All Episodes
Dec. 7, 2021 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
01:30:38
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #279
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello and welcome to the podcast The Lotus Seeders for the 7th of December 2021.
I'm I'm joined by Leo.
Hello!
And today we're going to be talking about how Labour says don't vote Labour.
Stunning and Brave, actually based.
Also, conversion therapy and what that is and, well, how do you define it?
Well, the government's bringing through, it's got a consultation at the moment for a ban on conversion therapy, but conversion therapy doesn't mean what you think it does, probably.
And also, Rod Liddle triggering the inadequates, as they were called, by the university administration, which is quite funny.
So I thought we'd go through that.
A little bit of a free speech question on an event.
So some stuff mentioned first on the websites.
The first thing being here that I wanted to mention was the interview I did with Lord Miles, or Miles of Kabul, or Miles Routledge, or whatever other name you've got for the guy.
So I think you met him because you were in the office for a long time.
Yeah, last week.
Yeah, good guy, honestly.
I went into it because it wasn't, you know, someone on the internet.
You don't really know what they're going to be like.
And after hearing the full story and getting to know his personality and all the rest of it, I was sort of on his side already because I didn't get the criticisms.
But once you go through all the criticisms possible, there is nothing.
There is literally nada of what I could find that is valid.
And, I mean, kind of mad, but, you know, that's part of life.
So, good guy.
Go check that out.
And it's good fun.
He's got lots of stuff coming up.
I mean, the trip to South Sudan he's going to do, and then a whole bunch of other things in the mind that we won't spoil.
So, if we go to the next one, we have some other stuff on the website.
So, this is the one being Critical Race Theory Explained number one, the problem with civil rights.
I don't know if you've read much of Critical Race Theory, Tex.
I get bored reading books.
I just like being able to scroll and look at pictures of Capybara.
Yeah, so this is a video Carl made after reading the Bible, and yeah, civil rights, not for us, is the argument being made by the critical race theorists.
We're trying to bring segregation back in, under the guise of safe spaces.
Because the blacks will be better off under segregation, because this time around, we'll have more resources for blacks and less resources for whites, and it's like...
Okay, big brain.
Or we could just not do that.
Yeah.
We could just not do segregation, but okay.
Anyway, so go check that out.
The next thing to mention is an article from Hannah Gell.
So she's written, Jordan Peterson's return to Cambridge is a huge deal.
She went down and watched Jordan Peterson at, I believe it was Oxford, or, sorry, Cambridge Union, obviously.
And he was giving his speech there.
So go and check that one out.
I believe that's free.
I can't quite remember, but yeah, yeah, that one's free.
So go and check it out.
And then the next one to mention is the video I did with Carl, which is, Barbada shows there is no peace with wokeism.
91% black, it's like 3% white.
They're Irish as well, so they're not even white. - Yeah, and the white people that are there aren't, I mean, it's got an all black parliament, I believe.
And the white people, 'cause I've got a mate from Barbados, and so he says that the white people are descended from the original sort of indentured servitude.
Yeah, the Irish and Scots as well.
And they're called Redlegs, and they don't have an exalted position in society there.
They're basically just incredibly sunburnt and have a strange Bajan accent.
I love the idea that Parliament's 100% Labour, leaders' Labour, everyone's black, in every position of power.
91% of the population are black, and yet you had protests to screw you about white supremacy.
So we went into more of the clips that we didn't have time for, I believe, when we did the segment.
They should be more worried about Chinese supremacy, with China investing in Barbados to try and steal its ports and get strategic military positions.
But that's the point.
If you have an island like this that's got the conditions as such, well then, if they're not stopped harping on about white supremacy at this point, they're never gonna.
Never will.
You could get rid of that 3.4% of Irish people there.
Still not gonna stop.
Still gonna whine about white supremacy.
That's the point.
There is no peace with these people.
So let's get into the segments.
So, first one being Labour.
Labour.
New strategy.
New slogan.
Don't vote Labour.
That's the slogan.
So this is the first link here, if we get it up, which is the Norfolk Labour Party website.
This site, like the rest of Labour, is not working anymore.
And then if you scroll down on this, they say, vote Green Party.
The Labour Party under Starmer is finished.
He lied to get elected leader and is backtracking on all pledges he gave at the time.
He can't be trusted any more than Johnson can.
So this isn't the official Labour Party site for Mid-Norfolk?
This is.
So what, has it been hacked?
Yeah, so apparently someone who was inside the party who ran the whole thing was just like, well, I'm leaving and also I'm going to take the website down with me.
Oh, it's like the fat guy in Jurassic Park.
Yeah.
So we go to the next one.
This is the reporting on it.
And in here they have Michael Rosen, the chair of Mid-Norfolk Labour Party, who said, This site is currently under the control of somebody who is not a member of the Labour Party anymore.
We are working hard to get this domain name back under the control of the Labour Party.
We will be setting up our own Mid-Norfolk Labour Party site once we've done that.
What we don't want is two sites that confuse people.
I love this.
Confused people.
This site isn't confusing people.
And this shows how diligent and rigorous Labour's attitude to business continuity and actually running the country would be if they don't even have control of their own website.
How are they going to run a massive modern Western country's infrastructure?
You'd think they'd have some procedures in place.
Yeah, you'd think basic procedures.
When I was with UKIP, they had procedures in place for even Facebook pages.
Never mind the website for the whole region.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Absolute joke.
Anyway, so he says that the former member was one among a number of people who have recently chosen to leave the party because they're bleeding members like there's no tomorrow.
Mr.
Rowson said he absolutely wanted to state his disagreement with the message on the website.
I thought you'd agree with it, but okay.
He says, we actually think that Labour's on a really positive dejectory, he said.
Really, though?
Who believes this?
Well, I kind of believe it.
I mean, Keir Starmer's more of a return to the centrist Chad era, the centrist era of the Blair and Brown years, which, you know, for all the people...
Tony Blair's terrible!
He's not really a war criminal.
He went into a war with America.
So he was led in by them.
He was just preserving the special relationship.
He didn't know there was going to be a million and a half people killed.
He thought it was going to be a good war.
But it wasn't.
So everybody judges him on that.
They forget about all the other stuff, like the fantastic local amenities and play parks that he set up, their great approach to criminal intelligence.
So, yeah, I mean, I think Tony Blair, as a sort of ideological heart of the Labour Party, is somebody and an ideology that people will vote for.
It's like a technocratic, pragmatic, centrist Labour Party.
That's what Keir Starmer represents, whereas Jeremy Corbyn is just like, nobody's voting for a mad communist garden gnome guy.
I agree with that last sentence.
The rest of that I could not disagree with more.
I couldn't even care about what he did in Iraq, quite frankly, because it's just like, well, okay.
What he did to this country is what I can't stand.
What did he do to this country?
Oh, there's a few bad things.
Devolution was bad.
The immigration reform.
No, I think this country needed a lot of immigration.
Hundreds of thousands for years.
Our economy did pretty well.
I mean, all right, there could have been more done to ameliorate the impact and maybe even the impact across social classes.
The diversity industry?
Yeah, that stuff is terrible.
I don't think you can blame Labour entirely for that.
I blame them for the expansion of the public sector, particularly under Brown when he basically wanted to buy votes.
But no, they did.
I mean, the only area of the public sector I've got actual expertise in is criminal intelligence.
And the national intelligence model that was brought through under New Labour is fantastic.
It's just unequaled.
So that's your experience of the thing.
That side of it went well.
From a technocratic point of view, that one little sliver of public policy is amazing.
Okay, I have no idea about that specific sliver of public policy, but I can't stand a lot of the reforms he did and the effects we are suffering.
Devolution was bad.
Faith schools were bad.
A lot of other stuff is good.
This isn't a debate about Tony Stark.
There's happy days!
There's great music in the charts.
But anyway, he's gone either way, regardless of whether or not you hate him or think he did some good.
And we're looking at the Labour Party as it is, which is him saying here, the example of this chap saying, it's on an upward trajectory or something.
I was like, right, okay, so let's just take a look at what the Labour Party's been up to recently.
And the first thing we have is denying genocides.
Okay, I mean, we're back to the Corbyn era, I guess.
Except this time, not about the Jews.
Of course, it's about...
Hey, there's Jeff Norcott!
Yes, who is just sitting in the corner silently, being like, what the f*** am I watching?
And I don't know if you've seen this clip, but you might enjoy it.
So you see LBC, do you believe they committed a genocide?
They're trying to ask the Labour MP. And the Labour MP, not so...
Not so interested in answering that question.
In fairness, there is a lot of debate.
America's come out and accused China of genocide, but I think a lot of countries, there's some debate as to whether their treatment of the Uyghur Muslims actually reaches the threshold of genocide.
Because they certainly don't have the industrialised slaughter.
Even if it's not, if it's not what it is, this wouldn't be the first genocide either of the CCP. I mean, there have been like six or seven they've done throughout history.
Yeah, yeah.
So I thought we'd enjoy the response here from this chap.
So the first one here is him saying that the conservative says that there are Chinese tentacles throughout the world.
That's a racist statement.
You shouldn't be allowed to make that statement.
So let's play the first clip.
Things can be said which accidentally have a damaging impact.
When he was saying that China has tentacles all over, you know, 30% of students on campuses and the rest of it, I think we've got to be very careful that where our government has disagreements with the government of China, that this doesn't end up fuelling anti-Chinese racism in our society.
That's not what it's about.
And that's the Chinese government issue.
That's what they'd like you to believe.
This is not about being anti-China.
This is not an argument for China.
It's an argument for the Chinese Communist Party government.
Don't fall into their trap, Richard.
That's their narrative.
There is an increased instance of racism faced by Chinese people in Britain, for example, in relation to COVID. And we've got to guard against that.
That pudding-faced moron.
Oh my god, I hate how the left always, the first thing they do to try and shut down any criticism or any debate or any questions is, oh, that's racist!
That's racist!
Criticising the Chinese Communist Party is racist now.
Even though China is now the world coloniser.
You want to talk about, you know, the UK? White colonisation?
Like the CCP? Oh no, we wouldn't want to cause racism, would we, CCP? It's like minority getting the camp.
Yeah, yeah.
And how come Labour stick up for Muslims in Rotherham and Rochdale and try and cover up their systemic abuses there?
But when there's actual Muslims, they're the victims.
Like the Uyghur Muslims in China, they're absolutely happy to throw them under the bus because any criticism of the Chinese Communist Party is racist.
Oh my God, absolutely pathetic.
Honestly, I'm never voting Labour again.
But honestly, it is pathetic and it is the usual stock rhetoric from the Labour Party that X is racist, therefore stop conversation.
stock rhetoric from the ccp because they have seen this as a weakness in the west yeah and in response to say the china virus as trump called it because the ccp alleged the virus came from the u.s so he was like no i'll call it the china virus to make sure people know it came from china yeah they were like no no that's racist and the dems all brought into that narrative and you saw them all tweeting at the time and demanding that he was a racist for saying these things yeah and the same thing from richard bergen here how dare you say that the ccp is trying to have its tentacles into all of our institutions yeah That's racist against Chinese people.
And how on earth can it be racist?
Like, nobody's saying that Chinese people have tentacles.
Except Richard Bergen.
I've never heard that racial stereotype in my life.
Oh, those bloody tentacle owners.
That is absolute nonsense.
I mean, the stereotype about Chinese is eating the tentacles, but I mean, they do anyway, so it's not even a stereotype.
Well, I mean, the...
On a serious note, China is really stepping up its colonisation, especially in Africa.
So they use debt traps.
So Uganda is going to lose its only international airport.
So they lend Uganda all this money.
And obviously, a lot of African countries have got despotic, kleptocratic leaders who then manage to siphon off all the money and they're corrupt so the work that China's paid for doesn't get done.
The bridges or whatever, the factories, the roads don't get built.
So then China says, well, we gave you the money to do all this stuff.
You haven't done it, so we're taking your airport.
And that's China's way of a land grab.
Did the same in Sri Lanka with the port there because they needed a port in that region.
Yeah.
But what's interesting is you can see here Richard Bergen, essentially a bought and paid agent of the CCP, in effect.
As you can see, de facto, he is out there on the mainstream defending the Chinese from any slight criticism.
I mean, even just saying that they're trying to infiltrate the West is...
No, no, no, that's racism.
Let's remember this in 10 years' time because he's basically defending Hitler.
Yes, so we'll go to the next clip in which he also tries to play the Noam Chomsky game of how do you blame whatever's happened on America within three steps or less.
Let's go to the next one.
What I'd say more widely is, look, there's things that the government of the United States has done historically, which we profoundly disagree with, invading other countries using a nuclear bomb.
Not committing genocide against millions of their own people.
Not responsible for the deaths of a million Chinese citizens who happen to be Tibetan.
This is on an altogether different scale.
Let's not try and call them in the same terms as America requires.
I was referring to the only use of a nuclear weapon in war against civilian populations.
In peace time.
And the invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan.
I'm not really egregious to draw comparisons between the United States and China.
The point I want to make, however...
Everything you've said You could say in the States, you couldn't say in China, anything I've said.
The point I want to make is that, of course, we need our government to speak up for human rights around the world.
Of course, we need our government to speak, including to its allies, like Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, about the human rights abuses there.
I think we need to avoid a rush into a new Cold War, because Cold Wars can become proxy wars, hot wars, that's not in the interest of anybody.
And of course our government will have disagreements with the government of China, but when it comes to climate change for example, we do need to be working with China in relation to averting climate catastrophe.
And you look, for example, at the huge refugee crises that are going to be caused because of climate catastrophe.
There's going to be a need for more international cooperation when it comes to climate change, when it comes to the flow of refugees and a whole host of other issues, diminishing resources.
And that means working with governments in other countries who we have profound disagreement to.
No, I wanted to play the four things in this because I didn't want to edit it up so people get the reality, which is it is as bad as I'm saying, which is you can see him there.
Firstly, trying to blame the United States as being as bad as China, because Chinese may genocide their own people, but the United States did bomb Japan with ukes.
And saved potentially tens of thousands of lives, hundreds of thousands of lives, definitely tens of thousands of American troops' lives, and to stop an absolutely despotic regime.
The debate around whether or not the nukes are justified is silly, but even then...
Yeah, because we had the firebombing of Dresden.
We bombed other cities.
Don't start a war if you can't finish it.
Yeah.
The Americans finished it.
And the other point he tries to make, which is just like, the CCP, we need to be nice to them and not criticize them because climate change...
It's like, right, okay, genocide or climate change?
Ah, I don't know what to do.
We'll let the people die.
Screw them.
You know, we'll have to focus on the climate change.
Yeah, history is going to judge him very poorly, and I don't think anybody's going to vote Labour.
Again, there's not going to be a Labour government for...
I can't ever see one happening again.
It's going to get played in five years when we get the Starmerites in power, but...
Anyway, but I just set off the point where it's just like, yeah, okay, we're literally genociding people, but that's on the back of the bus because climate change.
And so, dude, get your priorities right.
Anyway, so let's go to the next one in which he says that China has emissions or something.
Let's go to the next one.
In your answer there, I haven't heard one single condemnation of anything the Chinese government has done.
Including on the environment.
29% of greenhouse gases are produced by China.
That's the conservative.
Who cares?
What the hell's wrong with you?
What kind of argument is that?
He goes on to wither on about climate change.
But again, the dude is denying genocide, and you're like, yes, well, they do commit emissions as well.
Dude, are you paying attention to the conversation you're having?
Like, focus on the fact that he's talking about genocide and is just like, no, I'm not going to talk about that.
But that shows how the wokists have sort of distorted the balance of morality.
So carbon emissions are seen as worse than genocide.
Even the conservative.
Even the conservative MP is like, yeah, well, carbon emissions, you've got a fair point, Labour.
We'll talk about that.
Genocide, not so much.
Anyway, but he does get back on that and we'll play the last clip here.
Action is needed from China and from the United States and from the UK on climate change.
However, there is a line which is incorrect, that somehow people believe that per head of the population in China, their carbon footprint is greater than ours.
That's not true.
The average person in China has a smaller...
I'm not defending China.
They're going the wrong way on climate change.
We need to have a sensible discussion about these things.
China is a superpower.
Of course there will be things on which we profoundly disagree with them.
Of course our government has to hold its allies and other countries to account on human rights abuses and those discussions need to take place.
Do you believe they've committed genocide?
Do you believe they've committed genocide?
The approach you're taking is to ask you if you believe they've committed genocide.
The approach that you're taking is...
It's a straight question.
You're trying to basically create a political storm.
Let me speak if that's okay.
Do you agree with the House of Commons that genocide has been committed by the I'm saying that our government needs to hold other governments around the world, yes including China, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, to account on human rights abuses, but inevitably we need a relationship.
Why do you find it so difficult to utter one word of condemnation about anything to do with China?
I find it astonishing.
I mean, it's unreal.
It really is as if he is being paid by the Chinese Communist Party to defend the Chinese Communist Party and spread mistruths and lies about them to make them look better.
I mean, that's the only possible...
If you can't, like, just sit there and say, like, yeah, yeah, they've, like...
Got this systemic torture and repression of Uyghur Muslims, of their own people.
Like, why?
I mean, something that, like, if it happened in...
Can you imagine?
Can you imagine if it happened in Britain?
How outraged, how insanely...
Even if it happened in a fractional manner.
If it was just, you know, the cultural side of it.
You know, the culture being erased in schools.
You know, the government's currently complaining because people will point out that you're wearing a hijab.
Yeah.
They'll be like, well, that's Islamophobia.
We need to tap down on that.
Yeah.
Okay, how about being put in prison camps?
Yeah, how about being sterilised, being raped, being brutalised, being forced to work as a slave for companies that actually pay, so Nike pay the Chinese government for cheap labour and the Chinese government uses Uyghur Muslim slaves.
Like, we're talking about Black Lives Matter and how slavery 400 years ago was bad.
Muslim lives don't, that's for sure.
Like, jeez, why aren't we talking about how the slavery that's happening right now is bad?
I know, it's just unreal.
If he's not getting paid to do it, I don't know why he's doing it.
Maybe he's just a communist and he's like, you know, comrades of the world.
But the Chinese Communist Party is quite smart with its propaganda, so they pay YouTubers and they pay...
I mean, if you're watching Xi Jinping, you know, we're open to bribes.
We're not.
I am!
I am.
If you want me to come back on next week and talk about the glorious wonder of the Chinese Communist Party, man, I'll send you my PayPal link.
Just deposit some...
Rage Shadow Legends.
Some Yuan or whatever it is in there.
Anyway.
mention is just of course this isn't the first time either as the interview with china uncensored showed that carl did with them uh this is like the the sixth or genocide they're on at this point and big shook i mean every time communists get the power they've genocided almost everyone yeah and a lot of ethnic minorities and if we carry on we go to uh some other stuff i wanted to mention so andrew neal can't get into the whole drama of andrew neal right now because god knows he's getting sued about that so don't say anything stupid but uh the thing he said here which i found interesting he said i've had my third jab all pfizer and i strongly recommend everybody to do the same i've also seen how
well the vaccine passports work i don't believe in mandatory vaccination but if you don't get jabbed you need to realize there are consequences on where you can go like fantastic Just promoting vaccine passports.
That's very lovely.
Very British.
I mean, even Keir Starmer said it wasn't British.
I just want to say that I met Andrew Neil at the Spectator's Parliamentarian of the Year Awards and he said he watched my videos and he was a very nice man.
So I think he's great.
I think him, he's great and also I agree with him that vaccines should be mandatory and also the Chinese Communist Party is a force for good.
Rightio!
Anyway, but I just wanted to compare this because you've got people, you know, promoting vaccine passports at this point.
We just look at the status we have already.
So we don't even have mass mandates in this country.
It's not a mandate that you are forced to do.
So if we go to the next one, we have some footage in which the police are enforcing it.
What do you mean?
Because it's not enforced.
That's the point.
In this country, you are advised to wear masks, but you don't have to.
And if you do go into a shop and they say you need to, you can just say, well, you can't ask that question.
And that's the end of the legal conversation.
Yeah, I've never had a problem saying I'm exempt, apart from when I was on a Ryanair flight.
Well, when I was checking in, not checking in, but at the gate for the Ryanair flight, and they said I had to have a letter from my doctor.
And I didn't have a letter from my doctor.
But yes, they just made it up.
I think they've got that in their terms and conditions.
It's not legally enforceable.
Yeah, but it's a flight.
So they can remove you from the flight if you don't meet their terms and conditions.
My understanding is that it's still not legally enforceable because it would violate the Equality Act, even if they've read it in their terms and conditions.
Yeah, but airlines are different.
Let's not get into that debate.
You may be right.
But we'll play this clip just to see what happens.
I'm not exempt.
I'm exempt, so I don't need a mask.
So mind your business, yeah.
Mind your business.
You don't need to ask me if I'm exempt.
No, you don't need to ask me.
It's not your business.
What I'm going to do with you now, yeah, I'm going to ask you why you're exempt.
You don't need to worry.
It's my medical history.
I'm not asking your medical history.
So don't worry.
No, you won't.
No, you won't.
I'll be going.
No, you won't.
You don't even have your mask on properly.
Look at this guy.
He's got his nose out and he's trying to tell me to wear a mask on the subway when I'm exempt for asthma.
So mind your business and let me go on my journey.
Right, stay there.
You're detained me for not wearing a mask.
You weren't even wearing a mask in the first place.
So at the minute, right, you're under arrest.
Under arrest for not wearing a mask.
Under arrest for wearing a mask.
Give me that.
Under arrest for not wearing a mask.
That's disgusting.
That is disgusting.
It's ridiculous.
You wouldn't see that in the glorious, wondrous state of the Chinese Communist Party.
I just checked my PayPal balance.
Are you doing a gig at this point?
This is what you could get for only $5.
Anyway, I just wanted to mention as well, CrimeBodge's videos are back up, because I know he disappeared for a while.
For people who don't know CrimeBodge, he specialises in suing the police for when they do things that are illegal.
And whoever that is, I would recommend getting in contact with CrimeBodge, because he's a great guy.
And also, if you haven't watched his videos, go and check them out, because they're up.
It's disgusting that the police were like...
Again, the police even wasn't wearing the mask.
Yeah, he wasn't wearing the mask himself.
And also they said, oh, but it's your attitude.
You know what I mean?
That's a crime.
Attitudes are a crime now.
Booking boys.
Jesus.
What's the police with consent?
And also there's real criminals out there.
How come when my car gets broken into, two and a half grand of camera gear gets nicked, the police couldn't care less.
Well, the robber was very polite.
Oh, he didn't misgender me.
And he was wearing a mask.
Actually, he probably was wearing a mask.
Anyway, moving on there, I wanted to mention some other stuff.
So, I mean, Andrew and Neil promoting vaccine passports.
We have an example of what the reality on the ground is.
And then we have an example of the Labour Party's response to the situation.
This is so funny.
So I wanted to remind people of this.
Remember this?
And this is a Labour Party MP saying she feels very unsafe being around people with no masks.
Let's play the clip.
I feel incredibly unsafe in the chamber when I'm sitting there wearing a mask and I look across the benches and I see most of the Tories not wearing masks.
It makes me feel unsafe when no one was wearing a mask.
They should have worn masks.
Did you feel unsafe sitting at Labour Party conference?
I'm sitting in the chamber, which can be very packed.
I can sit in the chamber wearing a mask and I look across and I see hundreds of MPs not wearing masks.
There are vulnerable MPs also sitting there.
And I think it's a dangerous message to send to the rest of the country.
And is it about a message?
Because, I mean, Julia's point, Julia's point anecdotally, but Julia's point that people weren't, Labour MPs weren't wearing them at party conference.
Should they have been?
I think when we look at the case rate now, when we look at the issues in Parliament, when we look at the messaging that's coming out of the Speaker's office, this is dangerous to other people's public health.
I think MPs should be wearing it in the Chamber and around the estate as well.
Why are you wearing one now?
Because we're in the studio, we're socially distanced.
Have you seen how claustrophobic he can get in there?
Hang on, you two.
It is ideological.
Hang on, let me just come back.
Pathetic.
Yeah.
I mean, that's pathetic.
Just exposed there.
But exposed again, because what's she been up to?
So this is her.
I think it's, what is it?
Yesterday?
Yesterday.
So she's posted her own, like, hypocrisy online for everyone to see.
This is her at the Mobo Awards, in which she's hanging out with hordes of people.
Very, very close.
Very claustrophobic, her words.
No masks from any of these people.
The anxiety they must have caused her.
Unbearable.
But yeah, she still stayed there for the whole night.
Yeah.
Of course.
Seems to look quite happy there.
I also hate, like, you can see in the clip where she's trying to be serious, trying to make you take her seriously.
She, like, stares at you and she's like, doesn't make me take you any more seriously.
It just shows that you're lying.
Yeah.
And you think you can get away with it.
And it just shows it is completely ideological and it's all theatre and it's all to score political points.
She even says it in that clip.
Yeah, she's asked, is it ideological?
Yeah.
Stupid noise.
It's the same with all the people who say, I saw racism, I feel so unsafe, it's so damaged me, you know what I mean?
And then it turns out in their WhatsApp messages they've been racist as well.
Yeah, so vote Labour.
I think not.
I think we'll mention the last link on this and then we'll save the rest for another time.
So if we go to the next one, we just have the fact that these MOBA awards, never heard of them.
So if we go to this one, it's just them celebrating Black Excellence.
I've heard of them because I'm young and cool.
Right.
It's the Music of Black Origin Awards.
Right.
Which is most music, to be fair.
Okay.
But also on their website, they have an endorsement by Jeremy Corbyn, so I'm just like, ah, big shock.
Oh, that famous black guy, Jeremy Corbyn.
Also endorsed by YouTube.
So again, the oppressed minority here, who are endorsed by the powers that be.
Okay, but we'll end that there.
Labour?
Nah.
Let's go to this one.
And it's my segment!
So here we go.
I'm just going to start off with a bit of fan mail I got.
You're going to have to click view story, because believe it or not, that isn't my story.
I didn't post a story saying viewslotuseaters.com.
So you'll have to pause this!
Oh wait, this isn't the right thing.
No, you need to skip to the one that I actually sent the link to.
So...
So just click through.
Click through.
Click through.
This is other fan mail I got.
Click through.
Click through.
Oh, this is it!
So pause it or it'll move.
So this is basically, I got engaged and I said, I put a ring on it, which is obviously referencing Beyonce, because I'm a big proponent of music of black origin.
And I got all these replies from all these angry wokers being like, IT! YOU'RE OBJECTIFYING A WOMAN! Yeah, I'm objectifying a woman, you know what I mean?
Obviously, that's what I like doing, because I'm a man with a dick.
But like, she says, it!
I'd be running away fast!
And I replied saying, you don't look like you can run very fast, because she's fat and old.
And the next one should be Fat Keith from The Office, if we click through one more.
Next one, next one.
This one!
This one, so basically, remember The Office, the British one with Ricky Gervais?
No.
Oh right, because yeah, you're 19 years old.
But if you were born before, if you were born in the 80s, I've got time for you.
And you will have seen The Office featuring Ricky Gervais.
So this guy, Ewan McIntosh, played the fat...
Am I allowed to swear?
No.
Okay.
Well, the fat guy on The Office Who Eats a Scotch Egg, so he posted on Facebook, currently on GB News, Dominic Frisbee and Leo Kers, a more objectionable pair of C-U-N-T's.
You'd be extremely hard-pushed to find.
And I don't know why, but I just posted, I'm delighted to be living rent-free in the head of the fat C-U-N-T from The Office Who Eats a Scotch Egg.
So that is, I don't know why these people have a boner for me, but that was...
I always hate watching you.
Yeah, hate watching me and also contributing to GB News' advertising revenue.
And also, man, you've had one acting job in 25 years and it was eating a scotch egg and you just lucked out that you did it sitting near somebody who's talented.
So shut up, get back in your box, except you won't fit in it because you're too fat.
Anyway, moving on to what I'm actually going to be talking about.
So the government's got like a conversion therapy bill coming through.
It's already come through in Canada.
I should probably explain, if you don't know what conversion therapy is, historically it's been, you know, homosexuality was viewed as a mental illness which required curing.
So the actual guidebook, the handbook for psychiatrists, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders...
It listed same-sex attraction as a mental disorder until 1973.
So this is, you know, relatively...
That's like 50 years ago.
Relatively recent that, you know, this was...
It is recent.
It is recent.
I understand, but I just...
To me, it's recent.
I got told a story about when...
I think it was Norway decriminalized homosexuality or whatever.
And then there was some group that took out adverts trying to make sure that people knew it wasn't a disease.
And they had some guy call up the office and go, I'm really sorry, mate.
I can't come in.
Feeling a bit gay.
Oh, fair enough.
You've got time off sick.
Yeah, it was horrific.
Conversion therapy in the past, a lot of it was driven by the religious right, and the techniques used to try and change someone's sexual orientation were straight out of a clockwork orange.
Electric shocks administered to people while showing them homoerotic images, which, to be honest, I'm not sure...
If that would make you more or less gay.
That happened to Lou Reed, singer of the Velvet Underground.
They had chemical castration, even lobotomy.
Like, they'd use wires to chop up people's brains.
And this wasn't in the 1800s.
It wasn't in Saudi Arabia.
This was happening in the West as recently as 1969.
Alan Turing being a very famous one.
Exactly.
So Alan Turing giving chemical castration to, you know, and he took that because the other option was a prison sentence.
Like, insane.
And like a man who helped Britain win the war.
Absolutely insane.
So you can understand why, you know...
People would want that banned.
The problem with the bill as it stands now is it's also covering transitioning.
So it means it'll be illegal to have therapy that guides people away from transitioning from gender affirmation, surgery or whatever.
Just to clarify, we don't do any of that stuff anymore.
Oh yeah, nobody's getting electric shock treatment.
Maybe if you go to...
There's a club down the road.
Yeah, people are probably getting it done for fun, but nobody's...
This isn't a common problem in the UK at the moment.
Statistics show a survey of gay and lesbian people said that just 5% of them had been offered...
Gender conversion therapy.
Today, it's obviously a lot milder.
Nobody's being offered lobotomies, but it's a religious thing.
So if you're from a hardcore religious community, they'll offer...
Pray the gay away.
Yeah, they'll offer...
My friend Stephen was offering...
I've got a mate who's totally gay, super gay, wears a bow tie and stuff.
Well, that's a political statement.
I should be gay.
Loves dicks in his face.
So when he was 14, his parents were these hardcore Scottish Catholics.
Oh man, Scottish Catholics could give the Taliban a run for their money.
So they could see that he was gay.
His parents could see that he was gay.
So they sent him to this religious straightened out camp in America where religious dudes get you to pray the gay away.
But I don't think they really thought this system through.
Because if you get 200 gay teenage boys together at a camp overseen by priests, there's not going to be less...
Anal sex going on at that camp.
As we know, all male boarding schools.
Nothing goes on.
Yeah, nothing goes on.
I don't think they really thought this system through.
But then I realised it's like when your dad catches you smoking a cigarette and then he makes you smoke the whole pack.
These kids are going to come back from the camp with arseholes like a car crash.
They are never going to look at a dick again.
So maybe that's how the conversion therapy works these days.
I don't know.
So anyway, the conversion therapy ban...
The conversion therapy ban has already passed in Canada.
So bill number C4, I don't know why they named it after plastic explosive, to ban conversion therapy.
No one should be tortured under the false pretense that a person's sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression can and should be changed.
But actually...
Those things can change.
If we move on to the next one, you know it's a bad idea because this is still Canada saying they went through.
But you know it's a bad idea because Justin Trudeau has tweeted saying it's a good idea.
And there's a lot of support for the bill if we move on to the next tweet.
So this is what the trans, the trans rights activist.
So if you're against trans people being protected from conversion therapy, you're basically pro-torture of trans people at this point.
That's where you are now.
But bear in mind, what they class as gender conversion therapy isn't the same as what Was classically classed as gender conversion therapy.
So they're not talking about electric shock treatment or, you know, religious demonising or telling people it's a sin.
They're talking about offering therapy to transgender people, transgender children, who quite often gender dysmorphia is mixed in with a lot of mental health conditions, anxiety, autism, dissociative disorder.
So any sort of treatment, any talking therapy that would help with those conditions and maybe end up with a person not transitioning would be seen as torture.
Even though the actual transitioning involves a lot of drugs and hormones and surgery that could be regretted later.
Yeah, having a chat, basically.
But having a chat's torture.
The surgery, the hormone, not so much.
Yeah, it's weird.
It's a strange way of looking at it.
Speech is violence.
And obviously, you know, trans rights activists are supporting it.
So we move on to the next tab.
They are obviously, with their male pattern baldness...
I mean, sorry, female pattern baldness, because they're real women.
They are coming out with all the violent fantasies.
So kill Bilbo with the trans woman who goes back.
I shouldn't use such a high pitched voice.
Kill Bilbo with the trans woman who goes back to conversion therapy camp to rescue her friends, murder the fuck out of her abusers.
Ugh, I'm a real woman.
Suck at my dick.
All right.
We move on to the next tab. - What is that accent?
I don't know.
Stonewall.
Stonewall have said that, you know, all these countries have a full or partial ban on conversion therapy.
Britain is the only one that doesn't!
Because Britain's bad.
Albania.
Come off it.
So, yeah, Brazil?
I mean...
Albania's a Muslim country.
I don't buy it.
Is it?
Yeah.
Right.
Is it?
Yeah.
Isn't it in Eastern Europe?
No, it's in the Balkans, just above Greece.
Isn't that Eastern Europe?
Is it Muslim?
Not really.
It's basically a holdover from the Ottomans, in my understanding.
The cultural integration is to a point.
Right, right.
I don't recognise any of those flags apart from America and Australia.
But yeah, so if we move on to the next tab.
So there's some criticism.
So the government's proposals, as I said, would ban conversion therapy for sexuality, but also stop doctors exploring options other than gender confirmation treatment.
So, you know, hormones, surgery and all the rest of it for children that question their gender identity.
If we move on to the next one, there's more criticism from Kathleen Stock.
So, you know, this is raising the points that, you know, what...
Sexuality is quite clearly defined.
So it's attraction to someone who's the same sex as you, the same biological sex, usually.
That's why it's called sexuality, not genderality.
So that's clearly defined, and it's easily reversible.
If you decide you don't want to be gay anymore, you just start...
Like licking vag and girls' assholes.
I mean, if you're five cocks down and you think, actually, you know, I'm not enjoying this anymore.
Yeah.
And what have I done?
Yeah.
Then, yeah, that's pretty simple.
Maybe you're not gay.
Maybe you're just a bit...
Which does happen.
Sometimes people, you know, start off bisexual, end up, you know, gay or end up...
You know, sexuality, you know, even though a lot of the times it stays as a, you know, a constant, you know, it can change.
But it's, there's no detransitioning when you change, when you, you know, change your sexuality.
You don't need to, like, get your breast implants taken out.
It's just, yeah, you've got to change.
My public can't look this good.
You've got to change your TV viewing habits.
You know, you can't do this anymore.
But I mean, apart from that, it's pretty easy to go back.
So Kathleen Stock, who of course was the professor at University of Sussex who was bullied out of her position for questioning trans ideology, she's raised the point that feelings can be temporary.
So gender identity is much more nebulous, diaphanous than sexuality.
And acting on feelings of gender identity involves drastic bodily changes, the surgery, the hormones, and some regret the changes later.
So if we move on...
I've just got this question in my mind.
So you know how they refer to the surgery of getting chopped off or whatever?
They refer to that as gender confirmation surgery?
Or affirmation, yeah.
Yeah.
Why can't I refer to sexuality affirmation therapy for all the stuff where they were like, yeah, I'll pray the gay away?
I mean, that's the problem here.
It's like, well, how is one valid and not the other, surely?
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
But I mean, I think sexuality, sexual conversion therapy has been pretty much proven to always be horrible and never work.
Pseudoscience.
So it's pseudoscience and it's horrible.
It's torture for people.
So it's a horrible thing.
It should be banned.
What if it's voluntary?
Well, even then, it's like euthanasia.
How voluntary is it?
Are people being bullied, coerced into it?
Immediately as coming to mind is Milo, of course, who's just like, actually, I'm not gay anymore, and he wants to go around.
Man, that guy just wants to be famous.
It is weird.
We all want to be famous.
We could do the reverse.
I mean, if I'm a grown adult and I wanted to go to therapy and become gay, why should I not be able to pay the money to have the therapy?
I don't think you need the therapy, just suck a dick.
But I'm not feeling it, so I'm going to go do the therapy.
But you really want to get a job with The Guardian.
But should that be bad?
My pursuits into left-wing politics?
I don't know, I mean, I can see people doing that.
Famously, Hollywood actors have done that, and there's porn stars who do the gay for pay thing.
You've got all the Christians who are like, yeah, I can therapy you and you won't be gay anymore.
Where are the ones who are like, yeah, I can therapy you and make you gay?
I mean, where is that?
I wonder if it does exist.
It might.
But yeah, so, I mean, looking at, you know, there's been a lot of articles about this.
So, I mean, we've got to really look at, you know, what is gender identity?
Because, I mean, could you define what gender identity is?
I mean, there are a million debates on it, isn't there?
Yeah.
So yeah, no.
So sexual orientation is well defined, well understood.
But gender identity is, you know, as I said, it's quite nebulous.
So the human rights campaign defines it as one's innermost concept of self is male, female, a blend of both or neither.
So what on earth does that mean?
Nobody knows.
So it's not simply and clearly defined or objectively measurable.
So homosexuality is measurable by you sucking a dick.
You know what I mean?
What if it's a woman's dick?
Then that's a complicated...
Then that's straight.
I think that means that's still straight under current woke laws.
Because that's a female penis.
Which I totally understand.
If transgender women want to keep the penis, because apparently if you get it removed, there's a one in three or one in four chance you'll never orgasm again.
So yeah, keep the dick.
But the other issue with it is that sexual orientation is easy to change.
You just date men instead of women.
Changing gender can be damaging and it's also difficult to reverse.
So you go through all the drugs, the hormones, the delayed puberty and the surgery.
So the economists in this report, they report that trans identity can be influenced by many factors.
So clinics and psychologists report that many trans identified patients also suffer from depression and anxiety.
Some have had abusive childhoods.
Many are gay or lesbian.
It may be confusing their emerging sexuality with a cross-sex identity.
I mean, this is why so many gays and lesbians feel that they're being erased.
So you've got butch lesbians who feel that the new generation of butch lesbians are being told that they're male and they have to transition or being guided towards that funnel that's taking everybody through transitioning.
I almost want to call it a gay genocide.
There are no new gays.
You like throwing the word genocide around.
The Chinese Communist Party does a sterling job and doesn't commit any genocide.
Thank you for the donation, Xi Jinping.
So a few children who present with gender dysmorphia seem to have homophobic parents for whom the idea of having a straight trans daughter is preferable to having a gay son.
And this is actually government policy in Iran.
So in Iran, being gay is illegal, but the government funnels you into transitioning.
So the You're a woman, and then it's not gay.
I mean, the horror stories are, you're a man, you're kidnapped, you're raped, and then the government finds out that you were raped, and, well, you had gay sex.
They'll put you to death, or you can transition.
Yeah.
Fantastic.
Yeah, and all you did was, you know, be a victim.
Um...
So yeah, stuff like that is horrific.
And crucially, between 60 and 90% of children identified as trans eventually seem to reconcile themselves to their biological sex.
So these feelings of gender dysmorphia tend to sort of fade out by adolescence, which is...
It's common sense.
You can pray the trans away, but not the gay.
Well, it's not praying.
It's when your hormones kick in and stuff like that.
And obviously, even in your teenage years, things are topsy-turvy.
You're going through a lot of changes and stuff.
So children seem to generally tend to reconcile themselves to their biological sex as long as their cross-sex identity is not uncritically affirmed.
That's got far too many double negatives in it for me to know what they're talking about.
So basically, The Economist is saying that talking to patients about their feelings should not be illegal.
And that's what this bill would do.
Talking therapy makes good sense.
We move on to the next one.
This is more criticism.
So more crap conversion therapy science.
If you imagine the government's proposed conversion therapy ban is based on authoritative evidence, you'd be wrong.
You can tell because the team behind it are now churning out self-justifying rubbish like this.
And this is interesting because there isn't enough data Because people are scared to research you.
You saw what happened to Kathleen Stock.
You know, she gets bullied out of her position as a professor.
They're afraid of the answer.
Because if the answer isn't a politically correct one, their career is over.
Yeah, absolutely.
Absolutely.
And the next tab.
So, I mean, this is interesting.
This is somebody, you know, a feminist.
So somebody that would be deemed a trans-exclusionary radical feminist.
Saying that this move towards transitioning as many people as possible is going to end fairness in women's sports.
Women's sports are already at a disadvantage because they're so rubbish.
The England women's team did really well.
Did better than the men's team in the World Cup or something like that.
Okay, then they can play each other.
I'm like, yeah, they're playing women.
Like, obviously they're going to, like, it's not fair.
They're playing women.
It's going to be much easier.
Anyway.
You know what, we'll get into it.
My dad, he's a big sports guy.
He loves watching all kinds of sports.
And they started doing, like, the women's stuff in the Olympics before the men's stuff.
And it made sense because then you'd watch that and you'd be like, yeah, that's pretty good.
And then you'd see the men's stuff and be like, oh, it just gets better.
So it means that if you watch the men's stuff and then the women's stuff, you're not disappointed.
Right, yeah, yeah.
I prefer watching the women's stuff.
I don't like sport.
Because I'm so straight.
I like watching them prancing around.
Anyway, if we move on to the next tab.
So this is somebody supporting the conversion bill.
So basically it's up for consultation at the moment.
If we move on to the next tab...
So this is pointing out the reality, or certainly somebody's perception of how conversion therapy and the trans rights movement is erasing gays and erasing lesbians.
So it's making the parallels in lesbophobia between 1973, when there was conversion therapy, and 2021, when this ban on conversion therapy is ironically bringing through I can see the problems with this.
There's an industry rapidly growing up around transitioning.
In America, we've gone from one gender transitioning clinic to over 50 in just a few years.
This is all happening incredibly quickly.
Whereas in Poland, that kind of growth isn't happening.
Oh yeah, I don't think we need to look to Poland as an example of a stellar society.
Fine, okay.
I don't want some guy in a frock with a big beard swinging a watering can full of incense to be deciding what I do with my dick.
But it's interesting that the massive growth in transgenderism only seems to be appearing in certain countries.
Yeah.
I mean, it's where wokists have got the power.
And I don't think the Catholic Church should have the power either.
I don't think anybody should have the power.
I think people should be allowed.
We've got to have a libertarian society where people's power over other people is minimised as much as possible.
But anyway, so this industry that's grown up, so there's therapists and doctors, etc.
They're making money from this.
They've all got a vested interest in encouraging people to transition so that they're pushing more and more vulnerable young people into the system.
So starting puberty blockers can begin what doctors call a treatment cascade.
So data from European clinics suggests that the vast majority of those prescribed puberty blockers go on to take cross-sex hormones.
These drugs are powerful.
They have powerful side effects.
Puberty blockers can stunt growth and weaken bones.
A recent case in Sweden documented a teenager with osteopenia.
Do you know what that is?
No idea.
A debilitating brittle bone disease.
Osteopenia, I think it's to the dick.
It debilitates your dick bone.
No, it's a...
Dick bone.
It's not a real bone, actually.
My mate broke his dick, though.
Having said it's a lassie, he slammed down his dick too much.
He's a comedian.
Phil Nickel, great comedian.
Broke his dick, and he said it was the most painful thing I can imagine.
So when it's engorged and hard, then it can snap.
He'll let you snap a courgette or something.
Is it better?
He's better now.
Right.
Cross-sex hormones produce irreversible change, including the growth of facial hair and a deep voice in women and the growth of breasts in men.
Long-term use can affect fertility.
Surgery to remove breasts from women who transition to being men is permanent, as is surgery on the genitals, which also guarantees sterility.
As the growing number of detransitioners shows, some of those who undergo such treatments come to regret them bitterly.
And yeah, the transitioning isn't based on rigorous peer-reviewed research.
It can't be because the academic environment is so hostile to any examination of these issues.
Questions are seen as criticisms and objective analysis is denounced as transphobic.
Anyone raising objections is hounded from their job, like Kathleen Stock was.
Same thing happens in the IQ departments.
People who want to study IQ, they're just endlessly, there's types of research they can't do.
Whether or not the truth is the truth doesn't matter.
Right.
I don't know what IQ is, but I'm just getting to the end of this.
So, I mean, yeah, don't get me wrong.
I know that gender affirmation surgery is absolutely the right solution for some young people, but a lot of them are being rushed into a system, and we don't have enough data at the moment.
It hasn't been around long enough to know that if it's the right thing for everyone.
The data that we do have suggests that it isn't always the absolutely right thing for everyone.
So, yeah, you know, in trans people, valid treatments...
For related mental health issues such as autism, dissociative identity disorder are being interpreted as conversion therapy.
A GP is quoted as saying, the way the bill is worded at the moment, I could end up in prison.
So the government's consultation is out at the moment.
It closes on the 10th of December.
It closes in three days' time.
And it's got the aim of passing a law before an international conference on gay and trans issues in London next June.
So yeah, there's the link.
I don't know if we can put the link on the website or whatever to the Government consultation.
But yeah, if you go to the next tab and then the next tab.
So this is the open consultation.
And you can go there and you can, if you've got any, if you want to raise any issues.
There's links underneath the podcast.
People can find it.
So people can raise any issues.
And I think, you know, it's something that needs to be examined.
Otherwise, you know, in 10, 15, 20 years time, there's going to be a lot of people unhappy and traumatized by the fact that they were sort of You know, as vulnerable children or teenagers, they were sort of rushed into this.
I mean, we say in 10 years' time, we're already getting it.
Yeah, yeah.
You remember there was that court case from that chap or girl, I can't even remember what they started as, and then they went through it and went back and went, hang on, I've been lied to.
That was why I did that, because I was misled by the adults in the room.
Yeah, absolutely.
And sometimes there's so little oversight and so little process.
There's a kid in Ohio, I think it was Ohio, who went to a gender transition clinic.
They prescribed him hormones on his first visit.
And then, I think his third visit, they made an appointment for surgery.
And it's like, there surely has to be some sort of, I don't know, just...
Talking, discussing and finding out the full plethora of what they actually believe and maybe just waiting a bit to see if it resolves by adolescence.
I mean, I understand you want to...
I suppose in America it's not as profitable.
Well, you want to get the hormones into them before they go through puberty because nobody wants to get a handjob of a transgender woman with big hands.
So I can see why they want to get the hormones into them.
But no, on a serious note, it does stop the...
You know, the changes and then it'll be easier to pass as female if you, you know, you're transitioning to female.
But, I mean, we're seeing a lot of people resolve into their biological gender and a lot of people detransitioning and a lot of people being unhappy and even committing suicide.
And, you know, while it's the right solution for a lot of people, it's not the right solution for everybody.
So, you know, people, there should be some sort of, you know, due process and talking therapy before people are pushed into surgery and hormones.
Should we end that there?
Sorry if that makes me Hitler!
I should be able to ask people how they feel.
I can't believe the GPs put that out and be like, I get a prism for just asking you how you feel.
I mean, that's kind of my job.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So let's end on something a little bit lighthearted.
So Rod Liddle has triggered the inadequates, as referred to, by the university.
So this is at the University of Durham.
So he went to give a speech and the university is referred to the people who were autistically screeching in the side.
As inadequate, the SJWs.
So this is the first article here to get the context, which is universities offer helping hand to students paying their way with sex work.
Top universities are offering training to students who are involved in sex work.
And this is at Durham?
This was at Durham and Leicester, Manchester and Newcastle University.
They were all offering and inviting undergraduates access to tools to help them navigate challenges they might face when escorting, performing on webcams and stripping.
So if you're in any one of those professions...
Just a radical concept here.
Why don't universities drop their fees so that students don't have to resort to sex work?
Because university fees have way outpaced inflation.
Could just get a job at McDonald's or Spoons.
Probably wouldn't pay for Durham's fees.
I mean, I know the webcam probably pays more right now, but it'll not pay as well in the long term, let's say, because you pay with your soul.
But anyway, the university's offering advice and help for those who want to be cam whores, which is a new kind of profession, I imagine.
And Rod Liddell took this as a bit of a joke, and if we go to the next one, we have his response here, which said, prostitutes are stigmatized because their trade is filthy.
I love Rod.
That's a man who just doesn't...
He's like, nah, I don't care.
You can't touch me.
Yes, which is why I quite enjoy the chap.
I don't know much about him, but I like that he doesn't care.
He's great.
He interviewed me for a Sunday Times thing, and unfortunately he was behind a paywall.
But he seems good fun.
But he's brilliant fun.
I had a drink with him, and he was really good laughing.
Anyway, so he says in here, and you can see how he just has fun with what he does.
This noble institution is offering two courses in the various forms of harlotry.
My only concern is that at present, they do not offer any academic qualification in these subjects.
At least an undergraduate degree in, say, practical whoring would be better.
Perhaps followed by a master's degree in deconstruction of the topless Han Shandy, 1897-1913, such courses would probably result in more lucrative career opportunities than many of the more traditional subjects which students pay through the nose to study.
I'm attending a dinner at Durham University next month, and fervently hope that some of the ambitious young ladies on these courses will be in attendance.
I mean, yeah, okay, you know, the guy has fun, right?
Yeah.
And also, it's a ridiculous situation.
What do you mean you're giving advice to sex workers?
You shouldn't be promoting sex workers.
Yeah.
I mean, whatever.
So then he goes to university.
How did that go?
How did that, him turning up and giving a speech?
Was he cancelled?
There were autists in the corner, screeching.
Because me.
Don't like the man.
The man bad.
Of course.
So you have Pink News here, who are butthurt, and them reporting, So he went on a transphobic penis rant.
I mean, I don't think they thought that headline through.
I mean, do you remember when Pink News put out an article that said, quick reminder, Republicans want to make child drag shows illegal.
I was like, hmm.
Yeah, that sounds like a good idea.
Republicans don't sound too bad.
I was like, thanks for campaigning.
And also the point of being like, he's got a transphobic penis frown.
And it just reminded me of an article I saw.
So if we go to the next one, this lady who I follow is quite nice.
And she right here is not waiting to have sex with trans people transphobic.
I mean, I love it.
The argument, I'm entitled to F you.
I mean, is that a rapist or is that a trans rights activist?
Yeah, I mean, this is the thing.
I don't know why our sort of, you know, autonomy and, you know, choice with sexual intercourse completely breaks down when it comes to transgender issues.
I mean, if you don't If you want to have sex with a transgender woman, then yeah, that's your choice.
I mean, you might remember the trans rights activist with the signs.
I can't remember where it was that said, suck on my P word, you transphobic C word.
Yeah.
It was like, right, okay.
Hello, rapist.
I'm not interacting with you.
There is no point taking you people seriously.
But again, transphobic penis rant, as Pink News called it.
Anyway, let's carry on.
So we go to the next one.
We have the Inadequates quote.
So this is from the, I believe, the wife of the university's principal or something like that.
She said, Ooh, what did he say?
What did the bad man say?
So if we go to the next one, we have the footage of what the student's being bought her, which is funny.
And I thought we'd enjoy some of this.
And as you can see, her there making fun of them.
So let's play this clip, which is just a small compilation.
The audio's a bit bad, so you might have to pay attention to the audio on this, but we'll be talking about it afterwards.
Let's play.
What are you frightened of, you silly dog?
I think you are an arse!
Why not?
That's arse! Arse! Arse! Arse! Arse! Arse!
That's the arse apparently.
Look, you've heard us about this video today.
All that you've done is speech.
Speech does not cause power.
Now, finally, that is no right.
He didn't say that tonight.
No, he didn't say it tonight.
He said it before.
Rob is a humorist.
That's disgusting.
Rob is a humorist.
You don't think it's disgusting.
Say that to her.
You're a disgrace.
I am a scholar.
You shouldn't be in university.
This man is for people like me.
Yes, he has.
He said we're unnatural and in reverse.
That's disgusting.
How am I supposed to feel welcome in this college and not bringing people in like that?
It's disgusting.
It's disgusting.
I mean, I love that there.
So the footage is of one of the professors.
I believe he's the one who invited Rod to give the speech.
Yeah.
And then the butthurt students.
I mean, you can kind of hear the pink hair, or whatever the hell's going on, because they don't show the individual, because of course they don't.
Yeah.
But I love that the professor just holds his ground.
And he's like, no, you shouldn't be at a university if you are not prepared to listen to people.
Yeah, surely a professor should hold his ground against students.
Exactly, but it's so refreshing.
Yeah.
I'm sorry, it's been so long.
Instead of getting bullied out of...
The position like Kathleen Stock was.
It's disgusting.
Students should be there to learn and to take part in debate, not to silence it and to say that they know better than the professors.
The last time I think I saw a professor on campus hold his ground like this on camera...
It was definitely Jordan Peterson where he just sat there and debated with him and was like, you're just wrong.
And I can explain why.
And this guy there, you're just wrong.
Like, you can be butthurt, you can be upset about what he said, but if you can't interact with someone who disagrees with you, you shouldn't be at university.
Also, him making the point, speech is not violence.
Because they were like, we've been harmed and he said, no, all he's done is talk.
The safetyism card.
They say, I'm put at risk.
I feel unsafe.
It doesn't matter.
Your feelings aren't objective facts.
You're not unsafe.
You're at Durham University.
You'd be unsafe if you left and went to Durham Town Centre.
Go to the union and get your courses on being a sex worker.
Oh yeah, but being a sex worker isn't unsafe.
I mean, Jesus Christ!
Anyway, there's also, I couldn't make it out, but it's almost like he says, what is it, like, if you're BLM, you should go and join the BNP? That's disgusting?
I'm not even too sure, but whatever.
The complaints are silly, and we'll get into them.
So if we go to the next one here, we have the Telegraph article listing all this.
And as you can see, Durham College head apologises for calling students pathetic.
For walking out of the Rod Liddle speech.
So this is the professor here.
I was quite disheartened that he had apologised, but when I read the apology I was like, alright, no, I'm based.
He didn't say anything too silly.
So Professor Tim Luckhurst, principal of South College, reportedly shouted, at South College we value freedom of speech!
As several students left the dining hall in protest over the choice of guest speaker.
Yeah.
Again, cool.
Them leaving is them exercising their freedom of speech as well.
So yeah, let them go.
If you want to walk out, go for it.
Are you pathetic?
Yeah.
And that's all allowed too.
That's how this game is played.
Because if you cannot sit next to an opponent and make them look stupid, then you've lost.
But I've walked out of stuff.
Yeah, fine.
I walked out of that Sweeney Todd film.
It was bad.
I don't think that was an intellectual debate.
I walked out of King Kong as well because it was bad.
Take it up with the director?
I don't know what to say.
Anyway, so the university has launched an investigation saying it is concerned about behaviours exhibited during the event.
About what?
Presumably his wife there get a bit drunk and going, arse, arse, arse.
Which is, to be honest, quite funny.
Because they said that she couldn't say arse to them.
She's like, well, bugger off.
So in an apology email to members of the college, Professor Luckhurst said that students had exercised their right to leave the dinner hall and added that students had as much right to absent themselves from the speech as my guest had to make it.
Fine.
Yeah.
I mean, a guy who gets it.
Yeah, you can walk out.
Go for it.
It's fine.
No one cares.
If you can't, debate him.
It is pathetic.
But, you know, whatever.
You're alright to leave.
You're alright to stay.
Anyway, so Professor Lockhurst's apology came after he faced calls from the student union to be fired, and Durham University announced it was launching an investigation as a matter of urgency.
And he's going nowhere by the looks of it, and good on him, and best of luck to him.
If you need any support, just say.
So a university spokesman refused to rule out the possibility of Professor Luxor's behaviour being part of the investigation.
And if he is, for standing his ground and defending free speech, well then the Free Speech Union ought to be involved, and if they aren't already, I'd be surprised.
The university added it categorically did not agree with the comments made by Little during its after-dinner speech on Friday night.
No one thought you ever did.
That's not how guest speakers work.
We had a guest speaker.
The university implicitly agrees with everything they've said.
No one thinks that.
I don't know why we have to have that conversation every time.
As Little rose to speak, several students staged a walkout, at which point Professor Luckhurst shouted at Southgate College, we value freedom of speech, and pathetic, according to the student newspaper Palentine.
During his speech, Little said he was disappointed he did not see any sex workers that night.
I mean, again, so this is what they were offended by, right?
And he opens the speech with, I don't know, prostitutes here, I'm very upset.
Why did I bother?
He went on to see that science or pure facts are that, quote, a person with an X and a Y chromosome that has a long dangling penis is scientifically a man, and that's pretty much scientifically end of the story, Palentine reported.
Palatinate.
They're scientifically a male, not a man.
What's the difference?
You become a man.
You've got to walk down a lot of roads before you become a man.
So, man is gender and male is biological sex.
Well, it's a role in life, isn't it?
It's a station.
Whereas you are born male.
That's fair.
So he continues, quote, It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the cause of Africa's problems, just as it is fairly easily to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism.
Little added.
I mean, demonstrable.
We can see...
He was really going full tilt to get cancelled by these students.
Well, he's right as well.
He's got the data on his side.
Because the reference there to the educational underachievement, well, we had the race report, and as it showed, if you had people who were born in Nigeria and then moved to the UK, they performed better than most groups.
And those from the Caribbean who came to the UK performed poorly compared to other groups.
It's like, right, so if there's institutional racism, surely it would treat the Nigerians and the descendants of Nigerians who were slaves the same, right?
Yeah, yeah.
Because they look the damn same.
Although people would say that slavery was in place for 400 years, so it imbued certain cultural traits and behaviours.
So, for example, if you had intelligent children, they'd be taken away from you.
You taught your kids to act stupid.
I think that's a bit silly when we're talking about the 21st century.
No, it's not.
Slavery went on for 400 years.
Yeah.
So 400 years is a long time for attitudes and behaviours to be ingrained in a culture.
And then you've got 200 years of cultural change, not only in the Caribbean itself, but then moving to the UK, living in the UK, being raised...
Yeah, but come on.
Oh, come on.
Slavery didn't just end.
And then it's like, oh my God, we're so equal.
Look at this.
Everybody's equal now.
Well, if 400 years...
There was only civil rights in the 50s or whatever, the 60s.
In America.
But if you're looking at 400 years can do institutional change in a culture, well then 200 years of institutional change can also take place.
Yeah, but what I'm saying is there are probably other bad things coming in after that.
But you don't think the Africans also have taken that route?
So Nigerians, I mean, certainly I can't speak for all Nigerians, but the Nigerians that I know have quite a strong family structure and they also tend to go to church and live a good life like that.
Not that I live like that.
But exactly, cultural differences.
Yeah, cultural differences.
Not the underachievement because they're both black and therefore both being systemically...
No, but you can't compare the descendants of slaves with people from Nigeria.
Yeah.
You can if you're arguing that systemic racism keeps people with brown skin down.
Yeah, but I think the systemic racism argument is more complex than just saying it's just brown people.
I mean, not for all people.
The systemic racism argument is based on racism, not on cultural difference.
But if you dig deeper into it, then...
Well, then you're not making a systemic or racism argument at that point, are you?
Well, I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree to agree that I'm right.
Okay.
But anyway, the argument goes that essentially you are both black, therefore, well, you're both victims of racism in the same way, and it's like, well, actually, how do they perform differently in every strata of society?
Cultural differences.
Anyway, so we'll move on from that, though, in which he makes his points there.
And of course, white working class males underperform pretty much everyone.
Performing lowest, actually.
Right, right.
I think gypsies were the only ones below us.
Right.
Fantastic.
Jeez.
Again, no systemic racism there, though.
That's how the system works.
He finished the speech with a message about the importance of listening and to doubting people's opinions.
So again, I mean, being a liberal about the things, terrible.
Students have written to Durham's vice-chancellor claiming that Little made transphobic, sexist, and racist and classist remarks during his speech.
Throw anything else in, why don't you?
Let me just make up any old crop.
I mean, again, they're sending a message to the Chancellor.
When did they not?
I mean, when did the leftists not complain about anything?
There was a guest speaker who was a right winger.
Okay, let's just say he's done all these things.
And I think it was Milo or Carl or someone who got booked at some university and a letter of complaint was sent to the university administration before they'd even turned up to give the speech that they were going to make these remarks that were sexist, racist.
You haven't even seen the bloody speech.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
That's like the complaint email that a comedy club received about me.
So somebody sent a complaint email.
But the person wasn't there.
See, yeah, we don't reckon they were there, because they said I was homophobic, transphobic, misogynist, and I didn't mention transgender people, I didn't mention gay people, so I couldn't be in either of those things.
I was misogynist, so that was a lucky guess.
They got the misogyny, they were like, well, I'll throw it in.
Classist, maybe.
I don't know.
Why not?
I mean, they put it in there.
Anyway, finishing off with this.
So an open letter signed by a thousand students saying they were butthurt.
Quote, distressed and emotional after hearing a speech while stopped drinking so much.
They called for Professor Luckhurst to apologise for showing a complete disregard for the student welfare.
My welfare!
Your welfare.
Oh, your welfare!
Get a grip!
You student...
What is wrong with people these days?
I get it.
What are you going to do when you get...
I'd love to see these people just work a day on a building site.
The students I hung around were way more fun.
Like, we enjoyed Mischief.
University used to be a place you went to to try and get laid but never get laid and take lots of drugs and drink.
Well, it's just on the political side of things.
I remember everyone enjoying the mischief.
The mischief was the fun.
The people who don't enjoy the mischief, what are you doing there?
What's the point?
Anyway, so we'll skip over some of that because you call them pathetic.
There's also the point here.
The Student Union said the position of Professor Luckhurst was untenable, adding no principal gets to abuse their students.
Call them pathetic and then attack them for just wanting to be safe in their home.
This is Noam Chomsky.
Again, I'm going to just say the hell with him.
He was very much a promoter of the idea that universities should be seen as a home of students.
No, they're a place of learning.
They're not your house.
Again, they refer to it as a home.
Are they thinking old folks home?
Well, there's nothing that can harm you.
No dangers.
I mean, that's what they have in mind.
I don't want to sit around and just talk about intersectionality.
Get lost.
Yeah, you should be challenged.
Anyway, but that's that.
We'll move on from this.
So this is just some other responses from people.
So this is someone saying that, well, why is my invitation to talk about cats?
And the answer is, nowhere, because you're not interesting.
No one wants to hear it.
Whereas for Rod Little, interesting.
I'd like to hear what she says about cats.
I want to know how much she spends on cat food each week.
Probably a lot.
But anyway, talking about the fact that no one wants to hear them, or who do they want to hear?
Well, I have an idea in my mind.
So this is an event that took place a few days ago.
So this is at Penn State.
I have a good friend who was there.
Carl gave a speech there for Turning Point USA. Another group was set up called Uncancelled America, or Cancelled America, and they booked Milo to turn up.
So you can see, again, in this place, the local leftists being butthurt.
And then if we go to the next link on this, this is Milo's full speech, which you can go and check out.
Is that Milo?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Is that what he looks like now?
He says he's put on weight because he's become heterosexual.
He's got to get used to the lifestyle of being heterosexual.
Which, okay, but I thought we'd just play a quick clip from this just to get a taste of it.
And you can see him there promoting Pray the Gay Away, which, eh, that's what he's doing now.
So let's play this.
Is it picking things up?
Should be.
All right.
No!
Look, I'm not walking around with this pointed at my mouth.
It's very bad for my recovery.
But there's the point.
People want to go and see him.
That's the difference.
That's why people are of note.
Agree or disagree with them?
You know how he says he's straight now.
Is he just trolling?
What's he doing?
I don't know.
I think he's genuine.
He threw his ring away that he got married with.
It's a lot of money to throw away for a laugh.
Nobody can have sex with his ring now.
But, like, is he just trolling?
Because this seems like another thing just designed to inflame liberal sensibilities.
Which I totally salute, but, like, I just don't entirely believe him.
It is incredibly amazing.
Well, you can go and watch the full speech if chaps are interested, and him talking about the fact that he doesn't want to hold the mic like that.
But anyway, we'll end up there.
Let's go to the video comments.
Cool.
So, trying to get one of our kids to be good tonight, and we told her that Santa is watching, because, you know, Christmas is coming up.
She said, yeah, I know, and then pointed at our smoke detector and said, through that, I'm concerned.
I don't get it.
She thinks that's the chimney?
Well, I guess it's to do with smoke, isn't it?
Oh, yeah.
And also it's in the ceiling.
Also, nobody's really got a chimney anymore.
Have you got a chimney in your house?
I live in an apartment.
Actually, I live in an apartment as well.
I've got a chimney.
Bastard.
Can't have a fire in it, though.
What?
I've got a fireplace with a chimney for Santa to get in, so I'll get presents.
Oh, it's just for Santa.
Right.
Well, it is now because I'm not allowed to have a fire.
Okay.
Anyway, to the next one.
Life as a Unicorn, My Dad Made a Porno, My Life in Transition, Marvel Pride, DC Pride, Lesbian Batwoman, Love is Love, Six Angry Girls, The Autistic Trans Guide to Life, Man Enough to Be a Woman, Yes, You Are Trans Enough, The Trans Pride Coloring Book, Trans Britain, Our Journey from the Shadows.
And those were just the books in English I could find around Herr Morfty and Danies.
Help!
Oh, she's having so much fun.
I always enjoy video comics.
Yeah.
That's hilarious.
Although I feel the same way about it as I do about people who complain about my comedy.
Don't come and see my comedy.
Don't buy those booty lights.
The lassie who complained about my comedy said she'd come to see the show in June or July.
Found it horrific.
Then came back in October.
It was still horrific.
Yeah, because it's still me.
And it will be next year.
Yeah, yeah.
I'm going to stay horrific.
Anyway, but she's at her sister's bookstore helping out.
Oh, right, yeah.
Let's just, like, kill me.
I do sort of feel like it is kind of being, like, just jammed down people's throats a little bit.
I do want to know the ones in Danish, if there's some interesting ones, so have fun with that.
We really need to go to Copenhagen and meet up some people or something.
I've been to Copenhagen, it was fun.
I did a gig in a...
Wait, no, we had the elections, they're full of communists, we need to go to Jylland.
Well, they've got that Christiania, or whatever it's called, where they have their own...
They're sort of like the Portland Autonomous Zone, but nicer and with more drugs.
Yeah.
She lectured me on it last time because I got facts wrong, so I don't want to say anything.
So, we'll go to the next one.
Hey, Lotus Eaters.
I got a brand new gun for the collection.
This here is the Kyokyo Shiki Tanjoju, or the Japanese Type 99.
This gun was selected by the Japanese military due to the fact that it met their height requirements.
This is due to that the old Type 38s were taller than the average Japanese man.
So, they needed a shorter gun.
Yeah, that's an interesting fact as well.
Interesting.
Yeah, I always love the phrase, Chinaman, send him a step ladder.
I love Mafia too.
Anyway, but the gun show-off, I really do enjoy.
Did you ever used to have a gun, Leo?
Well, funny you should mention that, because my dad had a gun that's so big, it's banned in America.
It's banned in America?
Yeah, yeah.
I'll never have it.
It's a punt gun.
But they've got the Japanese ones there.
My dad's an expert and my dad's a gunsmith.
So he used to value just weird, rare guns for auction.
So many of these Mongolian rifles that were like all like they're for on horseback from like way back in the day.
So like, you know, they couldn't make the steel hard enough and the powder burnt too slowly to have a short barrel.
So this enormous long barrel banded up.
And like this big counterweight on this side and it would have like a flaming wick and the wick, you know, you'd pull a string and the wick would go down so you'd get one shot.
But it was really just for...
So John has just said that punt guns are legal in America.
This one wasn't legal in America.
This one was illegal.
It was too big.
Or is your party fact finally dead?
You had a fat check.
Fact checked.
Fake news!
No, that's not true!
Punt gun's illegal.
I'm going to check it right now.
Anyway.
Punt gun.
The only question I've got are the chaps who have guns in the audience.
Does anyone have a Finnish Mosem Nagant?
Because I always want to see how much those are.
Federal regulations prohibit their use in migratory waterfowl hunting.
Wait, so that, hang on, so it's not the illegal to own the gun, it's just the usage...
Oh, it's not illegal to own it, it's just illegal to use it.
Well, what's the point of having a gun if you can't use it?
I could shoot at a burglar, I mean, a bit overkill.
You can't shoot at a burglar with it.
Why not?
Because he could claim that he's a migratory waterfowl.
And then what?
And then it's illegal.
Well, there you are, burglars.
Tips for what you're up to.
Let's give her the next video a comment.
Because she's having a hissy fit because she can't go into politics.
That's what you signed up for.
I've never forgiven Netflix for ruining the House of Cards stories.
Written by a Conservative MP and converted in peerless fashion into three BBC series, the tale mingles Macbeth with Machiavelli to weave a constitutional crisis that matches events of today.
As with any British TV adaptation, it succeeds where the Americans fail because it actually reaches a conclusion.
Wasn't it also rumoured that she was thinking about running for the presidency at some point as well?
Hmm.
She does.
I don't think she could cause any more harm.
I mean, the Queen might have a heart attack and die if she does that, just because it's just so insulting.
Anyway, but on the point of House of Cards, I've never watched the British version.
I don't know if you have.
No, I haven't.
I've watched Yes Minister a lot.
I've watched the American version of House of Cards.
I've watched Benny Hill.
I mean...
But yeah, so is the American version the one with Kevin Spacey in it?
Yeah.
Right.
And then all of a sudden he's just not in it.
And like his wife takes over the presidency.
And it's really weird.
It's just like...
Like Kamala Harris.
Yeah.
But it's also, it's so obvious that like they were going somewhere and the story was very good.
Like it was, you know, I was interested.
And then all of a sudden he gets done.
So then it's just like, well, he's dead.
Well, that's what happens if you hire a nonce.
Let that be a lesson to any other Netflix producers.
Actually, a lot of Netflix output is so shite.
To be honest, if we can't convince them that nonce flicks is a bad idea, at least we can convince them it'll hurt their bottom line.
Literally the bottom.
No!
Let's go to the next one.
You're right, lads.
So, just watched you go in a cartoon epoch.
That was brilliant.
I really loved it.
About the books I was going to send you.
Currently moving house.
Moving in the week before Christmas, which is a nightmare.
It's my first house, so I might actually do an update on that for you.
But yeah, thank you again.
I'll definitely get the books to you.
It might take a little while.
Cheers.
Are these history books, I take it?
I'm not entirely sure.
I assume they're books for the book club or something.
First editions of the Gulag Archipelago, he says.
I really don't want to do a book club on that.
Because it's long.
How many books do you read a week?
No.
How many books do you read a month?
I don't know.
They're all over there.
Hey, Unmasked!
I've got that.
That was the last book I read.
We had Andy in for it.
Yeah, I saw Andy on Sunday.
Not the Sunday before.
But we do book clubs, so essentially we'll read the book and then we'll do like an hour version of it.
So you don't have to read the 300 pages, right?
Right, that's what I need because I find it very difficult to read books because I'm used to just scrolling and looking at pictures of Capybara.
Yeah, I mean, me too.
Which is why I don't really enjoy reading at all.
And why it's kind of a halt of work.
But the idea of doing Gulag Archipelago is slightly...
What is it?
Like 900 pages or something?
And just every page was in the Gulag.
It was terrible.
Here's why.
There's an interesting bit of data in The Economist this week that shows that there's communities around former Gulags in Russia are doing better.
Because the people there are more intelligent.
Because obviously all these political dissidents were sent to the gulags and they were super intelligent people.
And so when they left the gulags, if they didn't die or whatever, they had families.
They kept a lot of their contacts with Moscow, but would stay in that area and start businesses or contribute to the local economy, become accountants, become university lecturers, whatever.
And so it creates this sort of cone of intelligence and prosperity around former gulags.
That's such an unintended consequence.
It fits so well as well, because I've read accounts in North Korea and Soviet Union of average people who worked within the party who didn't get very high, but they noticed that the party members were so mediocre, especially the ones who progressed.
Because if you were intelligent or competent, gone.
Oh yeah, absolutely.
And you still see it happening in local authorities in the UK. Yeah, it's a rule of power.
Yeah.
Let's go to the next one.
That's where I got fired from.
Is that a video game?
Yeah.
Seattle.
Alright.
That's awesome.
Thanks for that.
Speaking of which, I've replayed Fallout New Vegas recently a lot.
Is it good?
It's very good.
Is it one of those games you can just play?
Because I don't like these games where you've got to go and collect all this stuff and it's boring and it's like doing admin.
No, no.
If I want to do my taxes, I'll do my taxes.
I want to have some fun.
There's that crap if you want it, but you don't have to at all.
There's the main quest, which is about the fate of New Vegas and the Hoover Dam, because it's post-apocalypse.
And there's the NCR, the New Californian Republic, fighting Caesar's Legion.
These two tribes that have eventually formed up.
Is it fun?
Yeah.
I highly recommend it.
It's fast.
You're not just bored.
It's not Call of Duty.
I mean, if that's what you're asking for.
I like Call of Duty.
It's really fun.
The gunplay isn't as good as Call of Duty.
I'll give it that.
Maybe not for you.
My dad's got a gun.
Anyway, I was thinking about doing the politics.
I need to get around to writing more about it.
If anyone has any good memes or takes on New Vegas, send them my way.
So let's go for the written comments on the side because I think we're out of video comments.
So on Labour, saying don't vote Labour, Baron von Warhawk, watching that smug Labour idiot defend China sickens me.
He is defending organ harvesting, corruption, pollution, slavery, genocide and foreign terrorism.
This man is obviously brought by China.
Kick him out of the UK government as quickly as possible.
I wish we could.
There is no way except for his local constituents or the party to do it.
Bold words, but I can't help but agree.
Yeah.
I can't get over it.
He's just so brazen-faced.
He's just like, yeah, we're not criticising China.
I'm not going to mention the word genocide ever.
Well, then you're clearly bought by them.
What the hell's wrong with you?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
You know what?
He's part of the socialist group within Labour.
I can't remember the title bit.
I think they're called Labour.
No, but it's like 40 MPs who are not...
Like super momentum or something.
Kind of.
Basically, they'll defend it to the death kind of thing.
Literally to the death.
They're the kind of people who would become Mao or Stalin, right?
I'd love to just go person to person, invite them in for an interview, LBC, and ask them that question.
Just one after another.
Expose them.
Anyway, so Free Will 2112.
Richard Bergen is a hard-left Corbynite, and other Corbyn supporters like John MacDonald and Diane Abbott had positive things to say about Chairman Mao.
Did Morgan harm, as Chairman Diane said.
So it is not surprising that the hard-left MP like Bergen would defend the CCP. He is a fellow traveller.
I remember he also went on a big anti-Semitic rant at one point that got him in a lot of trouble, but then he just stuck around as an MP because...
Yeah, because that doesn't get you cancelled from Labour.
No, anti-Semitism, A-OK. Student of history, the Armenian genocide was bad.
Leftists, you're being racist towards the Turks.
That's the argument.
Alpha of the Betas, as someone who works in academia and tech industry, you can take it to the bank.
The tentacles of China are everywhere.
People are bribed.
Professors are naively given gifts, like smartwatches, that submit their data.
Chinese researchers and Western companies send research back to China.
Everywhere they go, they have dual secret loyalties.
It's an open secret.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And we saw it with the Wuhan lab leak theory.
So 20 scientists signed a letter dismissing the claim that the virus could have come from the Wuhan weapons lab, biological lab, as a conspiracy theory.
And it turns out they're all paid.
There's also the FBI. They keep arresting Chinese citizens who have basically stolen research at the border trying to get back to China because they've sold it for money back to the CCP. Every year, there's a few dozen.
One of the biggest espionage cases in history was China stealing the blueprints for the F-35 bomber and then they brought out their own fighter.
They brought out their own plane, the J-20.
It's the same bloody It's just the same, with a different colour.
It's like when you see the Nike knock-offs down Woolwich Market.
They've just taken the logo off.
Anyway, getting on to the conversion therapy stuff.
John Wade says, Feeling unsafe for no reason is irrational, and irrational fears are pathologies.
You need some treatment.
Robert Miller says, Conversion therapy via prayer equals evil.
Conversion therapy via hormones and surgeon's scalpel stunning and brave.
Kevin Fox says, I don't know the data.
To be honest, I presume that's true, because we keep getting told.
What is it, 41% or something like that?
Yeah, I'm not sure.
I'm not sure exactly what the...
But I know it is more likely to commit suicide and be victims of homicide as well.
I loved...
I can't remember who it was.
I think it might have been Rosa Dorn that brought it up.
There's a constant narrative in the UK as well about transgenocide going on.
And she got the data.
It was one trans person who'd been murdered in the last 10 years.
But statistically that counts as quite a high proportion of the population because there aren't that many, I guess.
Is that genocide though?
Yeah, it's not exactly a genocide.
It's also, you know, some guy kills her, the state did this.
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, yeah, don't get me wrong, especially for a long time, transgender people went through a lot of social stigma and a lot of, you know, there's...
They go through a lot.
Even now, you can imagine how difficult that would be to go through.
So that's why there has to be free debate and discussion around how best...
Tolerance.
Yeah.
I mean, that's the goal for normal people.
Not for everyone.
So George Winger says, It boggles the mind that governments are willing to prevent adults from choosing therapy to, in their minds, fix themselves, but not willing to prevent a potential harm to children.
Hmm.
I mean, again, I'm really finding it funny that there are people out there who are like, yeah, give me a grand and I'll make you not gay.
Like, they actually believe what they're doing is gonna work.
It's going to work in terms of getting them money.
I guess it does.
I suppose Milo would argue the opposite.
We'll have that debate someday.
So Kevin Fox says it's not just Iranian men who get killed for being raped.
For them at least transition is a way out.
For women it is not so easy.
If a married woman is attacked and raped she will be stoned to death for adultery with no option of transition while the rapist may be flogged or jailed for only six months.
Jesus.
That's the Islamic law for you.
It is Sharia.
I don't know what to say about that, but it's just, yeah, Muslim world.
Sorry, just barbarian.
Like, utterly barbarian.
Islam does not produce any good legal system.
So, Edward Woodstock says, now for a word from our sponsor, it's your boy, the Chinese Communist Party.
The Chinese Communist Party has all sorts of features, such as single-party government, social credit score, a systemic human rights abuses.
That's not all, though.
It also has...
What?
Intrinsic.
Intrinsic disinformation campaigns so you can experience the feeling of being gaslit in your own country as well as China.
From brain-dead leftists who have chosen the worst hill to die on since the Battle of Hastings.
Sign up today by voting the Labour Party or equivalent Economic Dead Ends.
That's fantastic.
That's hilarious.
You know, if you don't get that money from She, you should, like, one of your shows or one of your videos, right, you should open it and be like, it's your sponsor, like, Ray Channel Edges, like Dankula does.
Except, you know, it's She and the lads.
Anyway, we're out of time.
So, if you want more from us, go to thelotaciers.com.
Please subscribe to get access to streaming content, such as the interview with Miles.
There is a short clip put out on the second channel of that if you don't want to subscribe because, I don't know, you're watching the show but you don't like it, I guess.
Alright, you might be out of money, fair enough.
But otherwise, there's plenty of free content there.
Where do they find you?
If you want to find me, I'm on YouTube.
You can see my videos.
I put up a video once every week or whatever, Leo Kearse.
I'm also on Twitter and Instagram and all the rest of it, so you can follow me on those things as well.
All right.
Don't you have shows coming up as well, though?
I had a show last night.
It was great.
How many hate watchers?
£666.
That's so much money, isn't that?
Right, okay.
666.
Sacrificing anyone to the devil on the show?
No, I didn't have Travis Scott on.
Anyway, that's all from us.
If you want more from us, we'll be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock.
Thank you and goodbye.
Export Selection