Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 2, 2022 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:16

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #515

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 2nd of November 2022.
	I'm joined by Connor.
	Hello.
	And today we're going to be talking about the fact that affirmative action's death is live, destroying leftist media with facts and logic, and our innocent invaders who didn't do nothing.
	Trust me.
	Anyway, just something to mention first.
	So firstly, the second birthday moment submissions end tonight at midnight.
	So if you want to submit stuff for that, then that's the deadline.
	Otherwise, some other announcements.
	First thing being, there is a freemium gift today, of course, day 22 of the campaign.
	This is the book club Jonathan Heights the Righteous Mind, so do go and check that out.
	It'll be today at 3.30.
	That's live.
	Free at 3.30.
	Free at 3.30.
	Anyway, also, tomorrow we have another freemium live hangout, which will be Are There Big Cats in the UK? Which continues our journey into Carl telling me that things exist that don't exist.
	Anyway, moving on.
	Trans women are women.
	Let's move into the death of affirmative action.
	So Affirmative Action's death is going to be televised live for all of us to enjoy, and I thought we would, because why not?
	And I'll mention first, just a little shill, of course, being the book club, being Frank McCullough's The Tragedy of Liberation, because the whole point of The Tragedy of Liberation was, let's make equality our entire worldview.
	We will lift up our people over their people, because that's equality, trust me.
	Let me guess, the results of millions of deaths?
	Yeah, it did.
	Socialist definitions are just hell.
	And so the socialist definition of, well, what's going on in American universities, of equality, trust me, which is that we're going to give places to black and Latino students over Asian and white students because that's equality, trust me.
	So it's very big brain stuff.
	I think we'll check out the defences of all of this, because the argument is pretty simple.
	I don't think there's many people who are actually convinced that racial discrimination against whites and Asians is a good thing.
	You would think so among the general population, but not in the BBC, MI5, any American university.
	Well, there are some elites who decided to come out and protest.
	Their elite privileges should be continued.
	Funny that.
	We'll start off with this lady here.
	She says, the feeling of the Supreme Court is electric this morning.
	No matter what happens in these cases, our diversity is inescapable.
	Hashtag affirm diversity, diversity matters.
	Hashtag Harvard, blah, blah, blah.
	And if you scroll down, we can see it's some elite protesters turning up to demand so that their privileges on the basis of race continue forever, all time, because their diversity is inescapable, which sounds like a threat.
	God forbid they lose their aristocracy.
	Yeah.
	Go to the next one here.
	We have the NAACP who have decided to nuke themselves.
	There's any credibility they had left.
	They've decided that, no, actually, racism good.
	Why is racism good?
	Racism is good for us.
	The National Association of Advancement of Coloured People.
	Turns out the advancement was not along equal lines to anyone else.
	It was above everyone else.
	No, so they're just parroting the Bull Connor position that we're set up to oppose.
	They're actually going to be like, yes, segregation today in Ferrara, but for us.
	This is a really weird argument, this one here.
	This is probably the worst one I saw.
	Today, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case that's being mentioned.
	Two cases involving affirmative action without race-conscious admissions, is what they're calling it.
	Racial discrimination in favor of black and Latinos over whites and Asians.
	Students will be deprived of the educational benefits of diversity.
	I have seen Tim Paul repeatedly say, when they say our democracy, they mean a multicultural, multiracial democracy, which is erasing the constitutional republic.
	So this is another symptom of totally antithetical American worldviews.
	Sure, multiracial democracy means nothing to any liberal.
	It's not what the hell you're talking about.
	No, it's democracy.
	But no, instead, it is on the basis of race we will run our societies.
	But the more important point for me, though, is that they argue that if we don't have black and Latino people who shouldn't be there on campus, then what will happen?
	Well, the educational benefits of diversity won't be given to the white and Asian kids, as if people with brown skin are some kind of training wheels for white people.
	Yeah, it's also, the educational benefits of diversity also give us black-only dorms, black-only common rooms, and if you enter them in the library, we will scream at you on TikTok.
	Sure, sure.
	But ironically, the NAACP is arguing that black people are actually only there for you to learn about, as if they're specimens or something.
	Yeah, like it's a zoo.
	So you can get used to diversity.
	You won't get the educational benefits of diversity because you're around black people, so.
	That's a really awful argument of all people to make at the NAACP. Okay, radio, they continue with this line of thought.
	Here's the next link.
	Notice that white is the only ethnicity there not capitalized as well.
	No, they also don't do that.
	But it's just the...
	Again, the idea being that the race is the solely important thing here and we must interact with each other.
	But those filthy whites, not equal to the rest of us, as you correctly point out with the capitalization of all things.
	The next one here, we also have Latino Justice, which again, not justice.
	I don't know if I have it in here, but there's that famous quote that leftists always used to use, which is, what is it?
	To people of privilege, equality feels like oppression.
	Yeah.
	It's like, yeah, these people feel like they're being oppressed because they're being asked, how about you live amongst the rest of us instead of above us?
	But they respond, there is no way we will win this fight if we do not do it as a team.
	Hashtag a firm diversity event in DC ahead of the oral arguments of affirmative action.
	Our diversity is our greatest strength in this country.
	Arguing that those of diversity against those of non-diversity, non-diversity now includes Asians, beauty of the modern age, need to unionize together to fight this.
	I'm just bored of this regurgitated axiom of faith, of our diversity is the greatest strength in this country.
	Really, that's interesting.
	Then why were all of the systems which you are currently appealing to within the Supreme Court, all the constitutional statutes and that, written and passed by a rather homogenous ethnic and religious group?
	Sure, the arguing on the basis that race determines the outcomes is ridiculous.
	Yeah, it's stupid, yeah.
	It's the funniness here of them unironically saying that we actually are in a race war.
	This is their position.
	They are unionizing on the basis of race, these race warriors here, and they are going to fight for their privileges in court.
	That is unironically the way they are arguing their position.
	Cool.
	I just come out and say it, finally.
	Like, okay, fine.
	Yeah, this is literally how you operate your thinking.
	Which is that you're in a race war against all those who you need to be lesser.
	If we move on, we have more from them.
	Again, normal thinking.
	Black North Californians fight hard for desegregation.
	Racial integration is a part of the McKinsey family legacy.
	We won't go back, Floyd says.
	This is one of the plaintiffs.
	The thing is, that doesn't make any sense.
	Hmm.
	Because you're actually arguing for, well, privileges.
	It was directly against all of the civil rights movement in the 60s.
	So, huh, okay.
	Except maybe if you just see that as a road to privileges, which I think these people do, which is why they see the world through a race-war lens.
	If we continue, there's even more of this.
	Sorry to dwell on it, but I love the people who have come out to try and defend this, because it's such an easy argument.
	No one is going to be convinced by any of this who is normal.
	Or shouldn't we have black people just getting special privileges for being black?
	Yeah, no.
	No, thank you.
	I'm not a madman.
	No.
	Someone else continues this as a lawyer who presumably is a diversity hire.
	Right now we are walking into the Supreme Court where one of our lawyers will argue in defence of race-conscious college admissions.
	Again with the lying.
	Racist.
	College admissions.
	They also say race doesn't matter.
	Nonsense.
	If race matters when people seek jobs, interact with the police or use the internet, facing discrimination and bias in every realm of life, why shouldn't race matter for inclusion in the admissions?
	They're saying race shouldn't So if you abolish racial considerations from college admissions, then that means that any discrimination becomes the moral onus of the individual, and then you can complain about that on an individual level.
	But you don't want to give up your special privileges.
	No, literally, he says race does matter.
	It matters in all cases, he says.
	Maybe not crime statistics, etc.
	for this guy.
	He's not interested in that one.
	But just in the places that might benefit him personally, which is amazing.
	We'll move on to the next thing here.
	We are the co-authors of the Amicus Brief, signed by 1,240 social scientists supporting diversity and race-conscious admissions.
	So we have here the race scientists who have turned up to defend racism.
	That's also really gross that they've just got, like, the few Asian protesters there, and been like, hey, my token Asians, would you like to support discrimination against everyone else?
	Well, even yourself.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Like, these Asian, I presume parents here, are actually demanding racial discrimination against their own kids?
	Yeah, against their own daughter.
	That's pretty disgusting.
	It's unbelievably gross?
	Yeah.
	Do you know about the Jews for Hitler movement?
	No, I haven't heard about that, no.
	There's a really funny movement at the start of National Socialism.
	There were Jews who used to go to Hitler's rallies and chant down with us.
	There weren't very many in number.
	No, and they tragically diminished over time, I'm sure.
	Yeah, they soon realised he wasn't kidding.
	So there's that, but also, it happens occasionally.
	You get people who unironically argue for their own oppression, which is weird.
	Well, look at Hope Not Hate, staffed almost entirely by supposedly straight white men.
	Yeah, there's that.
	If we go to the next one here, we can see Asian Americans standing up, saying they will not be tools for white supremacy.
	They will instead be tools for, well, diversity supremacy.
	You'll be tools for Asian academic excellence eradication, I suppose.
	Unironically, your kids are going to have to score, I think it's like 200 extra points on the SATs.
	I thought it was like 400 when we last looked at it.
	It was something ridiculous.
	I think it was even compared to whites or blacks.
	Oh, yeah.
	It gets even more mad as that.
	If we move on, why do you think any of those people are there?
	They're being paid.
	Yeah, of course they're being bussed in.
	Harvard pays students to go to the rally in DC. This person posts...
	Well, Harvard University itself?
	Yes.
	The one that's being implicated in...
	in in the case right so the the university that's being sued for racial discrimination is paying its students to turn up in their defense to try and give a veneer that oh yeah there's a grassroots movement to defend diversity diversity is strength but it's actually the university paying for lobbyists effectively in the form of their students and teachers right and when journalists have been arrested outside courthouses for disclosing details of the case this is not a conflict of interest in any way, shape or form? -
	No, it's also just obvious corruption.
	Yeah.
	Like, kind of comical.
	Like, all those groups we just saw, yeah, they're literally being paid.
	As you can see here, bars, hotels, buffets all provided for these people to turn up and screech about how Harvard didn't do nothing.
	But they did, because we got the black and white documents where they tell us that they're very proud of discriminating against white and Asians.
	It also shows how insincere it is, because they're just doing it for the free lunch and the networking event.
	Yeah, well, it's a good free lunch.
	Anyway, but we'll go to the last one here.
	This is the only other group that was there.
	Funnily enough, I'm not getting free lunches from the people being sued.
	This is equal rights for all.
	Pretty horrible group, far right.
	They want to oppress nobody, which is horrible.
	I can't believe they would do such a thing.
	Instead, what they should be asking is to oppress white and Asian people.
	Yeah, no.
	It's a group here who turned up to defend the idea that maybe the best person for the university position should get the university position, not the best black for the university position.
	That seems like a bit of a weird...
	Yeah, because that's a great name and great framing by those activists, but I could immediately, as soon as you read it out, I can just hear the rattling of leftist angst against it when it's completely non-objectionable, unless you're a racist.
	Like, ironically, good luck trying to frame this debate in any other terms than the obvious, which is that Harvard stands for racism, and they think that's cool because they're doing it for black people, and then there's a bunch of people who are like, yeah, I quite like being privileged.
	I'd like to keep my lord and lady status in society for my race.
	It's my proper tear.
	Yeah.
	But then we'll go to the legal case itself, because that's all funny and that's outside.
	The legal case is somehow even funnier.
	So we have some clips from the thing.
	The whole thing is still going on, and I'm sure there'll be more out of this, which I'll enjoy, but we'll enjoy what has been published since.
	So we have Greg here who's doing a great job of cutting it up.
	There's one lawyer who's trying to defend racial discrimination against whites, and he's describing what he's doing, and he uses the term Latinx in the middle of it, because of course he does.
	So let's have a look at that.
	Let's play the first one.
	Environment, right?
	That's right.
	And the evidence also bears it out at Petition Appendix 78, where the evidence showed that hundreds of white students with lower combined GPAs and SAT scores We're admitted ahead of higher performing black students,
	Latinx students, who went to UNC. And I think that bears the hallmark of the type of individualized consideration that this court wanted.
	Thank you, council.
	I don't know if you've seen the memes, where it's like, Latino people when you call them a slur, and they're just laughing.
	Latino people when you call them Latinx.
	Yeah.
	Gustavo Fring.
	I don't know if you know much about the US's grading system, but obviously GTA and SAT are two separate.
	I suppose we'll be corrected by any of our American viewers, but is it possible that they had a slightly lower GPA and when you combine the scores they're lower, but then the later score which actually secures your college admission was a lot higher than expected?
	It's like getting a low GCC predicted grade and getting a star in the exam.
	Is that possible why they were admitted?
	I'm not sure about that specific conversation point there, but quite frankly, I'm not really willing to humour an individual who's openly saying I should have less rights.
	I mean, that is his job as the lawyer in this case, but still, go to hell.
	I'm not even going to have this conversation with you because my rights aren't up for debate.
	It's as simple as that.
	We have someone else who decided to come in and tell us that the entire US military actually depends on diversity, and if there were no diversity hires in the US military, the whole thing would collapse.
	Right.
	Yeah, I remember watching American Sniper and him doing blackface every time he wanted to secure a kill.
	Fantastic.
	Because if he wasn't black, he wouldn't be able to do it.
	No.
	Unironically, this is the argument being given here from someone.
	It's just incredible.
	Let's play this one.
	That truth is vitally important to our nation's military.
	Our armed forces know from hard experience that when we do not have a diverse officer corps that is broadly reflective of a diverse fighting force, our strength and cohesion and military readiness suffer.
	So it is a critical national security imperative to attain diversity within the officer corps.
	And at present, it's not possible to achieve that diversity without race-conscious admissions, including at the nation's service academies.
	The military experience confirms what this Court recognized in Grutter, that in a society where race unfortunately still matters in countless ways, achieving diversity can sometimes require conscious acts by our leading educational institutions.
	the court's precedents strike a careful balance it's just unbelievable if you're finding a little bit difficult to listen to the commie speak what she's saying there is that well the u.s military is actually most operational when it has a diverse range of people with different skin tones competence is not as important as that which is why you need race conscious admissions in the academy as she says which means we will hire the big the best black for the job
	not the best person for the job because we're interested in people on the basis of their race alone and therefore we will look at the black applicants and only pick one from there Anyone else can go to hell.
	That's the race-conscious admissions part, she says.
	Well, when we were talking a moment ago about how this is a very centralised elite aristocracy and their particular pet ideology, I looked up Elizabeth Preleger, who is the woman just talking there for audio listeners, and she has absolutely no service record.
	Shock.
	So again, different branches of government are being dictated to by Washington bureaucrats who have never stepped outside their law office.
	But I just, again, no knowledge, but also on the face of it, Obviously it doesn't make any sense.
	Yep.
	Why would the military, because there are more people of different skin tones, be more effective at its job?
	Wouldn't a more competent military be more effective at its job?
	So you'd look for competence rather than race, obviously.
	I don't know.
	There were two black snipers in Washington that had a great accuracy rate.
	You know what's funny about the Taliban?
	Yep.
	Not very diverse, it turns out.
	No, you're right.
	No, but they were very ingenious.
	Unfortunately so.
	Actually won the war.
	Yeah.
	Thanks, Joe Biden.
	Strange, isn't it?
	Anyway, we'll move on from that.
	We'll go to Diversity Hire, the judge herself, who's sitting in the court case as Diversity Hiring becomes illegal.
	I will never not find that funny.
	I make no apologies.
	Isn't it ironic?
	But she decides to argue that, well...
	What if a child was born in 2004?
	It's about the year you'd have to be born to be at college now.
	Yeah, when segregation was still on, yeah.
	Yeah, yeah, well, no, no, no, not even segregation.
	Any child born in 2004 is actually held back by slavery, Connor.
	There's a reason she's called the diversity hire judge.
	She really tried.
	It's a bit too long, the clip, so we're only playing the last bit, but the setup is that she says, well, there's a white family and a black family applying for a college job, and the white family could say, you know, we've been going to this college for generations.
	This sounds like the start of a joke.
	The black family would have never been allowed to go to this university because slavery, a hundred and something odd years ago, which totally stopped this kid in 2004.
	But let's play her argument.
	The second applicant says, I'm from North Carolina.
	My family's been in this area for generations, since before the Civil War, but they were slaves and never had a chance to attend this venerable institution.
	As an African American, I now have that opportunity, and given my family background, it's important to me to attend this university.
	I want to honor my family legacy.
	By going to this school.
	Now, as I understand your no-race-conscious admissions rule, these two applicants would have a dramatically different opportunity to tell their family stories and to have them count.
	The first applicant would be able to have his family background considered and valued by the institution as part of its consideration of whether or not to admit him, while the second one wouldn't be able to because his story is in many ways bound up with his race and with the race of his ancestors.
	So I want to know Based on how your rule would likely play out in scenarios like that, why?
	Excluding consideration of race in a situation in which the person is not saying that his race is something that has impacted him in a negative way.
	He just wants to have it honored, just like the other person has their personal background family story honored.
	Why is telling him no not an equal protection violation?
	Because he wasn't enslaved.
	Yeah, nor was his dad or granddad or great-granddad.
	You dunce.
	I love it.
	Both of the applicants, she gives, are both born in around 2004.
	But one of them can't say that his ancestors were slaves.
	That's why he's never had a record at this university.
	Hmm.
	Yes, because it's a lie.
	Yeah.
	Lie diversity hire.
	They did a breakdown of Supreme Court justices since her appointment and the amount of words they used in oral arguments and she was already the most and I can tell because she waffles on without saying anything of intelligence at all.
	There's a reason I had to cut down that clip.
	Yeah.
	I just love it.
	Like, your dad born in the 80s couldn't get in because of slavery and you can't get in because of slavery.
	You were born after 9-11.
	Yeah.
	You can't get in an American university because of slavery.
	Yeah, she really is a diversity hire in every possible way.
	Thick as concrete.
	Absolute moron.
	And then we have someone who's not, Clarence Thomas, who comes out.
	And we've been listening to all that crap.
	No one's actually defined what diversity is, have they?
	No.
	So Clarence Thomas, just as the goat he is, comes out and is like, Hang on a second, you're all speaking commie gibberish.
	Let's put this in simple terms so we can actually hear what you're saying.
	Define diversity for me.
	And as soon as you do that, the whole thing will fall apart.
	Let's play that clip.
	I've heard the word diversity quite a few times and I don't have a clue what it means.
	It seems to mean everything for everyone.
	And I'd like you first, you did give some examples in your opening remarks, but I'd like you to give us a specific definition of diversity in the context of the University of North Carolina.
	And I'd also like you to give us a clear idea of exactly what the educational benefits of diversity at the University of North Carolina would be.
	Yes, Your Honor.
	So, first, we define diversity the way this Court has in its Court's precedence, which means a broadly diverse set of criteria that extends to all different backgrounds and perspectives and not solely limited to race.
	And there's a factual finding in this record, PEDAP 113, that there are many different diversity factors that are considered as a greater factor in our admissions process than race.
	I love it.
	Direct quote, diversity means a broadly diverse criteria.
	Oh dear.
	Diversity means diversity because diversity is a strength, which is diversity because diversity means diversity.
	It's like the UN's definition of woman.
	Timeless, formless, the world.
	A trans woman is a woman because women are trans women are women.
	It's comical when you get them to get to the point.
	You're a Boris of leftist stupidity.
	Yeah, I love Clarence Thomas.
	He just brings it down to a simple thing, which is a defined diversity for me.
	And you know if they just honestly said, yeah, just not white and Asians.
	That's who we're trying to help here.
	Just not white and Asians.
	Screw those people.
	Then the whole case would be over in a minute, because we wouldn't have to live in so much commie gibberee gobbledygook.
	But we do instead.
	Anyway, that is the death of the affirmative action on the United States, and it is being televised, so we enjoy.
	Move on.
	Oh, there we go.
	Sorry, I thought you might be holding that in.
	It's alright, no.
	I'm sorry, everyone.
	I'm still losing my voice somewhat.
	It's my fault.
	There we go.
	Right.
	I should be fine.
	It's also very warm in here.
	Okay.
	So, yeah, I should be fine.
	I should be fine.
	Alright, time for a white pill.
	How about this?
	So we don't spend much time watching telly, do we?
	But it is important to check on how the dinosaur media or their channels decide to transmit to the boomers what their worldview should be.
	And I promise in this segment, we're going to be able to fact check all of the cringe that we've seen on the likes of ITV and the BBC recently, and enjoy the gradual demise of their socialist presuppositions, but also celebrate the success of our sibling networks, because they've been trying to be cancelled, but continues to because they've been trying to be cancelled, but continues to be rather successful.
	Speaking of a remoralized national vision, you can go and subscribe to the website, and also you can listen to and read this for free.
	It's free, and the audio track is recorded by its author, Beau Dade.
	It's a red pill testimony, and I decided to plug this piece just because I think it deserves a hell of a lot more attention than it's already gotten.
	And it's better than pretty much any political speech given the last 50 years.
	And it seems like the cry from the man under the boot heel of the person that's colonizing his country.
	And culturally, we're being absolutely atomized and erased, as we've seen from the recent ONS and Census Statistics.
	And I think Beau words it pretty perfectly.
	So go and enjoy that rather than the question time clips I'm about to subject you to.
	Because David Lammy was on last week.
	Our mutual favourite politician and, unfortunately, future Justice Secretary, if we're judging by the polling.
	Local man who thinks smoke is racist?
	Yeah, the Vatican, yes.
	Yeah, yeah.
	The one time I actually...
	Agreed with the current person occupying the Vatican, even though he's a disciple of Paolo Freire.
	So, one of the audience members, this was in Dulwich.
	Dulwich is a Labour stronghold, and they really packed out the audience with people that worked at the NHS. And this woman said that she had been disabled by long COVID. Obviously, our sympathies go out to her.
	And she was complaining on and on about how the Tories, of all people, have destroyed the NHS. So, sorry, we're going to have to listen to this person.
	As someone who has been left disabled by long COVID, I was completely fit and healthy before, and now my life as I knew it is unrecognisable.
	I'm not getting appointments.
	I'm not getting the help.
	My GP actually says long COVID clinics are a myth.
	What we need is multidisciplinary places where you can go, where you can get help.
	It's just not happening.
	How is it affecting you?
	I mean, at my worst, I mean, as you saw, I came in in a wheelchair.
	I'm pushing myself to do what I can, but it It's a blood disease that stops the oxygen getting around your body, which affects any or all of your organs.
	The press keeps saying it's a respiratory disease.
	In older people it tends to be more often respiratory, but in younger people it tends more often to be heart or other stuff.
	So you're seeing increased numbers of heart attacks, things like that.
	And it is so urgent.
	People are being left with no help.
	When you're alone, you don't have a carer, you don't have the help that you need, you are just stuck in bed.
	You're not able to do the things you do.
	I'm actually a founding member of a charity called Long Covid Support.
	We've been desperately trying to do what we can to help and support people where we can.
	Reading all the peer research...
	Papers that are out there trying to learn, trying to share that information, but where is the support from the experts?
	We're the ill people, and we're doing our own.
	We're being the most resilient you can be, and I have met the most resilient people I've met in my life through this.
	But we need help.
	And the constant underfunding of the NHS across the board is disgusting.
	People are dying.
	People are killing themselves because they don't want to live a disabled life.
	And that's another issue.
	The fact that disabled people are looked less than.
	You know, we're hardworking.
	We want to work.
	We want to do.
	We want to get on with our lives.
	I didn't choose to suddenly stop.
	Okay.
	Obviously tragic that her heart attacks and blood issues were caused by COVID. Definitely.
	And if we go next to David Lammy's response to this at some point in the programme, he just doubles down on this myth.
	And the reason I'm highlighting this is because I feel like time and time again we need to do our job to refute it.
	So we can listen to our favourite politician, shall we?
	It's desperate.
	Right across the NHS. You can't find an NHS dentist.
	I met a woman who's been waiting for an appointment at a bowel clinic for 18 months.
	The government's ambition is that you should see your GP within two weeks.
	We had a decade of cuts in the National Health Service.
	And now as a consequence of the black hole that they gave us, they're talking about further austerity in public services.
	The NHS is on its knees.
	Nurses are leaving because they want a less stressful life.
	They're having to take their own kids to food banks.
	It is desperate.
	And this is the sixth richest economy in the world.
	And I hope when we get that next general election, Lucy, your party will be held to account for what you've done for the National Health Service.
	I wonder why no one can see an NHS doctor for 18 months.
	Perhaps it's because you locked down the country, David.
	Might be to do with that.
	Maybe.
	Just a hint.
	All the burning of the money.
	I just can't get over it.
	The NHS is underfunded endlessly.
	We've got told this.
	I don't know if you have the broth for this segment.
	Oh, we've got some now, yeah.
	Yeah, it's not.
	What's happened is the money is wasted within the system.
	What's that graph between...
	Everyone must have seen it.
	The number of doctors in the NHS versus the number of administrators over time.
	And it's just like administrators just threw the roof.
	Doctors, no real change.
	The £70,000 a year diversity stars that get paid to take meat out of the cafeteria or paint rainbow crosswalks.
	Keep spending all this money, but no one can see a doctor.
	It's like, yeah, it's because you're not spending it on doctors.
	Yeah.
	I'm dying.
	Wait, let me wear my pride pin.
	So I'm just going to decide to fact-check the NHS budget claims because we're kind of sick of it.
	If we can just go down, John, to this graph.
	So this is the Department of Health and Social Care spending.
	It's in real time, so it's adjusted for inflation before anyone says that.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And since 2007, it's just been going up and up and up and up and up to new records every single year.
	And it hits 2020 and 2021, and it's $191 billion and $190 billion, respectively.
	A lot of that is additional cash injections for covering the costs of COVID and lockdowns.
	But then if we look to the projections for 2022 to 2025, it continues to stay at about £175 billion a year.
	So it's going to continue to rise, even if you deduct the emergency spending that was conducted because of two years of COVID. So we can go to just the next one as well.
	Some key facts and figures about the NHS. So with the UK population rounded up to about 68 million, because the 2020 ONS figures estimated 67.1 million, and we obviously know that there are probably far more than that in terms of illegal migrants or people that are just off the books, but let's be really charitable and only go up by about 1 million.
	It works out to spending about £2,941.18, a little bit of change, per person every single year.
	So that should cover the costs, particularly because lots of people are quite healthy and don't need that kind of spending.
	We're actually the second lowest for healthcare spending per capita in the OECD, but it's been 10% of our GDP as of 2019, according to The Who, prior to the budget increase of COVID, of course.
	It's still going to say Relatively the same.
	And it's remaining high relative to the decrease in GDP total per capita growth thanks to the said lockdowns that caused us to spend so much.
	So it's competitive with inflation even now.
	And as our GDP has subsided, we're technically spending more of that proportion as it goes on.
	So we are just a health service with a country attached at this point.
	As you can see with this graph, that percentage of GDP is the average for comparable countries.
	So it's about 10, and that's only going to go up considering health spending is going to go up, but our growth is going to continue to stagnate.
	And before people say it, no, stagnating growth is not a reason for increasing migration, because if we can go to the next one, that's where all the demand is coming from.
	So there were 2,082,321 visas granted in the year ending June 2022.
	So this only came out recently.
	So they're saying it's 34% fewer than the calendar year of 2019, primarily due to the pandemic.
	But that's immediately going to go back up, especially with all the trade deals.
	And that's still 2 million people plus who can, every time they come in, use the health service free from the point of use without ever paying a penny in.
	And lots of people are health tourists, and they come over here and have their kids, because it's a much nicer place to have them than lots of other countries around the world, and don't support the system whatsoever.
	I know if you come here and you're a student, you have to pay a tax.
	I think it's outside of the EU student, but that's all gone anyway.
	To pay for that, just in case, but you're essentially paying an insurance payment, which won't pay for everything you use if you do use it.
	It's a gamble.
	Do you know what the rate of tax is?
	Off the top of my head, no.
	Okay, well, I'm going to take a guess and assume that given the students, it's probably significantly less than the £2,000 per head as well.
	So, again, we're just hemorrhaging funds.
	So the idea, Mr Lammy, and disabled woman in the audience, that the NHS is chronically underfunded, no, no, no, it can just never meet demand.
	So...
	So, also affecting housing, of course, just a little branch off.
	This is the first video we actually did together.
	First video we did for the site.
	You can go and watch that in your own time, but just to summarise, we're basically building houses just for the new migrants every year because we're building less houses than there are people coming in, and the size of migrant households is significantly larger than the UK's, and we're sub-replacement birth rates, so where's all the demand coming from?
	If the native population isn't having enough kids to even replace themselves, then who's all the new houses for?
	Great question.
	Though, God forbid we reform any of this system, because if we can look at this one, the social care cap faces a delay until the election in 2024.
	Rishi Sunak's attempt to fill the financial black hole left by, oh, I wonder if it's his pandemic spending, but the NHS budget will be protected from cuts.
	And if we remember as well, there was a woman...
	As if it's never been before.
	Yeah, exactly.
	This is new.
	From the guy who was Health Secretary at the time they were accusing of all these cuts, who is now Chancellor, who is refusing to cut it.
	We have literally never cut the NHS, but don't worry, it's protected from cuts, which have never happened.
	Well, do you remember there was a woman, fairly recently, who, blithering idiot or not, said she was going to reform the system and actually get more cost-effectiveness, and they literally staged a coup to get her out.
	Yeah.
	Isn't that interesting?
	Oh well, I suppose public spending doesn't matter because we'll be swallowed by the sun monster very soon.
	If we can watch this next clip, this was also part of Question Time, and again, I feel like I just have to debunk the mainstream narratives because there are still a few scarce people watching them, so you can come here instead.
	I think it's a bit ridiculous to say that climate change is not as bad as it is because did we not all experience this summer where we got 40 degree heat?
	That's unheard of.
	And also the floods that have been happening in Pakistan, 30 million people displaced.
	Yeah, climate refugees, that's in our future, it's really immediate, and I think this summer should have shown everybody that.
	We thought maybe it's going to be in a few 30 years' time, 2050, but it's happening right now, and I think we really need to take action.
	It's called weather.
	Good on you, Julia.
	So, first of all, it's the Cali girl inflection.
	Day was warm, so we were going to die from heat.
	Climate change is when some are hot.
	I can't get over it.
	Yeah, well, in Texas, remember when it was cold?
	Not too long ago?
	Ah, no climate change.
	You're wasting my time.
	Trends are not set by single events.
	Everyone knows us at this point.
	They still do it.
	But the reason I've raised these two is because when Julia then refuted that as the only dissident rightist voice on the panel, and even then, I like Julia very much when I've been on her show, but she is very tepid on the housing issue and anything to do with American politics, so she's not quite as rightist dissident as we are.
	But when she said, oh, well, climate change isn't apocalyptic even by their own reports, I've read them.
	And also the NHS is very good at everything except saving lives, which is demonstrable by the fact that everyone's on a waiting list.
	She got booed for these observable facts, whereas Imitation Valley Girl there got a massive round of applause.
	Yeah, I'm not sure I want these people moving over to watching us.
	I think I'm quite happy with them being in their own little safe space.
	I think the viewers of Question Time would be very nice to come over and watch us, because the audience is already very much hand-picked.
	Yeah.
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, I can fix her.
	I just thought I'd refute the climate catastrophe narrative again to set you all at ease.
	So, the wonderful Bjorn Lomberg here, who's written some very good books like Cool It and Force Alarm.
	He's an economist and he's assessed the UN's goals and he found that if you decided to do the UN's policies...
	For climate change, even if we took their IPCC predictions at face value, even the worst ones, then it would be the second least cost-effective out of all 17 sustainable goals.
	And then William Nordhaus as well turned around and said, and he's a Nobel Prize-winning economist, even if you took the worst of the UN's predictions and followed all their policies, you'd do more damage by actually giving them all the money to give everything than if you just let climate change rip through the entire world and did sweeps on all.
	So, Bjorn Lundberg gives us an optimistic reading here.
	As temperatures increased over the past two decades, that has caused an extra 116,000 heat deaths every year.
	This, of course, fits the narrative of climate change and what we've heard over and over again, but it turns out that because global warming has also reduced cold waves, we now see 283,000 fewer cold deaths.
	You don't hear this, but so far, climate change has saved 166,000 lives every year.
	It also mentioned climate upsides, like the fact that more CO2 in the atmosphere has acted as a fertilizer and created a profound global greening of the planet.
	One NASA study found that over a period of 35 years, climate change added an area of the green equivalent to twice the size of the continental United States.
	Now, obviously, you can say, oh, we're concerned about soil aridity and the lack of nutrition in different crops and yaw, yaw, yaw, yaw.
	You can solve all those issues.
	Basically, human beings can adapt.
	It's not as apocalyptic as we're worried about.
	I don't really get into the climate stuff, but I am just bored.
	Yeah, I don't blame you.
	People telling you exactly what's going to happen, which will be, you know, global death is usually the narrative you get.
	And it's just painful because it's just like you don't know.
	Like you haven't considered half of the stuff that will happen in response.
	You have no idea.
	And this happens every 10 years when new data comes out.
	It's like, actually, all this other stuff that we didn't think would happen because we hadn't thought about it has happened.
	Well, that's why the term has been broadened, and we're absolutely going to get the little Wikipedia bar underneath the YouTube section of this segment.
	That's why the term's been broadened from global cooling to global warming to now the all-encompassing climate change, because they want an unforcifiable apocalyptic doomsday prediction.
	You know, change will happen?
	It's like, yeah, is that good or bad?
	Yeah, it's morally neutral, and also we can adapt to it.
	If we go to the next one, just a little bit of reporting here, just if you were worried about the worst predictions for adverse weather events, non-tectonic hurricanes, floods, droughts, etc., it turns out that even though they've apparently quadrupled since 1970, and they're forecasted to increase by about 40% by the 2050 deadline, they've decreased in lethality by 99% over 100 years.
	Because humans, funnily enough, don't stand on the shoreline and allow the water to creep up past their shins and go, oh my god, I'm drowning.
	I guess I can't do anything about it.
	Advanced notice now.
	Yeah, exactly.
	So we should be fine.
	We shouldn't collapse our economies doing it.
	I think we should be able to tackle this.
	Anyway, so if we go on to the next one, the BBC's competition also has, well, some very strange stuff they're doing with youth culture.
	This is Woo, an outlet.
	If we can just scroll down through this, John...
	A lot of these weird articles are coming up on climate change, on black identity issues, all this sort of stuff.
	If we can go to their About Us page, the outlet's run by ITV, and it says, Our purpose is to make people feel good.
	With inclusivity at the core of our business, we bring wellness to a generation that's traditionally been underserved by the industry because we believe feeling good isn't something that should be accessible to older, richer people.
	Whether you're looking for CBD... So this is ITV funding this, so all the people watching the adverts during Coronation Street are...
	Bankrolling the propaganda of your kids with stuff like this article.
	Subversive nonsense in the next tab.
	An expert explains how to make the switch to non-monogamy.
	For couples who are thinking about exploring life beyond monogamy, there is one central question.
	How to open your relationship?
	There's no right answer because every relationship is slightly different.
	A 2020 YouGov poll found that a third of adults in the US would still say their ideal relationship would be non-monogamous to some degree.
	I looked at the poll, actually, in this, and it said more than 1,300 US adults, so that's a very small sample size, found that one-third, 32%, say their ideal relationship is non-monogamous to some degree.
	Millennials, 43%, are most likely, but then also another 43% said they want to be completely monogamous.
	So it's a completely bunk article, but it's trying to sell alternative lifestyles to Gen Zers Bankrolled by a bunch of boomers watching adverts at primetime soaps to say, oh, well, aren't the LGBTQ community that are associated with non-monogamy viewing life from a marginalised lens?
	And so you can get a wider perspective by opening up your relationship.
	All this kind of nonsense.
	I really hate these polls.
	A third of people want to be monogamous.
	Real preference isn't that.
	Everyone knows it.
	You're also manufacturing consent by just soliciting these kinds of responses.
	It's not great.
	Why are a third of the people you meet not in non-monogamous relationships?
	Yeah.
	Funny.
	Yeah.
	But there's also the fact that a lot of these outlets are obviously their viewing figures are going down.
	Meanwhile, GB News, sister outlet of ours, lots of guests like Leo and Nick come frequently on our show from that outlet, and I go on there a fair bit as well.
	They're having their advertisers attacked.
	They have since launch, and they're still under duress.
	Despite that, they're being very successful.
	The professional station is finding its feet in a growing audience, but a sinister left-wing outlet called Stop Funding Hate...
	Has attempted to starve it of its advertising revenue, and it seems that many in the advertising industry are willing accomplices.
	They originally targeted the Daily Mail, but obviously the Daily Mail was established at the time, and GB News was in its infancy, so they thought it was an easier target.
	Since its launch, GB News has been criticised for spreading problematic messages about climate change and unnameable respiratory disease.
	And demonising trans people at every opportunity.
	So over the past year, Stop Funding Hate volunteers have been working to identify the GB News advertisers.
	We're now seeing very few high profile brands appearing on the channel.
	GB News Chief Executive Angelos Frangopoulos.
	I hope I'm saying that right.
	I'm definitely not.
	He's referring to the fact that since Sky News, no new actual TV outlets were set up to provide news.
	I thought we'd look at just Stop Funding Hate.
	Just stop there.
	Just stop thinking.
	A little while ago, when this happened, a bunch of Tory MPs wrote a letter to then-Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng to say, well, they're a CIC, right?
	They're a community interest company, and that means they get certain tax exemptions because they're part of the Charity Committee.
	Why do they have that when they're obviously political?
	The letter says, the 10 backbenchers said, we are concerned that since 2017 the campaign group Stop Funding Hate, based in Manchester, has been exploiting the prestige that is afforded by CIC's status and the privileged access that CICs have to grant many grants for taxpayers' money for overtly political means.
	A spokesman told Mail Online, in a free society, we all have the right to encourage brands to advertise ethically and avoid funding toxic media.
	To deny this would be to undermine basic free market principles.
	Oh, okay, so it's alright.
	Free speech when we do it.
	Sure.
	It's like the, um, you read June.
	You know, Frank Herbert is the author of that.
	There's a, there's a quote that I found a little while ago that says, when I'm weaker than you, ask for freedom because that's according to your principles.
	When I'm stronger than you, I take away your freedom because it's according to my principles.
	It's the obvious repressive tolerance deflection of just saying like, oh, well, when we want to starve you, you're advertiser.
	Oh, don't worry, bro.
	It's just free speech.
	Accountability culture.
	Definitely.
	Now, the frustrating thing is, and I know this sounds like I'm...
	Being a bit bleak, but we'll get to a positive at the end, don't worry.
	The frustrating thing is the Charity Commission decided to say, yeah, no, no, they're fine.
	There's no breach of CRC regulations and stop funding hate can maintain its status, which is obvious nonsense because, I mean, unfortunately, if the Conservatives had any testicular fortitude, they'd not only go after stop funding hate, but they'd also reform the Charity Commission.
	I had some run into the Charity Commission before as well.
	I worked for an environmental policy advisory board.
	We're telling the government, basically, you're spending loads of money on net zero.
	Please stop, because it's not going to work.
	And we were cancelled from charity commission status a couple of times for being too political when criticising Extinction Rebellion.
	But then the Marxist library have protections from the charity commission.
	So, frustrating that there's no appetite in politics to do anything about it.
	But back to the Telegraph article for some good news.
	How about this?
	Since, because GB News have been taking evasive action, the channel has appointed a new head of commercial, who will be based in Manchester, not London, right near Stop Funding Hate, funnily enough, and she's getting new ad agencies.
	Also, John Cleese will be presenting his show soon, despite initially denigrating GB News as KGB News, which is just cringe, but seems he's been one around.
	And other big names have also signed up recently, among them Michael Portillo, who's quite a nice bloke, actually, and Camilla Tomedy, who was formerly associated with the Daily Telegraph, who's now their political presenter, and she's quite good.
	Increasingly, GB News looks like a good place to make a name for yourself.
	And it is working, because rather than stopping funding hate, they're just stopping watching nonsense.
	If we look at the comparative ratings of GB News, we've got some good news about it as well.
	The daily average views have actually climbed to a steady 30k a day, and those are without the comparable budgets of their rivals like Sky, BBC, and even Talk TV to many respects, which I don't want to denigrate a network I occasionally appear on, but they do have a lot of Murdoch money.
	Their YouTube and social media engagement is also much higher than any of those channels.
	The former head of digital, Rebecca Houston, who I had a bit of a bust up with once, but it's all under the bridge, I guess, said that GB News is really a digital media business as a TV channel attached, and apparently the data says that the channel, which claims to have had 5 billion impressions across web and socials since launch, has reason to be bullish about its digital which claims to have had 5 billion impressions across web and At the start of February, it had 2.9 billion impressions, according to its own release figures, and on YouTube, GB News has more followers, 474,000, than LBC, News UK, and Times Radio.
	So, again, the dissident networks, or at least as much as GB News can get away with, the likes of Mark Stein, are doing rather well.
	And I thought I'd just finish, again, with a little white pill segment.
	Little congratulations to Lawrence Fox, because after taking over from Nigel Farage for quite a while, he's getting his own show.
	So that should be quite fun, especially as a lot of the marginal right-wing networks are coming to, not right-wing networks, right-wing parties, some more successful than others, are trying to come together to talk it out.
	And, of course, a friend of the show, Calvin Robinson, had them on his show.
	And I just thought I'd finish it off with a little thanks to everyone watching, because according to our social media manager, our analytics are all up as well.
	So this is where you can find us and follow us.
	But we currently, apparently, our alt tech reach has exceeded 100,000.
	Twitter interactions doubled in about a month.
	And our YouTube views and subscribers are all up.
	So thanks for everyone that pays for us and pays our wages and goes over to the site.
	Seems like the exodus from the current thing to alternative media, especially considering you just look outside and you get miserable about the state of things, is working.
	So moral up, lads.
	We're going to win the media war.
	Sorry, though.
	My laptop decided to die just in the middle of that.
	That's right, mate.
	No worries.
	For some reason, it's not charging.
	Let's move on to our innocent invaders who are totally innocent.
	Didn't do nothing.
	I know it's a meme, but it really is a meme.
	Yeah.
	It's true.
	I want to start off just by mentioning Carl's written a new article.
	It's called The Last Country Occupied by the British Empire.
	Can you guess?
	I actually proofread this, so I know the answer, but I'm not going to spoil it for everyone.
	Please go and watch it because it's an excellent...
	Not watch it, read it.
	It's an excellent analogy.
	Do go and check it out.
	The census data has been published for people who don't know.
	Just the data about how many foreigners live here.
	Yeah.
	Not on the ethnicity data.
	That's on the 21st, I believe.
	Yeah, but we'll just take a look at the people who aren't on that list, for one, which is the illegals, of course, because Stella Braveman decided to come out, their new home secretary for all that matters, and say something correct, which of course has caused fracas.
	How dare she?
	Why not just lie 24-7?
	Yep.
	So she said, let's start pretending that they're all refugees in distress.
	The whole country knows that is not true.
	Yeah.
	You can just go talk to them.
	If you've got a hotel in your town, like me, just go and have a word with the people there.
	Oh, what's your name?
	Get out Google Translate if you have to.
	Why are you here?
	Oh yeah, I come through Italy and then France and then I come here.
	Yep, you're not meant to be here.
	Yeah, you're like student backpackers.
	You're just an illegal alien who is begging for money.
	That's why you're here, not in Italy.
	You didn't stop at a safe country.
	The crying from the opposite benches as well when she said this, it was definitely annoying.
	Shall we take a look at some people who aren't refugees in distress?
	Let's go for it.
	Somali asylum seeker?
	Seeking asylum from what?
	Mohammed Ismail carried out a terrifying sex attack on a woman in Birmingham.
	He pushed his way into her home, molested her.
	As she fought back, she was stabbed in the throat, but was able to escape.
	He's been given two years and three months, which is a tiny sentence for what is being described there.
	It's not proportionate.
	Capital punishment needed.
	But Mohammed here was seeking asylum from...
	He's in there self.
	No reason to be here.
	Just let him in.
	Why not?
	There's also poor souls out there who we are filming as journos go down and meet the boat people.
	They tell them, why are you here?
	Why are you here?
	How long have you been in France?
	This man responded, seven years in France, five years in prison.
	But again, all of this being so organised, them all looking like they're having a jolly, they're all carrying the boat together, like collective responsibility, it looks like a bunch of students on a PGL trip, doesn't it?
	It looks like they're about to go river rafting before they go and have their buffet lunch.
	It is jolly for them.
	It's exciting, for sure, but it's all in the aid of begging.
	You know you will get more money in England, and therefore, even if you have to spend five years in prison in France, for what?
	Who knows?
	Yeah, but then you've also just had your bed and board provided to you in a prison in France from the French taxpayer as well.
	Sure, but I don't think he's actually ever been in prison for the illegal immigration.
	No, not for that, of course.
	He probably wasn't in there for shoplifting either.
	No.
	His loaf of bread because he was starving to death, the poor lad.
	Yeah.
	I think he might have been in there for someone a bit worse.
	Yeah, five years in a French prison.
	But anyway, as soon as they let him out, they didn't deport him in France, they sent him to us.
	Thanks, France.
	Cool.
	Very cool.
	And then we have the celebrity response to Suella Ravenman's comments.
	We have Adel Ray here, who decides to openly admit that, yes, indeed, they only call white ministers racist because it's a tactic, whereas they can't do it to Suella, and he's upset.
	What would be the response if a white minister had used the word invasion?
	What would some be calling him her?
	Is the feeling that a British Asian has a free pass when referring to those asylum seekers we called the National Front racist for similar language in the 70s?
	Well, it's very queerphobic of them to not consider alternative pronouns, of course.
	Sure, but Adil over here is openly admitting that yes, indeed, the only reason they call white people racist is because it works.
	They know they're not, it's because it works.
	They get away with it.
	It's entirely a tactic.
	They do not have any sincere beliefs about your racism.
	And remember who is talking?
	Someone who is actually racist, Adil.
	We'll go to the next link here.
	If we can get it up, there should be another link in there, John, if you can load it.
	Because we have the fact that, well, Adel isn't the nicest folk.
	You may remember he went on a TV program with Constantine Kissin.
	Well, it was his TV program, Adel's TV program.
	I don't know if it's the next one then, John, if it's not there, but if you can load it up.
	It's a quote from the book, from Constantine Kissin's book, which is, Constantine was there, had a debate about whether London was English, and then, I believe it's Adel.
	I mean, you can tell if it's not.
	Just tweet it.
	Was this GMB, by any chance?
	Because I remember it being the John Cleese comment, originally.
	I've been told it's him, but if it isn't, then he can just publicly say it's not, and we'll find the proof.
	Yeah, apparently he turned to Constantine and said, I'm so glad that there are no white British people in part of this debate.
	Cool.
	Cool.
	So the guy who's going to sit there and tell you about how, yeah, we need to call Swallow Braveman racist, is actually a racist, and he's just using tactics here.
	He has no consistency about any of this, other than he wants the country to be continually made non-English.
	That is something he is excited about.
	Again, back to the Frank Herbert quote, When I'm weaker than you, I ask for freedom, because that's according to your principles.
	When I'm stronger than you, I take away your freedom, because it's according to my principles.
	The next one here, we can see Femi pointing out that she called it an invasion and they all lost their minds to that.
	The next one, it calls the conservatives to come out and just pick up their dictionaries and tweet the dictionaries.
	We have here, definition of invasion, an occasion when a large number of people or things come to a place that is in an annoying and unwanted way.
	Yeah, there we are.
	Thank you, comms, for pulling out your dictionaries.
	Thing is, it's kind of annoying, and I get why you're doing it.
	It's an easy win, obviously, but the dictionary definition is right.
	You're not wrong.
	Well, we haven't changed it, subversively.
	You kind of let the debate be ripped away from the reality when we were discussing the word invasion instead of the actual invasion on the beach.
	And, of course, this is called the laws of leftist tears, which were quite funny.
	We'll enjoy that, I suppose.
	We have one Islamo-leftist who decided to come out and say, disgusted to hear Suella Braveman say there's an invasion of our southern coast just a day after a migrant detention centre was firebombed.
	Language like this, betraying migrants as invaders, whips up hate and spreads division.
	No, it's the rapes, terrorism and theft that spread division and hate.
	I can see I'm in top response there.
	Yay!
	It's just like, don't you know your words are causing this by saying it's an invasion?
	It's like, no, funnily enough, it's the invasion.
	And the actions of the invaders, which makes the British public not like them, if the invaders had turned up and were all doctors, engineers, and lawyers, and were doing charity work on the side every night to integrate the all-spoke perfect English, the king's English even, with a nice upper-class accent, there would be zero hate or division or fear of such people.
	Because why would you fear them?
	There's nothing to fear.
	The only thing you'd have to say is, alright lads, not all at once, because we don't have the sewage system to support this many people without upgrading it.
	But if there was reason to fear, that would be the reason for the fear.
	Well, I mean, it's not even like people are getting their houses broken into or anything.
	We've got a Peter Walker from The Guardian, who was also very, very hurt from these comments.
	Wait, without wishing to be a bore about the subject, a serving Home Secretary describing asylum seekers as an invasion on our southern coast and in the commons is really striking.
	It's the sort of language that a decade ago would have been perceived as on the far right.
	Yes, a decade ago, there was not an open invasion of the southern coast.
	Now there is.
	I mean, literally, 40,000 people every year are D-daying England, and you're like, well, how can you say that's happening?
	Because it is.
	Wasn't David Cameron raked over the coals at one point for saying almost exactly the same thing about the Calais border?
	And David Cameron was not at all far right.
	I don't know.
	I can't remember off the top of my head what you said.
	But it's just the fact that a decade ago you couldn't say the South of England was being D-Date every day.
	Whereas now you can because it happens.
	I actually worked out that by 2024 the rate of increase year on year of the amount of migrants that are arriving at Calais, not Calais, from Calais to Dover, is going to supersede the 64,000 British men that stormed the beaches of Normandy on D-Day.
	So by 2024, we're going to have more migrants than young Brits at D-Day.
	There are some morons who try to intellectualise this as well.
	We have one such intellectual.
	Globally, there are around 26 million refugees.
	1.4 million of them need resettlement right now.
	85% of all refugees are given sanctuary in developing regions.
	There is no invasion of the UK, idiots.
	Yeah, because the UK isn't literally as bad as Pakistan.
	But what are you moaning about?
	But also, there's a bunch of other countries on the way to us.
	You're only coming here to this isolated island because you want free money.
	But her argument is that stop complaining until we're literally in the same state as Sudan, one of the listed countries there.
	No, I don't want to lower the level to Sudan.
	Thank you very much, you brain-dead idiot.
	Quick thing, I looked it up.
	David Cameron was condemned for dehumanizing language because he called the Calais migrants a swarm in 2015.
	Stop swarming.
	Yeah.
	In the next link here, we can also see the fact that while the immigration minister decided to announce, this is a guy who works under her.
	I know, Robert Jemrick.
	I love this.
	Well, in a job like mine, he says, you choose your words very carefully, and I would never demonize people coming to this country in pursuit of a better life.
	I agree, Minister.
	It is unbelievable what some people demonise.
	Next link, please.
	Rewording that, I would also never demonise people coming into my home in pursuit of a better life.
	I was about to say the exact same thing.
	If I invade your home, Robert Jenrick, which I'm not going to do, don't worry, because your home is much nicer than mine, especially because I don't have one...
	You have a better life than me.
	What if I break in and have it?
	Yeah.
	Funnily enough, I can't get a home like yours because you keep bringing too many people into the country.
	Yeah, obviously, in case YouTube is retarded, don't commit crime.
	That's the point.
	Which is the crime bad.
	Crime into country bad.
	Also crime into Robert's house bad.
	He's got the Paul Pelosi home invader opinion.
	Whereas he's on the opinion that crime in his house bad, but crime against his country, not so bad.
	In fact, quite good.
	He is indeed the bike lock cuck of the entire nation.
	And if you wanted to take a deeper look at what's actually happening with these people, I decided to.
	We can see here, this is Serco, who have listed where all the Home Office contracts have gone.
	Turns out, this country has been divided into three thiefdoms of three companies.
	We have here the division.
	Wales and the south of England have gone to Clear Spring Ready Homes.
	We have Scotland, Northern Ireland, and North East Yorkshire and the Humberside going to Mears Group, and Serco getting the North West, Midlands, and the East of England.
	All getting divided up into little fiefdoms for these three companies to take in these hordes upon hordes of illegal aliens and help them and get paid quite the pretty penny to do so.
	Because the thing is, who is this benefiting?
	Genuinely, it's not benefiting the politicians.
	They're getting raked over the coals from the public from it.
	The local high street JD Sports, where all of these migrants go and spend all their money, apparently, judging by the amount of Nike boxes in the hotel windows down the road.
	Indeed.
	But apart from that, who's making the serious cash out of this?
	And it's the people smugglers, for one.
	They make billions every year, which, you know, okay.
	I kind of just respect the hustle at this point.
	How are you even getting away with that?
	The local councils as well, because they're paid to house them.
	But then there are these guys, who I suppose you've got to respect the hustle, because the hustle is big.
	And the most transparent group on this is in, like, they're not careful enough to try and hide it.
	They didn't want you to know this, but they just didn't hide it as well as Serco did.
	Clear Springs Ready Homes, which I'm going to take a look at, because it's also where I live in the South.
	Because we have here Serco saying that they were awarded £1.9 billion in the largest ever contract award given to them.
	Nice work if you can get it.
	This is for housing these illegals.
	This is the biggest contract circuit I've ever gotten from the government.
	As well, that was three years ago, so you can only guess that with this problem continuing, they're going to get tons more.
	That was a 10-year contract that was given to them.
	So we can imagine Clearspring are on exactly the same sort of contract, except slightly bigger.
	So I decided to call up the hotels just in Swindon, because that's where I live, and ask them, Can I have some information about the people here?
	Just, you know, backgrounds, or just have a chat, or try and interview folks.
	Can we arrange anything?
	And I suppose we'll play that, because this is how it went.
	Thank you for calling...
	Hello there.
	I was wondering if I could ask questions about the people staying in the...
	about the asylum seekers.
	I'm making a video about the influx of asylum seekers in Swindon.
	I was wondering if there was an email or someone I could ask about that.
	Um...
	Sorry, do you want to speak with me, my manager, because I can give you any information?
	Okay, sure.
	Hello, how's the hell?
	Hello, I called because I'd like to ask about the asylum seekers staying in the **** in Swindon, and...
	How can I help you?
	Hello there, sorry, I don't know if I got disconnected.
	Sorry, we can give you any information.
	Hello?
	Hello there, is this the ****?
	Yes, but we're not a ****.
	We're a private company, so we're not taking any bookends.
	That's okay.
	I just wanted to ask, I'm making a video about the asylum seekers in Swindon.
	I was wondering if I could ask any information or is there an email I could address questions to?
	No, I can't comment on that.
	Sorry.
	Is there not even an email I can ask about?
	No.
	Can I ask about the company name?
	Maybe I can contact them?
	No.
	We can't give out any information whatsoever.
	Is that company policy or government?
	It's company policy.
	Very transparent individuals.
	I love the idea that the lady there just hung up.
	Like, I got a bit transferred to the manager.
	I was like, hey, by the way, I'd like to ask about the science speakers.
	What?
	Yeah.
	It was like a skit.
	And I don't want to kiss your backside, but stuff like this is really important.
	So well done for doing it, man.
	It's really ridiculous as well.
	I know it's ridiculous.
	You could have just spoken like the other guy and be like, yeah, sorry, I can't give information, company policy or whatever.
	And the thing is, there's a reason they didn't want to talk.
	Because, well, I found the company responsible, Clearspring Homes, as mentioned earlier, and let's take a look at their record, shall we?
	Because they're public.
	Thanks for that.
	In case you're wondering and watching, the company operates 10-year contracts with the Home Office, they write in their own reports to the investors, and to provide asylum for accommodation, support and transport services in the south of England and Wales.
	The Home Office contract runs until September 2029, so presumably they're on the same contract as Circo are of about £2 billion for 10 years, which is good money.
	They used to get paid £170 million for seven years.
	In case you're wondering.
	So, revenue's gone up ten times.
	Turnover per employee in this year was £2,472,000.
	Used to be about a million pounds, turnover per employee.
	This reflects growth in the number of asylum seekers accommodated under home office contracts, they write to their investors.
	Operating profit per employee this year was £166,000.
	The previous year it was only £28,000 per employee.
	Profit.
	They're making over 150 grand per employee they employ.
	I did look up the cost of the employees.
	I don't have it in here.
	You work at Clear Springs Ready Homes.
	All of you could go on strike tomorrow and demand a tripling of your wages and the company would still make more profit.
	Can we start letting them sleep on the floor in the studio?
	The money we can make.
	Yeah, exactly.
	That's per employee, remember?
	God.
	Revenue growth while maintaining cost control is mainly responsible for this improvement.
	So that is the other scummy downside to this, which is that you don't actually have to provide very good food.
	You don't have to provide quite many staff at the hotel, because it's a skeleton crew, unlike a for-profit hotel.
	So you really provide the bare bones and rake it in.
	Yeah, you just put a couple of token security guards outside that don't really do anything to stop incoming or going.
	What are they going to do about it?
	Yeah.
	The frustrating thing is I tweeted about the census statistics that you put me onto, and immediately I had all the libertarian think tanks coming after me and going, oh, I guess we'll just send all of our great workers home then.
	This is what we're complaining about.
	This specifically.
	Demand for asylum accommodation, they write, is driven by the arrival of asylum applicants in the UK, and the number of arrivals per year is expected to continue at a high level for the foreseeable future.
	They write to their own investors in 2022.
	That was in January.
	So, no matter what the government say, let's check out what the people profiting off this are saying to their investors, because that's the reality.
	That's where these things matter.
	Which is that this crisis is going to go on for as long as the foreseeable future, and thank you, British government, right, Clearsprings, because, oh my god, we are raking in the cash.
	They are doing incredibly well off of this.
	There are perverse incentives at work here that keep the problem just afloat.
	Don't worry, they've got real concerns, though.
	They've worked with people to make sure this is the best possible outcome.
	Oh, great.
	Local authorities are always consulted extensively on the location and operation of accommodation to ensure and promote harmonious integration of the company's service users, the illegal aliens, with the wider community.
	That's not happened.
	I can tell you right now.
	No one was in the middle of town in Swindon.
	Definitely on Linton on News, everyone was consulted there.
	The company's employees are also encouraged to use greener forms of transport where possible.
	Are you trying to push me to limit on the company's no swearing rule, Callum?
	This is just unbearably annoying.
	I love that.
	As they brag to you, they're destroying the country for profit.
	They're like, by the way, we...
	But we cycle to work.
	They don't.
	You'll see the cars, they're petrol, but whatever.
	Anyway, we'll move to the next link here because we also have just the data from the Home Office.
	If you click on the left image there, this is just the Home Office for this year, just releasing how much they spend.
	The highlighted part is asylum costs alone for the Home Office, 1.5 billion per year.
	Cool.
	So that money of, you know, 2 billion contract to Clear Springs, 2 billion to Serco, 2 billion to the MERS group, presumably, is probably way higher.
	You don't get that amount of money.
	What is that, 6 billion over 10 years?
	That's no.
	They're spending, well, about 15 billion over 10 years?
	So it's double.
	It's double.
	They're in for a double paycheck on top of what they're already reporting as profit.
	Speaking of profits...
	Profits for this year, after tax, £28 million for Clear Springs, running the hotels on the south.
	Last year it was £4 million and a half.
	Yeah, that's...
	Profits are up, what is that, five times?
	Seven, isn't it?
	Something like that?
	Dear God.
	Cool.
	Feels good to be there.
	Dividends for people are £28 million.
	Just giving all that back to dividends.
	Presumably to the directors.
	The directors also pay themselves £200,000.
	Because, you know, it's a great deal for the taxpayer.
	If we go to the next link here, I just want to compare this to the past as well.
	Specifically for this group.
	The guy who runs it, and still does, he used to pay himself £1 million in salary from the contracts he got from the UK government.
	This was in 2016.
	This was revealed.
	And this was a scandal from one person, and now it's everywhere.
	Every town, every city, every single company.
	But now he pays himself 230 grand, so he's got to suffer on that.
	But he does get the dividends, and the dividends are, for everyone, £28 million.
	So I'm sure he's really struggling like the rest of us.
	He really feels the damage this is doing to our country.
	Anyway, the company received most of its income back in 2016 from the £130 million seven-year contract from the Home Office.
	Remember, it's now $2 billion for 10 years, which isn't real, because if the Home Office is spending $1.5 billion, it's probably $4 billion for 10 years.
	So their revenue is more than 10 times what it used to be.
	They're the only people profiting from this.
	Them and the people smugglers.
	I don't know who else.
	If you want to let me know if someone else is profiting from this, do let me know.
	Because I can't figure it out.
	Everything's getting more expensive for the rest of us.
	And if this didn't profit for some people in society, this would be stopped tomorrow.
	This doesn't profit any group in Hungary.
	No.
	The government would not permit the kind of spending to these kind of companies to make this profit, in which case it doesn't happen.
	Why am I working to pay for this?
	This is the near quarter of my paycheck that gets skimmed off every single month is going to house some economic chancer who's probably been in prison.
	Yeah, they are.
	What a wonderful society we live in.
	We have the next one here.
	Because we're actually in the wrong.
	Oh.
	Get lost.
	Some do-gooders.
	They're not do-gooders.
	It's some...
	Traitors?
	I don't know what the right word is.
	Seditionists.
	I don't know what's wrong with these people.
	Fifth column.
	They call themselves SOAS to Taney Support.
	They turned up at a detention center and started shouting with megaphones, asking people where they're from.
	They shouted back, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Sudan.
	None of these being any of our neighboring countries.
	No.
	Funnily enough.
	So none of these people have any right to be here unless they came direct through one of the approved schemes.
	I highly doubt it's a significant percentage.
	We go to the next one.
	Who are these people doing this?
	Oh, look what they want.
	No borders, no nations, stop deportations.
	Cool.
	The thing is, they're actually achieving their goal.
	We barely have a border.
	Our nation is literally disintegrating, and we don't deport.
	So, these guys over here are actually achieving their political goals with zero elected power.
	Cool.
	What do they think of what's happening to these people?
	In fact, they're being given all this free stuff.
	They think the hotel's on high enough quality, I guarantee it.
	It's the Holocaust.
	It's that far.
	We go to the next one here.
	This is a concentration camp.
	They write, the children's cries for freedom and we need your help are a haunting indictment of the barbaric British border regime.
	Bro, you came here.
	Yeah.
	We want freedom!
	What you mean?
	Please go elsewhere.
	You're allowed to leave.
	Voluntary deportations are a thing.
	It's like Stella Creasy screaming at Suella Braveman in the Commons questions.
	Hysterically, with everything scripted.
	One, it's just your NPC tracked, where you're manufacturing emotional outrage.
	And two, she was literally saying, oh, these hotels aren't good enough, where Suella Braveman was going, okay, here's one four-star, here's one five-star, here's this...
	They're getting better treatment than any of the veterans who are homeless and on the streets.
	Oh yeah, I mean, there's that hotel there, one of the ones I spoke about.
	100 metres from there, there's another beggar, and he's a druggie.
	He's a beggar, and he sleeps rough every night.
	He has infinitely more right than some beggar from France.
	That's just what these people are.
	Too bad, though.
	And we're not witnessing the only group that have decided this is the Holocaust.
	We also have the journos, the people in Westminster with their verified checkmarks, the lord and ladies of Twitter.
	Suddenly it all feels a bit 1938, writes one man.
	Ha ha ha.
	Aren't I right, guys?
	You have no idea.
	You've never been to these people and spoke to them, have you?
	You just sit in your ivory tower in London.
	Because indeed, it is just like the Holocaust, actually.
	If you go to the next link here, we can see an artist rendition of the Holocaust as it really happened, which is the...
	and stay out.
	Next time, brother, we'll get into Auschwitz.
	That is genuinely what these stupid morons think.
	And we'll end it off with something that if it hasn't annoyed you enough already, this suddenly will.
	Our favourite LBC host decided to come out and join in with the conversation.
	Dear Suella Braverman, this is what the invaders built in Seville.
	Wish you were here, Sanjita.
	What we're looking at is a mosque built by the Muslim invaders of Spain.
	Yeah.
	That had to be forcibly removed by war to reclaim Spain and the reconquister.
	And she's bragging that this is what's happening to England.
	She's saying that this will happen to England as well, and it's a good thing.
	I don't know what else heard this tweet is.
	There's an apocryphal story about Spanish tapas and tradition.
	The reason they give you chorizo and red wine is to determine whether or not you are Muslim.
	And it is hundreds of years old because they were concerned about the invaders re-entering simply because they did so many rapes and murders and they destroyed so many cultural artefacts of the native Spanish.
	It's like, right, okay, yeah, it's not...
	Sorry, Sanjitha is like, well, that's exactly like the boat people.
	Yeah, of course.
	I guess the mask is off.
	And she's like, well, that's a good thing.
	That's her message from all that.
	I'm so angry, I'm despairing.
	Like, I just hate it.
	I hate it.
	There's a reason I'm on suicide watch.
	I'm joking.
	Don't do it.
	It's just the madness of what we're looking at.
	I don't know if we can scroll down, because John mentioned earlier.
	There's actually a response in here, because someone says, you know, well, isn't this horrible?
	Why would you want this to happen to the UK? And, uh, yeah, there we are.
	I think it's that one.
	Which, uh, the invaders also killed many of the native population, but hey, nice slave-built buildings.
	She responds, oh, just like the British did then.
	I didn't do anything.
	Stop ruining my life.
	No, this is revenge that you need to suffer, which is that the Sea People are just like the Moorish invaders for Spain, and what will happen to us is deserved because of what the British did in the past.
	Thank you, Sanjita.
	Truly leading Britain's conversation.
	I suppose, actually, I've just seen, yeah, you have the Hong Kong refugee camps as well.
	Yeah.
	This is how the rest of the world actually deals with refugees.
	And you know what?
	If you want to talk about actual refugees, we do have a debt to the Hong Kongers because we abandoned them in 1997 and now their entire country has been subsumed.
	So a few Hong Kongers, until the Chinese can be rescinded and they can go back and resettle in the country they'd quite like to go back to, I'm okay with that.
	Well, we're doing that.
	Yeah, I know, yeah.
	So we're taking, what is it, 200,000 asylum seekers is the pure number given.
	And a huge percentage of that, not even half, but a huge number of it, are British passport holders.
	Yeah, I'm totally fine with that if we didn't have two million visas a year and a million stayers and loads of Chinese students.
	Every one of those boat people takes up a space for Hong Kong.
	Yeah.
	These people are not fleeing anything and the people fleeing communism are being put at the back of the queue because of those.
	Cool.
	Let's go to the video comments.
	I was just wondering if Connor notices that all of these leg-bit horror stories about being driven out by their families always seem to have the exact same story beats and it never seems to involve non-Protestant religions.
	I can't help but wonder if this is all just fakery, because it's not like anyone's gonna basically try and fact check these people.
	I also wonder how many of these stories of them being attacked is more because they're getting up to criminal mischief rather than them actually being gay.
	Yeah, well, there was the thing I said about the Jeffrey Dahmer series coverage of, there was a guy who wrote in Unheard, oh yeah, gay bars haven't had their Me Too movement.
	And they said it's because there's a lot of drug taking, a lot of drinking, and a lot of promiscuous sex, and you kind of just have to get groped.
	And if you didn't want it, then you just got to take it as part and parcel of the courting ritual.
	And it's like, right, is there a culture here that allows really dark predators to operate?
	Yeah.
	Maybe.
	And then the idea that, oh yeah, every religious parent's just super intolerant.
	I mean, I've been reading articles on leftist prohibitions against quote, no, not November.
	And they're saying, oh, you're only against porn because you're Catholic.
	And it's like, well, yeah, sure.
	But...
	Well, they have got you to rights on that.
	The anti-pawn thing came before the Catholicism, in my defence, and we've got contemplations coming out about that this Saturday.
	But it's like, it's just the oldest trope in the book.
	Meanwhile, shall we examine the Islamic world's perspective on the gays and pornography?
	Is it just that it's kafar and they can kind of do what they want?
	Or, hmm, suspicious.
	Anyway, I suppose the next one.
	Growing up in the 1980s UK, there were some local eccentrics who dressed funnily or spoke peculiarly.
	These days, eccentrics push further, but my parents and their friends always taught tolerance and a certain acceptance.
	Might the line the current-day activists overstep be defined by a word we don't hear so much?
	Nuisance.
	The tolerance I was taught was always clearly bounded by not being a nuisance.
	Also, gender as a spectrum is like comparing the visible spectrum to the electromagnetic.
	If gender is a spectrum, it is a tiny fraction of a scale fundamentally split on non-ionising and ionising, the extremes of which are certain, and activist's supposed uncertainty is confined to a tiny area.
	You're saying gender is a spectrum just erases personality, and ironically, the less conformist you are, the less personality you have.
	Interesting points about the nuisance, though.
	I'm going to start using that term more.
	Yeah, well, it's like they've erased the particularities of different regional cultures, like the pearly kings and queens of Cockney, London, and instead they've just got this, what do they call it, globo homo, where it's just the unanimity of rainbows everywhere.
	Yeah, great, cheers.
	Tony D and Little Joe with another Lotus Eater white pill from the Good News Network.
	Delicious cancer breakthrough pomegranates found to significantly fuel tumor-fighting immune cells.
	It's a substance in pomegranates known as urolithin A. It rejuvenates immune T cells and it's good that you eat the pomegranates, drink the juice, but doctors are now doing clinical trials to treat patients with colon cancer.
	Good news.
	Then I have to eat fruit.
	Yeah, but you don't die of cancer.
	The risk I'm willing to take.
	Okay.
	I did love the idea that you go to the hospital and you get found with intestinal cancer and the dude just brings out those pomegranates.
	It's like that meme with the bowl full of eggs.
	I don't know if you've ever seen that.
	No.
	There's just this story about this guy, this Japanese girl, and they had her in her house.
	She woke up and she was like, where am I? He's got a bowl full of eggs.
	It's just like, you have to eat these.
	Anyway.
	You could attract a woman with a slice of cheese.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Well, I guess this is what you call an early morning video before I'm headed for work.
	The Danish election is over and it looks like we are kind of having a Brazil situation where I think the left wing won with a razor-thin margin, so that kind of sucks.
	But again, it's a razor-thin margin, so we have some very base people who are going to be in Congress.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	I think Cole might be covering the Brazilian election tomorrow with very careful wording, considering I'm sure it's just as safe and secure as 2020.
	Hmm.
	Suspicious.
	I don't follow Brazilian politics, but I can tell something about that.
	Yeah, I don't really.
	I just think South American country is probably corrupt.
	Well, the only province he did win is where all the corruption is.
	Yeah.
	Carl actually said that when they took it to the Brazilian equivalent of the Supreme Court, it was a bunch of Luca, Luna, whatever his name is, appointees, and his ex-lawyers, and they said, oh yeah, no standing.
	Oh, okay, right.
	You don't want to examine you.
	The guy whose payroll you were on for ages, that makes sense.
	Yeah, would you?
	Good point.
	Well, on the comments, Captain Charlie the Beagle says, Connor, on a completely different note, you talk about the state of the Catholic Church, which, as a member of, I am starting to agree to.
	Have you heard of the Trinidites?
	Tridentines.
	There we go.
	They celebrate the Mass in Latin, and I think they reject the Vatican II. Open to correction.
	I actually haven't.
	You're welcome to tweet me something at it, at con underscore Tomlinson.
	I just sort of take my nan to church on a Sunday and then do all of my biblical investigation in my own private time.
	But the frustration with the Pope, I mean, first of all, he was a disciple of Paolo Freire, as was Klaus Schwab, and then he's just recently done a deal with the Chinese, like the actual Vatican City have done a deal with the Chinese government.
	Like, right, okay, you're just a communist, aren't you?
	Fantastic.
	I'm never going to get over how Christians end up becoming communists.
	No, well, see...
	You know nothing about what happens.
	No, but it's like the gaze of Palestine.
	I don't argue philosophy.
	I just like the de facto realities.
	I'm just like, what are you doing?
	I don't know where this ends.
	It's because it's very low resolution, though I am going to...
	I think I'm going to subject Carl to it, because we mentioned it a little while ago, of a hangout of, was Jesus a socialist?
	And just go through all the verses in the Gospel.
	It's like, yeah, if you envy another person's property, you will perish in the fires of Gehenna.
	And Gehenna was an actual physical place, not just wait until hell.
	Sure, but I don't want to even get into more philosophy because it's just a practical basis.
	Yeah, sure.
	Gaze for Palestine.
	I know why there's philosophical reasons for people, but you look at them and you know you're going to die.
	Yeah.
	I'm not even going to argue philosophy with you about the oppressed global blah, blah, blah, blah.
	You are dead if you go there and you know that.
	Count Dayton, did the Romans have a diversity quota for its offices and ranks?
	Did the Greeks, Alexander the Great, Xerxes, Belisarius, the Crusaders, all the Muslims...
	No.
	Well, they did try saying Centurions were black, didn't they?
	Was it you that covered that yesterday?
	Yes, that was it.
	Why should the family background be of any relevance to a university admission?
	It shouldn't, really.
	The argument given was that in some personal statements, people were like, oh, well, my dad went here, my granddad, and I want to be part of that lineage.
	But frankly, I never understood the argument, nor do I think it matters.
	Yeah, but I think it's a uniquely American thing because they don't have that older country, and so it's like in Gatsby when they talk about the American aristocracy.
	Because we don't really do it here.
	No, we don't.
	My uncle, for example, he's the only other person in my family to go to university, and he went to Goldsmiths to study media, and now he digs gardens for a living.
	So he didn't really apply it very much.
	He didn't write to Goldsmiths being like, well, I have a long family here.
	Yeah, no, no.
	Funnily enough, he didn't.
	But the Americans would like anything to establish themselves as an aristocracy and act as if they don't have a country younger than most of our pubs.
	And that's not to dunk on our American viewers.
	It's just an interesting observation.
	But you also have such a different aristocracy than the old world.
	I don't know why you're trying to imitate the old world.
	Yeah, exactly.
	You guys have your Pelosi's and Clinton's, etc.
	It's different.
	That's why propositional nations do have their problems.
	That base chick says, as someone who is actually in the military, forcing diversity into the military does nothing but create division within the ranks.
	The more the military pushes die incentives, the less I want to interact with members of the celebrated minority classes, specifically because I don't want to put myself in a position where I end up standing in front of an IG trying to salvage my career because I said and did something offensive.
	Yes, you shot lots of terrorists, but did you do a microaggression?
	This happens, I think it's in one of the Battlefield games, there's a female character.
	It's just like, you have a problem with me because I'm a woman.
	And he goes, no, I have a problem with goddamn liars!
	It's like a, what was it, Call of Duty, was it Vanguard, the one that was the World War II one?
	Where they had black female Nazis because of the character customizer.
	It's unbelievably stupid.
	It made the Nazis stronger.
	Diversity is the right strength.
	There were actually quite a few black Nazis.
	Oh, well they allied in the Middle East with all of the, um, what would now be Palestine, didn't they?
	Yeah, yeah, but it's just, um, there are the occasional minority Nazi and you can find the old foes.
	Like, the Mike Nationalists tried to occasionally shout and be like, look, they were inclusive, and it's like, they weren't.
	No.
	Like, don't be stupid.
	But it's just funny how occasionally you do find that in history, but it's like one guy out of 10 million.
	Yeah.
	SupremeDuck says, I like how hard the pendulum has been swinging.
	Twitter is taken by a non-woke person.
	Schools are in court for the diversity BS. Yeah, it is change.
	It does feel dispiriting sometimes, constantly covering this stuff, but it's only because of the constant pressure of, I hope, us and parallel outlets have been exerting that inspires people who are already in the institutions to change something.
	It's like, yeah, well, if we let up the relentless pressure just because we're bored or tired, they're not going to stop, so we kind of have to just keep going.
	All the American armies depend upon diversity.
	If we don't have enough women, gays and people of colour, our strength will plummet.
	Therefore, we need racist policies to ensure that our troops can continue to fight, because race policies make us stronger and better fighters.
	Then why did you lose in Afghanistan, my lady?
	Why did you lose in Afghanistan?
	Well, actually, I'm suddenly in favour of sending a bunch of leftists to the front line.
	Do you remember those fucking...
	I've got one in my house, actually.
	The gender inclusivity training folder I found in the trash in Afghanistan.
	Yeah, it makes you stronger.
	It's in the trash.
	The Taliban put it in the goddamn trash.
	Michael...
	Sorry.
	Michael over here.
	The masters at seeing everything through a racial lens were the Nazis.
	Indeed they were.
	Lord Narva, thanks for the white pull on affirmative action, lads.
	Make the beneficiaries of discrimination answer for their privilege, as is such a common sentiment in this day's and age.
	Turning to their own rhetoric back on them is usually the most effective cudgel I find.
	Next band of Trunk Kids.
	I will mention, I did see Lauren Southern's video recently.
	It was kind of old.
	But she made a video talking about the fact that her career does kind of depend on her being a woman, and she hates it.
	That's one of the reasons she hates feminism, is that she now knows at any given point that actually, yes, part of the reason you are so successful, Lauren Southern, is because you are a woman.
	If you were another white man, you wouldn't have been invited to these panels, these events.
	And she just lays it all out.
	You can see her kind of just deflated, like, I'm going to put myself in the doghouse for this comment, but my missus occasionally goes on telly and she says some slightly based opinions which she may or may not have inherited from me over time.
	And even she recognises, oh yeah, I get certain bookings because I'm a nice pretty young girl.
	And I'm like, yeah.
	So even media itself, even dissident right media, still has the diversity quota mindset occasionally.
	Just lucky that she goes on there and says some base stuff.
	Yeah.
	It's frustrating, yeah.
	Even for the diversity hire, it's not fun.
	No.
	We'll go to the leftist media.
	Free Will.
	I imagine Stop Funding Hate are a vitriolic ultra-left organisation who don't tolerate any heresy against the leftist viewpoint.
	A kind of gentler form of social cancellation.
	Yeah, on their About Us page, they literally have screenshots of the Holocaust.
	And they're just comparing GB News to Holocaust denial.
	It's like, right.
	Yeah.
	No, you've never met any of their hosts, have you?
	But yeah, Tom Harwood, arch Holocaust denier.
	Yes, but you can play a lot of Nintendo Switch.
	Yeah, there is a slight concern.
	If you broaden the tent too much, the pegs start to collapse, because I don't think I want the patriotic, principled position to become a refugee camp from people that have been cancelled.
	I'm all for forgiveness, but I don't want to broaden out the movement too much.
	It's like, obviously Dave Rubin's show is all about conversations, right?
	Have you seen his recent thing on Daily Wire of Jordan Peterson talking about his new family?
	No.
	Right.
	It is very...
	I'm going to actually not win any friends with this.
	It's very dystopian because he has used his sister as a surrogate for his husband's sperm and they've freeze-dried lots of other women's breast milk in their garage.
	And it's like, right, I don't think that's that compatible with some of the other more conservative perspectives on our side of the aisle to the point of where lots of conservative women are saying that surrogacy sounds like womb-renting.
	If you don't gatekeep a little bit, you are going to have these massive contradictions that are going to derail the movement.
	It's like when we were talking about the LGB alliance.
	I don't think so.
	Because you have to remember, this is not, these alliances specifically, just describing what the theatre is in the United States of the political divide.
	It's not about ideological positions at this point for the right.
	It's about survival.
	And that's why the 10th is so large and includes so many left refugees trying to just, you know, not be their lives destroyed.
	So do you not think we're going to...
	If and when we win, hoping when, do you not think there's going to be a sort of mass ousting and that's going to create a new backlash against the more conservative order?
	Does that make sense?
	Well, all politics is division.
	So there's this huge tent in America, I think there's a very small tent of leftists, and these two tents are fighting over power, and if the small tent of leftists finally becomes irrelevant...
	Then, yeah, the large tent that remains will split, as politics always should and does, and then there'll be more debates to be had.
	Until then, I don't think it's right to describe this as some kind of fracture point.
	I really don't think it is.
	Yeah, we're never going to reach an end of history, but I just don't think it's...
	You don't want to spend too much of your time infighting.
	That's my only concern.
	Lord Nerevar, the NHS is overwhelmed.
	Fund it more.
	Money is wasted.
	The NHS is overwhelmed.
	Anyone else think there might be a better solution?
	Yeah, just slightly.
	Grant Gibson.
	The NHS should be considered much differently from a national insurance scheme.
	Well, they literally call it national insurance.
	You need young people to pay into the system while they're healthy and the population pyramid to have a broader base at the top.
	No thank you.
	If you bring in a 40-year-old doctor or engineer, you've missed taxing them 20 years of earnings with essentially no cost to the system.
	Then within a few years, they start to need management for the hypertension and their net drain on the system which continues for the rest of their life.
	Or we could have a privately funded system that isn't like the American one where they bollocksed up the insurance system in the 30s by tying it to employment and raise premiums so much.
	And you could tax people less so they could keep more of their savings throughout the rest of their life and have less government control in the economy so inflation wouldn't kick in.
	And when you actually need medical treatment sporadically, because not many people do all the time, you can afford it.
	Rather than just taxing me to death all throughout my life?
	For someone else to have a kid over in this country then bugger off somewhere else?
	That'd be preferable.
	Your second segment.
	Sure.
	So Sophie says, when the country goes bankrupt, they'll probably just leave.
	Then they'll have to flee England.
	Forever a refugee.
	Yeah, this is actually one of the endpoints in which this stops, which is that England just becomes undesirable for them.
	And this is something I realised when speaking to a man from Northern Ireland.
	And he explained to me how Northern Ireland used to be very Irish and Unionist and Catholic and all that jazz, and now is not.
	And increasingly...
	Woke as shit?
	No.
	Increasingly, as he put it, English, and that meant Birmingham.
	Right, okay.
	And he was like, yeah, I'm not raising my girl here.
	We're leaving.
	Yeah.
	It's like the average Bradford man that went over to the Texas synagogue.
	Yeah, the Bradford men are turning up in Northern Ireland, and it didn't used to be that way because Northern Ireland was not a place you would go to if you were a foreigner, because why would you?
	Give me my potatoes, bro!
	Well, no, that's the self.
	But it's more about the poverty and the violence.
	And if there's poverty and violence again, then they won't be there.
	Because they're not interested in any ties.
	They're interested in money.
	Supreme Duck stabbed in her throat.
	That's attempted murder, burglary, and sexual assault.
	Two years.
	WTF. But here's a poor Somali refugee.
	I can't believe you would say it, Mr Duck.
	don't care Steve Hayduck says just wait till Western elites have their own exodus to enclaves to third-world countries look at the number of Americans moving to Mexico City yeah that is funny as well but the Mexicans will probably end up Serbian them God, it's really frustrating.
	I really don't want to read any more comments on that one, and we're out of time anyway, because it just makes me mad.
	Census is out.
	Go and have a look at the census.
	Just the foreigner's numbers, because it's all we can talk about in the office, because we're all bombshelled by it.
	By the way, we'll be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock.

▲