All Episodes
Jan. 30, 2023 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
01:30:49
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #578
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello and welcome to the podcast The Lotus Seas is episode 578 for today, the 30th of January, 2023.
I am joined by Harry.
Hello!
Back together again.
Brilliant stuff.
Today we're going to be discussing how Eliza Blue has encountered the Streisand effect, how Tyree Nichols' death wasn't caused by white supremacy.
Is that how it's pronounced?
Because I have been saying Tyre the whole time over the weekend, and I think it would probably be more respectful.
It's Tyree, yes.
Yes, it's more respectful if I pronounce it right, so Tyree.
Yes.
Alright.
Yeah.
No parent would name their child Tyre, I don't think.
Americans are very strange people.
Yeah, and also how art subverts life.
Before we go on at three o'clock today, this is the piece of content that's coming out, which I'm particularly proud about.
Carl and I went through Simone de Beauvoir's second sex, and when I say Carl and I, I meant I subjected Carl to the torture of reading out Beauvoir's quotes for nearly two hours.
The evil origins of feminism, ladies and gentlemen, strap in because it gets incredibly wild.
So if you haven't subscribed already for £5 a month, go and do so.
Without further ado...
Well, that's quite nice that my content on MLK came out on Friday and then your content about feminism is coming out today.
We've bookended the weekend.
Oh yeah, the demolition of Boomer Truth in real time.
Speaking of demolished credibility, Eliza Blue has encountered the Streisand effect.
Now, this happened after she went on Timcast to read out two statements from people who are anonymously accusing Andrew Tate of human trafficking via using the Loverboy method to ensnare them into his Camgirl website.
And...
I reported on this with Dan at the time and even though I am inclined to believe that Andrew Tate has done some rather sordid things like being dishonest about the prospects of the women who were on his Camgirl site meeting the men who were paying them to meet him, these two allegations were light on details, heavy on emotion and weren't particularly convincing.
We can't say whether...
Either or, it's true, but it wasn't represented in a very good way.
And so, Eliza didn't come across as particularly credible at the time, and people started looking into her history and her own claims about why she is an anti-trafficking advocate.
And what we're going to do here today is not say anything that's libelous.
We are going to look at what other people have said, report on some of the sources they've provided that raise questions as to Eliza's timeline because she hasn't given a detailed account of how she claims she was trafficked.
And we're not going to dispute her account.
Just ask Eliza.
We'd like some things cleared up.
Well, I would like to address, just before we go any further, that I have referenced her previously on segments that we've done in the past when she's been talking about certain issues.
She was very involved in the post-Twitter shake-up that took place after Elon bought the platform, and she seemed to be involved in that.
She's done and said a lot of things in regards to trafficking that I support, and I think anybody would support.
Exactly.
When you talk about why she's an advocate for trafficking, I think...
That's a bit of a blank statement because I think, as a neutral position, most people are against it.
It's more her specific reasons that she's given.
As to why she is an authority on the topic beyond just somebody who has the ear of the people at Twitter who have gotten CP taken off the platform, which, brilliant, well done, if she had the role that she proclaims to have had in removing that from the platform...
Fantastic work, Eliza.
It's just that some of her background details in saying that she herself is a victim of trafficking appear to be nebulous or unclear.
Yeah, I'm interested to find this out because I've not really looked into it over the weekend or since this information started coming out myself.
I've only heard...
On the peripheral that that was going on, and in the past when I have referenced her, I never thought to look into any of her claims, because my main thought was, why would you fake a story like that?
I'd never really seen any description that she'd given of her experiences, I just saw that she labelled herself as such, and kind of assumed what I think a lot of people would do, which is give a good faith interpretation of that.
Benefit of the doubt.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah, because why would somebody lie about such a thing?
Yeah, well, if this does result in Eliza stepping away from being a trafficking advocate, perhaps she has learned how to code and she may be able to apply for the job that we've currently got going on LotusEaters.com, which is that of a web developer.
Smooth transition there.
Exactly.
Daily Wire quality stuff.
So if you can work from the office in Swindon, either by commuting in like I do, which is why I'm always exhausted, or living in this hellhole like Harry does, then go and look at the website and see if you fit the criteria and come and work with us and be annoyed by us in the office every day.
Anyway, without further ado, Eliza originally reached a bit of prominence in 2021 because she's partnered with Tesla as an anti-human trafficking advocate.
This was from January 9th, 2021, and she attended the Tesla Parade Against Human Trafficking in Atlanta, Georgia in December.
She also had the Tesla logo shaved into her head for the event.
So she has a long-standing relationship with Elon Musk.
They seem to be on friendly terms.
So, if we can go to the next one.
She's also proclaimed herself a free speech absolutist very recently.
I want to be crystal clear.
I'll die on the hill of free speech in America.
The government cannot remove it.
The WEF cannot remove it.
Free speech is an unalienable human right with or without both the government or the WEF. I think this is similar.
I've seen her post numerous times in the past about her considering herself a libertarian, so I think this would fit within that belief system.
Yes, it is a bit buzzwordy, because everyone seems to want to attribute everything to the WEF nowadays, and the WEF are obviously evil, but they're just the nexus, the funnel through which all the elites' bad ideas run through.
If we destroy the WEF tomorrow, the elites would still exist, so the problem is wider, but it's nice that it's entered the public consciousness at least.
So, she supports free speech absolutely, unless it's for mass flagging campaigns of things that she doesn't like.
So, this is from Raw's Alerts.
Everyone, a person by the name of Brittany Venti, who's a YouTuber, who one of the super chatters actually recommended she watch Dan's Brokenomics series as well, so she knows who she is, quite like Brittany, has been wrongfully censored and locked out of her account due to sharing a public video and asking a question on an old music video that Eliza Blue did a while back.
An account named Amanda Jean has falsely locked her out.
So, what she said was, hey, Eliza, do you mind explaining...
Why this particular video is out there at a time that you claim to be human traffic?
Because it's a little bit...
She seems, given the screenshot, to be asking in complete good faith.
Yes.
She was asking, was the video coerced?
Because it was a little bit lewd, let's put it that way.
There's also someone else that's been banned, The Quartering, friend of the show.
If you can go on to the next tab, please, John.
So, Jeremy released on his...
I believe this is his local's account.
That's what Jeremy says.
says, we cannot confirm or deny.
She goes by many names, but is also very close to Elon directly.
This is concerning.
This is also why here and my email list are so important.
Sometimes I will have to take stands on principle, but that also means I was lose access to you directly.
And he gives information for if you'd like to contact the quartering because you watch his content, you can follow those links there.
There was also someone else.
Chrissy Marr had one of her tweets taken down.
So...
Oh, this was Yellow Flash, actually.
That's Star Wars girl raising this.
If we go on to the next one, please, John, as well.
Yeah, Chrissy Ma actually locked her out of her account for sharing something.
And then Manuel Defango is on the next one.
And the reason I brought up Manuel is because we're going to come back to his Twitter thread very soon.
Because him and Eliza Blue are not particularly friends.
Because Manuel raises some uncomfortable questions about Eliza's career history.
Wait, so who's been banned and censored?
So we've got Brittany Venti, The Quartering, Yellow Flash, Chrissy Maher, Manuel Defango, and some other accounts of non-repute that have shared similar links.
Okay, so Chrissy Maher and Manuel Defango, seeing as he seems to be tweeting here, have got their accounts back, is that correct?
Yes, their accounts have been unlocked because they've deleted the prior tweets.
But Brittany and The Quartering are still not on the platform.
Yes, exactly.
So, Eliza is claiming that they've been banned, nebulously, because they shared non-consensual nudity.
It was on YouTube.
Publicly available video.
If we go to the next tweet, please, John.
Was this not a screenshot taken from a music video?
It was the link to the music video as well.
It was publicly available.
So she says, as of January 2023, 48 states and Washington DC had passed laws prohibiting the distribution or production of non-consensual pornography.
It's also against Twitter's TOS to post this type of content.
Now, I haven't got the link in here, but also one of the Twitter trust and safety team, the new people appointed by Elon, did a thread on why they're banning certain accounts and things, obviously alluding to the fact that Non-consensual nudity was shared by these accounts, but it was publicly available until it was brought to Eliza's attention.
And it is interesting to note that recently I've seen as well a certain drop-off in engagement with my own posts that I've been putting on Twitter and a number of content creators, not just the ones that we're naming here, but a few other content creators and a few other public figures, were put on Twitter and then immediately taken straight off again.
So it's strange.
Some people are suggesting that some people...
Within the Twitter infrastructure might be...
Sabotaging?
Going back to the old ways, shall we say.
Yeah, new boss.
Same as the old boss.
If we go to the next one, please.
The video was public, so this was the link.
Go down, please, John.
Just stay on the tweet.
Yep.
This was the link.
It had the link in bed, but it is deleted ever since the last few days.
The video has been taken down since it was brought to Eliza Blue's attention.
So...
I wouldn't be able to show it to you anyway, because she is in dental floss-thin underwear, shaking her nearly bare arse at the camera to the point of where you can see her bumhole, but it is curious how she has enough pull at YouTube to have had it taken down.
Do you mean Twitter?
Has it been taken off of YouTube as well?
It's been taken off of YouTube as well.
Oh, okay.
If we go to the next one, please.
We have it here.
She says...
This is Eliza's update tweet.
I have been sexually exploited in multiple ways.
I'd like to thank WorldStar for removing a video depicting me on Wednesday of this week.
I'd like to thank Google and YouTube for removing the video on Wednesday.
I'd like to thank Twitter and Twitter Safety, obviously, for censoring the accounts that shared it.
If we go to the next image on this, though, someone emailed...
One of the WorldStar employees, and he said, So, this seems to have been contractually consensual.
She may have been alleging she was coerced.
If that was the case, then terrible.
I was going to say, you can still be coerced into signing a contract.
Of course, I agree.
But the censorship campaign is suspicious, because it wasn't nudity...
It was scantily clad, it was publicly available on YouTube, and she hasn't addressed it until it has been removed.
Yeah, it seems very strange that she would have knowingly let that stay on the platform until it suddenly came back to bite her.
Yeah, so maybe she filmed it under duress, right?
Let's hear from Eliza's own words if she filmed it under duress or not, shall we?
I'm really happy that the WorldStar video got released.
That was good piece to the puzzle.
Um...
Was that the full clip?
Yeah.
Was there more to that?
Not necessarily in the tweet that was shared, so she's happy that it's part of her career.
There's also another clip here where she calls her mother.
That clip could be taken out of context.
Sure, I agree.
That could be taken out of context.
What about her doing a full YouTube video that's been up for over nine years, calling her mother, asking her mother, which other music videos you'd like me to see in?
Can I be too sexy?
What do you think about my career?
Can we play an extract from that, please, John?
Okay, I just wanted to see what you thought about me being in music videos.
I know, but what do you think about it?
Have you watched a couple of the music videos that I was in?
You told me that you thought they were funny, right?
Well, they're funny because they're so stereotypical of what you'd expect that type of video to be.
Right, right.
Like party and whatever.
Yeah, a lot of parties.
A lot of girls in short skirts, you know, shaking their booties.
Do you think I look too sexy?
I don't think it's possible to look too sexy.
You don't think it's possible to look too sexy?
So, it goes on longer.
I didn't want to play the full seven-odd minutes, but she then asks, okay, who else do you want me to be in a music video with?
You don't want me to be in a rap video with Snoop Dogg?
Really, mother?
Okay, and what...
Because once again, I've not really looked into the story beyond just kind of accepting the label at face value.
What period is she alleging that she was trafficked between?
We're going to go through that timeline in a moment.
Alright, because obviously nine years ago, what would that be, what, 2014 now?
Yeah.
2014, 2013, when that video would have come out?
Something like that.
Yep.
So, then Eliza got context checked for her own tweet.
By Twitter, who she's thanking.
Okay.
So she says, The clip or a screenshot from the clip out of context.
We haven't done that here, okay?
Twitter decided to context check it with, the screenshot in question appears to have originated from a music video publicly available on YouTube for several years and they link to an original tweet which had the link to the music video in it itself.
Yeah, I don't think this will have been Twitter itself.
I think certain readers and certain people can add that context to certain tweets now.
Yes.
So this wasn't Elon himself personally taking this?
No, it wasn't.
So Twitter has intervened to censor on behalf of Eliza Blue that people have been context-checking her underneath, and it's stayed up because people have been upvoting the community notes.
Sorry.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So, here we go with Manuel, who has a bit of a personal vendetta with Eliza, but he compiles some interesting claims in this, and there are some questions raised about the veracity of Eliza's timeline as to how and by who she was trafficked from.
So, the following are all allegations, just putting it out there, the evidence given only establishes timeline discrepancies.
So Eliza Blue claims to have been trafficked in LA as a young girl, but forgets she was well-known in the My Chemical Romance fandom during that time.
If you just scroll cursorily through the thread, please, John.
She lived on MySpace and hung out with Jeffree Star around the 2007 date she sets for her alleged trafficking.
I also hung out with Jeffree Star from 2005 to 2008 and was around when she first showed up to the crew.
Back then, she was a fangirl of My Chemical Romance and didn't give two S's about child trafficking.
In 2007, Eliza Blue was busy claiming to be engaged to Gerard Way of My Chemical Romance, the same person who wrote The Umbrella Academy.
I know who Gerard Way is, yeah.
At the same time she was claiming to be trafficked, she was claiming to be engaged to Gerard Way.
So unless she's claiming it's Gerard Way...
And she was hanging around and Miguel is claiming that he actually knew her personally at the time because he ran into her because they ran into circles.
Same subcultures.
She uploaded lots of YouTube videos.
She was famous on MySpace.
She was friends with Jeffree Star.
So she was a well-known face.
Very public figure.
Yeah.
Well, public figure in the sense of if you hung around in this subculture, you'd know who she was.
Well, she was eager to make her whereabouts public and get herself a bit of a profile.
Yes.
Last year, someone compiled the My Chemical Romance story to show Eliza Blue was a, and he says she was a crazy stalker, of the band.
I am not saying that.
And apparently she threatened to commit suicide.
It gets weirder.
I mean, checks out, given the subcultures.
Eliza Blue was on TV show Blind Date, which ran from 1999 to 2006.
On that show from 2006, Eliza claimed to be 21 and talked about sex.
Yet a year later, she was 17 and being trafficked.
Okay, yeah, that doesn't really add up.
I mean, scroll back up, just for this one.
Yeah, that's definitely her in a very mid-2000s emo look.
With the name Eliza Cutts.
Or Eliza Sleep.
Yeah, I've known many girls of that type.
Hmm.
Lots of names also as we go throughout this timeline.
So 2006, she's on blind date at 21.
2007, she's a My Chemical Romance girl on MySpace and Stickagram, but also saying she's getting trafficked at this time, and also saying she was 17 when she was getting trafficked.
And 2016, she says that she had refused offers to sleep with people for $150,000.
In 2022, she's saying 15 years ago, at age 17, she was trafficked, which means in 2007 she was 17 and being trafficked, but we know that doesn't add up with the blind date stuff.
So there's some questions here which require asking.
So now to get to her actual story.
She was groomed at age 15 at the Vans Warped Tour for two years by an unnamed photographer.
Apparently this is what she said.
She went to LA with a photographer.
And given the crowds at Warped Tour, I could believe it.
Fair enough.
She went to LA with a photographer and moved out before she was 18.
She got into drugs and was sold as a trafficking victim.
Now we have a good timeline for everything.
The My Chemical Romance only played the van's Warped Tour from 2004 to 2005, putting her story at 2005 for being 15 years old, yet somehow in 2006 she was on blind date, claiming to be 21.
Alright.
So, she's claiming...
Was she claiming, is what this guy asked, that she was trafficked by Michael Michael Romance members, anyone on blind date, Jeffree Star, James Charles, who she'd also mentioned being friends with, the unnamed photographer.
It's not very clear for someone of such a high-profile anti-trafficking advocate for how this meant...
And also, of all of the pop-punk and emo bands out there from the mid-2000s, I think My Chemical Romance might be one of the only ones that I'm not aware of having underage grooming allegations against them.
Because sadly, that was a relatively common thing in the subculture, given the kinds of girls, the kind of crowds that it attracted, which were mainly teenage girls.
Yeah, the Tumblr phenomenon, yes.
But, as far as I'm aware, My Chemical Romance never seemed to have been involved in anything like that.
Right, so there are questions as to what Eliza is alleging during her time in this subculture and also questions about her age at the time she was involved in the subculture.
Also, in 2009, Eliza Sleep, so, same name, sorry, different name, same person, Also known as Eliza Cutts, was auditioning for the Chicago American Idol Season 9 auditions.
In 2010, the New York Post ran an article, if we go to the next one, saying she was 28 and she was also one to watch for the 2010 auditions for American Idol.
So the one thing I am certain of this whole way through is that we have no idea how old she actually is, or at least her age keeps jumping around.
This is also a remarkable level of autonomy and public image for somebody who's supposed to be being trafficked at the time.
Yeah, she's involved in a lot of music subcultures and willing to put herself in front of cameras, and then retroactively is saying that during this time...
At an unspecified age and an unspecified date by unspecified people, I was being trafficked and therefore I can represent trafficking victims.
Not saying that it's impossible, just that it would be a very strange series of circumstances to find yourself in.
It's unclear, let's put it that way.
There's also the My Chemical Romance subreddit, not usually a reliable source for literally anything, but...
Quite interesting in here, they say that they've known who Eliza is for quite a while.
She was a hairdresser that was obsessed with Gerard, this is the post that I'm reading here, and managed to force herself into his life through work and friendship she formed with Mikey and Alicia.
search world's most hated crew for more information about her and Alicia.
The general understanding is that she stalked him, infiltrated his life so she was unavoidable, then went off the deep end when they were in a relationship and he left her.
Then he was engaged to Linz within the same year.
She also made herself available and information about her and Gerard was very accessible to fans, flaunted their relationship and got mad when she got hatred or backlash about her behaviour.
She lurked on My Chemical Romance sites and communities like LiveJournal, which was already documented in the private thread.
She posted public blogs that could be easily read on MySpace, Barsenet, All Now Purged.
It was wild.
If you haven't read her fan fiction she wrote here, it's linked.
We're not going to read it.
The links are dead, but the text is also in the post.
About their relationship, it explains some things, albeit poorly.
Also note, there was a long-standing rumour that Gerard paid for her to have an abortion that she may or may not have started herself, but she later denied that ever happened and stated she was never pregnant.
So, that may be wrapped up in the trafficking allegation.
If it is true, we cannot confirm nor deny it.
This is just from people in the subculture at the time that provided a few links that do demonstrate she was involved in the subculture.
Again, questions are raised.
So, if we go to the next one, she also arse-modelled for Tyra Banks on The Steve Harvey Show.
When's this video from, John?
Just scroll down slightly, please.
10 years ago.
That's 10 years ago.
Okay, very interesting.
Yeah, so it was about 2012.
Okay, interesting.
Eliza's also daughter of a congressman.
We click on this.
Representative Richard Morthland, Republican, 71st District.
So, did a Republican congressman from Springfield, Illinois, allow his daughter to get trafficked and still be quite high profile and in the public eye?
How certain are we that this is actually her dad?
I believe it is actually the case, yes.
Oh, okay.
Yeah, I've seen lots of people reporting it.
So, again, if we're wrong, happy to be corrected.
Seems a bit odd, but also there's a suggestion that Eliza has been using her father's ranch, or at least a property potentially owned by her father, if we go to the next one please, John, for a charity effort called Humanity House.
Now, there's no 501c3 non-profit registered to Humanity House, but she did say that she had started up a venture to have a place where human trafficking victims could go and feel safe.
It seems that we don't have a particular site for it.
She actually linked it to Andrew Yang here.
If we can click on these tweets, John, the first one is to say that it's a pleasure to announce that Humanity House is now a home, and she cites the poem that's written on the Statue of Liberty.
If we go to the next, Andrew Yang actually acknowledged the effort, So, she set up what seems to be a charitable enterprise, but people can't quite find the location for it, and she hasn't really spoken about it since then.
The only thing we have found, if we move on to the next thing please John, is that...
Someone...
Oh, this is interesting.
The tweet has been limited that was the source to this.
But her parents sought approval for something to be built on their property in September of 2020.
And then she said in March 2020 it was now being opened.
And we actually have in the next link the PDF of...
Yeah, can we go to there?
From Rock Island County, the planning permission and the map from her parents...
So again, questions are being raised.
Why has this charity house never materialised?
Why has it never been given an actual location?
So she was claiming that it was already opened before the planning documents had even been filed?
If this is the location, yes.
And this is the only location that people have found so far.
So again, questions are being raised, Eliza.
We'd like them answered, please.
Because if you really are doing good work, we just want to make sure that we're supporting someone who...
Says what they actually do, you know?
That seems to be pretty reasonable.
And once again, it seems very strange when you've got allegations coming at you that if you do have a legitimate story behind them, you could just come out and make a public statement explaining all of the potential discrepancies in the story.
Instead, you're choosing to censor.
Instead, you're potentially misusing some of your behind-the-scenes influence in Twitter to get people's accounts banned.
Exactly.
And in trying to censor, it's created a destroyer's end effect where people are going, well, why are you trying to hide this?
We're just getting more and more information released.
If we go to the next one, please, John, the quartering is also in this video.
I'm not going to go through it because he does enough of a good job documenting it.
But as soon as she opened up Humanity House, she crowdfunded for two vacations.
She said, I need time off and I'm going to crowdfund to go on holiday because all of my trafficking charitable work has really taken it out of me.
And so she crowdfunded herself two vacations.
So...
Interesting stuff to do.
You would have thought that you possibly would have need to stick around and make sure that you need all the supplies for the house instead.
But again, questions as to why she did that.
So we get down to what is Eliza's trafficking allegation in her own words.
So she went on Michael Malice's podcast, I believe this was now two years ago, might have been last year, and she defines trafficking as catfishing.
Play the clip please, John.
I was trafficked on Twitter as well.
So there's been three profiles to my knowledge that my former abusers made to traffic me on Twitter.
I didn't realize because I kind of just signed up for Twitter in late 2019.
So it was like one of the last few days of 2019 I signed up for Twitter.
What does that mean that they traffic you on Twitter?
How can someone traffic you if they're not in contact with you?
Yeah, so the way that that was working, I didn't know about the profiles existing because I wasn't on Twitter and I wasn't looking for them.
The way that my former abusers were doing it is that it was going back to my Instagram.
The Twitter accounts were linking back to my Instagram and they were trafficking me off Instagram, Backpage, you know, sugar daddy websites.
I mean, whatever type of internet trafficking is what was happening.
I'll go into more detail.
So it looks like a profile.
In my particular case, the profiles look like profiles that would be me, but trying to entice business to sell me, bringing it back to my Instagram where they were doing business.
Fortunately, in my particular case, there are no nude images or videos of me on Twitter.
Thank God.
Right now.
The day is young, I guess.
But it would go back to my Instagram and that's how they would traffic me, sell me, without my full consent and without my knowledge.
When I joined Twitter, an ex-boyfriend actually pointed out the first profile.
After I reported it to Twitter, it took them three and a half months to take it down.
The second profile took five days.
They actually took it while I was on my way to do my interview with Tim Cast.
And then the third profile, the platform has refused to take down.
So, she is saying that people misusing her image to lure men into giving the money or using Camgirl websites is how she is being trafficked.
That seems to be using the term trafficking quite loosely.
And that's an immoral thing to do on behalf of the people who are using the images to catfish, both for the people they're catfishing and also for Eliza herself.
But it's not human trafficking, no.
My missus, she watches the show you may have heard of called Catfish.
It's insufferable.
But I would have thought that their show would be much, much, much more serious if at the end of every episode somebody went to prison for human trafficking.
Yeah, it's not honest, but it's not a crime as far as I know.
Also, she's not quite telling the truth because people have found that she had a profile which seems to have been run by her, posting some rather saucy photos under the name Eliza Sleep quite a few years before that.
So claiming that you only joined Twitter in 2019 under the name Eliza Blue, there is at least a question here as to whether or not you ran that account.
Because that was one of your former names when you were going by a different career, and it was a bit more salacious than her current content.
So, again, questions raised.
Eliza also used to work for a Camgirl website.
Now, this could actually be a trafficking claim, but she doesn't tell the story with much harrowing in her voice.
I'll let her speak for herself.
You know, I have a service that I work through called Chatstar, so anybody that wants to contact me personally, like a fan or, I hate the word fan, I hate the word fan, it's so ugly, but anybody that feels a need to contact me personally can text message me through a service called Chatstar, and I do get paid through that.
You know, they pay to text me.
Wait, Chatstar is a cam site?
Hold up, wait, what?
I'm over here like, oh yeah, she's talking about it's messaging and it's called Chatstar.
I'm, oh my god, I'm so dumb.
Literally porn star chat, oh my god.
Oh my god.
Okay, okay.
I need to recollect myself for a second.
Watch Cam Soda's free live cams.
No re- Whoa, what?
No registration required to view our live sex webcams.
Ladies and gentlemen, we got them.
Literally she webcammed!
That's why she's getting $150,000 offers to fuck people, because she literally was on a camgirl website.
Okay, mystery solved.
Thank you to Brittany Venti for that coverage.
I'm sure Brittany isn't feeling particularly aggrieved by this whole scenario.
The last one that Eliza seems to have suggested might have been why she was trafficked.
Chrissy has shared this clip.
If we go to the last one, please, John.
She says survival sex and prostitution without a pimp that she experienced was trafficking.
If we play this last clip, please.
You stood out and said, I'm a survivor of human trafficking before it was a pop culture topic.
So I appreciate you laying that groundwork for me and all the folks that worked in the movement to lay that groundwork so to be there when survivors like myself reach out.
I wanted to say something first, that you said that I'm a survivor of human trafficking.
I did say that, but not till later.
What I first said was, I'm an ex-prostitute.
And I had a pimp.
And everyone's like, and it's your fault.
But we didn't happen!
But Annie, we didn't have the language to put to it.
We didn't have the language to put to it back then.
I mean, this wasn't, you know, this wasn't a conversation the way that it is now.
I'm an ex-prostitute.
We did not have the language to put to it then.
And I feel like what you said was perfect at the time for what it was.
And to be brutally honest, depending on the folks that I'm talking to, I will navigate and say pimp, trap, her.
We'll navigate and say pimp, trap, her.
It just depends.
We'll navigate and say pimp, trap, her.
After I turn 18, and after things happen after that, I can honestly say I do play a role in what's going on around me.
And also, survival sex is not considered human trafficking.
What's survival sex?
Survival sex is that gray area between...
Let's talk about something funner after this.
This is not my most fun.
You know what I mean?
Let's kick it up a notch.
No, we can talk about survival sex.
I don't care about that.
Listen, this is like water off a duck's back.
I'm just tired of it, man.
It's been a long week.
We had the election this week.
Let's talk about anything else.
No, I'm just saying.
So survival sex would be if you need something like housing, drugs, medicine, food.
You're selling sex to survive, but you don't necessarily have a pimp or a trafficker.
Survival sex is not considered human trafficking.
And there were moments where I could have chosen to handle things differently and I didn't.
So, although bad things happen to me, I am also capable of doing really horrible things.
Yeah, I think we said it just right.
Before you say anything, can I just say to everybody who puts together these compilations, good work.
Please stop it with the music.
Please stop it with the over-editing, because honestly, it just makes the content of the video look more like a crazy conspiracy.
You're not going to gain legitimacy by editing it in such an over-the-top and coarse, to quote Peter Hitchens, manner.
It really doesn't make you look legitimate when you edit things.
But...
I get the point of what that video was suggesting.
If you were just listening, what you missed was the fact that there was overlays of text saying things like, because that's what she did, why does she keep referring to it as we in such a way?
And yes, that does sound just like prostitution is now trafficking because I say so.
Yeah, it sounds like I have done things that I'm not particularly proud of in the past, and therefore I am going to define away my culpability in choosing those sorts of things as human trafficking and therefore fight it.
I'm not saying that's what happened, but that is definitely the implication that the video and its edits of her own words are trying to suggest.
Also, I have one other question, which is that if it is true that her father is a congressman, why would she need to...
Go through survival sex in the first place.
Why would she need to do something like that?
Because surely she would be able to go to her father if she was ever in need of any help.
Does she have a bad relationship with him?
Are they disconnected?
What's going on there?
I think, whether or not that rap video was made consensually, you could probably surmise she has a bad relationship with her father.
I mean, I wasn't going to say so, but...
I would.
So, often, those looked in the public eye are the loudest to drown out the rattling of skeletons in their closet.
I hope, given Eliza's claim that she's doing lots of good work over at Twitter, that this isn't the case.
But we have some questions.
Fancy answering them?
Alright, let's move on, shall we then?
So, over in America over the past weekend, I imagine if you're watching and you are American, that you will have had quite a tense weekend, specifically if you are closer to blue cities, in particularly blue states, like if you have been anywhere near Los Angeles, New York, anywhere like that, I'm sure you have been feeling a little bit of tension,
and that's because the media has been trying to blow up the event known as Thierry Nichols' death, which is something that happened earlier on this month, on the 7th of January,...into a situation that could cause riots.
I do not think that it's right that the media has done such a thing.
I also do not think that it is right that the media has tried to, despite the fact that Terry Nichols, who died after an altercation with police officers, I know we can't say anything to...
It's specific about our opinions on it because of the fact that there's no charges, or at least the charges that have been brought forward need to go through a court first before we can say whether it was murder or not.
But the event seems to be being used by the media to try and suggest that despite the fact that the five people that beat him were all black, that it was still white supremacy, we need to abolish the police as usual.
You get through all of the same talking points.
So that's what we're going to look at today.
And before I go any further, I don't...
I want to draw everyone's attention to the most recent premium podcast that Connor and I put together.
This was my baby, something that I'm very proud of.
Talking about the dark side of MLK, as you can imagine from the thumbnail there.
Talking primarily about how he is not a conservative hero, and it does not benefit the right wing or conservatives, or anybody who considers himself not to be a progressive, in any way to deify the legacy of this man, to turn this man into some kind of saintly martyr.
He was not, in my opinion, a good person.
On a personal level, I do not believe that his legacy that he left behind is anything to shout home about.
I believe, in fact, that it has been massively detrimental to general civil liberties in the US, and also the well-being and welfare of blacks in America as well.
Certainly have not been benefited by the affirmative action that came out of the Civil Rights Act, and certainly were not benefited by things like encouragement of single motherhood within black communities.
There have been lots of things and now what we're living in is just the post-civil rights era given that what actually happened was that sadly the Civil Rights Act of 1964 acted as a separate and replacement constitution from the original constitution of the 18th century.
As a point of clarification, we obviously agree with content of character, not colour of skin.
In this podcast, we go through the truth of what actually MLK did in his lifetime.
It's not like he even wrote that line in the first place.
Yeah, but it's also, we're judging MLK by the content of his character and find it wanting.
So, go subscribe for £5 and listen to this history lesson.
Absolutely we did.
So before the video footage of Tiri Nichols was released on Friday, there were other bad events going on in America, particularly in Atlanta, because there were riots erupting down there.
So they mainly centered around attacking the police foundation headquarters that's in Atlanta at the moment.
This that we've got on screen right now, if you can see that, this is the body cam footage of the police encounter with Tiri Nichols.
It's actually very distressing to watch.
It is available online, as you can imagine.
But it doesn't paint a very good picture.
But once again, before that, the Atlanta riots went on last weekend.
They were Antifa members and other sorts of lefty activists attacking the police foundation headquarters and protesting new police developments after an incident where a black man was killed by the police.
And I think we can guess where all of...
This is going, and this does not relate to the Thierry Nichols story other than to just show that there are still lots of racial tensions going on in America and lots of opportunities for activists to take advantage and make an excuse to be able to destroy cities, burn down police buildings, and generally loot, burn, and murder.
Anyway, I'll read a bit from this article, which I think, if you scroll upwards, it's on Yahoo News, but I think it's taken from Fox News, just to be clear.
So the incident was an activist, Manuel Esteban Paz Teran, who was 26 years old, killed by a police officer after allegedly refusing demands by authorities on Wednesday, and allegedly fired a gun at state troopers at the Atlanta Public Safety Training Center.
Big surprise there.
Activists have been camped out on an 85-acre planned facility known as Cop City, and that's the colloquial name given to it by the activists because they, of course, want to denigrate it, In recent days to protest the planned training center when Teran was shot and killed after authorities tried to remove the protesters from the plot of land on Wednesday, they vowed to continue their protests in the way that only leftist activists can, violently.
An individual without warning shot a Georgia State Patrol trooper, said the Georgia Bureau of Investigations Michael Register, and he continued and said, Other law enforcement personnel returned fire and self-defense and evacuated the trooper to a safe area.
The individual who fired upon law enforcement and shot the trooper was killed in the exchange of gunfire.
Because you play stupid games, you get stupid prizes.
Teran was an activist working against the development of the City of Atlanta's Public Safety Training Center, and his fellow activists vowed to protest against the facility and the police after his death.
The Twitter account, Seams from Atlanta Forest, called for a night of rage to enact reciprocal violence to be done, to the police and their allies, according to a post.
A total of seven people were arrested and charged with domestic terrorism after the riots.
Some of those arrested were found with explosives.
That's always fun when that happens.
And Pedro Gonzalez, a fantastic journalist who works for Chronicles, I think he's an associate editor there, and also has his own sub-stack, broke down some of the information as far as he found and gave some interesting info and tidbits regarding that group I just mentioned a moment ago, scenes from the Atlanta Forest who were organising this protest.
He says, Atlanta is suffering a wave of riots, leftist shot cop, Mayor Andre Dickens said people are facing domestic terrorism charges, and as it turns out, these protests are connected to the Democratic Party's political apparatus.
Big surprise, they always tend to be.
Tehran was connected to a movement called Defend the Atlanta Forest.
In a tweet, the group indicated Tehran was fond of cop killer Assata Shakur.
Once again, all of these people tend to be fond of cop killers.
The left-wing outlet Green Matters described Defend the Atlanta Forest as decentralized with no official leadership.
Ahem.
Excuse me.
Spokespeople or organisation status in order to retain anonymity and is made up of various individuals and groups.
But the group's website shows that it's plugged into the Democrat Party's broader organisational network.
So this is once again the fallacy that these organisations and groups tend to be grassroots comes butting into the head with the political reality that oftentimes they are massively funded by outside organisations and vested interests.
So, the website states that you can assist them by donating to the Atlanta Solidarity Fund to support legal costs for arrested protesters and ongoing legal action.
So once again, if we've got protesters breaking into shops and looting things, we want to make sure we get them back onto the streets as quickly as possible so we can get them back stealing some Nikes for the cause, bruv.
The Atlanta Solidarities Fund's donation page shows that it is hosted by Action Network, an online platform that left-wing groups use to organise and fundraise.
The Action Network's big clients are the Democratic National Committee, the AFL-CIO, and Black Lives Matter.
Black Lives Matter themselves affiliated with ActBlue, the Democrat funding super PAC, so it's all the same beast.
It's always all the same beast.
This website prominently displays the following advertisement.
After three months of using Action Network, the DNC shattered all sorts of fundraising records.
So if you're not convinced that they have a close relationship with these people, if they're using the platform to raise lots and lots and lots of money, the likely matter is that they've probably got deep connections with them.
In short, the fundraising apparatus and political network, designed to keep people engaged in domestic terrorism, as Dickens said, and out of jail, is connected to the Democrat Party and its proxies.
One other part of the story, or just a note in conclusion, Pedro says, is that there exists no institutional or organizational parity on the right to get away with this sort of thing.
Democrats are effectively subsidizing domestic terrorism, and there are no consequences, because there never is, because they're always in charge when these situations go down, and when the right are in charge when these situations go down, we say, oh, let's be fair.
Let's be fair.
Let's not punish our enemies who want to kill us.
It's ridiculous suicidal thinking.
But we've got some footage from some of the riots that were going on in Atlanta.
So here's Tommy Robinson sharing this footage of a police car being burned in Atlanta.
If we go to the next one, we've got footage of the Antifa attack on the police.
I think this was on the Police Foundation headquarters, so...
Yeah, they're just picking up bricks, throwing, smashing the windows, doing typical Antifa stuff, and nobody's doing much to stop them.
Here we've got footage that Andy Nose shared of some of these protesters being arrested.
What you can't hear, if you just click on the image so we can hear the audio here, John...
I'm sorry, my sympathies don't go with that because it's clearly performative.
Listen as well to what they actually start shouting.
We all got it on video Well, it seems we might have missed it for a moment that put what a lot of these women are shouting is I can't breathe Yeah, you could hear it.
You can pause it now, John.
We've heard what we needed to there.
Thank you.
So, yeah, they're just shouting, I can't breathe.
It's incredibly performative.
They're trying to make it seem that they're another George Floyd because these movements want another George Floyd, not because they care about the people involved or care about the lives lost, mainly because they care about the political excuses to go out and riot.
As always, CNN, we're back to their old tricks as well, and decided to release this statement in their own coverage of it, where the guy on the left here, I don't know this guy's name, he's just an average CNN reporter.
David Peasner, freelance journalist.
Oh yes, right there at the bottom of the screen.
Thank you for that catch, I could have come across as quite the numpty.
He was just saying, we shouldn't describe it as violent, we shouldn't use the word violent to describe it.
After all, they're only attacking property.
There is literally a car on fire.
Real violence has never been tried.
God, okay.
Alright then.
I mean, if this is what they call non-violent, can you imagine what violent protest looks like?
If you're setting things on fire and stealing things...
Oh wait, I can, it's Kenosha!
Yeah, if you're setting things on fire and stealing things, why am I not to immediately suppose that you won't escalate to killing me if I get in the way of said property?
Like David Dorn.
Yeah, the way they always do every time somebody does.
Or, say, for instance, in Portland, I forget the name of the man, the man who was simply walking down the street wearing a MAGA hat who got shot by a crazy leftist Antifa protester.
So, interesting how this always happens, but that's what has been going on in Atlanta.
Let's move on to the Terry Nichols incident.
So...
I'll read through here what we know about it, and then I'll discuss my opinion on it, having watched all of the police camera footage and the body cam footage.
So, Nichols was stopped at around 8.30 on January 7th for alleged reckless driving in Memphis.
A confrontation occurred and the suspect had fled the scene on foot, the police report said.
Police pursued the suspect and another confrontation occurred when they tried to take him into custody, the report added, and Nichols was admitted to a hospital in critical condition after complaining of shortness of breath.
It seems that he wasn't overdosing on anything this time.
It's not that kind of situation.
I saw a Newsweek report that said he had no prior criminal history.
So this obviously requires further investigation, but this does seem, as far as what we have seen, to be an overreach of police power and capricious and excessive brutality.
Yeah, as far as I can tell, judging by watching the footage, it seems to be open and shut police brutality.
I know that there are some people who are suggesting that he was resisting arrest, and there's an argument to be made there that he shouldn't have resisted arrest.
If he had been more compliant, perhaps they would have gone easier on him.
But at the same time, what he was doing to resist arrest, so to speak, did not in the slightest justify the massive overreach of a reaction that he received.
Yeah, he wasn't on any drugs.
There were five police officers all larger than him.
I think he was 60 pounds underweight, and they'd already pepper-sprayed him, and even if you do need to detain him with a bit of force, that doesn't require beating him over the head with a truncheon within an inch of his life.
Yeah, and this time, if you watch the footage, he's calling for his mother.
This time, it actually was his mother that he was calling for, because he was actually on the street where his mother's house was, and he was trying to call for her so that she could come out and help him.
This is not a case of some fentanyl addict screaming out for his girlfriend who he has the nickname Mama for.
And then people misinterpreting that.
No, it seems to be...
It seems that what we're being told about this information, judging by the footage that has been released, was... has been accurate.
The only thing that we can say about it though is that it's very strange that the footage was released on Friday, and immediately all of the media networks decided that what they wanted to do was tell everybody, Riots are gonna happen!
Some bad thing happened to a black guy involving police a thousand miles away in a completely different state that you've got nothing to do with.
Watch out this weekend because there might be riots.
And sadly, I can understand after the summer of 2020 why they would have this reaction.
I do think the media wants...
to put it forward as being a thing that is going to happen in every single occasion because it means that they get more clicks It means that they get more news to report on But at the same time, it's pretty reasonable to assume if we scroll down just so we can see which cities in particular are highlighted That somewhere like San Francisco, Los Angeles, Portland or Seattle or even some of the blue cities Austin, Dallas in Texas would erupt into violent chaos because Because sadly, that seems to just be what happens now.
America, if we go to the next tweet...
Well, I was going to say riots are now treated like weather events.
Yeah, yeah.
Charles Main, if you go to the next one, just said that we're at a point where rioting blacks are treated like a weather phenomenon.
It shouldn't be the case.
It shouldn't be the case that if you are living in America, you have to constantly live in fear of riots just because a police somewhere thousands of miles away from you who has nothing to do with you or your life decided to do something bad.
Obviously, we can condemn the actions of rogue police officers beating people, but that doesn't mean that you need to go out into the street and start smashing up local businesses.
That doesn't help.
I don't see how that helps.
But yeah, I'll just carry on with some of the rest of the information just for full context here.
So Nichols suffered a broken neck after the situation and went into cardiac arrest during the confrontation.
Family released a photo of Nichols in a hospital bed, and then on January 10th, he died after kidney failure and cardiac arrest.
All of the police officers involved were fired from the Memphis police last week after being found.
This is from the original article I was looking at.
Sorry, John.
You can just stay on here, though.
After being found to have violated department policies pertaining to the use of force, duty to render aid, and duty to intervene.
The department said in a news release they were indicted on Thursday on charges of second-degree murder, aggravated assault, acting in concert, two counts of aggravated kidnapping, two counts of official misconduct, and one count of official oppression.
In a statement Thursday following the announcement of the charges, President Biden...
Because he had to chime in.
Noted that fatal encounters with law enforcement have disparately impacted black and brown people and called for Congress to advance the George Floyd...
Sorry, I've got to laugh when they call it...
The George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, a police accountability bill that stalled in the Senate in 2021.
I assume that would be after all of the defund the police movements went through, got them to actually defund the police, and then saw an immediate spike in violent crime and went, hold up, we should be refunding the police.
But they're not...
Disproportionate, based not on population.
That's not the factor you have to look at, because again, it's not half the population of the black community.
Where's the crime?
Who's committing the crime?
It's more so...
It's a very small portion of the black community.
It's about who has the most interactions with police, and obviously who resists arrests.
In this case, it was a clear...
It seems to be a clear-cut case of police overreach by five black officers and one black guy.
There's not even a racial dimension to this.
However, if you look at other cases...
White people are more likely to die in police custody than black people, despite being the majority population, but having less interactions with the police for violent crimes.
And just to make it clear, there was initially, having watched the body cam footage, the body cam footage that you can watch for the first bit of the interaction, where Nichols was supposedly...
footage prior to the cars having already stopped so we don't get an indication of how reckless he was being or even if that was an accurate characterization of his driving at the time but the guy whose camera footage we are following at first is a white guy who is a little bit heavy handed with him but all the rest of the police officers are black they're also being heavy handed with him and then he manages to leg it away from them and then by the time we get to the point where they're just actively beating him then it's when we get
I think the five or six police officers who are all just black guys.
They're the ones who actively beat him.
But what we see in the footage, from what I have seen, is the cars are already stopped by the time the footage starts, so we can't, like I say, judge how warranted the traffic stop was in the first place.
But they're all very aggravated, they're all already very angry.
They go up to the door, they open the door, they yank him out, they throw him on the ground, and immediately start shouting to present his hands.
He's shouting, I didn't do anything, what am I doing?
What are you doing?
I didn't do anything, I've not done anything wrong.
They try and grab his hands, but he seems to be trying to keep his hands away from them.
And to be fair, in that situation, being dragged out and thrown straight into the street, I would probably be freaking out as well.
You can make the argument that in trying to keep his hands away from them so they couldn't cuff him, he's resisting arrest.
That's a fair argument to make, but in that situation, I don't know if I'd have done any different, because it's freaky.
You expect interaction with the police in this situation to be, say, they just say, they get you out of the car and they cuff you, but they're not screaming at you, they're not chucking you to the ground, but once again, we don't have the context of what happened prior to the video starting.
He manages to get away because the guy whose camera we're following has a taser on his leg.
I don't know if he tased him or not.
They had the taser on his leg.
He legs it away.
The cops in the process of doing all this manage to accidentally pepper spray themselves, which is...
A little bit funny.
I run this training, yeah.
Not gonna lie.
And then all the other footage that we see is from the perspective of either a pole camera that was on the street that he was beaten, or from the perspective of the police officers who were beating him, and it's not good.
They manage to tackle him down, they're shouting once again, give me your hands, he's trying to...
Either is one of two things.
Either he's trying to keep his hands away for him, or the way that they are kneeling on him and the position they have him in, he can't give them his hands, and then as a result they just start beating on him.
They just start beating on him, and it is pretty brutal, and it seems completely undeserved.
I'm sure there are some people who might be able to excuse it or give a better explanation for why, but that's the take that I've got from it.
And I think it is right that because it led to this guy's death, and even without it leading to this guy's death, that what happened was unwarranted, what happened was brutal and unnecessary, and that these people should probably be charged.
That's my take on it as it starts right now.
But it's the fact that the media immediately went into overdrive saying, Riots!
Riots!
There's going to be riots!
Board up your windows!
There's going to be riots!
You best get prepared, because guys are going to come and smash through and steal all your stuff.
And once again, I can understand why, but the fact that the media wants it, they were relishing in the idea that it might happen.
Like, we've got Fox News here, and this was Georgia Governor Brian Kemp issued a state of emergency order on Thursday ahead of a potential protest in Atlanta over the weekend in an effort to prevent the unrest and chaos that occurred during last week's riots.
That would be referring to the Atlanta ones again.
The order calls for a thousand National Guard troops to be called up and it expires on the February 9th.
The order said the state of emergency was declared because of unlawful assemblage, violence, overt threats of violence, disruption of the peace and tranquility of the state, and danger existing to persons and property.
And police departments in major cities like Austin, LA, Washington, DC, were all preparing for potential unrest at the same time.
I can understand why, but if you lived in a sensible country, this would not be national news, this would just be local news, and it would be something bad that happened in a particular town, in a particular situation, that doesn't have to impact everywhere else in the country.
I very much doubt that the Iowa police have much to do with the Memphis police, for instance.
But in the UK, we also had our own favourite talking heads decided to chime in for some reason, where David Lammy was...
It's traumatic.
It's exhausting.
Tragic to constantly watch the footage.
It doesn't need to.
It doesn't need to be, because you don't need to watch it, because guess what?
England...
England, our tiny little island...
Britain, off the edge of Europe, doesn't have to have anything to do with America, if we don't want it to.
But you do want it to, because you want the martyrs, you want the victims, so that you can push your grievance politics and push for changes that you want, which almost inevitably always give you more institutionalised power.
Dr.
Scholar decided that she wanted to chime in as well.
Everybody's favourite doctor, where she was talking about it being black and brown gatekeepers.
The fact that it was six black dudes beating this guy meant that we can't call it white supremacy when it was!
It was white supremacy.
That's the attitude that she's giving.
Head of the MLK Centre and Martin Luther King himself, daughter Bernice King, decided to speak out against communal trauma, saying that you don't have to...
In the next link, John, please...
You don't have to watch the video of Terry Nichols being beaten by the police.
You don't have to subject yourself to that trauma.
It should not require another video of a black human.
It's amazing that you manage to turn, hey, don't watch this video, it might be upsetting to you, into another victimhood badge, into another pledge of victimhood.
Incredible.
The MLK Centre themselves released a statement going through...
All of the same platitudes that you would expect.
Policing only black and brown people get bad results from police interactions.
We have to take accountability for the system.
It's not the people individually.
It's the system of white supremacy that perpetuates certain oppressive behaviors, etc.
I really felt that white supremacy when I was threatened with arrest for saying one word out of context last year.
Maybe you're blacker than you thought.
Maybe you can apply for them nice, nice victim books.
Anyway, and we've also got this last one I pointed out here, where they just say it outright, okay?
How can it be racist if the police are black?
Because the institution of policing itself is racist!
That's right.
Upholding law and order, the sorts of standards that we've come to expect in the West, in the US and the UK and elsewhere, is just inherently racist.
And that is what these sorts of people believe, and you can maybe make an argument for it if all of the police officers everywhere were white, and they were only doing it to black guys.
But when it's six black guys, you're stretching.
You're reaching just a little bit.
But, 144, almost 145,000 likes.
People agree with this.
People agree with these takes.
There is a subsection of the US population, and the UK population, and a lot in the West in general now, that just believes policing in general is inherently racist and therefore needs to be abolished.
It's not because they actually care about people's well-being, it's because they care about...
Going into the streets and smashing stuff and stealing stuff.
That's as far as I can tell.
And in the next one, we've got the incredible, incredible opinion piece from CNN. The police who killed Thierry Nichols were black, but they might still have been driven by racism.
just squint really hard I can find a way that this was racism.
It's by Van Jones by the way who has a history of working with the Obama administration and was very corrupt and then he called the election of Donald Trump white lash.
He also points out at the beginning of this article that in the early 90s After the Rodney King incident that he was arrested in the LA riots that took place afterwards.
So I'm sure, upstanding, charming gentleman.
And we don't need to read it because the article says everything that you think it does.
If you were to type this headline into ChatGPT or whatever it is and say, write an article based off of this, it's everything you would expect to come out.
You can literally get AI to write these articles now.
But what it actually turns out is that in the post-George Floyd order, as reported by the post-millennial, The Memphis Police Department dramatically lowered their standards before hiring two of the officers charged in Thierry Nichols' death, and a few of the other officers were involved previously in some pretty suspect behaviour that seems to have gone either unnoticed or just not really been cared about by the police.
And I wonder if that is to do with the fact that Memphis at the time had a campaign going saying if we have a greater diversity within our department, then less people will be beaten hurt.
Because Because they say a more diverse...
I think I saw the advert for it.
It's like a more diverse police department commits less crimes or beats less people, has less police violence.
What is it with Tennessee police departments?
Because wasn't it also Tennessee where that female police officer recently got gangbanged by the entire office?
Oh yeah, it was.
It's very strange what's going on in the state.
This is a red state again.
These are just very communal communities.
They like sharing.
That's just what goes on down there, I suppose.
But anyway, so the police officers involved, they've all got strange names, so apologies.
Tadarius Bean, Demetrius Haley, Emmett Martin III, Desmond Mills Jr., and Justin Smith all had been Memphis Police Department officers for just a few years when the fatal beating occurred on January 7th.
Bean and Haley in particular have only been in the force since August of 2020, after the department lowered the education standards.
MPD recruits are no longer needed an associate's degree or 54 college credit hours and could just get by with only five years of work experience.
And I assume that's just general any work experience, so that's not a good start.
And in 2021 and '22, recruitment was struggling so badly, the department offered $15,000 signing bonuses, and last year the department also reportedly lowered the fitness requirements, doing away with the timed physical ability test.
The department even offered waivers for felons to join the force, according to the New York Post.
So this doesn't sound like it's a consequence of white supremacy, if you take white supremacy to mean certain Western standards generally taken from Britain, for instance, that were exported across the world.
It sounds like it was relinquishing those white supremacist standards that might have led to this in the first place, because it means that the police officers on the street were not as qualified and not as safe as police officers that could have been out there otherwise.
Very interesting.
But, thankfully, in regards to the riots that the media were absolutely guaranteeing were going to happen, you should all be very, very afraid, there was some looting in Memphis, like this bike shop was looted, there were Terry Nichols riots in Memphis, by the sounds of it, but, other than that, I've not really seen much.
NYC was apparently driven to a standstill, but the most that I've been able to find in regards to riots that were going on was this, and this next clip, which was just...
An actually peaceful demonstration in the middle of New York.
Now, I'm not saying that this won't escalate further.
I'm not saying that this won't lead to more rise.
Just that this is the information and this is the footage that I've been able to find at the moment.
so it seems to mainly be not anywhere near as terrifying a response as George Floyd was, but I did see somebody on Twitter pointing out that it might just be because it's January and it's cold and it's less fun to riot in the cold.
So we'll see where this is going, but it doesn't appear to me that Tyrion Nichols' death had anything to do with white supremacy.
And with that...
John, you might want to get rid of the stuff for the next stuff.
Hey, there we go.
Right.
Do you ever watch your television and think, this doesn't look much like the world on my doorstep?
I know we're seeing the same thing with adverts, but it's definitely fed into the TV programs now that I don't think you or I really watch, except I still live with my family and they just stick it on in the background of dinner time and I am subjected to all of the boomer truth regime broadcasts over the airways.
Today we're going to look about how the media manufacturers consent, particularly on the topic of Is that who I think it is on the right-hand side of this image?
It is, but this has nothing to do with Ash Sarkar today.
They skew their content to misrepresent reality and gaslight you.
This question time clip from a couple of weeks ago demonstrates just how they can pack the audience to make sure that the questions selected push a particular worldview.
This just blew my eyebrows off my forehead.
Let's play.
What is your experience in the NHS? Why are you asking it?
Well, I'm a junior doctor, so I'm working in the NHS. I've worked on the front line.
I'm also a junior doctor, and I live and work in Anna's old constituency.
So, I'm to merge to nurse practitioner.
I've only been qualified, actually, for four years.
My goodness.
It feels like our audience is full of people.
I know it isn't, but I seem to unerringly seem to have found you.
It's all here in the glasses.
I worked in the NHS for eight years as a registered nurse.
I'm currently a junior doctor as well.
I'm working as a teaching fellow in one of the hospitals nearby.
Can I just...
Everyone put their hands down.
How many NHS workers are in this audience?
Put your hands up.
Right, well, I guess...
Well, I just need to have found you or something.
Put your hands back up.
Yes, man, the blue chef.
So, those are all questions one after the other as well.
Like, I edited out about 10 minutes of discussion between, but all of those questions were in succession.
About a third of the audience there, conservatively estimated, were NHS workers.
And they are selected, because you have to put your profession in when you sign up to be on question time.
So somewhere, there's probably a lobby of NHS workers that says, it's a good idea to go on question time.
Then in the BBC, they pick NHS workers, and then they get selected to ask their questions first, shoved to the front of the queue.
It changes your perception as to what the public concern themselves with, the particular issues, and it's always the NHS never gets enough funding, we don't have enough migrant workers here, etc.
There will be a lot of organisation of producers and behind the scenes people, like people just hands on set, going on behind what you see just on the screen to make sure that the right people ask the right questions.
They will probably be screened as well before they go on to ask What kind of questions are you going to ask?
You always do, yes.
Because you're not going to want some crazy to get up and start yelling, I don't know, start asking questions about the Holocaust or something like that.
You don't want crazies getting in there.
Yeah, exactly.
And it's really funny as well, because Timothy Stanley jokes, the state of the NHS in this country at the moment, the only place you can find a doctor is on question time.
So it's kind of biting the ironic.
What we're concerning ourselves here is with the issue of representation.
If you pay £5 a month, you'll be able to subscribe to LotusEaters.com and learn all about this topic when Carl and Beau went through Hannah Pitkin's book, The Concepts of Representation.
What it is, representation in the political sense is acting in the interest of your constituents.
So it's not necessarily that they have to look like you, but they're acting on your behalf.
They listen to your concerns and they depict them accurately within the halls of power.
But media representation, artistic representation, is meant to be the replication of something in reality, one step removed from reality, so we can play out our ideas and so our ideas die so that we don't have to.
We can learn from media.
But the only reason we can learn from media is if it some way communes with what is true, how people truly act.
Now, I don't think this extends to the concept of soaps these days.
Harry, I'm conscripting you into my long arc on this channel of moaning at Coronation Street.
Can you go to the next?
Thankfully, I don't live with my parents, so I don't have to be put through Coronation Street, but I do live with my missus, so I am put through other terrible television.
Yeah, so linked in the description are the other couple of parts of when I've discussed this topic before, but this was the last one.
What this storyline is is the far-right grooming storyline.
To catch you up to speed, a character called Griff...
Oh, those far-right grooming gangs?
Is that what this episode is?
The well-noted occurrence of far-right grooming gangs?
They actually did a grooming gang storyline once, and it was a white girl groomed by her white boyfriend and a police officer.
Many such cases.
So this storyline is ideological grooming.
So there's a young lad who's got ADHD called Max.
Manufactured consent.
Exactly.
And he lives with his stepdad.
And what happens is he encounters a guy called Griff, who's a very compelling speaker, who talks about all sorts of...
Did they really just call him Griff and then change one of the letters?
Yeah.
All sorts of conspiracy theories, which we couldn't say on YouTube, of course.
And he talks badly about migration, using analogies like invading species with ecological metaphors.
What ends up happening is Griff, even though he presents some actual fair concerns, like the NHS is overstressed, infrastructure is overstressed, there's cultural incompatibilities, he presents those concerns to the councillor and says, you aren't listening, you're covering up, and I'm going to get arrested for my free speech.
The night before...
This sounds pretty bassed.
Yeah, well the night before, they've already poisoned the world because they had him beat up a migrant child, and then they have him bomb a curry van.
So Max ends up turning him in and going astray from the far right.
But in this particular video, this clip that's in this last segment I did with Dan, go back please John, which you can watch on Rumble because it wouldn't allow us to play on YouTube or on our website.
And if the clip we play in a second isn't up there, you can watch it on Rumble or on our website, of course.
Max goes to David, well now that Griff's in prison, he did make some good points.
He was true.
There are people that are trying to destroy Britain.
There are people trying to destroy our statues.
There is too much migration.
And David shouts at him and hounds him down.
So he drives his stepson away, further into the far right.
And it's culminated, if we go to the next one, in tonight...
Well, not tonight.
Last week's Coronation Street episode.
Tonight on Coronation Street!
Yeah, it's not Monday Night Raw.
My bad.
Connor shows up for an all-round slobber knocker.
What happened is, they recreated the Joe Cox murder.
So, there was a far-right terrorist.
Really?
Yeah, who live-streamed the stabbing.
This seems to be very poor taste.
Yep, and Max was watching the live-stream, and the guy was inspired by Max's YouTube videos made by Griff to go and stab a local counsellor while she's at a refugee's welcome event.
We're going to watch a clip.
Again, if you don't see the clip here on YouTube, because we have to edit it out, go and watch it on our Rumble channel or on our website linked in the description.
Let's play.
Where's the audio gone?
Does the clip not have audio?
The clip does have audio, I don't know what's happened here.
Oh well.
I'm sure it's just...
Right, so I'll describe it.
Basically what happens is he walks into the Refugees Welcome event, he's live-streaming, talking to the counsellor, and he's got a concealed knife the entire time.
Max is watching all of this from on his phone at home, and eventually Max decides to try to alert the people...
Oh no, look, he's filming that.
Oh, black people.
Essentially, he's walking towards her with a knife.
The refugee child, who was beaten up prior, warns everyone, tries to get in the way.
Yasmin, who helps run the curry house, gets stabbed, and then they all hold Blake down, who's the gentleman who stabbed them.
And when asked, why are you doing this?
He shouts, this is for England.
Alright.
Doesn't represent reality all that well, I don't think.
Well, you see, I remember there was about a year and a bit ago, there was one event where a public event had a stabbing of a public figure in it, but the circumstances seemed flipped, almost.
We'll discuss that towards the end.
But since, far-right doesn't really register on any global terrorism map, so I think this is trying to convict a consensus reality that keeps, obviously, you and I compliant with mass immigration, multiculturalism, and depreciating down our purchasing power and wages.
No, we can find the Global Terrorism Index, and it shows definitively that far-right terrorism is just basically not a thing anymore.
Yeah, well, it keeps us afraid of that.
By not noticing facts so that we don't push back on these policies which are making us poorer because we're too afraid of being called racist.
Now, it does represent reality in part.
Let's go to the next one, please.
There was a teenager who was recently prosecuted for apparently inspiring the Buffalo shooting that happened a couple of years ago.
So Daniel Harris, 19, from Derbyshire, posted videos which were shared by Peyton Gendron, who has admitted to a supermarket shooting in Buffalo.
God, the Independent doesn't read their copy, New York.
And linked to Anderson Lee Aldrich, the only suspect in a shooting at a gay bar in Colorado, Manchester Crown Court, Heard.
Referring to Gendron, who has pleaded guilty to murder and hate-motivated terrorism charges, the judge has said, This indicates that at the very least the material you produced and published had some influence upon the young man.
I know he was a similar age to you who went out and shot ten black people dead at a store in Buffalo.
Harris, who's the teenager charged here, was found guilty following a trial of five counts of encouraging terrorism and one count of possession of material for terrorist purposes relating to a 3D printer he was trying to use to make firearm parts.
The court heard his offences were carried out over a period of 14 months The court heard the video he produced glorified mass murderers and encouraged others to emulate them by carrying out similar attacks.
One video, called How to Achieve Victory, said there was a need for total extermination of subhumans once and for all.
Harris had previous convictions, including the racially aggravated criminal damage of a memorial to George Floyd in Manchester.
Why does there need to be one of those in Manchester?
Because the capital, we black, means an international umma, which are aggrieved and that can beat us over the head no matter the cultural applicability.
He was engaged with a de-radicalisation programme, but told the oppositive his behaviour was a blip and denied having any interest in politics.
At the time he made those claims, the court heard, he was creating a video homage to Thomas Mayer, who murdered MP Joe Cox.
So Max in Coronation Street has also been charged with incitement to murder.
So it's obvious they're trying to parallel the Joe Cox murder and this kid who was the Buffalo shooter by entangling him in a far-right white supremacist web of conspiracies.
I hate this.
I hate this.
did this kid magically possess these people and force them to pull the trigger on anybody no he's from Derbyshire He said some very unsavoury things.
Is he responsible for the man who went and shot ten people just because that man watched his YouTube video?
Well, I need to know the context of how he said these statements anyway, because that could be like a cheeky little joke.
Like, ooh, aren't I so edgy?
I'm not going to lend credence to the idea that it was a cheeky joke because I can't say either way, but did he go out and tell this specific person, this viewer, at this time and this place to do this thing, or did he issue a blanket statement of hatred that I would disagree with but not find necessarily criminally actionable?
And was he actively building the 3D gun parts?
This is a question I don't have answered.
Or did he just have a 3D printer and they've connected it to the idea that he could be building gun parts?
So...
Either way, 19-year-old kids go in prison.
Exactly.
And this is what they're linking the storyline to.
But then we have a lot of other instances that don't quite line up with the reality that Coronation Street is trying to present to us.
So, this was the day after the Coronation Street episode aired that we just watched the clip from.
A church worker was killed and a priest badly injured during a stabbing spree in at least two places of Christian worship in Algeria, southern Spain, which police are investigating as a terror attack.
Diego Valencia, Sir Christian at the Church of Nuestra Senor de la Palma, was killed, while Antonio Rodriguez, priest at San Isidro Church, was last night in hospital seriously injured but stable, the town's mayor said in a post on Facebook.
Police said last night that a suspect was in custody.
Three other people were also injured in the attacks, local media reported.
According to police sources cited by the newspaper El Pace, the assailant is believed to be of Moroccan origin, though he was not carrying identity documents.
So not a white supremacist attack.
Seems to have been a hatred of Christianity and the Spanish by an immigrant.
If we go to the next one...
Not the first time that Spain has experienced such a thing.
Same day as the Corrie episode aired...
An Afghan asylum seeker who's stabbed to death an aspiring royal marine has been jailed for life with a minimum sentence of 29 years.
Thomas Roberts, 21, was stabbed to death...
I can't pronounce that name and I don't particularly care.
You're a scumbag.
Also 21, keep that age in mind, who duped Border Force by posing as a 14-year-old boy during an argument over an e-scooter last year in Bournemouth.
The stabber had posed as a young Afghan orphan in order to gain entry into the UK in 2019.
But in reality, he was a 19-year-old man who was wanted by police in Serbia for shooting two people dead in an apartment arguing over smuggling.
Judge Paul Dugdale told Salisbury Crown Court a sentence on the basis that...
The stab-up was at all times the aggressor that night, and by his behaviour created a situation that led to Thomas Roberts' death.
Over and above that, he was looking for trouble.
On March 12th, you murdered Thomas Roberts, a man you had never met before.
You spent 26 seconds of your life with him, at the end of which you stabbed him fatally twice to the chest with a large knife you routinely carried with you.
You started a conflict, and throughout, you were the threatening aggressor.
In seconds, you took the life of a thoroughly decent man with a bright future who was loved greatly by so many people.
Your momentary act of extreme senseless violence has left a family with a tragic loss that they will feel for the rest of their lives.
Earlier, Mr.
Roberts' father, Philip, described how his son's death had left a terrible void.
Giving an impact statement, victim impact statement, he said, I miss him very much in so many ways.
He's struggled to get up at work for 5.30am.
I miss him fixing things at home.
I miss all his friends coming to the house.
I miss his lovely girlfriend coming to stay with him.
Tommy is my only son.
I always wanted a son, and he's been taken away from me, leaving a terrible void.
I miss him every day, every hour, every minute.
Now I ask that justice is served.
This guy was a former drug dealer.
He shot two people in Serbia.
He exploited the asylum system, pretending to be a 14-year-old, and he killed an upstanding man who was wanting to defend this country and had his whole life and a future wife ahead of him.
And you're going to tell me that far-right terror is the major threat when we keep seeing, with the Reading stabbing, with the Manchester Arena bombing, with repeated attacks by people exploiting the asylum system from overseas, that far-right terror is the biggest threat?
Really?
I don't know if you've seen it.
I did see a clip going around on Twitter over the weekend of footage of a shooting that took place where it was some foreign immigrant Middle Eastern shooters come in, burst into this place, a bunch of people get under the tables, and the guy filming the video, just casually, because you're in a very stressful situation, says something regarding the man being a word that I'm not allowed to say because we would get flagged for Islamophobia.
At which point, all of the people surrounding him, who, as far as I could tell, were all white English people, decided to scowl at him and tell him not to be Islamophobic.
I haven't seen that before, no.
It's astounding!
It's astounding the level of cognitive dissonance that people will put them through.
Same with Manchester Arena bombing, where Manchester turns around over the next week and says, oh, we don't look back in anger.
I'm sorry, you've got every right to be angry.
People died.
Exactly.
Though we also have the right to be angry with the BBC. So ITV hosts Coronation Street, but the BBC also does soaps.
They didn't run a story on it.
This is a screenshot taken on the day by our social media manager, Daisy.
If they've run a story since, then happy to be corrected.
But...
At that time, they didn't run a story on it.
What they did run a story on was, Afghan professor, if they kill me, I won't stay silent.
So they're still promoting the idea that Afghanistan is an intolerable hellhole and we have to take every single person from Afghanistan over here because the Taliban is completely incompatible with Islam, of course.
And that's not true because I'm sure at this point Callum would probably live in Afghanistan sooner than he'd stay here.
House prices and all that.
So let's go to the next one.
The reason he was able to exploit the asylum system by claiming to be a child is because children just go missing all the time from the asylum system.
There was 200 young child asylum seekers that have gone missing recently.
The missing youngsters include one girl and at least 13 children aged under the age of 16.
The rest, we don't know if they were actually adults, but we're going to presume that these are all children.
Responding to a question from the Liberal Democrat peer Paul Scriven, Lord Murray told the House that 88% of the missing children, 176, were of Albanian origin, and said the government hoped to phase out the use of hotels for children as soon as they can.
There are six home office hotels for unaccompanied asylum seeker children, including one in Brighton, where 76 have gone missing.
An investigation by the Observer newspaper cited child protection sources and a whistleblower working for the home office contractors, describing how youngsters were abducted off the street outside the Brighton Hotel and bundled into cars.
A counsellor for nearby Hove says that more than 100 children have gone missing from a hotel, housing, asylum-seeking children in Hove.
So this looks like a child trafficking gang being operated by the asylum system.
Again, is white supremacist terrorism, anti-immigrant terrorism the main threat here?
Or are these stabbings, these terrorist attacks, these murders, and these child trafficking efforts all being done off the back of an excessively compassionate and...
Failing safeguarding system for asylum in the UK. Seems to me that it's eminently sensible that we shore this up.
So, Chris Flip, who's a Conservative MP, has said now that we need X-ray checks to be introduced because of this asylum stabber.
He said the government would be quickly introducing X-ray and other scientific age checks to stop adult migrants claiming to be children to boost their asylum chances.
At the moment, age assessments are done by social worker interviewers.
What we need to introduce are scientific age assessment methods used in other European countries, including X-ray bones off the wrist.
There's also Lee Anderson MP who went down to the Calais border migrant camp and said he couldn't see a single child.
So these are all the people that are waiting to jump in dinghies and come over here.
So Care for Calais, which is the charity group here, are just enabling them to cross the channel and leech off the UK taxpayer when they don't have any more legitimate asylum claims and...
Well, plenty of people that come from Hong Kong, for example, that actually do have a legitimate asylum claim.
And the last one that you've already alluded to, I can't wait for Coronation Street to run the storyline that involves a Muslim stabber for an MP or a politician, because we recently had the Sir David Amos murder by Ali Harbi Ali.
So, he was an Islamic State fanatic.
He's been given a whole life sentence for murdering Sir David Amos MP in...
ooh, where's the Essex town?
South End.
Wasn't he also the son of an ambassador?
Yes, he was.
So Ali stabbed the Conservative MP for South End West more than 20 times after tricking his way into a constituency surgery in Essex last year.
Ali, from Kentish Town in North London, told the court he had plans to target various MPs, including Cabinet Minister Michael Gove.
He told his trial he was motivated by a desire to seek revenge against MPs who had voted for airstrikes on Syria.
So I can't wait for Coronation Street to tell the truth about Islamic rape gangs, migrant terrorists, the excessive exploitation of the asylum system by people claiming to be children, children being snatched off the street by Albanian migrant gangs.
But I won't hold my breath, because they're just keen on misrepresenting reality to keep you poor and indoctrinated.
Good one, Connor.
Let's go to video comments.
Maybe what you mean is, sometimes straight people have gay sex just to get off.
It's a thing.
Is it?
You ever been so horny and had sex with a man, Callum?
I was born this way, baby.
I'm attracted to men because they are men and I'm a man and I love men.
No.
You?
No.
Oh.
All we're doing is asking questions, Callum.
These two stories, they don't line up.
If you could just give us some pertinent answers, then we're happy to take these allegations down.
Let's go to the next one.
Quite apart from its meaning of slow, retard was also a classification of people with IQs below 100.
Scores from 0 to 24 were idiots, 25 to 49 were imbeciles, 50 to 74 were morons, and 75 to 99 were retards.
If the woke of today object to the term retard, then why don't they object to the far worse classifications?
In fact, Why do they love to bandy those worst terms about?
I don't think they've really put that much thought into it, to be honest.
I would have thought that the classifications would have been inverted, because retard is way worse than idiot.
But I'm more so surprised that people have genuinely zero IQ. I didn't think that was even...
Well, I don't know if that's possible.
I would imagine that if you've got zero IQ, then you'd just probably forget to breathe and choke to death.
But I'm glad to know that, in fact, when I've been calling lots of people retards, there's a decent chance of...
Being right.
I've been medically.
In terms of the medical terminology, I'm completely correct.
Retardation, a requirement to enter the Labour Party.
Anyway, so, comments for the first segment.
AK, I can't help but feel that Musk is controlled opposition and not really our guy.
What are your thoughts, Harry and Connor?
I think he's probably largely distracted here and or...
He has terrible taste in women, as we know from Amber Heard and Grimes, and his friendship with Eliza.
Listen, man, as far as I can tell, Elon Musk's mating tactic seems to be any holes a goal.
As long as she's fertile, just let me go straight at her, okay?
Because he is just interested in getting them to pop out kids.
Yeah.
So, you know, I respect that, but yeah, I kind of get the feeling that Elon, at first we all had a bit of a sense of excitement when he first came around, but now it's becoming clear that either he's taken his hands off of the steering wheel and the old people who used to be in charge of Twitter have basically just come back around because the likelihood is when he fired all of those people that quite a few left over were technically very competent but ideologically still very captured and they might be back into the driver's seat.
Either that...
Or he might be controlled opposition.
Either way, for all the good that he has done recently, I still distrust him on the basis of the brain chips, the very fact that he runs Tesla and supports the green agenda.
I distrust a lot of things that he is in support of.
I support the fact that he tried to clear out Twitter.
I support the fact that he certainly tried to clear out the CP that was on Twitter.
I respect that.
But some of the other stuff that he's involved in, no, I do not trust whatsoever.
Lord Nerevar, it's so weird to see Eliza go off the deep end like this.
Up until the Tate arrest, she was a perfectly normal and seemingly respectable individual.
Had she just been claimed by the mania surrounding the Tates to such a degree that she's betrayed all of her principles, or was this bubbling under the surface all along?
Add her name to the list of people who've shown their true colours, I suppose.
Yeah, I don't think she time-travelled to create 20 years of weird career history where she was in the public eye but also claiming to be trafficked.
I think this is always bubbling under the surface.
Yeah, if the allegations are true, then there's no sense in saying that she's changed because this was always her and we just weren't aware of it.
You can't fix her, bro.
X, Y, and Z. Devil's advocate.
If the charity is for human trafficking victims, keeping the location a secret would be paramount.
Sure, but it hasn't been registered.
There's no 501c3 documents for it.
There's no...
You'd actually have to...
I don't know the process of how you would register such a thing.
Okay, but if you're doing tax write-offs, for example, for a charity, then...
You would need to have the official documentation there.
And you would need a bunch of supplies.
If you were housing human trafficking victims, you would need sanitary towels.
You'd need food.
You'd need fresh bedding.
None of those things have been purchased or ever expensed.
So that doesn't...
Questions!
Again, LaFrench.
Eliza dyes her hair in bright colours.
She's clearly sending you signals that she's toxic.
Ah, the old toxic frog, Canard.
Shall we go on to some of yours?
Uh, yeah, sure.
Well, I just want to point out somebody agreeing with me, something I always like to highlight.
Think Positive said, Agreed on the unnecessary music, Harry.
It's the primary reason I unsubscribe from channels.
I just find it annoying, and I think it makes you look stupid, and it makes whatever point that you're trying to make look terrible, just by association of being surrounded by all of that extra fluff, which just looks rubbish.
Agreed.
So, Slavic Swadad, almost said Slavic suicide, that's how I misread it, said, when people justify riots and say, it's just property damage, let's just give them a chance to pay it back.
To be fair, they won't.
They won't be able to since most of them are jobless or have low-income jobs.
Traditionally funny that history tends to repeat themselves.
Rich kids playing revolutionaries, bet Marx would be proud.
Yeah, I suppose it's very difficult to understand the value of property that you've worked for when you're still living with your parents, and they buy everything for you, or you've just been subsidized by very rich parents, as many socialists are.
Bald Eagle, 1787, says, when handling the mostly peaceful protesters, I wouldn't mind the cops using a little excessive force.
They can stand in for the parents that fail to properly discipline their children.
I'd say that's fair if you're in a situation where there's riots in the street and there's violence and some guy opens fire on you first, but in a situation like Terry Nichols, I don't think it was warranted whatsoever.
He shouldn't have run.
He probably should have complied a bit more, but in that situation, I can't say that I would have been any less freaked out than he was.
Kevin Fox.
Antifa has been scuppered this time because Elon and Andy Ngo are shutting them down every time they try to use Twitter to coordinate their actions.
That might also actually be a decent point, if that is the case.
Sophie Liv Peterson says, Blacks are so oppressed in England, makes up 4% of the population, yet 50% of all acting and model roles in English entertainment.
Also, all big companies encourage to have 50% blacks somehow.
This is all true, and I do see some people, when we comment on American racial politics, complaining, you're English, it doesn't apply to you, It gets imported over here.
It does get imported over here to the point where the relations that we see, the dynamics that we see in play, might as well be taken straight out of Jim Crow era South, judging by the rhetorics that somebody like Dr.
Scholar uses.
When we never had that dynamic over here.
No, of course not.
We invited them over on Windrush.
No, we didn't.
Did we not?
No, no, no.
That's actually a falsity.
The Windrush generation were never invited by the government.
The bus companies just heavily advertised and they showed up.
Alright.
Okay, fair play.
Either way.
Anyway, Rick Archer says, It doesn't make sense, but doesn't need to.
Just listen, don't pay attention to the details.
Read the headlines and be outraged and follow the school of fish among the stream.
NPC.exe has received update boop as harrowing as it can be to realise such a thing that is in fact how I'd say 90% of people out there work they are complete NPCs and they have no mind of their own Anyway, let's go on to the last few comments for yours.
Yeah, that's fine.
Free Will 2112.
Years ago, there was a Coronation Street plotline involving the character Deidre Barlow being falsely imprisoned for murder.
Coronation fans petitioned Parliament for the character's release, and the real Tony Blair responded, asking his then-home secretary to look into the matter.
Is it any surprise, then, that the viewership is fertile ground for ideological brainwashing?
Yeah, Peter Hitchens covered this in The Abolition of Britain.
This was a genuine mass-formation psychosis moment.
Was the invention of the soap opera like Corrie and EastEnders, is that what Hitchens is pinpointing on it?
One of, yeah.
I think The Archers was pushed to make the government accept farming subsidies or something like that, originally.
Oh, really?
Yeah, I would like to be corrected on that if I'm wrong.
Again, when you've got a very fertile ground of middle-aged women who are the most likely to be scaremongered into hypochondria, subjected to very emotional, non-logical plotlines, and then you just shove propaganda in front of them while their brains are switched off and they're having their five o'clock glass of wine, they're the easiest to petrify into large-scale political movements.
The far right.
One last one.
Kevin Fox.
Guys, I can beat the police arresting people in the UK under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003.
In the past week or so, a guy has been convicted and sentenced to 42 years, later reduced to 28 years, but he is appealing, for 14 online comments about the royal family here.
"The Lessie-Majesty laws make Section 127 look positively tame.
There are two teenagers serving 15 years, each for drawing a moustache on a poster of the King.
Pretty sure certain people in power seem to think it's still the days of Yul, Brina and Deborah Kerr." I don't know where Kevin is based, but...
I would imagine French Canada.
That's royal family, Harry.
French Canada's us.
It might be like Thailand or something like that.
Potentially.
I'm just saying because it's French and it's about the royal family, so it might be that they just enforce anti-monarchy stuff.
Canada have our royal family on their money.
I know, but they have different laws over there.
Anyway, that's it for today.
We'll be back tomorrow at 1.30.
Thank you very much for watching.
1 o'clock.
Damn, alright, I'm doing a callum.
Export Selection