Jeffrey Epstein’s leaked emails—featuring bizarre terms like "shrimp" (requiring insulated storage) and a $1,000 bounty for girls—hint at coded references in a network tied to figures such as Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and Bill Clinton, alongside fertility rituals and alleged child exploitation. The hosts link Epstein’s alleged cult to broader conspiracy theories, framing modern liberalism’s embrace of abortion (63.6 million U.S. cases since 1973) and unselective immigration—where foreign nationals accounted for 37.7% of British Transport Police arrests in 2024–2025—as evidence of societal decline driven by moral rejection of God and natural law, echoing Pope Paul VI’s warnings in Humane Vitae. Epstein’s revelations expose a web of elite complicity, while critics argue policies like these undermine conservative values and contribute to cultural decay. [Automatically generated summary]
Welcome to the podcast of the Lotitas for Monday the 9th of February 2026.
It is Monday, but it's all quite exciting in politics at the moment.
We're not going to be covering exactly what's happening right this second because it's all quite breaking.
So we're going to be covering today how the Epstein revelations are getting very dark, how we have become a civilization that worships Moloch, and how the things that we think the way that the country is is actually way worse.
I'm joined by Nate M. Ferris, and we're going to crack on.
But after the podcast, Ferris is doing a live Real Politik where he is going to be diving in depth into the connections between Epstein and the network of, I mean, what would you call it?
Financiers, politicians, influencers in Europe.
Yeah, the gross, grubby network that's been controlling our entire continent.
A little bit about Britain, a little bit about Ukraine, a little bit about the peace process.
Yeah, and it's terrible, to be honest.
It's a conspiracy theorist's sweat dream confirmed in black and white.
Which is not overstating this situation at all.
But anyway, so in prelude to that, let's talk about how the Epstein file revelations are getting pretty dark.
They're getting like genuinely, I mean, the internet is, of course, ablaze with all of this sort of stuff.
So you've seen people talking about pizza and grape soda, right?
This is all new to me.
This is all new to you.
The Pizzagate thing is all new.
I don't know anything about this.
I thought this was for the Pentagon when you get pizza.
To give you a preface on that then, Pizzagate was a few years ago now where Hillary Clinton's emails were leaked by WikiLeaks because her emails got hacked because it was an in-secure server or whatever it was.
And there was a weird terminology that was being used about pizza.
I mean, okay, you know, the food pizza, I like just as much as anyone else.
You go out, you might get a pizza, you might get a kebab, or you might get a burger or whatever.
You don't really talk about it that much, right?
You don't send constant non-stop emails referencing the word pizza over.
I don't even think Italians do.
I don't even, yeah, I don't even do.
But the point is, it became apparent that this was kind of a code word.
So if you were messaging a dealer, you'd say, have you got any grass?
Or can I get some snow?
Or something like this.
It took on that sort of aspect.
And then it got buried.
And they were like, nope, this one journalist came out and he was like, nope, Pizzagate, nothing but an alt-right conspiracy.
A couple of years later, he was actually imprisoned for raping toddlers.
So, you know, we'll trust his word for that.
But the point is, a lot of people are seeing a very similar reflection in the Epstein files because pizza and grape soda for tomorrow for lunch, that seems really weirdly specific.
And various other things like that.
And you'll notice that people have been talking about shrimp a lot because they talk in a weird way about shrimp.
Whoever this is, all weirdly redacted, someone is asking if we need someone, the shrimp, otherwise someone doesn't want to help her with the agency.
Now, that's not talking about food, is it?
No.
Yeah, no, yeah.
And even if that's a person.
To be fair, they could be referring to somebody as the shrimp because he looks like a shrimp.
Maybe.
Absolutely.
Maybe.
But why are we redacting this?
Like, what's so mission-critical about the redactions here, right?
Sorry.
And then we've got, like, various other ones as well.
As you can see at the bottom, we're in a getting agreements.
I can't even think of the smell of black shrimp.
It's a bit weird.
I mean, I think they use shrimp to mean prawn.
And there's just prawns, they're pink.
Sometimes they're green if they're not cooked.
I like shrimp, but not too much if it's too pink.
I'm definitely more into white than any other colour.
Huh?
No, someone like shrimp.
You throw away the head and keep the body.
Right.
I mean, this is.
What the hell is this?
I feel that they're not talking about prawns.
No, they're definitely not.
This is.
And if they were like, again, in the other ones, why are we redacting so much about them?
You've got here, O Paul.
You, I know how much you hate those stomach aches.
Compilation preview, creamy shrimp.
So someone who has been completely redacted.
And then a good character.
I tried to photoshop the cream off the twin shrimp.
So I just feel this isn't talking about food.
No.
Right.
And so it's right.
Okay.
This is kind of dark.
Then you've got just various other things.
Would you like a massage?
I can cook food for you.
You choose.
I'll make you a birthday dinner.
No shrimp.
Okay.
That's weird.
I thought he liked shrimp a lot.
I mean, who knows?
So yeah, the shrimp definitely refers to someone, right?
And this is a category of someone's.
Or that's right.
A category of someone's.
And then you've got other weird things.
And this is the keep the shrimp one.
Where's the more sure there was another shrimp one?
Meeting tomorrow shrimp.
Right.
This, this, this, not really about food, right?
For who again, why would it be so redacted?
Why can't we know who he's meeting tomorrow?
And I guess having shrimp for dinner or something, right?
But I've got to bring in a lot of extra information on this.
Call X, she will give you a massage and she looks better than shrimp anyway.
Right.
Okay.
This is not about food.
Right.
Do we agree?
Yes.
Let's move on.
So there are also references to tuna.
How do we deal with frozen white tuna?
What does that mean?
What does it mean?
How do you deal with it?
What do you need to do with it?
If it's food, you just cook it.
I don't even know what white tuna is.
I'm only familiar with just tuna, which is kind of greyish.
Again, so bit weird.
Apparently, though, there's emails where he's talking about his fish allergy.
Can we?
I can't get that properly, but so yeah.
Here we go.
He was waiting after he got to the SHH room where Epstein was brought back to his room with his lawyers.
I've been holding while medical visited him there regarding some paperwork for his fish allergy.
Don't know who this is from, obviously.
Don't know what the context is either, because of course I don't know who it's from.
But so is he talking about fish if he has a fish allergy?
Shrimp and tuna?
If there's a fish allergy, and the thing is, it's like, okay, if that's not what they're talking about, and they are talking in coded language as if they were drug dealers or something.
Well, that's a bit dark, isn't it?
Bit concerning.
That's really bad.
And then you have this clip from Asmagol, which is just the funniest thing in the world, because there are a lot of references to jerky, as in beef jerky, one would assume.
But they just tend to say beef jerky.
Jerky.
Sorry, not beef jerky.
We'll watch this.
This is just very weird.
Hope you are feeling better.
Did we analyze the jerky?
Why didn't we get jerky this week?
I also added more to the jerky and ginger lemongrass.
Thank you so much.
Super cool.
Beef jerky.
Delicious.
Jojo is here and we'll walk the jerky over to Jeffrey.
We'll walk the jerky over to Jeffrey.
Why would jerky walk around?
Why would it do that?
Delicious lunch, beef jerky.
Steve and I are very grateful, above all, for your friendship.
Some of these emails are so wholesome, aren't they?
It's too bad they eat kids.
A small insulated bag would be fine.
I don't checking it.
No need for crazy amounts of ice.
One should do.
There is one bag of beef jerky in the fridge.
Please get it.
Also, Blank has more at her place.
Please get it from her as well.
I suppose it needs to be in a cold, insulated bag.
Just wanted to touch base about jerky.
JE said he was going to start eating regular food again, so he might be eating less jerky.
He said he has six bags of it in a downstairs freezer.
Why would you freeze jerky?
Steve needs a six to eight ounce portion of jerky.
I gave you all the jerky we had, and it lasted only half the amount of time it was meant to.
I felt like it was more important for you to have the jerky to eat during my time off.
My plan is to make a batch before I leave for LSJ, and some of that will go to Steve, and the rest will go to you at LSJ when I arrive.
Little St. James Island.
And that's what LSJ must mean.
So logically, that means that they were doing this off of the island.
Steve Hansen is sending jerky to your attention overnight.
I believe it should be enough to get him through.
Jeffrey Epstein is asking to bring him more jerky.
I'm flying in on Friday.
I will bring jerky.
Is there a time I could come say hi and drop off the beef jerky?
And that's from Jeffrey Epstein.
Francis has time to come tomorrow.
Show me how to make it.
Jerky class anyone.
He will bring you to taste his new jerky recipe from the restaurant.
He sends a warm hello.
He's working at a restaurant called Cannibal.
Guys, the restaurant's called Cannibal and Cooks.
Wait for it.
Beef, jerky, and steak.
Can blank make some jerky?
I think we should landscape all around the house to use the water if possible.
If the main house is not enough, are there any recorded images of Jeffrey Epstein with beef jerky at all?
No, there are no recorded or publicly known.
So you get the point.
I mean, I don't think I've ever emailed anyone more than once about food, right?
As in, we're going to a restaurant.
What would you like to order?
I'm willing to play the devil's advocate here.
Yeah.
I'm willing to say that at some point he went on some weird diet and was obsessive about eating beef jerky.
Quite possibly.
If you go on any kind of keto diet, your favorite snack is jerky because that's one of the few things that you can eat.
I'm on keto.
I actually don't.
Jerky.
I make homemade jerky and it's amazing.
I'm sure if you make it homemade, but often the stuff you buy has more carbs in it than you expect.
Sorry.
Absolutely.
I'm willing to accept that they are talking about pizza and grape soda because they're pretending to be normal people.
Possibly.
And my inclination around all of this is that since it can't be proven yet, there should be more pressure to release all of the names with no redactions, especially when it comes to stuff like that.
Because then if you have the names and you can prove another connection through a court case, through something or whatever, it will establish the facts.
That's the first part.
The second part is that when you look at this, this is primarily an ethnic network.
Not really a.
There's not enough evidence to say that this is a satanist network or that this is a child-eating network.
That's very restrained of you as a Catholic.
Yes, yes, yes.
And I'm willing to accept that it might be all of these things.
Yeah, oh, yeah, absolutely.
Well, in terms of looking at how this network works as a power brokerage, an information clearinghouse, and a node that connects different ethnic networks to each other.
And in terms of seeing the extent to which it influences politics, that seems to be the more catidian, more day-to-day relevant revelation.
Sure, and I agree, and you can cover that in RealPolitik this afternoon.
But I do think it's a bit weird.
It's very, very weird.
All of it's weird.
I mean.
It is weird.
You've got weight stipulated.
And that's a lot of jerky Yeah Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Even someone on keto, that's a lot.
Storage implementation, which you wouldn't need for jerky.
Why do you need the cold bags?
Why do you need to freeze it?
Insulated bags.
Yeah, none of that.
I don't need that for a jerky.
If anyone's wondering, that makes it insanely tough and difficult to chew.
if it's actually beef jerky.
The whole reason jerky was created was because it didn't freeze it.
Yeah.
Yeah, so the cowboys could just have it and wine and dried meat.
It doesn't require basically like a dry kirk.
You can keep it in a jar.
All of this is definitely not about beef jerky.
I don't know what it's about.
Yep, that's the thing.
It ain't about beef jerky.
Just sure.
I don't know what it's about.
And all I'm saying is this is what basically the internet is saying about it.
But if it wasn't a food item, the weight and the storage and the sort of cold storage method wouldn't really make too much sense.
And those things are used sort of frivolously that it'd be unlikely that those are euphemisms for another thing.
So it's the jerky that's a euphemism for something else or an alternative name for something else.
But those things are actually.
We're definitely talking about some kind of consumable, though, right?
Yeah.
That's the thing.
And this is like, why are they redacting things that should be just completely innocent, right?
Would it be possible for you to make another batch of beef jerky for Jeffrey Epstein, please?
Jerky As Euphemism00:03:14
He's running out.
I mean, supposedly he had a private chef.
Yeah, why are you doing anything?
Why would you hide the name of the chef?
He must have had a dozen private chefs, right?
Because he had like 8,000-foot mansions everywhere.
And we've got the plans of the kitchens of these mansions.
And this is like on Little St. James, in his Zorro Ranch, in his New York apartment.
He had one in England somewhere.
I can't remember where it was.
So he must have had like half a dozen chefs at least.
And then probably ones on his private jets, of which he had multiple, his yachts or whatever else he had.
Why does he have, like, and this is another thing, like, you know, oh, he's taking, he needs more steaks for the island.
It's like, he doesn't do his own shopping.
What are we talking about?
There is a lot of weirdness there when it comes to the food that suggests that it's coded language.
Correct.
You are right, though.
We can't prove it.
And the thing is, there are other interesting things.
Like, there is a restaurant, or there was a restaurant in New York called The Cannibal.
Right?
So, actually, and it is a meat bar.
So, I don't know if this is another sort of comic ping pong pizza thing, but like there was actually a restaurant there that apparently is closed down now.
So, I mean, you know, you are right.
There is something that's not there's something that is off here.
There's something that's off here, but it is connected to real world places.
So, you know, who knows?
Like, I don't know.
I mean, a lot of people were going on about the sulfuric acid.
Yeah, well, we'll get to, we'll get to, well, that's, well, actually, no, we'll talk about it now because I forgot to get the link, I think.
Sure.
But yeah, he ordered 330 gallons of sulfuric acid.
And don't get me wrong, that's a lot of sulfuric acid.
But how many swimming pools does Jeremy Epstein have?
So there's a massive swimming pool on Little St. James.
He's got one on each.
Pretty much.
Pretty much.
And when you are doing reverse osmosis with water, the membranes get dirty and the levels of pH and the water are off.
And you do need to fix that by gradually putting in acid into the system.
Correct.
And that is the right kind of acid to use.
Yes.
And I have to say, because I looked into this, it is exactly also the right acid in which to dissolve bones.
That is also correct.
So the point that stands is what we can prove that there is a massive ethnic network working for its own interests, constantly in communication, trying to get business deals, trying to profit off wars, trying to connect different countries into its orbit.
This we can all prove.
Wouldn't it?
This we can't.
Gallons were.
Well, maybe you would if you've got like half a dozen swimming pools.
would store it and it would be gradually released into the water to clean up the pipes and the membranes and maintain the pH level.
So there is...
There's a plausible deniability.
There is a plausible deniability to all of this.
But the point is, especially with the food talk, it feels deliberately like this is plausible denial.
Yes.
Jail Letters and Plausible Deniability00:09:20
I wasn't born yesterday.
And that's why the names should be unredacted.
And we should know if this is an email to his chef, if this is an email to whoever, we need to know who precisely are these individuals that are in the emails.
Yeah.
And then you've got the, and then it just, it just, okay, that's like the surface level of, oh, that's really weird.
Then you get the dark stuff where Epstein is messaging Mandelson saying, quote, I love the torture video.
It's like, right.
Hard to think of a good context for that.
Yeah.
Actually.
David Miliband at my table.
Do I say hello?
Poor old David Miliband.
Probably nothing to do with this.
Okay.
I genuinely think the Milibands aren't involved in this because Epstein seems to have been an enemy of them.
That seems to be what the comment is there.
Yeah, sort of.
Yeah.
But anyway, moving on, then you've got this one, which is just Epstein messages saying, quote, whoever said that she felt God's presence next to her when she was in bed.
She knows that Jesus watches over her and helped save her life.
Whoops.
Well, this is scary.
You should dress up as him when you see her.
Of course, the oh, Jesus, I'm coming trick.
I mean, that is that shows the mindset.
Yeah.
That shows the mindset of this individual and the people he's in communication with.
And whoever his victim is.
Yes.
This is definitely discussing a victim.
Yes.
Praying for salvation because he's victimizing her.
Yeah.
Whoever he's messaging says you should dress up as him when you see her.
And that would be really funny.
Yeah.
These are deeply sick people.
I wouldn't be surprised if all of this proved to be worse than we imagined.
I agree.
For now.
For now, this is...
Break this network and stop these people's influence.
Oh, just jail.
I mean, I would say worse, but jail as best we can hope for.
Let's say jail instead of what we actually need.
And then you get really weird ones like this.
Someone messaging him saying, again, we don't know who this is.
Do you remember the name of the gynecologist that you used to send your victims to?
Huh.
New York, as in which one, where?
Yes, many years ago I used to send them to a guy in New York who once commented something to the effect that you were keeping him in business single-handedly.
Yeah, that's that is not disputable.
No.
And there is no plausible deniability and there's no innocent explanation here.
No.
And so like I say, I agree with you that on the top layer, that's why we have those ones first.
It's like, okay, here's a lot of coded language.
We can't prove any, you know, who knows?
But I'm sorry, what?
No.
I mean, literally, the guy literally calls them his victims.
Yeah.
And he's like, oh, well, we're the one in New York.
Yeah, yeah, you know the one I'm talking about.
The one that you were keeping in business single-handedly.
Then you get other ones where this woman here in 2013 has emailed Epstein to say there are quite a few things that have known parts of our lives that we never discussed in writing.
She goes through quite a lot.
And then she said, you made many unusual offers.
You offered to buy my baby six months into our relationship.
And six years later, you offered to support my next boyfriend.
Okay, well, that would explain why Epstein was trying to hire a nanny.
It's probably not in any emails either, and I understand why nobody believed it.
understand nobody would believe it yeah that's yeah and notice that epstein isn't denying that right He says, yes, you didn't like taking cash, but you took everything else.
Okay, that's interesting.
And then there's this random email, like a letter.
That's what's particularly crazy.
Yeah, this was a letter to Jeffrey Epstein at his Palm Beach mansion from someone called Esther Kern Tyser Epstein.
And the letter, sorry, I say email, says, you're receiving this because you are a convicted sex offender required by law to monitor, control, and contain your sexual deviance, or an orderly citizen who can benefit from having your sexual deviance monitored, explored, and amplified.
So the letter is written in this quite strange, comical way, unserious way.
But it gets really, really quite dark as you get to about here.
When the Divine Madness expanded to a ranch in Reserve, New Mexico, we became neighbors to educator, entertainer, sorry, educator, entrepreneur, and philanthropist Jeffrey Epstein, who had bought the Zorro Ranch.
He said he was intrigued by my recruitment methods, and you sent me as an ambassador.
Jeffrey was tall, handsome, rich, and so magnetic.
He had learned all I can from you and Jeffrey, became my new common-law husband.
He adopted my teenage daughter, X, and her friends as his own, flying them in private jets, taking them snorkeling in the Caribbean, and introducing them to VIPs like Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and even President Clinton.
I became part of a Coven.
Coven?
Coven.
Of very empowered, confident, and successful women recruiters, including a longline Rodactid.
I used all the recruiting techniques developed as Yo Girl taken to a whole new level for Jeffrey.
We called ourselves the Dream Team.
Every girl had a $1,000 bounty, and I was recruiting a dozen a week through my nutrition classes.
Still, I wanted more from Jeffrey, and he was often distant and dismissive of me and my feminine charms.
One night as the sun set over Little St. James Island, I stood in the room where Jeffrey had just received a therapeutic massage from one of my daughter's friends.
The room was covered in a genius' seed, which was going to waste.
I had an inspiration and asked the chef to bring me an extra large turkey baster and a beautiful fertility ritual created my youngest daughter.
At first, Jeffrey was furious, but then I pointed out by staggering daughters every eight years, he would always have a supply of ripe girls at his disposal.
He bought me a house at wherever and got my oldest daughter into wherever by donating $50,000 to their gender studies program and forbade my youngest daughter to attend wherever.
And all she had to do was send him a pint of Mormon blood every week.
Now.
What on?
What am I doing?
It's just a random letter that was sent to his address that happens to seem to know exactly everything about his life that they can talk about.
I mean, who knows?
Could be complete schizo nonsense.
But it might not be, right?
Who knows?
This is just mental.
And there's a...
Oh, no, I did that at the Salt of Greg House.
So there's a Twitter account of someone who claims that they are Epstein's ex-girlfriend.
And she had posted they sacrificed children to Lucifer's entire cult.
Jeffrey got involved in their operations for financial reason to obtain compromise.
He never participated in those rituals.
Maybe.
This person is named in the files.
This is the small insulated bag for Jerky, as if there's any reason for that.
But again, this is just a Twitter account.
We don't know that it is her.
Could be someone making it or anything like that.
So the point is, as I said, it's getting really dark, and I honestly have trouble.
There shouldn't be any names redacted.
No, there shouldn't be any names redacted.
And I really have trouble giving anyone involved the benefit of the doubt.
Yeah.
I don't really see any reason to.
And so I think I'm just going to assume the worst until proven otherwise.
Oh, that was light and cheery, wasn't it?
Sorry, guys.
Yeah.
Oh, wow.
A lot of it's coming out.
That's insane.
Logan says, I support the Roman Legion method with these people.
Yep.
Trump called this a Democrat hoax and tried to protect them.
He's still protecting them.
Never forget that.
I'm most certainly never forgive it.
And that's the thing.
Trump.
Yeah, his action on this has not been good.
It's very bizarre.
Yep.
Super strange.
Oh, you're still talking about Epstein?
Yes, obviously.
Yeah.
And it turns out that every freaking billionaire and hedge fund manager and financier are all in this together.
They could be, but this is insane.
Well, I mean, if Virginia Guffery's testament in her book is anything to go by, every academic that you see pictured on Epstein's Island, she claims to have slept with or been raped by, maybe I should say more accurately.
Yeah.
So anyway, Flavia says, I truly understand the actions of God in the Old Testament.
And Crank Texton says, the files go a long way towards exposing this super governmental power structure that rules over nations.
People whose names are redacted are happy for people to focus on Epstein's crimes instead.
Yeah, I just wanted to get to because we covered it last week.
There's a lot of people like, oh, well, see, this is not really anything that spectacular.
It's like, well, it kind of is if you actually are digging into it a bit, I'm afraid.
I think that's why they release so much all at once.
And there's another batch, isn't there?
There is another 3 million or something.
There's millions and millions of batches of these things, which makes sense.
Yeah.
He was emailing everybody of substance all over the world.
And he was emailing about, you know, Indians, Arabs, Asians, Ukrainians, Russians, etc.
And they're all connected in this way.
Somehow he finds the time to worry about the beef, jerky, tuna, and steaks going to Little St. James.
It's like really weird.
If that were me and I were emailing all these important people, I wouldn't be worrying about organizing the pantry.
But hey, what do I know?
Sexually Conservative Morality00:14:30
Anyway, let's move on.
Another cheery segment to another cheery subject about how we are under the reign of Morlock.
But let's start with something that's actually pleasant a little bit and watch this video.
This is a woman who had been saying that she doesn't want babies and hates babies.
And, you know, first time she holds a child, and then she wants a children.
And just to be clear, like, this is a natural impulse that women have.
I mean, my wife constantly sends me baby videos.
She's like, I want another.
I'm like, darling, we've got four queer.
I'm getting over.
I don't want any more.
And there's ones like where babies pull their when you pick them up and they pull their feet up.
It's called scrunch.
Women have a term for it.
It's called scrunch.
And there's just like literally just videos of women lifting babies up and they're doing a little scrunch.
And my wife's like, see?
I'm like, I just give her what she wants.
Fair enough.
Anyway.
And then we get this quote from Simone de Beauvoir, which I haven't actually fact-checked, but it actually sounds like if it's not, it's someone summarizing her philosophy.
Exactly, exactly.
Which is, no woman should be authorized, authorized, mind you, to stay at home and raise her children.
Society should be different.
Why?
Women should not have that choice precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.
So the whole objective of the left has always been to immiserate women.
Destroy the family, make the women workers.
Exactly.
Make men lonely.
Exactly.
And if you look at the campaign for first contraceptives and then abortion in Britain, it started with something called the Malthusian, Malthusian League.
The most wrong man ever.
The most wrong man in history.
Exactly.
Malthus was of the view that the world is going to explode because of overpopulation.
We're all going to starve to death.
We're all going to starve.
There isn't going to be enough for anyone, etc., etc.
And then we had all of these agricultural improvements and industrial improvements that proved actually you can provide an enormous level of prosperity that was unimaginable to insane numbers of people.
And this can continue.
These guys essentially, as their starting point, believed that materialism governs everything.
I mean, look at the organization was secular, utilitarian, individualistic, and Malthusian.
Yes.
Brilliant.
What an evil liberals.
Exactly.
Modern liberals.
What an evil-sounding organization.
Exactly.
And these guys were of the view, essentially, what they did was reject God.
That was the premise of it.
And they rejected the idea that life is sacred, ordained by God, loved by God, ruled by God.
Anything, morality.
Anything of that sort.
All of it's gone.
And they were, when you look at the individuals involved, they were members of the National Secular Society, one of the most horrific organizations in Britain today.
Their leader is on record sort of explaining how pedophilia isn't pedophilia sometimes.
That guy, so, you know.
Is he in the Epstein files?
Well, good question.
I haven't looked for him.
There's so many others there.
And the view of these people is that man should play God and should control human life in its entirety.
And now, having followed through with this, they got what they wanted.
And they got a lot of what they wanted in the 1960s.
And in the 1960s, we see a big transformation in Britain where obviously waves of migration had been coming in since Swindrush in 1948.
But that's when the Abortion Act was passed in 1967.
That was also around the time when the first Race Relations Act was passed.
It's also around the time when public contraceptives became publicly available.
And when contraceptives became publicly available.
And so basically there was this transformation of British society.
And it led to this logic that said, actually, there is no difference between being British and being non-British.
Everybody becomes British after five years and change.
Moreover, there's no difference between men and women now.
There's no difference between men and women.
We have scientifically interceded in the reproductive process.
Precisely.
We've killed the natural cycle of family formation and relationships.
And the result of it was this kind of disaster that we see today.
And we see it in abortion statistics.
We see that now the number of abortions in Britain in 2023 was about 300,000.
It's 280,000.
Absolutely mad.
And the number of live births in Britain is around 600,000 to 700,000.
Yeah, about 650,000.
Yeah.
So you could increase the birth rate by 50% if you stopped abortion.
And this is the it's about 900,000 births a year we need to maintain a stable population.
Yes.
So it is purely the abortion statistic that is responsible for our declining population.
100%.
100%.
So what happened in the 60s was basically the so-called silent generation took power and surrendered and surrendered completely to socialist ideas and surrendered completely to communist ideas.
Just to be clear, these were liberal ideas, right?
But it's the boomers are the quintessentially liberal generation.
Yes.
The John Lennons, they're the Woodstocks.
And this is why.
I've always been thinking about this.
You know, the boomers have got this awful habit of telling sordid jokes.
Right.
And it's gross.
And I always like, I never understood it.
Right.
Why are the boomers all such perves?
And then you think about it, oh, well, their parents are hyper-conservative.
Right.
Right.
Their parents, hyper-conservative.
And the cultural telos of their generation was to break these social norms.
And so perverted jokes were a really easy way of doing that.
Actually, we're going to make everything a bit sordid.
And it was just like, that's gross.
And I remember my daddy a few years ago being proud of the fact that he didn't tell pervy jokes.
Right.
I mean, I was glad that he didn't, right?
But I always found it a weird thing for him to mention.
He's like, no, I was never, I can't remember he say, you know, never dirty or something like that.
I was like, well, yeah, good point.
He never was.
And it didn't occur to me why this was important until I started thinking about what the boomers were overthrowing.
Conservative.
Overthrowing moral order.
Exactly.
Sexually conservative morality.
Yes.
As a generational mission to overthrow.
The butt of every joke was Victorian morality.
Yes.
Because, yes, they were hypocrites sometimes.
Sure.
And we're all hypocrites sometimes.
And this was used to sort of undermine the entire system and sever any connection to morality, decency, and God.
Create a state of affairs where women actually need birth control.
Yes.
Because if you're in a highly conservative society, you don't need that.
There's not much of a demand for it.
No.
So they created the demand for these kinds of procedures and medications.
And it's been absolutely destructive.
And we should tie together this.
It's literally killing our civilization.
Yes.
And we should tie together the start of the slippery slope, which is the Malthusians demanding contraceptives and then moving on to abortion with the end of the slippery slope, which is where we are today.
The slippery slope actually begins there.
That's where it all starts.
And in our minds, if we want to be reactionaries or restorationists or whatever you want to call it, these patterns should be noticed.
And now, 90% of abortions happen early, thankfully.
And the majority of those, the vast majority of those, happen using pills.
But that still means 11% aren't.
Yes.
These are the really horrible.
And these are absolutely gruesome.
And these are absolutely gruesome.
And with the population demographics changing, you're having things that you would never have heard about in Britain, like sex-selective abortions, which is something that was never really the case.
And you see it in this massive spike in abortions in recent years.
It's always been high of a couple of hundred thousand a year, but why does it spike in 2021?
I don't know if it's got to do with a boris wave.
I don't know if it's got to do with the economic crisis.
I think it's far simpler.
I think everyone's just at home.
And so what they were doing was just sitting around.
Even then, this is after the lockdowns, isn't it?
This is after the lockdown.
You know, that's after the lockdowns, 2022, but then it continues to 2023 and it keeps on rising.
So, and it's happening a lot more with women under 18, and it's happening a lot more with women over 35 who normally wouldn't be the right demographics for this.
I was going to say, the demographics that they brought in, that's not, they're not the ones which they typically would be relatively conservative on that.
Surely they wouldn't be.
No, the Indians are not conservative about this stuff at all.
Well, you do have a lot of Muslims as well.
That's what I was referring to.
The Muslims are not conservative about early abortion.
Really?
No.
Their belief is that the soul enters the human body only after 40 days of conception, which is a very weird one.
That's an interesting get-out clause.
But Islam's full of those.
Exactly.
Islam's full of them.
Oh, you can have a temporary marriage.
Don't worry about it.
Yeah, yeah, okay.
Islam and Judaism are lawyer religions.
Christianity is philosophical religion.
We talked about this on advanced brokenomics, basically.
Yeah, we talked about this on Brokenomics, essentially.
So you're seeing this rise here, and then you see supposed feminists like Jess Phillips being asked about abortion.
We might have shown this video before, but I think it's just worth taking a minute to check it out again.
For miscarriage.
Are we not doing that?
So basically, they're working on legislation or passed legislation that recognizes that a miscarriage is indeed a tragedy and a woman gets some time off on the back of it.
Yeah.
And which is totally justified.
Something I absolutely support, yes.
We lost the audio again.
That happens when you point out.
In by Sarah Rowan, who really fought very hard for the issue.
Why do you think it's important to recognize these babies and recognize the grief?
From what angle are you asking me this question?
Look at the evil smile.
She knows it's a political trap.
Look at the evil smile.
She knows she's on the horns of contradiction here, right?
Exactly.
Because if I recognise that a miscarriage is a tragic and heartbreaking thing, which it is, which it is, then why is the same not true for abortion?
Exactly.
Because essentially what they are conceding is that life began at conception.
Exactly.
That is exactly.
Look at that face.
Look at that.
She knows.
You evil bitch.
She knows exactly what is happening.
You got me on this.
You see her trying to escape from it, but she gets absolutely no.
Sorry, that expression, man.
Look at it.
Look at that.
I have a deep disdain for Philip.
Who doesn't, but that is an iron court.
Yeah.
You son of a.
No, I'm on the precipice of being caught.
Well, she knows.
I think I'm just about.
She can see it.
Yeah, she sees it.
And she knows she's fallen into it.
And she's just like, she knows her position is completely contradictory and makes absolutely no sense.
But here we are.
And now, essentially, the change in legislation that hasn't been passed yet, it's now with the House of Lords and it might be passed.
But it will allow more or less abortion until birth.
What's the justification for that?
There was never any justification for it.
Just mental.
It was always evil.
It was always bad.
And you have to remember that for the 11% that don't go through abortion through pills.
Sorry, sorry.
Go back there.
Who the hell is it?
Tonia Antoniatzi.
I've some.
It's a foreign MP.
Yeah, exactly.
But that's the person that tabled the extreme abortion memory.
What are you doing in my country?
What are you doing in my house?
What are you doing in Parliament?
What are you doing?
Obviously, Italian.
And look at their birth rate.
Look at their birth.
And you sort of see this kind of endless support for more abortion.
Like when the right makes a slippery slope argument, which is made very strongly here in Humane Vitae, an encyclical from Pope Paul VI, against contraceptives, and he says it'll devalue women, it'll devalue relationships, it'll devalue marriage, it's going to be destructive, it's going to lead to more abortion.
Well, that's exactly what ends up happening.
Like, philosophically, the church always 1968.
Right, well, he was correct, wasn't he?
Yeah.
Right about when this whole thing was being done.
And then you see this description of an abortion, and I encourage you to look at it because although this man gets mugged by a group of feminists trying to say that what he's saying isn't true, but the way that later term abortions happen is genuinely disgusting.
It's brutal.
It's genuinely brutal.
And these babies can feel pain.
It's not that they can't, and they know something is wrong.
And they feel that pain, even if it's with the vacuum or with the pill or with whatever.
Moreover, the mother feels the baby's pain.
The mother feels the baby's pain.
Which is why so many end up being traumatized.
Mother's Guilt Over Abortion00:02:06
Exactly.
This is why there's so much guilt surrounding abortion.
You can feel it.
I know you feel it.
Yeah.
It's so horrible.
It is a genuinely disgusting procedure.
But later on, abortions involve either dismembering the baby or crushing its skull or injecting it with poison in the heart.
And it's disgusting.
And these babies are viable.
And you see this example here in Australia where I'm not going to show you the video because you should see it.
You should see it.
We probably can't show the video.
Because the algorithm will make sure that it's not seen.
But you see this small baby alive and sucking its thumb until it dies.
And this is supposed to be morally defensible and liberation and choice and so on and so forth.
This is supposed to be you're evil if you deny women the choice of doing this.
This isn't a choice, guys.
This is a genetically unique individual, scientifically speaking.
And it's alive.
But it feels pain.
Even if you go into the argument of, well, even if you subscribe to the argument, well, it's a woman's body, blah, Fine, whatever.
But at that point, I mean, you can't, that's not the argument at that point.
I mean, you are still leaving it to die, and then that's murder.
Yes.
Right, like, even if you subscribe to the initial argument.
Yes.
Yes.
You can't subscribe to that.
I hate the term that survived his abortion as well.
As in, okay, they tried to kill him.
And he survived.
It's an accurate term.
He survived that attempted abortion.
Yeah, but the term abortion, it sounds too clinical.
I hate it.
Survived an attempted murder.
Yeah.
And then just left die.
These are the Christians trying not to be not too extreme, essentially.
I know.
This is just Carthage sacrificing its children to Moloch, man.
I swear to God.
This is what it is.
Surviving Abortion00:09:38
The purpose of this is to, oh, you know, maybe I'll get prosperity.
Maybe I'll get a better career.
Maybe I won't be a little bit poorer.
Maybe I won't struggle economically.
It is intended as a sacrifice for material gain.
The gods of the economy.
To the gods of the economy, which is essentially Moloch, Baal, whatever you want to call him.
But this is fundamentally a religious question.
It's a moral question.
It's about evil.
It's a civilizational question, isn't it?
It's a civilizational question as well.
Civilizational decline, and this is the part of that which is causing the decline.
It literally is analogous to the Carthaginians sacrificing a child for prosperity in the brazen bull of Moloch, statue.
It really is just like that.
And here you see Merkel and Holland from way back when, in 2015, 2016, explaining how the declining birth rate requires more migration and that they should welcome everybody.
And you see Merkel speaking again on the same exact theme.
And I think we saw the Greek defense minister a few days ago coming out saying that, no, no, no, there has to be more immigration because of this and that.
And you saw Ursula von der Leyen, I think, signing a trade agreement with India, which allows India to send its excess population to Europe.
And you kind of go, well, even if you're not going to look at this from religious terms or from moral questions, the survival of your civilization is at stake.
Indians will not become French or German or English.
That's not how it works.
Rishi Sunak is the best example.
Rishi Sunak speaks all the time at Indian business forums.
Nobody in Kenya celebrated Rishi Sunak becoming Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.
Pretty much everybody in India did.
Even though his father was born in Kenya or in whichever it was.
And he was born in Southampton.
Exactly.
He's still a son of the soil of India as far as the Indians are concerned.
Exactly.
They know it.
And you see this kind of thing happening.
Literally, sorry, the term son of the soil, that was used by that bloody Scottish Pakistani guy who's like, he literally says in an interview with Pakistani TV, I'm a son of the soil of Pakistan.
Yes.
But you were born in Scotland.
Yes.
Okay, okay.
I mean, just fair enough.
Straight up tell us.
We're in agreement on this point.
Exactly.
There has to be some realism here.
And you see how the moral depravity involved in contraceptives and in abortion led to a slippery slope that has been insanely destructive.
And you see how the rejection of moral principles on these issues has material real-life consequences.
Like religious morality isn't just God limiting your freedom because he doesn't like you.
It's actually real warnings about the consequences in real life that will happen to you down the generations.
And when you see these people advocating for contraceptives in the late 1800s and the early 1900s, then getting their way a couple of generations later, and then you see the fruits of that two generations down the line, you understand why religion has these moral codes.
Because you don't see it in your own lifetime.
You're thinking about convenience, comfort, this, that, or the other.
But you've ended up in a situation where if you just stopped abortions, you would have a stable population.
It's crazy, though, isn't it?
That no one has any self-reflection.
Sure, implement these things.
Are you going to reflect on it and go, well, was this a success or was this a failure?
And no one's doing any self-reflection to be like, oh, actually, this has been a really bad idea.
Well, they're just accelerating it even more.
Which is Labor's version of self-reflection.
Yeah, exactly.
You get this nasty, evil stare.
This horrid hatred and anger.
It's that.
Because you've got a belief that the status quo is how everything should always be.
The fact that ramp it up a bit more.
They act like these completely settlers.
Hang on a second.
There's a lot of horror that is contained in the word.
Like the the the moral crime that is abortion is having real world practical consequences.
Yes.
You know what I think this perfectly illustrates though, is that the right should never let up on anything that they truly believe is morally just and is going completely the wrong way.
Because if you do, if you sort of cede this ground to these people, they will never relinquish it.
They'll only accelerate it.
Yes.
Because that is the nature of the demonic.
It doesn't understand human limits.
And you sort of see this in Humanivite.
Near the end, the Pope sort of explains the implications of the consequences, the objectification of women, their use for purely gratuitous purposes, the dissolution of morality, the inability of people to stay married.
And at the end, one of the things that he says is that, look, you guys have to recognize that there are limits to human authority.
And these limits to human authority come from natural law.
And the church is not at liberty to change that because it didn't make that law.
It is merely its guardian interpreter.
And even if you can scientifically subvert them, that doesn't mean there aren't consequences for this further down the line.
Exactly.
Exactly.
And so you should read this document and understand why these positions are taken by the religious that seem extreme and anti-progressive at the time, but they confirm that the church is there to contradict the world.
It is there as a contradiction.
It is there to oppose this kind of madness.
And now we've had this madness for 100 years because you have to trace it back to the Malthusian League, to the National Secular Society, and to the attempt to separate God's morality from politics.
And these are its fruits.
Abortion's evil is one of those fruits, but you also see it in immigration.
You also see it in the collapse of norms.
You also see it in the amount of lies that we have in our politics.
You see it in the Epstein files.
You see it in the corruption.
You see it everywhere.
We're arriving at the kind of horrific utilitarian thought experiment.
Yes.
What if your civilization's productivity and abundance and happiness and stability was all predicated on one child that had to be tortured forever?
Would this be a utilitarian calculation you would agree to?
Exactly.
And we're actually at that point where we're like, well, we do think that.
But it's not one child.
It's 300,000 a year.
Yes.
Like, we genuinely think, yes, this is a worthy sacrifice to make.
And I'm sorry, I just don't at this point.
I've come to the conclusion that I don't like it at all.
Yeah, you're not alone.
Anyway, we'll leave that there.
And I won't go into how this also carries over into euthanasia and what's happening with that.
That's another thing.
And with Labour's attempt to get Britain to turn into another Canada where, you know, if you have to use a wheelchair, your doctor will recommend you death.
But these are the fruits of the same logic.
So insane.
So insane.
141 Paladin says, I had an otherwise reasonable conversation with a liberal woman about abortion.
She got rather upset when I said that women aborting is a disgusting practice, that it is rather new.
I mean, obviously throughout history, you will find examples of women having abortions, but nothing on this scale.
With this kind of artifice.
Sisselstone says, the original Hippocratic Oath, the one from Hippocrates himself, specifically forbids abortion.
They knew thousands of years ago that it is evil.
I mean, this was always, I mean, this was always the Roman quote-unquote propaganda against the Carthaginians, but it seems that the Carthaginians probably did.
Yes.
Where's the mouse gone?
I can't.
Look at this in the mouse.
There it is.
The Carthaginians probably did conduct child sacrifice, although not on the scale the Romans implied, but they definitely did it.
And yeah, so what's Leviticus 20 maxing?
All the punishments.
Leviticus 20 again.
I can't remember off the top of my head.
It's full of prescriptions and punishments for breaking these prescriptions.
Yes.
Sorry.
Cheers.
Where are we?
Here we are.
All right.
Well, on all of those very, very cheery notes, I'm going to talk about something which is equally as cheery, it seems.
So, yeah, we're going to be talking basically about the policy of violence, effectively, the policy of decline, the numbers of just sheer nonsense that's being approved by politicians.
I mean, it's crazy.
The Numbers Are Way Worse Than You Think00:13:33
Like, it's absolutely crazy.
So, I titled this: The Numbers Are Way Worse Than You Think because They Truly Are.
Now, this isn't actually a hugely new study or piece of research from the Center for Migration Control, but it came across, I came across it recently, and I wanted to talk about it because it really is actually shocking to me.
I mean, I, you know, I'm rather blackpilled, I think everything's quite bad as it is, but this still shocked me.
So, I think it will shock everyone else.
Um, you know, regular Lotus Eaters viewers and anyone that comes across this, hopefully, it'll put it into perspective why this is an argument that we need to win.
Yep, because this is this is all a policy and it could be removed like that, it could be gone.
Now, just that as a headline: migrants arrested for 170,000 offences last year, one every three minutes, and we wonder why everything is falling apart.
We wonder why the police can't come and actually investigate real crime, right?
Like, just every three minutes, every three minutes.
That is incredible.
So, what are we saying?
In the course of this podcast, 30 migrants have been arrested.
That's the data.
That's the statistical reality of what is going on.
And we're also, I didn't include it, but this is well known.
We're at a deficit for police.
Police are leaving the force at record levels.
Everything hasn't been as stretched as it has been now before.
We're truly on the precipice of a complete decline.
And this is one thing which we don't.
This is a choice because we get rid of it instantly.
Now, I'm not saying that English people, British people don't do things.
Of course, of course, they do.
We've got our own scum, and I've got some figures for that as well.
But why are we importing a bunch of other scum?
But if you got rid of these every three minutes, I mean, we'd have more to go around to police our own and get our own house in check, wouldn't we?
Which I'm all for.
I am all for.
Think about it this way: when it comes to these guys, sending them a female police officer is going to solve nothing.
Yeah, you're going to have to send five, ten of the female officers where sort of one old school bobby would have done the trick.
Yeah, oh, 100%.
And this means that the money that is being spent goes to waste.
And you need a lot more bodies in the police to actually do the arrests.
And the risk of violence towards them is much higher.
And every once in a while, if you're in the wrong area, you're going to get mobbed by a group of cousins who will say to you, how dare you arrest one of us?
This is why they don't police those communities.
Yeah.
They just don't police them.
I mean, you had Bushla Sheikh saying that, you know, people should be writing to Ofcom because somebody pointed out that the grooming gangs are predominantly Pakistani Muslim and that they have a religious motivation.
Yeah.
And this is the most well-integrated, one of the most well-integrated westernized individuals in that community.
So you kind of go, okay.
But I just think of that meme of, you know, the Muslim woman and the little white girl with the blonde hair and the makeup looking like an absolute doe, like a rabbit.
It's just like, you know, leaning over, like, looking really concerned.
It's like, you don't have any authority.
You are fictionally playing as if you have authority.
Because the second someone says, right, okay, I'm just not going to cooperate.
What are you going to do?
You're five foot two and a hundred pounds wet.
The police system in this country relies on consenting.
And the British, by and large, have approved that consent.
But when consent is removed or it was never given to begin with by migrants, because they don't know us, they don't know our culture, they are not like us and you don't think like them, then what do the police do?
Well, and that's why we see the constant degradation of society.
I'd also like to point out this, these figures aren't the full figures, so it's way worse than even this.
This is just what they record.
Exactly.
And we know that certain groups don't like to tell on one another.
Well, the crime survey implies that the crime is way higher, right?
Oh, yes.
We know that there are crimes which are not arrestable offences.
People don't arrest for them.
And these are still crimes.
These are still things which erode a society.
So however bad this is, which is shockingly bad, every three minutes a migrant is arrested.
I mean, that is shockingly bad.
It is way worse.
It's way worse.
And we're not even seeing the black economy in this, where it's things like the drug dealing that's going on, the child trafficking, the gangs.
Shetty gangs, yeah.
Barbershop near my house goes down.
Drug shops.
And now instead there's a nail salon.
Yeah, yeah.
You can tell that they're both money laundering fronts.
Yeah.
And then you've got like the violence that happens within these communities because they don't trust the authorities.
That Sasha Johnson woman, the sort of black activist where she was shot in the head at a house party.
No one daubed in whoever did it.
It's like, okay, well, that person's going to get away with it.
She's currently, you know, cabbaged in a wheelchair or something.
It's like, okay, well, then what can we do?
You know, what can we do?
Yeah, it's truly shocking.
So this is the Center for Migration Control.
It's a really good, it's a really good piece.
I just thought we'd go through it.
So new research reveals that last year, so this is 24 to 25, of only available data, of which not all forces release the data.
So again, it's still even worse because not all police forces release the data and they still don't record it all either.
But 172,889 foreign nationals were arrested.
And that was recorded by the 43 territorial police forces of England and Wales and the British Transport Police, which I'm going to get to.
I'm going to get to the British Transport Police in a minute because that's a separate statistic that I want to take a look at, which is still shockingly bad.
Let me there for a second.
Foreign national excludes naturalized foreigner.
Yeah, no, it's way worse.
Who were born overseas and were allowed to come here?
Yeah, it's been here for six years legally to get a passport.
Yeah, I hate, I hate that.
That's the number that you're looking at.
I hate all of this.
No, you're completely right.
Worthy statement there.
So it's the equivalent of 473.66 arrests a day, 19.7 every hour, or one every three minutes and three seconds, which is staggering.
So the data shows arrests for offences ranging from murder, grooming of children, manslaughter, rape, possession of firearm, through to immigration offences, including efforts to facilitate the illegal entry of others and stalking.
So it's just off the charts.
Yeah.
50,000 violent offences, 11,000 sexual offences.
It's mad, isn't it?
It's chaos.
It's the sacking of our country by literally foreigners.
If you were being looted by an army horde, it would look like this.
Yes.
Except that in medieval times, you would negotiate three days of looting and then it stops.
Yes.
Yeah, there's an end pointer.
Correct.
Yeah, this is just.
And there are also provisions.
You can argue a treaty or some sort of terms of surrender or something like this.
No, this is just a non-stop sacking of the country that has got no end in sight.
The fox and the hen house perpetual.
Yes.
In perpetuity.
So about the data, so this is what makes it even worse.
Freedom of information request was as follows.
Please provide within 20 working days.
Total number of arrests of foreign nationals made by your police force.
So that illustrates what you were saying there, Ferris, is that, yeah, there's still people that have just been because we rubber-stamp passports.
So there's still way worse than this.
Foreigners just.
I'm British now because Magic Soil, I guess, and traitors in the Home Office.
Total number of arrests of foreign nationals made by your police force for the year ending 31st of March 2025, and then just asked for what it was.
So of the 44 police forces, only 39 responded.
So, well done.
Good.
Nice.
Love that.
Isn't there a legal requirement for them to respond to FOIs?
There is.
Yeah.
And then of the 39 police forces, 36 provided the information on the number of arrests.
Surrey and Greater Manchester Police were unable to provide all of this information in a usable format.
Whilst the City of London has woeful data practices and thus did not have a breakdown by offense category.
Yeah, I can believe that.
Why would the City of London not have the right kind of data given that it's the City of London?
Great question.
Well, that would be the financial centre.
It's the ethnic makeup of the place.
And so they are incentivized to not have that kind of breakdown in place.
They're just not.
So the City of London has a slave class.
Yes.
The slave class of servants.
Because if you look at it, as you say, how is the city of London highly diverse?
Well, it's because in social housing, half of the social housing in the city of London is filled with foreigners who they've imported to be their servants.
That's just the city of London.
That's not the metropolitan.
Yeah, no, no, I know, I know.
It's a small city of London area.
You would think that that would have zero social housing.
You would think that would have basically zero foreigners in it because this is where all of the very rich people live, but they've got their servant class.
Yeah.
So this is just it in sort of graph format.
But you can see Metropolitan Police Service.
Pretty, pretty.
A lot of it is focused in London, which is not a great surprise because that's where the most foreign nationals are in the country.
I mean, it is where you expect it to be.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
You know, Greater Manchester, for instance, West Midlands, for instance.
You know, these are the hubs.
West Yorkshire, Kent, Thames Valley.
I'm surprised Thames Valley is not higher, to be fair.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
That's because the Thames Valley Police are notoriously useless.
Yeah, massively.
Yeah.
Well, yeah.
They are impressively useless.
And I'd also like to sort of reiterate that this is what's recorded, and the police are incentivized to not record ethnicities and immigration statuses and things like this.
So even though this is really bad, it is so much worse because we know that they don't like to record these things.
We know that it's well documented within all of the grooming gang scandals that they try not to record any of these things, the ethnicities, the breakdowns, and all this kind of stuff.
They should be separate bonuses for deportations.
Yeah, they should be.
These people seem ideological, but if you change the incentives, they will be ideological in the opposite way.
Give them bonuses for deportations, give them bonuses for arresting foreign criminals, give them incentives to do that and to report it correctly, and then you will see a behavioral change.
I mean, if I had my way, I'd abolish all the police, and it would be the military would be brought in.
No, it would be, and then they'd have to, well, that's what I would do.
Because the police themselves are ideologically infiltrated now.
And I think they're unsalvageable up until a point.
Just the women?
Well, no, because a bunch of the men that were in charge of college of policing and things.
So I would scrap the whole thing.
I'd have the military in charge, and then they would, in New Britannia, Nate's New Britannia, they would then train up a new police force of absolute Chads.
But unfortunately, I'm not in charge, so it is what it is.
So anyway, we've scrolled through all of this.
Again, it's just what you'd expect.
It's pretty bad, but this is just the breakdown of it all.
So supplementary data from the five non-responsive forces.
And this is how they sort of calculated it up a little bit because it was like 160 and their total was like 170.
So of the five forces which were unable, unwilling to provide a response, the CMC has data from a previous Freedom of Information request covering the 1st of January 2024 to the end of October, which will allow us to supplement the data.
So that's how they did it.
But again, that's still actually reduced, right?
Like it's still way worse.
So just shocking, awful, awful, awful, awful.
And why did these police forces not provide the data?
So, you know, there is immense public interest in this type of information at the moment.
In July 2025, there were allegations of a cover-up leveled against Warwickshire police as officials were hesitant to release details on the nationality and immigration status of the men charged with brutalizing a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton.
Council leader of Warwickshire went over their heads informing the public that it was an Afghan illegal migrant who had committed the crime.
So since then, police forces have been advised that it is important to release details.
Absolutely, it is.
And they still don't do that.
Stop and Search Controversy00:15:07
We see that all the time.
It's always the case.
And they even now say, have you seen this new thing that they do?
Please don't speculate.
oh yeah they say that all the time oh i i to me that seemed like oh no they've been doing it for ages Oh, they.
Yeah, we ask you not to speculate on the ethnicity of the perpetrator.
That's where you know who.
I don't need to then, do I?
Thank you for telling me.
Thanks for letting me know there.
It's not a native.
Absolutely madness.
Absolute madness.
So, you know, all of this is shocking.
All of this is bad.
And this is a policy.
This is a choice.
This is something which, you know, they're allowing to happen.
Yes.
So I said I talk about the British Transport Police because you know how green energy, green, New Deal, Green Transport, they're trying to get everyone to go on public transport, aren't they?
So buses, coaches, and trains.
Yeah.
Well, trains are really bad right now.
Foreign nationals account for one in four arrests on British railways.
So I just calculated it.
Apparently, there are 1.6 million foreign nationals in Britain.
That's not people born overseas who have been given nationality.
That's a 10 million people, right?
So 10 million people in this country were born overseas but have been given national status.
It's like, okay, but we've got 1.6 million foreign nationals on the official records that are over here.
So that is 11% of the foreigners in this country last year were arrested.
One in the criminal class.
Yeah, I mean, that's like that is.
It's not just competition for jobs.
No, it's a competition for jobs as criminals.
That's a wild level of self-selection from that group, right?
Yes.
One in 10 of just a foreigner in Britain, he has a 10% chance of just being a criminal that year.
Yes.
And not in the previous year, in the previous year, it was going to be roughly the same number, right?
So in 10 years, basically, every foreigner in Britain committed a crime.
Oh, that's mad.
Well, it's insane, isn't it?
This illustrates that.
Sorry, every foreigner who hasn't been given settle status.
But yeah, so it's even higher then, still.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
But like you said, you're only talking about those people who are classed as foreign nationals who don't have British citizenship.
So this is the same thing.
This is just foreign nationals.
So the cohort that you mentioned there.
So there were 9,771 arrests carried out by the British Transport Police in 2024, 2025.
37.7% were foreign nationals.
That's mad.
That is insane.
That's crazy.
That is absolutely insane.
That is crazy.
That is crazy.
That's so wildly high.
88% of arrests for theft of passenger property is by foreigners.
Yeah.
That is insane.
Well, 36.6%.
Yeah.
I mean, that is.
36.6 is sexual offences.
35.7 is arrest for violence.
39.6 is arrest for drug offences.
I mean, again, yeah, 79.3, nearly 80% arrests for just people just wandering around stealing your stuff.
I mean, this is just, this is a choice.
So your MP, wherever, you know, if you're in the UK, your MP, and they vote for any sort of policy that brings individuals over there, are actively participating in the cultural decay of this land.
It's absolutely atrocious.
Yes.
And it doesn't have to be this way either.
It's because we're so unselective with who we let in.
Like, when we're letting in literally hundreds of thousands of people from, I mean, millions of people, but hundreds of thousands each year from like Africa or South Asia.
And it's like, okay, but these are not the same as letting in people from France or Germany or the Netherlands or Norway.
Some parts of Latin America, man.
Yeah, yeah.
So yeah, that's a great point.
Latin America as well.
Like we don't tend to have that many of them here, but you are right.
And the one or two that we do have in my gym all have gang tattoos.
No, really.
But we could be so much more selective and actually get something out of our immigration policy because there are entire continents of people who will never be net contributors to our economy at the very best.
When it's like we need immigration for the pensions or for the NHS, whatever.
Well, there are entire continents of people who, for their entire lives, will never be net contributors.
So we don't need any of those people from the economic argument, let alone the damage it's doing.
And so, as they say here, the country is seeing an epidemic of violence on the railways as the number of crimes has increased in the last year, whilst violent crime has allegedly decreased across the country.
It has surged by 7% on mainline rail.
There's been an increase of more than 200% in reported crime on Britain's railways since 2015.
I wonder if that's not.
That's mad.
That is mad, but I wonder how much of that is being essentially in a confined space.
You can't get away from these people.
You're on a train.
You're trapped.
You've got to wait until this next stop.
Crazy, right?
Yeah, it's absolutely crazy.
So, in terms of, I don't think that's the one I wanted.
This is the one I wanted.
I've got to scroll through this a little bit.
Sorry.
Because I wanted to get to.
We've got the stop and search, or should have a stop and search figures.
Basically, stop and search.
No, it's not there.
Right.
Anyway, stop and search.
Is absolutely fascinating.
So you now know some of the sort of data and the statistics on what's happening with migrants and things.
And so, stop and search.
Who do you think gets stopped the most?
Go on.
Well, I'm biding some time if you can.
Well, I mean, if we're talking in London, Sadiq Khan came in on a platform of abolishing stop and search.
And it's still happening.
Because it was racist.
So I'm guessing that actually they, by absolute number, stop and search white people more.
Am I correct?
70%.
70%.
And is this in all of Britain or is it just in London?
Is it England and Wales?
Yeah, England and Wales, yeah.
So we have the raw data, like we know.
We know that, you know, one in four foreign nationals, you know, on British Transport Police.
We know foreign nationals, and by definition, that a foreign national, the yes, they could still be white, but the highest because we know who we import, the potential chance of them not being white is far outweighs them being white.
So when we get figures like this saying that, well, actually, only 13% of black people are being stopped and searched, and only 11% of Asian or Asian British.
Oh, no, no, no.
11% of stop and searches are Asian.
13% of the stop and searches are black.
The thing is, the black population of Britain is only about 3%.
So that's wild overrepresentation.
The Asian population is apparently only 6-7%.
So again, massive overrepresentation.
But I think that, well, they're probably not accurate figures.
That's the thing.
Yeah.
Well, yeah, they're not accurate anyway, but it should be higher than that.
If you know the if you know that there is a problem with certain demographics when it comes to crime, it makes sense to focus your efforts on the demographics that are more prone to do so.
It's not racist, it is common sense.
Which is how Boris actually managed to get knife crime down in London.
Yeah.
Yeah, and then the last thing I wanted to close with, which I just thought was interesting.
So we had the total figure up here, didn't we?
It was 172,000, was it?
172,000, right?
So in England and Wales, so again, 172,000, approximately 456,000 white people were arrested in a recent annual period, which represents about 79% of total arrests where ethnicity was known.
So while white people constitute the majority of arrests in absolute numbers, they have a lower arrest rate per hundred per thousand, sorry, compared with obviously just other ethnicities.
But in raw numbers, I mean, it's just staggering.
It's absolutely insane.
You think of per capita against that per capita and just sort of blow people's minds.
It's insane.
It's crazy.
I mean, three migrants, a migrant arrested every three minutes is just insane.
Crazy.
Policy choice.
Yeah, policy choice.
Policy choice, but not to our benefit.
I mean, why would you bother with any migration if you had such a large legal and administrative burden that was going to come with it?
Why would you bother with any of it?
But this is why everything falls apart.
Like the justice system completely crumbling, right?
So, yeah, again, every three minutes, a foreigner is arrested, right?
And that's the ones which don't have legal status here now.
And they wonder why there's a big backlog of people waiting for a trial.
I think I did a segment here.
I think it was like 100,000 or something.
Just absolutely insane.
So every three minutes, that's being added to, and it doesn't have to be added to.
That's a choice.
You know, the Shabana Mahmood wanting the literal panopticon of England and Britain as a whole.
It's like, right, okay, well.
The only way to keep a lid on the thing.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Crazy.
So the numbers, whatever you think of them, are so much worse.
So much worse.
Cranky Texan says, it's easy to criticise Trump for not going hard against Epsys Network, but he can't.
He has to work with them because they can trigger a global depression with a keystroke.
Liz Trust was a glimpse.
I mean, this is a good point.
Actually, you know.
But then the answer is: go through it.
The only way out is through.
Yeah, I'm fine with stuff like that.
I'm fine with that.
You'll be because then you'll realize how poor the West is become in terms of actual production, and you won't be able to import all this stuff, and you'll have productive people, and you won't have people on welfare.
So it is.
But at least it's not a facade either.
At least it's honest at that point.
Exactly.
And also, it forces us to actually think about things like wealth being tied to production rather than wealth being tied to speculation.
Right, exactly.
The fictional economy.
Because that's the point where it's entirely debt-related.
Exactly.
And the city of London is something like a third of our wealth in Britain.
It's like, right, so it's just financial services.
So we're not really a wealthy country.
What we are is a very fictional country.
And we should be honest about that.
But anyway, let's go to the video comments.
We are looking for a compromise candidate.
We could just stand up and flexible.
Likeable.
No firm opinion.
No bright ideas.
Intellectually committed.
Without the strength of purpose to change anything.
Someone who you know can be manipulative, professionally guided.
And leave the business of government in the hands of the experts.
That could also play Keir Starmer.
We were just talking about this.
That applies so equally to Kierstama to anyone in New Labour at this point.
Vacuous empty vessels, aren't they?
Yeah.
Let's go to the next one.
Also, I was hypnotized by the power button symbols and the pupils.
Imagine having that in real life.
I was imagining someone looking at me.
Oh, someone in the eye.
I mean, I wish more humans had that feature, to be honest.
Josh and Heri were right on the nose.
Or should I say I?
These eyes are actually touch screen.
When it comes to arresting people over the Epstein files, you probably wouldn't want to announce it publicly before you've actually arrested them.
Don't want to give them a chance to run away after all.
Good point.
Let's get to the next one.
Dane Scotty criticising what he calls the left.
It must be a weekday.
Seriously, though, something I've noticed is the tendency of the left to gatekeep what journalism is often denying right-wingers the title of journalists at all.
Right-wing journalists operate individually on small teams, such as The Voice of Wales, Andy Know, and Project Veritas, and they go to a place, investigate a claim, and are usually abused and threatened for it.
Meanwhile, the left have taken on the moniker of media or journalists while they turn up in large numbers to obstruct.
For a group who call everyone else reactionaries, it's amusing to see them act reactively while the people they deride do actual proactive work investigating claims of social and public importance.
Yeah, notice how they're very institutionalized.
They always lean on the reputation and the sort of mystique of the institution because you can't see what's happening in the BBC.
But you know, there are tens of thousands of people, and they're all doing basically what we do.
There's no particular difference in the actual stock and trade of what we do, but I wouldn't want anyone to smear me with the label of journalist.
So, anyway, let's carry on.
Did he know that Mandelson had continued his friendship with Epstein after the conviction?
He went through a process exercise, and then there was security vetting.
I had to conduct the inquiry myself virtually.
And you didn't find evidence of anything incriminating.
Of course not.
In the first place, John Halsted was one of us.
We've been friends for years.
In the second place, the whole story was got out by the press.
And in the third place, the whole object of internal security inquiries is to find no evidence.
It's so perfect.
That scene goes on for a bit longer.
I saw the clip going around.
It's incredible.
Genuinely incredible how this is.
I mean, whoever wrote it absolutely knew their stuff.
Let's go to the next one.
Ooh.
Is that Avesbury?
It looks like it, doesn't it?
Yeah.
That's the right line.
How lovely and wholesome.
Avery is very close.
Can't stop doing it.
I think he's going to clean out that drain.
Oh, right.
Because this is the thing.
Oh, there was a thing on the Swindon advertiser today.
Oh, there's a big road been flooded.
And it's like, you know, there are going to be a bunch of retards in the comments going, climate change, climate change.
No, block drains.
So just clean the bloody drains out.
There's so many other things as well.
Like it's the farmers not using their land and that controlled runoff.
And that runoff is just rife because lots of farmers are incentivized not to use their land.
Like, anyway.
Yeah, the problems are actually really prosaic and just pragmatic.
Oh, it's global carbon.
Oh Recollect That00:03:16
No, no, no, no.
It's the fact that we are just not taking care of the country.
I know this clip.
Let's watch this.
That noise.
You can hear it even more clearly I can think of which is better than that is the sound of Peter Mandelson being attacked by bears For real?
Yes.
Brilliant.
Yeah, because I mean, everyone.
This is the thing.
Starmer's defense of Mandelson is really weird and weak.
Because it's not like Mandelson was.
I mean, that was in 2010.
He was always corrupt.
He was known as the Prince of Dance.
Everyone knew that.
But that's why that puff piece.
Have you seen that puff piece?
I've seen the title.
I haven't read it yet.
I've looked into it.
It is so bad.
Really?
There's even images of him like just breaking some eggs with his dog in the kitchen in the door.
He just sat down chilling with a sandwich.
What do you like, mate?
Oh, come on.
What are you doing?
Yeah, come on.
So bad.
Circling the wagons.
And the thing is, as well.
This is the establishment's paper.
Epstein's a master manipulator.
He manipulated me.
Harboohoo who leaked government documents.
The Times is the paper of the establishment.
Yes.
And for them to be doing this shows you that the establishment thinks this should not have happened to Mandelson.
Well, you know what it shows?
It shows that Mandelson's calling in the favours, right?
Mandelson's like, right, okay, you.
I know this.
You have to do this.
Yeah, you have to do that.
I guarantee.
And the thing is about Mandelson as well.
It's like everyone's kind of acting.
It's like, oh, he was friends with Epstein, and Epstein was really bad.
It's like, you think Mandelson wasn't getting in on all of this?
I mean, what was the picture of him in his underwear with that young woman?
Sorry, All goes back to you leaked government documents.
Yeah, that's the true crime.
Yeah, Mandelson.
But like, everyone's acting as if he himself, oh, who knows?
But he was definitely.
No, no, I'm certain that Mandelson has done horrific things as well, right?
You know, I can't prove anything, obviously.
But I'm not going to assume that he's.
That's the thing as part of that article.
Sorry, just real quick.
So funny is that he says, oh, I don't recollect that money.
And then they go, but what about the photo?
It's like, oh, yeah, I don't recollect that either.
It's like, yeah, but the photo actually is real.
Yeah.
You were there.
And if you don't recollect that, and that's real, everything else you don't recollect is probably real as well.
Yeah.
Why should you think it's not?
He literally just instantly debunked his own sort of argument.
That's so funny.
But they're at the point where they've got nowhere to go now.
Anyway, let's get off the next one.
Looking at the Epstein stuff, I find myself thinking about the Dark Ocean Society and the Black Dragon Society of Imperial Japan, which got disbanded after World War II.
A lot of what they did, though, was very innocuous, kind of touristy, normal businessman kind of stuff.
You know, they just go around, say, a place like Manchuria and just keep detailed records of everyone they did business with and everyone they met and all the geography of the areas they went through.
And then they just submit it to like the Japanese state when they came back home.
Yeah.
I'm not familiar with it.
No, neither am I, but it seems pretty much spot on, really.
Yeah.
Tried Telling Someone00:04:32
Alex says, not to get too scientific gents, but if you want to look for sulfuric acid in conjunction with hydrogen peroxide, the combination of these two creates piral solution that's exceptionally good at destroying anything with carbon in it, such as paper, sugar, and jerky.
Steve says, these files are so disturbing that I hope these are just real references to food, but I think it's not.
Dirty Belt says, I assume the worst.
It's far worse than I thought.
Yeah, medieval punishment's too good for these people.
Absolutely.
Yep, there's a lot of redacted things that we can't read.
Arizona's Desert Rat says, I've sent emails or texts about the need about jerky.
That was when I was getting ready to go for a long hike.
However, eating jerky for lunch is weird and sorting out in the freezer is illogical.
Yeah, and eating like, you know, eight pounds of jerky wear, eight ounces of jerky, it's like six pounds, eight pounds.
Yeah, staggeringly high amount.
Oh, you're running out.
Quick, we need to get more.
It's like, what?
Sorry, yeah.
How are you getting through?
Oh, yeah.
Cost says, these slash worshiping degenerates are the ones who decide when we go to war and who we die for.
They're being subjugated by monsters.
Yeah.
The weird amount of shrimp mentioned, considering it's never kosher.
That's a great point, actually.
Of course, you know, he's the one going on about him being Jewish and Goyen and stuff.
And yet, what's with all this shit?
I'd not thought about that.
Yeah, that's a great point.
I can't believe I didn't make that connection.
You know what?
That's probably why the names are redacted because they're probably Jewish as well.
So it's like, well, this doesn't make any goddamn sense then.
No.
Great point.
That's a really good point.
Yeah, I wish I'd connected that.
I just feel foolish now that I realize I didn't.
Jimbo says, abortion has always been about women trying to control other people's perception of them for murdering a baby.
Tried telling someone who's had a miscarriage it was just clump of cells.
Well, my wife has had three miscarriages and I've seen everyone and there's definitely not a clump of cells.
And it's the saddest thing in the world.
So it's Marambl Morg says over 63.6 million abortions have been recorded between 1973 and 2020 in the United States alone.
The greatest genocide of our time.
I'm not going to read the rest of that, but you'll understand why.
Michael says, I'm all for contraception, but the whole abortion thing is always difficult.
See, this is what I was saying to you, right?
Contraception makes sense because it's prior to any kind of horror, you know, and so fair enough.
And like I was arguing, it's like, look, there comes a point where you're like, you know, a married couple will want to use contraception because they have a brood.
But it's a slippery slope.
The slippery slope is not a fallacy.
It's a fact.
I'm happy to be like, yeah, contraception for married couples only or something like that.
Fair enough.
You know, once you've got like, however many children?
One inch.
Trust me, man.
Oh, man.
I've gone compromising.
But I've got too many children already.
Not too many, but I've got enough.
And like, you know, I don't want another half dozen.
Michael says, oh no, that was another one.
Dudley Douchebag says, I went from being ambivalent to staunch anti-abortion with hardly any exception due to moral and social destruction that followed.
I welcome the rage of the pro-abortionists.
An easier burden than watching society apologize.
Yeah, I was the same.
When I was doing my MEP campaign in 2019, I was doing a debate with this one guy who came up to me.
He's like, you know, like, I've thought about everything, and the one thing I can't square in my own head is abortion.
And he was like, what do you think?
Have you got an answer?
I was like, I don't.
I hadn't, I just didn't.
And that was one of those things where it's like, right, okay, it is bad.
You know, and there's just no getting around it.
So Derek says, Ferris, when St. Paul was telling the Corinthians to get their act together or stop loose living, it didn't have just personal consequences, but also relational consequences.
Someone online says, it really is sad that we live in a time where saying murdering babies is immoral is considered extreme.
Well, again, it's exactly the kind of conversation they would have had in Carthage in the Senate of Carthage.
Some Carthaginian would have been like, you know, I'm not sure all this child sacrifice is a good thing.
They'll be like, oh, look, the extremist is here.
Get the police to arrest him for praying outside of the sacrifice ritual room.
Like, it's just sorry.
It's just disgraceful.
I really just can't stand it, man.
Kevin says, the only way of putting military in charge of policing would work is if no one above the rank of W01 is involved, keep the university indoctrinated officers and high-ranking military leaders away.
Well, the whole, the whole thing.
I thought about that.
The whole thing.
The military redo first.
Yeah, it clearly needs a redo.
Dan says, I wonder if resurrecting the honor in service would encourage young people to resume jobs that are currently being outsourced to imported foreigners.
Yes.
Thanks for Joining Us00:01:47
We need to cluster.
I've done again a segment here where I spoke about being very culturally biased about where you spend your money as well.
Like, we need to learn to be sort of ethnically conscious and very, very choosy about where we spend our money.
Stop, you know, deliveroo, stop Uber eat, stop going to an Indian, stop doing these things.
Just stop.
Completely stop.
Omar says, even perfect data would only cover illegal behavior.
It's not illegal to not say sorry, skip the queue, leave a shopping cart, leer at underage girls, loiter in playgrounds, take from charity you don't need, make comment that there's too many English in England.
There are thousands of microtransgressions daily.
And this is a genuine point.
Like you saw the Guardian article the other day, so we should stop saying thank you.
It's like, idiots.
How about I just deport you?
Just get rid of you.
And then it's not your problem.
Yeah, I hated it.
And it's one of those things that they don't understand what it hits at.
But sorry.
Well, I was just going to say, so completely right.
And that's why that's how societies and cultures used to self-regulate without the managerial police getting involved.
Yeah.
You know, like you would have a bloke on the street that you wouldn't mess with and you wouldn't go do awful things around in that neighborhood because there would be a guy that would be like, no, don't do that.
But it'd be also just generally most adults would be like, what you did.
But also, everyone around you would be like, what's that?
Make a spike out.
Exactly.
Exactly.
Do that.
Exactly.
Behave yourself.
Yep.
And Isaac says, it definitely feels like we've got 100 million in the UK right now, not 67 million.
I mean, it just feels that the country is just crammed with people.
It's absolutely mad.
Anyway, we're out of time.
So thank you for joining us, folks.
Go over to lowseas.com in half an hour to watch Veris's Real Politique, where he examines in detail the connections Epstein had with European elites.
I imagine that's going to be highly illuminating, isn't it?