going to be going to the Supreme Court.
	You know, I filed this massive lawsuit against these big tech social media companies, and I had to raise all that money myself, right?
	It was very difficult.
	It was very financially taxing.
	It was very hard for me to take on these powerful companies that are worth billions of dollars and collectively worth over a trillion dollars.
	And so how do everyday people who want to get justice and accountability pay for litigation against banks, right?
	We saw recently there were lawsuits filed against Bank of America for deplatforming conservatives.
	How do people take on tobacco companies?
	How do people take on products like Roundup, right?
	How are these lawsuits paid for?
	Well, it's paid for through litigation financing.
	And joining me now to discuss how Tom Tillis' bill is waging a war on litigation financing to kill the industry of litigation financing, which would ultimately deprive everyday Americans of being able to get true justice and accountability in our legal system is Ashley Keller, a trial lawyer who specializes in this.
	So Ashley, thank you so much for joining me tonight on Lumer Unleashed.
	I know that this is kind of a niche subject.
	It really hasn't received a lot of reporting, but as I just said, as somebody who has taken on these companies and I know firsthand how difficult it was to raise the money to pay for my litigation.
	And at some points, I didn't know if I was going to be able to continue.
	I wish I would have been able to have access to litigation finance.
	I wish.
	It probably would have made my life a lot easier.
	So what can you tell us about your experience working as a trial lawyer and how litigation finance helps everyday people get justice and accountability?
	I can tell you a lot.
	So first, thanks a lot for having me on the show.
	I love your brand of investigative journalism and what you're doing to help President Trump make America great again.
	Obviously, the focus right now in the news is geopolitics, as it should be.
	But as you note, this is a really important domestic economic issue.
	And I think folks like Senator Tillis are hoping that he can just sneak it in at the 11th hour to the big beautiful bill and get it enacted at the behest of the chamber.
	So let me just quickly set the stage to pick up on some of your remarks.
	To my mind, there are two types of Republicans today.
	The first group realizes what time it is and recognizes that the Chamber of Commerce and the C-suite grandees that finance it are not friends of conservatives.
	Those are people like Senator Lee, Senator Young, Senator Paul, Senator Schmidt, the Scotts, Senator Hawley, among others.
	And then there are people like Senator Tillis, who I don't think have gotten the memo yet on that.
	They think this is your grandfather's Republican Party and that big companies can do no wrong and that the only thing they really want from government is a free market so that they can make products and services that people want.
	And they're going to stay out of politics and for the most part, stay on the right side of legal lines.
	And I think you and I both know that that first group of Republicans is the correct group of Republicans.
	Corporations are engaging in widespread misbehavior today.
	And for the most part, that misbehavior, I think, is really bad for conservatives.
	So whether it's stealing your data, throttling conservative speech, depressing wages by hiring illegal labor, discriminating flagrantly on the basis of race, that's the sort of stuff that corporations are engaged in today.
	And they're going to people like Senator Tillis and essentially saying, make it easier for us to get away with this.
	What do you do if you're the victim of some of this corporate misbehavior?
	Well, in our legal system, what you have to do is you have to sue.
	That's how you get the compensation to compensate you for these injuries that the corporations are inflicting.
	And that's the thing, too, is a lot of people feel that they can't sue because the first thing that happens is when you go to a lawyer, they say, okay, well, you got to give me a upfront retainer of $100,000.
	And then you have everyday people who may not even be making $100,000 a year saying, well, I can't afford that.
	I can't afford to go bankrupt.
	I have no money to sue.
	And then a lot of lawyers, they say, well, you know, this is going to be a very expensive case and it's going to take a lot of time and you have to give me the money upfront.
	And a lot of people end up just getting completely screwed out of any justice and accountability.
	Good people who are fired.
	I mean, we saw a lot of this, especially during COVID, a lot of discriminatory practices where people were fired because they were forced to take a vaccine and they either didn't want to take a vaccine.
	Under the Biden administration, we saw a lot of companies implement DEI practices.
	They were discriminatory hiring practices against white people, the firing of white people, the firing of heterosexual people that didn't want to buy into the LGBTQ nonsense in our country.
	And so a lot of people have their lives completely turned upside down.
	And what this bill would do, this, it's called, and I love how, I love how deceptive he is with the semantics here.
	Tackling Predatory Litigation Funding Act is what he called.
	What's predatory is the way that these corporations target people, knowing that everyday Americans don't have the money to fight back in a legal system against a corporation or a company or a government.
	I mean, there are people that have been able to sue governments with litigation financing.
	It's not just companies.
	There are people who have filed litigation lawsuits financed by litigation finance against terrorist organizations.
	A lot of families of American soldiers who have been murdered by Islamic terrorists or people who have filed lawsuits against governments that prop up terrorist regimes that have killed Americans.
	These lawsuits are funded with litigation finance.
	And so if anything is predatory, it's Tom Tillis.
	He's the predator in this situation, in my opinion.
	Well, I think you have a lot of that exactly right.
	You brought up terrorist organizations.
	The PLO was engaged in terrorist activity, and the victims have been waiting decades to get Their access to justice.
	You talked about $100,000.
	Unfortunately, high-stakes litigation, you need to add at least two zeros to that.
	And these huge corporations love that that's the way our legal system works because they have billions, if not trillions of dollars, not of their own money, but of other people's money.
	They have shared.
	I know that litigation costs more than that.
	I'm saying $100,000 upfront.
	When I was trying to take on big tech, I had some lawyers tell me, okay, you have to give me $100,000 upfront to start.
	And that's just to start.
	They wanted to have $100,000.
	And that doesn't last long, right?
	You could blow through $100,000 within two months.
	And so a lot of attorneys now want money upfront.
	And instead of you paying them as they go, you know how this works.
	You're a lawyer.
	And it just makes it very difficult for people who they think long term.
	They're like, well, it's going to ultimately be more than that.
	And I don't have the money.
	And I don't see how I could ever have that much money.
	Yeah, I'm privileged to work for the state of Texas and a coalition of states leading the antitrust charge against Google for monopolizing the ad tech stack.
	The people of Texas have already invested tens of millions of dollars in experts and consultants because these cases are extremely expensive.
	And so those big companies, they have access to law firms with thousands of lawyers.
	They're more than happy to pump tens of millions of dollars into these lawsuits.
	How do the flesh and blood little people get access to justice?
	They need access to capital too.
	And that's what the litigation finance industry supplies.
	Senator Tillis' legislation is premised on the idea that the Chinese Communist Party is investing in these lawsuits.
	I've never heard of a single example of the CCP investing in U.S. litigation.
	But if we want to ban the CCP from investing in the United States, I think that's a great idea.
	Let's pass that bill.
	Let's not raise the tax rate on litigation finance for firefighters and pension funds to 41%.
	Let's not prevent litigation financiers from offsetting their gains with losses.
	The bill says if you make a million dollars on this investment, you pay 41% tax.
	Even if you lost $1 million on this other investment, no other industry is subjected to that tax treatment.
	So all of the rationales that Senator Tillis is offering for his legislation very respectfully, I think, are pretextual.
	What are some other cases that you've been involved in that you can use as some examples for people to understand how litigation financing was able to bring justice and accountability for people affected by wrongdoing of many corporations or governments?
	I'm sure that you have many cases that come to mind.
	You mentioned Google, of course, but maybe you have several other examples as well, just so people can see how diverse this is and the options that are available if somebody were to utilize litigation finance and how many people are being affected in a positive manner by litigation finance.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	So the way that TALIS legislation defines litigation finance, even a loan to a plaintiff's firm is going to count.
	And so my firm and lots of firms across the country rely on bank loans and similar types of capital provision in order to run our businesses.
	We don't get regular cash flow.
	We only get paid when we win.
	We recently secured with Co-Counsel and the Attorney General's office in Texas a $1.4 billion settlement for Meta's violation of Texas's biometric privacy law.
	Texas was essentially taking Instagram images and screening the biometric information on everybody's face and then storing that in their database, obviously for their profit, without consent from Texans, without consent from people who weren't even on Facebook's platform.
	If you went out with your girlfriends one night and took a picture and put it on Instagram, even if they weren't members of Facebook's platform, Facebook was screening their facial recognition technology and using it for their own purposes.
	So that's a good illustration.
	We represent flesh and blood people all of the time in litigation.
	So Robert Mallory, who was injured by Norfolk Southern after spending years at the railroad company, he developed cancer from carcinogens from cleaning the cars.
	His case had to go all the way to the Supreme Court.
	He was up against Carter Phillips, a great appellate advocate at Sidley Austin, an Amlaw 10 firm.
	That wouldn't have been possible without capital.
	So just about every case that plaintiffs' lawyers touch is going to be financed in some respect.
	And yes, there are some very fortunate plaintiffs' lawyers, and I'm very fortunate to be among them who are able to put in a lot of their own capital.
	But these lawsuits are so expensive to bring access to justice to real people, to real Americans, you need to have access to capital.
	And that's why I think you're seeing a lot of conservative voices like Gene Hamilton and Adam Mortara come out against the TILUS legislation.
	They know it's not good for conservative causes and the Make America Great Again agenda.
	Well, and I think it's also interesting how he slipped this in during a time of conflict.
	So he knows that people are not going to be paying attention to this right now.
	He also slipped it in right before Congress decided to go back to their home districts for a week, right last week when they weren't in session.
	So it's not like they could be confronted about this or asked about this in Washington, D.C., up on the Hill.
	And it appears that Mike Johnson has given him, you know, a wink and a nod and approval to get this done.
	And so for people who aren't aware, the Big Beautiful bill is expected to be voted on between July 1st and July 4th.
	And so we're really running out of time here.
	I mean, if you look at today's, what, June 22nd, people only have about 10 or 11 more days or so to contact their representatives and to tell them to put pressure on Tom Tillis, Senator Tom Tillis, who, by the way, is a total Trump hater and a total rhino.
	He was censured by the North Carolina Republican Party for being such a rhino, for supporting trans issues and for voting against funding for President Trump's border wall.
	I just think of the fact that he's calling this the Tackling Predatory Litigation Funding Act, it's really interesting because I guess one lawsuit that could potentially be filed in the future is a lawsuit against NGOs, right?
	You could potentially sue NGOs for facilitating the invasion of our country, which resulted in illegal aliens killing Americans.
	So that could be a potential lawsuit.
	And why would Tom Tillis, who voted against President Trump's funding for a border wall, want to see a lawsuit like that?
	I mean, there's so many things that are, you know, with this, with this, if this bill, if this legislation is included in the Big Beautiful bill and it's not killed off, so many people, millions of Americans are going to be deprived the ability to get justice.
	And, you know, this doesn't even just pertain to active lawsuits, cases that are already ongoing.
	Think of all of the examples.
	I just gave an example right now.
	Came to my mind.
	If somebody wanted to potentially sue NGOs for facilitating an invasion, say they had a family member that was raped and killed by an illegal alien who came in with an NGO.
	What's going to happen when that family member tries to sue and they don't have the money to sue and then they're told that they can't get financing?
	How many people are unaware of this?
	How many people are going to be deprived the ability to get justice or take legal action in the future, even if they wanted to?
	I haven't seen any news coverage about this.
	So I'm just kind of shocked, especially given the fact that President Trump campaigned on weaponization of the justice system, weaponization of lawfare.
	I mean, if anything, I think that this is a form of weaponized lawfare, right?
	In the inverse, though, because it's a weaponization of justice.
	It's siding with these greedy corporations and siding with governments, siding with the powerful elite, siding with the globalists, everything that President Trump campaigned against.
	And I don't think that President Trump would support this.
	In fact, I know that the America First Legal Institute issued a statement saying that they oppose this.
	They're opposing Tom Tillis's legislation that he snuck inside the bill.
	So it's important for people to just think, like, what have you found yourself victimized by a corporation?
	What have you found yourself victimized by, you know, the mega corporation you work for for discriminatory practices?
	What have you found yourself a victim of a horrendous crime and some multinational organization or terrorist organization or NGO was responsible?
	I just think of all the people that are going to be victimized in the future who are not going to be able to get justice.
	You've got it exactly right.
	I'm going to only slightly disagree with you.
	I would not focus people's energy on Senator Tillis.
	This is his baby, and I think he's a lost cause.
	There are so many MAGA Republicans in the Senate who, if they are only made aware of this issue, are going to come around to the right side.
	I'm refusing to be a cynic.
	I'm an optimist, and I think you bringing attention to this issue is going to be the key to stripping it out of the big, beautiful bill.
	President Trump, I don't think, supports this, but he's not going to kill his signature piece of legislation.
	Exactly.
	I was just saying people should understand who Tom Tillis is, right?
	If you understand his background, because if he's your senator, then you know what a piece of garbage this guy is.
	So you know that he's censured by his own party.
	You know that he has, you know, worked against President Trump.
	You know that he's a rhino.
	That's all I'm trying to say is that a lot of people may think, oh, well, he's a Republican senator.
	How bad could this be?
	Well, it's bad.
	And if you look at his record, he's not pro-Trump.
	He doesn't have interests that align with President Trump, which is why people who do support President Trump are speaking out against this legislation.
	Because if you truly supported President Trump and you believe in his message of combating weaponized justice and weaponization of lawfare, then you would oppose this corrupt legislation, which would deprive everyday Americans, the people who, and we're the everyday people, we're the everyday people who voted for President Trump because we view him as our champion.
	He's the guy that's standing up against all these corporations and the globalist elites that are trying to screw over hardworking American people.
	That is why he had such an overwhelming mandate at the polls in November.
	And this legislation undermines it.
	And they're trying to tuck it inside of President Trump's big beautiful bill so that they can taint President Trump's otherwise good legislation.
	That's what I am saying.
	And you're right.
	I think that a lot more MAGA Republicans were made aware of this.
	I don't even think a lot of members of Congress are aware of this legislation that was tucked inside the BBB.
	But if they are, and you call your representative and you call your senator and you call your member of Congress, we can get it taken out.
	And that's what people need to do.
	And you only have about 11 more days to do this because I'm told they're either going to vote between July 1st and July 4th, sometime between that period.
	You've got it.
	President Trump is a billionaire and they still try to crush him with litigation.
	And he knows how expensive lawyers are.
	So he wants regular people to have access to justice, just like he had the best representation.
	Everyday Americans deserve great representation too.
	Absolutely.
	Anything else you want people to know about Senator Tillis's?
	It's called for people that are taking notes and you want to know.
	It's called Tackling Predatory Litigation Funding Act.
	Very deceptive name because really there's nothing predatory about litigation finance.
	If anything, it's offering a helping hand to people who otherwise would not be able to afford litigation.
	It's Senate Bill 1821.
	Again, call your representatives.
	Call your representatives this week and tell them how awful this legislation is.
	Let them know that Senator Tom Tillis deceptively tucked it inside the Big Beautiful bill and how this is harmful, how it allows for weaponization of justice and weaponization of lawfare to proliferate in our society and get it removed.
	Anything else, Ashley, that you want to leave the viewers with before you go?
	The thing I'll leave you with is you know that people aren't really fighting for the thing that they're saying when there's no logical connection between their arguments and the actual facts on the ground.
	And that's the case with Tillis's legislation.
	As you say, there's nothing predatory about litigation finance.
	Litigation finance doesn't fuel frivolous lawsuits because the financiers don't get paid if the lawsuits don't succeed.
	So, what they really mean by frivolous lawsuits are ones that the corporations think that they're going to lose, but they wish they wouldn't.
	That's not frivolous, that's just them getting caught for their misbehavior.
	Our civil justice system exists to correct that misbehavior and to get compensation for people when they're harmed by it.
	So, this legislation, as you say, is pretty deceptive.
	It's resting on false pre-textual premises.
	And I'm really hopeful that Republicans, the Republicans in the first camp who again realize that the chamber is not our friends, are going to be awakened to this.
	I really appreciate you putting a finger on this issue while there's so much else happening in the world.
	It's really important that the truth come out about it.
	And now that you're talking about it.
	A lot of people were like, oh, this is very random.
	Why are you talking about this?
	Yeah, it's random, especially if you look at the state of affairs in the world.
	But you can't just sit there and talk about Iran all day long.
	That's what people want us to talk about all day long.
	And yes, we are talking about Iran tonight and we're going to get back to the subject of Iran.
	But at the end of the day, this is the time.
	It's in times of conflict and in times of global chaos that our politicians take advantage of the news cycle to deceive people.
	And this is when you have to be on high alert is when there's chaos, when the media is only focused on one thing, back-to-back coverage, wall-to-wall coverage of, you know, the bombing of the nuclear facilities in Iran, the conflict with Israel, the conflict with Iran, the missile strikes.
	That's all you're hearing about.
	And it's all we've been hearing about for the last two weeks straight.
	And meanwhile, we are about to witness the complete bastardization of our justice system.
	I mean, people already talk about how a judicial coup is taking place against the executive branch and how unfair all the law fare was against President Trump, who, as you just pointed out, is a billionaire and could afford his own legal defense.
	Now, imagine if the tables turn and they decided to start targeting his supporters or, and they already have.
	We don't need to imagine if the tables have turned, but imagine what's going to happen.
	Let's just say after 3.5 years from now, Donald Trump gets out of office and people start getting targeted again by a corrupt DOJ and by the new administration.
	How are people supposed to afford their litigation if they can't get access to litigation finance?
	So it's in your best interest because, hey, no one wants to be sued.
	No one wants to file lawsuits, but sometimes you have to.
	Sometimes you have to for the sake of correcting the record and getting justice and accountability.
	And ask yourself, do you want to find yourself on the losing side before you can even file a lawsuit because you don't have the money?
	Or do you want to know that there's going to be an option for you to get funding for your litigation if you find yourself in a situation someday where you need to file a lawsuit against a powerful entity with unlimited funding?
	That's what everybody needs to be keeping in mind.
	And they need to light the phone lines up tomorrow and call their representatives.
	Thanks for pointing this out.
	I'm optimistic in large part because of your bringing this issue to people's attention that we will get this stripped out.
	Great.
	Well, thank you so much, Ashley.
	I really appreciate you coming on.
	Where can people follow you?
	I don't know if you're on social media or not.
	I know that we had you on because obviously you're involved in some very impactful cases that are at the center of a lot of viral news stories right now, especially the case out of Texas.
	And so I figured you'd be the perfect subject matter expert to come on tonight.
	But where can people follow you and follow the cases you're involved in?
	I know you have a website, Keller and Postman.
	Yeah, I'm a tech Luddite and I'm old, so I don't do the social media tweets, but KellerPostman.com has the latest and greatest information about what we're up to.
	Wonderful.
	Great.
	Well, thank you so much for coming on.
	And hopefully the news cycle gets back to a more balanced level this week and people are able to talk about other issues other than the airstrikes.
	But this is, in my opinion, one of the most undertalked about stories right now.
	And it's going to have devastating consequences for everyday Americans if this is not taken out of the Big Beautiful Bill.
	So call your representatives.
	Ashley, again, thank you so much for coming on.
	I really appreciate it.
	Thanks for having me.
	I appreciate it too.
	Absolutely.
	Have a good night.
	You too.
	All right.
	There you have it.
	You heard from a trial lawyer himself about how this is going to negatively impact our justice system.
	So definitely be sure that you contact your representatives.
	It's already alarming to me that more people are not talking about this, especially given the conservative movement's focus on going after big tech, going after big banks for deplatforming people, going after woke corporations that discriminate for DEI practices.
	So this is something that should really be on the radar of more conservatives.
	And shockingly, it's not.
	I don't know why it's not.
	Well, I guess we know why, right?
	It's all the conflict with Iran and Israel, but still, you should be able to walk and chew gum at the same time and have conversations about multiple subjects without completely screwing over the American people.
	So before we continue, I want to take a moment to thank the sponsor of tonight's episode of Loomer Unleashed, Kirk Elliott Precious Metals.
	Breaking news, Laura Loomer has been canceled.
	The president of the United States has refused to take her phone calls as he suspects she is soon to be arrested.
	Is Laura Loomer the most hated person on planet Earth?
	We want to hear from you, the listener, and get your opinion on whether or not...
	We coming for you, bitch.
	We coming to your house, Laura Loomer.
	We fight, we know your, we know where you live.
	We coming for you right now.
	We coming for your friends.
	We coming for your friends, little dog.
	Frankly, you know, I hope they throw her away for the rest of her life.
	I hope she dies.
	She is currently on the run from authorities.
	She is described as armed and dangerous.
	I just can't believe she's been getting away with it for this.
	An angry mob appears to be forming outside the home of journalist Laura Lumer.
	What is wrong with you?
	Why are you not panicking?
	Because I called Kirk Elliott precious metals and I learned how adding gold and silver to my portfolio is one of the safest Ways to not just grow my finances, but to also protect them from the uncertainty of the future.
	So I'm fine.
	Call economist Kirk Elliott at 720-605-3900 or schedule a call online at keepm.com/slash Loomer to learn how you can safely grow your retirement portfolio with precious metals.
	Be sure that you head on over to kepm.com.
	That's keepm.com slash Loomer.
	They have a nice landing page here that they've created for the viewers of Loomer Unleashed.
	We had Dr. Kirk Elliott of Kirk Elliott Precious Metals on the program the other night to discuss how the price of gold is rising amid this conflict.
	It's a great time to invest in precious metals.
	Be sure that you contact Kirk Elliott today.
	You can visit the website, kepm.com slash Loomer, or call 720-605-3900.
	720-605-3900 with all the chaos in the world.
	You see governments, you see people rushing to invest in gold because, well, it's a reliable backup given the fact that the dollar is crashing and we have an unstable economy, not because of President Trump, but, well, it's a recovering economy.
	President Trump inherited a broken economy and he's doing his best to fix it.
	But you can protect yourself against the crashing U.S. dollar by investing in gold and silver.
	So again, visit kepm.com slash lumer, kepm.com slash lumer or call 720-605-3900.
	We're going to continue talking about Iran, but as you know, in the beginning of the month and I believe June 4th was the date, I was in Washington, D.C. for my deposition.
	As many of you know, I filed a lawsuit against Bill Maher because he falsely accused me of sleeping with President Trump in the aftermath of the presidential debate in 2024, in September of 2024.
	And Bill Maher had his deposition in early April in Beverly Hills.
	And then I had my deposition on June 4th in Washington, D.C. And there's been some really interesting developments in the case where, you know, obviously Bill Maher doesn't want the contents of his deposition out in the public.
	And so those are now confidential.
	It's interesting how this guy can go on a show and falsely accuse me of having sex with Donald Trump.
	But now it's really bizarre.
	Now they're trying to make it so that my deposition can't even be made public.
	Why?
	Because, well, I did so well in my deposition.
	So joining me now to provide an update on the law fair that I myself am involved in, trying to get justice and accountability against somebody who has wronged me, somebody who has defamed me, right?
	I've sued Bill Maher and I've also sued HBO.
	It's important.
	It's really important that people be able to use the legal system to get justice when they have been wrong, to get justice to correct the record.
	And that's what I'm trying to do.
	And I'm trying to protect it for every other American who finds themselves getting completely screwed over by corrupt individuals or big corporations or media personalities or whoever it may be.
	You don't want to get bullied and you need to be able to use the legal system to fight back when you are wronged.
	And so joining me now to discuss the updates in my own legal case against Bill Maher and HBO is my attorney, Larry Lehman.
	Larry, thanks so much for joining me.
	I really appreciate it.
	Larry, can you hear me?
	I think Larry's having some issues right now.
	I guess we'll go back to our cover Johnny Ron in the meantime while he's connecting.
	Hey, can you guys let me in?
	He's having an issue connecting.
	Let's try to get that resolved, please.
	Yes.
	Thank you.
	Let's see what else.
	We are live right now, too.
	So be sure that while we're waiting on Larry to connect, that you go to rumble.com slash Laura Loomer.
	Rumble.com slash Laura Loomer.
	Repost the live link.
	Also, we're live on X. Be sure that you repost the live link on X at Laura Loomer and Loomer Unleash.
	I think we have Larry now.
	Do we have Larry?
	I'm here.
	Okay, great.
	Larry, thanks so much.
	A bit of a technical issue there.
	That must be the new audience.
	No, it's, I don't think technology is your strong suit.
	Great lawyer, but it's okay.
	Who knows?
	Maybe the Iranians are hacking us.
	Yeah, who knows?
	Maybe the Iranians are hacking us.
	Larry, it's great to have you on.
	I don't know if you caught the tail end of my previous segment there talking about the importance of litigation financing and whatnot, but we were talking about how, you know, there's efforts right now to try to kill off litigation financing by taxing it out of existence.
	And I was just talking about how important it is for people, everyday Americans, people who aren't billionaires, people who aren't millionaires, people who have been taken advantage of by corporations or screwed over, defamed by media networks, have the ability to file a lawsuit if they ever need to file a lawsuit for the sake of getting justice and accountability.
	And we've seen with this recent election how our justice system has been completely weaponized and how there, you know, there's a lot of corruption.
	You've written books about this.
	I know that you're no stranger to this.
	You've been a lawyer for decades in our country fighting against the corrupt legal system.
	And I guess I found myself now dealing with, in my opinion, what is a very corrupt situation.
	And I wanted to bring you on so that you could explain to my viewers what is happening in my own lawsuit against Bill Maher.
	Because last time I checked, when you're involved in a deposition, your own deposition is allowed to be released to the public.
	And now we have been contacted by Bill Maher and by HBO this week, informing us that my deposition for some reason that I flew all the way to Washington, D.C. to record under oath is not allowed to be disclosed publicly.
	Even though when I walked into the deposition in the law firm, Davis Wright and Tremaine, Which is an anti-Trump law firm that has represented CNN and lawsuits against Trump.
	They represented George Stephanopoulos and the lawsuit that President Trump recently filed against him.
	Ultimately, Stephanopoulos had to settle with President Trump for $15 million.
	These are people who openly advertise that they are anti-Trump in order to solicit clients.
	Now they're telling me that I'm not allowed to release my own deposition.
	And I figured, what better way to highlight the corruption in our judicial system than to bring my own lawyer on to talk about this ridiculous update in my own lawsuit?
	Well, you're right, Laura.
	And it goes all the way back to refresh people's recollection without being off color.
	You were defamed by Bill Maher because he wanted to get to Donald Trump during the election.
	He supported Kamala Harris, claimed she was a shoe-in to win, and used you as the vehicle to defame Donald Trump by saying, and I'll clean it up because Bill Maher is a low-class degenerate, frankly.
	I'll clean it up and say that you slept with the president behind the back of Milani and committed adultery.
	Now, they tried to dismiss that case.
	They failed.
	And even before that happened, we had sent them an email and a letter saying to mitigate the damage that you've caused to my client, Laura Loomer, that's my law firm claimant law group PA, that you should retract this.
	You should apologize and put her on the air during an episode of Real Time.
	And they, of course, refused arrogantly.
	Now, their arrogance is unbelievable.
	They can smear you in front of millions of viewers.
	They can harm you.
	It's hurt you financially.
	It's hurts your reputation, your goodwill.
	It's prevented you from opportunities because people view you as radioactive unfairly, totally unfairly.
	It's because you're so effective.
	And now they've moved the court that even your own deposition should be kept from the public.
	It can only be used in the context of litigation, unless it's attached to a pleading.
	And believe me, it will be attached to a pleading.
	But we have a video, and the video should be released.
	The court should have ordered it.
	It's going to be up on appeal.
	A magistrate judge made that ruling.
	No aspersions towards the magistrate judge.
	I don't want to anger the judiciary over there.
	But he will be, I believe, reversed by the judge in chief.
	And we're going to be pursuing that.
	But more importantly than that, you're right.
	How can they prevent you from releasing your own deposition?
	And what does that deposition?
	It's funny because, you know, when we walked into the deposition, and I guess stop me, right?
	If I'm not allowed to disclose the contents of my deposition.
	But we walk into the deposition and there's this whole, you know, discussion about what part is going to be, you know, public and what part isn't going to be public.
	And of course, you know, anything that contains your personal information has to be private.
	And personal information, of course, is, you know, your address or your bank information, things like that.
	And so the lawyer, her name is Kate Bollinger, who works for Davis, Wright and Tremaine, this very liberal law firm, was so adamant about how all of this was going to be public and everybody was going to see it and it was going to be on the record and the tapes were going to be available to be posted.
	And now all of a sudden, they don't want it to be released.
	And the only reason why they wouldn't want my own deposition to be released is because, well, I outperformed them in my own deposition.
	And they thought that they were going to try to make a fool of me.
	But at the end, they're the ones that looked like fools because they falsely accused me of having sex with Donald Trump.
	They have no evidence whatsoever.
	And now I'm having to waste my own money trying to get justice.
	And some people will say, well, that's your fault.
	You know, you're the one that filed the lawsuit.
	Well, again, it goes to my point.
	At what point are people not allowed to get justice or accountability from the character elites?
	At what point can people not stand up and try to fundraise for, you know, the costs associated with their litigation?
	Are people supposed to be financially ruined in this country because of lies that are spread about them?
	I'm a young woman, right?
	Why should I be falsely accused of having an affair with somebody just because they don't like me?
	They don't like my investigative journalism.
	They don't like the fact that I'm on good terms with the president.
	And they don't like the fact that the president absolutely obliterated Kamala Harris during the presidential campaign.
	And so, you know, what has happened to me could happen to any of you as you're watching tonight.
	And it's just an abomination because really litigation in this country is so expensive.
	And most people can't afford it.
	Most people can't afford to get justice when they find themselves getting screwed over.
	But even if you try to get the funds needed for your litigation, you encounter all types of judicial corruption or all types of sleazy tactics to really deprive individuals, myself included, of getting justice.
	And you've been my lawyer for many years now, Larry.
	So you know that this isn't the first time that I've gone up against somebody who is extremely powerful and extremely wealthy.
	But it's becoming increasingly harder in this country for people to get justice.
	And at some point in time, I think people are just going to lose all faith whatsoever in the DOJ and lose all faith whatsoever in our justice system, especially as they watch the judicial coup happening in our own country.
	Well, you're right.
	And see, they don't want your deposition to come out because Kate Bolger, that's her name, of Davis Wright-Tremaine, yes, they advertise until we call them on it that they're anti-Trump.
	I had an article written in the Hollywood Reporter about that.
	I've been up against them many times.
	They're leftists.
	When I went into the Davis Wright in New York, I couldn't even figure out what bathroom to go to.
	I mean, you couldn't.
	They had three sexes.
	I couldn't figure out which one was which.
	I mean, these are the people you're dealing with here.
	But they browbeat you at the deposition, them and two other women.
	And they didn't want that to be put out in a video because it would show, frankly, just, you know, how improper and unethical they have behaved.
	Same thing with Maher when we deposed him.
	They were comatose that that might be released because it shows the real Bill Maher acting like he's the Joker in Bacman.
	And believe me, He's not funny.
	He's not a comedian.
	He's a pundit.
	I never found him funny.
	I was on his show years ago before it became so vile as it is today.
	And it's okay to smear and to harm Lara Loomer, but it's not okay to have a video deposition of Bill Maher or even yourself released to the public.
	So we'll be challenging this, if necessary, all the way up to the Supreme Court.
	They need to see this.
	They need to see what you're dealing with.
	And it's important.
	You're right.
	You, Laura, are sitting on our department of, along with other prominent people, including Nancy Mace and others, and Alan Keyes, former ambassador, our department of judicial and legal accountability.
	We need to revise this legal system.
	People have lost total confidence in it.
	And it's not just President Trump, but it's everyone.
	Well, it's just totally backwards.
	Even today, we saw just the absolute insanity of our broken justice system where you have President Trump who filed, you know, he issued a deportation order for Mahmoud Khalil, right?
	The State Department issued a deportation order for Mahmoud Khalil, who is one of the Muslim individuals in our country who was involved in organizing these violent pro-Hamas protests at Columbia University.
	And they had him in an ICE detention facility in Louisiana.
	And then a judge tried saying that, you know, the Trump administration couldn't deport him.
	So this deportation was halted, even though he's a Syrian national.
	And then he's held in ICE detention.
	And now he was released today.
	Just imagine this, right?
	He is a pro-Hamas Muslim on a visa in our country.
	He's not even a U.S. citizen.
	He was supposed to be deported.
	And now he's been released back into the public where who knows?
	He could be radicalized.
	He could be recruited as an Iranian proxy to carry out an act of terrorism.
	He may feel a sense of revenge.
	He may want to try to get revenge by carrying out an attack in our country.
	You don't know.
	It just is very dangerous to release an individual like Mahmoud Khalil back into the streets of America, back into society.
	And what is he doing?
	What is the first thing that this guy is doing upon being released back into society after being released from this detention facility?
	He's back at Colombia chanting globalize the Intifada, promoting terrorist propaganda.
	And so, again, how are people supposed to feel a sense of security or have confidence in our justice system when they're watching all of these radical judges get away with carrying out a judicial coup?
	I mean, if President Trump can't get justice, how can somebody like myself get justice?
	How can everyday Americans get justice?
	And I know that you've represented all types of clients.
	I was just talking to my previous guest, Ashley Keller, a trial lawyer, about how litigation financing is used to help people get justice, especially for this is something you have experience with, suing terrorist organizations, Americans who have been either killed by terrorist organizations or had family members who were killed by terrorist organizations, right?
	Suing governments that enabled or funded these terrorist organizations or suing these terror organizations like Hamas and the PLO or the IRGC themselves.
	And this is something that you've done.
	Perhaps you can speak to that.
	But it just seems like no matter how egregious the crime is, no matter how egregious a case is, it seems like the criminals and the guilty party are, the guilty parties rather, are being favored in our justice system.
	You're right.
	And it's the federal judges.
	They are appointed.
	They're politicians in robes.
	They're very politicized.
	They get on the bench generally with large campaign contributions.
	You can guess with almost exact certainty how they're going to rule based on who appointed them.
	They're like clowns in the Stephen King movie, frankly.
	I mean, they are very, very dangerous.
	And it was Thomas Jefferson who said he was against federal judges.
	Unelected, unaccountable to the people, they would become despots and tyrants, causing us to shed the blood of patriots and tyrants yet again every 20 years or so.
	He didn't want to see violence, neither do I. But it's gotten to the point where it's key.
	Look, there was a judge the other day in San Francisco.
	They knew where to file cases, the left, that enjoined Trump from sending the National Guard to Los Angeles.
	Even the Ninth Circuit had to reverse that leftist judge.
	This is what you're dealing with.
	And fortunately, we have our case in Ocala, Florida.
	It's a very favorable venue.
	The judge in that case, not the magistrate judge, you just basically put a seal on everything, but the actual judge himself that sits atop him, allows the case to go forward.
	It will go to trial.
	It's an easy case.
	It's not confidential.
	There's no reason that anything should be kept off the public record.
	And yet you can have your reputation destroyed and harmed among certain quarters.
	Of course, our supporters know otherwise.
	But yet Bill Maher's deposition can't be made public and your own cannot be made public.
	And this is why you need to be supported.
	And if you're interested in this case, you can go to larryclayman.com.
	I'm handling this in my private capacity.
	Freedom Watch, obviously, has been fighting against this for years.
	I founded Judicial Watch because of this in 1994, watching judges.
	That's what it's about.
	So this is important.
	Your case will go to trial, Laura.
	It's going to go to trial in a very religious area of this country.
	I don't think they're going to be real happy with Bill Maher.
	And if anybody wants to see who Bill Maher is, go out on X and look at his tweets.
	Look at how disgusting they are.
	Look at how he hates women.
	He's a misogynist.
	He hates Trump.
	He's never been married for good reason.
	I mean, who would marry the guy?
	I mean, if you're a woman, I guess there's an opportunity to go the other way.
	But this guy is really bad news.
	And, you know, he picked on you, not so much because it was you, because he wanted to get to Trump.
	Well, he, you know, is not a great guy.
	He seems to think that he's above the law.
	And that's what's really interesting is that for a Democrat Party that loves to screech, nobody's above the law, they scream this at President Trump and his supporters in the aftermath of J6.
	And they screamed this all throughout the presidential campaign when they were indicting President Trump over and over again.
	They don't seem to have any regard for the law.
	And so how unprecedented is it for somebody to have their own deposition sealed and for somebody to be denied the ability to release their own deposition?
	Because I had never heard of this happening before until you just updated me.
	remember?
	I've never heard of this.
	I'm honestly so shocked.
	I can't believe that I'm not able to release my own deposition because I was going to release my own deposition to the public so people could see firsthand how I answered all the questions.
	It's likely to happen.
	We just have to go up to the higher judge here.
	But do you remember when I was fighting the Clintons?
	Years ago, you're a lot younger than I am.
	You may not have a complete memory of it, but I would take depositions of everyone, Stephanopoulos, Carville, Mac McClarty, White House Chief of Staff, you name it.
	And they would be released the same day, and you'd see vignettes of them, little clips of them on cable news every night.
	They're American proceedings.
	We're not like King George III, who did things in star chambers, secret with his corrupt judges.
	We have a system in our country where people will be able to see what goes on in our justice system, open justice.
	It's not supposed to be secret behind closed doors.
	And that's particularly true with regard to your own deposition.
	You have the right to release it.
	Now, we're not going to do it right now.
	It'll be attached in transcript form to a motion that I'm going to file in the next few days to hold Kate Bolger and her colleagues accountable for harassing you and browbeating you and making objections during depositions to give, to tip off witnesses to answers.
	I've deposed HBO, the corporate representative.
	I've deposed Marr.
	This is what she does.
	This is a firm that I've fought against for many years.
	They're unethical.
	They don't know how to tell the truth.
	They're liars.
	And they, frankly, could care less.
	And can you imagine three women sitting there allowing Kate Bulger to browbeat you, women, after you have been defamed as a woman and dragged through the mud?
	I mean, what can be more despicable than that?
	I've always been in my career.
	You're right, I've been practicing for decades.
	I don't accept any client to represent.
	And I would not have accepted this case if I really believed in the rights of women and not to defend a misogynist and a sexist.
	And that's what he is.
	Go look at his tweets.
	Look at his views on women.
	And you were the victim.
	Yeah, it's disgusting.
	Well, any comments, any thoughts about this ruling to release Mahmoud Khalil?
	I know that you yourself have been involved in litigation trying to get justice for victims of Hamas and victims of other Islamic terrorist organizations.
	What are your thoughts on these judges ruling Mahmoud Khalil, who has been involved, he's not even a United States citizen, been involved in these protests that are favorable to Hamas, releasing this dangerous individual back onto the streets of America?
	Also, too, they announced today that they're releasing Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who's an illegal alien, back into the streets of America.
	So, you know, up is down, down is up.
	It's unbelievable what is happening in our country.
	And I just wanted to get your thoughts on this as somebody.
	You know, just a little background.
	I've sued the supreme leader before for Akbar Mohamedi, the first student leader to call for regime change who was mutilated.
	His body, you know, went through the streets of Tehran celebrating that.
	His brother, manager, whose genitals were mutilated.
	I still have a case pending for the victims, the families of extortion 17 against Iran.
	I have a default against them.
	These people are dangerous people.
	Most Iranians in this country are good people.
	They're industrious.
	They basically built Beverly Hills, for instance.
	And I have a couple of them who are my doctors, Iranian Jews.
	But the Iranians and the type of Khalil, these are radical people.
	These are people who present a clear and present danger to the United States.
	And any judge that would let that person out on the streets, frankly, should be removed as a judge.
	He's not engaging in good behavior.
	By the way, there's no constitutional right to life tenure in the Constitution for federal judges.
	It's serving for good behavior.
	It doesn't exist.
	Yet we have a judiciary committee run by Jim Jordan, who hasn't called one judge up in eight years, actually longer than that, nine years.
	He's not a lawyer.
	He could still call them up, call them in the carpet, have them start impeachment proceedings and get that underway.
	He'd rather go in Fox News than fundraise.
	This is what you're dealing with.
	And this is why you are sitting on a committee with regard to Freedom Watch that will take action against these judges with citizens' grand juries, citizens' trials, holding them accountable.
	And we need to do something because without a legal system that functions, then this case is going, the country is going to go into a very violent state.
	And we don't want to see that.
	As somebody who has sued the Iranian regime and sued the supreme leader and somebody who has sued Hamas and has tried to get justice for the families of victims of these terrorist organizations, what are your thoughts about President Trump's strike on Iran's nuclear facilities?
	I think he did the right thing.
	I think it was fantastic that he did that.
	You know, I was pushing him to do it.
	Mark Levin was pushing him to do it.
	We had these rhinos and Tucker Carlson wing of the Republican Party that were trying to scare him.
	Charlie Kirk all of a sudden has become a fan of doing it just three days ago.
	He wasn't.
	Okay, this is what we were dealing with.
	But president did the right thing.
	Now he needs to take care of the regime.
	And I think he's got that in their sights.
	They need to be eliminated, for lack of a better word.
	You know, it's like a cockroach.
	If you leave one cockroach in your home, the colony is going to grow back.
	Now is the time to get rid of the leadership, not the Iranian people, but the leadership.
	You know, the Iranian people are great people.
	The Iranian people love Trump.
	They love Western civilization.
	They're oppressed.
	These people have been fighting for freedom for a very long time.
	And it seems like that's Why they have to shut off the internet, right?
	That's why they have to shut off the internet.
	And people are begging Elon Musk to turn on Starlink and Iran because they don't want the Iranian people seeing how weak the regime is.
	They don't want the Iranian people seeing what President Trump just did to the nuclear facilities because now is probably the best time, if there was ever a time, to have freedom, to secure freedom.
	If you are the Iranian people, now would be the most ideal time to rise up and overthrow the Iranian regime.
	Well, I think we ought to help them with that.
	During Obama, we had an opportunity in 2009.
	He didn't.
	The Voice of America was a propaganda network for Iran.
	They actually had the son of a supreme, of a Ayatollah running it.
	I think the United States should not sit back and just wait for the Iranians to do it.
	I think we need to help them.
	And I think President Trump will do that.
	And that's his intention.
	If you don't do it now, you know, it's kind of like John McEnroe when he played tennis.
	You get somebody down five sets to zero, you finish them off because they will rise again if you let them get up.
	Already we know that they took the enriched uranium at 60% and took it out of Fordo and took it out of Istafant and took it out of the tance.
	They took it out.
	They still are a threat.
	You need to eliminate the leadership.
	And frankly, I hope no one gets hurt, but I actually hope that the Iranians do provoke President Trump and give him the green light to take them all out.
	Because that is the intention, I believe, of President Trump.
	And it certainly is the intention of Prime Minister Netanyahu.
	Well, we have a post from President Trump that he posted earlier today.
	It said, MIGA, make Iran Great Again.
	And he talked about how, well, if the Iranian people are not going to come to the table for peace and the Iranian people are not, or the Iranian supreme leader, excuse me, if the Iranian people want peace and the Iranian supreme leader is not going to come to the table to change his ways, then let's pull this up on the screen.
	It says it is not politically correct to use the term regime change.
	But if the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again, and of course, President Trump is talking about not just the demilitarization and the denuclearization, but also to actual change in Iran where they stop oppressing the people, they stop chanting death to America.
	They stop threatening to nuke the West.
	They stop threatening to nuke Israel.
	Then he said, why wouldn't there be a regime change, make Iran great again?
	He's not saying the United States is going to get involved, but he's saying why wouldn't there be?
	If the current Iranian regime is not going to make Iran great again, you used to see in the 1970s women in Iran dancing in the streets, wearing bikinis, beautiful women, beautiful, gorgeous women, some of the most beautiful women you'll ever see in your life, free, happy in a bustling society.
	And now they're all covered in burqas and hijabs and beaten to death in the streets if they take their hijabs off.
	So again, that's what President Trump is talking about.
	If they are not willing to make Iran great again and go back to the time where Iran was a bustling society and people were free, people were happy, people had rights, then ultimately the people are going to have to implement regime change.
	And so I don't really understand all these conservatives who are attacking President Trump as being a neocon.
	Do they want the Iranian people to continue to live in oppression for eternity?
	I'm not saying that the United States is going to be responsible for this regime change, but why are people so opposed to the Iranian people taking advantage of this opportune time to rise up and take their country back?
	No, you're right, Laura.
	Iran has the capability.
	They have the ability now.
	They do.
	Being one of our best allies and one of Israel's best allies.
	And if you make that regime change, that's going to bring Saudi Arabia to a final peace agreement with Israel.
	The Gulf states will follow.
	They view Iran as a huge threat.
	The Sunnis hate the Shiites.
	The Shiites hate them.
	The Saudis and the Gulf countries are Sunnis.
	So consequently, it makes sense to take them out.
	But I don't think we should just sit back and wait for the Iranian people.
	We should help them.
	We should, frankly, arm them.
	And you cannot equate the Iranian people to the Iraqis, who were very unsophisticated, you know, uneducated, etc.
	The Iranian people are very sophisticated.
	If you get rid of the Ayatollah and his henchmen, they will certainly fill the vacuum.
	It won't be another Iraq.
	Any last thoughts?
	Any last comments, Larry?
	I know that, well, in terms of, I want to be careful about what I say about my own case.
	Obviously, things are pending right now, but we're going to be providing updates as things progress, as we get more updates from the judge, as it relates to my case against Bill Maher.
	But as it stands, it's looking like I'm going to go to trial.
	It's looking like this is going to go all the way to trial.
	It will go to trial, Laura, and it's going to trial in Ocala, Florida, where you had your campaign office.
	It's going to Florida in the Bible Belt.
	And it's somebody, it's an area that actually respects Judeo-Christian ethics and values.
	And I'm going to put up on our website at larryclayman.com in the morning a pleading that I wrote.
	It's public, and it says what's been going on here.
	People should read it.
	And you can see how Laura is being treated, you know, terribly.
	Yeah, we'll put Larry back on too.
	We're going to bring you back on the show to talk about it as the case proceeds.
	But it's just another example.
	Every single day, there's so many stories, and God only knows how many people are being subjected to the same type of treatment by our justice system.
	And the reality is, is it's too many cases in one day to cover them all.
	And it's just a very sad state of affairs that this is the state of our justice system in this country.
	But hopefully there's able to be some type of judicial reformation in our country over these next 3.5 years.
	Because if we're not able to get the judicial coup, we're not able to get the attack on our justice system, an attack on accountability.
	Really, that's what it is.
	It's an attack on accountability.
	They're trying to, the elites of our country are trying To deprive everyday people of being able to get any sense of accountability.
	If we don't fix it over these next 3.5 years, then that's it, because we're in the strongest position now than ever before to address accountability issues and to address the lack of justice.
	And I'm not just talking about myself or President Trump.
	Who's gone to jail?
	We haven't seen any of the people involved in Crossfire Hurricane.
	We haven't seen any of the people involved in the attacks on President Trump, the people who were at the center of trying to steal the 2020 election.
	The FBI just released a report the other day.
	I don't know if you saw this big story, that they believe that there was CCP involvement, printing of ballots, illegal ballots to help steal the election in 2020.
	So where's the accountability?
	Who is going to go to jail, right?
	Where is the accountability?
	How come the Butler report hasn't been released yet?
	There's so many things as it relates to our justice system.
	And it's so funny, it's called the Department of Justice.
	It should be called the Department of Injustice.
	There's so many examples.
	On a day-to-day basis, it's like a fire hose.
	You know, it's so hard to keep track of everything.
	It's very overwhelming.
	Every day I try to keep track of, I try to keep track of all the updates in President Trump's cases and all these federal judges that are trying to have a coup, a judicial coup in this, the executive branch.
	And it's so overwhelming.
	And that's just pertaining to these federal cases involving the president.
	Think of all the other people that are being screwed over in our justice system.
	It's something that we focus on a lot here at Loomer Unleashed.
	And I just find it to be very overwhelming.
	Well, it is.
	And the American people, you know, years ago when I was at Judicial Watch, which I found that I had a show in New York City and I talked about judges and how they behave and how they harm people if they're not careful.
	We have a plan to get better judges, but the people actually rose up off their chairs.
	It was like a Jerry Springer daytime show.
	Everybody's experienced it in the family court system and with conservatorships and everything else.
	They see the injustice and they see how money talks and nobody walks.
	These federal judges, there's some good ones, but by and large, they're bought and paid for by the special interests.
	Lobbyists put their names forward.
	President Trump criticized the federal society a few weeks ago for the judges that they asked him to appoint.
	He relied upon them.
	And now these judges are ruling against him.
	It's a club.
	They protect each other.
	And President Trump has now had and the administration about 250-plus lawsuits filed against them in leftist areas of this country, whether it's Boston, whether it's Seattle, whether it's Portland, whether it's Chicago.
	About 60 to 70% have wound up with preliminary injunctions.
	They're trying to run out the clock because he only has now another three and a half years left.
	And this is their strategy.
	And you're supposed to, when you file a case in federal court, it's supposed to be assigned randomly.
	I don't believe that that happens in most instances.
	This clown, Bozberg, James Boesberg in D.C. has gotten the last three or four cases involving Trump.
	He's the Chief Justice.
	It's so unprecedented.
	It's so unprecedented for one judge to be assigned four cases involving the same individual.
	I mean, talk, if you can just speak on that briefly before you go, because I don't think people understand how unprecedented that is.
	There's more probability that there's life on Mars than that would happen.
	Okay.
	It's mathematically impossible.
	So it's also corrupt what goes on in the clerk's office.
	Also at the same time.
	It's not like four cases over the span of four years or so.
	It's all at the same time.
	Exactly.
	Back to back.
	Back to back.
	So this is what you're, you know, we've impeached basically one judge in the last many years, Allisey Hastings from Miami, you know, from Florida, Laura.
	The guy, when he was impeached, then ran for Congress, claimed it was a racial witch hunt against him, was elected and was in Congress ever since.
	He died, you know, the last few years.
	But this is the nature.
	Eight judges have been impeached in 250 years in this country, roughly speaking.
	And it's unbelievable.
	And they were impeached just for drunkenness and not showing up for work, basically.
	Are we to believe that judges are any more honest than any other man or woman?
	That's what Jefferson said.
	Are we to believe that they don't take bribes?
	Are we to believe that everything's done up and up?
	No.
	But even apart from that, the political affiliation of a judge will tell you almost with exact certainty.
	You can see the rulings at the Supreme Court, how they're going to rule.
	Forget about the law, forget about the Constitution.
	They'll rule the way they want.
	And then if you call them on it, if they do something unethical, the complaint goes to judges in the same courthouse and they throw it in the trash.
	I'm talking about federal judges.
	Now, in Florida, you know, we elect judges.
	And by and large, the judges are fairly decent because they're accountable to the people in the state system.
	But in the federal system, they're unaccountable to the people.
	And they have, like Jefferson predicted, become despots and tyrants.
	He was against federal judges.
	Absolutely.
	Well, Larry, we're going to have you back on the program to talk about this because it's not like this judicial coup is going to be stopping anytime soon.
	But in the meantime, where can people follow you?
	They can go to two places, LarryClayman.com to read about Laura's case.
	And there are aspects of what we do at Freedom Watch, which also touch on Laura.
	We went all the way to the Supreme Court, for instance, with regard to social media.
	They go to freedomwatchusa.org, and we would appreciate the support.
	We need more lawyers.
	We need more paralegals.
	We need to be able to help more people that don't have the opportunity to afford lawyers themselves.
	Absolutely, Larry.
	Well, thanks so much for coming on.
	Thanks for everything you're doing in my lawsuits.
	I appreciate it.
	And we'll bring you back soon.
	Thanks so much for coming on.
	You're a great friend and a great client.
	And your worth, Laura, is you don't even have to say what it is anymore.
	When the President of the United States basically has an opportunity to have you in his office at will, you know how important Laura Loomer is.
	You can forget about the Bill Mahers and everybody else.
	What they tell you is complete nonsense.
	Well, I appreciate that.
	It's very nice of you to say I do what I can.
	I try to support President Trump and I try to do what's best for my country and America first.
	And, you know, there's so many people that are trying to stop President Trump and work against his agenda.
	But at the end of the day, truth always prevails and we just have to keep on fighting.
	You just can't ever give up.
	You have to fight, fight, fight, as President Trump says, and never, ever give up.
	Well, let's pray for President Trump and Vice President Vance and people in the cabinet because, you know, what happened at Butler, God forbid, but it's probably not going to be the last time.
	And we need to protect him.
	And, you know, the Iranians have tried to assassinate President Trump multiple times now.
	I predict that's one of the reasons why they haven't released all these reports is because it pertains to issues of national security.
	But President Trump had two assassination attempts, and he said in multiple interviews and multiple posts that he has reason to believe that Iran was behind those.
	And I know for a fact, speaking to members of the Trump campaign, that several of them, including his campaign manager, had to have armed security outside of his home towards the last few weeks of the campaign because the Iranians were also trying to assassinate some of President Trump's campaign staff.
	So this is a real threat.
	And we have to defend our country.
	We have to deport these illegals.
	We have to deport the jihadis.
	And we need to really fight back against these judges and expose these judges who are trying to prevent President Trump from completing his mission and doing what we, the American people, voted for him to do.
	Yeah, and you can read about our Department of Judicial and Legal Accountability at freedomwatchusa.org.
	It's kind of like a compliment to Doge.
	Something needs to be done.
	And we need to help the Justice Department.
	They're overwhelmed, the Trump Justice Department.
	They need help from we, the people.
	But one other thing, last thought, Laura.
	President Trump was very, very shrewd in the way he used legitimate situation ethics and deception against Iran with regard to the attack yesterday.
	Make no mistake about it.
	He wants to eliminate the entire leadership, and so does Nathan Yahoo.
	And that's something that needs to be done.
	Well, thanks so much for coming on, Larry.
	I really appreciate it.
	You're welcome.
	Okay.
	See you soon.
	Stay safe.
	You too.
	Larry claiming, you guys.
	So, look, it's a really serious situation.
	I'm honestly shocked.
	It's so hard to keep up to date with all of the examples of judicial corruption in our country.
	And it's very personal to me, too, because not only did we all witness it during this last presidential election season, but I found myself at the center of it, the center of judicial corruption and the center of these abnormalities in our legal system that work against everyday people from getting justice and accountability.
	Let's see.
	Anybody have any comments or questions posted in the chat?
	We are live right now.
	So please be sure that you download the Rumble app.
	It's free to do so.
	Subscribe to my channel by clicking the green follow button.
	Also, we're live on Rumble and X. So please be sure that you're following me on X at Loomer Unleashed and also Laura Loomer.
	Let's see.
	He seems like a top-notch lawyer.
	He has a good personnel presence and will do well in front of a jury.
	Yep.
	There's a good lawyer.
	Jojolina 2022.
	Thank you for staying strong and for all that you do praying for you and justice and accountability.
	Thank you.
	It's very nice of you.
	I appreciate the super chat.
	Oh, here comes the wake gnats in the chat.
	God.
	Let's see.
	W producer being removed by the moderator.
	Yeah, feel free to put your comments and your questions in the chat.
	We check the chat regularly.
	So if you have any comments about any of the interviews or any of the guests, we will come back to the chat.
	I want to get back to the coverage on Iran.
	You may have seen some of these videos.
	You may have not.
	But there's been a lot of updates.
	You saw the comments made by President Trump, the brief remarks that he made last night.
	We played those for you in the beginning.
	We saw JD Vance on NBC this morning talking about how you don't want to view this as war with Iran, but rather attacking their nuclear facilities.
	They're at war with their nuclear program, not at war with Iran.
	And so I gave several examples of military actions that President Trump had taken during his first term, his first administration, in other countries, the form of bombs or drone strikes that did not result in prolonged wars in the Middle East.
	See, Draxion said, Larry Clayman is a great choice.
	He got one of the J6ers out early, which was a difficult task.
	Yeah, he does a lot of great work.
	Let's see.
	There's so many clips.
	There's so many clips.
	So many clips.
	Such a great day yesterday, what President Trump did.
	Rubio went on CBS News today and talked about how we have no plans to engage in war, but rather we want to negotiate peacefully, dovetailing what J.D. Vance said this morning on the Sunday morning programs.
	Let's go ahead and play clip number seven.
	Let's hope they don't choose that route.
	Let's all hope that they actually decide, okay, let's go negotiate because we want a diplomatic and peaceful solution.
	We have achieved our objectives.
	We're ready to negotiate this in a peaceful, you know, diplomatic way.
	We've been prepared to do that for days.
	They are the ones that played games, as they have done for 40 years, as they have done to multiple presidents.
	They tried to play games with President Trump, and they see what happens.
	This is not a game-playing president.
	When he says he's going to do something, he will do it.
	And as a result of this airstrike, you now have sleeper cells who could potentially be activated.
	And a lot of people online today were blaming President Trump.
	They said, well, you know, these sleeper cells wouldn't have been activated or these sleeper cells wouldn't be thinking about carrying out attacks in our country had it not been For these attacks on Iran?
	Well, the reality is, is we've been talking about these sleeper cells, these Iranian proxies, for a long time.
	If you were a longtime viewer of my show, you saw a week ago I had Tom Homan on, right?
	The Borders Are.
	And he talked about the threat of these Iranian proxies and the 2 million Godaways, many of whom are Islamic terrorists living in our country.
	And now people are up in arms.
	They're trying to blame President Trump.
	They're saying, oh, if we get attacked, it's going to be the fault of President Trump.
	No, it's actually the fault of Joe Biden who allowed for these 2 million gotaways to come into our country.
	It's the fault of the Democrats who allowed for years of open borders and thousands of Islamic terrorists, actually millions, really, but millions of Islamic terrorists to come into our country undetected.
	As Tom Homan said, a lot of these gotaways is what keeps him up at night.
	He said it scares the shit out of him.
	Tom Homan, you can see that interview on my Rumble channel if you missed that about a week or so ago.
	We clipped it.
	We posted it on X for everybody to see.
	He said it scares the living shit out of him.
	The idea that 2 million gotaways, we don't know who these people are, but we do know that many of them are Islamic terrorists.
	We do know that a lot of the people who came in have affiliations with terrorist organizations.
	But a lot of these individuals have fake documents.
	A lot of these people use fake names.
	And so really, who are these people?
	What's their real identity?
	And that's the problem is that we have a lot of people who may or may not be, and that's just, you know, put the gotaways aside.
	What about all the people who have come in, who are in our country and they have been detected and ICE or DHS is aware of them, but maybe they don't actually have the name that ICE has identified them with.
	Does that make sense, right?
	There's a lot of people that are swapping out passports and identification documents at the border.
	There's tons of videos of passports and birth certificates and all types of documents being dumped in the Darien Gap or in the southern border because people are trying to ditch their original documents.
	They're getting fake documents upon crossing over as a way to pretend to be somebody else to avoid detection on the terror watch list.
	And our Border Patrol and ICE and DHS encountered individuals who were on the terror watch list, the FBI terror watch list, who were trying to use fake documentation during the Biden regime to come into our country to attack America.
	And so it just makes you wonder how many of the people who are identified, not talking about the 2 million gotaways, but the people who have been identified aren't really who DHS or Border Patrol thinks these people are because they're still dangerous.
	We're not saying that they're not dangerous or that they're not criminals, but maybe they're even worse than what DHS thinks that they already are.
	Maybe they were already, maybe they're even worse than what Border Patrol or ICE thinks that these people already are.
	So huge problem.
	And I want to play this clip for you.
	Let's play clip number nine of Tom Homan today warning about Iranian sleeper cells in the United States, which is exactly what he said on my show a week ago when we had him on to talk about the rise of Islamic activity at these pro-illegal alien protests and riots that we've seen erupt across our country.
	Let's go ahead and play clip number nine.
	Can you assess that issue particularly?
	How many Iranians are in the country that are in sleeper cells trying to do bad to America right now?
	Well, look, you and I have talked about this many times.
	I said the last four years, my biggest concern was this open border was the biggest national security vulnerability this country's ever seen.
	So I pulled numbers this morning just from a CBP under Joe Biden.
	There was 1,272 nationalists of Iran releasing the country between OFO and the Borbatro.
	And you compare that to the Trump administration, zero, right?
	Zero releases.
	And right now, because of President Trump's leadership, we have the most secure border in my lifetime, most secure border in history of this nation.
	So we have a secure border.
	So that was President Trump's big win on securing this nation.
	So we're not releasing people in this country.
	Special interest aliens aren't crossing that border undetected.
	But under Joe Biden, we had over 10 million people cross that border.
	But my biggest concern from day one, beyond the fentanyl, beyond the sex trafficking, women, and children, were the 2 million known gotaways.
	Over 2 million people crossed that border.
	We don't know who they are, where they came from, because they got away because Border Patrol was so overwhelmed with the humanitarian crisis that Biden created that over 2 million people crossed the border and got away.
	That is my biggest concern, and that's what created the biggest national security vulnerability this country's ever seen.
	And you have that on surveillance, seeing people get away.
	Do you have a sense of where they went?
	No, you know, the intelligence community under President Trump has been on this since day one.
	What gives me any comfort at all is that you don't have Chris Ferray there.
	You got Cash Patel there.
	You don't have Alejanda Mayorkas there anymore.
	You got Christy Noam.
	And you certainly don't have Kamal Harris as a border star.
	So President Trump brought a great team, been on this since day one.
	Do we know where every one of the two million are?
	No.
	We don't know who they all are.
	We don't know why they're here or where they came from.
	But we do know Border Patrol Intelligence for the last four years, they found prayer mats south of the border.
	They found identification from people from Iran, Turkey, Uzbekistan, Syria south of the border.
	So we know that some terrorists have crossed that border.
	We'd be a fool to think zero cross.
	The thing is, though, we got President Trump as a commander-in-chief who's put all resources on this.
	That's why President Trump from day one, ICE operations, despite what the left media says, he has been focused on national security threats and public safety threats.
	And between ICE and the Bureau, we've removed thousands of national security threats because of President Trump's leadership on this.
	Yes, that's right.
	Tom, thank you very much.
	And that's exactly why what President Trump did is America First.
	As I said, been saying this for years, and Tom Homan came on the show to talk about it.
	He just confirmed it again today on Maria Bartaromo show.
	They have the passports.
	They have the documentation of people, Muslim terrorists, Iranian proxies who are dumping their passports because when they're getting to Border Patrol or they're crossing into our country illegally, they don't want to have any documentation on them because They don't want to be known.
	They don't want to be identified.
	Why are they doing this?
	Because they clearly want to hide in the shadows, because they want to evade Border Patrol.
	They want to evade our national security representatives so that they can carry out an act of terror, so that they can carry out crimes.
	You know, you have different types of illegals.
	You have people that want their documentation and, you know, they try to get asylum or they have no problem, right?
	They have no problem using their real ID.
	Places like California, they don't care, right?
	Catch and release, they're not going to do anything with these illegal aliens.
	And a lot of these illegals have no problem showing their real ID.
	But the people that are dumping their passports and dumping their IDs and dumping their birth certificates in the desert while crossing over illegally into the United States, a lot of these people, as Tom Homan said, are from Islamic countries who are dumping their documents and they have prayer mats and they're finding Qurans.
	These are not good people.
	If you dump your identification, you don't want anybody to find out who you are, probably for nefarious reasons.
	So I wouldn't be surprised if we get attacked, not because of what President Trump did, but because I think that they're doing a good job.
	I would like to see there be more mass deportations.
	I think that the speed and the amount of deportations could increase.
	I really do.
	But unfortunately, a lot of these deportations have been blocked by these obstructionist activist judges who, as we just discussed, are trying to stage a judicial coup in our country.
	And so we are working against the clock here.
	We only have 3.5 more years left to get this done.
	65 million illegal aliens in our country.
	They've been telling us that 20 million illegals are in our country since Ronald Reagan was president.
	How if Joe Biden invited 20 million into our country and these people had kids, the 20 million that Ronald Reagan said were in our country, how are there only 20 million illegals in our country?
	The number is more like 65 million, but you still see all the politicians citing that same 20 million number for the number of illegal aliens in our country.
	It's 65 million.
	That means that one in five people living in this country is an illegal alien.
	Okay?
	That's the breakdown for you.
	One in five people living in this country is an illegal alien.
	So huge problem.
	And we're at risk of being attacked.
	And as I said today, if you live in a city with a large Muslim population, you need to be armed.
	If you yourself are an assimilated Muslim who fled an Islamic regime and you do not agree with all of the butchery of the Islamic ideology, but you still identify as a Muslim, you also need to protect yourself because these proxies are out to kill non-Muslims.
	They're out to kill Westerners.
	And they're also out to kill and they're out to harm Muslims who embrace the West, Muslims who are assimilated and now citizens of this country.
	They don't just want to kill U.S. citizens.
	They don't just want to kill Westerners.
	They don't just want to kill Jews.
	They don't just want to kill Christians.
	But a lot of the targets of these Islamic proxies, these Iranian proxies, these Islamic terrorists are Muslims themselves who try to practice a form of Islamic reformation.
	So some people will say, oh, well, you're just trying to incite violence against Muslims.
	No, actually, I'm telling you that assimilated Muslims who have embraced Western society and, you know, are not out here calling for jihad every day and not out here, maybe they, maybe they're not super religious or they just identify as Muslim because their parents are Muslim or their grandparents were Muslim, but they're not fanatics, right?
	Those people are also at risk of being attacked because they will view you as an apostate in a place like Iran if you push for Islamic reformation.
	So those people need to be careful too.
	Everybody needs to start caring.
	Everybody needs to start thinking of their safety because I think it's very likely that we will see some type of attack.
	And it has nothing to do with President Trump striking Iran's nuclear facilities.
	It has everything to do with the fact that Joe Biden and the Democrats allowed for over 2 million illegal alien Islamic terrorists to come into our country.
	And every single state, all 50 states in our country now have Iranian proxies.
	All 50 states, according to the FBI, have ISIS terrorists.
	So whether it's ISIS, whether it's Hamas, whether it's Hezbollah, we have terrorists living amongst us in all 50 states, and every American needs to take that threat seriously.
	And so if the Iranians are sending illegal aliens to our country to attack Americans, isn't it in our best interest to denuclearize Iran?
	How is that Israel first?
	How is it Israel first to denuclearize Iran when Iran is sending illegal alien terrorists to our country?
	A lot of them are traveling through South America.
	When I was in the Darien Gap, you know, they have entire Hezbollah encampments.
	It's well known.
	It's well known that Hezbollah comes in through Colombia and Panama.
	So these Iranian proxies are taking advantage of illegal immigration to come to America to attack and kill American citizens.
	And what did Trump say?
	He was going to make America safe again.
	What did Trump say?
	I'm going to make it so that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.
	Promises made, promises kept.
	So I think that a lot of this activity that we're seeing against President Trump is paid for.
	I think there's a lot of people that are starting to see the writing on the wall after these next 3.5 years.
	They're thinking Trump's going to be gone.
	I need to try to start establishing myself for the next financial grift.
	There's a lot of people who made a lot of money off of President Trump and his name.
	And now they want to throw him under the bus, knowing that they're not going to need him for anything in 3.5 years, or at least they think they're not going to need him for anything.
	And they're trying to find inroads with the radical left or the Muslims or the communists or whoever it may be, anybody who's trying to undermine President Trump.
	That's what they're trying to do.
	Because look, there is a big movement right now.
	And if we lose the House, then President Trump would become a lame duck president because, well, they're going to attack him and they're going to undermine his agenda every day like they did during His first term when we lost the House and we lost the Senate, and the Democrats were able to, you know, file these bogus impeachment charges against the president and harass him and try to block his entire agenda and stage a coup against his administration and almost throw him in jail.
	So, I can't say with confidence that we're going to win the House.
	I can't say with confidence that we're going to keep the House and the Senate.
	I really can't because I don't think that the Republicans are doing enough to use their power to fight back against this infiltration and subversion.
	I think that there's too much going along to get along.
	And eventually, 2026 is going to come along and we're going to be asking ourselves, what did we do to stop this invasion?
	What did the DOJ do to crack down on Islam in America?
	What did the DOJ do to crack down on terrorist activity in America?
	What did the DOJ do to go after these activist judges who are trying to stage a judicial coup?
	What did they do?
	And if the answer is not enough or nothing, well, too bad.
	That's going to be the end of our country.
	It's not going to matter if Trump's in the White House because they're going to be able to subvert every single thing that he does.
	And he's not going to be able to get any part of his agenda through the House or the Senate.
	So, you know, we actually really don't have 3.5 years.
	We have about one year left, right?
	We have one year left for Republicans to get it together to start increasing the heat and applying more pressure.
	Otherwise, I don't think things are going to look too great in our country.
	Not because of President Trump, but because where's the leadership?
	We're not seeing enough leadership.
	Republicans need to be doing more also to push back on these foreign influence operations that are attacking Donald Trump.
	Look at Tucker Carlson, another grifter trying to lie about President Trump, trying to say that he's at America first and that his whole entire legacy as president is going to be destroyed if he does these strategic attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities.
	Did Tucker Carlson scream about that when President Trump raided al-Baghdadi and killed al-Baghdadi?
	Did Tucker Carlson say this?
	Did Candace Owens say this when President Trump killed Soleimani?
	Last time I checked, they were celebrating.
	Last time I checked, they were celebrating.
	And this is why, you know, Iranian state media is now showing people like Nick Fuentes and Candace Owens, and they're using them as voices to try to undermine President Trump and his administration.
	If Iranian state media, which is regime media, Islamic supremacist state media, is using your talking points to fight against President Trump, you are on the losing side of this issue.
	You are America last.
	If the Iranian terrorists are using your comments to push back against the United States of America, you are on the losing side of this argument.
	You are.
	you're on the losing side of this argument.
	So I'm not doing what I'm doing to get rich.
	I'm not doing what I'm doing to undermine President Trump.
	I'm not looking for my next big payout or my next big payday.
	As people saw, right, it puts you at a financial disadvantage to be a Trump loyalist because you see that you're targeted.
	Look, I just explained to you the litigation I'm involved in.
	People know that I was subjected to cancel culture for years.
	It's not like being a loyalist is financially beneficial, but I'm not focused on what is financially beneficial.
	I'm focused on what's right for my country and what's right for President Trump.
	And too many of these influencers and too many of these pundits are doing what's going to be good for their wallet, not what's going to be good for our country, not what's going to be good for our national security and not what's going to be good for their future, their children's future, and the future of Western civilization.
	So I don't really give a shit if they want to call me Israel first, if they want to call me all these nasty names and call me a Jewish propagandist.
	I am America first.
	And if you can't see the threat of Iranian proxies coming into our country illegally and being activated and you can't see the threat of, you know, the Iranian regime sending sleeper cells to our country and they've been doing it for years to try to weaken America from within, then I don't know.
	I don't know what's wrong with you.
	I don't know what's going to open your eyes or what's going to teach you.
	Maybe you need to see another 9-11 in order to wake up.
	I don't know.
	I hope we don't get to that point in time, but I feel like that's where things are heading.
	I really do.
	That's where things are heading in my opinion.
	Okay.
	Thank you.
	Let's see.
	Smiley NSB said, you're sharing the truth.
	So share, share, share.
	Yeah, this is the truth.
	This is the truth.
	And look, there's a lot of bot networks.
	Don't believe everything that you see online.
	I'm not saying you have to take everything I say 100%.
	Maybe you're not going to agree with everything that I say, right?
	I'm not a propagandist.
	What I'm telling you is be very skeptical of the information that you see online because a lot of it is being propped up by bot networks.
	There's foreign money that's being injected all throughout social media to try to pay people off, to push a pro-Iran, pro-Russia, pro-China message, to try to undermine President Trump, to weaken his legacy so that America crumbles to the threat of this red-green alliance, this red-green alliance, this communist-Islamist alliance.
	So again, you know, you should really be skeptical of who some of these people are that you're getting your information from and ask yourself, you know, what benefit they have in propping up Iran.
	Nobody should be propping up Iran right now.
	It doesn't matter if you're anti-war.
	It doesn't matter if you're pro-regime change.
	Nobody should be giving fodder to the Iranian regime to be utilizing on their own television networks.
	terrible.
	I'm not sure.
	I'm not sure.
	Somebody said, this is not good in my opinion, Laura.
	I don't see any benefits for America.
	Well, we have an Iranian threat in our own country.
	So if you don't see the benefit for America by President Trump showing strength and force against the Iranian regime after they sent 2 million Iranian proxies into our country to be activated at any moment to kill and maim Americans, I don't know what to tell you.
	I don't know what to tell you.
	If you don't understand the concept of making America safe again and trying to root out these Iranian proxies and make sure that people who chant death to America are not only not able to keep sending their Iranian proxies to America to kill Americans,
	but they're not able to get access to a nuclear weapon to nuke the West and nuke our country here in America, the United States of America, if you don't want Americans to be murdered in a nuclear holocaust, then I don't know what to tell you.
	If you really can't see, if you're telling me that you don't know how this is good for our country, then you must be okay with the possibility of Americans being killed in a nuclear holocaust.
	I don't know what to tell you.
	I don't want to get nuked for Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones and Candace Owens, okay?
	Just like these people like to say, I don't want to die for Israel.
	Well, I don't want to get nuked for Tucker Carlson.
	I don't want to get nuked for Alex Jones.
	I don't want to get nuked for Candace Owens, okay?
	I don't want to die in a nuclear holocaust.
	don't so just People used to agree on this.
	They used to agree that Islam was a threat to the West, that we needed to preserve our values here.
	We needed to preserve Western civilization.
	And it's very concerning to see so many people running cover for this Iranian regime.
	We actually have a video.
	Some people in the chat said they want to see this.
	So let's go ahead and play clip number 20 because if you think that I'm making this up about Candace Owens being on Iranian state regime TV this week and Nick Funtis too.
	Nick Funtis was also featured.
	They actually played a clip from one of his monologues and Candace Owens.
	I like to call Candace Owens Tehran Candy.
	You know, we had Hanoi Jane.
	We had Hanoi Jane.
	Now we have Tehran Candy.
	I call her Tehran Candy.
	This is bad.
	This is career-ending stuff to be featured on Iranian state media.
	I mean, think about this.
	These people are Islamic terrorists.
	These people have killed U.S. service members and they are cropping up Candace Owens and Nick Fuentes to work against the United States of America.
	Let's go ahead and play the clip.
	I was a little bit of a thought that Trump could be able to get him.
	I was a little bit of a thought that he would have been able to get him.
	I was a little bit of a thought that he would have been able to get him.
	There you have it.
	So it's it's real.
	A lot of people said, oh, that's not real.
	They didn't show her on Iranian state TV.
	Yeah, they did.
	They did.
	And trust me, I know a lot of people.
	I know a lot of people at the White House.
	I know a lot of people in conservative media and politics.
	I know everybody.
	Doesn't mean I get along with everybody, but I know everybody.
	And let's just say that this clip was circulating in a lot of chats today, and there were a lot of discussions about how concerning it was.
	So it's really bad.
	Very, very bad.
	And here's an example of the threat of Islam and these Iranian proxies in our country here on U.S. soil.
	This is a report by Amy Meck, who's a journalist who does a lot of reporting on the threat of Islam in America and the threat of Islamic immigration.
	And here's a video of an Islamic cleric here in the United States, I believe in Texas, talking about how after these strikes on Iran, Muslims need to rise up against the infidels, which are non-Muslims.
	They need to rise up against the infidels and pledge allegiance to Iran.
	We've got millions of people, okay?
	Millions of these people, these Muslims living in our country who have the same views as this crackpot jihadi calling for Muslims to rise up in American cities and to pledge allegiance to the Ayatollah.
	Let's go ahead and play this clip.
	This is happening.
	This just happened on U.S. soil.
	So this is not, you know, the Middle East.
	This is not Iran, this clip that I'm showing you.
	This is Texas.
	Okay, this is Texas.
	Go ahead and play the clip.
	Be angry at those whom you deserve to be angry at.
	And it is those politicians who sided with the abettors of massacring.
	But even in that anger, and even those who sided with the zulm, let us be clear here.
	The two sides are not equal.
	On the one side, you have the bloodthirsty, colonialist settler enterprise, a machine of cruelty that has industrialized genocide, trampled on every single remnant of human dignity, unleashed a cruelty so depra- That is the reality.
	Contrast this with the other side, Iran right now.
	The average person in that country has nothing to do with the foreign policy.
	In that land, the adan is being called.
	In that land, the masajid are being filled.
	In that land, sajdah is done.
	In that land, the Quran is recited.
	In that land, as this battle is going on, they are invoking Allah for help.
	How can you compare this with that?
	Wallahi, this is the height of injustice.
	No matter how angry you are, and yes, wallahi, some of that anger is legitimate.
	Some of that anger against politicians of that country of Iran is legitimate.
	No matter how angry you are, the two are not and cannot be the same.
	And also, by the way, do you really think, oh innocent person who thinks these two are equal, do you really think that Israel only wants to destroy Iran and that is it?
	Have you lost all sense and sensibility?
	Do you not understand that after Iran it is every single Muslim superpower in the region?
	Do you really think that it is just one land?
	You cheering them on against Iran is you cheering them on against yourself when your own turn comes.
	They have publicly and blatantly said they want a greater Israel project.
	They want to gobble up every single Muslim land and region.
	Some of their maps that they say greater Israel includes Mecca and Medina.
	And here you are, O naive, foolish person, blinded in your hatred, angry in your sectarianism, believing the two are the same.
	No, wallahi, they are not the same.
	And I say this as somebody who strongly disagrees theologically and politically with the country of Iran.
	But still, on the one hand, you have Iman, even if it has mistakes.
	On the other, you have not just kufr, but blatant kufr.
	Not just average kufr, but the most deviant, arrogant type of kufr that we have not seen for many millennia.
	This is firanic Kufr on the one side.
	No matter whatever mistakes the other side is making, you cannot equate the two.
	And so, in this current conflict going on, I state unequivocally that yes, while I do not support Iran unconditionally in this conflict, without a doubt, the aggressor is Israel.
	Without a doubt, the dhum that is happening is happening from and because of Israel.
	And I will criticize Israel a million times before I criticize the other side for having done what exactly in the current conflict.
	Whatever grievances we have and we have grievances, let us agree to pause them for the time being.
	I'm not saying ignore.
	Once things settle down, once things are calm, once we have both eliminated the common enemy, then let us sit down and dialogue heart to heart.
	Let us see what can be done.
	Let us see if we can solve our internal differences is to see Muslim countries, Muslim rulers who are unfortunately siding with Israel, aiding and abetting Israel against the bombing of a fellow Muslim land.
	Wallahu Musta'an, we seek Allah's refuge.
	Wallahi, shame, shame on anybody who sides with the butchers of babies and with genocide enablers against people who say the kalimah and who pray to Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala.
	To Allah we complain and to him we show of our reality and weakness that, oh Allah, we have nothing to do with anybody who sides with tyranny and oppression against justice and against the people of Islam.
	And what should you be asking yourself after watching that clip?
	Why did we let these people into our country?
	That's what you should be asking yourself.
	Why did we let these people into our country?
	Why do we have millions of these jihadists who would kill us if they had the opportunity?
	I mean, you can look at the way he's talking.
	Rise up.
	Rise up.
	Rise up against the infidel.
	You know what that means?
	It means kill the non-Muslim.
	So we have a serious problem in this country.
	As President Trump said, we have a Muslim problem in this country.
	In fact, there's a clip.
	Let me find it.
	I posted this on my account the other day.
	And it's a great clip.
	It's a really great clip.
	It's a compilation of President Trump speaking out about the threat of Islam in our country.
	And it's something that we don't really see a lot of Republicans talk about anymore.
	I'm going to send this to my producer.
	I have him pull this up right now.
	This is a great clip.
	And you can see President Trump's own statements over the years of him talking about the threat of Islam and the threat that Muslims pose in our country and how we need to have mass surveillance of mosques and how we need to start addressing this threat before these people come and kill Americans.
	And so if this is not addressed, if the mass deportations do not increase and we do not get a hold on these Iranian proxies and President Trump, look, President Trump already showed extreme and very effective force and strength.
	It was amazing.
	It was probably one of the most sophisticated military operations ever.
	Just required a lot of coordination and precision on behalf of the United States and Israel working together to take these nuclear facilities out.
	President Trump needs to be able to show force against Iran.
	He needs to be able to show force against the Iranian regime, or else they're going to think that it's okay to send their jihadi hate preachers here to our country to preach the killing of infidels.
	And then one day we are going to find ourselves the victims of a Sharia supremacy takeover.
	Do we have this clip?
	I want to go ahead and play this clip just because I don't think a lot of people really understand that Donald Trump campaigned on this.
	This is what it means to be America first.
	If you are new, my producers of my era, the clip I just texted you, this isn't something that was on the show doc.
	So I just texted you a new clip.
	Let's get this pulled up.
	It's a clip.
	It's a compilation of President Trump speaking about the threat of Islam.
	And you have all these people that came into our party that really don't understand what it means to be MAGA.
	And now these people are disruptors.
	Some of them are being paid by Qatar.
	They're sowing Discord and they're trying to pretend like they get to tell President Trump what it means to be MAGA.
	They get to tell President Trump what it means to be America first.
	And the reality is, is you don't know your foreign policy was Democrat foreign policy.
	Your foreign policy is not the foreign policy that President Trump has been campaigning on, not just for the 10 years that it's been since he officially launched his presidential campaign, but also before he launched his presidential campaign, when he would constantly rail against the Obama administration for their handling of the JCPOA, the Iran nuclear deal.
	He would constantly rail against the threat of Islam.
	He constantly spoke out about the threat of Sharia supremacy in our country.
	And I have a serious problem with people like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens and others that are now trying to redefine what it means to be America first.
	These people were not with Trump since the beginning.
	These people were not with President Trump since day one.
	And if you were not with President Trump since day one, you really honestly have no right to be telling President Trump what it means to be MAGA and what it means to be America first.
	And you also have no reason to be gaslighting people into thinking that we should be having acceptance and no fear of this Islamic ideology that seeks to oppress and kill everything that is non-Muslim.
	Let's go ahead and play this compilation.
	It's a Muslim problem in the world.
	But you do believe overall there is a Muslim problem in the world.
	Well, there is a Muslim problem, absolutely.
	You just have to turn on your television, sir.
	I think Islam hates us.
	Did you mean all 1.6 billion Muslims?
	I mean a lot of them.
	You look at what's happening with the Quran.
	It's a pretty scary thing.
	There's something there that teaches some very negative vibes.
	They do not respect us at all.
	Large portions of a group of people.
	Islam.
	Large portions want to use very, very harsh means.
	You have more than a handful of moderate Muslims, but you certainly have a problem with Muslims.
	If you have people coming out of mosques with hatred and with death in their eyes and on their minds, we're going to have to do something.
	They're trying to take over our children and convince them how wonderful ISIS is and how wonderful Islam is, and we don't know what's happening.
	And we have to look at the Muslims and we have to do something.
	We cannot stand by and be the stupid people while our country is destroyed.
	I want surveillance of certain mosques, okay?
	And as I'm playing this clip for you, Candace Owens is out again saying, you can't make this shit up.
	It's almost cartoonish.
	Totally legit Iranian sleeper cell attack on American soil is now to be expected, mocking the fact that, you know, we have millions of Iranian sleeper cells in our country.
	So these people are enemies to America.
	As far as I'm concerned, Candace Owens is a traitor to her country.
	She's an enemy to America.
	And why doesn't she just go back to the UK with her husband, right?
	She married this guy for money.
	She's married to this rich guy.
	Go move to the fucking UK, Candace.
	Okay, get the fuck out of America if you're going to gaslight people into thinking that, oh, we don't have Islamic terrorists living in our country.
	We do.
	And, you know, you have to really question her intentions.
	If you're going to go around gaslighting people, telling them that they don't need to be worried about a terror threat when our own national security officials have identified known Islamic terrorists who have crossed into our country.
	What are you doing?
	Are you trying to get Americans killed?
	So again, you have to be very skeptical of these people who are trying to undermine not just our national security, but are trying to give an upper hand to Islamic supremacy.
	As I said before, Candace Owens married into a very wealthy family, right?
	Her husband is British.
	I've met him before.
	Nice guy.
	Nothing against him.
	His name's George.
	Nice guy.
	But look what's happened to the UK.
	They have allowed themselves to be totally conquered by Muslims.
	They have allowed themselves to be totally conquered by Islam.
	And now she's actually gaslighting people.
	Let's get this clip.
	Let's get this tweet pulled up.
	This is just ridiculous.
	I mean, people have to see this.
	And look, I used to be friends with Candace Owens.
	You know, we used to hang out.
	I used to, you know, go to dinners with her and whatnot when we all lived in Westchester.
	I used to hang out with her, but something has happened to her.
	Something has happened to her and she has changed.
	She has changed and not for the better.
	Not for the better.
	Nothing positive has come out of whatever happened to Candace Owens.
	Let's go ahead and pull this tweet up and people can see.
	Is she calling Donald Trump a liar?
	Is she calling Tom Homan a liar?
	Is she calling our border patrol officers liars?
	Is she calling ICE agents liars who have come into contact with Hamas and Hezbollah terrorists and Iranian proxies who have tried to, excuse me, carry out attacks in our country?
	One hour ago, she just posted this.
	One hour ago.
	You can't make this up.
	It's almost cartoonish.
	Totally legit.
	She's trying to basically take away any type of actual legitimate national security concern that Americans should be worried about and have Americans become sitting ducks.
	I mean, it just makes you wonder.
	Is she trying to get American citizens killed?
	Is she trying to get American citizens killed in an act of Islamic terror?
	Because that's what it sounds like.
	It sounds like that's what she's trying to do.
	If you're telling people in a sarcastic manner, oh, totally legit Iranian sleeper cell attack.
	Oh, you don't have to worry about it.
	I am going to ask you, are you trying to get Americans killed?
	Why do you not want Americans to be vigilant about the fact that we have been invaded by, I mean, I just played for you the clip of that Imam in Texas talking about how people need to rise up against the infidels and stand with these Iranian terrorists.
	So you can think what you want, but it's pretty obvious that there are people.
	And again, right?
	She is not really living in reality compared to your average person.
	She married into extreme wealth.
	Okay.
	She has a very privileged lifestyle.
	She has a very privileged lifestyle.
	She's not going to feel the pain that a lot of other Americans are going to feel.
	I bet she has security.
	I bet she lives in a gated community.
	Okay.
	She's not going to be subjected to the same type of security threats as other Americans or other people living in the UK who have to deal with the threat of Islamic immigration and Islamic terror in their country.
	So it's very pompous and it's very arrogant for her to be mocking this situation because when something bad does happen and innocent people are hurt, I'm going to point back at all of these tweets from all of these social media influencers who are simping for Qatar, simping for Iran, and trying to downplay the actual legitimate threat of Islamic terrorism.
	It's a national security threat.
	Before we close out, I want to thank the sponsor of tonight's episode of Lumer Unleash Kirk Elliott Precious Metals.
	Let's cut through the noise.
	The economy is shaky.
	Banks are failing.
	Inflation's eating your savings.
	But gold and silver, they've held value through every single crisis.
	And you're seeing this now as gold continues to rise, even with the growing crisis between Iran and Israel.
	But don't get buried buying the wrong kind of precious metals.
	Those shiny coins and ads, they carry a high price and high fees.
	But when you try to sell them, you get less money.
	That's why Dr. Kirk Elliott does it differently.
	Real bullion and no games.
	So visit kepm.com slash lumer and get the straight answers.
	Protect what matters and secure your financial future before the next crisis hits.
	Head on over to kepm.com slash lumer, kepm.com slash lumer or call 720-605-3900, 720-605-3900 and protect your financial future today.
	Look, people can watch whoever they want to watch.
	People can be friends with whoever they want to be friends with.
	But if you take anything from this episode tonight, it's that you should be very skeptical of all the information that you're consuming right now.
	Ask yourself why people would want to be propping up a regime that has killed thousands of Americans in acts of terror.
	Ask yourself why Iranian terrorist media is propping up certain social media influencers that are encouraging people to be anti-Trump.
	Just ask yourself, what would be the benefit of that?
	And also ask yourself how these people may be benefiting, whether it's professionally, Politically, financially, socially.
	We don't know.
	We don't know how these people are benefiting.
	I have my suspicions, but you should be asking these questions.
	Ask yourself how people like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens and others benefit from downplaying legitimate terror threats in our country and undermining President Trump and his foreign policy at the expense of the safety of American citizens.
	Ask yourself.
	I'm very concerned by the total 180 rhetoric that a lot of these people have and the national security implications it's going to have in our country.
	And I'm going to be following this closely.
	I'm going to be documenting this closely.
	And I'm going to continue exposing and reporting on people and calling people out publicly who are pushing out false information, who are trying to make Americans sitting ducks while we have a legitimate terror threat in our country, because people need the truth.
	People don't need to be gaslit and fed Islamic propaganda.
	American citizens need to understand that the enemy is here, the enemy is among you, and Donald Trump is doing what he can to try to denuclearize that enemy from becoming more violent than they already are.
	People have already been killed.
	People have already died, not because of Donald Trump, but because of the Iranian regime and these proxies and Hamas and Hezbollah who want nothing more than to kill every non-Muslim and every supporter of Western civilization, every American and every Israeli they meet in their path.
	So it's very important that as this conflict continues to escalate, that you are weary of the people who are providing you information.
	With that, thank you so much for tuning in to this special Sunday episode of Loomer Unleashed.
	Be sure that you're following me on social media, on X at Laura Loomer, and also on X at Loomer Unleashed at Laura Loomer.
	You can follow me on TrueSocial at Laura Loomer.
	All my handles on social media are at Laura Loomer.
	Be sure that you go to rumble.com slash Laura Loomer and subscribe.
	It's free to do so.
	Download the Rumble app and click follow and you'll never miss an episode of Loomer Unleashed.
	The next episode of Loomer Unleashed will air this Tuesday at 9 p.m.
	Eastern and I will see you this week for another live episode.
	Thanks so much for tuning in.
	I hope you all had a wonderful weekend.
	There is a young female journalist, conservative journalist by the name of Laura Loomer.
	If America's men acted like Laura Loomer, our problems will be fixed in about five minutes.
	Chain herself.
	She chained herself.
	Let me feel about that.

▲