Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 17, 2024 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:32:26

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #938

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Bad news everyone, it's Monday.
	But good news, we've got an amazing podcast lined up for you.
	I hope you're doing well.
	I'm joined by Bo and Stelios.
	Hello.
	Monday the 17th of July.
	No, June.
	June.
	Don't even ask me what year it is.
	But yes, everything hopefully is going well for you.
	The weather's actually relatively good, which is nice.
	The global warming heatwave is finally here to destroy us.
	And I have some breaking news.
	Today is the last day that you can get Islander Magazine.
	This will go into print at five o'clock today.
	So if you want to get one of the first copies, and we have sold a lot of this which is great because there are some amazing articles in it and the whole thing is just a perfect work of art, get your first edition now because we're not going to be reprinting it.
	So this is the only opportunity you have, the opportunity you have.
	But today we're going to be talking about how Nigel Farage is the leader of the right, and we have to just get over that and get on board, how the Labour Party are going to destroy us all, what they intend to do in government, And how Malay is actually really winning hard in Argentina, I understand.
	Superb stuff.
	So let's get on.
	So Nigel Farage is, in my opinion, just the leader of the British Right.
	This is just something that he has achieved through a long career of advocating for those things upon which we all basically agree.
	He is, of course, a boomer.
	Actually, he's not a boomer, he's old Generation X, but he's in the boomer mindset.
	So he has his boomerisms, which I'm afraid we're just going to have to forgive and forget because there's only so far a boomer can become based, I think, is the issue.
	But it's fine, it's fine, it's totally fine.
	Nigel Farage is doing a great job and I really appreciate what he's doing because, in my opinion, he's acting like the tip of the spear against the two-party consensus.
	As Peter Hitchens has been saying for many years, well guys, I think the Conservative Party needs to die.
	And Nadja Farage is like, good point.
	I'll get on that.
	Hold my beer.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And the Conservatives have never been in a weaker position either.
	So Farage is basically at the apex of his powers at this point.
	He's been a very successful MEP.
	He is the reason, really.
	It's his sort of charisma, his activism, and the base that he used in UKIP to project the Brexit message, which forced Cameron to give us the referendum, which of course we won.
	And then he was just generally a sort of influential voice on GD News, and then he did Love Island, so the Normies got to learn that Hatchery seems like an alright chap.
	So, superb.
	Nigel Farage is at the peak of his powers.
	And the Conservative Party is in decline.
	So recently the Conservative Party released their manifesto that I thought we'd have a look at because it's atrocious.
	Politics UK have just given us the bullet points and as you can see they've got seven bullet points on immigration here which is the primary issue facing Britain.
	So when Nigel Farage came out and said look this is the immigration referendum, this election, he's right.
	Immigration is the root cause of all of the problems that we have, and he's made it a real point to press.
	The Conservatives have come out with this tepid piss-weak, just watered-down milky tea manifesto, which I'm very disappointed with.
	We're going to work with other countries to rewrite asylum treaties, guys.
	One, I don't believe you on any of these immigration promises, obviously.
	The Labour Party never had the balls to go full-on mass immigration like the Conservatives have.
	The Labour Party let in something like half a million to three quarters of a million in total per year.
	And then with net migration, that would end up being about 250,000 to 300,000, which is unbelievably high.
	But the Conservatives decided, "You know what, we can let in 1.2, 1.4 million." And then with net emigration, that makes nearly 800,000 net a year, which is insane, insane numbers that the average person isn't really aware of.
	And so the- - Well, unless they look at their own high street.
	Unless they've got eyeballs in their head.
	Yeah, unless they look at their own high street.
	But even then, people have got this impression that it's like, well, I mean, net migration must be about 80,000 a year or something.
	Literally, the poll's done.
	People are just like, no, no, it's ten times that.
	What are you talking about?
	People just have no idea.
	So anyway, look at this.
	We're going to work with other countries to rewrite asylum treaties.
	Don't care.
	Why aren't you unilaterally getting rid of these people?
	They're illegal immigrants.
	They've broken into our country.
	Regular rhythm of flights to Rwanda.
	Don't care.
	Just dump them all on a Scottish island if you have to.
	Prioritise national security over the European Court of Human Rights membership.
	Just repeal it!
	What are you talking about?
	What is with all of these weak-ass halfway houses?
	Stop illegal migrants challenging their removal in the courts.
	Yeah, okay, you should have done this 10 years ago.
	Clear the asylum backlog.
	Introduce a legal cap on migration which will be reduced every year.
	Just end it!
	Yeah, and they've already promised that sort of thing before.
	Since 2010.
	Completely failed to deliver on it.
	2015.
	Like the ECHR thing alone. 2017.
	These are broken promises.
	Like Preeti Patel's trying to repeal the ECHR or Suella Breverman's looking into doing it.
	She's promising they're looking very hard at it this time.
	And it's like, no, we just don't believe you.
	Yeah.
	Just don't believe you.
	And other people have said, I've heard other people say, we don't even need to repeal it or anything.
	You just have a government with enough balls to just act.
	Well, you could just ignore it.
	What are they going to do?
	Send an army?
	Right, yeah.
	They're not going to do anything about it.
	Yeah, Brussels is going to send their tank divisions into London, are they?
	But until they destroy the Quango industrial complex and retake control of the Bank of England, as Liz Truss has demonstrated, then the Blairite apparatus that surrounds the government will continue to needle and confound and to make sure that nothing substantive happens.
	Do you think Farage is going to actually do these things?
	I don't know.
	I'm not saying he will.
	He is soft right.
	I mean, you know, despite being characterised by some as far right and extreme right and all that sort of thing, he's actually reasonably soft still.
	But this is my point.
	It doesn't really matter whether Farage himself is going to do these things.
	What matters is that he breaks open the paradigm.
	That's the point.
	I completely agree.
	Like you say, I don't think Farage is going to do all of this.
	But who knows, he might surprise us all and he might be like, actually I know what the problem is.
	I've been doing this for a long time.
	I'm quite long in the tooth.
	That, that, that and that.
	All gone.
	But anyway, so, pathetic, right?
	They've got a bunch of other pathetic things but the thing that really annoyed me the most, 22 points on net zero?
	It's like, what?
	No, just make sure that they're not dumping pollutants in the rivers, if that's not too much hassle.
	Make sure it's actually worth going for a swim at the beach, and that's all you need to do.
	You don't need to do any of this left-wing nonsense.
	But net zero by 2050.
	So there it is.
	Not 2030, guys.
	2050.
	That's the right wing.
	Now shut up.
	Build nuclear power plants.
	That's the right wing.
	No, shut up.
	You know, not one single...
	Build nuclear power plants.
	That's just it.
	I can hear that coming through, by the way, Samson.
	Build nuclear power plants.
	That's all you need to do.
	That solves the entire problem.
	And that's, of course, why the Greens are against nuclear power.
	They don't want the problem solved because that means that capitalism gets to survive.
	What they want is revolution.
	Anyway, so on the back of this, they raised £570,000 in donations.
	Who donated?
	Yeah, that's a great question.
	But not many people.
	I mean, that's ten times less than what they raised in 2019 under Boris with 5.7 million.
	So, Pearse Week Manifesto, one of the most unpopular leaders ever, couldn't even raise a million pounds.
	But there are still, sort of, some absolute diehard Tory boys that, regardless of anything, regardless of the very fabric of their society being destroyed in front of their very eyes, will still insist that the Tory Party is the way to go and that They're not going to dishonour their hands.
	Yeah, yeah, basically.
	But we can just step past these people because they're yesterday's paradigm.
	But yeah, so and then you can just see just everyone just taking the piss out of the Conservatives everywhere.
	Like Rishi tweets out what you'd think would be a tried and tested Conservative canard.
	You will always be better at spending your own money than the government is.
	Okay, Rishi.
	I mean, like, just, just...
	I mean, the quote tweets on this are just hilarious, to be honest.
	It is hilarious, especially now, if you factor in the amount of money that they won in donations.
	Well, yeah, the market has spoken, Rishi.
	Just keep it yourselves, people.
	You can spend it better than if you give it to me, Rishi Sunak, the famous poor politician.
	Which is totally true, but like, The thing is, we're labouring under the highest tax burden since World War II.
	So why would you tweet that?
	You know, why would you tweet things that are just so contradictory to your own government?
	It's embarrassing.
	And then Sonex had just... I mean, I don't even know if Sonex is still campaigning, to be honest.
	I didn't see anything from him over the weekend.
	No, I was going to add stuff to this, but nothing had happened apparently.
	But of course he had an interview where he was like, yeah, I really suffered.
	I went with that Sky TV as a child, as Beau and I discussed on Friday.
	No one of our age had Sky.
	Like, it was the rich kid who had Sky.
	I was 16, I think, when we finally got Sky TV.
	I never, ever had it.
	Really?
	There's other kids at school got to watch The Simpsons before they put it on Channel 4.
	Yeah.
	And I was like, what's The Simpsons?
	Who's Homer?
	I don't, what?
	No, no, no, no, no, no.
	Sorry, 15.
	It's quite old into my childhood.
	But yeah, so that's not exactly going without either, to be honest.
	Not exactly.
	But I hate the framing.
	It's like you don't have to be like, oh yeah, I come from a poor and impoverished background.
	It's like, look, poor people don't want to be poor.
	They don't hate people who aren't poor.
	Christ, that's what communists do.
	So don't reject the framing out of hand.
	But anyway, Starmer, of course, was like, yeah, I didn't have Sky TV growing up either.
	Andrew Neil, who launched Sky TV in 1989, pointed out that Starmer was 27 when it launched.
	So good point, Keir.
	You didn't have Sky TV.
	I didn't realize Keir Starmer was 61, actually.
	Doesn't look that old.
	He doesn't.
	Obviously, he needs to get out drinking and smoking more with Farage, who's 60.
	One year younger than him.
	I mean, I thought he was older because I watched a boxing video of his, him punching a boxing bag.
	True, I just thought he was really weak.
	Yeah, but I mean a 70 year old who's in relatively decent shape can punch harder.
	That is tough.
	Not only has Starman never thrown a punch in his life, I don't think he's probably ever done any physical manual work in his whole life.
	100%.
	He's obviously an office worker.
	Anyway, so there was this incident I mean, I don't think Starmer is actually a bright guy, that's the thing.
	Not particularly.
	I don't think he's very smart, that's the problem.
	Because, like, he's doing a town hall here, answering questions, and he brings out the old, oh, my dad was a toolmaker, and people start laughing because it's the predictable thing that he says now.
	And so he got upset by that and was like, well, I can't believe they disrespect my factory working father.
	But no, they're disrespecting you.
	Your dad making tools is a perfectly honourable vocation, but that's literally all we know about your dad, because it's literally what you say about your dad, and so it was just predictable, and so people were laughing at you being an NPC.
	It was a pre-programmed thing to say, and Starmer didn't, he genuinely didn't seem to get that that was, in this interview, that that was what people were laughing at.
	Anyway, so what's been going on from Farage?
	So Farage has been winning debates.
	Farage, this is the second ITV debate, and he smashed it.
	Absolutely smashed it.
	He is the only person on the stage with any charisma.
	He is the only person on the stage who is actually saying something interesting.
	You've got the Conservative and Labour who are just like, yeah, everything that, you know, the uniparty consensus has done for the last 30 years, that's been bad.
	We need to stop doing this.
	We're going to do less of those things.
	And then you've got the sort of woke Celtic types, the Green Party, the SNP who played Cymru, and they're all like, you know what guys?
	Communism.
	How about we have full communism right now?
	How many more immigrants can we fit in Britain?
	Maybe if we actually compress everyone into just a giant meat flesh sack, we could get every single person on Earth Within the M25.
	And it's like, great.
	That's brilliant.
	I mean, literally, the SNP, the Scottish guy, was like, Scotland has a problem with immigrants.
	We don't have enough of them.
	It's like, you could take some of ours, if you want.
	We can send Scotland our immigrants, if you like.
	I mean, you've got lots of space in the highlands.
	Surely you need a few Pakistani colonies.
	There, you know, a few Bangladeshi colonies, maybe some North Africans.
	I don't know.
	I mean, I don't know why that's your opinion, but it is.
	But the point is, Farage is the only person going, hey guys, it might be sensible for Britain if we stop immigration for a bit, if we lower taxes, if we do things that are in the interests of the British people, then actually things could get better.
	And everyone's like, God, you're a racist, Nigel.
	Isn't it remarkable though that he's the only politician with, as you say, charisma.
	Yeah.
	Sort of actual charisma.
	Yeah.
	And of course we're sympathetic to it, being sort of right-leaning.
	Yeah.
	But nonetheless, he really is.
	People call him a great communicator and he is.
	Mm-hmm.
	You know, I don't agree with absolutely everything he says.
	I still think he's a little bit of a weak source.
	I still think he's a little bit... Doesn't matter, let's not have any counselling.
	No, don't worry, I'll be voting reform.
	Don't worry, I said this before.
	I know.
	Despite my history with them, I've still been voting for them.
	And the shifting of the Overton window and the breaking of the two-party paradigm is the most important thing in this election.
	I've been personally disavowed by Farage.
	Right, yeah.
	So, you know, I'm not worried about it.
	Farage is.
	And he's clearly winning as well with the audiences.
	In fact, people were just like, my God, the rest are political pygmies compared to Nigel Farage, which is totally true.
	He is the master of his element and he's doing a great job.
	And so, this is paying off in the polls.
	So it's been, what, nearly two weeks since he announced his candidacy, is it?
	Must be, yeah, roughly.
	Nearly two weeks, and there's going to be just over two weeks until the election night stream.
	By the way, the election night stream is more important than the election, of course.
	July the 4th, we're going to be doing an all-nighter, where we're going to be here all night watching the results come in, and just keeping an eye on the general lay of the land, so tune in for that, it's going to be amazing, on LotusEast.com.
	Yeah, so the latest poll came out from YouGov and this is great because, as you can see, Nigel Farage has overtaken the Conservatives.
	But also what's interesting here is that Labour have gone from like 44, or 46, 47 at some points, a couple of months ago, down to 37.
	Which is interesting.
	So I think that Farage is probably not just sucking up Conservative votes.
	Somehow there are still some Conservative voters left in this country.
	They're at 17, 18 percent.
	Reformers up to 19 percent.
	Labour are down to 37 percent.
	That's good.
	Many of those who would vote Labour were disgruntled Tory supporters in 2019.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	A lot of them will be the red wall that Boris flipped.
	And doubtless they're quite sympathetic to Farage because Farage is their kind of guy.
	He's Mr Brexit and they doubtless voted Brexit.
	So all's good.
	Farage, whatever you think of him, he's a superb campaigner.
	As you say, he's a great communicator.
	And so it's become apparent to right-wing people in the United Kingdom.
	And when I say right-wing, I'm being very generous with that description because I'm now about to cite The Telegraph.
	They already know that he's the leader of the Conservatives.
	He is the leader of the right in the United Kingdom.
	It is Farage.
	And he's been making just great strides for just based politics, I guess we'd call it.
	The politics that serves our interests rather than the interests of like the abstract goal of liberalism or international bodies or anything like this.
	And so they have to be like, well look Farage clearly won the BBC debate coming top of a snap YouGov poll.
	A lot of the Tories tonight will be thinking, I wish he was our leader.
	Yep.
	Just to be clear though, that really should be Conservatives with a small c. Yeah.
	Because he's not already the leader of the Conservatives, i.e.
	the Conservative Party, and won't be.
	He said explicitly, they can join us, we'll fold them into reform, I'm not suddenly going to flip to be the Conservative leader.
	Yeah, the Conservatives are splitting the reform vote.
	Right, right.
	Which is literally now, according to the polls, what's happening.
	But you are, of course, correct.
	Small C Conservatives.
	But he's also the leader of the Big C Conservatives.
	It's just the Conservative Party hasn't yet recognised this.
	And I mean it, because, I mean, remember that the Tories raised £570,000.
	Well, Holly Vallance herself Raised 1.5 million for reform.
	Did she?
	Wow, that's news to me.
	I know!
	What a hero!
	Was she like Neighbours or something?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, like she's a soap opera actress, but like she's obviously based and she's totally on side and she's obviously doing great work for reform and Farage.
	So on that alone, that's three times almost what the Conservatives have raised in total by one person for reform.
	And so this is great.
	And for us, it's just broadcasting our message far and wide.
	I mean, let's play this bit just so you can hear it.
	If you've got net migration running at three quarters of a million a year, it's not surprising the size of the economy grows.
	But the income ahead has fallen for the last six consecutive quarters.
	The penny is beginning to drop.
	Mass migration is making us poorer.
	Mass migration means our kids and grandkids can't get houses.
	Mass migration means rents are up between 20 and 30 percent in the last three years alone in this country.
	Mass migration means, I almost missed this interview, the traffic is now so bad on our roads because six million more people live here than when the Conservatives came to power.
	No, he keeps going on, like, this is a message that's been absolutely hammering, completely correct, that's exactly what we've been saying.
	Superb.
	I want this message being broadcast across the entire country.
	Absolutely on point.
	Fantastic.
	Yeah, all aboard the Nij train.
	100%.
	Just to say once again, you know, some people still on the further right could criticise him for saying that he's taking the wind out of further right.
	I mean, I've seen him a few years ago sort of gloat that he's destroyed the real far right in Britain, whatever.
	But for this election, if nothing else, this message, getting it out to normies and boomers and breaking that paradigm of the two party, you can only really vote for anything other than Labour or Conservative, it's a waste of votes.
	To break that, this is gold.
	This is pure gold.
	It's perfect.
	So yeah I mean before you said that it would be good to everyone should join the Conservative Party so that when when out of the ashes we can make a new thing.
	But Nigel wasn't running then.
	Right.
	Now Nigel is running.
	The idea that Nigel would because he hinted that he might in the jungle and all sorts of times that he might join the Conservative Party but that's now off the table really.
	He's committed to Uh, staying with reform at least until 2029, so you wouldn't advocate any more for raising the Conservatives out of the ashes?
	Which is all about the Nigel Train and reform going forward.
	Things were just different like six months ago when I mentioned that.
	I was like, look, the Conservatives are on a bit of downswing, they'll probably lose the next election and get like, you know, 150 seats or something.
	And maybe we can make, you know, if we join the Conservative Party, we can make a strong argument from within the party.
	But Nigel wasn't running, he wasn't smashing them in the polls.
	It wasn't looking like they're going to get, by the way, it looks like they're going to get about 70 seats in the election, which isn't zero seats, but it's a start.
	Nigel wasn't storming, you know, things have changed.
	And to be honest with you, you know, it would be better if the Conservatives just went away.
	Because they really are just committed losers.
	And apparently we've got a sneak preview of some policies reform we're going to put out.
	They're going to abolish the TV license fee, so that's the end of the BBC.
	Nice.
	Love it.
	Opposition to a cashless society, great idea.
	Free speech bill, good idea.
	Anti-corruption unit, good idea.
	And make St.
	George's Day and St.
	David's Day national holidays.
	Love it.
	Love everything about it.
	Why wouldn't we want that?
	Why wouldn't we want that?
	And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
	In fact, about now, they're probably announcing the actual manifesto, so obviously I couldn't look at it in advance, but we'll cover it tomorrow.
	I wonder what the policy, or if they do have one, on re-migration.
	Well, I know that it's going to be re-migrating a lot of illegals, but I don't know about the rest of it, so we won't speculate until tomorrow.
	But he's been putting out these amazing videos, and these are just genuinely, genuinely good campaign videos.
	I'm unashamedly patriotic.
	I'm not scared of being that.
	It's not sentimental.
	It's all I believe to be right.
	I think family, community and country are the cause and the backbones, underpinned by Christian culture, of the way that I was brought up, the way that I believe to be right, the way that I believe is worth us standing up and fighting for.
	If I say these things to you with great passion, I mean them with dead passion.
	I care about our culture, but we fight for British values.
	I'm determined that we fight for the benefits of Brexit.
	I believe that we're not a country that should be trolling their borders.
	You decide for yourselves who comes and who does not.
	So, amazing.
	You can't ask for much more at this point.
	Exactly, that's all I've wanted a right-wing politician to be saying.
	Because everything flows from that, once we've got that.
	So go and share that to every normal person offline.
	Send it to your boomer aunt and uncle.
	Look, it has to be Farage, it can't be the Tories anymore.
	And he's winning on TikTok as well.
	So another thing that's weird is Aaron Bastani here being like, hmm, a group of 16 year olds came up to me in Sussex, desperate to talk about Farage, who they discovered via TikTok, which is interesting.
	And you look at his TikTok and he's actually doing brilliantly.
	I mean, look at those numbers.
	I have a question for everybody.
	are superb and so he's radicalizing the youth and saying hey by the way you don't have to hate your own country actually um we can compare this to uh swella braveman this is her uh tiktok campaign i have a question for everybody who wants to go to the four seasons orlando
	oh what was that - A total lack of energy.
	That's what that is.
	That is a campaign that knows it's going nowhere.
	That realises that the genuine goodwill is not with them.
	Lack of self-awareness?
	Yeah.
	I mean, if their campaign was going well and they had a lot of energy, then this could be funny in an ironic way.
	But it's not.
	It's just kind of weak, which is a shame.
	Since we're talking about TikTok, of course, go follow us on TikTok.
	LotusEatersUnderscore.com on TikTok.
	We're doing all right, actually, all things considered.
	Is there one with me and Karen with over 300,000?
	Yeah, yeah.
	I never go on TikTok, you see.
	I'm not a big TikToker either, but we're doing all right.
	So go and follow us over there.
	Anyway, You can tell that Farage is the leader of the right, just to continue on with this point, because as you can see, Conservative MP Andrea Jenkins is using a photo of Farage on her campaign leaflet.
	Bit weird.
	Yeah, it's a bit weird and very telling.
	It's like, yep, I'm friends with Nigel Farage, which is why you should vote Conservative.
	He's the guy in charge and everyone knows it.
	And then Dean Doris went on Times Radio and was just like, look, it's just over for the Conservatives.
	It is over.
	I'm not even sure why the candidates are bothering going out and delivering leaflets.
	It's over.
	I agree.
	I agree.
	And indeed Doris, a very strong Boris partisan, former MP, and other conservatives, senior Tories, just think the party will split apart after it loses this election.
	Because it's, I mean, the Conservative Party has long been a broad church of various competing factions, but it's come to the point where they just, what do they even have in common?
	You know, what do the National Conservatives have with, like, Cameroonian Blairites?
	I hope it's shattered to pieces and scattered to the winds.
	Absolutely.
	It's, you know, if you can't do it to the CIA, at least you can't do it to the Tory party.
	And so you've got Nigel Farage.
	Again, compare this to Swellers.
	Like, this is also cringe, but funny.
	so fran just and so he tweeted that good morning rishi sunak so again that's cringe but funny because he's trolling rishi sunak The energy is with him, everyone knows the energy is with him.
	He's clearly having a good time, and he's just on the campaign trail, just going for it, and Sunak is just tanking the polls, so everyone can see.
	And obviously the zero seats meme is seriously getting around.
	This is a projection after the latest poll, using the Financial Times seat projection tool, and it has them at 11 seats.
	Which is 11 too many.
	But yes, it has them very, very low.
	Yeah, the Tories.
	And there have just been loads of memes, I'll skip those for time's purpose, but there's been a huge amount of memes on the Zero Seats front.
	And Zero Seats apparently is coming because half of all Conservative voters think the Conservatives deserve to be totally wiped out.
	Like, sorry, what?
	When something like the zero seats thing gets this much traction, it's hard to deny that it hasn't tapped into the zeitgeist.
	It is the zeitgeist, 100%.
	So Neymar hit the nail on the head, I mean... Wizards reap towers.
	Can't be understated, he nailed the zeitgeist here.
	And I mean, it's just remarkable.
	A quarter of people who voted Conservative in 2019 say that they deserve to lose all of their seats.
	So that's not even, you know, okay, you've got Labour Party members going, yeah, I think it's 0-6.
	No, no, no, no.
	These are your own voters, you know.
	I suspect they'll still get 50, 70-odd seats.
	Yeah, they probably will.
	It won't be as low as 11, I wouldn't have thought.
	I mean, fingers crossed it is zero, actually zero.
	But we've got two weeks left of Farage ruthlessly campaigning against them.
	Who knows, right?
	Who knows?
	And you've seen the left a lot, probably, complaining, why is Farage getting so much airtime?
	Because he's the right wing.
	He represents, he is the leader of the right, he represents the energy of the right at the moment, an insurgent right.
	And by the way, only 35% of people disagreed with that statement.
	And then so, it got around, Farage himself endorsed zero seats, and there was one person who wasn't happy with the idea of the Conservative Party being destroyed.
	Can you guess who it is, Stelios?
	Tell me.
	Peter Hitchens.
	Obviously, it's Peter Hitchens.
	I've seen him and Dan are having some flirtatious tweets and exchanges.
	Yeah, because Dan was like, you are the originator, the progenitor of the zero seats meme.
	You were the one who said that the Conservatives... Now your creation has Matthew, creation has met the creator now.
	Yes, and he's not happy because Starmer's going to get in and we'll talk about it in a second.
	But I mean, what did you think the alternative was going to be to destroy the Conservatives?
	Obviously Labour.
	But the Conservatives deserve it.
	I mean, like, you know, they imported millions of people who are never going to vote for them.
	Well no, they've committed a crime of unparalleled, unprecedented severity.
	Yeah, and they've definitely been party to a bunch of crimes.
	I mean, look at this.
	Where did those Afghan boys come from who decided to rape a girl at a Kent school?
	Where did they come from?
	Not only that, but they have also contributed to the demonization of people who talk about it.
	Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
	In fact, speaking of demonization, Uh, you've got, uh, Calvin Robinson was kicked out of the Conservative Party last week for, quote, openly supporting Tommy Robinson.
	So, oh no, not Tommy Robinson!
	Sorry, did he do something like this?
	Did he allow a child rapist to stay in the UK after arguing being deported back to Eritrea would harm his mental health?
	Like, sorry, well, oh no, you can't associate with Tommy Robinson.
	Why do you want to associate with the party that has done this?
	Why do you want to associate with the party that has done this?
	Like, this all happened under the Conservatives.
	They made this happen.
	And they're like, well, I mean, you associate with Tommy Robinson, you've got to be kicked out.
	Shut up.
	Honestly, shut up.
	So just a final thing on this.
	I think Nigel Farage is going to win in Clacton because for some reason the Labour Party have decided that they'd find the whitest constituency in Britain and then run the, quote, Wakanda diaspora candidate who literally hates white people and says that white tears, white man's tears, are his favourite drink.
	Right, so you want Farage to win in Clacton by a staggering amount.
	Superb.
	I'm in favour of that.
	I want Farage to win in Clacton by a staggering amount, which is superb.
	But yeah, we'll leave it there just because it's preposterous that they've done this.
	Anyway, so just in summary, Farage is obviously the legitimate leader of the right, he has the mandate of heaven, he has the energy, he is winning, and hopefully he does really well.
	And as you said on Twitter, a little clip you put up saying, message discipline.
	Yes.
	OK, you might be further to the right than Nigel, or you might be slightly to the left of him, or something like that.
	But the way elections go, the way party politics goes, is you have to know there's going to be no perfect leader.
	There's going to be no perfect party with a perfect agenda and manifesto.
	Politics is the art of compromise and things.
	And so for this election, this time out, This is the vehicle.
	As I say, all aboard the Niage train.
	It's the best option at this point.
	And although some people, some, you know, people that aren't prepared to compromise any of their politics, will say that's just a sellout.
	Well, no, like, get real.
	No, Nigel Farage is good on almost all of the issues.
	He might not be perfect on all of them.
	Almost all the issues.
	Be good on almost every issue I care about and it will be a net positive step in the right direction to have Nigel Farage as an MP and then hopefully Prime Minister in 2029 than not.
	That's just that simple.
	Well, even Kathleen Blakelock of the English Democrats retweeted you saying, yes, at least for this election, don't vote for me, vote for reform in the constituency she's standing in.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And we're going to have her on tomorrow.
	Um so yeah that's sort of the message this time around.
	Yeah it's it's Farage can break the consensus we have to put the weight behind him as he acts as the tip of the spear to pierce through their armour.
	Send a message to the establishment.
	Yeah 100%.
	With Nigel that's that's the thing to do this time.
	And no one else has the chops.
	There's no one else at the moment.
	By the way, I think there is a rationale in the Labour Party in the selection of the candidate who will run against Farage because they know that he's going to lose because Farage is very strong in that constituency.
	So they want to make it all about racism.
	Oh no, don't call me a racist.
	Those days have passed.
	That'd be new, wouldn't it?
	Exciting.
	But still, that's what they want to do in the eyes of the general public.
	Maybe, maybe.
	Anyway, let's move on.
	Okay, so I'm up next, aren't I?
	Yes.
	Okay, let me just scroll down a wee bit here.
	All right.
	So, we all know that Labour is going to be the next government.
	Yep.
	Barring a miracle.
	Starmer is going to be the next Prime Minister.
	So let's have a quick look at Labour then.
	Let's have a quick look at them.
	And they've put their manifesto out, and I read it, and the sort of the classic Obama sort of change.
	Change is coming, change is happening.
	Don't worry about whether it's change for the better or not, but just change.
	It's literally the Zentian position.
	Yeah, the Lord of Change, Sir Keir Starmer.
	Yeah, it's just going to be change.
	He might grow an extra arm or something.
	Maybe a pair of eyes, I don't know.
	Now, so I've read the Manifesto, and I've read loads of Manifestos in my time.
	It's one of those things that politics nerds do.
	A lot of parties just betray their own Manifesto all the time, don't they?
	But nonetheless, It's supposed to be they're sort of laying out their agenda isn't it?
	And the thing I took from it, broadly speaking before we get into details, was that it kept talking loads and loads and loads about chaos, that Britain is in chaos, that the Conservatives have put us in a state of chaos.
	That was just the word that kept cropping up again and again and again.
	It was obviously they sat around and brainstormed this thing, got a team of PR people to decide what their message is going to be and it was that they're going to get rid of the chaos And restore order.
	Sorry, doesn't Keir Starmer look like an angry bank manager there?
	He looks like I've defaulted on my mortgage payments or something.
	I'm about to get a severe dressing down, but then I'll be given a two-month extension or something like that.
	He's got his sleeves rolled up, so he's ready to work hard.
	He just looks literally like a branch manager of a local bank.
	But that's, anyway, sorry, yeah.
	God forbid chaos.
	Yeah, yeah.
	So, I mean, let's talk about a bunch of stuff that they talk about.
	So, the first thing, or the most important thing, for I think most people, certainly our audience, will be immigration and borders and things.
	And they talk about, they don't talk about it a great deal.
	Surprisingly.
	I mean there is a chunk in there which I'll read out in a moment but there's no real specifics in there and it feels like it's exactly the sort of thing they'll just renege on or just not act upon ultimately.
	It's just not their concern is it?
	They're in favour of immigration.
	Yeah, they said that they would launch a new border security command with hundreds of new special investigators to use counter-terror powers to smash criminal boat gangs.
	Which is actually a good sounding idea, I wish they'd do it.
	Yeah, if they do do that, I just don't see it happening.
	So they said right near the beginning, one of the main sort of tenets of what they want to do is to have a quote, a mission-driven government So in other words, more Blairite, managerial, target-driven stuff?
	Yes.
	Need another Quango.
	Yeah, more Quangos.
	OK.
	In some ways, though, although they're obviously sort of, you know, fairly... their left is socialists, and some among their members, like John McDonnell, for example, or Jeremy Corbyn, are out-and-out communists.
	To be fair, I think Kit Coburn out.
	Yeah, so yeah, it's funny, isn't it?
	I'm looking forward to that, who wins in Islington.
	On the election night, it's going to be interesting keeping an eye on it.
	Because it's funny either way, right?
	Because if Corbyn wins it, which I think he probably will actually, probably if he had to put money on it, that's funny because it's one in the eye to Labour.
	But if he loses, that's funny because Corbyn's career's over.
	So whatever happens there is funny.
	Anyway.
	No losers from our point of view.
	Despite being quote-unquote radical lefties, you know, Blair in the shadow of Blair still wanting to completely reform and change all sorts of things about the very nature of our system, in other ways it's business as usual.
	So this is a quote, commitment to the nuclear deterrent is absolute.
	So, Starmer's decided to draw a line under that.
	Yeah, this is him, like, staying very firmly within the Blairite paradigm and avoiding the sort of Corviknight paradigm, which is total dearmament, unilateral dearmament for nuclear weaponry.
	Well, I personally haven't got a problem with being committed to the nuclear disagreement.
	But what it says is that he's still in hock to the chiefs at the Pentagon.
	Oh yeah 100%.
	Yeah 100% because the other thing is an unshakable commitment to NATO.
	I'm not saying much on board with that personally.
	I have criticisms.
	And that Russia and Iran are the main threats.
	So again, just taking the line directly from the Pentagon and the State Department, just whatever they're telling us we think about foreign policy is what we go, yeah, yeah, that's what we think as well.
	Yeah, Keir Starmer's going to make you die for gay rights in Ukraine.
	Yeah, under a NATO banner.
	So in some ways, business as usual.
	So on the immigration thing, I'll read out a couple of paragraphs here, so it'll take me a couple of minutes to read it out, but this is everything, but more or less everything they say in their manifesto, which isn't all particularly short on borders and immigration.
	So listen out for what's omitted.
	Right, so they say this.
	Britain is a tolerant and passionate country.
	We have a proud tradition of welcoming people fleeing prosecution and abuse.
	Schemes like Homes for Ukraine, Hong Kong humanitarian visas and the Syrian resettlement program have provided important routes for refugees seeking sanctuary.
	They're obviously proud of that, you know.
	But the system needs to be controlled and managed and we need strong borders.
	Sorry, we want as many people as we can get.
	It needs to be managed.
	The problem with the Conservatives is they're just not managing things correctly.
	Yeah, that's what you often get when you get a Labour MP or someone on a late-night talk show or something and you say, what is your plan for immigration?
	They'll say, we need more safe and legal routes.
	That's what they say.
	More of it, just done properly.
	It's a very slight misdirection, but basically more, if anything.
	They say we need strong borders.
	The small boat crisis fuelled by dangerous criminal smuggling gangs and undermining our security and costing lives.
	Rather than a serious plan to confront this crisis, the Conservatives have offered nothing but desperate gimmicks.
	Their flagship policy, to fly a tiny number of asylum seekers to Rwanda, has already cost hundreds of millions of pounds.
	Not untrue.
	Even if it got off the ground, this scheme can only address fewer than 1% of the asylum seekers arriving.
	Also true.
	It cannot work.
	I agree.
	Chaos in the channel has been matched by chaos at home.
	The Conservatives' unworkable laws have created a perma-backlog of tens of thousands of asylum seekers who are indefinitely staying in hotels costing their taxpayers millions of pounds every week.
	They don't go on to address that any further.
	So you're not saying you're going to get rid of them or re-migrate them or anything, it's just...
	It's just there's a permabacklog.
	We need to get rid of that.
	Yeah, the backlog needs to be cleared because the administration is being held up.
	The bureaucracy is having a problem with the backlog.
	It's not that there's a problem with hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people who shouldn't be here being here.
	The problem is the system itself is just not working as it should.
	I'm going to fix the system, don't you know?
	So there's a lie by, well not a lie by omission, but they're just omitting there that they're not so, they're talking about a perma-backlog of tens of thousands, but not that they're going to send them home or anything.
	No, they're not.
	It's just that we need to fast-forward their application so they can stay indefinite.
	But that is not the... But they don't explicitly say that though.
	Yes.
	That's the tricky thing they're doing here.
	Because the left, right now, with its distributed philosophy, It says that, for instance, there should be massive redistribution of wealth from those who have to those who have not.
	And the question is, how do you understand those who have not?
	They don't understand it in national terms.
	They understand it in international terms.
	Exactly.
	So that's why whenever they're talking about tackling poverty, they don't talk about domestic poverty.
	They talk about tackling global poverty.
	I love the idea that it boils down to, well, we need to take money from the haves, which are people who worked hard and paid their taxes, to the have-nots, which is criminal illegal aliens.
	It's like, what?
	No, that's theft.
	Why are you doing that?
	It's just outright theft.
	Give to foreign criminals.
	Thanks, Labour.
	Yeah.
	So, you know, already it's fairly clear what they intend, but the manifesto goes on, Labour will stop the chaos and go after the criminal gangs who trade in driving this crisis.
	I mean, good.
	Yeah, but they won't.
	They won't, but good.
	We will create a new border security command with hundreds of new investigators, intelligence officers and cross-border police officers.
	This will be funded by ending the wasteful migration and economic development partnership with Rwanda.
	This new command will work internationally and be supported by new counter-terrorism style powers to pursue, disrupt and arrest those responsible for the vile trade.
	We will seek a new security agreement with the EU to ensure access to real-time intelligence and enable our policing teams to lead joint investigations with their European counterparts.
	Just blah blah blah blah blah.
	And then they're going to be like, yeah, and you know, they haven't got it there, I'm sure, but they'll be like, we need then safe and legal routes.
	So all the people who wanted to come can come.
	We're just going to be in control of it rather than the criminal gangs.
	Yeah, exactly that.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Let's take the criminal gangs out of the equation and the Home Office will do it.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Labour will turn the page and restore order to the asylum system so that it operates swiftly, firmly and fairly.
	There we go.
	So yeah, we're just going to funnel them in, bros.
	And that the rules are properly enforced.
	We will hire additional caseworkers to clear the conservative backlog and end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayers billions of pounds.
	Going to grow the bureaucracy to do it.
	Yeah, the bureaucracy is growing to meet the expanding demands of the bureaucracy.
	Yes, yes, precisely.
	Labour will set up a new returns and enforcement unit, will you, with an additional 1,000 staff.
	A re-migration unit, okay.
	To fast track removals to safe countries, again, still that thing, or if it's a bad country, like say Pakistan, where they've got human rights abuses, we can't possibly deport anyone back to those types of countries.
	They'll probably have to stay instead.
	Back to countries who people do not have the right to stay here, we will negotiate additional returns arrangements to speed up returns and increase the number of safe countries that failed asylum seekers can swiftly be sent back to.
	And we will also act upstream, working with international partners to address the humanitarian crisis which leads people to flee their homes and strengthen support for refugees in their home region.
	So just a quick thing there, what you mean Cure all oppression in the rest of the world, so no one wants to leave their own country.
	Really?
	We're going to send money to foreign governments.
	Right.
	Yeah.
	That's brilliant.
	So again just to keep on on the border and migration stroke re-migration issue there's a there's an article there talking about it's the next link yeah so in the European Conservative there's an article they're talking about what you know a bit more realistically what's actually happening in that article they say
	Keir Starmer's Labour is being cautious in its messaging ahead of the July 4th general election but a senior party official has been unable to contain her excitement about sweeping plans to reverse major aspects of Brexit if it gets into government.
	Details of these changes are only just coming to light but appear to have been in the works for some time.
	Labour International Chair Fiona Urquhart said in comments seen by the Mail on Sunday that Starmer's top team quote is prepared to revisit some of the Brexit agreements and believes restoring that freedom of movement is paramount.
	The Labour Party has made it clear that it wants to see a greater level of freedom of movement within the EU for Britons, in particular for professionals and trade.
	Robert Bates, who is Research Director of the Centre for Migration Control, Think Tank, said the comments reveal what many on the right already suspect, that the Labour Party is unashamedly pro-freedom of movement.
	He told the European Conservative Keir Starmer and most of the Shadow Front Bench Under then Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, spent the entirety of 2019 pushing for Britain's borders to remain open to hundreds of millions of people on the continent, which they did.
	Let's not forget that this Labour Party is also hell-bent on expanding the franchise, not just to 16-year-olds, but to EU citizens as well.
	They are nakedly attempting to gerrymander the make-up of the British electorate.
	A Labour official has denied the claim that his party would bring back free movement within the European Union.
	But however many times Starmer has stressed he wants to make Brexit work, whatever that means, I've not just added that, that's in the text, whatever that means, Labour representatives have made it quite clear that they intend to draw Britain closer to Brussels via schemes such as a youth mobility agreement if they get into office.
	Urquhart's comments suggest that Starmer shares these desires and is simply being coy about them now.
	to keep British patriots on side while the Conservative government circles the drain.
	Urquhart told a Mallorca newspaper in March that Labour quote is being cautious it's not making too many bold announcements because should it come to power it does not know what is going to be faced with But he cannot stress enough that it is well aware of many of the problems facing Britain's overseas, especially in the EU.
	The problem at this election, added the CFMC's Bates, is that Conservative Party attempts to present themselves as any different are an egregious assault upon the truth.
	Pretty, pretty based.
	He also said since 2021 And Britain having left the European Union, mass migration has skyrocketed precisely because the Tories have given visas to millions of non-European Economic Area citizens.
	The choice at this election is between a Conservative Party who claim to want controlled borders, yet do exactly the opposite, or a Labour Party who is avowedly pro-mass migration.
	The British public deserve better, end quote.
	Or vote for Nigel.
	Yeah.
	Or there's the third way.
	Yeah.
	Exactly.
	Business as usual, or Nigel.
	And the thing is, we know that Keir Starmer prefers the European Union.
	He's just openly come out with, like, yeah, I prefer Davos, which is obviously the West, but, like, same difference, really, to Westminster.
	So, yeah, we know.
	We know that that's what you're like, Keir.
	This is one of my predictions.
	I can't remember if I said this on camera or it was just in the office, but if they get a giant, giant majority, which they look set to get, Then it becomes their own backbenchers who are the real opposition and they will splinter, it's just so notorious, with a mere 80 majority splintering.
	It's too much for them to hold together and I think that will happen to the Labour Party because they've got, just like the Conservatives, some disparate groups within them.
	But their own backbenchers are more radical lefties?
	Yeah, right.
	Great.
	So you've got like the actual race communists.
	Yeah, you've got like... Blairite leftism or race communism, and the argument is going to be how race communist-y it gets.
	Yeah.
	Great.
	You've got like the diehard sort of Blairites, Brownites.
	You've got the Corbynistas.
	You've got the people that have tied their flag to Starmer's ship.
	There's a whole bunch of groups.
	And I doubt if Starmer can hold them all together well.
	I suspect there'll be no real honeymoon period and they'll start infighting immediately.
	I think Starmer will just start executing them politically as well.
	I mean, if you can do that to Corbyn, he'll just be like, no, you're out.
	Gone.
	Gone.
	He'll just do the same with the rest.
	He doesn't seem afraid to do so.
	No, he's absolutely not.
	The funniest thing will be when a lot of the far leftists are denouncing Starmer as far right.
	Yeah.
	Oh yeah.
	It's going to happen.
	This has already happened for some.
	They already call him the right wing of the Labour Party.
	It's like, yeah, okay, the right wing of the left.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	So I'll whip through a few other things because we've already been going for a few minutes on this one.
	They want to build 1.5 million new homes.
	Great.
	Just that.
	For who?
	Yeah, exactly.
	For who?
	There's been a baby boom amongst the native population of Britain.
	No, it's to house foreigners.
	Your money to house foreigners.
	Yeah, more safe and legal routes and we'll need... Millions of more homes.
	Yeah.
	On climate and energy, they're committed to clean power by 2030.
	They've got a green prosperity plan.
	Not one mentioning nuclear, right?
	No.
	Of course it's not!
	They say stuff like this, they say... Why don't we get solar panels in England?
	They say, we will not issue new licenses to explore new fields, oil fields, because, because, look at this, they will not take a penny off bills.
	They cannot make us energy secure.
	What on earth are you talking about?
	If we dig out more energy from the ground, that won't reduce the amount of money you have to spend on energy.
	I mean, no one accused him of understanding economics, but like... Sorry, go on.
	Yeah, um, drilling for new oil apparently cannot make us energy secure, and will only accelerate the worsening climate crisis, which is a hoax.
	Uh, in addition, the sun drives climate change, not CO2.
	I don't know if I've said that on YouTube before.
	Oh, really?
	I don't know.
	Well, carry on.
	The suns and volcano drive... Yeah.
	Well, we'll have to cut that out then.
	Yep.
	Okay.
	They go on, in addition, we will not grant new coal licenses and we'll ban fracking for good.
	Okay, yeah.
	And they're going to make a new publicly owned company called Great British Energy.
	Yeah.
	There's still wind farms and solar panels around the country.
	Amazing.
	One of the worst things I think possible is a marriage between government and corporations.
	Also under the rubric of bizarre lefty ideology.
	Yeah, right, yeah.
	Yeah, completely captured by...
	Wind farms in Scotland.
	It's like, you know, okay, maybe.
	You know, we need solar panels all over Britain.
	It's like, which means solar panels?
	Like, you can see a map of the amount of sunlight Britain gets.
	It's really low, actually.
	Like, if all the, you know, could you not have said, like, geothermal or hydroelectric or something?
	No, solar panels.
	It's like, okay, whatever.
	Idiots.
	We really need nuclear power stations, is what it is.
	That's the way forward, kind of, obviously, isn't it?
	Yeah, just a dozen nuclear power stations.
	I mean, and the thing is, I'd be fine with them being owned by the state as well.
	You could be like, okay, well, the taxpayers will fund the nuclear power, and then electricity will just be free.
	So that way my nan, or they're both passed on now, but you know, your nan can have the heating on all winter if she likes, and she doesn't have to pay a penny for it, you know?
	And as for the relentless leftist or Labour assault on the very fabric, the very nature of our country and our politics, is that they quote, Labour is committed to replacing the House of Lords with an alternative second chamber.
	It's only been around since time immemorial, it's only been around since what the 11th century or whatever.
	It's only a part of the national fabric of this country.
	Yeah, just do away with it.
	Because hereditary peers, commies hate hereditary titles like that, don't they?
	To be fair though, maybe the British public would be a bit amenable.
	Like, you know, they used to send quite far right-wing people to the European Union, right?
	The BNP got a bunch of EU MEPs because they saw it as being something, a sort of secondary thing.
	It's not a primary thing, we don't want these people in charge of the country, but we are happy to send them as a protest vote.
	Well, maybe that'll get packed out with the protest votes as well.
	Maybe, maybe.
	Of course, Labour and the Conservatives have packed the House of Lords in the last couple of generations with types who aren't really traditional.
	In any real sense.
	So it's already been damaged.
	But anyway, they want to, they want to quote, replace the House of Lords.
	Okay, another thing.
	We will increase the engagement of young people in our vibrant democracy by giving 16 and 17 year olds the right to vote in all elections.
	Full stop.
	End of quote.
	Okay, fine.
	They get radicalised on TikTok by Nigel Farage.
	Okay, what now?
	Any 16 or 17 year olds out there listening, or younger, you're going to lose me as a fan.
	I don't want children to have the vote.
	These are children, and most children don't know what on earth they're doing or talking about.
	But, if it helps, vote right wing.
	That's just it.
	The left is literally here to sell out your future.
	Just vote for the right.
	I'd raise the age.
	Well, yeah, I would too.
	And put a property qualification on it.
	I'd make it about 35.
	But, you know, since that's not on the table, young people, you need to vote right wing.
	There's a bunch of other things I could talk about but I'll just talk about the economy because well apart from anything else they want to make sure that well okay here's a paragraph.
	They're going to raise our taxes aren't they?
	This is a classic example of what the Labour manifesto is like.
	It just says a whole bunch of statements and promises with no detail but I mean that's what all manifestos usually are like otherwise it'd become a tome wouldn't it?
	But this is a classic paragraph with with no real explanation they just say quote we will bring down the cost of energy We will reduce food prices by removing barriers to business trading.
	They really do think the state is God.
	Yeah, oh yeah.
	That's it.
	We will make housing more affordable, expand access to childcare, and make work pay.
	We will support families with children by introducing free breakfast clubs in every primary school.
	Labour will also keep mortgage rates low, as low as possible, with a strong independent Bank of England, which will continue to target stable inflation of 2%.
	End of quote.
	We will create a forest of money trees.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	We will make sure that unicorns fly across the sky to announce dawn.
	You know, like, I'm all for promises.
	But we will keep food prices, we will reduce food prices, and a few lines later, we want inflation to remain at 2%.
	Despite the massive inflation we've had in the last year.
	It's just nonsense.
	And is it Rachel Reeves?
	Is that her name?
	It is, yeah.
	If she comes across You know you can sort of judge people quite quickly and certainly if you watch them for 10 minutes or an hour you get an impression of what they're really like.
	Yeah.
	She's a moron.
	Of course.
	She's not an economist.
	Really?
	Who could imagine?
	She doesn't know what on earth she's talking about.
	Okay one last thing if we can if you can put up that Samson that the cabinet the Labour shadow cabinet so let's just have a very quick look before I finish off at Who's probably going to be in government next?
	So there will probably be at least a small reshuffle.
	So this probably won't be the exact government we're going to get.
	But it largely will be, I would have thought.
	So obviously Starmer and Rayner.
	Our best and brightest there.
	At the tippy top, yeah.
	Our best and brightest.
	Jesus!
	Yeah, but then Yvette Cooper, Ed Miliband, David Lammy.
	These are the losers of the 2010s.
	The sort of the Labour rejects who weren't good enough for Blair.
	But Yvette Cooper at the Home Office.
	Disastrous.
	Right.
	A disastrous thing.
	David Lammy is the Foreign Secretary.
	Could you get, could you get someone worse to have as your, your, your, your, because if you're head of the, I think, if you're head of the Foreign Office you're like the chief diplomat.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Like the highest possible diplomat apart from perhaps the Prime Minister themselves or perhaps the King.
	David Lammy.
	A true moron.
	At least Ed Miliband's going to make sure we all get bacon sandwiches in the book.
	Yeah, Ed Miliband at Energy.
	The dumb Miliband.
	And the rest of these people just a stream of morons.
	I can't help but notice... Fang and Debonair at Culture Media and Sport.
	I can't help but notice there are like three diversity hires.
	Yeah.
	That's interesting, isn't it?
	Like, no one's like, oh my goodness.
	Oh God, Lisa Nandy.
	Yeah, Lisa Nandy.
	She's welcome.
	Hilary Benn.
	Yeah.
	But like, no one's like, oh, well, Labour's really racist because they've got hardly any diversity.
	And the Conservatives are not racist because they literally have an Indian prime minister and a 90% diverse cabinet.
	Like, that's not... Like, after the election, the safe seats are going to be very diverse for the Conservatives, whereas Labour looks like A nativist party?
	Almost.
	It doesn't matter for leftists.
	Their heart is in the right place.
	That's all they care about.
	That's literally it, isn't it?
	I like Joe Biden.
	As long as we've got a shill at the top that we can control, and he's weak enough to do whatever we want, the globalist agenda, etc, etc, then that's fine.
	We'll go with that.
	What I wanted to add before, when you were talking about the choices, I think that generally speaking, when a PM builds a cabinet, they don't want people who are going to be so popular, who are going to challenge them.
	I think that this is a realistic, it's to be expected.
	Yeah.
	Are there many names in there that would challenge Starmer?
	Yeah.
	At some point, not many.
	Four diversity Entries but just Lisa Nandy for example.
	I mean she's what was her father.
	He was the the running me to trust.
	Yeah So again, just committed to changing our demographic.
	Flooding us with foreign nationals.
	Absolutely committed to it.
	Yeah.
	And she, currently anyway, is international development.
	Perfect.
	Oh good, we're going to be developing other countries.
	Perfect.
	So there we go.
	Alright, so I'll leave it there because I may have run over a little bit, but yeah, the Labour government is going to be bad, but nonetheless, It has to be done.
	It has to get a bit worse and I said that before it has to get a bit worse before it can get better again and someone called me out and said so accelerationism then I thought you were against accelerationism which I am in broadly speaking in sort of pure platonic terms I am but there's no option at this stage again politics is the art of what's doable Isn't it?
	And this is the only thing that's durable at this moment.
	We have to slay one dragon at a time, because the whole next five years will be zero seats for Labour.
	And then in 2029, hopefully we can move into a full new paradigm.
	Okay, that's it.
	Right, okay.
	One thing before we start.
	I think the cut was around 12 to 2.
	12 to 2.
	It was 148.
	Sorry.
	Worry about it afterwards.
	Can I have the...
	You can.
	That's as far as it goes, I'm afraid.
	Okay.
	So we are going to talk about Argentina and Javier Millet and the powers that he is gaining because he's going on an OP mode.
	That means overpowered.
	So one thing to say is that when we're talking about Argentina, we're not talking about the US, the UK or a country in the EU.
	We're talking about a very specific setting.
	And I say this because a lot of people who are commenting on Argentina or replying to comments I have made or some of my colleagues have made.
	They literally talk as if Argentina has the exact same problems with the UK or the US or the EU.
	These are not the same things.
	You could say that to a degree they are similar problems, but the degree in which these problems are causing trouble in Argentina is vastly different.
	So just for me to summarize my limited knowledge on this, South America has just been broadly racked by socialism for generations now, and Malaya is a response to that.
	Yes, so basically Argentina suffers from more than three decades of terrible economic mismanagement.
	From statist policies and you could say a very mistaken idea of what inflation is, because literally if you look at Argentina and its economy for the last decades, literally the people who have governed Argentina think that you can have money trees printing money and everything is going to take care of itself.
	Yeah.
	Also, just to mention about Argentina, if anyone doesn't know, I mean, going back a few decades now, but they were ruled by a succession of military juntas, military governments.
	Yes.
	And a type of, at least back in the 60s and 70s, A type of civil war.
	Yeah.
	Where they were disappearing each other all over the place.
	Yeah.
	To the tunes of thousands and thousands of people.
	Yeah.
	You know, actual sort of dungeons and things.
	Suicide, not suicide, torture chambers and all sorts of things.
	People being thrown out of helicopters, that's where that meme comes from.
	So they've had a lot of instability.
	And then, yeah, some leftist stuff thrown on top of that, which will never help, and so on and so on.
	Yes, exactly.
	And right now, I think they are facing the worst economic crisis of the last 20 years.
	So it is a sort of national emergency for Argentina.
	So they were having an inflation crisis, weren't they?
	The yearly inflation rate is around 300%.
	Jesus.
	And we will talk a lot about this because we are going to talk about how he's constantly misrepresented and why the people who are opposing themselves to Millet's policies and the politicians of Argentina who are echoing their concerns, they bet and they bet wrong.
	And Millet has won his first major legislative victory.
	But one thing to say is that he is literally slashing down the departments that he said that he was going to slash down.
	Yeah, you love to see it, don't you?
	Yeah, so apparently this isn't news to people in Argentina.
	This is not something new, but those outside Argentina need to hear this.
	This is from Guardian.
	And you see, it says Argentina's far-right president poised to shut down anti-gender violence agency.
	Just communists.
	Communists.
	Again, you see, they talk about it.
	They talk about him as being far-right.
	Women are risk.
	amid an increasing number of femicides, but assistance, including emergency help line will be cut.
	Now, this is interesting because it shows vastly different approaches to crime.
	So one of the major causes of crime is poverty.
	So literally the person who is trying to do something with Argentinian poverty is Millet, but apparently the Guardian has a problem with this.
	Now, just an interesting thing... One of the problems that's wracked all of South America is soft approaches towards criminals, which is one of the things that Bolsonaro was strong on.
	Or Bekele.
	Yeah, Bekele, exactly.
	I'm sure the same sort of thing is going to be the consequence of leftism in Argentina as well.
	So, are the criminals really the victim of society?
	Is he really?
	And here, last paragraph, they say the Libertarian president is openly anti-feminist and has faced... I really liked him, you don't have to sell him to me!
	But I think there's a pattern of mainstream media who are routinely referring to politicians they despise as far-right on the title, and then towards the end, where almost no one is going to read, they just throw different adjectives.
	So, what happened here?
	Last Wednesday, Millet had his first legislative victory, and this may sound a bit counterintuitive because people know that he won an election, but he doesn't have majority in the Congress.
	So that was a major problem.
	The coalition party that he governs, and his major party is the La Libertad Avanza, Doesn't have the majority in Congress.
	So what happened there was the following.
	Millet comes along and he says, I'm going to do something about the disastrous policies that are ruining Argentina for decades.
	Now, the main beneficiaries of these policies and the politicians who have presided over them.
	They know really well, and everyone knows, that the free market reforms that Malay is advancing yield benefits to the mid to long term.
	So what they wanted to do was to basically stall as much as possible to prolong those terms so that Malay would lose his popularity.
	But the thing is that Malay is taming inflation, And he's also showing the political will that he wants to actually clash with this corrupt system of clientelism and actually backfire on them.
	Because he doesn't lose his popularity.
	He is taming inflation.
	He is cutting government spending.
	And suddenly, you see that people in the Argentinian Congress had a tie when they were debating the reforms he's proposing, and then the Vice President, who has the extra vote in the Argentinian Congress, voted in favor of Millet's package.
	No, no, go ahead.
	Just a couple of quick things.
	So if the inflation was running at 300% yearly, I mean, right, but then you're not that far away from sort of having to print thousand dollar bills and things like that.
	That's insane.
	300% is absolutely insane.
	Your economy is absolutely broken at that point.
	But it's interesting to note that Argentina's got a system a bit more like America rather than Britain where the executive is completely separate to the legislature.
	So we don't have that, do we?
	Our Prime Minister, the head of government, is in the legislature.
	So it sounds like he is what Americans would call a lame duck president.
	He's president, he's head of the executive, but he's a quote-unquote lame duck because he doesn't control the Congress.
	Yes.
	Which is unfortunate, really, if you really want to just force stuff through.
	In this case, though, this is a very interesting case because it seems to be working.
	Because what happens is that the idea is that...
	When you have all these people who are in favor of Millet, and he has massive popularity ratings, they sort of got the message that they cannot literally create obstacles to him.
	His popularity is going to raise, and in fact, they are going to be charged with the negative, let's say, effects of of what Millet is trying to do right now.
	All the short-term effects that would be charged on Millet if they did nothing are going to be charged on them because they literally show everyone that they are stalling and they are prolonging the period.
	So is he very popular amongst the average Argentine?
	He's unbelievably popular.
	Really?
	Right, okay.
	Did you not see him travelling on an airplane?
	I knew he was popular, I just didn't know the degree to which.
	The entire airplane was just cheering him.
	He was amazing.
	He's also like a rockstar there, he literally walks on stages dancing in funny moves, it's like Osho from something.
	He's got big hair and sideburns, I mean come on.
	There was a song he was singing like, you know, I'm the king I will destroy you and everyone went mad.
	I love that energy.
	So what is interesting here, though, is that he is gaining extra powers.
	The legislation is delegating to him broad powers in several sectors, like energy, pension, security and other areas, because basically what they're doing, they're declaring Argentina to be in a sort of situation of national emergency, and they voted to give him, to delegate to him extra powers.
	They need a strong executive to just cut through all these layers of problems.
	Yes, yes.
	Now, this hasn't gone without any kind of resistance, and that is why a lot of the politicians that Millet is trying to compromise with have introduced some reforms that could be seen as watering down his initial program.
	But I think that's a step towards the right direction.
	Now, this hasn't become law yet.
	It will go to the lower house of the Argentinian Congress.
	And there is where all the articles of the bills that are being debated will be debated individually, but everyone believes that this is going to pass and that this is going to be his major political victory.
	Now, a lot of people are protesting.
	A lot of people are communists.
	Yes, so you see here we can play this without sound.
	I'll close the sound, you see?
	There are massive protests and they get violent from people who are protesting against the reforms.
	Commies and lefties and Antifa are absolute filth, aren't they?
	They just really are, everywhere in the world, everywhere they crop up.
	Sorry.
	No, sorry.
	No, no, no.
	They're literally out here violently protesting in favor of inflation.
	Yeah, and agorist nexus is there.
	Inflation or death.
	How dare you try and save your nation?
	Yeah, how dare you save the economy?
	Yeah, but that is the issue, though.
	When it comes with inflation, the main beneficiaries of printing money are those who are going to get it first, especially by the government.
	But the fact that they don't understand, and here is where there is a lot of plausibility in this criticism, is that inflation is an indirect tax.
	Yeah, I mean, you're literally arguing we need more government.
	How dare you remove the government?
	And you see here that civil disobedience is violent, and you see here public property being destroyed.
	There's nothing like the destruction of public property to show where people stand towards the common good.
	Yeah, thanks for ruining the place we live in.
	Yeah, and you see also here Amnesty International, they had to make a comment.
	They had to add the people who oppose Millet, who is the only person who shows that he has the political will to do something about the massive poverty that Argentina suffers from.
	And they say people...
	People in Argentina are protesting Malay's economic reforms.
	Authorities must respect the right freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.
	And police found responsible of unlawful use of force must be held accountable.
	It's like they're literally throwing molotovs at the cops and tearing up the street.
	And it's not just freedom of expression.
	They're not just like, hey guys, I'd like to voice a counter-opinion to the current Malay reforms.
	No, they're ruining things.
	They're hurting people.
	I need to be free to be able to destroy public property.
	Yeah, absolutely not.
	Yeah, because that's how the public good is being promoted.
	And it's funny, aren't the leftists always telling us that words are violence?
	Yeah, but actual violence isn't violence.
	Actual violence is liberation.
	Yeah.
	They just put an anti in front of everything.
	It's anti-violence.
	Yeah.
	So here we see them burning some bikes.
	I see.
	- Yeah, the public. - I see, that's really helping things. - That literally shows how they are gonna cause damage that increases the amount of money that needs to be given to address it.
	So they're basically, Essentially, it's the cult of massive public spending, just increased public spending.
	Isn't this an attack on the climate as well?
	Because surely they've got the bikes there to reduce the number of people driving cars, set the bikes on fire, then surely damage the atmosphere.
	By their own logic.
	It's anti-climate value.
	Yeah, so here is what happened.
	We have the post that we can translate, and basically there were 35 in favor, 35 against.
	Some other accounts say 36 in favor, 36 against, and the vote of the vice president saved the day as far as Millet's camp is concerned.
	And they say here from La Derezza Diario, in particular, Title 1 of the base law, is approved, which declares an emergency in Graz delegated powers to the president, Javier Millet. - Good. - Yeah, so what is interesting here is that if you see, there are all sorts of people who are trying to cultivate an anti-Millet front, and they there are all sorts of people who are trying to cultivate an anti-Millet front, and
	They are actually purveyors of misinformation in order to harm Millet's image.
	And here we have Z Media official.
	Javier Millet's Argentina is in complete chaos.
	People are protesting his devastating policies, which are driving the people into unimaginable poverty and desperation.
	Inflation is at 300%.
	Population living in poverty reported to be as high as 50%.
	In response, he has declared the people terrorists and accused protesters of trying to perpetrate a coup.
	There's everything wrong with his tweets.
	So first of all, he was elected.
	Argentinians elected him to do precisely what he's doing right now.
	So he's not declaring the people terrorists.
	He's declaring a lot of people who are, again, who are disrespecting the public vote.
	To be, let's say, anti-social elements.
	Literal communists.
	Also, when she says inflation is at 300%, that's the yearly rate of inflation, so she's trying to charge Millet and blame Millet with inflation from what happened before Millet.
	Yeah.
	And she says population living in poverty reported to be as high as 50%.
	I think that this is roughly accurate.
	Probably true, yeah.
	Especially among young people.
	Where it's supposed to be between 50 and 60 percent, and she's saying people are devastating his policies, which are driving the people into unimaginable poverty and desperation.
	This puts the cart before the horse.
	Argentina was already in unimaginable poverty and desperation, and that is why they voted for Millet.
	He's only been in office a few months, hasn't he?
	Yeah.
	It's only a few months, right?
	Since December.
	Right, okay.
	But look at here, if we click on her, she says, share the truth at whatever cost, expose them, Ephesians 5.11.
	Commies have just got no problem with lying.
	I don't think that's just being a commie though.
	Well, a globalist then, whatever they are.
	Who knows?
	I don't know who they are.
	Yeah, I don't know who they are, but the people who follow them are people I know and know aren't communists.
	So that's weird.
	So basically she's misleading people massively and she has on her, she's basically virtue signaling, because that's what virtue signaling is about.
	Because sadly, I think someone was saying that around 70% of people will believe just anything people say.
	Just believe the headlines.
	Yeah, just unfortunately so gullible and that's what people like her... So why is this person lying so much?
	What's the agenda?
	What would you think their agenda might be there to misrepresent truth so badly?
	Basically, the agenda is ultra-statist.
	So we have one president in the world that is very much, you could say, anti-statist right now.
	And people who have vested interests in promoting statism have also the interest to shatter his image.
	So now their bet was That Millet was going to have problems in the short run, and he was going to be blamed for them so much that his popularity was going to be decreased, but apparently this isn't happening.
	The message isn't convincing at all.
	And it's fun to see that The Guardian is also playing into it, and also Amnesty International are playing into the narrative.
	Let's not forget things like that.
	And here we also have Millet winning in the meme sphere.
	There are some really nice memes with Millet.
	So the declaration of memes here says, why can't we get to have your Millet in the US?
	And he says, the meme Millet phase.
	He could definitely say something like that.
	If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
	Yes.
	Here we have the inflation rate, the monthly inflation rate, and Axel Kaiser says Millet brings the inflation rate down and prevents a hyperinflation that would have brought the poverty rate to 90%.
	I don't know exactly about the calculation, but the thing is, Millet's actually taming inflation, and he has brought it down to 4.2% in monthly inflation.
	And what a lot of people are criticizing with when they're talking about Argentina suffering from 300% inflation, they're talking about the yearly rate.
	Millet's actually curing inflation in Argentina.
	Well, just to say, I mean, it needs to be under zero to cure that 300.
	You'd want deflation, wouldn't you, to start to actually deal with... Yeah, reducing the rate... It's obviously still bringing it down, at least.
	I mean, I'm not... Yeah, that's obviously good.
	Yes, I mean the rate of its increase is... And here, I'll show you some funny clips from his fans, and we'll show here, because...
	He has also good energy.
	It's like you were talking before with politicians and Farage.
	You need good energy to popularity because he actually has a vision for Argentina and he is being criticized for the way in which he is pushing forward free market reforms.
	Now I want to say that I don't think that free market reforms are a panacea no matter how they are being Pushed forward.
	But you see, the people are with him, they voted for him, and the plan to destroy his image is backfiring.
	So this is good news for Argentina.
	And just one last thing, which I think is absolutely representative of what is going on.
	We have this other meme here.
	Javier Millet saving Argentina from decades of socialism.
	It's up to you to break generational trauma.
	And we have here a communist parent and a communist grandparent shouting to the kids, trying to indoctrinate them.
	And Millet holding a shield, trying to stop the brainwashing.
	And the kids are saying, I'm proud of you.
	I love you.
	And they have basically the flag of Argentina because that's what communists are doing.
	They hate national identity because they think that national identity is what the bourgeois class is trying to use in order to destroy working class identity.
	And that's why they literally are pushing for the propaganda that anyone who is talking about national sovereignty, national interest is far-right because that is their agenda.
	They hate national identity and national consciousness.
	And what is really weird is to look at those parties that are allegedly center-right basically advocating for communist propaganda.
	Yeah, communism at its very heart, the soul of communism is an international movement.
	Yeah.
	It's that you have to bring, you have to bring, you have to let the international worker throw off the shackles of oppression from the capitalist.
	Yes.
	Across the whole world.
	Yes.
	That's the vision.
	The tactics sometimes can come with socialism in one country, but that's the vision.
	Right, yeah.
	It's interesting you mentioned about Milo that he's actually got a vision for Argentina.
	It's funny, it always used to be the way, and I'm talking about sort of in the 20th century or earlier, that you wouldn't really be a politician unless you were brought into some sort of vision.
	It doesn't have to be your own personal One, that you would have a vision for the future going forward, a political view.
	And we live in a world where quite often you take someone like Starmer... Keir, Starmer's got a vision of a massive bureaucracy ordering the chaos.
	Or someone like David Cameron, not necessarily really any sort of vision, just, I want to be the Prime Minister.
	And whatever I need to say in any given moment, I'll say.
	But I haven't got a vision for Britain or anything.
	Well, anyway.
	They're going to cancel Kafka, who had bureaucratic nightmares.
	They'll say, no, no, no, this is bad.
	White man wrote it.
	Bureaucracy is good.
	So should we go to the videos?
	Yeah, let's go to the video comments.
	I saw Carl's video on the relations between men and women, and I thought it was very good.
	Feminists critique the red pill, but it's usually very typical, and they don't acknowledge that the men might have some valid points.
	People like pearly things exploit men who are lonely, and they don't see that she's just telling them what they want to hear.
	Feminists aren't going to convince them, but I think they're more likely to listen to a man who's sympathetic to their problems.
	So thanks a lot, and take care!
	Also, Happy Father's Day to all the dads!
	Thanks, and thanks for that as well.
	That was a lovely little picture.
	Jan V sends us lots of wholesome videos.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Thank you.
	I really like the colours on the leaves.
	I'm a big fan of colours.
	Yeah, that exhibited some skill.
	Yeah.
	Some skill with oils.
	Right, let's go to the next one.
	So you can see my crow friend out there.
	I threw some peanuts out there for him.
	And he's currently eating some and collecting them.
	And I saw him just a little while ago bury one.
	So he seems to be trying to save stuff up.
	I can't help but notice the blue skies.
	I do like California refugees, he's a really nice guy.
	One thing I would say though is that I don't like crows or ravens.
	Why not?
	They're stone cold killers!
	Sure, but I like cats.
	True, I don't like cats either, mostly.
	I like nice house cats.
	I don't like killer cats that will bring you a dead mouse.
	House cats will kill anything.
	Well, some cats are killers, aren't they?
	And others, like, don't know what to do.
	You give them a mouse and they're like... Anyway, crows will kill all sorts of things just in cold blood.
	Just murder them and not even eat them.
	Honestly, most animals are like that.
	Yeah, true, fair enough.
	Seagulls are pretty savage sometimes.
	Seagulls are awful.
	Yeah, literal pests.
	I always enjoy the videos where it's the guy like bashes the seagulls, like good.
	I lived in Newquay, I hated the seagulls.
	They were just a nightmare.
	They'll blast your eardrums out dude, so loud.
	They'll literally steal your food from out of your house.
	Like literally boot seagulls, roundhouse kick seagulls.
	Let's get to the next one.
	A Gentleman's Observations of Swindon, Chapter 4.
	The Goddard family name was apparently well known in Swindon prior to Thomas Goddard's acquisition of the Manor of Swindon for the Crown in 1563 AD.
	He purchased the Crown Inn and renamed it to the Goddard Arms, and it became a very important administrative building for Swindon.
	It still operates under that name as a pub today.
	The right to hold markets and fairs was granted to Thomas Goddard in 1626 AD by the King, and in the Civil War the family was divided, with Richard Goddard for Swindon siding with the Royalist cause.
	Interesting.
	I didn't realise the Goddard Arms was that old.
	It's a lovely pub.
	Yeah.
	My one and only reform meeting I had was in there.
	Yeah, right.
	I had no idea.
	So Thane Scott is on a mission to save Swindon's image.
	That's what I think he's saying.
	I'm totally on board with it.
	I'm on board.
	It's an uphill battle, but I'm on board.
	It used to be quite nice.
	Okay, if I campaigned for Mayor Swindon, I would literally just destroy the Johnny Morrell building and the Debenhams building.
	Oh yeah.
	And we'd make just massive, great stuff.
	We'd make the best Buildings that there could ever be.
	So, uh, going to the written comments before we do, uh, the Shadow Band sent us a $200 Super Chat on Friday, but unfortunately we couldn't read it because of course we had the power cut.
	Uh, but thank you very much.
	And, uh, Rebar says, this donation was earmarked for Friday, and I did go too much, so I bought two more shirts.
	Keep up the good work, guys.
	Love, Ludsys.
	Well, thank you very much.
	Remember, last day to get, um, Islander.
	Uh, anyway, uh, Bonsoul Bomber says, I didn't know Farage was on Love Island, Carl.
	No, it's I'm a Celebrity.
	Did I say Love Island?
	I meant I'm a Celebrity.
	They're all the same to me.
	It's like these, these, these.
	I don't watch any of them.
	You know, too hard to handle.
	You have Lana the Cockblocking Cone or something.
	Yeah, I don't know.
	I got the wrong one.
	To me, these are all like Dino TV shows.
	And so it's just like, it's just kind of the slop of the Dino show.
	No, I get you.
	They're all the same to me and I don't care about any of them.
	But thank you for correcting me.
	Lord Nerevar says, Reform is still something of a tactical vote for me, obviously.
	Farage is absolutely barnstorming and saying all the right things, but it remains to be seen if he'll do all the right things.
	Reform has a lengthy path to walk to re-establish trust among the voter base after Tyson's antics.
	Yeah, no, honestly, I totally agree.
	It's entirely tactical.
	But we haven't got anyone better.
	That's just the way it is.
	I mean, I saw on the Guardian article here, where we had it earlier, they had I think that's the other... Look at that, live, Nigel Farage claims young people have had their minds poisoned with negative views about Britain.
	That's perfect.
	Like, Nigel Farage couldn't have written a better headline himself.
	Everyone who goes to the Guardian gets to see, that's Nigel Farage's opinion on how the young people have had their minds poisoned against Britain.
	Yes!
	God yes, that's exactly the messaging I want to see all the time, all day every day, on every newspaper.
	Nigel Farage points out something true that's happening with leftist hate.
	George says, I find the simping over Farage infuriating!
	Do people not have any memory of his political history, like abandoning Brexit to Boris, or throwing Jared Batten and Cullen under the bus, blah blah blah?
	Yeah, that is all true.
	That is all true.
	But Farage is literally the only person we have Saying things like this.
	I, you know, I'd love it if there was any conservatives doing any of the sort, or anything like that, but Franz is just the only guy with chops to do it.
	I mean, my thinking is, I think I still saw that they're still getting rid of people, even in the last week or two since Nigel has been the leader.
	Still chopping a few candidates here and there for wrong think.
	Yep, it's really sufferable.
	So that's why I did mention during the segment a couple of times that, you know, he's still pretty soft.
	I'm not in any way contesting that.
	And I sympathise with George.
	George is being infuriated to some degree.
	But, what you're saying is true though.
	It's not about us.
	Party politics, yeah.
	That's the thing.
	Party politics is, it's a dirty thing.
	You can't get involved in it and not get dirty.
	Yeah, 100%.
	And that's the thing, like, obviously everything you've said about Fraud is true, but us being infuriated by it doesn't change the calculus.
	I think, I hope that Reform will get some seats this time, three seats, seven seats, maybe 10 seats, something like that.
	Next time in 2029, hopefully become the government.
	And then going forward from there, there will be other parties that are further to the right than reform.
	And then we're talking.
	Yes.
	That's the goal.
	It's literally to break open the landscape.
	Right.
	But first we need to break the Tories, break Labour, and then onwards.
	Kevin says Stelios is right.
	Just wait, there will be a major police action in Clacton when Nigel wins.
	Stories of white supremacists and fascists living in Clacton will abound.
	Not that many of the people in Clacton were forced out of their ancestral home by the guy standing against Nigel Farage.
	Well, I don't know, I think they probably were.
	Omar says, the Wet'suwet'en neighbour keep trying to be popular by committee and wonder why campaigning for the modern audience doesn't resonate with a single voter.
	Farage rocks in with single issue voters he wants solved and both parties are scrambling to find anything they can campaign about other than the issue at hand, immigration.
	Well, I saw them rolling out, Nigel Farage is a racist.
	Did you know?
	It's like, I know you think he's a racist.
	Yeah, I know that you think literally everything is racist.
	So you saying it doesn't have much impact on my opinions on that.
	It's a very good point there and absolutely true.
	If you take for example the Labour candidate in South Swindon where we are, Heidi Alexander, we'll just refuse to engage or answer anything around immigration.
	Just ignore it.
	We'll just completely ignore it.
	And that's what they're doing across the board.
	General Hai Ping says, Labour have already stated that once they're in power they'll be giving asylum to all the Rwanda Scheme immigrants.
	Gimme Grinz, sorry.
	Gimme Grinz, that's new to me, I like that.
	Yeah, Pirate Tomsky, Zero Seats doesn't go far enough.
	The Conservatives deserve being tried for treason.
	Yeah, but Zero Seats is the first step on that journey.
	Thomas says, what was that?
	Bo, 2023, sums up most of the last eight years.
	A guy from Hungary says, no disrespect to Stama Senior, but he did help create a big tool.
	Good point.
	Rob says, while the media works itself up in a frosh frenzy, it quietly sweeps under the carpet the Islamisation of UK politics.
	Yeah, this is a really concerning thing that we'll talk about in an election night, actually.
	There are a number of Islamists threatening Labour seats.
	We may even see everyone's favourite Jess Phillip lose her seat.
	LOL.
	Well, I agree, and this is all stuff that we're going to map out on the election night.
	Of course, as the results come in, we'll probably know something about the place that it has happened in.
	laws against those criticized Islam.
	Well, I agree.
	And this is all stuff that we're going to map out on the election night.
	Of course, as the results come in, we'll probably know something about the place that it's happened in.
	And I tell you, it will be funny if Phillips loses that scene.
	To, you know, Mohammed.
	Peter says, I hope Nigel Farage has some seriously good security.
	Generally, even when a slightly right-wing politician becomes this popular, they become a target to those who don't want him in power.
	Well, that's true.
	Jack says, so I found out when I went to primary school with a guy standing for Labour in Clacton.
	I found it such a shame he turned out to be anti-white.
	University must have got to him before Sense could.
	Running an anti-white candidate in an overwhelmingly white area is an interesting move.
	Well, it only works if you're in a Liberal Democrat area.
	It works in Jeremy Corbyn's candidates.
	I think though they want him to lose so they will say that, you know, look at the racists that elected for us.
	Possibly, possibly.
	The other thing is about most party people that try and run for office is most of them aren't people of conviction.
	So, for example, if I was ever asked back in reform, for example, it would be, well, only on the proviso that I can say the things I genuinely believe.
	Most people that run for office just want the power and the office, and so they're told by the party apparatchiks or the party establishment, this is what you say, this is what you do, and they just go, yep, right, that's the line, I'll do exactly that.
	That's what most of them are like.
	Only on the proviso that I can say about the Scottish, what I really think, says no.
	I love it.
	On the front page of a Scottish newspaper.
	That's great.
	OPHUK says, lower the voting age to 16 but restrict it to men only.
	Problem solved.
	No, raise it to 35.
	I'm done with lowering voting ages.
	Sophie says, just want to remind you guys, Denmark started a new program called Zero Asylum Seekers Accepted for the simple reason that we are at full capacity.
	As a result, the migrants figured out that we had a grand total of 700 asylum seekers in 2023.
	Imagine only having 700.
	That's amazing.
	Anyway, the Crusader says, Argentina is a surplus for the first time in decades.
	Clearly Malay is doing some work.
	Yeah, he actually got the government budget to be balanced.
	It's an unthinkable thing in this day and age, isn't it?
	It's just unthinkable.
	Can you imagine the government not spending more than it taxes?
	Roman Observer says, Argentinians, vote Malay.
	Malay does what he's promised.
	I mean, that itself is a miracle, isn't it?
	No wonder there's all the angelic bloody imagery around it.
	My God, he's actually doing what he said he'd do.
	Leftists know, how could you do that and then destroy property?
	It's mad.
	The Unbreakable Litany says, Communists are aiming to kill people in the Anglosphere.
	That meets the legal threshold to shoot them in defense of life.
	Yeah, no, it doesn't.
	They're not going to accept that that's your judgment and defense.
	And Warlord Wu Tu Tai says, Long live Malay, the good RGTM.
	Well, there had to be one, right?
	Anyway, on that note, we have run out of time, so thank you so much for joining us.
	Again, if you want to get Islander, it is the last day today on the store, so go get it, and we will see you back tomorrow, where we have Catherine Blakelock on, I believe, and she's not known for being tactical about her opinions.
	She's quite full-on.
	Anyway, thanks for joining us, folks.

▲