All Episodes
Previous Next
June 24, 2022 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
01:29:18
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #422
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus E-Tus for the 24th of June 2022.
I'm joined by Carl.
Hello.
And today we're going to be talking about Stop Being Racist to Gary Lineker.
Poor, poor brown man.
The leftist race war fantasy and how women can get dates.
So presumably another dad sermon is coming up.
How women, not even can get dates, how they can get a man.
Alrighty, otherwise, some things to mention first.
Hey look, I'm married.
I've got my wife's experience to learn from.
Okay, but to first mention, just the Gold Tier Zoom call that we'll be doing today at 3.30 UK time.
So if you're a Gold Tier member, do come and join, of course.
We should just hang out, take questions.
We do a, what is it, a five-minute?
Five-minute limit.
Limit between each individual, because then try and maximize going through people and questions.
So come and join us for that.
Otherwise, just going to mention, almost done for the notes for Douglas Murray's The War on the West Book Club.
I know some people like reading along for some reason, so if you want to, go and do that, because we'll be filming it probably sometime next week, and then it'll be out.
So, we'll find out.
Otherwise, let's get into being racist to Gary Lineker.
Well, we have to actually request that people stop being racist to Gary Lineker, the famous footballer and football pundit and insufferable woke scold on social media.
Notoriously a white man.
No, breaking news, Gary Lineker is actually black.
Huh.
Is he doing a Rachel Dolezal?
No, well, no, not even a Rachel Dolezal.
He's always been black.
As far as he's concerned.
Anyway, before we go into the rise and fall of this once great footballer, if you want to support us, you can go over to loadseas.com and enjoy the rise and fall of Oasis.
Apparently a once great band, according to Thomas, but I don't agree with him on that.
But they talk about how Oasis is a genre-defining band, and it's a very interesting listen.
Anyway, so Gary Lineker, as you may know if you're older, was a famous footballer, but if you were younger, you may only know him as a commentator who is insufferably woke on social media.
That appears to be what he is.
The refugee man.
I have loads of refugees living in my loft.
They don't.
Well, that was actually what the criticism was.
He was, in 2020, he was insufferably virtue signaling over the channel immigrants, so people breaking into our country.
He was like, oh, we should take them, we should take them.
And so a Conservative MP was like, well, how many are you taking?
Well, none, obviously.
NIMBY, obviously.
You know, he's got a massive mansion.
He's paid like £1.7 million a year by the BBC. He's the highest paid BBC commentator.
He's like, oh, those poor refugees.
It's like, well, Gary, I think you can actually afford to build them a block of houses.
You know, a block of flats.
You could afford to put them up.
Get a big barn.
Insulate it.
Put, you know, beds in there on your giant, you know, thousand acre estate.
Or just build a refugee camp.
Yeah.
Of course, with all the money you have, you could make it as humane as you want as well.
Yeah.
And imagine the kudos you'd get on social media if you were like, I'm funding this.
I mean, I would be like, okay, great, Gary.
Well done.
Like, bravo!
That's actually doing something good.
Instead, you're just virtue signaling, aren't you?
And so obviously, you know, Lee Anderson, who was an MP for Ashfield, was like, yeah, try taking them in your own home, which he didn't.
But then he continued complaining.
It's like, well, this is affecting Britain's global reputation, don't you know?
A xenophobic, a small xenophobic minority that somehow becomes so powerful and influential.
Imagine that.
Imagine that there was a small xenophobic minority of racists in this country who managed to influence government policy.
No, Gary, this is the majority opinion that these illegal foreigners should go home.
That's the majority opinion of the country.
By far, in fact.
But anyway, of course, in 2020...
So obviously the right opinion.
Yeah, exactly.
In 2020, he was supporting Black Lives Matter, obviously, insufferably, tweeting about Black Lives Matter and trying to make a joke about it, which is even more funny, because the joke got him chewed out by the leftists.
So Gary, what made you think you'd tell a joke?
Do you think they were like, oh, hello fellow black man?
We can joke about Black Lives Matter, can't we, fellow blacks?
It's like, no, you can't, Gary, okay?
I don't care how dark you think your skin is.
So anyway, in 2020, in the Premier League, a bunch of players, of course, took the knee on both sides in support of Black Lives Matter, and the slogan replaced the names of all the players on the backs of their shirts.
So virtuous.
It went well.
But he tweeted out, had a tenner on Black Lives Matter to score the first goal.
And loads of people were like, wow, casual racism, Gary.
He was like, what?
I'm black!
Can't joke about these things anymore, I'm afraid, Gary.
And of course, when it came to taking the knee, he was like, well, if you boo the England players for taking the knee, you're part of the reason why the players are taking the knee.
Okay?
Martin Daubny replied to this.
Excellent reply.
Utter rubbish.
I'm taking the knee as I'm against Black Lives Matter, saying they want to defund the police, abolish capitalism, and attack the nuclear family.
Yeah, that means you're part of the problem, which is that you're a heretic.
I mean, you don't want our ideology, therefore we're going to keep pushing.
Yeah, exactly.
Gary Lineker's just like, well, okay.
But I'm assuming all of that's good.
Again, as my fellow blacks would say, this is what we need to do.
And of course he blocked him, which is hilarious.
Why do you keep saying my fellow blacks?
Well, because Gary Lineker's the victim of racism.
Are you genuine?
I'm not even joking.
I mean, that would be the stupidest possible thing for him to do, surely.
Well, that's only because you know what Gary Lineker looks like.
Okay.
He is Britain's Talcum X. Let's go to the next article.
I got racist abuse for my darkish skin.
Darkish!
I mean, ish is doing a lot of work there, isn't it?
A lot of heavy lifting.
I mean, like, I've seen lighter Italians.
Am I darkish now?
I think I am.
Yeah, you're more darkish than him.
But the thing is, right, and what you can see from this picture is that Gary Lineker used to be a footballer.
And footballers play football out of doors.
And when you're out of doors, running around all day, in the sun, if you actually aren't black...
Your skin goes a slightly darker shade than if you spend all of your time indoors.
Is it really?
It does.
I had no idea.
This is what we white folk call a suntan, Gary, and it looks like you may have had one for a while during your career as a young man.
You've been on WebMD for that diagnosis.
I did, actually.
I had to...
Just, Gary, you're a joke, mate.
No one thinks you're black or, like...
I don't know what race you think you are.
The chat is just full of we was footballers.
Sorry, Gary.
I can't take it seriously, mate.
So, he said he was a tiny, geeky kid in Leicester and would be bullied without football.
He said he was racially abused a couple of times as a professional footballer.
I mean, your name is Lineker.
Not like, you know, an African name.
It's not Abjula or something.
They don't have African features or skin or genetics.
Your parents aren't from Africa.
They're from Leicester.
They don't even have an African object probably near you in your house.
You look normally British, I'm afraid, Gary.
I don't know why I have to say that.
But he says, without being good at sport, life would have been very difficult for me.
Because I think I would have been bullied at school.
Well, I mean, if you're just making it up.
Here's an alternate reality where I was bullied at school because I was black.
This is Gary Lineker.
It's like, wait, you weren't?
I was kind of marginally that way anyway because I was this tiny geeky kid with darkish skin.
I had pretty much racist abuse, although I'm not.
I'm as English as they come.
So what, the kids at school were calling you the N-word for having a tan because you played football?
I don't think that happened.
Yeah, I don't really believe that.
But then also, surely he's dubbed himself in a real problem there with the left-wingers by saying that because he's white, he's as English as they come.
I imagine that didn't go down well.
There are a few questions about that.
Right.
He's like, no, look, I'm white.
You mean English?
Oh.
Okay.
He says, when asked if this was really the case, because the people of this podcast were like...
You were racially abused, weren't you, Gary?
Yes, yes.
They called me Jungle X. No, they didn't.
And he was like, oh, it happened all the time, all the time.
Even in professional football, I had that a couple of times.
Well, all of your professional football matches were broadcasted, Gary.
Why isn't there any footage of them calling you racist names?
Well, they cut it.
The fans, I'm sure I remember my brother telling me a football chant, which they used to sing about Gary, calling him the N-word, and they've cut all that footage because they didn't want it transmitted, presumably.
Nothing about him taking a dump on the pitch.
But he says, I wouldn't ever name any names, so I got that kind of nonsense, which is a bit weird.
There was part of something that made me, I don't know, but other people might not be able to handle that.
I don't really believe this, Gary.
I just think you really wish it was true.
Also, if he genuinely believes it to be true that he is now a person of colour, surely he has an N-word pass?
In which case, give it a try.
Take it for a spin, Gary, considering you are now a fellow black person.
I mean, he's just so obviously normalised.
I don't believe you, Gary.
But if you had to draw a European white man, I mean...
It would look fairly similar to Gary Lineker, yeah.
If you had to draw a European black man, that's not what people would do, typically.
Well, I mean, social media, as you can imagine, loved this story.
It just erupted.
This was just amazing.
So you've got Gary Lineker when he was young, successful, and black.
Again, just, you don't look black.
You don't look like you've got darkish skin.
I don't know.
Maybe it's just me.
Maybe it's just me.
You just look totally normal.
And then perhaps it's this one, actually, in the next photo.
This is when he was playing for England in the 80s.
Yeah, I could see it.
I could see the...
Maybe, yeah, this guy got racist abuse.
This is John Barnes.
He was a famous footballer back in the day.
And then people pointing out, well, hang on, isn't this clown world where you've got Eddie Izzard can go into the women's toilets and Gary Lineker is black?
Again, Gary used to look like a lad with a tan, mate.
Because you're outside.
I don't even think it looks like he's got a tan in most of these photos, I'll be honest.
Well, yeah.
He just carries on.
Which one is Gary Lineker?
Oh, no, sorry.
This is him as Ali G. Because, again, that was the joke behind Ali G. Is it because he's black?
I mean, you've got the same sort of skin tone as Sacha Baron Cohen, who isn't black.
And that was why it was funny, because he was literally saying it to politicians, and they were looking at him going, what do I say?
He's not black.
He's just asked me if he's black.
But he's putting on the sort of affectations of a black person.
Am I supposed to say no?
Who knows?
Anyway, going to the next one.
I mean, I just can't see the difference, Gary.
I mean, if a racist walked in the room, he'd just be confused as to which one to fight.
Thank God this person's like, just so everyone knows, Gary Lineker's the one on the left.
I'd still wouldn't have known if you'd not told me.
Gary Lineker, left.
The next one's just brilliant.
Just love this.
Gary Lineker landed in Dover as a child refugee.
And of course, you've got a lot of black people on Twitter laughing at this, going, Gary, what are you talking about?
Gary, you sound like a prat.
And, uh...
The term darkish, I've never actually heard that before.
Darkish!
I've heard, you know, that people use the word dark or brown or whatever.
Darkish, though, is something I not actually think I've ever heard.
But what I love about this is, this is Gary really stretching that definition.
It's like, well, when I'm tanned enough, I'm kind of darkish.
Which puts me in the minority category, and I was racially abused.
I mean, black people aren't actual black anyway, unless you're talking, like, South Sudan pebbles, right?
And then you get, like, brown that gets used and then black, and then it's dark.
And so Gary's just stretching out these colour swatches.
And it's like, no, no, look, I'm slightly on it.
I mean, it really is the one before white, surely.
I mean, just what are you doing, Gary?
But the thing is, right, now, lots of people were laughing at Gary, and they still are laughing at Gary.
And so The Guardian was like, well, hang on a second.
Actually, he was right to speak out about receiving racist abuse.
I would have thought at least they, you know, even they would have just thrown him under the bus and been like, what the hell with this?
No, he's famous.
He's got millions of followers.
Famous black man who's being abused.
Just look at the picture they've used, right?
How did someone mistake you for a person of colour, Gary?
Again, you just got a suntan, mate.
Does he?
I mean again, I can't even see one.
I expect they've probably darkened the picture somewhat.
They've gone to the photo shop and just like, you know, brushed all over him.
Yeah, okay, you're not as pale white as your shirt, admittedly, but that's not really what we mean.
He's not a white man, come on!
But you just look like you run around in the sunshine, like all the people behind you, in fact.
But anyway, so this chap Jason says, most people who look at Match of the Day host Gary Lineker would have no difficulty recognising that the man is white.
Yep.
I mean, we see most people.
The only person who appears to have a problem with that is Gary Lineker himself.
Well, whoever wrote this article, presumably, as well.
Oh, no, he recognizes he's white.
Oh.
Well, he just began that.
Everyone can see Gary Lineker's white, but...
Except Gary in the mirror.
So it's a little surprise that he was mocked after revealing in a podcast interview that he suffered from racist abuse due to his darkish skin throughout childhood and moments during his professional footballing career.
So yeah, confused, poorly cited racists.
Who forgot their glasses.
So Gary Lineker were like...
These blind members of the clan were...
I think they were shouting it at just anyone who walked by.
They got lucky that it was Gary and therefore it fit perfectly.
Gary Lineker's standing next to John Barnes and people are yelling race and abuse.
He's like, what?
John, can you believe this is happening to me?
Exactly.
I can't go.
Gary, it's just so obviously not true, mate.
While he immediately qualified his comments with the assertion that he was, quote, as English as they come, which presumably meant white.
Hey, I didn't say it.
You said that.
Many social media users and pundits ridiculed him for supposedly identifying as black.
It's like, well, yeah.
But the mockery is misguided.
Lineker's comments were important and insightful.
Man, this is a real stretch.
What are they insightful to?
To discovering what dark-ish is?
They give us a glimpse of how race and racism work.
Blind racists mistook Gary Lineker for a black man, and that's how racist, racism is a problem.
They hold on to a view of race as static and constant throughout time and place.
Yeah.
Oh.
No?
No!
If race is socially constructed, then actually we could include, we could expand what it is to be black to include...
Not black people.
Yes, Talcamex and Gary Lineker.
Right.
I would have thought that the racist position would have been that it's genetic, not that it's, you know, just something that we've socially got.
No, the post...
And you can shift between the races.
I mean, I don't think apartheid South Africa was like, well, you know, he votes for Trump, therefore.
Postmodern...
Nearsighted racists are like, well look, for the purposes of my insult, Gary Lineker is a black man, okay?
So if you're called the N-word, that makes you a black man, regardless of your skin tone?
Yes, but that's how postmodernism works, isn't it?
For a normal person, it's the person who is a woman wears a dress, and then for them, it's the person who wears the dress is a woman.
Yeah, no, that's the way they think about it.
The social construction imposes itself upon you.
And so if someone insults you using the N-word, you are now black.
That's what is being assumed here.
And then you have the freedom to use the N-word as you please, presumably as well.
I mean, he's a victim of it.
Clearly a victim of racism.
And so, anyway, he says, despite the fact that we know racial categories are constantly invented and reinvented, think of, say, the codification of coloured as an identity in apartheid South Africa.
Do I have to?
I mean, again, the idea that before there was apartheid in South Africa, people just didn't know there were different races.
How could they tell that there were different races of people living in South Africa before apartheid?
It's almost like the concept of race came before the law against certain races.
I mean, it only makes sense.
How could you invent a law against certain races without having a distinction regarding race?
I'm imagining that conversation between two guys.
So I thought we'd make racism illegal.
What?
What's racism?
I don't know, but this guy mentioned that we should.
He's a time traveller.
Otherwise, it won't exist in 2020 for him to whine about.
And moreover, again, if the race didn't come before the racist law, how did you even decide that there should be a racist law, but how it would operate?
You're asking me to find logic where there is none.
I am.
He says, first it's worth saying that if you look at photographs of Lineker as a young football player with his dark hair, olive skin and wide nose...
You would obviously say he's a Moroccan.
However...
You can see why he may have been read as something other than white.
No.
No.
Olive skin.
Yeah, okay, he's got a tan.
English people tan.
He's not even as tanned as any Spaniard in any of those photos that I've seen here.
But I love the assumption here.
It's just, so you know, the guy who wrote this has an African surname.
So, I haven't seen a picture of him, but I assume he's black.
So, breaking news, white people actually get darker the more time they spend in the sun, right?
They tan.
So, white people are not just a blank sheet of paper.
They actually, their skin color changes as they spend time outdoors.
And so, like, the fact that olive skin is not something that white people do never have.
You know, at some points in their lives, they will have that.
Not exactly breaking news, but anyway...
But anyway, so he says, you know, you can see why, because he just so obviously looks like he might not be white, as if all white people are Scottish people who live in the Outer Hebrides or something.
So he says, for whiteness to survive, its boundaries must be constantly policed.
What does that even mean?
But imagine that.
Imagine that, right?
Because what are you saying then?
Stay in your lane, whiter?
No, no, no.
So there were some nearsighted Klansmen in the 80s, in England, like, watching Gary Leonecker play football.
I'm like, no, I've got to police the boundaries of whiteness here.
Gary, you're a nigger!
You're not a part of us!
Yeah, exactly!
What?
You spent too long out in the field.
Just of all people.
Of all the people to be like, yeah, I'm going to police the boundaries of whiteness with Gary Lineker.
Like, no, that didn't happen.
That's not what was being done.
A bunch of neo-Nazis are like, well, if we don't get rid of him, the white race means nothing.
Exactly.
Then anyone can come into the white race of Gary Lineker and be white.
It's such nonsense.
If we're allowed to sunbathe and still remain in the white race, something's gone wrong.
In other words, many white people will have the experience of being scrutinized for looking a bit ethnic.
I love the black guy is now going to tell us what the white experience is.
Have you ever been scrutinized for looking a bit ethnic?
I haven't.
And I was actually thinking about this the other day, because I've noticed I tan quite easily.
I've got a bit of tan just riding into work, right?
And so I saw myself in the mirror holding my son, who's paler than I am, because he doesn't spend as much time in the sun as I do.
And I was like, oh wow, I actually look like...
You had a Gary Lineker moment.
I had a Gary Lineker moment.
I was racist to myself.
Maybe I am black.
I was.
Your son turned and went, what is this?
Yeah, well, my son was like, oh my god, dad.
Thankfully he can't speak yet.
He was thinking racist things.
Mum, get me away from that.
But I love the idea that this guy's kind of like, yeah, so white people know what it's like to have racism.
Yeah.
Just what are you on?
You know, this is just...
Even a holiday tan can throw a white person's race into question.
So fragile it's borders.
I love this as admitting that Gary Lineker's tan.
Like, the holiday tan Gary Lineker gets from, you know, going to Qatar and playing football or something.
Well, your whiteness is in question now, Gary.
As if...
And the thing is, this is nonsense even from the social justice perspective.
Whiteness, from the social justice perspective, is not actually contingent on having white skin, or the actual shade of your skin.
So if you're a neckbeard in the basement, your possession of whiteness is maximized because you've never seen sunlight.
That's not what that means.
This guy's an idiot.
This whole thing's nonsense.
It's really stupid.
But anyway, he concludes ghoulish right-wingers rushing to dismiss his words and tweet Black Lineker's Matter.
Unremarkable and unexpected.
It's like, come on, it is pretty funny.
Black Lineker's Matter, that's great.
But it's worth being graceful to the more sensitive reaction from racial minorities who feel insulted or patronized by this story.
And so they should, frankly, Gary.
It is patronizing, say, you with a suntan were being given racial abuse.
Certainly the case of Rachel Dolezal appropriating black identity and claiming to be transracial.
Gary.
All the allegations of blackfishing against Jesse Nelson provide evidence of why many have simply had enough of what can be seen to be an epidemic of white people appropriating the racial struggle.
So there we go, Gary, right?
Even the guy defending you is like, well, you are appropriating the racial struggle here, aren't you, Mr.
Multimillionaire famous white man?
The racial struggle.
Yes.
Sorry, of 2022 Britain.
No, the racial privilege of being an effing minority.
That's what that is.
That's what Gary's trying to buy into, yeah.
There's no struggle he's buying into.
He's trying to get victim points and kudos and social media attention.
And he did get it, but just not in the way he thought.
But the point is, there's no winning here, Gary.
There's no winning.
Hey, you're not black.
No one thinks you're black.
No one thinks you're racially abused.
And the people who are prepared to indulge in the fact that you claim to be racially abused have still cast you out as being someone who's appropriating their culture.
So just knock it off, mate.
And on that note, speaking of racial abuse, let's talk about the left.
So, I thought we'd talk about the leftist race war fantasy, and I mean in that that the leftists, of course, have a fantasy race war that they want to engage in, desperately.
I think they are engaging in it.
To some extent, but I mean, they genuinely want to get to the end stage of that as well, which is just endless violence instead of just, you know, summers of love instead.
Which I think I'm not going to demonstrate just by, well, let's take a look at what they've been up to in the media recently.
So I found this article from the New York Times, a newspaper of record.
Someone had written an opinion piece and they were like, yeah, we're going to publish that.
White people are afraid of being replaced.
That's the headline to go with here.
We'll come back to that in a minute, but just for the context, we have to go, of course, to Jimmy Fallon.
Noted demographist, I don't know what the term is, in which, of course, you may remember he gave a little skitch in which he spoke about the fact that the white population had gone down.
Can you just point out that Jimmy Fallon is more tanned than He certainly is.
But as he said, the number of white people had gone down, the audience there whooped and clapped and celebrated this tremendous news that white people are disappearing, not just in percentage, but in numbers as well.
So the difference between 2010 and 2020 was a 10% drop as a total of the United States being white went down to 61.
But that was also 19 million fewer white people on American soil.
Hmm.
Just the number, the pure number went down.
Yeah, yeah.
That's what everyone was celebrating.
Just for the context of what we're about to read from those letters to the editor of the New York Times.
Let's see the kind of people who read the New York Times and send in letters.
First one here.
To the editor.
We are approaching the demographic point where white people will be a minority in the United States.
Right, hang on.
What I love about this is it assumes that all non-white people are in some sort of coalition with each other.
They're like, yes, hello fellow non-whites.
This is how we identify.
So Mr.
Mexican, Mr.
Black, Mr.
Asian, Oriental, exactly.
We're all just the same, aren't we, against those whites.
And so when we are the majority, they will be the minority.
It's like, no.
And the race war will have been completed in one stage, which is to unify us against the white people.
And to crush them, presumably.
Which is, of course, not how...
Anyone else thinks about this?
Yeah, you know, like, Asians moving to the United States aren't like, finally, I can help crush the white man with my fellow blacks.
Yeah, exactly.
There's nothing in common here.
And often, don't ask them their opinions of their fellow ethnic minorities.
But he continues.
That demographic trend will have enormous political and economic consequences.
Sounds like a threat.
What kind of admission is that?
White people are going to come with a minority, and once they do, there's going to be huge political and economic consequences for a lot of them.
But you would normally, if that was a good thing, you would say benefits?
No, consequences.
As if vengeance is on the menu.
Or as if collapse is on the menu?
I mean, both of them are the same thing.
Like, economic consequences doesn't sound very optimistic.
It will be hard to stack the deck in your favour when you are outvoted.
And also when there's just no money.
I mean, again, it just sounds like a threat, though.
It's just, well, you're outvoted, so we're all going to kill you.
What are you going to do about it?
All the minorities are just going to be like, yeah, so we're voting against the whites today?
Motion carries.
I mean, it's literally going to be South Africa, is what they're thinking.
Motion number five of F the whites.
Minorities vote for...
I love this so much as if people are moving to the United States just because they hate white people.
There is a significant subset of white Americans who cannot accept the prospect of reduced status.
Again, the language here, very telling.
This does not mean that they will be disadvantaged.
It means that they will no longer enjoy the unfair advantage of white privilege.
But if the prospect of reduced status doesn't mean you're being disadvantaged, how can any minority claim that they are being disadvantaged?
And also, what economic and political consequences are there going to be if there's no disadvantage to be had from those consequences?
Yeah.
I thought diversity was our strength.
The language is deeply confused.
Why are you acting like this is going to lead to the collapse of the United States?
This is a progressive, obviously, writing to the New York Times.
And I love the idea, just for a second, that the progressives, the progs, are actually going to end there and be like, well, the whites are a minority, therefore white privilege no longer exists.
Oh yeah, as if.
As if it's going to happen.
But okay, minorities aren't disadvantaged.
Then stop whining.
You would have thought.
And I just wanted to mention this, just the fact that for Douglas Murray's The War on the West book club we're going to be doing, there is a beautiful point in here I'm going to mention to you, which is just the fact that the idea that the white privilege will suddenly disappear from the narrative.
And the mention here that he makes is the fact that the British spent so much money on freeing the slaves and then patrolling the world, literally, with the East and West Africa squadrons.
Imposing whiteness on foreigners.
It is still said that we must pay reparations, and it just doesn't make any sense.
But we did until 2014.
Yeah, and Douglas makes the point that, well, you can compare this to Greece, who asks Germany for money every single time that the Greeks run out of money.
Which is every single year.
And the only way that's going to stop is when the Greeks become financially responsible, which isn't going to happen.
Someday now, you know.
It's just, you know, absolute nonsense.
So the idea that just because whites are a minority, therefore the white privilege thing will go away.
No.
What will have to happen is for black Americans to outperform whites in In education's earning, etc.
Or forever.
Or white privilege will still be claimed to be real.
And even then, that will last all five minutes until they say, yeah, we might be, you know, extremely poor.
None of you are achieving in the universities anymore.
They aren't already.
But then, well, you still have white privilege because the founding fathers were white.
So, the idea ends there.
Sorry, it's really annoyed me.
He continues though, this individual: "These people are increasingly panicked and relying on antisocial activities such as voter suppression, sedition and violence." What?!
Where?
Where are the race mobs of white people stalking through the streets being violent to minorities?
Where are the signs being put up by business owners saying, please spare me, this is a white-owned business?
Yeah.
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
They're not putting, white lives matter, please, I'm a single mother, don't destroy my shop.
But they are putting, black lives matter, please, I'm a single mother, don't destroy my shop.
Please, I'm a white woman in a married family with 14 kids who are all white.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah.
This is such an inversion of reality.
I mean, completely living in clown world.
It will only get worse for the foreseeable future.
The thing that isn't happening, that's going to intensify.
Yeah, because zero, when that intensifies, it's still zero.
Make no mistake, they will try to do whatever it takes to stave off their inevitable reduced political status.
Man, you really sound like you're enjoying this.
I mean, again, the idea that there are no disadvantages coming to whites as they become a minority, but also their political status will be completely wiped out.
Good to know, New York Times reader.
And let's be honest, these people draw their support exclusively from the Republican Party and its enablers in the media and right-wing organisations.
All Fox News of them.
What?
The Republican Party's like, maybe we shouldn't have a race war.
And Oren Hollander's like, listen, you dirty right-wingers.
Dirty white people.
Yeah.
He ends it off with, forewarned is forearmed.
Oren Hollander.
So there we are.
There's a lovely little chap who's just telling us to be prepared for the civil war that comes as soon as white people are a minority.
He's expecting to go out there and engage in his race war firsthand.
That's terrible.
And the New York Times were like, well, put that in the paper.
Yeah.
Give that a nice, friendly title.
That's the top thing.
That's the top line there for what they had.
They have some other ones in here that I thought were worth going through.
Another one to the editor.
I would encourage Tucker Carlson at Fox News to invite a dozen or so chiefs from what remain of our Native American tribes to discuss what they think about Great Replacement in America.
Well, they're probably like, yeah, it's not good.
From Robert there, who claims that the white population is being reduced, and that's a good thing, presumably.
I don't know what other point he was making, except that, don't you know that Great Replacement was terrible for the Native Americans, and therefore it would be terrible for white people?
Wait, no.
Have you thought for more than three seconds there?
Yeah, ask the Native Americans how that works, and say, yeah, they're going to be like, yeah, not good.
Yeah, but the funniest one in here is from Frank, who says, the proof that liberal elites do not want to replace whites with non-whites is that progressives are pro-choice on abortion.
The abortion rates for black women are several times higher than for whites.
Oh, come on!
I can't say that!
This is a progressive chap here who's trying to dab on the right and be like, hey, idiots, we can't be for great replacement because we kill black babies.
Yeah, look at the black babies we've got killed in the abortion clinics.
If we were for great replacement, we would forbid the blacks from having abortions.
Idiots!
Come on!
Jesus!
What a statement!
Minorities are far more likely to vote for Democrats.
For decades, abortions have been disproportionately depriving the Democratic Party of millions of potential black votes, writes Frank.
Openly, he just says it.
That's his opinion.
Does Frank need to Google who Margaret Sanger was?
Maybe.
And the purpose of Planned Parenthood?
If liberal elites really wanted to advance the Great Replacement Theory and replace white voters with black ones, they would never have been pro-choice.
Conservatives.
Man, that big brain meme where he's sat on his elephant brain stomping around.
Yeah, see?
Like, come on!
I love the quality of person who writes to the New York Times.
Yeah, you've got Frank here who's like, well, really, us liberals are doing the most to stop the Great Replacement by killing all those blacks, don't you know?
How many blacks are you killing, Republicans?
Zero!
You're pro-life!
Okay, yeah.
So there's, you know, some notes from people who wrote the New York Times.
That's so awful.
Any other newspaper, I mean, if we got letters like that, I mean, we certainly wouldn't be really, we'd be like...
In the bin.
What message are we putting out that attracts people who think like this?
That's what I'd be asking.
But not only that, the person in the newsroom, because remember the work that, you know, you've got to organise this and all that.
Someone's done that, read through, presumably, about 20 loads on these different articles about race, and has gone, well, these are brilliant.
And you know, hats off to them because they weren't funny.
Yeah, because I mean, we must have had loads of letters, you know, so it's like, well, we've got to choose the five or six best ones.
Yeah, have to.
And if we move forward, these writers to the editor of the New York Times are not the only ones.
Sorry, before we go on, like, if you're a black person watching this, like, go back a second, just the previous one, John.
Right?
Abortion rates for black women are several times higher for whites.
This is what the Democrats are proudly saying.
We kill as many black people as possible.
We are artificially reducing your population through abortion and we're proud of it.
Yeah.
That's what they're saying.
Sorry, carry on.
They're not the only people to warn of civil war in relation to this.
If you go to the next one, Al Jazeera, Qatari propaganda outlet, we're also warning of civil war here.
There's a black chap here who's a lecturer of history at an American university.
Got the Tim Pool position.
Yeah.
I think that's probably fair.
He goes on to say that white supremacist terror attacks in the country are going on, and this is essentially a prelude to the war that's coming.
And he says, as a nation, the United States has endured more than 50 years of white males who have refused to accept the victories of the civil rights movement, Okay.
way of framing the last 50 years of history.
They defy the demographic trends that would have them as a minority in the United States.
Some may find such thinking alarmist, but the United States is much closer to the conditions that led to the Civil Wars of 1861 than most Americans would dare admit.
I really don't think that's true, but I feel like the conditions of 1861 might have been a bit more extreme.
Might have been slightly worse.
Yeah, you would have thought.
But it's weird how he writes that.
But you can imagine him writing it with such a big grin on his face.
Just the idea, finally, finally we can have the race war.
I honestly believe that's how these people think.
I mean, just to be clear, the Civil War in America wasn't a race war.
It wasn't blacks against whites.
White on white crime.
Yes, it wasn't blacks against whites.
And so, I don't know why he thinks that this can be framed as a repeat of that.
Well, he believes that because whites have become a minority, and therefore there are white supremacist terrorist attacks, Right.
as to whether or not it will be a white country or not.
- Right, right. - And he's- - Right, right, that's about to happen, yeah.
- He says all this, and I just think of him with a big old smile on his face, 'cause seriously, that's how I think they think about this matter.
And he's not the only one.
There are a lot of articles from other minorities who have done incredibly well in this white supremacist America. - Wajahat Ali.
Is it time for me to leave America, right?
I'm not going to go any further.
Yes, is the answer.
Wajahat.
Because you're writing for the Daily Beast.
Yeah, some leftist minority who...
The fewer Democrat voters, the better.
Just for the sake of the black population.
Honestly, Wajahat.
But I can never get over how you have people like Mr.
Ali here who are like, you know, the United States is basically apartheid South Africa.
Anyway, now to continue my job in a high place in the media.
Well, I mean, he's Middle Eastern, so.
Maybe, but he doesn't.
So they've got a great track record when it comes to the Blacks.
He gives an argument.
It's tough to love a country that doesn't love you back, and even tougher to fight for it as it is trying to kill you, because he thinks that, I don't know, there's just gangs of Klan members gunning down minorities, presumably, every single day.
There's just 10,000 a day, perhaps.
He then goes on to say that his father is making plans for them and the family to leave.
Where do you think he's going?
Going back to Pakistan?
Mexico, maybe?
Canada.
Yeah, Canada.
He's narrowing it to Canada or New Zealand.
The two whitest countries on Earth.
Every time.
It's weird.
Like clockwork.
He then sums up that because he's a patriot, quote, in my heart, I know I'm never leaving.
Like, right, okay.
You just have to line up on your side of the race war, then.
Yeah, as he looks forward to that.
And he's not the only one.
If you go to the next one, there's another article I found here.
Same thing.
This guy's saying why black people are afraid of crazy white people.
Is it the same for the...
No, don't worry.
He defines crazy, quote, as anyone who believes in any aspect of the racist Great Replacement.
This is the not just...
noxious maddow yes this is the noxious idea that liberals are deliberately replacing white people with non-whites and immigrants according to the southern poverty law center poll nearly seven in ten republicans surveyed agreed to at least some extent that demographic change in the united states are deliberately driven by liberal and progressive politicians attempting to gain political power by replacing more conservative white voters because they watch msnbc yeah uh they I mean, we've been over this.
I'm not going to play the clips, obviously, but we've been over it before.
There are a million clips in one of Joe Biden and every other member of the Democratic Party saying, and that's a good thing.
Demographics is destiny, and that's a good thing.
Yeah.
Okay.
He goes on to say that the SPLC reports that more than a third of all respondents felt that demographic change in the United States is a threat to white Americans and their culture and values.
It's only because of all the pro-race war propaganda the left's putting out.
But also, I mean, de facto sort of, you moron?
Like, if you have immigrants that aren't Anglo-Saxons come to the United States, then Anglo-Saxon culture, because that's what you mean by white culture.
You don't mean Italian.
You don't mean Russian.
I mean, the Russian community in Florida is not damaged by this in the slightest.
What they are talking about is Anglo-Saxon culture of the United States.
Of course it will wane.
I mean, what's it?
Skeleto, for example, won't be able to say the same that it's as Anglo-Saxon in America as it is in the UK, for example, in the cultural terms, obviously.
No.
But then he goes on to say that nearly half of those agreed that demographic changes were part of a purposeful plan to replace white Americans.
Crazy, right?
I don't think you want the answer to that one.
Anyway, this explains some of the eye-opening results in a Washington Post poll of black adults released last month.
75% of African Americans worry that their or a loved one will be physically attacked because they are black.
Where's the evidence?
You don't have any.
Well, they're not looking at the crime statistics.
No, they're just not.
This is just complete mass delusion.
It goes on with another one here, the most exciting, where it says 75% of African Americans say white supremacists are a major threat to black Americans.
Where?
Where?
What are you talking about?
That's just obviously not true.
Clearly, black Americans are being deluded to an extreme extent.
The only example in recent years is the buffalo shooter.
Well, you've got a handful of shootings, okay, but then...
No, no, a bunch of these shootings were, like, you know, people shooting Mexicans and stuff like this.
Or Mexicans shooting Mexicans.
In Nivaldi, yeah.
Or the, what was it, the Syrian guy shooting up Asians, which, uh, he was white.
Or a guy shooting Jews.
Or a guy shooting Middle Easterners.
It's like, okay, all of these are terrible, but...
They're also a drop in the ocean compared to the actual threats to your life.
Yeah, I mean, I'd rather not live in Chicago.
Yeah.
And then he goes on, he says, would I actually leave the country for my own protection, this black writer?
Because he believes, presumably, he's part of that 75%.
And obviously he concludes that he won't.
I shock.
Big surprise.
He also isn't going to Mexico.
Not interested in that.
But it's important to note that these people haven't the faintest idea, obviously, of what's going on beyond their own bedroom.
Yeah, yeah.
We'll mention this again.
Because remember, 75% of black Americans think their lives are in serious danger of white supremacists.
Presumably the police as well.
And it's just the polling on that.
Which you can see, how many unarmed black men were killed by the police in 2019?
They polled people between very liberal and very conservative.
The results weren't good.
7% of liberals thought that it was over 10,000 black people being killed by the police.
No.
About 20% of liberals got the right answer of 10.
Whereas obviously around half of conservatives got the right answer.
And the rest of them also being a bit deluded there.
But nowhere near as deluded as 10,000 unarmed black men being killed by the police every year.
I mean, I can see why 75% of black Americans think that, you know, the biggest threat to their lives are white supremacists out there.
I mean, if you're deluded enough to think that there's 10,000 unarmed black men being killed every year, as if you literally live in apartheid South Africa, you know, on steroids as well.
I mean, on the plus side, about half of the liberals got it roughly correct.
Close.
Fewer than 100.
But to have it so extreme, I mean, 15% of very liberals, you know, are the ones who got it right there.
More than half think the police kill a thousand unarmed black men.
I mean, it's literally in double digits.
It's delusional.
And also just the notion of...
More than 10,000.
That could be literally 50,000, they could think.
Think of what you're thinking of the United States as in this worldview.
There's just black people being killed left, right and centre.
Minorities are just being killed.
Remember he said that it's hard to love a country when it's trying to kill you.
Almost all of the conservatives and almost all of the moderates have got roughly accurate estimates there.
But there's just the delusion in the fact that they think that America is hell on earth for people with darkish colour, as Lineker would say.
If you go to the next link here, we can see the southern border doesn't agree, obviously.
Regardless of the legal migration, which I imagine is mad as well, but the illegal migration in the United States is even crazier.
200,000 a month, at least.
You scroll down on this, the numbers are unbelievable.
Biden has now let in over 3 million illegals in two years.
Is it even two years?
No, you're right, actually.
It's not even two years yet.
Not even two years.
Three million.
Unbelievable.
And you compare this to Donald Trump...
That's 1% of the United States in a year and a half.
Yeah.
Insane.
I think how much impact that alone has.
That's a massive city.
I mean, regardless of the presumably 1 million something a year the United States...
I think it's 1.5 million now under Biden.
Legally, I mean.
Yeah, legally, yeah.
1.5 million.
So there you have it.
I mean, just the change is rapid, to say the least.
Staggering, isn't it?
If you go to the next one here, we can compare this to Donald Trump.
I mean, elections do actually matter.
And as you can see under Donald Trump there, the fall in between 2016 and 2019, before the pandemic, is 13% decrease in legal migration.
Right, okay.
Something.
And then the pandemic happens, of course, so it goes down to 40% below.
So, you know, something happened there.
But, uh, I suppose, never mind.
Race theorists are back to tell us the United States is not only apartheid, but whites have nothing to fear either.
If we go to the next one here, just to end this off.
This is James Patterson claiming that racism hampers white men.
This is most fictional work yet.
We've had a bunch of boomer white men saying, well look, I'm being discriminated against.
And it's endless.
Yeah.
He says in here, the author says, that white men are having a hard time finding jobs in film, theatre, writing, TV, etc.
Exactly what Christopher Eccleston was saying.
Yeah.
And this is, you know, obviously a pushback to the obvious delusions of the left who are not living in reality.
I mean, the data alone shows it.
And, well, what did he have to do as soon as he was saying these things?
Well, he had to issue a hostage statement, didn't he?
We got a last one here.
I suppose we'll end on this.
Just a quote from him saying, I apologize for saying white male writers are having trouble fighting work.
I absolutely do not believe that racism is practiced against white writers.
It doesn't happen.
Nothing is happening.
Everything is fine.
Oh, this is so Soviet, man.
It is unbelievable that an individual would have to do this, presumably under some kind of threat, either to his livelihood or his family.
Please know that I strongly support diversity of voices being heard in literature and in Hollywood everywhere.
It's just...
Take the shot, man.
Unbelievably embarrassing.
I did like that everyone seemed to respond to this at this point.
Tim Young under the bottom there.
I apologise for telling the truth because the mob got angry at me when I did.
Yes.
Precisely, Tim.
That's exactly what that is.
It's just obvious that this moment, for say, like 2020 was a crazy year.
Good lads in the replies there.
Nice to see it.
But looking back at 2020, it's obviously a culture of evolution that happened.
Exactly.
And I love, as you were saying, the responses here being overwhelmingly...
We can see.
Everyone knows this is BS. Everyone knows this is a hostage situation at this point.
And you don't have to play into it.
They're not actually going to pull the trigger.
They don't have anything to do it with.
But otherwise, I suppose I'll end that on there because we're out of time.
But just, they left this race wall that they're all fantasizing about that they really wished to come true.
Hmm.
So, ladies, let's talk about how you can get a man.
That is dating advice.
It is.
Right?
Because apparently some women need it.
And, you know, I'm not going to say that I'm an expert on getting a man, but my wife is.
She's married.
She's successfully married, so surely there's some lessons to be learned there.
But anyway, before we get in, if you want to support us, you can go to theloses.com and read this fantastic article by Thomas about how inceldom is only going to get worse.
Because there's...
It takes two to tango.
And if women can't get men, well, that also means that men can't get women.
And Thomas is right when it's getting worse for men, but we always get complaints, oh, you only have a focus on men.
It's like, okay, that can change.
Don't worry, we can talk about you ladies.
So you get articles like this, and this is what spurred this for me.
Because I'm actually very sympathetic to Molly here, who published this article a few days ago.
And she says this, I'm almost 25, I've never been in a relationship, and I thought I'd be married now.
What happened?
That's a great question.
What happened?
I mean, she's not like, you know...
She's massively unattractive.
She's pretty normal-looking.
Is that her?
I think that's the writer.
Yeah, no, no, that's her.
No, that's the writer, isn't it?
That's the author of the article.
Oh, okay.
They always have the author of the article.
Sorry, sorry.
I got confused between the woman there and the woman there.
No, no.
But she's not, like, you know, hideously unattractive.
She's, you know, pretty average-looking.
Average-looking women should be able to find average-looking men.
If they can't find average-looking men, what's going on?
You know, why is all this going wrong?
And so she says, in September I'll be turning...
I love the idea that there's a shortage of average looking men, if that makes any kind of sense.
Don't worry.
No, there actually is a shortage of average looking men, because women think 80% of men are below average.
Oh yeah.
So the average looking men are actually the top 20% of men, according to most women, apparently.
I'm not saying that's what Molly thinks, because she doesn't say that.
Anyway, she says, Now, again, I want to be clear.
I'm very, very sympathetic to the way Molly thinks.
And how life is just not turning out as she expected it to be.
She says, I'm painfully or comfortably single, never been kissed, and around 400 Tinder matches down the line of her appearance six years, I guess you could say I envisaged my life to be something a little different.
Isn't that sad?
I'm a bit confused.
I mean, I'm not an expert on how Tinder works, but if she's had 400 matches, why has she not gone on a single date that's gone anywhere?
Well, I think it's due to men's expectations, which we'll talk about in a minute.
But she says, I'm an avid reader of romance novels, and the trope I see that sees an inverted girl fall for a guy in a bookshop, I guess I expected my life to resemble a book when I hit my 20s.
Well, here's the first piece of dating advice.
Get off of Tinder.
Go to the bookshops.
Go outside.
Go and actually meet people in real life.
She says, but the point there though, she wants a fairytale romance.
What social movement may have been responsible for killing women's ability to get fairytale romances?
With an F. Does.
In my teens, I dreamed of falling in love young, getting married in my mid twenties and spending the rest of my life with whoever I tied the knot with.
That's lovely.
That's a lovely dream.
Why should she be unable to fulfill this?
A childhood sweetheart seemed idyllic and something I could get behind constantly on the lookout for a classroom crush who might have secretly liked me too.
I always thought I'd fall in love at 18 and marry seven years later.
Imagine telling our grandkids the story of how we'd fallen in love from across the classroom or how we'd met on the bus or the train or at the library where I studied.
Suffice to say, none of this happened, and as I approached 25, everything I thought I knew about love was a lie.
It's like, well, that's an ideal, isn't it?
And it's a nice, romantic, and feminine ideal that she's grown up with.
I imagine there are lots of women who had something like this before they ended up going to university.
She says, In all honesty, I'm not quite sure where I got my initial ideas about my 20s and falling in love from.
Thinking about what I first wanted out of my life, it now seems completely unattainable.
But some people my age do seem to have it all.
I've seen people my age who have achieved what I first thought I wanted.
They've got a mortgage, a long-term boyfriend, a baby on the way, a car on finance, and a grey crushed velvet sofa.
So these are quite nice, wholesome, realistic dreams.
She's not asking for anything that's absurd, and for some reason it's still out of reach.
She says, Well, maybe you could be mad.
Maybe something has gone wrong.
Maybe there's something wrong with society at large.
Possibly something that has been influencing the minds of young men and women into how they should be interacting with one another.
She says, Nothing in my life turned out how I thought it would, and I'll likely be stepping into the next chapter of my life as a young, free, single woman once again.
But like so many other girls in their 20s, I've realized I need to revel in the fact that I have freedom and truly figure out who I am before I inevitably end up falling in love one day.
You're already 25.
You've already had all the freedom you'll ever need.
No, but I don't know why you haven't figured out who you are by then.
Well, it's a bit of a cope, to be honest.
And sadly, she's just like, well, you know, here's hoping.
And so, yeah, well, good luck.
You know, I'm genuinely hopeful.
But she obviously, you know, she wants a husband, kids, grandkids.
Perfectly nice.
Can't get it.
Totally normal looking woman.
Should be able to.
But the problem as well is that women have a problem.
Men aren't exactly catchers these days.
This is a story that I think is emblematic of this.
So a man and a woman go on a date and she refuses to have sex.
She doesn't want to have sex with him because he just says.
And so he's like, right, well, I'm not paying then.
Oh, okay.
Can you ever have imagined saying that to a woman?
No.
Exactly.
It is funny.
I'll give them that.
It is funny, but it's ridiculous.
What's the nature of the meeting?
Because it's not a date.
It's a bit unclear, actually, because it was from a TikTok video.
But this person called Alaska Girl questioned her date about his last minute decision to split the bill.
And he was like, well, are you going to give me some ass?
And she was like, no.
And he was like, well, there we go.
Where's the love and romance here?
Well, okay, yeah, it is not a catch situation.
But you can see how this is just entirely transactional.
But also, I'm wondering what the meetup was about, because if it's a Tinder meetup, not a date, that's the thing on my mind.
If it was from a sex app rather than a dating...
Sure, sure.
And it's unclear.
You know, they might actually be in a relationship already.
Who knows?
But the point is, these things should not be handled as transactions.
And this is not the first time we've covered this.
We've talked about the...
I mean, A, OnlyFans makes sexuality purely transactional.
But also that app that is for young women who are looking for rich men, and there are millions of them on there apparently, just looking for men with money so they can get paid and give them sex.
It's like, look, this whole thing is being looked at in the wrong way completely.
And so you've got the romantic idealistic girl who we saw just there being like, well, I thought I'd find, you know, a dream romance.
It's like, yeah, that's something that's being lost here, you know?
Certainly lost on that guy.
Certainly lost on a lot of men as well.
This is just one example of many that I have seen.
So if everything is now a transaction, what are the options for women?
Well, the option, and I hate to say this, but this is just for women generally, is to essentially stop having sex with men you're not in a relationship with.
I was, you know, just looking for advice for women from women about this, to see if it was any good.
And actually, some of it was quite good, and some of it was remarkably conservative.
And I think it's because the conservatives might actually have a point about this.
So this was just one of those listicles.
Oh, well, why does he keep you around even though he doesn't want a relationship?
And it's like, because you're having sex with him.
That's why.
You're an idiot.
You're having sex with him.
That's why.
And they've got a bunch of answers, but they do actually have, you're having sex with him.
It's like, yeah.
And they say, it's an incredibly shallow and awful reason, but a common one nonetheless.
Yeah.
Duh.
Why would I buy the cow if I get the milk for free?
Why would I? Why would anyone?
Women, you've done this to yourself, so who told you it was a good idea to go out and have lots of easy, promiscuous sex?
That's right.
Feminists.
Anyway, they say, if you've been having sex with him while you're dating, good for you, girl.
Is it?
Is it?
You've got the boyfriend you want.
I thought they weren't dating, though, essentially.
Well, yeah, exactly.
There's no shame in being intimate early on in a relationship.
Should there be?
It's easy to say this when I'm married, by the way.
Even if there's not, I mean, is it advisable?
Exactly.
And the reason it was shameful prior is because it was completely inadvisable.
Because your grandmother knew if you were going to give up the prize on the first couple of dates, he was just going to not bother seeing you again.
He got what he wanted.
You have to give him a reason to be invested.
But it can blur the lines between something casual and a serious relationship.
As stereotypical as it is to say, it is unfortunately true that women are more likely to consider sex to be a sign that he's got deep feelings for you.
He doesn't.
If you have sex with him, in the very early stages of you having any kind of romantic interaction, he doesn't have deep feelings for you.
Well, he can, but...
He doesn't.
It's not an advisable strategy, for sure.
He doesn't.
Like, what's the percentage chance?
It's not looking good.
It's not looking good.
But moreover, by having sex with a man that early on in your relationship, if you can even call it relationship, you're actually revealing to him that you're a certain kind of girl who doesn't keep anything sacred back for herself.
Notice the other woman hasn't even been kissed, right?
And I think she's a good example to use.
She's been reserving this mystical romance for Mr.
Right, but she's in a dating pool of guys who are like, I'm not paying for not having sex.
She can't form a romantic attachment with a man like She did say she was looking on Tinder, which is a bad pull.
Exactly.
It's a really bad pull.
And so if you're being sensible like the first woman, who's like, no, I'm going to actually do what is necessary so I can craft this dream relationship, which is keep my sanctity as a woman, then you're looking in the wrong places and you're in trouble, basically.
And other women, they're ruining men for you, just so you know.
But anyway, in his mind, he might be just enjoying himself filling his boots, so to speak.
Yes.
Yes, that's exactly right, right?
If he's getting great sex from you, he might not want to leave, but even if his feelings for you don't run that deep, why would he leave behind that kind of fun to be single and forced to spend his nights alone?
If you want some clarity for him, your first port of course would be to take sex off the table.
Ooh.
Good advice.
Very conservative advice, though.
As if your grandmother knew something.
The best advice is always the conservative advice, let's be honest.
Yeah, it seems that way.
Robert Conquest laws, like one of them is the thing everyone knows most about, they're conservative about.
Yes.
Once he realises you aren't going to be dishing it out like you used to, the sex fog in his brain will lift and he'll have a chance to find his morals again.
Oh really, that's very interesting.
So he is being immoral by taking advantage of your looseness when it comes to how often you...
Whereas you have no responsibility.
Exactly.
Your own decisions mean nothing.
But as she's saying, look, women are the gatekeepers of sex.
Take sex off the table.
Yeah, you should have done that from the start.
And then he would have had to have worked for it.
You would have been able to start...
Have that romantic spark...
But they've got some other good points in here, actually, which I thought were worth going through.
Another reason if he's having sex with you but won't be tied down to you is he wants to keep his options open.
Yeah?
You're an option to him.
This is the thing.
If you want this deep, meaningful, romantic relationship, he has got to not see you as just an option.
They've got loads of other, you know, Irrelevant points, basically.
It's quite far down this list that this one is.
Some guys aren't ready to settle down, but they do know they have real feelings for you.
They don't like the idea that if they commit to you and make your relationship exclusive and official, they can't continue to woo every lady they meet.
Why would they want to do that if they had a special relationship with you?
They wouldn't.
And the reason they don't have a special relationship for you is because you haven't held anything back that's just for them.
Well, you haven't cultivated one.
No.
Like, it actually takes work to do that.
Yes.
And it actually means holding something back for a period of time.
If you've found yourself an eligible bachelor who's been used to living at large and meeting a new woman every night, it shouldn't come as a surprise to you that he's avoiding taking your relationship to a more serious level.
Why would he?
Why would he?
So if he keeps telling you he wants to take it slow, but you know he's dating and hooking up with other women, he's probably not that devoted to you.
Probably.
If you are dating a man who you are convinced is dating other women in addition to you, you have to stop dating that man.
He's not the man for you.
He is not into you.
End of story.
So they've got a few questions, which I thought we'd go through.
What does it mean when he says he doesn't want a relationship?
It means you're an option.
He's not into you.
He's using you for sex.
You think it means...
That's what it means.
That means he wants to marry me.
That means maybe in a year's time he'll want to marry me and give up all of those other women.
No.
It means you allowed him to get the thing that he wanted and so he doesn't need to be particular about you at all.
The conquest has already been made, as far as he's concerned.
Am I wrong?
No.
So basically, you need to stop seeing him.
And so, what to do when a guy says he doesn't want a relationship?
If you want a relationship?
You stop sleeping with him.
Like, if you don't want a relationship either, then enjoy doing what you're doing, I suppose.
Yeah, but that's not the question here, is it?
But that's the point.
If a guy says, oh, I don't want a relationship, then you have to stop sleeping with him.
If you want a relationship...
You can't sleep with a man who is not interested in having a relationship with you.
Again, you giving up that thing that nature has designed to tie a man to you.
That's why women are the gatekeepers of sex, goddammit.
And if you're abolishing that gatekeeping ability, well then you're going to get used and used and used.
But this is not good.
Again, it seems very sensible to someone of my age, but I can imagine there are young women who just don't understand this.
And it seems that there are other women who are like, look, you've got to stop having sex with him.
But why?
Why would I need to do that?
Go speak to your grandmother.
Idiot.
But how do you tell if a guy likes you but doesn't want a relationship?
And they say, guys are very forthcoming when it comes to their desire to commit.
Yeah.
If a guy wants to commit to you, he will.
And if he doesn't, then you've got to dump him.
You've got to go and start a romantic relationship with someone else and don't sleep with them on the first date.
But anyway, they carry on saying, you know, in the same vein, they're very clear about when they're playing around to tell the difference.
Some signs that a guy is not ready to commit include he is not able to define your relationship.
He is always ghosting you on time and reappearing when he finds it convenient.
And so, don't do this.
Just don't engage with men who do this.
Conversely, men don't engage with women who do this, obviously.
But a different kettle of fish.
But we'll leave it there.
So basically, you've got to be really particular, and you've got to be restrictive as to when you have sex.
On that, we'll go to the video comments.
Do you want to watch the Hangout, guys?
Please consider the sentence, I could not put the trophy in the suitcase because it was too big.
You understand that, I hope.
Lambda would have no idea what it is because Lambda does not have a model of the world with which it's interpreting the words.
It does not think in terms of the world.
It's just associating words.
And if you don't believe me on that front right there, I'll get to the storytelling problems next time.
Okay, well, maybe.
But I do believe in the conversation with Landa, it does use the term it to refer to something else.
So again, like I said, I'm not saying it's sentient.
I'm saying it's a very, very clever program.
Yeah, it was very interesting.
So I found this Twitter thread, and can we please have a dadist lecture on it?
I tried to find a way to send it to you so Carl could make it.
Maybe he could look it up and make a segment or something.
It's a really, really good thread.
Thank you.
I have indeed seen that thread, and it would be worth a data segment, you are right.
You should really play Red Dead Redemption 2, because I play a lot of it, and still am.
And I get this feeling when you're playing it, because it's got all these mini things about being in the Old West.
You know, most of the games wouldn't bother with, right?
Sure.
So you can go picking herbs and picking herbs that you mix with meats in it.
Everything takes forever as well.
Like, actually going out and cooking all the meat, like, it takes a long time for video games.
You think it would just be instant stuff.
Yeah, yeah.
To go and find the correct animals that you need and the right pelts and whatnot.
Like, it's...
There's an unbelievable amount of small things that you would...
Everyone just thinks it's like, oh, yeah, you know, cool thing that they've added for the game to be better, right?
But it really gives you a sense of achievement.
And then you start thinking about it and be like...
Damn, I wish I was doing that in real life, actually.
That's the thing.
I want a horse.
And honestly, I'd love to get a horse and just go riding somewhere.
It just sounds like so much fun.
And I think it's definitely true.
I saw that thread as well.
Go shoot some squirrels.
That's so true.
I think if you could get more kids to play Red Dead 2, maybe without less of the murder, then they'd also have the same kind of satisfaction and idea that maybe we should go and do this.
Well, that's why I've been playing Warhammer and painting the miniatures rather than playing video games.
That's what I've been spending my time doing.
Because at the end of it, I have something that I've completed.
I was talking to Daisy about trying to go pick, you know, what's it called?
Herbs and whatnot around here.
She was telling me about all the different ones.
I just ended up talking about magic mushrooms, which apparently grow around here as well.
Oh, really?
There you go.
Business.
No, not business advice.
What am I saying?
Probably not business advice.
Just, you know, I'm not into it, but just, if you could find a robot for robosexuals, I just, maybe?
You did?
Let me just give it a test run.
From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me.
I crave the strength and certainty of steel.
Says the guy building that.
The irony of that is I don't even own a toaster.
That's probably the best count.
I got an argument.
Well, no, there was an argument outside.
My friends were a Romanian guy down the hall who gave me his toaster.
And I was like, oh, great, finally, I got one.
And then it was covered in crumbs.
Great, finally, I got a sex toy.
No, and I got it, and it's covered in crumbs and stuff still, and there's loads of bread in the middle.
I was just like, oh, I can't even toast toast in it.
I'll throw it away.
Can't have sex with this.
No, not that either.
Someone's already used it.
Anyway, let's go to the next one.
I think they say that the whole point of propaganda is not necessarily that you believe it, it's that you know it's BS and you can't say anything about it.
Tonight, the takeover of Wandsworth Town Library by a group of American gay men in the year 2035.
We had some friends in Wandsworth and this was right, it was a few months before Pride.
No, it wasn't Pride anymore, they changed the name, it was Arrogance.
Well, I think they thought by the time you're wearing gimp animal outfits in front of the Metropolitan Police and getting selfies, it's kind of like a little bit past that.
All right.
But no, that's a great point, though.
It's about humiliating you, forcing you to tell the lie.
Yeah.
Hey, guys.
Oh, gosh.
Okay, I guess I need a light.
Thank you guys very much for letting people know about my substack, taraj.substack.com, and the essay there about CCP propagandists, I believe I found in our media, in my essay on Squid Game.
This is how I want to thank you.
This right here is the UGG Ascot Slipper.
It's what got me through the pandemic.
It's about $100 American.
I recommend matte or suede.
Okay.
They look comfortable.
Good slipper advice.
Yeah.
Do you want any slippers?
No.
My wife wants me to get slippers.
I was thinking, you've got to be old enough now, you've got, you know, like two pairs.
You know, one for outside, one for inside, something like that.
I don't even wear my shoes or I go barefoot.
Like a man.
Rival.
Do you know you're never going to get slippers?
You're sat there going, oh, Red Dead Redemption.
I really love to go riding and shooting and skinning.
You're like, yeah, but I would wear my slippers.
No, but I'm looking at you and you're a little bit grey.
I'm thinking, you know, that man should be given some slippers for Christmas.
You know, I'm just thinking...
Little slippers.
Okay, well, guess what you're getting for Christmas.
Let's go to the next one.
Slippers are gay.
Someone should probably let Ezra know...
That Parcheesi actually originated in India.
In fact, there was an emperor, Akbar I, he had a giant Parcheesi board made of marble in his courtyard and he used women dressed in different colored robes as his pieces.
So, yeah, Ezra's an idiot.
Alrighty.
Sounds based.
See you next time.
People listening, he's playing with his wooden door.
you Very rotted wooden door.
Well, I guess the hinges are fine.
Don't look it.
No.
What was this in reference to?
I think he's brought this big old house that's a bit of a mess, and he's been showing us around all the things that have broken, which presumably he's going to be slowly fixing up over time as well.
Oh, that's cool.
The next one.
Oh, what should I watch for TV today?
Let's see.
Oh!
Oh, that's nice.
Look at Paramount Plus.
Supporting Germany.
Nice.
What?
Do you see the pride flag there, but they've got it in order, so it's a German flag?
Oh, yeah!
Deutschland, Deutschland, Dubai!
It's paramount!
It's weird, actually, isn't it?
Oh, God.
Well, you know, it brings a whole new meaning to the racial pride flag, doesn't it?
You put it out like that.
Art gold, thanks.
Let's go to the next one.
From South Jersey heritage comes the story of George West.
He was a lawyer that lived in the early 1800s in a mansion with his two brothers and his parents in Catawba, New Jersey.
George slowly poisoned each member of his family one by one to get at the family fortune.
After they were all dead, he took the money and left.
But he also rigged the front door of the mansion with a shotgun booby trap.
But months later, when the money ran out, he came back to the mansion, forgot about the trap, and killed himself.
I mean, A, you get what you deserve.
But B, why did you need to booby trap the mansion?
Why don't you sell the mansion?
So how do you forget about it?
I mean, how many shotgun booby traps do you make?
And you think, oh, you've lost count.
Did I do on this one?
No, it's probably fine.
I'll just open it.
Only one would find out!
But like, why would you bother?
I saw it in the chat there, just in response to the German pride thing, it was just like, for the daddy land from all the Paramount Stormtroopers.
Let's go to the next one.
Literally raised by wolves, Lehman Russ essentially just lived on Norway the planet.
When the Emperor came for him, Lehman challenged the Emperor to an eating and drinking contest.
And won both.
The Emperor had to slap him around a bit and make him join the legions.
Eventually, manipulated by Horus into almost murdering his brother Magnus, who, to be clear, did absolutely nothing wrong.
What happened to him to make him disappear from canon?
He left.
No, no, seriously.
one day he just wandered out of the feasting hall and just walked off yeah I think in what is that the emperor detects the speech he's just in a warp just having fun deeply suspicious of your appreciation of people who don't know Kyle's got some chaos units now
so I just saw your video about depression in young people and honestly I just wanted to say thank you because I was feeling clinically depressed for the last month
and I didn't know why until I saw that video.
So on behalf of pretty much everybody, I just want to say thank you.
Glad we could do some good.
Always nice to hear.
Let's go to the red comments on the side.
So the Wuhan wet market says Gary Lineker.
Sorry, I forgot what that was, I think.
I was wrong about the wet markets as well.
Gary Lineker should apply to be present to the NAACP now that he is as black as Elizabeth Warren and Rachel Dolezal.
Wasn't she involved in the NAACP? Yeah, I think she was a chapter master or something.
Even better, we should ask him if he has an M word passed.
I'm sure he truly was a brother.
If he was truly a brother, sorry, he would have no problem saying it.
Just Samuel L. Jackson, you know, that interview?
Say it.
Try it off a size.
Do it.
Ross says, Chalky Lineker was bullied for his ears, not his skin tone.
Yeah, exactly.
And his goofy face.
Kevin says, he got racially abused a couple of times and got lughole abused millions of times because of his jug ears.
So why doesn't he identify as an African elephant?
I too am a fellow elephant.
Justin says, Gary Lindker, I had darkish skin, but I'm not.
I'm as English as it comes.
So Gary thinks that non-whites can't be English.
Seems rather racist.
Robert says, Can someone ask Gary which countries is our reputation going down in?
In which countries don't seem to care?
It's almost like anything the countries don't care about have in common.
Each country should be almost 99 ethnically the same.
Jonah says, I can't blame Gary for claiming M-Web Pass.
If anyone could, they know it would be beneficial to their career as a victim of the right kind of racism.
Jimbo says, Gary Lineker is the perfect example of how comfort and Twitter is making people utterly deranged.
Yeah, which is true.
Since Brexit and Trump, our moral betters truly believe they're surrounded by people who need to be re-educated into race communism, despite being ridiculously wealthy themselves.
That's why we have celebs singing, imagine.
Shame, because he actually seemed like a normal person when he's on the TV. Yeah, I know, it's really embarrassing.
Like, Gary Lineker, in the 90s, he had a sterling reputation, because he wasn't giving any of this nonsense.
I mean, I only joined Twitter after I started working for you, and I must admit, I found a lot of people that I'd seen on TV throughout the years and just thought, oh god.
Like, there is something weird about that space that turns people into ghouls.
Yes.
I am looking forward, because I'm thinking about it more and more now, there definitely is, by the next season, there's going to be chants about Gary Lineker being black.
I'm looking forward to it.
Because you know how brutal I've mentioned some of them to you.
Oh yeah, yeah.
So, whatever comes out of it, it's going to be good.
Looking forward to those.
But the chant will get you banned for life.
Alfred Bates says, Gary Lineker is the whitest black man since Michael Jackson.
The thing is, at one point, Michael Jackson was actually black.
Yeah, that's true.
Have you seen pictures of him when he was young?
He was actually, you know, he was black.
But he still was off, though, wasn't he?
Well, he got skin whitening and cosmetic surgery and all that sort of stuff.
Is that really, can you really do an Uncle Ruckus to stop bleaching your skin?
Well, I don't know how it works, okay?
I'm not saying I'm an expert in it, but his skin was definitely a lot paler, okay?
That's the black version to get a tan.
Maybe.
I don't know.
Anyway, General Hyping says, The Rwanda debacle has been a beautiful mask-off moment for the left, too.
Ten years ago, there's no such thing as an S-hole country, you racist.
Nowadays, you can't send refugees to live in Rwanda.
It's an S-hole.
Yeah, I know.
It's great, isn't it?
Alex says, You got it wrong.
Economic consequences aren't for white people.
The writer is a progressive, so they probably think that minorities can't do anything for themselves and need the white majority to help them and give them things.
And so when there are no white people...
Maybe.
We've played two clips now, which have made me laugh, because there was one we did back when we were going through the Great Replacement stuff, and this Indian lady was being shown it, and she ended up responding at the end saying, well, I think America has enough materials that they can support the minorities, which...
And then there was that other one, which you weren't here for, where a guy went to the Labour March on the weekend and just went around with a clipboard going, do you support bringing refugees out?
Would you like to sign to take that?
Yeah, yeah.
And one of them just went, and he said, what does equality mean to you?
And she said, well, it's equal treatment for those who don't belong here.
Why?!
John just, do you want to put that note up again, John?
John, apparently Michael Jackson had something called Vitiligo, where his skin loses pigment in patches, so he ended up just bleaching the rest so it wasn't patchy.
I had no idea.
That's still black.
But, uh, equal treatment for those who don't belong here.
What a statement!
That's so based.
It was from a Labour Party.
She had a sign that said, refugees welcome racists.
You don't belong here, though.
But I think you should be fairly treated.
Omar says, all those opinion pieces can be reduced to authored by a white idiot who thinks they won't be included in the anti-white pogrom they're fostering.
It reminds me of various clips of BLM supporters screaming infusion at the rioters that they're on their side as their property was destroyed.
Yeah, the particular clip of them trying to cheer the rioters as they march past.
Then someone starts throwing stones at the window and smashes the window.
Like, we support you.
It's like, yeah, they don't care.
It was university students who were playing beer pong.
Yeah.
They don't care, idiots.
Lord Nerevin says, As time goes on, it's looking more and more like we owe Tim Pool an apology.
Well, I never denied Tim Pool was wrong.
Well, it just seems there's a lot of mirror image Tim Pauls out there.
Yeah.
Race war now.
We all laughed for years at Civil War predictions.
I wasn't laughing at it.
I was like, yeah, it probably is, mate, to be honest.
But now it's looking more and more likely.
The breakdown of federal law, don't say based, flagrant disregard for the rule of law, dehumanization of the opposition, clear battle lines and issues that are polarized enough to get violent, buckle in, folks.
Yeah, I know.
I mean, this really does look like that's where it's going, frankly.
Radchick was right, says the Democrats really never got over losing their slaves.
That's true.
And at that bloody letter, it's like, look, we can't be replacing the whites because we're killing all the blacks.
Just checkmate.
I guess I can't get out of that.
Conservatives.
Yeah, exactly.
You got us.
Killing the blacks to own the cons.
Left this part being, I think that statement has been proved untrue by that letter, but just accidentally.
Such a hell of a mask off moment.
It's like, yeah, we just want equal treatment for those who don't belong here, isn't it?
It's like, yeah, okay.
And now they're dangling this replacement thing.
They don't belong here!
Hello, fellow anti-racists who want to talk about the people who don't belong here and killing the blacks.
Ugh.
Now they're dangling this replacement theory propaganda as a carrot to the more radical individuals, while they're simultaneously hurting the nuclear family in minority marriage and birth rates.
So they can't own slaves, now they're using subversive means to manipulate and control.
Yeah, that's exactly what this is.
Honestly, the way that the left uses intersectionality is subversive, to control minorities.
That's exactly it.
A weird guilty conscience, though, where you're like, okay, I want the whole world to come here, but I know they don't belong here.
Like, I know what I'm doing's wrong.
Also, I'm going to get them to abort their babies.
Yeah, but the idea of just being like, I am...
I mean, to believe that they don't belong here, but you still want them all to move here, surely means that you know you're trying to destroy the country, and you're happy about that?
What else could it mean?
Just...
Itachi says, the great replacement is more about the indoctrination of children into leftist insanity than some silly colour wheel.
Yeah, that's exactly right, actually.
When Tucker Carlson's talking about it, he's like, look, they're bringing them in because they expect them to be Democrat voters because the Democrats promise them free money.
You know, it's not that he's like, oh, the whiteness of the immigrants or something.
Colin says, or to put it another way, 70% of African Americans have been terrified by the MSN reporting.
Yeah.
Well, it's like 70% of African Americans think that, you know, they're going to get killed by a white supremacist.
Well, it's not because of what happens in their daily life.
It's not because of the Klan who are on the street corner going, I'm watching you, boy.
You know, it's not that.
It's because of what they're reading in the papers.
Baron Von Warhawk says, these leftists keep talking about an upcoming race war in the USA, while at the same time ignoring the real racial conflict going on in the USA. Where are the articles talking about the random acts of violence against Asians by black people?
Well, they do have hashtag stop Asian hate, which isn't working.
I know, it's done a lot of work, hasn't it?
Can't believe that those thugs in New York City were like, wow, I was going to punch that old Asian woman in the face, but stop Asian hate changed my mind.
It really is some kind of sickness, though.
Yeah, it is.
To see, like, 20-year-old men doing that.
It's disgusting.
And, like, it's just the worst thing in the world.
But, I mean, what can you do?
This is just life now.
Because it's not even rational in the slightest.
It's just, like, are you a literal animal?
Like, what's wrong with you?
Yeah.
I mean, do we just give you 50 years in jail and hope you die there?
Because, I mean, you clearly can't be given a pencil.
There was a video in London the other day of a group of black guys who was, like, drop-kicking an old Englishman.
And it's like, why?
Oh, he's racist to me.
It's like, so?
So what?
So we're proving him wrong by being...
Well, let's just assume you're right.
So what?
You don't have a right to dropkick an old man, you fucking savage.
Are you serious?
But yeah, anyway.
Nicholas says, I know correlation is not causation, but my experience of the women in my life who spend their time bemoaning the lack of worthwhile long-term relationships all tend to be over-entitled, obnoxious and tedious people.
That's probably true.
It's often a chore to spend time with them.
It's a shame some good people also fall by the wayside because of a loud vocal minority, as it seems to be with everything recently.
Yeah, it does.
Henry says, as someone who has used the various dating apps, I can probably guess why Molly hasn't gone on a date despite 400 matches.
There's an expectation that the men have to be the ones to make the first moves.
However, we've also had years of Me Too horror stories, which amount to a bad date, which puts people on edge as asking a match to meet for a coffee could be career ending if you ask the wrong single journalist with a degree of Twitter clout.
I don't really think that's one of the major factors.
I think it's the expectations.
Like you said, Twitter is basically a sex app.
So it's like Twitch.
Twitch is also true.
Don't take that back.
What was the dating app again?
Tinder.
Tinder, that was it.
Then we give them a T. Twitter, Twitch, Tinder.
Whores everywhere.
Yeah, exactly.
The whore apps.
But I don't think it's about Me Too, really.
I think it's because, honestly, the young men have expectations, and the young women fulfill those expectations.
And those expectations aren't, should we get married and start a family?
Anyway, Maureen says, about a third of women will go on a date with men who they're not romantically interested in to get free food.
Doesn't help.
John's like, yeah, this happened, has it, lads?
Okay.
Of course not to John.
What are you doing?
I was surprised, actually!
Just do something fun on the first date instead of taking her to dinner.
Take her for a walk, for instance.
Show her some places of interest.
Besides, by doing something active, it will be easier to find something to talk about.
You'll get to know her personality faster than when you're sitting across the table from one another.
Also, it's fascinating that these women don't seem to assess their own potential shortcomings.
It's a shame that the traditional dating dynamics changed.
Completely true.
Jonathan Crowe, hey man, says, My partner didn't have a choice about dating me, I announced to her family and friends on Facebook that we were in a relationship, and everyone was so happy for her she just went along with it.
That's a risky move.
Yeah, that could have backfired into Me Too territory, I feel.
Bob says, the problem is not that women are struggling to get men.
There aren't.
They're just not looking for someone with qualities of a good husband or partner.
Well, this is when you say, getting men.
That's the question, isn't it?
Sleeping with men?
Obviously not.
It's easy for a woman to sleep with a man.
But to get him to commit, you actually have to start closing those legs, ladies.
But anyway, it's just not the terrible facet of a culture's high time preference.
Correct.
There's already a trait of youth, but in previous generations, family, society and culture used to temper it.
Yes, that's true.
Heathcliff says, My wife makes me breakfast in the morning and dinner when I come home from work.
She also puts my socks in little bundles and isn't a whore.
Wow, you've got a real keeper there, man.
Jesus.
Socks in bundles and isn't a whore.
I mean, it's so difficult.
It does sound like a weak list.
That sounds like an awesome list.
What are you talking about?
No, I know, but it's just when you lay it out like that.
You imagine, like, the women describing their perfect man, and, you know, it's all this fairytale stuff, and it's just a man with little socks in their ass.
Yeah, I'd like breakfast in the morning, dinner when I get home, socks and bundles, and if you do not be a prostitute.
It's not even a high bar to bars.
Turning point average men.
Turning point pub.
Yeah.
Vermillion says, I don't know about a woman landing a man in the modern day.
That said, my co-worker even half-jokingly berates men and talks down about men, and now has seemingly triggered something in our younger staff members and acts similar in regard.
While I'm not well-versed in social life or relationships, are you an AI, mate?
Well, I'm not well-versed in social life nor romantic relationships.
Or otherwise, the experience I have leads me to believe that many of the locals and those online are positively crazy or have a need to stand for some cause or have a persistent whiny issue rather than getting on with life and the issues at hand.
Some women are fine, though few and far between the interactions I've had.
Perhaps I attract mildly crazy or desperate women being a tad unhinged myself from what I'm told.
Possibly.
Bald Eagle says, How dare you try to force your patriarchal definition of what a whammon is on us?
Just kidding.
It's basically impossible for modern women to fight a man.
All the men are either fully infused with soy or have decided it's not worth all the baggage and victimhood that comes along with it.
I think we're going to see actual men marrying women that are 15, 20 years younger than them to cut out the current generation of women from having children.
Which is possible.
Charlie says, the best thing I saw regarding Tinder is that to find a long-term partner is to revamp their profile, making it as wholesome as possible and clear that you want a long-term relationship.
It's a step in the right direction.
Yeah, that probably is the right thing to do.
If you're going to use Tinder.
But remember, the kind of guy that's on Tinder is the kind of guy who's going for the kind of women who's on Tinder.
I think I showed you.
I went on there once and just like took photos of just like random women just to make the point.
Yes.
I remember what was it?
I posted something about it and then Lauren, not Lauren Southern, Lauren Chedd messaged me and like, oh, well, you know, there may be someone.
I just sent back like one of the images and went, yeah, she's looking for bits to write.
There's just some bird with her ass out.
It's just like, yeah, not marriage material.
No.
Grant said, yeah, exactly.
So this woman's like, I've had 400 matches on Tinder.
I was like, okay.
Great.
You know, what was the point of that?
You know, these guys are looking for sex.
I have also got serious relationships.
Yeah, exactly.
Grant says, Unfortunately, there's a coordination problem in the dating market.
The women who are putting out get lots of dates, and they make the exceptions for all women high.
This makes the chaste women a long-term investment that these children, not men, as in the young men who are having sex with them, are unwilling to make.
They are kids in candy stores.
Men find women like the author of the original article.
Yeah, and it's a real shame that she's like, well, I had all these dreams of romance, and I wasn't a whore about it, and I can't find a guy.
So that's terrible.
That's really terrible.
Catastrophic Regression Threshold says, on the data sermon I cannot wrap my head around is why anyone seems to think that Tinder is an actual site for dating.
When it came out, it was known as a hookup app.
When did people forget that?
Good question.
Omar again says, I think you've sort of touched on it, but the most important reason a woman can't get a relationship isn't that she's having sex with a guy.
It's that she's been having sex with everyone else before him.
Yes, but she is capable of lying about that.
I've heard that women sometimes lie about the number of partners they've had.
So, if you're having sex with this guy, you're like, yeah, no, no, no, you're the first guy I've just literally met, jumped into bed with, and had sex with every night this week.
First time I've ever done this.
No one believes it.
By removing women's obligation to keep chaste, feminism has removed men's obligation to commit to them.
Precisely true.
The only ring anyone will put on the town bicycle is a bell to tell people to get out of the way.
Oof.
Oof.
Oh my.
That's kind of an inside expert from a woman.
Yeah.
The rules are so broken that even a woman looking for a normal courtship can't navigate the tangled mess of bespoke boundaries.
Nobody knows where the lines are anymore so trying to date is like entering a minefield where every wrong step is potentially lethal for your relationship or reputation and future dating prospects.
That's exactly right.
Is there any dadist advice?
You don't have any attraction to anyone?
It's an agenda, isn't it?
Yeah.
I don't know if I have any advice for that, I'm afraid.
John, you got any advice for that?
Someone who doesn't find anyone attractive can't find someone and fall in love, obviously.
I mean, literally, you don't find anyone attractive.
Come on, there must be someone out there you like.
I mean, just look up, like, the best-looking men and women, I guess, at first, to start from there.
Yeah.
And then...
Maybe think about, like, I don't know, finding personalities attractive?
I don't know.
Anyway, otherwise, we're out of comments.
We're basically out of time.
Yeah.
We're doing the live stream anyway.
So, I suppose we're only here.
But if you want more from us, learnsthears.com.
Otherwise, we'll be back at 3.30 UK time, so in an hour, with the Gold Tier Zoom call.
▲
Export Selection