Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 18, 2023 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:29:15

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #570

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Music Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 18th of January 2023, I'm joined by Harry.
	Hello!
	And today we're going to be talking about Hogwarts Legacy returning.
	Again, so soon.
	There's been some developments.
	And, um, Democrats wanting being white to be illegal.
	As usual.
	And the Celts voting to oppress themselves, which was a funny vote, so...
	Also as usual.
	I suppose, um, shall begin.
	So Hogwarts Legacy was fun.
	I don't know if you remember a segment about that, but it's returning because the people making the fun are going harder, I'm going to say, on both sides of the SJW and internet racist community.
	Which side do we fall on, Callum?
	I think we're in either camp, so I think we're just here for the spectacle.
	Are we the fence straddlers?
	We're the ones reporting on the news.
	I actually brought my beanie with me today.
	I need to go and grab it quickly.
	We'll start off just by mentioning something on Loisies.com, being the Cyberpunk Dystopia episode we did about I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream.
	Not sure what relevance this quite has to this, but either way it's good, so go and check that out.
	It's about a video game?
	Yep.
	There's a video game version of it.
	How did you find this?
	Because I know Carl played it and you read the 14-page story it's based on.
	Yeah, and I watched all the Let's Plays and stuff.
	Does it look like a good game?
	I wouldn't play it.
	That doesn't say anything.
	I would play the Steamed Hams graphic adventure novel.
	As we found online.
	It's a thing that exists, folks.
	Yeah, I'm not joking.
	There's actually, if you type in Steamed Hams the graphic adventure, you'll find that.
	Classic point and click for the whole family.
	Anyway, video game stuff aside.
	We'll go to the graphics, actually, talking about video games.
	We'll start off just to remember people where we were.
	Are we going to continue to have the graphics argument throughout this segment?
	Because this morning we were having an argument about whether the graphics look good or not, and I think they just look fine.
	People can make their own opinions, but I just want to show them what I was talking about.
	Okay, alright, fine.
	A lot of people were like, what are you talking about?
	I need a visual aid.
	That's what I need.
	Callum needs bright, saturated colours and low detail environments so he can tell things apart.
	Yeah.
	Because apparently he's not just dyslexic with words, he's dyslexic with everything.
	Anyway, we'll start off just with, you may remember, some tags from the users who are villain protagonists, capitalism, and genocide simulator applied to Hogwarts Legacy, which is not even out.
	Won't be out for like 20 days or something, but sure.
	Once again, I was already interested in buying this.
	You don't have to keep selling it to me.
	Indeed.
	And we'll move on to the graphics, just to show you what the hell I was talking about, because someone put it here.
	This is the Hogwarts in 2004.
	This is now.
	And it's just...
	I don't know.
	I don't think this is saying what I think you think it is.
	What I'm saying is that the old graphics are easier to follow where you are and where the things are.
	They're more cartoony and simplistic, and that aesthetic style can be pleasant for a lot of people, but I don't think there's anything wrong with the one on the bottom either.
	I think the one at the bottom looks lovely, it's got the mist hanging over the water.
	It's pretty typical graphic quality for games nowadays.
	Could be improved, is my point.
	Could be improved by shitting up...
	Ranking up the saturation on the colours and taking away 90% of the detail and then Callum is happy.
	Yeah, there we are.
	Anyway, so going to the SJWs who won't shut up because they were screeching about the fact that it was a transphobic game.
	Why not Brianna Wu?
	Yeah, Brianna Wu has come back from the dead to tell us all Hogwarts Legacy isn't a game.
	It's not out.
	It's not out.
	The game isn't out.
	Just to remind everyone.
	It's a character test.
	There's a trailer and some screenshots.
	That's it.
	That's all there is, but that was enough for everyone to jump on board and be like, yeah, so J.K. Rowling's used on trans people.
	I love the implication of this, like, I'm going to go buy the disc, going to put it into my console, boot up the game, and it's just come up with a big screen that just says, you failed!
	It's a three-hour lecture of J.K. Rowling to the screen, like Big Brother from 1984, just being like, look, you're not a woman.
	Let me tell you why.
	That's actually what the disc will do.
	Anyway, she says it's a character test, and a lot of people are about to fail that character test of...
	Do you buy the game or not?
	Which...
	Okay.
	Alright.
	Alright, Brianna.
	I suppose we're all missing Depression Quest.
	I'll move forward to...
	I think that was Zoe Quinn who did Depression Quest.
	Brianna Wu, I think, has achieved actually nothing in her life.
	Didn't even make a depression quest.
	Sad.
	You couldn't even make depression quest.
	We'll move forward to some more opinions of Miss Wu.
	She says that gamers will sell trans people out.
	My position on Hogwarts Legacy is clear.
	As if this is a friggin' partisan debating point at this point.
	What's your opinion on Benghazi?
	What's your opinion on Hogwarts Legacy?
	I mean, she seems to be answering questions that no one asked.
	I'm boyconning it.
	If you think you care about trans people, you should too.
	But, in what should not be a surprise to anyone, most gamers don't care about trans dignity enough to sacrifice for them.
	Indeed, since I was the age of four, I have dreamt of Hogwarts Legacy.
	And I will not give up that sacrifice...
	I mean, how is this anything just but a self-dunk?
	Yeah.
	Because it's just admitting, yeah, people don't care enough.
	About trans dignity.
	Not existence of trans people.
	Not the whatever.
	No, no.
	Again, it's not about genocide or any of that.
	No, it's just, you must believe me.
	You must believe that I am a woman.
	In all things.
	And the trans dignity.
	Not enough, says Brianna Wu.
	We'll move forward.
	She has one more.
	She says, F around and find out.
	This is why it's really important for decent people to boycott Hogwarts Legacy.
	Again, as if it's South Africa apartheid.
	Guys, come on.
	I have a lot of friends in games media, but I will be cutting ties with anyone who promotes this.
	I can't lose my connections to Brianna Wu.
	So I'm going to have to join the boycott, because I can't lose a good friend, such as a lady who's done nothing.
	I think with friends like these, anybody who is friends with Brianna Wu, you're better off without her.
	I think you'll be alright.
	Anyway, one dude blew up.
	One SUW who was whining about this.
	Oh no.
	Oh, this prick.
	My request to you all, please don't support Hogwarts Legacy!
	For the, like, boring things for this to be a thing about, right?
	Like, if there was a new Hogwarts movie or something, it'd be more interesting.
	But the fact that it's just some, like, spin-off Hogwarts game in a long list of Hogwarts games...
	As far as I'm aware, the development of which has not had anything to do with J.K. Rowling.
	Not that that really matters anyway.
	But it's more the fact that there's nothing special about the game.
	It's not even some groundbreaking new technology or anything big.
	It's just another Hogwarts game.
	It's something that people have been asking for for a while, which is the Hogwarts RPG, create your own character, do quests and stuff.
	Let's play Captain Retard over here.
	Let's enjoy what he has to say.
	Please do not support the upcoming Hogwarts Legacy game.
	Friends, colleagues, cohorts, the whole lot of you, I'm asking you very sincerely, please, do not stream it.
	Don't make YouTube videos about it, don't buy it, and don't bloody pre-order it.
	The reason being is that you may not be aware that by supporting this title, you are essentially aligning yourself with some really heinous transphobic values.
	J.K. Rowling, a.k.a.
	Joanne, has made it extremely clear that they see the success of this title as being vindication of their transphobic views.
	That, you know, by this title doing well, that means that they were correct.
	And honestly, you just have to look and see the kind of people that are cheering for this game.
	Please don't be among them.
	If you weren't aware of all this, I'll do a longer video after this to explain a bit more of the nuances, but I just had to say, please don't support this game.
	Please.
	So, according to this gentleman, J.K. Rowling herself has put the hammer down and said if you buy this game, you are confirmed transphobic.
	And if you don't, then she's going to completely change her mind and join in with the, as you said, separatist pride flag in the background there.
	With a skeleton on it.
	Which is really weird, because for people who don't know, you've got the transgender chevrons on there, and then a skeleton.
	And the funniest thing about that is, of course, that if you look at a skeleton, if you're an archaeologist, you can determine if it's a male or a female, and its thoughts in its head don't matter.
	Perhaps this is secretly subversive.
	I don't know.
	It's really weird.
	I doubt it.
	But still, my question that I've just thought of that has been inspired by this clip is, does J.K. Rowling even know this game exists?
	I don't know if she said anything about it.
	Yeah, I don't think she's made...
	I've not...
	Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've not seen any public statements about the game made by her.
	No.
	Anyway, we'll move forward, because, well, there was someone else who blew up being very mad.
	Some person here.
	From someone who was literally a poster child for the Hogwarts School Choir at Universal Studios.
	If I cannot buy Hogwarts Legacy, so can you!
	As if it's crack.
	Like, we're...
	I'm literally addicted to this stuff.
	It really is that easy.
	This was one of the best, most memorable parts of my life, but JK Rowling harming people I care about.
	She's out there with a knife, like Jack the Ripper, hunting down transgender women in the streets, which, um...
	Trying to cut off breast implants with...
	But the thing is, we have the gamer response, which has been extreme.
	We'll get more extreme over time.
	We'll start with this one, which is funny the damage is a silly little game can do.
	It's after it sells a billion copies.
	Every transperson on Earth might be dead.
	I don't know.
	Maybe it's like, you know, every time you buy one of these games, a child doesn't transition.
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	There are rumors out there.
	I'm buying ten.
	In that case, there's a pagan theory about such things.
	Many a meme was made, of course, in response to this S show and has been carrying on.
	And we'll go to the next one just to enjoy one of those memes.
	When even pirates decide to buy Hogwarts Legacy to show their hatred for trans folks.
	Proud to play alongside gamers once more.
	Beautiful.
	There are more memes as well out of this.
	There's this one.
	Very protective over their own belongings.
	Independent.
	Ambitious.
	Wishes not to be treaded on.
	Affinity with snakes.
	Slitherin!
	Says the Sorting Hat.
	And some other people, unfortunately, began to notice what a lot of other people had noticed, which is Hogwarts and Harry Potter's story is very, very traditionalist.
	Well, as it points out in the first line of this, it's because she took basic fantasy tropes.
	It's because she was copying the stuff that came before, just passing that on.
	You kind of accidentally bring on a lot of the values that come with that as well.
	Yeah, it wasn't a conscious thing, but as they pointed, it's...
	Like, the whole idea of the chosen one protagonist in the first place has a certain air of divine right to it.
	Yeah, rightfully so.
	Rich jock protagonist gets into prestigious school with zero efforts and entirely through bloodline.
	Teachers and students armed learn self-defence.
	Slave race cooks all their meals out of sight.
	It's the goblin...
	No, sorry, not the goblin.
	The house elves.
	The house elves.
	As opposed to the field elves.
	Yeah.
	Squat, hook-nose, goblins run the bags.
	Oy vey.
	Antagonist subverts government and media.
	That's true.
	Voldemort subverts the government.
	For people who haven't watched Harry Potter.
	He actively infiltrates the government, and then the people involved in it just kind of go ahead with it, because they're like, well, as long as I keep my cushy job...
	Convinces the regime that he doesn't exist.
	It's more that they're just like, oh yeah, it's not real, don't stop worrying about it.
	They literally, in the sixth book, Harry Potter's big thing is that he says, I saw Voldemort last year, and everybody goes, Voldemort?
	What's a Voldemort?
	Rape gang's never heard of it, anyway.
	Only news outlet that tells the truth is run by Wizard Alex Jones.
	It's also true.
	And, um, well...
	The screeching continued, regardless to any of this.
	One individual decided to start getting the books, and removing J.K. Rowling from the books, to then resell the books without J.K. Rowling's name to an audience of...
	Angry people?
	I don't know what to call them.
	I don't know who's buying these little things.
	Why would you do that?
	Mentally ill person re-sells books after scribbling on them.
	Yeah, so I can't stand looking at the name JK Rowling.
	Okay, you're insane.
	And a lot of people notice that there's quite a lot of irony in that statement as well.
	Apparently he's selling them for £150.
	Sorry, £140.
	If you're interested, or you can pay it with her name on for £8.
	Anyway...
	And take it off yourself.
	We'll go to the irony in the whole situation, as some will know it.
	The irony of superficially changing the outside of something while the inside remains exactly the same.
	And this is where things go even more extreme, because the gamer community decided that...
	A notoriously inclusive and tolerant community, yes.
	They actually are, but in a roundabout way.
	Which is that they were having fun, and decided to have a bit more fun delving into more funny and funny spicy topics, so we're going to do this in a way which I have to disavow everything I'm about to read.
	So we'll start off with a fanfiction that was written.
	Can anyone tell me the average IQ of a house elf, Miss Granger?
	Actually, IQ is pseudoscience, which doesn't matter anything.
	That's wrong.
	10 points from Gryffindor.
	Now, what makes up 13% of the population, yet 50, sir?
	Correct, 20 points to Slytherin.
	There we are.
	Presumably, these side bits of the book we didn't get to see.
	I imagine this was the dog whistle that I was getting reading through the books.
	I don't know if anybody else caught it.
	There are some more racial jokes.
	The worst one is this one that I found.
	Eek.
	The funny thing about all this being, of course, is you actually meet the people who make these jokes and they're usually actually Indian or something as well.
	Of course they are.
	They're not racist, they just think it's funny.
	I would go out of my way to argue that in all likelihood, honestly, if you were to probably survey the entire world, white Westerners would probably be the actual least racist people in the entire world.
	Yeah, 100%.
	In all likelihood?
	It has been done, actually.
	Oh, has it?
	One of the best surveys was, would you let someone of a different race marry your daughter?
	And basically, it's just Northern Europe.
	Is that basically it?
	The rest of the world, not so inclined.
	Weirdly, France is very, very anti.
	Everyone around them is more pro than them.
	They're just like, no.
	Anyway, disavow, of course, but I'm just reporting on the memes.
	Maybe this is more true than we thought.
	Oh my goodness!
	Before playing Hogwarts Legacy, and then you play Hogwarts Legacy for one hour, and that's what becomes of you.
	Well, you know, when you're just presented with the horrifying reality of it, then it just comes clearer.
	Also, some person is also trying to reclaim the musicals of Harry Potter.
	Wait, there was a musical?
	Of course there were bloody musicals.
	Reclaiming Harry, making magic more inclusive and making Potter more queer.
	Five stars.
	Guy with a quill.
	Five stars.
	Okay.
	Alright, I don't know if this is real.
	This is very cringe.
	I'm hoping this is fake, but I can imagine it being real.
	That's the thing.
	This kind of reminds me of something.
	I don't know...
	This is maybe going a little bit off topic, but there's other musicals which have been claimed by the queer community, which I don't necessarily think were originally intended to be, even though musicals are obviously the gayest form of media possible.
	Have you ever watched Rocky Horror Picture Show?
	I think so, yeah.
	It's the one where Tim Curry is a transvestite.
	Yeah, you've seen that.
	You know that it's been co-opted and claimed by the queer community as the greatest early depiction of queer culture in Western media and such like that.
	I don't think these people realise that the message of the film is that these are all horrible people taking advantage of one another, and an explicit line at the end of one of the songs near the end of the musical is, your lifestyle is too extreme, and then they shoot him.
	The main character, the transvestite.
	I forgot most of the movie.
	Do you not remember all of that?
	No, I thought it was just kind of a weird movie, to be honest.
	It was a weird movie, but I just find it funny how musicals seem to be trying to do this a lot.
	Anyway, that's not the spiciest thing the gamer community did and were reporting on and disavowing again.
	One man had the worst day ever.
	I genuinely feel a bit bad for this guy.
	Obviously, you looked, he had pronouns and such in his bio, but he was also 15 years old.
	Mr.
	Chase over here decided to put up this tweet in which he posted an image of himself and then an image of one of the Green Gods goblins and was like, this is what I look like versus what J.K. Rowling thinks I look like.
	Oh, this is going to go down into history.
	Just that first comment there.
	The reason this is going to go down on internet history and the reason I'm featuring it is because, oh boy, it did not go well.
	Because if you go to the next one here, this goes bio, someone saved.
	Jewish individual, student, 15.
	He, him.
	Eco-socialist, anti-fascist.
	So this was not a joke.
	This was sincere.
	Before we immediately start saying that this guy deserves all of it, yadda yadda, Remember, he's 15 years old.
	He's still a stupid teenager.
	But the funny thing about the internet history moment in this, and the reason it's blown up, and ergo why I'm featuring it, is because you go to the next one, he deleted it, of course.
	Which is, um, because everyone was like...
	You won't tell him.
	Hmm.
	Yeah, anyway, so that's disavow, disavow, disavow.
	Wait, wait, wait.
	So, all of these are dated quite early.
	When was the original tweet from?
	Did people only just unearth this tweet in the Hogwarts Legacy run-up?
	It's blown back up.
	Anyway, but we'll end it off with just the forums, the most recent update.
	I just want to check out the forums, the Sacred Potter forums, as the story would say.
	Hands down the text, so great one.
	They're still buggered.
	As you have here, will I be able to have my very own slave in Hogwarts Legacy?
	That's the DLC. I'm not reading the rest of that.
	You have to pay extra for that.
	This was just like, I logged out, as you can see, this was nine hours ago, someone made this thread, there's a whole bunch of comments in there, people discussing what they would like for the game.
	To be fair, you could have the exact system that he's suggesting here, where you have your own house elf, and you just call him your servant.
	And all of a sudden it's less problematic.
	Are you allowed to use that word or is that their word?
	What, servant?
	Yeah.
	Is servant being reclaimed?
	With a hard...
	What, with a hard T at the end?
	Servant.
	Servo.
	Servo, bro.
	Anyway, if you go right on that one, the images.
	This is just a screenshot of just a list of what's going on.
	Why are you people arguing with the mentally ill?
	ill?
	That's always a good question.
	I question that daily.
	Saying all of you are pre-ordered are clowns about the Transpost.
	Boycotters went planning to buy the game anyway.
	What are you guys naming your character?
	Can Flex Tape stop the boycotting?
	Now this is the crossover we didn't know we needed.
	And then at the end, Mr Heck over there saying, to all the people saying to boycott the game, because the forums are still full of unironic SJWs and gamers arguing...
	Actually, I've just thought, you know in the second one, Ron breaks his wand and he ends up magicking himself into puking slugs?
	Yeah?
	If you'd just used flex tape, it would have been sorted.
	Alrighty then, but anyway, please don't try magic at home.
	I'm just saying...
	And I'm going to saw this table in half and put it back together with flex tape.
	That's a lot of damage.
	Anyway, that's what's been happening with Hogwarts Legacy and the...
	Controversy?
	Retard fights?
	I don't know what to call this because it's so dumb.
	Fun and games!
	There you go, it's just fun and games.
	JK Rowling's not involved, the game developers aren't really involved, the game's not even out, nobody gives a crap about anything to do with the video game.
	It is entirely just local people fight for no reason.
	I'm putting money on my monkey and you've put money on your monkey about who's going to win in the knife fight, I suppose.
	I'm just honestly interested in buying the game.
	Looks like it could be fun.
	I could be wrong, but it might be alright.
	I really don't want to.
	I know you don't want to.
	I don't like spending money, I'm cheap.
	True.
	From the horse's mouth, ladies and gentlemen.
	Anyway, let's move on, shall we?
	To Democrats, as always, wanting people being white to be illegal.
	And being white is a very broad term.
	What, being white is a noble goal?
	To all of you out there who want to be white who aren't, yeah, good luck to you.
	No, we can do it.
	You just have to say you're white, remember?
	Yeah, well, you just break out the chalk.
	No.
	Why?
	It's fine.
	Anyway, yeah, so being white is no longer just, you know, having a skin color or hailing from a particular part of the world.
	world, it is subscribing to a particular way of life and having a certain history and set of values that you want to live your life by, which makes you, of course, automatically evil.
	And the democrats being anti-evil, and you can tell they're the good guys because they're anti-evil and they align with the anti-fascists, and because they have anti-fascists in their name means if you don't agree with them you're an evil fascist.
	This is just how the world works of course.
	They want to, you know, prevent people from being evil.
	Before I go any further and explain what's going on here, I just want to say that I've got a new article out today.
	As of this morning, called Anatomy of the Communists.
	This is a premium article, so you will have to be a bronze tier member or higher to be able to view it.
	If you're a silver member, you do have an audio track done by the wonderful John Crow.
	And this article I'm really happy with, actually.
	Excuse me.
	Where I'm just talking about how communism is not necessarily just an economic system as put out by Karl Marx, but it's also the ideology, all of the practical theories for how the world should work outside of the economic system that really characterizes a communist.
	I think a communist is somebody who hates traditional family structures, who hates generally Western culture, who has out-group preferences, all this sort of stuff that you can Also ally with just general progressivism, so I just explain it and go through a lot of literary references and other such things, and my own understanding of what a communist is.
	So give that a read if you're interested.
	It might be a good one for people who aren't really aware of what communism really is, because it kind of tries to go through the fundamentals.
	But there you go, you can check that out.
	But as I said, Being white is not something that people like anymore, especially liberal white people in America themselves.
	They hate it, and Josh and I have covered this recently.
	Well, a few months ago, it was long enough ago that I still had the facial fur going on, but this was the unbearable whiteness of everything, where Josh literally just went on Google and typed in the unbearable whiteness of, and it came up with many, many...
	Many ridiculous examples.
	So this is a perfect example that we've got on screen where we're laughing about the unbearable whiteness of milk.
	Do you know every sip of milk that you drink drains the melanin straight from your body?
	I have heard this.
	Tariq Nishida has given us the gospel.
	It really does.
	But it also shores up your defences against sickle cell anemia.
	So it's kind of a...
	Makes no sense.
	This is not medical advice.
	This is not medical advice.
	I am not a doctor.
	But trust me, bro, it was revealed in a dream.
	So there's that.
	Then we also saw what whiteness could be considered from the Smithsonian guidelines that they gave a few years ago now.
	So if we could just scroll down to the Notorious infographics so we can understand what being white is.
	And this is white culture in the United States.
	So we've got things like white dominant culture and how it's been normalized in the United States.
	It's almost as though the people who made up the colonies were generally Northern European white people.
	Well, it's very more specific than that, isn't it?
	Like, in this graph they have, what is it, a Protestant work ethic?
	So we got rid of all the Catholics.
	Well, that's gone.
	There's no Irish, for sure.
	Okay.
	So you're out of the picture straight away.
	Oi.
	And then they have more in here where they talk about the fact of, what is it, the King's English?
	Yeah, the King's English.
	We can see women's beauty being based on blonde, thin barbies.
	So if you're a fan or attracted to blonde, thin women, you're racist.
	You're Nordic.
	Yes, if you're Nordic, if you like Swedish women, you're a racist.
	If you go down a bit so we can just see the bottom of communication, being polite is white.
	And the king's English.
	Well, who in Europe speaks English?
	It would be the English.
	Yes.
	There you are.
	So we've narrowed it down to literally posh English people.
	That's whiteness.
	The descendants of English colonists need to be eradicated.
	I mean, banned.
	I mean, stopped from promoting white supremacist culture.
	Because, you know, they can say, oh, we're not saying that white people need to go, blah, blah, blah.
	We're just describing the characteristics...
	We know that whenever used in context, saying that somebody is proliferating whiteness or etc., etc., they're using it in a negative sense.
	They're saying that this is a bad thing, that this is happening.
	I do love some of the things.
	So planning for the future and timekeeping as well is also being white.
	They're very complementary, to be honest.
	But it's the fact that they want to promote the opposite of these values, which is why they're labeling them with the white label.
	Ooh, evil, scary, spooky.
	And I went to the ADL's website as well to get a definition of what white supremacy is because the ADL are going to be the most impartial and unbiased source for such a thing.
	So they say it's a term used to characterize various belief systems central to a few of these tenets.
	Now, a few of those tenets are ones that, yeah, you could say...
	Yeah, that sounds pretty...
	not something that I support and disavow, potentially.
	So just that whites should have dominance over other people of other backgrounds, whether they coexist or not, and that they're genetically superior, yadda yadda yadda.
	But they do also highlight here that white people have their own culture that is superior to other cultures.
	That's also white supremacists, apparently.
	Having their own culture, in scary quotation marks...
	Okay?
	And it's superior.
	I mean, that doesn't necessarily have to be racist, that just means that I prefer my culture.
	Doesn't even mean that I'm exclusionary.
	Other people can also adopt the values and tenets of my culture, and stick to those if they want, and I think that's a good thing.
	I think this makes North Korea the most white supremacist country on earth.
	Almost certainly.
	In every case, the most white supremacist countries inevitably end up being East Asian, according to these standards.
	No, but the North Korean, like, the whole reason for the apparatus of the state and it being so strict in North Korea is to stop cultural pollution.
	So...
	Pretty white supremacist of you, Kim.
	What's going on there, bro?
	And then we also have most white supremacists today further believe that the white race is in danger of extinction due to a rising flood of non-whites who are controlled and manipulated by Jews and that imminent action is needed to save the white race.
	Now, I'm not going to make any comment on who is orchestrating this, but as we pointed out, this is just...
	An observable fact that they are trying to replace us, and they brag about it.
	Whenever it's not a right-winger saying it, they say that demographic change is a good thing, we need to change the states in particular areas like Texas, we need to get that to a purple state before we can flip it to a blue state.
	They want to import a foreign population who they are banking on being more likely to vote Democrat in the US. They assume that if you're not white, you vote Dem, and that's not necessarily true.
	And in fact, in the UK, we've had that proven wrong in a few ways, and increasingly in the United States as well.
	But this is the worldview of the left.
	I mean, that's the weird thing about the last lines there.
	They're describing this as the white supremacist worldview, but when you ask a Democrat about why do you want mass immigration, they give you this line, like, this is what we want to do, and it's like, but why?
	Why?
	Why would you do that?
	What kind of mad world are you living in?
	They're like, yeah, but then I'll get more votes.
	It's like, okay.
	You believe in the same thing as the white supremacists.
	And they do that, and then they also believe that the white way of life, if they want to characterize it that, that being sort of like, kind of local, parochial, everybody knows each other, small town ethos, really kind of wholesome small town America sort of stuff, they look down on those people.
	They hate those people.
	Yeah, sure.
	And they want to get rid of that way of life.
	It's the Jews that always makes me laugh.
	Like, do you know the meme of the J-O-O? Ben Shapiro does it a lot because it's just funny.
	Because it's the idea that basically, like, Jews are one monolith, like, you know, hyper-being with the puppet strings.
	And she's like, he's the Jew.
	And it's like, okay, okay.
	Whatever.
	Retard.
	Like, it's a completely diverse group of people with different opinions.
	But for another explanation, I got this Atlantic article which explains what the language of white supremacy is.
	And it's all leading up to something.
	Don't worry, John, if we could go to the next one for me, please.
	Thank you.
	The language of white supremacy, talking about narrow definitions of the term, actually helped to continue the work of the architects of the post-Jim Crow racial hierarchy.
	The post-Jim Crow racial hierarchy surely being that of the Civil Rights Act.
	So, I don't get what the point of that's supposed to be.
	Either way, it talks about how white supremacy is framed as a broad concept, because if we have it narrow, if we have it accurate in describing one particular thing, it's much less useful as a political tool, because everybody knows that when you say white supremacy, or white supremacist, that gets most people's alarm bells ringing, because that's just been hammered into them from childhood.
	So white supremacy is framed as a broad concept, one where wielding racism, or benefiting from it, Even in subtle forms, note that there's no mention of intention there, it's just, if you are white and benefit in some way from white supremacy, which they say is just a broad system of values, then you are bad.
	Okay, to quote scholar Francis Lee Ansley, Evidence?
	Evidence for any of that?
	No.
	No, we don't need to prove that that's happening, or even that that is something that is widespread throughout America.
	We just need to say it is, and then people go along with it.
	They even give example in this article of, seeing as there's been a bit of MLK bashing recently, I thought I'd join in.
	In his 1967 book, Where Do We Go From Here?
	Chaos or Community, MLK also talking in similar language, which is itself concerned with hope and building interracial solidarity, King wrote the doctrine of white supremacy was embedded in every textbook and preached in practically every pulpit.
	It became a structural part of the culture.
	King saw that white supremacy was a structural pillar of America equally important to democracy itself.
	In that work, he also analyzed white backlash not as an insurgency responding to proximate political factors or politicians but as a visceral, enduring, autonomous response guided by white supremacy.
	In other words, King used white supremacy in a way that might have seen him scolded today So that's always very interesting, because once again, and this is something I'll be covering in a premium podcast soon, people like to think that King was this race-unconscious, colourblind kind of guy.
	No, he wasn't, and he was really the kind of guy who was the massive forebear to a lot of the critical race theory stuff that we see nowadays.
	He would have agreed with a lot of that stuff.
	He often said that America needed a fundamental and revolutionary change in its own values.
	So that's the sort of stuff that we understand as white supremacy, These days, it's not just a specific act, it's not just being racist or evil to other people on a practical level, it's living within the structures.
	And therefore, we have to criminalize it, say the Democrats.
	And we've got this coming through the House of Representatives soon, the Leading Against White Supremacy Act of 2023.
	Can you see this going well, Callum?
	I'd love to hear the definition of white supremacy, because if it involves speaking the King's English...
	Would you like to know if there is a white supremacist, well, a proper definition of white supremacy in this bill?
	No, there's not going to be.
	No, of course there isn't.
	It's nice and nebulous, so we can just have it as being any of those things that I've covered before.
	If you're on time to work, sorry, sorry chap, off to prison with you.
	I like to call this, as John has dubbed, the anti-white existence bill.
	And so let's read through a little bit of it and what it's planning on doing.
	So the bill to prevent and prosecute white supremacy inspired hate crime and conspiracy to commit white supremacy inspired hate crime and to amend Title 18, the United States Code, to expand the scope of hate crime.
	So it's going to go into the hate crime legislation that already exists and expand it to just say white supremacy as well, even though you would think the definitions of hate crimes already put out would cover white supremacy, but we need a special extra category, okay?
	In general, it's when a person engages in a white supremacy-inspired hate crime when white supremacy ideology has motivated the planning, development, preparation, or perpetration of actions that constituted a crime or were undertaken in furtherance of activity that, if effectuated, would have constituted a crime.
	Which is circular bollocks, as far as I'm concerned.
	Yeah, none of that made any sense.
	White supremacy is when we say that white supremacy influenced a bad thing that happened.
	Alright, okay.
	Great.
	Fantastic.
	Good to hear.
	So I don't know how the other person comes into it at that point.
	If my friend just happens to actually go crazy and do something terrible, my being friends with him is just...
	You're part of the conspiracy.
	Apparently so.
	Okay, very interesting.
	And at least one of whom published material advancing white supremacy, white supremacist ideology, so just saying, if you send out a memo to everybody at work saying, hey guys, don't forget to get to work on time, boom.
	Got him.
	Antagonism based on replacement theory.
	There it is.
	I think that's the ultimate real reason that they're trying to get this bill through, which is to just criminalize anybody saying replacement theory or advocating that it is a thing, unless you're a Democrat.
	Because, of course, given that these are laws that will be applied by real people, those real people will have their biases, and they will inevitably, if it's a Democrat or leftist saying that we're trying to replace you, That's fine.
	That's not white supremacy.
	That's just a good thing.
	If you're a right-winger saying, hey, they're trying to replace us and pointing to the evidence, then you'll be put in prison or charged or fined.
	as Tucker Carlson almost found out.
	Yeah, exactly, yeah.
	Or hate speech that vilifies as is otherwise directed against any non-white person or group.
	And such published material was published on a social media platform or by other means of publication with the likelihood that it would be viewed by persons who are predisposed to engaging in any action in furtherance of a white supremacy-inspired hate crime or who are susceptible to being encouraged to engage in actions in furtherance of a white supremacy-inspired hate crime or could...
	Here's a fun one.
	As determined by a reasonable person, I've never met this mythical reasonable person that I always see talked about in legal documents, but let's carry on just for the hypothetical.
	So you're just being...
	The onus is on you if somebody possibly sees, and it says, So, once again, white supremacy, not defined in here.
	Nebulous term that can be used to mean literally anything that leftists don't like.
	And if you say something that is just potentially heard...
	Maybe, by some guy who maybe went off and did something bad, the onus is on you to explain why you were being racist.
	Apparently.
	So I say, boy, I sure do love talking polite to people.
	Some guy overhears that.
	Goes off and shoots up a school for some reason.
	It's my fault.
	It's a hard-knot life.
	I can't believe you would do this, Harry.
	How could you dare speak the king's English and be polite to people?
	I mean, that is the crux of the thing, how you even define the term.
	Well, you can define it as literally anything.
	This is a nice grey bill.
	It's full of grey area, so it can just be applied literally any way that any activist, judge, or attorney wants it to be.
	It's just a tool.
	This is a hammer to be used to destroy dissent from the system.
	And the motivation, if you scroll down to the bottom of this page, because...
	If there's one thing I can give to this document, the bill is literally a page long, so at least there's that.
	At least she didn't feel the need, the person who filed this, to fill it with 30 pages of other pointless nonsense.
	But no, just right at the bottom of it, it basically gives an explanation as to why they're doing it, and they also want this language added.
	To section 4702 of the James Byrd Jr.
	Hate Crimes Prevention Act, which is...
	I can think of two.
	Yeah, I'll be interested to hear the examples given.
	The New Zealand mosque shooter, not in the United States, but whatever, and the guy in, what was it, Buffalo.
	That's it.
	That's all I can think of.
	Those are the only two in, what, the past 10, 15 years?
	Maybe you could say Anders Breivik as well?
	I don't think he mentioned replacement theory, but I could be wrong.
	But, I mean, they were still saying he was a neo-Nazi and was inspired in that sense, weren't they?
	Sure, but just if you actually wanted to make the claim that the shootings are on the rise because of this thing, and it's like, well, I can't think of many.
	Neither can I. But either way, the bill was put forward by this person, a Sheila Jackson Lee, unsurprisingly Democrat representative of the House.
	She has criticised the Tea Party in the past in the July 2010 NAACP National Convention.
	She said they were the KKK. Perfectly sane thing to say.
	I want lower taxes, Klansman.
	Yep.
	That's just what Hitler wanted as well.
	Jackson Lee supports the Equality Act, a bill that would expand the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
	So she's just the modern Democrat, really, isn't she?
	She's just the absolute lunatic.
	She's an absolute lunatic, which is exactly what the leftists in the Democrats want, and I looked to see what coverage was going on this on the right wing, and Fox News decided to try and get in touch with her and her office for an explanation on what any of the descriptions in the bill mean, what white supremacy is classified as.
	As you would expect, they didn't get back to them.
	Big surprise.
	But they also got some clarification on what the consequences could be from a law professor, Jonathan Turley from George Washington University, who was saying it's going to destroy free speech laws, overrides the First Amendment.
	He also points out that a reasonable person is standard is common in the law but Turley commented on how Jackson Lee's bill uses it to consider how a person with a predisposition to commit a hate crime might act.
	How would a reasonable person discern a predisposition to engage in white supremacy?
	Totally asked, likening it to the Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart's 1964 test for pornography, in which he said, I know it when I see it, rather than offer any clear definition.
	So, white supremacy is just when you feel, you can taste it in the air.
	Tastes like white supremacy to me.
	And then just, oh, okay, that's all we need to hear.
	Bam!
	Convicted.
	Guilty.
	I also saw that New York Post, shockingly enough, were reporting on this and for some reason decided to basically carry some water for this bill by giving the one example of a genuine white supremacist shooting from the past five or six years by pointing out the Buffalo Massacre that you were talking about.
	Instead of talking about all of the other Massive hate crime kind of things that you could talk about, like all of the BLM riots, shootings, etc.
	Anti-Asian attacks.
	All sorts, because I can give some examples of BLM and Antifa-inspired murders and assaults.
	There was the Baton Rouge shooter from, I think it was 2016 or 2017, the guy who just went, black guy, inspired by BLM, just goes crazy and shoots like eight or nine police officers just because he's heard from BLM that police are bad.
	Okay, no mention of that.
	We've got Daryl Brooks from a few years ago, just plowed through a Christmas parade because he hated white people.
	The entirety of the 2020 summer riots.
	Antifa attacking Andy Ngo.
	Killing of Aaron Danielson, which was the guy who was just walking through Portland wearing a Trump-slash- Yeah, I mean, he was murdered because he tried to stop them from looting.
	It wasn't necessarily about politics, but the whole situation...
	Well, apparently that's anti-black action.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And they would probably make the argument that he was upholding white supremacist oppression by trying to get them to stop robbing a shop.
	Whilst counting their money.
	That's just how this works.
	That's the regime that we live in, sadly.
	And just to clarify a few points, we looked a few weeks ago at the Global Terrorism Index, so we can actually just verify whether far-right or far-left terrorism, and that would include things like white supremacist shootings and such, is the bigger issue.
	And we can just see it.
	Just go to the graphs for me, please, John.
	So, page 34.
	Incidents and deaths from terrorism in the West by ideology.
	Most recently, far right, not big enough its numbers.
	Not big enough its numbers compared to the far left.
	It's been decreasing since, what is that, 2017?
	Yeah, it looks like it would have been 2018-2019 is when it hit kind of a peak, and then it's just gone down to basically nothing in 2021.
	Okay, alright.
	If we go to the next one as well, I mean, that just says it all, doesn't it?
	For those listening, so it's far left and far right terrorism in the West, 2007 to 2021.
	It's always been more on the far left side to the point where it's almost been double in 2018, far left to far right.
	It was catching up in 2019, but then by 2021, far right terrorism is nothing.
	And far-left terrorism is massive.
	But you don't see any bills being put forward by any House of Representatives to just ban far-left terrorism or the causes of such or the organizations that promote such things in the mainstream public.
	But if there's one thing we can content ourselves with, it's the fact that the House is majority Republican at the moment, so the likelihood is that when this bill goes through, Unless the respectable GOP thinks otherwise, I really hope it doesn't, this bill is not likely to pass, but it is good to know that this is what's going on, because as soon as they get control of the House again, more bills like this are likely to come through.
	And for those who think, because I know this happens sometimes, that we in the UK are just making fun of America for being a place that's full of ridiculous laws and stupid nonsense, Don't worry, the UK is also not immune to a little game of silly bookers from time to time, because I saw this article from Guido Fawkes, Order Order, where the Home Office has released a recent document guideline on what language to use, whereas now homosexual is now an offensive phrase.
	Okay.
	We live in a very, very silly world.
	There you go.
	How?
	Whatever.
	I guess I'm just gonna have to go back to calling people queer.
	Rather queer, sir.
	So the Celts have decided to vote for their own oppression, which is a funny ton of events that I wasn't really expecting.
	They've been doing that for years, haven't they?
	Well, we spoke about the Irish a little while back, and the fact the Irish identity was largely about being oppressed by the English, and then when they got independence and whatnot, and the Good Friday Agreement.
	Now it's kind of crap.
	Well, there's not much to do.
	do they did what a lot of former colonies did which is that they went we hate the english people and english people went fine fine we'll leave and then they left and then they looked at each other and went i hate you too actually well what are we what are we doing and um well socialism seems to be the solution to a lot of the caloric nations and this is in regards to scotland this time around not the irish and we'll start off just by promoting the politics of the crown because the issue in here is constitutional the scottish parliament decided to pass a bill that was mad and the uk parliament which is obviously above it just went yeah new
	not not doing that we're not going to give you royal assent that's not happening that's not passing and And we can see this in real time.
	Because you may remember, a while back, we have a stock image of one local protester.
	Oh.
	Oh, this isn't...
	Yeah, scroll down on that, will you, John?
	Local man exposes feminine penis.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	This was the women at the event who were like, yeah, no, I don't want men in my female toilets, so...
	Oh, okay.
	Because then the question at the floor was like, well, what is a woman?
	And then this lady here was like, I'll show you what a bloody woman is.
	Okay.
	So that's why she did that.
	And, well, it was a bill passed by the Scottish Parliament, even with the protests from the women here.
	It disestablished what a woman was.
	Good job.
	And criminalised saving gay people from...
	Feelings that they were transgender.
	And if you wonder what the hell I'm referring to there, Andrew Doyle, local gay man, has the deets.
	The cast interim report, which was clear that children struggling with gender, most of them turn out to be gay, require psychological support.
	This ban on trans conversion therapy could criminalise such support, thereby greenlighting gay conversion therapy.
	So there you have that.
	You're allowed to convert gay men or gay women into becoming trans men or trans women, but the reverse is not going to be allowed, because that would be evil and wrong.
	So, conversion therapy when I suit it.
	Listen, surgeons gotta make their money somehow, okay?
	Yeah, so, of course, you have the, well, people who are not in the alphabet, but are homosexual or bisexual, etc., being like, well, this is cancer.
	That's very offensive of you to say.
	The Home Office is not pleased.
	Well, they can send me a letter.
	And then you've got the women, a small group of British society, but women in general, also quite upset.
	And as Michael Tracy notes, even of the general population, when you break it down, no one's interested in what the Scottish government were proposing.
	Because they're proposing that if you say you're a woman, you're a woman.
	So disestablish me what a woman is in law.
	Great.
	Or a man.
	They're in as well.
	And then also legalizing gay conversion therapy, which is not too popular in the UK. And he's got the data to prove it.
	Because if you go on that second image there, we can see that there is some graphs of the public asked about such a thing.
	Some question here.
	Remove the requirement for a doctor's diagnosis of gender dysphoria.
	Only 20% of the public are like, yeah, I support that.
	60% of the public are like, no.
	Needs to have a doctor's diagnosis.
	And then another 20% of the public don't have Twitter.
	Yeah, and there's endless other polls there where you get the same result effectively, which is new.
	No, I don't want people just to be able to say they're a woman and be a woman.
	That's mad, because it will lead to safeguarding issues across all kinds of parts of society.
	But the reason as to why they're doing this is, of course, pure ideology.
	Sniff, sniff.
	And women are not happy about this, as well, as you can see.
	There's some MPs tweeting about this, and underneath I saw their feeds were just filled with things like this.
	Lesbians don't like penis.
	Ah, well that's not very inclusive.
	Those are the old school lesbians, as opposed to the new lesbians, who already have penises.
	And like penis.
	Used to call them...
	We used to call them homosexuals.
	But now, apparently, the appropriate term is...
	Fairly normal person.
	Yes.
	But for the alphabet, I don't know what we're going to do with that.
	Did you hear the Italian Prime Minister when we play it?
	LGBT? What?
	LGBT. LGBT. It's just the Italian accent.
	They don't say LGBT. That sounds like a call for liberty.
	I want my LGBT. LGBT. The liberties.
	The Yucca Magimers.
	Anyway.
	It culminated in a debate in the UK Parliament where they were just like, so the Celts have voted for something, and they obviously have done something mad, so we can't let them do that, so we're going to have to just strike down their independence on this?
	Like, you shouldn't have the right to vote for your own laws because you've clearly, like, all been taking acid or something.
	Can't trust you.
	And even Labour member Rosie Duffield stood up to say this was all nonsense, and as a result, she just got shouted at and tried to be shouted down by her own party members and her fellow leftists, which is what you get for being a leftist, frankly.
	Yeah, this is what you get for aligning with leftists.
	Don't like Rosie, but still, she is right on this issue.
	But we'll play her clip, because it's interesting.
	I welcome the Government's invoking of Section 35 in this case as the bill clearly conflicts with the Equality Act and would have repercussions for women, for women across the UK. Does the Secretary of State recognise the strength of feeling amongst women,
	women's rights groups and activists in Scotland that this bill seeks to allow anyone They just don't want to hear it.
	I just heard someone at the end there go,''Rabbish!'' Not true.
	Okay, prove that it's rubbish, prove that it's not true, because we've got a mountain of evidence on our side.
	Well, I've got the convictions.
	Yeah.
	And then the convictions are in the prisons when you put them in the female prisons as well.
	I'm not that familiar with Duffield outside of her advocacy against this sort of stuff.
	She's been a long-standing leftist to the point that I was in a constituency when she did this, a vote against her.
	But she, um, there was a local geisha bar that opened up.
	And of course they hired some English girls to dress up as geishas because, you know, Japanese.
	Oh, okay, and this was cultural appropriation.
	Yeah, she's screeching about stupid stuff like that.
	She wouldn't respond to me about Count Dankula.
	She just didn't want to say anything.
	Well, sadly...
	She's like, well, you know, it comes for you eventually.
	Yeah, this is what happens, it will eat to its own, but at the same time, it's hard not to feel sorry when I could hear her voice audibly cracking when she was talking about that.
	Well, she is right, which is that, yeah, it's a safeguarding issue, and people shouting rubbish are just not willing to engage reality.
	I just think these people are evil.
	If we go to GB News, because GB News had, what was it, Thornbrion, and she was just like, I was there and I didn't see that, when the interviewer was just like, why were they shutting down your own member and no one supported her?
	It's just in complete denial.
	In case you're wondering as well, the Labour Party line on this is don't vote on the bill.
	Oh really?
	You have the Scottish Parliament to vote this thing in, in their parliament, which is mad.
	And then this goes to the UK Parliament who are like, should we strike this down?
	This is mad.
	And the Conservatives are like, yeah, we should strike it down.
	And the Labour Party went, we're not getting engaged in that debate.
	Even though it's insane, we don't want to be seen to be not supporting the insane thing.
	Yeah, we don't want to be seen as supporting or not supporting, because let's be honest, if Labour get in, we know where they're going to go.
	It's not a surprise.
	And then there was one speech by a Conservative, which was reasonable, but of course, again, got shouted at because how dare she say things that are true.
	And we'll play this because it's just amazing how deluded the people on the opposite benches are.
	Let's play that clip if we can.
	And I think, indeed, the Government is very right to be concerned about fraudulent and malign applications, with the implications for child safeguarding.
	Now, this morning in the Education Select Committee, we had Professor Alexis Jay, who of course chaired the inquiry into institutional child sexual abuse.
	And it was harrowing to hear the stories of decades of child sexual abuse throughout institutions across this country.
	And there's one key feature of that abuse, which is that predators will exploit any loophole they can find to get access to children.
	And that is, I'm afraid, what will happen with this bill.
	We shouldn't be asking how easy is it for someone who's uncomfortable with their sex to obtain a GRC. We should be asking how easy is it for a predator to get access to children and I'm afraid this bill would make it vastly easier for a predator to get access to children to change their sex, to change their gender with an eye to exploiting loopholes of accessing children and women in particular.
	I had an experience recently in a restaurant where a man dressed as a woman walked into the toilet, so I was on my own in the toilet, so he stood behind me and stared at me into the mirror looking at me in my eyes.
	Now I have no idea if he intended me any harm.
	But my instinct, my evolved instinct as a woman was to be frightened because unlike almost any other species, women are far less powerful than men.
	We can't defend ourselves.
	That's why we have...
	No, it's a fact.
	The difference in strength between men and women is phenomenal.
	That's why we have separate sex categories for sport.
	Women are evolved to be wary of men in intimate spaces.
	That's why...
	This is all just such obvious truths.
	Yeah, and it's the noise in the background that's the interesting thing there, which is like, women are weaker than men, and they're just like, oh, how can you say that?
	If she wanted a brilliant example to bring up, and I hope she does at some point, of places where this kind of thing can make it very easy for predators to access young people, etc., etc., she needs to do no further than just reference LGBT Youth Scotland.
	Are you aware of this?
	We went through it, yeah.
	Yeah, yeah, exactly.
	That's all she needs to do is just say, well, James Rennie, who ran this organisation that was supposed to be for protecting LGBT youth, was actually noncing on them and taking them to really inappropriate places like gay bars when they were underage.
	What do you want?
	He's in prison now.
	I also love that at the end of that, where she's talking about the fact that women should be safe in female spaces, and someone just shouts out men.
	Just because she's talking about the fact that men shouldn't be allowed in female spaces, and they're like, yeah, men!
	I was like, yeah.
	Of course they're screaming, no, no, they're trans women!
	They're not men!
	Okay, okay, whatever.
	Alright, show me the actual real difference.
	And we'll end this off, at least this debate here, with someone screeching, which is the opposite bench, and we'll see what their argument was.
	Let's play that.
	That speech was probably one of the worst transphobic dog whistle speeches that I've heard in an awful long time.
	The idea of linking trans people with predators, frankly, is disgusting, and you should be ashamed!
	Is there an argument, or is it just moral outrage?
	Calm down.
	Calm down!
	The speaker just tells us, shut up.
	Stop with your phony outrage.
	It's embarrassing.
	I will say he had some rather suspect noncy physiognomy, but that's just my opinion.
	That's your judgement on the man's appearance, not what he's been up to.
	But there is actually something interesting on this.
	Before we play the next clip, we'll get this tweet up.
	Because this individual, remember this?
	Remember this grown woman?
	I forgot, but I remember now.
	It's shocking that so much can happen that I can forget the image of a grown woman screaming fascist at a baby.
	Yeah, so this grown woman was screaming fascist at this baby here.
	She was the head of policy for that MP who was screeching about transphobia.
	Oh, that makes us perfect.
	You know, Ibrahim X. Kendi had his anti-racist baby book.
	I'm going to write fascist baby.
	I'm going to write that and see how well it sounds.
	Okay.
	And, uh, we'll end that off with, in the debate, someone decided to ask something.
	This is a very minor point of, like, uh, I don't know, parliamentary wares, but some conservative stands up and is like, did you hear anything transphobic?
	And the speaker isn't actually able to answer that, because all of a sudden, transphobia doesn't mean something specific, it means whatever you need it to mean.
	I have to say to the father of the house that Different colleagues, different members of this house are going to interpret speeches in different ways.
	Sorry, some of the people in this house are on crack right now, so we've got to accommodate them.
	We've got to accommodate the crack takers.
	And that's amazing because, for people who don't know, if you are being transphobic or rude or whatever, you get kicked out of the House of Parliament.
	As an MP, you will just get kicked out because you're not being parliamentary.
	And in which case, in all future debates, the consumers should just sit there and be like, racist, just whatever, just shout any old BS. It's up for interpretation, bro.
	Because remember, people interpret things in different ways.
	Like, there's no definition of anything anymore.
	So just do whatever you want, apparently.
	We'll end this off because the vote was easy enough.
	There you have it.
	Labour didn't turn up.
	Purposely, because they don't want to be seen to not endorse crazy, but also they couldn't endorse crazy because the public might not like them.
	The S&P endorsed crazy, a lot of them endorsed crazy, and the Conservatives went, maybe not crazy this time.
	Maybe next time.
	Give it a few months.
	Yeah, we are the ruling party, so we'll just screw things up later.
	And the last thing is that the Welsh apparently also want the same treatment.
	That's why I mentioned the Celts, because they also want to be told you don't have any independence anymore, because you shouldn't, because you're incredibly insane.
	So I look forward to that.
	Apparently that's going to happen in a couple of months.
	Which makes me wonder more and more, why do we have these parliaments if they're full of people who are so insane we can't even leave them to pass a single piece of legislation?
	I'm all happy at this point for English separatism from the United Kingdom.
	To be honest, I'm happy to do it because then we won't necessarily have all of these lunatics influencing our own parliament.
	Yeah, I don't really want to be babysitting.
	I mean, if you guys want to run your own country and just be mad...
	Have fun running it into the ground.
	That's fine.
	I do not care for Scottish independence one way or another.
	Go for it.
	But it's just insanity that we have to sit here babysitting these people.
	And we'll end this off just with an LBC interview that went viral, which is someone trying to defend the Scottish Parliament, and as the bad man tweeted out here, it's a funny video, so let's listen to this.
	Can you point to an example of a human being changing their biological sex?
	I think it's very, very clear that when we talk about sex being binary in GCSE or O-level biology textbooks, that is a gross oversimplification of what is going on.
	And what we know in terms of the expression of how people live in terms of...
	That's not sex.
	Sorry, I'm asking you for an example of where a human being has changed their biological sex.
	Actually, very few of us know what our chromosomal makeup is because we don't...
	Well, Helen, when you say it's not necessarily about changing, do you accept that there are no examples of human beings changing their biological sex?
	I'm not actually sure we can say that because we don't have the chromosomal makeup of every single human being.
	We don't know that.
	Do you know what your chromosomes are?
	I've never had mine tested.
	I don't know what mine are.
	And I think the important point here is I'm not a trans person, but I think we have heard...
	How do you know?
	That's a good question.
	That's a good question.
	I thought the only way to know is to have your chromosomes tested.
	But it's not only true, it's also funny how it's a weird inverse of the what is a trans woman, because of course that's been a nice roadblock, because they can't define it, because they say a trans woman is a trans woman, who thinks they're a trans woman?
	It's a circle, right?
	But how do you know if you're trans?
	Is another question outside of this, which is even funnier.
	And if you can't know what your actual sex is because biological sex isn't real, bro.
	Yeah, and they won't define it that way.
	They'll say, well, you think you're trans, therefore you're trans.
	In which case, if it's all in your head...
	Big silence!
	Anyway, let's enjoy more of that, I suppose, as the Celts just keep deciding...
	My last word on this was shutting down the asylums was a mistake.
	Anyway, let's move to the video comments.
	One of my cats is obsessed with drinking my shower water, though.
	It's really gross and creepy.
	It's official, Carl.
	You have become Belle Delphine for cats.
	What?
	Wait.
	Oh, wait, no, yeah, the cat's drinking his tap.
	Oh, no.
	Oh, no.
	What the hell is that?
	It doesn't even really look like it.
	It just looks like a random homeless guy.
	That looks like Baz grew a beard and got a Twitch channel.
	Anyway, there we are.
	What on earth?
	Go to the next one.
	Nice to see you guys reviewing I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream, the story where academic agent's mind gets uploaded into an AI. But interestingly enough, in the game, the actual author plays the evil computer, which kind of works because in real life he's just a massive dick full of hatred and malevolence.
	And so it really bleeds through in a dialogue.
	I must say, Ellis does give an absolutely fantastic audio version of the book.
	There's actually an audio version that's free on YouTube, where you can go and listen to the full book.
	But the book's only 14 pages, of course, so it's not long.
	It's probably like 20 minutes or something.
	Yeah, but he does a really good job of reading it, because of the emotion he puts into the AI's voice, for example.
	He's just talking about, I hate!
	I hate you!
	And it's just like, that's pretty good.
	This sounds like, was it an inspiration for the Master from the original Fallout?
	Probably not.
	Oh, okay.
	The Master's a very different being.
	Oh, okay.
	I mean, like, the AI... It just sounds a bit similar to me.
	No, I mean, the Master, he's a good guy in Fallout.
	He doesn't want to kill all of humanity, he wants to make them the same.
	He's a super mutant supremacy.
	Yeah, yeah, well, his idea is...
	He's the Great Uniter.
	Yeah, do you not remember the Master's philosophy?
	I've forgotten it, to be honest.
	So the idea was that...
	Well, he's a bit of an SJW. Well, he actually is an SJW. He wants to flatten everyone down to the same, eliminate all inequalities.
	Yeah, yeah, 100%.
	His theory was that basically racism, inequality, and prejudice is what caused the nuclear war.
	And in which case, if we get all of humanity, dip them in this poison over here, that turns them into a freak mutant, but they're all the same freak mutant, Then there'll be no more divisions within the community.
	See, I can see some flaws in the plan, but at the same time, all of the super mutants are jacked as hell.
	Yeah, but also, it doesn't...
	Would I sacrifice a lot for 3D delts, perhaps?
	But it also doesn't get rid of inequality.
	Obviously.
	Like, some mutants are gonna have more than others.
	Why not?
	All the super mutants are the same, just some super mutants are more the same than other super mutants.
	It makes perfect sense.
	Yeah, okay.
	Wow, that's that.
	Don't make me watch Drew Barrymore.
	Oh, when I was in college, I fell in love with a boy who was mean to me.
	Oh, God.
	Yeah, well, he broke up with me and he said that I was too ambitious and wanted too many things and I would end up alone and lonely.
	And so I got really mad.
	And then I was like, fine, I'm going to figure out all the things I'm going to do to make him rue the day that he was mean to me.
	I did a spreadsheet and I laid out all the things I was going to accomplish and all the ways I was going to just be fantastic and magnificent.
	And I don't know if he's ever going to see it, but I'm doing okay.
	I'm doing okay on my face.
	I'm going to find out all the ways I can prove him right.
	Thank you.
	Who the hell makes a spreadsheet?
	This is how far women will go just to hate men.
	No, this isn't women.
	This is her.
	Yeah, no, this is her.
	This is her being mad.
	In a very feminine way.
	Dude dodged a bullet.
	I don't know what else to say.
	Dude was right.
	He called it straight away.
	So congrats to that guy.
	Wherever you are with your, I'm sure, beautiful wife and 13 children, you enjoy yourself, mate.
	You made the right choice.
	13?
	I know it's an unlucky number, but, you know, it's working on 14.
	The map piece says, tell Harry to grow back the WW2 British Army moustache.
	No.
	No.
	It's really hard to do.
	The General Melchard, is what I'm thinking.
	Yeah, I don't want the moustache back, to be honest.
	And also, the missus doesn't like the moustache or facial hair, because she says it irritates her skin.
	LordNerva says Hogwarts Legacy has the potential to herald a new business model for video games and media in general, looking forward.
	On a number of occasions we've seen controversies in media be met with grovelling knee bending from the creators, which causes the product to bomb and the cycle to repeat.
	Here we are seeing radio silence from the devs and publisher, and all-out war happening in the consumer base, raising the game's profile and making it the top pre-order on Steam.
	Let the plebs fight.
	Release the product anyway.
	Rake in the cash.
	This is how things should be.
	Remember to buy a copy for the game, everyone.
	I'm not endorsing buying the game, but you're completely right, which is this is really how it should work, which is that regardless of whatever the hell the consumer base is arguing about politics, just make the game.
	Publish the game.
	Don't say anything.
	He gives a crap.
	I like money.
	That's how I want my games to publish.
	So, I mean, to be fair, you say that the developers haven't said anything about it.
	They did change the tags once.
	Well, they did change the tag once as a joke, but to be fair, they have made it so that the character creator won't have gender options, but it will have binary voices and housing.
	So I wonder if it'll just give you a range of body types that you can choose from or something?
	I think it's always been that way as well.
	That's not in response to the concept.
	Oh, okay.
	Alright.
	That was on the, like, here's what the game's gonna be.
	That's still weird.
	I mean, that's one of the first choices that I would make with a character creator.
	Am I a guy or a girl?
	Simple.
	I think a lot of people were joking about being a trans wizard in the whole thing.
	Well, that's why you just choose guy and then choose girl voice.
	So Colin Pease says, Hogwarts Legacy, woke on woke crime.
	Yeah, I tell you, because I remember when woke used to mean white supremacist.
	So watching the Poltards turn up is really funny, and it is ickly woke on woke crime.
	Sophie Love Peterson says, You know, I find it kind of interesting that they weren't yelling and shouting like this when the last Harry Potter movie came out.
	Magical Beasts and Where to Find Them, Dumbledore Secrets.
	They were saying nothing back then, and that was also after Rowling had been deemed a transphobe.
	So what now makes this also different from then?
	People are also happy letting the Cursed Child play in the West End.
	No big protests over there.
	So it's just that this one specifically, I think this proves it's all about performance.
	I disagree.
	I think the pushback from the gamer community is far more fun and stokes the flames in a much more interesting way than, I don't know, the West End community.
	I'd also be interested to see if the people producing that film and producing the current productions of The Cursed Child have made comments disavowing and distancing themselves from JK Rowling, because I bet it's that.
	BasedApe says, sometimes I think about doing a Become an SJW for a Month challenge.
	I mean, it sounds horrible, but imagine what it's like to genuinely think the Harry Potter woman is genociding people and proudly declaring war on Transformers over who gets to pee where.
	Who does LSD when you can trip like that?
	That's a good strategy, like, for a video.
	I want to see that.
	I want to see that video, but, hey, I really don't want you to put yourself through that, because that does honestly sound horrible.
	It would be getting offended at such tiny, minute things for no reason, but then also having to be vehemently against it.
	Dedicate your entire life.
	It sounds horribly tiring.
	No wonder they're constantly posting about how tired they are.
	I watched a guy recently, he did a video where he was trying to live the day of Andrew Tate.
	Like, took his advice on how to just live the day to day.
	Didn't go well?
	Well, you have to wake up and drink two and a half litres of water.
	Well, straight away?
	Pretty much, yeah.
	So you'd just be pissing throughout the rest of the day?
	Clears you out.
	I don't know.
	It's a detox routine, man.
	And then he drinks a coffee immediately after the two and a half litres of water.
	And then...
	Let me guess, black coffee?
	I think he goes to the gym or something, and then there's 11 more coffees.
	Oh no, he's training fasted!
	There's 11 more coffees during the day.
	You don't eat until the end of the day.
	This is the worst intermittent fasting routine I've ever heard in my life.
	If you want to be dead throughout the day with no energy, that's how to live.
	Because you will be just running off of pure caffeine fumes.
	The guy saying it was just like, I feel like crap.
	The whole thing.
	But, um, I mean, I've seen a number of people do, like, trying to live, like, the day of one fitness influencer, like Johnny Shreve did one on The Rock, where he was just miserable, because it was kind of the opposite.
	Instead of that, it was just, like, it was an 8,000 calorie day, so for the entirety of the day, he's just shoving his face full of food constantly, and that's miserable for the opposite reason.
	There's two other people.
	Because, I mean, it is kind of just true that...
	Obviously, The Rock does not actually live like he suggests in men's health.
	He's on steroids.
	People who are very extreme have different extreme lifestyles.
	So I can believe that Andrew Tate lives like how he listed, because he's talked about a lot.
	He's a maniac.
	And there are two others I can think of that are equally kind of crazy.
	Warren Buffett and Churchill.
	So, Warren Buffett, for all the fast food he would eat, that was ridiculous.
	Like, this guy tried to live it.
	It's just, you're eating McDonald's.
	Didn't he have a special relationship with the nearest McDonald's to his office?
	Yes.
	It's gross.
	The people at McDonald's could probably give you better forecasts of the stock market than analysts.
	Also, he drinks loads of sugary drinks constantly.
	So the guy doing it constantly just felt horrible because of a sugar overdose.
	Yeah, I bet.
	So I saw one other guy.
	He tried to live the life of Winston Churchill.
	And the main thing there was keeping up with Churchill's drinking habits.
	So he'd wake up in the morning and have a scotch.
	That doesn't sound nice.
	Also taking all your meetings in baths as well.
	That sounds just inconvenient.
	Was that half a bottle of champagne for every meal?
	Fucking...
	Alongside wines and no more brandy?
	Sorry, I didn't mean to swear.
	But it's a ridiculous amount of alcohol.
	That sounds horrible.
	Can't...
	Can't feel good.
	But these people did live like that, so...
	And still do, for most of them.
	Omar says the trans activists really have no idea how unpopular they are.
	They believe their own propaganda to the point they think about their boycott will actually dent to JK's royalties.
	George says the Harry Potter memes are quite spicy.
	I remember when people were using them against JK Rowling while she was a progressive darling.
	Also, any gamer worth their salt wouldn't give WB money after what they did to Troy Levitt.
	Not aware of that, actually.
	Who's Troy Levitt?
	I remember something, but I don't know what it was.
	If you can look that up.
	Alfred Abadis says, I'm old enough to remember when J.K. Rowling was a mouthy, rude, intolerant progressive, darling, and a crusade for every woke nonsense.
	Until she wasn't.
	It's hard to generate much concern for the left eating itself.
	It's like Marxists shanking the Trotskyists.
	Yeah, but it's funny.
	That's my point.
	Yeah.
	Okay, so Troy Leavitt, or Leavitt if you want to pronounce it like that, is the...
	Leavitt?
	Troy Leavitt?
	Leavitt, mate!
	Was the lead designer to Hogwarts Legacy and used to have an anti-SJW YouTube channel.
	Ah, yeah.
	Okay, that's what it is, and they all hated him for it.
	Yeah.
	Did nothing wrong.
	Shake Silver says, to be honest, I saw some gameplay of the combat, and that looks pretty neat.
	I think the devs are going to be the worst done by this controversy, even if the game sells well, their reputation will be short.
	Meanwhile, Rowling will be out there making bank, and the activists will move on to a new target.
	They could just make a sequel.
	This sounds amazing.
	I mean, you've got another job for one more game at least.
	Yeah, I mean, I think we've just found out that Troy is in all likelihood a viewer of the channel.
	So if you're watching this, Troy, thank you very much for all of your work.
	I hope the game goes well.
	Colin P says, It's actually sad how many Harry Potter child actors turn out to be narcissistic, ungrateful brats.
	Ironically, the only lead actor who seems to be resembling a normal person is Tom Felton.
	Maybe Draco was the hero.
	That's so true.
	I never thought about that.
	Well, he was the most elitist, which immediately warms me up to it.
	He's playing a devil, and then he comes out of it being...
	Being the nice one.
	Yeah, because, I mean, Hermione's become a complete brat.
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, he probably thinks to himself, well, who would I be without the work of J.K. Rowling?
	No one.
	Okay, maybe don't throw him under the bus.
	It's a pretty simple calculation to make.
	There was one that went to prison.
	You mean Doyle or whichever one it was.
	I remember the names.
	Crabbe and Goyle.
	Yeah, Crabbe and Goyle.
	I think it was Crabbe.
	For people who don't know, he was white until the last film.
	And the reason for that is because he went out to London riots and got caught stealing.
	And so in the subsequent film, they made him a black man, which...
	Interesting choice.
	Kind of racist.
	Anyway, and then I don't know.
	What happened to Goyle?
	He was just in the films.
	I think he's in all of them.
	No, I'm trying to remember the actors, what's happened to them, because I know Hermione and Ron both have been like, trans women is a woman.
	Same with Daniel Radcliffe.
	Yeah, Daniel Radcliffe works with Mermaids, so he's a confirmed scumbag anyway.
	Colin P says...
	Nope, read that.
	Supreme Duck says, You guys already made me buy this game once.
	I'm hovering the buy button again.
	Again, I'm not endorsing buying the game or anything.
	I'm not going to.
	The whole thing's funny.
	Baron from Warhawk says, Remember when J.K. Rowling was the darling of the left?
	However, once she started questioning the transagenda, all of the rabid Harry Potter-loving fans turned on her instantly and now treat her as if she was the second coming of Hitler.
	Hopefully...
	Oh, no.
	You know what she should do?
	She should rewrite one of the books where it's just a fascist paradise or something, just to piss them off.
	I mean, according to these people, it already is.
	Hopefully now they'll read another book, just like the FBI crime statistics.
	Oh, well.
	Interesting.
	So, moving on.
	Colin P says, Wait, having our own culture is white supremacist, but adopting anybody else's is cultural appropriation.
	Does not compute, does not compute.
	Well, I think there is a certain consistent standard in it, which is they don't want cultural appropriation.
	They don't want to adopt white culture as they understand this, as they label it.
	So maybe that makes a bit of sense.
	Colin P says, but Harry, if they can't define what a woman is, how do you expect them to define white supremacy?
	It will be anything that annoys them.
	As with everything else, that's the only standard that they apply to.
	What have you sent me, Callum?
	What's going on?
	Oh, it's the steamed hams graphic adventure.
	Oh, thank you.
	We can post some Let's Plays of that later on today.
	I wonder what the ending's going to be.
	But yeah, white supremacy, the definition of it is anything non-leftist.
	That's literally it.
	That's why Larry Elder can be a white supremacist, apparently.
	Colin P., have they finally got around to capital W white?
	Possibly.
	I didn't actually pay much attention to that.
	Matt P., I think this one's for yours, but mandatory IQ tests for MPs?
	They did actually do that once.
	It wasn't IQ, but they did the GCSE Maths.
	Okay.
	How did it go?
	A third of Conservatives failed, and 75% of Labour failed.
	Okay.
	This is not a good sign.
	No.
	It's also telling.
	We've got a very low quality of MP and politician in the UK. GCSE maths.
	What is that?
	What is GCSE? You're 11 years old.
	They can't do maths for an 11-year-old.
	I probably, because it's been a while, would struggle, but I was in the top set of maths in my secondary school.
	It's not hard.
	They listed the questions.
	Although, to be fair, in the last year I did end up falling asleep a lot.
	It's about like, if you flip a coin three times, what's the outcome that you'll get?
	Heads?
	Or dividing up something between people?
	Well, it'd be like basic algebra.
	At the topmost for secondary school GCSE maths.
	And I think I could probably still do that.
	The vast majority of left-wing MPs can't do that.
	Wait, did they know that these tests were coming up?
	It wasn't just thrown on them, was it?
	No, it was an agreed thing that the MPs would do it.
	No names are attached.
	Just revise for it.
	Literally, you can just go back, imagine when you were still in school, and just think, I should probably read up on this, or practice.
	It's such an easy, easy thing to do.
	Apparently it's 14, 15.
	Sorry, 14, 15, or 16.
	What, 16, 19?
	What am I saying?
	I don't know.
	Oh, no, yeah, yeah.
	How old would you be when you do GCSEs?
	So, 15 years old.
	Yeah.
	That's still easy.
	That's why I was saying top set by the last year.
	Freewill2112 saying, having anti-free speech legislation that is vague and open to interpretation on the statute books, giving law enforcement the leeway to arrest just about anyone on a whim, is the holy grail of the totalitarians once the statute books...
	Expect the state to move quickly to silence all their critics.
	No wonder they are pushing this.
	It is victory for them if they succeed.
	That's why I'm saying the likelihood is it probably won't get through this time just because the majority of Congress at the moment is Republicans, but only by a thin majority.
	so if the democrats can you know flip that around in the next election or whatever whatever ends up going on then the likelihood is that bills like that might get pushed through there might be some opposition to it but they will probably get through so these these things these people just need to be removed from whatever position they find themselves in xy and zee says remember when these treat um remember when these traits the commies are demigrating were called european pepperidge pepperidge pepper
	oh no i can't talk pepperidge farm remembers guessing european slash western isn't loaded enough well yeah Because this, sadly, it's like, I remember when I was in secondary school, like, ten years ago, slightly more than that now.
	Oh, God, it's been more than ten years since I finished secondary school.
	I feel so old.
	There was people that I knew that would sort of, if they were mentioning anything to do with somebody's race, they would, like, hush.
	They would whisper in hushed voices.
	They would go, but he's black.
	Because they just thought that naming the race of a black person was a bad thing to do.
	Why?
	What's wrong with black people?
	No, that was the thing.
	I told them at the time, that's really weird that you feel the need to whisper that.
	I think it's because they thought that acknowledging the race of anybody who isn't white is wrong, because that's potentially going to point discrimination their way.
	Whereas acknowledging the race of white people, there's always been this, ever since I've grown up, an accepted knowledge that there is a double standard against white people, whether they wanted to acknowledge it as such or not.
	So that's just how it goes.
	So just calling it white means the white bad.
	There you go.
	Freewell2112 again says, If a person hates milk because it is white, they are dangerously insane.
	Correct.
	Sophie Peterson says, What I also find very amusing about all of this is that all of those woke LGBTQ plus things they love so much, that is actually something extremely white and western.
	That is very true if you look at it globally.
	The rest of the world, all the non-white countries, hates all of that stuff.
	People in the Middle Eastern countries throw gays off of rooftops.
	The Chinese will just shoot you.
	Don't get me started on black African countries.
	It's not pretty.
	That's true.
	But also with the Western culture comes certain expectations that these people don't like and they think are racist and evil and think oppress them.
	So we need to take down that, but we also need to keep this, which is actually in practice something very difficult to do without massive force.
	Matt P. Hate crime is just, oh, he murdered someone?
	Okay.
	Wait, he said the N-word?
	Hang him!
	Pearl-clutching nonsense.
	Also very true.
	Freewill2112.
	Changing what is acceptable terminology every five minutes is another method of sowing confusion against one's ideological enemies.
	No one is ever completely sure what is acceptable to say at any given time.
	That's true.
	I also recently have been reading Joseph de Maestria, because I thought it would be interesting to give him a read, and I was reading one of his essays where at the end he basically just states that if you start to...
	if you find that a culture starts to introduce a lot of foreign words, a lot of nonsense and foreign words into the language, There's a pretty sure sign of civilizational decline.
	Very correct.
	Free Will 2112.
	If rational thinking and hard work are white values, and by extension white supremacy, then doesn't that leave employees and scientists open to accusations of white supremacy since employees require diligent employees and scientists have to proceed on lines of rational, critical thinking to make the discoveries?
	Is this an attack on, and by extension, the beginning of the end of the rational world we live in and a return to a paranoid, ignorant world full of ideology and superstition?
	I couldn't say.
	I couldn't say.
	I do know that it is weird because there is a contradiction going on because the technocrats that rule us, what I would call the normal men's oppressors, are dedicated to running things on uber rational lines, but they also have the kind of double standards where but they also have the kind of double standards where it's like, if it's people...
	Basically...
	As far as I see it, the people who are running the elite circles are dedicated to the neoliberal, ultra-rationalist line of thinking that will push the world into being incredibly insular, incredibly atomistic, you know, the World Economic Forum-style thing.
	But, for the time being, to be able to undermine the people who might prove to be their adversaries, they need to promote a lot of racial hate, because the generally, typically white middle class are the only people who could really present some kind of We're good
	to go.
	Not conspiratorial, just accurate and observational.
	Omar Awad says, Absolutely correct.
	Casey Darling says, Why not call the bill leading against racial supremacy?
	Because it's only bad when white people are racist, but it's totally fine for everybody else to be racist.
	That's racist.
	Yeah.
	AZ Desert Rat is...
	Is it bad?
	I don't give a monkey's shiny blue backside what the colour of my skin is.
	I've always been taught to worry more about how I behave.
	And that is probably the best way to go about it on a day-to-day basis.
	Just be polite.
	I know that's very white of me to say.
	Try and be a decent person to those you come across.
	Not that hard, as far as I'm concerned.
	Let's go on to the rest of yours.
	Do you remember the other day when there was that thing, the black guy was like, being professional is an unrealistic standard.
	For who?
	And he was like...
	I mean, if you say so, speak for yourself.
	Actual madness.
	Anyway, on the kilts, Ron Swansea says, Look, I offer an independent Wales, but I need to be ruled by a libertarian king, ideally descended from Owen Gwynethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethethetheth Yeah.
	Yeah, I agree.
	Lord Nerevar, personally, I don't think the Celt separatists actually want independence.
	They want a higher grid control, but also the ability to rely on a higher authority for financial support.
	That's why the mainstream separatist movements in Scotland and Wales are pro-EU. As Count Dracula says, they want to be slaves, but in charge of who is holding the whip.
	That said, I don't think they are all like that, even the SNP. Voters probably do it out of ignorance than agreement.
	The movements hate England and want the benefits of parliaments to be answerable too.
	The people just want to be left alone.
	Celtic libertarians confirmed.
	Kind of, yeah.
	But...
	I suppose it is.
	It's not a coincidence that every Celtic independence movement has ended up exactly the same, which is they've all been socialists in their outlook, and in the modern era that means being an intersectional, and they've all had the same problem the Irish have, which is the identity is we're oppressed by the English, and then when you get in what you want, you're just kind of sat there peeing your pants.
	Like, what now?
	Oh, it's like we were looking and talking about Rhodesia slash Zimbabwe.
	The English leave and then all of the ethnic groups native to that place just look at each other going, wait, I remember actually, I hated you this whole time.
	What are the ethnic groups?
	Well, they're not.
	There's tribes.
	They haven't even got to the point of ethnic groups.
	Oh, they hadn't even got there yet.
	No.
	Well, all the tribes looked at each other and went, now back to business.
	Eh.
	Well, it's sort of like one guy in charge just like, hmm, money.
	If I print more of it, I have more of it, therefore I'm richer, right?
	Yeah.
	If I print infinity money, I'm infinity rich.
	Why don't the homeless just buy a house?
	Matt P says, imagine telling people a few hundred years ago that Scottish independence would happen because the British government wouldn't let children cut their bollocks and breasts off.
	Damn English!
	It's been 3D chess this whole time.
	I don't want to go to Ireland and just be like, you doing okay, buddy?
	I wonder what, if you polled the Irish Republic, you'd be like, hey...
	No, we'd have to fix the UK first before we asked them would you like to come back.
	Edward of Woodstock says, What if he wanted to fundamentally destroy the safety of women, but Westminster said no?
	Yeah.
	Put that on a leaflet.
	Colin P. No, wait.
	What she was saying about the offence is taken, not given, so if the lady speaking did not find her own comments transphobic, then it is the bloke's problem that he does.
	Or is he questioning her lived experience?
	Ugh.
	I don't even want to talk about that kind of nonsense.
	Kevin P, sorry, Kevin Fox, says, I assume you mean the Scott over there?
	S&P guy?
	The guy who went red in the face.
	Yeah.
	Got some gammon energy from that guy.
	His head of policy was the lady screaming fast as a baby.
	Just think of how insane that guy's family and friend circle is.
	These are the people cracking the whip against all of us, by the way.
	Makes you feel great, doesn't it?
	Imagine just hanging out with those people.
	It would be unbearable.
	Did she say one thing?
	Everything went...
	I tried imagining and everything went red for a moment, so...
	I just got spoken to a policeman.
	What did he say?
	What did you just...
	Did you just assume it was a he?
	Like, that'll actually be a thing they'll do.
	Mm-hmm.
	Awful.
	Amar Wad says, Nobody arguing for trans inclusion into female spaces is at risk.
	They're all the most privileged of people and probably have zero risk of anyone, let alone feminine penis havers, waltzing into their private spaces.
	Yep.
	I noticed, um...
	Mr.
	Robinson interviewed a Muslim man recently, and the guy was saying, Oh yeah, I had crap from the Muslim community for meeting you, but I had more crap from my wife's family, who are white.
	Yeah.
	Colin P., obviously an important debate given how full the house was.
	Yeah, to be fair, the Labour Party just didn't turn up.
	Tactically.
	Because they didn't want to be there.
	I think it was Rosie and Jess Phillips.
	That was it.
	Because I actually believe in women.
	It still looked as though the Labour SNP side was a bit more filled out than the Conservative side, so it's annoying that Conservative MPs don't feel the need to just show up for this stuff.
	All the SNP were there.
	Because, of course, it's their madness being overturned.
	and Bleach Demon says this Sheila Jackson Lee two confederate general names and thus a bit racist Bill, is clearly going for the Rwanda solution to cultural and race relations in the US, I can't wait until my existence and honesty is considered white supremacies of these loons I mean your existence already is Sorry to break it to you.
	I do wonder if you forcefully integrated that standard of whiteness into policing.
	Because in the UK we do have laws against hate speech and blah blah blah and whatnot.
	If you take that to the British police and tell them speaking the king's English is a symptom of white supremacy.
	Being polite is a symptom of white supremacy.
	I mean it's a Monty Python sketch in the making.
	You'd have to police arresting people for being polite.
	I mean, how quickly would society just do great?
	The test is as police walk down the street, they say good morning to people, just to try and catch them out.
	If they respond good morning to you too, you're Nixon!
	You've got to respond with fry them like bacon or something.
	Piggy?
	You've got to snort at them.
	Yeah.
	Peppa Pig nationalism.
	You don't remember that story about the Peppa Pig was being viewed by a lot of American kids, and so the American kids started getting British accents from it.
	Oh, excellent.
	But the bad thing is that Peppa Pig's awful for kids, because the pigs are really rude, and also a lot of snorting, so the kids start picking that up too.
	Oh no, the kids started snorting like pigs.
	They don't turn into nice British kids, they turn into these little terrors, just for no goddamn reason.
	Well, America's got to ruin everything, don't they?
	I knew someone who was looking after kids, actually.
	You mentioned that they stopped the kids they were looking after watching Peppa Pig.
	Could you just turn them into little S's?
	Yeah, that wouldn't surprise me.
	Anti-Peppa Pig rant for the next episode.
	Anti-Peppa Pig action.
	We're pretty much out of time, so if you want more from us, Lizzy's.com.
	Otherwise, we'll be back tomorrow, 1 o'clock.

▲