Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 3, 2022 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:50

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #384

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Seaters for the 3rd of May 2022.
	I'm joined by Harry.
	Hello.
	And today we'll be talking about the death of Roe v.
	Wade, the continued queer capture of our institutions, and also the attempted removal of Tucker Carlson.
	Serbians in the audience could stop playing the music, I guess.
	I don't know.
	Anyways, let's get into it.
	Let's start off with the death of Roe v.
	Wade, which is an interesting development.
	So, Roe v.
	Wade is apparently about to be destroyed.
	So, this is the law in the United States that made, well, criminalizing abortion illegal.
	And the argument being that it's in the Constitution, bro.
	A woman has a right to abortion.
	So, it's up there.
	It's somewhere in there.
	Don't look for it.
	It's Amendment 3.5 or something.
	It's buried in between a couple of them.
	Okay.
	It's in there somewhere.
	Yeah, trust us.
	And I thought I'd start off with a shill, of course, and we'll start off with some other things that may have aged poorly than legalizing all abortions.
	As you can see here, the reality of trans regret.
	This is a premium hangout you did, in which you got to enjoy yourself.
	I've been looking into the dark stuff recently, and I've come out a different person.
	Honestly, when you start to look into this stuff, it completely changes your perspective, not only on the whole trans issues, but also on the rhetoric used by trans rights activists.
	It's like you don't know what you're doing.
	You're just making everything worse for these people that you're trying to help.
	But that's just leftist activism in a nutshell, isn't it?
	I was just the term trans rights.
	Trans right to what?
	Well, trans-entitlement to get transitioning off of your taxpayer money.
	Anyway, so do go and check that out.
	That's on lollies.com.
	Otherwise, we shall get into Roe v.
	Wade.
	So let's start off with some footage of people who are protesting what has happened.
	So, uh, it should be a different link there, but there's some protesters who were protesting the fact that they were upset that, well, the news had broke that they're going to be destroyed, and they were outside chanting, abortion is a human right for some reason, and...
	No, it's not.
	Uh...
	Okay.
	Abortion is healthcare as well, was one of the other chants.
	This also just comes down to the leftist interpretation.
	Oh, here we go.
	As you can see there, just chanting abortion is healthcare.
	It comes down to the leftist interpretation of what a right is, whereas the right wing tend to be like, a right is something that is...
	You're born with?
	Yeah, you're born with it, whereas the left are just like, no, rights are what other people can give me for free.
	Yeah, gives me that for free, and healthcare being one of them, though.
	Before we go to the next one, we just have them chanting, I just heard them, apparently they're chanting, sexist Nazis got to go at this news, as you can see by MythInformed Milwaukee there.
	I thought they were chanting, sexy Nazis got to go at first, which is a whole new dimension.
	I was like, what the hell are they chanting that for?
	Well, I mean, there is the stereotype of the leftists with the MAGA chuds, you know?
	Yeah, but for Nazis.
	Yeah, yeah.
	But it wouldn't be past what I would expect from them, you know?
	No, true.
	If we go to the next one, we can see TikTok having a whole bunch of reactions there as well.
	There's TikTok collecting them, which is a lot of them just screeching and snorting, apparently.
	Perfectly normal.
	I can't have my 15th abortion, no!
	It's untenable.
	I might have to start wearing protection instead.
	But let's move forward.
	So what is the news here?
	So the news is that apparently a draft of what the court's opinion is on Roe v.
	Wade has been leaked, and this is entirely new.
	This has not seemingly happened before.
	It's completely improper.
	It seems like one of the judges or one of the staff has just leaked this draft, which is interesting.
	That kind of professionalism is completely broken down.
	If we go to the next link here, we can see Politico who ran the story as soon as they got their hands on that draft.
	The Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights draft opinion shows.
	The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v.
	Roe decision according to an initial draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court and obtained by Politico.
	Quote, Roe was erroneously wrong from the start, Alito writes.
	Erroneously, sorry.
	Quote, we hold that Roe and Crassidy must be overruled.
	Roe and Casey.
	Casey, sorry.
	And the opinion of the court, it is time to heed the constitution and return to the issue of abortion to the people and its elected representatives.
	So, the opinion is that the Supreme Court never should have ruled on this.
	This isn't our purview.
	Yeah, it shouldn't have been a federal law in the first place.
	This is a state's rights issue.
	Literally, because it's not in the constitution.
	I doubt the founding fathers and the federalists were like, but what if women want to kill babies before they're born?
	We must write in a clause for this.
	Yeah, and I'm not hugely invested in the whole abortion debate.
	I've mentioned this previously.
	My perspective is on it, I don't really know.
	I'm willing to learn more.
	And I've always been a bit like, there must be a period in which it's okay, surely.
	But the more and more they interact with the leftists, the more and more they keep arguing for just literally killing babies.
	Yes.
	I'm saying after they're born as well.
	I think the old standard of, what was it, safe, legal and rare was basically sounded fine to me, but it's the fact that they've, as always, you give them an inch, they will take a mile.
	Hillary Clinton position.
	I didn't know you were a Stand With Her fan.
	Oh, I know, right?
	I know.
	I believe that she could win.
	It seemed that that set up some pretty common sense standards for it.
	You know, if she's been raped, if she's got threat of dying in childbirth or something like that.
	The extreme cases.
	Yeah, the extreme cases.
	Okay, there's an argument to be made.
	But if you've just made a bad decision, had sex without protection, and you're just like, oh no, I want to get rid of it, then maybe you should have thought about that before you made the decisions that led to it.
	Not to mention all the other options you've got for birth control, not to mention the morning after pill, blah blah blah blah.
	Or just adoption.
	If you want to give up the baby, if that's convinced you're not fit to be a parent.
	But they're right in here, deliberations on controversial cases have in the past been fluid.
	Justices can and do sometimes change their votes as draft opinions circulate and major decisions can be subject to multiple drafts and vote training, sometimes until just days before the decision is unveiled.
	The court's holding will not be final until it is published, likely in the next two months.
	So that's the thing.
	None of this should be public.
	It's just someone's leaked it for some reason, and it may not even be the case.
	Things may change, but apparently in two months, essentially, the court is going to come out and be like, yeah, yeah, that was dumb.
	Let's get rid of that.
	that it seems very convenient that it could be leaked like this especially when there's been so much controversy over the past year or so about states like Texas changing the changing the requirements to be able to get an abortion and such and the older controversies that come out of that it seems like something that has been deliberately done to court controversy to try and intimidate the Supreme Court if this has been the decision that they've made behind closed doors
	The immediate impact of the ruling as drafted in February would be an end to the half-century guarantee on federal constitutional protection of abortion rights and allow each state to decide whether to restrict or ban abortion.
	It is unclear if there have been subsequent changes to the draft.
	No draft decision in the modern history of the court has ever been disclosed publicly.
	While a case is still pending, the unprecedented revelation is bound to intensify the debate over what is already the most controversial case on the docket this time.
	Apparently this being a discussion in, I believe it's Mississippi, they've changed their abortion laws as well, so there's the argument.
	If the Alito draft is adopted, it would rule in favour of Mississippi in the closely watched case that is the state's attempt to ban most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.
	H. George W. Bush appointee who joined the court in 2006.
	Aliso argues that the 1973 abortion rights ruling was an ill-conceived and deeply flawed decision that invented a right mentioned nowhere in the constitution and unwisely sought to wrench the contentious issue away from the political branches of government.
	Seems absolutely correct.
	Yes.
	Just looking back on it.
	Quote, the inescapable conclusion is that a right to abortion is not deeply rooted in our nation's history and traditions.
	And you might think, well, sort of, well, duh.
	Did we need to really have to confirm this?
	Yeah, it's strange, isn't it?
	I mean, you think that these things are so obvious, but apparently not.
	And, well, he pointed out that there is no right to abortion in the Constitution.
	Let's stop being silly.
	And so, fair point.
	And looking back, if we go to the next one, we can see The Guardian writing about this and sort of saying, well, what were the arguments for Roe V. Wade looking backwards?
	What was the point?
	And of course, they've written this in a style that is supportive of Roe V. Wade, because The Guardian being a left-wing outlet.
	However, the arguments don't make any bloody sense.
	I mean, like, stuff.
	The fact that this was a lady who, I believe she was in Texas, her lawyers argued that she couldn't go outside the state to get an abortion, and she wanted to get it done, and that was her right.
	And they argued it was her right because it was her privacy right, which don't make any sense.
	Quote,"...this right of privacy is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy." How?
	That's very strained reasoning.
	So because of that, the federal government has to step in and force all states to make it legal?
	But also just, like, run that to murder?
	Murder is a privacy issue?
	Hey, I did it in the privacy of my own home.
	Police, please, back away.
	But it's even worse than that.
	It's like, you're in the docket, and it's like, why'd you do it?
	Well, I'm having my rights violated right now.
	I am a murderer, but I did it privately, and therefore, my privacy rights are okay.
	Oh, he's got us there, boys.
	Case dismissed.
	The whole thing collapses, which is a weird argument looking about.
	I don't understand it.
	Maternity or additional offspring may force upon the woman a distressful life and future.
	Psychological harm may be imminent.
	Mental and physical health may be taxed by childcare, they argue.
	Which is essentially just arguing, well, if you force her to have the child that she got pregnant with, then she may have negative effects by having to pay for it or raise it and whatnot.
	Which, yeah, that's what getting pregnant is.
	Again, I don't really feel like that's an argument to have an abortion.
	Yeah, I mean, as long as it was consensual sex, by definition, no one forced her into this.
	No.
	So the idea that, well, no, I have a right to abortion at any point because, well, the kid may cost me money.
	You knew that.
	Also, it's not a shock.
	Isn't the...
	The upshot of this, of this kind of argumentation, is that basically anything can cause distress for life and future.
	Anything could cause psychological harm.
	If you have any dependents on you and they're taxing to your life, then you can kill them.
	Oh, my mental and physical health is being so taxed by looking after my grandma.
	Sorry!
	Get the pillow!
	A man's right to...
	Yeah, I don't know.
	It's a weird argumentation.
	I just don't get it looking back.
	But we'll read his arguments now and why he says, well, this is obviously inappropriate.
	So we go to the next one.
	We have back to the article here.
	And these are some quotes from his text, which I read what I could, the highlight sections.
	The highlight sections, I think, are the most important.
	He says, We're
	good to go.
	And that sounds true, because what this is, is a massive overstepping of political boundaries by the federal government.
	Yeah, it also just seemed completely unnecessary.
	I love the way Supreme Court justices do, right?
	I do really enjoy reading their arguments.
	But the fact that he argues, well, look, the states were already liberalizing their view on these laws.
	They've done it since.
	The judicial branch seemed to have just enacted this, because, well, we wanted an end to the political debate, and that's not our role.
	We're here to interpret the Constitution.
	Not be, well, Democrats, I suppose.
	It's also weird looking back how many Republicans voted for this, but whatever.
	Quote, Now chiefly rely on the Due Process Clause and the 14th Amendment.
	That provision has been held to guarantee some rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution, but any such right must be, quote, deeply rooted in this nation's history and tradition.
	And of course, abortion isn't one of them.
	Abortion isn't deeply rooted in American history or tradition as a right that all Americans have.
	So, that's the thing.
	It was also, you missed out there, it said also deeply rooted in the implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.
	And what of the liberty of the little baby?
	No, don't have liberty.
	I mean, you've been reading, what was it, the chap you mentioned earlier?
	Oh, I've been reading Rothbard's Libertarian Manifesto, For a New Liberty, and it's brilliant, and it's super autistically logical in all of its arguments, which I think is one of the reasons that it appeals to me so much.
	In fact, all of the ANCAP is based on a super strict logic, and Except for the one bit where he argues in favour of legalised abortion, which is he kind of goes with the, oh, it's a parasite invading the private property because you own yourself, invading the property of the woman, nobody has the right to...
	Yeah, nobody has the right to do this.
	And it's like, well, yes, but...
	And he also kind of frames it in a quite dishonest way, where he's like, oh, all they're doing is ejecting this invader from their property.
	And it's like, ah, yes, but what if I decide nine years in, you're invading my private property?
	Time to eject!
	You know, that kind of logic doesn't really flow, or at least he doesn't seem to acknowledge that the logic can be taken to some really negative extremes that he wouldn't stand by.
	Which is exactly what you get with modern Dems in a different vein.
	They're obviously arguing with different ideological principles, but they end up with, well, why not up till birth?
	I mean, Hillary Clinton literally did end up saying that at one point as well, which was embarrassing.
	Yeah, there's been quite a few more people coming out recently being like, unless it's literally got its head sticking out of your vagina...
	It's fair game.
	Yeah.
	So, the ending quote here from him being, So go to hell.
	which uh yeah i i read his argument seems solid uh it's an inherent inherent contradiction of we as a society we as a culture and a people see murder bad but killing babies a-okay this this is his argument and also apparently the majority of court agree with him and this has been leaked so it probably is the case that this will end up all getting overturned which is interesting to know that they actually do have some Republican values in them.
	Well, nice to know.
	So what's the leftist response?
	Because that's always the funniest part, because good things, OK, neat things, we can see.
	But the leftist response is CALM, RATIONAL, in all caps.
	We can see one here.
	So this is some verified checkmark who decided to go with, Right now, abortion is still legal.
	If you have an appointment tomorrow, next week, soon, you are still fine.
	Go out and get your abortions.
	Just get it done now.
	Everybody, even if you're pregnant, even if you want your kid, just go and get it aborted, just in case, because you won't have the opportunity again.
	I imagine living in the last days of cocaine being legal in America...
	Like, the days leading up to it being bad.
	Everybody short your stuff while you still can.
	Everyone went mad.
	The annoying thing is, again, once again, these people don't seem to recognise, okay, just because it's not enshrined in federal law doesn't mean that you're...
	This stupid, progressive state isn't still going to go, well, yeah, we're fine with abortion up until whoever knows how many terms.
	Yeah, it doesn't actually change anything for the highly leftist states, because, of course, it's up to you.
	Yeah, do you think California's going to go banning abortion anytime soon?
	No.
	If we go to the next one, we have some other leftist responses.
	This is one from Hillary Clinton herself.
	Safe, legal, and rare woman who has completely thrown that out of the water.
	As you can see here, she goes with, this decision is a direct assault on the dignity, rights, and lives of women, not to mention decades of settled law.
	The lives, dignity, and existence of the children in this conversation.
	Well, also, it's interesting that Hillary Clinton must have really quickly gone out and got a PhD in biology.
	She knows what a woman is again.
	Seeing as she can recognise what a woman is.
	It's interesting how that whole rhetoric's been thrown out of the window.
	It always is very specifically for the abortion debate.
	Men can also have women, Hillary.
	It's the patriarchy exerting control on women, unless they're going into their sports and winning all of the prizes.
	She goes with, it will kill and subjugate women, even as the vast majority of Americans think abortion should be legal.
	Again, it still will be.
	It's up to your state, is the case, but also, even Texas accepts it as legal for, I think it's cases of rape and murder.
	And I think it's up to six weeks, because the sixth week is when you can start to detect a heartbeat.
	And that's like the clearest kind of objective measure as we can have as to when life begins.
	So, I mean, you got your arguments there, but then in fact, this will kill and subjugate women.
	Women babies, I guess.
	If we move forward, we then have the response which is that the traditions and history of America are extremist.
	This according to Pocahontas here.
	Sorry, I'll allege Pocahontas.
	An extremist Supreme Court is poised to overturn Roe v.
	Wade and impose its far-right unpopular views on the entire country.
	It is time for the millions who support the Constitution and abortion rights to stand up and make their voices heard.
	We're not going back, not ever.
	Let's take it line by line for a minute.
	The Constitution is far-right.
	I mean, by their logic, it actually is because it's trying to limit government power.
	Yeah, the foundation document and the foundation of what American ideology is, the Americanism, as we foreigners look at you and call you, is far right.
	That's extremist to Pocahontas.
	Okay, well, that tells you more about her than anything else, doesn't it?
	It's unpopular, which is why you can't just change it at state level.
	You can, if it was popular.
	Go for it.
	Well, the...
	Saying the imposition is that what they're actually doing is overturning a massive imposition of power upon the states and letting it be their decision.
	Yeah, and there's also the point she says it's extremist to implement essentially traditional American ideology.
	If that's extremist, I mean, do you remember when Carl was talking about the fact that we had Curtis Yarvin and whatnot all talking about that they see the world as they're living in the normal space of tradition and the countryside and whatnot and normal life, and then you have these weird city dwellers who live in this clown world-esque society where they think that cutting off their children's genitals or restricting it so they go infertile is totally normal.
	Well, if they don't abort the children first, of course.
	Yeah, whereas you saying that maybe we shouldn't do that is you're the extremist in that situation.
	I mean, it is more and more true.
	Well, remember, in the Cultural Revolution, who was it ruining the countryside?
	The city dwellers.
	Yeah.
	There's also the fact that she wants to support the Constitution and abortion rights.
	No, she doesn't.
	These people would actively repeal the Constitution if they could get away with it.
	Because abortion rights aren't in the Constitution.
	Right.
	As it's been pointed out by the justices, it's not there!
	As it's been pointed out by anybody who's even taken the time to flip through the bloody thing.
	So, contradiction in terms.
	If we move to the next one, we then have some other leftist responses we have here, again, with the extremist rhetoric here.
	The radical right extremist Supreme Court just voted to overturn Roe v.
	Wade.
	This is a dark day.
	Again, how about we institute the Constitution as written?
	Well, that's radical far-right extremism.
	The radical far-right extremist Kentanji Brown-Jackson.
	I do love that your prediction came perfectly true with this.
	They bring in diversity, woman, just so she can sit there while they tear up everything she loves.
	Look at it, leftist.
	If we go to the next one, we have Senator Sanders, who decided to come out with saying that this, again, was extremist and we've passed laws now to legalise abortion everywhere.
	And by doing it, we should also get rid of the filibuster as well, just tear everything down.
	I'm surprised they aren't more talking about packing the court, as they said they would.
	As well, just pick more Supreme Court justice.
	Just ruin it.
	Why not?
	Raw power.
	If we go to the next one, we have AOC, who, of course, is mad as well.
	She went with, as we've warned, SCOTUS isn't just coming for abortion.
	They're coming for the right to privacy Roe rests upon, which includes gay marriage and civil rights.
	I didn't know that civil rights apparently relied upon the right to privacy.
	We should really start telling all those pride parades, shouldn't we?
	Don't you know it's meant to be private?
	No, but the idea that it's the right to not be discriminated against on the basis of race is your right to privacy?
	No, there's no way that's true.
	I'm sorry, but that's absolutely no way that is that true.
	This is mad.
	Once again, AOC seems to have just taken that original Roe v.
	Wade decision at face value and not questioned it at all and gone like, hold up, right to privacy has nothing to do with this.
	Hold up, this is nonsense!
	And if we look at the people on the ground who turned up to do the protesting within an hour's notice, you can see one person here putting that they saw F. Kavanaugh being written into the ground in...
	I hope that's paint.
	And you see it's Kavanaugh who's the extremist.
	Yes.
	And if we go to the next one, we can see the kind of people who turned up with an hour's notice.
	You have him saying here, abortion on demand and without apology.
	Describes himself with he, they, organiser.
	Presumably split personality disorder.
	And if we go to his LinkedIn, we can see he literally works for the Dems as well.
	So, big shock.
	So, the people you see in the pictures are literal...
	Paid actors, almost.
	And these people wonder why it is that public opinion on abortion seems to have flipped, eh?
	We just want drive-through abortions is what we're after.
	It's the American way.
	It's the only thing.
	You can get an abortion and a nice big tasty while you're at it.
	Big bulgur.
	Anyway, we go to the next one.
	We have some other...
	John found this image, which I found funny.
	And it's, again, a big own.
	As you can see to themselves, there's some diverse cast.
	One that says women aren't the only people who have abortions.
	Let's put that to one side.
	Let's not even engage with that today.
	And we have abortion restrictions exist to control us, not to protect us.
	Yes.
	100% yes.
	That is, yeah, that is the conservative position.
	I mean, it's literally to protect the babies.
	Yeah, it is to restrict you from killing the baby.
	That's the conservative interpretation of what's going on.
	So, absolute Chad, yes.
	If we go to the next one, there's just another rendition I made of this.
	You can click on the second image there, which is murder restrictions exist to control us, not to protect us.
	Okay.
	They also protect you, you may have thought.
	I mean, even in the abortion case, it also protected you from being aborted as a child.
	I mean, I don't...
	Please, someone in the chat, correct me if I'm wrong on this, but I have seen some figures going around recently which have said that since, I think, the 1970s, since Roe v.
	Wade, more black children have been aborted than born.
	Yeah.
	So this is really protecting those communities, isn't it?
	The black nationalists describe it in their quote, the Negro Baby Holocaust...
	The black nationalists are very upset about all this.
	I can imagine they are!
	It's like everyone in Tariq Nishida going, alright, fair enough, no more Brother Wars.
	And Tariq, for all his faults, can be pretty based sometimes.
	Yeah, there's also an academic agent who likes to show you a graph of crime over time.
	There's a little down after...
	No, moving on.
	Let's go to the next one.
	We can see also here the whole murder restrictions exist to protect us are also maybe important and maybe more important quicker than later.
	If we can click on these, you can see the first one here.
	Someone saying conservative justices will have their lives and the lives of their families threatened because of this.
	The person who leaked this knows that.
	And then someone else verified just being like, good.
	Good.
	Wonderful.
	You go to the next one.
	You can see some.
	Gerno.
	Who is just happy to have people's lives threatened.
	Should we just start using scumbag as a synonym for Gerno?
	Yeah.
	After Taylor Lawrence as well.
	Open scumbags?
	Yeah.
	Open scumbags?
	They've never been closed about it.
	What am I saying?
	Yeah, they're actually proud of it, if anything.
	Proud scumbags.
	Inciting violence directly there.
	So there you have it.
	There's the death of Roe v.
	Wade, which seems to have been coming about, thanks to a leak.
	We can all see it happening in real time.
	And as you say, I do love that the diversity hire is going to have to sit there with a big old frown as all the leftist documents just get ripped up in front of me.
	Yep.
	Let's go to the next section.
	Beautiful.
	I didn't bring my water.
	I'm very upset.
	Would you like some water?
	No.
	I'm not...
	I'm not infected with anything, Calum.
	No, it just feels weird.
	Alright, you're lost, I suppose.
	Continue having your dry mouth, sucker.
	gonna have to conserve refreshing alright so let's carry on then So, this is a nail that has been hammered quite extensively on this show, but I think we just need to keep hammering it over and over and over again, because they don't stop.
	Like, you're just hitting wood at this point, but I... Yeah, I'm breaking through the wood.
	I think it's worthwhile breaking through the wood.
	It very much is.
	Oh, Pete!
	What an absolute gent, eh?
	There you go.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Los C's is a very professional podcast.
	Alright, but yes, the continued queer capture of our institutions is something that we have been speaking about for ages, but sadly we need to keep talking about it because it keeps going on.
	And this, of course, is going to be referring to a lot of the trans issues that we've been covering recently, so just as a little quick heads up for anybody who hasn't yet watched it, you should check out the premium book club that Carl and I did recently on Abigail Schreier's Irreversible Damage, talking about the Epidemic of young girls, often with mental illnesses, often autistic, often in their high school age, deciding to en masse transition and decide that they're boys.
	Looking at it as a kind of social contagion, seeing as it seems to pop up most frequently amongst friendship groups.
	One girl will say, I'm trans, and then three or four of her friends will do the exact same thing.
	I'm so hearing often vulnerable, defenceless child exploited by adults in the room.
	Yes, there is some pretty shocking stuff in that, and honestly there'll be some pretty nasty stuff in this segment as well.
	That's why you're here!
	Yeah, that's why you're here.
	It's really not for the faint of heart, all this sort of stuff.
	So let's carry on.
	So first of all, I just wanted to point out something that I was made aware of by the fact that you follow Nuance Bro on Twitter, correct?
	He posted about this on Twitter, that this isn't, yes, this is a real thing.
	So San Francisco, the massive progressive dump.
	The place where most often you'll hear about it in the news when there's a video of naked homeless men having sex on the street or people just defecating or injecting needles.
	So instead of focusing their infrastructure of the local government or local mayor's town or office or anything, investing in trying to clean up the streets or anything like that, they have their own Office of Transgender Initiatives.
	This is what your taxes go to, San Franciscans.
	Don't be anybody else...
	Are there any San Franciscans who even watch us?
	I doubt it.
	I really hope they've left.
	There might be one.
	If you're still living in San Francisco watching this show, please just move.
	Just move anywhere.
	And if you voted Democrat, wherever you move to, don't vote Democrat.
	Please, for the love of God, just don't.
	So this is a real thing.
	They've got their own office for transing children, I assume, is what it really comes down to.
	And they've been around since 2017.
	Let's take a look at some of the initiatives that they have on their website.
	So they want to have real talk about training for city employees.
	So once again, I wish they would teach them how to handle crack addicts.
	And people, you know, shitting on the street.
	They have a solution, which is to give them crack.
	Oh, I forgot, I forgot.
	You forget.
	Big ideas for a big brain place.
	Ah, yes, yes.
	This is what makes San Francisco such a desirable place to be, obviously.
	So they want to educate you.
	I'm imagining a bunch of drug addicts just being like, let's put us on the map.
	They want to talk about trans housing, which is very interesting.
	So if you're trans, get free housing.
	I see no negative incentives being set up by this initiative.
	What's a trans house, though?
	Because I live in a house, but then there's...
	I don't know, it's a caravan?
	I identify as a house.
	Have you seen, like, you know, there's door houses where everything's a bit smaller.
	Maybe that's what all the homeless people in tents are.
	This is just trans housing.
	Don't discriminate, figure it out.
	Is there a urinal in the bathroom is what I'm thinking.
	Are there little amenities to make it more fitting?
	I mean, it's San Francisco.
	The whole place is a big toilet.
	And they've also got Trans Training, where they talk about, from a different page that I've not got up here, so don't worry about it, Michael.
	We offer live online training sessions to city and county employees, teams and departments.
	Our trainings cover in-depth perspectives on working with transgender and non-binary communities.
	During our time together, we facilitate conversations about how gender affects us individually.
	Practice skills relevant to your team's unique needs and learn how to build more welcoming and, most importantly, more affirming environments for transgender and non-binary people.
	So basically, if you're employed by the San Francisco local government, you have to be affirming, you have to be welcoming.
	You can't even just go, are you sure?
	Are you sure?
	You really want to cut your dick off?
	Are you sure about that?
	No, not my place.
	I just signed the forms.
	Yeah, I just signed the forms.
	And your taxes in California are paying for this absolute nonsense.
	I'm glad KitKat's left.
	So one of the gold-tier subscribers, she was like, I'm getting the hell out of here.
	Yeah, good shout, KitKat.
	Good one.
	but I just want to point out the government offices like this when you've got especially when they call themselves an office for initiatives all those initiatives are just going to be things that aren't going to help because how do I get paid I get paid coming up with more initiatives how do I make sure that there's more initiatives to make sure problems are never solved government bureaucracy only breeds more bureaucracy because then you can invite your friends in who think the same as you to also get employed on the taxpayer's dime literally have circle time where you sit around and discuss leftism
	yes and get paid for it it's I suppose it's good work when you can get it isn't it we need right wing circle time It needs to be a thing.
	In government offices, like instituted, we must have sessions where you sit around and talk about, yeah, was that really a woman?
	Is it really a woman?
	I don't know.
	I see some stubble on there.
	Yeah, no, I don't think that would happen with the right wing because honestly, we've kind of got more important things to worry about than all this stuff.
	Yeah.
	But one of the interesting things is they've also got a brainwashing module that I sadly wasn't able to get into and see what all the questions are, primarily because it's not allowed outside of the USA, and I didn't have time to set up a VPN. But yes, they have an Office of Transgender Initiatives Academy.
	Transgender 101.
	Strengthen your commitment to inclusion.
	So, this is meant for...
	Is it like Police Academy?
	I can only assume so.
	This is meant for all city employees...
	So, if you work for the city of San Francisco, you have to affirm your commitment to inclusion.
	This is basically just another pledge of allegiance, because, I mean, we want to throw the constitution out in the first place, unless it's maybe got an interpretable line about abortion.
	So throw out the constitution, commit your allegiance to the transes, is what I'm getting from this.
	Zieg pronouns.
	Please.
	Yes, and they also had this article which was just a list of their initiatives that they wanted to push for their TGI, which I believe stands for Transgender, Gender Nonconforming and Intersex Community Inclusive Care Act.
	And the thing is, intersex is completely different from any of those because intersex is an actual biological phenomenon.
	Say, you're born with both sets of genitals due to some freak mutation.
	I mean, no part of the alphabet has anything to do with any other part of the alphabet.
	Let's be frank.
	I mean, the closest you could say is the gays and lesbians, but historically they don't like each other.
	No, you'd think they'd have a lot in common, but apparently not.
	And then you've got the bi's who everyone hates because they're just like, well, pick a side.
	And then trans is not a sexuality, so you've got nothing in common with them, and then intersex is a biological phenomenon.
	This is a fantastic idea to base a movement around.
	Hence why they're all so rational and reasonable when discussing people who disagree with them.
	But I'll carry on from here.
	So on February 4th, 2022, Senator Scott Weiner...
	Great name for this.
	Great name for this stuff.
	The magic is real.
	Mr.
	Weiner's going to teach you about that.
	Mr.
	Weiner just wants to speak to your kids for a few minutes.
	No, don't run away.
	He wants to tell them about queer sex.
	Why does Mr.
	Weiner want to do that?
	I mean, it sounds like a mascot, right?
	It's a guy in a mascot suit.
	And he's called Mr.
	Weiner.
	In a giant penis outfit, yep.
	But he introduced Senate Bill 923.
	I'm surprised it's not 69-420, to be honest, given how this is going so far.
	The TGI Inclusive Care Act to the California State Senate.
	This bill will require that California health providers and staff receive crucial training in transgender, gender nonconforming and intersex cultural humility in order to provide inclusive care to these communities.
	It will also require health care plans to indicate which in-network providers offer gender affirming treatment.
	Gender affirming being that they will not ask questions, they will just transition you.
	They will hand you the hormones, and then as soon as you're done, you're through any arbitrary period of time with those hormones, they will get you signed up for the surgery straight away.
	Which, as you can probably guess, is not the most responsible way of dealing with these people in these situations, but hey-ho, this has never really been about helping people, it's been about helping myself to look like I care.
	That's all it's ever been about.
	Despite the dearth of research on TGI communities, it's well documented that we experience...
	To be fair, TGI... I keep thinking TGI Fridays.
	It's not just me, right?
	No, that's true.
	That's true.
	But also, you know, TGI, go for it.
	Use this acronym, because honestly, the LGB is slowly starting to distance themselves anyway.
	So there you go.
	We've always pointed out that T has nothing to do with the rest of it.
	So, you know, TGI... Whatever.
	Yeah, but then you have the eyes looking around, like, why am I here?
	Yeah, it's like, you people know nothing of my work.
	My feet hurt.
	Despite the dearth of research on these communities, I wonder whose fault that is.
	It is well documented that we experience high rates of health inequities in California and nationwide.
	This is exacerbated for TGI people who are also BIPOC, immigrants, disabled sex workers...
	Roll out the red carpet, because we've got them all here right now.
	We've got the BIPOC. We've got your immigrants.
	We've got your disabled.
	We've got your sex workers.
	We've got your trans women and or other subpopulations vulnerable to systemic violence.
	Is that how markets are up north now?
	There's no more like, you know, buy your veg.
	We've got your immigrants, two for a fiver.
	Get your trans women lads down while they're still hot.
	Yep, pretty much.
	Two for a fiver, pick this morning.
	Great deals.
	Existing research indicates that these inequities are caused by the pervasive discrimination that we experience in all areas of life, such as housing, education, employment, families of origin, and healthcare settings.
	So once again, there's another checklist for leftists.
	Thank you.
	Maybe that's a good point, but is this due to strict discrimination?
	Because they don't give the reason for this in this article.
	So is it due to discrimination, or is it down to the much more likely factor that most of these people, absent of their gender dysphoria, also tend to suffer from anxiety, depression, and a whole host of mental illnesses that they're more than happy to put all over their Twitter bios?
	Which means they might not pay the rent.
	Yes.
	Because I know some landlords, and they're really concerned with rent and not much else, in the sense of, like, that's my base need, is you pay the bloody rent.
	This is the foundation of the agreement that everything else comes from.
	You could be as strange, or queer, or anything else.
	No one really cares, as long as you pay the damn rent.
	And so the fact that you have a higher rate of homelessness here, I don't think that's probably to do discrimination.
	It probably is to do, as you say, with not being able to pay the rent.
	And also massive amounts of mental illness among these people, which is not helped by all of this community that they involve themselves in.
	Being shut out of these opportunities pushes many TGI people into criminalised activities such as survival, sex work and drug trade.
	Yes, yes, it's because they're criminalised and it's because they're pushed out of opportunities that these people engage in sex work and drugs.
	Yes, that's the only reason.
	It's not that they just do it anyway.
	Which results in high incarceration rates.
	I can't help taking heroin.
	I'm trans.
	I mean, that is the argument that some of them would probably use, to be fair.
	Well, I guess we'll see what ContraPoint's excuse was, so...
	That is a good point as well, yeah.
	Without safe housing, education, employment, and healthcare, TGI people continue to experience serious preventable medical and mental health problems.
	So, once again, all this is generally used as just a Trojan horse to get through all of the typical progressive talking points and policy points that they just want.
	Like we said, give me dat for free.
	That's what they want.
	If you wanted to sum up leftist ideology, it's just gimme dat for free.
	Someone clip that.
	Yeah.
	And the same 2015 study reported that 22% of these Californians did not see a doctor when they needed to because of fear of mistreatment.
	No, not actual mistreatment.
	they were just scared that they might probably probably just scared that they might be misgendered oh dear i can't go to the doctor now he might call me the wrong pronoun guess i'll die um and of those who did see a provider that year 33 reported having one or more negative experiences seeking health due to transphobia ranging from being refused treatment which probably means i want the hormones no I'm being mistreated!
	But I work at TGI Fridays, dammit!
	To being assaulted in a healthcare setting, to having to teach their provider about transgender people and the medical care they need.
	So, you're having to go in to speak to your doctor, and they're like, excuse me, what?
	You want me to do what with your genitals?
	Oh, sorry, let me sit you down and teach you, Mr.
	Doctor, about how you should be doing your job.
	Obvious nonsense.
	Obvious BS. All of this.
	And, interestingly, there was this recent article from the Post Millennial talking about some of the...
	The consequences of transitioning, especially given that the push recently seems to be transitioning kids, because if you can't abort them, let's go with the next best thing and just sterilise them.
	I mean, that seems to be the tactic from where I can see it, man.
	I have a hell of a way of putting it.
	These people are crazy, man.
	They think that human life is a parasite on, oh, gentle Mother Earth.
	That's the way that they're looking at this, though, isn't it?
	Really?
	You know it's true!
	I just never thought of it like that, but yeah, okay, like, neo-abortionist.
	Yeah, pretty much, you know, like, here's the next best thing, guys.
	So, at a recent talk at Duke University on trans and gender-diverse policies, care practices, and well-being, surgeon and trans-affirming doctor Marcy Bowers, who transitioned at the age of 38, admitting...
	Age of 38, they point out elsewhere in this article, after he'd already fathered three children...
	So, transition when it's no real threat to his ability to procreate.
	Admitted that children who undergo transition before puberty will never have adult sexual function or experience orgasm.
	So this is the life that we want to condemn all of these trans kids to, to never be able to truly experience sex.
	It's not an important part of the human condition, is it?
	No, no.
	Human connection has never been anything physical, you know.
	When I go see my girlfriend, the most we do, we just hold hands, we look each other in the eye, and we know.
	We know it's true, you know?
	And that's enough of me.
	Yep.
	Pretty much.
	See you next week.
	I prefer 1963 Beatles, thank you.
	I just want to hold your hand.
	An observation that I had, said Bowers, every single child who was, or adolescent, who was truly blocked at Tanner Stage 2, which is the beginning of physical development, when hormones begin their work of advancing a child to adulthood, has never experienced orgasm.
	I mean, it's really about zero.
	And also, interestingly, from irreversible damage, Basically, studies have shown that any child who goes on to hormone blockers when they're in adolescence, 100% chance that they will be going on to further medical transition later in life.
	Not necessarily because they wouldn't have detransitioned, but because they have transitioned themselves socially to the point where you can't go back on it.
	You feel like a fraud, you've forced all of your friends and family to go along with this, so you kind of feel the need to go through it socially.
	This raises huge and glaring red flags about the concept of informed consent for children and teens who are ushered into transition.
	How can a child or preteen who has never experienced sexual satisfaction, orgasm, sexual intimacy, consent to giving that up?
	Which is a good question from the post-millennial, and the only answer is they can't.
	They can't consent to that at all.
	And the fact that people are having to sign informed consent forms that don't mention any of this stuff is criminal, in my opinion.
	and these people should be facing legal action.
	Part of the incredible process, according to Bauer's talk at Duke, is that a teen who doesn't want to be the biological sex they are is able to stop their natural puberty with puberty blockers, a drug called Lupron, and then use hormones to force their body to go through the puberty of the opposite sex, which is really, really exciting.
	And just a heads up for anybody who doesn't know, Lupron is a drug that they use to chemically castrate inmates in prisons.
	Really, really exciting, Harry.
	I know.
	Why does that excite the person who said this?
	What a brave new world we live in, right?
	After seeing thousands of patients and being a pioneer in transmedicine, Bowers said that an additional...
	The prisoners were the pioneers.
	This is like saying, no, I was the first guy to think of the gas chambers, don't worry.
	I'm a pioneer.
	Bowers said that an additional concern is that when a boy undergoes this process, the penis does not grow, which makes it hard to take that genital material and surgically give it the appearance of the genital area of the opposite sex.
	When there is not enough genital material to use to create the appearance of a vagina and to align the opening of a neo-vagina, oftentimes other parts of the body are used.
	Transgender surgery, Thailand, notes that the two most common techniques are penile inversion vaginoplasty and rectosigmoid vaginoplasty.
	The skin graft is normally used for the vagina lining during sex reassignment surgery.
	I'm sorry about this, by the way.
	If you're eating.
	It's important to know this stuff because this is the absolutely barbaric practices that people are expecting your kids to go through.
	I mean, look at the languages being used there.
	The appearance of a vagina.
	A neophagina.
	They don't even call it in themselves because they know it's not.
	It's strange because in the public-facing stuff, like, I'm a woman, trust me, look at me, blah, blah, blah, all that stuff, it's 100% you have to pretend.
	But as soon as you get to the reality of any kind of surgery, it seems all the language immediately notes that, yeah, this isn't real.
	Yeah, I mean, also, I will just say there's a reason that people like Blair White...
	Are not going along with the bottom surgery.
	Because even though she wants to be a woman, as a trans woman, Blair White's like, I ain't getting this done to myself, Jesus Christ!
	Can you imagine what happens if it goes wrong?
	I'll skip through the rest of that because it's just disgusting.
	I think I've made the point there.
	The chat already grossed out for sure, I can see.
	Yeah, I bet they are.
	And the article just ends with, The White House has encouraged parents to affirm their kids regardless of sterility and lack of sexual function.
	The Department of Justice seeks to target states to protect children and teens from this fate.
	Good point, because of course, Jen Psaki and all the rest of the Democratic White House institution right now are saying we just need to protect trans kids.
	Does this sound like it's protecting people?
	No.
	No, it doesn't.
	Sounds like you're doing some pretty bad things to people.
	There's another article that I found that was just because, of course, this isn't just strictly in the US.
	This is everywhere right now in the West, particularly in the UK.
	So this was an article talking about the NHS being accused of favoring men changing gender over women with medical needs for breast surgery.
	And this one's just nasty because it's talking about how a woman was refused surgery and being in constant pain because she was unable to breastfeed her daughter because she had implants when she was a child because of some medical issue that she had.
	And the NHS were just like, oh, no, we can't do that.
	Sorry.
	But when they sent her the letter, the letter also noted, oh, but the transgender women, they're able to get breastplants without having to worry about it because we're focusing on.
	They're in real pain.
	They're in psychological pain.
	You might have an actual pressing physical medical need right now, but we need to really care about our inclusivity.
	This is the privileged class that are the alphabet...
	Yes, and then there's just some interesting stuff that's also developing in sects that you wouldn't imagine would be part of the alphabet soup.
	For instance, a teacher striking at a Catholic school saying they're fighting for an inclusive education after a gay author ban.
	So, teachers striking at a Catholic school for adopting Catholic principles.
	I don't know what to make Catholics.
	They're weird people.
	I know, they are very strange, but still, this is the base level, what you would expect.
	They don't want to be teaching their kids about gay stuff.
	And I'm not saying that I support it one way or the other, but it's just like, are you that surprised?
	But the most interesting thing...
	I mean, the same thing happens at a Muslim school, no one bats an eyelid, but...
	But the last thing I wanted to go over was just that the Northern Irish Green Party has released what it calls a Queer Greens Manifesto, calling for children of any age to be permitted to alter their gender.
	So I'll just go through a little bit of this, because this is happening over in...
	Yeah, here's a sign that you can see.
	Dear MLA candidates, what is a woman?
	Hashtag respect my sex.
	And then all of the graffiti on it saying F-terps, whatever she says she is.
	Really fought through the...
	This is a rational and intelligent society that we're building on right now.
	So the Queer Greens are a group...
	Could you imagine bringing a Roman, teaching him English, and then just taking him up and showing him the sign and being like, yeah, so this is politics in 2,000 years from where you are.
	No, he would just turn and go, so this came from America, yes.
	And America came from the English people, yes.
	All of a sudden, we'd all pop out of existence because the Romans were just genociders.
	Be right back.
	Yeah.
	There you go.
	Conquers Britain and does what they did to Ghoul.
	So, the Queer Greens are a group within the wider Green Party, and its seven-page manifesto sits alongside transgender policies contained in its existing 40-page general manifesto.
	Among the demands in the Queer Manifesto are these.
	One...
	Increased participation and representation of LGBTQ plus people in sports and leisure activities, ensuring that appropriate training and resources are available.
	So you want to just get rid of all the women in sports, basically.
	Just replace them with trans women, because obviously that'll be much more exciting for everybody.
	Who will not replace us?
	Ensure that LGBTQ plus identities, issues and rights are included in teacher training across all settings, so your teachers have to know this.
	Provide healthcare professionals with consistent, specific and appropriate LGBTQ plus training and bring forward a gender recognition bill for Northern Ireland on a basis of self-declaration requiring non-medical diagnoses or interventions inclusive of non-binary people and those under the age of 18 with no lower age limit.
	So a newborn baby.
	A newborn baby.
	If the newborn baby reaches, is a little boy, but he reaches for his mummy instead of his daddy, then that means he's a woman, which means we're snip snip.
	Give them the John Money treatment.
	This can only end well.
	And also, this isn't included in the article, but Pete pointed out to me that in the actual document in the manifesto, they included this one because they're always Trojan horses for other kinds of leftist ideas as well.
	We will work to remove requirements for LGBTQI plus asylum seekers to prove their identity and will introduce specific supports for them while the direct provision system is phased out.
	Because if it's It's not bad enough that they want all this on your taxpayer money.
	They want, once again, for asylum seekers to just be able to come in and get whatever they want off the back of your money.
	Suddenly, 100% of the sea people are queer.
	What a surprise!
	Who would have seen this coming?
	It's not like people respond to incentives.
	Or anything.
	So the Green Party Northern Ireland Deputy Leader Mal O'Hara, who is standing in North Belfast in next week's election, said, Ministers have failed to deliver a fully funded LGBTQ plus strategy, despite it first being promised in 2007.
	The traditional parties have failed to deliver the LGBTQ plus community in Northern Ireland.
	It must get so tiring just saying that acronym.
	Over and over and over again.
	Because honestly, it gets tiring for me just saying it.
	But it's time to elect politicians who prioritise the fight for social justice.
	It's time to vote green.
	So if you're in Northern Ireland in the next week, I recommend that you absolutely do not vote green, or else you will be flooded with new trans immigrants, and they will be trying to trans your children.
	The second they get into preschool.
	So once again, this has completely captured so many of the institutions that we hold dear.
	Be vigilant, be wary, and stand against it wherever you can.
	I'm always amazed how, like, bat-ass green movements are all over the world, because...
	I mean, you say just Northern Ireland, but it's, you know, the Green Party in the UK, in Germany, they're all the same.
	Like, they're all the same people, the same kind of ideology.
	And it amazes me how you have people who are like, yeah, I want to talk about climate change.
	By the way, I'm going to cut off your newborns.
	Well, the thing is, the interesting thing is, with the Green Parties and climate change, the proposals that they have for solving climate change don't actually solve anything anyway.
	They just transfer power to these big business companies that they supposedly stand against.
	It gives more power to the government, and governments, shockingly enough, if you look at China, government-controlling business doesn't help with emissions.
	I'm just imagining someone like Alex Jones telling you, being like, yeah, I care about the environment, I want to talk about the chemicals in the water that are turning the frogs gay.
	And then just someone turns around like, that's a good thing.
	Anyway, let's move on to Tucker Carlson.
	The attempted removal of Tucker Carlson has taken place, or at least it tried, from the New York Times here.
	There have been many times to have removed Tucker Carlson, not from the Serbians this time around.
	Sorry, Serbs, but I love the memes.
	And I thought we'd start with a shill, of course, this one being Tucker Carlson's Anglo-Saxon political traditions.
	You may remember he got in deep trouble for painting his face like that, live on air, and screaming, come on, England, score some...
	Goals!
	Come on, England!
	Yeah, so they were talking about Anglo-Saxon political traditions, and this is verboten in American-speak for some reason, because, I don't know, they hate us, Anglo-Saxons, for some reason.
	So go and check that out.
	And then we'll get into the Tucker Carlson experience.
	Ooh.
	Strap in, lads.
	It's a rollercoaster ride.
	Go to the next link.
	We have the New York Times who decided to create the Tucker Carlson experience for you and me to all enjoy.
	So we can...
	How generous of them.
	They've watched every episode of Tucker Carlson.
	Every episode.
	Apparently that's what they did.
	And they've condensed it so we could all enjoy.
	This is like the ultimate Tucker supercut.
	I really appreciate it, to be honest.
	Of course this is a smear piece, so they're trying to cut it in a way in which they want to make him look bad.
	Note also that the whole thing where it's like the New York Times saying, night after night, the host of the most watched show in primetime cable news uses a simple narrative to instill fear in his viewers.
	They want to control and then destroy you.
	See, there's no evil conspiracies going on.
	Anyway, let us tell you about our 1619 project we've got going on.
	Don't worry about fear.
	He's trying to make you feel fear.
	Also, don't go outside.
	There's a deadly virus.
	Yep, it's constant.
	There's a lot of things to be said there.
	But the Tucker Carl experience is the fact that they were trying to figure out what Tucker Carlson is up to.
	And so they got the big scoop.
	How did they get the big scoop?
	They watched his show.
	That was the research they did.
	I mean, Douglas Murray makes this point, but it's a very good one.
	It's just like, wow, that's peak journalism right there.
	I put on the TV and watched it.
	So that's the big scoop.
	Apparently they had nine journalists doing this.
	What, round the clock?
	Did they lock them in rooms or something?
	Like little slots where they put the plates through with the slop.
	But let's go through it.
	So if we can go to the next one.
	They don't care.
	What you think.
	They want to control your mind.
	They want you to do what you told them.
	They want you to kiss the ring.
	They're not sentimental.
	They want power.
	They want power.
	They hate you.
	They want to hurt you.
	They call you a racist.
	They call you racist.
	They want to control what you do.
	And of course they want to control your children too.
	And they want you to know it.
	They couldn't be clearer about that.
	As if this is meant to make him look bad.
	So this is what these little compilations are going to be, but they're all gold.
	They're all true as well.
	Yeah, like, it's all very obvious.
	Like, it's bleedingly obvious who he's referring to, which is...
	Also, just because they've chosen out-of-context clips where they don't give him a chance to explain who they are doesn't mean that he doesn't explain or know who he's referring to.
	Yeah, it's the ruling class who are made up of power-hungry Democrats and Republicans as well, and there are active examples of these people for everything they allow to happen or actively promote.
	I mean, we could go on the list, but if you've been on this channel for more than five minutes, you'll know lots of these examples.
	And any dissent or resistance against such things is just immediately treated as some kind of hostile, treasonous action against the state itself.
	You'd think the leftists would actually be very open to the kind of rhetoric that Tucker is using, oftentimes because more than anything, he seems very class-conscious.
	He certainly is.
	That's why he's upset about the constant focus on race, because it's like every moment you're thinking about race, you're not thinking about class.
	Which is true.
	Well, there are a lot of billionaire Dems, aren't there?
	But we'll keep enjoying the Tucker Carlson experience.
	Let's go to the next one here.
	Good evening and welcome to Tucker Carlson Tonight.
	So this is inside the apocalyptic worldview of Tucker Carlson Tonight.
	They chose, like, the most friendly opening possible.
	I know.
	Keep your arms and legs in the right.
	He just seems like a nice guy.
	This wholesome chap, he's the evil one.
	Let's keep going.
	Let's go to the next one.
	So this is them saying they watched all 1,150 episodes of Tucker Carlson tonight that he hosts five nights a week.
	Oh god, how dare he?
	Which he says his thoughts, and that's terrible.
	Let's keep going.
	Let's go to the next one.
	They want to control you when you enter Mr.
	Carlson's world each night.
	I love how this is the preamble.
	Like, I'm playing a...
	It's got, like, a little fun house.
	Enter my world!
	It's like we're in an escape room together.
	Have you ever been to one?
	Yeah, I've been to a few.
	You get a little explanation.
	It's like, right, so hello, folks.
	We're in the escape room.
	We're in the world of Tucker Carlson.
	Yeah.
	You're among his 3 million plus viewers and part of Fox News audience that is 92% white and overwhelmingly older, according to Nielsen data.
	And they mention that, not because they actually care, but because they hate white people.
	And we know that.
	Well, it's a bit of a dog whistle to let you know that you should hate him based off the demographics of his audience.
	Leftist dogs here, majority white, therefore bad.
	So, they are the ruling class and they threaten everything you believe in.
	Demonstrably so.
	We have the names.
	We can literally tot it up in a big old list if you want.
	Put it in a flight log as well if that's more convenient for you.
	Let's go to the next one so we can see what they then go on to say.
	They say they include Democrat and some Republican officials, members of the media, big tech executives, academics, sports and Hollywood stars and others.
	Many of these people have been attacked in dozens or even hundreds of episodes.
	Why is that?
	No more.
	It doesn't evaluate.
	Why are they being attacked?
	Well, because they're instituting ideas and procedures in the United States that are, well, criminal, should be criminal, evil, or just insane.
	And he will give us plenty of examples.
	The academics are actively brainwashing your children into believing all of this rubbish that the ruling class want you to believe anyway.
	I love as well that they're like, oh, this mysterious they.
	Who could they?
	You know, stupid commentator.
	It just says they all the time.
	And then they've given you the face of every individual he could possibly name.
	There's Fauci.
	There's Biden.
	There's Obama.
	Booty gag.
	Nancy Pelosi.
	Pocahontas.
	You've got that guy, the war hawk, Liz Cheney there.
	Mitt Romney, the snake himself.
	Michael.
	I mean, Michelle Obama.
	Bill Gates.
	Soros.
	I mean, this is the thing that I find so amazing where they're like, they're just saying they because they're trying to be mystic about it or they have no idea.
	Anyway, here's who they are referring to.
	Here's the literal list.
	Here's the literal faces of every individual.
	I mean, you've got the fish lady herself on the left there as well.
	Oh god, no!
	Whose name escapes me.
	Oh, God.
	Laurie Lightfoot.
	Laurie Lightfoot, that's her name.
	Let's continue.
	So Tony Fauci is back, unchastened, with still more commands.
	He cares about the environment to the extent it gives him more power.
	Things are getting more dangerous in this country.
	Luckily, Kamala Harris has a plan.
	She plans to disarm you.
	Liz Cheney can harness the awesome power of the national security state to seize your personal text messages.
	Sandy Cortez and her friends want to abolish your police, not their police.
	So this is a lady with huge estates all over the country who brags that she's a $30,000 freezer telling you you're just gonna have to suck it up and be poor for the planet she doesn't care about at all.
	So if you're asking yourself, does a 90-year-old left-wing Hungarian financier have enough control over the way my country operates?
	The answer is decidedly yes.
	The tech oligarchs join forces to censor their political opponents.
	You may be one of them.
	You weren't being paranoid to worry about this.
	You were absolutely right.
	I can't get over how they present this, like, look at the madman.
	And he just gives us, example after example, a very good point.
	This has to be a psyop.
	I know, right?
	This is the New York Times being like, evil Tucker Carlson, look at how wrong he is, guys.
	Did you know that he thinks that the tech billionaires have too much power?
	Why is it that a 90-year-old Hungarian just has immense influence over all global politics?
	Yeah, that's a terrible point.
	Why is it that Nancy Pelosi is so rich and yet encourages everyone to be poor?
	Why does AOC want to abolish the police except where she lives?
	Strange.
	Again, everything here makes him look like the golden boy who's doing great work.
	I hope even if it wasn't the intention that this has accidentally created a whole host of new Tucker fans.
	This is why I said it's the Tucker Carlson experience.
	Keep yourself in the right.
	This is his highlights right here.
	Let's keep going.
	Let's go to the next one.
	See what else they have to say.
	Mr.
	Carson frames nearly every topic on his show as the ruling class plots from gun control to marijuana legalisation to COVID restrictions.
	Well, yeah.
	We can name the people and then they have their consistent ideology on these matters.
	Well then, yes, we can put those together.
	I mean, gun control is literally a way for the ruling classes to be able to stop anybody below them from being able to defend themselves.
	And resist them ever again.
	We'll keep going.
	Let's go to the...
	Why are people who have taxpayer-funded bodyguards demanding that the rest of us disarm immediately?
	People in charge are suddenly for weed.
	Is it because they're super cool?
	Or is there some other reason they might want a passive population?
	They don't care about the actual environment.
	They care about controlling the rest of us.
	In a single day last month, we watched, for example, our entire professional class dutifully change their Twitter avatars from mask up To the now-mandatory Ukrainian flag.
	Our ruling class is obsessed with denying biology because when you're God, there is no objective reality.
	The point of the exercise is to humiliate the rest of us by forcing us to obey transparently absurd orders.
	The point is to disarm you, to strip you of your autonomy, your power, your right of self-defense.
	God, he's so based!
	I know, I can see the chat.
	I'm failing to see the problem.
	Everything he's saying is true.
	We're honestly lucky that Tucker Carlson has such a large audience when he's actually talking about important and honest issues.
	There's also the strange aspect here that...
	Again, I mean, it's becoming more and more true, as Carl mentioned about the Dark Enlightenment folks, where they see them as mad, like the Clan World-esque progressives, see everyone else who wants to live a normal life as insane because they're just so far removed.
	You want a wife and children, you insane person?
	Yeah, they looked at these clips of Taka saying, well, yeah, they want to get rid of your guns, as they have in almost every other place on Earth, so they control you.
	I mean, we have a similar situation in Britain, which is once the guns went, British traditions, political traditions, those Anglo-Saxon political traditions, have just destroyed themselves.
	They're just gone.
	I did an article on the lack of any amount of self-defence that's allowed within the UK, just because of how tight not only our gun laws are, but just the laws that are imposed on people who want to defend themselves from their property being intruded upon, or any just violence against them.
	Anyone pointing that out?
	They're the mad ones.
	The person putting this together is so removed from you and me that they think this is mad.
	I mean, that's the most revealing aspect.
	And Cthulhu swims left.
	Let's keep going.
	Let's keep enjoying the experience.
	Sorry, if you can keep on...
	There we are.
	They keep whining about the fact that he points out that, well, if you're an average American, who's your biggest threat in your life?
	Is it Putin or is it the people who run the country?
	This is smeared as him being pro-Russia.
	It's like, this doesn't make any sense, you idiot.
	He never supported Russia when he was saying that.
	Two things can be true at once.
	Putin can be bad, and also the ruling elites can be bad.
	One of them is more pressing to the average American, funnily enough.
	Let's keep going.
	What is this really about?
	Why do I hate Putin so much?
	Has Putin ever called me a racist?
	Has he threatened to get me fired for disagreeing with him?
	Has he shipped every middle class job in my town to Russia?
	Did he manufacture a worldwide pandemic that wrecked my business and kept me indoors for two years?
	Is he teaching my children to embrace racial discrimination?
	Is he making fentanyl?
	Is he trying to snuff out Christianity?
	Does he eat dogs?
	These are fair questions, and the answer to all of them is no.
	Vladimir Putin didn't do any of that. -I don't know what his diet is. -I don't know what his diet is.
	So why does permanent Washington hate him so much?
	But there we are.
	It's just the point of why the obsession here, not because Putin's good or anything he's done is good, but if you're an average American, who's the biggest threat to your life?
	And that's the point being made there.
	Again, this isn't really a successful smear of him being pro-Russian.
	Once again, this isn't just providing answers to his questions that are reasonable on their side.
	It's not providing answers as to why you should hate him.
	It's just pointing at him and going, look, he believes the wrong things.
	He's not a member of the cathedral.
	Look how mad he is.
	He's not.
	The clips make him look good.
	Let's keep going.
	Let's keep going along this line.
	So let's just flick through a bunch of these just so we can get to...
	They care more about identity politics than they care about your life.
	They care more about preventing a border wall than they do about raising the wages of American workers.
	They care more about putting Roger Stone in prison than about punishing looters and arsonists.
	They care far more about foreigners than about their own people.
	They seem to care more about Venezuela than they care about this country.
	They care about Afghans far more than they care about you.
	They don't care about you and they're saying that as clearly as they possibly can.
	They don't care about your kids and they really don't care about your grandkids.
	Yeah, 100% true.
	And also, I love the international aspect he raises there, which is, this is where the Dems could really just stop being stupid and actually look at the things they complain about and see where it is.
	Which is, you endlessly get these complaints, and everyone agrees on that, which is that whenever there's a foreign war, there are some people who make ridiculous amounts of money.
	Like, unbelievable amounts of money.
	And clearly, they're the biggest winners out of any of these situations.
	I wonder if Nancy has any stocks with those companies as well.
	And when the ruling class utterly get obsessed with a place that's destabilising and just licking their lips, hoping it turns into a war, well, there's a reason why.
	And of course they care far more about that than any of their own people, because while they're interested in making whole loads of cash...
	And, well, we have it in Nancy Pelosi as a single individual, but there's just endless lists of them as well.
	Again, you can name them.
	Like, Johnny Harris even did a video naming some of them, and he's, you know, leans left.
	But let's move along to the links now, because that's the Tucker Carlson experience, and there's lots more if you want to enjoy yourself.
	The best one in there that I found was when they were saying, did you know he complains that white people are being discriminated against?
	And then plays a clip of him pointing it out.
	Real dunce stuff that they think that's their own.
	So we have the New York Times, there's an article here, sorry, an image here saying, in more than 800 episodes, Coulson refers to the ruling class.
	Yes, he did call you out.
	Take it personally, I guess.
	Just pointing this out isn't refuting it.
	No, let's continue.
	If we go to the next one, we also have been complaining that apparently people who disagree with Carlson have not been on as often as they used to.
	And whose fault is that?
	I wonder if Tucker's been refusing to have guests on his show.
	Yeah, he's not a man to turn down a debate.
	He loves it.
	Absolutely not.
	I think it has more to do with the fact that the leftists won't engage in debate.
	I mean, demonstrably so.
	When you try and book something, everyone who's ever tried to organise anything political with debates will know the right-wingers will just go, yep.
	We'll be there.
	Don't worry about it.
	It's the leftists who are like, I need to know the conditions and terms and who I'm debating against.
	So then they'll just pull out no reason anyway.
	Let's keep going.
	So we go to the Ministry of Truth.
	As you can see, the Babylon Bee saying, announced their targets being Tucker Carlson for the two minutes of hate.
	Of course, we get a fake news article, but then also, obviously, the truth.
	Because if we go to the next one, we can, of course, see back when they were saying, well, this guy is spreading fear.
	Keep it in mind.
	This guy is the evil man.
	And if we go to the next one, of course, we have the New York Times themselves.
	Headline, It's time to scare people about COVID. Oh, but he's spreading fear, guys.
	Watch out!
	So this whole thing is obviously a transparent political attack, if that wasn't obvious at all already.
	But if we go to the next one, some people making some points about that.
	So we have Greg here saying, The New York Times traced Tucker Carlson's ancestors all the way back to 1850 and assigned nine reporters to watch every episode of his show in order to smear him as a racist, but couldn't even be bothered to ask Hunter Biden if he ever forgot his laptop at a repair shop.
	The first one, is there a point here?
	Actually...
	I mean, some people you can't help.
	Some people you cannot help.
	But that is an unbelievably astute observation here, which is that when they really want to target someone, Tucker being one of the most effective people in the West, and therefore has the highest price on his head for these people, they'll spare no resources.
	Absolutely anything.
	But asking one question of their own side cannot be done.
	If we go to the next one, we also have the reporters went on to other leftist media and said he's the most dangerous man alive.
	He's more dangerous than anyone realises what's going to do.
	NSNBC again probably being like, we get to control the narrative.
	No, not anybody else.
	Yeah, dangerous to who?
	The ruling class.
	You being part of it here.
	I mean, you and all your friends are part of this, if nothing else.
	We move forward, we also have the fact that Trevor Noah decided to go on this at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.
	Decided to try and smear Tucker Carlson in here.
	He said that Tucker asked questions that you can find out by Googling them.
	I'm like, Yes.
	I know.
	You guys are awful.
	It's obvious.
	So, that's how frank you are.
	Thank you for not playing the Trevor Noah clip, by the way.
	We can spare ourselves that.
	If we get to the next one, though, we will play one clip and enjoy it, which is Douglas Murray, who was there at the White House Correspondents' Dinner and was getting grilled for, like...
	Hmm.
	So were you there?
	It's a bit weird.
	He was like, well, you know, you go for the same reason you go to the zoo, just to have a look and learn.
	And he did learn some things about the kind of swamp creatures who write such smear pieces and try to remove Carlson.
	And I thought we'd enjoy it because, again, some very good observations.
	Let's play the clip.
	Journalists in my experience in Australia and Britain, certainly the ones I know, don't take themselves as seriously as journalists in America.
	Journalists in America think that they are somewhere above the fire service, above the police, something like that as the guardians of democracy.
	And so they have these backpacking occasions.
	And really, as somebody explained it to me, they also invite celebrities.
	And the celebrities go so that the celebrities can feel smart.
	And the journalists invite the celebrities so that the journalists can feel famous.
	Here's the problem with these people, and actually came out again at the correspondence dinner in Washington on Saturday night.
	They genuinely don't have any curiosity as to why For instance, Tucker Carlson's show, and indeed Hannity, who they kept mocking at the Correspondence Association dinner, keep on performing better than the radical left-wing shows like MSNBC, or the slightly further inside to the left, Viewers of CNN, they can't work it out.
	They can't work out why these Fox shows have prime time audiences which they dominate night after night.
	And, you know, you and I might think that if somebody just massively outperformed you all the time, you'd think, well, I wonder what they're doing.
	That's, you know, that's maybe something I can learn from.
	Maybe their show doesn't feel like homework.
	Or maybe the host is slightly more relatable than me.
	That's a fantastic point.
	It's just bob on.
	Yeah, the strange thing there being they never actually take a look and think, well, why are we consistently losing to Tucker?
	Why do people hate us so much?
	Yeah, why do we look like villains out of a Batman movie?
	Yeah.
	It's really the Simpsons meme, isn't it?
	Am I wrong?
	No.
	It is the people who are wrong.
	Absolutely.
	But the zero lack of self-awareness and even sense of self-improvement, I really do think that that is true.
	They genuinely do not look at anyone else and think, how can I self-improve?
	It's just, how can I destroy?
	How can I make sure that my mediocrity is at least higher than what they've got, rather than actually improving yourself to not be mediocre there with those journos?
	Otherwise, why else did they do this?
	Why else did they spend their lives watching every episode of Tucker Carlson and come away with it with, let's smear him, not, how can we make our show better?
	I mean, you've got enough material to show you how to make the show better and the knowledge, surely, at that point, but apparently not.
	The fact that they can come out of all those episodes as well not being smarter...
	Yeah, that's wild.
	But we'll skip a couple of links here, if we can, Michael, so we can go to that one, because this is also a very funny point.
	So if we click on the first one there, they also put another piece out trying to smear him and saying that he talks a lot about white South African farmers being attacked, which presumably is fake news, according to them, in their minds, because they say that it's a story from the Neo-Nazi Daily Stormer.
	As opposed to the reality in the ground.
	Which is why, if you go to the next image there, New York Times reports on white South African farmers being beaten and arrested...
	They confuse their own reporting for white nationalist reporting because it happens to reflect just a reality that is South Africa.
	It's just amazing.
	And then if we go to the last one here, we can see Tucker's response, which is just golden again.
	Just holding up the front page and just laughing because this is ridiculous.
	I mean, to think that he's the clown world in the world compared to the progressive, literal clown world where you're putting on your makeup and talking about cutting off children's Yeah.
	Anyway, that's that.
	Let's move to the video comments.
	So I can't help but laugh any time they complain about how this material was acquired through a hack.
	I don't give a s***!
	Is the material true?
	Like, you got caught in the act, but you caught me in a way that you shouldn't have been allowed to!
	F*** off!
	Also, enjoy the view of one of Ohio's two nuclear power plants.
	I get to drive past it for work on occasion.
	Well, it looks lovely, but that's a fantastic point, though, and I really should have hit it more when we talk about it.
	Which is that, imagine talking like this in the age before computers.
	It's like, did you know this person got it leaked to them?
	This document that shows that the president's corrupt?
	Well, you can't show people that.
	That's a leaked document.
	Water what?
	Watergate?
	No, we don't want the people knowing about that.
	Sounds like fake news, bro.
	It's like, yeah, I don't care if it's leaked.
	The question is, is it true?
	Well, that's the leftist attempt to discredit, isn't it, always?
	It's never to attack the points being made, always to attack where and who they're from.
	I'm going to enjoy this.
	Let's go to the next one.
	So, I get the impression that Callum is a fan of Snowpiercer, and I was curious to know if he was aware of the Rhino Stew's theory that Snowpiercer is actually a sequel to Willy Wonka.
	I've heard of this, actually.
	Yeah, I know it sounds insane, but, like, they managed to link all of the villains with Snowpiercer back to the main characters from Willy Wonka in their grown-up forms, and ultimately culminating in the Conductor being basically just a grown-up version of Charlie from the Chaka factory, using Willy Wonka tech to basically build the Snowpiercer.
	We need to do a video on this.
	I'd completely forgotten about it.
	The politics of Willy Wonka.
	As you just remember, I remember the guy who showed me it, he's now dead, did actually mention that to me when we first sat down and watched it together.
	But yeah, it's a good theory.
	And also, I'm a fan of Snowpiercer in a very strange way because it's not a good movie.
	I've heard good things about it from everyone except you.
	This story is stupid as hell, is what I mean.
	It's the dumbest thing on earth, but I love it because it's so dumb.
	And there's also just the best lines ever.
	Have you got around to watching it yet or not?
	I still haven't.
	I mean, it's directed by a South Korean director, so I'm expecting that the translation of lines may have been somewhat...
	Mismatched from the intention, you know?
	It's, you know, 99% fine.
	And then one of the main characters at the end just sits down and is explaining, you know, when we got on the car, we had to eat people because there was no food.
	And he goes, you know what the worst thing is?
	I know what people taste like.
	And I know that babies taste best.
	Oh!
	What is that line?
	It sounds like it's communicating something that would be horrible.
	It's just the phrasing.
	The babies taste best.
	The babies taste best.
	Why do you think we eat lamb?
	There's also just the...
	Spoilers, I guess, but there's a strange circumstance.
	It's him and one of the other characters is one of his best friends at the start.
	And he explains that actually there was an instance where a man with a knife came to a woman and wanted to eat the baby.
	And an old man cut off his arm and gave his arm instead and said, eat this.
	And he says, you know, his good friend was the baby and I was the man with the knife.
	It's just weird.
	Anyway, but yeah, do enjoy Snowpiercer.
	It's a laugh if nothing else.
	I feel like I need to watch it and we need to do a video on it now.
	Yeah, that's why I keep calling his protein bars bug bars.
	Yeah, because they're made of cockroaches in the film, aren't they?
	Also, I've read a rumour multiple times now that apparently the bug bars in the movie were meant to be made of feces, but I can't find any actual solid evidence of that.
	Well, no, I think one of the points that was made to you was, well, in South Korea, where the director's from, they do eat bugs anyway, so to a South Korean, that wouldn't be a shocking and terrible thing.
	It'd be pretty normal, so it's like, gotta go even one further, so just make it poo.
	I mean, it is worse.
	I mean, even the North Koreans don't do that, so...
	As far as they let us know.
	No, they trade it in for tokens.
	Oh god, yeah.
	Anyway, let's go to the next one.
	Forgive me.
	I'm so sorry.
	The apples, they are back in charge, as you can clearly see.
	We would like to groom your kids and bow them to Mickey.
	We will circle back, create the greatest pros.
	The biggest word you ever heard, and this is how it goes.
	True, an international subject of pressure.
	Well, that's getting posted on social media.
	Honestly, that wasn't too bad.
	You're more talented than that Nina woman who's in charge of the Ministry of Truth, so nice one.
	I wondered where it was going, but it came all right.
	I think you did well there.
	That was good.
	Yeah.
	I was anticipating more cringe than there was, so thank you.
	Thanks, Sophie.
	Let's go to the next one.
	I brought home the motor home for free.
	I'm pulling the 350 with the four-barrel carb out of it.
	Pulled all the injection pumps and the alternator and the pump and everything off.
	Pick up all the oil lines, and it's ready to lift out once I get the machine.
	Throwing the 350 inside of my 1990 Ranger that I picked up for $50.
	I just pulled out its motor.
	It wasn't any good, and the 350 makes twice the power, so when I get that in here, it's going to be a little muscle truck.
	All right.
	Nice.
	Is that going to fit?
	You can make it fit.
	I love the idea of just having a Hot Wheels car where the engine comes out as well on the top.
	The thing that I always think with that was something that happened in one of the episodes of Grand Tour.
	I didn't get to watch a lot of it.
	It's really good, but Richard Hammond did that to one of his cars, but came up with the massive problem that in the view where he should be able to see the road was just a massive engine now, so he's having to sit there like...
	He's tiny as well.
	Yeah, he's a small guy.
	Let's go to the next one.
	A previous video comment from me explained the full set of letters for the marginalized community.
	Well, the Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario has shown me that I need to do better as they have undertaken the stunning and brave work to make it even more inclusive.
	However, they are still missing Two Spirit and plus the vicious bigots.
	Alex, you're normally so well-spoken.
	You know, it reminds me of a meme I saw, though, in which a guy falls asleep on his computer, wakes up, Polish man agrees with him.
	Because of their alphabet!
	When I'm looking at that, it's just like, it's almost like it should be Polish.
	Oh no, I see this is WandaVision, isn't it?
	Oh no.
	Don't know what that is, so let's go for it.
	Yes, I don't have a choice.
	I challenge you to a debate.
	What the f***?
	No.
	Dyes of cringe.
	What the hell?
	I kind of thought that that would be Zen.
	Because he was the one on the Zoom call going like, Oh, but WandaVision was fine.
	No, it was terrible.
	Although they did...
	They too watched the TV. It did produce white supremacist vision, though.
	What?
	Did you not see there was two versions of the same character and one was just pure white?
	Oh, and he's...
	That's just white supremacist vision, okay?
	KKK vision.
	Everything he sees is pure white.
	That's going to make a family guy joke, but not mine.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Hey guys, as a recommendation for a future Epoch episode, maybe you could make one on HMS Warspite.
	It's one of the most decorated ships in Royal Navy history.
	She fought everywhere between Dreadlands all the way to the landing in Normandy.
	And it has a lot of funny stories as well as a lot of Just amazing stories that are connected to that ship.
	Also, to anybody who's not subscribed, a little bit of shilling, do subscribe purely to watch Carl call Napoleon an idiot over and over and over again during that Napoleonic Wars series.
	It's wonderful.
	Alright, well I'll pass it along to Bert and Carl.
	Yeah, and thank you for the extra show there.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Part of the track washed out and the train derailed, injuring 37.
	Now, no one died.
	And later, the train was decommissioned.
	You can see the tracks were abandoned.
	Trees are growing through it.
	But they say at night, you can hear the ghost train, the blue comet, still running through the pines.
	I'll be sure to look out for it.
	I love how last week I said, is Joan alright?
	And you've just picked her up.
	And I kind of feel bad now, because she clearly looks like, I just want to go back to bed.
	Please.
	Anyway, I guess we'll look out for the ghost train.
	Let's go to the next one.
	My Royal Council has come to the decision.
	The noble vassals of my rule shall decide unto themselves, if they wish the succubus race to continue their ritual sacrificing.
	I have more important matters to attend to than to deal with your petty squabbling.
	No, no, my power!
	Thank you.
	Okay.
	Thank you for that.
	I actually like that.
	Just the king showing up with his Hoes Mad document.
	By royal decree.
	Hoes are mad.
	Nice touch.
	Although I was thinking in my head at the time, Minecraft.
	It's like the male Animal Crossing, where you just spend all your life making loads of stuff, and they try and show it to someone, they just don't care.
	I care.
	Do you watch other people's Minecraft creations?
	I like it sometimes, especially since they started to add all the shaders in, because especially looking back to, because I remember when Minecraft first came out, because I was never a PC gamer and all of my friends were all of a sudden obsessed with telling me about this game where, oh, you can make things out of cubes, and I was like, yeah, that's never going to take off.
	What suckers, eh?
	But going back from how it looked and functioned back then to everything that you can do in it now and how you can actually make stuff that is really aesthetically pleasing is quite impressive.
	Yeah, I do miss the simplicity a little bit.
	I can understand that.
	I never really played it.
	It's like original RuneScape.
	I don't know if you know about that.
	Oh, I played original RuneScape back in the day, yeah.
	I just love how there's RuneScape now with more stuff in it, and half of the audience is just like, nah.
	They go back to classic RuneScape.
	They've got their own server where they just play classic RuneScape in which they can't do half the new things.
	All the RuneScape fans are like, no, return to tradition.
	Very based.
	Let's go to the written comments.
	So we'll skip through these.
	So on Roe v.
	v raid silly mid on says the whole abortion debate was a bit of a non-entity for so long because a compromise had been reached in safe legal and rare the moment the left started pushing it as a good to the point where they were celebratory marching bands on late night tv yeah if you want an abortion get one Have you seen that?
	Yeah.
	Cancer.
	I hate it.
	Breaking the terms of the unofficial peace treaty.
	For me, I'd put a cap on the number of elective lifestyle abortions to one, maybe two, and then start charging for them.
	Prison time.
	There are other methods of birth control that are far cheaper and they don't come with ethical questions of ending life for lifestyle reasons.
	Yeah, I mean, I think that's probably the correct way to look at the history of the American debate on this, which is you guys seem to have had a peace treaty in that respect, the Safe League on Rare, and it was just utterly destroyed.
	It was like, well, okay, we have no reason not to just go back and say, hang on, it's not in the Constitution, Dumbo.
	Yeah, I mean, it doesn't help when one of the other side comes out basically in every way possible as unironically evil.
	Kind of doesn't help, does it?
	You ever heard the term Demon KKK Rats?
	I think so.
	I don't remember where, though.
	It's just like you see some of the more like, you know...
	Is that an Alex Jones-ism?
	He probably has used it.
	Because it sounds like an Alex Jones-ism.
	Demon KKK Rats.
	And I'm just like...
	That's a bit far, but at the same time, it's very true when talking about abortion, at least.
	Yes.
	Speaking of which, Bleached Demon has something to say.
	Perhaps more important and troubling is the leak itself.
	The first time since 1986 that a US Supreme Court draft decision has been leaked.
	This could undermine the internal workings of the court, subjecting more decisions to the kangaroo court of public opinion.
	Even in the slightest defeat, the left stabs at the heart of respectability.
	Hmm.
	Absolutely.
	It's very interesting that this leak comes immediately after Biden's newest appointee gets in as well.
	I'm so happy about that.
	No, I was more meaning something else, but, you know, something to think on, isn't it?
	Oh, that she may just...
	Well, she is a diversity hire.
	Yeah, exactly.
	It's a very good point, actually.
	Andre M says, Just a reminder that the people who are pro-abortion were given the right not to be aborted.
	Children of privilege, in that respect.
	Yep.
	And you've got to keep your genitals, too.
	Let's move on to the queer capture.
	Yep, so Lord Naravar says...
	You've got living privilege.
	Yep.
	Sorry.
	Reading some of these comments, I'd just like to remind some commenters that gay people and LGBTQ people are not the same.
	Gay people are normal people who also happen to be gay.
	LGBTQ people are the nutty retards who dress like clowns and like shoving foreign objects into their neo-vaginas.
	Please make sure we remember the difference, chaps and chapettes.
	Good point, Lord Naravar.
	Normally you're the one who points out the Douglas Murray queers versus gays...
	I just think it's a very nice way of summarising it.
	Yes, so I would have thought by now that we have made that pretty clear, that that's the distinction that we hold as well, but thank you for reinforcing that, Lord Nerovar.
	Student of history, having an office of alphabet initiative, but homelessness, drug use piles of garbage slash excrement and mild typhoid outbreaks, California sounds lovely and diverse, and that's why you should not live there.
	Robert Longshore says, I hope Harry's girlfriend's parents aren't watching this show, lol.
	I don't think they'd care.
	I really don't think they'd care.
	He's just going to message you and be like, I want damn grandkids, damn it, stop holding hands!
	Yep.
	Student of history says, first idea for right-wing initiatives, department for the advancement of private armament policies.
	I'd support it.
	I'd support it.
	I'm telling you, right-wing circle time is not a bad idea.
	Yeah, I'm starting to come round to this now.
	How will the civil servants talk about how can we get more guns into the people's hands?
	Can we just, like, airdrop them into the cities, just handguns raining from the sky?
	But the Americans did that.
	Wait, did they?
	Do you know about the Liberty pistol?
	No, I don't actually.
	It's a very cheaply crappy made pistol that the Americans airdropped over the Netherlands so that civilians could use them and turn them into partisans.
	And again, a couple of shots and it's broken.
	But still.
	You can then nick his gun and move on, right?
	Yeah, yeah.
	So then, yeah, literal airdrops of Liberty pistols all over the country.
	I like the name of that as well, just the Liberty pistol.
	It's here to protect your freedom.
	There's a friend of mine who totally didn't try to 3D print one.
	This is just hypothetically speaking, you know?
	Anyway, pirate skeletons.
	So San Francisco is setting the seas for a dead city in 20 years or less.
	A large portion of the population is non-reproductive, and the rest of them are getting abortions.
	And yes, when that does happen, we'll be able to go back in and reclaim it for our own.
	But Carl has said that when he's walking around it, it's actually a lovely city, architecturally speaking.
	It's just the people inside it.
	As with a lot of these American Democrat-run cities as well, I'd imagine, to be honest.
	as soon as they all stop breeding and just die out we can go back in and take them for our own free will says if only the tories would sit around and talk about conservative issues you're assuming the tories are conservative Nice one.
	Let's go on to the Tucker Carlson.
	yes he made it in Minecraft chat Tucker Costs stuff Edward of Woodstock says yeah Tucker thinks we want to control you how ridiculous is that by the way don't leave your house remember to ask and use the correct pronouns stay in your lane and believe the experts women and the lived experiences of trans people you cis white straight male bigger also controlling what you think that's our job MSNBC MSNBC. They're never going to live that down.
	It was the best moment in TV in, what, maybe 50 years?
	Ben van der Plats says, Whichever intern had to watch and cut up Tucker for those videos, I actually switched to his position.
	However, they were still trying to sneak in all the base stuff.
	You know, that's a very good point.
	Well, the problem is, if you're trying to smear Tucker, is everything the man says is pretty based.
	So, like, oh, there's no material to work with if you want to make him look bad.
	Also, I just like Matthew Hammond.
	Was there a tenth journalist that watched Tucker and was convinced he was right?
	Nine out of ten journos hate Tucker Carlson.
	Journos hate him.
	Find out with one easy trick.
	Save ruling elites.
	I don't know.
	No, that's the special discount code.
	Matthew Hammond.
	Oh, sorry, just for that.
	Longshanks says, I want to thank the New York Times for that collage picture of the elite.
	It's the most useful journalism they've performed since they lied about Stalin and gave us an idea of what the media is really for.
	That's a fantastic point.
	It's true.
	Screenshot that.
	We should just be posting that.
	Constantly.
	Underneath.
	Anything New York Times does.
	Anything about the ruling elite.
	Here you go.
	Here's the names.
	I also did a book club on a book that's all about how the New York Times has just lied for decades.
	Basically since they started.
	Actively accepting active measures as well.
	Lee B says it really seems like some base guy is inside doing the whole expose, certainly is student of history, Tucker's ultimate MAGA fans the New York Times free will 2112 there is still this view that the left has betrayed its own democratic ideals, they never had any the hard left is and always has been authoritarian remember the phrase dictatorship of the proletariat what about the terror during the French Revolution even Cromwell came to be a military dictator the left is inherently authoritarian
	the global establishment has learned well and the hard left have all the money and influence to implement their global tyranny.
	New York Times claims they want to destroy you.
	John Tron, what?
	That's crazy!
	Stares into the camera.
	The last couple of honorable mentions, student of history says, I demand my right to privacy, to sacrifice children to the dark god of chaos.
	Smile, libertarian.
	And Simon...
	Something says, Can't tell what's disturbing to me more, the progressive degenerates or the non-hairy harry.
	Or non-Harry Harry.
	I'm sorry.
	I'm still me.
	I'm still me deep down.
	It's just that beneath my beard, shockingly enough, was hiding a face.
	I know.
	I know.
	It's terrifying.
	You sound like you've got a new face.
	Well, I came in with this on Friday and Josh just was like, oh, okay.
	And then he was like, oh, don't worry.
	It looks good.
	And I was just thinking, oh, I bloody hope so.
	This is my face.
	I'm stuck with this.
	Also a correction.
	Apparently it's not the Liberty Pistol.
	It's the Liberator.
	That's even better.
	Yeah, because you do it yourself.
	We're going to drop the liberators down for you.
	We're going to actually go and liberate yourself, folks.
	Anyway, that's the end of us.
	So if you want more from us, go over to LettersSeeThis.com.
	Do go and check out.
	Otherwise, we'll be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock.
	Thank you.

▲