Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 16, 2022 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:08

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #393

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 16th of May 2022.
	I'm joined by Harry.
	Hello!
	And today we're going to be talking about W2EF. I love Antifa now.
	Also the nonce defender hired by a child sex abuse center.
	I don't see anything that could go wrong here.
	And also, how did these people ever win?
	Referring to Roe v Wade.
	And I thought we'd just have a look at some of the responses from the leftists because they're hilarious, if nothing else.
	There's a lot of cope going on.
	Yeah.
	So to start off, we'll go with WTF. I love Antifa now.
	So I might love Antifa now, or at least some of us might, and of course it's a bit ironic and a bit jokey because they have become the chief misogynists.
	They have become misogynist-in-chief.
	Pretty based.
	It's incredibly what it is.
	So as you can see here, I thought we'd start with a shill, of course, being the interview with Posey Parker, a women's rights advocate, and also I'm going to make the point that we should stop calling them TERFs.
	I don't know why I've been doing this, and they're totally right, because she's not a feminist.
	She says herself.
	Well, I can understand calling somebody like J.K. Rowling a TERF, because she is a radical feminist, whereas if Posey Park is like, no, I'm not a feminist, I just care about women and their rights.
	But there's the thing, like a whole bunch of what has been called the TERFs, including by myself, because they're not feminists, like they've said themselves were not feminists, although they do have their preclusions, of course.
	But we'll go forward and we'll go to what the story is about why we might love Antifa now if we're chief misogynists.
	If we go to the next one here, we can see, well, this is Julie Bindle, verify checkmere right now there, that this was an image that took place in Manchester over the weekend.
	We have some black-clad Antifa types with their trans flags guarding the Emily Pankhurst statue, the suffragette who, well, overlooked the bombing campaign that the suffragettes engaged in to get the vote.
	Very progressive, very forward-thinking.
	Yeah, you might wonder what the hell all this was about.
	If we go to the next one, we can see the protest and counter-protest.
	So, Posey Parker, the non-feminist, the women's rights advocate, who decided to turn up and give a speech about the fact that women are women.
	Stunning and brave.
	It actually is, though, because, of course, you end up with these people turning up and screeching at you.
	And one of the things they decided to screech at her and her supporters was, we are on the right side of history, as you can see Stephen reporting on the ground there.
	It's their one go-to phrase, isn't it?
	It's almost, it's quaint and stock at this point.
	Oh, you're on the right side of history.
	Of course you are.
	There you go.
	You never have been.
	No, they never have been.
	And that's also as if to imply, I mean, they subscribe to the Whig theory of history that everything is just a straight line of progress going up and getting better and better.
	And we're on the good side, so things will get good.
	Yes, if we win, things get good.
	If they win, things get bad.
	It's never that simple.
	But also, for these examples, I think they're definitely on the bad side of this one.
	Let's play the clip to hear the screeching.
	We're on the right side of history!
	I love how simple it is, though.
	Just, we're right, you're wrong, prepare to die.
	Just screeching it over and over again, like a child.
	But there's no...
	That's the point of the screeching, right?
	There's no conversation, there's no room for disagreement, there's no room for rebuttal.
	I think these people never got past the two-year-old period of being a toddler, just saying, this is mine, and you go, no, it's not.
	Yes, it is.
	But it's also the modus operandi of left-wing politics, as you can see by exemplifying this example.
	I'm so glad I don't live in Manchester anymore.
	So embarrassing.
	But then we also have this individual who noticed it as well, who was there.
	I presume she's part of the women's rights group.
	She says, Manchester now, the other reason I know I am on the right side of history.
	I have never felt the need to obscure my face as a protest.
	Hope all the women are safe.
	Because this black bloc turned up, of course, obscuring their face.
	Which, yeah, is actually a good point.
	Why are you obscuring your faces in public?
	You're going to go to a public protest.
	You show your face because you're public?
	You would have thought, but no.
	Instead, I'm going to cover it up.
	This is also technically illegal in the UK. Because you cannot wear a uniform to a protest.
	Oh really?
	Because of Moswell Moseley.
	So we banned that to shut that down.
	But that's the thing.
	The black bloc is also a uniform as well.
	But the police just don't enforce the law in that regard.
	Although I do love, I don't know if you can see it very well, but if we can click on it, please John.
	Can you spot the capitalism amongst the black bloc?
	The Chanel bag.
	Oh yeah!
	It's just like, eh, £2,000 Chanel bag.
	Well, it's only capitalism if they don't get the Chanel bag.
	Yeah.
	There's capitalism blocking them from what they so desperately need.
	What, would you rather they starve, Callum?
	Would you rather that they can't carry food with them and literally die?
	Yeah.
	But however, this is also just a funny thing, of course, because this is the anarchist federation of turned out, a bunch of socialists as well, so it is correct, cool, and anti-fart.
	It's not just the tactics and the uniform and all the rest of it.
	It has all the ideology along with it as well.
	If we go to the next link, we can see them also screeching here.
	You have Posey going down and just filming them, because it's funny.
	And they're screeching, protect trans kids.
	And the question that comes to mind is, for what?
	And who?
	For what?
	I mean, I would protect kids from the trans activists, ideally.
	Let's play the clip.
	So they're behind that for now.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, of course.
	But they're screeching at Posey and her supporters that they're there to protect trans kids.
	Again, for who?
	There is no such thing as a trans kid.
	Just to make it clear, what they're actually trying to protect them from is, number one...
	Reality?
	Well, yeah, number one, reality.
	Number two, their parents, because parents are often very protective of their kids.
	And number three, just anyone or any institution that won't affirm them entirely, because affirmation, anything other than affirmation of their identity, is evil and is going to kill them, despite the fact that research has shown that pure affirmation does not work.
	That's why I say, for who?
	Who are you protecting the trans kids, quote-unquote, for?
	Well, it's not the parents, it's not the kids, it's for your movement.
	That's what you're protecting it for, instead.
	There's also Stephen tried to go up and talk to them in the slightest and of course the black bock, being a black bock, are autistic so they couldn't speak.
	Let's play the clip.
	How you doing?
	You okay?
	I did come for the statue but if you want to have a discussion, I'm open to it.
	No?
	Okay.
	Sorry, why are you blocking me from the statue?
	Hello, let's ask you a question.
	Watch your face.
	Can I have a look at the statue, please?
	In public property.
	Can any of you speak?
	Any of you willing to have a conversation?
	No?
	Do you think this changed anyone's mind?
	Yeah, it's the wing guard, don't worry about it.
	The black face mask on the bottom of the left.
	It's just, it's really just a shame you're not eight foot because my arm sort of just gets it.
	You sure you don't want to chat?
	Happy to hear why you're here.
	Blink once for yes, two for no.
	No?
	Alright, well thanks anyway.
	Stay safe.
	Love it.
	Love Steven.
	That's brilliant.
	Also, like I said, the darting eyes, it makes them, they don't look intimidating, they don't look scary, they look confused and scared.
	Because this is the funny aspect for me especially, because we're on, you know, right-wingers are used to dealing with Antifa, a bunch of socialist lunatics who just want to cause violence, and yeah, okay, retards turn up and screech fascist and we all just laugh at them.
	And the funny thing being that they've now reduced themselves to going to women's rights protests and screeching at the women because of intersectional logic on transgender ideology.
	And that is what they're reduced to.
	And I can't think of any worse optics in mind for your political movement than to be screeching at women that they don't deserve to be safe for your ideology.
	At this point, it's literally got to the point where the existence of real women delegitimises trans women in their mind.
	If you can't actually just be a real woman, then what's the point?
	Also, I love the imagery.
	No one seemed to pick up on that, but the imagery there, and I suppose you can get it up in this JK Rowling tweet if you just scroll down a little bit, because you can see it in Stephen's footage, which is the fact that there is a rope with a transgender flag attached to it around Emily Pankhurst's neck, lynching her there.
	That is quite symbolic, really, isn't it?
	The trans movement is literally...
	Hanging by the neck, until dead, the women's rights movement in the form of the suffragettes here.
	Although, we should make it clear, Emily Pankhurst, I'm not that familiar with her, to be perfectly honest, but you said she did some bombing?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, I'm not a big fan of bombing.
	Yeah, though, I mean, for people who don't know, in the UK we had two movements, one for the idea that we just have political activism and protests and blah blah blah, therefore to get women's rights, and then there were the suffragette guys who were like, what if we just bomb the parliaments to radicalise the moderates?
	I don't know, so...
	Yeah, they would bomb, like, letterboxes and stuff and ended up killing five people.
	So, one of them being a suffragette, so not much was lost.
	However, that's the situation there, which is that they want to hang the suffragettes.
	So, literally misogynist in chief, if nothing else, from Antifa.
	I respect them more and more.
	Joking, of course.
	But you can see J.K. Rowling here as well, also taking notice and then retweeting Stephen's footage and plenty of other pictures and whatnot for her hordes of fans to see what is going on.
	Her saying here, there is no conflict between women's rights and our ideology.
	To prove it, we've dressed up as ninjas to block public access to a statue of a suffragette.
	We're confident that this has done wonders for our cause.
	It definitely isn't an unintentional, hilarious own goal.
	I don't know why you didn't pick up on the hanging as well.
	Not only are they going to try and block you seeing the suffragette, they're going to hang the suffragette.
	How tolerant.
	They're standing for the establishment, finally.
	Conservative and FIFA. BCFO's feminism.
	We go to the next one.
	Conservative in the 1800s, maybe, as you can see there.
	If you think I'm being hyperbolic about that being around her neck, you may remember there was a lady in this country who did end up being interviewed by the police for hanging up a suffragette ribbon on a...
	What was it?
	A gate?
	That was it?
	It's not even around something's neck.
	Oh, yeah, yeah.
	I do remember that, yeah.
	It was reported to the police as a noose.
	And then she was interviewed by the police, and I believe ended up having to fight for a job as well.
	So, yeah, I'm not taking any of this symbolism for granted.
	And the fact that they're just doing it with the trans flag on it and waving in front of it, it's just too perfect.
	Too perfect an image.
	Well, just imagine, because the police were there the whole time, this scene, everything is the exact same, except the flag is not a trans flag, but is something related to right-wing ideology.
	Instantly shut down.
	Yes.
	Everyone arrested.
	Identities released.
	People doxxed.
	This is having left-wing privilege, which is you can do literally anything and the state will back you up because, well, you're part of their movement, effectively.
	If we go to the next one here, we can also see the fact that Antifa started manhandling some woman who turned up with a, I believe that's some kind of suffragette flag there, and I suppose we'll play this so everyone can see.
	Hey!
	Get your hands!
	Get your hands!
	Hey!
	Hey!
	Stop!
	I mean, okay, literal assault also...
	What were you attempting to do, really?
	Also, I like this guy's style.
	He's very cool.
	He's very cool, I'll give him that, yeah.
	But then the Antifa Blackbark member there, what, you're just gonna push her over?
	Because that's the thing as well, like, for right-wingers...
	in the sense that they would turn up to protest and physically assault people.
	In Sweden, we've seen them raid homes of people and threaten their lives and whatnot.
	All over the world this has happened.
	But in the UK, you, of course, have this right-wing protest, and it's fine.
	In the sense of, like, no one cares that a man has been beaten up by someone from Antifa.
	But if you beat up a woman who's there with a suffragette flag...
	It's not a good look.
	It is the worst possible optics on Earth, and they still do it.
	But I think the best thing about it, John just pointed it out, was the fact that this was one guy, one Antifa member, trying desperately to push over what looked like a middle-aged woman and failing spectacularly.
	He managed to get her to comfortably sit down, and then...
	Still holding onto a flag.
	She didn't even lose it.
	Yep.
	Unlike in T4 King's College of the Lost Inn, it now sits in Cole's garage.
	So, there's that.
	There's also J.K. Rowling taking notice of this, calling it basically best misogyny.
	I never expected the right side of history to include so many people in mass intimidating and insulting women, did you?
	But she never dropped her flag.
	Emily would be proud.
	I just love the fact that it's just like, yeah, misogynist in chief literally pushing over women.
	Why?
	Because anti-fascism.
	I mean, it's never been more clear.
	I know it's always been clear for us, but for the public, for Joe Average Guy, I mean, if you needed a piece of footage to show how degenerate Antifa are, I mean, that's it.
	That's the one you show.
	There's also the next one, which we can see them just screeching.
	It's women on their little mobility skewers.
	Let's play the clip.
	Off streets!
	Off city!
	This is what community looks like!
	That's what you're screaming at.
	This is just embarrassing.
	Just imagine how pathetic these people are.
	All you can do, we've just put some flags and hung a new sort of statue and we're yelling at people in mobility scooters.
	Jesus Christ, get a job.
	I mean, there's a reason I focused on this.
	It's because you couldn't ask for better optics, which is there's a little lady there on her mobility scooter and the black box is screaming, whose streets?
	Our streets!
	What do you want her to do?
	Like, stay home?
	Cripple fight!
	It's ridiculous.
	If we move forward as well, we can also see someone making the point that the police did not arrest people with face coverings and their little uniform, but instead tried to warn the lady holding the suffragette flag that she was the bad one in this instance.
	If we go forward again, we can also see the fact that the TERFs are not exactly confident that the police are even on their side, and rightfully so, because the police are terrible in this regard.
	The police, yeah, they do generally side with the furthest left cause.
	In the past, they may have gone, women's rights, that's as far left as we're going, but now that it's been pushed even further, they've left the women's rights in the rearview mirror.
	No, they're now for women's rights and lefts.
	I don't know.
	It's all over that movement.
	But you can see them here with the pride flags, the local police.
	It's just endless.
	I think Manchester police had to be, what was it, completely destroyed at one point.
	Possibly...
	Possibly one of the worst.
	Once again, I say I'm really glad I don't live in Manchester anymore, just because of the fact that, one, the police are completely useless.
	And also, this sort of thing is happening almost on a weekly basis.
	There's constantly social justice activist protests going on.
	The other week I saw a bunch of people I knew in uni were outside of the massive public library there, all protesting on behalf of trans rights.
	Okay, what rights don't they have?
	A trans right to what?
	Yes.
	To be a woman.
	Okay, you can't have that.
	Okay.
	This is literally a Monty Python sketch.
	Yeah, a reality.
	What's the point in having the right to have babies if you can't have babies?
	It don't work.
	And you could be a lumberjack if being a woman doesn't work out, so, you know.
	Yeah, but this is, sorry to bring it down a notch, but, I mean, the intersectional ideology, as you can see, infecting the Greater Manchester Police.
	I mean, this does have real-world effects as well, separate from this case, which is, of course, I believe it was the Greater Manchester Police who had to be completely disbanded administratively and rebuilt because of their failures in regards to the grooming gangs.
	The fact that they completely ignored it because they didn't want to be racist.
	Well, they don't want to be racist, and also the more time they spend on stuff like this, the less time they're dedicating to something else.
	There's also that aspect as well.
	But this ideology is what caused them to ignore the grooming gangs.
	Because, oh no, arresting a brown nonce would be racist.
	No, no it wouldn't.
	And even if it was, he's a nonce.
	I feel like one is worse than the other in this case, but the Greater Manchester Police didn't think so.
	But let's move forward again, because we can also see the usual lobby groups turning up and being like, there's no place for hate in their communities.
	Unless it's hating women.
	Which gives space!
	That's right.
	I'm against homophobia before.
	Hell of a statement.
	But you can see Faircop here making the point.
	Actually, it does.
	Hate is an everyday emotion expressed, for instance, at booing at the National Anthem at the FA Cup Final.
	Not pleasant, not smart, not clever, but not criminal.
	And very much part of livable life, or in regards to anything else as well.
	So I really hate this idea that it has no place in our society.
	So I guess we'll all be happy.
	We'll take the happy pills.
	I think hate is honestly a very useful emotion.
	It's a human emotion.
	It's a very human emotion.
	But there's a reason that we have that emotion in the first place, which is, for instance...
	Nonces.
	Yeah, nonces.
	I hate nonces.
	It helps me to keep them away from my children.
	It's very practical.
	But let's move forward, because there's also some other stuff I thought I'd mention that I found hilarious.
	So this one, this being a weird message...
	So this is Gloucestershire Fire Service here with their new fire truck, and they've done the paint again to show conformity with the regime.
	You can click on that, John.
	We can see that they wrote on here, Fire doesn't discriminate, neither do we.
	That is a threat.
	Awfully reads like a threat.
	It's just like, you said earlier, that's right, we'll burn you to the ground.
	Just the police turn up Hank Scorpio style.
	Yeah, scroll down for your response to that as well.
	This is what I'm picturing.
	This is the fire service.
	They show up at your house and you've got a suffragette flag on the window and they go, don't get out the water cannons, boys.
	Take it rather literally.
	We're not the water service, we're the fire service.
	Shh, shh, shh.
	Burn down the place.
	Fire doesn't discriminate, and neither do they.
	Oh, God.
	Moving forward, there's also the imagery from that day being, of course, obvious, because after the Black Bloc left, the women's right activists went up and put a suffragette flag on the suffragette instead of a noose.
	Of all the things.
	And I thought I'd end this off by checking in with gender ideology in Australia, of all places as well, because something happened that was just gross, and I thought we'd look at it.
	So this is quoted here, in the news.
	Safe Place Australian Museum defends allowing man in lingerie to play with Lego at a children's event.
	I mean, I've got some questions, you might think.
	This is all in the name of inclusivity as well.
	Don't want to be exclusive and say that the man in lingerie can't be next to the two-year-olds.
	We want to be exclusive, inclusive to perverts.
	Yes.
	Don't want to exclude them.
	That would be right wing.
	They might be upset.
	I'll be the right wingers on this.
	Kick them out.
	So here's a quote.
	You let a male in fetish gear play in the Lego kids set during the school holidays, the woman said.
	When I spoke to the security, they said they could do nothing and pointed me to the organizer.
	He's sitting there with his full package out.
	Disgusting.
	I mean, that's a very salient point by one of the women who witnessed this.
	One Twitter user wrote, Man in fetish clothes wants to play with children and the museum are too chicken to remove him.
	I'm shocked that the parents didn't pick him up by the hair and kick him into next week.
	He was poking the hornet's last.
	And yeah, also, not a bad point.
	If you can scroll down here, John, you can see what the hell are you doing with your life?
	What the hell is wrong with you?
	The people who allowed this?
	Stay away from children.
	Jesus Christ.
	In a statement shared with news.com.au, a spokesman said the Australian Museum is, quote, committed to being a safe place where everyone feels welcome, including suspected nonsense, apparently.
	There you are.
	I think we've got some evidence.
	This looks like evidence to me.
	In the name of inclusivity, we can't kick this person out dressed in lingerie with their package out in front of the kids in the Lego set because that would be right wing.
	Yeah, I'm feeling more and more confident about being right wing every day of the week.
	Literally every day I have more and more confirmation that I made the right choice.
	Absolutely.
	They then continue to say, the safety of our visitors and staff is our top priority, and we have policies, procedures, security, and Australian Museum staff to ensure this.
	Except that your policy is about protecting the weirdos you show, but not the kids themselves instead, apparently.
	There we are.
	That's the end of the news there.
	In regards, I thought we were checking Australia.
	And, uh, I don't know.
	WTF. Love Antifa now.
	Chief misogynist.
	I didn't realise that your segment was going to tie so fluidly into mine.
	I know, right?
	So, moving on.
	Guess who's back?
	Alan Walker is back.
	Yes, nonces are back.
	In fact, you can say...
	Yes, tell all of your friends.
	Tell the entire neighbourhood.
	Give this video a share.
	But yes, for those of you who aren't aware, you might want to check out one of our previous podcasts that I did with John talking about pedo-pride being denied when Alan Walker, who is a sexologist, I think, some doctor with a PhD, was coming across with nonce advocacy in a university in was coming across with nonce advocacy in a university in Virginia, was placed on administrative leave because the university got some backlash from having a professor there who was going like, well, actually, we need to consider the feelings of the pedophiles.
	Yep.
	Yep.
	And then was eventually fired.
	Before I go any further, just because it's very, very relevant to this, check out this premium podcast I did with Carl a while back, talking about scientific nonce advocacy, because yes, it is a thing that exists.
	It's something that we're going to be covering today, and Carl did a very good job of going into depth on what's going on with the various mainstream attempts to try and normalise paedophilia, or...
	Minor attracted persons, as the term is becoming to be known.
	So let's just carry on now.
	So first of all, the thing that made Alan Walker quite notorious in the first place and brought a lot of negative attention to the organisation that was interviewing the...
	Them?
	No, we're not respecting the pronouns.
	No, no.
	Interviewing her, because she's trans, but I think female to male, but still goes on to gender-neutral pronouns.
	So she was interviewed by Prostasia, a child protection service slash advocacy organization.
	They're an NGO that say that they like to protect children.
	They don't.
	They don't really, not in any actual practical way.
	In fact...
	Protect them for who?
	I have evidence that they are doing the opposite of protecting children.
	But let's go on.
	So they spoke to Alan, who had a book out called The Long Dark Shadow, Minor Attracted People and Their Pursuit of Dignity.
	Their pursuit of dignity.
	Nonces and their pursuit of dignity.
	Yes, this is a real thing.
	A little dark shadow.
	I mean, do you want to sound like a supervillain?
	Because, I mean, that's what you are.
	And then you called yourself a term that would go with that, so...
	But the description here is, it's one of the first scholarly studies of minor attracted people who do not offend, and judging by the research in the book that I was able to actually find online, who said they do not offend...
	No verification beyond that.
	Oh, they told me that they didn't offend, therefore I can take their word as sacrosanct.
	I talked to Alan about their research, the stigma attached to this population, and what they learned about strategies to prevent offending.
	They're not preventing offending, they're just trying to de-stigmatize this overall.
	So, like, I've got it written down all my notes here, so I understand what it is that they're going for.
	But we shouldn't be destigmatising nonces and treating them with dignity.
	We should be making sure that it is the absolute most stigmatised behaviour that you could ever partake in.
	So also just again revealing endlessly in which they're like, yes, we must normalise this, normalise that.
	And it's like, hmm, how far are you going with this?
	We must normalise nonce.
	Nope, no, no, definitely not.
	Don't really want to do that.
	But also the slippery slope is real.
	If you're trying to destigmatise them and make them someone that you can just like, oh, invite the nonce to your barbecue.
	Invite them to your children's birthday party.
	They can read stories.
	No.
	No, I don't think I will.
	So, I don't want to play any clips.
	I've got one clip later on, but in that video, Alan is consistently saying that prevention is needed on the map side, on the non-side, saying that purely focusing on stranger danger from children doesn't help...
	Even though, you know, teaching kids to be aware of strangers and stranger danger and all that sort of stuff probably does help.
	But they don't state at any point what exactly they think will be good prevention on the adult side other than therapy, speaking to families, and limiting contact with children.
	You know, okay, fair play.
	This is all obvious.
	But then also saying we should create map support groups.
	Where all of the nonces can get together and exchange tips.
	I mean, you know, support one another.
	I just don't see it going well.
	Chris Williamson has talked about this.
	I mentioned him when we were out to lunch.
	Yes, yeah, yeah.
	He sat down and did an interview with a guy who made the documentary.
	He wasn't involved, of course.
	He was just making the documentary.
	Well, he went to Germany, and in Germany this is legal and allowed, so all the nonces get together and they have like cope groups where they're trying to convince each other not to engage in it.
	And he was making a documentary about this group and the fact that it was a thing, and one of the most messed up aspects was that there was a man and a woman who met each other in that group, bonded over their sickness, and then were actually thinking, you know, we want to start a family and have kids.
	No.
	Big no.
	Sterilise yourselves and then stay away from children.
	Lock yourself in a room for the rest of your lives and stay away from children.
	Stay away from society.
	Just get out.
	Just get out.
	That's how I feel about this.
	I must say, there is some statements online saying that Walker has advocated for high-quality child porn and realistic life-size dolls to be given to pedophiles as a way to affirm them and prevent them from...
	I wouldn't be surprised.
	I'm not buying that thing.
	It wouldn't surprise me if it's something hidden within the book later on towards the back chapters, but I can't verify it, so take that with a pinch of salt.
	But there is a previous paper that I was able to find called Minor Attraction, A Queer Criminological Issue by Alan Walker.
	Very interesting how it all gets wrapped up in queer, isn't it?
	Where she states that there exists evidence that minor attraction is a sexual orientation and the parallels between the treatment of MAPS and LGBT populations are striking.
	So what they've basically done is notice that, hey, this kind of rhetoric worked for gay rights...
	Why not use them for pedo rights as well?
	Hmm.
	So that's what it's doing.
	Because the kids can consent?
	Yes, whereas children cannot.
	But they've also got the FAQ on here, and they state that they are sex-positive, prosthesia are, and that sex positivity means that every human being has the right to express and enjoy their own sexuality, provided they do so consensually.
	Sex positivity underpins our opposition to child sexual abuse, since it is a constant violation.
	By definition, children can't consent to sex with adults.
	I'm glad that they...
	They make that clear, at least.
	But, they say this contrasts with other organisations whose work is underpinned by society's moral standards, which can be mutable and subjective.
	Whereas us, we don't have any standards or morals.
	Yes, we...
	So this is basically...
	I appreciate that they're trying to go with a principled stance, but I don't trust you.
	And that's based on my own subjective moral opinion.
	Ooh!
	Because I think there is reasons that a lot of people have this subjective moral opinion, and it's right to keep it so.
	You also have a sex offender running the organisation, Guy Hamilton Smith, who has a big Reddit post self-reporting about how he is a nonce and got added to the sex offender registry when he got caught, so that's a good start.
	And they have what's referred to as a map support club.
	Where everyone can get together and talk.
	Do you know what the age limit is for that?
	Better be 18.
	13 and older.
	13 and older.
	So nonces can get together in this support group and openly get into contact anonymously with 13-year-olds who are worried that, oh, I might be attracted to kids as well.
	And it's like, oh, great.
	So you're going to open up a forum where kids can get groomed.
	What could possibly go wrong?
	Fantastic.
	We joked about Brass Eye all throughout, but it's literally this is the one thing we didn't want to happen.
	Yep.
	I know.
	But this whole organisation, to me, seems like a bunch of perverts getting together and finding ways that they can legitimise their degeneracy and their noncery.
	And the whole thing, especially throwing aside the subjective standards, appears to me like this.
	I had you mock up this meme earlier.
	Being a paedophile is bad, actually.
	Source!
	Source!
	That's the whole thing.
	Where's the empirical evidence?
	Well, if you can't conclusively...
	It's hidden in this hammer.
	If you can't conclusively prove with science that being a nonce is bad, then I can't take that as true.
	That's the whole approach to this whole thing.
	But I also found some interesting stuff.
	If they want sources, I've got sources, because...
	Oh, the link should be in the document right under the meme there, John, because I found a website that's talking about why you should be concerned about Prostasia, as if it wasn't evident on the face of it, but they actually have some good statistics in here.
	So here's some.
	Through the entire website, as well as one article titled The Intersection of Civil Rights and Child Protection by Guy Hamilton Smith, they state the following statistic.
	95% of all sex crimes reported to loss informant are committed by first-time offenders.
	As if that makes it any better.
	This is only the first time they've done it, guys.
	Don't judge them too harshly.
	Who hasn't had a lapse in judgment and, you know, nonced someone?
	I think most people.
	But carrying on.
	Therefore, they believe that tax dollars spent on the sex offender registry not only violate individuals' rights, but that money could be better spent on prevention.
	So they're trying to go with the libertarian argument here.
	This is violating my independent rights.
	I had major doubts about his claims, considering that he himself is listed on the sex offender registry, but I decided to research the topic.
	They found an interesting article in a study by these people involving 4,295 child molesters.
	The rate of recidivism, which is them going back and committing the crimes again, was 5% after three years of release.
	So, sounds like most of these first-time offenders don't go back, right?
	Oh, but that number climbs fast and climbs dramatically.
	In 5 years, that number climbs to 23%.
	In 10 years, that number climbs to 28%.
	In 15 years, that number climbs to 35%.
	The longest study ever conducted found that after 25 years, the recidivism rate was 52%.
	So it sounds like it wasn't just an accident that these people just happened to non-skids.
	It sounds almost like it's a degeneracy in their brain that's compelling them to do this stuff and we should remove them from society.
	This isn't difficult.
	This is all pretty simple stuff.
	In the article, they continue, Three Simple Steps That Can Reduce Child Sexual Abuse by Megan Ingeman.
	She promotes the idea that children need comprehensive sexual education.
	This is all to protect them from being nonced, by the way.
	That includes pleasure, consent, chronophilias, fetishes, etc.
	Which really puts a whole new spin on the whole, like, we need sexual education from the age of five up that's all about pleasure and consent and all this sort of stuff.
	Chronophilia, they point out.
	It was a term coined by the sexologist John Money, who did some pretty awful experiments, which I've spoken about a number of times, so I don't want to have to describe them again.
	But it was a term coined by him to describe individual experiences of sexual attraction limited to individuals of particular age ranges.
	So it's just a fancy way of saying you're a nonce.
	Under the Comprehensive Sex Education header, Megan writes, So all of those kids in Florida and Californian schools being taught by their teachers about fetishes, this is for their own benefit to make sure that they understand when they're about to be nonced.
	We're just teaching them that gay people exist, bro.
	Yeah, we're just teaching them gay people exist.
	Get that word out of your mouth.
	Also, intersectional, all of the links to LGBT, queer as a political group, it's all connected, isn't it?
	And they constantly complain.
	This is why, when you go like, oh, please stop teaching my five-year-old about sex, they go, don't you understand how this harms queer people?
	Because it is all connected.
	Because at the end of the day, being a political umbrella, they're more than happy to accept pedophiles into that.
	They just need to get society into the state where the rest of us are happy to accept it.
	This being the difference between the alphabet that goes on forever and can be auditioned with anything, and the other people who are not part of the alphabet.
	Well, because don't you understand?
	Her whole book, I read through a section that's available online, it's literally just, won't somebody think of the poor pedophiles?
	Don't you understand that society teaches them to hate themselves and pedophiles might end up hating other pedophiles.
	Oh, the humanity of it all.
	Good.
	We can organise them.
	Get all the pedos into a league.
	This person, who's definitely not pro-nonce and just cares about children, has been announced by the John Hopkins University as having been hired for their child sex abuse centre.
	We are excited to share that Alan Walker, PhD, will be joining the Moore Centre as a postdoctoral fellow on May 25th, the Moore Centre for Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse.
	Interestingly enough, the John Hopkins University is where John Money operated, and, uh...
	Committed his crimes.
	I think committing his crimes is probably the best way to describe what he did.
	What he did was not scientific research.
	It was abuse on a massive scale.
	And John Hopkins, after the inevitable backlash, started to cope about this.
	Like, no, no, no.
	Alan's a leader in the field of perpetration prevention research.
	It's essential that we have Alan.
	We're delighted to have Alan.
	Because otherwise, how are we able to protect children?
	If we don't have pronounces on the team, how do we protect children?
	To stop the nonsense, they're going to become nonsense.
	And we've got a big self-report from queer criminologists who were applauding Hopkins' bravery in hiring Alan in the next link along.
	Congratulations to the DQC, I assume that's a D-something-or-other queer criminology member, Alan Walker on this new position.
	It's all connected.
	It's all connected.
	Queer criminologists, pronounces.
	You can start to just sub out a lot of these terminologies that you find a lot in the progressive left for pronouns.
	That's, generally speaking, what I would do.
	And we've got people in the trans lobby coming out in full support as well.
	Um...
	This one's brilliant.
	Gandalf the Gay says, in response to someone, you are correct.
	People look at, like, what he said and say, and are like, see, he thinks that kids should be able to have sex, when he never said that.
	Granted, none of these people have ever read what he's actually said, or written just what Nazis have read about what he's said or written.
	So it's even more so than, um, hatred, like, want to protect kids, you must be a right-winger.
	Want to protect kids, you must be a Nazi.
	I didn't realise that was what the Hitler Youth was all about.
	Stone Toss is just like, well, okay.
	Alrighty then.
	Yeah, so once again, more straw men thrown out.
	We've also got the stunning and brave position of nonsense of people too.
	Once again, people not realising that this is the actual position that Alan is putting forwards.
	But minor attracted people who make up a portion of, but not all child abusers, we need to draw that distinction there, exist as people in their own right.
	Therefore we must accept them.
	Do they have rights?
	Therefore we must, what, just let them just go about their day?
	Just don't worry about the nonces.
	Just trust the nonce to their own judgment to not touch your children.
	No.
	I don't think I will.
	And then there's one of my favourite ones here, which is to prevent child sexual abuse, you first need to understand it.
	To understand it, you need to understand the people who commit it.
	Alan Walker is knowledgeable on the subject.
	See, to understand the nonce, you need to think like the nonce.
	And in thinking like the nonce, you need to act like the nonce.
	It's just...
	The state of academia.
	Yes, this is the state of academia.
	Antibodies against kookery.
	These people say that they're not the kooks.
	I know.
	I know.
	And just to make sure that I'm not strawmanning this person, I did get a clip that Andy Ngo shared where you can hear her say it in her own words, so let's just play a bit of this with their position on Nonsery.
	Thank you so much for that question.
	I use the term minor attracted person or MAP in the title and throughout the book for multiple reasons.
	First of all, Because I think it's important to use terminology for groups that members of that group want others to use for them.
	And MAP advocacy groups like Before You Act have advocated for use of the term MAP. They've advocated for it primarily because it's less stigmatizing than other terms like pedophile.
	A lot of people, when they hear the term pedophile, they automatically assume that it means a sex offender.
	And that isn't true, and it leads to a lot of misconceptions about attractions toward minors.
	I've definitely heard the idea that you brought up, though, that the use of the term minor-attracted person suggests that it's okay to be attracted to children.
	But using a term that communicates who someone is attracted to doesn't indicate anything about the morality of that attraction.
	I think there's morality inbuilt into it, wouldn't you say?
	Yeah.
	I mean, the idea is that the paedophile and the other version, oh, there's a different...
	No, there isn't.
	No, there really isn't.
	No, there really isn't.
	As far as I'm concerned, I think they refer them to as a nomab, a non-offending, minor-attracted person.
	One that inherently admits that, yes, if you're minor-attracted, you're more likely to offend.
	Two, to me, that's just nonsense waiting, is all you've said there.
	With extra steps.
	Yeah, you've said pedophile with extra steps.
	And there was an interview as well with the rest of the ProStasia, because I didn't want to get the whole clips up, but they've just done a transcript of the interview.
	I thought I'd read out a bit of the highlights that I found here.
	So, they continue on this weird distinction between offending and non-offending maps, as if...
	They aren't one in the same.
	Well, they aren't one leading into the other, basically.
	Child sexual abusers are people who have committed a sexual offence against a child.
	Many of these people are indeed MAPs.
	Good to get that admission.
	But first of all, there are many people who commit sexual offences against a minor who are not attracted to children in general.
	We know that abusers commonly commit sexual offences for reasons related to power, control, and access, but not because of attraction.
	So many child sexual abusers are not MAPs.
	So if it's nothing to do with sex, why would these people be sexually abusing them?
	That's just complete rubbish.
	There's obviously a sexual dimension to them because children can, sad as it is to say, children can be abused without being sexually abused.
	So obviously there is a paedophilic element to their behaviour.
	Making them paedophiles.
	Okay?
	So, but good attempt to try and separate the two categories.
	She carries on.
	Once again, all of this is self-reporting.
	So, they come up to you and say, I'm a map, but I swear I've never acted on it.
	Never once.
	But also, I feel really bad about how society makes me feel about myself.
	Can you write a book about me, please?
	My purpose in asking about their strategies for non-offending are pretty obvious, as I'm interested in offence prevention, and I figured maps' personal strategies would have relevance to other maps who might be struggling with some kind of temptation to act on their attractions.
	So...
	Trust the map.
	Trust the nonce to tell other nonces how to not nonce.
	No.
	No, I won't.
	Although I'm not a map myself, well, so you say, I am queer and so I too have been through experiences and realized that I have attractions many people wouldn't understand and that some people find to be immoral.
	And those experiences have really shaped who I've become.
	And so I sort of empathized with those experiences and I wanted to learn more.
	So...
	Once again, diminishing the legitimacy of gay people who aren't part of the alphabet lobby by saying that you have the exact same experiences as nonces.
	The moral to relativism there, though.
	I know.
	Well, some people find what I do immoral, therefore this is just as legitimate as I find myself legitimate.
	No, it's not.
	No, it's nothing to do with one another, to be perfectly honest.
	What we need is an option to get those maps who want it into some kind of affirming therapy.
	How do you affirm...
	Because with trans therapy, trans affirming therapy, is you just give them what they want.
	That's right, you are a woman, and we keep going until...
	Yeah, yeah.
	So what would the affirming therapy for a nonce be?
	I dare not even guess.
	But I just thought I'd end up with the reaction that she's got from...
	Other professors, which I think was quite funny, she carries on.
	So I remember a professor of mine asking about my research, and when I said I was studying people who are attracted to children who don't commit offences, he said, oh, okay, sex offenders.
	And I clarify, no, they have attraction to minors, but they haven't committed an act of sexual abuse.
	And he said, right, sex offenders.
	Based.
	And I also had another professor who, when I brought up my research interests, she just said, yuck, and moved along.
	I feel like people were giving you a message.
	Yeah, people were saying, this is not the best path to go down.
	And honestly, no matter what potentially good intentions this person may or may not have, if you were to go full good faith and give them the benefit of the doubt, if they do have good intentions, They are remarkably naive in their approach to just going, oh, you've never nonced anyone?
	Okay, I completely believe you.
	You're definitely the best person to go to for preventative measures.
	And also, there is a massive element here of just trying to normalize it, which is not good for anyone.
	Not good for society, not good for anybody, and certainly not good for children.
	Well, let's try and raise the mood a little bit.
	Yep, awful.
	I'm sorry, I know, I found this.
	Because I'd covered it before, yeah, I had to.
	But we'll go to, well, the Roe v.
	Wade stuff.
	So, Roe v.
	Wade has been going through the courts and the backlash has been glorious and I thought we'd just have a look at it and enjoy.
	Because why not?
	I always enjoy a little bit of leftist cringe, if nothing else.
	And we're going to start off here with a shill for Lawrence Wright's The Looming Tower, The Road to 9-11.
	You might wonder what the hell that has to do with abortion.
	We'll get back to it.
	Watch to the end.
	Trust me.
	Think of all the children that weren't born because of 9-11?
	Is that where we're going with this?
	It's even more big-brained leftist thinking.
	They were trying to abort America?
	I won't spoil it, but the lady who wrote The Handmaid's Tale is going to justify 9-11.
	Oh...
	Has she been watching Hassan?
	Yeah, so if we go forward, we can see some of the first responses, of course, which included diehead feminists screeching.
	Well, I can't kill baby, what's the point?
	In life anymore?
	Why do I even live?
	I don't know.
	It's the only thing I can find enjoyment in now.
	And also, if we go to the next one, we can see there are a lot of memes like this.
	This is just a random one I found, which is the pregnant man emoji, of course.
	A guy who's just had a big turkey dinner.
	Then suddenly, out of nowhere, when Roe v.
	Wade popped back into the news, the Liberals knew what a woman is again.
	Now hang on.
	I've seen that.
	Don't be so fast.
	I was going to say, but that's not entirely accurate, is it?
	No, only some of the leftists have realised that.
	The next one here, we can see a manly woman.
	Someone in a male voice, as Andy Ngo says, shouting, keep the laws out of my P word.
	word.
	Let's play.
	I really don't think that she has any fear of anything going near her I think your cats are going to be fine.
	That's the only one I think you're referring to, because there's nothing else going on, is there?
	Let's be frank.
	Also, it just shows the kinds of people that are attracted to these protests, because I don't mean this to be too harsh or anything.
	Obviously massively autistic.
	Yeah, but not in just, like, I've got autism or anything like that.
	No, like, clinically, something is wrong with you.
	You have made politics your entire life clinically online.
	I mean, it should be a diagnosis, frankly.
	And have driven yourself insane in any other period in history.
	If you turned up, like, we time-traveled you to the 70s, 60s, 80s, 90s, and just put you down in front of an average family and you had a conversation with them.
	They think you are just insane.
	They would probably call the authorities.
	Never want to see you again.
	I mean, when you're screeching about your kitty cat that you don't have, what's wrong with you?
	So, we're going to see more of this.
	As Andy Ngo also documented, there was this instance in which some guy was trying to talk to some anti-fart weirdos.
	Just threw out a cheek hile for a second there.
	I thought you were a dude, my bad.
	But let's play this clip because it's funny.
	You are harassing me!
	Are you not nothing?
	I'm a human being followed by a man who's not entitled.
	You are fired.
	I thought you were a dude.
	Oh, my bad.
	I didn't know that.
	Sorry, sir.
	Get the fuck out of here!
	Get the fuck out of here!
	Ma'am, I'm sorry.
	No, no.
	Back it up.
	Back it up.
	No.
	No, no.
	Now, get away from her.
	Get away from her.
	She said it.
	He just misgendered this woman, sir.
	I didn't know that.
	I'm sorry.
	Somebody call the police.
	Seattle, please It's very telling how the this person obviously knows okay, I've Like blocking my face have an obviously very masculine frame broad shoulders or narrow hips I'm trying to look masculine because you're trying to look like your top.
	So, I obviously need to have my pronouns on my shoulder or no one will know.
	I just love that there are loads of Soviet songs from the Afghan war with a blood type on my sleeve.
	Are you going to say that?
	I'm a woman.
	Bury me with a woman.
	No.
	No, you're not.
	Let's move forward as well, so we'll move to the next link, so we can see the guys in Seattle there giving Nazi salutes as they burn the American flag.
	Very interesting.
	That is very interesting, very telling.
	That kind of socialist, I presume.
	Let's move forward.
	Let's go to the next one, which is some other responses, because you've got those violent types, and then you've got the...
	I don't know what to call them.
	Brain-dead types?
	It's not even that, because you can tell these are kind of the moron kids who were fine.
	They were perfectly normal kids, and they were sent to university and made dumb, and this is what came out.
	I suppose there is a kind of collective retardation effect.
	Yeah, so this person went to uni and was retarded in her studies to the point that she is now holding a sign at a...
	Pro-choice march, as they call themselves, with a sign that says, fetus equals good snack.
	You know what, when Carl talks about Warhammer, and it's really nerdy, and it's a little bit tismy?
	A little bit literal demons.
	But there is a lot of truth to it.
	This is the Slaneshi demon right here, going, nice fetus you've got there, do you mind if I eat that?
	So the demon has turned up to side with the I don't know.
	I don't have anything to say.
	Come on, this is just so...
	I mean, if you don't want to be called baby murderers, stop calling the fetuses good snacks.
	I know, it's a radical procedure.
	If you don't want to be called baby murderers, don't be so enthusiastic about saying how you love murdering babies.
	Let's move to the next one, because there's a leftist cartoonist I saw.
	Oh god, this.
	This is brilliant.
	This is gold.
	They're after me, not because I'm the end goal, but I'm in their way.
	And it's Roe v.
	Wade.
	Oh no, take down the Roe v.
	Wade domino, and then we're going to outlaw Plan B. Nope, that's not abortion.
	For one.
	Ban from contraception?
	Nope.
	Federal ban on abortion?
	Uh...
	Banning gay marriage.
	I mean, one of the problems is the fact that it was a federal law in the first place.
	Banning gay marriage.
	That has nothing to do with this.
	Anti-sodomy laws.
	Again, nothing to do with this.
	Repealing women's right to vote.
	Very base, but not for this time.
	Banning...
	What was that?
	Interracial marriage.
	Interracial marriage.
	What does race have to do with that?
	Well, I mean, I can think of one way that Roe v.
	Wade ties into race, but not in the way that the leftists would like.
	No, but I love how they're like, well, if we can't kill kids, we might as well stop people in race mixing.
	What?
	Imagine all of the race mixing that will happen if they can't abort them.
	We don't want a generation of half-breeds.
	What's the left of banned race mixing?
	Because they're not allowed to kill kids.
	They're going to return Jim Crow there.
	The last one there, if we can go back.
	And then the last one they have on there is the return of slavery.
	So, if we can't kill babies, we might as well enslave the blacks and return to a tradition.
	Well, I can see why they're so scared.
	If only I'd have been able to deuce this obviously logical series of events right here.
	If only the right-wingers had known.
	I mean, clearly, we had no idea.
	I had no idea that if we stopped killing babies that slavery would return, but it's all hinged on that, didn't it?
	We should probably cover bread pains at some point, because it's such an obviously embarrassing attempt to rip off Stone Toss, but for leftists.
	Yeah, although the cartoons are just crap.
	I mean, like, really crap.
	If it was stone-tossed, it'd be half the words as well.
	Let's go to the next one.
	So we have Bezos' outlets, the Washington Post, who decided to go on another doxing screen.
	This one, they tried to dox the Supreme Court justices' family homes.
	They quickly deleted that.
	I bet.
	I bet they did.
	Put up a notice that said this file was inadvertently published.
	I accidentally wrote this article and posted it.
	I don't believe him.
	Colour me surprised, but an organisation that has a hired doctor, Lorenz, and does it publicly, and continues to do it, I don't believe that it's an accident.
	I think it's genuine.
	If we go to the next one, we can see, well, why would you do such a thing?
	For a call to arms, of course.
	Everyone's seen it, but we'll go over it again, because it's mad.
	Laurie Lightfoot, an elected representative, decided to go with two of my friends in the LGBTQ plus community, presumably including the P. The Supreme Court is coming for us next.
	The movement has to call to arms.
	We will not surrender our rights without a fight, say, fight to victory.
	I didn't know Laurie Lightfoot had such a large hand in January 6th.
	Yeah, well, that's our end.
	If we can't, sir, the final victory is when we kill all the babies.
	That's right, I'm for queer activism.
	If I can't have babies, no one can.
	End the breeders.
	I don't know.
	I'm sorry I don't have much commentary to make because it's just so obviously evil.
	In which someone's like, yeah, we're going to call to arms, go after the Supreme Court Justice's family homes, and, well, we should be able to just kill kids.
	Equals tasty snack.
	Once again, it's always worth bringing up with this.
	All they're looking to do, they're not looking to ban abortion everywhere by federal order.
	They're literally removing the federal order that abortion has to be legal in every state.
	That's all it is.
	If we go to the next one here, we can see the call to arms in effect.
	This is some anti-abortion group that had their place hit with Mars of cocktails and then scribbled on the side there.
	If abortions aren't safe, then neither are you.
	Fantastic.
	Good work, Lori Lightfoot.
	Get some people killed, why don't you?
	Because, you know, to...
	Well, actually, no, it does make sense.
	I just realized that.
	Well, if we kill kids and then we kill the adults too, and then we kill everyone and then communism wins.
	Because we're all equal when we're dead.
	That is true.
	Communism is when everyone's dead.
	Absolutely.
	If we go to the next one, we of course see the leftist response to this, which is that they called for more of it.
	This is a verified checkmark, as Andy Ngo puts here.
	A leftist journo who's like, more of this.
	Maybe these people never know a moment of peace or safety until they're in the ground.
	Fantastic.
	Thanks for telling us the left-wing wealthy, which is everyone dead, as more.
	We'll go to the next one.
	We also have the respectable face of retardation, and this is the most funny thing.
	This is what I was laughing at earlier.
	Okay.
	So this is Insider News.
	Verify checkmark, so they can decide the context of anything they put up.
	They're going to fact-check us as wrong, because have you forgotten what's really important about abortion?
	The money.
	What?
	Disney cartoon level villainy right here.
	Yeah.
	Women denied abortions are more likely to miss bill payments, experience bankruptcy, and use social services than other women in the same socioeconomic status.
	Yes.
	You know what would help prevent that?
	Being serious about sex.
	Or having a man in your life.
	All that.
	But there's the aspect of just, well, if you didn't want to get pregnant in the first place, be careful about sex.
	I mean, this culture in the West, as you pointed out previously, we don't.
	We have this ridiculous notion of how sex should be just another thing you can do.
	It's as easy as just going up to a vending machine and popping a coin in and getting a packet of sweets or something.
	That's how simple people are making it out to be.
	There's no consequences, there's no emotional connection forged through sex or anything like that, and it's just a lie.
	Obviously.
	And our culture is waking up to this in this debate.
	Fantastically.
	Once again, so many of my friends in my generation have gone off and done the thing where they've gone off and been self-reportedly a slut for a while.
	And then they always get so concerned and so confused.
	Why have I caught feelings with this person I've been sleeping with for a month?
	Oh, I wonder.
	I wonder why.
	Might have been all the sex.
	Who knows?
	But anyway, to be careful about sex and make sure you don't end up in bankruptcy is a legitimate thing, and the percentage of people who do is not a significant percentage as we listed previously, who then go for abortions.
	It's just not a high percentage at all, so don't give me that BS. Abortion restrictions cost the US about $105 billion annually.
	What?
	What the hell does that mean?
	I don't understand.
	So, because women are pregnant, and therefore not at work, we're losing money, damn it.
	Therefore, I don't know, legalize killing babies so that we can make more money.
	I mean, the graph is still going up, but it's going up slightly less than it was before.
	We can't have this.
	We're losing money by having kids.
	What the hell are you talking about?
	But if we don't have kids, who's going to make money in the future, though?
	Don't think about that.
	Don't think about that.
	We just need money now.
	Just more money.
	Just more growth instantly.
	All right, Keens.
	All right, fine.
	Young women who utilize legal abortion to delay an unplanned start to motherhood by just one year realized an 11% increase in hourly wages later in their careers.
	So, fantastic.
	We can calculate the worth for human life, which is an 11% increase in your hourly wages.
	That's it.
	Thank you, Insider.
	Thank you, Insider News, for coming to the fact check, which is that's what it's worth.
	Okay, so I won't have this baby.
	I'll have one next year to make sure I get paid more.
	But of course, they're not saying, wait a year and plan your life.
	No, they're saying, legalize abortion, so you kill the kid, and then you get 11% increase in your wages, so kill another one, another 11%.
	Is that a benefit?
	Do I get a coupon when I go to the clinic?
	You go into your boss, give him the fetus, and he goes, oh, well done.
	I mean, I don't know what view of the world these people think is ideal.
	Because it's mad.
	If we go to the next one, we also see the fact that they say unplanned birth reduced the labour force participation by as much as 25%.
	That's right, drone.
	Get back in the office.
	Don't not kill the kid.
	Instead, just get back into the labour force.
	I mean, I really hate that term.
	I mean, it really does treat humans as just an object.
	The idea that you were just a drone in the hive city.
	If we go to the next one as well, we also have the fact that, of course, Brown's most affected.
	I'm sorry, I just hate the term they use.
	I mean, technically, when it was first put in place, they were.
	Yep.
	Young women and women of colour, specifically black and Hispanic women, most likely impacted, from Roe v.
	Wade.
	They're not impacted, of course, in the way that you're thinking.
	They're not worried about that.
	Because, well, the reality, of course, will be that there will be more brown babies.
	And Inside News is petrified of that future.
	I mean, you'd think they'd think it was a good thing.
	Hmm, but no, apparently not, because they're still on the Margaret Sanger train of, well, as the black nationalists call it, accurately, funnily enough, the Negro Baby Holocaust, which is what Planned Parenthood was set up to do and did successfully.
	I mean, it is literal eugenics.
	Yeah, so I also love just the point of there's no birth, there's no labour force, but they don't think that far.
	Let's assume they have that kind of thought.
	Well, in the long run, we are all dead anyway, so...
	If we go to the next one, we then have the New York Times, who have had a big old big think about this, which is that of the body of 100 people deciding this, 76% are men making the decisions about private lives of nearly 160 million women.
	That's ludicrous.
	Again, funny how you were able to find what a woman was all against all of a sudden, but then also, who cares?
	I really hate this argument that men should have no say in abortions because they're men, so they're not the ones who get pregnant.
	Yeah, they're not the ones getting birth.
	It's not like, you know, it's their child as well or anything.
	But also just the argument, okay, we'll take that to its logical conclusion.
	Women don't really make up the murderers.
	Men are all the murderers.
	Like, women are like 5%.
	Pathetic.
	Do better.
	Women.
	We need parity in murder statistics.
	Hey, if you're a leftist.
	The point being that basically murder is a man's domain, and therefore women should have no say on whether or not it should be legalized.
	It should be entirely up to us to decide if murder is legalized.
	It's just silly.
	Like, this is the conservative position.
	It's a baby murder, right?
	Therefore, the men should not have a say in it is insane.
	There's also the point, as John makes, that women don't pay into the tax system over their lives, which is a whole other argument, but let's leave that for now and move on to the fanfiction section of this segment, which is the last thing I'm going to enjoy here.
	I invented...
	I don't know how you say it.
	Gilead?
	The Supreme Court is making it real.
	This is Margaret Atwood, the creator of Handmaid's Tale, writing about the fact that it's all coming true, bro.
	It's going to happen.
	I've heard mixed things about Handmaid's Tale.
	I've heard good things and bad things, and they kind of...
	Come from the sides of the aisle that you would expect, you know?
	Yeah, I never bothered reading it or watching it because it's just so ridiculous.
	And she even says herself that it's ridiculous in her opening paragraph of this article, which I find funny.
	In the early years of the 1980s, I was falling around with a novel that explored a future in which the United States had become disunited.
	Part of it had turned into a theocratic dictatorship based on the 17th century New England Puritan religious tenets and jurisprudence.
	Although I eventually compiled this novel and called it The Handmaid's Tale, I stopped writing it several times because I considered it too far-fetched.
	Yeah, that's why you should have left it, because it's obviously ridiculous.
	The idea is that this group overthrows the Constitution because we right-wing in that.
	It's like, no, that doesn't make any sense, especially in the American context.
	Because the right-wing Americans are always the ones who hate the Constitution so much.
	Burning it left, right, and centre and saying, it's just a document, bro, who cares?
	She says, silly me, theocratic dictatorships do not lie only in the distant past.
	There are a number of them on the planet today.
	What is to prevent the United States from becoming one of them?
	I'm thinking, what the hell are you talking about?
	I mean, number one, all the checks and balances and political traditions of the United States is one.
	Like, the whole purpose was for not to be part of the old world.
	But then also the idea that there are theocratic dictatorships.
	I can think of one being North Korea.
	But apart from that, I mean, maybe Iran?
	I mean, Saudi Arabia is a kingdom.
	I mean, I'm sure, to be fair, this is not too bad a point, because we seem to have this sort of idea nowadays that all of the bad stuff is in the past, we've only got onwards and upwards from here, whereas that is not the case.
	Things can still get worse.
	But she mentions theocratic dictatorships, North Korea being one of them, and, well, abortion actually is legal up until the rate the United States allows it, and they're one of the five countries on Earth that do that.
	I mean, everywhere in Europe, it's not as late as it is in the United States.
	Yeah, that's true.
	The liberal states.
	We don't allow that in anywhere else in the civilized world.
	She says, uh, for instance, it is now the middle of 2022 and we have just been shown leaked opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States that would overthrow the settled law for 50 years on the grounds that abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution and it is not deeply rooted in our history and tradition.
	True enough, the Constitution has nothing to say about women's reproductive health.
	It No, it has nothing to do with legalising murder.
	I don't know what to say.
	But the original document does not mention women at all.
	Shouldn't need to.
	It's the aspect.
	Women were deliberately excluded from the franchise, and then she goes on to whine about the history of civil rights, but she butchers it, and I can't be bothered to waste my time with the lazy re-reading of history about women's suffrage, so we're going to skip over that.
	She gets on to, women were non-persons in US law for a lot longer than they were persons.
	If we start overthrowing settled law using Supreme Court Justice Samuel Leto's justifications, why not repeal votes for women?
	Why not indeed?
	Moving on.
	There's a point there that it's not based on the right to privacy, dum-dum.
	This argument was based on the right to privacy in the most ridiculous circumstances by a woman who lied and then spent the rest of her life trying to overturn the decision.
	Trying to make up for it because of how awful she felt about it.
	Yeah, so the idea that women's rights to vote are just based on private...
	They're not.
	They're based on the right to vote and elect without...
	No taxation, without representation.
	You're an American, you should know this.
	It says there as well, the right to abstain from giving birth.
	Well, you can do that if you're just careful about sex.
	It's not that difficult.
	Wait, you say, it's not about the organs, it's about the babies.
	Finally, we're there, she's got it.
	Okay, so now we can have the real debate.
	From the lady who wrote The Handmaid's Tale.
	Which raises some questions.
	Isn't acorn an oak tree?
	Blah-de-blah-de-blah.
	And she gives other stupid examples.
	And then she says, The hard line of today's anti-abortion activists is at conception.
	Right, she's understood the conservative position, American conservatives, right?
	And honestly, after everything that I've learned about over the past few weeks as a result of this, I've kind of got to the conception point at this point, because it's like, everything else just introduces moral grey area that nobody can agree on, so it's easiest and simplest, okay, it's been conceived, done.
	But we've got there, she's managed to define the American conservative conception on the argument.
	Okay, good enough, she's got that.
	Now, how is she going to butcher it, and then try and legalise abortions?
	And this is the best part of the article from this...
	This absolute brainless.
	And I'm really glad I never bothered reading this crappy book because it seems that really she is an airhead.
	So she says, The conservatives say it starts at conception, which is now supposed to be the moment at which a cluster of cells becomes ensouled.
	But any such judgment depends on a religious belief, namely the belief in souls.
	No, it doesn't.
	I mean, I'm an atheist.
	I think you're an atheist, aren't you?
	Yep.
	Plenty of atheists around the world who still cringe at a pregnant woman being kicked in the stomach.
	And so do you.
	Don't lie, Margaret.
	I mean, at the end of the day, you don't have to believe in souls to understand that there is something, I don't know, if you could say sacred about human life.
	Yes.
	But even then, it's just like, what the hell?
	So she continues, let's look at the First Amendment.
	This is the stupidest argument I've ever heard.
	She's going to make it.
	It reads, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.
	It ought to be simple.
	If you believe in insoulment or conception, you should not get an abortion because to do so is a sin in your religion.
	If you do not believe in souls...
	Then, under the Constitution, you should be able to do what you want, because under the Constitution, you should not be bound by the religious beliefs of others.
	I have a religious libertair to kill what has no soul.
	Which, being completely arreligious, I believe is nothing.
	That doesn't make any...
	Therefore, I'm okay to just murder anything and everything.
	So you can go with it...
	Atheists, like, I tend to subscribe generally to natural rights and natural law, like the old Greek conception of it, which is, you know, makes the human life is sacred because, you know, if you murder someone, you're taking that away from them without their consent, making a decision for them.
	It's bad.
	I just love that Margaret has come to the opinion of legalised murder.
	Why?
	Because abortion needs to be legalised.
	So we'll just kill anything that doesn't have a soul.
	My freedom is being restricted.
	Go to the next one here.
	Here's some chaps who definitely believed in that opinion.
	My Libertier.
	They screamed as they slammed themselves into the Twin Towers because they were killing infidels who have no souls and therefore everything about this was fine.
	At least that's Margaret's interpretation as she sits watching the planes fly in there and goes, well, fair enough.
	I mean, that's their Libertiers.
	As free Americans.
	I mean, given that I'm an atheist, I have nothing to say about this.
	Nothing at all, says Margaret.
	This is perfectly moral.
	She's the leader of the Futurama Neutral Planet.
	In fact, to stop them would be a violation of the Constitution.
	It's their religious liberty to murder whoever they want, because they've decided they don't have a soul.
	And if we go to the next one, we actually have a funny example of this, which is the Satanic Temple apparently agree.
	With her interpretation of all of this.
	So, fantastic.
	You are literally on the side of Satan, Margaret.
	And you are an absolute airhead.
	I'm glad I never read you a bloody book.
	Because apparently you are the stupidest person alive.
	If you're going to justify the, let's just legalise murder because, I don't know, souls and stuff.
	Knows nothing.
	Let's move to the video comments.
	And in the end, you kill.
	To cut out the team is to kill.
	Power of these simple words saw the audience.
	Brings a tear to my eye.
	I could make so much money being a speaker at leftist conferences, I swear.
	I've been thinking about government, and I have a simple, cheap and effective solution to making life better for everybody.
	MPs can only use publicly available services.
	No private schools, no private healthcare, no private transport.
	MPs can only use the services that a government provides to its citizens.
	Give it a year and I'm sure you'll see the MPs making better decisions for the services that they themselves are forced to use.
	Not a bad point, actually.
	I hate it.
	Because they're going to start making everything government-run, and then they'll have tiers of government-run and make theirs at the top.
	Yeah, that's a good point.
	I do agree with the idea of doing that for the NHS for them, though.
	Because then they'll finally abolish the NHS and abolish that rule together.
	Like, it should be packaged.
	And I can think of a few things that could be abolished.
	The government in the first place.
	Read too much libertarianism.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Okay, Lotus Ears.
	So, it's been a week since I last looked at Mum and Dad's chickens.
	And you can start being able to tell the difference between the turkeys there and the chickens there.
	You can see he's a little bit taller and has a snood starting to develop on top of his Turkey.
	That's it for now.
	More of that.
	Send more videos.
	Post more, please.
	More, please.
	I've got nothing more to say.
	I want to see the full development up to and including the dinner table.
	Actually, yes, as well.
	That would be funny.
	Could we play the butcher?
	I don't think we could.
	No, we don't want to play...
	I don't want to see that part.
	That part would sadden me.
	But to see, you know, that their life came to something meaningful to give me a full stomach would bring joy.
	Hey guys, this is proof that you are doing something good.
	Here's another Lotus Eater who came all the way from Sydney.
	So to celebrate, Callum, we're giving you this again.
	CSCooper.com.au CSCooper.com.au CSCooper.com.au CSCooper.com.au CSCooper.com.au Okay, that's my favorite meme.
	What do one of those people who you shout to do this make of it?
	Because I understand the chap there will get it, because he's a fellow Lotus Eater, but absolute randoms are just like, why do you want me to shout you?
	The Lotus Eater's in training, okay?
	Okay.
	Let's go to the next one.
	But, there's one they fear.
	In their tongues.
	The great MAGA king.
	Obama!
	Obama!
	Ha ha ha.
	Ha ha ha.
	That's well done.
	That's very well done.
	Go next one.
	You exercise your right to freedom, and this is the result.
	All rhetoric to avoid conflict and protect each other from hurt.
	The untested truths spun by different interests continue to churn and accumulate in the sandbox of political correctness and value systems.
	Everyone withdraws into their own small gated community afraid of a larger forum.
	They stay inside their little ponds, leaking whatever truth suits them into the growing cesspool of society at large.
	The different cardinal truths neither clash nor mesh.
	No one is invalidated, but nobody is right.
	It predicted the rude problem of social media.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, you've not played MGS2, have you?
	You've only played a bit of MGS5. I started it again the other day.
	I just uninstalled it.
	I can't.
	I really love it.
	I think it's a great game, but I can understand if you didn't like it.
	But MGS2 is really good, and I'm thinking about doing a video on it, maybe politics of MGS2, just because of stuff like that, where it did...
	Kojima, that came out in, like, 2001, and he seemingly was just able to, from thin air, just deduce and predict that all this was going to happen.
	I like the idea he was just throwing out ideas, and quite frankly, there's a parallel universe where the ghost people became real, and he looks like a genius for predicting that.
	Well, the thing is that he kind of ruined the rest of the series by accident by releasing that game, because he wanted the ending to be so confusing and nonsensical that he couldn't make another game in the series, but then it made loads of money, and Konami went, well, we're gonna make one anyway, so he's like, fine, I'll come back just so you don't ruin it without me.
	MGS3 is great because it's a prequel, but MGS4 has a very, very hard time trying to make everything make sense when the end of the second game was supposed to be nonsense.
	It's not just that he's mad.
	It was actually, I'm going to end this, and then he's been stuck with his own decision.
	Yes, it was only Konami screwing him over in 2014 with Silent Hills and Metal Gear Solid V that got him to cut off from the series completely because Konami just don't want anything to do with him.
	Why?
	I don't remember, actually.
	I'd need to look back into it.
	I think they just didn't like how he conducted himself and how he had, like, basically complete creative control.
	And Konami wanted to take the studios away from developing, like, actual video games and making gambling pachinko machines for Japanese arcades.
	I remember watching the Jimquisition at the time.
	I remember that happening.
	I just can't remember what the hell the dispute was.
	Yeah, I think probably the best video I saw on it was Super Bunny Hops.
	So, check that out.
	Let's go to the next one.
	With Trump looking better and better every day, I live-stream the maiden voyage of the Magatron.
	You can find it at youtube.com slash nimechworks.
	Yeah!
	Mech America great again.
	Democrats destroyed with his right arm and motors.
	I don't know what to say.
	You've seen the Great Magnet King, you know, the huge animatronic thing of him as the emperor?
	Oh, that photo that came out recently, yeah.
	No, no, no, like someone made a huge animatronic trump back when he became president as the god emperor of mankind.
	I think it was in Brazil or something.
	I think so, yeah.
	We were trying to get that shipped over to London for his visit, but it didn't work out.
	Next one.
	In the New York Times comes the story of the bicentennial ghost from an article in 1976.
	There was a house in Rancocos Woods, New Jersey, and a family lived there and they were haunted by John Dobson.
	He was a soldier during the American Revolution in 1777 and died during that winter.
	When the family moved to Florida, he moved with them.
	When they moved back to South Jersey, he moved again.
	But when the family did research, they could find no John Dobson in the records.
	I don't understand.
	It was in the New York Times.
	What are you telling me?
	The New York Times lied?
	They got something wrong?
	No.
	No.
	I refuse to believe.
	Let's go to the written comments.
	So Trent C says, Callum, I'm an atheist.
	Stream cuts out.
	Obviously divine intervention.
	Fair enough, God.
	You got me there.
	Antifa versus the women.
	Freewill2112 says, Antifa is like a rabid guard dog which has been conditioned to attack whoever hits handlers ask it to.
	It has no distinction between them and bites on instinct anyone who opposes it.
	Yeah, which is why I just love the zero self-awareness of, like, you're fighting middle-aged women on mobility scooters, and you're still as hostile as you've ever been.
	Yeah.
	There is no self-awareness to how that looks, is there?
	No.
	I mean, I've been listening to Paul Gottfried's book on fascism, and in that he just does a really good breakdown of how, like, the idea of anti-fascism originated from, like, the Frankfurt school thinkers, and, like, neo-Marxism and all that basically just comes down to anti-fascism, and even Adorno, in those early books, was basically like...
	Fascism is anything that isn't my leftist political beliefs, and it's just carried on since then.
	In his book, I think it was The Authoritarian Personality, he just lists an interview that he had with someone that he just declared was a fascist, and was like, see, because he disagrees with me on socialism and redistributive tax and all that, that just makes him a fascist.
	Real big things.
	I mean, I get this with Carl.
	Whenever we go into our socialist book, ever, at this point, it's always just, yeah, well, they're all wrong because the right wing, therefore, we'll just kill them all.
	It's just like, oh, really amazing thinking.
	That has been the leftist tactic for the past hundred years, hasn't it?
	Yeah.
	Hello World says, I actually went to this and the whole thing was a disaster for their optics.
	One of the Antifa idiots carved an anarchist symbol despite the majority of them being for climate change.
	What?
	Wait, what?
	Being for climate change?
	Climate change accelerationists.
	Let's not leave out the turfs, though, with Posey herself saying, let's have the people with vaginas speak first and all you people with penises can talk after.
	Yeah, she is a female supremacist in regards to her movement.
	She wants women to take front and centre.
	Okay, but she's not a feminist.
	No, she's not a feminist.
	Okay, what's the distinction that's drawn there?
	Oh, well, because she's making a women's movement.
	She wants it to be women, first and foremost.
	I can understand.
	If you're doing a men's movement, you want the dads to speak.
	Yeah, that's fair.
	Not only that, we also had a couple of Karens blaming the antics and trans and antifa on men's rights activism.
	I kid you not.
	After this, I, for one, do not trust feminists to put their differences aside.
	Both parties are people who want their group to be more powerful.
	That is true.
	We can see that aspect.
	I mean, I've got, I've not read it yet, but I've got the book Trans by Helen Joyce, and I know in that she's making the argument, because she's coming from a feminist perspective, that all of the trans women in female bathrooms is just men trying to encroach on female spaces.
	And to be fair, there is a truth in that.
	Because it's like with those black box.
	I mean, the police did a report, and we didn't read it, but they said some people online describe the individual as a man, some others as a trans man.
	Because they wanted to edge their bets, I guess.
	Yeah, well, we can't be sure.
	George Happ, so that misanduous terrorist Emily Pankhurst is finally getting the historical treatment she deserves, but ironically, for the wrong reasons.
	I personally wouldn't have gone for a rope, but rather a white feather or a feeding tube.
	I'll be very based.
	She was force-fed in prison because she went on, like, hunger strikes.
	Oof.
	Yeah, I'm being facetious.
	This was obviously the bad treatment, but she shouldn't have bombed people.
	Lunatic.
	Lee B says Antifa really needs some football fans to help them come up with some better chants.
	They're not winning anyone over with this American cringe garbage.
	Yeah, that's actually true.
	Last British football chants are gold.
	You ever heard, like, the American ones?
	Like, I saw one American game and it was like, I believe, I believe that, I believe that we will win.
	That's it?
	Go home!
	You're not outwardly insulting the opposite team or calling all their mums slags?
	Or saying the other team deserved to have all died in a plane crash in Munich?
	Where's the fun?
	What's the point of it?
	You know the Munich one?
	I think I've heard of it in reference but I don't think I've actually heard that one.
	I'm trying to remember it now.
	Wait, let me play football chants.
	Yeah, who's that screaming on the wrong way?
	Munich crash.
	Who's that dying in the snow?
	It's Matt Busby, all those boys making all the effing noise because they can't get their aeroplane to go.
	They all died in a plane crash.
	Oh yeah, Man City fans mocking Munich air disaster.
	Yeah, I'm not engaging in the mockery here.
	The point I'm making is that British football chants have no chill whatsoever.
	They really don't.
	They will do anything, apparently.
	And not being a football fan, I'm not involved in any of it, but I'm looking back just thinking...
	Ooh!
	Ooh, that's spicy!
	There's a whole bunch of others that I've read online.
	There's ones about people.
	There's a guy with...
	There's the funniest one I saw.
	It's so mean.
	There's a guy with...
	He's got, like, split personality disorder or something.
	Oh, yeah, yeah.
	And the chant is about the fact that, like, he's got one fan and it's himself and the other guy or something like that.
	It's unbelievable.
	That's fantastic, though.
	Hey, if anything else, it's a testament to the great British imagination.
	There's a reason we're full of poets.
	British football chants are something else.
	Edward of Woodstock says, Dear leftists, you claim to be on the right side of history, yet you are called the left wing.
	Curious.
	Also, you are genuinely disgustingly rude and horrible people compared to your opponents.
	Absolutely.
	This is true.
	Let's move on to the nonsense.
	On to the nonce defender.
	Ultra XYNZ. Tried to get me there.
	That explanation falls right in line with George Carlin's view about the softening of language.
	Poor people used to live in slums.
	Now the economic disadvantaged live in substandard housing.
	Call a spade a spade.
	Being an alcoholic is not a desirable state.
	Being a nonce is not a desirable thing to be.
	The social stigma should be the preventative measure in itself.
	Yeah, I don't trust that any of these people's preventative measures that they're putting forward are actually going to do anything effective other than encourage people who would previously just keep themselves out of society to come out and go, I'm accepted now!
	Come on, children, give me a hug!
	Yes!
	Pirate skeleton...
	Someone's put an amazing chant in the chat.
	Oh, yeah.
	It's just, uh, Lehman, you're a C-word.
	Lehman, Lehman, you're a C-word.
	LAUGHTER I stand by that one.
	Pirate Skeleton says Child Sex Abuse Center hiring Walker is like a firehouse hiring an arsonist.
	Yeah, maybe like the Gloucester Fire Department might have done.
	I guess we'll see.
	We're going to discriminate.
	Kevin Fox says 13 year olds in a map support group.
	Wait for it.
	Next they'll be telling us there are AAKs out there.
	Adult attracted kids.
	That...
	That is the next step, isn't it?
	It means that they're going to be like, oh, you see, it's fine for me to be a minor attracted person because there are adult attracted kids out there who are just, you know, ever so eager to be in a relationship with someone 30 years older than them.
	It's a South Park sketch.
	This is a South Park sketch, but real life is a South Park sketch at this point.
	South Park is struggling to keep up.
	Absolutely right there.
	Based Ape, let's just call a spade a spade here.
	The reason the left is so obsessed with sexuality is because nobody wants to have sex with them.
	I mean, fair, have you seen them?
	Without all this garbage, they push, they would never get laid.
	Suck it up, buttercup.
	You can't rape a child, just rub one out like a true gamer.
	Words to live by.
	I hate this topic.
	Yep, Peter R says there's no room for nuance in noncery.
	Yep, no nuance nonce.
	Taffy Duck, regarding the nonce professor...
	It's like the KKK with the NNN. Yeah, the triple N. We're part of the triple N coalition.
	Wayfinder nonce is no nuance.
	Taffy Duck, regarding the nonce professor, the problem for normal people isn't the word paedophile.
	The problem is the fact that you all want to nonce our kids.
	Call yourselves maps if you like.
	We will change our signs to read woodchippers for maps.
	Your move, groomer.
	I hate the idea that if you just remove the stigma from the language used around it...
	There's actually some mean magic there.
	It's just like a cartoon image of just a guy putting a map of the world in a shredder.
	I'd love to see that become a hate symbol.
	Yes.
	Yes, I can see it.
	But yeah, just changing the language, will that make me any less aware that you're likely to try and nonce my kids?
	Will that make me any less suspicious around you?
	No.
	No, it will not.
	In fact, in fact, actually, maybe there is something to do with this.
	If we make it less stigmatized, the nonces will announce themselves, meaning they're easier to round up.
	I have a joke, but I can't say it.
	Oh, okay.
	Captain Charlie the Beagle says, regarding the nonce defender, if this whole thing, if nothing else explains how the likes of Jimmy Savile and Rolf Harris were allowed to continue for as long as they did, somehow I doubt the BBC will cover this.
	No, and if they do, it's a good thing.
	Dave Carter, you can spend less than a minute watching that diddler advocate dude and see that there's something deeply, deeply wrong with them.
	Why does anyone think these damaged people should have a single say in how society is structured?
	Because it's the same sorts of people who are already in charge of how society is structured.
	Because you need people to manage stuff...
	Expand what needs managing.
	Oh, we've got all this LGBT representation that needs managing.
	Oh, now we need to represent all of the nonces as well.
	Guess we'll need some nonces in managerial positions to manage all the rest of the nonces.
	And it carries on perpetually forever and ever.
	I must say you should call them shepherds.
	What do you do for a living?
	I'm a gay shepherd.
	Yep, pretty much.
	I'm the nonce whisperer.
	Maureen Peters.
	Pedos need to get professional help.
	It is a psychosexual disorder.
	Yes, it's not a sexual orientation.
	You are right.
	It is a psychosexual disorder.
	Even the people who never touch a child do not earn the pursuit of dignity as a minor attractive person.
	I agree.
	And Captain Charlie the Beagle again says, Yes.
	Yes, I am.
	I'm shocked at how desensitized I am to this whole thing now, because I've just looked so deep into all of this absolute garbage that spews from that side of the aisle and how they all seem to always end up at the same conclusion, which is we need to liberate the nonces.
	I'm just numb to it.
	Fair enough.
	I'm just numb to it, which is why it's always entertaining seeing your reaction and others' reactions, because everybody else is not as desensitized to it.
	You're just like, yeah, there's some stuff and there's some stuff.
	It's like when I show you corpses and you're like, ew.
	Let's go on to how did these people ever win.
	So, Kevin Charlie the Beagle again says, regarding the West's attitude towards meaningless sex, I recommend reading the portrait of the Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde.
	It's a great book on the dangers to the body and soul of a person that pursuits hedonistic pleasures for the sake of it.
	A great book on the value of temperance and prudence.
	I do have a copy.
	I do need to give it a read.
	Do you know what it's about?
	I haven't looked into it, no.
	I think he's...
	Dorian Gray is the guy who, like, he puts all of his age into a painting.
	So, physically, he never ages, but the painting continues to age on and on forever.
	And if the painting is destroyed, I think all of it comes rushing back to him.
	So it's like a supernatural sort of story, but it's obviously a physical representation of, like, you may not see it on him, but here's all the bad stuff that he's done to himself.
	Captain Charlie B again says, funny how when it came to BLM they railed against the killing of black people by the cops.
	When it came to black women, thanks to Roe v.
	Wade, killing black babies is a large factor.
	Suddenly there's a silence.
	Interesting.
	Bleached Demon, again, best name in the chat so far.
	I'll give him that.
	The left seems to be obsessed with theocracy as somehow a non-relativistic moral stance is essentially the Spanish Inquisition returned.
	Yeah, it's a good point, actually.
	Whenever we're not engaging in the nonsense, they're just like, well, that's the end of the world again, isn't it?
	Yeah, when you violate one of their articles of faith, such as not killing fetuses on demand or putting up roadblocks to sexualization of kids, they scream heretic and put on ISIS clothing.
	Yeah, close enough, actually.
	3w2112 says, how has this minority of loons managed to make our political class fall in line?
	I don't know.
	I mean, especially looking at the United States.
	I mean, I never really thought about abortion issues in the United States that much.
	I mean, because, you know, it seemed like it was mostly settled.
	But then with this coming back up, the leaks chat...
	Frankly, it is amazing what the Americans are up to.
	I mean, the fact that they have it so late, the fact that they think that it should be on demand, the fact that the left will now openly say, get that little B word, sucked out.
	I think what it was, was that post-World War II there was a massive shift in political aims and such, and around the era of the civil rights, people sort of finally figured out how they could...
	Channel their rhetoric to get what they want as special privileges put into law.
	And since then, despite the fact that the civil rights, I would say, was for a good cause, they still managed to...
	They didn't just repeal all the bad stuff that was going on.
	They also managed to get put in place a lot of stuff that I would say was equally discriminatory, just in a different way.
	And at the time, people excused it and said, oh, you know, we're just making up for past injustices, but that making up process never stops.
	There's no end to it.
	And then when you...
	I'm imagining an abortionist with a brick and all these black babies.
	I'm making up for past injustices.
	I mean, basically, what happened from there is all the other special interest groups caught on how they are able to sort of get all these special privileges, and then it just keeps going from there because people petition it.
	People lobby the government.
	There's loads of money that goes into this stuff.
	Yeah.
	Just a sec.
	I mean, that's how they would see it, because what happened was in the past...
	Yeah, there were some jokes I can't make, but it's unbelievable.
	In the past, what it was, these people, these poor black women were forced to have babies they didn't want, whereas now they can get rid of them, and they can go off and be free to smoke crack, you know?
	1977, things were terrible, whereas now it's going perfect in the black community.
	Someone online says, if you don't want to be called a baby murderer, don't murder babies.
	They can't hear you.
	They're deaf.
	And they can't read it because they can't read.
	Seems like a fairly simple rule, so I'll agree to that one.
	And an honorable mentions, Alex Ogle says, I need to find the Philip K. Dick short story where he writes about a future abortionist driving around in a van to carry out abortions.
	The trouble is that, in the story, abortion includes anyone up to the age of 12...
	Who is not wanted by their family, the van allows the abortionist to take the babies away to be gassed.
	His stories are delicious parodies that have turned out to be unsettling true.
	Yeah, I've heard people talk a lot about that short story recently.
	I need to get a hold of it as well.
	I did find it fun reading Margaret Atwood's article.
	She's just like, yeah, everything I thought was clearly insane.
	But it's totally true because you should be able to kill someone if they know you have a soul.
	It did read like she'd been sniffing bath salts.
	I think that...
	They all take these signs and the themes, oh god, look at our prophet who wrote this book, and it's just like, she's clearly a moron.
	She's clearly insane.
	It's like, I can say, Stephen King has written a few books that I think are very good, and that I really like, but the man's an absolute retard.
	So...
	The man is crazy.
	Just check out his Twitter and nothing that comes out of that man's Twitter is logical or sensical in the slightest.
	And on that note, we're out of time.
	So if you want more from us, loaderseasons.com, of course.
	Otherwise, we'll be back tomorrow at one o'clock.

▲