The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1255

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 18, 2025 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:38:22

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1255

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Um hello and welcome to the podcast of Lotus Eaters episode 1255.
	I'm your host Harry, joined today by Bo and Firaz.
	Oh.
	And today we're going to be talking about the cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel and I think also Stephen Colbert.
	Or mention him.
	We're mentioning him.
	Either way, couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of guys.
	I'll be talking about Operation Scatter, and I will also be reporting on a situation that is currently ongoing and developing.
	So by the time we actually get to my reporting of it, things might have uh carried on since then.
	There might be more information that I'm not aware of.
	I'll try and keep on top of it as I'm going through these segments.
	But you know how fast things can move right now.
	And I'm going to be talking about Operation Scatter and the HMOs and the closing of migrant hotels actually being something of a monkey's poor.
	And Fear Ice is going to close us out speaking about the cost of backing Israel.
	So you've chosen a nice, safe simple, subject for us to talk about disaster.
	Nothing controversial.
	So thank you very much for that.
	And uh let me know.
	Yeah, I'll let you know, Samson.
	If anything happens, I'll try and keep one eye on reports coming from Epping at the moment, just to see if anything uh if if there are any new developments.
	Uh with that, shall we get into Jimmy Kimmel?
	Okay.
	Have you heard?
	Have you seen about this?
	Mr. Jimmy Kimmel has been cancelled.
	Oh no.
	As in actually his show has been cancelled.
	Yeah, just his show.
	Yeah.
	Not the man.
	Actually cancelled off the earth.
	No, no, no, no.
	Just his show is being has been cancelled.
	Uh happened pretty quick.
	Sometimes that can just happen.
	The powers that be, uh, I think this is ABC just decided nope, we're gonna end that.
	So uh well, let's watch this this short which covers it.
	ABC telling NBC News that they will be taking Jimmy Kimmel's popular late night show off of the air indefinitely after a comments the late night hosts made earlier this week about Charlie Kirk's assassination and the motives of the man accused of killing him.
	The MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.
	Now this also comes just hours after FCC chairman Brendan Carr suggested that the FCC could take action against Disney and ABC for Kimmel's comments, and it also comes after Next Star Media Group announced in a statement that their affiliates would not be airing the show, saying that they quote strongly objects to recent comments made by Mr. Kimmel concerning the killing of Charlie Kirk.
	Now NBC News, we've reached out to Kimmel for comment, and we have not yet heard back.
	Surprise.
	Okay.
	So that happened.
	Uh bit of a bit of a TMZ segment for me.
	I don't I I usually prefer things with a touch more gravitas.
	But it's in the news today.
	It's in the news cycle.
	Let's talk about it.
	Sometimes some gravitas or the or else just space.
	Oh yeah, or that.
	Yeah.
	Can you get any more gravitas than the wonder of the cosmos?
	He's gonna start reading out his poetry in a minute.
	Just long quotes of Carl Sagan.
	Just a 25-minute long Carl Sagan quote fest.
	I'd actually like that.
	I'd watch that.
	Um there are compilations on YouTube.
	And of course, a lot of people are uh just gloating.
	Heaven forbid we would we would go.
	Na na na.
	Goodbye.
	So I like I like Jeremy Hamble at the quartering.
	Right.
	Um so yeah, there is a lot of gloating.
	It's a rather menacing screenshot.
	Yeah, it is actually, yeah, that's terrible.
	That's terrifying.
	Yeah.
	That's the look he gives you.
	Oh no, no, no, no.
	Okay.
	Um so yeah, uh I mean I always think it is shitty when people gloat when something you know, when someone on the right goes down for whatever reason.
	Right.
	Or gets you out.
	I always it's always annoying when the left gloat.
	Uh but also I I have been known to do it a little bit from time to time.
	Um, we're all human.
	In this case, um, because it's so sort of inconsequential, the career of Jimmy Kimmel is already a million millionaire.
	And the regime propagandist for the past five, six years he was one of the people pushing the COVID lockdown narratives.
	Oh, yeah, yeah.
	Which ruined who knows how many people's lives.
	Yeah, no.
	And I think pretty much everything else that was supported by you know Biden or Obama, he was always their their guy.
	I wonder what specials Jimmy Kimmel did on the the poor death of George Floyd.
	I'm sure he was also spreading misinformation during those just different kinds.
	Oh, absolutely, absolutely.
	Oh, yeah, an establishment shield, no doubt about that.
	But um so but it does seem like his ratings according to this one website anyway, that his ratings even over the last like six months or or year or so is um Complete freeful.
	That's almost halved.
	Kind of tanked, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Almost halved.
	The thing is, you know, we're in the game of getting clicks and getting numbers and all that sort of thing.
	If you're even stagnant, that's pretty bad.
	Yeah.
	You're like that's a mortal wound if you're stagnant.
	Yes.
	If you're going down, you're sort of already dead, really.
	Uh it's not like this year has been bereft of news.
	I mean, we're looking from February of this year, which is when Trump stepped into his second administration.
	So there's been plenty that has been happening since then.
	Could it be simply that people aren't interested in what he has to say on the matter?
	I think so.
	I think that is the case.
	I mean, look, at the beginning of the year is still pulling in close to two mil, which in one way is really good numbers.
	In another way, if you're sort of all over real television and pushed you got a fifty million dollar budget a year and stuff, that's actually not all that good.
	And it's down to sort of nearly halved.
	Yes.
	Um now.
	So you can imagine the the powers that be would be looking at his show anyway.
	Yes.
	And being like, eh, has it run its course?
	Yeah.
	Um because if he was a real cash cow, if he was putting in 20, 25 million plus every show and growing, then I doubt I really doubt they probably would have just Xed him like that.
	But um, I think the the interesting bit for me is the FCC talking about um looking into what was being said.
	And I think what this confirms is something that a lot of people on the right need to wake up to.
	Post liberalism is here, guys.
	The the liberal order where oh, it's the free marketplace of ideas and all of that.
	Look, we tried, it was the left who reneged on that agreement.
	It was the left who wanted to debank people, it was the left who wanted to arrest people for things that they say.
	It's still happening here in Britain.
	It's still happening here constantly, it's all over Europe.
	Um they're trying to shut down the AFD, they're trying to ban Marine Le Pen from running.
	So liberalism as an idea has run its course and it has died.
	And now that it has died, when the right gets into power, it has no choice but to fight using the tactics that were developed by the left.
	Because this is going to be the only way in which it can govern.
	So for me, the theme isn't Jimmy Ficking J Jimmy Kimmel, you know, who's he anyway.
	Uh the theme is something more significant, which is all right, guys.
	We agree to your rules, and we will engage in battle accordingly.
	That for me is what's interesting.
	Yeah, I mean, uh if it was entirely up to me, um, I I wouldn't do that as much.
	Like, for example, when the left would dox people and stuff, um, I'm against that, and if and when the right does it, I still find it uh distasteful in the same way.
	I feel like we could be better than that if possible.
	You know, the argument of you thought it was really bad when loads of uh right leading or conservative people were uh cancelled, so why are you cheering when it happens to the other side?
	Yeah, it's actually a fair point in my mind.
	Yes.
	But but also, but but also the point you just made is also actually still valid, even though I may find it a bit distasteful.
	It's actually still valid.
	It is also to put to put through a little bit, I don't think that these are at all entirely comparable.
	As Stelios and I were discussing yesterday, ten years ago, what were people getting cancelled for?
	In 2017, what was James Damore fired from his job at Google for?
	Yes.
	Writing up a document that said men and women are having different achievements and rate of achievement because of biological differences between men and women.
	Pointing out the obvious, which has been acknowledged for decades before modern feminism came around.
	What is Jimmy Kimmel and others like him, what are they getting cancelled, quote unquote, for?
	Well, they're getting cancelled for encouraging political violence, and in Jimmy Kimmel's case here, encouraging a misinformation narrative that, again, could get more people killed.
	This is a very, very volatile situation.
	Because as far as I'm concerned, yeah, the things that Jimmy Kimmel said weren't too bad after the initial lies that he began spreading.
	when he played that clip of Donald Trump having a very unusual reaction to um to Charlie Kirk's death basically dismissing it and being like oh we're building a new East wing of wherever I am right now that was unusual and that's worth pointing out but he loaded it he preloaded it by saying oh this guy who did it is MAGA.
	That's a that's a lie and this is not the time for lies.
	I think it's an absolutely fair point to uh draw attention to why you got quote unquote cancelled yeah what you actually did.
	Yeah for example just one little anecdote there was some people in reform when I was still in reform and they got sort of deselected or ostracised for quite literally just liking a Tommy tweet or something or leaving a reply under a Tommy tweet saying yeah or something.
	That was it.
	Right.
	So very very very very minimal.
	You got housted for saying okay here's our policies here's how we would practically do them and and apparently Richard Tice was horrified at the idea well no no no bo we're not supposed to actually do them God no God forbid we do anything like that.
	Yeah well but I think you know in a in a way Harry you're sort of we are in agreement in the sense that we're no longer pretending that everything is neutral and everything is evil of equal value.
	We are now of the view that, yes, there's right and there's wrong, there's truth and there's lies, and we are going to be intolerant of you lying, but not by killing you and not by arresting you, just by saying, well, you can't be in this position if you're that dishonest or that hateful or wishing death on people who disagree with you politically.
	So it's a sort of sorting, it's an end of neutrality, and it's the end of the idea.
	that everything is neutral and everything's of equal value we just have a disagreement of opinions.
	That's what we're seeing now and that is a good thing and that's a necessary thing absolutely that this is how politics should be fought if we are men of principle so say it matters what was actually done so in the case of Jimmy Kimmel saying that the the shooter Tyler Robinson no relation I understand no no no no relation another spooky thing we share a middle name James Oh really?
	Oh yeah.
	Still no relation and if there is a relation his relation diverged from mine probably with the Mayflower.
	Can you account for your whereabouts on the time so in this case Jimmy Kimmel uh did say something that is just sort of factually wrong you know that this guy is MAGA.
	And he probably knew it right yeah so it's factually wrong.
	So someone mentioned in the office and I think again it they're not really parallels in any way but still it's worth some sort of reference what happened to Alex Jones where he said just the factually wrong thing about Sandy Hook.
	Right.
	And it like you got taken to court and fined in whatever way billion dollars a billion dollars or two billion dollars I think you're right two billion.
	Just an insane crazy number.
	And it was that happen to Kimmel?
	No.
	And it's not what we're calling for no but if you're constantly spread spending your time lying maybe you shouldn't be on a mainstream television.
	That's that's a fair argument.
	Next we need to see good all go.
	Because he's not just lying Lewis Goodall on LBC has been or was immediately after consistently coming up with narrative spins for why Charlie Kirk you know I'm not gonna say it outright but was heavily implying that this was the uh fair comeuppance.
	Yeah fair come up and to the hateful rhetoric that he had been spreading by debating college kids.
	It's the argument Stelioff said it the other day look what you made me do.
	If that woman hadn't if that woman hadn't have been dressed so provocatively she wouldn't have got raped thing if you hadn't said what you'd said you'd still be alive today in that sort of argument.
	Yeah gross um so okay on the on the sort of left lefty leaning century stuff there's all sorts of uh all sorts of takes about right wing cancel culture uh unheard uh the right wing cancel culture and and free speech uh was it even mum's net mum's net getting involved right wing cancel cultures at it again um yeah all sorts of example of right wing cancel culture,
	the young Turks, right wingers cancelling Americans en masse.
	Well well here's this.
	Here's here's the example.
	Here's the thought experiment, right?
	So immediately after the murder of Charlie Kirk, which who was murdered for a difference of opinion for espousing what are essentially mainstream Christian views on most subjects he held the mainstream Christian view of abortion, of whether you can be a man or a woman, and a number of other subjects.
	And outside of that, when it came to race relations, he was going off of what can be factually verified.
	Exactly.
	It's all common sense stuff.
	He's murdered, and these creatures come out of their wood out of the woodwork to celebrate, to dance, to shout from the rooftops about how happy they are about it and how much they want to see it happen to other people.
	Now consider that you're perhaps from a conservative or even centrist family.
	Maybe you share some of those same values that Charlie Kirk held.
	Mainstream normal Christian values.
	If those people are working in health care, do you want them administering drugs to you?
	If they're working in childcare, do you want them near your children?
	If they're working in education, do you want those people educating your children?
	Do you even want them serving or delivering your food?
	Because if they know anything about you, you now know that they have a murderous impulse, a hateful animus towards you.
	So I think it's only fair to say they have revealed their character to me.
	They should not be in a position where they could harm me or my loved ones.
	Exactly.
	Yeah.
	I I don't think any of us would shoot a Jimmy Kimmel or celebrate the shooting of a Jimmy Kimmel.
	We look at it with Dane.
	I'm glad that he no longer is being listened to.
	I don't know who listened to him in the first place.
	I feel bad for them as well, uh, for having listened to him.
	But there's a real difference in values and in temperament.
	One side is saying, look, you're wrong.
	I'm adhering to the values that built Western civilization, and you came up with your ideas in the last five seconds in civilizational time and are trying to impose them on me.
	And the uh the other guy's saying, Well, you're an AC and you deserve to die.
	Okay.
	Like that's not an even Yeah.
	Right, yeah.
	I loathe Jimmy Kimmel.
	I find I've I think of him as as as an uh an ideological political enemy, but I wouldn't even flick the end of his nose.
	I wouldn't even stand on the back of his shoe while he's walking along, so his heel came out.
	I wouldn't do anything to him.
	I wouldn't even do right.
	I wouldn't even give him a noogie.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	I wouldn't even give him a Chinese burn.
	I wouldn't even do that.
	Uh so okay, there is a very real difference there, absolutely.
	Uh I mean, get a load of this.
	I mean, this is like a a year old or so.
	But this is a classic right here.
	But reflections on right wing council culture, the the the terrifying uh the justifying censoriousness because the left started it's dumb.
	It's also untrue.
	McCarthy, McCarthyism, the specter of McCarthyism.
	That's a classic thing leftists like to do, to think to try and argue that history starts at a certain point.
	Yes.
	That that they choose to make an argument.
	And even for a time as as well, um centre-right figures were talking about McCarthy and using McCarthyism in that same way that the left do.
	But the problem with McCarthy is as soon as you take even a cursory glance at what he was doing, one he was right.
	Exactly.
	Obviously right, as you've pointed out here that he did nothing wrong.
	Two, it's exactly because he was right that they killed him for it.
	Well, you think he was killed?
	This is a side theme.
	I think it's I I think the circumstances of his death coming so quickly after he was taken off of all of these committees.
	Oh I thought he drank himself to death.
	Anyway, let's not worry about that.
	Yeah, I think it's very suspicious.
	Okay.
	Similar to um similar to Patten.
	And as if like history started with McCarthy and he did it out of nowhere.
	Like it wasn't a response to Stalinism.
	No, No, like okay.
	Okay, Jacob.
	Yeah.
	Sure.
	I I think cancelling people because they're literal traitors might be a good idea.
	Yeah.
	And it's not like the uh administration of the US government at the time wasn't full of communist spies or anything.
	It's not like FDR was literally being advised by a series of Soviet spies, which we found out in the Venona decrypts when they were released in the 90s.
	Yeah, I mentioned I meant the Venona project, yeah.
	BB Dade's got all the receipts right there in this article.
	That's like a lot of people.
	Yeah.
	Um so I mean uh what was the next thing I was saying?
	Oh, yeah, Jimmy Kimmel.
	Because some on the left, like Owen Jones, have tried to argue or claim that cancel culture isn't a thing, it's not real.
	That's just made up.
	The right moaning about the left cancelling them.
	It isn't it isn't real.
	Uh but of course it is.
	Uh oh, it's Carl Benjamin telling this guy to shut up, basically.
	For anyone's only listening, yeah, uh guy saying deplatforming Trump really, really worked, and the fact that big tech waited for him to lose power to do it uh must never be forgotten.
	Um yeah, okay.
	This is from a guy accusing everybody to the right of Tony Blair of being a fascist.
	Thank you.
	Yeah, right.
	I mean Owen Jones absolutely uh personally, not just I was gonna talk about all leftists but I mean himself, personally.
	Uh but then engaged in council culture.
	I mean Can we can can we get up that one?
	Oh, yeah, he's him just asking for someone to get fired by the end of the day, not just Red.
	Yeah, by the end of the day, that's immediately but also cancel culture isn't real, according to Jones.
	Yeah.
	Also it's not real.
	Um the argument seems to be when people sort of put him up on it, it's like, well, they're not actually cancelled, they're not actually dead in a ditch.
	So they're not cancelled.
	Yeah.
	And that would be the old school commie way of g cancelling them, I suppose.
	Yeah, that's that was that was literally it, yes, exactly.
	Uh Dank doing a funny one.
	Saying logging on to Twitter to see Owen Jones getting cancelled after years of cancelling people himself and then saying cancel culture doesn't exist.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, things don't really have to make sense, do they?
	Uh particularly.
	Oh, yeah.
	So the point is loads we have memories.
	We remember loads of people getting quote unquote cancelled.
	Yep.
	Um, like uh Gina Carano is probably one of the great ones.
	I think she recently settled in court for loads of money off of Disney.
	I wish she'd taken that case all the way to the bitter end.
	Yeah.
	I wish she hadn't settled, but okay.
	That one was particularly ridiculous because they accused her of anti-semitism, I believe, even though the example that she was giving was like arguing against that.
	It was using the classic like Nancy's bad kind of arguments.
	But they accused her of anti-Semitism for it.
	So as far as I as far as I'm concerned, Gina Carrano, they just wanted her off.
	Yeah, they just wanted rid of her.
	And they used any excuse, and that's how these people operated.
	If they had nothing on you, they just they just accuse you of something anyway.
	Yeah.
	And I mean, the the left has set clear rules whereby them winning means that people on the right cannot be employed.
	People on the right cannot get an income or work for any sort of major uh corporate or media or uh university or what have you.
	And now they're complaining that the rules that they advocated are coming back for them.
	Okay.
	It sounds a bit hypocritical and weak.
	Um I forgot about that one.
	Scott Cawthan, the guy who made Five Nights at Freddy's, basically a children's series, got cancelled because he was a Christian who donated to Republicans and voted Trump.
	Well, that's the thing.
	If they realize that you're a Republican.
	He'd literally done nothing other than just be a Republican, a basic Christian Republican.
	I mean, quick ones off the top of my head.
	I got Chris Pratt, Dean Kane, Rob Schneider, uh, Kevin Sorbo, James Woods, John Voitt.
	And these are just these are just Hollywood types as well, TV movie type people.
	But the thing is, the most pernicious thing is that quite often it was just normal people.
	Yeah, right.
	Someone someone goes on Twitter or something and posts a little clip, and they're just they're a complete nobody.
	Yep, a complete working class non-entity, and I don't mean that in a pejorative way.
	They've got like ten followers and they're j they work as um i in a in a convenience store, but they make uh little video saying go Trump or something, and they get dog piled and they're and fired.
	They man that happened loads.
	They managed to fire a police officer because he I think donated twenty five dollars to the Kyle Rittenhouse defence fund.
	Right.
	Like they they that that was all he didn't say anything, he didn't do anything.
	In Britain, police officers are being removed from the force because they sent uh WhatsApp messages that were deemed insensitive or sexist or racist.
	There's no target too small for them.
	Exactly.
	Exactly.
	So now complaining about this when Jimmy Kimmel gets gets gets the boot, like really yeah.
	It's just despicable.
	Also it doesn't happen, it doesn't exist though, council culture, it doesn't exist.
	But it shows the kind of morality that they have.
	It shows the morality whereby everything that they do is good and everything that the other side does is bad.
	And it shows the morality where these are people who have one rule for themselves and another rule for everyone else.
	And the f the only way to keep society functioning, as we learn from Christianity, is you have to have the same rules for everyone.
	Like certain rules must apply to everybody, and these guys cannot accept it.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	So now it's coming back.
	Now the pendulum seems to have swung at least to some degree.
	Uh people uh on the left are like you know, welcome to our world.
	Yeah, welcome to the party, pal.
	Yeah.
	Exactly.
	Like Hassan.
	Mr. Pyker.
	Um tweeting from under his bed.
	Isn't that the guy who regularly calls for people to die or something like that?
	I think he said a number of things.
	I saw a clip the other day.
	So again constantly.
	Constantly.
	There are compilations of him and compilations of destiny saying that uh saying that their political enemies should die, should be shot.
	There's a very strange and disturbing video of Destiny talking about how he was this close to planning and committing a murder of somebody that he knew personally.
	Really?
	Yeah.
	I didn't know that one.
	These are mentally unstable people.
	And they use terms, Hassan uses terms like fascists to mark people out as his political enemy.
	Kind of give himself a moral blank check to do whatever he wants to.
	That's exactly what is exactly what has happened to Charlie Kirk.
	I did see a clip the other day, because I don't watch uh Monsieur Pika.
	I did see a clip the other day where he just said uh like slice their bellies open or something like that, explicitly just saying cut cut them open, slice them open.
	Yeah, and he's like let their guts lay on the floor in all of the blood and writhing, and it's like that's a sick thing to say.
	Remember him saying America deserve 911.
	That's yeah, that was pretty mental famous one.
	Pretty mental.
	Um it seems that he has none of Jenk's savvy or temperance, which is a remarkable thing to say when you're comparing somebody to Cenk Yuga, but he's a he's at least shown some class in this whole thing, comparatively.
	Well, comparatively, yeah, to make them like if he compared high leftist standards, yes, absolutely.
	Yeah, he at least goes, Hold up, hold up, hold up, you're making us look really bad.
	Yeah.
	That is the other thing I think's funny.
	You see the left, that sort of take.
	Um, where um they're saying well, they weren't saying it's it's bad to uh yellow over Charlie's murder, but don't do it so explicitly so openly, it makes us look bad.
	Well, did you did you see um that's a bit revealing in and of itself, isn't it?
	Did you see Anna Casparion in Destiny on the Piers Morgan package?
	Again, I saw like a 40-second clip, or yeah, I saw a bit, I saw a little bit.
	Because Anna is being, you know, reasonable, she clearly knows that this is terrible optics, and she herself has kind of been cancelled by the left for saying I was sexually assaulted and that's bad, and they all went, Oh, you hate migrants now, do you?
	You hate the homeless, do you?
	And she's like, Well, maybe maybe police on the streets to clean uh clean up the streets is not a bad thing, and they went, Oh, you're a you're a fascist now.
	I see you're a fascist now, Anna.
	Um and and destiny comes on ostensibly on her side, but there are so many clips and screenshots that came from just that short few minute long exchange where she is clearly visibly repulsed by him.
	Yeah.
	Because he's disgusting.
	He's got a weird thing where his jaw goes laterally when he talks.
	Have you noticed that?
	Anyway, anyway.
	Apparently it's something that comes with methamphetamine abuse.
	Oh, is it?
	Yeah, not to say that that's why it does for him, but that's one of the main reasons that that can happen with people, supposedly.
	Okay.
	Yeah, I watched a bit of that clip, and there was a point where they're both arguing with each other and both just talking over each other without pausing, you know, both sort of nearly shouting at the same time.
	Uh I got about five, maybe ten seconds into that.
	I'm like, that's enough, that's enough.
	I I get it, I get it.
	Yeah.
	So okay, that's the story.
	I've run out of time.
	Jimmy Kimmel has been cancelled.
	So maybe he'll go on he'll start his own podcast.
	Maybe we'll start a YouTube channel.
	I mean, again, Jeremy at the Quartering said, you know, good luck with that.
	Good luck with that dude.
	Uh starting starting from the bottom.
	When you have to genuinely compete in the marketplace of ideas, and your ideas have already lost.
	Uh good luck with that.
	You're gonna make 10 videos a day, like the culture in time.
	That's why when they leave their networks, they all end up sort of becoming a little more sensible.
	What was the CNN guy who sort of Jake Jake Trapper or Jake Tapper is?
	No, I was thinking about uh the Kumo about actually uh Oh, Chris Cuomo.
	Yes, Chris Cuomo.
	He became a little more sensible after he left CNN, and maybe Kimmel will try to pull that off, but then you'll know, well, which which one is the real guy?
	Like, where were you getting paid to lie?
	And if so, the FCC should absolutely stomp on these network's ads.
	Yeah.
	Little Freddo crashed and burnt when he tried to make it in the real world.
	Um okay, uh Jimmy Kimmel's being cancelled.
	There you go.
	May I have the mouse, please?
	Uh, would you like to go through your super chats or would you want me to uh if you wouldn't mind if you that's fine.
	So on YouTube, you can only pick one PM, Starmer or Blair.
	Which one I'll address that to you, Bo.
	God.
	That's tough.
	You remember living under Blair better.
	It's tough.
	Do you want your left eye plucked out or your right?
	It's like, ah, God.
	If nothing else, Blair has better media savvy.
	If nothing else about it this way, would you rather have Paul's or Indians?
	Yeah, well, polls, certainly.
	Yeah, uh, then yeah.
	In some in some respects, Blair did some okay it did some okay things.
	It didn't feel like he was actively trying to speed run us off a cliff.
	No, that's what he was doing, but it didn't feel like that.
	Well, we know it retrospectively.
	Yeah, we know it retrospectively though.
	It's much more insidious than uh I don't know, that's a tough question.
	Uh alright.
	Uh someone says, buy Jimmy, now do everyone on LBC.
	I believe uh the academic agent is currently trying to work on that.
	Um says, Could you please invite Razorfist to discuss McCarthy someday?
	Thank you.
	I would love to.
	I would love to chat to raise a fist about McCarthy.
	Uh before now, I've thrown a tiny bit of shade at razor fist because I don't agree with his take on uh Lincoln, Abraham Lincoln.
	Uh but uh but I I like him other than that.
	And I watched a long form video of his about two weeks ago about McCarthy, and it was spot on, and it was very well researched.
	And um he even said two or three things I didn't know before.
	That makes me sound really big-headed, doesn't he?
	He even referenced something I had not even heard of before.
	But no, it was a very good video, it was very, very good video, and I'd love to chat to him about it.
	Uh, whenever I've reached out to him once or twice on Twitter, he's he's blanked me, but he is good friends with Carl.
	So maybe, maybe one day.
	Yeah, maybe one day.
	I don't mind razor fist, but I mainly watch him for like when he discusses metal music.
	Oh right.
	Uh I like that stuff.
	Well, I'm a history nerd, I just like the history stuff.
	Yeah, he does some good stuff.
	Uh K Bar's BBQ says Jimmy Kimmel should be glad he isn't part of the AFD.
	Hi, bros barbecue.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I I have to thank you for that name.
	That's hilarious.
	Uh and on Rumble, Sorayan555, leftists are losing their minds because they could never conceive of a world where the right would hold them accountable for anything.
	Now the shoes on the other foot, they visibly can't handle it.
	We've got a little bit of a taste of this last year as well.
	And remember, these people are intellectually and emotionally stunted children.
	Like my daughter isn't even two yet, and she displays a greater depth of emotion and empathy and the ability to share and care for others than these people do.
	So you've got to expect tantrums.
	That's a random name.
	Based Harry strikes again with the true takes on conspiracies.
	I am happy the left are getting what they deserve.
	I once got fired from a job for quote unquote sexual harassment because I laughed at a joke.
	Yeah, they there you go.
	Habsification, leftists, cancel culture is only real when it happens to me.
	Yep.
	That's the way it always works.
	Again, children.
	Drunk changeling, free speech isn't a theoretical principle.
	It's a functional tool that stops us from becoming a Rwanda, but it only works when everyone follows it.
	People calling for violence need to face consequences.
	Well, especially in the aftermath of real violence.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Sigil Stone, Jimmy Kimmel getting fired is a tragedy.
	They silenced a strong black man's voice.
	That's very true.
	He's just been doing sophisticated white face these past twenty-five years.
	And Doom Hand says, if I'm being honest, Kimmel's comments don't seem that bad.
	Nothing he should have been fired over.
	He said a lot worse during the lockdowns, though, which is why I still don't feel bad that he got fired.
	Yeah.
	Fair.
	Again, regime propagandist, I don't care so much for his rights, so to speak, at all.
	Okay, moving on to the next segment.
	So for years now we heard over and over and over again about the hotels that the invaders of our country were being shipped into, they were being held there, and they were being given stipends, weekly stipends for the privilege of being there, and they were also illegally working for things like delivery as delivery drivers when they shouldn't have been.
	We were told over and over again how much it cost.
	People were upset about it, constantly pushing for it to be changed so that they weren't being held in hotels, and finally the government listened to us.
	However, it appears that we have had a bit of a monkey's poor wish, because they're not sending them back simply because they're not legally allowed to be here in the first place.
	No, instead they will be coming to your neighborhood.
	They might be coming to your student halls.
	They may be coming next door, depending on how much of a greedy scumbag next door's landlord may happen to be.
	Chances are as well, if they are one of those that they might even be foreign.
	I've seen it happen in towns local to me, where foreign landlords just are happy to put new new Britons into their housing instead of, you know, letting somebody who needs to get onto the housing mar uh market or just rent a place instead.
	So first I'll be going through this, and then as we get towards the end of the segment, I'll discuss the consequences of these people being in your neighborhoods and towns and some of the recent developments that have been going on in Epping.
	If you remember two weeks ago, roughly, Callum from Epping, who had been organizing the protests down there following the sexual assault of a minor by some of the illegal migrants that were being held in one of the hotels, he came in and spoke on the subject and the protests, and Jack Hadfield was here as well.
	Well, there have been further developments as of yesterday and this morning in Epping that Callum has been doing some live reporting on, and I have been trying to stay up to date with it as well.
	By the time this goes out as a clip on YouTube, things might have changed, things might have developed again.
	Uh, but we'll see.
	I'll do the best that I can here.
	So, first of all, one of the things that they told us that they were going to do is have a one-in-one out process.
	Which is absurd enough on the face of it already.
	Which is completely useless.
	Yes.
	Yeah.
	Is completely useless as is, but at the very least, they were trying to sell us on some idea that the people who shouldn't be in this country, at least some of them, would be leaving the country.
	Well, guess what?
	Not happening.
	Even that.
	Even that is too much.
	Because on Monday, the first flights were supposed to take off with migrants on them.
	There were no migrants on those flights.
	On Tuesday, they were supposed to try again.
	Still no migrants on there.
	We can see the actual look of that in these posts here, where uh one of the sons reporters, Thomas Godfrey, was on the plane, and there were no migrants there.
	Or at least no illegal migrants being deported back to France.
	So uh that is a face of how we all feel about this.
	So why is it that they weren't sent off?
	Who blocked it?
	Well, can you interrupt you for one second?
	Yes, of course.
	One of the reasons the one in one out is so much worse than the pre-existing system, is that the ones in who would be taken would be a lot more likely to be allowed to bring their entire family with them.
	And one of the things that you see done is that they might send um like a f uh a father might go and take his brother's child with him, and then that child gets to apply for family reunification with her parents, and then rinse and repeat endlessly to sort of bring in a whole extended family.
	Acts as chain migration are the anchor to get all the exactly.
	So the one in one out was firstly missold to the public as being uh a way of reducing the numbers.
	Not only is it fundamentally an illegitimate thing to do, it's also a lie intended to encourage chain migration.
	But sorry to interrupt.
	No, it's no problem.
	It's poisoned meat.
	Not even that, because the second they actually need to follow through on it.
	They still can't do it because our governments are just allergic to deporting people.
	I know that Labour were putting out figures saying what was it at the beginning of last year, we've already deported 20,000 people.
	Uh have we seen any further updates since then?
	Have they had any more big figures that they like to band about since then?
	Because if I remember correctly, most of those deportations were actually done under the last few months of the Tory government.
	And that's a drop in the ocean anyway.
	Yeah.
	So on this story, on Monday, it was disclosed to the telegraph that the first migrant to be returned under the deal had been removed from his Air France flight, but the French had been informed that he would be flown out on Tuesday.
	However, the flight was delayed by at least another day.
	Plans to send out a second migrant on Tuesday were also foiled after his lawyers claimed that his experience of being tortured and trafficked should prevent him from being returned to France.
	This may sound callous.
	Frankly, I don't care what happened to him before he arrived here.
	Fact is he shouldn't have been here in the first place.
	And this, along with a ruling by I believe it was Judge Sheldon, Justice Sheldon, I should say, meant that he couldn't go and they just didn't send any of the others as well.
	So an already useless policy made even more ineffectual by not even having the uh having the power to f uh follow through with it because British and French charities started a campaign to bombard Air France with phone calls, emails, and social media messages urging urging them to not to agree to collaborate with the Interior Ministry and not to deport these people on these flights.
	As far as I'm concerned, if these charities, if that's the function of these charities, they should be shut down.
	They should they should be shut down.
	You have to register with the uh charity commission, the charities commission needs to go in and say, No, you cannot do that.
	You cannot interfere with the governmental processes, you cannot operate in this country anymore.
	I'd I'd suggest that odds are that the funders of the charities include Sorry Group Open Society and the government.
	So basically, in every single way, British taxpayers are funding their own replacement and they're funding their own invasion.
	Yes, um that having ever voted on it, and in fact uh every chance voted against it.
	Exactly.
	I know a little bit about this case.
	So the guy, this one particular guy that's sort of the case study, I suppose, is um from Eritrea and seems peaceful country seems to have gone through Libya at some point because uh he that was where he claimed that he would become a victim of traff trafficking.
	Uh also in an article I read it said that his own mum had paid traffickers in the Calais region a thousand pounds to make this thing happen.
	So all of that, yeah, yeah, I just don't care.
	Yeah, I just don't care.
	Get rid of him, clear him out.
	Yeah, yeah.
	That's unfortunate.
	That's unfortunate for you.
	You should have stayed in Eritrea, yeah.
	Can we take a moment to thank uh Sarkozy and Cameron for having destroyed Libya and allowed this to happen out of an insane and misguided sense of human rights?
	Um if they hadn't overthrown Gaddafi and completely failed in the aftermath of it, as everybody with any sense told them that that that would happen, which they should have known after what happened in Iraq, a lot of this stuff wouldn't be happening.
	So the madness of the foreign policy here, I mean, remember, Libya was on the list of countries that were supposed to be targeted after 9-11 to to make sure that all of Israel's enemies in the Middle East were eliminated.
	There were seven or nine countries or seven countries, I think it was Les Clark listed the 2008 at one point.
	Exactly.
	Your point I just I'll just add, um, I absolutely agree with you, the the lack of any plan afterwards, because personally I'm glad that uh Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi are dead, think they were monstrous people, but but the horror that happened after is uh quite easily.
	Let's not get arguable.
	We'll say we'll say it's your political discussions for your segments.
	But the point I was gonna say uh more generally, just about this is that it seems to me that what the governments always do is a form of filibustering on deporting people.
	Yes.
	Um it's what the Tories is what Braverman, it's all Braverman did as far as I can tell, it's what uh it's what uh pretty potel did, it's what cleverly did.
	It's what they all do, it's like they're pretending they're gonna do something like the whole Rwanda plan, sort of basically pretending they're gonna do something, and then oh the courts thwarted us, or oh, we c the civil the civil service servants thwarted us, oh well, we can't do that.
	All right, back to square one.
	Meanwhile, we're being invaded the whole time.
	Well, do you remember when Priti Patel was confronted about the amount of migrants she legally let into the country in an interview, and she just uh fell straight back onto well, we needed those doctors and nurses, didn't we?
	You want you want people serving your food, don't you?
	And it's like, okay, you're not going to take any responsibility for this, you're not going to accept that there have been any negative consequences, not just to illegal immigration, which is again a drop in the bucket compared to legal migration of millions of people coming from all over the world.
	And we just got to trust the government to vet them.
	Because I hate to break it to everybody.
	The rapists from Rotherham and Rochdale, all of those places were here legally.
	They weren't they weren't asylum seekers.
	They were here legally.
	The Manchester Arena bomber here legally.
	Yep.
	I think nearly all the seven seven bombers or all of them legal.
	Axel Rudekabana born here.
	He was born here in the world.
	Welsh choir boy.
	Yeah, but we shouldn't have any concern for these people.
	But seeing as we can't deport them, well, where do they go now?
	Well, at first they went to the hosp uh to the hotels, as I stated.
	But then for uh for about a year now, we've been hearing reports on this.
	So this is an article from August of last year.
	And even if you go further back than that, you can see rumblings around 2022 of people like Morgoth reporting on Sergo uh Serco, sorry, uh one of the major government contractors for HMO's houses of multiple occupancy,
	looking to start schemes to offer landlords a lot of money monthly, 3,000 pound rental payments with none of the responsibility that comes with normal landlord um uh the the job of being a normal landlord, like having to main uh maintain things, pay for upkeep, pay for certain bills, all of the responsibility taken off of their hands purely for the sake of making them HMOs where they can house migrants.
	That's been going on for years now.
	We've reported on it before, but it's really come into full force now, and we knew that this was gonna start happening as late as sorry, as early as August of last year.
	So the government made a statement about it at the time saying that what it's all about is having a more equitable dispersal of asylum seekers.
	Otherwise, you have these areas that have concentrated numbers, uh also equitable, the m moralistic language as if it's if there was anything equitable about this to begin with.
	Yeah, it's kind of like it was um they already know in the implication there that it's bad for them to be in one place, so it'll be they want to lighten the load on some places by making everywhere equally terrible.
	Otherwise, you have these areas that have concentrated numbers, and that's where uh what we got in areas with hotels and large sites, that creates a whole host of challenges, meaning services in those areas are then stretched, and asylum seekers can't get the basic or crucial support that they need, which is none of our responsibility.
	Just because a bunch of people who are dead now signed some agreement in 1948, so that Eastern European refugees wouldn't immediately get gulagged by the Soviets, doesn't mean we have to take in the absolute refuse of the entire world.
	That's not how that works.
	That's not how that should work.
	We don't owe these people anything, people that come across on small boats.
	We don't owe them anything.
	The implication is that we we we're obliged to help them.
	We're not.
	We're not.
	And and no other country takes it to this kind of extreme.
	I mean, Britain's policy about this, it was done briefly by Biden when he was putting up illegal migrants and hotels.
	But this is such an extreme point of view.
	If you are going to even pretend that you owe them something, you owe them maybe a bed in a military barracks along with a bunch of other people like them.
	You don't owe them high-end properties in London.
	You don't owe them properties in in the middle of towns up and down Britain.
	I mean, even if you're going to pretend that you could owe them something, which it's itself false.
	Not this.
	But they also said that uh they were looking to massively increase the procurement of dispersed accommodations, such as empty homes or former student blocks, which is now coming into effect because it's not like we have a housing crisis.
	No.
	Or anything in this country.
	Earlier on this year, people got a hold of this map.
	Circo migrant sites uh sites by county, which showed the areas where it appeared that they were going to start trying to disperse these migrants who otherwise would be staying in hotels.
	As you can see, the Northwest in particular was suddenly going to get a huge influx, particularly around the Liverpool and Greater Manchester, Lancashire area.
	And that is what we are beginning to see now.
	They tried to walk it back and say, no, no, no, no.
	That's not what's going to happen when the government released a statement.
	Sorry, the Home Office released a statement saying that uh the list of local authorities shared on uh Circo shared on its website for landlords is not a home office list, nor is it a list of any existing or future asylum accommodation.
	Circo is one of several companies contracted by the previous government six years ago to provide dispersal asylum accommodation in different regions, and this list simply appears to reflect the geographical list of local authorities covered by the CERCO contracts at that time.
	I mean I I that's that's like a denial and admission in the same light.
	It's not a list of uh future or existing asylum accommodation, it's just a list of existing asylum accommodation.
	Yes, exactly.
	The logistical point to remember here is that by doing this, they make it a lot harder for a future government to actually conduct deportations.
	And they make it much more painful to the local population, because imagine the police sort of tearing through the house next door as they try to put seven, ten hostile men on a van and send them off.
	At least in hotels you have them in groups of hundreds, but somewhat centralized.
	The proper thing to do is obviously to use military barracks, but dispersing them in the population allows them to hide more effectively and makes it much harder to do deportations on any basis other than oh, you don't look British, let me see your I let me see your papers.
	And then when that ends up being the only way of doing it, they'll start crying, well, you're a Nazi, that's fascism.
	Why are you asking British people for their IDs?
	And pretending that, you know, the foreigners are actually natives.
	So that the there's a game that's being played here that's deeply destructive, that's extremely well thought out, obviously, and malicious.
	Yeah, it is malicious, absolutely.
	Yeah, yeah, evil.
	And like you've got a lovely pristine piece of canvas.
	Someone drops a big turd in the middle of it, and you say, Hey, you've just dropped a turd in the middle of my pristine canvas.
	Now it's okay, I've got a spatula here, let me smear it across the entire thing.
	That's better now, isn't it?
	It's evenly spread now.
	Right, brilliant.
	That's equitable shit.
	Exactly.
	Uh but now we begin to see where the government was lying, which we already knew that they were, because there are already reports coming from places across those areas in the Greater Manchester and Lancashire area, uh, of the effects of these migrants being airdropped into their communities.
	So this is in Horridge, where they uh the locals are complaining about late-night parties, overcrowding and drug taking, blame the latest government migrant initiative.
	The move has seen migrants being turfed out of the hotels to and sent to live in houses Of multiple occupancy across the country.
	Horich residents claim their town in Greater Manchester is bearing the brunt as hundreds of N uh HMOs.
	And that's in the past few years, they don't specify, but in the past few years, the HMOs in the Bolton area have risen from 170 to 72.
	That's ridiculous.
	That's what almost quadrupled.
	Yeah.
	If not more.
	If not more.
	And that's because the private landlords have decided that they would rather take the 3,000 pounds per month, no strings attached, than actually provide housing to locals who need it.
	Who maybe are looking to move out of their parents' home for the first time in their lives and at least start renting somewhere so they can have their independence.
	Nope, sorry.
	Sorry, I'm not doing that anymore.
	The government's given me a nice fat check of 3,000 pounds per month to sit on my arse and do nothing.
	And now you, Mr. Nextdoor Neighbour, have to put up with, as in this case, six Afghans, Syrians, and Eritreans smoking weed next door and drinking till the late hours of the night every single day.
	And then, presumably, likely going on to menace your children, as we'll see later on.
	Locals are angry at the overcrowding, lack of housing for Brits, and claims that single parents with families have been evicted from homes, which have been turned into HMOs by the private landlords cashing in.
	Residents have said that a single mum used to live in one house with her two kids in one of the Terrence houses, terraced houses nearby, but she was kicked out with a section 21 no fault eviction notice by her landlord, who then turned the three-bed home using builders into an HMO with locks and fire doors in every room.
	And just after Christmas, a minibus pulled up outside and six men moved in.
	Does that sound fair?
	Does that sound reasonable?
	Because it's one thing for these people to be coming into the neighbourhoods in the first place.
	It's one thing for the government to be air-dropping them in.
	It's another thing that this is encouraging some of the most heinous behaviour possible, the most uncharitable behaviour possible for...
	From landlords.
	We don't know if these landlords or property developers are local or if they are foreigners.
	I know again, in my local town, one of the um there were there were plans to try and turn one of the local properties into an HMO.
	The council did block that, I believe, trying to by trying to use an Article 4, um, which makes it so that you have to go through far stricter planning permissions to be able to put this through.
	Uh and though those landlords, those landlords who wanted to turn it into HMOs, Indians.
	Because they don't care about the local neighbourhood.
	They don't care about little market towns all across the country, being able to be places for locals to live and make their lives and have a sense of community.
	They just want to make money.
	That's all they care about.
	People like that should not be allowed to own property in this country if that is what they are going to do with it.
	Loads and loads of landlords, property owners in this country are foreigners.
	Loads.
	And it's it's sort of not okay.
	In lots of countries in the world, I think, for example, Thailand.
	It's very, very difficult, but very, very difficult for a foreign person to become a tire citizen.
	Very, very difficult.
	Or subject, they've got a king, haven't they?
	Very, very, very difficult to uh buy and run and own a business in Thailand or to buy a property in Thailand.
	That's a lot of the world works like that.
	It's like, no, you're not one of us.
	So you can't own well, we'll make it extremely, extremely difficult, almost impossible for you to own anything for exactly this sort of reason.
	Exactly that sort of reason.
	Because they know that you won't care.
	You can be the landlord from the other side of the world, and you don't care who really lives there and what they're like.
	Yeah.
	And that's terrible for them.
	So they don't allow it.
	Yeah.
	But we, anyone can come here.
	You're Russian, you're Indian, whatever.
	You come here, you've got enough money, you can buy whatever you want, do whatever you want.
	And what really happens to these neighbourhoods.
	They, well, the first of all, the houses become slums.
	And it destroys the family homes in the local area because as we were discussing before this came before we came on air, uh, what happens to the neighbours?
	Well, their next door neighbor uh is now a slum.
	Their next door the home next door is a slum, so they don't want to live there anymore.
	They don't want their children growing up around that, so they move out.
	Maybe it gets bought up by a property developer, maybe it gets bought up by someone looking to be a landlord And take advantage of this same scheme.
	So they move more in.
	More people move out, and eventually you've got a ghetto.
	A ghetto filled with slums.
	It destroys communities, it destroys family homes, and it turns everywhere, as always, into South Africa.
	Because that seems to be the ultimate goal of all of this South Africanization.
	The government contractor Circo, it carries on has been advertising private landlords to provide houses for migrants in an appeal with the heading, Are You a Landlord?
	Circo has said it will consider all types of property.
	So they target, they target areas and say we'll give you a lot of money to do nothing.
	As an independent councillor, David Grant said, if you have a family home that you can rent out for 700 quid, and then you have a government contact that comes along for an HMO house and you can rent it for three grand a month with no liabilities, no maintenance, and no adherence to any rules or regulations, the landlord is gonna do that.
	And as well as Horic, we see it all over.
	Here's one in a private accommodation in Nunaton.
	We've all seen this chap, Mohammed, as reported on by the Daily Mail and his ever so grateful expression that we saw in that.
	And uh we've got more reports where there are over a hundred villages, towns and cities where they're coming in, and they uh report on here in the Daily Mail saying that uh only three 30,000 or so of the approximately 110,000 uh illegal migrants in the asylum system remain in hotels.
	So they've already dispersed most of them or are on the pro in the process of dismember of dispersing them.
	This week the BBC delved into the problem by going to a Lancashire town of Wigan, which has recently clamped down on the huge number of HMOs there, many of them for asylum seekers.
	What does HMO stand for?
	Someone says houses of multiple occupation.
	Okay.
	So again, when they buy these places up, the multiple occupants of the home that that's converted to essentially a stinky dorm.
	Yeah, they turn it into essentially dorms.
	So it's not just one person, maybe a wife and a few kids moving in, it is six or seven grown men moving in next door to you.
	It's because in America apparently HMO means something else that's like just to make it clear for it for us.
	Despite having a housing list of this is Wigan of 12,000 people, it has 900 HMOs, a 190% increase in only four years.
	So people are seeing what's going on and they're cashing in.
	So one of the locals said that he'd been living next door to one abode, saying, I've had intimidation, confrontations on the street.
	He said as he showed photos from a year ago of young men dressed as delivery drivers coming in and out of the house, even though asylum seekers are not allowed to work.
	The migrants in Wigan, a once proud cotton town, were placed there by Circo, one of three giant home office accommodation providers, the others being Mears Group, PLC, and Clear Springs Ready Homes.
	So if any of you watching have any kind of investments in Circo, Mears Group, Clear Springs, pull them out.
	Pull them out.
	I know the government are the ones contracting them, so it won't make that much of a difference, but you can at least do whatever you can to make a slight dent on these people.
	Circo, when asked, told the BBC it wasn't responsible for the behavior of migrants in the community, saying that was a matter for the police or the government.
	So they take a load of money from the government, advertise, targeted advertise to local landlords to get them to move these people in, drop them off, not our problem anymore.
	Scum.
	These people are scum.
	They are selling you down the river for money.
	They should not be allowed in any position of authority to do such a thing.
	And they go on to mention here that in Grimsby, a terrorist house was recently revamped as an HMO to provide four bedrooms, including one on the ground floor.
	We talked to two Afghanis and a Yemeni.
	You want them in your neighborhood, don't you?
	Who have moved in courtesy of the government.
	They were pleased to get rent-free accommodation.
	I sure they are.
	I'm sure they are.
	And what do the landlords have to say about all of this?
	Well, I found an article on Landlord Today whining, whining that some local councils have started to do Article 4 directions, particularly in Horich.
	They say it's not fair.
	It's not fair.
	All we want to do is turn your neighborhood into a shit slum.
	It's not fair that the Councils and the local residents say that we shouldn't just be able to turn all of the local properties into HMOs and cash in.
	I mean, I never ever thought I would have any kind of sympathy for the Marxist landlord interpretation.
	But if anything was going to do it, it's this.
	Yes.
	It's this.
	If you have no sense of local community and are only there to make a quick buck by ruining towns and neighborhoods, you should not be allowed to have any control over even a dog house, let alone actual properties that people live in.
	And now, of course, we're seeing the move into flats as well.
	This has started to happen in Aberdeen.
	People are very, very upset about it.
	And what happens once they're in your local neighborhood, other than just disruption?
	Well, this is where we're going to get on to some of the more relevant recent stuff.
	So for one, some of these people who end up in the neighborhoods turn out to be like this guy, an uh ill uh a G Egyptian illegal migrant, 42 years old, who raped a woman in Hyde Park.
	Uh turned out he was already a convicted Islamic terrorist, and the home office knew.
	The home office knew, and they're still paying SirCo to make sure they're in your neighborhood.
	Living in the Hilton Hotel off Hyde Park.
	Yep.
	Yep.
	You have to understand how broken the economy is.
	With a Hilton to accept this.
	Or how much money the government is throwing at the Hilton to break the economy and accept this.
	Yeah.
	All right, then.
	Anyway, we're getting on, so I'll go rapid fire now.
	To the more relevant stuff.
	Obviously, all of this kind of behavior, these kinds of developments, are what caused the protests in Epping a few weeks ago that led to uh friends of the show Callum getting arrested and led to the government decision, sorry, the independent judiciary decision to not shut down the local asylum hotel in Epping.
	Uh, presumably they're still looking for local houses to put them instead.
	Well, what kick started that in the first place?
	Well, it was accusations of one of the migrants living in that hotel having sexually assaulted a girl.
	People at the time in the mainstream media said that this was some kind of libel, that he hadn't done anything, this was just local racists looking for a reason to protest.
	Eh.
	Wrong, he was guilty.
	They arrested him, they tried him, he was guilty, he's been convicted.
	So that was justified.
	That was justified.
	Well, what else is happening in Epping right now today?
	So, yesterday, a uh two men tried to break into a school in Epping.
	Here you can see him right there.
	Situation is developing, the but the children aren't safe, that's for sure.
	They are trying to break in to your schools.
	How did the Daily Mirror report on this?
	Well, they reported on it, but uh, if you can see here, they cropped his head and arms out so you can't see that he's black.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	There you go.
	There's the extreme.
	Uh there's no excuse.
	No excuse for this at all.
	They are trying to hide it from you, as always, so that you are unsafe.
	If they try to hide this information from you, it is because they do not want you to have your guard up around these people who are clear and present dangers to yourself and to your children.
	They want them living in your neighborhoods, they want them menacing your children, they want them to hurt you.
	There is only one explanation.
	And uh it was confirmed independently by other people like Charlie Peters of GB News and reported on, saying it was confirmed the man who broke into a school in Epping is a homeless asylum seeker who was on the run from the police.
	This is madness.
	So clearly, harassing children, trespassing, aggravated trespassing.
	Surely when they arrested him, something was done.
	He was put through the criminal system, he's in jail right now.
	I thought he was already failing to attend court, so he's literally on the run.
	Yep.
	No, they let him out straight away.
	Huh.
	They let him out straight away.
	I'm not gonna play the whole clip because this segment's already gone on for a while.
	But what happened was the locals were speaking to this police officer saying, why have you let him go?
	And they I think they said it was something like conditional bail, and then this absolute jobs worth here.
	Uh somebody had a picture of him, but either way, uh This absolute jobs worth is like, oh well, it was trespass, but it weren't aggravated trespass, so we can't do anything.
	That's just the law.
	That's just the law.
	The law means that if some violent criminal breaks into your school, menacing your children, they just let him go.
	Not even a slap on the wrist.
	Is that a system that works?
	Is that how you have a society, even a civil society?
	No.
	And what are the consequences of such a thing?
	Well, he immediately goes to a school again the morning after.
	He immediately goes to a school the morning after.
	This is a developing situation.
	Locals around Waltham Abbey spotted the same man hanging around schools.
	And it's been reported, and I've verified this through contacts that uh I've spoken to Callum and a number of other people.
	Uh Adam Brooks has posted on Twitter saying that he's just visited the school and confirmed.
	The school is now locked down.
	Local parents are rushing back to the school so that they can pick up their children because they are unsafe.
	And do you know why that is?
	Well, we found something else as well, which is they were living in a forest behind the school in a sh in a camp that they put up.
	Locals, by the looks of it, have gone and uh trashed the camp.
	Literally an engineer.
	They've they've trashed the camp.
	But as we can see here, mate of mine was just down the Upshur school and said one of the mums showed him a video of the field behind the school.
	It's got a tarp up, and they're living there.
	So even if they can't get houses, they will do whatever they can to be near your children and make them unsafe and harass and menace them.
	And then when somebody gives this guy what he deserves, there is somebody on the left is going to cry that this was a racist attack.
	Yep.
	Yep.
	And the police will act, but they won't act at any point to actually do something to protect school children.
	There is this is criminal.
	There is the people responsible for this are clearly traitors, and there is no other way of looking at it.
	There is no compromise on this.
	The people who are behind this who allowed this to happen need to be tried for criminal charges.
	The people doing this, the actual migrants themselves, there is no compromise.
	There is no halfway there system of one in, one out.
	There is no Rwanda plan.
	There is no dispersal that will fix this.
	This will only spread the problem to the far corners of this country.
	The only problem, the only solution, is to send these people back.
	Deport them.
	We need to re-migrate these people back to where they come from before more people can be hurt.
	Yep.
	Sorry that went on for a while, but there was a lot of information to go through that.
	I'll quickly run through the rumble rants and super chats that we've got.
	Thank you.
	Thanks for all your research so we can keep up with what's really going on.
	Oh, also, if you are in that local area, there is a peaceful protest arranged outside the Lufton police station later.
	So if you feel like showing up to that, just make sure that it remains peaceful and make sure that you are being targeted in your demands so that you can get actual justice done.
	These people can't remain in that community.
	Charlie Kirk texted Dave Smith two days after his Douglas Murray debate, claiming Dave was right about Israel because he has the source quotes.
	Well, Dave Smith uh is a very intelligent man and uh makes some very good arguments.
	Apparently the police helicopter is looking for him, but claim they can't arrest him as he hasn't committed a crime.
	This is from Epping.
	Great.
	Yet.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Luke, when is Base Harry going to do a gym session with Marsh Marcus Follin, the Golden Jarl, Sweden's Giga Chad, P. S. Bo could discuss history with him.
	I I would get absolutely uh I would get cucked by Marcus and the amount of weight that I can lift versus what he can lift, I would look pathetic.
	But I'd like to go anyway, because he just seems like a generally very pleasant and friendly guy.
	Uh the great political shell game, they make Yugoslavia and will be and will get to be the first.
	I don't know exactly what you mean by that, but thank you for the money anyway.
	That's a random name on Rumble.
	In Harold the Reds Britain, HMOs will be made into a crime against humanity punishable by a good lashing.
	I'm not saying that that's what I do, but some are saying.
	Sigil Stone, can you explain what you mean by these abbreviations?
	Okay, yeah, we've already explained HMO.
	Uh In Bose Britain, can we confiscate properties from landlords that take the government's money to betray the company, uh country?
	Yeah, those that uh be deported, we could at least give the we'll confiscate their property and at least give them the market value of that.
	Otherwise it's just stealing.
	Yeah.
	Uh but yeah, when they're deported, their property's taken away, yeah.
	There we go.
	That's a random name though.
	Shit no sigil stone based on his takes.
	Harry would be the goblin hunter, rubs hands, and that's in response to Sigil saying, since Starmer is handing out property, can I get a castle?
	O can be my master at arms, Harry can be the dungeon troll.
	Thanks, bro.
	And uh fictaja says, remember when Labour slash Kitler Stalin said how bad the Rwanda plan was.
	Oh dear.
	Oh, it's all rhetoric, it's all rhetoric, they never follow through and uh follow through with anything, uh except for making things worse.
	Anyway, yep, here is oh, you've already got the mouse.
	Oh, I got the mouse.
	Uh somehow the topic that I'm discussing, which is Israel, is slightly more pleasant than what you were discussing.
	Um the Middle East is changing in response to the way that the United States is refusing in any way to police the Israelis and get them to calm down.
	Uh yesterday, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan signed a mutual defense agreement, which states that attack on one country is an at considered an attack on the other one, by implication extending Pakistan's nuclear umbrella to Saudi Arabia.
	And this was a direct result of the Israelis deciding that they were going to bomb uh Hamas leaders in Qatar.
	Uh they basically decided that what they need to do is to bomb the negotiating team of Hamas in Qatar, which is the country holding the mediation to end the war.
	And that was Israel's idea of trying to improve their the prospects of a peaceful solution.
	Uh Qatar is a major non NATO ally, meaning that of the United States, meaning that it is designated as a sort of American protectorate, and the fact that the Americans would allow Israeli jets to go over, probably over Saudi airspace, and then bomb a major non-NATO ally, um, kind of wipes the floor with the credibility of American security guarantees.
	Then hasn't America got a giant base in Qatar.
	They do, they do, with very sophisticated air defense systems, which did absolutely nothing.
	Meaning that the Americans were at least a passive participant in the strike, and the idea that they didn't know about it is ridiculous because the commander of American forces in the Middle East was in Israel three days before, and American commanders sit at every level next to Israeli counterparts coordinating the regional war.
	So this caused the Saudis to panic because they figured we could be next, and they decided to go and get a nuclear guarantee from the Pakistanis.
	I wrote a little bit on my personal blog about the strike on Qatar and what it means.
	But one of the things that it means is that when the Americans say that they want to negotiate, it could be a ruse to start bombing you, because this is the second time that it happens.
	In the same year.
	In the same year, this is what happened with Iran.
	They were given the 60-day deadline, and then as soon as the deadline was up and there was uh a number of roadblocks put in place to actually coming up with an agreement, boom.
	No, no.
	Worse than that, negotiations between the Americans and the Iranians were scheduled for two days later.
	And then the Israelis attacked them.
	And the perception is that look, we can't trust the Americans, and so the Muslim states are banding together.
	And Saudi Arabia aligning with Pakistan is a big deal because Pakistan is a major defense ally of Turkey.
	They work together on developing military technology, training, tactics, etcetera, etcetera.
	And the Turks clearly see that relationship as a future pathway for them to get nuclear weapons.
	And now with the Pakistani nuclear umbrella extended to Saudi Arabia, and with the Turks and the Israelis fighting in Syria by proxy for now, but the the Israelis last week took out some Turkish surveillance equipment by attacking Syrian territory directly.
	What the Israelis are willing into being is their nightmare, which is these big Muslim countries allying together rather than doing what they would normally do, which is fight each other.
	So this is a bit of a disaster.
	Is worrying Pakistan extending its nuclear umbrella to Saudi Arabia?
	Because alliances like that, we've done that before.
	I think, of course, of 1914.
	Where yeah, one small thing can very quickly snowball into something gigantic.
	So what's happening now is that s not just that, the other huge defense partner of Pakistan is obviously China, and it was Chinese equipment that was responsible for shooting down the Indian jets, the Indian Rafals and the Indian MiGs that were shot down in May.
	So what you're ending up with is a situation where the Muslim world as a whole, because of American support for Israel, is not just banding together, which they're clearly doing, they're also siding with the Chinese, which is what Samuel Huntington warned against in 1992 or 1994, I believe, blaming excessive liberalism for this.
	Now what's actually the the proximate cause is excessive Zionism.
	The recklessness of Israel, the fact that it's threatening everybody around them is driving this.
	And in case you think it's, you know, I'm being unfair, no, the Israelis are saying that everybody in Gaza, in Gaza City, which is in the very north of the Gaza Strip, needs to head south to the Egyptian border, and they are imposing um th that is going to lead at some point to them trying to drive the Palestinians over the border into Egypt,
	and Egypt's trying to stop that by mobilizing troops into the Sinai to try to say to the Israelis, look, you've got to calm down now, you can't just sort of attack us and force these people across the border.
	But the Israelis are actually doing the same thing in the West Bank.
	They're doing everything they can to make sure that there is no two state solution, and they are locking down the West Bank city by city so that each city is its own contained unit and cannot communicate with each other, meaning that if the if a war breaks out where they try to sort of get rid of the Palestinians and the West Bank in the same way that they're doing in Gaza, they can do this one city at a time.
	The implication being that they're threatening Egypt and Jordan, which are seen by the Saudis as key allies and necessary for the stability of the region.
	Which is why after the bombing of Qatar, they announced this defense agreement with Pakistan.
	They didn't tell the Americans about it until after it was signed.
	Which I think is quite an important can I play devil's advocate real quick for a moment?
	Not that I disagree with you that Zionism seems to be out of control at the moment.
	Absolutely agree with you there.
	But also just to say, I mean, Hamas are insane terrorists.
	Yes.
	Don't shed a tear for those guys in Doha.
	Absolutely.
	Um, you know, and Egypt, like if back in the 70s when um Saddat made a peace deal with Israel, the Arabs murdered him.
	Yes, right.
	So the Muslim Brotherhood murdered him.
	Sorry, who are the parents of Hamas.
	Or part part of my parent organization.
	So it's both it it both sides, it's part part of my my major concern outside of just a full-on hot war escalating into a hot war in the region which um Western allies would be drawn into.
	Yep, would be the expelling all of these people into somewhere like Egypt, I can see in some Israeli ministers have already um uh put for put this forward as a solution.
	I could see these people moving through North Africa into Europe as as many do, and from that point, they go all across Europe, and what do you get there?
	Well, you get a lot of uh men, women and children, all of whom have been radicalized by what has happened to them, all of whom who blame European countries and the US for being allies to Israel, correct deciding to join cells within those countries that will then go on to commit terror attacks later.
	Absolutely that's one of my greatest fears.
	Absolutely Correct.
	Absolutely correct.
	So there's a there are several dimensions of this.
	First of all, the West has an interest in the Muslim world not being not establishing a network of alliances comparable to NATO.
	That's one strategic objective.
	The second strategic objective is to make sure that they don't all side with China, because that the natural resources there feed the Chinese industrial machine and make it even stronger.
	The third is this shouldn't become the West's domestic problem.
	But you see Israeli politicians saying, well, these people, the Palestinians should be sent to Ireland, or the Palestinians should be sent to Spain, or the Palestinians should be dispersed all over Western Europe or Australia or what have you.
	So this has always been an Israeli talking point, and now it's being reinforced a lot from senior people in government in the Israeli government saying, Yeah, that's exactly what should happen.
	It's the West that should take the Palestinians and solve the problem for the Israelis.
	So on every level, this is terrible for the West.
	And this is a direct cost of the Americans refusing to basically put a lid on Israel's actions.
	And you see Trump here, according to the Wall Street Journal, saying about Netanyahu that he is effing me after the strike on Doha, and we can see that the strike on Qatar really effed the United States because it pushed the Saudis into Pakistan's arms, into Turkey's arms, and into China's arms, and the Americans are not willing to do anything about it.
	And you can have a conspiratorial explanation as to why that is.
	Another explanation, which was explained to me, I think, by Carl, which was explained to me by Carl, and he made a brilliant point, the Americans view the Israelis through a purely emotional lens, and because they view them through a purely emotional lens as a sort of favorite sun, they give them a huge amount of latitude.
	But then at some point, there's going to be the realization that that child is a monster.
	And when that happens, I would argue, the emotional reaction is going to be equally severe, and is going to go, we want nothing to do with this, help us get rid of this thing.
	And if you look at what was happening with Charlie Kirk, what's happened with Candace Owens, what's happened with Tucker Carlson, they've been increasingly turning against Israel.
	And this kind of strategic blunder, that is civilization shifting, pushing the entirety of the Muslim world into China's arms, and into greater unity, this is going to backfire enormously.
	And this will eventually turn the West against Israel, much more so than the pro-Palestine leftists, who I have nothing but contempt for as civilization destroyers.
	So there's got to be some moderation, but the Israelis seem incapable of doing it.
	They seem incapable of just slowing down a little bit.
	Well, again, on your points of the entire Muslim bloc potentially unifying and allying with other groups, one other reason that we wouldn't want that is if they do unify in such a way and decide that we are their enemies in the West, not just in Europe,
	but also and increasingly in America as well, yep, they they already have massive Muslim communities in those countries who are going to be far, far more loyal to whatever orders are coming from the East than they are loyal to the countries of occupation that they live in right now.
	So in I think that would that would be something that worries me.
	Sorry, but uh Bo, did you I was just gonna make what one point that springs mind whilst you're talking is that um it seems to have been this way for decades.
	When you're talking about this, like can America uh reel in Israel in any real sense.
	I'm thinking of the late 60s, early 70s, uh the LBJ Nixon years, when Israel was just doing whatever it wanted, and then the United States can calm down, stop, stop, until the point where all the Arab countries get together and boycott uh and uh do uh an oil embarga.
	Yes.
	And it's so it totally screws America in all sorts of ways.
	And America's like saying, please, Israel, can you please stop being so crazy?
	And Israel's like, no, we're doing what we can do whatever we want.
	Pretty much.
	And we're still in that situation.
	So basically, they don't have a lot of experience over generations of being next to other empires that take a long time to wake up.
	So if you're Germany and you're next to Russia and you were wise as opposed to the current leadership, you'd realize that you don't want to crush uh cross the Russians too much because it would trigger a major war.
	And if it did trigger a major war, your best interest is probably going to be not to try to invade Moscow, but to keep it on the borders of the two empires and then negotiate a peace afterwards.
	Which is very much how these European empires fought each other, with some exceptions, Napoleon, Hitler, etc.
	But these are remembered because they're exceptional.
	The Israelis don't have that kind of hysteric historic memory.
	And because they don't, because they're new to this game, they think that force is the solution to everything.
	And their thinking is exactly like that of the left.
	When we do it, it's alright, but when it's done to us, uh October 7 is like five bazillion September 11ths.
	Well, okay, obviously it was terrible, and it shouldn't have happened, but it's over now, and the war has been going on for two years, and you've not got on gotten anywhere, except unifying much bigger neighbors against you and driving them into a block that is completely hostile, not just to you, but to the Western states on whose survival you depend.
	The Western states, which your survival depends on.
	So this is madness.
	And it needs to be stopped.
	Um I'll uh give it the limitations of time, I'll leave it there.
	I I I do remember I read a quote once, I forget if it was from like Clinton or maybe even Johnson, uh, who was a big supporter of Israel.
	I think he was like their guy.
	Right.
	Uh he was he was two thumbs up and they were two thumbs up for him.
	One of one of them said, and it was quoted around the time when the Iran situation was happening earlier this year, that as president, as president, there will come a point where your relations with Israel will just piss you off.
	There will be no other way to deal with it other than you will just be furiously raging impotently in the oval office, and there's not much that you can do about it.
	Well, you could not give them billions of dollars of of aid and military assistance every single year.
	I mean So from the Wall Street Journal, it's written in the constitution that says you have to do that, is there?
	Answering that point, uh, from the Wall Street Journal about Trump being absolutely enraged with Netanyahu, another reason for the continued warm relations between Netanyahu and Trump is the Israeli leaders' influence with Congress and in Republican centric media.
	This is a the domestic influence affects the foreign policy.
	I mean, uh with Trump as well, uh personally for him, I would imagine also the fact that his daughter's married to Jared Kushner and he has uh part Jewish grandchildren.
	Yes.
	Is also a big emotional pull for him.
	Yes, but that also means that if the emotions were to sort of shift, they wouldn't shift gradually.
	It would be as as a man of you know deep emotion and strongly motivated by his by his feelings and emotions, it's not going to be calibrated when it happens.
	Yeah, I suppose.
	Well, see, you mentioned Candy Science, I see Candy Son's talking about AIPAC and like how why does this always happen?
	Because, well, yeah, APAC's got loads and loads of Congress men and women in its pocket.
	Yep.
	Loads of them.
	Yep.
	Yep.
	Yeah, you can't you can't really talk about that, apparently.
	We probably won't put that bit on YouTube.
	Uh we'll see, well, I mean, we're on YouTube right now, so we'll shit.
	He's been too comfortable for two.
	I'm only quoting Candy Sowings.
	Yeah.
	Anyway, I'll read through some of the uh rumble rants and super chats that we've got here.
	It seems that this one has been uh as you would expect with such a subject, somewhat contentious, so there'll be some questions fielded to you uh that you can reply to there, Ferraz.
	So, first of all, on YouTube, this is responding to my segment saying one in, one out is a human laundering, turning illegal immigrants into legal ones.
	Exactly.
	Yeah, pretty pretty much.
	On to your segment.
	So Swamp Cleaner says if you think Hamas wants a piece of the state.
	Oh, they absolutely don't.
	I have a bridge to sell you.
	Yeah, but um, they absolutely don't.
	Correct me if I'm wrong, I might have been given the complete wrong information.
	But around the time when Hamas was becoming the de facto leaders of Palestine, was was there not in Israeli involvement in making sure that they were in that position, or am I completely soft base there?
	There was some Israeli support for Hamas, and it continued all the way until just before 7 October, when Natanyahu was facilitating payments from the Qataris to go to Hamas because he thought that this was one way to preserve the peace, and because he thought that having the West Bank under one administration, the PLO, and Gaza under another, Hamas, meant that you couldn't be pressured to accept a two-state solution.
	Okay, so divide and conquer.
	So this was like the th this is well established, and like this isn't even a contentious point.
	This isn't you know, this is just facts.
	That before Hamas was sort of the legitimately voted in rulers of the Gaza Strip, before that was the case.
	Uh there was just a whole number of god knows what organizations, and Israel would rather have one body that they could sit down and negotiate with even if it is Hamas.
	No, no, that's like there was the PLO leading a bunch of other smaller.
	Exactly.
	But like the PLO, so you've got Yes Rafat sitting at the top of the PLO, and you can talk to him, but then he doesn't control what everyone under him does.
	Wasn't that the case for like the last few years?
	Yes, sir Arafat.
	That so they were always just in organizations, but they weren't strong enough to challenge Fatah, which is Alafat's organization, if it decided that it absolutely wanted something.
	Like it had the ability to impose on most Palestinian groups with significance, except for a couple that were being funded by the Syrians or the Iraqis, and these guys were just l lunatic radicals on their own.
	So the Abu Didal organization being one example of them.
	I feel like you know, yes, Rafat would agree to something, and then like the the next day, some other dudes would just but anyway, anyway.
	Yeah, it's complicated.
	Yes, it's complicated.
	Uh let's carry on with the rumble rants.
	We've had quite a few uh very generous donations, so thank you to everybody who's sending his money.
	We really appreciate it.
	Hope you're getting your money's worth with these discussions.
	Sigil Stone, Trump's extraordinary weakness on Israel combined with Netanyahu's bloodthirst is going to start a huge war.
	This cannot continue at all costs.
	Some are predicting that it might end that way.
	I can only hope to God that it doesn't.
	Yeah.
	Hapsification.
	So the Saudis signed a mutual defense agreement with an insane Islamist country.
	Correct.
	Yeah.
	Correct.
	Which they really look down on.
	They don't like like the Saudi Pakistani relationship is Pakistan doesn't seem like a country with the greatest standing anywhere.
	No.
	Well, they've not got the same stripe of Islam, have they?
	Yes, they do.
	Well, Pakistan Wahhabist.
	No, uh Pakistan are suddenly mostly Salafi these days, largely due to Saudi clerical influence.
	Right.
	Uh well, whereas Afghanistan is more the one that you're thinking about, which has a um Aren't Saudi Arabia the Royal Saudi family Wahhabist thing.
	Yes.
	Right.
	But you know, to what extent?
	Like it's a different conversation.
	That's a different conversation.
	Okay, yeah, another another very long complex thing.
	Exactly.
	Uh right.
	Brendan Lucas uh sent two in for ten dollars each, so thank you very much.
	If Americans were truly irrational in regards to Israel, why is the four billion it pays to Israel marked only for USA equipment?
	If it was irrational, the money would be unmarked and used to invest in Israel.
	No.
	Why would you say that?
	And following up with that, I'm not unsurp uh unsympathetic to scrutiny over the Israeli relationship, but why not have your guest host say that Jews use children to make their matza absolute blood libel rubbish?
	I don't see why you need to escalate to that far.
	I think Fat Firas is being um fair and rational in his criticisms of how Israel as a geopolitical entity is operating on the geopolitical stage.
	I've not heard anything that could even be remotely compared to blood libel.
	So on Firis' behalf, I've got to say that you're being quite hysterical there.
	Thank you.
	Um Brendan again for five dollars.
	And and and again he sent quite a few in, actually.
	Uh Israel has defeated four Arab armies at the same time, and your fantasy of cowardly Jews only belies your own Hisbollah allegiance.
	We did that before the USA alliance.
	Okay, uh again, I don't think that Fearaz is claiming that the Jews are being cowardly or sowing any sort of allegiance or support of his blah.
	I feel that you're being quite irrational and unfair in these criticisms, and you're kind of plucking them out of thin air.
	Nothing that has been said today could even remotely support those claims that you're making.
	That's a random name.
	Uh I enjoy these segments of shut it down.
	And uh one more from Brendan.
	And I don't mean to go hard against you, Brendan.
	I'm being critical of the specific claims that you're making here, which I don't think are being supported by the segment if you go back and watch it again.
	There was no Israeli support for Hamas.
	Hamas ostensibly recognizes Rails congruity in 2017.
	Hence Israel released money to them.
	The money, of course, is a fraction of what Hizballah and the IRGC gave.
	So that's that's more of a factual uh dish um uh disagreement there.
	So there's a problem with that because the money from Qatar allowed Hamas to operate all of the levers of government, whereas the money from the IRGC allowed it to operate as a military entity.
	If it was operating only as a military entity without being able to run a government, it wouldn't have remained in power in Gaza for that long.
	So even that is just not like that's just a a wrong assessment of the situation.
	It's funny, whenever you talk about this, whatever you say, someone accuses you of being either pro-Israel or pro-Islam.
	I'm anti both one way or another.
	Yeah.
	It's one of those it's one of those things where whatever you say, it's like talking about Russia and Ukraine.
	No matter how reasonable you are about it, you get accused of being something or other.
	So well don't worry about it.
	Happily Brendan has um sent in another five dollars.
	Again, thank you very much for your um for your generosity here, despite the disagreements.
	Says I'm fine, I am being irrational, but I don't feel like like what Firaz is saying is entirely true.
	I apologize for what I said.
	Well, thank you.
	That's a big officer.
	Yeah, that was that's that's very good of you.
	Thank you very much.
	And as long as we can keep it to like factual disagreements where we can debate the facts.
	Exactly.
	I'm I'm absolutely happy.
	That guy I I I don't I'm not sure if it was him, but the the whole blood and matzla thing, I mean and also Sigil Stone, I I see what you've sent in here as well, but uh, I think now that's all this piece.
	Yeah, now that we're resolving it peacefully, thank you very much for the donation.
	I won't uh I won't carry on uh with any of that.
	Do we have some video comments that we should be going through?
	Seems we do.
	It appears so it looks like we've got three.
	This is for Sargon.
	The reason why I count social media be one of the modern day cancers is because it is a double-edged sword.
	Yes, it is an open marketplace of ideas, where you know, news and ideas come forth.
	It is also completely destroyed how humans interact with each other.
	Um, how men and women have sex, how relationships react, how children you know, view things.
	You know, all of it has to stem from social media and what is done to the you know, just our brains.
	It is not good.
	Yeah, the addiction, the the addiction to the dopamine hits is really really really bad for some people.
	I did when I got when I got suspended off of Twitter for two weeks back in July.
	Um the cleanse of being just off it for two weeks.
	I could have jumped back on sooner if I just hadn't appealed the thing that they said that I'd done, which I hadn't done.
	They were just trying I just must have been mass reported or something.
	Um but the cleanse was well worth it.
	Let's just say uh that's from office space.
	Yeah, I'm gonna go gonna need to go ahead and ask you to whatever.
	That's the film office space.
	I need to watch it.
	It's a great one.
	It's a great one.
	I really need to watch it.
	And uh I'd just say I am grateful almost on a daily basis that all of my formative years were without a mobile phone or the internet at all.
	Yes.
	I mean, I'm I was like 19 before I got a mobile phone.
	I'm just old for that.
	I'm thankful for that.
	I'm just old enough to have similar memories of myself growing up.
	I went to my friends' houses and knocked on the door.
	If they called to see if I was free to say hello, they ring they rang the landline from their house's landline.
	Backwards.
	As well.
	So you know, I'm grateful for all of that too.
	I'm older than both of you, so this is one of the memorials that popped up here in Kerrville after the Fourth of July floods.
	The green ribbons are to honour the girls from Camp Mystic who died.
	The 28 little girls that got swept off into the darkness and drowned in the river in the raging water.
	And the same monsters that are celebrating Charlie's death said they deserved it because Kerr County votes red.
	Again, these people, they wear a mask of empathy.
	They skin sh they skin suit human emotion because we know that on the inside and on the outside, they celebrate bad things happening to good people.
	I didn't realize the death toll was that big on that.
	That's horrifying.
	Or that it was Yeah, uh, yeah, that one.
	Ugh.
	Terrible.
	Terrible.
	May they all rest in peace.
	So it's been about ten years since Gamergate.
	Since then, a whole new generation of people have grown up.
	People like this chap here.
	And apparently they're not very happy with this online safety act.
	Uh, is causing studios to rethink some of their game features.
	Those features are things like you know, chat services, so they can actually talk to each other online.
	In fact, they're so not happy with this that some of them are even referencing Nepal.
	This Gamergate 2.0.
	I'm gonna let you in on a little secret here, buddy.
	Gamergate never ended.
	This is all Gamer Gate.
	We're still we need to close the gamergate, and all of this chaos will end.
	Gamergate is a state of mind.
	Yes.
	It's a way of being.
	And uh I'll read through a few of the comments that we've got on the website.
	I'll say two each for each segment, and then I've got to be on at three, so I'll be very quick.
	Uh Jimbo G for Bo says the BBC is reporting that Kimmel simply said that MAGA were taking advantage of Kirk's murder, completely left out that he said one of theirs that did it.
	Yeah, you got the clip.
	We got the receipt.
	Mainstream media lies about other mainstream media pundits.
	It was like the second clip on YouTube Shorts.
	Yeah.
	So like yeah.
	What a surprise.
	Baron von Warhook, when it comes to Jimmy Kimmel getting fired, I'm guessing the studio was looking for any excuses to get rid of him due to low ratings, and this is good enough.
	I did hear a rumour that he was told that if he apologised they would let him stay, and he refused.
	I don't know how true that is, though.
	On my segment, Sophie Liv, don't you guys love that your taxes are going to be raised further to pay for this?
	I hate the government.
	I fucking despise the government.
	Anyway, someone online, paint the St. George's flag on their campers' tents, and they'll get cleared off.
	And uh for uh for Fear's segment, uh Roman Observer, Israel seems to be counting on the slow reaction of the West to do as much damage as possible before having to say sorry.
	Um and then someone online as an American, the important thing is that we stay out of whatever happens.
	I do not care.
	There we go.
	And with that, I'm going to call it an uh call an end to this.
	Thank you very, very much for watching and joining us.
	We'll be back again tomorrow.
	Bo is doing something at three.
	Yeah, I'm just recording a brokenomics with Dan.
	Oh, well, you can look forward to that when it's eventually edited and put out.
	Thank you very much.
	I think we've had some very interesting discussions today, gentlemen.
	Definitely.
	And uh we'll see you again tomorrow.

▲