All Episodes
March 14, 2023 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
01:31:54
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #609
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello and welcome to the podcast The Load Seaters for the 14th of March 2020.
That's the wrong year.
It's three, isn't it?
Joined by Harry.
Hello there!
What year is it?
It is 2024.
Bastard.
Anyway, so today we're going to be talking about the Mana Sphere crossover, the absolute free speech absolutists that's the left have become overnight.
Beautiful to see.
Syncs versus incels, which is a topic of the world I did not know I needed.
All I know of this last segment is the name you've given it, so I'm curious as to whether it's as literal as you're saying it is.
That would be funny.
Like the incels have declared war on sinks.
They're just that opposed to washing.
Yeah, they're close.
Actually, there is a weird crossover there of romantic love.
Well, it wouldn't work because age disparity.
We'll get into it, we'll get into it.
Okay, all right, all right.
We'll start off just mentioning something on the website.
So this is 3.30, I think, today.
There's a Q&A about the Silicon Valley Bank breaking down, in which Karl and Dan are going to sit around.
I think more Dan's going to do the Q&A and Karl's going to go Carl's gonna ask the questions, and Carl will look confused.
So, um, yeah, there's that.
100% entertainment.
Otherwise, Manosphere crossover time.
So the Manosphere has had quite a bit of a crossover recently.
I mean, it has for a while.
A lot of normies have been arguing that, like, Andrew Tate, the right-wing, merged, and that's how the normies see that crossover.
I never really saw it that way.
I never saw Andrew Tate as really being a right-winger.
He was more of a, like, guy who spoke about dating and women and He was just an influencer, as far as I'm concerned, and he was a, like, anti-woke influencer, but I never saw him as putting forward any particularly right-wing views.
It was weird.
Certainly not the running a brothel, that doesn't seem to be particularly right-wing to me.
But there's a bit of crossover here that's far more interesting, which is the dating world, or at least the dating podcast world.
We'll start off just by promoting something on lotuses.com, being the politics and philosophy that they love.
Because you'll see a lot of this as we go through it, which is once you put the glasses on you realise all the messaging society has is just a lie to make you obey for some goddamn reason.
But we'll find out why.
Because the WhateverProg podcast, it's pretty funny.
Apparently used to do pranks or something.
Never heard of it until it started doing what it's doing at the moment.
I've seen a lot of clips from it on Twitter.
I've never watched a full episode, and looking at that, they are five hours long.
And I know that you've been watching them, so, you know, Godspeed to you, sir.
I've been watching them for a while, because they're really interesting, to be honest.
And the Manosphere stuff, for me, is not actually about the men.
The men are really not entertaining in the slyest.
Well, he's just there to ask questions to make women not be able to answer.
No, no, because there's other podcasts that do this and various ones.
The one about this guy I like in particular is he'll sit there and he's just like the host.
He's fairly normal human being.
And he'll invite some like proper garden tools, you know, the hoes.
And then a couple of normal women and then someone next to him who'll be based on normal.
And that's enough to be entertaining because the garden tools in the room are that out of touch.
I know he had Michael Knowles on recently, didn't he?
Yeah, this is where the crossover aspect comes into it.
Because it's the women that are interesting on these streams.
And some of them are enlightening as to why they do what they do.
This one in particular... I see they've come dressed in their best Sunday clothes.
There's a lady at the top of the table there with the... what is that, like ginger hair?
I don't know.
But she makes $250,000 a month doing OnlyFans and also has a body count over 300.
And story for another time, but really interesting character.
We'll get back to that for some other segment, because I quite enjoyed actually listening to her, and it made me realize why they do what they do, because there's a certain kind of woman- Well, it's for the $250,000 a month, isn't it?
Not really, because you've got to think, like, what else would she be doing if this was the 1980s?
It's like blowjobs behind McDonald's.
I mean, frankly, I feel like she's- Pretend to tradition.
She's living her best life.
I mean, the technological progress we've had in society, yes, has been bad for a lot of things, but for that particular, like, Character?
Makeup of a personality?
I think we're probably doing better than the 80s version of ourselves.
For the naturally inclined prostitute, they were born into the perfect age.
Maybe, maybe.
But we'll go to the viewpoints of the women in general, because usually they're just absolutely mad, and not really enlightening in the sense of learning something new about why they do it.
Are every single one of them OnlyFans models, or is there any variation?
Are they all OnlyFans models, prostitutes, strippers, that kind of thing?
Just all kinds of interesting women who either engage in the sex industry or don't.
I don't know.
I think OnlyFans comes from the sex industry.
I think that's correct.
I would imagine so.
Yeah.
Otherwise, just models and stuff.
Basically, lots of normie women who are obsessed with looking pretty is really the criteria for that side of the table.
That's just women?
Well, a certain kind.
A certain kind.
It's a lot more normie than normal, I'd say.
But we'll start off just with, like, the mad opinions you get out of these people.
I mean, like, this is probably the baddest one.
Let's play.
If I want to date with a guy who's single, and he's not f***ing any other girls...
Then I would be like, well, why isn't he?
Like, what's wrong with him?
Obviously, there's been some flags going off for other girls to make them avoid the situation.
So, I mean, like, I personally would be, like, more inclined to want to go on a date, at least a first date.
With a guy who's... Well, the guy who's, like, normal.
Yeah, who's, like, hooking up with girls and I'm hooking up with guys.
Like, I mean, I feel like that's dating in 2022.
Yeah, okay, that's a healthy life.
I'm only looking for guys who are already having sex with multiple women already.
I can see the twisted woman logic here.
Yeah, yeah.
Alright?
I'm sure you understand it as well.
The thing that seems wrong for me is the idea that it needs to be reciprocal on both ends.
He needs to be screwing loads of women, she needs to be screwing loads of men at the same time.
Welcome to the West.
Yeah, welcome to the West, but I can understand.
I've spoken to many young women and a lot of them do have the idea, and I think this is something that goes back a lot longer than just right now, that a lot of women will see that as a status symbol, status marker.
Yeah, yeah.
You can follow the twisted woman logic, but it is just... No, no, it's like the phenomenon, as well, that women will be more attracted to you, as a man, if they see you with a woman around your arm, or if they see a ring on your finger.
This is just a well-known thing.
It's just really funny because they'll openly say stuff like that.
You just sort of look at them like, are you for real?
This is where that tweet comes from.
Women will say this stuff.
I wonder why every culture, every religion throughout human history has severely restricted their autonomy.
And, um, these normie women, I mean, one of the things that really comes out of it is the political aspect.
Because, okay, dating stuff, interesting, but not really a political world.
This is where that divide has been true.
People, like, say that these are the same space, the manosphere and right-wing talking points or whatever, right?
But not really, they're really two different sections.
But when you bring in politics and ask these normally women what their opinions are, this is where the crossover comes far more interesting.
Because of course they all believe leftist nonsense, and one of the best examples here being the critical race theory crap that these women will come out with, this woman in particular.
I suppose we'll play this one and enjoy her enlightenment of the world.
You date a police officer?
No, f*** the pigs.
Because the institution they support is inherently racist and profiles black and brown Americans especially.
Throws them into jail, which is a continuation of the slave trade, essentially.
People are working in prisons for less than minimum wage, making pennies and dimes, and it's unfair.
And that's what you contribute to if you're a cop.
My question to you is, I disagree with you on... Yeah, I bet you do, white boy.
That's a bit racist.
You're so incredibly pale.
How can you be racist against, and I'm also half white, so like, how can I be racist against you?
You don't think you can be racist towards someone who's white?
No, I don't because you've never experienced racism in history.
White people haven't experienced racism.
What's your definition of racism?
Um, I'd say basically like the persecution in any type of way that leads to the downfall of just like someone's life.
It's incredible.
Did you see the way that as she was making the speech, she was ramping up to it?
She started off very, very uncertain, and the entirely blank look in her eyes the entire way through, it's like she was being given- she was being fed a question for an examination, a verbal examination, and she was just like, oh, what's the prescripted answer?
I know I read this in a textbook somewhere.
But that's the funny thing, isn't it?
Because, I mean, like, normie individuals are overwhelmingly just indoctrinated through the education system.
I think saying individuals is giving them a little bit too much credit.
But the point is, like, critical race theory is now bimbo energy.
It's just what it is.
That's a better way of putting it than I had, yeah.
It's just someone comes up to you and starts talking about how the pigs are basically enacting slavery on a suppressed... what?
You're a bimbo.
That's just all that goes through my head is bimbo energy.
You're too stupid to think about anything other than what the television and a few teachers have told you.
Yeah, and you'd get it nearly at the time and place in which, you know, there are bimbo opinions you would expect from bimbos, but in the modern age, Critical Race Theory is definitely a bimbo opinion to find.
And the correct response has been noted by some people on Twitter.
I mean, this is usually the podcast, which is just like, you know, women drinking the retard juice over there.
Her being a good example of that.
But, I mean, on the political issues, it just gets even funnier and funnier, because of course, like, gender ideology is also bimbo energy these days.
And this is a rather long interaction, but it's the one that went viral recently and made a lot of people aware of them.
Remind me, I recognize that man on the right, the man in the middle between the other guy, the main host, and the woman.
Who's he?
Because I recognize him.
I can't remember off the top of my head.
Bloody hell.
He's, as you can see, the setup again, like, garden tools, normal women, and then, like, someone who is not a moron.
Chase, would you rather smash the hottest trans woman in the world or the oldest woman in the world?
We'll see this interaction for people who haven't seen it.
But again, just normie gender ideology becomes the bimbo energy.
Chase, would you rather smash the hottest trans woman in the world or the oldest woman in the world?
Oh, no, not the same question.
Honestly, bro?
The oldest woman in the world, because then I wouldn't be gay.
What?
You really just want me to just whip you a f***ing new one, I swear.
Are you like, Chase, how dare you be transphobic?
Yes, actually, what the f*** do you mean?
Yes, that was so unnecessary.
Because if I had sex with a trans woman, I'd be having sex with a biological man, and I don't want to do that.
That's not what you said, though.
That's fine.
Because I'd be gay if I had sex with a biological man.
That's not gay.
That's not gay.
And I don't care if you're doing this for, like, whatever, but, like, shut the f**k up, actually.
Why don't you make me shut the f**k up?
Because I have an opinion that differs from yours.
Oh my goodness, here she comes.
Oh, no, there she goes.
She's not.
She's not.
It would technically be homosexual.
A trans woman is a biological man.
Sue me.
It's not f***ed up.
It's real.
It's true.
It's factual.
I'm not allowed to say that?
It's true.
- Okay, if you guys want to respect gender identities, that's his though.
That's his sexuality. - I'm not allowed to say that.
I'm not allowed to say that. - Yes, from a biological woman who doesn't even have any trans friends, that was too far.
A man of God who doesn't judge a Christian, yeah.
- Yeah, you know what God said?
It said he made them man and women.
He made them man and women.
I just told you I'm not gay.
I'll pass on that.
Thanks though.
Who knew that stating biological facts would make people walk off the show?
Very funny.
I love the complete woman moment there of, I'm going to come and rip you to shreds, leaves.
Yeah.
Wow.
I don't know whether there was, some people commenting about the fact that maybe she was like, I'm going to leave.
And then everyone was like, okay.
And she's like, all right, let me come back and shout some more.
She hadn't had her 15 minutes yet.
But the interesting fact there, of course, being that the bimbo energy, yet again, is just the most normie leftist opinion of the newest nonsense.
In this case being gender radiology.
You don't even need to listen to anything they're saying.
You just need to see the visual of it and you can understand immediately what's going on.
And you can see just the lack of action going on behind the eyes.
But anyway, I kind of preferred the old bimbos.
The ones that would talk about, you know, mascara.
How cute puppies are.
And eyeliner.
And stuff like that.
But, you know.
How nice it is to be nice.
Not leftist theory.
That's not what I want for my bimbos.
Especially because they don't have the actual cognitive power to even be able to intelligently express leftist theory.
Yeah, well, I mean, that's sort of an inherent trait of a bimbo, is that they don't actually think anything.
They've been told to think things, and then they think they think them.
So they just parrot them.
Does thinking this make me pretty?
Yeah, kind of.
But there's a whole other conversation about this.
There's a funny thing he does.
He'll ask a question.
Well, there's obviously a right answer and a wrong answer, but they always pick the wrong one.
Oh, yeah, obviously.
He'll go to the first lady and say, like, what's the answer to that question?
She'll say something retarded.
And then you can see the rest of the women, like, they know they don't believe this, but just, like...
Cows or something.
They will just copy what the previous woman said and it's just like... We might get to it.
I don't know what clips you've got in here but I have seen the clip where he asks them a basic straight question and they are so obviously don't believe what they're saying but are afraid to express anything different.
All acting like herd creatures.
They're just like, I don't, I'm not for confrontation, so I'm just gonna go with the crowd, and we'll say a thing that's not... And just to be clear as well, this is not something that is unique to women in this day and age, because we have a uniquely... No, but it is bimbo-esque.
It is perfectly bimbo, you are right, but we have a uniquely feminine energy going throughout many men.
today as well so this is something that lots of men also fall prey to where they're just sheep they're herd creatures and they don't have thoughts of their own this is just npc behavior yeah it's uh quite common although it's particularly apparent in women i did see the account as well i was interacting quite a lot with the daily wire like they're retweeting a lot of daily wire stuff and whatnot so they had michael noels on the show um after that woman's breakdown where if you go to the next one we'll see it's just that
He's on there and you can see Kiko Kiki KKK over there is on the show again to have some opinions and situation again I just find it funny you got the garden tools who are all from like the Anglo-Saxon world and then you've got the normal women who are from Eastern Europe in this case.
Okay.
Happens every time.
Goddamn slavs putting us in our place.
Yeah, but there was a really funny moment.
I did see a lot of people enjoying this.
We'll go through some of it.
But we'll start off just the fact that Michael discovered how bad it really was out there for our brother.
It was goddamn funny to see.
I think Michael's married and has children, right?
Yeah, yeah.
Good job that he got in there early before all of this happened.
But we'll go to the next link here so you can see his face, at least.
Which is just like... Why?
Let's play this clip and enjoy what he found out.
How much of a body count are we talking here when we're talking like, can you tell us like the highest, maybe the top three you've heard from, from some girls?
I couldn't tell you the top three for the highest I've ever heard from a girl.
It was like 340-something.
What?
- What? - 340 something?
- What?
340 something?
- It killed that many people?
Is that what body got? - Partners, partners.
- Oh man, 'cause I'm like actually not a prude, and I'm from New York, and I'm like, the highest I've ever heard is like 100, Where are you hearing that from?
I've heard way higher, too.
Than what?
Than, like, 340.
I've heard, like, I'm just saying, a hundred's the highest I've heard.
Yeah!
And I thought that was crazy.
I mean, fair.
This is an interesting question, actually.
When you've been speaking to people out in the real world as, does this technically count as the real world?
I suppose so, these are presumably real women.
Average American conversation.
What's the highest that you've heard colloquially in your life?
I ain't gonna beat you, I know that.
I'm friends with degenerates, so yeah.
But go on, I'm curious.
I don't know, I mean I don't usually ask that question because it's not really... You went to university, people would have said at some point.
I'm trying to think who was the biggest bimbo.
Actually, to be honest, most of the... Oh, this is gonna be cruel.
So we had some nicknames for some of the girls I knew at university.
Oh, yeah.
They weren't pretty, but the thing was is they were a mess, not because they had sex with, like, loads of partners, but just because they were, like... They were just a mess.
Yeah, they needed to sit down and have a chat with themselves, but... So I never really found spotty counts anywhere near that high, that's for sure.
They were too busy being insane to have slept with that many people.
In my own personal experience of speaking to people at university, one guy that I knew had slept with, he said about 70 people, but he said he'd lost count.
In university some guys will end up doing that sort of thing, but it is shocking when you hear women say that as well.
And this wasn't even at my university, this was before I went to university.
One woman that I knew who was almost 30, so she wasn't even 30 yet, she said that while she was in university she'd slept with 66 different men.
And she said this very proudly in a room where all of us were there, we could all hear her, and her boyfriend was sat right next to her as well.
And this poor guy, he was Argentinian, I can only hope that he just, he barely spoke English.
I can only hope that he didn't understand what she was saying because otherwise his heart would have broken.
I did.
I'm not going to name names.
There was a girl I was friends with.
Um, she was just really funny.
She, uh, uh, was sat there one day and then we, we noticed like these, uh, this guy turns up, knocks on the door, walks down the halls, goes down to her room.
I'm like, a bit weird.
Do you know who he is?
No.
No, maybe she knows him from class or something.
Anyway, next day, different guy turns up.
A bit strange.
Next day, two guys turn up at the same time.
Oh no!
Did you not hear anything the night before?
No, nothing.
So what, are we just... is she dealing drugs?
What's going on?
Innocent minds.
She's dealing something out, that's for sure.
Yeah, we found out apparently Tinder is a very easy game when you're a university woman.
She was dealing you red pills, that's what she was dealing.
But there's some other funny moments out of this conversation with Knowles over here that's obviously interesting on the dating front.
Like the next one is just this lady admitting that she has like a committed partner that she's been with for like several months and then she also just has sex with random guys on the side but she's not like in a relationship with him officially.
I've met a few people like this.
Some of my friends actively take this stance.
It's very strange to encounter.
But like, Michael is asking her, so which one do you have better sex with?
And she's like, oh, the guy I've been seeing for ages.
He's like, why don't you just settle down with him?
Well, of course, you know, you get to know each other.
That's what happens.
It's just a really funny situation where she's like, well, I'm definitely having worse sex by doing what I'm doing.
And he's like, well, why don't you stop doing that?
And she's like, well, I'm not going to stop.
I'm assuming that it's probably also giving her massive self-esteem issues as well, because she's beginning to see herself as a piece of meat, as so many testimonies from women like this do.
I'm maybe psychoanalyzing, but I've heard enough testimonies myself to know that women do begin to see themselves as nothing more than sexual objects after a while.
Sure, but I don't want to make up things that they haven't said.
What I'm interested in is what they have said is revealing because, like, Michael will sit with them and they'll lay out, my decisions are leading to my life being worse.
Michael will say, why don't you stop doing that and do this, which you have told me would be better, and they just say no.
And it's just like, okay.
I've been Michael Knowles in this situation before, sat on a table with a bunch of my whore friends and gone, why don't you not do those things?
Why don't you do those things that aren't making you miserable?
And then they go, but yeah, but then I wouldn't be as free as I am.
I wouldn't have my personal autonomy.
But do you really want that if it's making you miserable?
It's, you know, your choice, but... Okay, whatever.
Like, you literally picked the illogical choice, right?
The only way that I can be free is if I'm sleeping with lots of different men at the same time.
And sad about it, which... Yeah.
I mean, that's the thing I got from this lady here.
She's saying, like, the sex she has with the random men is way worse.
But we'll go to the next link here, which is, the ladies also sit there and tell him that abortion is bad, birth control's bad, and sex before marriage is bad, and drugs are bad.
And he's like, yes.
So stop doing it.
Wait, it's the women saying that?
It's a clip for people to watch at their own time.
We don't have time for all of it.
This is to say, the whole thing's like three, four hours long or something.
So go and enjoy that in your own time.
But the trans debate went exactly as you'd expect it.
And it's the next link here.
There's a timestamp or something.
where the funniest part is where you know kkk over there is saying that well uh if i if i had a husband and he came out as a woman then i'd be a lesbian and michael is sat there going seriously you'd be a lesbian if your husband of 10 years suddenly just said he's a woman and didn't change anything about him and you can see her look up at the sky and then for the first time ever she's thinking about what she thinks There is a cog turning very slowly, but it's turning for the first time.
But it's not something she's received as an opinion.
She's gone, hang on, why do I think that?
It's obviously wrong.
But then she just says, oh yeah, I'd still be a lesbian, I guess.
But you can see she's smiling and laughing because of how ridiculous it is.
So I'm not going to waste my time with that.
But the ability to reason is really quite hard to find.
And I think that's far more interesting in the bimbos.
So I suppose we'll play that and enjoy.
You just told me that if a man has sex with another man while that other man is wearing a dress, he's not engaged in a homosexual action because the second man is secretly a woman.
But you're telling me that I, by using my right reason to deduce from the world that because the world is, say, in motion, there has to be an unmoved mover.
Or because the world is caused, there has to be an uncaused cause.
Or for any other number of reasons, we can conclude that God must exist in order for this contingent world to be as it is.
That seems a little crazy.
And they're right there, folks, is exactly what the f**k I'm talking about.
Like, that was like, you barely even used any religious jargon, but it's like- Right, I used logic.
Like- I used the language of formal logic.
You're losing us.
Like, you're losing us.
What did you say?
To be fair, that was way too high level for them.
They were moaning about him using religious language earlier.
He didn't use any.
He was like, yeah, I just use logic.
And he correctly did.
They're just like, I can't follow it.
It's like leading a school of fish or something.
It really is what it is.
There are some great clubs from this podcast.
Most of them are of the guests just being absolutely awful individuals.
This individual here talks about how being a feminist is just doing whatever you want to do.
It's like never a true word was spoken but she doesn't realize what she said.
And there's other ones of like some of the female garden tours coming on and talking about how they emotionally destroyed men they were dating for fun.
I've seen that one.
That's just evil to see.
Yeah.
And it's obviously the case that the absolute trainwreck that the garden tools are is not because of overdosing on right-wing ideologies, though.
What would give you that idea?
That's the thing in my mind watching these, and why the crossover is so interesting between the Manosphere and right-wing politics there, in the form of Michael Nose this time, but could be anyone else going on there, right, is that you've got these women who really are just leftist ideology.
Like, people don't have ideas, ideas have people, and these ideas have got that, for sure.
And it's not a surprise.
I mean, we've been over what is taught in American schools from, I think about like middle school, I don't think we can emphasise just hard enough that these people vote.
They can vote.
We let them vote.
It's just the fact that they're completely full of that ideology.
And what's really funny about this as a setting is that obviously modern leftists refuse to debate their ideology.
You're not going to get Kimberley Crenshaw versus Chris Rufo.
They're not going to sit down in a room and actually have the debate, two people who know about the subject, one who founded the subject, the other one who can obviously point out why it's disgusting, and them clash at it.
When it comes to critical race theory, if you debate them you can just point out your family came here on the Mayflower.
There's that too.
It's why the target audience for leftist ideologies is defenseless children.
It's why they go after the schools.
It's because they're not really capable of arguing in the public sphere and therefore they don't bother.
And frankly they don't need to either if they can go after defenseless children.
And they're able to do it because the state allows them to.
Yeah, this is the result of defenseless children being propagandized from the moment they were born.
Exactly, but it also gives us the perfect place in which we can see leftist ideology completely crumble in real time.
Because sure, you're not going to debate the professor, the ideologue who invented this absolute garbage, but what you are going to get is the generations that they've tried to indoctrinate as their legacy engage with someone who slightly disagrees on the most minute level that points out maybe having your mouth full of cock and cum dribbling down your throat as a man might be a bit gay.
I mean like it's the easiest argument to make.
I've seen a few 4chan posts where people realize that halfway through.
I mean there's the one I posted the other day.
The bussy it wasn't it wasn't straight after all it was just gay.
There was this guy posting about how he had a transsexual prostitute in, because he believed that it wasn't gay.
And then he writes that once his mouth was full of cock, he realized that maybe the accusations that this was gay had some credibility.
So yeah, they did.
They really did.
And not only in theory does this all crumble, like some people who are obsessed with philosophy arguing, but just, like, human aspects of their life, this completely crumbles, especially in the form of women, where they're given the examples of, my life is miserable because I followed this ideology and it's not worked.
It's like, yeah, of course it's not worked.
It was mad.
But it's not good enough just to be like, that's obviously untrue because of logic.
We can say, look at the human being that tried this.
They've got women going like, I've got a body count of almost 350 and people always seem shocked when I tell them that.
Yeah, it's almost as if the sex positivity of the left was kind of a complete dead end.
It wasn't really something that would actually enhance women's life status.
It was something that would degrade it.
If you went down that route of like, oh, I'll just act like an actual iguana, I guess.
But that's why I think the whole thing's so entertaining.
It's not necessarily because of, you know, women saying silly things, right?
It's because once you have that political engagement, we're able to have a battle zone in which the ideology can interact not only on a logical debating level, but on a human level as we see with the women with their lives not going well.
And that's what's so glorious about this.
Alright, let's move on then, shall we?
So, I am now a free speech absolutist, was the rallying cry of the left over the previous weekend just gone.
So, for those of you who weren't aware, we covered this yesterday, Gary Lineker currently runs Britain because it turns out that if he can just say whatever he wants without consequences with the BBC.
Because the BBC decided to change their guidelines on how they deal with political opinions from their presenters, despite the fact they are supposed to be an impartial organisation.
There is no such thing, of course, but that's what they pretended to be, and now that's just gone out of the window.
Let's not pretend anymore.
We are a very partial organisation, and our presenters are allowed to just insult the Massive swathes of our audience, those people who pay the license fee and pay their bills at the end of each month, because Gary Lineker gets paid, I think, from that segment that Kyle did yesterday, talking about it was 1.35 million pounds a year, and that was a pay cut.
That was a pay cut from 1.75 million pounds per year, so they could close up that gender pay gap.
He's still the most highly paid person in the BBC, of course.
So Gary Lineker runs the world, and it was amusing just to see how many people became free speech warriors while this whole situation was going down.
We do also have a recent contemplations that Josh and I did over the weekend that I would like to plug for everybody.
You should go and watch it.
We were talking about how corporations exploit ordinary people.
Now, this was a particularly difficult one for Josh to go through.
Being a libertarian, but we do all have major complaints about how corporations work, and we also gave a few anecdotes throughout this, sprinkled throughout, of our previous experiences working in corporations, primarily my experiences working in call centers for complaints, where I was Basically made to do and sadly was very good at doing some pretty shady things just to make sure that the corporation got its way at all times.
And happily the comments, as I was hoping, are just mainly people moaning about times they've been screwed by big business.
So please go and watch that and you can join in all the fun in the comments underneath as well.
Have you ever been screwed by big business Callum?
Hmm.
You probably have at some point.
EA stole 20 quid off me once, though.
I'm still salty.
Really?
Did they?
What for?
Well, I purchased a game, got a refund, they just didn't refund the money.
Fun.
Still mad.
Anyway, so, for a long time we've known that the left do not care about free speech, and in fact, generally speaking, it's only the centre-right that has actually cared about any sort of principled stance on free speech, which has had its
Positives and negatives, shall we say, as time has gone on, mainly because of the fact that being that the centre-right and people on the right aren't the ones in charge, they don't get to implement their principled stances and instead get proscribed and censored wherever they go, including social media, you know, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, wherever you go.
Spotify, there will be somebody telling you, no, you can't say that, you're a very naughty boy.
And the left has not been particularly quiet about this they've been trying to rub it in everybody's faces that we are in charge for a long time and anybody who says hey my speech is being censored even though i've not said anything that could be considered outside the realm of free speech that being you know incitement to violence or anything like that has been censored they've come out with articles like this and i thought we'd go through some examples
of what the left were saying about free speech and then we'll see what they ended up saying about free speech over the past few days so this one was wonderful let's just take a look at this headline the free speech panic how the right concocted a crisis that's right it's just the right do you remember the right we all just got together one day and we said hey let's censor ourselves so we've got something to moan about It was a good plan.
It was.
It was an excellent plan.
And now we're here, taking your money.
Haha!
It all comes together, eh?
Haha!
No, it was almost like the left were awful.
Yeah, I just love the idea that they've never done anything bad.
I mean, that's actually how they think of it.
No, no, they haven't.
But I mean...
It would be, I think the fascists, like when you talk to neo-nazis or white supremacists, they will tell you, yeah I mean we did some bad stuff, and then they'll try and justify it, but the leftists will just be like, didn't do it.
The kulaks were asking for it bro.
Like if you want actual denialism of reality.
I mean obviously the kulaks, the Holodomor never happened, but if it did happen, they were asking for it.
We'll do it better next time.
Yeah, exactly.
We just didn't cut out all the cool acts.
That was the real mistake we made, says the left.
The next one, here's a fun one from 2019.
The myth of the free speech crisis.
I love just the level of gaslighting that goes on here.
I feel like I've...
been beaten over the face by an abusive spouse and they just keep saying no it was the doorframe dear it was the doorframe you've got to look where you're going next time it's the myth of the abusive spouse and in this one it says brilliantly i don't know just go back to it it's the same article the myth of the free speech crisis and is an extension of the political correctness myth just political correctness that never happened either all the complaining in the 90s i was just conservative christian and evangelicals nothing ever happened to do with political correctness political correctness itself a myth
Oh no, I know, it's brilliant.
You're saying that there is nothing that's undiscussable within political life?
Of course there is.
In every society there's something undiscussable.
And I've seen plenty of people on the left defending political correctness and saying obviously it's just having manners, isn't it?
It's just having manners!
But apparently it's a myth according to this article.
It's not some madness.
Because you've got to remember, like, political correctness depends on the country you're in.
Because, like, to say the, you know, the things that we can't say in the West, right?
If you say them in North Korea, no one's going to give a crap.
But if you talk bad about Kim Jong-un, like that's political correctness?
Like you're not allowed to do that?
To say it's just manners to say that he never goes to the bathroom.
And there are literally certain subjects are completely censored and against the law in Germany to the point where many people on Twitter get notifications when they post particular things saying, little notifications saying, Germany is not letting you say this.
We have a choir to tell you!
Okay, I mean, I don't care about the German audience.
Sorry for any Germans who might be watching this right now.
You know, but if Germany doesn't want me saying certain things on Twitter, oh well, I can live with that.
So it carries on.
But there is, it's a recent mutation more specifically linked to efforts or impulses to normalize hate speech or shut down legitimate responses to it.
There we go.
That's been the stock response by the left for so long whenever anybody on the right or the center or anywhere who isn't just a massive leftist just says, let's just Freedom of speech, yeah, but not freedom of consequences.
Duh!
That's been the stock response.
You know what's doubly funny?
The author here is Nesreen Malik, and I don't know if you know anything about her.
She's from North Sudan, and she wrote a column once talking about the fact that her family used to call the South Sudanese the N-word, because they were darker than the North Sudanese.
Oh, she was that person!
Yeah, and were disgusted by them and blah blah blah, it was like horrifically racist stuff.
And then she moved to Saudi Arabia, and all the Arabs called her the N-word.
And then she was like, hang on a minute, racism might be bad!
It's like, it's funny how- Really, Nesreen?
It's funny how people's political positions shift depending if they're on top or on bottom, isn't it?
It was entirely her article.
Oh, yeah.
No surprise there.
There was this wonderful article that came out a few... I think last year, in fact, that just... The headline says it all.
Do you want free speech to thrive?
Then it has to be regulated.
And regulated by me, dammit, is the implication that always happens.
The only way to save your husband is to shoot him, missus.
And then there was this one, which was relevant to the beginning of last year, which was talking about Neil Young's battle with Spotify.
Do you remember this, when it was going on?
I think we covered it.
Yeah.
Together.
When Neil Young, who was a classic rock folk artist from the 1960s, 70s and 80s, he did rock... not Rockin' Around the World, that was that band whose name I can't remember.
No, he did Rockin' in the Free World.
He had a speech called the 2006 Freedom of Speech Tour, but when it comes to Joe Rogan questioning certain narratives around certain Drugs that were released over the past few years, shall we say, to get around YouTube.
Then that meant that he had to have Spotify make misinformation laws and rules applied to the platform or else Neil Young's gonna take all his songs and he's gonna go home.
So Spotify let Neil Young take all his songs and go home.
I think there's still only like two Neil Young songs on the platform and honestly it's a better platform for so.
It's unbearable you, Spotify now.
I know, I can't... if I can't get me young, what's the point of it, you know?
It's absolutely rubbish, but free speech is when I'm protesting things I don't like.
And this isn't necessarily just something that happens on the left as well, it's particularly apparent on the left over the past few years.
Free speech is when it's things that we don't like, is when You know, uh, Gary Lineker calls Tories Nazis.
That's free speech.
But if it's saying, hey, aren't we accepting a few too many migrants into the country, especially when they're illegal migrants who don't have any right and they just come in here and immediately claim asylum and then get loads of benefits and they get put up in a hotel, etc, etc.
That's anti-speech.
Yes, that's anti-speech.
That's you just sucking the air back in.
Like that.
That's not real speech.
You need to face some consequences for that speech.
But that's just how these things work and it's always worked with the left.
I think when we originally covered this story, like over a year ago at this point, I probably made the mistake, I've not gone back and watched it, but I probably made the mistake of assuming somewhat good faith on Neil Young's part and just assumed that he's an idiot.
No.
I think you did.
Yeah, yeah.
No, this is not just incompetence or stupidity.
This is a tactic that the left has used for the past 60 years, where when they're not in power, it's free speech, and then when they are in power, you're hateful, you're talking hate speech, that's not free speech, therefore we should censor it.
And this is a brilliant example, so let's...
Move on.
So this is where free speech all of a sudden matters.
Mirror, mirror politics.
The mirror, for those who don't know, is a left-wing British newspaper talking about Gary Lineker.
The broadcaster should have stood up to this baying mob of right-wing MPs and defended free speech.
We care now.
We can now.
We've realised the errors of our ways.
No wait, no, there weren't any errors of our ways.
It's just that we're right.
That's always the case.
And here's the next one from this person.
Josh shared this with us.
Priyamvada Gopal.
Who's that person?
Do you remember her?
No, I don't remember her.
Remind me.
She was a professor at the University of Oxford and said that white people don't count as people and was then promoted.
She's one of those ones.
Presumably to, like, post-colonial studies in Oxford, I'd imagine.
White Lives Don't Matter as White Lives was the nugget of knowledge she gave to the world.
Okay, alright.
Well, I know that the 4chan White Lives Matter meme has actually been proscribed as hate speech by, I think, the ADL and the SPLC now.
Which is just amazing.
And I think...
I don't know if this is entirely correct, but I think 4chan are now working on getting them to proscribe the sentence, White people deserve to live, as hate speech.
I mean, good luck to them.
I think they will.
I think they will succeed.
I can't wait to see when that gets put- White people have civil rights too.
I think that's- White people are people.
White people are human.
All these ones- ADL will just be like, nope.
Please don't murder us.
Nope.
Please don't murder us.
Definitely not.
You know, so that's always funny, but Priyam Vada saying that we don't mean everyone's free speech, pointing out that the free speech union didn't come to the defense of Gary Lineker, a man who probably hates the existence of the free speech union.
I think they did actually defend her, I don't know why she's thinking they didn't.
Well, it was a stupid move for them because Josh, if you scroll down, actually had a brilliant response to this, which can be summed up in this first sentence: "Defending the rights of someone who would not do the same in return is a self-defeating political strategy." Very well put, Josh.
Very well put, Josh.
I hope he heard that.
It's a favour.
No, that wasn't a favour, that was me genuinely complimenting him, because it's just true.
I thought you'd upset him at lunch or something else.
No, no, it's just... It's the equivalent of that Stone Toss meme, where they're on their knees with their hands behind their backs, but if we use the power of the government, it could be used against us, and it zooms out and they've got the gun against their head already.
It's that kind of vibe where it's...
Well, if I'm going to defend your right to screw me over, then you're just going to screw me over.
So, that's a pretty stupid thing for me to do.
And, uh, we've got people pointing out the obvious.
We've got this person, this dung beetle, John O'Connell, who has been a little bit of a pain in our side on Twitter every so often, so I just like to call him out.
Uh, saying, perennial underachiever, Toby Young's free speech union stubbornly silent on Gary Lineker's freedom of speech.
Speech union have always been selective on cases they highlight, i.e.
only the ones they agree with.
No, it's about if you're a member of the union.
That also helps.
That's really how unions work, you f***ing retard.
Yes, also, I think one of the important things to highlight throughout this story is that this is not a case of free speech.
This is not a case of someone being proscribed from the public sphere.
This is a case of an incredibly high-profile presenter.
Should he be allowed to work for state media?
Should the public be subsidizing this individual?
Exactly.
That's the question.
But no.
For the left, all of a sudden, we care about free speech now.
We care about free speech.
And it's really...
...is really just telling how much they will twist it around, twist all the narratives around, so that they will always be right.
And when we get to the end, I will give you possibly one of the most hilariously shocking examples of that I have seen.
It will involve, sadly, a few sentences from James O'Brien.
So I'm sorry if you do want to turn away from the screen when this happens.
No, those are just earbuds.
Although, if you eat enough of them, you might die.
So, you can give it a try in the next five to six minutes while we go on.
We've got a case in point of this man, John O'Connell, deciding when it is or isn't free speech for himself, which is, Ukip's Count Dankula can't find the job, the price you pay for hatred.
What happened to Count's free speech?
Dank had the right to free speech, didn't he?
Okay, the Gary Lenica doesn't deserve a job.
No.
I mean, I agree that Gary Lineker doesn't deserve a job.
I think he's an idiot.
There's no even attempt.
I think it would be a public service to defend the public from the absolute... You know in Futurama, those brain slugs?
Gary Lineker is the human equivalent of the brain slug.
He leeches intelligence from the public by being exposed to him.
So I think it would be a public service to just... No.
You're not allowed on television anymore.
It's dangerous to the viewer's health.
It is.
If he ever appears on screen, what we do is we just put a black dot where his face is so we don't subject you to that.
And the next one, we've got biggest brain in the room, Femi, decides to get involved in this.
Do not let Piers Morgan pretend he cares about free speech regarding Karrie Lineker.
He only cares about free speech when it suits him.
I love these arguments.
I love these arguments.
These are the arguments that you and I have experienced, have been saying for so long.
You only care about free speech when it suits you, and when it isn't, it's hate speech.
Now we're getting those same arguments.
It's good to hear that the leftists have at least been paying attention to the arguments, seeing as they can just throw them straight back at us.
But sadly, we're not the ones in charge of the television networks and everything else.
When I asked him to oppose anti-protest laws, he unfollowed me.
When I asked again, he blocked me.
Piers Morgan is an opportunistic hypocrite, and while Femi is not a person I admire or think is intelligent in any sense, he is at least right on that last bit.
Morgan is a bit of an opportunistic hypocrite, and I will say that being blocked by Piers Morgan is actually probably the best outcome for such a situation.
An example of Piers Morgan being an idiot...
We have, he did a recent talk segment talking about free speech means hearing opinions you dislike as much as the ones you support.
It appears this is not a free speech issue.
Why are you defending Gary Lineker, a man who in all likelihood despises you?
This is a very stupid thing to do.
And he had a follow-up tweet talking about this.
Because they're in the same club, really.
Well, realistically, that is why.
Piers Morgan, of course, he's been kicked off of the main club, but he's still waiting at the wings, hoping that if he can do and say the right thing, that they'll invite him back on.
Rich British elite Londoners.
Yeah.
Don't listen to a single thing that they say.
They are completely insincere.
Gary Lineker should tell the BBC to go F themselves, as I told ITV to over the Markle debacle.
I agree.
He should then go and find a job outside of the state job he had.
Yeah, free speech is the cornerstone of democracy!
And how's democracy working out for you, peers?
And if we look at the democratic opinion of the people underneath in the thread, now if we go, you can see some of these comments.
The first comment just kind of sums up the public reaction to him.
Impartiality, peers.
Many normal folk lose their jobs over social media comments, so Mr Lineker shouldn't be any different.
No, that wasn't the one, actually.
If you keep scrolling, I saw one that really summed up the leftist opinion.
There we go.
He was standing up for the most vulnerable.
You were moaning about a girl who turned you down.
Not quite the same caliber.
This is the response that you should always expect from leftists when you interact with them on free speech.
There will be some cut-off point where you have stepped over the line and they haven't.
And that's the only thing that they will care about because this whole thing is about friend and enemy.
If you are not friend, then you are enemy.
Free speech does not apply to you because to them you are not a human being.
Okay, so Piers, if you want to be intelligent, I know this is going to be very difficult, but I know that you want to be, you need to learn and internalise these things.
I mean, this is why I think Jacob Rees-Mogg's response was the best and most sensible one, which is, I'm sick of having this conversation every couple of months about some BBC presenter who's decided to turn around and say all right-wingers are Nazis.
Happens every couple of months, you know, this story.
Of course it does.
Just defund the BBC.
Defund the BBC because we know that the people in charge of it and running it and presenting it despise us.
You can have your stupid thing where you sit around and be leftist morons but on your own network and nobody watches instead of like leeching off the taxpayer.
That would be nice, but leeches gonna leech.
Speaking of leeches, Angela Rayner had this to say.
The BBC's cowardly decision to take Gary Lineker off air is an assault on free speech in the face of political pressure from Tory politicians.
They should rethink.
And this seems to be the canned Labour response to this, because if we go to the next one, we can see somebody else tweeting about this is just a Labour response.
Cowardly decision, blah, blah, blah.
Free speech, Tory politicians, they should get sacked and blah, blah, blah.
But what is the typical Labour position on free speech?
Well, I've got an old Angela Rayner tweet to exemplify that.
From 2021, instead of feeding our kids and funding catch-up programs in schools, the educational secretary Gavin Williamson is inventing a pointless culture war over free speech at universities.
He is protecting Holocaust deniers and doing nothing to improve education.
There's that line again.
There's that line.
I will always have an excuse for why it's free speech for me, but not for thee.
So you are right.
This shouldn't be a topic of discussion anymore because we know the leftist position on it.
I just think it's really beautiful to see it just in action, that the left do not care about principles, they have never cared about principles, it's only ever really been the centre-right that really care about these principles, and that's kind of been to their detriment to a certain extent.
It's nice to have principles and you want to stand by them, but if those principles only ever lead to you defending your enemies while they've got a gun to your head, They're not really that useful, as far as I can see.
Certainly not for the time being.
Well, you did end up with a gun to your head, so...
Nice job.
Yeah, exactly.
And then, possibly the most amusing one in all of this was Carol Vorderman.
Carol Vorderman, for those of you in the American viewership, you may not be aware of who she is, but then again, you might be.
Was she on Countdown?
Was that it?
Yep.
She was the woman on Countdown for a long time, who was basically there to stand there and look pretty and pretend like she knew things.
And here we have another example of her not looking as pretty, but still pretending to know things, where she says this inspirational line here, I'm at BBC HQ in London, where there is a statue of George Orwell, and his words, if liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
Watch the video, I stand with Gary.
I love that the left has now decided, no, we get to invoke Orwell.
We're the ones that get to invoke him.
This is just like... If Gary Neville can't go on the BBC, flip off the audience, and call them Nazis, this is literally 1984.
Yeah, no.
It's beautiful.
If you want liberty, don't work for the state.
No, of course not.
Set up your own media organization.
And this is a nice segue onto the final link that I have, which was this.
The most shockingly hilarious about face I've ever seen, because we've covered recently the Telegraph coming out with all the headlines talking about the Matt Hancock leak text messages showing that the government knew and were doing everything that we said that they were doing over the past three years throughout lockdowns.
And it seems that this information has finally got To LBC, Carol Vorderman, and James O'Brien.
And if this isn't the perfect example of leftists having no principles, having an incredibly short-term memory, and not wanting to stand by anything they said and turning around and saying, no, you were evil this whole time, then this is it.
Let's just play this whole clip and I'll just let...
Let it sink in for all of you folks at home.
I think there was a psychological shift which was we must be obedient.
And we have never had that in our psyche for the last hundred years.
So it was almost like going back to the First World War.
You will be told.
And it wasn't just for a week.
It went on for two years, really.
And every night we would see Posh Boy there, speaking in a very Churchillian manner.
We had no idea what was going on behind closed doors.
You had Sunak the accountant, you know, to his side, and then you had a scientist.
And it was all You know, stay at home, save the NHS.
I can't remember the three things, you know, wear a mask, save the NHS.
It was all about saving the NHS.
Flipping heck.
And I think it went deep into our psychosis because we were so, I mean I was, you know, I didn't see my daughter for ages, because she was in Cambridge at the time.
My son lives with me.
And obviously, like everybody else, you didn't see your friends, you didn't see the rest of your family, all of that.
And it was such a trauma.
And I think it's taken us.
And then it was allowed four people outside the pub.
It's all right.
in Wales but you're allowed six if you're across the border in England it had nothing to do with the science after that and I think it also affected the psychology of government right as in we can do They had absolute power and we know what comes with absolute power, don't we?
Absolute corruption.
And if they'd been good, honest, decent people, this would have been fine.
Well, not fine necessarily, but it would have been like a war.
It would have been, we are on the same side.
We're all doing it together.
Yeah, but we never were because he was having a party and the rest of them were filling their pockets.
And the rest, that's just what we know.
If only, if only there had been people screaming at you for three years that this was what was happening.
If only the good people had absolute power, everything would be fine.
Yep, if only Labour had been in charge and we would have had harsher restrictions.
If I was the dictator, socialism would have worked.
I know, it's just the sheer... I'm actually dealing with a child.
The sheer cheek of it.
This is one of the most outrageously shocking, awful things that I've ever seen and I'm laughing.
I mean, ridiculous.
Pour one out for all of the normal working people out there who lost their jobs or were personally insulted by James O'Brien because that's what he does.
He goes on his show, he takes calls from normal people which are always screened to make sure that only the most uninformed people get through so that James O'Brien can always feel like a big brain box.
And he personally insulted them on his LLBC show for expressing the same opinions three years ago.
Pull one out for those folks, because really, these people are scum, and they think that you're scum, and they hate you, and are not afraid to show it.
I couldn't believe when I saw that clip.
I just gotta go with the charge.
He really does believe if only the good people were in charge, everything would be fixed.
If only I'd been in charge.
He's really at that level.
I mean, when did you stop thinking that?
When you were like 13 maybe?
If only the good people were in charge, good things would happen.
I mean, can we expect anything more from what is obviously a slightly more evolved cave troll like James and Brian?
Time for Syncs.
So the Syncs vs Incel War, which is not about a punch up in the bathroom, it's a new acronym, which I think we're going to enjoy.
It's about involuntary childlessness.
Which, we didn't really have like a catchy term for it.
You got incels for involuntary celibate, of course.
Syncs, it doesn't mean directly involuntary, but we'll get to it.
We'll start off just with the Cultural Revolution book club on lewis's.com or something, it's remote.
Because the whole point here was that children were told lies and went out and ensured their future would be full of suffering.
And we're seeing the same thing happen in the West.
We'll start off with just the fact that, well, incels, very well known in the West, pretty normal.
The left-wing response to this is declarable terrorists, which, um...
In men who can't get laid, we best make that illegal.
That's terrorism now.
Okay, that was retarded, but whatever.
I should probably get on the phones with a few friends.
They're in trouble.
They're in deep, deep trouble.
But that's, you know, really a male thing.
Like, sure, there are female incels, but when you look at the incel world, it's predominantly male, and therefore it's become sort of a meme as well to insult men whenever you want to call them incels, right?
It's a great insult.
Works.
There's not really something as catchy for something similar on the female side of the equation, and the female side of the equation is obviously, as people have pointed out, women control access to sex, men control access to relationships.
So if the thing here of the incels is the men being denied access to sex, they can't get that, it's because the women are Not giving it to them, rightfully, because they don't want to have sex with them, so whatever.
But then you get to the point of, well, what if the women are denied access to relationships?
And the ultimate form of relationship here being kids, of course.
Which is where the sink comes in.
And the family is literally our biological impulse.
Single income, no kids, is what it stands for.
But we'll move to just quickly to enjoy the fact that modern women, normie women out there, are just believers of all sorts of lies.
This is just a most recent funny example and I thought we'd enjoy ourselves at this one where not only will they believe these lies but then uncritically promote such lies.
It has been a long time since I've seen an Omegle clip.
Yeah.
My god.
Check out the average Omegle user.
Play that.
8 pictures of people out of 10.
Alright, so there's this guy first.
Oh my god, he's negative 1 million.
Okay, what about this girl?
She's a 10, she's pretty.
She's a 10 out of 10.
Alright, what about this girl?
I think he's a 5.
Alright, what about this girl?
She's a 7.
What about this girl?
She's a 5.
He's a 3.
Wait, so this guy's a 3, but this girl is a 10?
Yes, she's literally gorgeous.
What do you mean?
She's majestic.
But she's obese though.
I know you're not talking looking like a whole humpty dumpty.
Do you think I'm fat?
Yeah, you look like it.
Oh, baby.
Where's that fat?
Where's that fat at?
I'm not body shaming.
Isn't it a fact that she's obese?
She's not obese.
She's gorgeous.
What do you mean?
She's literally more gorgeous than you.
But isn't it a fact that she's obese though?
yeah but she's gorgeous okay it doesn't matter if she's over like big she's literally gorgeous why are you like pointing out the fact that she's fat literally no one cares i don't care she's literally gorgeous because it isn't fat unattractive we're pointing out no no then why did you write this fat guy negative 10 because Oh my god, just shut the f*** up you little white a** head sharing a**.
So your first segment was women logic in action.
Second segment just picking right back up.
My point being just to remind people that yes, normally women believe all kinds of lies.
It's not uncommon.
It's perfectly...
Obvious.
And that was brilliant.
I think that some women do genuinely look at a woman like that and they just see confidence and they think, beautiful.
Yeah, and these kind of normie women who just believe things because they're told them and go along with the group and being particularly normal for women, I think the disagreeableness is a great way of measuring that, as Jordan Peterson always says, the difference in disagreeableness between men and women.
Great argument about why women and democracy don't mix, but that's a whole other conversation.
We're going to go to Jordan Peterson, in fact, because he did this video that sparked my interest in the Sinks.
It's titled The Epidemic that Dare Not Speak Its Name, and it's an interview with a guy who's a demographer, and his speciality is looking at involuntary childlessness.
At least that's his main field for this conversation, and the movie he's made about it.
So he does this and you do it apparently by measuring women who are around 40 and seeing if they have kids and wanted to have kids and then you do the data from there and some interesting facts just first off because i think it's cool about five percent of women the world over regardless of which country or culture don't want kids and will never have them it's just a constant apparently you can find throughout time as well it's not changed and about six percent of women want to have more than four kids and will probably go on and have them and the interesting thing about both
the statistics is those two groups when you measure them haven't changed a dot really and And yeah, we have so much more involuntary childlessness from women reaching around about that age.
And of course, well, it's not those two groups then.
It's not a huge bump in women.
You don't want to have any kids.
That percentage exists, but it's not significant.
You know, it's about 5%.
Instead, the thing he found from his data is that the rate of women who are having about one kid, you know, one and a half, maybe one kid, maybe two kids, they've just completely dropped off.
It's that group that's dropped off.
So you now have about 30% involuntary childlessness.
30%?
Yeah.
In many countries around the world.
I mean, the primary ones he's dealing with are, I believe it's, what is it, Japan, Italy, South Korea, Spain.
I imagine the suggestion here isn't that they have necessarily decided that they don't want kids for their entire life, just that they thought that they could put it off.
Yeah, and it didn't happen, and that's too late.
And that rate jumps every single year significantly from his data.
One of the things that people counter-argue is like, well, maybe they're just delaying because they'll have kids when they're a bit older, these women, because when you start looking at 20 and it's not happening, it doesn't happen, is the data.
Women who put it off in the 20s and whatnot, sure, there's some that have it later in life, don't get me wrong, but the average is just not working.
I mean, we've covered so many times, again and again and again, the later you put it off, just the more difficult it gets.
So, but we never really had a term for this, the involuntary childlessness, and it's one of the things they both actually speak of in the interview, they're like, maybe we should have a term for this.
Well, it's very similar to the incels for men, as Peterson also figures out.
Enter syncs, syncs of order to the room.
Single income, no kids is what it stands for.
And you might think, well, that doesn't really encompass entirely what you're speaking of.
But when you look it up, you don't find any men complaining about being single income, no kids.
I found one on TikTok.
That was it.
One dude.
How old was the guy as well?
He was like 30 something.
Oh, well, he's got time then.
But it's just like, OK, so it's basically women.
And every single person I saw talking about themselves as sinks were all in their over 30s at least.
So there's that.
And were they all very salty about it?
This is the life I chose.
This is the life I definitely wanted.
It's a really weird subculture.
And, of course, there are some single-income no-kids who want that.
About 5%.
Well, we've already covered.
Well, 5% don't want kids.
Whether or not they don't want a husband is a minor, minor percentage of what that is.
That's a good point, actually.
But the sinks are interesting, to say the least.
And I've brought it here to show everyone at my show-and-tell lecture.
Hello.
Let's enjoy the first one, in which a local sink starts whining about how everything costs money.
Millennial women in their 30s living alone are living a different life to everyone else and I'm going to tell you why.
We've got no one to go out with.
We're waiting for everyone's kids to get old enough so that our friends can go out again.
Many of us have had to move away from the places and the people that we know because we couldn't afford to rent or to own where we knew people on a single income.
Going on holiday is kind of weird because some people are totally fine doing it on their own.
I am.
But I don't want to do it on my own all the time.
Plus the fact that it's very expensive.
You're not surrounded by like-minded people who are in your lived experience.
I know some people who are in couples who don't have kids, but I don't interact with, on a regular basis, people who are living on their own, working, and don't have kids, and are my age.
So there's no one to really talk to.
Anyone relatable anyway.
Dating's pretty shit as well.
I think a lot of us have grown tired of dating apps and so we don't want to use them anymore.
It actually, when you reflect, it actually makes your mental health quite bad.
And changes in how many of us work now means that we work from home, which is great financially.
It's just not so great socially.
So when you finish your day, there is no one to talk to.
And because your friends have got young kids, you rarely find that you're able to just like pick up the phone and be able to speak to people, or you feel like you can't.
There's a stigma from other people that is very, very obvious of what they think about you.
And even though a lot of us will admit to potentially being lonely at times, we're not like that all the time.
But people, and you can feel this, sometimes they don't even need to say it, but you can feel that people are like, oh, poor her living on her own.
And yeah, do you know what?
I do want sympathy.
I want sympathy in people recognising That for everything that goes wrong in my flat, for the times that I want to go away, times when I need to buy furniture and buy stuff, I'm paying for it all myself.
We don't split anything in our lives.
Is that it?
And there are certain utilities that aren't dependent on usage and they could be split.
I don't have a man to help me reach the top shelf.
Is that really where that went?
I felt genuine sympathy for that woman for 90% of them!
Bam!
Right at the end, she got me!
Right in the gut!
It's obvious why most syncs are women, because no man would ever complain about, what do you mean I have to pay for everything myself?
That's just normal!
Obviously, that's just normal!
That's my entire life!
I love that, I just love that.
She's just like, why is no one paying for places?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Like, if she's buying furniture, is she complaining, I have to put it together myself?
Yeah, she's gotta do that.
I have to bring the sofa up the stairs by myself?
She shovels the snow.
Oh, it's little old you again.
Who could have seen this coming?
But it's true.
She's not wrong.
She's actually not wrong.
I agree with her that her life would be better off, in which she would not be a sink, but she is a sink.
That last 10% of that video was just pure cope.
It's really just a window into the unfairness in the system that should be there because of how men and women are different, but our entire society tries to tell us that men and women are the same and blah blah blah.
It's just like, it's not true.
Everyone knows it's not true.
You know it's not true.
Being a 30-something cink who sat there like, ugh, I have to pay the bills.
Oh, that's not the case.
But she's, you know, there's something there.
I do like, she talks about the lived experience of being a sink and then there's no one to talk to.
She goes on in a follow-up video where she mentions that she's managed to get in contact with loads of other sinks over TikTok and now she doesn't feel so weird.
The thing is... I've just got in my head, you know, Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy where they all turn into furniture briefly?
I'm just imagining just loads of talking sinks.
Well, the funny thing is, I mean, the thing about the internet is no matter how weird and messed up you are, there will be some community started over that weird and messed up thing that will make you suddenly feel normal and like, oh, this is normal, I should be like this.
My favourite version of that is someone writing about, if someone started talking about how they like having sex with toasters, you know, in the 90s, everyone would be like, what the hell's wrong with you?
You should probably stop having sex with toasters.
Whereas in the 2010s, there'd probably be some subreddit about having sex with toasters and people falling over different models of toaster in the modern world.
This one gets both sides just right.
It's true, though.
Callum runs that subreddit.
I don't know if that subreddit's real, but I know that green text is real.
It certainly will be.
There's other syncs who spent their time whining about tax unfairness.
One woman was talking about, oh my god, I don't get a tax break, unlike married women.
Well, they've actually embraced it.
Like, the incels, they've embraced the SYNC label.
Yeah.
Can we start talking about SYNCs?
Salty, salty SYNCs.
I can already see a SYNC lobbying group for government benefits and handouts.
Yeah, I don't think the SYNC's going to be labeled in Paris.
I can't pay my whole bills.
You have to pay my whole bill, taxpayer.
Yeah, she just dances.
There's no point playing these, John.
It's TikTok, of course she just dances.
It's women.
She's probably a nurse as well.
Sorry to be rude, but really, I'm not going to take that back.
How many goddamn Instagram or female TikToks there are?
And you check that every time, it's just women dancing.
You're not even good at dancing.
Stop doing it.
Be interesting instead.
For Christ's sake.
Hold on to the conversation.
We'll go to another sink here.
This sink is the funniest one.
She complains because she works for the city in making sure that people don't end up homeless.
She's complaining in here that people with children have priority for homeless prevention.
Obviously.
Whereas sinks... Don't you know I'm a woman?
It's like, yeah... Yeah, but they're children.
Yeah, nah, love.
Because the whole thing about why do we give privileges to women in society What can women provide?
They've got this frickin' miracle machine, frankly.
I mean, like, having weird different organs that can birth children is something we don't give enough credit to think about for a minute.
That's the most you way of describing a female reproductive system.
Like, what the hell is that?
You can make a child?
You've got weird other organs!
No, but it's amazing!
It's like you're playing some, like, you know, pay-to-win character, frankly.
In a video game.
It's madness.
They got the early release DLC.
Yeah, they got the DLC.
And of course, okay, well they get privileged status.
They can literally make kids.
That's amazing.
And no, that's why as a society in most circumstances, you know, also that the weaker so they can't fight off, you know, men with guns and whatnot.
So you give them privileges in life.
Right?
And that's fine.
That's actually proper.
I agree with that.
Yeah, absolutely.
But the funniness in all of this is you get a local woman who believes she should have privileges and she sat there as a sink going, hang on a minute, why do people with kids get priority?
Not me.
I'm a woman, aren't I?
Big brain!
Yeah, but I mean, you're a sink.
You're such a dismissive insult now.
You're a sink.
Look, insult is fantastic.
I get it.
It's a great insult.
It works perfectly on every level, hurts men at their being because, I mean, that is something that men are looking for and can't get from women.
It's something women control access to.
Yeah, well, guess what?
Sink.
And then they'll have to ask you what you mean.
But that's the thing!
And you get the joy of explaining how much of a failure they are.
Well, it's not really even like, it's, well... There is a bit of joy in it, don't lie.
Okay, I can't, I can't.
I mean, look at the glee on your face as we've been going through this.
But it is funny.
It's funny to watch people get some comeuppance.
And we'll go to the next one here, because other syncs have started to notice something.
This one's really sad, and it happens to everyone, not just syncs.
But this sync here was noticing some of the awful things that are happening in their life, as they're like, huh, hang on a minute, life's shorter than you thought.
Yeah, it really is.
And the worst one here, as they point out, is like your parents aging.
That just sucks.
That just absolutely sucks.
But it's a fact of life.
Life is way shorter than you think.
And that's for everyone, not just sinks.
But sinks find it much faster because your biology changes much faster at the moment in that regard.
Jordan Peterson also does TikTok.
Didn't know about this.
All right.
He uploaded this conversation with Chris Williamson, and it's an interesting one.
They speak in here of the fact that all society does is lie to women.
True.
Yeah, that's true.
We've been over many an example of how women in the modern age are just indoctrinated with nonsense constantly.
Not their fault.
They're just given this for some goddamn reason.
And the funny example in this one of the lie that's being told, Jordan says that the lie is, nothing would be more important in your life than your career.
Obvious lie.
It's a lie for everyone.
The last lie being nothing should be more important in your life than your career.
What's really funny about that lie and the fact that it's doubly mad is not even men sell this poison to themselves.
I don't know any man who's stupid enough to think his career is the most important thing in his life.
And will be the only important thing in his life.
There will be some men that think that they need to achieve great things, but that won't necessarily be a career.
They're like psychopath men who work so many hours a week on one thing.
You know, the kind of like Joel will talk about.
They're like the 0.01% of people who end up CEOs and they live a completely unsustainable lifestyle for any normal person.
You don't want to emulate these people.
And that's like, even to men, that's mad.
So the idea you'd sell that to women is like doubly mad and just funny.
The fact that you'd think that was true.
Selling the literal male psychopath lifestyle to women.
But this clip annoyed a lot of, uh, syncs.
Local sync have Oh no.
This is actually a feminist.
I don't know if she's a psync but I'm going to take an educated guess.
She's incredibly mad about that and she describes this situation in a different circumstance.
We'll play her description of what evil Jordan Peterson has said.
Let's play that clip.
Because what you consider a lie, we consider freedom of choice.
And for the first time in history, women have the right to choose whether they want a family or a career or neither.
Or both.
And also for the first time in history, men have no right to decide that for us.
And it drives you bananas.
It's just, I'm sorry, the sad music and the fact that you're complaining that you can't boss us around anymore.
It's just How's that working out for you, freedom of choice?
But it's just also not true.
It's like they say, ever since 2010, women have been able to finally work in the workplace.
No women had jobs before 2010.
It's amazing, really.
No woman had seen the outside blue skies before 2015.
I mean, it's madness.
After Anita Sarkeesian saved them all from their chains.
Yeah, I mean, Carl spoke about this.
It's also madness that people just think, oh yeah, the Victorian time, no women worked.
No.
Obviously not.
All women worked.
Except, like, the ladies of luxury.
For the obvious reason.
Like, everyone's starving.
It's just not even true, but whatever.
It's just, again, this feminist myth of how society progressed, which is women were basically slaves, just like blacks.
And then in 1920 they could vote, and then in the 60s they could go to work.
The entirety of human history has been nothing but sunshine and rainbows for white men, and women have always just been stepped on by them.
To complete low resolution, there are basically three dates in the world they know, and that's it.
It's like, okay, whatever.
Not even gonna engage.
But I do find it funny that she's sat there, yeah, well, I'm free and miserable.
Yeah, but you define freedom as being sold a lie that the career is the most important thing in your life?
No one believes that.
No men believe that.
Why should women believe that?
Madness.
But there's another sync.
She's more interesting.
She describes the reason she does what she does, because she wants the sex in the city lifestyle.
So let's enjoy her reasoning.
Let's play the clip.
I'm single and child-free in my 40s, so I kind of lived through that exact switch that the original video is talking about.
And here's my theory.
Now, there's loads of reasons, of course, but I think sex in the city changed us.
I can remember really distinctly in my mid to late 20s just commenting to my boyfriend at the time that I really aspire to live like Carrie.
I'm a writer and the idea of having my own apartment and affording that kind of fashion and that lifestyle, I was like, that's what I dream of.
And he was kind of like, where do I fit in?
And I was like, oh, you don't.
Now he didn't fit into my future for many, many reasons, but I think that was the first time that it really occurred to me that I aspired to anything other than hoping he would propose or hoping the next guy would propose or whatever it was.
And now I live like Harry.
I find this utterly childish.
It's really funny to me.
Someone would sit there when they're young and looking at the meme lifestyle of what could be great for you from that age.
They think, oh, that's fantastic.
I mean, if you take young men and make them think of the perfect life in the same way she's sitting there and being like, wouldn't it be great to be in the New York City high-rises and waiting on fashion?
Sean points out she's drinking in the middle of the day as well.
I mean, if that was a real drink, she might just be trying to sell the lifestyle.
But it's also just like, you'll find this in other shows, with men, not just women.
It's just like, oh, wouldn't it be funny to be this?
And when you're young, that's kind of entertaining.
Ryan Gosling is literally me.
Take like, I don't know, Barney from How I Met Your Mother or something.
I thought you meant from Barney the Purple Dinosaur, but carry on.
No, him too, but... I always wanted to be Barney when I grew up.
But you know how he's got like the perfect bachelor life as it's presented in the show, but you wouldn't want his life.
No, of course you wouldn't.
When you think about him all the five seconds, you're like, hell with that.
And she fell for the meme, the left-wing version of that?
What she was talking about, the benefits of her own life that she was describing there, was purely material.
I want to be able to live in an apartment, because that's the height of luxury in her eyes.
I want to be able to afford all of the fashion.
Oh boy, an apartment!
Yeah, wow!
I want to afford the fashion that I want to wear, and be able to drink in the middle of the day, and basically just fill my life with lots of meaningless Bollocks that doesn't actually do anything for me until the day I eventually die.
It's like if I was 11, and you asked me what would my perfect future be like, and I'd be like, I could buy all the toys I want, buy all the army men, could buy all the train sets.
Oh yeah, could get the biggest scale electric tractors ever been constructed.
Like, that's kind of cute when you're 11, but when you're sort of 40, And you're there with your gigantic, mansion-wide scalextric and you're going, I've got no one to play with.
I've got trains for yards.
It's kind of, you look at that man and you think, the hell is he doing with his life?
Correctly so, but it's just, okay.
Okay, a female version of that is freedom.
Once again, as a man, you can have a successful life whilst also having a family as well.
Sure.
They don't have to be mutually exclusive, which is why it would be weird to choose just one.
And not to discount that there is some small percentage of human beings that will choose the train set or the sex in the city lifestyle, as we went over there was about 5%.
These are called autists.
Yeah, there's that too.
But getting back to the sinks, because the lady from earlier, she's got sink pride worldwide.
Let's enjoy this cancer.
Let's play this.
Going to a film house alone is peak elder millennial psync where I can be my true psync self with my psyncy film house coffee psync-tastic reclining chair and the cleanest psynciest crumb-free carpet.
Too many psyncs.
No.
No, I haven't.
Have we already created the insult and they're already trying to reclaim it?
Yes.
It's not working.
Well, no, they can do that.
That's fine.
I mean, if you call yourself a psync, you sound like you're dunking on yourself.
There are some other terms that have been used in this sphere I found.
The child-free movement is a whole other thing.
I don't think this is cool.
This isn't really descriptive as well of anything.
This is an interview with a lady who's in her 20s.
It doesn't have the blunt force trauma of sync.
What?
No, no.
It's not really about an insult.
It's more like describing the situation accurately.
The term incel happens to also be an insult, and a great one.
But it does describe the situation accurately.
The child-free movement is just kind of insanity.
So this lady's 28.
She's getting her tubes tied.
She's not freezing any of her eggs either.
Her reasoning is that when someone says, aren't you going to maybe regret it and then you'd feel stupid?
And she says, yeah, well, if you have a kid, you might regret it and then feel stupid.
It's not really the same.
I mean, maybe.
I mean, suppose so.
It's almost like there are ways of not getting pregnant.
And the kid could turn out to be Ted Bundy, point two.
So, you know, maybe, but unlikely.
Yeah, I mean, this doesn't look like... I mean, the Sync people are interesting.
These people aren't interesting, the child-free movement.
They just kind of seem... I don't know, like they're all high on speed or something.
There's other women who... There's one woman here who's Sync.
She's just talking about the grief of not being able to have kids when she always wanted kids.
That's interesting.
She's got some... I mean, that's just sad.
No, no.
It gives you, like, a nice insight.
Like, she's a sincere person who's trying to explain something, which is cool.
But if we go to the next one, there are some posters who spend their time celebrating being 30s with no kids.
I've seen this a while.
This is various places.
This one's really kind of weird.
Like, her and her boyfriend are dancing with their... What do you call it?
Fluff babies or something?
I think they're called cats.
Yeah.
Um, there's that.
I've seen various posts about this.
What's he doing?
This individual though, I found funny though, because they posted this and then like a year later, you wanna know what they were posting?
Baby pictures?
Basically.
She paid out the ass for IVF because it's expensive as hell.
No one seems to think about that.
Well, yeah.
And, uh, it worked, thankfully.
I mean, you know what, good for her.
It doesn't always work.
At least she managed to change her mind and get the procedure just in time for it to be able to work.
Well, what I find funny is that she went from being like, yeah, I'm single to endlessly, it's just baby posting now.
Just constantly, like, prego posting.
Honestly, this is the happy ending.
I don't know.
This is the incredibly unlikely happy ending, even though she's still posting about it on TikTok when really she shouldn't be.
I'm not saying happy or sad.
I'm trying to assess.
It's just funny to me.
But we'll start with the last one here because there's some femme poster who's talking about how this is good because it's ruffling conservative feathers.
This is my favorite.
This is my absolute favorite.
All right, all right.
Because she quotes white feminism and very aptly recognizes as to why that 30% gap might be appearing in the West.
Let's play.
Child Free by Choice movement is gaining momentum and ruffling some conservative feathers, and I am here for it.
I am not child free, but I move an opinion that it's kind of like a face tattoo.
You definitely want to be sold on the idea.
So, I want to share a quote that I wrote last year when I was reading this book.
The name of the book is White Feminism by Koa Beck.
It's a brilliant book.
But here's the quote.
With the absence of a subsidized childcare, paid federal parental leave, and rampant pregnancy discrimination, young women who have had class advantages are left to ask themselves if they want to effectively lose them.
Because that's what parenthood in the U.S.
will ultimately entail.
If they want to partake in a different kind of labor that will offer them fewer legal protections, limited pay, increased hours, increased personal financial burdens, and with zero support from the institutions to which they have dedicated expending days and increased workloads.
In its increasing neoliberal cultural terrain, where everyone is encouraged to optimize themselves for the best employment, the strongest partnership, the most successful path, what strategically middle-class, somewhat self-aware woman wants to do more work for less money?
The pragmatics of having a baby are fundamentally incompatible with the dominant cultural messages surrounding economic security, class ascension, and performance aimed at women.
I couldn't have put it better myself, so yeah, there you go.
It's the biggest self-report, she doesn't even realise it.
Wait, but basically doesn't that say that if you don't have children, you are part of the capitalist system?
Also, I do have children, so this doesn't apply to me anyway.
Also, this book is derogatorily called White Feminism, which means the author hates me already, because I'm a white feminist.
No, the white feminist author over there is laying out that women used to have, as a I don't know, race, because this is how these people view the world.
Yeah, I suppose so.
Used to have gender privileges that far extended what they have now, and they were traded in exchange for political differences, now that women are instead considered basically just citizen.
You are the same as a male citizen as well, and therefore can be asked to perform the same goals, in which case you are not given any gendered privileges that you used to have.
There are still some, don't get me wrong, we can talk about the courts and everything else another time, but the white feminist there is like, we used to have way more, and now we don't, because we're now in this neoliberal world where the only thing that matters is our careers.
Yeah, she read out a passage which basically says you're now part of the capitalist system.
Yes.
What did she think she was reading?
I just find that really funny when she's like, oh, this is a great, great odyssey.
No, that's a self-report, love.
But whatever.
Of course, having a career can be highly desirable.
Not being dependent on men who can't be depended on is also definitely real and is now, as the white feminists there pointed out, supported by the state and not punished, which is a change that was demanded by feminists.
And you can argue about that till the cows come home.
But saying that there should be nothing more important to people than their careers is an obvious lie, and it's unfairly true for women more than men because of biological clocks.
But, sync cope?
Is not convincing.
I'm not buying onto it, but sinks are definitely real and something that I find incredibly funny.
Uh, not just because it's a weird mirror image to the insult movement in a way.
And finally we found it.
It's also the fact that I can't get over as we laughed at earlier, her sitting there being like, damn, I have to pay for things.
I'm never going to stop laughing at that, but there we are.
Sinks.
Now we know them.
Let's go to the video comments.
Oh, John's just getting the video comments up.
I'll go to the written ones for the time being until you tell me otherwise then.
So, we'll start with the Metasphere.
Andrew Narok says, It amazes me that they laugh over being utterly oblivious at what Michael Knowles said.
Not a nervous laughter, not laughing at what he said, but seemingly in glee over not understanding.
It's a pretty woman moment.
It's a bimbo moment.
Yeah, it's a bimbo moment.
It's real bimbo.
Oh, here we go with the video comments now.
So following up on yesterday's video, use the right tool for the job.
Compare this cut here with this attempted cut here.
That's a bad cut.
Yeah.
Hand sawing may be a time-consuming pain, but if your hand saw is made for cutting metal and your power saw is not, use the hand saw.
Excellent advice, I assume.
Oh, there we go.
...being based on ESG scores.
I asked him why ESG was being implemented, and he responded that the company wanted to be seen as world class, and it was a metric they saw as being relevantly measurable.
With the bank collapses in America, I'd warn fellow Lotus eaters that it's not just the financial institutions that are affected by this nonsense, it goes even to the point of manufacture of the stuff you buy.
Socialism affects the entire supply chain.
Yeah, it does.
That's absolutely true.
Makes perfect sense.
I do love the levels of ridiculousness you'll find when looking at the Soviet system.
But if you look back at the West, people are like, oh, we're not like that.
We've been over it.
We have price controls even in the UK.
It's actually crazy no one thinks about it.
This is just part of the system.
We just live in essentially a top-down economy.
Bay Snape says, can somebody please start financing some studies that correlate women's IQ with their body count?
I'm getting seriously concerned the excessive exposure to semen may cause brain cancer in women.
Possibly.
Interestingly, I don't have any data on IQ, but I have been reading through... Does guzzling cum make you retarded?
Well, while Callum gets back with us on that one... 17 things you didn't know about semen.
Callum's learning.
We're all learning today.
Maybe it does.
I've been reading through a bit of Ed Dutton's book, How to Judge People by What They Look.
I've been getting physiognomy-pilled recently, and one of the things that he describes in that is that supposedly...
I can hear laughter at the back of the office.
Yeah, so can I. I can hear Daisy laughing her arse off.
Supposedly, women who have more typically feminine features and, shall we say, larger sexual indicators on their body tend to be more sexually active and have more partners.
And the other thing that he points out is that women tend to, on average, have a slightly higher IQ than men.
But also have a much narrower bell curve.
So you tend to get much less, much fewer really stupid women than you do really stupid men.
But you also get many fewer really intelligent women than you get really intelligent men.
So this adds up to one thing for me, which is woman as the class of midwhip.
Apparently, there's one study in 2002 that gave evidence that it's an antidepressant.
Oh, I've heard that!
Maybe next time you're in a bar, Callum, I've got some great antidepressants for you.
Omar Ward says, can it really be weaponised?
Comparison when it comes from Braindead Bimbos that never self-actualise original thought.
She isn't expressing moral outrage, she's running transdefence.exe.
That's absolutely true.
Yes, she is.
And that's really what I find fun about the interactions.
Again, you can see how...
Because the thing about the legacy of the Critical Race Series Extensure is, sure, they'll have the people in the universities who are endlessly indoctrinated and continue doing their activism.
But their mass, like, let's go after the kiddos, isn't really a good strategy.
Because as soon as they're presented with, like, alternative reality.exe, it's like, oh, no.
My programming no longer works.
And you've lost one of those kiddos.
You indoctrinated.
Kevin Fox says, I bet they had to turn the smoke detectors off in the studio once those bimbos started trying to think.
You can almost see the smoke pouring out of their ears.
Apparently they don't eat beforehand, which is mad, because those things go five hours.
Well, they probably don't want to look bloated on camera.
No, no, the guy just doesn't want a pizza beforehand.
He says he's going to start doing it, because... Oh, well, that makes sense.
I bet they start to get irritated by the end.
Yeah.
Brandon Tom says, the scary part is that those bimos probably consider themselves as moderates.
Yeah, they do.
George Happ says, the women in the Whatever show are the best advertisement for MGTOW.
They are entitled, woke, and shallow.
That one who got offended over the trans discussion is why I fully support trans athletes.
Women need to face the consequences of their positions.
Going full Joker there.
Yeah, interesting ideas.
The Desert Rat says, men are allowed to say no to dating trans women.
Why does anyone think that it's okay to force someone to date a transgender person?
It's ridiculous.
Well, these women are pro-rape.
Well, I mean, because otherwise it's mean.
And to the stupid woman mind, then just being mean is the ultimate, ultimate crime.
That is one of the, I mean I don't know how, because there's the argument between is this a feminine trait or a bimbo trait and the funny thing that you ask one of them, I don't know if I've already mentioned this, but you ask one of them something and just they'll say something stupid and every one of them will copy it and you're just like, come on, come on, one of you!
Well, they've had so many trains run on them they can't help but replicate the train.
That was a sad one.
So he's interviewing the girls and he's like, why don't you settle down with this boy you really like?
And she's like, well, I want to run her through a few trains first.
What, did she actually say that?
She was an OnlyFans girl.
Like, it's a job.
But it's still, it's like...
Eh, okay.
Well, once- you're an OnlyFan girl, that- okay, first of all, that's a big turn-off for any serious man trying to get into a relationship, but then you've purposefully had numerous trains run on you, just for the sake of it.
I know, she's waiting, she's gonna settle down after the trains, is actually what her argument was on a public live stream.
Alright, get back to me in three years, let me know how it goes.
Alright, should we- Just imagine your mum watching that, like- Whatever.
Let's go on to my comments here.
So Justin B says the Lineker situation isn't a free speech issue, it's an issue of the less favourite response consequence culture.
He's welcome to voice his opinion but if he wants to work for a company with a neutrality remit he has to keep his opinions to himself.
If he doesn't want to do so then he needs to quit and go to a company that does not have such a remit.
The BBC should issue a warning to him at the minimum and with how many times he's tweeted something like this I cannot see him being on his final warning already well they've changed the guidelines for him so he won sadly in the end he won and he's going to get to keep uh keep calling everybody nazis on their money on their taxpayer money yeah lord naravar so a load of celebrities have suddenly decided that supporting free speech is fashionable great I can't wait for them to fundamentally misunderstand what freedom of speech actually means.
They don't misunderstand it, they know perfectly well what it is, and they just use it as a political tool.
That's the point I'm trying to make here.
But they'll do far more damage to the cause than good, and abandon ship when another belief becomes trendy.
Seriously, these are plastic people and we don't need their help unless they can get some legislation through.
I'm not saying that they're trying to help.
The only thing that they are trying to help was Gary Lineker.
The only reason they said free speech is because they hear the right saying free speech, and if they see the right cancelling, in big quotation marks, if they see the right cancelling someone, they think that if I just say free speech, magical incantation, and it will all go away.
That's what I see going on here.
Yes, that's absolutely the case.
And while we've still got a few minutes, let's go to the Sink comments.
Free expression while we advocate for destroying the country.
But don't you dare tell an edgy joke.
Free enterprise while our slaves work in our factories, but we'll bury small businesses in regulation.
Free association as we whine and dine dictators for political favours, but we'll make sure that you're debanked if you're in a picture with a bad man.
Yes, that's absolutely the case.
And while we've still got a few minutes, let's go to the Sink comments.
I'm in deep agreement with Sam over here.
Sam says, my missus is currently pregnant, and I couldn't get my head around how amazing it is that her body makes a little me It's almost like she's designed for it.
Impressive.
I tell ya.
Pay to win.
Brian Tomlinson says sinks need financial taps.
Freewheels says sex in the city is a tedious story about middle class Manhattan residents.
I will say I think I've watched a Sex and the City movie once and nothing about that made me think those women have got the life of a dream.
I know that my older sister watched it when she was younger but I never wanted to watch it because it looked like just girly BS.
Yeah it is girly BS but you you watch it and then you'd like none of the women I mean it's not like Bridget Jones where Bridget Jones is dealing with um like life's not going great and then she finds a guy she really likes falls in love with him blah blah blah happy ending kind of stuff instead it's just like a mess from start to finish with sex in the city.
Makes sense to me.
Arizona Desert Rat says you go guy if women are okay with women being obese you better be okay with men being obese.
That's a good point.
Nah.
Don't think we're stupid or that, but it is a good hypocrisy.
Robert Longshore says, 30% childlessness sounds about right to me.
Loads of my wife's female unfriends are like kids, yuck.
Sad.
What's an unfriend?
I assume that she's not friends with them anymore.
I would hope so.
TaffyDuck says, uh, met FemSala at a wedding once.
She was about a 4 out of 10, spent most of her time complaining about being single and constantly huffing copium.
She was on the table with me, my wife, and three other couples just to rub it in.
The most repulsive thing...
What was the planning of the wedding?
The organiser of the wedding was like, maybe one of them will just pawn their wife.
I'll just pour some salt in that wound.
The most repulsive thing about her, though, was her politics.
Every left-wing talking point ad nauseam.
We spent a lot of time laughing about her.
Good man.
No, but that's one of the tragic things I seem to find about I mean, I don't know how much it is in syncs, but you definitely get it as we saw with the bimbos, is that women... I mean, we can see this in the voting data, like, women are more likely to vote left-wing, the more likely to believe left-wing nonsense things.
This is just data, like, you can see the... Oh, see, it's even interesting, um, I've seen data where men who go to the gym are more likely to become more right-wing the more they go to the gym.
Women, no effect whatsoever.
Sure, sure, but there's, like, a distinct difference between men and women, just, like, voting pattern.
Like, men, I think it's, like, 55% right-wing, women, 55% left-wing, something like that.
And you'll see when women can't succeed in that realm, they seem to revert back into being far more... The thing they find comfort in, ideologically, is left-wing nonsense.
You can sort of see that with, like, I suppose the MGTOW movement, where it's just like, ooga booga, men strong, I don't need no woman.
But then you're not getting any women anyway, so it's a bit weird.
I mean, whatever works, right?
But it's, um, yeah.
Rue the Day says, if only there was a type of person who was strong, tall, and caring, who might contribute to my household and keep me company.
Oh, well.
Oh, well.
Are you offering?
Is that what that was?
No, no, that was me like, oh... You're like, Harry shall rise!
No, no, can't think of anything.
No, just before we finish, as we've just gone over time, Sir Marhouse asked if York is nicer than London?
Yes.
Yes, you'll have a great time in York.
It's a much nicer city than London.
I wanna do a slander video.
You know, there's slander videos.
What?
About York?
Yeah, it was York between New York.
It's like how crap New York is compared to York.
I've never been to New York, so... We need to go to both, and then film it, and then do slander.
Or York will be much nicer.
Least racist New Yorker versus least racist Yorksherman.
Ooh.
That'd be entertaining.
You know the least racist New Yorker's gonna be a black guy?
There's going to be some guy going, Das right!
Anyway, we're out of time.
If you'd like to enjoy Das Right, go to New York.
If you want to see something sensible, go elsewhere.
Literally anywhere else.
Not LA, I suppose.
Otherwise, we're out of time.
Export Selection