Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 13, 2023 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:52

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #567

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Load Seaters for the 13th of January 2023.
	I'm joined by Harry.
	Hello!
	And today we're going to be talking about Hogwarts Legacies.
	Marketing is absolute gold.
	I very much enjoyed the strategy I think they're playing.
	The World Health Organization, World Order.
	And Tommy joins the Labour Party, which is kind of a piss stick, but I think we're going to have fun.
	Apparently we're allowed to just say his name now, so...
	We're not on Facebook, so this is where we're going, on Facebook.
	Oh, okay, so that's alright then.
	Yeah, we don't stream on Facebook anymore either, so that's...
	That explains it.
	Anyway, shall we get it?
	So we're retiring rumbly-tumbly.
	Rumbly-tumbly?
	No, I still like it.
	Oh, okay, good.
	So Hogwarts Legacy's marketing's absolute gold.
	In case you don't know what the hell Hogwarts Legacy is, I didn't either.
	It's some video game that's using the Hogwarts world's...
	Who cares?
	That's not what's important in the slightest.
	What's important is, what's a woman?
	Yeah, it's that again.
	It's the same godbed thing as always, isn't it?
	I mean, if I were the developers of Hogwarts Legacy, I'd be really grateful to have J.K. Rowling's name attached to it, because it just markets itself.
	Great, we've got J.K. Rowling's name.
	No budget needed for marketing.
	The leftists will promote it for us.
	There'll be an outrage, and there was.
	And we'll start off just with promoting, of course, something from Logistics.com, this being the interview with Posey Parker, a fellow Hogwarts enjoyer, I think.
	And we'll go and check out Hogwarts Legacy Steam page, because that's the thing.
	There you go, there's the game.
	Not sponsored, in case you're wondering.
	And looks like another 2020 game release, I guess.
	And I... I'm kind of interested.
	I like RPGs.
	I like role-playing games.
	Hogwarts and stuff like that is something I grew up with, so I might enjoy it.
	I don't know.
	I'm looking at this.
	If you click on a screenshot there for me, John, this is a minor thing for me.
	If you click on a screenshot, then we can see it's a very detailed world, and this is all very impressive and part of the modern world of gaming.
	But then people were posting screenshots of the PS2 games, Oh, did you ever play the PS2 Chamber of Secrets?
	Yeah.
	That was the classic.
	I was looking at those, like, I actually prefer that game.
	It also looks better.
	It's got the more cartoony aesthetic.
	My eyes don't feel assaulted.
	I know where to look, if that makes sense.
	I don't think that makes sense.
	What do you mean?
	The simplistic design guides your eyes to what's important in the image, rather than a million things happening on screen.
	I mean, in these screenshots, it doesn't look like there's a million things happening on screen.
	It looks like there's one...
	Like in this, for instance...
	It's about graphical fidelity, but whatever.
	Okay, alright.
	I still feel like there's only one thing you're supposed to be focusing on here.
	It's just this...
	Dragon...
	Troll.
	Sure, there's a place for good graphics, but I'm missing bad graphics, is my point.
	Anyway, there's a place and a time for good graphics.
	That's not now.
	Minecraft clan unite!
	And it's not now, which is the point that everyone else decided to go on.
	Because we go to the SJWs.
	The SJWs decided to come out and make their voices heard as if they're ever not.
	I mean this with every fibre of my being.
	F you if you buy Hogwarts Legacy.
	800,000 views on that one.
	Not many like Karoonies, though.
	Because everyone's like, you're an idiot.
	Go to hell.
	Not listening to any of you people.
	She was very upset, this individual checkmark here.
	If you go to the next one, there's more of that.
	If you're playing a wizard game who's more important to you than the trans community...
	Yeah, it is.
	Don't make me choose!
	Don't make me choose!
	God, do you care about the starving kids in Africa or video games?
	What is this weird dichotomy?
	Do you care about this abstract thing that you've never actually seen in person or this video game that you can buy?
	Yeah, the trans community.
	That doesn't even exist.
	The thing that doesn't even exist.
	Or my game.
	Don't act surprised when some people no longer want to engage with you.
	Good riddance.
	Yeah, and this got a lot more support from the SJW community.
	And the thing is that the feminists also got involved in the Hogwarts Legacy video game debate.
	And then things got spicy.
	No one has purchased the game from either of these camps.
	It's not out yet.
	By the looks of it.
	Because it then exploded a little bit more because the anti-Semitic community got involved.
	The anti-Semites got involved.
	Well, the anti-anti-Semites over here.
	Oh, alright, okay.
	They were like, oh, it's anti-Semitic because J.K. Rowling drew Greengrot's bank with goblins in it.
	And then, I don't know if you know...
	Oh, the Jon Stewart take that was totally a joke.
	Yeah, but it's also not a set.
	That bank...
	It's a real bank.
	I know.
	And there's a mosaic on the floor that's a Star of David in the central lobby of the bank, which people thought was a racist part of the set.
	It's not a set.
	It's a real bank in London.
	Yep.
	Anyway, but no, no, this is...
	That's just how banking works, guys.
	Sorry to break it to you.
	You're calling Jews goblins.
	It's like, nope, nobody was doing that, but okay, that's what you think.
	Anyway, for no reason at all, upon the anti-anti-Semitic community doing this, the anti-Semitic community got involved.
	Oh, okay.
	4chan, for some reason, also likes video games, in case you're wondering.
	We have an artist rendition of the Anons at home.
	I mean, to be fair, once again, the more they say that the game is transphobic, inherently evil, if you buy it, it does make me want to buy it more.
	No, you're hurting Israel.
	And 4chan was like, hmm, I'm interested.
	And the Steam discussion page for the video game has now become much fun.
	Very good fun.
	Has it become the tennis match?
	It's an endless clown world-esque show between the Tumblrites and 4channers.
	Once upon a time, the war has come again between the two camps, and it's taking place in the Hogwarts Legacy Steam discussion chats.
	That's where all great battles go down nowadays.
	This is one locked thread for someone saying it's a little disappointing that Steam would allow this game.
	Oh no.
	What's the complaints they have?
	From being able to own slaves, Hells Elves, I know, really, right?
	I will say, they do have a bit of a point on the house elves as slaves thing, because if you remember...
	Did you ever read the books?
	I know you can't read, but did you ever try to read the books?
	No, I didn't read the books.
	I watched the movies, because they're speaking books.
	The speaky books with moving pictures.
	You can't even deal with comic books.
	The pictures, they just stand still.
	What am I supposed to do with this?
	In the books, they cut it out of the film.
	I can understand why they did so.
	In the fourth one, Goblet of Fire, there is a subplot where Hermione tries to free the house elves because she says that they're slaves.
	And she goes to the house elves after...
	Not the field elves?
	Basically, yeah.
	No, just the house elves she wants.
	Just the house elves.
	The field elves they can fend for themselves.
	But she goes to all of them in Hogwarts and she's like, you want to be free, don't you?
	You want to be free?
	And they go, no.
	They say, no, I like doing this.
	Do you understand how hard it is life for a normal house elf without a house?
	Massa, treat us right.
	Basically, yes.
	They also say killing goblins.
	Need I explain this reference?
	Research some history for this one.
	Yeah, you might have to.
	I think they mean the Holocaust, which, um, no.
	I don't remember that being a goblin holocaust in Harry Potter.
	Maybe I missed that book.
	It is clear what this game is set out to be, and I will not support it, and I encourage anyone with any humanity to do the same.
	And all the responses, if you scroll down, are just people going, K. Scroll down for us.
	Oh, there it is.
	Bye.
	Bye.
	Bye-bye.
	I'm going to enjoy my genocide.
	What glue have you been sniffing?
	Steam point farming?
	But the thing is, there's a lot of this.
	J.K. Rowling herself came out.
	Kyle Pilkington got in there.
	We've got KP and also J.K. Receipts please, or shut up.
	So, if you haven't paid me money, I don't care.
	Wait, did someone make a Steam account with a picture calling themselves J.K. Rowling?
	Yeah, it's great.
	I assume it's the real J.K. Rowling.
	I hope it is.
	Who else could it be?
	No one would ever steal anyone else's name.
	Not on the internet.
	Anyway, we also go to the next one, which is the game is also rumoured to give you powers.
	Magical powers, such as if you buy it because of the tags, you automatically grow six inches on your peepee.
	Ooh, big peepee.
	Someone else said it's 12 inches on their peepee.
	Ooh.
	Rumours, I'm sure.
	Maybe medical misinformation.
	I don't know.
	Anyway, we'll go to the next one.
	I know there is a Harry Potter spell called Ingorsio.
	Well, we'll find out.
	There's also people sharing their dreams.
	This individual has his dream of becoming a trans-Jewish wizard.
	Can't wait to be represented.
	Didn't know...
	No, not reading that.
	But this is my point, which is that this is the quality of the discussions board.
	It's not about, should we get this translated into another language?
	Although I did see a lot of people being like, Ukrainian, when?
	When transported to Ukraine?
	Slavica, Ukraine.
	Why not support Ukraine?
	It's like, okay...
	Where's the Ukraine house?
	150 points to Ukraine!
	Anyway, you have to take in Ukrainian wizard refugees through the whole...
	I don't know.
	The next one here, there's other people discussing their best Kanye West songs and which ones they'll be playing throughout the game.
	Some people are saying that he's a very talented guy.
	It's going to be power, obviously.
	I don't know why.
	Probably he's going to be listening to that gospel album he did while he's playing it.
	And there's also the best meltdown at all that I saw, which is genius from a number of reasons, and maybe you'll see them at the end.
	Solid Green Day here.
	Decides to write, enough with the trolling in this discussion forum.
	You guys have ruined any form of tangible discussions and communications here.
	Will there be trans?
	Will there be Ukrainians?
	Why is it all non-Harry Potter related questions?
	Never understood the state of the discussions channel, but it's a effing mess.
	Be that as it may, I think mod should lock the entire forum until release.
	A child would behave better than the lot of you, and it's an absolute fact.
	Women are all behaving well here while the men are acting like baboons.
	Anyways, as I suggested before, lock this discussion down until the game's released.
	Now, Harry, would you kindly read the first word of every line?
	You.
	Will.
	Never.
	Be.
	A. Anyways.
	Mr.
	Green Day.
	Hat off.
	That is some good posting.
	Very well done.
	This does feel like something that someone's mum wrote until you notice the secret patterns.
	Actual goal right there.
	And we'll go to the next link because there's even more.
	I just put together a collage here for the different posts that I saw.
	We have buying this game, supporting evil, and people just going, that's acceptable.
	I don't care.
	As far as I'm aware of that.
	The Harry Potter community, if you want to expand it out like that, right, has always just been a den of infighting.
	Like all internet fandoms, it's all just debating who's screwing who, who's secretly gay, who's secretly this or that.
	So this is just business as usual for fandoms online.
	They've just found a new medium to do it with.
	You've got the, you know, the TERFs.
	You've got us and all the 4chaners all holding hands going, yeah, come on, let's be funny.
	Let's mess with the trans rights lobby.
	People saying we need to do better.
	The fact that the matter of this game is being brought by a lot of people who think the following is funny.
	Racism.
	Speciesism.
	Uncouth jokes and gender phobia.
	I'm sorry, this one in the top.
	Buying this game is supporting evil.
	You may as well join Sirius Black and his evil death chompers.
	First response.
	No, don't read that.
	Oh, come on.
	Read that in their own time.
	We disavow the anti-Harry...
	No, the pro-Harry Potter community now.
	That's what it is.
	People saying this is a gateway to the alt-rights, and, like, yeah.
	I mean, to be fair, I mean, Harry Potter, the films, it was quite revolutionary, and it had transracialism, given that, if you notice watching the films, one of Malfoy's minions changes from white to black halfway through the series.
	Yeah, do you know what that is?
	I think it's because one of them was a massive druggie or did some bad stuff.
	No, he was at the London Riots.
	Even though he's, you know, a very successful actor.
	And decided he needed to steal some basmati rice.
	So the actor got sent to jail.
	He was just a bit keckish.
	So they replaced the actor because they needed a new actor.
	They just replaced him with a black guy and acted like nothing happened.
	Which is like, this is a big difference.
	Goyle had a hell of a glow up, what can you say?
	But also, it's a bit racist.
	It's like, the guy gets arrested for stealing in the London Riots and then they made the character black.
	They were like, well, if you want to be like that then...
	Anyway, maybe JK Rowling does have some problems, I don't know.
	The devs also of the game decided to tag their own video game with the following tags.
	Transphobic and transphobia.
	This is their doing.
	Wait, how did...
	I thought this was randos doing this.
	No, you can put your own tags on as a consumer, but then the game devs themselves seem to have added this.
	They quickly got rid of them, but they did add them for a little while.
	For a joke, presumably.
	It's funny.
	At least they're in on the joke.
	Yeah, there's that.
	Someone making the point that it's the first transgender genre for Steam.
	I would kind of love, because I saw some news reports saying that you can be trans in the game, I would love if it only lets you get 42% of the way through the story.
	I think you can be trans in the game.
	The reason I'm calling this the marketing is because if this was not a conscious effort, it certainly has become the reality of how the game's being marketed, at least outside of who cares what other marketing they're doing.
	This is the best thing ever.
	I'd be interested to know when they started developing this.
	If they started developing before she got cancelled, and then halfway through development, they're just like, oh god, no.
	I think it's probably fairly soon.
	If you go to the next one here, there's also the best-selling games it has now become on Steam.
	The best-selling game on Steam itself.
	They have it.
	So SJW started tagging the game with their custom tags.
	If you go to the next one here, they tagged it with a villain protagonist, Capitalism and Genocide Simulator.
	I would play that game.
	Well, it's a genre.
	Is that where you play...
	What's it, that pandemic game?
	Plague Inc.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Do you just play Plague Inc.
	to wipe out humanity?
	City Skylines, Plague Inc.
	and Hogwarts Legacy.
	I don't know what genocide there is in the game.
	It's not currently released, so nobody even knows.
	So none of this makes any sense, obviously.
	Maybe there's some, like, Mass Effect-style choices.
	Do you save the house elves, or do you save Pufflepuff?
	The field elves.
	Anyway, after it was tagged with Genocide Simulator, we can now see where it is on the charts, which went up even more.
	There we are.
	Went up 29 places.
	Ooh, genocide!
	It's now number three in the top sellers there for the entire week, instead of just that one day where it was the best selling.
	Yeah, so quite the strategy, to say the least.
	If you go to the next one here, we can see more of this.
	Not buying Hogwarts Legacy because of J.K. Rowling, buying Hogwarts Legacy because it looks fun, and buying because of the Steam tags.
	Well, Genocide Simulator seems to be a very popular Steam tag, so if there are any, I don't know, Steam, Cleanlight devs, No, I'm not recommending that.
	Actually, don't do that.
	That's a terrible idea.
	What was I thinking?
	We'll go to the next one here.
	Because just content for the internet historian.
	When in 20 years he finally makes another video.
	Saw some big tweets about this.
	Someone copies of Hogwarts Legacy, please.
	I've been using that screenshot.
	It's golden.
	If you go back, I did see people saying, you know, it's the new Hogwarts episode.
	The final...
	No.
	I don't get over it.
	I don't know what his move was as an actor, Daniel, where he became just like, I'm going to be Harry Potter for ages and then become a Nazi?
	No, he did basically what a lot of child actors do when they get big in some family-friendly property.
	He goes, now I'm going to be an esoteric avant-garde actor who stars in socially aware films.
	Oh.
	That's interesting.
	He was one of those guys.
	You know what I always thought would make a good Nazi in a Nazi movie?
	David Tennant.
	I don't know if he's done it.
	How so?
	I don't know.
	Is it that Time Lord triumphant speech at the end of Waters of Mars gets you wondering?
	I think there's just something amazing about people who play the moral good guy in whatever TV series or movies they do, like Harry Potter over there, and then becoming a Nazi.
	So the idea of Doctor Who just becoming a Nazi would be really funny.
	Well, I mean, it's like you will have no idea about any of these references, but I'll try anyway.
	Are you aware of an actor called Henry Fonda?
	Okay.
	In the 1950s and around that era, he was one of the biggest stars in Hollywood, and he was in a very famous film called 12 Angry Men, and he was known for playing the handsome, goody-two-shoes good guy in literally every film that he was ever in, until 1968, when he was in a Western, spaghetti Western, called Once Upon a Time in the West, where in the first scene, the first thing you see him do is murder a child.
	And then everyone was like, I wasn't expecting that.
	Is it a good scene?
	It's a great scene.
	It's a really good film.
	Right, well, I have to give it a go, I suppose.
	Oh yeah, John's pointing out Doctor Who, Matt Smith is now in House of the Dragon as Daemon Targaryen.
	He's doing a great job there.
	I want SS David Tennant.
	That's what I want to say.
	Alright.
	We'll go to the next image here because there's some other memes that came out of that.
	It's right there.
	Sorting hat.
	Now sort your sex as well.
	Mail!
	I can actually imagine that scene.
	I want to re-dub the original scene for the Sawyer.
	In the next one as well, we have Is Gandalf the Prisoner of Azkaban.
	I'm sorry, I'm just imagining the hat on Harry.
	You'd make a good woman, you know?
	Yeah, it has the little like, you know the hat sits there, it has like little robes.
	Oh yeah.
	And those little hands that come alive.
	What?
	And start groping him, what?
	No, groomer!
	Anyway, so I heard that, I heard he is an angelic being who has taken human form to defeat the Dark Lord Rowling, but has become, because of his transphobic remarks, he, him, was in prison.
	That's being Gandalf here.
	I hope we can triumph against evil, says Grant over there.
	I think he's been deleted.
	They started deleting all the threads that were funny.
	At least we've got the screenshots.
	Be sure to save those.
	The last one here.
	This is some subreddit.
	I can't remember the damn name now.
	But they are the SJW community mostly involved in this.
	They're just whining about how J.K. Rowling is transphobic.
	And when everyone says how, they just go, how can she not be?
	Where's the evidence?
	Okay, no argument then.
	These people don't need evidence.
	They've never needed any evidence.
	J.K. Rowling, for all intents and purposes, is still a progressive feminist.
	She's just not quite as progressive as they want her to be.
	What was the quote earlier?
	From that moron?
	There is no finish line in the pursuit of progress.
	Oh yeah.
	Never gonna end.
	Anyway, we'll end this off just with one more, which is a message to all the kids out there.
	Don't do drugs, kids.
	As we can see here from Jeremy...
	Overuse of Polyjuice Potion has long-term side effects.
	This is an anti-drug message, I'm sure.
	Side effects include loss of friends, infertility, loss of self, loss of sanity...
	Hang on a minute.
	You remember what Polyjuice Potion is, don't you?
	Yeah, it's the one that turns you into someone else.
	Yeah.
	You do have to, like, pluck their hair first, though.
	And, um...
	Anyway, that's the Hogwarts Legacy Saga, which I'm...
	I think is hilarious.
	Very much enjoying.
	Look forward to more of the rating of the Steam Discussions page, which has been going on.
	Personally, I think we should do an Office playthrough of it.
	And see what happens.
	See what bad decisions we can make.
	But it's a weird part of the world where I don't even think the game looks good.
	I'm not going to play that.
	I'm too busy playing, apparently, the PS2 version.
	I think it looks alright, but yeah, the PS2 game's a special place in my heart.
	Yeah, but it's the fact that the game, like, none of the discussion whatsoever is about the video game.
	I kind of like this, I don't know, I think we'll call it post-Gamergate world of gaming industry stuff.
	It's just like, eh, let's just have a debate about politics.
	That's it.
	Like, the entire video game itself is completely pointless.
	Not even relevant.
	Carl sat in the corner, but I just wanted to play the video games, though, guys.
	No, I mean, the guys on the GamerGate side, I mean, pretty much lost.
	I mean, Carl is right about that.
	And in which case, we'll just keep fighting a good fight and having fun whilst doing it, I suppose.
	Yes.
	And now onto something much less fun, and that will be the Who World Order, because the documents being written up at the moment or amended by the World Health Organization are going to be just completely destroying any sense of sovereignty, any sense of independence that a country has, and lots more that we'll look into.
	I am not entirely sure if this segment will be appropriate for YouTube, given the guidelines that they have at the moment.
	So if it turns out not to be appropriate for YouTube, I would just recommend that you click on the links in the description on the YouTube video and head straight to the actual podcast on the website, where you can view the whole thing completely uncensored.
	I do think possibly...
	And also subscribe to us on Rumble and Bitshoot, etc.
	Subscribe to us on Rumble, Bitchute, all of the places that aren't going to be censorious like YouTube is.
	But I also think that if the first half is going to be appropriate for YouTube, if we manage to get it past, the second half definitely won't be.
	So either way, you'd do well to go to the website and check out the podcast.
	And what else you would be good to check out is a recent video from Connor called Our Wile E. Coyote Economy, basically on how the economy is...
	Just a big circular...
	I mean, it's just a big circle jerk of people passing things back and forth to one another to keep investment prices and other such things up, and it's not sustainable, and the Wile E. Coyote is like, we're on the edge.
	No, we're not on the edge, we're off the edge.
	You know in Wile E. Coyote cartoons from Looney Tunes where he would be hanging over the edge in suspended animation and then he would look down and just fall?
	We're in that point right before he's looked down, so eventually it will collapse.
	Sadly, it will be bad for everybody, but it's going to happen eventually.
	And also, if you have just stumbled onto this video and you've not watched our content before or aren't familiar with some of the things that we're going to be talking about, I'm going to be talking about, like I say, some of the amendments the World Health Organization is going to be making to one of the major documents that forms international law on health preparedness and solutions to health crises that happen.
	In the member states of the World Health Organization, which makes up about, I think, 194 member states there.
	If you hear this, if you hear any of these proposals, and just think to yourself, well, that doesn't sound too bad.
	I mean, they just want to keep us safe.
	Please remember that these proposals will not remain in the abstract.
	they will not be administered by unthinking robots and computers.
	There will be actual people administering these decisions from top to bottom, and those people will have their own agendas, they will have their own biases, they will have their own opinions, and they will have their own ideas on how things should be done.
	So please remember, no matter how nice something sounds on paper, when it comes out into the real world, the likelihood is it will not resemble that original abstract idea at all.
	Anyway, let's move on to it then.
	So what are they amending?
	What is the World Health Organization amending?
	And I do also have to thank Vicky for sending me through some of this information.
	Vicky's one of our behind-the-scenes people.
	She sent me through a lot of this and said we should probably talk about it, so thank you to her.
	So the International Health Regulations Provide an overarching legal framework that defines countries' rights and obligations in handling public health events and emergencies that have the potential to cross borders.
	They are an instrument, it says here, of international law that's legally binding on 196 countries, including the 194 WHO member states.
	It says, it continues to say here that they create rights and obligations for some countries, well, for countries involved, including the requirement to report public health events.
	So, for instance, this would be like COVID from three years ago.
	Bloody hell, it's three years ago now.
	Can you believe that?
	Feels like it's just gone like that, doesn't it?
	Turn the world upside down.
	The regulations also outline the criteria to determine whether or not a particular event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern.
	At the same time, the IHR require countries to designate a national IHR focal point for communications with the WHO to establish and maintain core capacities for surveillance and response, including designated points of entry.
	So that would be designated points of entry to countries like airports and such.
	Additional provisions address the areas of international travel and transport, such as health documents required for international traffic, and they also introduce important safeguards to protect the rights of travellers and other persons in relation to the treatment of personal data, informed consent and non-discrimination in the application of health measures under the regulations.
	I doubt that.
	I doubt that thoroughly.
	And in the implementation tab, if you just want to click on that, just on here, yeah, if you want to click on implementation.
	So it says as well, it's the governments are responsible, including all of their sectors, ministries, levels, officials and personnel for implementing IHR at the national level.
	And the WHO plays a coordinating role in IHR implementation and together with its partners helps countries to build capacity.
	So for the time being...
	Right now, the WHO, as far as I'm aware, is basically like an advisory body.
	They can advise countries to do certain things, but the countries don't actually have to.
	Obviously, during the COVID pandemic and the crisis that went around there, it became very clear to most people that the WHO was...
	Played a much bigger part in the global affairs than just that of an advisory board.
	And what we're going to see as we go along is that a lot of the changes they're going to be making to the documents that we're going to be looking at are basically just going to be formalizing the changes that were informally put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, which will make it so that the governments are basically completely subordinate to the World Health Organization.
	And it's going to lead to things like...
	Social credit scores, I would imagine.
	It's going to lead to digital IDs because they outright explicitly say that that's what they want to implement in the documentations.
	But I'll carry on here just to finish off.
	In the preparedness, they talk about how the WHO's support focuses on the priority needs identified by the WHO regional and country offices in order to help each country meet its IHR commitment.
	So each country involved in this has their own WHO regional and country office, which means that within each of these countries, even if they don't want to do something and wanted to keep the information away from the World Health Organization, because they know the World Health Organization is going to force them to do something they don't want to, they've basically got organizations already set up there who can spy on they've basically got organizations already set up there who can spy on them, communicate with all the other member states, yada yada Let's carry on.
	This is the information that I was sent by Vicky, and then I looked into it a bit more, so if you want to go to the next link for me, thank you.
	If you scroll down here, we can see what's going on.
	They say here is secret negotiations for pandemic treaty have been taking place this week.
	So they've been taking place through the 9th through the 13th of January, so today is the very last day of the negotiations of the proposed pandemic treaty, and the document that I have access to Is the one that's going to be looking at the different proposals for changes in the documents that they already have from the 2005, like I say, the International Health Regulations 2005.
	That's the document that they're changing.
	I'll read a bit of what's going on here and then look at the document to confirm that what they're saying is true.
	Yeah, the International Health Regulations Review Committee of the World Health Organization is planning to meet in secret from Monday, January 9th, 2023 to Friday, January 13th, 2023.
	The IHRRC will be working to finalize what is now a 46-page document that includes proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
	The proposed amendments would, and this is where we get some of the very dangerous changes that are going to be made to it.
	But basically, like I say, the sad thing is, as bad as all of these changes are, they will just be formalizing changes that have been going on in the way that the world is governed, because we have increasingly been working towards globalization.
	We've got the Blairs of the world, we've got the David Camerons of the world, we've got the Macrons of the world, Klaus Schwab's, all of them trying to organize into some kind of globalized governance system, so that they can centralize power within themselves, and then just...
	It forces to be the atomized, autonomous, non-autonomous data entry monkeys that even Simon Pegg complained about recently, partially accurately.
	Of course, his answer to vote Labour instead of Tories is not the answer, but still I can understand the worries that he has.
	So number one, it will change the overall nature of the World Health Organization from an advisory organization that merely makes recommendations to a governing body whose proclamations would be legally binding.
	Article one, and we'll look at that when we get to it.
	Number two, it will greatly expand the scope of the international health regulations to include scenarios that merely have a potential to impact public health.
	And looking through the document, that is something that has gone all the way through it.
	Every single change that you see in relation to where they've crossed out a public health crisis has been changed to say potential to impact public health or potential to have a public health crisis, which means we can just make it up.
	We can just decide.
	People have started to get the sniffles.
	This has the potential to impact public health.
	Literally anything could have the potential to impact public health.
	For instance, climate change, at least the way that they advertise climate change to us, could have the potential to impact public health if it's starting to get sunnier.
	Oh, we don't want people going outside as much because there's a greater risk of skin cancer, etc., etc.
	Going to have to lock you down for safety precautions.
	That's how it's going to go.
	Number three, it will seek to remove respect for dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of people, which is included in Article 3.
	Now, once again, human rights as understandable organizations governed by the UN, like the World Health Organization, is basically just a post-hoc explanation for why they're allowed to go into foreign countries and invade, like Afghanistan and Iraq, where you need to protect dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of people, whereas really what we want to do is put down...
	Organizations and governments that aren't happy with America, etc., etc., but it's what they're replacing it with that I think is the important part here, because, as you can imagine, a lot of this language is going to get changed from the idea of human rights, which, as much as they don't really exist, at least are paying lip service to the idea that governments have certain barriers that they're not able to cross, right, when you're dealing with them.
	Governments aren't allowed to do this.
	The whole point of rights is the truth.
	Government can't do that.
	Exactly.
	Well, they're replacing it with dye.
	Because, of course, they are.
	Number four, it will give the general director of the WHO control over the means of production through an allocation plan for health products to require developed states' parties to supply pandemic response products as directed.
	That's in Article 13a, which, looking through the document, is a completely new article that has been added in there, basically just to say that if you, as a member state, have productive capabilities to be able to send off all of these resources to foreign countries, you're going to do it.
	Whether or not you actually have the resources spare, no, you've got the capability to do it, you're going to do it.
	Number five, give the WHO authority to require medical examinations, proof of prophylaxis, proof of vaccine, and to implement contact tracing, quarantine, and treatment.
	Number six, institute a system of global health certificates in digital or paper format, including test certificates, vaccine certificates, prophylaxis certificates, recovery certificates, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	So, alongside a few weeks ago, I covered with Stelios, we covered the online harm safety bill, which is basically just saying you're going to need your digital ID to access certain websites and go on the internet, because otherwise there's a chance that children could be harmed, which sounds like a nice idea on the face of it.
	The same as all of this sounds like a nice idea on the face of it, but it will be how it's applied that is going to really count, and I do not trust anyone.
	Anybody that we have at the moment to apply this fairly or in any kind of objective way, it will always be in the case of promoting elite interests.
	Number seven, redirect unspecified billions of dollars to the pharmaceutical hospital emergency industrial complex...
	That's a bit of a mouthful.
	With no accountability.
	Number eight, allow the disclosure of personal health data.
	Number nine, greatly expand the World Health Organization's capacity to censor what they consider to be misinformation and disinformation.
	That one is absolutely correct.
	And you can see, if you go on the World Health Organization's website, they already have massive documents drawn up on how they respond to...
	Oh, this is just an offhand comment.
	You don't need to go to the document just yet.
	Thank you, John.
	They already have massive pages drawn up on how to respond to...
	Vaccine crises, which is basically whenever anybody in the public or any organisation is stirring up controversy regarding vaccines and creating hesitancy in people, they have plans drawn up exactly on how they are going to respond to that, where they're going to promote vaccine safety and yada yada yada.
	But it also always involves censoring people.
	And number 10, create an obligation to build, provide and maintain IHR infrastructure at points of entry.
	Once again, this is basically so they can have their own little organisations, their own little outposts in each country to keep an eye on people.
	And we'll see as we go through the document just how intrusive that will end up being to nation's sovereignty.
	But anyway, let's go into the document itself.
	And we can see here, like I say, it's the article-by-article compilation of proposed amendments to the International Health Regulation 2005.
	And let's read through some of this.
	So if we scroll down, so the proposed amendments are struck through if they're removing it, emboldened, underlined, if it's something they're adding to it.
	The first one that I noticed was in the Article 1 definitions.
	For the purposes of the International Health Regulations, the term standing recommendation means, and you can see they've crossed out non-binding advice, is no longer non-binding.
	Which suggests to me that this is just purely a document that is not advice anymore.
	This is just, you're going to get your orders handed down to you from upon high by the World Health Organization.
	If you are a member state of the World Health Organization in the UN, you are going to have to adhere to this, or you're probably going to face sanctions, you're probably going to face fines, all sorts.
	I think that's everyone except North Korea?
	Pretty much, yes.
	Globalization.
	Isn't it beautiful?
	Just take your orders from some guys a million miles away who love the Chinese Communist Party.
	Yes.
	Sounds like a fine idea to me.
	From Article 2, which is on the scope of the document, they say, So the fact that they've said...
	It's the potential to impact public health, and we need to prepare for it, means that they've basically just given themselves complete carte blanche, because realistically, anything could have a potential to impact public health, and therefore you are justified to do anything to prepare for a potential incident that could impact public health.
	Therefore, like I say, they're giving themselves carte blanche to do whatever they want.
	They will, of course, sell it to you under the auspices of keeping you safe, Keeping you healthy.
	But I contend that safety and health and other such things are not the only virtues that we should be living by.
	They are not the only metrics by which to judge human happiness, human well-being, and human flourishing, etc., etc.
	And therefore, the idea that we have to centre the entirety of society around keeping you safe and keeping you healthy...
	And not even you keeping yourself safe and healthy, the government, a large global organisation doing that, is ridiculous, unfair, and I also just think it's partially demonic when really we all know that this will be massively abused, and it's basically just being put in place to formalise the system that we're already living under, sadly.
	And they also say that they will avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade, livelihoods, human rights, and Equitable access to health products and healthcare technologies and know-how.
	So they are once again formalising the idea of equitable access to health products.
	So you've seen it.
	I've seen it.
	We've all seen it.
	Lots of articles, lots of documentaries talking about the inequitable ways that certain health practices are distributed among populations of different ethnicities and genders and such.
	Black people have to spend this much extra time waiting for appointments than white people, etc., etc., This is, once again, just a formalisation of can't have that, need to change your entire system, turn it upside down.
	Well, they tried to change it in, what was it, the Boston Heart Disease Unit.
	They decided that too many black people had heart disease and were dying of it, so they just stopped treating white patients more commonly.
	This will solve the problem.
	Yeah, the only thing that happened is more white people died than usual.
	I'm not that shocked.
	It was an amazing policy.
	Yes, that is a completely amazing policy.
	And like I say, Article 3 on the principles, we can see right there, the implementation of these regulations shall be crossed out with full respect for the dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of persons, and instead replaced with, based on the principles of equity, inclusivity, coherence, and in accordance with their common but differentiated inclusivity, coherence, and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities.
	So it's just, we're going to, taking into account their social and economic development.
	So the ESG score type management, where everything has to be sustainable in one way or the other, and inclusive, governed properly, etc., etc., is just going to, this is just once again formalization of woke principles so that they have an extra room to control you.
	Because this is not respecting people's freedoms, this is not respecting people's cultures or way of life, this is just forcing in the extremist, leftist agenda, as always.
	If I wanted to show someone how extreme these people are, I mean, that would be it.
	That bit where they're just like, cross out human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons and replace it with die.
	Once again, as I say, with the UN and other such organisations, these principles have never been anything but lip service in the first place, but at least they felt that they had to pay lip service.
	You could criticise them on that basis, like you're not fulfilling this.
	Yes.
	But, I mean, my only hope with documents like this is that either if you are watching this and you have any kind of institutional power to be able to try and fight back against it, that you're able to, to mount legal battles against it, or just the very practical basis of being able to apply all of this in a realistic time frame and within realistic...
	Just being able to realistically and practically apply all of this I hope is beyond the capabilities of any human being or organised group of human beings, but if this all passes through then I guess we'll just have to see, because this could fundamentally change the way that our society is structured.
	And they've added number two, the state's party shall develop and maintain capacities that implement the regulations in accordance to their common blah, blah, blah.
	So once again, we're just going to make sure to implement plenty of infrastructure in there that means you can never escape this paradigm.
	And this is the part where they introduce digital IDs, because as you see here, actually, no, if we carry on, number three, where was it?
	No no no, I'm just looking through my own document.
	Apologies here, folks.
	Yeah, so basically a lot of this is going to be implementing digital IDs.
	If we go on to Article 4, which is the responsible entities, so they say each state party shall designate or establish an entity with the role of national IHR focal point and the authorities responsible within its respective jurisdiction for the implementation of health measures under these regulations.
	The WHO shall provide technical assistance and collaborate with states parties in capacity building of the national IHR focal points and authorities upon request of the state party.
	So there we are.
	We're establishing a new centralized power within your country, whether you want it or not, because these guys are going to be ones handing down orders from on high.
	And if we skip to Article 12 as well, we can see this is the part where it talks about the determination of public health emergency of international concern.
	And they say here, if the Director-General considers, based on an assessment under these regulations, that a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern is occurring, the Director-General shall notify all states' parties and seek to consult with the state party in whose territory in the event, blah, blah, blah.
	And may, in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 49, seek the views of the committee established under Article 48, here and after the Emergency Committee.
	So they're going to set up an Emergency Committee, which will presumably be set up entirely with yes-men, so they can make it seem as though this Director General has some kind of democratic mandate.
	The people want to be able to do this, and I can prove that because I have a committee of people, the Emergency Committee, who care about you, the people out there, Who all agree with me.
	It's the idea of, you know, trust the experts as always.
	And in paragraph 6, they've added a new paragraph 6, they say here, and this is really scary, where an event has not been determined to meet the criteria for a public health emergency of international concern, but the Director-General has determined it requires heightened international awareness of a potential international public health service,
	the Director-General, on the basis of information received, may determine at any time that So this just says we can set up safety precaution lockdowns.
	Whether or not we have any evidence to say that it's justified, if it doesn't meet the criteria, but I feel like it.
	I feel like it could be dangerous.
	Therefore, lockdown.
	And the guy that they're saying would be in charge of as Director General, isn't that the guy?
	Like, literally the guy from Ethiopia who's in love with the Chinese Communist Party?
	Probably.
	I wouldn't be surprised.
	Just that dude?
	I know there's a lot of Chinese involvement in the WHO, so that's always concerning in the first place.
	And in Article 13, where it talks about the public health response, there is a particular part in here under Section 4, if you want to scroll down to it, where it's talking about how, you know, we're going to set this up so that if we say that there's an alert, we're going to send it through all of the states and they're going to have to go ahead with it.
	And they say here, this is a new added part, where they say, when requested by the state party, the WHO shall provide information supporting such an offer.
	The state party shall accept or reject such an offer of assistance within 48 hours.
	And in the case of rejection of such an offer shall provide to the WHO its rationale for the rejection, which the WHO shall share with other states' parties regarding on-site's assessments in compliance with its national law.
	A state party shall make reasonable efforts to facilitate short-term access to relevant sites.
	But what that part is saying, if you don't want to do what we say you have to do, you have to write us up a grovelling apology for why you can't do it, and then we're going to send it to all the other states' members where they will scrutinise it.
	So we are going to struggle session sovereign nations into doing what we want if they don't want to.
	Sounds great, doesn't it?
	I just love the arrogance of any parts of the UN or World Health Organization.
	Who the hell are you?
	We pay you.
	Where do you think your money comes from?
	The state governments that you're sitting there acting like you can run.
	Anyway.
	Yeah, once again, my only hope with all of this is that they can't actually practically implement it, but I guess we'll just have to wait and see if that's the case.
	If we go to Article 13a, which is the WHO-led international public health response...
	They say on part four of that, upon request of the WHO, states parties with production capacities shall undertake measures to scale up production of health products, including the diversification of production technology transfer and capacity building, especially in the developing countries.
	So, we just get to dictate what you do with your productive capabilities.
	If you have the means of production, you will be forced to do what we want, because remember, from Article 1, none of this is no longer...
	all of this is no longer non-binding.
	This is binding, if you are part of this organisation.
	There's the digital vax passes are introduced in Article 23, if we scroll down to that please, John, wherein it says the health measures on arrival and departure, and this will be between states.
	So, number one, subject to applicable international agreements and relevant articles of these regulations, a state party may require for public health purposes, and this is where they've added the new part in, whether in paper-based or digital format on arrival-departure, information concerning the traveler's destination so the traveler may be contacted, information concerning the traveler's destination so the traveler may be contacted, and information concerning the traveler's itinerary, blah, blah, blah, if they are required under these regulations, Once again, this is the new part that's been added in.
	Documents containing information for a lab test in digital or physical format, including documents containing information on a laboratory test for a pathogen and or information on vaccination against the disease, including those provided at request of the state party in digital or electronic form.
	So there's your digital VaxPass.
	There you go.
	The thing that they said would never happen, the thing that they told us we were crazy conspiracy theories for even suggesting might happen...
	Formalized, in documentation, that all of the governments are going to have to stick by.
	Otherwise they'll either be ostracized from the international community, which we know that they don't want to be, or America will come knocking and say, you best do what we say!
	Because we know what happens if America does that and you don't.
	Allow me to just take a quick sip.
	This is fantastic.
	I know it's lovely, isn't it?
	There is more information in this document, but it's basically just repeating information that I've already gone over here.
	So I hope that's been a nice black pill for you, because I do have more information, but it's not really going off explaining anything that anybody who's been watching the show for a while probably isn't already aware of.
	Like I say, it's the...
	Definitely YouTube non-friendly part, including the fact that they're introducing a new variant now where Jimmy Fallon's been singing a new song.
	I thought you said Jimmy Savile then.
	No, no, not Jimmy Savile.
	They've not brought back Jimmy Savile to try and sell this to the people.
	I know who kids like these days.
	Oh, no.
	No.
	But, yeah, we've got Jimmy Fallon singing about a new COVID variant called XBB15. Are you excited?
	Are you scared?
	Are you quaking in your little boots, Callum?
	Are you going to get the sniffles again?
	I've been COVID like three times.
	Same.
	I bet you're terrified, aren't you?
	But this one's different.
	Because we gave it a stupid name.
	Therefore, it's different.
	But just remember, once again, if you are watching this and you think to yourself, I'm sure the people implementing all of this have everyone's best ideas in mind, everyone's best intentions are being thought of here.
	They just want to keep us safe.
	They just want to keep us safe.
	Remember that Project Veritas, who have been hitting really hard recently on this, have again and again and again exposed scientists and members of Pfizer and members of massive organizations, health regulatory bodies, etc., just talking about how, yeah, actually, the things that we were telling you in the press, the things that we were forcing on people, we didn't actually know the answers.
	We didn't know the answers, we weren't as certain as we could have been, and we might have actually hurt people.
	So this one was a Pfizer scientist saying that your antibodies were better than their vax.
	There you go, pretty simple.
	But the thing is, that was known science before all of this, so then all of a sudden during that pandemic, we didn't know the science anymore.
	It became verboten to say it, and if you said it on YouTube, you would get your account at least suspended, if not probably banned.
	Same on Twitter, same elsewhere.
	They also knew about myocarditis in the next link, where I think this was one or two or possibly even three separate scientists talking about how they were just regretful of what they were doing, and this guy talking about how he knew about the myocarditis, and it was something that Pfizer were looking into.
	Then there was the fact that it was all gain of function in the first place, which was something that even DARPA... DARPA refused to go ahead with this.
	It was something that had been put forward to them in 2018 by the EcoHealth Alliance, and there are still people who say, oh, you're just crazy.
	You're just crazy if you thought it wasn't from the Wuhan wet market.
	You're just crazy.
	All of this, just a coincidence.
	Peter Daszak, all those people involved in this, just a coincidence.
	And then you've got people from the FDA... The FDA, this economist for the FDA, Taylor Lee, just outright saying, yeah, if I had my way, we'd just be blow-darting unvaccinated citizens with the COVID-19 vaccine.
	And that might have been a joke.
	But you know that if he could get away with it, you know if these people could get away with it, they absolutely would.
	And all of this documentation with the World Health Organization is just them formalizing their own ability to do such things.
	If you think it will stop at the changes they have made in the documents right now, where they basically just give themselves, like I say, carte blanche to do whatever they want, to a point, it will go further.
	They will not stop here.
	These people, I've...
	I despise these people.
	I mean, am I supposed to pretend that I think these people are human?
	These people are monsters.
	I'm gonna go Alex Jones here.
	These people are demons.
	Bad things are coming to these people if we lived in a just world.
	But sadly, they will get away with it.
	They will continue to get away with it.
	And I hate it.
	But I can only hope that when this is all over these people, these individuals...
	Who are trying to destroy our culture, trying to destroy our way of life, trying to destroy our own sovereignty, trying to destroy local communities, trying to convince you to not have a family, cut your genitals off.
	I can only hope that in the end these people will all burn in hell.
	So, I had to restrain myself there because I could have been much worse, but let's carry on.
	I enjoyed the sermon.
	Anyway, we'll move to Tommy joining the Labour Party, which is not something, as Carl would say, was on my bingo card, for God's sakes.
	Anyway, we should start off...
	Now you're saying it.
	We'll start off just with, if we can load up the shield there, then we have the fact I wanted to put out our side punk dystopia that we did yesterday, me and Carl, in regards to I have no mouth, but I must scream, because...
	Well, I wasn't expecting this.
	I mean, it's a kind of dystopian horror in which...
	The book was only, what, 14 pages long?
	Yeah, but it's just funny to see, like, you know, the leftists and Tommy shaking hands in this regard.
	This isn't Tommy's doing either.
	This is something that has happened without his consent.
	Isn't Tommy basically just saying things he's believed, excuse me, for years now?
	Yes.
	And people are only just noticing.
	Yeah.
	Well, we'll go forwards.
	We'll go to the former Labour BAME chairman who decided to take note of the things he's been saying.
	And this is the interesting part about the whole conversation is that he's not done anything.
	He's just sort of turned up on podcasts as he is chatting away.
	And this chap, this particular podcast, was very good in my opinion.
	I wish I had a link somewhere to show people, but you can find them on the notes somewhere.
	And it's like clips from what have gone viral, I've noticed.
	I've had them popping up on my Shorts feed.
	I've seen this one popping up earlier for me.
	Yeah.
	And this lady here saying what he says in the clip.
	I can't play because it's just a bit too long.
	But it's just him talking about how the establishment obviously lied to us about the invasion of Iraq.
	The fact that there's weapons of mass destruction, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	And then it was all BS. And obviously, the entire country had been propagandized.
	Even in the modern era, this still takes place.
	And then he goes on to say the same thing with Gaddafi in Libya.
	And then he says, and now that's why I see it with Ukraine.
	The West is being propagandized.
	And if you don't think that's happening, then...
	What did you think happened in Libya and Iraq exactly?
	That it was all good and chummy.
	And according to this person, who, you know, fair play to her for agreeing with Tommy, pointing out obvious basic facts of reality is now left-wing.
	Well, the point here being, she sees it from an anti-war perspective, I presume, or at least a lot of people do, and Tommy's seeing it from the lies perspective that just happens to justify war in this case, or something else, whatever.
	It doesn't matter.
	It just happens to be...
	And you don't have to be left-wing to be anti-war.
	Well, his thing is more just like, I hate the government.
	I respect it.
	They just lie to us constantly.
	The war is the example given here.
	And she says that it's 23-3 and Robinson is more left-wing than the leader of the Labour Party.
	The world is really ending because Tommy isn't entirely wrong here.
	And, um, yeah.
	He's been right about a few things.
	Quite a lot.
	Just one or two.
	But you may have noticed that you might not have heard from him.
	Quite a while, Miss Khan.
	Because he was banned.
	And now all of a sudden you're allowed to hear him again.
	You're like, well, hang on, he's not talking nonsense.
	Interesting how that works.
	Because if we go to the responses to her tweet, it's a load of check marks.
	I mean, this one here, he's the global drugs editor at Vice World News.
	Oh, okay.
	I was going to say, are we saying checkmarks as in classic understanding of checkmarks or neo-checkmarks?
	I'm using, whenever I use that word, I'm using it.
	You're a traditionalist.
	I go and check.
	Make sure they have the disabled stamp.
	And this guy here, he responds to her with just Muppet.
	Good argument.
	Very convincing.
	Why shouldn't we listen to the bad man?
	Because he's bad.
	I'm sold.
	I do appreciate that Elon let us see the view counts now, because we can see a whole new ratio.
	Yeah.
	For almost 15k views, 17 likes.
	Very good.
	And the next one here is also a freelance journalist for Al Jazeera English, so he works for Qatari-funded media.
	NPR and Vice News, and he decided to respond with, let's hear the fascist out.
	The Great Replacement Theory is left-wing.
	Actually, I'm very smart.
	22,000 views, 100 likes.
	It's a great point.
	I've got to think about that more.
	You showed me this.
	Didn't Tommy do the political alignment test and he just came out dead centre?
	Yeah.
	Like, he's the ultimate centrist.
	He literally just wants to grill.
	It's ridiculous.
	The way he comes out on the political compass test.
	But no, he's a fascist.
	Why?
	Because he said, maybe don't invade Iraq and Libya on false pretenses.
	Maybe you shouldn't trust the government.
	Also, when we do that, they keep coming over here as refugees and then doing bad things to our kids.
	I love that his whole thing is, I don't trust the government.
	And he's like, yeah, you're a fascist.
	You're a state worshipper.
	And that's just the only word that the leftists have to go for, and sadly, it's worked.
	A lot.
	No, but it's like, call him a Muslim, then.
	I mean, really, like, you don't trust the government.
	Yeah, well, you're one of those people that worship the state.
	Imagine just calling Tommy a jihadist.
	Yeah, I mean, that's literally as true as calling someone who hates the state a fascist.
	It doesn't make any goddamn sense, you moron.
	Anyway, Owen Jones got very mad about this.
	I just thought I'd mention first, of course, the Nazi that is Tommy Robinson.
	Pictured here burning a SWAT sticker in 2009.
	I don't know if you heard the story before or not.
	I know that he was part of the EDL and he spent a lot of time in it.
	Mainly, I know this from Strange Death of Europe, Douglas Murray's book.
	He was mainly just spending most of his time trying to keep Nazis out.
	Yeah, like he actually fought them.
	Like one of his convictions for assault is him punching a Nazi.
	So he did exactly what the left asked for.
	Yeah, they hate him for it.
	It's like, huh, interesting.
	Anyway, so that's the image we have of Robinson on file.
	We'll go to Owen Jones.
	Owen Jones is very mad about this.
	He decided to respond with, this is a grotesque thing to post.
	Robinson is a far-right extremist and nothing he says here is left-wing.
	The BNP opposed the Iraq war.
	They did not do so from a left-wing perspective.
	Neither does Robinson, who rails here against open borders.
	Please delete this.
	And to be fair, he is correct in saying that nothing he said was inherently left-wing.
	So I've got to respect that.
	I don't trust government.
	Well, that's definitely not left-wing, so I mean, you're right there.
	Well, not at the moment, no.
	But this person is thinking the above person in the classical sense.
	Owen Jones...
	The Bush era left or something.
	Is Owen Jones coming out in support of the Iraq War?
	Is that what's going on here?
	I think so.
	Alright, fair play.
	Imperial Owen Jones.
	But also, it doesn't make any sense that you didn't listen to the speech, Owen.
	Like, we know you didn't.
	What you got away from that is he's anti-Iraq War, that there wasn't the point of the speech.
	The point of the speech was, here's some examples of the government openly lying to you that we know about, and then on everything else, do you really think the government's telling the truth?
	The fundamental argument being, don't trust the state.
	Then don't have your best interests and heart.
	And you're like, yeah, well, I don't agree with that.
	I mean, this is what Owen Jones has been writing about for the past 13 years, and then he sees someone he dislikes saying it, and he's like, well, actually, this changes everything.
	Almost 400,000 views!
	400 likes.
	Sorry, 4,000 likes.
	I mean, it's just a complete friend-enemy, isn't it?
	That's a huge distinction.
	Thank you, Elon.
	Anyway, someone says, why should I delete the sign?
	Huh?
	There.
	And he goes, because he's a far-right extremist and needs to be defeated, not legitimized.
	You don't know what that means.
	This is the thing about the word far-right.
	It means nothing.
	If you actually want to define it, this is what I like about the central centrist movement, is they are actually able to accurately define what is the far-right and the far-left.
	And that is true.
	Like, if you wanted to define what is the actual far-right, it would be those who want the forceful removal of all undesirables in British society, out of the country, or so forth, and normally define it by race.
	Well, there you are.
	Robertson wants that.
	No, he wants lower immigration rates, and wants to chat about why Islam is Islamic.
	It's not the same thing.
	Owen Jones is the extreme leftist.
	He is a complete maniac, so I'm not surprised that he can't take a single sensible position on anything.
	He rows against open borders, unlike me, who loves them.
	You are the extreme leftist, then.
	Nobody wants open borders exactly the extreme left.
	Anyway, one of the main reasons Tom Robinson opposed Western wars is because he doesn't want more Muslim migrants coming into the country, Jones writes.
	Why?
	Why doesn't he?
	But who does, Owen?
	Again, I mean, just self-report.
	He talks about this in the video.
	How do you not understand this?
	And then she responds with, I opposed Western wars and the destabilization of the Middle East, and it did cause an influx of displaced Muslims around the world.
	I want Muslims to be safe in their own countries so they don't have to flee.
	That's just such a sane take.
	Yeah, but this is the funny thing between the Islamic side of the Labour Party and the progressive side.
	It's obviously being a communist is haram, so it doesn't really work.
	It's just an alliance of circumstances.
	Is being a communist haram?
	Yeah.
	Oh, really?
	I thought a load of the movements were socialist movements.
	What do you think happened to the communists in Iran?
	Oh, fair play.
	Peru.
	And this is the point where you can see the language there.
	Their own countries.
	And she writes, I want my country to be their country, no!
	Don't we live everywhere?
	It's like, no, no we don't.
	We all have our place in the world, and that's true.
	Do we?
	At what point do we just accept that Owen Jones has some kind of weird humiliation kink?
	Because he just makes such a fool of himself 24-7.
	That ratio thing's totally true.
	He got a million followers.
	Look at that, 165 likes.
	Million followers.
	Beep boop.
	Anyway, so Robinson decides to challenge him to a debate because of course he did, so if you've got a next one here, just documented that.
	Are we getting straight into debate me bro territory?
	There we are.
	Destiny, set it up.
	Anyway, he then goes on to make a video talking about the Muslim lady and notes that the only people telling a Muslim woman to shut her mouth are white leftists That keeps happening.
	And you've got Robinson sat there who's just like, nah, keep going, love.
	Say your piece.
	Free speech.
	I mean, I agree on everything, but who cares?
	I was like, yeah.
	Who do you think is more desirable to talk to?
	And she decided it's him.
	Well, Tommy talks, like you say, a lot about Islam being Islamic.
	I don't think he has a problem with that on its face.
	He just dislikes them doing it in places that aren't already Islamic.
	Like, if you're going to be Islamic in an Islamic country, like, in Afghanistan.
	I don't think Tommy would have an issue with the Taliban in the sense of, like, you're a bunch of people who do Islamic things in an Islamic country.
	Tommy's not barreling over the horizon in a one-man tank with a British flag on it or anything.
	Yeah, I don't think he's a crusader.
	No, neither do I. Maybe he's a crusader for his own land.
	It would be funny if he was.
	And that's about it.
	I don't think he's going to Palestine to do that anytime soon.
	Tommy and all the football lads coming over the horizon.
	I do love his thing on Israel-Palestine, though.
	I don't know if you've seen him wearing Zionist shirts and whatnot.
	I don't think he gets a crap about the Israel-Palestine conflict.
	It's just funny to him.
	Is he just trolling?
	Yeah, like you just wear the shirt.
	Like Lord Miles will sometimes...
	He's got this fake version of a Mossad agent ID card.
	He's put his own face on it and his name and he sometimes just tweets it going, Shalom, brothers.
	Autism is a powerful tool.
	Like when he was in Afghanistan, he just kept going up to the Taliban and being like, Shalom.
	And they just started laughing.
	So they think it's funny too.
	They just knew it was a joke.
	Yeah, obviously.
	Anyway, she says, I agree with Robinson here.
	The more white people attacking me, cancelling me, calling me dumb for sharing his clip than Muslims who happen to agree with what he said.
	It's also as if I didn't go to war with the Labour Party to expose the corruption of racism because this lady apparently is on the outside now because she's got in trouble with them.
	I do love Labour members' shock that Muslims are agreeing with the man who's saying let's not bomb Muslim countries.
	Yeah, it's the thing.
	You don't actually have anything in common with the progressives, and you know that deep down.
	Flee for the hills if you think you did.
	Anyway, we'll go to TR, who's also making Muslim Brotherhood out there with fellow supporters.
	New supporters, perhaps.
	Oh yeah, you were telling me about this the other day.
	All of the Muslims have started responding to his tweets just like, good point.
	Yeah, all the Muslims are like, you know what, that Robinson guy doesn't half speak the truth.
	Because this is Owen Jones whining about Cage and him going like, you're lying.
	And then the Muslims are like, I'm Muslim and I disagree with Robinson on how he pictures Islam, but I respect his realism and the genuine willingness to solve issues our government are making and deliberately ignoring.
	And he's like, thanks, brother.
	I'm just getting to, like, no more brother wars.
	Yeah, that's what I want.
	I don't know if you can click on that one there, the Owen Jones tweet in the middle, because the cage thing he's responding to is rather funny, because this is like a Muslim organisation who are against the wars, and they're just like, we Muslims don't believe in left-right bullshit, like, we believe in what's true, and Owen's like, we're kind of that.
	Okay, interesting.
	Owen Jones, like so many other progressives, is just a cultural imperialist.
	Yeah, yeah.
	It's not in a decent way either.
	He's not like, stop burning your lives alive.
	It's like, have you tried chopping off your...
	No.
	Do you know what might fix the Middle East?
	McDonald's.
	Anyway, we'll go to the BBC News, who have something recently.
	This is not the only thing which Robinson has got his name trending for.
	This case came out recently.
	Eleanor Williams, Barrow Woman Guilty of False Rape Claims.
	And the story here, being a woman who falsely claimed that she had been raped and trafficked by an Asian grooming gang, has been found guilty of perverting the course of justice.
	She posted photos on social media in May 2020 of injuries she said were from being beaten, but the jury heard she inflicted the wounds herself.
	And there was a bunch of other evidence that they went through, the fact she made up Snapchat accounts, blah blah blah blah, and she's been found guilty of lying, which is a crime in the UK, which you will get a punishment for.
	Not in the US, is my understanding still, which is amazing.
	Yeah, this reminds me a lot of...
	There was a big race hoax in the 1980s where some girl claimed that she'd been beaten by a load of white people, this black girl, and then they found out that she'd just done it herself.
	Al Sharpton and those types showed up for it.
	Yeah.
	Well, this one, this case, obviously you would think, okay, Asian grooming gang alleged guilty girl, sorry, victim girl, Tommy would be down there doing a demo, irresponsible man, blah, blah, blah, if you believed all the lies.
	Because that's the thing.
	The reality was that, I remember this at the time, I mean, The Guardian even reported on it, if you get the next one here, appeals for calm after Robinson visits Barrow.
	He did not turn up with a demo.
	He did not turn up with an army of EDL lads shouting Justice Ferelli or some such thing.
	The reality was he turned up with a camera.
	To find out what was happening.
	And, well, we can see it.
	The thing is, he went there and he interviewed the Muslims who were being accused.
	He then also interviewed white suspects who had been accused by earlier rape.
	And what was his conclusion at the end of all of this interviewing?
	His conclusion that there probably was a gang in Barrow, but none of these men were involved in it.
	This case was not part of that.
	A shockingly sensible conclusion to come to when presented with the evidence.
	Like going and finding what is the facts and then making your opinion on those facts that you have found and gone and looked for instead of just sitting there and making up your own worldview.
	Sounds far right to me.
	Yeah, and he even explained this whole thing in a recent podcast, the one I mentioned earlier, which again is great.
	I actually really like this guy.
	People should go and check out DMC Daily on YouTube.
	But we'll play this clip here in which he explains what happened.
	I'd been up in Barrow covering an alleged grooming scandal.
	A young white girl had said she'd been raped by lots of Muslim men, yeah?
	I'd gone up there for a week trying to investigate it as a journalist.
	It actually turns out, in my eyes, the girl's lying.
	In your eyes?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	The girl's lying, there's a court case coming out soon.
	Which is once again, sorry to interrupt, this is just not him being biased like you're actually saying there was a...
	No, I went up there, do you know, I went up there and as I walked into his house, Mohammed, so I turned up, I started asking lots of questions, I found out lots of suspicious stuff about the girl and her family.
	And then I, so then I reached out to the Muslim men.
	And I sat and saw what had happened to them.
	And bearing in mind I've already found out five, six things that don't add up with this girl.
	So then I thought, do you know?
	And what I said to him, he goes, why are you here?
	I said, mate, if you're innocent, if this isn't true, yeah, I want to be the person that lets people know it's not true.
	Yeah, you should have been people.
	Yeah, and people will listen to me.
	So in this town, people will listen to me, yeah, on this issue.
	And so far, I've seen this, this, this, I've seen five, six different things.
	And then, so as I'm in his house, I've got someone trying to find the girl's stepdad.
	Because the girls' family are lying to everyone on this show.
	So this girls' family have done this big campaign.
	It's called Justice for Ellie.
	And then my phone rings and says, he's in the KFC car park.
	I've got someone following him.
	So I said, right, I'm on my way.
	So I rush up.
	I'm shooting over.
	I get out of the car and I go up to him and I say, and I've got all this footage, I said, when are you going to tell the British public the truth?
	When are you going to stop lying to him?
	Because I know you're lying.
	And he's like, well, he's expecting me to be up there just, but I've already done a week of researching and interviews with lots of people up there.
	So I said, when are you going to tell the truth?
	And then as I do that, some boy's on his bike, he goes, you racist prick.
	Just the usual fucking soy boy, long hair mess.
	So I said, mate, fuck off, yeah?
	And then he spits in my face.
	So as he spits in my face, I hit him a couple of times.
	Put him on, put him on, he falls off his bike.
	As he falls off his bike, I've then got back in the car, we've left, I've gone back to the Muslim fella's house.
	I'm like, bruv, man, so you ain't gonna leave what just happened.
	I said, what?
	And then you see blue sirens all outside.
	Oh, man.
	I said, I just punched some bloke up in the car park.
	He spat in my face, called me racist.
	I mean, there's the reality of actually what happened.
	And the funny thing about all of this is that, of course, you have the socialist laborites all debating whether or not Tommy Robinson is now based for them, which is funny.
	That's why I'm saying that he joins the Labor Party, because that whole discussion underneath was not just the check marks, but also a bunch of them being like, brother speaks a good point, including the Muslims.
	But then there's his version of events of how things happened.
	And I believe he said all that before the verdict even broke.
	So there's that as well.
	And, well, instead of reporting the facts, here you have the response, as we have from the guy who runs Hope Not Hate, for example, who has a hard-on for him, just saying he came there and he vilified the process and the Muslim community in Barrow, realizing she lied.
	Lenin then tried to toe back, pretending he never believed her, but he can't undo what he did, providing no evidence.
	That he did anything.
	The article that he's linked to is the same article that we were looking at earlier, which doesn't seem to mention him at all.
	No.
	And we have the reporting at the time from the Guardian that he wasn't there doing what you're saying he's doing, so unless you have footage of that, which you haven't posted anywhere...
	Mysteriously.
	You're just like, wow, this happened.
	It came to me in a dream.
	Yeah, this was revealed to me in a dream.
	Yeah, there's also some local journo who's whining about this as well.
	He's just like, I've never heard such rubbish in my life.
	You weren't saying this when you were barking your racist nonsense through a megaphone and demanding I explain myself.
	Were you, Robinson?
	And I have evidence of what you said and did at the time.
	So I asked her to give me the evidence.
	Along with everyone else in the thread.
	It was just like, you got any?
	You post it?
	It's a good question.
	You send us, I don't know, the audio file.
	Anything.
	Nothing as of yet.
	Maybe something will come out that shows that indeed he was down there, I don't know, calling for lynchings or something as the bad man that he is YouTube.
	Of course, we disavow him entirely.
	I mean, if he was there doing such a thing, I'm sure there would be probably at least an hour's worth of footage just from people filming it on their phones.
	Or just at least one Guardian article that's like, bad man calls for bad thing, time to censor him.
	Hopefully with a link to footage of him doing such a thing or admitting to doing such a thing.
	No, she doesn't have any...
	Nick doesn't have any...
	I don't know who does.
	Maybe it's out there somewhere.
	Maybe it's on VHS. Maybe that's why it's hard to find or something.
	It was recorded on an old-ass VHS recorder or something.
	Whatever.
	The only footage I have seen from this period is from him himself, which is filmed on...
	What was this?
	The 31st of May 2020, so in the middle of the process before it had come out that maybe she's lying about this.
	This is what he had to say at the time.
	Let's play that clip.
	When I got to Barrow, I realised that there's...
	I've met now two other men.
	None of them are Muslim.
	They're not connected.
	And they've both faced rape allegations which have been proven unfounded by Ellie Williams.
	So that is what Ellie Williams faces court trial for.
	Now, it's not...
	I have no doubt, I'm 100% certain that there is a grooming gang operating in this town.
	But why do we have to be so careful?
	I've met in Barrow other families, not Ellie, I've met other families.
	I've sat with their mums and their dads as they've broke down and cried in their lounges.
	Cried about what's happened to their children in this town.
	Cried about what's been ignored.
	But the reason why we have to tread so carefully, my entire career has been about bringing justice for the victims of sexual exploitation at the hands of Muslim gangs.
	If Ellie Williams has falsely accused multiple, five, separate men of rape allegations, and we go full steam ahead, and the whole country does, as many celebrities are, Rachel Riley, many celebrities are now backing the Justice for Ellie campaign.
	If it's proven, if there's a risk, and this is all I care about is future victims, I'm not saying Ellie Williams is not a victim.
	I'm not making my judgement.
	I'm simply giving you the information to enable you to make yours.
	If there's a risk that it was proven that Ellie Williams had falsely accused men of rape and was doing it again, do you know how damaging that would be to future victims of rape to come forward?
	People will continually say, oh what, like in Barrow?
	No, I don't know about you, but that does not sound like what is being described.
	No, it sounds quite reasonable.
	Quite a sensible position to take right there.
	Sensible centrist.
	I've got to get that meme on my head.
	That's the footage.
	There's the video footage, the evidence, and the opposing evidence that has been said to exist doesn't currently exist in the public domain or anywhere else that I could find it, so...
	What am I to do except present the evidence I can find?
	So there you have that.
	And this is the problem.
	This is exactly the problem.
	Because if you go to the next one here, this is the reason I decided to do this segment, is the bad man is back.
	Tell a friend.
	As you see here.
	He's back on Twitter.
	He's not being deleted.
	Wait, what's that binaries posted right under it, John?
	Just scroll down for me.
	Knock, knock.
	Happy New Year!
	Anyway, but that's the ultimate thing about this story that makes me interested.
	The reason he was banned officially from Twitter.com was because he made up...
	Sorry, no, he didn't make them up.
	He tweeted, So Quilliam did their own research, found a statistic, he said this is a statistic from Quilliam, and the guys at Twitter went, banned.
	And he's been banned for years as a result of that.
	Correct me if I'm wrong, Quilliam also run and organised by Majid Nawaz?
	Yeah, and a bunch of Muslims.
	Not a bunch of anti-Muslim bigots, as the SPLC tried to label them, which they're not.
	Anyway, unofficially, the reason he's banned, and we all know it, is so he can't make responses.
	Because, think about it.
	Like, let's go to Bo Cohen 1, for example.
	People seem to like when I mention channels I like, but there we are, there's another one.
	If I made a bunch of lies about Bo Cohen, just say, you know, he's this, he's that, he believes this and that, and then I managed to lobby YouTube and Twitter and Facebook to get him banned from everywhere so he can't respond, Not only is that great, because now everyone just believes my side of the story and here's no ability to respond.
	I can just continue making stuff up and he can't respond.
	And that's exactly what was attempted, I think, in those two previous examples.
	Well, we see what happens when he's back.
	All of a sudden, the accusations of him just being mindlessly anti-Muslim fade away when he posts things and Muslims come out in force going, brother's got a good point.
	Or just, he was in Barrow doing this, that, and then he's there like, no, I wasn't.
	Here's the video evidence.
	Like, that's the tactic.
	That's the entire thing here, which is, how do I censor the guy not only from being there so he can't respond to the lies I've already said, but then the future lies?
	And that's what seems to have happened with Robinson, and now he's back, which I must say is a hell of an advancement for free speech.
	I mean, to have people back, not just him, but many others on Twitter, being able to respond to things that are said about them, is so good.
	It's such a basic thing, but I forgot how valuable it was in the absence.
	and now it's back I'm so glad who's this guy?
	Boko M1 is his stuff good?
	it's gaming youtube I highly recommend oh alright sorry guys throat's a bit sore alright let's go to the video comments on the subject of Prince Harry not playing enough crusader kings to understand monarchy I find myself a little skeptical of the claims that he has the best selling nonfiction novel
	I'm wondering if there's some third-party interference, like with Black Panther, where schools were buying tickets for every student, or NGOs were buying tickets to give to inner-city children.
	Kind of drives up the numbers that way.
	Probably be libraries in this case.
	Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if it's just the shop's purchases of the book so they can put them on sale at retail being included in those figures.
	That wouldn't surprise me at all.
	Comment for Connor.
	Sadly, much of what we are seeing in the comic book industry are indeed people's fetishes.
	What you see here are the 22 stats from the fanfiction site Archive of Our Own.
	The color code here shows the relationship status of the fix.
	Green for general, blue for male on male, pink for female on female, and purple for straight.
	As you can see, the fanfiction site is dominated by homoromance, and I guarantee you, most of these are written and consumed by women.
	It's a fetish, dude.
	It's a fetish.
	I'm sorry, it's full of homo-romo!
	Your accent is delightful.
	When you say things unexpected, like fetishes, it just sounds funny, especially.
	You are absolutely right, though.
	I mean, Pregnant Joker.
	Pregnant Joker.
	That's a fetish.
	There's that meme of the writer's barely disguised fetish.
	They're not even barely disguising anymore.
	No, just the writer's out-and-out fetish.
	She is also right about the overwhelming women who are like, I want to see man-on-man stuff.
	She's like, yep, yep, that's a thing.
	That weirds me out.
	Really?
	Yeah.
	Do you not like lesbians?
	Refrain from commenting.
	Did you ever see, I think it was, I might have mentioned it before, but Clarkson's view on lesbians.
	What was his view on them?
	Like, I love lesbians.
	I watch all their films.
	That's a good one to be fair.
	Hogwarts Legacy Marketing.
	So Omar Awad says: "This is why gamers won Gamergate, a relentless mockery.
	It's crowdsourced trolling the human AI you can't lobotomize.
	If you screech whatever Sounds like a laugh.
	You have nothing.
	All we need to do is take out our protest mirror and show everyone how miserable these people are while the lads are having a good time.
	That is true that it's the best form of fighting, in my opinion.
	It's the most successful in political terms.
	But I don't think the gamers won Game of Game.
	I think the SJWs definitely won.
	Yeah, I was going to say, I don't know how much I agree that gamers won.
	I don't think I wasn't even winning that.
	Because I'm pretty sure that a lot of the people that they were rallying against now occupy good positions in video game companies and get to spread their influence, which isn't good.
	Yeah.
	What's ZQ? What's she up to nowadays?
	ZQ? Oh, Zoe Quinn.
	Yeah.
	I didn't check her.
	I think she's...
	She's still making terrible games?
	I think she does OnlyFans or something.
	Oh, God!
	No, no, no.
	It's Twitch.
	Twitch.
	Sorry, I got this mixed up.
	Oh, okay.
	Not a Y. They're kind of similar?
	I mean...
	Yeah, if you're on Twitch and you're a woman, you're probably whoring yourself out in some way or another.
	Did you see the guy on Twitch?
	Remember when it was really bad?
	Like, women were basically just...
	Well, I think it's still bad.
	They're just wearing nothing.
	Being like, I'm playing video games, but the camera takes off the screen.
	I've seen the screenshots of, like, the hot tub streams that some of them do.
	Sorry, I've just noticed that in 2018...
	Oh, no, 2017, Quinn identified as non-cisgender, and her preferred pronouns were they, them...
	I'm shocked.
	No, I know.
	Interesting how it's always cultural, not genetic.
	I'm not a whore anymore, guys, because I'm not a woman.
	Let's just say I love how I'm born this way, but it only happens in culture that people absorb this stuff.
	Never in genetics.
	No, not once.
	I get the high rates of transgenderism all over the country, just in certain circles.
	But anyway, there was a guy on Twitch who did a response video, sort of, where he started his own Twitch channel and then was just like, oh guys, can you see?
	Can you see?
	Look at my cat!
	And then started like, oh, dropped my pen and turned around and showed off his ass.
	Just for that stream of a minute of taking the piss, he was banned.
	Oh!
	Hypersexualization, they said.
	There wasn't even any skin on stream.
	It was just some guy taking the piss.
	Justin B says, My concern with the reaction to Hogwarts trolls is that they have the companies figured this out.
	I.e.
	are they deliberately poking woke in order to draw a controversy so that the anti-woke buy-in to own the tards?
	It happens a lot.
	For example, the Dr.
	Seuss books were cancelled and most of his books were on the bestseller list.
	This might happen with some companies, and maybe it's happening in this case, but either way, it's not really my business.
	Like, if you want to throw money at something, okay?
	I mean, even if you want to just be like, the funny me-me?
	I mean, we like the stocks, was the thing, so...
	I'm sorry, I've just seen the next comment from Baron Von Warhawk.
	Yeah, we're not reading that.
	Can we read a few?
	Okay, well, I'll try...
	Go on, go on.
	I'll trust your judgement.
	Go on.
	Yeah, we could do them all.
	Why not?
	Yeah, yeah, go on.
	Harry Potter and the LGBT plus stone made in the Middle East.
	Harry Potter and the Chamber of...
	No.
	Harry Potter and the Prisoner of...
	No.
	Harry Potter and the Goblet of Racism.
	Do I drink from it and become more racist?
	What happens?
	You put your name in the goblet.
	Does it choose who's most racist?
	I would love to see that in the office.
	No.
	Harry Potter and the Order of the Nuts.
	No.
	Harry Potter and the Pure Blood Prince.
	No.
	Harry Potter and the Deathly Transitioner.
	There are a lot of comparisons.
	Yeah, that's what all the discussions are, and discussions form are quite fun about.
	I mean, George...
	Sorry, not George.
	Sorry, Baron, you should write some of those as just fiction, because I think you've got a talent for naming conventions right there.
	Come on.
	I'm not sure that would be published.
	Anyways...
	I'd read it.
	Zenshan says, buying this game is evil, so you might join Sirius Black.
	Well, he was the hero.
	These morons are just showing off that they've never read the damn books.
	Unless there's a troll, which is also entirely possible.
	Yeah, it certainly is.
	Shake Silver says, Harry Potter is a very interesting vector for the culture war, despite all the fervour of the permanently online activists over J.K. Rowling's opinions.
	They can't really attack the content itself, which continues to be popular with the normies who don't really care about this abstract fight.
	Yeah, there's also the other aspect.
	I did see a legitimate comment about the Ukrainian language transfer, where someone was like, no, it's actually huge in Ukraine.
	It was the first language that was transferred into the original books, just because there's huge love for Harry Potter there.
	As a series, it really appeals to kids.
	But there's the point that if you...
	What was I saying?
	Oh yeah, it's still hugely popular.
	So even with the trans controversies, you'll call it, this is only a thing in the Anglosphere, and only a thing within the Anglosphere among a very small minority, and only within the cities.
	And in which case...
	These books are in every language on Earth.
	You go into a random souvenir store for British things, in Bath for example, you'll find a Harry Potter store just full of Harry Potter crap merch for 10 quid each.
	In Oxford as well.
	I'm pretty sure I've seen some really strange translations like the traditional Hebrew translation of Harry Potter, stuff like that.
	But the souvenir store in London, you half expect London's going to have some Harry Potter stuff, but even a provincial place or somewhere out of the way, but there's some tourism, there'll be people selling Harry Potter stuff, because you'll have Chinese couples, whatever, turning up, buying Harry Potter ones and stuff for their kids.
	I mean, you can go anywhere.
	But my point being, do any of those people, the tourists, who turn up, the Chinese, the Ukrainians, and so forth, do you think any of them give a crap about the Anglosphere debate on transgenderism?
	I mean, they'll probably just point and laugh at us for it.
	Yeah, they're still buying the merch.
	They're still buying the game.
	It's also just hilarious to think that they could win on a global scale.
	The argument.
	I remember I was told a story.
	This fella, he'd served in Afghanistan with the American military, and he was saying about they had a transgender specialist turn up one day in a rural village, and they had the Afghan National Army, and they were trying to prepare them beforehand because they knew this was going to be a bit weird.
	So this person was specialized in presenting...
	Okay, guys, there's this weird thing that the West has been doing No, no, no, these guys are just soldiers, but they have some guy coming, and they're like, alright, they're going to find it weird.
	So they're like, this guy's coming, a bit strange, this thing in the West, they're trying to describe it.
	Anyway, the transgender soldier turns up, he's some specialist, and who cares?
	And the Afghan National Army, he said, just turn and look, and we're just like...
	They just didn't get it.
	So, yeah.
	XYNZ says, I don't even have a console or a rig, but I might just buy a copy for It Feels Good, Man.
	Yeah, I did see a lot of people seem to be doing that, because again, it's not out.
	Once again, I'm genuinely interested in playing.
	It looks like it might be a decent game, so I'll see what the reviews are at first.
	Mainly reviews from not like Kotaku or anywhere like that, or Steam even.
	Reviews from people I trust, and then judge from there.
	Alright, so on the WHO world order, Robert Longshore says, when did anybody in this country, or any other country, vote for regulations to be written and implemented by organizations outside of the state they live in?
	That's the fun part!
	You didn't!
	And you don't have to!
	Because these organizations just suck up all sovereignty of the nations that get involved in the first place, and it's for your own good.
	It used to be for the good of human rights, global human rights, now it's for the good of global equity.
	Free Will 2112 says, They're Blairite globalists.
	They're absolutely for it.
	Rishi Sunak was parachuted in as the advocate for this kind of thing.
	Rishi Sunak's all for digital IDs.
	He's all for digital currencies.
	He wants us to be under the thumb of big globalist government for the rest of our lives and for the rest of human history, so they're absolutely for it.
	Kevin Fox says, how long after they win the next election before the Labour Party used this document to ban the sale of cigarettes and tobacco in the UK? Yeah, potential health risk, right?
	They have already put forward the idea that they want to ban smoking.
	This BS will give them the authority.
	Yeah.
	Omar Awad.
	The Who will save everyone, no matter how many of you have to die in the process.
	It's a sacrifice they're willing to make.
	Yeah, I always think of that.
	You've not watched The Suicide Squad, have you?
	Yeah.
	Oh, the one with John Cena in it.
	And Idris Elba.
	When they're on the island.
	No.
	Have you watched the first one with Will Smith?
	Yeah.
	Okay, in the second one, John Cena is in it, and he plays a character called Peacemaker, and he has a great line at one point where he just says, I love peace, and I don't care how many women or children I have to kill to get it.
	And that's the way the global elites see it.
	They see it as consequentialist thinking, our ends are all means necessary.
	You're more on the money than you think.
	News today broke.
	Oh no.
	The Council of Europe agrees on further support for the European Peace Facility.
	Yep.
	The Peace Facility is providing measures to support the Ukrainian armed forces and set up its own army to fight the Russians in case of war.
	A peace facility.
	This is the endless war for peace that we will be embroiled in, because as long as there are bad things happening elsewhere in the world that some twat bureaucrat can say is not peaceful, then we have to go to war to implement peace, which the Afghanistanians showed they definitely wanted, didn't they?
	It's not new either, though.
	It's like, you know, the Ministry of War is called the Ministry of Defence now.
	It's just like, just stop.
	Have you ever watched Dr.
	Strangelove?
	There's a line in that where it's all of the bureaucrats and the technoglobalist elites just arguing around the table and one of them pushes one of the other and he goes, Gentlemen, gentlemen, we can't fight in here!
	It's the war room!
	Just the irony of the whole thing.
	Once again, carte blanche.
	They can just do what they want.
	David Fisher, for your safety, is a well-trodden path to tyranny.
	That it is.
	AZ Desert Rat said they don't want to censor, they want to control.
	Yes.
	He's left a few other ones.
	Governing body, nope, nope, nope.
	Not for the USA. The USA has been facilitating this for decades.
	What the F? Since when did countries have rights?
	Since when did the WHO make decisions?
	This is far out of the purpose of the WHO. That's absolutely true.
	Well put.
	Let's carry on.
	Well, who is identified as one, yeah.
	Ironically, those Richard Spencer that identify themselves as alt-right are now lefty CNN commentators.
	They still are.
	What is he doing, though?
	I've not seen him on CNN that much.
	I don't know.
	I know that despite the fact that Carl and so many others were banned on Twitter for ages, Richard Spencer had his account there the whole time.
	Let's see what he's up to.
	I think David Duke still has it.
	Or is he banned?
	Of course he does.
	Oh, no, but Richard...
	Oh, no, no.
	Thank God.
	He's still got his checkmark.
	I was worried for a second there.
	He doesn't even have to pay for us, does he?
	Should I follow...
	No.
	Recently, his pinned tweet is from January 11th.
	Set a reminder for my upcoming space on Does God Exist?
	That's tomorrow at 2am, so we can still catch it later on today.
	Edgy content.
	It's like being back at early YouTube.
	He's mainly just retweeting things.
	Anyway, Bald Eagle says, Maybe this is the reason why the men aren't trying to protect women and they are assaulted in public anymore.
	one of the things I find interesting about that I haven't gone through all the evidence yet one of the white guys who was accused not the Muslim guy, she accused the Muslim guys and some white guys, the only person who spent any time in prison, even though they were all falsely accused and there was no evidence, is the white guy I knew that was going to be the case yeah, and the situation with her, I don't know if it's me too there is a bit of a conspiracy about it and I'm not unsympathetic to that conspiracy because this was the one case in all of British history where all of a sudden establishment figures were able to jump on board
	as Robinson mentioned earlier like a bunch of celebrities were like this is terrible, we need to do something and there were MPs tweeting about it, it's like you guys never say anything about any of these cases But this one, which is a lie, you jumped on?
	Yeah, it felt very astroturfed.
	Weird.
	Weird things.
	Anyway.
	Angel Brain says, My take on Tommy, I work brutal working class jobs, work hard, no chance of promotion, and we are getting outnumbered by foreign workers.
	All my superiors are either Polish, Latvia or Russian.
	We are now getting loads of workers from the Philippines and South Africa.
	Due to Brexit, they have to recruit via Dubai.
	Harder to get people from the EU. All of us in my workplace are literally seeing the local population getting totally outnumbered by people from other parts of the country.
	Globe really breaks your morale knowing the hard work won't cut it anymore because you'll have to get promoted because your effing Polish isn't good enough.
	Yes, I'm angry.
	Doesn't mean I'm wrong.
	No, you're entirely correct.
	Sorry to hear you're in that situation.
	It's entirely common as well.
	That's the bad thing.
	I do find it darkly hilarious that the elites just seem to think that there is the global citizen as if if you import all of these foreigners to run the jobs that they're not going to prefer the people coming from their countries or cultures more like their own.
	Well, you've now got to compete, not just with everyone in this country, but everyone in the globe.
	Not only on hard work and competence, but on price point.
	And you really think you're going to work, sorry, you're going to be able to compete on price point with a Filipino slave?
	Yeah, especially when your boss is also, like, Filipino or from around that area.
	It's like, are you kidding me?
	Really annoying me.
	Like, the Polish shops here, a bunch of the workers still only speak Polish, and I'm just like, are you kidding me?
	The Polish community in Swindon's been here since the Second World War.
	You were complaining about this earlier.
	They've been here since the Second World War, the Polish community.
	70 years.
	You'd think they could take some time.
	Yeah, anyway.
	Fresh out of time.
	So, if you'd like more from us, come back on Monday, 1 o'clock.
	Thank you and goodbye.
	You did it, boys!
	You did it!
	Alright, thank you very much.
	See you soon.

▲