All Episodes Plain Text
Jan. 1, 2018 - Loomer Unleashed - Laura Loomer
01:30
Former Muslim Explains Abdul El-Sayed's Politics

Former Muslim Abdul El-Sayed's politics are dissected through the lens of alleged hypocrisy, where a candidate claims personal Sharia adherence while opposing it publicly. The analysis argues that such contradictions stem from Islamic doctrines like taqiyya, which mandates deception, and al-Hijrah, requiring Muslims to infiltrate non-Muslim nations to eventually impose Sharia law. Ultimately, this strategy allegedly involves exploiting the LGBTQ community and liberal allies to achieve total religious dominance, suggesting that democratic platforms are merely tactical tools for an ultimate ideological takeover rather than genuine policy proposals. [Automatically generated summary]

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Speaker Time Text
Lying Politicians 00:01:08
unidentified
How can someone like Abdulrahman Muhammad Al-Saeed practice personal Sharia in his own life, but then be running on a platform promoting ideas that are completely oppositional to Sharia?
Sharia is totally incompatible with democracy.
The way that this happens is that in Sharia and the Sunnah, that Muhammad instructed Muslims that they could use taqiyya, which is the doctrine of deception.
And so everything coming out of any Muslim politician or candidate's mouth is lying.
Taqiyyah is the doctrine of deception.
And in the defense of Islam and the rules of al-Hijrah, which is the doctrine of immigration, all Muslims must immigrate to a non-Muslim country and eventually turn it Muslim under Islamic Sharia.
That is the purpose of al-Saeed, of anyone that is Muslim running.
They will use the LGBTQ community.
They will use liberals.
Export Selection