Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 24, 2022 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:31

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #399

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 24th of May 2022.
	I'm I'm joined by Harry.
	Hello!
	And today we're going to be talking about the insect overlords, our overlords, the American racial imperialism in England, and also Clinton getting caught, which has been enjoyable if nothing else.
	But I suppose we'll start with the insect overlords.
	So, we have our insect overlords, and I'm going to call them that because that's how they see themselves.
	God bless.
	I welcome them.
	Fantastic.
	With open arms.
	They sit there and go, we've all the world.
	A bunch of Germans.
	But we'll start off here talking about a little shill here being Rousseau's discourse and inequality book club that me and Carl did, in which Carl told me about, well, Rousseau's philosophy, which again was like some kind of stupid insect that didn't understand anything.
	I was just thinking, what if we centrally plan everything in the world and everything would be fine if we just have a few people controlling the place in this series?
	Well, I mean, they are the representatives of the general will, after all.
	Yeah.
	We know because they told us so, and they're the representatives of the general will, so they can't lie.
	And if they're wrong, then everyone else is just wrong, and don't worry about it.
	Because everybody else is going against the general- What doesn't make sense about this to you?
	Yeah, so, uh, the- the philosophy of merely pretending to be retarded is, uh, coming true.
	And, uh, if we go to the next- I mean, this is worth a watch just to see Callum's spirit break.
	If we go to the next one here, we can see the fact that, of course, the WEF, World Economic Forum, being the Bug Boys as well, as you see this article here, why we need to give insects the role they deserve in our food systems, which is not.
	Well, surely that is to use to catch other, better food.
	No, it's to eat.
	Eat the books.
	Eat the books.
	I refuse.
	We've got the next one here.
	They're having their big stupid meeting that they have every year, this time in Davos, of course, and we have this clip of Mr.
	Schwab himself giving a new evil speech from his Legion of Doom.
	Did he even shake his fist for a second there?
	Yeah, the future belongs to us.
	Is he going to start slamming it on his podium?
	Let's play.
	Let's also be clear.
	The future is not just happening.
	The future is built by us, by a powerful community as you here in this room.
	We have the means to improve the states of the world, but two conditions are necessary.
	The first one is that we act all as stakeholders of larger communities.
	That we serve not only our self-interest, but we serve the community.
	That's what we call stakeholder responsibility.
	And second, that we collaborate.
	And this is the reason why you find many opportunities here during the meeting to engage.
	into very action and impact-oriented initiatives to make progress related to specific issues on the global agenda.
	So there we have it.
	We have the global elites who are literally getting together and telling you they rule the world, they run it, they're going to plan the future, and it's being built by them.
	This is pure Machiavellian.
	For anybody who's not aware, the stakeholder capitalism, which he puts forward in all his books and everything that he's done in that speech there, is basically the opposite of trying to run your business to make profits.
	It's instead saying, you run your business to make an improvement in the world.
	Who Who determines that improvement are the global elites, whether or not people want them or not, because obviously if you're getting profits, you're providing the public with the service or good that they already want.
	If you're not running for profits, you're not doing that explicitly.
	So it's the global elite saying, this is what you want, and we know because we know what's best for you.
	we're going to run all our businesses and even if they're at a loss we've got black rock and vanguard and uh and other investment funds going through esg uh environmental social and governance to say to keep those businesses propped up whether they're actually profitable or not as you say with the stakeholder capitalism aspect there just they will decide what is good for the stakeholders and well they are the only stakeholders frankly when it comes to it which is uh well we don't like you such as elon musk getting a lot of rankings as you say but it's the i think he's taken off ESG recently because he's obviously going against the agenda.
	Exactly.
	I just love how you have this insect brain philosophy that some retarded elites are going to plan all of humanity's future in a little room and everything will work.
	Why?
	Because, well, we're important and smart.
	No, you're not.
	You have no idea what the hell you're doing.
	But I gave myself the smart badge, so I'm smart.
	I mean, it really is that simple.
	People who just think they're important, there's no evidence that they're important, but they know they're important.
	I don't know why, but they just decided that they should run the world.
	Just to remind everyone as well that Boris Johnson, Emmanuel Macron, Justin Trudeau, all of these, half his cabinet, they're all involved in this, they're all part of the agenda.
	Biden, this is where Build Back Better came from after all, so everything going wrong with the world can kind of be traced ideologically back here.
	So what are they having this time?
	So they're all meeting up, and what's the speech as well?
	I just thought I'd go for some of the good clips, or some of the stuff that's said.
	So as you saw there, you have Schwab himself saying that we're all in the world.
	And you have a new one here in which they're saying they're going to recalibrate all human rights, specifically freedom of speech.
	Let's play.
	We are finding ourselves in a place where we have increasing polarization everywhere.
	And everything feels binary when it doesn't need to be.
	So I think we're going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online, you know, from freedom of speech to the freedom to, you know, to be free from online violence or the right of data protection to the right to child dignity.
	I don't remember any of those other than speech being rights that I'm aware of.
	The right to be free from online violence.
	Online violence being people saying mean names at you.
	Yeah, the violence that doesn't touch you but instead upsets you.
	Also, the world is more polarized than ever.
	We need to stop this by preventing anybody from speaking their mind.
	I mean, that's a solution, I suppose.
	We have a unipolar world in which no one disagrees and everyone agrees that the WEF did nothing wrong.
	And we just, well, I for one welcome the insect overlords.
	We go to the next one here.
	We also have some other nonsense that they were proposing.
	Just stupid ideas.
	But you can see, again, just the way they think about the world and the fact that they run it.
	And so you have some, who cares here, Unilever's chief executive saying that he would like to see standardized carbon footprint labels on products similar to calories.
	So you can feel sad.
	Because what other purpose is that?
	I mean, what are you going to do if you pick up your KitKat and it gives you the amount of carbon it took to make the KitKat?
	Why do I care?
	How are you even going to process that in your head?
	I don't know what that even means.
	Yeah, what effect has that had on the world around me that I can actually tangibly put my hand on?
	What can you point to me and say, this is because you bought that KitKat?
	It's just to make you feel bad for trying to live by eating.
	How dare you?
	Whereas if you've seen the carbon emissions of the boogs, you'll feel much better.
	It'll be much better.
	If we go to the next one here, we have Ukrainian stuff as well.
	Them saying that the Ukrainian war will just last forever and ever and ever.
	Joe Manchin here, speaking at the World Economic Forum, rejects the idea that Ukrainian war should ever be resolved with some kind of treaty.
	Instead demands fighting to the end until total victory.
	I didn't realise we were taking after the Japanese Imperial Army, but okay, alright, fair play.
	Yeah, I mean, this is a valid question that's been asked by everyone, thinking about the Ukrainian war, which is like, well, what does victory look like for us?
	Because we're not in it.
	Like, it's the Ukrainians.
	Spending billions of pounds and dollars just sending aid over there so that it can go to totally legit, not corrupt individuals.
	Well, it's just members of Congress' families of NGOs giving themselves money.
	But then there's just the fact, okay, well, how much of this are we going to print?
	And, well, I saw we did the segment in which Tucker Carlson said it's three trillion.
	Three trillion US dollars just in the US. Apparently, they're being sidelined for this.
	That's the term they're talking about.
	And, well, Joe Manchin saying, well, basically, yes.
	We will keep going until we get rid of Putin, which...
	It's going to happen.
	You're insane if you think that's going to be the result of just sending money to Ukraine.
	I don't think that's going to work, but whatever.
	We'll see.
	If we go to the next one, we also have the Kievan mayor here.
	How do you say his name?
	Klitschko?
	Saying, we are fighting for every one of you to the conference of World Economic Forum leaders there.
	We pay for that with the biggest price, human life.
	Every day, hundreds of them.
	It's very important that you stay with Ukraine.
	Now, I'm not happy that there are civilians on the ground in Ukraine who are legitimately being hurt by this war, but last time I checked, I don't remember Russia knocking on our doors.
	I don't remember them knocking on France's door.
	I mean, they're assaulting the West, you could say, at least is the argument given by those who are massively pro-Ukraine, although the idea that Ukraine's part of the West is a whole other conversation.
	But there's just the aspect here of him being like, wait, he's talking to the World Economic Forum.
	No one else, because I remember the kind of who mentioned it, but the viewing figures on the YouTube channel are crap.
	No one's watching them, except themselves.
	And him saying, we're fighting for every one of you.
	Well, if we go to the next one here, we can actually see the fact that John previously noted that the State Department literally handpicked him to be a key player in Ukrainian politics.
	Like, this is a phone call that was leaked from the State Department talking about who they're going to put in charge of Ukraine after the revolution.
	Because, you know, that's the Americans' job, not the Ukrainian people's.
	And they decided that he should be a major player who should one day become the leader as well.
	So, fantastic.
	I mean, literally handpicked.
	The next one, we also have Malcolm...
	I'm sorry, this is the...
	There should be more in there if you can look up, John.
	Which is that Malcolm Nance turned up.
	Do you remember him?
	I remember Malcolm Nance on Bill Maher arguing about critical race theory with Ben Shapiro, and he got completely trashed but acted like a child the whole time, so people may have thought he won that argument.
	I don't know how people could think he won that argument, because as you say, it was just embarrassing.
	I mean, he literally was just like, ah, but you racist though, to everything Ben was saying.
	So this is the image here, which he turned up in his uniform in Ukraine, streaming in there to the World Economic Forum, and Poso turning up, the trainee, which we'll get to in a minute, showing us that he's there, which makes me just laugh, because again, I mean, the caliber of these people, I mean, if you go to the next one, I mean, as you mentioned, the only thing anyone really knows him for is, of course, that he went on Bill Marshall and got destroyed by Ben Shapiro.
	With facts and logic?
	Indeed, with facts and logic, which is like, here's critical race theory, it's mad and proposes segregation again, and Malcolm was like, I want that.
	Ben went to law school and was taught this sort of stuff as part of the curriculum, and Malcolm's just like, nah, never heard of it.
	But if I have heard of it, it's a good thing.
	But then he argues that it's fantastic and should be the way the country works, so presumably that's what he's fighting for in Ukraine as well, which, okay.
	Emancipating all the black Ukrainians.
	And then re-segregating them for equal.
	Trust me.
	Yes.
	Let's go to the next one here because we also have the fact that, as you mentioned, the private jets, the carbon usage for the pleb needs to be told to them through their Kit Kats.
	You need to know how much carbon that took in your sandwich.
	But as for them and their private jets, endlessly, no one cares.
	Carbon, what's that?
	I mean, to be fair, I could actually imagine all of these global elites travelling around on their big jets, their big carbon emission-y jets, but feasting, engorging themselves on just handfuls, mountains of bugs.
	I mean, just because they're that transparently evil.
	I mean, you can see Schwab just gorging himself on bugs, just eating them all as he just, I don't know, flies around the world in a circle just to burn petrol over the dab on the peasants.
	But there's the point here, at least Sophie says here, that they're hypocrites.
	It's not hypocrisy, really.
	There's a very clear difference between what they do and what you do, which is they're important.
	Your family's not.
	There's no evidence for this, but it's true.
	And the thing with calling them hypocrites is that, yeah, you're pointing to their ideology, but I think we forget to realise that the ideology is for us, not for them.
	Well, that's the thing.
	It's one in which we look at the world through a lens of elites and plebs, and well, they're the elites, and you're not.
	It does seem a lot like they're trying to build Plato's Republic, doesn't it?
	But we shall move to the local man who holds a camera, Jack Posobiec himself, who turned up with his dangerous camera to film what was going on, and this was not accepted, but as you can see, they previously blocked him on Twitter because he had pointed out that they're all crazy lunatics, and if we go to the next one here, he turned up and tried to film and was detained by the Davos police, here being the World Economic Forum police as well.
	Well, let's play this clip.
	Yeah, this is wild.
	I'm not allowed to record.
	Please don't.
	Isn't this a public street?
	It is.
	But actually I don't like it to be on video.
	I can take it off.
	You have your documentation on the phone, man.
	Take it off, please.
	Yeah.
	Do you want to take a picture of it?
	Yes.
	We can everybody see it.
	You can show me and then I can watch.
	Can you put your handy away?
	Sorry?
	Can you put your phone away?
	Am I not allowed to film?
	No.
	Why not?
	Not during the police.
	Why is that?
	It's not allowed to give.
	On the public street?
	Yes.
	Is that a law answer to it?
	Here it's not a law.
	Please put it away.
	Not familiar with that law?
	Please put it away.
	Seems like you just don't want me to film.
	Sir, please put it away.
	Okay!
	So there we have Poso being arrested by the World Economic Forum Police, and that's not even a joke.
	What were the charges?
	I think they were just asking him questions.
	I don't think they actually ended up taking him to jail.
	Or if he is, well then, F in the chat, boys.
	Poso.
	Yeah, very concerning.
	As he has to eat his boogs in the cell.
	But if we go to the next one here, where there was very quick memes, obviously, made of this, which is a local man with his camera, and that's not allowed, at least according to the World Economic Forum Police turning up here.
	And if we go to the next one here, there are even more memes instantly made, which is just like...
	An evil poso man turns up with video cameras.
	You're live-streaming the whole conference.
	Why are you scared?
	What are you scared of?
	That's the thing.
	I think this is a two-pronged attack by these sorts of elites.
	They will go on YouTube and lay out all of their evil plans for everybody to see.
	It's a thick German accent.
	In his sixth German accent, yes.
	But if anybody else reports on them, they immediately try and shut it down and get it told, get their buddies in the mainstream media to talk about it as if it's some kind of conspiracy theory, despite the fact we've got it on camera, exactly what they're saying and what they're doing.
	It's basically like some kind of Orwellian doublespeak, but in terms of actions instead.
	I mean, I love how the police literally turn up, which is like, where are your papers?
	Like, what have you got?
	And if we go to the next one here, we can see that, yes, indeed, they are some kind of special police force, with their little badges there, that say World Economic Forum Police 2022, with the weird logo, of course, as well.
	Now that's very concerning.
	That's normal.
	Totally normal.
	In fact, if we go to the next one here, we can see that this is annoyingly normal, apparently.
	As you can see here, this is 2009's police badge, which you could just buy, apparently.
	I presume they were just giving them out as stickers.
	And the badge above that one is the one for the Canton Police.
	So presumably, they are the police for the Canton.
	And then the World Economic Forum gives them special stickers that are like verdes.
	It's the books.
	And then the police do eat the bugs and walk around detaining journalists and asking them, where are your papers for the rest of the day?
	And that's normal.
	Totally normal.
	I mean, again, you're not important.
	They are.
	They get their own special police force.
	Why?
	I mean, they get to choose what's good for you with this whole stakeholder thing, and then if you disagree, they will send their own police force to come and detain you.
	Yeah, great!
	If we go to the next one here, this is just, I tried to look into, like, what's up with this, because I'd never heard of this before.
	What I seem to find out, I mean, correct me, Swiss citizens, if we're getting this wrong, but it seems that the canton has to pay for the security for the World Economic Forum every single year, and it keeps getting more and more expensive, pissing everyone off.
	Rightfully, I would imagine.
	So then there's this, presumably, some kind of agreement that's taken place between the WEF and the Canton to be like, hey, we'll pay for some of the police force, presumably.
	That's why they're wearing the badges.
	Unless they just directly work for them, in which case I can also imagine that happening.
	They're saying here they were paying 1.17 million just to host these guys, security-wise.
	I mean, that's what you had to pay, just for them to turn up in your town and ruin it, frankly.
	If we go to the next one though, we have Posobiec also just shilling for MyPillow whilst he gets taken to the paddy wagon, which I just, I love this meme so much, I must admit.
	So he just says, when you get detained by the World Economic Forum Police and thrown into Davos lockup, you really want to make sure you get a best night's sleep of the whole world.
	From MyPillow.com, promo code POSO! I love how, whatever's happening to him, I can imagine him being arrested in North Korea.
	He's just like, well, I'm gonna go to bed on MyPillow tonight.
	Yep.
	Does not care.
	Gotta respect the hustle.
	Yeah, and if we go to the next one as well, we have the fact that Poso has also previously caused the splash with the WEF, who previously decided to call him a spreader of disinformation online.
	He tells people exactly what we've been saying this whole time.
	Disinformation.
	He films us, and then uploads the footage, and that's disinformation.
	Because he's uploaded it.
	Well, interestingly enough, I mean, Jack Posobiec and his memes were one of the main reasons that Nina Jankovic and her disinformation board seem to have been at least put on hold.
	And I don't remember looking into it.
	Is Jankovic part of the World Economic Forum?
	I would imagine so.
	I wouldn't be surprised.
	So this all seems quite fortuitous for them, that they just managed to get their hands on him.
	But literally the man who killed the Ministry of Truth also has big enemies in the WEF, which of course he does, because they're basically the same thing.
	If we go to the next one here, we also have the fact just to remember what they have planned, because they still keep all their old stupid tweets up, because this is the future they want for you, as seen there.
	Welcome to 2030, I own nothing, I have no privacy, and life has never been better.
	Oh, fantastic.
	With your bug lady eyes.
	As you stare.
	Oh god, you're right.
	Weird.
	If we go to the next one here as well, we also have another clip out of the conversation.
	There's even more going on today.
	There will be more stupid nonsense that comes out of these people's mouths.
	But remember, they're our insect overlords, so we must do as they say.
	And this one is the Pfizer CEO telling us about how he's going to put chips in us all.
	That's not my word, YouTube, so don't bring this to me.
	This is his own words.
	Let's play the clip.
	It is basically a biological chip that it is in the tablet and once you take the tablet and dissolves into your stomach sends a signal that you took the tablet.
	So imagine the applications of that, compliance.
	The insurance companies to know that the medicines that patients should take, they do take them.
	It is fascinating what happens in this field.
	There we are.
	So is he just talking about mind-control pills that you take there?
	Or is he implying that if you're taking the pill, you've already basically been mind-controlled by us, so jobs are good in boys.
	So to be clear, it's got nothing to do with the vaccines, he's just saying that he wants to put a pill inside people so then he can see whether or not they're taking the medicine they've been prescribed to get, quote, compliance out of them, which, yeah, that's not scary at all in the slightest.
	But there we are.
	I mean, I love how the medical misinformation or conspiracy theory misinformation guidelines you get on various Western social medias, and then they just end up saying them at these conferences openly.
	They're saying they want to put a chip in you.
	I'm honestly surprised that this clip doesn't have the little misinformation thing at the bottom of it.
	Well, that's the beauty of this.
	I mean, that's why they smear people like Poso as disinformation units, because he dares to just show us the clip.
	Here you are, talking.
	And I've looked at documents where they're like, oh, the World Economic Forum is not planning some great reset or anything.
	You don't need to worry about it.
	It's like, I've got the book right here.
	It says The Great Reset on it.
	What am I supposed to believe?
	I mean, it's the weakest cover-up in all of human history.
	But I think that's the point.
	It's so weak, but at the same time, it's still letting everybody know that these guys are the ones controlling the information, because they can just go out, say all this stuff publicly, and then still tell everybody, no, you didn't hear what you heard.
	Yeah, it's not happening.
	Don't worry about it.
	And I love how that's got 4 million views already.
	Let's get it higher.
	If we go to the next one here, we also have the Canadian Rebellion in response to the UEF as well.
	This being great from here.
	I haven't been following Canadian politics too much, so I don't really know Pierre's character here, although I know Dave's going to have a message to him about it.
	But this is just, I love to see it, which is, of course, remember that Trudeau and Harper's cabinet are apparently basically just puppets of Mr.
	Schwab.
	And, well, then we have the opposition candidate here being like, well, yeah, look, if I become the prime minister, I'm going to ban every minister and every other top official from even involving themselves in the WEF. I mean, quote, you can't be part of a policy agenda that works against our people.
	Revolutionary idea right there.
	Very simple, and also I love to see it, and quite frankly this is a question that should be asked of every party leader all over the West, which is just, do you have any involvement with the bug people?
	And if they do, then no.
	You have no responsibilities.
	It seems that caring about your own native population and constituency is becoming somewhat of a radical position to be taking for politicians now.
	Yeah, but anyway, I'd love to see it.
	I'd love to see the Canadian Rebellion, and also, well, there we have it.
	I suppose we'll keep an eye on the insect overlords and the crap they come up with, and their delusions about the fact that they're going to run the world.
	Otherwise, that's that.
	Go to the next section.
	Alright, carrying on from that rosy future that we've got ahead of us, let's take a look at the dystopian present that we currently occupy, that being the American racial imperialism which has penetrated England and has been penetrating us for a good long while now, to be honest.
	So we're getting pegged by the Yankees?
	Yes.
	By their ideology, at the very least, which has infiltrated everything to do with us.
	We all know about all of this, but there are more examples to bring up, because every single week there's another example of England taking on the strangely American standard of we need to be less racist because we need to make up for our evil, racist slavery past when what they're referring to is American slavery.
	Their own past.
	Yeah, exactly.
	They had a war, and a lot of people died to end slavery, and good on them, but we just went around the world stopping it, with the West Africa and East Africa squadrons.
	Shockingly enough, the East, especially the Middle East and East Africa and all this...
	A lot of bullying had to happen.
	They really weren't a fan of this whole ending slavery thing, and depending on which countries you look at, they still aren't.
	Another great argument for bullying, which is to stop the slave trade.
	Yes.
	But before I go any further, just to point out that Carl had a good article about this recently talking about the census data proving that Britain is not a nation of immigrants because in the past few decades we seem to have been trying to take on the American cultural mythos of always being a nation of immigrants because America had all of this immigration come in and, oh, they built our businesses, they built our country, and that's seemingly being exported over to here as well, which is not true.
	That's just not true.
	The English, for thousands of years, shockingly enough, were just English.
	We had one or two people here and there who showed up who were exceptions, but no, we were very English, and you can look into your own ancestry, you out there, watching who are from England, to discover that.
	But let's take a look at what's going on recently.
	So, many of you might be aware that there was a controversial post done recently for the Platinum Jubilee of the Queen, where Regent Circus, or Regent Street, sorry, just had a load of Union flags flying.
	It's pretty normal, right?
	Not if you're on Twitter, not if you're a Twitter leftist, because apparently, according to Twitter leftists, this is basically Nazi Germany now.
	Because you understand Nazi Germany flew flags, this flying flag is the same.
	The only reason we hit the Nazis is because of the flags.
	Yep.
	That's the only reason the left is confined to dislike the Nazis.
	Everything else they did, they think is, you know, jolly and good, but the flags...
	I mean, they hated the Jews, they were forced segregation, the left is like, well, so far this is sounding pretty great for me, but flags?
	No thank you.
	But this independent article, Jubilee Flags Aren't Racist, but it's no surprise people think so.
	This is just another variety on why this is a good thing.
	The title might as well be Jubilee Flags Are Racist, and that's a good thing.
	The Union Jack and St.
	George's Cross have become symbols of the far right.
	No, there's a pretty definitive thing that they're symbolizing.
	St.
	George's Cross, for instance, symbolizes England.
	So...
	You'll find it in your geography textbook, you freak.
	Make of that what you will.
	I guess they weren't paying attention in school.
	Groups that spew racial hatred towards Britain's ethnic and religious minorities under the guise of patriotism.
	The festivities of the Queen's Platinum Jubilee are fast approaching.
	And Regent Street is now decked out with rows of Union Jacks.
	I look forward to street parties and themed nibbles, but I also can't help but feel slightly apprehensive.
	Regent Street display has been seen by some Twitter users, because we need to judge all social progress by Twitter users now, as a celebration of Britishness, but others weren't impressed, and comparisons to the streets of 1930s Germany, which were adorned with Nazi flags, have been made.
	Because this is the only argument they can ever make.
	I don't like this.
	Why?
	Because it looks like Nazism to me.
	Anything other than the very, very superficial idea that we're flying flags and they were flying flags?
	No, nothing else, but it's an easy insult to throw at you.
	For some, the Union Jack is celebratory, patriotic, and evokes a feeling of national pride, yes, to normal English people.
	But for others, the display is hubristic, and the flag is symbolic for elitism, colonialism, and fascism.
	No, no, are you retarded?
	The one country that's still alone against fascism at one point during World War II was Britain.
	Why the hell would it be a symbol of fascism?
	I mean, these people don't know what fascism is and they will never understand because they don't want to understand because it's just an insult to throw around.
	It's basically a slur.
	But yeah, basically these people hate everything about this country and want everything changed and you do need to, in their eyes, be demoralized and ashamed of your past or else we won't be able to come in and take over with our new regime because otherwise you might put up a fight whereas now they're trying to get us into the position where we'll just hold the gates open for the barbarians.
	And so far it's been working, sadly, at least for the majority of the country.
	And then let's move along because there are many, many other articles talking about this sort of stuff.
	For instance, did you know that the countryside is full of white people?
	Did you know that English people are mainly the same people farming the countryside in England?
	What a shock!
	The Royal Agricultural University is launching a new scholarship scheme to encourage more British students from ethnic minorities to enter the farming centre.
	What sector?
	Why?
	Why?
	There's a guy on Twitter who made a really funny joke about this.
	Go on, go on, do it.
	Which is just like, we're sending them back out to the fields, and it's just like, no!
	No!
	But then again, I can't imagine that not being the justification for these people.
	It is true.
	The analysis by Sky News has found that 97.2% of workers in agricultural, forestry, and fishing are white, excluding seasonal workers, making it the least diverse job sector in the country.
	Okay.
	I'm imagining some Londoner who's dressed up as a southern plantation owner now being like, why are they all white?
	Where are all the colours?
	Basically.
	I mean, that's basically what they're asking here.
	I mean, what's the problem with it not being diverse?
	Are they good farmers?
	Are they doing their jobs right?
	They've been doing it for a thousand years.
	So far, so good.
	Yeah, so far, so good.
	I don't remember England specifically having any famines.
	Do you?
	Well, historically, yes.
	Well, recently.
	But the problem is I have seen some government programs talking about how, you know, oh, there's loads of people in the farming industry.
	They're all getting old.
	We need to phase them out and welcome in new talent.
	Who do you think that new talent is going to be?
	I just hate this Frederick.
	They're the new talent.
	There was nothing wrong with the guy who's currently doing the farming.
	He's making money.
	He's doing fine.
	He taught his son to do it as well.
	His son's been doing it for 10 years at this point.
	Just let him carry on with it.
	No, no, no.
	We need to take away your farm and put them into more diverse hands.
	Dan, Todd Hunter...
	Todd Hunter, Director of Academic Services at the RAU, told Sky News increasing diversity in education could reduce barriers.
	He said, we definitely think there needs to be space for everyone to play a part in agriculture in the land-based sector.
	Are they feeding you?
	What barrier?
	What is the barrier?
	Some black guy is like, I'm going to go start a farm.
	It's like, okay, that was always allowed.
	No one's going to stop you.
	All right, no, but it won't be the same unless it was somebody else's farm first that I'm just appropriating from them.
	God bless Mugabe.
	There are some obvious reasons why farming is predominantly white.
	Is it because English people are predominantly white?
	No, but the English people are basically Arabs.
	They basically don't exist.
	I mean, have you ever really seen an English person?
	Firstly, the rural parts of the country are far less diverse, and secondly, many farms tend to have been handed down through generations.
	Yes, because that, generally speaking, is how farms work, that's how people develop their skills, and guess what?
	It's their property!
	They can hand it down to whoever they want!
	If they want to hand it down to their family, that's none of your business!
	Ped Asgarian from the organisation Feeding Bristol, God, Bristol, said, we do not need to break the mould of it being ultimately an old white man and attract a work in the field, and that's what a farmer is.
	And then they also spoke to, um, oh wait, Ped Asgarian.
	Is that an English name?
	That's a beautiful Iranian name.
	Yes, yes.
	Then he went on about how he calls himself a British Muslim farmer because he left the city after making loads of money and then is referring to himself as a British Muslim farmer, proving that you're allowed to do this.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, you're allowed to do that.
	No one's stopping anybody from doing this.
	Maybe it's that people who come over to this country and mainly stay in metropolitan areas don't want to be farmers.
	If they wanted to be farmers, they could just stay where they came from and be farmers.
	Like, their stated preference means nothing.
	The revealed preference is them not doing it.
	Yes, you can make all the complaints you want to the pollsters.
	It doesn't matter.
	Your actions speak louder than words.
	And we've got also possibly some actual racism, or at least something that actually is quite funnily similar to it, which is Calvin Robinston.
	Being told that he doesn't know what racism is, and being cancelled by the Church of England.
	So, he was shocked to be told in February that his ordination, because he has been training up to become a priest as far as I'm aware, is likely to be problematic.
	He applied under the Data Protection Act to see the information the Church had on him, and he discovered that the Bishop of Edmonton had been reporting him to Church leaders since the beginning of his studies, Which is just unequivocally true.
	Calvin is a man who speaks a lot of sense.
	And the same day in Wickham wrote to the Right Reverend Sarah Mullerley, who is the Bishop of London, saying, to bring it to your attention, Calvin Robinson is not only a political commentator, ooh, scary, but he's also an ordnance and former teacher in this area who has just started at the St.
	Stephen's House.
	Calvin's comments concern me about denying institutional racism in this country.
	What does this have to do with worshipping God?
	God.
	Exactly, what does this have to do with worshipping God?
	Okay, in December last year, Wickham wrote to the Right Reverend Emma Einsten, Bishop to the Archbishop of Canterbury, and also to the Bishop of London.
	Wickham sent them some of Robinson's tweets, adding these are clear examples as to why his ordination should be looked at very closely.
	Robinson said he felt betrayed and heartbroken at Wickham's conduct.
	He said to hear that people are campaigning behind your back after you have given them all that you've got, I don't know how to put it into words.
	Robinson said that he requested a meeting with the Bishop of London who told him, Calvin, as a white woman, I can tell you that the church is institutionally racist.
	You're the Bishop of London!
	Surely that's your problem, then?
	She's there with her clan hood on, being like, Calvin, I need to tell you, you're not welcome round here!
	What other implication can you take from this?
	Pulls out a whip and is just like, get out of here!
	We don't want you in here!
	Yeah, he described her attitude as hushed condescension, which is...
	A very polite way of putting it.
	As you would expect from a man like Calvin, very polite, very prim and proper.
	That's not what happened, Calvin.
	They were just actively...
	Oh my god.
	So, white people not allowing a black man a job because he doesn't agree that there's racism...
	But that's the thing, like, you've got to ask the bishop here.
	Right, lady.
	Okay, racism against who?
	Because if it's racism against white people, well then, because she's saying, you know, as a white woman, I know there's racism.
	Okay, well then we can sort that, can't we?
	And if it's racism against black people, you're the one doing it.
	Right now.
	As you say, he isn't allowed in.
	I mean, obviously we're racist, Calvin.
	Just watch me, you fucker.
	It's like a brass eye sketch.
	It really is.
	But Calvin has since called them out on GB News and said, you know, I think he's going off into a more conservative Anglican sector away from this now.
	People who believe in God.
	Shockingly enough, that is what the church is supposed to be there for.
	Not anymore.
	It's now worshipping intersectionality, of course.
	But people like the Reclaim Party have posted on Twitter saying that we need to hold these people accountable.
	I mean, if we go along to the next link...
	They're explicitly saying that they're racist, right?
	Okay, so this is a remarkable omission of failure of leadership.
	They must both resign and create a more diverse and equitable church for all.
	So sign this petition to get them to resign.
	I mean, they said they're racist.
	They think racism bad, right?
	Quit!
	Like, the leader and all of the leadership are saying, we're institutionally racist.
	Okay, well you guys are the institution, so...
	You guys are in charge, so this is your fault, surely.
	I mean, I don't understand it personally, but yeah, if you're interested in getting these absolute knobjockies to resign, sign the petition.
	There you go.
	And along with all of this, the UK's first national black British civil rights group has launched in a bid to end systemic racism.
	All of that systemic racism held within the church, presumably.
	Let's take a look through the GB News article here.
	We will not stop until the Church of England is no more.
	Ancient enemies coming back just in a new face.
	A group of the UK's most influential black leaders have launched the Black Equity Organisation to advance justice and equality for black people in Britain.
	Now, this just seems like an American organisation to me.
	This is why I'm saying that this is American racial imperialism, because we do not historically have the same problems as America.
	Unlike America, who imported a lot of their black population originally as slaves, as part of the slave trade, we asked a bunch of people from Windrush, well, from the Empire to come over.
	They could have said, Yeah, they could have said no, and they came over here, and yes, they experienced prejudice, but for the most part, they were presumably given better lives over here than they would have had over there, which is why they came here in the first place.
	Otherwise they would have gone back.
	Yeah, we aren't holding them here, we didn't force them over here, but now apparently we have the same historical problems as America.
	The organisation is the UK's first national and independent civil rights group, and its launch coincides with the second anniversary of the murder in the US of George Floyd, which sparked Black Lives Matter anti-racism protests against the world.
	I mean, once again, this happened in America.
	I don't see why it has to affect anything over here.
	Chairman of the Trustees, Dame Vivian Hunt, said given the cost of living crisis, it's more urgent than ever that we have a voice for black Britons, because cost of living crisis hits blacks most affected.
	Is the message I'm getting there.
	She said, That's just...
	Surely, that's racism on her part.
	You mean white people can care about people who aren't white?
	The shock, the absolute audacity of it.
	I never saw this one coming.
	But also the idea that people haven't done a lot to do.
	I mean, a lot of people are trying to stop mixed confentanyl from turning up in the United States.
	They're really trying to stop this happening again with everything they can do.
	I mean, the border wall, for instance, was a fantastic attempt.
	They just don't want to see George Floyd happen twice, you know?
	There were people from all walks of life, huge amounts of young people, and a real response at a human level to the injustices that black Britons continue to face, almost like people are nowhere near as racist as you're trying to make them out to be.
	And once again, George Floyd was American.
	For me, that moment two years ago was a real awakening of how deeply engaged every household is around fairness and equality of opportunity.
	This is not about equality of opportunity.
	This is about equity, you liar, which are different things.
	Everybody wants the same things for their children.
	Black families in Britain are not any different.
	So they just go on with platitudes and platitudes and we need to end systemic racism, reduce racism.
	Oh, isn't it terrible that we're living in a white supremacist society?
	All that nonsense.
	I don't point to it, but it needs to end.
	Yep.
	Historian and presenter, Professor David Olusoga, who is a historical revisionist and author of the book Black and British, which is, of course, trying to find the tiniest little examples of, oh, there was a black guy in the 1500s once.
	There you go, we've got...
	He was part of King Henry's court and blew a horn, and that's all we know.
	Yeah, but that's an example of how England's always been a multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-cultural country.
	A black man turned up in England, and that alone made him so noteworthy he became part of the court.
	So basically, they were everywhere, and normal, and normal, and common.
	And if you deny this, you're an massive bigot and racist.
	So it makes sense.
	They've got a bunch of other people.
	Dame Vivian said that we decided to launch an independent national black civil rights organization to dismantle patterns of systemic racism in Britain and really drive generational change so that the lived experience of black Britons and all Britons improved.
	It includes an image taken by photographer Mison Harriman, the first black man to shoot a cover of British Vogue.
	So just in that sort of thing, you can tell right here, because that was a video produced by them.
	This is not about fairness.
	This is about getting political privileges, as these things always are.
	And to return to Calvin, he asked a fantastic question of this in a tweet, if we go to the next one, which is just, what rights are they protesting for that they don't already have?
	Name them.
	They can't.
	Because they're not looking for rights, they're looking for privileges.
	And just to see the effects of some of the way that this is going over in the UK right now, because of the fact that this is infiltrated, this whole systemic racism attitude has infiltrated every major institution that you can think of.
	This is already affecting police.
	I mean, the police in the UK are not amazing right now.
	God knows we've covered all of their failings multiple times.
	But this is not helping, because we've got here a Daily Mail article, how Chief Scott and Morley on day one from a woke watchdog.
	Row erupts after a launch of race issues planned as leaders refused to agree over the institutionally racist label.
	In a farcical scene after the action plan was announced, the leaders refused to agree or disagree with the label.
	They were chastised by Chairman Ambibola Johnson, another beautiful British name right there, I think?
	In 1993.
	So they're obviously pointing to an old example there, which might have some actual racism in them, but that was then.
	This is now.
	What they're basically just saying is, submit to our ideology, accept that you're racist or else.
	And this is not promoting unity within the police forces, which you would kind of hope would have some unity in them to make it function better.
	Doesn't make any logical sense either.
	Racism happened before, therefore racism now.
	Yes, racism happened before.
	Not even necessarily that racism happened now, more you racist now.
	That's what they're saying.
	And then I found this amazing article from the Times where polls have been taken recently which states that diversity is what makes us British.
	Let's stop there, that's 100% true, fine.
	Yep.
	Okay, well British is to be diverse, in which case then, that's part of the empire.
	Okay.
	Let's let it go.
	There you go, you can go out to your own countries, which are all part of the empire, and be diverse there, why don't you?
	United States, British, all of Africa, British.
	I mean, this is one of the things that's making me think, yeah, this is one of the things that's making me like, yeah, Peter Hitchens, secession from the UK, good.
	Scotland got to keep their...
	Other direction.
	Everything's British now.
	Everything that's diverse is definitely part of the British...
	No, no, no, no.
	No, because think about it.
	Scotland got to keep their national identity, whether they're diverse or not.
	Wales, they're still trying to keep theirs.
	England has been...
	You're told there is no such thing as English culture.
	There's no such thing as English people.
	And if we were to just separate entirely, we're like, well, this is England now.
	That's all it is.
	We can reclaim some of our identity, at least somewhat.
	But yeah, so they've just asked a bunch of people, about 2,000 people.
	Three quarters of the respondents think a wide range of backgrounds and culture is part of British cultures.
	Go down to the first graph here, John, just so we can see.
	Yeah, look at the change.
	In 10 years...
	People have gone in these polls from saying that about 50% will like actually this whole cultural backgrounds and diversity undermines British culture to only 28%.
	I mean, this may depend on who they're asking.
	They might be going to more progressive places to ask the pollsters.
	But this does show a massive change in attitudes.
	And then the second one was that a quarter, despite this, despite the fact that 72% of these people were saying, oh, it's what makes us British, this next one, race relations, still a quarter of ethnic minority respondents do not think race relations between different ethnic groups are better now compared to 1952.
	So, diversity is what makes us British, but also, you're still horribly racist to me, give me things for free.
	No, but just more diversity, the worse things get.
	Yep.
	Okay?
	Thank you, ethnic minorities, for your opinion.
	And there was a particularly scary quote in here, which was, 70 years on, we know who we are, the diversity of our society is a settled fact.
	Which just reminds you of the science is settled, doesn't it?
	This isn't a question you're allowed to ask anymore.
	This isn't a subject you're allowed to broach.
	If you disagree, what they're saying is you are on the wrong side of history.
	Because it's a settled fact.
	Are you just disagreeing with the facts?
	That's where we're going.
	But if you're going to try and tell me that England is racist, if Britain is racist in general, can you point out where the racism is?
	Because as far as I can tell, every single institution has a diversity pledge.
	Has some kind of thing saying we want more diversity.
	For instance...
	The Arts Council, if we move along, have a diversity pledge where they're talking about diversity, equality, equity, all of that stuff.
	The College of Police have to go through all of this, which probably explains why our police are so completely useless, because they're too busy being indoctrinated into intersectional ideology than being taught how to protect their communities.
	The Bank of England as well, the people in charge of the money, are being told that diversity is more important than competence.
	And then the government in general also has a diversity and inclusion strategy from 2018 to 2025, which I looked through and talks about they want to be inclusive by instinct, so you just need to naturally, if you see a black man and a white man applying for a job, you need to instinctively go for the black man.
	Because this is normal behaviour.
	And they literally refer in this document to intersectionality being the guiding ideology.
	So this is just captured.
	As far as I'm aware, all of the institutions are captured, and this is not English, this is not British, this is American ideology.
	And as far as I can tell, I can't see any racism.
	Can you?
	Well, I can.
	Just not against the minorities.
	Well, not the racism that they want to see.
	The institutional racism against the white applicants, yes.
	Yes.
	They're stating it.
	But, that's all I've got for there.
	Let's move to Clinton getting caught.
	I thought we'd talk about Hillary Clinton, because, I don't know, I like pain.
	So, Hillary Clinton has been caught, finally, at least for one thing that she did, which is nice to see, which is she is the disinformation queen herself.
	She is the one promoting all the Russian disinformation in the United States, it seems.
	I'm sorry, was I supposed to do spit take?
	What?
	Was I supposed to be surprised?
	Yeah.
	Oh, okay.
	But we'll see.
	If we go through this, first I'll mention the show being Active Measures here, the book club we did.
	If you want to see some actual Russian disinformation, some of the funniest cock-ups as well that they've ever done, so go and enjoy that one.
	And otherwise, we shall get into the, well, joke Russians being Clinton here, which is she decided to roleplay as a Russian disinformation agent.
	I mean, she's not Russian, but she's a joke, so...
	So this is a story in Politico in 2020, and the headline reads, Intel chief releases Russian disinfo on Hillary Clinton that was rejected by bipartisan Senate panel.
	Okay, yeah, this cuckoo lunatic is saying that Hillary Clinton tried to smear her opponents by putting out Russian disinformation or claiming Russian disinformation.
	And that's totally not true.
	Why?
	Because the Senate have said it's not true.
	Have they now?
	of an effort during the 2016 election to stir up a scandal against US presidential candidate Donald Trump by tying him to Putin and the Russians.
	No.
	Clearly that's Russian disinformation that Clinton would ever do such a thing.
	They're just trying to smear honest Democrats.
	Like Ms.
	Clinton.
	Honest, hard-working Democrats.
	Every last one of them.
	The way she's been treated is unbearable.
	They say the Senate Intelligence Committee issued five reports on Russia's sweeping efforts to meddle in the 2016 election to boost Trump, ranging across thousands of pages of nothing burger.
	A thousand pages of nothing.
	There wasn't anything.
	The panel was made aware that the allegation, early on in its investigation, and quickly dismissed it, the sources said.
	So, they were like, hey, we should look into the Russian disinformation.
	Some guy came to them and said, by the way, this whole story was planted by Clinton herself.
	It's all BS. And they went, that can't be true.
	Don't be silly.
	No.
	Absolutely not.
	I've just learned to distrust anything that ends with the sources said.
	Asked about Radcliffe's claims, Nick Merrill, a spokesman for Clinton, said in a text message that the allegations were baseless bull-ess.
	Completely baseless.
	There's no possible way Hillary Clinton made up this whole story herself and then has permitted this disinformation to travel around the world.
	When has Clinton been known to be dishonest?
	Nick Shapiro, Brennan's former deputy chief of staff at the CIA, said Ratcliffe should be ashamed of his blatant politicization of his position.
	Oh no.
	How dare he smear an honest Democrat like Ms.
	Clinton, who's just doing her best to save the United States from the Russians.
	It has long been known that the Russians were trying to stir up false narratives about the Clintons through similar avenues, Politico writes at the time.
	It is known.
	I love it.
	That's your source.
	Trust me, bro.
	It is known.
	That's your bibliography, is it?
	Okay.
	Why?
	Because the chief of staff for Hillary Clinton said so.
	The sun revolves around the earth, source.
	It is known.
	It came to me in a dream.
	That is the level of reporting you will get when reporting on Hillary Clinton.
	No, it's all bollocks, obviously.
	It's previously bollocks.
	We've got the next one here.
	We have the link being from the Wall Street Journal saying Hillary Clinton did it.
	Yeah, she did.
	She is the one who spreads the misinformation.
	Disinformation, as her own fellow board members would call it these days.
	Let me try now.
	Let me see if I can...
	I don't think it's going to work.
	Still nothing?
	No, I'm still not shocked.
	Not shocked at all.
	So, Clinton's ex-lawyer is being investigated for lying to the FBI about this, because he's the one who turned up to the FBI with like, Hey, don't you know Trump's working with the Russians?
	You should investigate this.
	And the FBI went, what are you, stupid?
	So, and then ignored him.
	Except, of course, that you had the guys in the higher-ups who tried to politicise the whole thing and try and make a story out of nothing instead.
	So now that dude's being investigated for just openly lying, because he obviously was.
	Her 2016 campaign manager says she approved a plan to plant false Russia claims with a reporter.
	The Trump-Russia collusion narrative of 2016 and beyond was a dirty trick for the ages, and now we know it came from the top.
	Candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton.
	And the thing is, I remember after the election, I was sitting down with a friend of mine.
	I won't mention him.
	He's a lovely guy from the United States.
	And he's left-leaning.
	He spoke for the Dems.
	He brought his mother over for the graduation.
	And we sat and had dinner.
	And she just told me, yeah, I think the Russians did it.
	But it's clearly the Russians put him there.
	And she won't be the only one, of course.
	These accusations dogged Trump throughout his entire presidency.
	Yeah, and it was literally just Clinton's...
	BS. Yeah, that distrust that was sowed into the public is probably one of the reasons that Trump had such a hard time getting most of his goals done.
	That was the testimony Friday by 2016 campaign manager Robbie Mook in federal court, and while this news is hardly a surprise, it's still bracing to find her fingerprints on the political weapon.
	I think it's just great to have it.
	I mean, we all know, it's obvious BS, but the fact that we now have, provably, it was her herself who made this up.
	She made it up out of thin air, and then smeared it by giving it to a reporter, giving it to the FBI, and thinking, no one's going to investigate me.
	Why?
	Well, I'm part of the elite, so I can do whatever I want, all the time.
	I'm sorry, I just have to comment on the mimetic nature of this whole thing, because I've just noticed that we've got Mr.
	Mook and Mr.
	Sussman.
	You couldn't make this up!
	So, Mr.
	Mook testified as a witness in special counsel John Durham's trial of Michael Seussman, Mr.
	Suss, the lawyer accused of lying to the FBI, Mr.
	Suss, in 2016.
	Took claims of secret Trump connections to Russia's Alpha Bank, to the FBI, and said that he wasn't acting on behalf of any clients, except that Mr.
	Suss was working for Clinton, of course, because he's her bloody lawyer.
	Prosecutors say that he was working for the Clinton campaign.
	I, for one, am shook.
	Prosecutors presented evidence this week that Mr.
	Suss worked with cyber researchers and opposition research firm Fusion GPS to profuse I love that.
	So the Clinton campaign sat around and thought, well, we lost.
	But how can we claim that we still won?
	So they made up BS about Russia and Trump, and then they gave it to the FBI, and the FBI laughed them out of the room.
	Just like, this is obviously crap.
	That's a shocking example of the FBI doing their job.
	Well, that's the lower ranks.
	As for the higher ranks, of course.
	I can't remember the damn guy's name, but the Obama layover.
	Yeah, I think I know who you're on about, yeah.
	That had to be dealt with.
	I mean, Trump just came to him.
	I remember at the time, him coming to...
	And this was like, how dare he do this?
	So I don't know why the names escaped me.
	Someone in chat will remind us of it.
	The guy in charge of the FBI who was left over from Obama being like, yeah, I still have to investigate whether or not you have connections to Russia.
	And Trump saying to him at a private dinner, no, you don't.
	This is obvious bollocks.
	And then this is like, how dare you try and squash the investigation?
	No, the FBI, even at the time, knew it was bollocks.
	By their own admission.
	Comey, there we are.
	Thank you.
	Thank you for that.
	And we're forward.
	Prosecutors asked Mr.
	Mook.
	Sorry, but you are right.
	The names are ridiculous.
	I know.
	About his role in funneling the Alphabank claims to the press, Mr.
	Mook...
	I don't know why it's so funny.
	Admitted the campaign lacked expertise to vet the data, because it was made up, yet the decision was made by Mr.
	Mook's policy advisor, Jake Sullivan, now President Biden's national security advisor.
	I love that.
	Just people who specialize in BS. Just...
	Swim in the same circles.
	Communications Director Jennifer, who cares, and Campaign Chairman John Podesta to give Alphabank claims to a reporter.
	Mr.
	Mook said Ms.
	Clinton asked about the plan and approved it.
	A story on the Trump-Alphabank allegations then appeared in Slate, a left-leaning online publication.
	Bam.
	There it is.
	Literally made up fake news.
	Gave it to a reporter.
	The reporter reported the fake news because they're not able to do anything but eat crayons, apparently.
	And that's how it was born.
	There you have it.
	That's simple.
	We've got the cause and effect beginning to end.
	Makes perfect sense.
	A lot more sense than the actual Russia story ever made.
	Yeah, it was just a salty old woman decided to make up fake news and then got it run in left-wing media like a hoax paper because left-wing media does not check anything they ever publish, apparently, or read, if they can read.
	On October 31st, 2016, Mr.
	Sullivan issued a statement mentioning the Slate story, writing, quote, This could be the most direct link yet between Donald Trump and Moscow.
	That we've made up.
	You sure about that, bro?
	Yeah.
	Miss Clinton tweeted Mr.
	Sullivan's statement with the comment, Computer scientists have appeared to uncover a covert server linking the Trump organization to a Russian-based bank.
	Apparently, it's doing a lot of work in that sentence, they write, which is entirely correct.
	So she and her friends made up a story, gave it to a journo, who was finished eating the crayons, published it, and then they retweeted it, and that's how the whole narrative was born.
	It is that blooming simple.
	It's all you have to do.
	And then the journalist was given a lifetime supply of crayons.
	Yes, but also just the fact that the fake news that they endlessly whine about, the clips that have to have the little warnings on because that's misinformation.
	We need to set up a disinformation board.
	Yep, the global elites caught yet again just making a thing up and then insisting that it's true and then, well, at least finally being called out for it.
	Although I have to go all the way to court.
	In short, the Clinton campaign created the Trump Alpha allegation, fed it to a credulous press that failed to confirm the allegations but ran with them anyway, then promoted the story as if it was legitimate news.
	The campaign also delivered the claims to the FBI, giving journalists another excuse to portray the accusations as serious and perhaps true, even though the FBI laughed about the room.
	This is super serial, guys.
	Trust me, Man Bear Pig is out there.
	Most of the press will ignore this news, but the Trump-Russia narrative that Mrs.
	Clinton sanctioned did enormous harm to the country.
	It disgraced the FBI, humiliated the press, and sent the country on a three-year investigation to nowhere.
	Vladimir Putin never came close to doing as much disinformation damage.
	It's factually true.
	I mean, probably the best line I've even seen or read about 2016 and that whole period, which is, yes, Hillary Clinton did more damage in the disinformation realm of the United States than Vladimir Putin could have ever done.
	I mean, just de facto.
	I mean, just made up the whole story.
	Got it published, got the FBI to look at it, even though it was obvious.
	Bull.
	So then we go to the next one.
	We have the left-wing media response to this as well.
	There's no evidence.
	This is Bezos approved media right here.
	Yep.
	Bezos' headline is, uh, there's no evidence.
	We have...
	They're in court.
	They're in court under oath saying this has all happened.
	And the Washington Post goes with, nah.
	Didn't happen.
	Okay.
	Didn't happen.
	Okay.
	And if the Washington Post says...
	I mean, the Washington Post says they care about democracy, so why would I not believe them?
	Democracy dies in darkness, folks.
	It didn't happen.
	Trust me.
	I don't know what to say.
	I mean, it is just kind of pathetic how flimsy and thin the cover-ups are at this point.
	We're like, we got you in court saying that you made this up.
	And you knew it was bollocks.
	And you made a huge story out of it.
	And now you say it's bollocks.
	And Washington Post is going, no you didn't.
	Nuh-uh.
	Okay.
	But then we have someone who did take notice, which is Elon Musk.
	We're going to the next one here, because of course we have the original tweet from 2016.
	It's because he heard being like, oh, computer scientists have figured this out.
	And, uh, well, someone responded, but being like, hey, Elon, this breaks the terms of service on disinformation.
	And Elon's like...
	They're my terms of service now.
	Yeah, you are absolutely correct.
	The last tweet is a Clinton campaign hoax for which their campaign lawyer is undergoing a criminal trial.
	100% correct.
	So Hillary Clinton should just be banned from Twitter.
	I mean, if their own standards are going to be applied, and if Elon gets his deal gone through, what's going to stop him?
	And I love how he tags there, as you can see.
	He tags the two leftists and the, I don't know what you call them, Miss Vagina over there, saying, oh, what say you?
	And it's like, well, going to have to ban Clinton.
	That's how it's going to be.
	We've got the next one as well.
	He also responded to Jim Jordan, who made the point that it was all obvious BS as well.
	And Elon responding with, all true.
	Bet most people still don't know that the Clinton campaign lawyer, using campaign funds, created an elaborate hoax about Trump-Russia.
	Makes you wonder what else is fake.
	Certainly does, Elon.
	And everything else we find out should also just be banned.
	Because remember, they did this to all of us for saying things that were true.
	You post clips of people saying things, and they go, well, you're not allowed to do that.
	That's misinformation.
	That's disinformation.
	Jack Posobiec points out that you're all evil.
	Don't worry, he's disinformation.
	He should be banned.
	We point out that you just made something up.
	And that's fine.
	Okay, not even the same standard here.
	There are no just doing it because you have power.
	It's, in fact, the rules as applied.
	People trying to politicize this as well, as we have this one here, people being, I can't remember, who was it?
	If you can scroll up here, I can't remember the outlet.
	It's like, yeah, no, it's being politicized.
	That one there.
	No, the one at the bottom there.
	In which the news outlet is just NPR. There we go.
	How dare you politicize this investigation by pointing out that it's political.
	One side just made up a smear.
	Of course it's political.
	And Elon responds to this by saying, Mr.
	Suss himself admitted billing Clinton's campaign to pay for him to present the Trump-Russia hoax to the FBI. This is not even questioned by the defense.
	Again, it's political.
	How dare you?
	By the way, I donated and voted for Hillary, so I am doubly pissed off about those funds being used for lying.
	That's fantastic to know as well, which is that Elon's got some stake in this specific incident as well.
	Elon's regretting decisions he's made by the sounds of it there.
	I don't know if there is an account for Hillary posting their L's online, but technically this is one.
	I mean, Elon, you're going to have to take the L on that one.
	Still light here, but you're gonna have to.
	You should have known better, frankly, and it's good that you do now, which is that, yeah, they will do nothing.
	They will stop at nothing.
	They will literally just make up information and then call you the disinformation spreader, even though they're the ones making stuff up out of thin air.
	There you have it.
	That's Hillary Clinton getting caught, at least, which is good to see.
	Let's go to the video comments.
	I want to remind people that even though the Democrats are supposed to lose a lot this midterm, it's not guaranteed that it actually happens.
	Primaries are still up.
	Make sure to get involved in them.
	Register to vote and get as many people as you can involved in that as well.
	Put in people that actually will make a change.
	Going along with the current democratic position obviously is untenable.
	So make sure to vote, put people in, and guarantee that there's actually going to be a change.
	Yep.
	If you want to see political change, you've got to go out and do it, and it sucks, but that's what you've got to do.
	Yeah, it's boring and time-consuming, but it makes a big difference.
	There we have it.
	Good message, though.
	I don't know what religion has a worse reputation globally than Islam at this point.
	I mean, maybe...
	Atheism, obviously.
	It's completely cringe.
	It's the most autistic.
	Let's not even get into Reddit.
	And then there's, well, just trying to tear down every single past culture because it has some religious influence.
	I mean, the obvious point is obvious, but atheism isn't a religion.
	Lack of.
	You could say that SJWs...
	Some people would argue that some elements of the atheist community do treat that sort of...
	The SJW side of it.
	Yeah, the SJW side of it treat the scientific side of it as a religion.
	The whole science is settled, you can't question this because science says so.
	Not atheism, though.
	It tends to come from atheistic perspectives.
	That's the thing, though.
	It's like atheism plus are all those cringe laws.
	Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Where they're applying leftist rhetoric to something and then making that their god instead of just not having one, which is what you would have thought they would have done if they were atheists.
	Go to the next one.
	Lotus Eaters, you give Scotland a hard time, and deservedly so, but I think that some...
	culpability on England's part for the current state of Scotland should be addressed and I'd like you to start with maybe the Highland clearances.
	Y'all haven't been saints.
	No, but those Highlands needed clearing, so what are you going to do?
	But on the regards to the place Scotland is at now, in that respect, I think we can, because unless you're going to say that we were wrong to give them their own parliament.
	I mean, I'd say that was the biggest mistake we made recently.
	But then again, that's our fault because they messed it up.
	I mean, if you give someone a shovel and they bash their head with it, I mean, that's not really your fault.
	Don't trust the Scotsman.
	I don't know what to tell you.
	Specifically the SNP. Yeah, true.
	I think Andrew Neil actually does the best job on this, just laying out, like, here's where you have the percentage of power over, say, drug policy, right?
	I believe it's like 100% for the Scottish Parliament.
	And then here's drug addictions.
	Right?
	It's very simple.
	It's entirely up to you to do this.
	The only thing you don't have control over is what?
	Things like foreign policy and taxation?
	Something like that?
	Almost everything in Scotland the SMP actually have control over on a local level.
	It wouldn't surprise me.
	That would be my recommendation of why England did nothing wrong.
	Including the Hyrule and Clearances.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Alright, well now it is week three of the chickens.
	So yeah, they're starting to get their feathers in so they look a little bit horrible now.
	So my plan is to show you guys the process of raising them right up from chicklets into dinner.
	So I'm not going to show you the actual killing of the chicken but I will show you the techniques that we use and equipment that we have and I'll show you steps of the actual butchering process.
	And I think it'll be good to see.
	Nice.
	I don't know how much of the audience is up for that.
	I mean, to be honest, I probably think more just the chickens being chickens is probably best, but I guess we'll find out.
	Well, that's true, but there is a big problem nowadays where people don't see where their food comes from.
	And this is...
	I'm very guilty of it as well, so it's probably good for everybody to recognise what you're eating in your hand was once alive, so...
	You ever killed anything?
	I mean, bugs.
	Yeah, probably, though.
	Ran over a rabbit once by accident.
	What's it called?
	You have scouts?
	I think it's explorers I went to.
	I never went to them.
	We are chicken, and we got to kill it and eat it ourselves, and it was actually surprisingly just simple.
	Yeah, I imagine so.
	I mean, at the end of the day, you can empathize with them to a certain extent, but it's still just a chicken.
	Yeah, it looked mighty tasty by the end of it.
	I bet it did.
	Yeah, next one.
	A common refrain I heard from the academics that grew up around was that if we were supinely agreeable and willing to sacrifice our own self-interest, the Islamists would be galvanized by our heroism and self-sacrifice and come more around to our line of thinking.
	This is also basically how they believe that China's going to react when we destroy all of our energy infrastructure.
	They'll just do the same as well in solidarity.
	Counterintuitively, the Islamic community can tell that they only have benefits when they push back against left-wing agendas and will suffer no consequences in response.
	Why integrate into this system when you can make the system integrate into yours?
	Good question.
	I think you're absolutely right about the climate change thing and whatnot.
	It's just like, oh, they'll just get rid of theirs.
	China will just see how brave and heroic we are and just throw aside all of their industrial plants and go, no, we see the true light now.
	Genuinely, some of them are that naive to think about.
	They'll be like, well, you know, it's been done, so they'll follow suit.
	Are you stupid as hell?
	Yes, yes they are.
	My best thing that I've ever learned about in regards to that kind of stuff is on the Climate Accords.
	Do you remember all the big fuss made about the Paris Climate Accord and it's so important?
	How dare Trump leave?
	Yes, yes, I remember all that.
	Do you know what the Chinese proposals were?
	Was it just, oh, we'll think about it.
	Well, no, so everyone had to make a proposal.
	So the Americans started and went, you know, we'll cut our economy by this much and do these many things.
	The Europeans are like, yeah, of course, you know, we'll chip in and more advanced technology to stop carbon emissions.
	What's everyone else going to do?
	And everyone else just went, we're going to carry on doing what we're doing already.
	Good luck, guys.
	Yeah, that's the thing.
	I think even of the people who were more climate-focused, unlike China and places like that, were literally just, they basically agreed to do things that they were already planning on doing so that they could just have something to throw their hat into.
	Like the CCP, I believe the wording of theirs was, we commit to having peak emissions by 2050, which they were on Measure 4 anyway, just because that's when they were going to get rid of the coal power plants.
	Okay, so we commit to pollute more by 2050.
	Impressive.
	Essentially, yes.
	Very based.
	Good luck.
	Tony D and Little Joe, and with another legend of the pines, from RoadsideAmerica.com comes the story of Mighty Joe the Gorilla.
	The 25-foot-tall statue was originally in front of a go-kart place that closed.
	It was bought by Larry Valenzano as a tribute to his late son, who died of a brain tumor.
	He was a bodybuilder, and his father, Larry, owned this gas station, which he renamed Mighty Joe's, after his late son, which was his nickname in the bodybuilding world.
	It now stands along Route 206.
	That's pretty awesome, to be honest.
	If I owned a gas station, I certainly would want the big gorilla outside.
	Keep them watch.
	I suppose if that was in the area, you know what to get gas.
	The next one.
	The next one.
	Cameron Steeding and Violent Gravy.
	Your all winners...
	Cameron...
	E-E-E-C-I... Raymond O'Donnell...
	Hilary Collins...
	Noah Smith...
	People listening, we're looking at a local man turning left very many times.
	Damn, it looks fun though.
	Yeah, it does.
	Wish that was me.
	Love to turn left.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Alright, I need a new project to do in my spare time, so for the next few weeks, here's the deal.
	I'm going to do a video each day talking about a Primark from 40k.
	Should be fun and interesting for you guys out there.
	But, um...
	Here's the flip side.
	If you make me sit to a TikTok again, I shall respond in kind.
	I just work here.
	Why are our audience threatening us now?
	Essentially the relationship we have.
	Arms race.
	I mean, I'm sure Carl will like talking about the Primarchs of 40k, so you know, whenever he's on the podcast, great.
	Go to the next one.
	When Halo was released in 2001, it had a massive impact on sci-fi and video games as a medium, the reasons of which are far too numerous to get into right now, but which include the beautiful setting and memorable characters.
	It would, as Carl says, have a particular aesthetic and quality to it, a heart and a soul.
	The TV series instead focuses on a cringe human story, race swaps and alters important characters, doesn't include vital characters, including a fan-favorite black character, and doesn't even include the namesake of a Halo ring.
	I had to rant about this to you guys, because I hate it and I know you understand.
	Yeah, I really don't get the fact that they didn't bring the black guy back as well.
	Because if you're going to do this whole thing in which they've race-swabbed a bunch of characters to be black because, you know, Yas Queen, diversity.
	Why do you not bring back the black guy that everyone likes?
	Well, because presumably he was obviously just a fixture of white supremacy.
	Because he was likable.
	Yes, because he was likable and didn't act like he was from the ghetto.
	I wasn't even a massive Halo fan growing up, and I've not watched the show, but I've just seen the reactions of people watching the Halo show, and it looks awful.
	Have you seen the clip going around from the last episode where there was the one person who was like, You may have hated the show, but at least you've got to admit that this was awesome.
	And it's just the fight scene where it does the classic thing that all these terrible adaptations of first-person shooters do, where it does the first-person swoopy shot, and it just looks ridiculous.
	And I'm just like, this does not look awesome.
	This looks so bad.
	This looks worse than the video games.
	I mean, I have seen ER's reaction to it.
	Oh yeah, I watched that video, yeah.
	I feel like that's very informative for anyone who doesn't want to have to sit through it.
	It is.
	Go check out ER for some great content and some spicy takes.
	Find his Get Out video if you can.
	It's hilarious.
	Go to the next one.
	On the subject of all the New Jersey cryptids we keep hearing about, I was wondering if Carl and the guys remember that movie, Baby the Lost Legend, where it's basically about...
	People trying to discover the Mokli Membe, a fabled species of brontosaurus-like creatures that live in the Congolese jungles.
	Yes, this is an actual thing that people believed in a while back.
	It's actually got a lot of Empire of the Dust vibes going for it, because half the conflict in the movie is just how inefficient the infrastructure in Africa is and how corrupt all the institutions are and apathetic.
	I mean, one of the most notable scenes is where the People's Army of Congo basically just gunned down one of the rare, irreplaceable brontosauruses because they just can't understand why these things are valuable.
	That actually sounds pretty good.
	The Chad C.S. Cooper and crew.
	Chad C.S. Cooper.com.au That sounds like a good film, actually.
	It does.
	Also, the aspect of them being interesting in pointing out that the locals are absolutely terrible at keeping the infrastructure is a great point.
	I'm sure you've seen it.
	You know the clip?
	This Chinese guy goes to Africa and there's a documentary about him trying to run a business.
	I can't remember which country it was.
	I think it was the Congo as well.
	And there's the famous clip of him going, it's also tiresome.
	Yeah, I've seen that clip.
	His translator is just sat next to him, and he's just ranting at his translator, being like, look, you guys had electrical wires and railroads that we didn't even have in China, and then we had to suffer on the Mao, for Christ's sake, and you've managed to destroy them, whereas we've gone forwards.
	Like, what's going on?
	Because the best part is not really the Chinese guy, it's the translator, who's clearly a local.
	He's just sat there going...
	Is he just thinking to himself, God, he's right.
	He's so right.
	Everything you're saying is correct.
	I didn't know that's where the clip came from.
	I'll need to actually track down the documentary.
	It sounds depressing and interesting.
	Yeah, it is pretty good, because you can see the Chinese guys getting frustrated, just dealing with the locals.
	It's just like, plan for five minutes.
	Next one.
	I think my video comment last week, me inside my mech's cockpit, confused the heck out of Zuby.
	If I had known, I would have provided better footage.
	Do you think it would be possible for, like, gold-tier members to know when a guest is going to be coming on a little bit in advance?
	But then again, some people might send in goofier video comments, but...
	Isn't that what you got the editors for?
	I mean, you didn't let me know when one of my video comments didn't have audio in it.
	I mean, we do put it out on social media.
	Like, I know Daisy puts it out on all the different social medias that we have someone coming in.
	So I guess that would be the place to find out.
	But, yeah.
	I don't know.
	I kind of like spooking the guests as well.
	It's fun.
	I thought it's because sometimes we don't even know if the guest's gonna show up.
	Yeah, there's also that.
	So...
	Yeah.
	That might be something to do with it as well.
	I just really love when Nick sat down and then the guy played the comment about Caesar's Legion being anti-abortion.
	Nick's like, what the fuck?
	LAUGHTER I'm increasingly convinced that if you could reset Western civilization to whatever point you choose between the Enlightenment and the 1950s, we'd eventually end up right back where we are today.
	Because the classical liberal worldview is really nothing more than the caboose on the progressive train.
	Looking back nostalgically at the way things were and occasionally pumping the brakes, but lacking any sort of engine that can reverse progressive trends.
	That's very much Cole's opinion.
	I could agree with that.
	I think there are inherent contradictions within classical liberal ideology that make it so that it basically gives a massive opening for tyranny, one of them being the existence of the state in the first place.
	Sadly, if you open that, if you open it up, especially if you allow taxation, what you're doing is you're, especially taxation, because it can't, it doesn't have any real objective measure to it, it's all subjective, everybody can recognize that it's subjective, and then you start, as we did in the early 1900s, in the progressive era in America and then through printing more money because we went off the gold standard and went on to the gold exchange standard after the Great War and stuff like that.
	You're just incentivizing people to further politicize the social space, which is why you get all these organizations popping up going like, because they recognize that, okay, you're going to tax them and then you're going to give that money back to somebody.
	We're going to make sure and do everything in our own power to make sure that that's us.
	How much libertarian texts have you been reading?
	Quite a lot.
	I can tell.
	You know what the problem is?
	The state existing and taxation at all.
	No, I think at the end of the day, if you're going to take classical liberal philosophy to its end point, John Locke and even Mises, to a certain extent, they didn't take it all the way.
	They were like...
	No, guys, we can trust the state to maintain contracts and we can trust them to maintain national security.
	And then those actually in charge of the state were like, yeah, yeah, sure, you can, okay.
	And then they started filling their pockets.
	That's why you need an elected king instead.
	Sort him out.
	Certainly would be better.
	I don't know.
	I remember when we met Corby Mickey, I thought he was a bit of a nutjob.
	The more I'm thinking about his ideas, it's actually...
	I mean, you can get it on the Mises Institute website.
	It's absolutely brilliant.
	All of their books that they publish are freely available on there, including the audiobooks.
	You need to give Democracy, The God That Fell by Hopper a listen, because you can just download the audiobook off the website.
	It's really good.
	Till then, we shall go to the written comments on the site.
	So, on our insect overlords, Benjamin Charles says, Not to worry, everyone.
	Turns out the World Economic Forum isn't an organisation, it's just an idea.
	Like Antifa, go back to sleep now.
	Nothing to worry about.
	You want your warm milk?
	Here you go, Daddy Klaus.
	It's the book milk.
	Everyone likes rats, but they don't want to drink the rat milk.
	Callum Dayton says, implemented socialism throughout history has always failed and resulted in millions of deaths, and that's the national level.
	If socialism couldn't be achieved at a rail carriage level, never mind the national level, what the F is going, is stuff going to be like on the effing global level?
	Well, what it's gonna be is there's going to be a nice cabal of people at the top who are the global elites, who all have communism for them, and then everybody else in the world are serfs, just like Plato wanted.
	Everything is perfect, don't worry.
	Also, it doesn't exist.
	Baron von Vorhoek says, So there is a special police force that specifically works with a shadowy-willed government that shut down reporters, answers to nobody, and wears patches with demonic-looking goats on their shoulders.
	God help us all.
	That's a good point.
	Yeah.
	I mean, I don't know what to make of whatever negotiation happened between the canton and the agreement with the WEF to have these guys holding those badges and whatnot.
	He's got a good point there.
	Why do they need to have an evil-looking goat as the symbol for their police force?
	I suppose they're rubbing everything else in our faces, so why not just make it look satanic while they're at it?
	Have you seen the Pakistani secret intelligence logo?
	No, I haven't.
	John, if you can look up Pakistani ISI logo, you'll find one where there's a goat, and it's the funniest thing.
	So, if you can find that.
	Edward of Wood's Pakistani ISI. Fun fact, using the word compliance as a euphemism is one of my favourite works of literature.
	The Horus Heresy, basically the backstory for DK, the euphemism is used for any human civilisation that joins the Imperium, willing or unwise.
	Bringing a civilisation to compliance can be simply signalling them up or sending down a legion of space marines to destroy it almost utterly.
	It's a very innocent word, and somehow it's just sinister.
	Yeah, there we are.
	Oh, thank you.
	This is the Pakistani eyesight.
	That does just look evil, doesn't it?
	You can click on the second one there, the second image, that's probably the highest-res one, which you've got a goat with, like, demonic horns and a snake in its mouth, surrounded by, of course, the Islamic moon and star.
	I'm getting big are-we-the-baddies vibes from this.
	Don't worry.
	We're on the side of gods, which is why our symbol is basically demonic stuff.
	What looks like a satanic ritual going on.
	Yeah, they're the ones who funded Bin Laden all those years, and also kept them safe.
	I'll tell you another on our side.
	Freeworld2112 says they really are fascist, totalitarian twats, wanting to chip people like cattle.
	What's next?
	Scannable barcodes on our arms.
	Boris, if you're part of this, you're a traitor.
	You've just given them another idea, Freeworld, so thank you for that.
	We're all going to look like Hitman by the end of this.
	Shaved heads, barcode on the back so they can scan us.
	I never actually understood.
	Why did he have a barcode on the back of his head?
	I think it's because he's a clone, so it was literally to designate which clone he was.
	Why would they use a barcode, though?
	I don't know, especially in such a visible place as well, because even in Hitman Absolution, he specifically has to do the worst disguise ever when he's on the run from the agency, which is he just puts a plaster over it.
	So he's just this big, bald guy who looks exactly like Agent 47, but it can't be.
	He's got plaster.
	So dumb.
	It is quite dumb.
	M1ping, I seem to remember a rather large conflict being fought in the last century, so the world didn't have to listen to the plans of the sinister Germans.
	Apparently, they won in the end, sadly.
	The eternal German will always find a way.
	Andrew Narog says...
	Well, actually, no, there is one solution.
	Careful.
	I did a speech on it.
	Is it just me or does the insignia of the WEF badge seem like Satanism 101?
	Yep, certainly does.
	And so are the Pakistanis.
	General Hyping, looking forward to Callum's new weekly segment, Boog News.
	We're already there, yeah.
	We could do more Boog News if you want.
	Why not?
	That's why I'll call the next one.
	Yep.
	Let's go to the next section of comments.
	All right.
	So Ryan Redacted said, so the flag-loving left are now saying flags are far right.
	So do all the Ukrainian flags and rainbows have to come down too?
	This is the question.
	There have been lots of leftist cope on Twitter of people with flags in their bio who've been calling this out, being called out, going, well, but you've got a Ukrainian flag in your bio.
	They're like, it's different.
	It's different.
	Flags are good when I do it, bad when you do it.
	I'm thinking about putting a Rwandan flag in my bio.
	I mean, why not?
	Rwanda is good for asylum.
	There's spoilers right there.
	JJHW says the left-wing Englishmen are now kulaks.
	I mean, that's what they're hoping for, surely.
	Freewill says you don't get to force people out of their jobs just to achieve racial quotas.
	Let people work where they want.
	This is not the Soviet Union where the state tells you what job you are allocated for.
	We have choice.
	That may be how they want it to look, that we have choice, but sadly it seems day by day that illusion is being shattered because they are absolutely very eager to get the people who own their property, own their business, to give it up so you can give it to black and brown people because diversity.
	You know, I'm sure these people would be more than happy to employ, you know, competent people no matter what their skin colour is, but no, we just need to give it to them for the sake of their skin colour because this is not racism.
	Okay.
	Andrew Narragh says, "Time to turn England into Zimbabwe.
	Forcing white farmers off their farms and giving it to urban minorities worked so well before after all." I will admit when you were reading that one I just had like Redusion songs playing in Yeah, this tactic hasn't worked well in the past, has it?
	We're gonna have to write our own, that's the problem.
	Again, we're gonna have to reword it, so now it's like the British never die.
	Justin B says, Yeah, not a bad idea.
	Maureen Peters says, So if I understood this correctly, they are planning to force black people and other minorities to work the land?
	Yeah?
	Yeah, pretty much.
	When you put it like that, yeah, that is exactly what they're planning on doing.
	Kevin Fox says she is correct.
	There is institutional racism in the UK. Unfortunately for her, that racism is happening the opposite way to what she is claiming.
	The racism is against whites, not blacks and browns.
	If a gang of white Telford gangs were running a grooming gang targeting Asian kids, how long do you think it would be before they were apprehended by the police and their faces and crimes spread all over the MSN? Well, as we saw with the college...
	Yeah, exactly.
	As we saw with the College of Policing, that would be working towards equity, whereas now that it's Asian gangs and British kids, that's working against equity.
	Someone asked to make the point as well that you see them make articles like this.
	I kind of want to make spoof articles saying that, you know what's really white?
	Sewage workers.
	And then just move from terrible job to terrible job, just complaining that it's too white and we need to get more ethnic minorities in.
	Do you reckon they publish that?
	I reckon it's worth a go.
	I mean, I've never seen you write an article, so it'd be interesting.
	Someone else has to spellcheck it, that's for damn sure.
	Yeah, no, that is...
	I'll give it a look once over for you, I'll make sure, okay?
	Kevin Fox says, same people saying that having...
	Unbearable whiteness of washing turds.
	Same people saying that having Union flags flying in Regent's streets were remarkably silent when Notting Hill was adorned with flags.
	I'm not saying all those letters.
	I mean, good God.
	So it's not the flags that make it look like Nazism, it's the fact that there isn't a brown and black intersectionalist triangle in the Union flag.
	And in that black and brown triangle, there is now also the Ukrainian flag as well, because the Ukrainians have been so favourable to gays and gay marriage.
	Very, very big logic, big brain going on right here.
	Henry Ashman saying, These flag misery guts are probably the same people who go to last night at the proms and wave EU flags during Jerusalem, Land of Hope and Glory, Rule Britannia, and God Save the Queen.
	I might order more flags just to wind them up.
	Yeah, I mean, I've heard people like Calvin and Carl say that before all of this sort of intersectional attitude came about, it was pretty rare for just an individual Brit to be flying the Union Jack or the St.
	George's Cross, just because it feels a bit American.
	It's not the sort of thing that we do, but now it's become such a thing to hate on the flag.
	It's like, well, we'll wave it in defiance.
	That's what we'll do.
	And final one here for this, Robert Longshore says, Believing there is a stereotypical black man is the issue here.
	I choose to believe that she was wearing a Ku Klux Klan robe with a shotgun and just saying you're not welcome.
	No, no, no.
	Not a shotgun.
	Let's not be too harsh.
	She had a whip, obviously.
	Of course.
	That's how she chased him out of the room.
	I would not go to the Church of England in London, that's for sure.
	Clinton getting caught, so Bleach Demon, a wonderful name.
	Hillary Clinton being held to account is about as likely as two weeks to flatten the curve.
	Or the Church of England being pro-Christian and pro-English.
	But it is always good to have an admission, even if we always knew, so that's why I wanted to go over it.
	I suppose so.
	But it's also great to see that we...
	There's always the statement that they always accuse you of the worst things they're up to.
	I mean, in 2016, she literally made up a fake news story, spread it around, massive disinformation, convinced half the country that Trump-Russia was a thing, got loads of time and money wasted by the Americans in the political scene, and then for the next few years they've been screaming about fake news needs to be stopped, we need to have more censorship online because of this, and also because of disinformation.
	They're the ones doing it.
	They're accusing you of the thing they do.
	When you're the ones assuming all of these guilty tactics, you're just going to assume that the enemy is going to be doing the exact same thing as you, so why not accuse them first?
	Ultra XYZ... Okay.
	Dark XYZ. Washington Post, democracy dies in darkness because Washington Post hired the same people who Clintons used to unalive Epstein.
	I'm sure they did.
	Longshank1690 says, I honestly cannot think of anything Hillary could have done to red pill an entire political movement, prove the existence of the deep state, and show they are deeply in the institutions of the United States and have been subverted than Russiagate.
	If she had just let Trump be President, Tucker Carlson wouldn't know who they are.
	I think we'd still have a good idea, but...
	I mean, it's not just her.
	A lot of the others would have to have done nothing for Tucker not to notice, but yeah.
	We would have needed the whole Hunter Biden laptop story to have never happened, stuff like that as well.
	But if they never did any of these evil things, I wonder where Tucker would be.
	Probably out on the farm.
	I don't know.
	He'd be probably just chilling out in the sun somewhere, enjoying himself, not having to scream into the void and being told by leftist news outlets, oh, you're just lying about everything.
	Barbados with a gulsa on his face, frankly.
	Yeah, there you go.
	And fair play to him.
	Henry Ashman, the WEF might have the means to change the world, but they don't have the right to.
	It's certainly true.
	Andrew Narog, I hate how politicized NPO has become.
	Taxpayer money to fund leftist propaganda.
	Certainly is.
	Kevin Fox, Hillary and Joe, for that matter, had to push the Russia collusion of Trump to distract and push everyone to look at Trump and not their links with the Russians.
	The Ukrainians, of course.
	Callum Dayton, six years of waiting for a confession and evidence has finally been admitted.
	This show goes to show why we can't deal with the socialists as a hive collective of globalists.
	Yeah, we certainly can't deal with them because they just openly lie.
	I mean, this is why I am optimistic, and as Cole said, some BS happens.
	And then you wait a few years, and someone will come out with a documentary showing how many mules there are, and you can see them.
	And I look forward to the further investigation on that, to see the names.
	So Anthony S. says John Durham's role is to protect the deep state actors who colluded with the Clinton campaign to frame Trump for treason.
	I haven't had a look into him himself, but I'm sure you're right.
	Yeah, well, too bad.
	They've just lost, haven't they?
	In the long run.
	And that's how they see it.
	Because, wow, we have New England now.
	The New Englanders.
	Do you remember when they started calling them the New Germans?
	Do you remember that?
	No, I don't actually remember that.
	Was that, like, 2015?
	Migrant crisis.
	Crisis created by the Germans, frankly.
	Well, I mean, Angela Merkel said they could take it.
	It turns out they couldn't.
	Loads of Iranians who were at war with...
	Turned up, and they were declared the new Germans, along with everyone else who just happened to join the caravan.
	You know, I was very interested when I was reading a book recently.
	I need to double-check that it's true, but they state in the book that Angela Merkel's parents during the Soviet period, when it was Western East Germany, deliberately chose to live in East Germany because they thought, oh, we need to repent for all of the evil stuff that Germany did during World War II. So I'm not surprised that Angela Merkel has no care for her own nation's sovereignty.
	But it's another level of German guilt where it's just like, what if we just exterminate ourselves?
	I mean, actually replace yourselves by calling them the new Germans as well.
	Like, the old Germans are being replaced in our own words.
	Oh, because we deserve it.
	Yeah, it's like, right, okay, again, another leftist doctrine.
	What a weird thing to confess.
	But otherwise, we're out of time, so if you'd like more from us, thoseears.com, of course.

▲