Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 10, 2023 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:31:00

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #650

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Music Hello and welcome to the podcast of Lotus years for the tenth of a month in a year.
	I'm joined by Connor.
	You're right there, that was very Burton one-man bad.
	And today we're... Keeping time, hello!
	Hello there.
	Hello, hello, lovely, how you doing?
	I don't know if you can just do a whole Cockney podcast, just to be like, oh, remember that ethnic group that's gone.
	Yep.
	For all time.
	Anyway, today we're going to be talking about Tucker Speaks and the Earth Shakes.
	She's definitely telling the truth about that sexy rape.
	And The West simply pretending to be retarded, which is my new favourite hobby.
	I don't know, it's like birdwatching.
	Subscribe to something on social media and you're like, eh, that.
	I've done a lot of Facebook groups recently.
	Just about 40k shitposting.
	Right.
	Shouldn't swear, but oh well.
	Anyway, point is, birdwatching time about The West being retarded.
	But let's begin first with Tucker Carlson.
	So Tucker Carlson decided to say something and the entire Earth shook because the dark demon arose from the slumber to tell everyone.
	I'm making a show on Twitter.
	Yeah, I could smell sulfur.
	The whole media class has s*** themselves, which is...
	Pretty good.
	I'm pretty happy.
	It's a good day, so let's enjoy.
	We'll start off by mentioning something else being on LotusSeries.com here.
	This is Lawrence Wright's The Looming Tower, because there's another funny story out of all this, similar to Tucker Carlson, because the FBI actually fired, well, let go, is the correct term to use, their best talent in regards to dealing with Bin Laden, the one guy who was obsessed with Al-Qaeda, right before 9-11.
	And that dude left and took up the job as head of security for the World Trade Center, and then one month later was killed by mysterious scientists.
	Right.
	Anyway, go check that out.
	Funny stories in there, and some not funny ones, like 9-11.
	Anyway, back to the subject matter, which is Tugger, because if you go to the next link, we can see that, well, Tugger was fired by Fox, and did one video where he spoke for like two minutes, just telling everyone Yeah, imagine if we focused on things that mattered instead of bollocks and he got 24 million views.
	That's the thing, everyone that's ever been on mainstream media or watched it and decided to switch over to people like us know that these short form 10 minute split panel things are actually getting nowhere.
	They're just generating Twitter clips that then generate outrage bait for people that barely pay attention that then go on the earnings report for engagement they can sell to advertisers.
	I mean the weirdest one I think has to be, in the UK at least, Good Morning Britain.
	It's the lowest of the low, like I recently saw some clip in which you've got some stock up boomer conservative type, who doesn't represent conservatives in the slightest, just a bigoted woman.
	And then you have some overly camp zoomer, and the debate was should we ban hoodies?
	Hoods on your jumper.
	Right.
	Who cares?
	This isn't legislation.
	Completely pointless conversation.
	And as Tucker points out in that video, most of the debates you see on TV are not meaningful.
	Yeah, it's like when Farage has to bring on, due to Ofcom regulations, Narinder on to talk about should we abolish the monarchy.
	It's like, okay, random influencer, I don't care what you think about this time-revered institution, but because you scream for two minutes, it's clippable.
	That's it.
	The best quote I think in here that he has is, When honest people say what's true, calmly and without embarrassment, they become powerful.
	At the same time, the liars, who have been trying to silence them, shrink and become weaker.
	And we can see it in real time with what happened next of course.
	Because the Ginger Liar and everyone else decided to come out after that video was released and promised us that Fox News was just going to be as based as before.
	Don't worry, they'll still be spreading, as she puts it, nationalist views, white nationalist views, conspiracy theories and lies.
	You know, that's what people were tuning into Tucker for, not, you know, his monologues where he's pointing out in very calm and very precise detail why you, professional liar, that was your job at the White House, cannot be trusted.
	I remember when Tucker was accused of racism and he went, what do you mean?
	My problem's with liberal white women, they're the ones doing this.
	Very specific.
	Funnily enough, not convincing, ginger lie here, and instead there was a report that Tucker Carlson was working with Elon Musk.
	This came up Axios at the time.
	What did you get here?
	But you can see right away what the media narrative's going to be before it even happens.
	They're saying here, rumblings of the discussion come as Axios further reports that Carlsen is teaming with allies to break his Fox contract, which currently runs till 2025 and prevents him from working with other outlets, which is about $20 million on the table there, if he shuts his mouth.
	Which isn't worth it.
	Like, if you're Tucker Carlsen, you can make more money in two years speaking your mouth than shutting up.
	But if he launches his own show without an exclusivity deal, he's technically not in violation of the contract.
	He's just posting original content to platforms.
	There's a legalistic argument as well.
	His lawyer is trying to still get him the 20 mil, which isn't like 20 mil.
	But they're right in here.
	Social media extremism experts.
	That's a job.
	That's a real job.
	That's not someone who's got too much tinfoil.
	I asked my mate Barry.
	Previously told Insider that Musk often uses his Twitter to amplify right-wing messaging.
	Just the drip drop of the poison of the media.
	Let's throw that in.
	Well, I spoke to an extremism expert.
	He was in the bathroom smearing his message in excrement, but we read it and he said, uh, muskman right.
	Right-wing.
	He also frequently interacts with right-wing commentators on Twitter like Mike Cernovich and accounts with names like EndWokeness.
	As if I feel like I'm reading TASS, the old Soviet news outlet.
	Like, the comrade who has been kicked out of the party, he was accused of liking, well, I don't know, western clothes.
	Yeah, it's just a tribal signifier.
	That's all this is.
	He enjoys n-wokeness.
	Good?
	What's?
	Okay.
	but then we'll get to the next thing here which is he spoke and the world shake but i'm gonna play the full thing because he's glorious and we shall enjoy as you can see it's been out what like a day or something it's already on 75 million views we should know pretty good but let's play this Hey, it's Tucker Carlson.
	You often hear people say the news is full of lies.
	But most of the time, that's not exactly right.
	Much of what you see on television or read in the New York Times is in fact true in the literal sense.
	You could pass one of the media's own fact checks.
	Lawyers would be willing to sign off on it.
	In fact, they may have.
	But that doesn't make it true.
	It's not true.
	At the most basic level, the news you consume is a lie.
	A lie of the stealthiest and most insidious kind.
	Facts have been withheld on purpose, along with proportion and perspective.
	You are being manipulated.
	How does that work?
	Let's see.
	If I tell you that a man has been unjustly arrested for armed robbery, that is not, strictly speaking, a lie.
	He may have been framed.
	At this point, there's been no trial, so no one can really say.
	But if I don't mention the fact that the same man has been arrested for the same crime six times before, am I really informing you?
	No, I'm not.
	I'm misleading you.
	And that's what the news media are doing in every story that matters, every day of the week, every week of the year.
	What's it like to work in a system like that?
	After more than 30 years in the middle of it, we could tell you stories.
	The best you can hope for in the news business at this point is the freedom to tell the fullest truth that you can.
	But there are always limits.
	And you know that if you bump up against those limits often enough, you will be fired for it.
	That's not a guess.
	It's guaranteed.
	Every person who works in English-language media understands that.
	The rule of what you can't say defines everything.
	It's filthy, really, and it's utterly corrupting.
	You can't have a free society if people aren't allowed to say what they think is true.
	Speech is the fundamental prerequisite for democracy.
	That's why it's enshrined in the first of our constitutional amendments.
	Amazingly, as of tonight, there aren't many platforms left that allow free speech.
	The last big one remaining in the world, the only one, is Twitter, where we are now.
	Twitter has long served as the place where our national conversation incubates and develops.
	Twitter is not a partisan site, everybody's allowed here, and we think that's a good thing.
	And yet, for the most part, the news that you see analyzed on Twitter comes from media organizations that are themselves thinly disguised propaganda outlets.
	You see it on cable news, you talk about it on Twitter.
	The result may feel like a debate, but actually the gatekeepers are still in charge.
	We think that's a bad system.
	We know exactly how it works, and we're sick of it.
	Starting soon, we'll be bringing a new version of the show we've been doing for the last six and a half years to Twitter.
	We bring some other things too, which we'll tell you about.
	But for now, we're just grateful to be here.
	Free speech is the main right that you have.
	Without it, you have no others.
	See you soon.
	There's not much that needs to be said, because Tucker's an excellent communicator and did a fantastic job there, before we get on to the response.
	But the main point being, nothing in Tucker Carlson's monologues is ever wrong, in the sense of he's very, very good at laying out, here's what I believe, you can get his opinion and accurately move on with your life, and nothing ever there is insane.
	It's perfectly reasonable.
	You can understand the guy because he's very good at communicating.
	and so the response is not one of good communication as to why he's an evil man and you shouldn't listen to him it is a frantic panic from the establishment and that is the real story here and it's the reason i played the full thing regardless of how long it was so you can get a sense of just how great Tucker is when put up to his opposition because his opposition watched this on MSNBC and their immediate response was a fear that nobody can police him
	That he might be able to say things and then, what, people could make up their own minds.
	Instead of, you know, what was the quote?
	I think it was the guy on MSNBC who said, you know, we're in the media.
	It's our job to tell you what's going on.
	Interesting.
	Let's play the response from MSNBC.
	Okay, well listen, Twitter was already under fire for misinformation, disinformation, all out lies, anti-semitism, racism, before Elon Musk took over, and now it's gotten kind of crazy, right?
	Seemingly unmoored, if you will.
	Will anybody be able to police what Carlson says, or is this the point?
	It's just a free-for-all.
	I think this is the point, it is a free-for-all, it's what Elon Musk wants to provide.
	This move by Tucker may cement the idea of Twitter as a right-wing website.
	I mean, it really is just like a fish you've pulled out of the ocean.
	Just flailing, just, I don't know what to do.
	Racism, sexism, antisemitism.
	Obviously, because Brian Stelter as well, the obviously straight scrotum that is Brian Stelter, got binned off his own CNN show and they turned the lights off as he did his outro on his last show, so it was almost like they couldn't keep them on.
	No one's even watching.
	Yeah, and immediately goes over to the World Economic Forum to do panels on disinformation, so you're just an establishment mouthpiece, that's all.
	So that's why you're terrified, because for so long, your hegemony only rests on the idea that you're not lying by omission, that you are objective, and that you're arbiters of all the facts.
	And Carlson just goes, no, I'm honest about my biases, and I have to be biased because I'm telling you what they're not telling you, so question, do they have biases that they're not being honest about?
	And they're going, oh my god, you're threatening our business model.
	And the big reveal in him saying, isn't this a right-wing website now?
	Twitter.com.
	The reason being because a centrist Elon Musk took over, purged the leftist control, and now allows right-wingers to speak openly and freely.
	That is what makes it a right-wing website.
	If you are not shutting down the right, Then you are on the right.
	Yeah.
	It's like, okay, you're not a centrist, you're not even close.
	No, you're practicing repressive tolerance.
	That exposure by your own actions is just gold, and another reason I love Tucker Carlson's ability to just shake the entire media earth.
	You can see here as well, Elon Musk responded by just saying to everyone, nope, this is what changed since I took over.
	What is it?
	He deleted all the pedophiles.
	Yeah.
	He got rid of 80% of the work, as in staff, at Twitter.com, and the amount of pedophilia on Twitter.com dropped.
	And this is what makes it a right-wing website?
	Okay, okay.
	Unrelated to your Roth and the trans community entirely, I'm sure.
	We'll move to the other responses from the media, because these are just, it's a real golden moment.
	I think everyone's going to enjoy today.
	We can see CNN here, who came out with a right-wing extremist Tucker Carlson.
	I'm not going to re-arrest that.
	Who cares?
	Right-wing extremists in support of a free speech.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	And this is the tweet headline that they put up.
	You know, this post, as you can see, 4 million views.
	They're getting, you know, utterly destroyed in the comments.
	It's CNN.
	They're a laughingstock for everyone.
	But the article is even funnier.
	Ignore the headline.
	Go and check out the article.
	Let's read this.
	They write in here, Twitter has devolved in recent months into a chaotic platform where the traditional press has come under assault from the billionaire.
	Yeah, that's what's fun.
	There's just...
	Oh, woe is me.
	I am a little poor propagandist.
	I can't make it in this world anymore.
	Please spare a penny for CNN, the real victim of the world.
	Yeah, okay.
	Okay.
	Colson demonized the news media with his announcements, accusing journalists of often excluding facts that detract from their narratives.
	Yes.
	They then write, without a space.
	He did not mention Musk had censored speech on Twitter, including banning several prominent reporters from the website just last year.
	They then provide...
	No facts, no context, no link.
	I can tell you nothing about that because they have done exactly what Tucker Carlson said they do which is they will give you one piece of information and nothing more to lead you down a path regardless of if it's true or not.
	Are they not referring to when Taylor Lorenz and the like posted someone's confidential information?
	I don't know.
	I can't tell what they're talking about.
	To steel man it, it might have been when they were posting the real-time location of Elon Musk's car when someone found it, when he temporarily suspended them for that information because obviously it's doxing, but they don't provide a citation, so...
	I don't know if it even could be the Indian situation.
	The BBC reporter who interviewed Musk got all hot and bothered about because some guys in India had done some posts that were illegal in India because of the Indian government.
	So the Indian government said to Twitter, you have to take that down in India.
	So of course, they have to comply with the law or have their staff arrested.
	So they complied with the censorship law in India for Indian users.
	I don't know if they're referring to that.
	Nothing.
	It's just that the who, what, when, where, and why isn't there.
	And I love that their sentence is, I can't believe that Carlson would say, we detract facts from the situation to present a narrative to people that's completely bollocks, and then do exactly that in the next line.
	And then they just move on to the Wall Street Journal.
	There's nothing there.
	I can tell you nothing.
	Because they've done exactly the example he gave you, which is, a man was unjustly arrested by the police, and I don't tell you about the previous bank robberies.
	Maybe they're referring to the fact that Musk won't let Alex Jones back on, but then it's inconvenient when you ask who got Alex Jones banned in the first place.
	Oh, that's right, it's Oliver Darcy.
	It's CNN who got... I don't think they're trying to defend Alex Jones.
	Really?
	Never.
	Carson was able to achieve that influence by posting high ratings.
	They write.
	Yeah, so people liked him.
	This is not the L you think it is.
	But his monster viewership numbers were earned through the trafficking of anti-immigrant rhetoric, false conspiracy theories and the promotion of white nationalist talking points.
	Or it could have been that he was telling a truth and you're a deranged lunatic who can't accurately identify these things, which is why you call it that.
	I think Carlson should just clip that as an endorsement and put it on his website.
	CNN, Tucker Carlson gets monster viewership numbers.
	For Twitter, the addition of Carlson's show is unsurprising.
	Musk has helped to elevate the visibility of far-right figures on the platform, both by engaging with their tweets from his personal account and allowing them to pay for Twitter Blue accounts.
	I love that.
	I mean, I'm sorry, but Tutka's point of, you are nothing more than a very thinly veiled propaganda outlet, could not be more proved than your response to that video.
	What are you talking about?
	Even if we ignore the idea that, okay, we'll say that all the people Musk is interacting with are actually far right, they're not, but whatever.
	Let's just say, from their perspective, it's true.
	Interacting with them.
	Oh no.
	He also interacts with leftists.
	Oh no.
	Crimey River.
	But then he allows them to buy verification.
	Your vision of the world instead is that we shut down political opposition and ban them from being able to engage in literally anything in society.
	Yeah, you're a thinly-veiled propaganda outlet.
	You're telling us that.
	The water companies elevate right-wing discourse by allowing them to drink water, which allows them to speak.
	How could they do such things?
	Musk has urged his millions of followers to vote Republican.
	No other information there.
	Really don't know.
	He's voted, what is it, Democratic all his life, and Republican a couple of times.
	And then he said to people, vote Republican this time because the pendulum needs to swing back.
	They just don't give you any of that.
	Again, they do exactly what Carlson said they do.
	In the article responding to his video.
	Knowing full well that the people who read this crap presumably have seen his video, or are going to.
	I mean, it boggles the mind as to how low effort the propaganda outlets are at this point.
	But do you... Okay, people still bothering to read CNN, unlike us, who are critiquing it.
	Do you really believe they're actually engaging with Carlson's original video, or do you think they just get their summary from here?
	I don't know.
	But really, I mean, the response to the tweet about it was that no one's reading CNN, for one.
	But then you have to wonder about the individuals who are writing this, the people in the office who are publishing it, and who's paying for this.
	I mean, just get your head checked.
	They also finished it off with, Musk has restored the accounts of many users who had previously been banned for violating the platform, such as right-wing figures like Trump.
	Okay.
	And then they mention white supremacists and neo-Nazis.
	Which Trump has condemned totally, so that's all fine.
	All the same thing.
	I mean, it's just comical how he accuses you of the thing and you just go out and do it.
	No inner... Self-awareness?
	Nothing.
	Nothing.
	I mean, you actually are the NPC meme.
	Incarnate.
	We got the next one here.
	We have Musk just letting it be known that there was actually no deal for this either.
	He didn't pay him a dime.
	He just wanted to do it on Twitter.
	He was like, cool.
	Okay.
	He also mentions that he hopes that many others, particularly from the left, also make content on the platform because it's free for everyone.
	If you don't, you're an idiot.
	Sorry, someone gives you something for free to make money and you're like, I don't want to do that.
	All right.
	We have the last thing here as well being Tucker using the platform makes the entire place right-wing according to every journo.
	This is just a compilation of the old checkmarks.
	The oldie aristocracy just being mad.
	Brian Stowell there again, of course.
	I'm not going to go through the tweets.
	You can go through them in your own time.
	It's all the same message because it's like an NPC update.
	I mean, almost.
	We could write the news before it happens, and then just present the tweets, and then just not even click on them.
	Just be like, there you are.
	I mean, literally in this case, that's what I'm going to do, because you know that's what that is.
	And you can go check me if you think I'm lying to you.
	It's there.
	I mean, just endlessly.
	It's like, that's a right-wing network now.
	Why?
	Because there are people who are non-left on it.
	Okay.
	We'll go to the Guardian, because they did something amazing.
	There's just a whole bunch of articles here, uh, for propagandists.
	So the Guardian went with, the so-called mainstream media is full of propaganda and lies.
	It was Tucker's message.
	So-called mainstream, okay.
	Carlson's pivot to Twitter comes after the site has become more welcoming to mostly conservative accounts who were previously banned for hate speech and disinformation.
	So the same line as CNN.
	I'm not joking when I say the NPC update is really predictable.
	The only thing I couldn't predict is how stupid the Guardian are.
	They write in here, Twitter responded to a request for comment with a poop emoji.
	Yeah, because it's an automatic thing.
	For the three people at the Guardian who don't know, it's an automated process now, they're not responding to anyone, you just get a poop emoji.
	Musk made that tweet, it got millions of views and you didn't see it?
	No.
	No, again, this is the manipulation Tucker was talking about.
	You take your boomer friend from the street you live on, who just, you know, reads the Guardian, he doesn't think much, he's kind of the NPC incarnate on your street.
	He will read that and be like, I can't believe they responded like that.
	They are literally manipulating the facts in their response to being told, you manipulate the facts.
	And they have no, no even pretense of trying to make themselves look reputable.
	I mean, this is just a beautiful moment in, there is no mask, there are no clothes, and no one cares.
	We'll get the next one here because here's the author.
	Uh, in case you wondered, pronoun loser.
	Oh, haircut as expected.
	Pronouns in bio, opinion disregarded.
	Yeah, she looks like a cow grazed her fringe.
	We'll go to the next one here just to remind everyone, um, don't hire these people.
	Tucker was right about that.
	You have pronouns?
	Oh.
	Bye bye.
	Going to the next candidate.
	We'll go to the BBC.
	The BBC went with, he lashed out at liars trying to silence honest people.
	Good.
	I demonstrably, we've been able to prove this.
	I don't know what you want.
	They also then delete half of his speech from their reporting because the BBC are liars trying to silence people.
	So what do you want?
	We'll go to the author of this piece.
	You want to guess?
	He's the racial justice editor in Indianapolis.
	Right, okay.
	So I'm sure he's improved the neighborhood.
	British broadcast, Indianapolis.
	But it's the American branch, right?
	But then the human beings you have hired to do these things.
	I mean, it isn't even the case that you sit back and go, said organization is terrible.
	We're not in, like, 2015, 2016, where the lying media is about correct.
	We can name every individual person who is doing this.
	And you have one here.
	Like, his job is... What was it?
	Racial justice editor in Indianapolis.
	Now, do you really think he's improved Indianapolis in the last few years?
	Well, he's certainly lined his own pockets by pushing for racial justice as a black man.
	We have also Qatari propaganda, who decided to come out with, uh, News You Consume is a Lie.
	From Al Jazeera, for people who don't know, literally Qatari propaganda outlet.
	They're allowed to broadcast in the UK, but Russia Today isn't riddle me that somehow.
	Whatever.
	And we'll get to the last thing here, which is also beautiful, because none of this screeching has any effect on anyone normal, of course.
	Your retard friend in the neighborhood, who just read the article, From the Guardian.
	Yeah, I don't know.
	Maybe there's no hope for him.
	I mean give another chance I suppose with video evidence of them lying.
	But we'll end this off with what's happened to Fox because of course they tried to get rid of him and caused all of this.
	Well, we have a lovely lady here to tell us how their viewership's going.
	Let's play.
	They've lost almost two-thirds of the audience that helps pay their bills.
	They're left with about a third of their audience.
	I mean, that's stunning.
	And I looked up and down the board at the rest of the primetime, which, with all due respect to the daytime, is all anyone gives a shit about over there at Fox News.
	The primetime pays the bills, period.
	They're all down.
	Just did a quick calculation.
	The 9 p.m.
	demo, which of course is Hannity, he follows Tucker, is down almost 40%.
	Down 39%.
	The 10 p.m., down 24% in the demo, down almost 20% in the total.
	And I could go on.
	The 11 o'clock got hurt too.
	in the demo, down almost 20% in the total.
	And I could go on.
	The 11 o'clock got hurt too.
	Greg Gutfeld, he was averaging 17.45 a night Now he's down to 15.86.
	He was averaging 2.58 in the demo.
	Now he's down to 2.07 and that's the least hurt hour.
	All the others are down double digits.
	They have lost repeatedly to MSNBC.
	Yeah, having covered the story broadly with Dan and Harry, I think Tucker was averaging on the Friday, on the show that he was doing, right before he got fired, 3.4 million viewers a night, and on the Tuesday, the replacement host was getting 1.6.
	That's like Doctor Who levels of drop-off.
	I think Fox News...
	I'm guessing it's roughly, what, about 10 years that they've had the highest ratings of every American news station.
	I mean, just beating CNN, beating MSNBC, ridiculously beating them, like 100% higher.
	Yes, Tucker and The Five have been consistently the top spots of cable news the last how many years?
	It's just forever.
	And now, because you got rid of Tucker, just gone.
	I don't want to hear Hannity, as we were chatting before we started, tell me about how I deserve to lose my job because of my market, instead of, well, how about we try and help people?
	How about the people are important?
	Which is the distinction between Tucker, who will criticize both parties, and someone like Hannity, who I don't think does.
	We'll let this off just by mentioning as well, even CNN took notice.
	They're sitting there being like, haha, we're now in second place!
	It's not really against the W you're thinking, is it?
	It's the guy on the podium, popping the champagne, kissing the woman, biting his medal, and he's still third.
	It's actually Brian Stolt here being like, wait!
	I'm in second!
	I think Brian Stolt has probably done that motion more times than you can count, Callum.
	Probably has.
	But anyway, good news.
	It's a great day.
	Tuck Carlson deserves the response he's getting, and so does Fox, and so does CNN and NBC of being the absolute clowns of the media world that they are.
	Well, I suppose speaking of obviously credible people, Elle magazine columnist E. Jean Carroll has won part of her civil lawsuit against President Trump for a rape that she alleged in her 2019 memoir happened in 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan.
	Daily Wire has the verdict and some of the case details here, so for those who aren't up to speed I'll just run through.
	So Carroll alleged that Trump and she encountered one another while shopping, that they'd met at a party before, and that Trump was trying to buy lingerie for another woman.
	that somehow there were no shop assistants, nobody really around, there was no CCTV on, and no eyewitnesses to witness this particular exchange, but hey-ho!
	And so they decided to have a conversation and joked, hey, why don't we each pick a pair of lingerie and go and try it on in the fitting room?
	And so Trump followed her into the fitting room and apparently raped her there, and she'd said nothing about that until 2019, and there is no DNA or video evidence or eyewitness testimonies to corroborate that.
	She apparently didn't want to report the alleged encounter to the police because she said in her complaint she was in shock and didn't wish to think of herself as a rape victim.
	Until obviously President Trump became president and then she wanted to elevate it to a civil case because criminally the statute of limitations had expired.
	Fortunately in 2022 New York passed the Adult Survivors Act that allowed a one-year period for victims to file a sexual assault lawsuit that was beyond the original statute of limitations.
	So they made the law different in New York.
	Where they both reside, so that she... Well, not for her to sue him, of course, we couldn't allege that, but so that this could happen, at least.
	Downstream of it, okay.
	I've got a question.
	Maybe you can riddle me this.
	If I'd been raped by someone who's now going to be president, I'm pretty sure they're against Hillary, I'd probably bring it up then, maybe?
	Yeah, during the running.
	Maybe when they'd won.
	Maybe in the first couple of years of their presidency, because now, you know, it's a big no.
	No, wait right till the end, and they'll be like, hang on a minute, I was a rape victim.
	Donald Trump raped me in the... Well, it took some time for her bravery to manifest, I'm sure.
	I'm confused, is all I'm saying.
	Yeah, so the jury actually rejected the claim that Trump rapes her, but they said he still committed battery.
	Even though she's alleging full-on rape.
	So, right.
	And he said that he defamed her by saying, I didn't rape this woman.
	Except they said that Trump didn't rape her.
	That's defamation now, is it?
	Yeah.
	I plead not guilty.
	Defamation.
	Cold-screwed.
	He's absolutely gone.
	There is no way that's going to happen.
	Right, okay, the business is going to be over.
	That's it.
	Right, so Trump has to pay her a total of five million dollars, two million dollars for battery, Even though that's not what she alleged.
	And three million dollars for defamation.
	There was a jury of six men and three women, one of whom was apparently a Tim Pool viewer.
	So, I don't know if he sat on the fence, as you joked.
	And they deliberated for little over two and a half hours before returning a unanimous verdict.
	Trump had obviously responded to this in his typical fashion on True Social.
	In all caps, I have absolutely no idea who this woman is.
	The verdict is a disgrace, a continuation of the greatest witch hunt of all time.
	Now, I would like to say that because Carol is particularly litigious, we would never allege that this woman is lying.
	Yeah, we just have some questions judged by some of our own statement.
	Speaking of getting lots of money out of people, if you'd like to pay us £5 a month to keep the lights on because we've been demonetised, you can go and learn from Dan from his BroEconomics series about universal basic income, which is all about people that don't work getting money from people that do.
	Moving on.
	Anyway, the reason I have some questions is because from CNN, from an interview she did shortly after she published her memoir, titled, What Do We Need Men For?
	A Modest Proposal, are you familiar with Jonathan Swift's A Modest Proposal?
	No.
	It was a satirical text about the Irish famine which suggested you should eat your children.
	He's got a point, but what's her point?
	As mutual bog men, I feel like you're betraying our ethnicity.
	I don't know, that island can sink.
	Well, so she decided to go on CNN and she was questioned as to why she alleges she has DNA evidence because she's never washed the dress since 1996 that she supposedly wore.
	Monica Lewinsky style.
	That's pretty good.
	So why doesn't she give it over?
	And she gives us an answer.
	Certainly an answer.
	Let's play.
	You have said that the dress, the coat dress that you were wearing, and we have a picture of it because you're on the front page of New York Magazine, this is exactly the outfit that you were wearing the day that you say the attack happened.
	You have kept that dress.
	You've never worn it again, you say.
	That's right.
	Have you ever dry cleaned it?
	No.
	The thing is, we all have dresses, you just hang them in the closet, something bad.
	You didn't have a good time wearing it and you never put it on again because it's just a bad luck dress.
	I never felt like putting it on again.
	I did not turn it into a talisman.
	I didn't wrap it in plastic.
	I didn't think.
	I just didn't want to put it on again.
	I guess my question is, could there be any DNA on there?
	I have no idea.
	I do not know if the president ejaculated.
	I have no idea.
	I guess the reason I'm asking is because the mayor of New York City, Mayor Bill de Blasio, who of course is running against President Trump, has said that if you were to bring a case forward, he will pursue it.
	He will have the New York City Police Department pursue it.
	So do you want to pursue this?
	It is the greatest police department in the world.
	The detectives are great in New York.
	The thing is, it's past the time.
	It's experts, I've been talking to experts, and they say that we've passed the legal... The statute of limitations.
	Yes, thank you.
	Yes, there was a statute of limitations in place at the time that this happened in late 1995 or 96.
	That has since changed.
	And Mayor de Blasio, when he heard your story, said that he would Pursue on your behalf an investigation and so you have the dress that you were wearing You don't I'm sure still have the tights, but would you consider doing that I?
	Consider it, but the experts are telling me that so you've consulted lawyers.
	Yeah, well they've Written to me.
	I I've never consulted a lawyer in my life.
	It's not something I would do they have you know emailed me to tell me that you know it this as you say the statute of limitations is passed because I I don't know the legal... I don't want to say what, you know, because I don't know what it is, but... So what do you want out of telling this story?
	Obviously you... So... Chat's asking if she's intoxicated.
	Um...
	Well, lots of her interviews would suggest that she's a little bit unorthodox, we could say.
	I do enjoy how she basically answers every question like Trump.
	It's like, if you go, well, do you want the police department to follow up on this?
	People tell me that they are the best police department.
	There's no other police department like it.
	People say... But the weirdness of being like, I don't know, whatever.
	With the dress, I don't know.
	I wasn't there.
	That Didier jacket, I have no idea.
	Well, Trump's team seemed to think that the president didn't, because they actually said, yeah, let them take a DNA test.
	The judge said no.
	Right.
	Bit weird.
	Evidence in my court.
	Yeah, so the judge actually rejected Trump's team to their request to test the dress and provide a DNA sample.
	Carol's lawyers also wanted to do a DNA test.
	Judge still said no.
	Very odd.
	Carol wanted to do it.
	But the lawyers did, representing on her behalf.
	So both parties consented.
	Which is not being alleged in a lawsuit, but... I'm also just a bit weirded out when she described her dress as a bad luck dress.
	Spot of bad luck, I've been raped.
	I mean, I've met rape victims when we were covering The Grooming Guys, they don't usually talk like that.
	I'm just saying.
	Yeah, well, we'll see later on how maybe you wouldn't frame this traumatic event in such a flippant way if it was truly traumatic.
	But again, not alleging she's lying.
	So, the analysis of the DNA on the dress that has been conducted so far concluded it did contain traces of unknown men's DNA.
	But the judge said the report didn't find evidence of sperm cells, and said reopening the dispute would raise a complicated new subject into this case, what, whether or not it happened, that both sides elected not to pursue over a period of years.
	Well, they're both saying now, so... Then throw it all out, it's a waste of time.
	Yeah.
	He said a positive match of Trump's DNA on the dress would only prove there had been an encounter between Trump and Carroll on the day she wore the dress, but not prove or disprove that a rape occurred and might prove entirely inconclusive.
	But if there's no DNA on there... Did they meet or not?
	Yeah, but hang on a minute, so... He can't rape her if he hasn't met her.
	He's saying, so if the DNA was on the dress, it wouldn't matter, it just proves that they did have sex, it doesn't matter if it's consensual.
	Okay, but what if the DNA wasn't on the dress?
	They didn't have sex at all?
	That's what you're worried about, wasn't it?
	Because we'll see that the judge is not the most impartial person in the world.
	Carol also has a habit of saying some bizarre things in lead-up to this.
	This was an interview on MSNBC with Lawrence O'Donnell, and I know that when I'm describing a traumatic event from my life, I always make sure to get a contemporary quip in, like it's a Marvel movie.
	Let's play, please.
	And the way he looked at me, you could see he was trying to calibrate how old a person, my thigh bone, in a Neanderthal cave, you know, it was like that kind of look.
	Okay.
	So I just, Lawrence, I wish I had said, I wish I said, I'll tell you my age if you show me your tax returns.
	Who doesn't smile when talking about how they were raped?
	That dislikes.
	doesn't get a joke in describing apparently the worst thing that's ever happened to you.
	Alright, so obviously credible person then went and spoke to Anderson Cooper, and if we go to the next tab, this is the CNN version.
	That dislikes.
	Well, the dislikes are because the interview isn't quite complete.
	So glad I'm not his type.
	Yeah, well...
	Well, if you're not his type, he wouldn't have...
	But that's part of what she sued him for defamation over...
	What?
	You said I'm not your type, but you raped me still, suing you for defamation!
	That's part of the defamation suit.
	It's the fact that he denied it and insulted her appearance, but she's saying she's glad that he doesn't find her attractive.
	So when I started drinking, I went to a nightclub with some friends once, and a friend was talking to this big black American guy from the Air Force, he was over for some reason, and I came over, I was drinking, and I came over, you're right, and she turned to me, and turned to the guy and went, do you think he's hot?
	And the guy from the Air Force went, well, he's rapable, I mean, is that essentially what she's alleging?
	It's just like, well, no, I am rapable to you.
	Yeah.
	Or I'll sue you.
	It's like, okay.
	Lunatic.
	Yeah.
	Well, speaking of lunacy, there is a part CNN cut out of their clip.
	And I'd just like to remind people that she said this, which makes her very credible.
	Let's play, please.
	You don't feel like a victim.
	I was not thrown on the ground and ravished.
	The word rape carries so many sexual connotations.
	This was not sexual.
	It hurt.
	I think most people think of rape as a violent assault.
	I think most people think of rape as being sexy.
	Let's take a short break.
	Think of the fantasies.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	If you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side.
	You're fascinating to talk to.
	I don't have anything to say to that.
	I've got some statistics.
	Yeah, yeah.
	About 30 to 57%.
	I prefer not to speak.
	If I speak, I'm in big trouble, big trouble, and I don't want to be in big trouble.
	So she was actually asked about this on the stand during the trial.
	If we go to the Washington Post, please.
	Carol qualified her CNN comments, which were construed by Donald Trump to mean that she enjoys rape.
	Okay.
	I think most people think of rape as being sexy because in our culture we are saturated with entertainment shows which continually show rapes to gather an audience.
	She said Game of Thrones depicted 9 rapes and over 50 rape attempts.
	It wasn't clear where she got her numbers.
	This is from Washington Post as well, so even they're taking issue with it.
	It is used because it excites people and draws an audience.
	Here I said, I think most people can think of rape as being sexy, adding that rape is the most horrible violent act that can be done against a woman or man.
	Rape on TV that's shown in a bad light, which means that it's sexy.
	Therefore, I am aroused.
	And so is everyone else, aren't you?
	I can't be the only one, guys.
	Yeah.
	Everyone else in the room is like, are you... It's like the Handmaid's Tale, where they go, you want to put us in bonnets and oppress us.
	You want to tie us down and... You want to put me on a pentagram and pour wax all over me.
	Ah, I've been a bad boy!
	Sorry, lady, you're not my type.
	I'm suing you for defamation!
	That is a South Park sketch, I swear.
	Again, obviously telling the truth.
	I'm going to sue you until you say you want to beat my ass with a paddle.
	Yeah, so she also has a consistent history of making these jokes, because over a decade ago, she decided to joke about this on her Facebook.
	So this has been pulled up by Trump's legal team.
	Joseph Takapina showed the jury this Facebook post from August 2012, where Carol said, wouldn't you have sex with Donald Trump for $17,000, even if you could A, give the money to charity, B, close your eyes, and he's not allowed to speak?
	Isn't that right?
	105 comments, 5 likes.
	I want to read those comments.
	Well, but this was a year ago.
	No, sorry, 11 years ago.
	Well before she came out with her public rape story about Trump and she was joking about having sex with Trump where he's in bondage.
	Okay.
	Interesting.
	The article also here notes that the lawsuit was conceived of a house party with Molly Jongfast, who's an anti-Trump blogger, George Conway, husband of Kellyanne Conway, who hates Trump, and Kathy Griffin.
	Talk about the elephant in the room.
	Please do.
	You're Donald Trump.
	You're the President of the United States, or, you know, in the 90s, billionaire, mortgage, dick-swinging magnet of American industry.
	And you can have any woman you want.
	She was cute when she was younger, to be fair.
	There's a photo of her when she was younger.
	She's fine.
	How old is she now?
	60s.
	So in 1995, she would have been... 50?
	30, 30-odd.
	Callum, it's 2020.
	Oh god, so much time has passed.
	Yeah, she was fine when she was younger, but also the point is, Trump, highly successful man.
	There is no woman in history who has been attracted to highly successful men.
	No, only highly successful men have to go around taking sex by force.
	Sure.
	I mean, it's not beyond the realm of possibility, and obviously he's been found guilty of something.
	Not the rape that she alleged, but there we go.
	We wouldn't allege she's a liar, but fine.
	She has proved in court that she- No, no, I can't make that joke!
	Actually, speaking of legal, it has a remarkable similarity to a Law & Order episode.
	I'm not joking.
	Raheem Kassam's found this clip.
	Let's play this, please.
	Uh, ah.
	Roleplay took place in the dressing room of Bergdorf's.
	While she was trying on lingerie, I would burst in.
	Hold on.
	May I?
	Name's Carol.
	So the man is defending himself from a rape charge, saying that it was a roleplay about bursting in on her in the changing room of Bergdorf's while she's trying on lingerie.
	The interesting thing from the National Pulse article that followed this up said that CNN reported in 2019 that Carol was an avid Law & Order franchise fan, though she claimed she'd never seen the Special Victims Unit featuring this episode.
	It tickled me to death, she said, the coincidence.
	It's a great huge coincidence, but it is a magnificent one.
	I've watched every episode except that one.
	Legally?
	Also in her own book there's an excerpt and she says Wouldn't it be fun to lie?
	I don't know.
	Well she conceded that her description of an entire floor of the famous department store being totally deserted of customers and staff conflicts with the fact that 99% of the time you'll have an attendant in Bergdorf's and that the dressing room door being open is very strange considering the security there.
	In Bergdorf's dressing rooms doors are usually locked until a client wants to try something on.
	That's in her own words.
	but okay very credible Let's go over to Trump's statements, because the man had a public gag order not being allowed to defend himself.
	Local lunatic making stuff up versus... Let's see what his... We wouldn't allege she was making anything up at all.
	We just allege that... It's my opinion she is.
	Don't sue me, please.
	So this is from the CNN article that's happened just before the case rested.
	One of her witnesses is Carol Martin.
	She worked with Carol, the one that's alleging it, at a news network in 1994-1996, and she says that she corroborates a story that Carol had told her about being raped by Trump while they were working together at the time.
	So that's a second-hand account, but that's saying that there's a consistent history that she said at the time this was the case.
	Martin testified she told Carol she shouldn't tell anyone the story because it was Donald Trump and he had a lot of attorneys and I thought he would bury her is what I had told her.
	Joe Tacopina, who's Trump's personal attorney, then read the jury some text messages that Martin had sent to friends and family once Carroll had made the lawsuit public.
	And she said, she's going to sue when adult victims of rape law is passed in New York State or something.
	WTF that's the defamation case and DOJ oversight or something.
	It's gone to another level and not something I can relate to.
	For her, sadly, I think this quest has become a lifestyle.
	Martin responded in court that at the time she sent those messages she was dealing with some serious personal matters, which affected her feelings towards Carol, and she testified the texts do not reflect her current feelings.
	Well obviously, because now Carol brought the lawsuit and could get some money for all of the damages.
	Look, my private texts don't reflect any of my private feelings either.
	Nothing I've ever text anyone.
	Your Honour.
	Represents anything I think.
	Also there's some interesting statement from Trump here.
	He says, I still don't know this woman.
	I think she's a whack job.
	I have no idea.
	I don't know anything about this woman other than what I read in stories and what I hear.
	I know nothing about her.
	She's a liar.
	She's a sick person in my opinion.
	Really sick.
	Something wrong with her.
	P.S.
	Sex.
	Sorry.
	Rape.
	Not sexy.
	Yeah.
	As most people would think, but apparently not E. Jean Carroll.
	So, Trump's deposition.
	We've got a summary from Law and Crime here, because we haven't got access to all the tapes and the whole thing wasn't live-streamed because he's not Johnny Depp and she's not Amber Heard.
	And in the clip that went round, Trump mistook an old photograph of Carroll with his ex-wife.
	Maria Maples, because they were in the same photo.
	Maria Maples had a side profile, Carol was facing Trump, and Carol was with her black husband, boyfriend, I forget the guy's name at the time.
	And Trump pointed to the wrong woman and said, that's Marla.
	Yeah.
	And then the lawyer said, which one are you pointing to?
	And then pointed out that, no, you're pointing to Carol.
	And Trump said, oh, the photograph is blurry.
	Law and Crime editorializes here that the photograph was seemingly clear, The interesting thing that Viva Frye has pointed out, if we go on to this next one, is that there's actually another clip in the deposition where Trump is looking at another printout and is also complaining that it's blurry.
	And I believe this was earlier than when he was shown that photo complaining about it being blurry.
	So the printouts might just be garbage and Trump, being a 70-year-old man, might not have the best eyesight.
	But okay.
	Alright.
	Fair enough.
	Obviously lying.
	Back to the Law and Crime article, please.
	26 other women have publicly accused the former president of sexual misconduct.
	Three of them testified to the jury in this case.
	Curious.
	Totally unrelated cases.
	No evidence from them other than subject to testimonials, but they're being added as witnesses for this case that's very specific.
	How odd.
	Businesswoman Jessica Leeds told a jury that Trump groped her on a plane in 2019.
	People magazine journalist Natasha Stoynoff said that Trump pushed her against a wall and kissed her when she went to Mar-a-Lago to interview him for a profile.
	At a political rally, Trump jeered at Stoynoff to a crowd saying, look at her, look at her words, you tell me, what do you think?
	I don't think so.
	And so we have the famous video that you showed Harry the other day, but I thought we'd just play it in context here, of where Trump was asked, okay, well, what do you think of E. Jean Carroll?
	And he was not the most complimentary to her or her lawyer.
	Let's press play.
	When you said in that video that Ms.
	Leeds would not be your first choice, you were referring to her physical looks, correct?
	Just the overall.
	I look at her.
	I see her.
	I hear what she says.
	Whatever.
	You wouldn't be a choice of mine either, to be honest with you.
	I hope you're not insulted.
	I would not, under any circumstances, have any interest in you.
	I'm honest when I say it.
	She, I would not have any interest in.
	If we'd like to take a look at the lawyer, Roberta Kaplan.
	I mean, I do love that it's literally the epic rap battle line.
	How do I say this?
	You're a two.
	She wouldn't be my type either.
	She.
	Oh, yeah.
	She's also the lawyer for Mary Trump, who hates, obviously, Donald, and is currently suing him as well.
	So it seems there's some coordination here, but okay.
	There's also the amazing clip of Trump defending the reprehensible statement he made on Access Hollywood, where he suggested that women might like to sleep with powerful men and let them touch them up.
	Might be a bit crass, but Trump decided to defend this.
	Let's play this clip.
	And you do say in the video that as part of trying to have sex with this woman, you took her furniture shopping, correct?
	We actually did look for furniture, yes.
	So that was true.
	You actually took this woman in?
	I think so.
	It's been a long time ago.
	How long is it?
	Long time ago.
	But I think so.
	I do think so.
	Is that the only occasion when you took a woman shopping?
	I think so.
	And you say, and again, this has become very famous in this video, I just start kissing them.
	It's like a magnet.
	Just kiss.
	I don't even wait.
	And when you're a star, they let you do it.
	You can do anything.
	Grab them by the pussy.
	You can do anything.
	That's what you said, correct?
	Well, historically, that's true with stars.
	It's true with stars that they can grab women by the pussy?
	Well, if you look over the last million years, I guess that's been largely true.
	Not always, but largely true.
	Unfortunately or fortunately.
	And you consider yourself to be a star?
	I think you can say that, yeah.
	One million BCE.
	Grug have many berries.
	Grug can do what he want.
	Grug say you grab.
	He's just carrying himself a little Hollywood Walk of Fame star into the cave wall.
	You will not have headache now, wife.
	This is such a farce!
	Come on!
	This is so ridiculous!
	Really?
	Really?
	Okay.
	So this is the part that they haven't been playing from Trump's deposition that might not have made the rounds and Viva decided to clip this again.
	Trump points out that there may be less than benevolent motivations behind this lawsuit.
	I think we should listen to this conspiracy theory and then refute it.
	Please play.
	Statement from President Donald J. Trump.
	Regarding the quote, story, unquote, by E. Jean Carroll, claiming she once encountered me at Bergdorf Goodman 23 years ago, I've never met this person in my life.
	She is trying to sell a new book that should indicate her motivation.
	It should be sold in the fiction section.
	Shame on those who make up false stories of assault to try to get publicity for themselves, or sell a book, or carry out a political agenda, like Julie Swetnick, who falsely accused Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
	It's just as bad for people to believe it, particularly when there is zero evidence.
	Worse still, for a dying publication to try to prop itself up by peddling fake news, it's an epidemic.
	Ms.
	Carroll and New York Magazine, colon, no pictures, no surveillance, no videos, no reports, no sales attendants around, question mark, question mark.
	I would like to thank Burdorf Goodman for confirming they have no video footage of any such incident because it never happened.
	False accusations diminish the severity of real assault.
	All should condemn false accusations and any actual assault in the strongest possible terms.
	If anyone has information that the Democratic Party is working with Ms.
	Carroll or New York Magazine, please notify us as soon as possible.
	The world should know what's really going on.
	It's a disgrace, and people should pay dearly for such false accusations.
	See, that's what you have in front of you?
	Yeah.
	So, Trump alleges that there might be democratic operatives working to...
	Dark sabotage of his entire life with multiple lawsuits, particularly this one.
	Of course we could not allege that- Oh, damn.
	Just to interrupt, I have actually remembered.
	It is a South Park episode.
	Oh, go on.
	Mel Gibson.
	Do you remember The Passion of the Christ?
	I have not seen much South Park.
	Alright, anyway, Stan and Carl try and get their money back because the movie was crap.
	So they go to Mel Gibson's house.
	And Mel Gibson starts tying himself up to a rack and goes, Ah, I bet you want to squeeze my nipples!
	I bet you want to, to, uh, stretch my body!
	But you'll never find the money!
	It won't happen!
	And they're just like, no, can we just have the $10?
	Right.
	It is actually a South Park episode.
	To quote Friedrich Nietzsche, much of philosophy is confession.
	Anyway, so it turns out the person that's paying for this lawsuit is a Democrat megadonor who helped bankroll the Fusion GPS firm that compiled the Steele dossier for the Clinton campaign that said Trump was a Russian asset, and he was also the former founder of LinkedIn.
	Previous liar, who funded lies, is now funding this lady, who's totally not lying.
	The interesting thing is Reid Hoffman was recently implicated in flying on Jeffrey Epstein's jet.
	So, clearly cares about sexual assault.
	Hoffman told New York Magazine's Kara Swisher, the short answer is I will spend as much I possibly can and it takes and is effective to beat Trump.
	Just motivated by truth, sure.
	Hoffman contributed more than $600,000 for the legal defense of Bean LLC, also known as Fusion GPS, the company responsible for the Steele dossier.
	Judge Kaplan actually ruled that the team cannot bring up the fact that Carroll's litigation was funded by this person, and they said that it would bias the plaintiffs, and to suggest that the plaintiff was biased and that the motive was biased is contempt of court.
	So Trump is not allowed to raise any evidence on his own social media to his own defense.
	He was not convicted of the rape alleged but they alleged that he committed battery even though there's no evidence of that or the rape and that he committed defamation because he said that she was unattractive.
	Right, so obviously not a political hatchet job and I'm sure that E. Jean Carroll has lied about absolutely nothing and I hope she enjoys all her money.
	Still going with the idea of going up to people with a picture of yourself and going, aren't I rapable?
	Yeah.
	And if you say no, I'll sue you.
	Yeah.
	All right, love.
	If it works for you, whatever bars you visit in.
	Move on.
	So the West is simply pretending to be retarded.
	After all, haha, got you, non-Westerners.
	Very convincing.
	At least I hope.
	I'm now on like stage 10 Copium, so I thought we'd do this and huff some more.
	We'll start off just by going over some other, well, not Copium, Depresso Espresso instead.
	This being Robert Conquest's Reflections on a Ravaged Century.
	Great book.
	By the way, we shall begin with checking out retarded Westerners doing retarded Westerner things.
	Such as local Yankee here, who decided to leave the United States for all of five minutes before being offended.
	She's in Iceland.
	She made it all the way to Iceland, the first stop of the plane before you get to anywhere in Europe.
	You know, because when an American does a world tour, they go to Europe and then home.
	Big old world out there.
	Yep.
	And she turned up to an Icelandic flea market in the capital and found a confederate flag being sold and quickly pissed her pant.
	Uh, can I just point out the flag next to it?
	No.
	No, that one's not important.
	The Japanese Rising Sun?
	They did nothing wrong, ever!
	Unit 343?
	The Rape of Manking?
	But racism, Connor!
	Oh, yes.
	Yeah, of course.
	Yeah, the Japanese were- I like the Japanese!
	I mean, technically.
	Have you ever seen Japanese imperial propaganda about race?
	I have seen bits and pieces, yeah.
	They weren't too fond of the... I mean, not the wartime stuff, but the peacetime stuff is usually about how, you know, big brother Japan's going to take us all together, the Asian race to the future.
	You've got little Korea next to him, and then the little Chinaman with his triangle hat, because, well, some stereotypes are just universal.
	Keep wearing the hats.
	Anyway, but the wartime stuff wasn't too keen on the ethnic Koreans or the... The baby on the bayonet was... Well, they actually blamed them for the Great Kanto Earthquake.
	They thought that somehow the Koreans conjured the earthquake.
	Well, they're known to do that.
	Damn K-pop, back at it again.
	I'm going to stop saying things that might get me, I don't know, deleted.
	Section 127.
	Yeah, there's a crime here as well.
	But this is just comical, obviously.
	Not only is she so caught up in her own world, she doesn't even notice the Imperial Japanese Bond.
	She sits there and goes, oh my god, the Dukes of Hazzard logo.
	That's how it's kind of known outside of the English-speaking world.
	Someone did actually post, I think underneath this or somewhere else, that there is a small community of Icelanders who love dressing up as confederates and, you know, have, you know, the Dodge Challenger with the confederate flag on the top.
	Not because they have any idea what confederacy was.
	They just like the show.
	It's really like Jukes of Hazzard.
	What's wrong with that?
	Yeah, I mean the Californians still call the short shorts Daisy Dukes, so... Okay, they're just completely ignorant.
	The guy here in question... Iceland will rise again!
	She bumps into the guy and is like, excuse me, I'd like to meet the manager of this flea market.
	Don't you know that it's racist?
	And apparently when he was told it was racist, he just said... Yes, thank you for noticing.
	You're not in America, and walked away.
	He didn't even deny that it was racist, he was like, yeah, of course it is.
	This isn't America, love.
	There's a friend of ours, who's our old age comrade.
	He uploaded a video, he's Icelandic.
	He's called Lord Pepe on YouTube.
	I think he stopped uploading, actually.
	But there's a video on that channel, which is called Iceland Perfor Political Correctness.
	Now, the black population of Iceland, rounded to the nearest hundred, was zero.
	I probably still is Zero, but there's a video in like the 70s where of course they wanted to put on a show.
	So they had a guy play... Who's that guy that sings the song from Toy Story?
	I forget the name now.
	Oh, the guy that sings You've Got a Friend in Me.
	Yeah.
	What's his name?
	I don't remember.
	Ah, forget it.
	Anyway, there's a guy playing him.
	So, um, out came the boot polish.
	Oh!
	Just the whole thing that way.
	Justin Tudor did some karaoke, did he?
	Yeah, everyone's smiling.
	She goes on to whine about this.
	She also is very upset that someone selling military antiques has military things with swastikas on.
	Yeah, it's Randy Newman, by the way.
	As you can see if you scroll down there.
	It's just very upset.
	That's not Randy Newman.
	Then who am I thinking of?
	I have no idea.
	I don't remember.
	Very famous black singer.
	Oh, that narrows it down.
	Yeah, that doesn't help.
	Kanye West.
	I didn't say it was Kanye.
	He blacked up, then put the mask on and told everyone I really love it.
	Anyway, she just gets super butt hurt.
	So, you know, average Westerner being retarded.
	In this case, a Yankee.
	But we shall move on, because there is more retardation to enjoy, lads.
	We'll go to the next one here, of course, which is the news that the Germans, I don't know if people know, but the Germans had agreed with the Nigerians to send back a bunch of bronze... I don't know, what do you call them?
	Antiques?
	Artifacts?
	Probably artifacts.
	Now, the Kingdom of Benin was- Oh dear.
	Quite a bit of slavery back in the day.
	Oh dear!
	Benin!
	Jolly lads that we were, we went down there and went, oh, you naughty boy, I'll give you a spanking for all that slavery.
	And whilst we're at it, we're going to take some of these bronze things because they're funny looking.
	Yep.
	Sodomon did a bit of museuming.
	Some of them ended up in the Germans' hand, most of them in the British hands.
	And the Germans decided, oh, sorry for the Holocaust.
	I'm so sorry, Nigeria, for the Holocaust.
	Presumably that's what the conversation went.
	Yep.
	Artist's interpretation.
	And have now given all their bronzes over to Nigeria, and a lot of tut-tutting about the British, and immediately, they've all gone missing.
	Oh!
	Oh, well, well, okay.
	So, was it a Nigerian prince that said, I am actually your cousin, I will email you... Send me ten artefacts, and I will... Send me the bronzes!
	When you send me the bronzes, I will put the bank account... If anyone doesn't know about Benin, by the way, King Gezo, who was depicted in The Woman King by John Boyega, Shout out to BLM rallies.
	His exact words when confronted by the British about dismantling the slave trade is, "'You cannot take the slave trade from me.
	It is the lifeblood of my people.
	Mothers lull their children to sleep at night with the song of an enemy vanquished to slavery.'" The source of their glory and purpose or some crap like that is ridiculously flowery.
	It's like, oh, okay, that's very interesting, but I have a gun.
	So, yeah, I just love... We've mentioned this account before, if you're watching live.
	You are funny in a way I can't explain.
	Because he literally just retweets stuff and then makes these crappy graphics about it that are fantastic.
	Graphic design is my passion.
	Not shockingly, the artifacts returned have gone missing for some reason.
	Everyone has to pretend that the thing they expected to happen has happened in Nigeria.
	They've all been sold off and not to be seen ever again.
	Amazing.
	I thought we'd just quickly check in on the Guardian before this happened, who was sitting there being like, Germany returns the bronzes.
	Britain, though, racist.
	Why?
	Because they don't trust the Nigerian government with these artifacts.
	Who knows?
	Maybe they just hate black people, question mark.
	I'm just asking questions.
	They're right in here.
	But as a nation celebrated the return of its long-lost cultural heritage, frustration was expressed with Britain.
	which holds the single largest collection of Benin bronzes at the British Museum, but whose governments have stonewalled restr... restrui... I can't say the word.
	Restitution?
	There we are.
	Debates for more than a century.
	Mohammed said that he had hoped Germany's move would nudge the UK to opening talks about the bronzes held at the museum.
	But I met a brick wall, he said.
	The British Museum must understand that repatriation is a turn whose time has come.
	Ah, Muhammad.
	Muslims have never been known to conduct cultural defilement across other countries.
	Well, I don't know how much we want to get into the whole, um, religious divide in Nigeria.
	No, no, no.
	But the, the funniness I just love out of here, like, Muhammad there is just like, I can't believe the British wouldn't give me money.
	Because that's what, um, presumably he did with it.
	Like the furnace fired up to melt them down and everything.
	Yeah, I just love, again, how, you know, in this case, the retardant of the West is the Germans.
	We're sitting there being like, I'm so sorry about the Holocaust.
	Here, have the bronzes.
	What do you mean just sold them?
	Britain did this.
	I am again the victim of Britain.
	God hail the EU.
	I don't know.
	Presumably that's how Germans talk these days.
	We'll end this off.
	Some more of that.
	We've got the next one here.
	We have our Eastern European partners versus us.
	I thought we'd just feature this.
	Just because again, you might join the EU.
	You might join NATO.
	You're never going to be part of the retarded West, Eastern Europeans.
	And God bless you for that.
	We can see here in Latvia, Latvia has decided that dozens of elderly Russians here are pictured.
	They're taking the basic Latvian language test as proof of loyalty to the country where they have lived for decades.
	And if they fail, they may face expulsion, Reuters report.
	And, um, local man in England who has lost more hope than he thought he even had.
	Meanwhile, I can get on a bus and not hear a single person speak in English.
	And, uh, he's right.
	I experienced that myself.
	Not even in London.
	I live in London.
	I mean, that's kind of the weird thing.
	It was sort of acceptable.
	It's like, yeah, London has completely fallen.
	Nobody speaks English there anymore.
	The few English people left constantly talk about, did you notice that nobody talks English around here?
	Isn't that strange?
	Even left-wingers would notice it.
	Yeah.
	So my place is not on a tube line.
	So I'm mostly insulated.
	And then suddenly mosques started popping up and Polish shops started popping up.
	Okay, right.
	I'm being diversity-enriched as we speak.
	Louis Armstrong, I've been told.
	Oh, okay, yes.
	We might load that up after I finish this segment for the website.
	I only like to enjoy if it's still up, Mr. Pepe.
	We'll get back to that.
	But yeah, it's just... I want to cry sometimes, but it is what it is, which is not only London has fallen, most of the world, which is England and nothing else.
	God, I love being a little Englander.
	Let's go to the next one here, because some other news in the West is retarded.
	We have here, local man, working for Soy Kale.
	It is a made-up name.
	That's amazing.
	He has also called himself Steve, the volunteer here.
	It is also a made-up name.
	And put himself with a little rainbow on that tag to go down and infiltrate the Calais Migrant Camp.
	This is being Steve Laws over here, who is now Funniest Man in Calais, I think is his new title.
	Because he decided to go down dressed like this, as you can see, put a typhus jacket on, the world is yours, you can do as you please.
	and uh no one in the leftist organizations which are trying to help the people smugglers because their ultimate goal is revenge for the british empire which they had no experience of as anyone they know that make the same people i'm sure yep anyway he uh went down and you can just be let in and do whatever you want as he points out i thought i'd just uh update people with that because he did go down if you go to the next one here we can see no need to get full access the big news there is holy crap the the migrant camp in cali is big yeah i didn't realize how big it was he just went down on the camera dressed up like a leftist
	And they just don't even try and stop you anymore.
	So Callum Smiles came in recently.
	We've just had the interview release, and I know he's releasing his... I mean, I think he's released his documentary already, but he went down there and had a poke about, and they let him in because he dyed his hair bright blue.
	These people are not... they're brightest, are they?
	But it really is true that...
	What is it when you look at someone's face and decide- Physiognomy.
	Yeah, physiognomy.
	It's sort of a- Yeah.
	No matter how advanced we say we are as a species, we do just go, physiognomy checks out.
	Yep, absolutely.
	He's one of us.
	The brightly coloured hair is just toxic frog physiognomy.
	It's like when a frog just has really bright colours in the rainforest so it avoids being eaten because you know it's poisonous.
	I mean, I kind of love... John's done this a few times.
	Actually, he got kicked out once.
	We went to the Batman protest once to cover it, and John decided to go with me down to the leftist side, and he was like, you know, not white, purple hair.
	What are they going to do?
	So, yeah, it does work, it seems.
	Anyway, moving forward, I thought I'd tell you about another retarded thing that happened.
	Ofcom, the queen of retardation.
	Oh, yeah.
	So for people who don't know, speech in the UK is not free.
	The news, I'm sure.
	Anyway, on the TV, it's even less free.
	It's regulated by Ofcom, which is not like the FCC, who just turn up and go, I've seen some side boob.
	Shut it down.
	Americans are not used to that sort of thing.
	Okay.
	American prudishness is very interesting when it comes to TV.
	But Ofcom instead are here to tell you, we're here to defend your rights to free speech.
	And that right is, if you do it, we'll punish you.
	Yep.
	I can't get over this.
	This is a news from GB News has been found guilty of breaking broadcasting rules.
	What did they do?
	They decided to have an interview with someone who said things about the vaccine, which is totally false.
	Anyway, so on here they say, in line with our rights to freedom of expression, broadcasters are free to transmit programs that include controversial and challenging views, including about COVID-19 vaccines or conspiracy theories.
	However, You have no such right, go to hell!
	It's basically the next line.
	The comments from the interview could affect viewers' decisions and therefore be potentially harmful.
	Now, can you tell me any kind of media which couldn't impact a viewer's decision?
	So, the problem with this, and this having chatted to GB News producers behind the scenes, is they know they're getting unilaterally policed.
	This is just the anarcho-tyranny of this body, because they won't do it for the BBC, who have just been unmitigatingly pushing the COVID-19 vaccine as entirely safely and effective, which of course it is, YouTube.
	But regardless about the vaccine conversation, it is physically impossible to make content that doesn't affect someone's views.
	Of course.
	Or potentially harm them by making them potentially change a decision.
	So what every producer has to do is make everything a panel debate.
	And have someone else on the other side who is definitely super more informed than someone like Andrew Bridgen, who recently went on Andrew Doyle's show and debated with Fraser Myers, who... But I'm sorry, even that, by definition, could change your decision.
	Oh, I know!
	It literally, legislatively, makes no f***ing sense that you could have freedom of expression, but also, if you do anything that might change someone's thoughts, you've broken the regulations.
	You know what the fun thing is, Callum?
	They're going to be regulating the entire internet.
	Great.
	Yeah, so our show is going to be subject to the same rule.
	So every time that we have a host on, one of us is going to have to be devil's advocate so that we don't influence someone else's decisions.
	This show is now based in Afghanistan.
	We have no such regulations, because as long as we're not actually there, we don't have to comply with those ones.
	Anyway, sorry, just... I don't know what to say.
	You're trying to apply reason to unreason.
	Just actual tyranny, as you point out.
	There's more of this as well, if we go forward.
	We can see the per capita people who have perked my interest recently.
	I thought this was... So we've played this meme a few times on the right there.
	The local lady, the thesis of the world, pushing the per capita boulder up the hill and never getting it.
	And of course we have Peter over here on the left who has some excellent logic.
	We shall read this if we give it a click.
	Wait, wait, her name's Peter?
	I don't know.
	ETA Griffin?
	I don't know.
	Let's give that a click so we can read it in full because Peter over here has some fantastic logic.
	Stupid ass graphs.
	White people make up 75% of the country, the United States, whereas black people make up 13%.
	Anyway, when whites commit a crime, that crime is compared to the 75% of you, and therefore looks lesser than if a black person commits a crime.
	Say there's 13, 13% black people, 4 of them commit crime, oh goodness, 30% of black people are violent, now there's 75% white people, 4 commit crime, only 5% I don't have to read the rest of that.
	What's her point?
	Her point is, I don't understand maths.
	That's actually her point.
	I don't know what more she's making.
	I did not pass GCSE level mathematics.
	I was too busy licking the pavement.
	Yeah, I just... Yes, the point is, yeah, so proportionally it's higher.
	No, no, no.
	Number, number.
	What?
	Number.
	Four white people commit crime, four black people commit crime.
	Same number.
	Callum, did you liquidate some crayons and put it in my water or something?
	I'm losing IQ points by the second.
	They're gonna lose some more because it's not just her.
	Oh, blimey.
	Look at the next one.
	Okay.
	Weirdo on Twitter.
	Another weirdo on Twitter.
	Oh, okay.
	Like I said, per capita is a system that whites created.
	Indeed, we created mathematics to look less violent and to make black people look more violent.
	Yeah, hi.
	Racism on new levels.
	We went back to the dawn of time and invented numbers to harm white... The Fibonacci sequence is proof of white supremacy.
	Yeah, okay, okay.
	Do you know what makes you look violent?
	All the fight videos that I keep seeing of people being violent.
	Disproportional violence would probably be the thing that makes you... Yeah, that might be it.
	We'll go to... Okay, retarded on Twitter.
	There's a few of them.
	The editor for Vox...
	Like the website, Vox.
	Oh yeah.
	Also drinking the retard juice today.
	Oh yeah, Aaron RuPaul, yeah.
	Crude racism, he describes it, to look at statistics.
	We also have Decoding Fox News down there to tell us statistically it's absolute rubbish in the size differences between black and white populations.
	She doesn't understand mathematics either, but she pretends she does.
	If one group has 20,000 and the other has 3,000, the only way to compare the two groups is per 10, 100, or 1,000 people.
	What?
	No it isn't.
	You cannot get an accurate comparison when using metric that makes them look equal.
	Look, I'm a total midwit, right?
	So I'm bad at maths.
	I'm basically... You're dyslexic.
	I'm like the numbers version of that.
	I did do a physics degree.
	Yeah, I know.
	So you're smart in that, right?
	I'm entirely smart in language.
	So I'm dumb.
	I'm dumb.
	I'm dyslexic and kind of retarded.
	And even I know this.
	Yeah, well, I was just going to say, so I basically will get things wrong on a calculator.
	You can divide by more than just tens.
	My IQ is now one after reading this.
	I feel like I need to go watch Josh's contemplations on IQ to understand why these people are so smooth-brained.
	My IQ is now about to be zero because there's one more to enjoy here.
	The biggest brain of the West.
	Keith over here.
	A factual rebuttal to Elon Musk's crime meme.
	I don't know how you make a factual rebuttal to numbers.
	I'm reminded of that TF2 video, The Heavy, who's like, some people think they can outsmart me.
	I'm yet to meet a person who can outsmart none but.
	We have a person here saying, white offenders cause more violent crime than every other group.
	I mean, again, person just doesn't understand percentages.
	I mean, the meme forever holds true.
	The per capita will not go up the hill.
	The rates at which white victims experience violent crime from black offenders is similar to the overall percentage of black people in the population, 14.6%.
	Which you may have noticed is more than 13.
	So again, that boulder ain't getting up the hill, folks.
	Ain't gonna happen.
	The West will forever be on this train.
	I thought we'd also just check out these people IRL.
	Because someone on 4chan knows something, which is... Oh, God, it pains me.
	Someone on Reddit decided to come up and say, Amen, as a Democrat, I worry about us allowing our cities to become wastelands of homeless drug addicts.
	I am excited to move out of the suburbs because at least life will be pleasant out there, even if I have to live amongst Republicans.
	I want to be able to go for a walk without fear of attack, I moved to a Republican area.
	Do Democrats only care about the rights of antisocial drug-addicted transients?
	I will never vote Republican, but I hate how us Dems don't have the courage to let the ends justify the means.
	I just love it, this guy who's like, I recognise that my party doesn't have my best interests in mind.
	In fact, I can see my party favours literal criminals over me.
	I have to pack up all my stuff and leave my home, but I also won't ever change my vote.
	This does remind me of the Dave Chappelle joke of how he knows why people want to vote Trump because he thinks they'll fight for them because he lives among the poor whites and then immediately turns around and denigrates people like Anders Owens and it's like, Dave, Dave, Dave, Dave.
	Is there a reason that you moved to Ohio out of Washington, D.C., which you have described as a crime-ridden hellhole?
	Is there maybe a reason?
	I just love living amongst racists.
	Well, we still play Clayton Bigsby, so maybe it's just method acting.
	That's just all he likes.
	We'll get to the next one here, because I want to remind everyone of the average IQ of a 4chan user here, just who are arguing about how I have more chromosomes than you, so I'm smarter.
	Even these people are able to recognize patterns.
	Better than your redditor.
	Anyway, we'll end this off with some more.
	Just Aaron Bastani is the golden shining example of the retard westerner in the UK.
	I'm gutted I didn't get to do the debate with him in the end.
	It's... it's... it's... it's... I cannot give anything away, but I do know some producers that say they do want to set it up.
	He was very busy.
	He was very... Oh no, no, I know what happened.
	What?
	He was busy doing this.
	Well, so Aaron, because Aaron is obviously someone who we want to put in charge of the communist utopia, Showed up to the Coronation Secure Zone without any ID.
	Good job.
	He also decided to go home and write about how East Germany was actually heaven.
	So if we go back there, we can read that tweet from him, in which he says, from the perspective of living standards, which rose constantly from 1949 to 1970, and political stability, East Germany was immeasurably more successful than the Weimar Republic or the Third Reich.
	Hold on, hold on.
	There's some comparison you're missing a bit there.
	Imperial Germany?
	West Germany, maybe?
	The one over the other side of the wall that wasn't a repressive hellscape?
	We can't compare those, because, well, East Germany had the Weimar Republic and the Third Reich, and nothing before ever, that we could ever compare it to.
	It's not like monarchy was better than hyperinflation or the Nazi totalen Krieg.
	Oh, and of course, I forget, West Germany wasn't subject to either of those?
	No, no, no, no.
	They escaped hyperinflation and totalen Krieg.
	In fact, after the wall was built, it was to keep the Nazis out.
	To keep the Nazis in West Germany.
	That's why it's called the Anti-Fascist Protection Wall.
	Aaron actually believes this crap.
	Presumably.
	Because look at the next one here.
	It's real.
	He actually put up some interview.
	You can see here.
	Where he even got community noted.
	Because it was so retarded.
	Oh, per capita's in there, lovely!
	Yeah, something he'll never understand.
	I remember an article from the New York Times quite a while ago of where they said sexual freedom was way better under East Germany, and they were citing books that were the testimonies of prostitutes who had to sleep with men to get bread.
	What a life.
	But you can see here, Karl pointed out the other day that the best thing about the community notes is that they have to have the truth put right next to the lies, and that's what infuriates them.
	Because you can see the title of the video there is, A Country Where Communism Almost Worked, I mean, retarded.
	But then you go to the next link, and we can see they changed the title of their video.
	Oh, the real story of Communist E-Trips.
	Right, okay.
	Also, buy our literal communist gold earrings for $22.50.
	Oh, come on!
	Gold earrings!
	What?
	Okay.
	I know charging for Marx's grave is a bit of a meme, and it's funny, but...
	Really?
	Trust me, communism were...
	Moving forward, because that's our British retard.
	I feel like I'm doing the Olympics, where we're just picking up the Western morons.
	But we'll end this off with some good news instead, which is Chile.
	Chile has decided to not be so Chile.
	They're going to be quite warm instead, and have heating and food.
	Because they've had some elections recently from the Constitutional Council, and this man's very upset, because the party of Pinochet became the biggest party overnight.
	Can someone hear helicopter blades?
	Anyway, this is real.
	I Need a Pinochet is a great video.
	If people haven't gone and had a look for that, I think it's banned on YouTube, it's on Bitshoot, so go and enjoy that.
	But it's not the original, guys.
	They did have to be in another party and then change their name back to the Party of Pinochet.
	But it would be pretty weird if you were the Fascist Party of Italy, changed your name to the Democrats, and then renamed it back to the Fascist Party of Italy.
	I think you might have something to do with Pinochet.
	Just a guess, folks.
	Anyway, moving forward.
	Because of course, the Chilean left is doing a big Pikachu into all of this.
	Because what the heck?
	We did retarded things and everyone voted Pinochet in response.
	Ah, it's good.
	We'll go back to remind people who might have not kept up.
	We did an episode on it ages ago where the Chilean left got in power and tried to pass a leftist constitution, which was the funniest thing in the world.
	They tried to give basically equal status to autonomous indigenous territories with their own legal system to be implemented, which of course is Not what a constitution is.
	No.
	Separating essentially a country from you.
	They also wanted gender equality, the respect for sexual minorities, solving the gender pay gap.
	As if that's even possible.
	Protecting all types of family and eradicating discrimination.
	Oh thanks, I hate it.
	By guaranteeing multilingualism, including sign language as an official language.
	That's not gonna make things complicated.
	So state-sponsored deaf bubble.
	Freedom of expression, of worship, the right to abortion, at all times, and to die with dignity.
	They also included the human right to water and animals as sentient human beings.
	Sorry, as sentient beings.
	Not quite human yet.
	Maybe next year.
	Wait, so, so, hold on, hold on, hold on, so...
	Animals are sentient beings and respecting all types of family.
	Are we going to get a Cenk Uygur situation here?
	But the fetus... Yeah, exactly, yeah.
	Yeah, okay, it didn't go down well.
	They lost.
	It was like 70% of the public just went, no, I'm not the leftist.
	Send this crap back.
	And you may remember one of the ladies who was trying to pass it was actually in a Pikachu costume, so the Pikachu facing is very apt.
	What?
	No.
	Come on.
	you don't remember that no she was in the parliament dressed up as Pikachu that was her thing that's how she got a seat alright moving forward just happy to report that Chilean politics is not in the west but Chilean politics work exactly the same as ours do as some Twitter account promoting the Pinochet boys has been able to prove to me we can go to the next link we can see that us looking normal next link You.
	A bunch of freaks.
	It does look like one of the Antifa mugshots.
	You don't need to read Spanish, it turns out.
	Just like that German headline, Ist Donald Trump ein Sexmonster?
	You can probably figure it out.
	So for audio listeners, one of them looks like he combs his hair with a balloon.
	One of them has bug eyes.
	It looks like mid-journey grade.
	I mean, I just can't believe these people are so weird looking.
	Like the Pinochet guy is just a guy with a sash on, standing, whereas the communists are stood behind their hammer and sickle with every kind of unusual face you could think of.
	Anyway, wonderful times.
	Left.
	Um, sorry, no, West.
	Pretty retarded, because it's full of the left.
	And, um, Chile, not so full of the left anymore.
	In fact, that number might be going down, uh, soon.
	We'll have to see what they do!
	Anyway, Taliban, you've got some helicopters.
	Help out.
	Let's go live in the comments.
	Something always bugs me about these principled libertarian types is that they always complain that, you know, the right should never use any state power to achieve their goals, but they never seem to complain when, you know, it's the democrat-backed, you know, BLM rioters going around, you know, burning down people's businesses and stealing their stuff.
	I mean, aren't they violating those people's rights to property?
	And they usually seem to go out of their way to actively defend the BLM rioters.
	In the case of that one guy that got shot, Yeah, they just don't care, do they?
	I haven't seen, so I think you have to distinguish, and far be it from me to defend Libertarians, between the sort of Mises caucus guys who would believe that any BLM rioters should be shot on the spot and they lament the fact that the cities have taken away gun rights to loads of the amoral leftists who just think all cops bad because I hate my dad.
	I think it's the Texas Libertarians who are the most vocal, like, I'm a retard and I show it.
	Oh, no, hang on.
	New Hampshire Libertarian Party yesterday said you should have more illegal immigrants and hire them because they're cheap.
	Weird.
	Yeah.
	See you in the next one.
	So today I found something which is this kind of field of little mini lupins and I believe that they're lupinus nanus, I might be wrong, but I do know that there are smaller species and I think that's what these are and it's just kind of a reminder that oftentimes you've got a lot of little flowers that are in your habitat so kind of look down a little bit more and take your time because you never know when you might find something interesting.
	It's really nice the weather's warmed up and I get to read in the garden on the weekends.
	It's nice.
	What?
	What's really weird is I always remember to look for flowers.
	It's just a wholesome little thing to do.
	It just reminds me of Karl Pilkington being like, keep your eye on the insects.
	Do you remember the little river that you used to run in Canterbury?
	I always used to just walk around the back down there to St Dunstan's where you get the bus up the hill.
	And I just made friends with the ducks and that was just something nice every day.
	So try and do that, people.
	You'll be less miserable.
	Have you gone to the Freemason Museum?
	No, but I do remember it.
	Right, okay.
	Interesting fellas.
	Okay, alright.
	Anyway, to the comments.
	I think it's the only female racing museum that's open to the public in the country as well.
	So anyway, if you're in Canterbury... Have you been back recently by any chance?
	Go and have a look at the funny swords and the handshakes.
	Freeing Cowgirl's gone.
	Uh, yeah.
	They franchised it and now that they've gotten rid of the pulled lamb and they've now got like tacos and it's in some retail park thing.
	It's miserable.
	They overcharged me and they served me cold beef.
	I was properly pissed.
	Canterbury.
	Anyway, for more tips on Canterbury, subscribe to the Podcast of Low Seas.
	I still remember when... Like, you know, I'm not one for the Islamisation of Britain, of course, but... Just some more reminiscing.
	Well, I do remember when Britain first turned up and it was the funniest thing I've ever experienced.
	Because you've got Canterbury Cathedral, you know, it's the heart of Christendom.
	I'm not for building a mosque anywhere in that city.
	But there's a small one on the college campus, like from a converted house, so that the Muslim students who are paying, you know, 30 grand, thanks for the money, I love Saudi money, can go and do their thing out of sight.
	And Britain first turned up to protest that mosque, thinking it was a mega mosque.
	And, like, I don't have anything against them being like, I don't want more moss in the country.
	But it was just really weird where everyone was looking at it like... Yeah, there's an issue with scale here, people.
	You guys have... You guys have not done your research.
	No.
	No.
	Anyway.
	So on the comments, OverThePantsPeePeeTouch says... We are a very serious podcast.
	He's a very serious man.
	He says, as an American and a Minnesotan, thank you, the Lotus Eaters, for helping me discover my love of classical liberalism and Anglo-Saxon traditions.
	Imagine being a classical liberal.
	Well, that's the reason I hate mass immigration to the United States, is because it makes it less Anglo-Saxon.
	And the more that happens, the less sway we have as a nation for our interests.
	People really underestimate the reason the, you know, them.
	The ones with all the power in America.
	You know, those people who are overrepresented in all positions of power in the media.
	Go on.
	The Irish.
	Those guys.
	The reason they have so much power is because of the mass migration to America.
	Whereas, you know, we've got that problem of as the country becomes more and more Español instead of Inglés, we lose out to that.
	There's a guy, I can't remember his name, I think actually Joe Biden spoke about this once.
	After a couple of instances you can really see that connection and the fact that it's dying out is so catastrophic.
	It's after World War II and 9-11 is those two moments in which the generations who were alive to remember those things really love the british and feel the anglo bond that we have and the generations in between not so much and understandably but the more the country demographically shifts and becomes less of an anglo nation i really do actually fear for our ability to even have any kind of connection which is really bad for the uk because you know Kind of need the superpower.
	Yeah, well, DeSantis recently articulated this when he visited Kimi Badnok.
	He was speaking specifically about the Anglo spirit of America, which is encouraging.
	Some of the other stuff he's done is not encouraging.
	My only point, for purely selfish reasons, is that I think Irish women are generally more attractive than Hispanics, so I encourage more Irish immigration to the US.
	Someone online says, uh, who's going to the police?
	What Tucker says?
	Very naked authoritarianism there.
	Yeah, I didn't really have time, I didn't feel, but it's hilarious that their number one fear was how do we police him.
	Uh, community notes.
	Oh, but you can't refute what he says, bugger.
	Damn.
	Anyway, JC says, I bet Tucker's had a lot of juicy stuff to reveal about working with Fox.
	Yeah.
	The thing I really like about Tucker as well, he hates both parties for the right reasons.
	Which is, um...
	When you know you've got someone and not, as I said the other day, an ideological... So.
	Let's go on to the next topic.
	Base tape.
	Trump.
	Let's face it, nobody has that much beer.
	Good reference.
	Bloody hell, I remember that one.
	I still told him not to fucking post that.
	Mr Lammy, get down.
	Let me tell you what happened with that.
	When did it get taken down again?
	So we went and filmed the thing.
	Gibraltar, wasn't it?
	Edge of Gibraltar.
	You can see Morocco.
	Perfect shot, you know, nice.
	We could film something funny.
	We do all these jokes and then we're like, that one's not going in, that one's not going in...
	And then he makes that one.
	We go back to the hotel room, we're editing it, and Carl's just pissing himself laughing at it.
	And so am I, but I'm like, you can't put that in, man!
	We're gonna get in so much shit, and he's like... It is really funny.
	Ross, even Anderson Cooper, doesn't believe her, yes, and he's a Vanderbilt, literally paid to lie, so that's interesting.
	Baron Von Warhawk, kind of weird that the woman didn't want to report it to the police, who could actually do something, because she doesn't want to be labelled as a rape victim, but instead writes a book where she's labelled as a rape victim after the statute of limitations is over.
	Well, yeah, and also labels herself a rape victim when it's a civil trial rather than a criminal one.
	So, I don't know how much you know about the Michael Jackson case and that, but originally the first Michael Jackson accuser, Jordan Chandler, his dad got the confession out of him by putting him under the influence of laughing gas, and then he was also on tape talking to his lawyer saying that he's going to take him for all he's got, because in the divorce the wife took the side of Michael Jackson because they were family friends, And so he tried to file a civil case against Jackson, not realizing that automatically in California, if it's involving child molestation, it becomes a criminal case.
	So he was just trying to get money out of them.
	I wouldn't suggest that she's doing that here for obvious reasons.
	Such as money.
	Yeah.
	Mr. Krabs solution.
	Lord Nerevar, I'm starting to get worried about Trump's vindication rate.
	Since comments are read in the website only section, I can say that this woman is obviously lying and it should be open and shut case.
	This is Lord Nerevar's opinion, not mine.
	But every allegation made against Trump is pretty much unbelievable with his track record.
	What if he turns out that he actually did do something, and the allegations are just dismissed out of hand?
	It seems we're lucky that Trump seems to genuinely be of good moral character, because he could try to get away with a lot, given how many cases he's beaten and how many people have cried wolf.
	Yeah, look, I don't think Trump's the most moral and upstanding person throughout history.
	I mean, he cheated on Melania, for God's sake.
	He obviously slept with Saul McDaniels.
	Like, that's gross.
	But, is he a rapist?
	Well, until proven otherwise... I don't need to be.
	Oh god, I was getting clapped.
	Onto your comments, bloody hell.
	You know, that's something he would probably say, though.
	Yeah, that's true.
	He's just like, I don't need to.
	I get all the women, I can grab them.
	No, he did say that.
	Why am I saying it?
	Anyway, John, I've sent you a video.
	I wonder if we can play some of it.
	We don't have much time, but I think people appreciate how funny it is.
	We've got a couple of minutes, don't we?
	Someone online says, you do have freedom of speech.
	You're totally free to speak the party propaganda.
	Oh, indeed we are.
	And Cynthia Paul says, I read that as Benin bronzes had been returned to the Nigerian government to the King of Benin as the rightful owner.
	You failed to mention the Germans are building a museum in Nigeria and now have nothing to put in it.
	I didn't know that.
	That's hilarious.
	Oh, blimey.
	Anyway, I mentioned the other day, Come Town podcast.
	Oh, lord alive.
	Which I just think is...
	Um, Binary Surfer has been enjoying, but there's this one from Tucker Carlson, which is weirdly poignant.
	It's really stupid comedy, but I just think it's great.
	So we're going to play like, I don't know, 30 seconds of this.
	Let's, let's just enjoy it.
	What is going on?
	What is happening?
	I used to be straight.
	I used to hate looking at guys' cocks.
	Having sex with women used to feel good.
	It feels kind of bad these days.
	What is going on?
	What's going on?
	When did it suddenly become better to fuck guys?
	Which it is.
	Which I love to do.
	We're having sex with a guy today.
	We're kind of gay, actually.
	Anyway, gotta enjoy that in your own time.
	I just imagined Tucker Carlson doing a segment on Twitter like that.
	Do you remember the Green M&M's one where everyone was saying, are you trying to make her sexy?
	Because Seamus from Freedom Tunes has done something like that recently.
	He's actually really good at the voice.
	The green M&M used to be something we could all masturbate to.
	And then that changed.
	What happened?
	This is wrong, actually.
	She became unsexy.
	And the Democrats want that.
	They want you to not green M&M.
	Even in this podcast, it's like, it's so stupid.
	Literally just do a very crappy impersonation of someone and then add, I'm gay.
	And it's the funniest thing you can do, which is doubly true with Tucker there.
	But anyway, that's our show.
	We're out of time.
	Pleasure as always, Calum.
	If you want more... Why?
	Otherwise, send us an email about why.

▲