All Episodes
Aug. 7, 2024 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
01:35:14
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #973
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Seaters episode 973 for today, Wednesday the 7th of August 2024.
I am your host Connor joined by Harry and Stelios.
Have you debuted your fancy new mug yet?
I have already said thank you to the gentlemen who wish to remain anonymous who sent them in but I've looked at the webpage on Etsy where they got them from and I've got to say an extra thank you because my goodness you really didn't need to but they are excellent.
Speaking of gifts, we're grateful for a thank you from Eloise, who sent in some biscuits and some tea and things like that via Amazon.
Also, I got a few weeks ago, I believe it was from Liz, a Costa gift card via Amazon as well, which I happily used on my weekend away.
So we like it when you guys send in gifts.
We all really appreciate it.
Thank you very much.
There is a PO box if you're interested.
Before we go on to today's topics, which are the blatant examples of two-tier policing under two-tier Keir, Elon Musk standing up to said starmer, and Tim Waltz just being weird, we have a few announcements.
Today it'll be 3.30, kicking off my show, as per usual, on a Wednesday.
Half an hour later, because we have guests on, I'll be talking to Jack Hadfield about his on-the-ground experience at the Southport Rights, but I'm also joined from four o'clock by Dame Andrea Jenkins, sort of one of the chief Brexiteers Always nice to have former politicians on.
government going to spill the beans on why there wasn't a reform pact and why she says can be bad knock is a party stooge so always nice to have former politicians on we're going to make a trend of it here over gonna give you a report on this one I don't care I'll stand by everything I've ever said.
They're all hideous communists.
Well, I hope they do.
It's good publicity.
Yeah, true.
I know you're watching.
Hello!
You can have that one in the archives, you lying commies.
Also, next thing, we thank you for everyone that tuned into the Hangout that we did, the Roundtable, where Harry and I called in, but we had all the hosts on.
We're hopefully going to do some of these in the future.
And also, thank you to those who enjoyed the election night behind the scenes video.
There is a 10 minute video about everything that went on there, where the thumbnail image of my face is not at all complimentary.
I've not watched this yet.
I like Josh looks as though he's very, very drunk trying to give you some very important information.
He's in the third stage of Kamala Harris coping with drunkenness, of where he's definitely trying to sound like he makes sense to fend off accusations that he can't drive his way home.
Just on the other side of this camera, there was a very bored woman.
So, if you haven't seen this yet, and you want to, and you're not a premium subscriber, you can sign up using the code ONLY121, that's all caps, no spaces, for 50% off the first three months of your premium subscription.
Is that for all tiers, Samson?
That's for all tiers, not just gold.
But I do recommend gold because then you can post comments and send us video comments and join our gold tier subscription stuff.
But bronze gets you all the content.
Silver, stay tuned because we might have some more goodies happening for silver tier members in future.
This also applies to anyone signing up for the first time, reactivating their subscription or upgrading their subscription.
So take advantage and help support us over here because we are independently funded.
But without further ado, let's jump into today's news.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer is insisting that two-tier policing is not an issue in the United Kingdom.
Well, I hate to break it to him, but the British people have a rather long memory and oodles of video evidence to the contrary.
So I thought today we would go through the abundant examples of two-tier policing enacted by Keir Starmer and his predecessors.
throughout the last at least a decade.
And it's unsurprising that people have taken note and when they legitimize violence and riots as the only means of redress, which we do not advise you do, by the way, because we don't want anyone to be arrested, it's very silly, but when they only address rioting from ethnic minorities, Muslims and immigrants, then it's unsurprising that the English working class take notice.
Now, If you are planning to go to any of these protests, again, we don't advise it because even if you're going down to express solidarity with the grieving parents of the Southport Massacre by the second generation son of Rwandan immigrants, not a Welshman, or if you're going down to complain about immigration, as we all do, absolutely legal and illegal alike, beware
Because the anticipated protest between 30 and 100 reported for tonight is going to be met with 6,000 riot officers deployed as part of Starmer's standing army.
Now, as I made this point on GB yesterday and Carl reiterated on our roundtable, you don't call it an army unless you're going to war with someone.
And given the two-tier policing enacted with the Muslim militias now turning out that MPs are denying exist or making excuses for, it seems the war has been declared against the anti-mass immigration white working-class English.
So, don't give them an excuse to lock you up, because they definitely want to.
Now, LBC are reporting here that they've said 5,950 officers have been mobilized to deal with the unrest.
And according to sources, this figure represents 30% of all trained riot officers across the country.
Of course, they're going to be spread very thin if it's not just happening in London, like it did in 2011.
They're going to struggle to contain this, so the violence, I fear, is going to continue.
Still no mention in this article of the Muslim mobs attacking pubs, pedestrians and parked cars, but there is an image in this article that, again, underscores just how bad the two-tier policing is, of these chaps.
Have a look.
A group of lads, just lads.
Typical British lads.
Yep, typical British lads about to go on the rubber dinghy rapids I'm sure, give members of the EDL a message from Birmingham.
Just a message, in balaclavas, flipping the bird at the camera that Lord knows where they got this photo from.
You can tell how desperate they are for some kind of grand enemy and how scattershot the messaging is being, given that they're still hammering this EDL button when everybody has pointed out they've not been around for years.
They were disbanded in 2013.
As far as I know, Mr Robinson went to prison because he punched a Nazi and they burned a Nazi flag.
So, they've been both irrelevant and counter-signalling the far-right.
Whenever they say far-right, we know they mean Nazi.
They're hoping that you fill in the gaps for them.
I mean, as far as I'm aware as well, the last time anything related to the EDL is that someone was, in 2017 or 2018, trying to organise some kind of protest in their name and had to cancel it because no one showed up.
Well also- That's how little of a factor they've been for ten years.
In 2013, they used counter-terror legislation to ban an EDL march going through London.
Why they didn't do this for the pro-Palestine, Demonstrations that happened every weekend in Westminster since October the 7th.
Who knows?
Priorities.
Yeah.
I mean, the very fact that the two-tier question is being asked is a major loss for the government.
Absolutely.
They've lost control of the narrative.
Because there would be no such narrative circulating if it didn't match people's experience in the least.
Quite.
Exactly.
People would completely think that this is just, you know, a silly theory.
They would say silly conspiracy theory.
Yeah, it's lining up with their intuitions, and you cannot tell people to deny the evidence of their own eyes and ears without significant enforcement costs causing your narrative power to drop off.
This isn't stopping them, though.
Mark Rowley, Met Commissioner, got pulled into one of two Cobra meetings this week.
Keir Starmer also convened the Cabinet in secret despite Parliament being in recess, so he's not putting The question to MPs but he is instructing his cabinet how to govern the country while being utterly inflexible to the fact that the far right, whatever boogeyman those are, are solely responsible for the unrest seen.
When someone asked Mark Rowley about why there is a perception of two-tier policing, is he going to do anything about it, he walked past and batted the microphone at the hand of the reporter.
I'm just going to play this clip.
Are we going to end two-tier policing, sir?
Excellent.
Petulant child.
Just what I want to see from the head of the Met Police.
This is a political statement.
There's a political statement, it's just that I'm not talking to anyone who dares to suggest this.
But also, what else is a political statement?
I don't care about it.
He's made this this morning.
He said that even questioning two-tier policing is complete nonsense and puts officers' lives at risk.
You know what I think puts officers' lives at risk, Mark?
Is creating this justified sense of two-tier policing with the litany of examples.
And let's start with one that is a dark stain on the Mets.
Urge to be politically impartial in 2020.
That's Black Lives Matter.
Now remember, Keir Starmer decided that it was his top priority to take the knee as a photo op with Deputy Leader Angela Rayner at the time where two billion dollars of property damage, multiple lives were being claimed, and entire cities were set ablaze, and Seattle was taken over by the Chas and Chop in America.
And parallel protests slash riots happened in the UK.
Not to the same scale, of course.
People Fortunately, didn't lose their lives, but there were scraps and scuffles.
The Churchill statue had to be boarded up because they were afraid of it being defaced.
Why were they happening in Britain in the first place, when BLM was supposed to be addressing supposedly American-specific issues?
Yes, it's a colonial import, as it were.
Keir Starmer thought that this needed this gesture, and also a down-the-line video expressing sympathy with the reasons why people were protesting against Systemic racism.
Something else that's completely unproven.
You know there's an old saying?
It's lost in the ages.
It says, never let a good opportunity to virtue signal go to waste.
That's exactly what happens here.
Yeah, I think Keir Starmer's made that the flagship policy of his campaign leading up to the election.
It wasn't Starmer though.
Wasn't the only one.
The Met Police themselves decided to do this.
I'm gonna mute that because it's just urban babble.
It's utterly indecipherable.
This is outside of Downing Street, by the way.
Police officer just decides to take the knee.
Very brave of him.
There we go.
Now, was this officer... Do you want to shine his shoes while you're down there?
Yeah.
Was this officer reprimanded for this?
Interestingly not, no.
At that time, Scotland Yard released a statement saying, Is he an MP or something right now?
personal decision not a political decision study else and should individual officers at their own discretion where it was safe to do so and it doesn't interfere with their operational duties decide to kneel on one knee with Londoners they are free to do so is he an MP or something right now or could it be one of the prospective ones oh what this this fella yeah I I wouldn't be shocked if it disbarred him.
I don't know what's happened to this particular officer.
I do know that he wasn't dropped from the Met for doing this because they decided to endorse a gesture which shows fealty with an organisation that have said they are trained Marxists and trained organisers, aka race communists.
The British police, happy, showing solidarity with race communists.
But don't be worried, there's no two-tier policing, especially not in sentencing, when this chap tries to light fire to the Union Jack on the Senatoff, the war memorial.
Bear in mind, this is a BLM activist, he was 19 years old, Astrophel Sang, and what do you think he got for this?
Oh, a parade.
In spirit, yeah, he got a two-year conditional discharge and was told to pay £340 in costs.
So, absolutely nothing.
A very minor fine for desecrating a war memorial.
But then, you must be thinking, okay, well hang on a minute, this is BLM, this has got absolutely nothing to do with Islam.
Well, as well, I think we should point out that this is criminal property damage, or certainly the attempt for criminal property damage, and I'm aware of somebody recently, slightly younger than this chap, who has just gone down for criminal property damage.
Who's that?
That's a young chap who's gone for two months.
Oh, the first photo of the gentleman charged who looks like a face merger between myself and Harrison Pitt for some strange reason.
Yes, the ideal Zoomer.
Yes.
The platonic.
Funny that all of us around here are happy to say, don't loot a Greggs, don't loot a Lush, don't smash up personal property, don't start fights with the police, don't beat up random black people.
And yet when they do it, they don't get any prison time or harsh sentencing.
So again, I know it's not about hypocrisy, it's about hierarchy, they just want to unilaterally punish the English, but the idea there's not a two-tier going on here Has there been any police investigation into that gang of Muslims who beat up the one gentleman outside of the pub?
That descended on him like a feral mob?
One of the Birmingham officials said, and I quote, that it was nothing more severe than what you'd see on a usual Saturday night.
No, I know Birmingham can be a bit rough.
But Muslims don't usually go to pubs on a Saturday night either.
No, I've actually been to a pub on Birmingham on a Saturday night before, and it's never seen anything like that.
But I do know that the poor chap was barred from the pub.
Right.
So justice has been served.
I disagree with you that it is not about hypocrisy, because it's about the institutionalisation of hypocrisy.
All wokeness is hypocrisy, institutionalised.
No, they don't see us as human.
That's the point.
It's not hypocritical because they don't see us as human.
Well, I think we're...
Let me express my point.
I think you will agree with me.
So, it's all about dividing the population into oppressor and oppressed groups and treating the so-called oppressors as second-class citizens.
That's all it is.
That's all the framing that they're practicing, that they are using.
So, yeah, there is no just two-tier policing.
There's just a two-tier system.
Yes, absolutely.
And that's why appeals to hypocrisy actually won't reach these people, because they know that they're punishing you as an underclass.
That's the entire purpose of the system.
So it's meant to be hierarchical.
Just saying the left are the real racists won't get us anywhere, but...
This is why people are angry.
This is what they keep seeing.
Okay, well here's another example of the police allying with, let's say, an Islamist mob this time.
Anyone remember this?
When a 14-year-old autistic boy dropped a copy of the Quran and had to do a show trial with local Muslims with his mum, the police orchestrated it and took part on the panel.
They knew this boy and his mother had received death threats.
This 14-year-old British boy fled his home, went into hiding like the Batley Grammar School teacher who is still in hiding and who the police, I don't think, arrested any of the people threatening the teacher outside the school.
He bought a copy of the Bible and was teased after mentioning it to his friends.
Good lad.
They were playing Call of Duty and when the boy lost it was also agreed that as a forfeit he should buy a copy of the Quran and bring it to his high school.
It's Kettlethorpe High School in Wakefield, West Yorkshire.
And then when his friend took the Quran and started reading from it aloud, he knocked it out of his hands.
And this desecration of a holy book that he bought on Amazon as a dare, led to the local Muslim community sending him death threats.
He was suspended from the school, along with three other pupils.
Police began investigating it and recording it as a hate incident.
So the police are complicit in this, and then the mother found herself pleading for forgiveness, saying, in his defense, he is autistic, he doesn't always realize what is appropriate and what is not appropriate, he's a very silly boy.
Did this take place in the local school?
I believe it took place in the local mosque.
Oh, that makes sense.
This image that we've got up on screen here, what does this look like to you?
Because it looks to me a lot like a hostage situation.
Yes, it looks essentially like a parallel government and legal system enacting vengeance on an outsider and threatening the life of a child.
And for this, the police officer in question decided to, Chief Inspector Horton here of West Yorkshire Police, decided to take part.
To diffuse community tensions.
And they feel they have to do this because there is a recognition that this community, Muslims, do not subject themselves to British law.
So there is a two-tier.
There's a parallel society going on.
The police feel the need to negotiate rather than subject to equal application of the law, as they would if the English made death threats to a 14-year-old Muslim boy.
Obviously as well, Five Pillars here shared the footage with Glee, basically.
So yeah, the Muslim community are celebrating at this at this win that they subjected this woman and her son to a struggle session in a local mosque.
I will also add that this is some of the weird, one of the weird implications of the restorative approach to justice.
Just says whenever there has been wrongdoing, let's put both rivals sit on the same table and they just find it out.
You can't enforce the law in this way in a whole country.
It's just a pie in the sky.
The premise is that it's not that a moral wrong has been committed by the criminal, it's that civilization failed to educate and enrich the criminal enough so he turned to crime, so therefore you just need an open dialogue between the aggrieved and the perpetrator.
It's a fundamentally insane and egalitarian anthropology that leads more crime to be committed.
Sorry, is she having to wear a head covering because she's in a mosque?
Oh, well you know you're on even ground then, don't you?
Exactly, yeah, exactly.
Fair point.
Okay, well, another example.
Speaking of the Islamic community, how about the Palestine riots that I've already mentioned?
Now, we've covered this many times on the show, but here's footage of them firing fireworks just openly in the street that they actually They shot these at police, they shot these at police horses, they attacked police.
Again, something that's not mentioned any time that we talk about the far-right thug riots that are currently going on where police officers are getting into scuffles and scrapes with various drunk football lads and deciding to go after and physically attack other bystanders who haven't done anything wrong.
I wonder why people are Don't like the police very much.
And then Martin D'Aubigny, when he was down there, do you remember when Parliament was in session talking about the ceasefire debate and they decided to project from the river to the sea on the other side of the tower?
Oh yes, yes, I remember this.
Martin D'Aubigny walked round and just found the projector and he reported it to the Met Police and said, look, they're projecting a slogan of genocidal intent on behalf of Hamas onto the building connected to Parliament while Parliament's in session.
Do you not want to turn that off?
And the Met Police just said, eh, can't do anything.
Even though they knew who set it up, they knew where it was.
Nobody was arrested, nobody was charged.
Wait, you can't even just unplug the thing?
Nope, they didn't, they weren't bothered.
They weren't bothered whatsoever.
So again, another example of two-tier policing.
Remember the Hare Hills riots in Leeds that we also covered recently?
This is a video of such events.
Fiery but mostly peaceful, I'm sure.
Burning police cars, burning buses.
Now, this was because Roma Gypsies had abandoned and led to the injury of their own children, and the children were taken away from their safety and put with a relative of the family.
It wasn't even that they were abducted and put into foster care or a government system or something.
And they decided that in response to their children being removed for their own safety, they would burn down their own neighborhood with other assorted immigrant groups.
Now, I raise this because If we want to apply the law fairly, and we don't want any violence, and we don't want to send the message that violence is the only means of getting redress for political causes, why did you give the kids back?
They gave the kids back, and the reason given, during a family court hearing, by her Honour, Judge Helen Trotter-Jackson, was it is important for everyone to focus on the children's welfare and taking the temperature down in this case.
We don't want the community that we know will burn down their own city to keep doing it, so we're going to re-endanger the children.
That just sends the message that the riots work, clearly.
Because, funnily enough, there were only 27 arrests for this whole thing that went on multiple days.
Bear in mind, as of recording today, Wednesday the 7th, there are 420 arrests and 100 people charged from all the protests after Southpaw.
And the majority of those are white English.
I doubt they're going to be the Muslims that are carrying blades and attacking random white people in cars.
So again, another bit of two-tier policing.
Clear example from this as well, TalkTV decided to do an interview with Nicola Wilcox.
Do you remember the video of the white woman saying to the police, why aren't you arresting them?
Why are you not doing that?
It circulated at the time, it was very famous.
What she'd done is actually she went out to give the police officers ice lollies.
Oh yes, I heard about this this morning.
Yes, and they decided to arrest her for inciting racial hatred.
Well, the scariest thing that I heard about this was, I don't know if you can play any of this clip, but she's explaining how she went to the police and the police told her to go away, go home.
But she'd just come out of her own home and all of the people around her had started to put their hoods up and behave threateningly around her, so she actually couldn't.
Because she didn't want them all to see where she was going so they would know where she lived.
Because they just set fire to a bus so it's likely they could firebomb her home.
It's a completely valid concern.
And then she said she was in the police station for, I think it's about 13 hours.
And at the end of it, they couldn't find anything on her.
But the police officer said, because we've arrested you, we have to charge you.
That's not how that works in this system.
They've made a scapegoat of this woman, who has done nothing wrong, was trying to do the right thing, was trying to prevent the violent rioters from attacking property and people, and so they have charged her with inciting racial hatred, and now she has to do a two-hour racial justice awareness course.
So a struggle session, because she didn't want her own neighborhood burned down.
And because she wanted to help a pair of police officers.
Yes.
Again, the white English who live in these communities are penalised when they don't do anything wrong, but the actual violent rioters, if they are not white, not English, and particularly Muslim, get off scot-free.
Yes, that's the perception of two-tier policing in this country.
Speaking of Muslims that get off scot-free, Manchester Airport.
I'm not going to be able to play this footage.
This is the CCTV footage of when the police officers decided to wrestle two chaps to the ground, because it turns out, as well-done-to-Richard-Tyson Lee Anderson predicted, These chaps started a fight.
And the reason they started the fight, as they're saying in a press conference that's happened the other day, is because their mum was on a plane and was being racially abused by a cruel man on the plane from Kuwait, notably white country.
He was yelling in Arabic as well.
And so They thought that, therefore, because the police wanted to search their mum on the way back, that this was a good excuse to break the nose of a female police officer and start unprovoked fights with armed police officers.
It's like, yeah, the guy that kicked him in the face thought he'd taken his gun so we had to put him out quickly.
He acted bravely.
But instead, before this came out, the local Muslim community, who don't operate on the same sense of justice as you or I, they privilege ethnic and religious solidarity over a sense of fairness and the due impartiality of the law, they turned out to the local police station and decided to agitate outside of it until those two men were released.
And then their lawyer went on the airwaves and decided to use exaggerated claims saying it was an attempted assassination.
Bear in mind their lawyer, their former lawyer now, Ahmed Yacoub, was an independent Gaza Islamic candidate in Birmingham.
And after all of this, they then have the Gaul, because the men still haven't been charged by the way, The CCTV's out.
We saw that they did wrong.
We saw they were the provocateurs.
We saw that they broke a policewoman's nose.
They haven't been charged because of community tensions, I'm sure.
They had the gall to go and do a press conference saying that the family have been subject to horrific racist abuse.
They punched a female police officer in the face.
She had lasting injuries.
Why are these two men allowed to do this?
Allowed to host this show trial as ambassadors of a community not subject to the same law as the English community?
Because there's a two-tier.
Again.
Okay, let's go to more recent events before I wrap up.
Richard Tice tweeting out the thugs that intimidated a Sky News reporter by saying Free Palestine, F the EDL, F the Zionists, throwing up his middle finger and gesturing his intent to discharge weapons while other men were loitering around a McDonald's with bladed weapons in full shot and puncturing the tyres of the news van as well.
Well, they couldn't properly puncture the tyres because they still drove away because they're stupid.
Tice points this out and Jess Phillips Not a friend of the show, decidedly.
Decides to use stronger language here than she did when condemning Liz Truss for being interviewed by me.
Sorry, use stronger language to condemn Liz Truss than here.
She just says, oh, it's alright, these Muslims are just showing up to defend their community from the EDL.
So it's fine for them to carry bladed weapons, it's fine for them to intimidate female reporters, just because of this phantom threat of the EDL that never materialises.
It's incredible, there's something implicit in this statement, is that if you send Muslims anywhere, they are guaranteed and expected to show up with weapons and begin shouting abuse at women.
Interesting perspective to take, Jess.
Well, gathering from her acceptance speech on election night where she was heckled and harassed by those men, nondescript men, idiots, it would be fair to assess that.
Yeah, it's just Jess doesn't want to admit the problem because these are a large number of her constituents and she's hanging onto her seat by a very thin margin.
It's almost like you imported this problem and this is of your own making.
The whole thing here is really interesting because they didn't want the good word that the mainstream media was putting on for them.
So, for instance, she's trying to, in a way, put in a good word.
Run cover.
Yeah, and they went out and they completely hijacked what was happening.
Shouting about, you know, Palestine.
It's almost like they have really poor impulse control for some reason.
And then they went to slash the tires of the Sky News van.
Yeah, because they're barbarians and it's really dishonest for media and politicians to run cover for that.
But they're only running cover because they're Islamic and not white.
And so there is a two-tier happening here.
I'll speed through the last bits just to go through it.
This happened yesterday.
You can go and watch the clip in your own time.
I got invited on to GB News and a former Labour MP and Member of European Parliament, Sean Simon, Denied that these were happening.
Then he was played the video evidence of the Muslims attacking the pub, the Swan in Birmingham.
And then he said, it's not happening at scale.
And then more instances were played.
And then he said, don't worry, though, I read a book by a police officer that said, of course, policing is always in tears, because you can't police everything exactly the same.
So it's not happening.
It is happening, but not enough.
It is happening, and it's a good thing that it's happening.
Glad that we've caught up on this dialectic.
He also denied the English existed, so that's how- But the Welsh, the Scottish, and the Irish do, presumably?
And the Palestinians, clearly.
Do the Cornish exist in this framework?
I'm confused.
They want independence as well, don't they?
Um, to get on Josh's good side, I'll say no.
Oh, okay, that's good.
And then, this is- okay, again, more blatant examples.
Muslim counter-protesters are going up to the police and the police are saying, don't worry, we are here to protect you.
That is the message they have received from Keir Starmer, who stood up and gave an address to the nation twice, not because of the Southport stabbings.
This is really important.
He didn't feel the need to show verbal solidarity with the grieving parents.
Instead, he got up twice to blame the far right and dedicate 28 million to round-the-clock protection for mosques, while taking away the winter fuel allowance for the pensioners that voted for him.
And this has alienated even my Boomer grandparents, who decided, against all sense to still vote Labour.
Very unwise.
And then there was this as well.
A police liaison, a sort of community support officer, told a bunch of Muslims who were armed at the time to discard your weapons at the mosque.
One, rendering the local mosque a kind of armoury, but two, if the EDL really were still existing, do you think a white police officer would have gone up to them and said, look lads, I know you've got bricks and bats, drop them off at Tommy Robinson's house and come collect them later?
No.
They know there is a community here that does not respect the rule of law.
Now, let's contrast this to the St.
George's Day Parade, where some passing moron decided to throw a pint towards the police, and so they decided to kettle everyone in, drive police horses through the crowd where children were present, and crack heads with batons.
Just because a few football lads were gathering and one of them, one of them got particularly rowdy.
And there was an on-the-ground perspective from Charlie Sampson, a friend of mine.
He was interviewed by New Culture Forum.
You can go and see that in your own time.
Recommend listening.
And also contrast it to how these people are going to be locked up.
So all of these people that have been censored, the hundred, probably going to get expedited prison time.
The court's going to work round the clock to lock them up, right?
What about the prison space?
Because apparently, 88,225 people are in prison in England and Wales, so there's less than 700 places remaining.
Well, as we mentioned before, Keir Starmer's doing his best Bane impression by letting all the inmates of Arkham Asylum out, because he's letting people out that have served only 40% of their sentence.
So that's up to 40,000 convicts to be released early.
Don't worry, no sexual abusers or domestic abusers, just literal murderers.
mother, a teenage boy killed in a machete attack.
This is Gordon Gault.
He's 14.
Poor lad here, right?
He was in hospital for about nine days.
Was killed by these two enterprising chaps.
Their names are Lawson Natty, and the other one is down here somewhere.
Carlos Nito.
Ah, yes, really enriching the country by being here.
He's a little bit more than He, Gordon Gulp, died in Newcastle in November 2022, and at the trial they were convicted of manslaughter and unlawful wounding.
Neto was jailed for nine years and two months.
Natty was only handed two years and eight months after their sentencing hearing in March.
And Natty, the chap at the top here, With the dead-eyed scare of a horse on us.
With the trustable face.
Yeah, quite.
This is the face of diverse and multicultural Britain.
He's going to be let out over this weekend.
After killing your 14-year-old boy.
For completely no reason whatsoever.
Basically being given a pat on the back and saying, good job, let's get back out of there.
To ensure we can lock up more English people, specifically.
Because they're not policing the Muslim rights, they're denying they exist.
What's the next thing that you could do after this to do more to condone, essentially, what he did?
And say we don't punish you for these things.
Give him a medal?
Yeah, they basically go, oh, one Englishman down, good job!
Yeah, which he'll then melt down to fashion into a new machete to have a duel in Southend, I suppose.
Don't worry, Ministry of Justice spokesperson has told MailOnline that any violent offender with a sentence under four years will be eligible for early release.
Oh thank God.
There's more of them.
They're celebrating this.
All of these sentences for some people are just ridiculously low.
Yes.
You should be not only spending life in prison, I would advocate bringing back the death penalty for murderers like this.
But the Labour Party think they should be out on the street and instead people caught up in the protests for immigration, even if they weren't violent, Should be locked up.
Even if they were inciting it online, which will include presumably Tommy Robinson, who's abroad and said don't go to these protests, and Nigel Farage.
And maybe us, we're under the eye of Saron.
And this is why, to finish off and dovetail perfectly into your segment, Seleos, Keir Starmer has lost narrative control because now Elon Musk is using the term two-tier Keir.
Yes, there is a two-tier justice system in the UK.
It's reflected in the media, by politicians, and by the police.
And this is why the riots will continue, sadly.
Again, we don't condone them.
But they will probably continue, because now, not only are the Muslim community not listening to the police as an authority on the law, but the British people have also lost complete trust in the police to serve their interests and apply the law fairly.
Get back to applying the law fairly, and it might well stop.
Right, can I have the... I think we have some Rumble... We do have some Rumble rants.
So, Binary Surfer sent a link, but we can't really look at that because we don't know what it is.
Thank you for sending it, though.
Thank you for sending us money, Binary.
Yes, thank you.
And he's saying it's more than 30% of Riot trained officers.
It's more like 50%.
I'm sure there's a source there.
We'll see the reporting after that happens later on tonight.
Caleb Knight is saying, This kid bought a Quran.
I got a Bible for free at my local church.
Is it different for Muslims?
Um, no, they do hand out lots of copies of the Quran free on street corners these days because they get a lot of funding from charities to assist with spreading the word.
It's just, this kid just bought it on Amazon.
Just follow the wailing Arabic noises coming from a cheap speaker and you'll find them.
Yeah, chaos is fun.
I must commend Connor.
Thank you, appreciate it.
I know I wouldn't be as restrained in my actions in the face of commie belligerence and stupidity.
If you're referencing GB News last night, Yeah, that man was so stupid he bent light.
It's really impressive to be in the presence of this.
And the last one from Binary Surfer again... I don't think I can read that.
What does it say?
My screen's off.
What does it say?
We've got to be careful these days.
Sorry, you've got to be careful.
Stelios, take it away.
I have been blurred, so I can't start.
You've been censored.
Oh, don't start.
Something's happened.
Stelios has been censored.
No, that's not right.
Nothing ever happens.
One thing to say to the chat, I really want to thank you because this is a very painful day for me.
I have an issue with my ear that is particularly painful.
And I must say that some of the comments that I've seen on the chat are really funny.
You're making up my day.
Pardon?
What?
Huh?
What?
Huh?
What?
It's the other ear.
I've got to practice the dad jokes.
I'm going to catch up with Harriet.
It's the other ear.
I'm not even deaf.
I'm just rude.
I just ignore you.
It comes from being with the North of London.
Yeah.
Where am I now?
You see, I'm not here.
I disappeared.
What, are you still blurred?
We're silencing immigrant voices, ladies and gentlemen.
No, it's all right.
We're catching up.
Apparently we're fine.
We fine?
No, Stelios is now an anonymous contributor to the podcast.
Welcome to the Boomer Tech of the Lotuses.
To be fair, I am starting my show slightly later, so if we have to spend an extra few minutes for comments, we're okay.
Yeah, we've got a bit of time.
Everything's going wrong.
Quick, apply the voice changer.
Samson's face is in the hole underneath his desk.
He looks like a CCHQ intern under there.
Even our tech is getting worse.
There's Turks in the walls, clearly.
Okay, the walls have stopped speaking Turkish.
Stelios can get on with his segment.
It's very warm in here as well.
Has Mr. Samson fixed it?
Right, okay.
Gremlin's chewing through the wires.
Yes, I think, Samson, we need to go to the next segment on the screen.
So, seen any good movies lately, anyone?
I thought I'd seen one but then we talked about it for an hour and I realised.
Oh yeah, look out for the Deadpool and Wolverine review coming out soon.
Anyway.
Right, so Elon Musk has decided to comment about English politics because the situation in England right now is so bad that people just cannot ignore it.
It is just so bad and so dystopian and we have both the Labour government and the mainstream media who are basically circulating their narrative that they're literally trying to tell us to disbelieve our own eyes.
They tell us, for instance, that there's no two-tier policing, that somehow all this is just and humane, and basically we have a society where we have gangs of people with bikes and machetes and stuff going out, and a whole establishment that is basically saying, that wasn't self-defense.
That's a huge problem and Elon Musk started talking about it.
He went after Keir Starmer and this exchange is a bit is also a bit funny.
It's bittersweet because it's a bit funny in some cases, but it's also bittersweet because the reality is horrible.
Well, the good thing is that Elon Musk is the world's largest platform, exempting maybe Donald Trump, if Trump got back on X, and he is now cementing the narrative that Keir Starmer is applying the law in a naked and preferential and partisan faction.
in the discourse.
Keir Starmer cannot shake the nickname two-tier care now that Elon Musk has used it.
And he waded into, which you were covering diligently at the time, the Parnell Square protests in Ireland and put on steroids the Irish nationalist narrative that our government is oppressing us.
We didn't consent to mass immigration.
They're trying to censor us and they're trying to change the constitution to make us less like Ireland.
And that toppled the T-shock.
Immigration still doesn't stop.
There's still a way to go.
But Elon Musk really helped in that situation.
So we're glad he's helping now.
So we have this summary from X here that is a bit funny because it says Elon Musk has publicly criticized Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister of the UK, on social media accusing him of creating a two-tier society and questioning his policies.
I think that the two-tier society has been going along for some time and we have been saying so because essentially it's wokeness and the Tory government was trying to outwoke the woke but Keir Starmer came back and says I'm the wokest of the woke.
And we have here, this has sparked a wide range of reactions, with some users expressing support for Musk's stance, and others criticizing it as trolling or an attempt to gain popularity.
Ah, Elon Musk, lacking popularity.
Yes, the next thing we're gonna be told is that he lacks money.
Yeah, exactly, so absurd.
Right, so here we have...
Elon Musk's talking about a clip from Andy Ngo.
He's tagging Keir Starman.
He says, why aren't all communities protected in Britain?
And he also replies with a hashtag to Tia Keir.
And this had just this thing had 5.7 million views and essentially it got trending.
Now, what is interesting here is that one of the most blatant, one of the most evident evidence for one of the most evident examples of the two-tier policing and the two-tier society and the two-tier rhetoric is that the reaction that Keir Starmer had with the BLM riots and the reaction that he has now.
And if you remember when the BLM riots were ongoing, there were people who were saying on the one hand, we should only chant Black Lives Matter, and other people were saying, no, we should Chant, all lives matter, and that should be the principle of legislation.
Well, that was racist.
That was very racist.
And apparently, Elon Musk is very racist because he's asking, why aren't all communities protected?
And Kia Starmer did the unthinkable.
As far as law enforcement is concerned, the last thing that a statesman should do is take sides in advance between rival communities.
Well I think I can briefly explain why he doesn't want to protect these communities.
It's because they see Britain as a propositional nation rather than an old world nation so they think Britain is a set of values you consent to and they set themselves as the only people that can define those values.
This is why the chap last night said that the English do not exist because we don't do it this way anymore because we've had newcomers so we've redefined what English means and so they see the far right As not English because they don't assent to multicultural, liberal, secular British values.
But they somehow think that the Muslims do because they think that they can just give them enough youth clubs and even the most ardent jihadian will fold into the melting pot.
And so they're trying to define the far right out of existence.
Well, I think there's a part of this as well, which is to do with international legalisms, which is that if you are a particular ethnic group that can be claimed to be indigenous, then you actually have rights under the UN.
There's the UN Indigenous Rights Act, or whatever it's called, that gives you particular rights specifically against some kind of ethnic or cultural genocide.
And if you go back to 2009, there was a parliamentary debate on whether there is any sort of legitimacy to the idea that there is a native British And they outright denied it and denied the English and the British any sort of indigenous status.
And I think that's part of the reason why is that the people in charge don't want us to have rights.
We have here Elon Musk quote tweeting Kevin Sorbo who is talking about the sentences that some people have had and you will see also Elon Musk is using the platform to talk about the grooming gangs that isn't talked as much as it should be talked.
I don't know if it is even discussed in mainstream media.
Uh, the last time it got proper coverage was GB News because Charlie Peter's excellent documentary on it, and that was about a year and a half ago.
Samantha Smith, who was one of the victims of the Telford grooming gangs, did an interview on GB News a while ago.
She attached this to Elon Musk's tweet and it got millions of views, but most people don't want to admit it because it indicts the establishment for importing A community of people with ethnic and cultural hostilities that all covered up for one another.
Because, as Karl's used the example before, if any of you lads knew someone who said, oh, I've got this underage girl tied up at my apartment, do you want to come and have a go?
We would not only call the police, we'd Kick the crap out of him to ensure the girl was safe.
I don't know anyone that I could call up and say, they go, yeah, I'll do that.
But they knew a lot of people that would do that.
The whole community did.
Yeah, the whole community knew that it was happening.
All of the testimony that you read regarding all of this is that, yeah, the whole community knew, the mothers of these people knew, and they thought that it was appropriate because these people were, what's the term that they use for basically religious outsiders?
Oh, uh, kafir.
Kafir, yes.
There's one thing I'm curious about, Elon Musk's promoting all of this, and I know that people consider Elon Musk to be a globalist, and obviously he does want to reach Mars and all sorts, but on Twitter recently I'm sure he responded to somebody mentioning that he was South African, assuming that he was ancestrally Dutch, and he said that he's actually ancestrally British, English.
So I wonder if this is just a part of him seeing what is essentially his homeland,
going to absolute pot and there's a there's a there's a bit something in his blood is telling him ancestral memory is telling him i need to speak about this yes the the saxon has learned to hate Elon Musk so this he is quote tweeting Keir Starmer again and he's asking is this still happening and he's also using community notes to use twitter and show that twitter has a lot of mechanisms of in a connection now community notes generally speaking is good Yes.
I've seen some really bad community notes.
But you can downvote them if they're inaccurate.
Yeah, but you can.
And I think, generally speaking, it functions really well.
And he's showing here the respective sentences that some people have had.
And they say here, left guy, Sean Tuck, jailed for 15 weeks after posting racist abuse online.
Middle guy, Sam Melia, jailed after a series of stickering incidents.
The right guy, and he had 24 months in prison, and the person on the right, Hamouda Al-Souaimi, jailed for two years, suspended for two years, with 180 hours unpaid work.
That's the only unpaid work or paid work he's ever done in his life.
That's the only work he's ever done, I assure you.
Repeatedly raped a 12-year-old girl.
That was the sentence.
So this is just obviously something that shows that these sentences weren't particularly well considered.
They weren't fair.
Yeah, so not only Kiyosama, but also the mainstream media are being targeted by Elon Musk.
Here we have Leo Kurz, who is talking.
Good lad.
Who is basically quote-tweeting Elon and says he's doing a good job of holding the government to account.
And he's doing a better job than the entirety of UK media.
And Elon Musk responds to him, why does the UK media, with a few exceptions, just parrot the government?
And basically he's telling them that without a written constitution, UK media companies are vulnerable to state prescription censorship by Ofcom, the state regulator for broadcasters.
So Ofcom mandates that you can and can't cover certain topics, and you always have to have some left-wing midwit on your panel at all times to provide balance.
So it creates jobs for their friends.
Exactly.
So what he is doing, he is basically shattering the multiculturalist illusion of The labor government.
And I will say this, because it's particularly important, because it is directly relevant to all the unfortunate cases that we have been discussing, is that multiculturalism is not a push for integrationism.
Multiculturalism is the exact opposite.
It says, no, people shouldn't assimilate, people shouldn't integrate, people should practice their different cultures.
So, this multiculturalist creed literally says that for individuals to be respected, their cultures have to be respected as well.
And when people are recreating multiculturalist tropes, in a very abstract sense, they never pose to think Whether the cultures that we're talking about are compatible or not with the host culture.
And I think that especially when we're talking about the grooming gangs, when we're talking about these very tragic cases, and the people who were complicit into it, or the people who were silent about it, or because they thought that, well, that's how it's been going on here.
That's part of the culture that seems to be a bit incompatible with Western culture.
And that's putting it politely.
Yeah, I want to be polite because I'm a polite person.
So we had a lot of criticism, a lot of interesting points that were being made.
And again, that's a polite claim.
We have Piers Morgan here who does the unthinkable.
He basically accuses Elon Musk for one-sidedness, as if we don't have enough one-sidedness from the mainstream media.
Yeah, but the thing is, Piers Morgan will pretend to have had our opinion in about six months' time, and to have always had that opinion, just like he did when he was supporting mandatory vaccinations, just like he did when he was supporting lockdown, despite him going out of the country and going on holiday, and supporting his son going to BLM marches.
The man is a hypocrite with zero wrinkles on his brain.
Glad you've got our back, Piers.
six months from now.
We have Aaron Bastani here, who is basically making a series of claims about X.
And Aaron Bastani and a lot of other leftists are creating a narrative that essentially leads down to calls to censor X, either entirely or temporarily.
But I will criticize them because if you really think about it, in principle, what they're saying applies to all kinds of communication, even telecommunications.
So they are gonna use this argument also They can.
It's entirely upon their hand to say that, well, we should stop telecommunications because people who phone each other can spread disinformation.
Well, if people have other people to talk to or other sources of media to consult, who's going to watch Novara Media unless they're being forced to?
Yeah, but who wants freedom of assembly when you want basically absolute power to promote your woke multiculturalist agenda?
It's a threat, people assembling and possibly representing a united front against you that guards against the potential for the abuse of power on your part.
Yeah, that's not something you want if you go after absolute power.
So he also says, this man has clearly lost his mind.
The government needs to relearn the majesty of the state.
Understand that they're invested with extraordinary democratic power.
Sorry, is Aaron Bastani a monarchist or average communist?
The majesty of the state!
And put OICs like this in the place.
Musk is cheering on a civil war in our country.
This is not a joke.
He's predicting it.
Now let me say one thing.
I think that this is basically unacceptable coming from Aaron Bastani because he is actually doing what I've seen in a lot of classes in universities doing.
He's playing the woke card of students, first-year undergraduates who think they're smart and they're actually stupid.
And they're basically, what they're doing is they're interpreting everything in the worst possible way.
And the disaster we're living right now is precisely what this has led to.
People who rush to say that any kind of warning is a threat.
It's not a threat if you're saying that what you're doing is unsustainable.
It's not a threat.
Let the man cook.
Yeah, so when Civil War says, Civil War is inevitable, when Elon Musk says this, He's not cheering.
He's not cheering at all.
He's warning that you ideologues need to wake up.
Listen to the people.
You don't know better.
You are supposed to serve the people.
The people are not supposed to serve you.
Now, we have here Rory Stewart.
He is asking Elon Musk when he's... Elon Musk is asking Keir Starmer, shouldn't you be concerned about attack on all communities?
And he says, Seriously, since when have you claimed to understand British communities or British politics?
Exactly how many days have you spent with these communities?
Does it ever occur to you that this might perhaps be the wrong time to sound off about a subject you know nothing about?
Screenshot this and any time Rory Stewart puts out a tweet about anything, just reply with it because Rory Stewart is a towering, thundering midwit who misjudged the room so profoundly he got kicked out of the Conservative Party while trying to run a leadership campaign and has spent the last few years counter-signalling any return to right-wing policy to the extent where he said he might vote Green.
Well, did he vote Green or Lib Dem in the last election?
He said his hand's hovering over Labour and then recently said, I'm ready to work for a Labour government.
So he's just grifting his way into a job for the uniparty consensus.
Well, so he claims to understand British communities and British politics, but have Has he actually understood a lot of the grievances of the English community?
I don't think so, because he co-hosts a podcast with Alastair Campbell, whose lies and dirty dossier got us involved in the Iraq War, so I don't think Roy Stewart's particularly in touch with how the British feel.
Let's go to the next censorious person, let me say.
Paul Mason, he says, HMG needs to enact the full Online Safety Act now.
No more consultations.
They should call the two executives of UK Twitter in to explain why the CEO is personally boosting hate speech, incitement and disinformation.
And pull the plug on the service unless this stops.
I'd be happy to lose this service and see Telegram blocked as well, if it avoids a serious breakdown of the rule of law this weekend.
Bear in mind, in 2011, he wrote a book saying that riots are good.
Yeah, and also, Conor, I want to ask you something, because I know you're really switched on.
Wait, did he actually?
Sorry.
Yes.
I know both of you are really switched on on this.
this.
This was posted in August 6.
Was it by then, was there another figure from the left-wing circles who had circulated disinformation?
Which one?
Oh, the hideous communist goblin that is Nick Lowell.
And endangered people's lives, and Paul Mason doesn't seem to be particularly asking for And they're close to be asked about?
Well, Stelios, Stelios, when they do it, it's malicious misinformation.
When we do it, it's an honest mistake.
Yeah, so Jessica Simo here is essentially saying X needs to be closed down.
Switch X off then!
Put your phone down!
Step outside and touch grass!
And she quote tweets as if, you know, there is no debate to be had about it, there is no argument.
She basically quote tweets Elon Musk's tweet, why aren't all communities protected in Britain, who is also quote tweeting, Andy knows Video evidence?
Video evidence that exactly what he says is exactly what happens there.
No, we can't have people believing in their own eyes.
In order to report things you need to have a sort of, you need degrees, you need 20 years of accreditation.
You need the mandate of heaven.
Yeah, without these you can't talk about facts and you cannot even show them because people might get the wrong impression.
That's incredible though, all he's asking is a very simple question which everybody can see is a very pertinent one, is very relevant.
Yeah, these communities are policed differently.
Her response to that is not to even try to come up with an answer, it's shut it down.
That's the only response.
Here we have another member, I think it's a knight, Sir Tom Windsor.
So, Sir Tom says, facing losing both the fortunes and the liberty concentrates the mind like nothing else at all.
Sir Tom Windsor reiterates his call for criminal liability for social managers of social media companies if their platform is not policing harmful content.
Curiosity wasn't doing this for the decades that child sexual exploitation material was running rife on Meta and Twitter.
That would have been a perfectly fine thing to hold their feet to the fire over, but no!
Now that people are noticing patterns about armed Muslim militias roaming around that the government doesn't want to police, now Elon Musk should be held accountable for it.
Well, if we know anything about the communities that are being criticised in all of this, Suggests that maybe the child sexual exploitation isn't so much of a priority, isn't so much of a concern with these people.
It certainly wasn't for the police covering up the grooming gangs, you're right.
And there's another thing I found here, because I must confess, I really like some legalisms, they keep the mind sharp.
So he's talking about criminal liability.
Has there been any case here?
Has there been any court that has any judge that has decided this individual here and this individual there who are the CEOs of social media companies are actually guilty in the eyes of law and therefore have criminal liability?
No, magically not.
Magically not.
As far as I'm aware, the most they could do is if they really extended, as Paul Mason was suggesting to do, the Ofcom's authority using the online safety bill, is that they would be subject to regulations that they could then be fined for, but that's still not criminal liability.
Is it not perfect when the people who are talking about how the system and progress How progress should be upheld and how progress should continue and how the West should survive against those far-right thugs are essentially disrespecting the basic institution of the West that is the presumption of innocence.
And you can't talk about people in these terms without them having been convicted in a court of law.
Just one question for that.
There's another interesting tweet that Karl has responded by Zara Sultana, who writes, I've said it before and I'll say it again, the enemy of the working class travels by private jet, not migrant dinghy.
Quick thing as well, she's currently suspended from the Labour Party for voting against Keir Starmer, so the fact that she still has Labour MP in her bio is factually inaccurate.
But also it shows how strong grip progressivism has in her party.
And that's why she wants to play the card.
But what if the man traveling by private jet gains by having the man in Migrant Dingney come over?
What if he runs Serco, for example?
But the interesting thing is, it's not just progressivism.
I think this is important.
I'm not disagreeing with you, Stelios.
Progressivism has taken root in the Labour Party so that they allow MPs like Zahra Sultana to be in it.
But Zahra Sultana is not making a principled stance about liberal universalism when she's talking about progressivism.
Neither was Hamza Yousaf making a really nuanced point when he decried all of Scotland for being white.
They just have anti-white race hatred.
And everything else is misaddressed.
So that needs to be pointed out.
So it's the rhetoric of the two-tier system.
It's Radio Rwanda.
And Carl has a brilliant response.
The enemy of the working class systematically rapes his daughters and beats his son while being covered for by the police and politicians.
And I want to end with this very chilling Claim.
And I want to say, look at the very sensitive way she is talking about it, where she's just trying to show us that she cares about the emotions of the audience, and she doesn't want to upset anyone's emotions, and all these, you know, sensitivity nonsense.
Look at what she is actually saying.
Click it again.
I think so.
I think so.
I think we should stop it.
It's only a temporary measure in order to limit the spread of inflammatory information, misinformation as well, across the United Kingdom at this point.
And I think we should focus on keeping people safe and communities safe as well.
So my point is just to... So essentially she calls for the banning of Twitter.
Only a temporary measure is what we said at the start of the lockdowns that were two years.
There's nothing more permanent than temporary government measures.
But what is really interesting here to note is that the same argument can be used for telecommunications.
The same argument can be used for freedom of assembly.
But what is different here?
Is that essentially they really are authoritarians, they really are after people's liberties, and they have worked for decades how they're going to present this.
I find this unbelievably chilling.
People should call it out.
That's the destruction of the West.
It's not progress, that's regress.
And Elon Musk needs to keep hammering on this, because we are now relying on him as an ally to keep the free movement of information around the UK, because the government are just denying that there are Muslim gangs patrolling around the country for white people.
And that's a real thing that's happening.
Exactly.
And one key difference is that anyone who posts on X They have their posts there for the people to see.
There are community notes.
Nothing of the sort occurs in any other platform.
Not in any other platform, but when it comes to telecommunications or freedom of assembly.
They're not public.
And what I want to say is that X and these platforms, they're good for people to know because I'm pro-free speech.
Okay, I'm not a free speech absolutist, but I'm pro free speech because I want people to know what people are saying.
Even if it's hideous, I want people to be able to point out and say, Destiny, for instance, said this absolutely hideous thing.
You need to be prepared.
You need to be vigilant.
There are people out there like Destiny who is saying absolutely hideous thing.
While sat on the corner.
Exactly.
In a hotel room.
This is habituating people into actually being concerned citizens and that is what they're having because wokeness is all about destroying civil society, demonizing civil society and creating a vast state without sufficient checks to its powers.
Excellent, I'll do the Rumble Rants.
Chain Toker says... Can I have a mouse, please?
Thank you.
Yes, there you go, Harry.
Did the mice work?
That one does work.
Caleb Knight.
Ah, Big Brother is reaching for his lost toy, quite.
They've lost grip over the narrative and they're desperately scrambling to get it back.
Trent Roberts says Aaron Bastani is a grifter.
I think he's actually just a bit dim.
He's also audience captured.
Aaron confuses me because every so often he'll come out with something really sensible.
I mean, it's something that should be obvious to anyone, like walking around a town where all of the shops are closed in the middle of the day and there's only a few, you know, vape shops and things open and going, man, Britain's not what it used to be, is it?
Someone should do something about this.
And then he comes out with everything else that he speaks of.
It must be austerity, he says, as milling Somalians drift past him like the walking dead.
I had a conversation with Aaron at GB News once, and I invited him on the show, and he said, oh no, they'd kill me, and I went, no, our audience would be fine with it, and he went, no, mine.
The audience captured.
Aaron's audience captured.
Oh, and Trent Roberts.
You should invite YouTuber Tick History for a future interview he'd make for a great discussion.
Bo has invited him before and he's decided not to accept.
I don't know.
Was there any reason given or is that private?
I don't know.
I don't know what the reason given was.
That's a shame.
I don't always agree with his takes.
I think his take on Gnosticism was dreadful and I think it was really good.
I've not read his take on Gnosticism.
Who are you talking about?
Tick History.
Well, I think the reason that somebody is saying is because he released a video the other day that's slightly over an hour long.
I still need to watch it.
Is this the open letter to Keir Starmer?
Yeah, because he's from Southport.
He might even still be living there.
So I'm very interested in watching that because it'll be good to get an on-the-ground take.
Well, I'm getting an on-the-ground take later from the actual protest, but it'd be good to get someone from the area.
And so, I mean, the invitation remains open.
I think Beau's still happy to speak with him, but perhaps ask him yourself.
Harry.
Alright, yeah, so everything's going to absolute pot in England.
We've got riots, we've got political discord, Elon Musk is worrying that there might be civil war.
America!
is also a country where things are going on right now there is still an election going on over here we're a bit preoccupied right now i thought it'd be good to take a little catch-up of what's going on and see how things are going over there and i looked at the latest polls and was very very shocked to find apparently all of the national polls are suggesting that harris at least in the popular vote is going to be slightly ahead of donald trump now
For someone who only just threw her hat into the race and was previously just a VP and one of the worst VPs ever, because she was under one of the worst presidents ever, was supposedly a border czar whose one policy was border.
What's that?
And now 10 million illegals have come in?
Yeah, and also has one of the most ear-piercingly screechy laughs I've ever heard in my entire life, and has no campaign to speak of.
I'm shocked!
I'm shocked!
A few reasons here.
One, I would probably take the RealClearPolitics polling average over this one because they're generally more accurate.
Well some of the other ones that I've looked at as well, The Economist, The New York Times, a number of other platforms that were putting up the polls seem to all have them either neck and neck or Harris slightly over.
Because lots of them have been oversampling Democrats.
CNN's recent poll that said loads of Trump voters are now switching to Harris was oversampling Democrats.
Exactly, it's ludicrous.
They heard that JD Vance is weird and they said, oh no!
I don't want to vote for a weirdo!
I'm going to vote for...
Kamala Harris.
They saw one TikTok dance and were persuaded.
They listened to Nick Fuentes and went, OMG, she totally brat.
Noted homosexual Nick Fuentes.
Sorry, but lots of them aren't adequately sampling the independents in the swing states, which is the one that she needs to win and Trump is currently leading in.
What is interesting is that less than a month ago, there was an assassination attempt at Donald Trump and almost no one is talking about it.
Yes, well that's another thing as well is that Trump's polls jumped up, they skyrocketed the moment that whole incident occurred, and then all of a sudden flattened back down when Kamala Harris decided to throw her hat in for completely organic and natural reasons, or perhaps this might be a 2016 or Brexit situation where the polls are trying to shape reality rather than the other way around.
Manufacturing incentive, yes.
Yes, but I thought, again, let's take a look.
Why might it be?
Well, Harris has been having to think about who her VP is going to be.
There's been a lot of discussion about who it was.
So far it was going between Governor Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania and Governor Tim Waltz of Minnesota.
Obama had been behind the scenes advising on who they should pick.
Apparently he was good friends with Shapiro.
There was speculation that Nancy Pelosi was also friends with Waltz.
So there might have been some Democratic insider background pushing and pulling going on here and there.
Then, of course, with Democratic politics in America, you've got to consider one major thing.
What is the major thing, given you have a party voter base which is mainly made up of foreigners and insane leftists?
But Josh Shapiro is Jewish.
Yes, Israel-Palestine has to be a huge thing in the considerations of this, or at least a potentially huge thing, or at least they've got to make it sound like they care, because at the end of the day, Democrats being the party of non-white people, let's be honest, that's what they are, that's what most of those communities consider it to be, that's why the black vote in America so consistently goes to the Democrats, they can kind of rely on most of these people to stick around no matter what.
Is what I would say.
So they're going to have the DNC from August 19th to 22nd, and it's going to be held in Chicago, which has the largest Palestinian American community in the entire country.
And people are, unsurprisingly, organizing protests.
There is the Coalition to March on the DNC, composed of more than 150 groups.
They want racial justice, LGBTQ rights, as all Palestinians supposedly do, and migrant justice as well, and dignified jobs.
They basically want everything.
The whole smorgasbord of progressive bollocks.
They want what Tucker Carlson is now calling as well, from Connie Drucker, gay race communism.
They are pushing for gay race communism.
That is woke.
And they are just openly saying it.
This will help people, apparently, somehow.
And it says, given the US is backing Israel, the coalition to march on the DNC decided to make Gaza and Palestine the focus of the two major marches.
There are parts of the Chicago local political structure that's saying, yeah, you can have your protest, but the DNC is here and you can have your protest over here somewhere.
So they're not getting exactly what they want.
They'll be having scraps of the But of course, they point out in this article from The Nation, it doesn't mean all of the organisations pushing material demands beyond the coalition to march on the DNC have the same approach to electoral strategy though.
Meaning, yeah, they're going to vote for Democrat no matter what.
Because they're not going to vote for Trump.
A lot of these communities just will not vote for Trump.
Quickly on the Israel issue, I did find it very interesting when Netanyahu went over and addressed Congress.
He had his meeting with Kamala Harris and his Camp was just leaking to the press.
It was really unproductive and he can't stand her.
And then he flew immediately to go and meet Trump in Mar-a-Lago, like he's addressing the king in exile.
So the Israeli faction, and that means that the foreign policy faction, they're lining up behind Trump.
So if they would have chosen Josh Shapiro, they might have made inroads there, but they clearly can't because their base are a bunch of rabid pro-Palestine people.
Yes, and that seemed to have possibly had a bit of a deciding factor in the choice of who it was going to be, because Josh Shapiro had managed to get himself named Genocide Josh, somehow.
Oh, because of Israel.
Yeah, because of Israel, because he'd condemned campus antisemitism, and because he is Jewish, the Democrat base had started to call him Genocide Josh.
Of course he doesn't want to be attacked on the university campus.
I mean, that makes sense.
Shock.
Either way, Waltz is the guy they picked.
Waltz is the guy that they picked.
And in this forward article, they give a little bit of description of him and his relation to the Israel-Palestine issue.
And he seems to be on that issue a bit of a fence-sitting choice where obviously he's towing the Democratic line and saying we will support them.
But also maybe let's tone down a little bit of the rhetoric because our base are a bunch of insane people.
Also, by the way, I'm Tim Waltz.
I'm insane as well, by the way, as we'll get into in a moment.
He has a popularity because of his Midwestern battleground state because he's Minnesota governor and has many friends in Congress.
He was named freshman class president after being elected in 2006.
He served there until 2019 when he was sworn in as Minnesota's governor, re-elected in 2022, and has steered Minnesota toward, guess what, liberal policies including guaranteeing abortion rights, requiring paid family leave, and incentivizing affordable housing.
I remember something happening in Minnesota around 2020.
Something fiery but mostly peaceful.
He didn't do much.
No, no.
He didn't do much.
I think Connor should continue because I have something to add.
Well I remember money being taken away from police officers in Minnesota and money via Kamala Harris in the form of donations being given to criminal perpetrators like Jacob Blake who she visited in hospital after he tried to stab police officers after violating restraining order for digitally raping a woman.
Why did they not mention his record on the BLM riots there?
That's curious.
Well, because they're also... The Forward is a leftist publication, so of course they're also vastly in favour of gay race communism, as Tim Waltz is.
Which is strange, considering it's a Jewish outlet.
You would have thought that some of the liberal Jews would have understood by now.
They are a progressive Jewish outlet.
Yeah, you would have thought some of them would have understood by now that mass importing anti-Semitic people from abroad might put their lives No, the Forward are one of the ones that cheer all of that up.
Which is demented, I mean... The Forward have an incredible article saying that the way to get past white supremacy is to forge a Jewish-Muslim alliance, and that's not going to go well, guys, I'm just going to say.
Interestingly enough, I have a lot to offer here.
That's what's interesting.
So, his wife said something really interesting about the BLM riots.
Oh, go on, go on.
She said, I could smell the burning tires, so I left the windows open.
What?
Yeah, yeah.
So she was almost getting some kind of thrilling glee.
Are you sure that's not Winnie Mandela's quote?
No, it's from Ann Wokeness.
We can post it afterwards if you want.
Yes, tell us if you want to send that to the studio.
I will send, yes.
Let me send it to Samson.
This is really funny in a way because it shows a lot of the ideological I'm sure Greta Thunberg is very upset about that.
Yeah, Samson, could we open this, please?
Oh yeah, but, um, Waltz is also notable for one other thing, which is that he's the one... I sent you a link, could we please open it?
He's the one that branded that Trump and JD Vance were... weird.
Oh, please don't use this word.
If you tell me I'm weird, I'm gonna melt.
You're weird, Stelios.
This is the party who believe that men can give birth, right?
Presumably, yes.
I mean, I've seen a photograph of his personal advisor, who is, shall we say, somewhat butch in that dress.
Right.
Quick thing, Samson, the mic's still on, by the way.
Yeah, we can hear ourselves echoing.
I do love listening to my own voice, but you know.
We know.
Yeah, let's take a look at this clip here that Stelios has linked for us.
Do you mind if I press play on here?
Click, click.
I would say those first days, you know, when there were riots, I could smell the burning tires.
And, um, That was a very real thing and I kept the windows open for as long as I could because I felt like that was such a touchstone of what was happening.
Wow, I bet you could smell that.
Bloody hell.
This reminds me of two things.
First of all, it's like a sort of goddess to which people are burning their offerings, and she opens the window.
Yeah, let me receive it.
She breathes it all.
She's just huffing the fumes like Charlie in It's Always Sunny.
And also, it reminds me of Ed Harris's character in Westworld, where he was saying, I want something true.
I just think she looks like a Hillary Clinton action figure.
Yeah, she looks like the bargain bin Hillary Clinton, you're right.
But yeah, Waltz called them weird, which is apparently an insult if you're 12 and a girl.
But apparently this was the democratic mandate, this was the new strategy.
They went, we've caught something good there boys, let's go in for the kill.
We've got blood in the water, time to strike the finishing blow.
And here's our nuclear czar, who is a bald man who steals women's luggage.
Maybe this is, maybe this is what caused these new polls.
Maybe people went, I don't know, he's kind of weird.
He's kind of weird.
Maybe there's a point to that.
Uh, but yeah, but I wonder, I wonder if, uh, literally because of the fact that he chose, like he came up with that whole weird thing, which they then took and ran with, if that's one of the big reasons that they chose him.
If so, congratulations, DNC, you are insane.
Played yourselves.
You are idiots.
That's exactly what wokeness is about.
People can't argue.
Yeah, retarded people.
Yes, but I think it's also obviously to do with the fact that, according to another article here, Democrats are hoping that Waltz's down-to-earth background and his rural nature will win over voters in swing states in the Midwestern region, particularly Wisconsin, Michigan, and I think it's also an attempt to counteract the fact that JD Vance is working-class Appalachian who pulled himself up.
So they want to also have their kind of folksy Folksy guy.
Are you alright, Stelios?
Or has your power levels exceeded the video wall behind you?
I don't know.
Maybe it has something to do with the fires from the BLM riots.
Stelios is manifesting his mutant powers today.
He's just shutting off cameras remotely.
You've overloaded it.
It's the offerings from the BLM riots that are interfering with the screen behind me.
Very impressive.
Also, people are going on about the fact that about 30 years ago he got caught in a DUI driving 96 down a 55 zone.
So this is the guy who will have, if he gets selected in alongside Harris on the ticket, quite a lot of power.
No wonder he wants to defund the police.
Quite a lot of responsibility.
He was just in a haste.
It was just hasty.
You could run on a libertarian ticket with that kind of record.
Oh yeah, I also wasn't wearing my seatbelt.
The state can't keep me down.
And of course he's a socialist, self-admitted, as you would expect.
There's this clip from a recent interview.
We can get out there.
Reach out.
Make the case.
And for one thing, don't ever shy away from our progressive values.
One person's socialism is another person's neighborliness.
That's why socialists are hellbent on destroying every neighborhood in the West.
Yeah, that's why every single Marxist text calls for the entire genocide of the bourgeois class.
Chas, chop, exercises in neighborliness, okay?
Especially the murders and the rapes.
There could be neighbors here.
I hate neighbors.
And, uh, what's the campaign against Trump doing?
Well, it's continuing to stumble on and pratfalling every so often, as it's expected to do.
Did you see Ben Stiller say he's gonna donate, what was it, 150 million to Karl Harris and say, I am ashamed of being a white man?
No, no, he said- He said, I wish I was black.
He said, every Jewish white guy wants to be black, which was- I don't think that's true, Ben.
That's a really weird thing to say.
Eric Kaufman, black man.
Yeah, I mean, obviously.
Clearly.
I mean, I remember when he came in and he tried to fist bump me, took me off guard.
That's not what happened, Stelio Astin.
I was just about to see Sean Astin join this thing as well.
Did you see Nick Offerman singing a song on his acoustic guitar?
He played a gay guy once in The Last of Us.
Well, he's not stopped.
Yeah, he's not stopped.
And of course, the punchline of the song was that Donald Trump is weird.
Aha!
Well, one day, one day it'll work.
It won't be this election cycle, but maybe one day.
Maybe you need a PhD to create a response to this argument.
Clearly I'm not... I'm just not credentialed enough.
That's the sad truth of it.
Of course, the arguments are still going on.
Trump shows his age when he talks about race.
This is in relation to the recent interview that he was doing where he pointed out, rightfully so, that I thought Harris was Indian?
When did she become black?
Shows his age.
They were saying that Biden was cognitively sharp for a good four odd years, when back in 2020 he also said if you don't vote for me you ain't black.
I love this.
They're saying if there's a depth to which the US presidential candidate Trump can't sink to when attacking his opponents, we're yet to see it.
Then they mention that he was born in 1946, two decades before the nationwide lifting of anti-miscegenation laws.
I'm sorry, they're trying to make it sound as though he's an old-school KKK member and that's why, that's the only reason anybody would ever go, hold up, her story's changed.
I like the idea that two-year-old Trump was out in the streets marching against black and white intermarriage by that kind of implication.
Maybe those photos of Little Rock, the guns being pointed, that was at Trump.
They were being pointed at Trump.
It is very very stupid, but of course what he was pointing out in those clips was very reasonable, which is that Kamala Harris is trying to appeal to racial identity politics, woke identity politics, and to do that she's essentially switching identities very fluidly as she goes.
And that she's saying that she's Indian for this campaign, she's black for this campaign, Indian depending on which demographic she's speaking to, black depending on... which is dishonest.
You can't trust her because she is always going to be a liar.
She's a woke chameleon.
Yeah, woke chameleon.
You shouldn't, you shouldn't be trusting this woman and they say, don't ask, don't ask about the contradictions, you're not allowed to ask.
That's their response.
She does say some stuff that are obviously contradictory.
She says, for instance, I want equity, not equality.
And then she goes on and says with equity, we are just giving resources to those who need it.
So we end up with equality of outcome.
So she's a communist.
Yes.
Like her running mate?
Yes.
There you go.
And they're really annoyed at J.D.
Vance.
Oh look, I already would have voted for him if I could.
You don't have to sell him on me.
J.D.
Vance's pure existence as a normal white guy from Appalachia means that he is public enemy number one for woke progressives and they're really furious that he liked Jack Posobek's new book.
Called Unhumans, and it goes on, it says in this article, it's amazing, an anti-democratic screed at the Posobiec Co-Roads with professional ghostwriter Joshua Lysak comes with endorsements from some of the most influential people in Republican politics, including J.D.
Vance.
The book argues that leftists don't deserve the status of human beings, no comment.
That they are, as the title says, un-humans, and that they are waging a shadow war against all that is good and decent, no lies detected.
Hang on, do you remember the Time Magazine piece that literally said the shadow campaign that saved the 2020 election?
Yes, do you remember all of those articles saying that white people shouldn't breed?
Having white children is white supremacy.
That's expression of suppression.
I don't know what that means.
Yeah, that's a two-tier approach, essentially.
They allow some of these voices to say it.
Because if you are a designated victim, you're allowed to say almost anything.
This is true, but J.D.
Vance pointing out that this is basically evil really gets on their nerves, and Trump said, Vance, and it says in here, should fire every single mid-level bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, replace them with our people, and if the courts try to stand in his way, Trump should stand before the country like Andrew Jackson did, and say the Chief Justice has made his ruling, now let him enforce it.
It's so based.
I know, it's excellent.
But I think one of the things the most got on their nerves, the thing that really has got onto their skin, is the childless cat lady comment.
Oh yes.
Because he called them all childless cat ladies.
He just held up a mirror to them.
The country is run by childless cat ladies and this led to articles like this.
I am a cat lady and I vote.
I know, that's the problem.
Like they try and say you're weird, you're weird, but then they proudly display that they are genetic dead ends who are more concerned with their pets than the rest of humanity and expect us to believe that their opinion means anything.
And the very fact that you've got articles like this being written shows that it's really got under their skin.
And I saw something even stranger, even more unusual, which was this.
I mean, look, these are the people calling you weird.
These freaks!
I've changed my mind.
Anne Hathaway wasn't the worst catwoman.
These freaks!
I thought the same thing.
There we go.
For some reason, Connor doesn't like the idea of Anne Hathaway in skintight leather.
She's mid.
Anne Hathaway?
No, she's not mid.
She wasn't, but at least you are seeing the light.
You come closer to the truth.
In comparison to this, I don't think you're saying much.
The debate Conor has in his mind.
When they release Batman 2, this is who they're casting, I hope you know.
You didn't like Zoe Kravitz, this is what you're getting instead.
Let's hear what this woman has to say.
Tell me about this getup.
Well, I'm a childless cat lady that J.D.
Vance wants to pick on and say that our lives don't matter and that we're miserable.
And that's not true, I'm very happy.
Remember her thing is I didn't bully out of a coconut tree?
As we were saying goodbye, she accidentally scratched me.
I love that little addendum there.
Yeah, you're so happy that you felt the need to get dressed in a get-up and go out and protest about the fact that you're absolutely delighted and not at all insulted.
I'm not bothered.
I'm not owned.
I'm not owned.
She turned into a corncob.
Yeah!
So these are the people that you're up against, America.
Actual freaks calling themselves childless cat ladies and dressing up like it.
Meanwhile, they have insane communists on their side, because they are insane communists.
So vote accordingly, I suppose.
Right, may as well run a bit over, considering that we had some technical difficulties and I'm starting my show slightly late.
Samson, do we have any more Rumble chats?
Because the Discord thing is up at the moment.
We do!
Okay.
Citizen Smithy has sent in three superchats, amounting to $8 total, thank you.
First one is, boats, boats, boats, it's nothing to do with racism.
Well, it's not just the small boats, I'm afraid, it's also the mass legal migration, because the Pakistani grooming gangs came here legally, and they still committed crimes, so it's more than just the boats.
Apparently I look like a Viking drinking out of that tankard, but I think he's probably referring to you?
Me?
Yes.
I would assume.
Again.
This is awesome, I can probably fit about three cups of coffee in this thing, so it keeps me going.
Excellent, good stuff.
Video comments, please.
Hello, ladies and gentlemen.
Firstly, I spoke to Samson in the chat last week and made the suggestion of there being an official Lodeseaters Discord for subscribers.
Is such an idea practical?
Secondly, considering the fact that Keir Starmer has announced that the military's Defence Human Intelligence Unit and his new Standing Army for tackling so-called far-right groups will be a permanent fixture, perhaps we should just refer to them by their real name.
The Thingamen.
Um the problem with the discord is that it's a liability because you can't control really who comes in if people invite people and people say all sorts of stuff that we wouldn't stand behind.
We don't want an entire discord of screenshots fed posting to be able to be used to And look, guys, we're still quite a small operation.
Like, we're a team of about 14.
We punch way above our weight.
It would need full-time moderation from a team.
We just don't have the funds or the infrastructure to do that.
I do hope eventually, I have suggested, that we incorporate subscriber-based emotes into the live chat, like a Twitch chat, and those emotes would be of us, and they could be designed.
It's just going to take some time for the web developers to hopefully get that up and running.
So that's hopefully a feature that can keep you guys happy.
But don't worry, we do have an archive of stupid screenshots of our faces for it.
Yeah, thanks for that.
The editors have been keeping them unbeknownst to us for a long time.
On with the next one.
Connor, adding on to a point that you made last week on Tomlinson Talks, I would also say as well that when it comes to things like same-sex marriage, adoption and surrogacy, You're dealing with people who are so spiteful and vindictive that they will ultimately do whatever they can to destroy their enemies from within by corrupting them because they know that what they're doing is going against the Word of God and the Bible.
Yes, I don't think they're all consciously in some sort of demonic revolt.
I think the main point of it is that it's amoralism because they see institutions, sex norms, and the bond between a parent and a child as an instrumental barrier to fulfilling their cosmetic and personal desires.
And I also don't think that cultural arguments can do this.
I think these norms were shaped by laws and the culture was changed by laws.
I think you need to change the law in order to change the culture.
But, point well made.
On with the next one.
You know, it's funny how many people forget the second half of idioms.
Everyone knows it's the early bird that gets the worm, but few remember that it's the second mouse that gets the cheese.
Likewise, everyone's running around saying that nothing ever happens.
Forgetting, of course, is as true right up until everything happens all at once.
You didn't have to be a genius to predict that 2024 would be a gigantic shift in a historical year.
I struggle to think of a single historical precedent where the entire global zeitgeist flipped 180 degrees within the space of a week.
All I know is when the Mad Max apocalypse hits, which will be about next Tuesday at this rate, I will do just fine.
Yeah, can I catch a ride, please?
That's a very cool car.
Nice building a better Batmobile than Robert Pattinson managed to do.
Also, quick thing.
On the Nothing Ever Happens, guys.
Who?
Because I know this is a meme, but I haven't actually seen anyone posting Nothing Ever Happens.
I mainly just see it in replies.
It's mainly a joke that people post.
And also, what is it?
I mean, there's a Lennon quote of all people.
What is it?
History happens over the course of decades, and then sometimes history happens over the course of a single day.
Yes.
Something like, I've probably butchered that, but I think it sums it up well.
I know what you're referring to, yes.
CitizenSmiffy is super chatted in against a great show, guys.
Oh, thank you.
What are you smiling at me like that for, Stelios?
This just reminded me of- You fancy a scrap, is that it?
Every time.
Let's get the next one.
Anyway, on with the next one.
If any of you wanted a reason to go fully off-grid now, let me give you one.
A Lithuanian electrical service, which is fully monopolized by the state, during the exchange of the meters from regular to the smart, have calculated to a whole bunch of people an underpayment in electricity of tens of thousands of euros, which by our prices you would have to spend 30 years trying to get.
Jesus Christ.
Yeah, they're not so smart meters.
that's why i refuse to adopt them again connor well done on the gb news segment yesterday oh thank you good hand of the heiress i think you we don't stelios is gone for the rest of the podcast now yeah please read my yeah good handling of the primordial ooze of a brain let the offcom regulations uh you think is impartiality must have forced gb news to have on yeah thank you very much uh meeting someone that concrete dense is it's like meeting the eighth wonder of the world hector rex
well done to connor for dealing with that proper wanker on gb news calling you a racist as you pointed out the reason for the unrest and the riots Salute.
I also, I've got to say, uh, you did a good job to just say, well, say what you mean.
Say what you mean.
We know what you're saying here right now.
Say it.
Go on.
And you've got it out of him.
And then once he's done that, it deflated.
The whole thing deflated.
He led himself down an intellectual blind alley and was too stupid to understand what he just said because then he turns around and goes, oh, but what if they were Welsh, Scottish, and Irish?
And it's like, Right, okay, so the Welsh are here, Scottish are there, the Irish are there, and there's this big empty space that wasn't occupied until the Windrush showed up.
Brilliant, great idea.
Well, until that John Trumpeteer guy showed up.
Yeah, exactly, yes.
And the English formed.
Excellent.
Right, I've got a couple and we'll do a few.
That's...
Iqbal Mohammed.
I'm sure that's your real name.
BLM vandalised statues and burned down a police car.
No harsh response given.
Palestine protesters celebrated outside Westminster on October 7th after hundreds of innocent Jews, and obviously other citizens as well from abroad, were killed, kidnapped and injured, and have since souted genocidal chants every weekend in London, and no harsh response was given.
JustUpOil have blocked vital roads and motorways, destroyed artwork and even tried to damage Stonehenge and a copy of the Magna Carta, and no harsh response was given.
Yeah, quite right, didn't include them, should have.
And it keeps going on about Islamists committing terror attacks, Lee Rigby, Sir David Amos, Manchester Arena bombings.
But the English take to the streets protesting and rioting after three innocent girls were murdered and a very harsh response given with nearly 400 arrested, over 400 now, and a government promised they will regret it.
There can be only one possible conclusion we can draw from this.
Anyone but the English can protest, riot, and cause a fuss.
And that's the exact point that the anti-immigration English protesters are taking.
And that's why I don't think the riots are going to stop anytime soon, even though we discourage people going down and participating, of course.
Well, the finance laws certainly are.
You get tax breaks if you're a Muslim.
The child being punished for just the innocent action of buying a Quran is, I think, the best example of a community taking over.
Especially because the police got involved when usually pranks are dealt with by schools, parents, teachers, etc.
Unless it's violent or dangerous.
But when it comes to the Islamic community, anything remotely offensive is considered dangerous.
So the police will bend over backwards and treat a little kid like a criminal just to appease them.
And it's very important here as well that It's not the English community versus the Islamic community in the minds of the politicians.
It's the far right, which is a set of values that they can then put in a pigpen and ostracize versus everyone else as a collective block with the Muslims being the most oppressed of that constituency.
So they're not even talking about two communities here.
The state doesn't recognize the concerns of the English as a collective ethnic or cultural group.
And that's why they feel at leisure to punish them.
Do you want to do some from yours?
Yep.
Shall I read some?
Read some of yours and... I'll read some from mine about America, then, very quickly.
JJHW says they are oversampling Dems.
The polls are BS.
Almost certainly.
ArizonaDesertRap, have any of these polls been conducted in places besides LA, New York, Chicago, etc.?
Most of these polls are conducted in densely populated urban centers.
They tend to completely skip the suburban slash rural populations.
Again, I would expect so.
Arizona Desert Rat again.
Yeah, no, rural people aren't going to vote for you just because you claim to be rural.
We're not that stupid.
Rightfully so.
Bleach Demon wants a man who let his state burn to keep the Somali voting bloc under control.
Oh yes, he's the one that changed the flag in Minnesota, the state flag, to look more like the Somalian one.
Yes, yes, you're right there.
I should have mentioned that.
Kevin Fox as well says, if Chicagoans want gay race communism, let them have it, then pass out the popcorn to everyone else to enjoy as we watch them all turn on each other once they are in charge.
The problem is, the states are permeable barriers.
And so that will spread.
It will be like Yugoslavia all over again.
Each part of the coalition will demand to be in charge one year of that and the Republicans can walk in and sweep up the remains.
I feel like that's a bit of a too positive a conclusion there but I do agree that yes when you have things like gay race communism as the state ideology it will inevitably lead to division, ethnic conflict, conflict down all sorts of dividing identity lines As we're now experiencing in the UK.
I don't think there'll be a self-correction because if the BLM riots didn't convince them not to vote for Democrats, I don't know what will.
Interesting comment here by Tech Heresy regarding banning social media.
Are these the same leftists that cheered the usage during the BLM riots to get out truth or the Arab Spring to organize in the Middle East?
Yes.
The goal is their control by chaos that's beneficial for the movement.
Absolutely.
I seem to remember an MLK quote that kept getting shared around during BLM stating that riots are the language of the unheard.
Yes, that was it.
And it's very poetic that the whole establishment tried to basically vindicate him by saying, well, we're going to censor your speech.
Yeah, we've got to ban Twitter.
Lord Nereva, the party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.
It was their final, most essential command.
And then, when they were showing people slashing tires, they said, nothing's going on.
Nothing is happening.
Remember the meme?
Nothing ever happened.
It seems what are called public servants forget the servant part of their title.
But these are not public servants, they're opportunist careerists.
Absolutely.
And this is basically the distinction between propaganda and action that I have been Constantly talking about and I think everyone's on board with this Politicians lie.
They create the face that they're in favor of popular government, but they're far from it Excellent.
Well, thank you very much for joining us, ladies and gents.
We suffered through the tech issues to bring you your daily news.
I will be back at half past three speaking to Damiandrea Jenkins about all of the ongoings of the last election and also to Jack Hadfield about the Southport riots from the ground.
If you aren't subscribed to LotusEaters.com, remember, you do currently have a 50% discount for the first three months.
It's only 121 is the code, no spaces, and you can upgrade or sign up anew.
Otherwise, we will be back tomorrow at one o'clock.
Take care and goodbye.
Export Selection