The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1246

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 5, 2025 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:29:06

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1246

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
	Welcome to the podcast of the Lotus East for Friday, the 5th of September, 2025.
	I am joined by Nick and Ferris, and today we are going to be talking about how Sadiq Khan has given the game away with his state resources for Muslims speech.
	How we are going to witness the rise of Gamanzilla in the near future, and they are terrified of it.
	And because of their terror, the deportations are coming.
	This is all just generally good news, I think.
	Like at the Witan the other day, right?
	I was doing the Q ⁇ A and I was like, two years ago, I came and I gave a speech in which I pointed out we don't act like we're inevitable at this point.
	We're kind of acting like we want this to happen, but we don't think it is actually going to happen.
	And I asked everyone, okay, put your hand up now if you think this is absolutely happening.
	And everyone was just like, yeah, no, the right is inevitable at this point.
	The left has completely collapsed.
	In fact, speaking of collapsing, we've got some breaking news that we're going to break with.
	Angela Rainer has resigned because of her housing tax code issue, which actually makes a really great point about how complex things are.
	If even the housing minister can get sunk by the housing tax code, maybe that needs to be sorted out, Keir Starmer.
	But also, Labour's investment minister, Poppy Gustafson, who's a member of Rachel Reeves' treasury team, has resigned as well.
	So this is like, oh, dominoes falling.
	Mate, 2025 election.
	I'm telling you, it's happening.
	I would absolutely love it.
	Let's get Farage out of the way.
	Anyway, like I said, we're going to be starting with Sadiq Khan giving the giveaway.
	But before we begin, we've got lads out this afternoon, and it's the lads that everyone has been waiting for.
	We all got our DNA tests.
	There are my ancestors.
	Unironically, actually.
	Whereas I'm so English, I broke the test.
	Just white as possible.
	Whereas you're sort of a global citizen, really.
	At least a quarter of me is a global citizen.
	But we'll cover that on ladsout on lotuses.com.
	So come over and find us there.
	But right, without further ado, let's begin.
	Yep.
	And please go ahead and buy an issue of the Islander magazine.
	You can find it on the store on the Lotus Eaters website.
	Now I want to tell you how Sadiq Khan has revealed that he's pretty much wrong about everything important in life.
	I'm kidding.
	Yeah, so let's sort of start.
	He had an interview last year with the Islam Channel where he made a bunch of statements.
	Now this is making the rounds again, presenting Sadiq Khan as saying that he's going to give council houses only to Muslims.
	He didn't quite say that, although he did clearly imply that they would be the priority for him.
	It's an important interview.
	And since Reuters took the time to fact check it and say, no, no, he didn't promise all of these freebies to Muslims, I wanted to explore it in depth and dissect it and show you why he's pretty much wrong about everything substantial in life.
	Let's listen to the man.
	Samson.
	Eight years I've sought to be a mayor for all Londoners, whether you're Muslim, you know, Jewish, Christian, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, member of an organized faith or not.
	I know many Londoners who are Muslims suffer real challenges in relation to not having their potential fulfilled because they're going hungry at school.
	Their parents are stressed and they're skipping meals because they're worried about how their kids are going to eat.
	So if I'm re-elected, I will make my groundbreaking policy of free school meals permanent, which will really make a difference.
	A family with one child will say 500 pounds a year.
	The second big thing I...
	So I wanted to just take all of this interview in context and just break it down step by step.
	Sure.
	The first question that I have is, why can't you afford to feed your own children?
	Yeah, what a damning indictment of the Muslim community.
	Exactly.
	Exactly.
	So if the beginning, if the starting point for Saadi Khan is that Muslims in London can't even afford to feed their own kids, the answer is they really shouldn't be in London.
	The idea of importing starving people to be on welfare and to be dependent on the state for something as basic as feeding your own children.
	We all go through hard times.
	We all owe each other charity sometimes.
	But charity is a communal effort within the community.
	Simply showing up in another person's country and saying, feed me and feed me forever is fundamentally different from demanding Christian charity.
	Sure, but have you considered that they don't care and you're prepared to give them money through the state and so they're prepared to take it?
	Exactly.
	Which is what it is.
	It's resource redistribution along ethnic and religious lines to benefit people who can't even feed themselves.
	If you can't feed yourself, it doesn't strike me as wise to bring you into my home permanently.
	I can't home Lebanon or Britain.
	I can't help but feel that they might not be as honest about this as we might expect as well.
	Yes.
	Ah, my children, I can't feed them.
	You have to feed them.
	Yes, yes, absolutely.
	Absolutely.
	The whole issue of cheating on benefits is a very substantial one.
	Saying they're driving taxis for cash or something.
	No, I'm saying.
	I'm saying they just go to school and tell them you haven't had breakfast.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Like that.
	Yes.
	You're saying they're not quite in tune with the high trust fair play society car.
	Weirdly, they don't share the Protestant values that seem to underpin England.
	Yes.
	But let's listen to what his second priority is.
	Because again, this was supposedly taken out of context, and I want to go through this step by step.
	Samson, can you control?
	Fulfilling their potential.
	Often they're underemployed or in jobs that, you know, they can do better jobs, but they haven't got the skills.
	Every Londoner who is on low income or not working will get free training to get the skills for jobs that are created in London, really important in this great city.
	They're the big issue facing Londoners.
	So let's pause here for a second again.
	If people aren't fulfilling their wages in the economic capital of Europe, at least it's partly their own fault.
	Again, another damning indictment.
	Yeah, I've got a bunch of untrained Muslims who can't earn any money, so you have to train them and feed them.
	Sorry, this isn't the British Empire.
	If we were governors over Pakistan or whatever, maybe I'd agree.
	But we're not, so piss off.
	This is the whole theme of it.
	The whole theme of it is that what's happening is that London is being flooded with low-wage, low-skilled people who are basically taking away the jobs from young English people who would start their career with a low-level job such as, I don't know, stacking shelves or working in a warehouse or being the livery drivers or what have you.
	These are perfect jobs if you're 14, 15, 17.
	A good way to save some pocket money, a good way to learn financial responsibility, become autonomous.
	Instead of doing that, what's happening is that people are being brought in on benefits to fill these jobs and usually to figure out ways of cheating the system.
	And it's these precise people who are Mayor Sadiq Khan's priority.
	That doesn't exactly seem sensible, but he's presenting that as his own electoral platform because he knows that he will get a certain ethnic and religious vote supporting him because he's going to redistribute money to them.
	But also, this interview with the Islam channel, you can't even notice that he begins by saying, oh, well, I mean, for all others, but here I am going to focus on the Muslims and what I'm going to do for them.
	And here's all of this stuff for the Muslims.
	It's like, right, okay.
	I believe you, Sadiq.
	Yeah, exactly.
	I believe you.
	Exactly.
	It's funny how he just has the micro, it just says Islam.
	I know it says channel underneath.
	If you had a WWE character of like the Muslim, it would be this guy.
	He's completely comfortable with it.
	And like I said, I believe that this is what he's going to do.
	Yep.
	His third priority around housing is what got people riled up.
	And I really want to take some time to sort of discuss that in a little more detail and give it the attention it deserves.
	Sorry.
	Samson, can we housing?
	And so we need to build far more homes in our city because often people from minority communities want to live near a mosque, near halal food, near places where other people like them.
	So for a variety of obvious reasons, and they're priced out.
	Can we pause that?
	Because there's not enough houses.
	Because often people from minority communities want to live near a mosque and get their halal food.
	It's like, I don't think that's communities plural.
	These Polish people that love the halal and the mosque.
	The Romanians and Bulgarians and the Hindus and the Sikhs.
	For me, it's the thoughtlessness of it all in the sense that if it was white flight and people trying to avoid people who are different from them, it would be called racism.
	If it's people congregating with others who are like them, which is a natural human impulse, you've had Irish neighborhoods, you've had Jewish neighborhoods, you've had all kinds of ethnic enclaves wherever different ethnicities mix, then it's a good thing.
	And we need to provide them with social housing, says Mayor Khan.
	At least 6,000 rent control homes.
	And the final thing to say in relation to Londoners who are Muslims.
	So he's promising 40,000 new council houses to make sure that people can live around their own kin.
	Yeah.
	Excluding you guys.
	Sorry.
	That's what integration looks like.
	That's what integration looks like, apparently.
	That's exactly what integration looks like.
	And the question that I have here is, have you considered the feelings of the people who already live there?
	As someone from Lebanon, I remember how the Palestinian inflow into Lebanon pretty much destroyed the country and led to civil war.
	I remember how the Syrian inflow into Lebanon pretty much destroyed the country and crippled it for a generation.
	And so I've seen this playbook a bunch of times.
	First comes, oh, please be tolerant.
	Oh, please be inclusive.
	Oh, please be forgiving.
	Then come the conditions.
	We want halal meat.
	We want to live around people who are like us.
	We want you to respect our beliefs.
	Then comes, well, we're a majority now.
	Screw you.
	So the playbook is a pretty standard one.
	And at no point does it take account of the people who already live there and their identity and their beliefs and what they want.
	Well, I mean, I'm not sure that it doesn't take any account of them.
	I mean, it takes account of how much money they have and how much money is funneled through the state to this particular community.
	Yep, pretty much.
	If it's the same playbook, which obviously is, and it's quite explicit, why do people fall for it every time?
	You're not shy about announcing it.
	I think you're being intolerant.
	And I think I'm about to call the police to report your intolerance and mine.
	I was being satirical.
	Yeah.
	Jokes are not allowed.
	I don't know if you've heard, but jokes are no longer tolerated.
	You might offend someone's feelings.
	But it really is a bit stunning that the argument here is that people should be imported to live in social housing and in rent-controlled properties and to have their children fed by the state and to have their children trained by the state because they can't make it work in the economic capital of Europe.
	The incredible thing as well, I mean, it's one thing to say ghettos are a problem.
	It's actually slightly better than what they do with social housing, which is they put it next to people who bought the house, but you bought a share of it.
	And you have to look across, because I've done this, at the people you're going to work to pay for who are doing nothing and who destroyed their part of their block or their side of the building.
	And you're like, oh, I'm going out to work now so they can watch this massive telly.
	And I have to watch it.
	And, of course, they're not from England either.
	And I'm just like...
	yeah he completely recipe to turn me into michael douglas falling down Yeah, but you can feel Gamanzilla rising.
	Yeah, I can really feel him rising.
	And also, they make noise.
	I live in a place, they made so much noise, like outside, kids outside, no parent supervision, screaming.
	Sorry to hydrate your bit, but screaming for hours and hours.
	This went on for years.
	The social housing kids, no one looking after them, just feral children.
	I know this is like the most Tory thing I've ever seen.
	No, no, no.
	It's Corbin policy to put, it's just leftist policy to put them, put it in, you've got to put it so we can't keep it separate.
	We've got to put it in with the, in with the people that have sweated to pay for the housing.
	It doesn't work because there's bound to create resentment.
	Anyway, sorry.
	Yep, it is.
	It is.
	It absolutely is.
	I hate it.
	I hate it so much, man.
	Sorry.
	Samson, can you control this?
	This is getting comic.
	Yeah, we get the sound.
	We lose the sound.
	Go back a couple of seconds as well.
	I'm really proud of.
	I'm going to say in relation to Londoners who are Muslims is look, one of our strengths is our diversity.
	Say I'm really proud of.
	I've organized, since I've been there, events like Ethan the Square, Ramadan Lights, and so forth.
	Why is that important?
	It gives a sense of belonging.
	Look, what's being admitted?
	Where's the diversity?
	Being admitted here is more important.
	What's being admitted here accidentally is even more important.
	It's not about just where's the diversity.
	What's being admitted is that there isn't a sense of belonging.
	It's a realization that this isn't your country.
	Now, I know that this isn't my country.
	I happen to be a friend of this country.
	But the admission here is that there is no sense of belonging.
	It must be artificially engineered.
	It is artificially engineered by creating events that are for Muslims and by making these events high profile, like having the iftar in Trafalgar Square as a sort of, you know, here we are, we're dominant, as having various events around Ramadan to celebrate something that is completely alien to Britain and to England.
	And to say, no, no, no, this is normal now, and this is what inclusion looks like.
	I don't think that an iftar is going to attract, I don't know, the average crowd from Essex who were originally from East London.
	I don't think these people are going to say, yeah, it's a wonderful iftar.
	Let's go for it.
	If anything, it takes on the aspect of settler colonialism, doesn't it?
	Extract resources from the natives so a foreign community can come in and terraform the landscape to be more suitable to them and then instantiate all of their religious and cultural habits there at the expense and completely against the will of the natives.
	How is it not?
	To be very fair, it will be somewhat diverse.
	There will be English liberal Democrat politicians there.
	And David House will be verified.
	Absolutely terrified, yes.
	And thousands of months.
	Trying to practice eating with her hands.
	It's not Samson's fault.
	It's really not.
	I know it's not his.
	What Donald Trump won in 2016 was because friends of mine, people in America, were complacent, thinking that we've made progress, we're going to carry on making progress.
	And the frustration we had was the lack of pace in progress, and lo and behold, it went backwards, right?
	I think the same's happening here.
	Over the last eight years, since I think that's the other five.
	So this is an important point.
	Progress.
	Can someone define it?
	Yes, I can.
	It's the Islamification of Britain for him.
	There you go.
	He's got no other telos here at all.
	It's like, no, we need to get as many Muslims over.
	We need to get them trained, get them paid for, get them fed, get their institutions up and running.
	And that's progress.
	And we didn't get that in America.
	In fact, you've got Gammon Ziller in America coming up in the form of Donald Trump.
	Return to an ancient system of governance.
	Whatever its merits, it's not really progress, is it?
	Well, I mean, again, it depends what direction you're going in, right?
	If you're like, okay, I want to get to that destination, which is the Islamification for Britain, and you want to get to, I'd like Britain to be a normal British country, well, you're definitely not getting the progress you want, and he's getting all the progress he wants.
	Yeah, pretty much.
	Pretty much.
	The goal's assumed, and then it's just how far along blip-blip-blip, how far the barrel is going to be.
	I can't believe Sadiq Khan, very public Muslim and chair of the Fabian Society, is doing this to us.
	Who can imagine?
	Yep, absolutely.
	It's not as easy as it looks.
	No, it's hard to do this.
	It's wobbly that matter.
	Instability leads to problems.
	Can we go to the bottom?
	And they've also used policies to divide.
	No, no, you can skip that.
	It's fine.
	May, Johnson, Truss, Sunak, that instability leads to problems.
	And they've also used policies to divide our communities, pitted north versus south, old versus young, some communities against the other.
	That's why we've got to be vigilant, and we've got to work really hard to be friends of our neighbours, provide allyship.
	And one of the things I'm really proud of is how Muslims and Jews work together, or Hindus and Sikhs work together, or Christians and Muslims work together, and so forth.
	That's a really good model.
	I was last night at London Citizens, and on the stage was a rabbi and a Muslim leader working together to support asylum seekers.
	That's like an old pop joke.
	There was a Muslim and a rabbi.
	Have you seen a lot of Jews and Muslims working together on the streets of London?
	But look at his argument.
	We all have to work together, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, to get as many Muslims into this country as possible.
	Exactly.
	It's like, sorry, no, I'm not in favour of that.
	That's all.
	Exactly.
	I mean, what point is Trump representing backwardness?
	The idea of your own nation first is backwards.
	Now, Sadiq Khan said nothing about the expulsion of Afghans from Pakistan.
	Whenever India and Pakistan get into a fight, the Pakistani and Indians on the progressive side start fighting each other, each one for his own ethnic kin or religious kin.
	And the argument between them is sort of, you know, endless.
	It's about a solution to it.
	It's about a solution for it.
	Exactly.
	This is about staking out territory.
	One has to go and the other can stay.
	Exactly.
	And so everything implied in what he says, oh, the communities are being divided from each other.
	No, no, no.
	The fact that there is diversity allows for communal divisions to emerge.
	Now, some diversity is going to be there.
	Necessarily makes them happen.
	Unless you're under an imperial system that keeps everybody under a fair enough boot, which is the only time where Lebanon worked, when there were either the Ottomans or the French.
	So saying that this is good, that this is progress, it implies a sort of moral universe that is completely alien to what, say, a Christian Mount Lebanon would be, or to what a Druze Mount Lebanon would be, or to what an English England would be.
	That's correct.
	It's entirely alien.
	And this is what he's offering.
	He's saying, I will work together with rabbis and whoever in order to make sure that there are more asylum seekers.
	Now, given what's happened over the last few years in terms of Jewish and Muslim relations, I don't know how this really works.
	But the fact that in 2024, you had Jewish rabbis willing to say, we want more asylum seekers from the Middle East and Africa who are going to side with the Muslims against us.
	That's just suicidal.
	That's just insane.
	It's destructive.
	I guess they have a place to retreat to, though, when it all goes belly up, right?
	They do have a place to retreat.
	We only have one England.
	Yep, pretty much.
	Pretty much.
	So the point of this segment is that Sadiq Khan is wrong about everything important in life.
	And everything he said in that interview, even though he didn't say, I'm going to give these houses only for Muslims, although he did say the purpose of these additional houses is to help Muslims live next to other Muslims.
	And near the mosques and the music.
	And near the mosques, and near the halal shops, and near their own kin.
	He did say that, even though Reuters did a silly fact check saying, ah, well, no, not quite, not exactly.
	Am I going to not read between the lines on this?
	Of course I am.
	Exactly.
	But the thing is, I'm not sure I'd say he's wrong, right?
	Because I think that from his own paradigm, he's completely correct about what he's doing.
	I've become the mayor of London, so I can funnel resources to the Muslim community so I can get them trained and get them educated and get them food and get them resources.
	And so they at your expense.
	At the expense of the taxpayers in order to continue Islamifying Britain.
	And I mean, that's not wrong, as in technically, logically incorrect from his point of view.
	That's precisely desirable.
	It's just really undesirable for just the native people of this country.
	Yes, pretty much.
	Pretty much.
	And, you know, outside of a relativist framework, it's also objectively wrong.
	But that's a different conversation that I'll say for another time.
	He goes on to.
	To have more houses in London.
	That's the sort of teamwork I want to see in our city.
	Well, you know, I'm somebody who is a member of parliament for 11 years and been there for eight years, and I've met too many victims of crime.
	I've spent too much time with brief families.
	It's heartbreaking.
	And what I'm clear about is what are the complex causes of crime?
	Not excusing it.
	What are the causes of crime?
	Deprivation, poverty, alienation, lack of opportunity.
	And they've got worse over the last 14 years because of government cuts.
	So we've got to be tough on the complex causes of crime.
	Invest in young people.
	Invest in youth clubs.
	Invest in art school clubs.
	Do you know what the other cause of crime is getting a big knife and putting it in someone else?
	It's just not enough youth clubs, mate.
	It's not always the poverty.
	Sometimes it's the big knife.
	Sometimes it's the knife's fault.
	Yeah.
	Sometimes it's the urge to pick up knives and stab people even.
	But if they just had some community centers, this wouldn't happen.
	You heard the man.
	I mean, even with the sort of school meal stuff and the community centers and all the stuff, all of that, you know that the contracts for these things are going to go to entities that Saudi Khan looks favourably upon.
	And you know that this is going to involve a huge amount of corruption.
	Some of it we will learn about, some of it we will never learn about.
	And that it is going to benefit people who either agree with him ideologically or religiously or are his ethnic kin, which is pretty much the same thing.
	So you know that this is a redistribution game.
	So there's an interest, as far as he's concerned, in presenting this crime problem as being, oh, it's just the circumstances.
	It's just the socio-economic factors.
	It's got nothing to do with anything else.
	Don't think about it this way.
	And I thought that given that he wanted to talk about this kind of, you know, toughness on crime.
	Yeah, go on.
	And by the way, I went with knives because we're on YouTube.
	I thought I'll tone it down from other things I could say.
	But isn't there a contradiction between a leftist frame, right?
	The idea of like, okay, it's poverty, it's this, it's that.
	But what does Muslims actually say about that?
	Because I can imagine that they're not really big on that.
	Surely in that kind of culture, there's an element of personal responsibility or pride or something.
	No, no, it's about honor.
	Honor, yeah.
	So where does that go with, oh, I'm just poor?
	That's leftism over Islam, surely.
	It divides into two things.
	So there's an old Islamic tradition that says that the penalty for thieving, which is to amputate the hands, was suspended in years where there was famine because the poor would steal food and that would be sort of tolerated.
	But generally, there is definitely a very harsh view on crime in Muslim societies.
	And it's very often enforced by the community itself.
	Like the police would have to sort of struggle to get the thief out from the hands of the community before he gets murdered.
	Crime in our country is a means to an end.
	And once Sharia is there, will they end the crime?
	I'm just wondering.
	But hang on, hand one.
	The thing is, we're thinking of crime as a universal abstract property.
	Crime in a kind of like general law-like way.
	If it's crimes from one community against another community.
	That is permissible.
	That's what I'm saying.
	Then this is allowed.
	Because there are all kinds of interpretations by people close to Islamic State, which are not fully mainstream in Islamic thinking, saying that, yeah, when you are in the land of the unbelievers, you get to do whatever you want.
	Yes.
	And you always see the argument that, no, it's the girl's fault that they got raped regardless of age, regardless of the fact that they were drugged.
	Exactly.
	Including from the wives and daughters and the families.
	Yes, absolutely.
	So you see this mindset that says, no, no, no, some crimes are permitted.
	So when he says we're going to focus on the causes of crime, one of the things implied in there is that I'm going to channel money to entities that are friendly to me in order to support my own community.
	And I will address, I will dress that up as being countering the causes of crime.
	But then if you just look at the data, what it tells you is that, you know, the percentage of Muslims who are in jail has been pretty overrepresented, shall we say.
	I mean, we can see on the graph here, it's nearly three times the actual population.
	Exactly.
	And that's a theme that's repeated pretty much everywhere in Europe.
	But also, no religion is a surprisingly underrepresented one as well, isn't it?
	Yep.
	You can see that 37% of the population, but only 31% of the actual criminals.
	Yep.
	Yep.
	So it's basically because the no religion types tend to be, you know, mid-width.
	Yeah, anything.
	So this tells you that really the growth of the Muslim population has led to an even higher proportion of Muslims being in jail.
	So it's not really worked, but this redistribution effort is ongoing.
	So when Reuters says that, no, they're fact-checking this, and that, no, Sadiq Khan didn't say that he was going to build 40,000 homes only for Muslims.
	What he said is considerably worse.
	He's admitted that there are ethnic and religious differences.
	He's admitted that Muslims in Britain don't feel a sense of belonging.
	He's admitted that there's a real problem with crime with minority communities.
	He's admitted pretty much every talking point of the right, but he's dressed it up in a particular way to say you should support my redistribution agenda that favors my own community.
	So this is the actual fact check on what Sadiq Khan said.
	It's not, oh, he's just going to give away houses to Muslims.
	It's actually considerably worse.
	Muslims want to form their own enclaves.
	They want to live separately.
	They want their own identity.
	They want to assert that identity in Britain.
	That's what Sadiq Khan actually says.
	Sadiq Khan is going to facilitate that.
	And his role is to help that as much as he can.
	Yes.
	All right.
	Let's get some super chats.
	Praise our dictator, Kia Muslim in me.
	Context, US only fortunately has approximately 1% Muslims.
	Yeah, but they're already congregating in certain given areas, aren't they?
	So Detroit is sort of gone.
	Well, yeah, but that was gone because Minneapolis was gone.
	It's Minneapolis that's the rules.
	Yes.
	Yeah, there are a bunch of other places.
	But who is Gaya, Starma, Macron, or Albanese?
	Probably Macron, I'd say.
	I'd go with Macron.
	Yeah, I'd say Macron's the gayest because of his intrinsic Frenchness.
	Hello, friends.
	Thanks to you.
	I'm for the first time in my adult life considering joining a political party and currently looking on how to join the AFD.
	Well, good on you.
	Drunk Changeling says, excite for the lad's hour.
	How many letters off the N can you say?
	Not that many, actually.
	Not as many as I was expecting, I'll be honest.
	But I get a couple, so, you know.
	Unlike James McMurdo, I won't get in trouble for it.
	Maybe if they can't feed their own kids, they shouldn't be having so many of them.
	Again, that assumes goodwill and good faith interface with the system.
	That's not what this is about.
	Can you do a roundtable on the Starma bunker?
	Yes, we can.
	London is what happens when you allow the state to be used as an instrument of plunder.
	Well, I mean, the state will be used as an instrument of plunder in a multi-ethnic environment.
	That's just what.
	Yeah, exactly.
	It's literally always one.
	That's exactly the segment that I did on Monday, by the way.
	Yeah.
	Because diversity means that the state is an instrument of plunder for different communities.
	So you have to control the state, frankly.
	Anyway, let's move on because I think the era of multiculturalism is actually coming to an end.
	Because something, and when Nigel Farrow is like, well, something's happening out there, it's like, yeah, Nigen, you're going to repudiate it.
	You are going to distance yourself from it.
	You're going to be like, no, no, I don't agree with what's happening when you figure out what it is.
	But anyway, go for now and go and get your copy of Under while you still can.
	It's not going to be on sale for much longer.
	And don't have to pay eBay prices for it, which are like hundreds of pounds.
	You can get it 15 quid or whatever your local currency is.
	And I recommend you do.
	Anyway, right.
	So today, I think it was yesterday, actually.
	Let me just check.
	Yeah, it was yesterday.
	Was the 1100th anniversary of King Ethelstan's coronation in Kingston town?
	Now, you'll know all about King Ethelstan, won't you, Nick?
	Not as much as you.
	It's not my era, but I've.
	I've bowed here.
	Yeah.
	You've got to just give me the right books and I'll read them, but I'm not as bad good on ancient history as you guys.
	You know, Ethelstan.
	That's right.
	So Ethelstan is the grandson of King Alfred.
	King Alfred expands the kingdom of Wessex to a bit about half of England.
	And it's Ethelstan, his grandson, who conquers the rest of it and first becomes the king of all of the English.
	And so he is truly the first king of England.
	And it was his coronation anniversary yesterday, which is very based and very cool.
	And I like it a lot.
	And slightly surprising that Tom Holland would be at something so based.
	He's a bit of a lib.
	Well, that's the thing.
	Tom Holland's like a lib dem, right?
	And I keep telling people, lib dems don't actually hate the country.
	They just want to be well thought of at their dinner parties.
	Yeah, fundamentally.
	But he was the guy that said that the covering up the rape gangs had good intentions behind it.
	That's because he's a lib.
	Yeah.
	And he was like, well, it's all about the intentions, right?
	But anyway, so you have that.
	And it's just interesting how if you were to ask King Ethelstan now, what do you think of your kingdom, my lord?
	He'd be like, why is it full of heathens and barbarians?
	I spent my entire life crushing and driving out pagans and barbarians.
	And supporting the Catholic Church.
	And why are they here?
	And that's a great question.
	I mean, you can see just.
	Just look at this by the bins.
	It's absolutely dire.
	Nappies, just look at this.
	What are the mothers who are doing this?
	Do you have no shame?
	Look at that.
	Can't help but notice the ethnic composition of this.
	That's horrific.
	This is an area in London, of course.
	Worst thing I've ever seen.
	Yeah.
	That's where I'm going.
	I hadn't watched that properly on the train.
	That is horrific.
	Yeah, it's pretty gross.
	I hate littering so much.
	Never mind nappies.
	I hate any littering.
	Any littering to me is like death penalty.
	But then nappies or whatever.
	Disgusting.
	And so that's just, you know, small examples of just how England is large areas of England are currently occupied in ways that are just infuriating to watch.
	Here's the Muslim Defence League.
	Feeling radicalised yet?
	I mean, it's just, it's like 300 or something, but it's Muslims.
	You know what I mean?
	It's just, that's not like a standing army.
	I don't know what it is.
	It's like the Persians coming over the hill, isn't it?
	Yeah, it's an army in waiting.
	And they know it.
	And this is the thing.
	They have this kind of thaimotic claim where they view themselves as a group primarily and they think, right, we're stamping our territory by marching down it in what is essentially a kind of militarized way.
	This was from the Southport riots and the reaction from the Muslim community to the Southport riots.
	And so it ends up looking like we're basically a colonized country because, of course, we put up foreign signs and we accept that large sways of the country just don't have English people in now.
	And so you can understand that that sort of collective sense of belonging and identity and dominion of the English people over England is being attacked by the sort of settler colonialism that mass immigration has turned into.
	I used to live next to Whitechapel to atone for my sins, I suppose.
	Yep.
	Just walking down the markets with all of the burqas there.
	Oh, yeah.
	Just absolutely horrific.
	One time I was sick at home on a Friday and somebody knocks on my door.
	Yes.
	Are you Muslim?
	What?
	If you're a Muslim, you need to go to the mosque now.
	Just on Friday noon.
	It's like a mosque militia going around.
	So just sort of they view it as doing good works by reminding people of their duty to go to mosque.
	And it's a way of enforcing community cohesion.
	I mean, in Lebanon, back in the day, if you missed church on a Sunday, everybody knew and would check up on you and make sure that you were all right.
	But this is slightly different in the sense that this is preemptive enforcement to make sure that you comply with the community's wishes.
	And that's how you get to mass vote.
	Essentially.
	And that's how you get these gangs.
	I was in the wrong country.
	If there was someone knocking, saying, have you got to church today?
	I'd be like, oh, no, thank you.
	You know, and I'd be like, that's it.
	I'd be alright with that.
	Yeah, yeah.
	That's a good idea.
	But anyway, so you can see why people are feeling that their country is getting away from them.
	And that actually foreign peoples who have their own countries that they could go back to are, in fact, taking over areas of ours.
	And then you get the police who are, of course, on their side.
	Here's a UK officer telling a man that asking people to speak English might qualify as a hate crime, which is great.
	You have alleged, we weren't here, so I don't know you've said it, but you've alleged to say, speak English.
	What was that?
	Speak clearly.
	No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, gentlemen, yeah, okay.
	So he could have been here.
	No, and that's fine, and that's why we've just come to speak, because potentially someone could perceive that as a hate crime.
	Speak English in England.
	Well, that could be a hate crime because the police are here to defend the new immigrants rather than the opposite.
	I mean, if they came up to you and said, speak Urdu or Bangladeshi or whatever it is they speak, that was on the signs, that would never be considered a hate crime.
	No, no, we don't even think about it.
	Potentially perceived.
	Anyone could potentially perceive anything as anything.
	These policemen have to really look in the mirror and say, is this what I want to do with my life?
	Yeah.
	And so, of course, this means that the natives are feeling rather dispossessed.
	Here's a chap who was trying to get a job on just a building site and he was just like, there were just no English people around.
	And so he doesn't fit in.
	And then you get this from the Times.
	This was a couple of days ago.
	I'm just going to read a quick quote from this because this is just insufferable.
	And it just, it really is driving me mad.
	Quote: My friend's department recently housed a charming East African asylum seeker who had been given leave to remain, providing him with a newly refurbished studio on a quiet street like a tree-lined street.
	This is in London.
	But then he brought over his wife and multiple children through the refugee family reunion route.
	Other tenants in the block of flats complained about the noise.
	The family had trouble fitting into one bedsit, but the council could not throw them out at such short notice.
	It had to provide them with a four-bedroom house.
	The man has a house in London.
	Millions.
	Millions we are spending on this, right?
	The man has no job.
	He's living on universal credit.
	No one in the family can speak any English.
	The children need schools.
	The wife needs medical attention.
	The council has a duty of care.
	So they went to the top of the housing list bypassing 2,000 locals.
	Like, if this isn't making your inner Gammon rage at the injustice of this, I don't know what will.
	And what's worse is when they just come out and say, yeah, this was always the plan, right?
	You might be like, who's John McTernan?
	Well, let's have a look at his bio and find out what.
	Yeah, strategist and commentator, formerly Tony Blair's political secretary and Julia Gillard's comms director, number two, PR Influence Index.
	Right.
	So when Migration Watch posts the white British as an English population of London, and they point out that in some boroughs it's down to less than 20%, it's bloody at 15% there, right?
	And John's like, a better London has been created.
	Yeah, it's an incredible tweet.
	I've shared it myself.
	And he was on Newsnight recently saying he's not in favour of the flags.
	Like, really, the guy that wants white people obliterated from London, I'm shocked.
	It's the worst thing I've seen since the Irish, by the way.
	Oh, yeah.
	Since the clip where trigonometry nod along with Bill Maher, this is the worst.
	And so it's just one of those things where it's like, right, okay, we can see the full scope of the system coming into view.
	Yes.
	The point, as John tells us, was to really rub our noses in diversity and simply ethnically replace us in our own capital, in our own biggest cities.
	And now you hear them talking about the shires over and over and over.
	And this is becoming very evident to everyone.
	The old lies, the old magic spells don't work anymore.
	And they've realized that, oh, they're summoning up Gammonzilla.
	Now, this is great.
	Mary Harrington coined this.
	And I think this is one of those genuinely insightful meme moments where it just captures exactly something that is coming into being.
	Where, as she says, the governing classes still think about the English masses as a terrifying giant subterranean gamanzilla that must be prevented at all costs from erupting.
	Yes, that's correct.
	And that's exactly what they're trying to do.
	But that's exactly what's coming.
	Yeah.
	Because, and I think this cartoon.
	They're willing it into being.
	They're willing it into being.
	Because this by accident.
	And Gamonzilla is just the English version of these pricks on the street, right?
	That's Muslimzilla right now.
	Like angry young men who are collective and they understand themselves as exercising political power and they will use violence.
	Yes.
	And they're like, okay, well, we don't want Gamonzilla coming to being.
	It's like, right, so the other one's fine because the other one is one of their client groups.
	Gamonzilla is actually still three-quarters of the population of this country.
	And actually, if Gamonzilla starts stirring, if Gamonzilla wakes and raises his head, well, that's an unbelievable amount of people who will be suddenly against the system.
	Yeah, and the core difference with Gamonzilla, or one key difference, is that you're allowed to do a kind of what would be a sort of racist cartoon of it.
	They've got all sorts of reasons, you know.
	And not only that, they've got all sorts of containment mechanisms.
	But I think that these are failing at this point.
	And I think they know they're failing.
	Actually, say hate on his fist as well.
	I mean, that's incredible.
	It does.
	And you know, he's got a little.
	Jimmy, the other one says love, but we don't see that one.
	We don't get to see that one.
	But this, this Gamonzilla has been, yeah, okay, you know, good point.
	Gamanzilla might arise as a giant pink ogre to eat you.
	He may well find himself stomping through the houses of parliament, smashing everything in his path.
	Yep.
	It's actually a wonderful, wonderful meme.
	Do they have hate on both hands?
	He does have hate on both hands.
	The socks look a little bit urban to me, that style.
	I don't need to have the socks like that.
	But the point is, they're aware that Gamanzilla has the power to do this because whether they like it or not, the power of selection is still in the hands of the general public.
	And if Gamanzilla decides he's going to vote for something really far right, then he will.
	And of course, you've got Angela Rainer gone today, which is superb.
	And Gamanzilla out stomping.
	It's a popular meme, and I like it a lot.
	It's drawn for First Blood.
	And so there is the containment method.
	In the wake of the raise the flag discourse, you've got Kirstan being like, well, I mean, I have flags everywhere, but using our flag to divide devalues it.
	It's like, no, no, no, no, no, no.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	You know.
	Exactly.
	That's Lucas' point.
	That's what a flag is for.
	But the thing is, the England flag has always been the sort of black sheep of the national flags because they know the England flag represents Gamanzilla.
	And it always has, and it always will.
	And they'll never be able to take it.
	No matter what Yvette Cooper says in Parliament, where she's like, oh, well, we should wave the St. George's flag with pride because it represents our values of togetherness, fairness, and decency.
	No, it doesn't.
	No, it really doesn't.
	Which is why you don't like the England flag in every other context.
	It doesn't represent values at all.
	It represents the kind of deep primordial sort of groupishness of the English working class.
	Identity.
	It represents a specific identity, a specific people, a specific community.
	And their claim to this land.
	That have been together for a thousand years.
	1,100 years.
	And their claim to this land, that's the thing that it always hinged on.
	England belongs to the Gammons.
	That's what the English flag means.
	And that's why they're putting it up.
	And, you know, God, God willing, you know, it'll carry on.
	And so you have the lib class talking about this on BBC Newsnight.
	And I think we'll watch a couple of clips of this because it's just fascinating.
	I think you guys will really get a lot of it.
	Let's watch this first one.
	I mean, that's a great thing.
	It's all about context.
	You know, the people who've been putting these flags up, we haven't really heard from them.
	They haven't said what their motivations are.
	When you hear they have a talk show, we haven't really heard from the people putting up these flags.
	Then invite them on.
	Absolutely.
	Like, you literally are the BBC.
	This is Newsnight.
	You are supposed to there for talk to the people who are putting up the flags.
	But like he says, we haven't heard from these people.
	Why not?
	Because we're keeping them out.
	We're making sure their voices won't be heard.
	And so, okay, I'm sure this is going to placate Gamanzilla.
	I'm sure Gamonzilla's going to be like, oh, yeah, I feel really included here.
	But this, I just couldn't get over.
	It's so we just don't hear them.
	And they're like, oh, we're not racist, mate.
	You know, it's not really that they are racist.
	What they are doing is just staking a claim to something that is theirs.
	Here them sound if they're always saying, oh, I'm not racist, mate.
	Now, those people who were in the mall when the women bought the European championships home, thousands of people waving the flag of St. George.
	Not one of them needed to or felt the urge to say, oh, by the way, I'm not a racist, because in that context, it's celebrating our unity.
	And unfortunately, the flags on the lampposts, because they're not saying what they're about, the implication is that they're more divisive.
	And I personally object to the flag of my country being used to intimidate my neighbours.
	And that's why I'm so about it.
	I mean, I think did he say patriotic?
	He did at the end, yeah.
	It's just a lie.
	I mean, it's a common sad.
	Yeah.
	So you talk about hating the flag.
	But notice how he's framing it.
	When we are in control of the discourse, the flag means inclusivity and diversity.
	But when you just put up the England flag without our context being applied to it, intimidation, hate, division, because they can claim all they want, but they know that's not what the England flag.
	The England flag stands for the Gammons.
	Did he find the Muslim Defence League intimidating?
	Apparently they didn't.
	Did he find the sort of speeches that come out of the East London mosque intimidating?
	Weirdly, not much to say on it.
	I mean, if you listen to what the Muslim community actually believes, and you're a liberal and you're not intimidated, it's because you're mentally retarded.
	Yes, you think that it's just never going to happen.
	But these things do happen.
	They are happening.
	Anyway, we'll carry on with news sites because they do love England, you know.
	They love England.
	I'm sure.
	When it's diverse and multicultural and with as few gammons in it as possible.
	Can I just revel in the love of England?
	Yeah, because I don't want viewers to think we're not going to love England.
	No, we do.
	We do love England.
	Sorry, just to pause there.
	So we've been dumping on you for half an hour now, but we don't want you to think that we don't love England.
	We, of course, do love England.
	It's like, look, you wouldn't need to say that if there wasn't implicit in that.
	His own logic applies.
	Like the whole thing, mate, I'm not racist.
	He did the exact same thing.
	He did the exact same thing.
	Actually, I do.
	We're broadcasting partiality.
	Can we go to the same guest and now make him give the opposite view half-heartedly?
	Yes.
	Yeah, and we didn't hear from the Gammons, though, putting up the flags.
	Well, why not?
	You know, you've got every opportunity.
	Whenever you listen to Blue Bragg, you've got to realize he's a proper communist.
	Oh, he's doing his songs.
	Even something like Between the Wars, quite good as a song.
	We listen to it.
	You're like, oh, yeah, he's just full-on communist subversion.
	This is what he is.
	So he's not, you know, it's not some liberal or something like that.
	He's a full-on commie.
	Isn't that great?
	We got on Ed Balls, a liberal, and then a communist to discuss English patriotism.
	Yes.
	Which, by the way, is what the mainstream thinks is the range of opinion.
	On the Daily Tea Telegraph podcast, which is maybe like, you know, the right-wing paper, they had Ash Sarko on and gave a very sort of like friendly interview about why she's a communist.
	This was Tim Stanley.
	So we all know they would never have the other version of an IST that's on the other side, right?
	So it's like they think the range goes from sort of wet Tory to communist.
	That's the acceptable range, even at the Telegraph.
	But the thing is, the great thing about this is they must feel themselves on a shrinking boat in stormy scenes.
	Because the fact that they're even discussing this, the fact that they're like, oh, yeah, no, actually, we do love England, guys.
	Here's our little England flag in the background.
	Can you imagine that five years ago?
	The boat gets tipped over.
	It's Gamanzilla.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Literally running out of the sea.
	But the thing is, they can feel him moving under the boat.
	That's why they're even having this conversation in the first place.
	They're like, okay, we're not going to get capsized by Gamanzilla, are we?
	It's like, maybe you are, actually.
	Let's listen a bit more.
	England, the things I love about England, Marmite.
	I love it.
	There's nowhere else in the world.
	I've been all over the world because of that job.
	No one has anything that can touch Marmite.
	But the problem is it's such a divisive issue.
	I've got a metaphor coming on.
	No, not really.
	It's one of those things.
	Because when people sometimes ask you to make a list of the things that define Englishness, which is impossible to do, because that would be top of my list.
	But you did also reveal a love of our folk tradition, which many of us might have forgotten.
	You tried to revive.
	Well, no, I was kind of part of that because of the minor strike.
	During the minor strike, there were a lot of folk singers whose, frankly, music was more radical than mine.
	And partly I kind of come from that tradition.
	My moments in Englishness that really inspire me are the fact that we were the first people to recognise that no one is above the law when we chopped off theater King Charles.
	You know, we had the first working class movement in the world in the Chartists.
	I revel in the things that we achieved with our neighbours in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales, the Battle of Britain, the founding of the welfare state, and of course 1966.
	That's always got to be in there.
	Yes, that was a football match.
	It was indeed.
	And are you telling me that I can be of the left and wave my flag as proudly as from the right?
	I do, because I think my fellow travellers on the left will recognise there are many types of socialism.
	There are many types of patriotism.
	There's a traditional patriot who believes in things that are immune to society.
	He nearly did.
	One of those things.
	The monarchy, the army, perhaps.
	Whereas my patriotism is based in values, the values that we as a society try to uphold.
	Compassion.
	So isn't that amazing?
	So he gives a really, oh, Marmite is the thing he's most proud about.
	I remind you, that was a joke about being divisive.
	I know, I know.
	I'm going to let him off.
	Sure, but, you know, then he goes, oh, well, you know, Magna Carta, the Charters, whatever.
	And it's like, yeah, okay, that's fine.
	Look at the first person plural.
	That's what we did.
	It's not what foreigners did.
	It's not what any other people did.
	No one else has a claim to this, actually.
	And his whole point of it, oh, well, therefore, the English is a set of values.
	It's like, no, being English is a continual ethnically inherited ethnicity with a history that you are part of, whether you like it or not.
	And the values he adheres to are leftist values, which would be a total imposition on England.
	They're not at all English.
	He's just saying, and I'm English and they're the values.
	Like, you follow a completely different and ideological top-down set of values that are completely separate from that.
	And you're a communist.
	That's what I mean.
	Exactly.
	And so you've got this, this is the kind of, so there is this kind of left-wing approved narrative of England, which there's a Twitter account called English Radical History that you can find the left-wing approved narrative of England.
	Because it's just, you know, here's a revolt against, you know, King John or whatever.
	And it goes through, here's the Charclis revolts or whatever, what Tyler.
	It's like, yeah, okay, these things are all cool.
	But like, there are other things about England that actually also matter.
	And one of those things is having a continual country that has been consistent for a thousand plus years.
	That's something the English are very proud of, actually.
	Oh, yeah, by the way, Enoch Powell said for the unbroken life of the English nation over a thousand years and more is a phenomenon unique in history.
	There we go.
	And that's what actually we are carrying forward into the future.
	But what I like about this politics Joe point, I mean, look at that.
	Look at that top quote.
	Majority opinion can be turned against minority groups.
	Oh, well, if we've got permission.
	Firstly, there is an enormous amount of minority privilege.
	Yes.
	And I've written about that, and it's sort of a huge thing.
	Secondly, what's happening now is that minority opinions are being turned against the majority.
	Yes.
	And thirdly, if you're a minority, as someone from a minority that survived in the mountains for a thousand years, you have to admit what reality looks like.
	You can't be in open revolt against the majority all the time and expect zero consequences.
	And it's this, these are the consequences that she's worried about.
	And Zoe here just gives the game away again.
	She's worried, but what if the majority decide they've had enough of the minorities and just kick them out?
	And it's like, yes, they have the power to do that, actually.
	And so this is what the lib is trying to avoid.
	The precious minorities must be, for some reason, here for as long as possible, forever.
	And the thing is, like I said, this would be what Gamanzilla would do as well.
	Gamanzilla would just stipulate an ethnic group and eject them, like the ejection of the Egyptians back in the 16th century.
	But the thing is, Gamanzilla already agrees with this, right?
	So when asked, admitting no more new migrants and requiring large numbers of migrants who came to the UK in the recent years to leave, 40, what was that?
	Yeah, 44% of people are just completely on board.
	Yeah, and they say, but what do they mean by that?
	My idea is let's just start the deportations and ask them exactly what they meant later, because they're clearly on board.
	We'll figure it out as we go.
	That's pretty radical.
	Zero.
	They want no more new migrants, 45%, and they want them to start leaving.
	That's huge.
	Farage looks like a wet leftist to half of the country.
	Yeah.
	And again, on the other side, you've got quite a strong sentiment where it's, again, about 44, 43% who are like, well, no, I don't really want that.
	Or I'm strongly opposed to that.
	But it's only 26% who are actually strongly opposed.
	So I suspect the sort of somewhat opposed, well, just consent by passivity.
	And I'd say that a lot of the don't knows are just being polite.
	Like, where's this data going?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, exactly.
	This isn't being collected by the government, is it?
	And remember, people are just quite hard line on this.
	But I think it's worth remembering that people think something like 70% of immigration is illegal immigration.
	And in fact, it's like 1% of immigration.
	Because if you remember that people think, oh, yeah, so all of the immigrants I see around, almost all of them are illegal.
	I want zero new immigrants and I want large numbers of them to go.
	And I'm happy for them to go in prison camps.
	Yeah, yeah.
	52% are happy for that.
	We've heard that number before.
	They literally just look around like, no, all of these people should be in prison camps.
	What are they doing here?
	Yeah.
	And if 52%, it was enough to make a pretty big decision about Europe.
	I think it's enough to put them in prison camp.
	I'm just saying.
	I'm a Democrat.
	Yeah, you only need 35% to form a government.
	You know what I mean?
	This is Gamanzilla's winning ticket right here.
	This is the genuine id of Gamanzilla speaking.
	And they are right to be afraid because literally when we get a right-wing government that says to Gamanzilla, no, we are going to do exactly what you're asking for, those people are going to win.
	And they're going to win a lot.
	And things are going to change very quickly.
	This is the thing that I keep saying.
	If you don't address people's reasonable concerns reasonably, they will end up being addressed unreasonably.
	Yes, indeed.
	And this is what they're afraid of, but this is also what they're willing into being.
	They're being so extreme in their insane experiment that the replacement is going to be equally insane.
	And they think that they can finesse it being like, oh, well, yeah, the St. George's flag means tolerance and inclusivity.
	It's like, no.
	It's just desperation talking.
	That's just desperation.
	It means the complete opposite, and everyone knows it, which is why you sound so scared.
	Yep.
	Right.
	The Times pissed me off to the point where I cancelled this week, says Thomas.
	Ian, sorry.
	Being informed and entertained by your coverage, so much more.
	So very happy to send some what they've been enjoying over 10 years.
	Well, thank you very much.
	And we're doing our very best.
	I'm wondering how many of these diversification policies were supported by the Queen and other royals.
	Well, who knows?
	Apparently, Minneapolis is only 3.5% Somali.
	And look how far the Somalis have got in Minneapolis.
	Jesus.
	Carl, could the UK government utilise the military in turning the UK into nationwide Northern Ireland?
	Could this be logistical or even feasible?
	Final card?
	No, there's only 70,000 of them.
	They know, they know, they absolutely know that they do not have the power, the manpower to restrain open sectarian conflict.
	That's why they're so desperate to sort of finesse this into the England flag now being like the pride flag.
	You know, it's like, sorry, that's not happening, bro.
	There are three stages of jihad.
	Let's all get along.
	We have to defend ourselves.
	And when the population is large enough, you will submit.
	Correct.
	Yeah, it's something that we've seen a few times.
	How many people will stop getting paid or lose their job if migration stops and people are sent home?
	The payments to the establishment class cause their resistance, deportation, and repatriation.
	Yeah, I mean, there'll be a huge, like when we finally get the great repeal bill, like David Starkey is in advocation for, there'll be whole industries of lefty lawyers, of NGOs, of, you know, the people.
	They can stack supermarket shelves and they can because they'll be flogged and sent to jail.
	Those that escape our wrath.
	Yeah, and Drunk Changely says, when he stands like an ox in the furrow with his sun and set eyes on your own and grumbles, this isn't fair dealing, my son.
	Leave the Saxon alone.
	And that's what the government is slowly but surely coming around to learning, I am sure.
	But yes, that's precisely it.
	And that's precisely.
	Rudyard Kipling prophesied the Gammonzilla and they didn't listen.
	Absolutely.
	When the English begin to hate.
	So my bit.
	Well, first we've got to do the old Islander, I imagine.
	Well, if Samson can grab it up for us.
	Let me see.
	I'm trying to go.
	Oh, go on.
	Islander 4 is out, guys.
	Get it while stocks last for 15 quid.
	Don't, you know, it's a collector's item.
	We don't want to pick it up for 300 later on eBay.
	So that's my Islander plug.
	And guys, I'm here to tell you that remigration is inevitable.
	Who's saying this?
	Is it me?
	Is it Steve Laws?
	No, it's the New Statesman.
	Hey, it's what the left are saying.
	But I mean, this is Steve Law's Twitter account being portrayed in the New States.
	He's the new editor.
	Yeah, I can.
	So it's the age of deportation.
	So I did a podcast with Arch yesterday, and he was like, why is it the left can do right-wing propaganda so much better?
	It's beautiful, isn't it?
	Than the right.
	They're off into an aircraft hangar.
	Isn't that incredible?
	Because right-wing donors are cheap.
	Yeah, that's.
	Yeah, right.
	They're like, yeah, we're doing the Hollywood version, yeah.
	Yeah, so incredible.
	Tangiel Rashid in the New States from the age of deportation.
	The haven that Britain once was is being dismantled.
	In its place, a fortress rises.
	Thank God.
	It's full on base.
	Finally, Fortress Britain.
	Oh, you thought deportations were your friend.
	Yeah, it's full on.
	It's full on stuff.
	Now, why did they do this?
	You've got to wonder.
	I mean, is it Trump derangement style fear porn where they just like they can't help themselves?
	Are they trying to exaggerate like, oh, basic border control is terrible to sort of try and contain it?
	Is it a kind of dark Freudian fantasy?
	Like, oh, don't deport me.
	You know, I did wonder.
	But I don't know.
	What do you think?
	So I think if you think back like five years, not even five years, there's no chance anyone in the government under the Tory government would have come out and said, I have England flags all over my house.
	I'm an English nationalist.
	I love England.
	BBC would never have had any of this.
	It's because there has been this primordial tectonic shift under British politics to the point where, I think, and it's widely, I mean, people, literally normal people, are talking about civil war and stuff like this.
	I think they're just well aware that actually the mood has very much shifted and we're going to start getting what we want is what they think.
	Yeah, and that very much is the tone of the article.
	But it starts quite differently.
	It starts with a kind of nice sort of filmic scene almost.
	A few years ago, as I cycled through my home stretch of northeast London, my tyre punctured.
	I got off my bike and locked it on a residential street.
	Returning a few hours later, I was shocked.
	A wheel was missing.
	I stood there exclaiming curses on our delinquent nation, our low-trust society, our crime-ridden streets.
	I was stood there being racist for a bit.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Well, it all came out of me.
	Gamanzilla was rising up.
	Then a door opened behind me.
	Don't worry, said a man standing in the doorway with a smile.
	There it was in his hand, my front wheel.
	What were the odds?
	He then reassembled my bike.
	The tire was now firm.
	It's puncher repaired.
	My benefactor turned out to be an asylum seeker.
	Can you believe it?
	Hold up in a home.
	I believe he's in Ilford no home office property, but yeah.
	Barred from work.
	He had time in his hands and he spent it fixing bicycles, Carl.
	He's a saint.
	For which his hometown in Eritrea was famous.
	That's what it's most known for.
	The money I offered was refused, even when government policy would suggest he lived off a mere five pounds a day.
	He mended my bike, he said, as a gift.
	would never take money never take money for and the thing is right there is actually a town in eritrea that is famous for its bikes I actually looked this up.
	It's quite big.
	It's a city.
	But because they're too poor to have cars, because they can't get petrol.
	That's like when lefties pick up.
	Look at Cuba.
	They've got like vintage value.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Do you know why?
	Yeah, that's the reason.
	And so I guess that this guy has heard about this on the internet somewhere and made up this story based on it.
	Because I do not believe this story for a second.
	Well, yeah, if it was the movie, my movie anyway, this would end cut to him being deported.
	Oh no, thanks for the bikes.
	Anyway, among oh yeah, I was gonna skip a bit to oh no, where's the bit it says among refugees?
	Oh, yeah, it goes on and says how these people are just legion.
	There's loads of them, totally loads of them.
	And there's a bit though, I'm trying to find it now, where they say they far outnumber the criminals whose cases are provocatively trumpeted before the public.
	Oh yeah, here we go at the bottom.
	And what really bothers me about that is like, yes, but what number would you accept then of child, I don't know if we'll have to say the word, but assault on, you know, but it's still massively disproportionate to the general population.
	We've all seen Rupert Lowe's graph.
	Yeah, yeah.
	It's that you can't, if somebody throws away their identity, you have no idea who the hell they are.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	You don't know what he's running from.
	I've met people in Lebanon who proudly told me that they were claiming asylum in Germany as Syrian refugees.
	Yeah.
	So like, why?
	Why do you want to put up with this?
	There's absolutely no reason we should.
	But anyway, sorry, Karen.
	No, I can carry on.
	I'm slightly put off by that camera is being right in my way.
	And then there's light on the screen, but I'm going to read it anyway.
	This is the point.
	Our desire to eject asylum seekers today is really the barely concealed expression of an enveloping disillusionment with immigration generally, even of the legal kind.
	Correct.
	That is correct, isn't it?
	It's propelling us out of an age of migration into something altogether new, an age of deportation.
	This is superb as well, because it's literally going to come down to the strangers are going home and the friends can stay.
	Because what they're worried about is just every single person.
	No, no.
	You know, very few people are saying that.
	And most of those people are just on Twitter.
	What the average person is saying is, I don't want all of these strangers in my country and they shouldn't have been in there in the first place.
	I mean, as a foreign taxpayer, I'm horrified at paying taxes to house some Somali guy with his four wives who's cheating on benefits.
	And we can literally just do it by that standard.
	It's not that hard.
	It's not evil.
	It's common sense.
	If you were in the UAE, if you were in Saudi Arabia, none of this would be tolerated.
	If you were in Pakistan, it wouldn't be tolerated.
	You'd have been ejected back to Afghanistan.
	Exactly.
	So this whole thing is so just absolutely stupid.
	It reflects how they view the native population of this country as inherently evil and inherently irrational.
	And the more extreme they become, the more they will will into being something that is extreme and irrational.
	But the thing is, like you said, being a net taxpayer, that's a good metric of friendship.
	Did you come over and take advantage of the system or did you contribute to the system?
	This is a very good way of determining who are the friends and who are the enemies.
	And so if you have communities and households that are not net taxpayers, then they can go.
	And if you have ones that are, they can stay.
	This is a very simple and I think straightforward and quite logical and fair-minded way of fixing this problem.
	Seems fair.
	She goes on to talk about Rupert Lowe saying he would deport people involved in the grooming gangs.
	And she says, even if they were born here or held British citizenship, British Pakistanis were, in Lowe's eyes, essentially foreigners with another nationality who could legitimately be deported back to their true homes in Pakistan.
	Now, couldn't you say it was their behavior by treating a certain group as other, namely English girls, and doing these horrific things to them.
	And because they're not of their religion and race, they did that to themselves.
	They designated.
	They decline themselves as foreigners.
	When you see the whole dress code of the Pakistanis, this came into being because of a guy called Abul Al-Bawdudi, a Pakistani scholar back when India and Pakistan, back in British colonial times, who said that the Muslims and the Hindus were getting along too well.
	Therefore, the Muslims need to be dressed completely differently to mark themselves as Muslims to make sure that there wouldn't be any sort of successful integration.
	We can't have them being foreign.
	So when you see these dress codes by the Pakistanis, they're marking themselves as foreign.
	But also, if we just ask ourselves, how are we denoting the community that we're talking about?
	We denote it by reference to a foreign country.
	Like you literally call them the British Pakistanis to explain to us who you're talking about in this article.
	So yes, unsurprisingly, we're like, oh, right, a foreign community.
	Yes.
	Because you can't describe them in any other way.
	Right.
	Who keep agitating for an airport.
	Yeah, I tell you what, if someone did build that, I'd be furious.
	It's bad enough as it is.
	Even if it was for deportations, only well, this bit though is very much what you were saying.
	It's a sign of how rapidly the Overton window of acceptable policy has shifted, that barely a year has passed since Lowe was forced out of his former party for proposing these mass deportations.
	And that that is exactly I mean good work lads basically.
	And the funny thing is she's now making Callum points because Callum says one year ago they kicked Bo from the party for advocating mass deportations.
	Now it's completely mainstream.
	I mean, literally, Zee Yusuf is announcing a mass deportation policy.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, so totally based.
	Bo is ahead of the curve.
	And now the New South Wales was admitting that's exactly what happened.
	So she's not wrong on the facts.
	It's a he that wrote this.
	Is it?
	Yeah.
	Oh, okay, sorry.
	It's a man.
	It's fine.
	Okay, I couldn't tell because the name on what I was saying.
	I wasn't used to the name first.
	It wasn't English.
	Okay, sorry about that, man.
	I used the wrong pronouns.
	So anyway, he goes on to quote Enoch Powell.
	Now there's always a danger when you quote Powell because he's going to be far more eloquent than you and he's going to be far more correct than you.
	So if I can find the quote.
	Well, is it?
	That is a different one.
	Enoch Powell says today, Tori, say tomorrow?
	Oh, yeah, next.
	It's what binds us to.
	If only.
	So it's weird that I can't.
	Oh, there we go.
	It's just that.
	Oh, yeah, here we go.
	So tell us what it is that binds us together.
	Enoch Powell, the prophet of the coming age, once demanded in a fantastical recital of English history.
	We can ignore the word fantastical there.
	Show us the clue.
	Yeah, true.
	Show us the clue that leads through a thousand years.
	The unity of England, effortless and unconstrained, the homogeneity of England so profound and embracing that the counties and regions make it a hobby to discover their differences and assert their peculiarities.
	Isn't that exactly right?
	It's amazing.
	Yeah, and his whole speech, that's in 1964 and I think the 1961 speech is incredible as well, where he quotes later about the sap of England and how, despite the empire, there's still that key sort of core to it and root.
	Italy.
	Yeah.
	And he goes on, now watch the slide pivot.
	Powell's fantasy was never right.
	The multiculturalism of today's England arose out of a history genuinely rooted and centuries old.
	1948.
	From its inception, Britishness, pivot to Britain, you see, was a composite identity formed in the aftermath of the Union of England and Scotland.
	So it's that kind of pivot.
	It's like he's talking about England and suddenly it's Britain, the colonial project.
	It's a different thing.
	But it's empire fated Britain to become a multicultural society molded by generations of intercontinental free movement that would catapult Englishmen like Powell abroad and in turn people of diverse origins to Britain.
	That's so not true.
	Like for hundreds of years we had a world-spanning empire and we didn't allow any of them to come here.
	Not just that.
	Let's pause and sort of go back to my neck of the woods.
	The Ottomans had an empire spanning parts of Europe, North Africa, Middle East, etc., etc.
	And they ended up being ridiculously nationalistic about Turkish identity.
	The idea that just having an empire means that you must therefore adopt multiculturalism is absolutely nonsensical.
	But if anything, it seems that having the empire is what makes you more nationalistic due to common exposure to foreign cultures, foreign nations.
	The Ottomans weren't particularly nationalistic when they ruled, but when their empire fell, they became ridiculously nationalistic.
	So the idea that you had an empire in the past, therefore now you must accept multiculturalism, like that doesn't apply anywhere else.
	And so why are you saying this when you know that it isn't true about the Muslim empire that's most relevant to you?
	Yeah, and actually, I didn't include it in the end, but Powell, I'll just read it because he had a brilliant bit on this in his 1961 speech.
	He says, he's talking about coming back from the empire and finding that England is still there.
	And he says, so the continuity of her existence, meaning England, was unbroken when the looser connections which had linked her with distant continents and strange races fell away.
	Thus our generation is one which comes home again from years of distant wandering.
	We discover affinities with earlier generations of English who felt no country but this to be their own.
	So he starts with Kipling and things that he's saying, okay, there was this generation of empire, but actually there's always an England there behind it that was never solid by this.
	So completely different to the person writing this article.
	So true as well.
	Yeah.
	Incidentally, this is a great rebuttal to the whole Michaela story.
	That just because you learned about Enoch Powell or Rudyard Kipling or what have you, that doesn't mean that you'll actually become British.
	It could just as easily mean that you will use that history in order to undermine England.
	So it's just as a sort of incidental point here.
	Yeah, now this is a very interesting bit.
	This age of deportation is a global one.
	This is a paradox.
	The brutal reification of national borders through deportation is now a thoroughly globalized phenomenon.
	Why is that a paradox?
	So it's actually similar to your tweet.
	where's the bit which has the nascent frenzy of just underneath it Yeah, there's a thing on the screen that's like totally.
	Oh, yeah.
	The nascent frenzy to expel illegal migrants in England is already in a very advanced state in India.
	she talks about how this is the case in india so what actually she's he i've done it again It reminded me actually of your tweet, Carl, because I think it's the same paradox as this, that people from around the world are saying we want to have nations.
	So it's a global phenomenon, in a sense, of nations saying we are not the global sludge.
	We are with nations.
	It's a global reaction against globalism.
	Yes.
	Because globalism, by its nature, being everywhere, trying to undermine every nation everywhere, has made the old adversaries realise actually they're kind of old allies as well.
	Yes.
	Whether you realise it or not.
	And without the French, who are you fighting?
	Without the English, who are the Irish have holding a grudge against.
	Without us existing as we are, none of it makes sense and everyone's identity goes away.
	And actually, it would be better to have a world of nations rather than of, like you say, the sludge.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And the fact that your tweet got 71,000 likes, 14.4 million.
	Well, Elon retweeted it.
	Oh, well, that'll help.
	That'll help as well.
	But it's obviously resonating with him and with many.
	And you're just saying what you've just said there.
	Yeah, sorry, there's a light right on the screen, which is why I keep acting retarded.
	But the other thing about this, he says the brutal rificification of national borders, suggesting they aren't real.
	Reification suggests they're an abstract that's made real.
	It's like, no, they are real.
	They're a border.
	It's the sea.
	You just think that's insane.
	Even if there's something artificial that we construct ourselves, so?
	So is the bloody internet.
	And that's how you're earning your living.
	Exactly.
	So's your house, you know.
	Just because we construct things doesn't mean they're not valid and decent and good.
	That's why we construct these things.
	It's because they're a good idea.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And the only bit I agree with, in a sense, is that when he says dismantling international human rights laws is therefore not a solution.
	The answer, if it exists at all, lies in strengthening it so that fewer people are made stateless or forced to flee illegal wars and persecution.
	I mean, if they want to do that, so they never leave in the first place, I'm down.
	But that would be fine.
	No, no, no.
	What he's saying is literally anyone from anywhere for any reason should be able to claim asylum in Britain.
	Okay, I'm against it then.
	Yeah, of course, because dismantling international human rights laws isn't a solution for the shitlib globalist who writes to the New Statesman, but it is absolutely a solution for the normal people of the world.
	So that's what's going to happen.
	Yeah, I don't know.
	And I don't know how much time we have, but there was another article in the New Statesman as well, which was interesting because it was Andrew Maher, kind of a lefty, but mainstream.
	And it was probably too big to go through the whole thing, but he calls it the left's immigration failure.
	And his conclusion was different.
	He's not saying deportations are inevitable.
	He basically, in the piece, says he has a sort of technocratic Malthusian vision.
	It's all about managing resources.
	And he says the left's got to get ahead of this, but purely from a resource management thing.
	He says, we're not going back from migration, which is different from the other article, but they're definitely going to lose if they don't manage it.
	And he's constantly worried throughout the article that actually it is going to be more like the other article describes.
	It is going to be this brutal deportation thing.
	There's one particular bit in it that would infuriate you, though.
	I'll see if I can find it.
	He says there's a second obligation.
	So he talks about government having two obligations.
	I was kind of reminded when you said earlier, are you not furious about the way that migrants are being prioritized for housing and things like this?
	He talks about two obligations that the government has.
	But the first one, here we go.
	So labor is struggling to straddle two different kinds of political obligation.
	There is an obligation to the wretched of the earth to a wider world affected by war, climate change and tyranny.
	And he talks about there would be a few British people that wouldn't want to save a drowning child.
	But he says, there is for the government a second obligation, which is to the sustainability and happiness of the people already here.
	That's the secondary.
	Why is that the second?
	That means having an overview of the number who can be fed, housed, and educated sustainably.
	Notice also, it's just so utilitarian.
	Taking into account the reasonable and unselfish desires of the current population for space, air and security.
	So there's no identity in the whole piece.
	He just, he talks about there's a okay, there's militant Muslims against white English racists and we all need to compete for space and air.
	So yes, there's an overpopulation problem.
	And okay, we don't want sex pests.
	But it's very kind of, it really shows actually the labor failure.
	Managerial.
	It's totally managerial.
	It's totally materialistic.
	Yes.
	I realize that thinking of, when I realized that thinking about things in a materialistic way, I began to sort of change my mind about important questions.
	If you think that this is simply a material question, you will never understand it.
	It isn't.
	So all I can hear is Gammon Zilla chanting, Inge Lund, Inge Lending.
	That's all I can hear when he speaks like this.
	So this is about the ideal, man.
	This is about spiritual questions.
	Yes.
	This is the nation.
	This isn't about materialism.
	Yeah, and even the sort of vision, at the end, he sort of offers a vision.
	I can imagine a future a few years ahead in which the government, perhaps by using the deterrent effect of quick asylum returns and ID cards for all workers copying the Danes and Swede, begins to win the battle on migration.
	But stop them!
	No one's letting them in!
	Again, it's so technocratic, and such efforts would inevitably start a conversation about sustainable population levels.
	This is the only way he can conceive of this argument.
	I just don't understand.
	The government could win the war on immigration.
	Well, who's stamping the visas?
	Well, it's the Home Office, obviously.
	Who's literally ferrying them in across the Channel?
	Well, it's the Royal Navy and the Coast Guard, actually.
	We're the ones.
	We're letting this happen.
	We're not being overpowered or something.
	God, it's so frustrating.
	I know.
	He's gaslighting on that.
	And there's one part in the article even says, to repeat, there is anyway no going back.
	It's like, that's weird because another article in the same publication says they're totally all going back.
	But he's like, there's no way back.
	This has happened now.
	Is it sort of fake faith about it?
	Yeah, just decisions by ministers.
	No, no, I've spoken to people, I'm not going to name them, who have just been like, look, we just have to accept that Islam is here now.
	It's like, you know what?
	You know, like in the early 20th century, we didn't accept a lot of stuff.
	You know, like 1920s, where we had like mass deportations between Greece and Turkey and stuff like this.
	We're just like, no, we're not having it.
	It's just a much cleaner solution if everyone just switches over.
	And after World War II, the Germans were deported out of Eastern Europe.
	Just like, no, no, we're just doing it.
	And honestly, I can see something like that coming about again because it's just like, look, there are loads of problems in the future, or we could just get this done cleanly without anyone being killed.
	You know, no one's going to die.
	It's just the easiest way for everyone.
	And honestly, generations in the future will thank us.
	Can I have that mouse back?
	Yeah, yeah.
	Right.
	Okay.
	Let's go to the video comments.
	And while you're doing that, I'll get the actual comments up.
	Sorry, I wasn't paying attention as I was doing.
	Omar says, Takia Khan keeps saying British Muslims, but he's describing both non-native passport holders and refusing to exclude non-British Muslims.
	That's a great point.
	That's a great.
	And this sort of linguistic denotation games are very important to keep an eye on.
	And it's one of those things you don't really think about because it's just the sort of liquid nature of human conversation.
	But that's a great point, Omar.
	Like, he is describing literally any Muslim in Britain as a British Muslim, as equally as valid a claim.
	So that Eritrean asylum seeker or whatever is just as much of a claim as, you know, your nan who is being kicked out of a house or whatever.
	But anyway, right, let's go to the video comments.
	I do not believe in 82 with you.
	Okay, apparently the video comments haven't been edited.
	So after the podcast, I will be thrashing the editing team.
	Sorry to gold tier members who sent us a video comment and we can't watch it.
	But trust me, they'll get good old Saudi justice.
	Angel Brain says, I remember my first jobs.
	My first proper job was stacking shelves in Morrison's for £2.16 an hour.
	Before that, I did my paper ad when I was 13 years old.
	Six miles around to earn money to buy the latest heavy metal tapes to listen to on my paper ad.
	A perfect system.
	What was your first job, Nick?
	Do you know what?
	It was washing up in my parents' little restaurant.
	So they ran a little restaurant and I was forced to wash up in it.
	And he'd be like, how can you say no?
	It'd be like, can you do the washing up to us?
	And it's like a school night.
	You know, you know, you can get back from school.
	You're not going to have to go in the next day.
	I'll have no time to myself.
	So you're like, no, but it's your parents.
	How'd you get out of it?
	Yeah.
	But it was a job because it was an official restaurant.
	So if that counts, it was.
	Did you get paid?
	Yeah, they paid me a little bit.
	That's good.
	What about yourself?
	Carrying boxes in a warehouse.
	Really?
	Yeah.
	Mine was working peeling potatoes in a chip shop.
	I was about 50%.
	It's far from miserable.
	Yeah, 50.
	To be honest with you, I actually really enjoyed it because there was the counter and then a door that led into the kitchen area.
	And it was basically just me in its kitchen.
	And so I just, you know, put they had like a CD player.
	It was a time of CDs.
	And so I'd get whatever albums I liked.
	I'd take them into work.
	I'd put them on and I'd listen to it.
	And basically, what I had to do is put huge bags of potatoes into this sort of churning machine that brings them.
	And then they'd chuck them at the end.
	And then I'd put them through a cutter.
	And then there you go.
	Here's a tub of chips, basically, for the front.
	And to be honest with you, I had a great time.
	I did it for like, you know, three hours a night or something.
	And I was just on my own, just like, you know, singing along to my music and just being 16 or whatever.
	And I actually quite enjoyed it.
	But yeah, anyway, yeah.
	So, yeah, first proper job is, you know, good.
	Russian says, surprising number of younger, pretty women at the reform conference.
	They can smell the winners, it seems.
	You know what, right?
	That was the same at the Wittan as well.
	There were like for the first couple of years, as you were there, mostly it was like stringy, nerdy men, right?
	But this year, there were like half a dozen attractive single women.
	And it was just like, right, okay.
	So things are changing.
	The vibe is shifting.
	As Russian says, the women are like, yeah, okay, no, it's going over there.
	I'm going to get myself a husband from this side, which is good.
	Well, I called it.
	This is, it reminds me of, did you see my tweet the other day about Susanna, Suzanne Reed, whatever she's called?
	So she was suddenly like sort of making the case.
	Eastern red pill.
	Yeah, like a little bit to Kevin Maguire, who's obviously left of anyone.
	And I suddenly came up with this term, the ovary window.
	When women decide it's acceptable, I like the new.
	And I'm like, this is a genius coinage, right?
	It's not quite Gamanzilla, but it's pretty cool.
	No, no, no, no.
	I think it's even better.
	I think it Subtly describes a very real phenomenon that everyone can feel.
	Like when the women realize the men have actually built something sustainable and they need to be on the right side of it, the ovary window shifts.
	And but then that's good for all the young men who'd put in all the time and effort.
	We'll have video comments in five minutes because I was shaming them.
	Threats work.
	Yeah, yeah, threats work.
	See, see, don't let anyone tell you it doesn't.
	But yeah, no, I think the ovary window is a superb coinage and well done.
	But I like Gamonzilla as well.
	I think Mary did a good job in that one because it rolls off the tongue and it's got that kind of intimidating implication.
	Yes.
	It's like, yeah, the Gammons are going to start destroying everything.
	Michael says, funny, my work as an English-speaking, my work has an English-speaking rule, but the leftists say it's for health and safety.
	Well, it might well be.
	Okador has sent us a super chat saying, by what these articles sound like, I'm surprised they're not saying the great Indian poet Rudyard Kipling.
	Well, that's the point.
	How can they not say the great Indian poet Rudyard Kipling, right?
	Because he was born and raised in India, but everyone knows that he was an Englishman.
	And when decolonization came, they just pointed at him and said, out.
	Why?
	Because you're English and we know you're English.
	And the same thing can happen here and it can happen anywhere.
	I love the idea of Gamanzilla, an ancient beast released from the planet itself as a cleansing ritual, being awoken to correct the sins of modernity and stomping around saying, I just don't like him, is beauty personified.
	I love it.
	It's totally true.
	And I think every country has its own Gamonzilla.
	I think that's what Trump was tapping into.
	And I think they're right to be afraid of it.
	Omar says, even Gamonzilla is the peaceful option because once he's achieved a British Britain, he'll calmly go back to sleep.
	If they awake the Gammon Reich, the trials will be legendary in their ruthlessness.
	If we decide the world needs another British Empire, I don't think we'll be quite so polite this time.
	Well, that's the thing.
	I don't think it'll come to anything like that.
	But I do think that basically we're watching at the moment the pillars holding up the liberal order just falling one by one.
	And I think in like 10 years' time, we'll find that things are just done in a really different way.
	Do you know what?
	Did you ever watch it?
	Everybody will end up pretending that they were for it all along.
	100%.
	Yes.
	Everybody will end up pretending that, oh, I was always in favour.
	I never believed the drafts were going to.
	Fuck you.
	We know you did.
	Yeah, exactly.
	I was never in favour of putting the asylum seekers up in hotels.
	And people will just dig up one of their tweets from 2023 and be like, what's this then, you liar?
	Yeah, there's a similar thing to Gamonzilla in Brexit and Uncivil War.
	Have you seen that?
	The film where Benedict Cumberbatch plays Dominic Cummings.
	And he says Britain makes a sound and it's like he's got his ear on the ground.
	He's like, Britain's making this grumbling low sound.
	That's Gamonzilla.
	Yeah, it's Gamanzilla.
	And it came out during Brexit and it sort of goes away.
	And he's like, it's been sort of quenched for now.
	Yeah.
	Vanquished or whatever with the word we satiated for now, but then he'll come back.
	But that's exactly correct, though.
	And they should have listened.
	You know, Gamonzilla is going to make himself heard.
	Said the punishment was the Boris wave.
	Exactly.
	Instead, he was punished with the Boris Wave.
	Kevin says, the problem with Gamonzilla today is that he has a Liberal Democrat tumor eating away one foot, stopping him from going on full rampage.
	Yeah, but the problem the Liberal Democrats have is the second the machetes are in the street, they'll vote for the BMP.
	I'm absolutely telling you.
	The Lib Dems are not hostile to Britain.
	They're just isolated from the problem.
	But when the machetes are running down their street, that's it.
	They're Gamonzilla.
	I mean, you even saw the sort of outlying sort of signs of it in Ed Davy talking about the noise on the train.
	That's Gamanzilla.
	Yes.
	Yeah, it's a little bit, and they're very nimby.
	I mean, they like the Lib Dems in Back in the Lakes where I'm from, and you cannot build a house there ever.
	And, you know, so even in the Lib Dems, the Gamonzilla lives, you know.
	Let's watch the video comments that finally arrived.
	Oh, did we?
	Oh, okay.
	Let me.
	Do you want to grab the video comments?
	And Zerg for $50, thanks, man.
	Says, take the My Melly.
	I found my soon-to-be wife on your Discord five years ago.
	Congratulations.
	We don't have a Discord.
	But congratulations.
	Don't let that stop you.
	Thank you very much.
	It's good first comment.
	Yeah, why are you giving people that I put not nothing into the tax system?
	The money the government's spending is not the government's money.
	It is our money.
	It is money.
	You rum off us in all the taxes we pay.
	It's why a pipe in Spain costs you next to nothing.
	But here, unless you are earning 70 grand again, you can't afford to go to the pub.
	And if you could send out a message to the government, what would you say?
	Wake up before the country wakes you up.
	The voice of Gamanzilla.
	Definitely a libertarian there making the argument against tax.
	Oh, this is the most traditional English position in the world, though.
	Why are you screwing me?
	Right.
	What was that war that was purely about some minor taxing you were telling me?
	Well, there were loads of them.
	There were loads of them.
	I mean, the American Revolution is about.
	No, there's one you were telling me about one of the old English wars.
	You remember involving I'd need more details.
	I can't remember.
	I'm too tired.
	I'll think of it in a minute.
	Let's go to the next one.
	I will not cease from mental fights, nor shall my sword sleep in my hands till we have failed to rush them in England's great and pleasant town.
	All I'm saying is, if I were in the government, I'd be like, look, we're just going to have to go to the right.
	It's just, it's just got to be done.
	There's nowhere else to go at this point.
	Exactly.
	There's nothing left on the left.
	Absolutely nothing.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Thank you for saving us.
	Now we can destroy this old lady.
	La la la la la la la.
	I mean, did you see the thing about the lady?
	The lady who was killed in the NHS hospital.
	Yeah.
	Just going around this morning.
	Yeah.
	I'm not even going to describe it.
	It's gruesome.
	But it's like, okay.
	Am I going to place bets on what kind of person did that?
	Anyway, Mother of Hate Monsters says, Can we please get remigration completed as England's 1,100th birthday present in 2027?
	Well, I guess we'll find out, won't we?
	Roman Observer says, the left lost, they're begging for mercy.
	They just haven't noticed it yet because they're bad at noticing.
	So do we have another video coming?
	Let's go for that.
	The gang rape may have been a way to vent frustration due to migration experiences.
	Sporadically, I go back over speeches from the BBC's annual wreath lectures.
	Some are remarkably based, others woefully woke.
	I was shocked to find such heinous attitudes as are currently used to excuse migrants' behavior have dated back at least to 1961 and the fourth in Marjorie Purham's lecture series entitled The Colonial Reckoning.
	She actually attempted to excuse retaliatory orgies of severe sexual assaults of white women in the Congo.
	Jesus.
	I mean, it is absolutely right that in the 60s you see all of the shitlib arguments being trotted out.
	Like if you go back and watch Jonathan Miller's discussion with Enoch Powell, and it's just Monday shit liberate.
	Their arguments have not evolved.
	Go back to the Race Relations Act 1965 and the lefties are all doing it.
	They're all saying exactly the same stuff.
	Their arguments have not changed at all.
	And the thing is, as well, Enoch Powell was just vindicated so much.
	Like, because Miller's entire argument was just that numbers don't add up.
	That's his entire like Enoch's like, well, I think a third of Birmingham could be of minority extraction.
	And Miller's just like, no, I don't think that'll happen.
	I don't think that happened.
	It's like, but if you keep adding people to it, plus one, plus one, plus one.
	He also says two other tropes they always do.
	One, it'll be different, but why will it necessarily be worse?
	And also, if you stop going on about it, isn't that the problem?
	And then they the charisma of your office is making people worry.
	No, I don't think so.
	They did the exact same in Enoch's 1981 immigration speech.
	The lefties all interrupt him and say exactly the same thing.
	Those two things always like you're doing this and it'll be fine.
	Just shut up.
	And it's like, no, it won't.
	He's the only one that can see it.
	There's a Jimmy Carr joke about this.
	You can avoid 100% of rapes if you just say yes.
	That is a Jimmy Carr joke.
	Chance from Canada says, There it was in his hands, my wheel.
	And then everyone clapped.
	And that really is.
	I just, can you imagine?
	Can you imagine that story being true?
	Come on.
	Kevin says, This is why the one-in-one out is a lie.
	Because the one-in will be someone who's been granted asylum.
	So the next thing they will do is use the reunification to bring the four wives, 20 kids in.
	And so it's one out, 15 in.
	And this is what the Tories did when they were sneaking in the Afghan migrants.
	Yes.
	25,000 Afghan migrants.
	But how many family members?
	We don't know.
	Because they snuck it in and then used a legal injunction to prevent the press from telling them.
	The Conservative Party, ladies and gentlemen.
	Anyway, right, so we are out of time at that point.
	So we will be live on loadseces.com in 30 minutes examining our DNA results.
	And it's honestly, I'm right.
	I was telling the truth the whole time.
	So look forward to having that.
	It should be.
	You look pretty shocked, though, by the results.
	I know, but that's not a picture of me looking at my results.
	But anyway, you're right.
	Okay, we'll see you in half an hour, folks.

▲