All Episodes
Previous Next
April 4, 2022 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
01:33:00
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #363
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
*Music* Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Teatus for the 4th of April 2022.
I'm joined by Harry.
Hello.
And today we're going to be talking about your big TV. No.
No, not my big TV. Sorry, I'm having a small TV. Yes.
Harry has a big TV and we were joking about it beforehand.
Sorry.
Anyway, we're going to be talking about actually the TERFs on the March, or at least TERF March, very similar to Hell's March.
The 10,000 year queer empire.
Yes!
Domination!
What happens is the turfs march into your land and then the queer empire repels them.
And also the biggest threat to national security, which is neither the turfs or the queer empire.
For now.
It's instead the bad man.
You know the bad man.
Who cannot be named.
Anyway.
Stuff to mention first on the website, so the new things that went up over the weekend.
The first thing here being your article in defense of Martin Shkreli.
Yes, this was an interesting one.
I sort of set as a challenge for myself after the one I did on anti-monopoly laws and stuff like that was that I was talking about price gouging.
Rory suggested, hey, perhaps Martin Shkreli could be an example of that because for anyone unaware, he's the guy who back in 2015 massively raised the prices of Daraprim, which was Advertised as a life-saving AIDS drug, and the entire media establishment went against him, and I think he's in prison now for defrauding previous investors.
So I decided to look into it, into the whole situation, and came out with a rather controversial opinion, which is I don't actually think he individually could be held accountable for much that he did wrong when the pharmaceutical industry in America is kind of set up in a way that incentivizes very bad behavior.
I know there's a lot of supporters of his because he's such a mean lord as well.
Yeah, that was the other thing is that I looked through his old Twitter account and it's like, this guy's hilarious.
How can I hate him?
How could you hate him?
What's the thing with the Wu-Tang Clan?
Oh, Wu-Tang Clan for some reason in 2015 released an album called something about Shaolin monks or something and they only released one copy of it because they wanted to be And have it be like a prestige thing.
They put it up for auction and Martin Shkreli is the guy who bought it for $2 million.
Because I've seen the stream.
And the media went crazy at him.
And then he just goes, that's enough.
Yeah, that's pretty much...
It's kind of what I'd do.
You've got to tease people, don't you?
Anyway, so go and check out The Defense of Martin Shkreli.
That's free on the website.
If we go to the next one, we have some premium contents.
This is Contemplations, the philosophy of aesthetics.
So this is between Josh and I. I can't remember who else was the other one.
I think this might have been Thomas, actually.
So do go and check that one out.
And if we go to the next one, we have the Peninsula Wars with Carl and Bo going through the life of Napoleon.
That's being part four in the series.
So go and check that out as well.
Otherwise, I do have some other announcement to make, which is tomorrow we will be doing the book club live!
Yeah!
So, the Cultural Revolution, Frank...
Frank DeCotta?
Yeah, Frank DeCotta.
I thought he was Mark DeCotta there for a minute.
Anyway, so we're going to be doing that live, which is going to be good fun, and hopefully we'll try and make things more lively as well, because you'll be able to tell us what we're wrong, or funny comments.
The Cultural Revolution was very, very lively.
Also to mention the video comments, please keep them for 30 seconds maximum.
That is the rule.
Also, tomorrow we will have Lawrence Fox in the studio with Carl.
So if you want to send in some video comments directed at Lawrence, that probably would be helpful.
Although I have no idea what will happen.
Maybe they'll overrun and Carl ends up going, no video comments today, I don't know.
So covering my ass there.
But also, if you want to send one in for him, that's what will be happening tomorrow.
So please do, because also I'd like to see some funny stuff.
Anyway, without further ado...
Turf March.
Yeah.
So you know Hell's March.
Well, now we have Turf March.
Yeah.
The Turfs are on the March.
And what are they up to?
Well, in the UK, Turf Island, as it is known by the Yanks, we are having quite the time.
so if we go to the first link here we can see the biggest new paper in the uk the daily mail a bunch of smear merchants but they also did decide to lead with this story exclusive the brave women launching what they call the most significant female movement since the suffragettes as you can see respect my sex if you want my vote being the slogan there i can't believe that the significant female movement of our time is just yes women exist Yes.
This is how far we have fallen.
Before women were going like, we deserve the vote, now they're going, yes, we exist.
I'm very much in favour of this, because as the same in all of the Anglosphere nations, women as a group predominantly vote left, as in just, I think it's like 55% to 45%, something like that.
It's not huge.
I wouldn't be surprised.
But you know, it is what it is.
But also the fact that, well, reality is important, and the left has completely abandoned reality on this point.
And in which case, no votes for you.
Very much in favour.
I think the Tufts are doing a good thing here.
I'd love to see it play out.
If we go to the next one, we actually have an opening spread in the biggest newspaper in the UK as well, saying here, respect my sex if you want my vote.
And then, it's wonderful.
Oh, this was actually written by Mayor Forstater as well.
Yes.
A lady who was taken to a tribunal over saying that women are women.
I believe she was the woman who J.K. Rowling came out in defence of that led to the whole cancelling in the first place, wasn't she?
Yeah.
I love how she starts off the article with just saying, can women have a penis?
That's the opening line.
We won't go through the whole thing.
The question of our time.
That's the biggest question in British politics.
We'll go through the whole thing.
It's pretty much, I imagine, arguments that many people would have already heard.
But I will check out a section here called, What is a Woman?
An easy question for many, but not for these politicians.
And they have a list of politicians.
I'm going to read some of them.
Because they're all leftists.
And it's all amazing.
Because of course it is.
Emily Thornberry, her response to What is a Woman?
People are complex, and they are different.
It is up to your listeners to decide if I have given a full answer.
Schrodinger's woman.
I guess you figure it out.
No, but also just they're complex.
I hope that's been enough of an answer.
No, it wasn't.
That's the answer that people straw man Tim Pool is giving.
Ah, you know, it's just complicated, man.
Woman, man.
That's Labour frontbench.
I haven't heard Tim Pool's actually take on this, so I don't know.
No, I know.
I was just talking.
Tim Pool in general is kind of straw man.
Every subject.
He's like, eh, it's complicated.
Fence, yes.
Lisa Nandy, another Labour frontbench.
What does she go with?
I think trans women are women, and they should be accommodated in a prison of their choosing.
The Labour Party.
Pro-rape.
Fantastic.
Because that's what that leads to.
We've done this in the UK. And it did lead to this.
I mean, it's not funny, really.
Do pedophiles get to choose to be in juvenile detention centres, you know?
You just get to choose your own now, guys.
Trans children are children.
That's late party policy.
We then have the Welsh nationalists, also leftists, because nationalism in the UK is a meme.
Plaid Cymru, so I'd go with, some women have penises, some women have vaginas.
Okay.
Okay.
Didn't answer the question.
Again.
Just, if you want to be a woman, you can.
Right.
The left also.
Again.
Failing.
Nadia Whittem, she went with, the Labour Party should educate those who are ignorant rather than ideological, and if they don't respond to education, transphobes should be expelled.
The re-education camp policy.
And they specifically state we are re-educating you into our ideological foundations.
Yes.
Okay.
The ignorance.
Whereas those who ideologically disagree with us, the counter-revolutionaries, the TERFs, they have to be expelled.
The feminist roaders.
Presumably just from the party, these feminist roaders will be sent out, but maybe from all of society, maybe they'll be sent to a concentration camp where they can concentrate very hard on what is a woman.
Pfft.
Anyway, that's Nadia Wittem, that's a Labour MP. Cool, cool.
And then we have David Lammy, who decided to go with, those who want to deny male access to women's spaces are dinosaurs who want to hoard rights.
All of these rights are mine, yes!
It's like the liberal value that the number of rights equal to the number of people.
David Lammy, of course, doesn't agree with this.
No, no human rights for you.
Stay away.
You can just make up these rights.
Like, these people, like, they imagine that women are like Smaug, just sat on that gigantic mountain of rights.
He's not entirely wrong in that aspect, because, of course, this is the modern predicament we're in.
I mean, women do be gold digging sometimes, but...
Well, in regards to rights, women have rights to women's only spaces, rightfully, and they should defend those rights.
Men don't have those kind of protections, but they should, and they should exercise them where they can as well.
But to say that the worldview should be that we only have certain rights for some groups and not for others, and therefore you can hoard these things...
Well, that is the left-wing worldview.
The right-wing worldview is we have the equal number of rights to the economic people.
Men and women should have those rights to gender-only spaces, whereas the left-wing worldview is not that.
So what you're telling me is David Lammy MRA confirmed?
Yeah.
I don't think so.
I think he wants the rights hoarded amongst trans women and no one else.
Well, I choose to believe.
What I was programmed to believe.
I love you, trauma.
Anyway, but the best one in here, and I've saved it for last because it is the best one, is Sadiq Khan, Mayor of London.
Go to the next link, you can see his response.
The questioner asks, do you think some women have male reproductive organs?
Khan responded, you're in danger of inciting hatred against people by asking that question.
Big brain, Tate.
Big brain.
If you dare ask the question, do women have penises?
You're inciting hatred.
And that's not just Khan being a blowhard.
In the UK, that's a crime.
And he's the Mayor of London, the head of the Met Police, effectively.
Threatening the interviewer with that question, which is just saying, by asking that question, do you want to be investigated, comrade?
That's not proper.
It's not proper to ask such things.
It's like old footage of people like Lauren Southern going through Muslim districts of Australia and the police come up and be like, no, you can't be asking Muslims questions.
Why not?
Because you just can't.
You'll incite hatred.
Against who?
What will happen?
No, you're at fault here.
My hatred against you, love.
Yeah.
That's the police for you.
If we go to the next one, we can see at least one, I don't know, there's Rosie Duffield here, a now rightist, I'm told, by the left, which is her saying that she's come out and supported this movement, saying respect my sex if you want my vote.
She's likely to die on her knees, though, because she runs in Canterbury, which is where I went to university, and the vote there is entirely controlled by the university.
To your body, sorry.
Good luck to her.
Probably not gonna go well.
But even then, don't really like her, because she also said that dressing up as a geisha was cultural appropriation, and the local bar that did that should be shut down.
This is the thing that a lot of people point out as well, which is that a lot of the TERFs, or the classical feminists, are kind of opened up the gateway to a lot of the absolute nonsense that we have to suffer through nowadays.
And I think that's a rightful criticism.
I don't know much about Maya's perspective on this, but on Rosie's perspective, I can absolutely say has her being my MP. I wrote to her about Count Dankula when we ran the campaign.
She just ignored my emails, calls, everything.
Like, right, yeah, just come.
And then she tried to shut down our local bar because they dared to do something which was un-PC. Okay, and now you're on the other side of the PC barrier.
These people only care about these issues when it wraps back around to affecting them again.
Rosie, I see that as an individual.
Yeah, well, with people like Rosie.
Anyway, moving forward, we can all see JK Rowling decide to step in all this as well because she decided to make another storm.
This time around, she found a video.
The video is someone, presumably transgender, I think I've looked up this person, Faye, because I sent you this, and yeah, I think the person is transgender, and also homicidally violent, if her words are to be believed.
Don't you know it's impossible to tell if someone's transgender?
Oh, I forgot, I forgot!
But yes, the homicidally violent is definitely true.
As you can see there, there's two images from a video she made.
Uh, she.
As I killed hearse, JK Harroling, I hope you fit in a hearse.
So this is JK Rowling responding to that by saying, I'm afraid I can't give a shout out to everyone promising to murder me.
One day.
But there are so many of you.
And I'm a busy woman.
But this one deserves a mention for the 90s rave vibe.
And...
So, in her next book, she should do it on the acknowledgements page.
Just every single death threat that she's received.
Just a warm thank you to Faye and...
I can't note them all, but here's all the ones beginning with A. It's just like the A section.
There's like 300 extra pages in the book.
So there's that.
If we go to the next link, we can see it's some crappy music video in which this person has tried to be...
Again, I agree with Chris Reagan on this, which is just, stop with the political music videos.
Honestly, they never seem to work.
They're also just cringe.
Yeah, no matter the...
A death threat aspect of it, but you can argue.
Yes, the call and incitement to violence.
As rightists, we have definitely been on the side of pro-freedom, and therefore in regards to these sort of things in the past and today, it's sort of, I don't care about this in the sense of the law should not be involved.
Like, society can judge this as they will, but whatever.
However, this is not how the world works in the UK.
These sort of things are meant to be taken seriously by the police, regardless of how political world should be.
However, of course, this doesn't matter because it's progressive and therefore is allowed to stick around, not only in the YouTube sphere, but also in the legal sphere as well.
And there's also the obvious question of what if a person who was non-progressive did this in the reverse, talking about how they would put some trans icon in a hearse and would kill them?
I don't think that would go down very well.
No, and there's the obvious point, the double standard, as Rosethorn points out, the friend-enemy dichotomy here.
Two tiers of morality, never forget, because she's on the side of the progressives.
The progressive, well, cathedral that runs our civilization will do everything to protect her, and will do nothing to silence such things as well, regardless of your views on what should be.
Can we move forward?
I want to say the friend-enemy dichotomy, some of it seems utterly stupid as well.
We had a discussion about this in the office.
You end up defending political anchors because they're on the same ideological team, such as person calling for death, for example, or the hashtag kill all white men lady.
Remember her?
Stuff like that.
To a certain extent, I can understand the desire for the friend-enemy distinction, because when you see leftists, it is very tempting to look at them and go...
Quite a few of them seem to really want me and a lot of people I admire dead.
But at the same time, you still need to apply what I would describe as objective moral values if you're going to avoid double standards.
I think the interest from the right of the friend-enemy distinction is that it's amazing to see the left walking a phalanx.
And it is impressive how they can just target someone and absolutely destroy them all together.
And that is impressive, but it also leads to them defending pedophiles because they're leftists and therefore part of the team.
One of us!
Yeah, so just a terrible idea for a worldview from what I can see here.
If we move forward, we can also see the fact that this is an article that made it into the national press here.
Twitter allows fey fandom trans attack on J.K. Rowling.
This call for death, as it's been put in the press.
Remember, nuance doesn't matter.
After Count Dankula, that is not an aspect of British law.
The context of your video is not important, according to British law, or at least according to the case of Count Dankula.
And if we go forward, we can see another case of this, in which you may remember, hashtag kill all the white men, Raoul.
This is where a student diversity officer decided to tweet out hashtag kill all the white men.
I would feel very safe in that student body.
I'm for diversity.
Kill all the white men.
Yeah, I mean, I'm sort of numb to this.
I mean, plus it was a while ago.
You kind of expect this these days.
It's quaint to think that this was actually taken seriously at one point by the police because it was a death threat.
And the police were actual police at the time.
And we're like, yeah, I don't care if she's a progressive.
We should probably investigate this.
And they did, even though the laws are terribly written.
And they did.
And what did they get?
Well, we go to the next one.
We can see that now they found nothing because the police have now changed as well.
And there you are.
I mean, this is the kind of police force that will not enforce the laws in one way, but if you dare make a Nazi pug video, you're going to get locked up sunshine.
I just love this.
Do you remember this video?
I think I've seen her at some point.
Wait, was that the compilation of all of the police officers saying, like, I'm an ally.
I'm an ally.
I'm an ally.
But this is some, like, 45-year-old lady who just looks like a dimmy in his life.
She just looks confused.
I'm wearing this rainbow, which means I'm an ally.
She just looks sad.
Like, she doesn't even want to be there.
Well, it's because she's having to pledge her allegiance to an ideology she probably doesn't even understand, but she knows that if she doesn't, she's in trouble.
Gonna get cut from the force.
Just look at all the...
There's rainbows on her tie, there's rainbows on the lapel, there's rainbows on the lapels on the sides.
There's rainbows behind her.
I mean, the police force is what it is now.
It is not a force for...
Especially ironic, given that this is English police.
We hardly ever get rainbows.
Yes, as well.
If we move forward, we can also see the Turf March is being supported by GB News here.
So this is a lady who went on there to support it there saying, not only is science under attack, but free speech is under attack.
The truth is under attack.
Absolutely true.
And also, good for Andrew Doyle there giving these people a platform to come and talk about this.
If we move forward, we can also see the fact that J.K. Rowling decided to launch up another clip that went viral, which is about the fact that this period in history is going to be seen incredibly poorly in the future.
Probably rightfully as well.
I won't be looking back on it with rose-tinted glasses, I'll say that for sure.
No.
I mean, the TERFs have done the right thing here.
We've done the right thing.
All the people saying that, maybe don't transition kids.
Maybe don't be obsessed with such things.
Because they're kids.
Maybe stop putting sexual identities on children as well while you're at it.
Maybe just give that a try, guys.
Bare minimums.
I know it's hard for leftists not to sexualise children, but you could give it a try.
Yeah, well apparently they didn't.
Of course they didn't.
And Tavistock being a great example of this.
And J.K. Rowling promoted this clip in which a chap, Dr.
David Bell here, decided to come out and just say all of the problems with this culture in very stark terms.
So let's play this.
There's a 4,000% explosion in presentations of children with gender dysphoria, that is children who have a psychological disturbance in relation either to their sexual body.
There are a number of pathways to this, and there'd been a great pressure to affirm these children as being trans, for example, when they present, without appropriate expiration.
35% of these children are on the autistic spectrum.
A large number of these children, and this has been acknowledged by the LGB Alliance, a large number of these children are gay and lesbian children who are suffering in relation to their sexual orientation and need to be helped to understand themselves better.
So that is, they have what we call an internalised homophobia.
They hate themselves, they hate their sexual body, and they want to get out of it.
What is really, really important in these instances is to recognise the terrible suffering of these children and not to precipitately label them as trans and put them on a medical pathway which has irreversible consequences.
So there you see.
There's the argument.
Very interesting.
Interestingly enough, a few years ago, if people had been talking about, you know, internalised homophobia and internalised this and that, I probably would have laughed at them.
But I think...
With all of the evidence that's piling up regarding these trans kids, the argument is becoming much stronger than it used to be.
I don't know, man.
He could be a quack doctor.
Oh, God.
He's probably one of those misinformation doctors again.
He's just making stuff up.
He has no expertise in the field whatsoever.
Except, of course, he does.
If he goes to the next link, John, you can load up the fact the Guardian article just saying that...
No, he's actually one of the Tavistock whistleblowers.
Oh, which automatically discredits him in the eyes of some.
People who don't know, Tavistock is the group within the NHS, or at least the clinic which is made for transitioning kids, because that's normal, state-funded.
And he just came out and became a whistleblower along with loads of other people saying, yeah, these people are nuts that I'm working with.
Like, they're obsessed with transitioning children for ideology, not for healthcare at all.
And, yeah, I mean, 4,000% increase...
That's normal.
One of the arguments that people always put forward is, well, you know, they still have to go through all of these testing, they need to go through these conversations.
Isn't he one of the guys who came out and was like, oh no, these conversations are basically just...
Are you cool?
You're a girl that likes football?
Oh, boy.
Yeah, I mean, some of them were, I think the lowest was like 30, what is it, 35 minutes?
Someone had on a Zoom call before they were given the hormones.
It's just like, it's an absolute esch show of an organization.
But also the point he makes about the homophobia as well being apparently completely true, which is you get parents from all kinds of cultural backgrounds, I won't say which ones, Saying that their son or daughter definitely isn't gay, because that would be haram.
So they're trans.
They must be a woman instead.
Yeah, just Allah got the body wrong.
Not like that's, you know, standard practice over in some countries or anything.
This isn't just Islamic, of course, but the best example of this in practice, in law, is of course in Iran, in which this is the case.
If you were caught having homosexual sex, or even a rape victim of homosexuals, well, rape, you have the option in the court of death penalty or transition.
So lose your head or lose your...
So people go with the second one.
They go with the obvious choice, sadly enough.
So that is also just a reality.
If we move forward, we can also see, speaking of hoarding rights, as Mr.
Lammy put it, this story made me laugh.
So we load this up, you can see I'm a hypocrite loading up this, which is, Widows to keep marriage veto.
Women whose husbands want to become transgender will not be trapped in same-sex partnerships Liz Truss has pledges.
Oh, good job there wouldn't be same-sex in the first place.
That's just, we've got to veto on transitioning.
So, women whose husbands want to transition will be able to veto the change, Minister for Equalities and Women, Liz Truss, has promised.
They're stealing my rights as a man again!
They're stealing my rights as a man to become a woman!
So, it's weird framing here, because as they mentioned, the current law actually is for both, it seems.
So, if your wife wants to transition as well, you have veto over that in the sense of Oh, okay.
Not in, you can't do that because I'm the man of the house.
That's not British law yet.
But you can't do that and keep the marriage.
So the marriage has to be redone if the partner wants to transition.
So that right will be kept within law.
Why are we humoring all of this when we're having to come up with all of this nonsense to go along with it?
You'd think.
But that's the thing.
Like, she's the women's minister for the Conservatives.
And she's like, yeah, I think we should maybe keep that right.
Apparently the leftist parties are all pushing for...
No, no, no, no, no.
Like, if you're married to your wife and your wife wants to become a man, nope.
You can't do anything about it.
You can't get unmarried.
You have to just live with your husband.
Yeah, it's like, you marry the person you meet, it's like with, because I have to say, Elliot Page, and his wife got divorced, I think, because his wife was like, well, I married a woman, I'm a lesbian, I don't like penises, goodbye.
Yeah, and apparently this is being smeared as a spousal veto.
Like, good.
I pray to God that it stays there.
Oh my God, my partner will get a say in the marriage?
No!
I should bloody well hope so.
I mean, if you're married to a woman, then she says, actually, I'm a man.
I mean, also, if you divorce me, I'm going to take half your stuff now.
It does seem unfair.
No, she'll be able to just cancel the whole thing.
If they end up both men, who gets the half...
I don't know.
What if you transition as well?
Just claim you're a woman.
So then you get half of their stuff for the rest of your life.
Yes!
We found a way to play the system, boys.
The framing here is, of course, it's a special privilege for women here, although that's not it in law.
I wouldn't be surprised if the law is changed and then men get messed over there, which, to be honest, I don't think the conservatives will have the spine to offend.
If we move forward, we can also see some more news in this aspect, which is the women have started rising up.
Which is good to see.
We did call for this, so I'm glad to see it.
Trans athletes must compete in a separate category or countless young women's sporting dreams will be smashed, Olympic gold medalist Nicole Cook says.
Fantastic!
I'm glad to see that some women in sport are starting to realise that there won't be any women's sport, the way this is going, and saying that, no, okay, you guys need a separate category, or this needs to just stop.
Like, we can't compete against men and have this be fair.
I've fallen this off with just a last aspect here, which is that LGBTQ are becoming less popular.
Could you guess why?
Well, I think we'll cover this in the next segment, but here's one quick reason, which is LGBTQI plus awareness dates.
We'll cover those in a minute, but I just want to demonstrate them here for a minute, just to see how many there are.
11 months of the year.
Fantastic.
If we go to USA Today, we can see the news on this, which is the number of Americans, 18 to 34, who are comfortable interacting with LGBTQ people, slipped from 53% in 2017 down to 45% in 2018.
The only age group to show a decline in this period.
I wonder if it's anything to do with this whole coming for our children business.
The Zoomers want you back in the closet, boys.
No, it's not to do with homosexual acceptance, I don't believe, in the slightest.
I think this is to do with the alphabets, again, which is just, they are a separate group from people who are people and gay.
Instead, they are the alphabets and only the alphabets.
Their lives are being queer, and that is it.
The beal and end of all their personalities.
Anyway, so that's the turf march, which is finally coming back.
I can see in the political sphere in the UK, which I'm really pleading goes well, because I want to see some groundswell on that one, but also on the sporting front, which is to say at least gold medalists coming out and saying, yeah, no, we're not competing with men.
It's not happening.
These people need their own category.
Good on them.
Yeah.
And with that, now that we've looked at the turf offensive, it's time to see the empire that they are fighting against.
The 10,000 year queer empire.
First...
Music playing already.
Yes, because I think as was hinted in that previous segment, the alphabets are trying to co-opt the entire calendar for celebrations of themselves.
And this has nothing to do with narcissism.
Nothing whatsoever.
But first, just a little bit of local news in the UK. Recently, there was the big controversy around conversion therapy, which has carried on.
As we can see here, the controversial practice of conversion therapy made headlines on Thursday after Prime Minister Boris Johnson U-turned on a pledge to ban it, before later backtracking following a furious reaction.
I believe the LGB Alliance had something to do with the initial decision to U-turn.
We should probably explain the U-turn as well, because I imagine if there's some Americans joining us...
Yes, Americans watching might have a very particular idea of conversion therapy.
Mike Pence and his electric zappers and whatnot.
Milo Yiannopoulos.
That doesn't happen here.
At least there are no significant cases of that happening at all in the UK. The conversion therapy as it existed in the UK was counselling, in the sense of if you were gay and you were an adult and wanted to talk to someone and say, I want to be straight, like Milo Yiannopoulos, That's legal.
Yes.
You were allowed to do that.
Purely opt-in.
Because it's all consenting adults and they're just talking.
But the government decided they would make this illegal because it's...
It hurts people's feelings.
...against human rights of the person who consented to it.
Very confusing.
It's all purely ideological, of course.
Conversion therapy, they describe in the Evening Standard here, is the use of methods such as aversive stimulation or religious counselling to change or suppress a person's sexual orientation.
As we mentioned, just counselling.
I don't know what aversive stimulation means.
Does that mean they show you pictures of buff nude men and administer an electric shock or something?
Because I've not heard of anything like that going on on these shores.
There was a consultation done at the time of this bill, and they couldn't find any cases, so it seems that this does not exist in our aisles.
It's very interesting.
I actually tried to cover something like this for my university project a few years ago, back when I was still in university.
Got in touch with Stonewall, got in touch with a load of forums to try and find anybody who had gone through conversion therapy in the UK. Could not find anybody.
And that's when I started to think, hmm...
Maybe this is a bit of a manufactured outrage, perhaps.
But carrying on, it is also used in an attempt to betray trans people to alter their gender identity to correspond with the sex that they had at birth.
Well, the fact of the matter is if leftists are to be believed that gender dysphoria, being a medical condition, isn't necessary for someone to be trans and it's just a state of mind, why couldn't you just be talked out of that state of mind?
This is the question they can never really answer.
And on Thursday evening, a leaked Downing Street briefing paper seen by ITV News showed that Mr.
Johnson had dropped plans for the ban, but just hours later, following outrage from LGBT campaigners and health charities, Number 10 U-turned again with a senior government source quoted as saying the ban would feature in the next Queen's speech.
And I'm sure the Queen can't wait for that one, so she can get round to pledging her own allegiance to the alphabet constitution.
Community.
I just can't imagine the cream being like, yes, I will no longer go to those sessions.
Me and Maggie are announcing...
However, it was reported that the legislation would cover only gay conversion therapy, not trans.
So, if you're gay, you're not allowed to do it, but if you're trans, you are allowed to do it.
And I don't think there's a reason for that distinction, personally.
I think if you want, you should be able to speak to your doctor about anything like that.
I mean, that's the funny aspect, doesn't it?
Because all that's happening here is, it's weird, and I'm not going to take part in it anytime soon.
Either for the reverse version, which I'm sure will be offered at some point.
I'm glad to see that you're confident in your own identity, Callum.
Stunning and brave.
The idea that if you're gay and you want to be straight and you want to just talk to someone about this.
Okay, weird, but if you want to do it, that's illegal.
But if you're saying you want to be trans and you want to be talked into it, that's fine.
Yeah.
I can understand even from a gay perspective if it's like, well, I want my own biological children.
I see people with, like, a happy traditional family.
Maybe someone can talk me into it.
I don't think it'll be successful.
But, you know, if they want to go for it, go for it.
Who am I to judge, right?
I can show you women until you're not afraid anymore.
Like they're just cowering in fear at the pictures.
But what does the government have to say about this in regards to the actual numbers of conversion therapy?
Because they did a research piece on this, the prevalence of conversion therapy in the UK. So the best evidence available on the extent of conversion therapy in the UK comes from the National LGBT Survey from 2017.
Yes, because we have one of those.
We have members of the government tracking the amount of gay people in the country because this is a very pressing matter.
It shows that.
Keeping track of them.
You know, the German government doesn't collect data on race.
Oh yeah.
Because of Germany.
And they're worried about that.
So whenever I hear it, it's like, oh, we've got all the statistics on Sergei's.
We have your exact numbers.
We know exactly where they are.
Sorry.
We've got trackers on them now.
It shows that 5% of respondents said they had been offered conversion in an attempt to cure them of being lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender in their lifetime.
A further 2% said they had undergone conversion therapy.
4% of transgender respondents said they had undergone conversion therapy.
And 8% reported having been offered it.
So, just from the figures alone there, the percentages, you can imagine that these are...
Pretty small figures.
And if you were to take the respondents as reflective of the entire population of LGBT people within the UK, I tried to figure out some numbers.
So if we were to take it as representative, that would mean that 165,000 people have been offered conversion therapy and less than 100,000 have gone through it.
The government estimates in the UK that there are between 200,000 and 500,000 trans people in the UK, which I think sounds like a pretty lofty estimate.
Sounds like you're taking in a lot of what's referred to as trans-trenders into that.
But, you know, I'll take the upper limit on that.
So that would mean about 20,000 trans people have gone through conversion therapy.
And that's it.
So even if I were to take the absolute top numbers...
That still sounds way too high in my opinion.
It still does sound way too high.
And that's if you take the data as being accurate and completely representative.
The trans may also be including consultation on gender dysphoria as conversion therapy, of course, because this is all qualitative data.
I'm going out and asking, have you had conversion therapy?
If in your head you think that time your doctor went, are you sure?
Are you sure about this?
That's conversion therapy.
That counts.
So there you go.
But...
The main subject of this segment is, as we pointed out before, the queer calendar.
Click on this again for me, John, just so we can take a nice look through some of these.
So, I just want to take a look through some, specifically, but I thought I would highlight a few that I've not gotten in any great detail.
Mainly being December 1st, World AIDS Day.
Which sounds like, uh, do you want an early present for Christmas?
No, it's a proper...
I mean, it's not a holiday.
It's a celebration!
No, it's a day to raise money for AIDS research and whatnot.
Yeah, no, that's fair.
I just think a lot of the optics of quite a few of these days, like a bisexual visibility day.
Does that mean I have to walk down the street with a woman on one arm and a man on the other, you know?
No, I think the bi people have to walk out with just their underwear.
So they know who they are.
They have to wear arm bands, maybe.
Yeah, they have to wear a special badge, you know, something like that.
The pink triangle.
But this is to make it very clear that for whatever reason, the queer lobby has managed to appropriate about half the calendar by the looks of it.
Because these also include certain months in the entirety of months.
Because one of the things that's confused me is that in the UK, for whatever reason, we seem to have two whole months dedicated to gay people and LGBT people.
Because we've got here...
It's not enough.
Obviously, obviously it's not enough.
Our precious gays are worth more than two months away.
What I'm saying is we need at least half the year dedicated in totality.
Our precious, precious gays.
I'm going to go for three quarters.
Oh my god, well I'll up you four fifths.
How about that, hey?
For this compromise.
So if we move along, we can see that in the UK, we've got LGBT Plus History Month is every February, and in America is also...
I think it's Black History Month in America, and then we swap it in October.
So we do Black History Month in October, they do LGBT Plus in October.
God, all these celebrations are very confusing.
But in June, we also have Pride Month.
Move along, John.
So, and this is a CBBC article.
That's the children.
Yeah, that's the BBC for children telling the children about what Pride Month is, why you should jump up onto all of those floats and get involved, probably.
It is the BBC, after all.
June is Pride Month, a month dedicated to celebrating LGBTQ plus communities all around the world, which sounds an awful lot like LGBT History Month, but okay.
Pride is usually celebrated with big parades and marches.
Once again, why is this on CBBC? Why do the children need to know this?
And what is the state-mandated education, mate?
Evidently.
What is the tangible difference between these two months in the way that they're celebrated, other than, like, in February, do I have to take a moment of silence to remember all those gay people out there?
Whereas in Pride, I have to take it to the streets?
Why do we need two months for this?
I think one's a solemn occasion to remember the Stonewall riots, and the other one is a celebratory occasion to remember the Stonewall riots.
Yes, it makes a lot of sense, yes.
We've also got Zero Discrimination Day, if we carry on.
Zero Discrimination Day, every other day of the year, it's allowed.
It's open season?
It's open season, babies.
Did I miss this?
Yes.
That's the 1st of March, oh damn it.
Claudia Webb, still on Twitter.
1st of March, no one is born to hate, we are taught to hate.
Let us take out time today on Zero Discrimination Day to pledge to rise above all forms of prejudice.
So every other day it's allowed.
I'm sorry.
Also coming from Claudia Webb.
Our friendly neighbourhood acid enthusiast is here to tell you about why you shouldn't discriminate against people.
Yeah, who taught you acid, Claudia?
Who taught you the hate that led to you throwing that acid, Claudia?
Bleach lady.
She threatened to throw it, we should say, before she sues the hell out of us.
I also just like the concept of Zero Discrimination Day, like the idea that if one single person is discriminated against, the day is failed.
It's been a complete bust.
Guess we'll get it next year, guys.
One Modern Warfare game goes with an N-word and the whole thing's done.
Yep, I guess so.
Bad luck, guys.
We'll get them next time.
This is, of course, being shown in schools as well.
I've got screenshots in the next tweet.
Click on that image for me.
This is Winchester School.
Ask the kid.
I know, I know.
But move along to the next image, John.
They've got a big slide here, talking zero discrimination against women and girls, and the little yellow block at the bottom is kind of difficult to make out on the screen, but it says, I assume it's been blocked off a little bit, but it says, a future where women lead the way to make peace with the Earth, or we are not going to have a human future at all.
Which sounds a little bit like a threat.
Like, the Earth is trying to kill us.
Sounds an awful like you're discriminating against all of those men who want to make peace with the Earth.
The men only make war with the Earth.
I don't know, I feel like we've already failed at zero discrimination today, guys.
But also, I love the framing of the idea that the Earth is trying to kill the men.
We're in an endless war.
Whereas the women can negotiate the peace.
Do the women have to jump in front as human shields?
No!
Not my precious men!
I love the chat, it's just like, throw acid, not hate.
Hashtag thoughts and pros.
Thank you, Claudia Webb, really setting the standard for us.
We've also got Aromantic Spectrum Awareness Week.
We need a full week for this.
Is that a perfume smell?
The celebration of aromantic spectrum experiences and identities.
Because you can't just be aromantic, it's also on a spectrum, guys.
Aromantic?
Does that mean you don't love you?
We've got a useful little definition here.
aromanticism is a romantic orientation which describes people whose experiences of romance is disconnected from normative, there's buzzword, get a buzzword in there, societal expectations, often due to experiencing little to no romantic attraction, or sometimes feeling repulsed by romance or being uninterested in romantic relationships. or sometimes feeling repulsed by romance or being uninterested in So basically, either you're mentally ill or just very selfish.
You can have sex with me.
You've got an insect brain.
Basically, it's the Black Widow perspective.
You can have sex with me, but if you'd show me any affection, I'm repulsed by it.
How dare you?
It's a very, very negative way to approach the world, I would say.
And Aromantic Spectrum Awareness Week is an annual international event meant to spread awareness and acceptance of aromantic spectrum identities, one moment, and the issues we face, as well as making more people aware of our existence while celebrating it.
Yes, because...
This is what it always comes down to.
We need to be seen.
We need people to be aware of our existence, because I'm definitely not a narcissist.
I just need everyone looking at me in this room constantly at all times, or else I'm going to screech.
But also, they're presenting this like it's a sexuality, but when you read that, all I think of is mental illness.
Like, you've clearly got a mental disorder if you can't engage in romance, right?
I can't physically feel romance towards somebody else.
That's a disability.
You have no ability to understand romance, right?
That's not a sexuality.
Well, I think you'll find that mental illnesses are all the chic right now, and if we further pathologize them as being sexualities, then that adds to our progressive point quota, so...
If we want to examine the spectrum as well, we've got this handy dandy guide in this next tweet that I've got up here, which is aromanticism as an orientation is a spectrum.
And we've got these lovely little definitions of other aspects of aromanticism, including demiromantic, which is experiencing romantic attraction after forming an emotional bond.
After forming an emotional bond is when you feel romance.
Yes, that's normal.
That's normal.
You don't need to call that a special word.
That's just being normal.
And then there is grey aromantic, which rarely experiences romantic attraction or only experiences it under certain circumstances.
You mean like finding someone that you form an emotional bond and connection with, which is also normal.
I don't walk into the office and automatically feel romantic attraction to everybody I encounter, sadly.
I know, Callum, I'm sorry.
But that's just not how it works.
They've just come up with special names for normal things.
The person who sits in that seat I'm attracted to?
What do you mean certain circumstances?
I don't understand.
So, Callum, I guess it means that you and I are both on the aromantic spectrum, as well as probably a few other spectrums.
Big spectrum.
Yeah, yeah.
We've also got Gay Uncles Day.
Being a man with a gay uncle myself, I think he would be horribly patronised to find that this exists.
You didn't make him a cake for Gay Uncles Day?
No, I think he would throw that cake back in my face if I were to do that.
He'd be like, what is this?
But I'm an out and proud gay uncle, or gunkle, which...
Sounds very strange to me.
It's not a great word.
I wouldn't call myself that.
I wouldn't either.
I have three nieces and three nephews.
They often refer to me as a sparent, spare parent, or punk, professional uncle, no kids.
For the love of God, don't mix those two words together.
We were joking about this earlier.
I'm the spunk that keeps the family together.
Oh, no, no.
Gay Uncles Day, also known as Guncles Day, please stop using that word, is celebrated on the second Sunday in August.
Yes, it's a thing.
August 8th, 2021 is the next Gay Uncles Day.
I assume it was the second Sunday this August, so look out for that, all gay uncles out there.
The idea for the day came from CJ Hatter of Florida, who made a Facebook post on May 8th, 2016 that said, Sounds a lot like just being an uncle.
Yeah.
Really?
I mean, I can actually appreciate the idea here, but the thing is, there's always so lackluster these days, isn't it?
Where's the gay uncle cookies?
Where's the gay uncle celebration-y stuff to go with it?
Why does there need to be a day for this in the first place?
It's arbitrary, isn't it?
If you're a great uncle, surely your nieces and nephews will probably celebrate that just in and of itself.
You don't need a special day when they're allowed to.
I'm not opposed to more culture, let's say, but you could have Easter and you've got the Easter eggs and whatnot.
There's nothing here whatsoever.
But, this does also mean, the guy came up with it, it was just a Facebook post, I can come up with any random holidays as well.
We do have International Men's Day, but, seeing as we can keep branching it into smaller and smaller categories, I personally feel left out.
So I hereby announce that today, the 4th of April, from this day henceforth, is going to be known as Tall Man's Day.
Celebrating all men over six foot tall.
These are the rules.
I can do this now.
I am currently being oppressed by small door frames, overhanging tree branches, and Tudor buildings.
Liberation from the hobbit holes, my friends.
We can do this!
Take the power back!
We're going to fight you every step of the way.
Yeah, well, we'll just step over you.
Take long strides to victory, my brethren.
Let's start making five-foot doorways now, just to annoy you.
If you do, if you do, God help you.
There are, as has been pointed out, some more legitimate ones, to be fair, like we've got from 2019...
Pete in the show just be like, Larry!
Oh god, I'm triggering Pete a lot recently, aren't I? But we've got some that are more legitimate than others, I would say, like Pulse Remembrance Day.
I didn't know what this was at first.
And then we've got Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida talking about Pulse Remembrance Day, which seems to be more localized to Florida because it's talking about the shooting that happened at the Pulse Club back in 2016.
So I can get behind a Remembrance Day almost for these people that happened in this local area because it happened in Florida.
It's something that's awful that happened in Florida.
So I think fair play.
Please don't tell me they turned this into an international day of celebration.
Well I mean it's listed on the calendar so...
In the Muslim world, they celebrate differently.
Yeah, there's quite a few other ones.
We've also got Bisexual Health Awareness Month.
I won't really go through any of this.
We've also got the most recent one, Transgender Day of Visibility, that happened a few days ago, which was an event to recognise the contributions made to the state by transgender and gender non-conforming individuals.
That was happening, and once again, this is just another case of it's like, if these people have achieved something, you don't need to celebrate their sexuality.
Celebrate the achievement!
Well, it's not even a sexuality, just the wording.
The identity, yes.
Day of visibility just makes me think of the question, do women have penises?
Like, that's gotta be what it is.
It just makes me feel that all the rest of the year, they're just wearing invisibility cloaks, and on this day, they just, ha ha!
They pop into existence.
And then we also have Transgender Day of Remembrance, which is annual observation to honour the memory of transgender people whose lives were lost in acts of anti-transgender violence.
Not in the Great War?
No, not in the Great War.
We don't take a minute silence for all the trans people who died in the Great War.
But of course, there's not enough.
There's not enough days for trans people.
Move along, I found this amusing tweet saying that, can we get Transgender Day of Joy?
I get the importance of visibility and remembrance, obviously.
But what about just feeling happiness and who we are?
It will never be enough.
Remember, it will never be enough.
To be fair, they did leave a few things out.
You might need to be careful with the next page here, John, because I don't see them listing anything about National Masturbation Day.
What?
National Masturbation Day.
Also seen November.
Yes, the first National Masturbation Day was May 7th, 1995, after a sex-positive retailer, Good Vibrations, great name, declared the day in honour of Surgeon General Jocelyn Elders, who was fired by President Bill Clinton in 1994 for suggesting masturbation be part of the sex education curriculum for students.
So they're celebrating the memory of somebody who said, let's teach kids to masturbate.
That says a lot.
I can kind of understand why they're leaving it out of the calendar, actually.
Also, how Democrats have changed in the past.
Bill Clinton was like, no.
Are you kidding me?
I'm with Bill Clinton on this one.
Shockingly enough, I also find myself with Bill Clinton.
I had a bit more on this segment as well, but it's probably going on too long now, so I think that's where I'll end it.
But just remember that this is what's coming for us.
We are all now part of the 10,000 year queer empire.
It's just like every day of the year is going to become a queer holiday, to the point that it just lasts forever for 10,000 years.
Is that your vision of the future?
Yes, and what's wrong with that, Callum?
A queer boot on a man's face.
You're not taking part of the turf marches, are you?
I certainly am.
We will crush the turf marches, sir!
Moving on to the bad man.
The bad man, the man whose name we cannot name because of, uh, we're living in a free country, decides to go on holiday.
He decided to go on holiday to Mexico with his kids because, well, why not?
As you can see here, there's an Arthur's rendition of what he had in mind for the afternoon, which is, uh, bad man being a suntan and asking for an Uno Biro and a large portion of chips, please, lass.
This is me whenever I'm in Spain.
This is true.
This is how every Englishman sees our beautiful times of the year when we go on holiday.
This is how we take our beautiful culture out into the rest of the world.
Perfection.
The best time of the year.
However, this is not how it went for the bad man.
If we get to the next one, we can see his Getter page.
And big thank you to Getter, of course, for him giving him a platform to be able to do this.
He says himself as well.
It's him saying, I've been arrested, separated from my three children, and I am being deported from Mexico as a matter of national security.
For what?
Talking about Islam.
You may know that the man likes to say quotes from the Quran.
He even wrote his own Quran, I think he called it Mohammed's Quran, where he just put it in chronological order, and the reason for that is because it just gets more and more violent over time.
That's not a surprise.
No.
So, this is his post here.
I don't know if you can scroll down to show the video, John.
We won't play all the videos because it'll probably get destroyed, but we'll play what we can.
And in this video, for example, he says that I can't buy a house, I can't open a bank account, can't even go to Mexico.
I mean, this is the state of his life for saying that Islam might not be compatible with the West, the Tony Blair position.
This is so prevalent now that he's been demonized for it that he can't even just go to Mexico, who you would think would be a country with more things to worry about than Islam.
He's a huge Muslim population in Mexico.
Yes.
He's going to rile them up immensely.
Apparently he's been there three times before as well, but this time, no, not allowed to visit.
If we go to the next one, we can actually see a video in question in which he's recording a conversation with presumably the border agents, and they say that, yeah, he is a national security threat.
Let's play.
Excuse me.
Excuse me, mate.
Excuse me.
Excuse me.
Yes, sir?
What reason?
What?
What reason?
That is confidential information from Mexico City.
From Mexico City?
National Security.
I don't know why.
We don't know that.
Okay.
Sorry, sir.
Sorry.
But it's coming from Mexico City for National Security.
Insane.
I've never broke a law here.
I've never done anything here.
Maybe that warning is only in Mexico.
I don't know.
Do you know all I do at home is I talk about Islam.
Ah, that was the reason.
For the United States, I can't say the word, but maybe for that reason, you are not...
Mexico don't allow you to intern to Mexico.
Maybe that is the reason.
Chris, we're talking about Islam.
There's no free speech in Mexico.
Only that.
Maybe it was that.
The borders open for Mexico to America.
The border's open for Mexico to America.
All the cartels just travel through.
Cartels can do what they want.
Yeah, so there you have it.
The border's from Mexico City.
You are a national security threat.
The guy saying all that must know is absolute BS. He doesn't sound like he had any conviction.
He's just like, yeah, you're a national security threat.
Yeah, let's talk about Islam.
Yeah, there you go.
He didn't speak perfect English, so I think he actually misconstrued Roblin Tomlinson saying that, as in, like, he promotes Islam, maybe, because he brings up, oh yeah, the United States may have problems with that.
I think the English wasn't perfect there.
But the aspect that was important was him saying, Mexico City sent us a message that you're a national security threat, so we're not letting you in.
Funny thing, though, it wasn't actually Mexico City that sent this.
It actually went deeper than this.
Of course, they got the message from Mexico City, but it was someone else involved.
If you go to the next one, you can also, the next link, you can see him saying that he had to say goodbye to his kids, who were also really upset.
He also met a couple of Kurds in the detention center with him as well.
Had a big old F-Isis moment there.
Very much F-Isis.
If you go to the next one, we can see that he also ended up saying that the kids are with a friend and they're safe.
Apparently the mother is now flying out to be with the kids because he's divorced from his wife because of all this.
Well, I don't know.
Harassment?
I don't even know what to call what's happened to him, frankly.
I mean, it's inhuman.
Demonization.
A campaign of hatred directed against him.
Yes, I think that's actually the right thing to call it.
The campaign of hatred against him.
I mean, to the point that we can't even safely say his name without worrying about the video being deleted because we live in a free country.
But the mother is flying out to then be with the kids to try and make sure they're safe as well.
He can't enter because he's a national security threat, of course.
But if we go to the next link, we can see that apparently Mexico City got their marching orders not from anyone in Mexico.
Literally zero people, zero Mexicans, had a problem with Romlin Tomlinson.
Well, yeah, why would they?
Because, like...
What issue is it of theirs that he says controversial things over here?
He's going to come over with his kids and order a beer and some chips.
He's going to say, Uno Biro.
Oh, how terrible.
Por favor, lass.
No, no one cared about that.
No one in Mexico, not even the central government, cared.
I mean, again, name the Muslim population of Mexico.
I mean, now I have to look at it beforehand.
Apparently it's like 2,000.
It's just, yeah.
I don't think it's many.
And that's in a country with a population of like over 100 million as well.
Yeah.
So, there's that.
Where did they get it from?
Apparently, the British government.
The British government contacted Mexico and told them not to let me in.
If this is not state harassment, then what is?
I'm probably going to need some help with legal advice as I'm stuck here in limbo.
If we play the next clip, we can see them interacting with the border again, and they seem to confirm it.
Can anyone give me the reason why I'm not allowed into Mexico?
Yeah.
But I explained you in the morning some alert from...
for...
An alert for national?
Maybe you have, I tell you, maybe you have some problem in your country with some police.
Oh, so has it come from my country?
Maybe you have some problem with your country alert to Mexico.
Oh, so my country alerted Mexico.
Is that definitely my country alerted Mexico?
My country contacted me.
My country?
Told you not to let me in.
My country contacted your country and said do not let me in.
How can they do that?
I tell you, you need to go to the embassy.
I will go to the embassy.
But how can they do that?
Is that right?
You ask.
Do you think that's right?
Because I was here with my children.
My three children have had their hearts broken.
They're still crying now.
They're still crying now.
They're messaging me now, crying.
Yeah, it's very bad, I know.
Okay, so my country contacted your country.
Yeah.
Again, just a tourist on holiday with his kids.
Yeah, there's no reason to do this.
Logically speaking, if you're the UK government and you're so scared of old Rumbly and you really hate him, surely you would want him to be in some other country as far away as possible from where you could stir up trouble.
But I think there's only one real way to explain this, which is that it's a message...
To him, and also to anybody else.
No matter where you go, we're going to continue to harass you, we'll continue the campaign of hate against you endlessly.
I mean, it's almost an obsession.
If this was your girlfriend or something, let's talk to you this much.
I mean, you'd get a restraining order.
Yeah.
But you can't get that from the British government.
No, as much as I wish I could.
But if we...
That's awful, as you can see.
But then he continues in here, which is, of course, his suspicions as to why they have such a boner for him, which is him saying that, well, be in Telford on the 7th of May for episode 2 of The Rape of Britain.
may remember we covered he did the rape of britain one his first documentary on the rape of britain in telford and it was very successful for him and now he's doing the second episode and we'll be doing a third as well so the second episode will be on the 7th of may i'm sure me and john will probably end up up there again filming and seeing what's going on and this is him saying i said nothing uh can stop what's coming and i meant it obviously Obviously the British state are S-ing themselves.
They should be because there's loads more to expose.
Remember the first episode, he just pointed out that there were local police taking bribes.
That was the allegations from the girls themselves.
Separate girls, who didn't know each other, all said this specific police officer was taking bribes.
He would explain a lot.
Cover it up.
And then the police cover that up.
I mean, this does go deep, deep, deep into the British policing system.
This corruption.
If we move forward, we can also see him saying that He's seen regular people being in arms about illegals being separated from their children at the US-Mexico border.
Where's AOC when you need her?
Yeah, he came there legally, not even illegally, and then was separated from his kids because he's a national security threat.
To who?
It's not clear.
Zero Mexicans, as I said, gave a toss.
If we go to the next one, we can also see he had some messages from apparently his family group chat here, in which he's got his kids just sending, you know, I hope you're on the plane, I hope you're alright, love you, blah blah blah, as you might expect.
That's just sad that it's gotten to such a point where he can't even just go on holiday and just be left in peace to go on his holiday.
No, I mean, there's a reason I show that meme at the start.
It's not just because it's funny, it's because it's true.
As in, like, the British really do go on holiday to Spain or Spanish-speaking places, sit around, get a suntan, drink beer, order chips, speak no Spanish, and then bugger off home.
Yeah, that's what we do.
It's almost like a cultural tradition at this point.
It's like drinking tea or something.
It's very much like something I can actually very much sympathise with in the sense of just being like, that's all I want to do.
I just want to have a holiday with the kids, drink beer and eat chips.
I've had holidays like that.
You get a break for a week or two.
It's great.
There was a place in southern Spain where we just drank seven up and ate chips and hot dogs for, I don't know, it was about two weeks when I was a kid.
Love those memories.
Yeah.
I imagine he had very much the same mind and instead he's having to be the poor...
And they're not just taking those sorts of experiences from him, they're taking those memories from the children before they can even, you know, have a chance to fool them.
Seemingly needlessly.
Obviously needlessly.
If we go forward, we can also see that when he returned home as well, he got to England, were they happy to see him or were they buggery?
He ended up in a spat with the British security airport police, the armed police, who decided, or at least one of them, just decided to go nuts and say that he had breached airport security.
There was no evidence of this.
The police officer has since have to apologise for the fact that he just made this up, it seems.
And I guess we'll watch the clip of him getting roughed up by the police for no reason.
Do you understand that?
What are you going on about?
What are you going on about?
What are you doing?
What are you doing?
- Thank you.
- Thank you for filming.
- What is that for me? - The door's locked.
- Yeah, go on.
- I haven't come through anyway.
- Well, you're not speaking to me.
You're screaming at me, you've got your gun through there.
- Yeah.
- I'm joking.
- What are you all about?
- Excuse me, it was just a moment.
Can you tell me?
Out of order?
Out of order?
Out of order.
Out of order.
They're in the All over nothing.
Again.
As I mentioned, the police officer has since admitted fault.
How can you go to work with your head held high after doing something like that?
I just don't know.
So the officer said that he had broke airport security.
He hadn't.
As you can see, Romlinson being like, it wasn't me, what the hell are you talking about?
The passengers being like, that's out of order.
And him being thrown outside there, the police officer of the Sintz having to admit that, yeah, I was wrong.
Completely wrong.
I mean, there are speculation, of course, that this is just continued harassment to try and threaten him.
I'm not even out of the bounds of disbelief on that.
I can imagine that being happening.
There's also some people speculating that maybe someone, you know, because they saw it was him and they hate him, they made up some lies and then the police went and harassed him.
I wouldn't be surprised.
It could be true.
But frankly, with the fact that the British security apparatus were threatening him directly by making sure he couldn't have a holiday and order some chips, I had the idea that they wouldn't continue to harass him once arrival back in the UK.
I don't find unreasonable either.
If we go to the next one, we can see a video in which, in this one, if you want to go and check it out, we don't have time to play it, in which he says that, yeah, the police are on camera apologizing to that particular police officer, saying that, yeah, he was in the wrong.
Completely.
Again.
Sorry.
Did nothing wrong in that case.
And then we'll go to the next one, because there's some other circumstances around this, at least with Mr.
Romblinton Tomlinson.
Sort of a chat being, oh, Rombie, Rombie, Rombie, Rombie, Rombie, Tomlinson.
Which made me laugh.
But he's also decided to come out and talk about the fact that he's bankrupt, remember?
Yeah, not anymore.
Oh yeah?
You may remember, he said that Jamal, this Syrian refugee who didn't do nothing, may have done some things that were not nothing, and then this was taken to court, and Tommy just didn't turn up, because he was just like, pfft, don't care.
Yeah.
Like, I'm not going to get a fair trial, so why should I bother?
That's his perspective.
Good man.
He was ordered to pay like £300,000 to Jamel for damages, which didn't make any kind of sense.
It was obviously lawfare.
That's, you know, part and parcel of politics in this country, apparently.
So he declared bankruptcy and was just like, good luck getting the cash.
I don't have any!
And after 12 months, in this video, he states that, well, it's been 12 months, I'm no longer bankrupt.
Officially, apparently that's how the law works.
You don't own any debts anymore to them.
So I hope not hate the organization that were very much behind the campaign to try and make sure that they got every piece of money they could from him in a lawfare activity.
Apparently they decided to put out a fundraiser 11 months into his bankruptcy, calling for money so then they could sue him and get the money.
Of course, they know, presumably, because they're lawyers.
After 12 months, that would all disappear anyway.
So, why did they raise the money?
For themselves.
Why else would they raise the money?
I mean, it's a leftist organization.
Grifters got a grift, my dude.
Yeah, yeah.
Many people will know.
But let's move forward, because if we go to the next one, we can see the fact that they raised the money here.
This is one of their examples.
If you click on that link now, it doesn't go to anywhere, because they don't tell you how much legal fund raised.
It's just gone.
It doesn't work.
They're just like, oh, thanks for the money.
Bye-bye.
Oh, goodbye.
That reminds me of BLM. Yeah, just making money off his back.
Anybody from Hope Not Hate invested in any property recently?
Probably.
Probably quite a lot.
Also, the fact that we should mention the head of research for Hope Not Hate is a literal member of the Communist Party of Great Britain, so a communist organization for people who don't know.
These people always are.
Yeah.
I'm not even exaggerating.
Just Google Hope Not Hate Communist Party.
You will find the guy.
Don't worry about it.
We'll go to the next one.
We can also see their accounts, which I thought I'd go and check out because...
You know how commies love money?
They really love money.
And it's just, it's sad how much money they get.
They posture like they don't, but yes, they do.
We don't have the most recent statements, but we just have from what I can find.
In here, this is for Hope Not Hate Limited, the company, presumably, in which they went from 500 grand in the bank to 100,000 in the bank.
So they spent a lot of money on, apparently they donated 400,000 to charity.
Which charity?
Their own.
My personal family charity.
Yeah, go to the next one.
We have Hope Not Hate Charitable Trust, who apparently got that money.
Wonderful.
Oh really?
They just gave it to themselves?
Yeah, they gave it to charity.
This is the meme of Obama giving himself a medal.
Well done, hope not hate.
Great job, guys.
£400,000 for charity.
My own charity.
Job done.
What did the Charitable Trust decide to spend this money on?
Well, you can see in there they took, in this year, given that they took £650,000 and also £500,000 in restricted funds.
Presumably that's charity money and some other, presumably British government money, frankly, considering how...
Pathetic that conservatives are rooting out communist organizations.
And in here, they spent £680,000 and £425,000, that's over a million pounds, on preventing hate.
You can see that, right?
Charitable activities, prevention of hate.
Over a million pounds.
We spent a million pounds.
Congratulations.
Did they put all their funding into Zero Discrimination Day?
Job well done, guys.
That's a lot of leaflets.
How many leaflets can you buy for a million pounds?
Probably enough to coat the entire UK. Yeah, that was 2020.
I don't remember seeing many, actually.
2021 is when they took that fundraising money they stole from everyone else.
Well, ah, took.
Ah, legally.
Redistributed.
Redistributed to the money they were given.
But they spent a million pounds on that year, and then they asked for more money the next year and got that money, legally, and then presumably spent another million pounds on preventing hate.
They still left them with a net 53 grand in the bank, which, wonderful.
This doesn't even, of course, take into account their salaries of the staff.
Apparently there's one guy who pays himself 60 grand and another guy who pays himself 70 grand.
This is of course not including the expenses on travel, dinners, all the rest of it, which are all listed in here as like tens upon tens of thousands of pounds.
Great.
Wonderful work if you can get it.
Spending a million pounds on prevention of hate.
I'm sorry, but I am endlessly in awe.
We're in the wrong business, my man.
What are we doing with our time?
Could you imagine?
What are we doing with our time?
We could produce a leaflet once a year and get millions of pounds for it.
Literal communists get invited by the British government to give evidence on endless committees and then piss a million pounds off the wall for a year to prevent hate.
Trust me, bro.
Meanwhile, engaging in a campaign of active hate against an individual.
Why?
Because your politics don't agree.
No, no.
It costs a lot of money to get to bribe that officer to rough up wrongly.
There's no evidence they've done that.
Obviously not.
That's a joke.
But boy, I could never get over how many leftist institutions we walk into during the show in which we just find some nonsense organisation, right?
And it's like, this is one.
Well, immediately you then find out the guys running it are literal communists.
They're like, right, that was easy.
Also, let's check out the accounts.
Millionaires.
Millions of pounds being banded about on crap.
We should start a bingo card.
Yeah, maybe we should.
Because every single time they at least tick one, two, or three of these.
Oh, God.
But anyway, leftists, the cash must flow.
Meanwhile, the bad man, Romlan Tomlinson, can't even go on holiday and order a beer and a load of chips from some Spaniard in English.
What is the world coming to?
I mean, when an Englishman can't rudely speak no Spanish to a Spanish lady for his order.
And then just start talking louder when they don't understand.
Uno, biro, por favor, lass!
In a world that that can't happen and instead leftists get millions of pounds, I guess it's a day ending and why?
Ah, I hate it.
I hate it.
Let's go to the video comments.
Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Ears for the 3rd of April 2022.
My name is Based Ape.
I'm joined today by Jonathan Crowe.
Today we're going to be talking about Harry's small penis.
In defense of my small penis?
Is this satire?
Don't be so triggered, Callum.
Callum, hold your excitement, please.
What does this mean?
I need to project my small penis out there.
How?
They want us to be a short manlet, preferably biologically female or low testosterone, cook old with a tiny penis.
Could you classify this as self-harm?
This is misogyny.
Like, you can't change it.
Like, unless you're going to wear some high heels.
And further reprehensible comments were made after this.
Really quick, could you pop a finger on my butt and buy me 69?
Disgraceful.
I can't believe anyone would say that.
It's disgusting.
What's wrong with you?
Indeed.
If you would like to see more from us, please go to thelotustheaters.com website and sign up.
Give us some money.
Thank you very much.
Now that, that is the news that matters.
That is some high-tier S-posting.
Very much a joke.
S-posting, mate, that was some top-tier journalism.
Yeah, I mean, number one, you walked into that one.
I knew I was.
The second I told myself, I'm going to read this article because it's too funny, but I know what's going to happen.
I know what's going to happen.
I accepted it.
I will wear this burden on my shoulders.
It's fine.
Say what you will!
Also, DildoGuy, very good meme.
And Jonathan Crowe, I'm very sorry, but that thing is also just full of table polish.
Like, we polish this table with that rag, so if you start passing out, that's not our problem.
If you start bleeding from unusual places, don't call us, okay?
I don't know what it'll do to you, but it's probably not healthy, is all I'm saying.
Otherwise, that was a fantastic post.
That was brilliant.
I endorse that message.
Go to the next one.
As an electrician, I'm partially qualified to explain the many flaws there are with electric cars and why they will never ever replace the internal combustion engine vehicle.
Such flaws include the inefficiency of batteries, the lack of available power on the grid, and the difference in between the operation of an electric motor and a conventional motor.
More to come.
I would have thought the argument about the amount of natural resources, like the specifically rare parts that you need, won't be enough to build the number of cars you need is a good enough argument.
I recently watched an AA video on the electric cars.
I think it was the electric car grift or something.
It's just the fact that you have to spend three hours charging it if you want a ridiculously low return on how far you'll be able to travel.
I just don't think people are going to want that.
Maybe.
I mean, Teslas are pretty cool, and I don't begrudge people for buying them in the slightest, as in, like, I'd love to have one.
And I know it would be fun.
And I can see the enjoyment, but it's just, it's actually from a policy perspective of trying to save the world.
I think, well, I just think the state coming in with the hammer and just banning everybody from being able to own, you know, whatever they want like that is kind of...
2035?
I think it's 2030.
Oh, crap.
Yeah, we're banning the sale of petrol cars in this country.
Yeah, I'm sorry.
If there are any members of the government watching, screw you!
You brought a car yet?
I have a car.
Oh, do you?
Yeah.
Seen it.
Do you want me to show it to you?
Do you want to come round after work?
Come see my car?
Yeah.
Alright then.
Alright, sorted.
That's what I'll do this evening.
Let's go to the next one.
Here's my car.
Bye.
Goodbye.
Get off my property.
Nothing else to do.
Go to the next one.
Whoopi Goldberg, she's at it again.
Daily Wire is reported on an incident that occurred during an episode of The View.
One of the women on the panel said that she thought it was wrong that everyone gave Will Smith a standing ovation when he got his Oscar after the assault that took off.
Whoopi's response?
I just want to stop with this elite stuff because you know a lot of us work for a living.
We work, we collect a cheque.
We got families.
We try to do the same thing.
The good stuff that everybody else tries to do.
This from a woman who is on the academy board.
The idea that Whoopi Goldberg is the same as some guy working in a factory, trying to fuel his truck, keep his mortgage payments up, and look after his family, really doesn't wash.
I'm not into this cancel culture, but I think in her case, I'll make an exception.
Yeah, I hate when members of the...
Obvious members of the elite always use, like, terms like, we.
Like, they're one of us.
Like, they're not completely separated from any hardships that people, uh, outside of their sphere experience.
Yeah, I mean...
It's annoying.
This is why, I mean, with all the best wishes that everyone in the West has for the Ukrainians and their fight and blah blah blah, it was extremely annoying seeing people like George Takei being like, we can bear the burden of increased prices on gas, electric, blah blah blah blah for Ukrainian sovereignty.
And then they...
Mr.
Takei.
I mean, what is he worth?
I'm going to Google it.
He's probably worth 10 million.
I'll throw an estimate out of it.
About 10 million?
Yeah, yeah.
Confident.
Watch Takei net worth 14 million.
14?
A bit more than I was expecting, to be honest.
Apparently, according to celebrityworth.com.
Probably inaccurate.
Probably tens, actually.
But yeah, he can afford, yeah.
Yeah, you can afford it.
Whoopi Goldberg can afford it.
Stop pretending like you're one of us.
See you in the next one.
I found that the widespread belief that our commonalities, not our superficial differences, is what defines us, is not only untrue, but harmful.
A Frenchman and a Belgian are not the same, despite similarities, nor are Englishmen and Scots, or Brits and Americans.
The irony is that trying to erase these supposed superficial differences is what would scrub us of our identities.
The differences in our art and culture can only be shared if we're allowed to develop unique identities in the first place, and not be squashed into a grey sludge of human conformity.
Humanity's defining feature is diversity, yet the diversity supremacists seem to want to make us uniform.
There is one of the paradoxes and the, well, the reality of their worldview.
Like, whenever they parrot for diversity, it's always, everyone will essentially end up the same, like the South Park episode of the Goobaks from the future.
You remember that one?
Yeah, no, I remember where they all just sort of, like, speak English.
Yeah, yeah, but the point being that everyone essentially ended up just a mix of everything.
It's not really...
I suppose you can put that on one side, but then when they actually then engage in it, they always seem to want to carve out a special little exemption for certain minority groups.
Especially if it's ones that they belong to.
Yeah, their racial purity should be preserved for future generations.
Strange.
Strange how those ones should be, but the other ones not so much.
Then again, not strange.
We know what they're about.
Let's go to the next one.
What's two-spirited?
I don't...
I think...
So it's meant to be an engine thing.
Two-Spirit is a North American Indigenous concept where a man can take on a more feminine role in the tribe and a woman can take on aspects of the masculine.
It was first recorded by Westerners as French explorers travelled through and traded with the tribes.
I read about it in the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls report from the Canadian government that is quite possibly the most illuminatingly depressing report on how the Indigenous are the architectures of their own failure, yet want to blame the settlers.
I'd love to hear that argument.
Yeah, very interesting.
Let us know in the comments where we could get a hold of that, if we can, actually.
Does that just mean you become a prison S, though?
Sorry, prison B. What?
Prison bitch.
No, no, I know, but does what mean that?
Like the two-spirit guy, though.
He's like, I'm going to take a more feminine role in the tribe.
I suppose maybe you're just a bit of a cook.
A cook or a prison?
Wait, no, you're simping for your more masculine female partner.
I don't know, I think it's a prison bee.
I've never really heard of straight...
Actually, no, then again...
What do you reckon it's gay, guys?
I've never heard of a straight relationship where it's like a twink with a butch woman.
So that's what it sounds like.
You know, twink, like feminine men.
I assumed it was two men.
No, no, that's what it sounds...
No, no, he was saying that it's a...
A woman can take on a more masculine role within the tribe, a man can take on a more feminine role within the tribe.
But they're still straight.
Yes.
This isn't even a sexuality, then.
Yeah, no, it's really weird.
Why is this even included?
It's really weird.
So they're basically describing, I don't know, twinks and tomboys.
Tomboys and guys who like knitting.
Yeah.
That's sexuality.
That's part of the alphabet.
Congratulations, that was always allowed.
Yeah.
Thanks for telling us no, though.
Let's go to the next one.
The only thing we can't afford is inaction.
The American people deserve our very best, and they will have it.
As the President will discuss in further detail in the days ahead, the United States Space Force will strengthen our security.
It will ensure our prosperity.
And it will also carry American ideals into the boundless expanse of space.
Oh, I was hoping you'd get to the part where the music kicks in.
Damn.
I don't think we're allowed anyway.
Yeah, probably not.
It's good memes.
I enjoy the memes.
As mentioned in the last Zoom call, a recent event was cancelled on Saturday.
A few online friends who were coming up for it couldn't get train refunds, so we just decided to have a day around town.
It was quite nice.
I showed them the site, I introduced them to a bit of northern culture, and many memes were had.
We went to see a leftist protest, actually, and I could only find one picture of myself from the event here doing my best impression of Bigfoot.
As for the protest itself, I'll discuss that tomorrow.
Oh, where was that?
That looks like it might be Liverpool or somewhere.
I just can't get over it.
I've been to a lot of these laughter's protests, and I imagine you had a similar experience if you've been to a few, mate.
You notice just...
It's all some freaking people.
Yeah, it's always the same people.
No, I've not been...
Well...
Speaking of, are we allowed to say his name now, or do we have to keep saying Rom?
No, they're still Haram.
But even then, if you go to these, let's say, rightist protests of all kinds, and Romlinson's ones are of a rotating character, they happen not too recently.
But even then, you may remember 10-20 people there?
Like, you'll be able to, oh, I saw you at the last one, kind of thing.
Yeah.
But with these ones, it's always, like, max 100, and it's always the same.
Like, the organizers are just five guys from London who go to every single one as well.
Yeah, I'm not that surprised.
No, but what I was going to say was that Rombly Tombly actually held a protest at my university campus when I was still going there.
And this is before I got involved in all of that sort of stuff.
And I didn't go, but now I really wish that I had gone.
Was it EDL back then?
No, it was back in maybe early 2019.
It was on the Media City campus at Salford University.
What was he protesting?
Probably the usual, to be honest.
Either that or...
Child rape.
Yeah, yeah.
You know, I mean, it's Salford, probably.
And I've not been to any leftist protests, but I have recently, on Saturday, went to Bristol.
And my first time going to Bristol, of course, there was a furry march on.
Because that's what you need to expect in Bristol.
I'm still puzzled as to what for.
Because, I mean, if it's a march for acceptance, I mean, we live in 2022 and you're in a leftist area.
Amazingly leftist as well.
Is it not just a march of dominance, like fash furries?
Just being like, we own this turf.
I didn't check their footwear, so maybe I should have paid more attention.
We'll send you back to do a report.
Oh, no, please!
Give you some Space Marine armor and a bolter.
I recently had a co-worker die of COVID.
Well, he was an alcoholic and ate a lot of fast food.
So, of course, it really had a bad effect on him.
What I found frustrating, though, is that it was impossible to talk to anybody about this.
Either COVID was the worst thing in the world and he should have been vaccinated, the mother effer, or he just got a bad cold.
It just seemed like there was no empathy for either side of anyone I talked to.
And it was incredibly frustrating and I'm kind of worried about that because if we can't empathize with people, how are we supposed to care about each other?
Yeah, I mean, I agree with this.
I do find it a bit annoying sometimes when you see people, it more happens on the right, as you probably alluded to there, where some people are just like, COVID's just a cold, and it's like, it's not.
You can still die.
There's still a 2% chance of death.
It's not the black death as it's made out.
For the majority of people, it is going to be something that's going to be mainly affecting people who already have Underlying health conditions.
But if you've got those, you should be taking it seriously.
I don't think I or anybody in the office has really said that you shouldn't be taking it seriously if you have those issues already.
I'm sorry to hear that your friend passed away of that.
It really sucks, to be honest.
Things get better.
This is just a shill for the Writers of the Lotus Eaters Discord channel, which is for viewers of this show that are writing inclined, or into other such arts perhaps, who are looking for advice or even some editorial consultation for any projects they might be on.
Very informal arrangement, but not exactly a memeing channel though.
It's not actually my channel, it's James Craig's, although I hear Mr.
Cooper is involved as well.
But James Craig is one of the authors of the book Faceless, and try and get it if you have a chance.
I haven't had a chance to read it myself quite yet, still going through some of the earlier Lotus Eater books I've seen, but I'll be getting to it soon.
Alrighty.
That's there for people who like writing.
Really cool.
I hate the written words, so that's not for me.
I'm sure lots of other people enjoy it.
You know I hate reading.
You confuse me.
What?
Why do you hate reading?
It's just painful.
Reading's great.
It hurts to do.
Reading's fantastic.
I know when the last time you read a book is.
It's not fun.
That's the thing.
We had great fun exchanging memes from that book.
Yeah, the memes part.
Not the reading the part.
Yeah, the reading was fine.
Maybe it's because I got dyslexia, but it's just...
Well, I think it's probably something to do with that.
It's the act of reading I don't enjoy, but the knowledge is also...
Have you tried audiobooks?
I can't get along with them.
Why not?
I don't know.
That's not an answer.
Yeah, it is.
Personal taste.
Ah, you suck at this.
You suck at reading.
I do indeed suck at reading.
I'll give you that.
Let's go to the next one.
Tony D and Little Joan with a story.
I was at OCCon this weekend in Ocean City, New Jersey.
Now, when I set up at the table, I have all my comics and books there.
I have the Jersey Devils laid out, and they say, oh, Jersey Devil, I know that.
I know that because it's South Jersey.
And the Pioneers, they also know that term.
I have the books out, and they go, oh, I know that.
But they don't normally point to my political satire books and go, oh, Hollywoke, that's about Disney, isn't it?
That's good to hear.
I think it's good that everybody knows now.
Yeah.
I didn't like how just overnight Disney's name became mud in this regard.
And it was all because they engaged in wokeism.
And also, well...
Also, a couple of them got caught in that sting about being nonsense, which was convenient.
The weird thing about Disney is, like so many other things, people have double standards on them.
People seem to...
They're sort of intuitively recognised.
They're a big, gigantic, monopolistic corporation in line with certain aspects of the government.
They don't have your best interests in mind.
But then when something like the...
They say trans rights!
Yeah, when the anti-groomer bill comes about, it's like, Disney, won't you do something, please?
It's very stupid.
Well, they probably know the people who run it, which we now all know.
Anyway, on Tough March, Karen M says Sadiq Khan didn't want to answer the questions about women's sexual organs because if he'd answered it in a way he really thinks, with a new, he'd be finished as the mayor of that woke place on the Thames.
If he'd said yes, he'd been in trouble with his fellow Muslim brothers.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
So he just threatened the interviewer with prison.
Listen, this will hurt you a lot more than it'll hurt me.
Well, I mean, that is going back to the Islamist roots, isn't it, Sadiq?
Which you're just like, eh, wow.
You want me to be asking those questions?
It's not very proper.
I don't see anything about that in the book.
No, there is actually something in the book.
Oh, fair play.
In the Quran, it's my favourite passage, in which he just says that God made men and women.
That's it.
Full stop done!
Yeah, there's no expansion.
Because, what is it, like, I think a woman's made...
I'm gonna get this wrong.
You know in Christianity...
In Christianity...
Made for the rib?
Yeah, yeah.
From Islam, it's something else.
If I remember correctly.
Fact check me on that.
I can't remember.
Okay.
But also, just, there's another section in which he talks about the roles of men and women, and, uh, God.
I say him, like it's some guy.
And he just says that men are the caretakers of women, and women are meant to serve their men.
And if she does not serve you, then there are three steps.
First, part ways with her, as in, like, sleep on the couch.
Get in a doghouse.
Second, oh, wait, no, it's part ways with her, as in, like, no, admonish her, as in, like, tell her off.
Then part ways with her, go sleep on the couch.
And then thirdly, beat her gently.
The interpretation of gently varies on which Quran you're reading, of course.
And then I think the last point is that Allah is compassionate and merciful, isn't he?
Because he only gave you a gentle beating.
Yeah.
The instructions from the imams is not to leave bruising.
That way the cops don't know.
Right, this is liberal.
So get a potato and a sack.
Yeah, literal wife-beating instructions from Mohammed.
Tish Potatoes says, I'm not sure I want to hear what Nadia Witham's idea of education is, or what education she received, if she received any at all, based on her performance in Parliament.
Well, communist re-education.
I mean, she is, quite frankly, just saying it out loud, which is least honest.
Should we move on to the queer empire?
Oh, yeah, yeah, sure.
Well, I was just finding this comment.
What happened to the probably more accurate descriptor of TransTrender?
Seems to more accurately reflect reality as many are incentivized into donning dresses for the points they can score.
Absolutely agree to you.
N-Y-N-Z. Brackets.
E-E. Close brackets.
You're not getting me again.
I'm English, dammit!
Yeah, Chris Wolfe says, That's a great point.
Yeah, yeah.
But that's the point.
You're not supposed to be able to win.
You're just supposed to submit.
You're just supposed to give in to every one of their demands.
Because you can't win with this demand.
You give in to it, and then another demand comes along.
So...
That's just how it goes.
M1ping, is there a nonce awareness week, preferably with a parade of wood chippers?
We could arrange it.
I think we could get that down.
I mean, we can just announce holidays now on Facebook.
I think we'll be arrested.
Well, we don't have to mention the wood chippers.
The UK police are all leftists.
That's a good argument.
They'll probably be like, oh, nonce awareness week, stunning and brave.
Stunning and brave.
Well, no, they'll be like, what are the wood chippers for?
Wood.
Yeah, we've got some great woodcrafting competitions on this week.
We want to get rid of it.
Yeah, yeah, afterwards, you know, you've got to clean up.
Chris Wolfe again says, Okay, how is an LGBT teacher not a conversion therapist?
My science teacher taught science, my literature teacher taught literature, and my New Testament teacher taught me naps.
Their LBGT teacher taught them LGBT. Yeah, you could classify it as a conversion therapist, even if they're not trying to convert the children overtly.
It is propaganda, I'll say that at the very least.
Charlie Rogers says, Yes, King.
Happy Tall Man's Day.
Yes, at 6'2", no, 6'2", Shorty.
My life is inexplicably different to the Short King experience.
Cloud People Pride.
Yes!
Bring it in!
George Windsor...
I'm a Shorty for being 6'2".
Yeah, he's an inch shorter than I am.
Okay.
Once again, I think Leo takes the cake at, what, like 6'5 or something?
But, you know, I'm willing to say there's a cut-off point where...
I've never seen his face.
I know, only his ankles.
George Windsor says, Harry claiming today for the tools.
Sorry, friends, today is already the International Ginger Supremacy Day.
Up the reds.
No!
We're taking it from you.
Us tall people are coming for you.
Freewell2112 says, What is it with these creeps that they have to micro-categorize everyone for every small variation of human behavior?
Because they don't understand human behavior.
Let's be perfectly honest.
These people are all dreadfully mentally ill, and they only can see things through the prism of other people's mental illness.
So if you're normal, that must be because you've got some kind of mental illness that makes you normal.
I still think that people are just disabled and can't accept it.
That's basically what I've just said.
Someone said, Alex Ogle says as well, CJ Hatter sounds less like a gay uncle and more like a creepy gay uncle.
CJ Hatter?
I mean, he could be the Mad Hatter.
I don't remember who CJ Hatter was.
He was the guy I was referencing in the article.
Ah, okay, sorry.
Let's move on to the national security threat himself.
So, Brian von Vorhock says, with how the government and the cops are treating Martin Goldstein, you'd think he started a grooming gang in Rotherham.
Perhaps...
Well, no, he'd be let off if he did that.
They'd be probably giving him money to fund his legal defence if he did that.
He'd be declaring him a city of culture.
Perhaps he has been in contact with groups such as the IRA, Hamas, ISIS, Communist Dictators, and Holocaust.
No, wait, I'm thinking of Jeremy Corbyn.
Has he actually been...
I mean, all of those, yes.
ISIS, I don't know.
I guess we'll have to search his phone and we'll find out.
I'm just gonna Google it.
Jeremy Corbyn Islamic State Isis Dorsman Would we be surprised?
Shaker Silver says I want the government the UK government to name one terror attack inspired by the bad man to justify this.
Name just one reason why he is a security threat other than he says things that are inconvenient.
I have an example for you.
During the, what was it, the Darren Osborne case in which he drove a van into a group of innocent Muslims outside of mosque after two Islamic terrorist attacks in which Muslims drove into some people on Tower Bridge and I think Westminster as well.
In the case, the media tried to claim that Darren Osborne did that because he'd been liking Tory Murray Robinson.
No, I said the name, damn it.
You mumbled that it's fine.
Alright, good enough.
I won't pick it up.
Because he liked him on Facebook.
It was complete BS. It wasn't in the case.
Someone just made it up.
That sounds incredibly tangential to me.
Yeah, but I just...
I couldn't actually find a source for it being mentioned in the court.
It just seemed to be made up by The Guardian.
Like, some guy just wrote it down and just be like, I'll rub it up.
The Guardian doesn't make things up, Callum.
Don't be so silly.
Yeah, but the funny thing was, when the case went forwards, they actually did find out what inspired him, because he said it.
Which is the BBC documentary, Three Girls.
So the BBC radicalised him into an anti-Muslim terror attack.
Well, we'd be surprised.
And also, I don't see any direct connections between Jeremy Corbyn and ISIS, but apparently he said that we should let Shemima Begum back in.
That's enough of me.
Yeah, close enough.
Allahu Akbar.
Oh, God.
Robert Longshore says, I hope not hate have used those funds to prevent the staff from hating their own lives, preventing self-abuse by buying themselves loads of nice stuff.
Be a better argument than what they spend it on.
Freewell2112 says, I bet GB government intervened, UK Voldemort embarrassed them, and the BBC, so they have to have him for it.
Absolutely accurate to the evidence we have.
I'm sorry, it is just embarrassing.
That is the truth.
The whole situation with him and the BBC and the panodrama that he did, do you remember the panodrama or not?
No.
It still irks me.
It actually makes me upset about where I live, because people who don't know...
Panorama, or a documentary group within the BBC, they do these things.
Oh yeah, yeah, I know them.
They decided to do one on Robinson and they got caught undercover by Lucy Brown making stuff up.
So then Robinson just said, Lucy, give me the footage and we'll make it public.
And they did in a documentary outside the BBC's offices in Manchester.
In response to that, the BBC lobbied YouTube, Facebook, blah, blah, blah, to ban him from everything.
Wait, wait, wait, when was this?
Because this might be the thing that I was talking about, because the BBC's offices in Manchester are at Media City, where I was going to university.
I remember getting this right, probably 2018, 2017, something like that.
If it was late 2018, that's the one that I almost...
That's probably true.
That was going on when I was at university.
Okay, I was there.
We were filming.
Oh, damn!
I should have gone!
You could have come and hung out with me and John!
Oh, damn!
Anyway, but he did that.
The BBC got him banned from everything, with some coordination with Muhammad Shafiq, a man who thinks that sexual slavery doesn't exist in the Quran.
I mean...
Open liar.
We don't have time for this.
But then the BBC were given an exclusive interview with Facebook who said that he had called for the beheading of Muslims.
Direct lie.
We now have it from Facebook that was a direct lie.
BBC published it without fact-checking it, of course.
Again, just open hostility from every level of the cathedral, but so blanketly open.
Like, everything is verifiably a lie.
Everything that they've done is verifiably untrue and they ran with it anyway.
No journalistic integrity whatsoever.
Being caught in a sting making stuff up.
No justice whatsoever.
He's banned from everything.
He can't tell anyone anything anymore, except on Getter, where you can find him on there, of course, or on Telegram and whatnot.
And the BBC just saunter on, because everything's fine.
I mean, that was a moment for me where I was just like, right, this whole thing's corrupt.
Like, corrupt to the core.
Anyway, sorry.
It really annoyed me, that episode.
But otherwise, we're out of time.
So if you'd like more from us, of course, please go over to HelloToSeeUs.com, subscribe to get access to all the premium content.
And to those who are, thank you immensely.
Wouldn't be able to do the show without you, because it all responds to the show.
And we'll be back tomorrow at one o'clock with Lawrence Fox and at 3.30 for the live book club on Cultural Revolution.
▲
Export Selection