Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 7, 2021 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:47

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #214

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 7th of September 2021.
	I'm joined by Carl.
	Hello!
	And today we're going to be talking about the eternal vaccine boost and also the Papers Please situation that is now being brought into the UK. Thank you, Conservatives.
	Not just the UK either.
	Yeah, not just the UK, but on that one I'm particularly mad because, you know, I live here.
	Also, Project Veritas going on a communist hunt.
	They're going to catch a big one, and they did.
	Good boys.
	Good boys.
	Doing the Lord's work.
	And also white supremacy with a tan.
	Yeah.
	It's very much like the black white supremacist Larry Elder.
	Well, CNN have come to the conclusion that even if they got rid of all of the white people ever, there'd still be white supremacy, which is unfortunate for CNN, I suppose.
	There are no white people, is there still white supremacy?
	CNN's answer, yes.
	Rightio.
	Anyway, some of the things I mentioned first on the website, so I think it was yesterday this went up, the speech you gave at Academic Agents Conference, the proposed road to Trumpton.
	I should mention, not all of the clips from that are being released publicly.
	This is one of them that's being released, I think.
	What's his name?
	I've forgotten Mark's name now.
	Not So Obvious.
	There we are, sorry.
	Not So Obvious has also been released, and if you want the rest, you have to go to the guys who organized the events page and pay for their book, because that's how they're raising some money to pay for the event.
	It was a really good event, and we recommend you do.
	But otherwise, your speech is free, available on notices.com, so go and check that out.
	Also, next thing to mention is just a series of articles that we've had up.
	So Hannah Gale did another interview with Will Noland, talking about how teachers don't know best, and it is not to them to decide the world.
	Will Noland's goodest boy.
	Yeah, good boy.
	You're a big fan of him.
	That's free.
	So if we go to the next one, we have...
	This is Josh's article, which went up over the last weekend, about as the world gets better, political discourse gets worse.
	This is premium, I believe, so...
	Very good point as well.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	If we go to the next one, this is Bose.
	Biden's great game, because, of course.
	Ah, yeah, because this follows up a previous article he had done talking about how Biden is messing everything up.
	I mean, the great game being Afghanistan, of course.
	And then the last one being one from Hugo talking about the Helter Skelter 2.0.
	No, it's Harry Miller.
	Sorry, Harry Miller?
	Yeah, from Faircop.
	Oh, sorry, I assumed it was Hugo because he did the thumbnail.
	Because I remember him asking for that image.
	Which is a good image.
	I'm glad I took that one.
	Anyway, go ahead and give that a read.
	But let's get right into the news.
	I'm going to keep stealing that until I die.
	Yeah, it's fine until Keemstar sees us.
	So, are you prepared for your eternal vaccine booster shots and showing your papers to the relevant local authorities when you want to go for a pint or to get food from the supermarket or whatever it is that you're going to be forced to do?
	Because that's probably something that's going to happen.
	But before I continue, if you're watching this on YouTube, well, that's about as far as we're going to go because YouTube has editorial policies about what you can and can't talk about with regards to The news on COVID-19, vaccines, and ivermectin.
	And so this is about all you're going to be able to watch of this on YouTube.
	But if you'd like to see what we're going to say about all of this, you can navigate yourself down to the description where there will be a link to the full podcast on aloadsets.com.
	And you can, of course, watch it all there for free.
	So that's...
	All the clips on BitChute, Rumble, blah, blah, blah.
	Or any of our alternative media platforms, which we, of course, use regularly.
	But yeah, so for those people watching on YouTube, that's about as far as you can go.
	Go click the link to find out more.
	For the people who aren't on YouTube, let's talk about Israel.
	Israel is a really interesting case study.
	I know I'm going to cut it to death.
	Well, look, I'm not a socialist.
	I've got no problem with Israel.
	In fact, I'm a supporter of the existence of Israel.
	Anyway, Israel has given us a great case study in this because the situation in Israel is very interesting.
	So if we can scroll down on here, John, I think that we should have a graph.
	There we go.
	As you can see, the situation in Israel is not good when it comes to the sheer number of cases.
	So Israel currently have their most confirmed cases ever, which is On August the 30th, the latest data I have here is 60,000 confirmed cases, but only 197 deaths on that day.
	So that's a very small percentage of people who have it, who are dying from it.
	And the reason that this is notable is that Israel is 78% vaccinated.
	So overall, they've given out something like 14 million doses, and Israel has a population of about 7 to 8 million people.
	And this means that 78% of people are double vaccinated.
	Yeah.
	I mean, I think Israel is the only major country, not micronation, that has actually done the vaccination process to its totality.
	And yeah, it doesn't stop the virus because...
	No.
	No.
	It apparently doesn't stop the virus, and it doesn't stop the virus so much that they are now at peak COVID cases.
	Although, like I said, the deaths are not at peak, so there clearly is some kind of impact when it comes to preventing loss of life, so that's good.
	But of course they're rolling out the third, and it looks like, if we can go to the next one, Israel's coronavirus czar is preparing to roll out a fourth coronavirus vaccine dose.
	I'm starting to think that maybe that isn't the answer.
	It doesn't stop the virus.
	The deaths are down.
	Like, why would another vaccine dose do anything?
	Almost everyone.
	Four out of five people are vaccinated.
	Like, this isn't the solution to the problem at this point, it seems.
	But yes, so they're preparing to roll out a fourth booster shot for people, so good luck with that.
	And the problem, of course, is that these vaccines are simply not effective against the Delta variant.
	Moving to the next one, NPR reports that health officials and then Pfizer have said that their data shows a dip in the vaccine's protection after six months after receiving the second shot, and that Delta accounts for nearly all of the infections in Israel today.
	So, there's no point vaccinating people against something they have already been vaccinated for that isn't, and for a case, for a variant that isn't affected or prevented by the vaccine.
	Literally, it's that clear.
	WebMD have shown us that the vaccinated, of course, can still get COVID, and we have lots of anecdotal examples of this.
	Not just WebMD, because I know some people are going to be iffy about WebMD.
	The NHS, CDC, everyone else also says this.
	I didn't realise there was something iffy about WebMD.
	Oh, you know, what do I have?
	Cancer.
	Every time.
	Oh, right.
	But yeah, so apparently they say that a new study by Imperial College London has shown that fully vaccinated people still face considerable risks for contracting COVID-19.
	At the same time, they were three times less likely to test positive for the coronavirus than unvaccinated people.
	And they say these findings confirm our previous data showing that both doses of the vaccine offer good protection against getting infected, says the Imperial School of Public Health.
	However, we can also see there's still a risk of infection, as no vaccine is 100% effective, and we know that some double vaccinated people can still become ill from the virus.
	So even with the easing of restrictions, we should act with caution to help protect one another and curb the rate of infections.
	So basically, this isn't going to be prevented ever, it seems.
	There's never going to be a time when there aren't new variants of this coming out.
	There's never going to be a time when the vaccines prevent the virus from spreading around.
	The lockdowns didn't work.
	The vaccines didn't work.
	It's one of those things we're just going to have to live with.
	So, what do you think the UK government's doing, Callum?
	Probably more vaccines.
	Oh, yeah.
	Oh, gotcha.
	Anyway, so the latest UK data is reasonably similar, actually.
	41,000, this is yesterday's data I'm citing, 41,000 people tested positive after like over a million tests that day.
	And we've also got the percentage of vaccinations there as well.
	Which is, yes, 88% first dose, 79% second dose, so really very approximate to what's happened in Israel.
	And, of course, this has translated to 45 deaths yesterday.
	Of people who tested positive for COVID within 28 days, not necessarily people who died because of COVID. Anyway, there are currently 7,600 people in hospital with COVID. We have over 100,000 hospital beds.
	NHS isn't being overwhelmed.
	The deaths are very low, in double digits.
	Tests are going on, a million tests a day.
	It's not ravaging the country, and if you just go outside and walk around, everyone's just getting on with their lives.
	It's going normally now.
	And you may remember that there were no plans for vaccine passports.
	As Nadim Zahawi said, we have no plans.
	Yet.
	Anyway, let's talk about how we're getting vaccine passports, shall we?
	So the BBC reported this yesterday.
	You said, what was it, Claire Fox from the Brexit party?
	Retweeted him at the time, being like, can I hold you to this?
	And he was like, absolutely.
	Oh, did he?
	I didn't see that.
	Anyway, so the Conservative government are going to be introducing vaccine passports for nightclubs and other indoor venues in England, and will be required at the end of this month, the vaccines minister has confirmed.
	Zahawi has said that it's the right time to start the scheme for sites with large crowds, as all over-18s have been offered two jabs by then.
	But that doesn't stop the coronavirus.
	It doesn't stop people getting sick from the coronavirus.
	So why is now the right time?
	What difference does that make to what's happening?
	I don't know if this has changed because nothing's ever concrete anymore, but I remember the rules being that the idea is that you can show your passport if I got vaccinated, but if you come with a negative test, that's not enough to let you in.
	So even though you're vaccinated, you can spread it.
	If negative tests, you can't.
	Because these aren't consistent standards, because as we'll see in a bit...
	Well, it's not just that.
	Then it's obviously not about stopping the spread.
	Because if I've got a negative test, I'm not going to spread it.
	Of course.
	But that's...
	You're right, obviously.
	But it's also not a consistent standard, as we'll see shortly.
	And so Zahawi also indicated the government's plans to offer COVID booster jab to the most vulnerable people, including all of the 50s, could also get the go-ahead this month.
	So enjoy your third booster shot.
	And I'm sure in six months you'll get another one, and another one, and another one.
	Obviously, there has been pushback to this.
	The Nighttime Industries Association have said this is going to cripple the industry.
	And, of course, for some reason, and I'm only assuming that it's about money, because I think this is probably about money.
	I think someone's getting paid out of all of this.
	Zahawi is thinking about extending the vaccine rollouts to all 12 to 15-year-olds, saying it would be absolutely the right thing to do if the UK's chief medical officers recommend it.
	If.
	If.
	Big if.
	Which they don't.
	They don't recommend that.
	Scientists, the UK's vaccine advisory body, have refused to give the green light to vaccinating healthy children between 12 and 15 years on health grounds alone.
	They said the children were at such low risk from the virus that jabs only offer a marginal benefit.
	They did say that it could be wise to vaccinate 200,000 teenagers who have specific underlying conditions.
	Maybe.
	Maybe.
	And they identified children with chronic heart, lung, and liver conditions were at much higher risk from COVID than healthy children.
	But the decision not to recommend the vaccine to all healthy children was based on a concern over an extremely rare side effect of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which causes heart inflammations and can lead to palpitations and chest pain.
	And, of course, death.
	As in the case of at least two now, I think, BBC presenters themselves, and of course other people that nobody ever wants to report because, you know, that makes it sound like the vaccines have got...
	Anything other than 100% success rate.
	I think the American stats, I don't know if you have them, I think it was like 60 in a million.
	Oh no, I actually do have that.
	Very nice thing.
	Dates from the US where millions of teenagers have been vaccinated suggest there are 60 cases of the heart condition for every million second doses given to 12 to 17 year old boys, compared to 8 in 1 million in girls.
	So there are side effects.
	The teenagers are not at risk from COVID. What's the risk per million of teenagers who get COVID? Much lower.
	Well, that's the thing.
	If it's comparable, which is the government saying, here it is, well then there's no point.
	I mean, we saw the statistics back a couple of months ago, didn't we?
	Almost zero children have died from this.
	And of course, another study has shown that young adult lung function is not affected by COVID. Research said the lung function in the participants of their experiments or study were similar regardless of COVID-19 infection.
	Young people not at risk of COVID. So for some reason, Zahawi has decided that teenagers should be able to overrule their parents' decision in whether they should get vaccinated or not.
	Why?
	So he said, I'd do it if the science agrees.
	Scientists said, we don't agree, and he went, screw you, I'm going to do it anyway.
	And moreover, you don't even need your parents' consent, which is weird, because, I mean, the whole concept of informed consent is basically the ethical bedrock of modern medical science and practice, and, I mean, we've only just started finding out what the actual damage that the vaccines themselves can do.
	As we say, 60 in a million.
	When it comes to these heart conditions, which, honestly, I'm amazed that the BBC is prepared to report this stuff.
	To be honest, I'm amazed they're finally saying, oh, yeah, maybe there is a bit of a problem with that, actually.
	It only took two of our presenters to die from blood clots for us to be like, eh, not perfect.
	But anyway.
	So, for some reason, teenagers will be able to overrule their parents to take the COVID-19 vaccine if the jabs are introduced, Zahawi has said.
	He wants the 12 to 15-year-olds to receive the jab, and they were judged to be competent, if they were judged to be competent, I suppose, then their decision would override the parents' wishes for them not to have it.
	Why?
	In what other circumstances, is that the standard?
	There's a medical standard that you can get children to consent to a procedure, and I can't remember the name of the standard, but it's essentially you run a test on them to see if they are understanding of the risks, understanding of the benefits and whatnot, and then the doctor makes an assessment just based on child-to-child.
	You can't do that on a mass scale, for one.
	But even if we accept that, the science disagrees, Minister.
	Yes.
	The scientists told you, don't do it.
	And I'm not sure, I don't think that children can give informed consent to this in principle anyway.
	So, either way, it doesn't matter, because that's what they're going to do for some reason, because they're conservatives.
	So plans are currently being drawn up as to whether the teenagers should be vaccinated, even though the scientists have said no.
	But Professor Chris Whitty and three other chief medical officers in the UK are reviewing the wider benefits of vaccinating the age group, such as minimising school absences, and they're expected to present their findings within days.
	Right.
	Okay, yeah.
	The name's Gillick Competence.
	Gillick Competence.
	That's the rule.
	Right, okay.
	So, I mean, I don't care about kids having a couple of days off because they got the sniffles.
	Why would I care about that?
	Why does that justify vaccines?
	What's the weird obsession with making them be vaccinated?
	Why stop at 12?
	Yeah.
	If the science has already told you 12 to 15 isn't worth it, well, then we're not following that anymore.
	We're just throwing them out.
	Well, that's the thing, isn't it?
	Why stop at 12?
	Why not go to 10?
	4.
	And why do you keep pushing it?
	Okay, well, the science might not, but there might be other reasons.
	Like, you know, they'll have fewer sick days.
	I don't care.
	You know, why are you doing this?
	Also, my stonks.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Exactly.
	It must be about stonks.
	I'm certain of it.
	Anyway, but the government is apparently waiting for advice before they continue.
	Hmm.
	So, are we going to need vaccine passports?
	Well, the MPs who want to meet Boris Johnson at number 10 need vaccine passports, which is deranged, because they're all mixing with each other in the House of Commons, but if you want to have a meeting with Boris Johnson, you need a vaccine passport or a negative test.
	This is what I mean about the not consistent standards that are being used.
	He's also had the virus.
	Exactly.
	And the vaccine.
	Twice.
	So I don't know why he's so terrified of this.
	Also, why not just do negative tests?
	Why the passport?
	John thinks it's Carrie, his wife, but I have no evidence to suggest that.
	She's also vaccinated.
	She's also vaccinated, so I can't say.
	Anyway, so, yeah, Boris has basically said that you can't meet him in 10 Downing Street if you don't have a COVID passport or a negative test.
	So this is him having, like, you know, drinks and meetings with various MPs.
	The invitation that's been seen by the Telegraph tells the MPs that for security and safety reasons, you'll need to present your NHS COVID pass, which is a horrible series of words.
	NHS COVID pass.
	I can't stand it.
	I can't goddamn stand it.
	This is...
	I mean, those of us who want NHS reform, this might actually be the thing that wakes people up to it.
	Maybe.
	Silver lining, I'm thinking here.
	Just anything.
	Yeah, now you're forced to pay for a medical service that will refuse to treat you if they think there's a pandemic going on.
	I mean, look at how many cancer deaths are there going to be.
	Excess cancer deaths.
	And now they're going to give you papers that you have to show.
	Like this health service.
	Won't give you healthcare.
	They'll actually instead enforce a papers please state and then lecture you on being white.
	It's basically Stalinism.
	Racial Stalinism.
	I hate it.
	Anyway, so a bunch of Conservative MPs have actually at least told The Telegraph, I really disagree with this.
	This is bad.
	And it's like, okay, well then do something.
	Do something.
	You know, there should be some sort of backbench revolt.
	I don't know.
	Do something, anything.
	I don't care at this point.
	Just make this stop happening.
	So, speeding up a bit because we're going on about this for a while, Boris has tweeted out his recent plans today, about an hour ago, in fact.
	So he says, the NHS cared for us when we needed it most during the worst pandemic in a century.
	Don't care.
	I pay for it.
	They're meant to do that.
	And if they didn't, then they'd be at fault.
	Not my problem.
	Not interested.
	Today, I set out my plan to ensure the NHS has long-term funding so we can help our NHS as it helped us.
	The NHS wasn't doing a charitable service.
	We pay for it.
	And now you're raising our taxes at 1.25% tax increase to pay for this.
	So effectively 2% because you pay and the employee pays it.
	Goddammit.
	So...
	Right, so, Conservatives.
	And they said in their manifesto, this was a rock-solid pledge, we will not be raising taxes.
	And here we are, raising the goddamn taxes.
	Why?
	Because of a Labour Party rhetoric coming out of Boris Johnson's fat face.
	Two, the NHS heroically treated over half a million, or heroically did their jobs.
	Don't care.
	Not my problem.
	Like, don't care!
	It does kind of remind me how the Soviet Union would talk about, like, the steel workers, or the farmers who are heroically farming the fields.
	It's like...
	Well, that's the point, isn't it?
	If they're just doing their jobs, why should I not be able to say, well, the farmers who are heroically feeding me, or the builders who heroically built the building I live in...
	Or the coal miners.
	I mean, if you're going to say, like, oh, the NHS, they're at risk of death, coal miners have a high risk of death, so...
	Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, doubtless.
	Anyway, yeah.
	So, yes, the inevitable result of an extraordinary effort that COVID has caused mounting backlogs in the number of patients needing carers at record high.
	Yeah, but that didn't have to happen, did it?
	Three, so now we'll set out how we'll support the NHS in the biggest catch-up programme in its history.
	Hopefully by defunding it, by privatising it.
	I don't care.
	I'm actually at the point now where the NHS is tyrannising me.
	Don't care.
	The whole point of the lockdown is, oh, we've got to protect the NHS. The NHS has been in no danger at all throughout this entire pandemic.
	Don't care.
	You're full of it.
	And then, of course, finally, four.
	We will build back better from the pandemic.
	Get...
	Can't stand it.
	Can't...
	Not carrying on with this.
	Right, next one.
	Gets worse.
	Gets absolutely worse.
	So, in October, there are rumours that we're going to have a firebreak lockdown, even though the country isn't being destroyed by COVID. There's no need for this.
	This is not justified.
	Why are you doing this to us?
	So yesterday, the independent newspaper claimed that the member of the government's SAGE Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, so the communists, the communists that advise the Conservative government of Britain, have revealed that the government has drawn up plans for an October firebreak COVID lockdown if increased hospitalisations continue to put pressure on the NHS. They're not.
	So communism, basically, is being imposed on us via the NHS.
	That's what's happening.
	The paper alleged that the source said restrictions could be reintroduced during school half-term at the end of next month, while a full lockdown would be unlikely.
	Last result, the school holiday could be extended to two weeks because the school summer holidays is believed to help curb a major rise in cases.
	It's the summer, obviously.
	But even then, I don't care.
	I don't want my kids missing more school.
	They already missed, like, a year's worth of school, Boris.
	It's not good for them, Boris.
	You're retarding their education, Boris, because you're a conservative.
	I can't stand it.
	It's really pissing me off.
	Boris is also said to be ready to reintroduce mask wearing and social distancing curbs on public space and transports.
	Now I'm exempt.
	Why?
	Because I can say so.
	That's why.
	There is also a possibility that travel restrictions could return.
	Of course.
	So the question is, are we going for the French route or the American route?
	And the American route being the English route.
	Right.
	So we're in France.
	How much longer can we say that?
	Well, yeah, exactly.
	We're becoming a continental country and I can't stand it.
	Anyway, so in France, of course, and in Greece, they're making vaccines mandatory for healthcare workers.
	This is something that's being discussed for the NHS at the moment.
	No solid movement on that here.
	Clap, clap.
	Thank you for working for us.
	Also, get vaccinated.
	I don't want to.
	Then you're fired.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	They're also bringing in passports for dining and travel, which has been the subject of massive protests.
	We'll go to the next one, John.
	So this law has already passed.
	It passed a couple of months ago.
	The approval was gone through, so this is just one of those things.
	You need to have a health pass.
	Papers, please, if you want to enter restaurants, trains, planes, or other public venues, which will apply to all adults.
	But the end of September will apply to everyone 12 or older.
	12-year-olds even get vaccinated in France?
	Apparently they can.
	Because I remember at the point they were bringing this in, they couldn't.
	So it was like, yeah, you can't enter anything, also there's no way of you getting them.
	Yeah.
	So naturally there have been massive protests about this.
	Thousands have been marching in cities across France to protest this.
	For six straight Saturdays, opponents have denounced what they see as a restriction of their freedom.
	Weird image as well.
	If you scroll back up there, you can see the anarcho-communist flag and then the French flags flying around.
	Yeah.
	Well, I mean, same thing, but you know.
	I mean, if your policy is so ridiculous that you can actually unite French nationalists with anarcho-communists, then perhaps it's you, that's all I'm saying, Macron.
	So they're arguing, rightly, that it's a restriction of their freedom.
	Yes, it is.
	Absolutely is.
	So, moving over to the United States, how are things going over there?
	Well, they're going a lot better.
	Actually, because there's obviously states' rights and devolutions and Republicans.
	They're the one thing.
	They're the thin red line standing between the world and total tyranny, status tyranny.
	So I just want to have salutes in the chat for Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Ohio, Indiana, Iowa, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming for all having banned Vaccine passports.
	At least, well, Oklahoma and Utah partially banning them.
	But the rest of them is banning them outright.
	Good for you.
	In Florida, if a business says they want to require you to show your proof of vaccination, they get fined $5,000 every time.
	Very good DeSantis.
	Heroic, noble, decent.
	And then we can also pour scorn on the two states that actually do require vaccine passports, which are Hawaii and New York.
	Disgusting Frenchisms abound.
	All of the others are currently not required, which shocked me about California, to be honest.
	I think they were in the process of building the infrastructure for it.
	Oh, there we go.
	But expect it in Democrat states that you're going to get tyrannized like they are being in France.
	And in Republican states, they will be preserving the very final remnants of English freedom.
	And so very quickly, let's go over the ivermectin hoax that was put out.
	You may have remembered that Joe Rogan got COVID, took some ivermectin, recovered.
	Turned into a horse.
	God, the latest MPC programming.
	It's just like, oh, it's horse medication.
	Yeah, and carrots are horse food.
	So if you eat them, you're being a horse.
	Ivermectin is used to treat humans as well, believe it or not.
	Anyway, so there were claims that a rural Oklahoma ER is being overwhelmed by people suffering from Ivermectin overdoses.
	And as you can see, Joy Reid on MSNBC, but she wasn't the only one.
	Rachel Maddow, all of the leftists, outlets basically, Rolling Stone were particularly guilty of this.
	And it turned out not to be true.
	And the ER that they thought they were citing had to put out a public statement saying no.
	That's fake news.
	That's not happening.
	You're spreading fake news.
	You're all a bunch of players of fake news.
	And so Fox have basically danced on their grave on this one.
	So this came from a particular testimony that gunshot victims are having hard times getting to facilities to get treatment.
	It's like, yeah, gunshot victims in rural Oklahoma.
	Just lining up around the block, bleeding out, because of all the Ivermectin ODs.
	Didn't happen.
	None of it happened.
	And so this was total nonsense, and they were lying, of course, because they wanted to, for some reason, create this weird...
	And as you can see here, Rachel Maddow promoting this.
	You can scroll down and see all the...
	They've got a list of tweets of people doing it, I think, at the bottom.
	Oh, yeah.
	Glenn Greenwald absolutely BTF-ing them like an absolute legend.
	Because they've all had to come out and be like, well, correction.
	No, you mean retraction.
	You mean we lied because we're trying to denigrate ivermectin, which again, it's not a new or controversial medical treatment.
	But apparently, Dr.
	V told me how this works.
	He did some research into this because he is a medical doctor.
	And apparently, ivermectin attaches to the cells in the same way that the coronavirus attaches to cells.
	But of course, it doesn't have like a deleterious effect that the coronavirus does.
	And so it just prevents it from entering your cells because it's already attached to whatever attacher it's supposed to get in there.
	That's the medical argument for it.
	Yeah, I'm not a doctor, don't take my advice.
	But of course this is why you can OD on ivermectin, you can have too much and all of your cells can get it, blah blah blah.
	But the point is, if ivermectin is such an ineffective drug, A, why does it seem to work?
	And B, what's with the weird, like, hate campaign against what, like, again, what was the other one?
	Hydroxy...
	Hydroxy...
	The medical word one.
	The one that was used in Africa, and has been used in Africa for decades.
	Suddenly, this innocuous drug that has been in use for decades, oh, that's evil, you're stupid, how dare you, that's for horses, or some of that, and it's like, okay, maybe, but there are doctors who are also saying these things do work, and Pfizer is using ivermectin in a new drug that they're developing.
	That's meant to be a twice-a-day treatment for COVID. And it's like, if it's so ineffective, why are they using it?
	Because it's not ineffective.
	Meme magic time.
	This gets approved, and then they have to admit, yeah, that it only works in the form from Pfizer that's regulated and also trademarked.
	But why are they so insistent on saying, look, there is only one way of treating COVID, and that's the vaccines.
	Are they being paid by Big Pharma?
	They don't treat COVID, they just stop you from dying.
	But that's what I mean.
	It doesn't make sense.
	Exactly.
	Are they being paid by the vaccine manufacturers?
	Or is it just that they want to impose a form of control on you?
	It's just about controlling your behaviour rather than what's actually good for you.
	But either way, all of it is absolute crap at the moment and everything's going...
	It's going to be the continual cycle.
	It's just, take your vaccine dose, update your booster shot on papers, please, and it's going to be like this forever, and I hate it.
	Fair enough.
	Anyway, have a wait until someone will cheer you up.
	Yeah, I want someone to cheer me up now.
	So, Project Veritas is a hunting communist, so, you know, I literally reminded the song like we're going on a bear hunt, like we're going on a communist hunt, and they did catch a big one, so this is the story.
	So, the first one here, projectveritas.protonmail.com.
	I assume O'Keefe is still banned or whatever, so this is the only account they've got left on Twitter.
	A California high school AP governor teacher admits communist indoctrination of students.
	Quotes from him, I have an Antifa flag on my classroom wall.
	I have 180 days to turn them into revolutionaries, and there's a reason why these kids Gen Z are becoming further left.
	And him claiming that I'm the one doing it.
	Yeah.
	Let's play the first clip of just the highlights.
	I have 180 days to turn them into revolutionaries.
	How do you do that?
	How do you...
	- You scared the fuck out of the ball.
	- Sacramento organization that is under the banner of Antifa is very loosely organized, right?
	So like, yeah, when there is like right-wing rallies and stuff, then we like, we'll create an opposition to that.
	- Yeah, beautiful. - Where would he go to connect to some of these organizations?
	I post a calendar every week.
	And I do it for extra credit.
	So they get points for doing it.
	So that encourages them to do it.
	And I've had students show up for protests, community events, tabling, food distribution, all sorts of things.
	When they go, they take pictures, they write up a reflection, that's their expression.
	Like, I have an Antifa flag on my wall, and a student complained about that, and he said it made him feel uncomfortable.
	Well, this is meant to make fascists feel uncomfortable, so if you feel uncomfortable, I don't really know what he's doing.
	Maybe you shouldn't be aligning with the values that this is antithetical to.
	So, the Cultural Revolution in the 60s was fixing the problem that It came about after the economic run.
	It ultimately failed.
	There was a lot of excesses.
	People were definitely shot in the streets that probably shouldn't have been.
	I didn't see the swastika.
	I've only just noticed that, but I'll mention that in a minute.
	So that's all of his admissions in a little highlight reel there.
	Project Veritas, that link there being the full 10 minutes you can go check out yourself, and he is just as bad as they highlighted.
	But Andy Ngo has been doing a lot of research on this, and he's thankful that Project Veritas were able to confirm his research, particularly on this specific individual.
	And it's kind of amazing, it's like he was given truth serum or something, he just spilled the beans.
	And yeah, he's serious, he's not joking either, and Well, this is what happens when they don't think there's going to be any blowback or pushback or punishment for literally indoctrinating children to become communist revolutionaries.
	Yeah, I mean, this is the...
	I mean, if you want, like, the meme version, like the leftist being like, ha-ha, the right-wingers think they're indoctrinating for Antifa and communism...
	This one.
	There'll be one.
	No, we'll do that.
	Okay, so here's the tweet from Andy Ngo.
	So he's thanking them for confirming his research.
	And he says that they exploit and indoctrinate vulnerable children, push out relentless propaganda, support taking up arms, terrorism, overthrowing the state.
	Yes, they're communists.
	This is the argument for why communism could be treated as the same as Islamism and put on the prescribed list.
	Because, well, that is what they believe.
	They believe in overthrowing the state by violent means.
	I mean, he literally said he's got 180 days to turn them into revolutionaries.
	What more do you need?
	Yeah, so if we go to the next one here, you can see that they have some, like, I think this is the student paper here, and you can see some of the stuff in the background.
	So if we click on the first image there, you can see the stuff they have in the background.
	So this has, like, long been known.
	You can see the Mao poster right next to the Pride flag, because of it, yeah, of course.
	If we go to the next image on here, you can see the political compass up in the corner there.
	And I only just noticed it in the previous vid, but no one else seems to have mentioned it.
	You can see the anarchist communist symbol, and then there was a swastika up in the corner, which, you know, too far to the better or whatever it is.
	But you can see how the class is largely in the communist sector of that symbol.
	Wow, I can't believe if a communist teacher is allowed to indoctrinate children all day, every day, they end up turning communist.
	It might just be that, you know, for grade's sake, you just, yeah, I'm a communist, bro.
	And we have some examples of that later.
	So we go to the next one.
	We have him being confronted by a black journalist, and the response was to call the cops on this black journalist for asking questions.
	Very tolerant.
	And he's got a hammer and sickle t-shirt on.
	Jesus Christ.
	He really is a communist.
	It's not hidden at all.
	I mean, he has an anti-far flag and a mail poster in the classroom all day, every day.
	I love the physiognomy of it.
	He's an obvious manlet as well.
	Yeah, you can see all those.
	Little manlet indoctrinating kids.
	It's just classic.
	So we go to the next one.
	There's some more of this as well.
	So you can see, you know, noticing that a bunch of his comrades in the area are very mad.
	What are they mad about?
	So they're mad that he has exposed them.
	That's what they're mad about.
	They also say that he was too overt in introducing students to far-left extremism.
	He should have done it more covertly.
	Oh, yeah.
	He should have been more subtle to avoid detection in the classroom, they say.
	And there's a quote from one of them that says, he gave thousands, maybe millions of alt-right and conservative people more ammunition in their fight about the left.
	Well, that's because the left are doing exactly what they're being accused of.
	As they always have been.
	You've given them ammunition to fight us because you've shown them what we're up to.
	It's not a lie.
	It's not like smoke and mirrors or something.
	No, this is real.
	And they're documented for years before, as those images show.
	And this is why McCarthy did nothing wrong.
	So we go to the next one.
	We have him making the point that same people and same networks.
	One of your old friends.
	Oh, Yvette Flarker, yeah.
	The absolute lunatic.
	So Yvette, the Antifa teacher who was filmed Assaulting People in 2016, is connected to the school and the extremist teacher.
	She was a middle school teacher as well.
	And his wife, of the communist teacher as well.
	So both were recommended by California Highway Patrol to be charged with a riot and more.
	And Andy Knows listed just the court documents listing their charges.
	I mean, both of them had two charges against them, and Yvette as well, for being a goddamn lunatic.
	So he made a response in which he was complaining that, you knew the conservatives are coming for my job.
	Good.
	Yes.
	I have no sympathy.
	No one should have any sympathy for something like this.
	Same thing for if someone came in with Nazi symbols all over the damn place, or if they came in with, I don't know, just make America great again, plastered all over the walls, and teaching kids.
	Moreover, this guy's a revolutionary.
	He should be investigated for terroristic activities.
	Sure, I'm just saying on the level of ideology first.
	Like, there's absolutely no reason to be sympathetic.
	Sure, the classroom should be politically neutral.
	But then on the basis of being like, yeah, MAGA, let's overthrow the country.
	Or, you know, Islamism, let's overthrow the country or something.
	Like, that's the next level.
	He's not just on one level of, you need to be fired.
	He's on the next level of, like, you need to be investigated, mate.
	I don't know what the hell you're up to.
	But it gets worse as well, some of the other stuff that was mentioned around him.
	So we go to the next one.
	We have the images here of the classroom.
	There's more.
	So we've got the first one there.
	You can see, I wonder if you know that flag at the top left there.
	Recognize it?
	I mean, it's a communist sign of somewhere.
	That's the Korean Workers' Party flag.
	Oh, right, okay.
	The Party of North Korea.
	Right.
	And they also have some identity and gender flag next to it, which I can't even identify at this point because there's so goddamn many who cares.
	And then you can see the political compass.
	I mean, it's just non-stop, isn't it?
	Yeah.
	It's this guy's entire world view.
	It gets even more overt.
	So if we go to the next one, like the next link, we can see...
	Even more overt than a poster of Mao and hammer and sickles everywhere.
	Worse, worse, worse, worse.
	Much worse.
	So we go to the next link.
	You can see him giving out stamps for people's work.
	And we can go on that first image.
	If you got it wrong, he put go to Gulag stamps.
	And if you got it right, the chairman approves stamps.
	And then you go, what is that?
	Kim Jong-un's KFC or something with the word bomb.
	I don't know how you missed this.
	Like, the school, I do not believe for a second, were just, oh, we had no idea.
	Like, this is the argument they give later on.
	I just, I don't know.
	Oh, yeah, we had no idea.
	Yeah, okay.
	Whatever.
	Whatever you say.
	Best part of this, though, is his tattoos.
	Because, of course, you can see there his hammer and sickle on his chest.
	Yeah.
	He has an Ingsoc tattoo.
	What?
	Let's go to the next link.
	Gonna load that up.
	Oh, my God!
	He literally has Ingsoc tattooed on his left arm.
	I mean, that's just parody.
	The English socialism, the party of 1984.
	Yeah, for anyone who doesn't know, like, the point of Ingsoc is they're a tyrannical Stalinist regime that are the evil villains of 1984.
	And he's like, ooh, I like the sound of that.
	I associate with that.
	Yeah, that's how I identify.
	Again, the name comes from English socialism as well.
	I can't get over how many leftists are just like, yeah, it's anti-authoritarian in general.
	No, it's clearly anti-socialist, you morons.
	Anyway, personal rant.
	So if we go to the next one, we have the school's response on this, in which they said, Whenever civic education includes topics that may be controversial due to political beliefs or other influences, instruction shall be presented in a balanced manner and does not promote any particular viewpoint.
	Pretty tepid.
	Like, this is what should happen.
	Great, but it's obviously not.
	You're not addressing the point there of the open communist indoctrinating students.
	And we also have an admission from former students that has been going on a long time.
	So go to the next link here.
	You've got Fox News, who took a quote from a former student who sent this in, saying that whatever took place, you had to just go along with it because you got extra points.
	And he even raised this to the administrators, he says, and teachers, and nothing was ever done.
	What a surprise.
	By that quote.
	So if we go to the next one, we have Project Veritas going down to the school board.
	So this is the journalist who broke the story with them.
	And he went there with a bunch of parents who were all kind of rightfully pissed off that some communist is indoctrinating their kids.
	And they're arguing, hey, you should do something about this.
	And the principal was like, I'm not going to talk to you here.
	I'll talk to you in private because he's upset.
	Why would you say that?
	I don't know.
	But I watched the interview.
	If we go to the next one here, this is the full interview that they did in private.
	And it's very telling.
	He tries to come off as being like, look, I'm very proper.
	If you brought this to me privately, we would have dealt with it as well.
	I'm annoyed that you went publicly because it's caused death threats to be sent to our teachers.
	You know, the typical argument.
	Oh, he looks like a man of personal responsibility.
	And the Project Veritas guy just makes a very good point, and he can't rebuttal it from what I've seen, which is just, look, you've already been told privately, we've been told, and also, it's bleeding obvious, you moron!
	You don't need to be told that this is all communist stuff, and that's why we went publicly, and well, deserved.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	If you allow indoctrination of students, and then the parents get upset and do something wrong, what did you think was going to happen?
	They were going to do something right?
	Yeah.
	You think they were going to be completely reasonable about the fact you've been indoctrinating their kids?
	I don't know.
	It's just an absurd argument he makes here.
	And I don't buy it for a minute.
	This does have a white pill on it, as I mentioned, which is that the teacher has been fired.
	So this is in response to them going public.
	So that is the way to do it, which is to record all of it and then go public.
	Don't care what the principal says.
	Make sure the parents find out what has been happening.
	Yeah, Project Veritas are the ones getting the results, not the principal there, who should have been on the money.
	I mean, the guy comes to work with Ingsoc tattoos, communist tattoos, a communist shirt, communist flags in the classroom, and then communist posters.
	Portraits of Mao on the wall?
	Of the worst person who's ever lived?
	Yeah, and you're like, oh, I don't know, maybe he's doing it in a balanced manner.
	Liar.
	I don't buy it.
	I have to lie.
	Anyway.
	So this is the New York Post breaking the...
	They had a quote from the school.
	As of today, this teacher was placed on leave, paid leave, because of his actions and choices in the classroom.
	Natmos Unified will be taking the legally required next steps to place the teacher on unpaid leave and fire the teacher.
	And the reason this is going to take so long is doubt that it's going to be something to do with teachers' unions in California and things like that.
	Well, just in America, generally, they're kind of scum.
	Yeah, but there's going to be a long process they have to go through.
	Yeah, but I don't know what it is with American teachers' unions.
	They're much worse than anyone on the continent, by the sounds of it.
	But, yeah, but this is one, one teacher.
	And, of course, this problem is far, far bigger than one, isn't it?
	Yep, so make sure you renew your subscription to Project Veritas because they're going to need more funding to get more communist teachers.
	Yeah, I thought we'd just flow through a few of these real quick, just to demonstrate the point.
	And probably you, if you're an American, probably go and check with the school.
	Especially if we're in California, for God's sake.
	Just have a look around the classroom, and let's see what you find.
	So we've got to the next one here.
	This is the lady who was...
	She got rid of the American flag, because she didn't like America, and replaced it with the racial pride flag, and got these students to pledge their allegiance to the racial pride flag.
	What?
	She's on suspension.
	Good.
	So, some progress there.
	As she should be.
	Should be fired.
	Yeah, obviously.
	I think she's also under investigation by the US government for removing the American flag.
	LAUGHTER America's that kind of place, isn't it?
	No, no.
	Good.
	No, right.
	As it should be.
	Sorry, if some Muslims in the UK took down British flags if we did a pledge of allegiance and instead were putting up the flag of ISIS or something and being like, pledge allegiance to this.
	If she gets done for treason or something, I'm going to laugh forever.
	So there's no shortage of work to be done.
	So we go to the next one.
	There's more here.
	So this is the activist teacher who shows off her collection of activist books that she gives to children to make them revolutionaries.
	Building an Uprising of Revolution.
	Queer Heroes.
	Yeah.
	Loads of different books there that are purposely made by leftists to indoctrinate kids.
	Totally not about coming for your children, is it?
	Oh, they know that they're coming for your children, and they're pretty explicit about it at this point.
	Open about it.
	Going to the next one, we have a teacher who's explaining how she is going to continue to push critical race theory in the classroom.
	I mean, I love lives with TikTok.
	This is a great source for if you want to find your teacher.
	Oh, yeah.
	Just scroll through.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And if we go to the next one, there's more of these.
	So we have this one, which is a teacher walking around showing off the BLM rainbow flags that they have plastered all over their school.
	This is what I mean.
	Just go to the school and have a walk around.
	I imagine it's going to be this evident.
	And it's an advantage of the right that we come up against the left in regular contact and therefore understand what's proper and not.
	They have no idea.
	Not only do they think they're right every time, they also have no idea that anyone disagrees.
	So they'll just openly do this stuff and be like, yeah, it's fine.
	No!
	You absolute moron!
	We don't allow indoctrination.
	And then the last one here being someone openly advocating a critical race theory.
	This time not to the students because that's been made illegal but they're going to indoctrinate the teachers.
	Just openly says they're going to do that.
	Let's play this last clip.
	As a white person, and I believe for many white people, we do not understand racism.
	Less than a week before the start of the new school year, staff at Intermediate School District 287 have an open dialogue on race and racism in America.
	We know that for our students to succeed, our staff, our teachers, our educational assistants have to understand racism.
	Superintendent Sandra Lewandowski taking steps to address racial equity.
	This summer, the district revised its policy to include critical race theory.
	The curriculum, which has been banned in schools across the country, explores racism through American history.
	The subject won't be taught here.
	However, Lewandowski says it will be used to better help staff understand the role of racism in its educational policies.
	Radius Guess is the Director of Equity and Inclusion.
	So that was a clip just from a local news report on the local school, being like, yes, we are going to indoctrinate the teachers into critical race theory, because we can't do it to the kids.
	Because then the teachers will end up doing it to the kids through osmosis of ideas.
	Fantastic!
	And just through framing itself.
	If you want to know more about this, by the way, you can sign up to losities.com, where we have actually got loads of really good premium content talking about this.
	We've got the Book Club of 1984, the Conservatives' Guide to White Fragility, and a bunch of other things.
	Plus the direct video about critical race theory.
	There is also that, where we go into this in depth.
	And at the moment, I'm working...
	The reason we haven't had a book club in a couple of weeks is because I've got the huge 500-page Critical Race Theory, the key writings that form the movement, and I've read it, and I'm currently making my notes on it.
	I'm about halfway through making the notes.
	So later this month, we should start to be able to roll out book clubs on that, so you can know in detail what it's all about.
	It's not about looking at racism.
	No.
	It's expressly oppositional to the United States.
	And if there's one thing that you don't want being taught in your country, it's a form of history that is expressly oppositional to the existence of your country.
	It's going to create children who hate your country.
	But if you're an American parent, you shouldn't have to, but apparently now you do.
	Keep a hawkish eye on the people who teach your kids.
	Absolutely.
	I knew it was bad.
	Check their social media.
	I didn't know it was this bad with the United States, where it's got to this kind of level, where it's like, okay, no, every teacher they interact with, you should be trying to search up and make every other parent available to be known about what they're up to.
	Yeah, when you meet the teachers, ask them for their Twitter accounts.
	Like, literally.
	That's a good standard, actually.
	Just say to them, I'd like to follow you on Twitter.
	You know, what's your Twitter account?
	Being stupid leftists, I'll just give it to you thinking no one disagrees.
	Exactly.
	And make it look like you're in favour of it, if that's what it takes.
	But make sure you follow them on their social media so you can see the kind of crap that they post.
	Yeah.
	And if they do engage in indoctrinating your kids, make it public.
	Yeah.
	Go to Project Veritas.
	Anyway, let's talk about white supremacy with a tan, which is a long article that CNN put out that at once celebrates the increasing browning of America.
	America's becoming a less white country, as they put it.
	But of course, this isn't going to destroy white supremacy as they describe it.
	Now, we'll get into what these terms mean as we go on, but they are lamenting.
	I just want to say first about that thumbnail that they have for their article.
	Literal NPC meme.
	Literal NPCs.
	But also, you can't help but notice that the white one is not only leading, but is also larger.
	More superior.
	From CNN's thumbnail.
	I wouldn't have made that thumbnail.
	But as you say, literal NPCs.
	So they begin with the myth that when white people are no longer a majority, racism will fade and the US will never be a capital W white country again.
	Now, capitalizing the word white has significant political implications, which is why I think it was the Associated Press or various press standards of organizations...
	So they're going to capitalize B for political black, as in the black nation within a nation.
	Again, this is all stuff that I'll explain in the critical race theory breakdown that I'll end up doing in about a month or so.
	But what they mean is that black people are a nation within a nation.
	So a sovereign group of people within the United States called blacks.
	And for some reason they've capitalized the W in white.
	So they're saying that white people are a sovereign nation, a sovereign race within the United States.
	Awful, awful framing.
	The only thing that should be capitalized, if this is being discussed, is the A in American.
	You're Americans.
	You're not blacks or whites or anything like this.
	These are all ridiculous categories that foreigners don't recognize when looking at your country.
	We can't even tell the difference between you.
	Not really.
	No, you're all the same.
	You're all the same.
	You're all Americans.
	Just be aware of that.
	To us, you're Americans.
	So anyway, they say that this myth was reinforced recently when the US Census 2020 report revealed that people who identified as white capital, again, alone, declined for the first time.
	It's totally irresponsible to have the capital W White.
	And honestly, right, if...
	Go on various alternative social media sites and look up those people who expressly pronounce themselves to be white supremacists or Nazis.
	And they were celebrating when they were using capital W, white.
	This is CNN using that.
	So this is the Daily Stormer's view on what white people are that's being projected from CNN. It's disgraceful, right?
	It's no surprise either.
	Well, actually, I did find it surprising.
	I didn't think they'd be so bold about this.
	So we're well into race war territory from CNN here.
	Anyway, so the majority who identify as white alone declined for the first time since the census began in 1790.
	So the majority of Americans under 18 are now people of colour, and people who identify as multiracial increased by 276% over the last decade.
	These census figures seem to validate a common assumption.
	The US is barrelling towards becoming a rainbow nation around 2045 when white people are projected to become a minority.
	What do you mean rainbow nation where one of the colours isn't there?
	That's how they're defining the rainbow nation.
	Yeah.
	Anyway.
	That year has been depicted as the countdown to the white apocalypse by who...
	Like, who is doing that?
	Who's called it that, right?
	It's also been called...
	Joe Biden's supporter of Richard Spencer.
	Yeah, well, yeah, and possibly, yeah.
	And dreadful news for white supremacists.
	Again, what constitutes a white supremacist is not what you think a white supremacist is.
	And two commentators have apparently even predicted the US white majority will soon disappear forever.
	It's taken as a given now that the browning of America will lead to an erosion of white supremacy.
	This is just awful.
	But they're not talking about people who are wearing clan hoods.
	They're talking about the average American.
	That's what they're talking about.
	This author says, I used to believe those predictions.
	Now I have a different conclusion.
	Don't ever underestimate white supremacy's ability to adapt.
	So there are going to be no white people, there are just going to be people with brown skin, and white supremacy is going to live through them?
	Yes.
	That's exactly what they think.
	Which is very revealing, because when they say white supremacy, they're not actually suggesting it's tied to a race.
	No.
	So if brown people can be white supremacists, perhaps the term white supremacy is a misnomer.
	Perhaps it's poorly labelled through the lens of left-wing American race politics, which seems to be the case, doesn't it?
	So they say, yeah, the assumption that more racial diversity equals racial equality is a dangerous myth.
	Racial diversity can function as a cloaking device, concealing the most powerful forms of white supremacy while giving the appearance of racial progress.
	Ooh!
	Spooky white supremacy in the minds of brown people.
	Like multiple African countries white supremacists.
	Yes.
	Racism will likely be just as entrenched in a browner America as it is now.
	So literally we brought in a bunch of brown people because we hated those white people and get rid of the white people.
	We got rid of them and now we're all still a bunch of white supremacists.
	Well then maybe this wasn't the problem.
	So anyway, by saying white supremacy, what they're talking about is a kind of English-speaking Anglo-Saxon Protestant values.
	If we go to the Smithsonian's chart, this was the most revealing way of presenting this.
	And as you can see, if you go to the top, there are aspects and assumptions of whiteness and white culture.
	So when they say white, they mean English.
	And when they say white, they...
	For some reason, appealing to a race when what they mean is a set of values.
	And these are actually English Enlightenment values.
	Because the majority of white settlers to America were English.
	Yeah, basically.
	And the leftists are too stupid to realise that that's the difference.
	Yes, and the term itself, the fact that they use a racial term, hides, conceals the fact that you're talking about a system of values.
	And of course, any system of values can be held by anyone.
	Like, any human can hold a system of values.
	And you can see exactly the kind of culture that they're talking about.
	Individualism, which is self-reliance, independence and autonomy, the nuclear family, the scientific method over superstition, Protestant work ethic, heavy value on property rights, planning for the future, sensible time management, competitive spirit, personal responsibility, and common law justice.
	None of these are racially exclusive.
	They're also English.
	They're also English.
	The bottom there, communication, the king's English.
	Yes.
	So, I mean, you know, it couldn't be more clear.
	Probably talking about France, I don't know.
	Yeah, yeah, could well be a bit of German in there, who knows.
	But the point is that these are a system of values that constructed a certain set of institutions which provide the country we call the United States with the Character and prosperity that it has now.
	And what they're saying is that these values are the reasons that immigrants want to immigrate to America.
	That's what made America great, is the fact that they protect private property, they have the common law, and they have a democratic, republican system.
	These are what makes America desirable to other countries.
	Countries that don't have these values and institutions running along these lines don't have the same kind of success the United States has.
	And it's not a coincidence that the English-speaking world, which is built on these assumptions, is generally where most immigrants seem to want to go.
	It's not a surprise, it's not a coincidence, and there's nothing stopping other countries from adopting these values.
	And if the people who are coming from these countries are looking and going, yeah, I want those values, you can't tie this to race.
	It's tied to culture.
	These values, of course, are English and Enlightenment values, but anyway, returning to the article, they say, I don't like raising such a pessimistic scenario, in part for personal reasons.
	I want to believe my country is on the verge of this brown new world.
	Again, Brave New World, you can go to LotusEast.com and check out our book club on Brave New World.
	It's not a utopia.
	It's a dystopia.
	Yeah.
	It's not something to try and strive for.
	It's the opposite.
	It's something to be avoided.
	For any reasonable person, it's not something to strive for.
	But if you are, I left this.
	If you're a CNN contributor, like perhaps Richard Spencer and this person.
	Maybe you want Brave New World and children interacting with each other sexually as their children.
	Yes, and people being totally atomised from one another and...
	Everyone on drugs.
	Everyone on drugs.
	Kind of like California.
	And having nothing to ever strive for and being set in stratified social casts.
	California.
	They can't escape and are in fact made to fulfil California.
	So yes, Brave New World, not something to aim for, but where there will be such a rich gumbo of skin hues, hair textures, and racially ambiguous people that racism will lose its sting.
	But the thing is, that's not what racism is to you.
	Racism isn't what people do to one another.
	They consider racism to be the very structure of the system itself.
	As we saw in the charts, what they're saying is, we need to overthrow these values and replace them with other values.
	And so she explains, I think it's a she actually, I'm not sure if it's a she, but they explain that their family is a symbol of these demographic changes and explain to them that my mother is Irish, my father is black, my wife is an immigrant from Central America with a biracial mother and a white Ladino father who is Jewish and Castilian, my stepmother is Chilean, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	It's like, okay, great.
	No one cares.
	No one does this for Americans as well.
	No one cares.
	It's such an American thing to be like, yeah, I'm going to go back five generations and compare all the racial mix-up of all of them.
	No one cares about any of that.
	But the point is, why would someone of such mixed ancestry be so obsessed with race?
	Why wouldn't they not want to talk about race?
	Why would they want to talk about something else?
	Culture?
	Personal values?
	Achievements?
	Who knows?
	But for some reason, obsessed with race.
	You can call my cue, that's why.
	Oh, yeah.
	So, they say, right, there is a yearning embedded in my DNA that a demographic tide will overtake white supremacy.
	Sorry, is she going to F her way to the end of white supremacy?
	No.
	But a yearning embedded in your DNA? You sound like a Nazi.
	You literally sound like the German Untermensch and the yearning in their DNA to be superior over all of the other races.
	You could reword that and be like, yeah, we're going to overtake Jewish supremacy or international Jewry or whatever Hitler would use as a term.
	I'm sure he would have said something like a yearning in my blood, which is basically what she's saying here.
	Anyway, the belief that white people are superior and they should maintain political, social and economic power over other races.
	That's not what you mean when you say white supremacy.
	You mean the systems of government and institutions that you have in the United States that came from England.
	That's what you mean.
	No one thinks that white people are superior and should maintain political and social and economic power over other races.
	And if they did, why would they allow other races into their own countries?
	Why would they do that?
	It doesn't make any sense.
	But again, with the Hitler list there, I must destroy English individualism.
	Yeah.
	I have a yearning in my blood to do it.
	Yeah, I know.
	Because it's Jewish controlled.
	And CNN just published this as if this is nothing.
	This is totally normal for them, right?
	She says, I'm sure it's a she.
	I'm going to have to try and remember to say, hey.
	Who cares?
	This yearning is not driven by some wish that people of colour will someday rule over whites.
	F. X. Doubt.
	I do have big doubts on that.
	It's a hope for a more just America.
	A hope that we can somehow escape the tribalism that tore other countries apart.
	Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, that's likely.
	That's what's happening, isn't it?
	The tribalism, the breaking people down into their multicultural silos, their enclaves, where no culture is allowed to talk to another.
	One of the essays in Critical Race Theory, the key writings that form the movement...
	It's about literally race-conscious district.
	Sorry, it's John Blake.
	Right, okay, thank you.
	So one of the essays is about race-conscious districting.
	As in, at the moment, right, districts are drawn based on geographic location.
	Well, you know what that means, Callum?
	That means race mixing.
	We can't have any of that nasty race mixing because people might get on with each other and not hate each other.
	And so what we need is race-conscious districts.
	So the blacks are there, the browns are there, the whites are there, and never the twain shall meet.
	South Africa likes this post.
	Exactly.
	It's literally apartheid, right?
	But I also love the politics of the new South Africa of high-identity politics.
	Yeah, that's an example of what tore a country apart, and you're like, yeah, but what if you try it in America?
	Exactly.
	It was real-identity politics.
	Like, this person, don't get me wrong, I don't think this person is smart enough or well-read enough to know that by adopting all of this framing and promoting all of this stuff, by succumbing to the yearning in their DNA, they are actually promoting tribalism and are going to cause the breakup in the United States.
	You mentioned the yearning in my DNA. I have, like, German marching music playing in my ears now.
	I can't hear anything other than Nazism coming through this.
	I just can't stand it.
	But the point is, your individual rights are there to protect you from racial domination.
	Like, that's what they do.
	That's literally what they do.
	And so, anyway...
	They cite David Simon, the creator of HBO series The Wire, for some reason.
	How is that comforting?
	Like, an uncertain, shifting sea of racial coalitions.
	And again, this is one of the things they talk about often in critical race theory.
	Isn't this how most people end up describing, like, what is it, the quarters of Jerusalem that divided up between the different religious groups?
	Well, I was going to say that about the Middle East generally, various tribal factions and loyalties.
	If that's a model that you're trying to reproduce, okay, well...
	Doesn't look good to me.
	I think that we should be interested in party politics, where you can self-associate to the party of your choice, and not have that determined by your blood.
	Because I'm not a fucking Nazi.
	I love the chat.
	It's like she's describing the gay race.
	Well, yes.
	Like, all of those are racial groups.
	Good point.
	Yeah, good point.
	Anyway, Simon added that this may be the last presidential election in which anyone but a fool tries to play, on a national level at least.
	The cards of racial exclusion...
	What?
	Racial exclusion?
	It turns out that reports of white supremacy's demise were exaggerated, however.
	White supremacy isn't just more resilient than many assume, it's also elastic.
	God, it's amazing!
	I can't believe it!
	I mean, where is it?
	Is it in the room with us now?
	I mean, I have no idea.
	Where's the manifesto?
	You know, how do we...
	Again, international jury comes to mind.
	It does, doesn't it?
	It's like, you talk to a Nazi, where is it?
	You know, it's everywhere.
	Yeah, well, you know, you can't point to it, but it's there.
	Even non-Jews, they're Jews.
	Yeah.
	Right.
	They're all tools of international jury.
	I think Hitler did actually end up writing about that, where he ended up calling the English a bunch of Jews.
	Oh yeah, absolutely, because we were agents of international finance, which meant Jews.
	Anyway, so white supremacy isn't just more resilient than many assume, it's also elastic.
	Consider how whiteness has been defined, again, capital W. Does it?
	I'm glad that these people can tell me because I wouldn't have known.
	And so they say in books like How the Irish Became White and How the Jews Became White, we get to find out.
	Are they white?
	What does white mean?
	But that's the thing.
	Even in these weird racial groups of people who talk about this, there's still this huge debate about whether or not Jews are white.
	Yes.
	But the thing is, if whiteness is so elastic, why doesn't just everyone become white?
	It's not tied to biological race.
	We've already exploded that thought.
	So why not just say, you can all be white?
	Also, why do white people keep trying to be black?
	Yeah.
	But, well, yeah.
	But, you know, if it's so elastic, everyone can just say, well, I'm white then.
	And who's going to tell you not?
	If you're upholding white supremacy and whiteness, Larry Elder can be white, then, you know, white supremacist or whatever, why doesn't everyone just go, okay, we're all white.
	Problem solved.
	That would be white supremacy.
	Would it?
	Well, that's the thing.
	No, it doesn't make any sense, because if everyone's white, then there's still white supremacy.
	If no one's white, there's still white supremacy.
	Yeah, that's where we are.
	You're dealing with a Nazi who's like, yeah, the Jews are everywhere.
	What if there are no Jews?
	Yeah, Jews did it.
	Yeah, and then we'll still be under the Jewish heel.
	There was a joke I heard, which is the reason Nazi Germany failed, according to the Nazis, is because there were too many Jews.
	It's like...
	Righty-o.
	This is real fascism.
	The US has broadened its definition of white people throughout history just enough to maintain power over black, Asian and Latino people.
	Yeah, but aren't Latinos becoming white as well?
	And weren't the Asians declared to be white?
	I think they're honorary Aryans or something?
	Well, however...
	But I'm pretty sure that basically all of these groups have been subsumed.
	I saw a thing as well.
	Harvard University calls them white.
	Yes, they do.
	And there was a legal case that showed that Arabs are white as well.
	So if you're an Arab and you go to America, you're officially white.
	It's ridiculous.
	You remember, I guess Trevor Noah actually did a good set on this back in the day, where he's like, his dad's white, his mum's black or something, so he was like, I was never called black in South Africa, but when I come to America, I'm suddenly black.
	Yeah, the same thing, like an Arab, you're not white, but then when you come to America, you're white.
	Basically Norwegian.
	Anyway...
	So, through a historical lens, being white in America today is like belonging to a once-exclusive social club that has had to loosen its membership criteria to stay afloat.
	Well, then why not just continue loosening that criteria?
	Yeah, literally be inclusive.
	If whiteness is so inclusive, what's the problem with it?
	Anyway, so, why do so many racial groups gravitate towards whiteness?
	The answer is both pragmatic and psychological.
	It's due to a racial hierarchy.
	That places whiter-looking people at the top and darker-skinned people at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder, which doesn't explain the Asians and how they're the highest earners in America.
	So...
	I mean, personally, my explanation for it is returning to those Protestant values that built America, you can see how the hard-working Asians with protected property work very hard and be very successful.
	Sure, but there's also the family values and all the rest of it.
	Yeah, there are.
	All of these things.
	Well, no, that's in the chart as well.
	Nuclear family and all of this.
	Yeah, it's just that we've largely lost this compared to...
	Yeah, but the point is, white people are actually slipping down the racial rankings and they're like, yeah, that's white supremacy.
	I think we're at the bottom in the UK. We are at the bottom in the UK. Just above the gypsies, in fact.
	And so this racial hierarchy is the foundation of white supremacy.
	Europeans created it, just Europeans, just random Europeans, they're all the same basically, created it around 500 years ago to justify slavery and colonialism.
	This hierarchy is where we get the modern conception of race.
	How is there Irish presidents in America if we're going to have a racial hierarchy?
	There have been Irish presidents.
	Racial hierarchy.
	And a half-black one.
	And a half-black one.
	Doesn't make any sense.
	I can't remember.
	It was half.
	It was fully black when he became president, anyway.
	But this hierarchy is where we get the modern conception of race.
	How a person's inherent worth, intelligence, or attractiveness can be determined by the pigmentation of their skin.
	No one thinks that.
	Find me the person who thinks that.
	Find me a person who thinks that a person's attractiveness can be determined by the pigmentation of their skin.
	Richard Spencer.
	I doubt he would even be so ridiculous.
	Well, there's Asian GF. I don't know what GF is, actually.
	No, no, I don't know.
	But, like, if you've got this horrifically ugly white person and then this unbelievably beautiful, like, black or, you know, non-white woman, he's not going to be like, well, yeah, she's ugly because she's got melanated skin.
	At least my girlfriend is white!
	But even then, like, no one says attractiveness is determined by pigmentation.
	It's so dumb.
	But anyway, either way, why continue it then?
	Why not just abolish the concept of race as an organizing principle?
	If you're complaining about it...
	Well, there's no left, so...
	Oh, exactly.
	Exactly, right?
	There's no left-wing politics then.
	We just abolished it.
	So the future of whiteness apparently is going to rest with the Latinos, so I'm going to try and hurry up.
	But it's a truth that's hard for me to accept because I see that racial hierarchy at work within my own family.
	Young male relatives who appear to the world as black and one appears to the world as white, and apparently they live in different universes.
	One of them got suspended, accusing of bullying her, and he surprised himself by telling his wife "Thank God he looks white." Yeah, I think we've found the white supremacist here.
	If the accusation had been made against the darker relative, the outcome may have been different.
	May have been better, but we don't know.
	Anyway.
	So, getting on...
	I'm going to skip a bunch.
	Multiracial people will not save America.
	So, even being multiracial is not going to help.
	Some pin their hopes for a more racially tolerant future on multiracial people.
	That issue hits even closer to me.
	We're often described as the vanguard of a new racial order.
	CNN, using the words, vanguard of a new racial order.
	In 2021...
	In which interracial couples and their children will chip away at white supremacy until it collapses.
	I hate this fucking ideology.
	The explosive growth of Americans who now identify as multiracial could be used to reinforce racial inequality.
	How?
	Depends on how we check the box.
	Ah yes, that's how this works.
	That's how it works.
	On the census, did you check black or white or mixed?
	And if you check the wrong box, then you're a white supremacist.
	Racial classification numbers are a great tool for uncovering the hidden hand of white supremacy, systemic racism.
	These numbers are used to enforce civil rights laws, track discrimination, and protect voting rights.
	Apparently.
	So, finally, what would real racial progress look like?
	Well, here's the hard truth we have to face about the future.
	We may someday live in an America where there are no racial majorities, but whiteness can still reign supreme.
	Nothing will change, though, unless we go after the racial hierarchy that makes whiteness such an exclusive club.
	But you've already told us it's not an exclusive club because it keeps expanding to absorb other racial groups.
	This requires radical change, as you can imagine.
	We need communism, Callum.
	It would involve uprooting systemic racism embedded in our public schools, neighborhoods, and justice system.
	So abolish all of that.
	All of those good and productive institutions that have high standards, abolish those.
	It would involve a more equitable sharing of power and resources.
	Communism.
	Yep.
	Racial communism.
	Racial communism, not out of white guilt or compulsion, but out of knowledge that we all do better when we all do better.
	It will ultimately require that we discard the modern notion of race.
	Then why are you bringing it up?
	Just get rid of it.
	People are never going to do it.
	No.
	It's like the diversity and inclusion officer.
	You know, racism will end when she declares it ends.
	It's literally Marx saying, look, what we need is a dictatorship of the proletariat to abolish the state.
	It's like, that's not going to happen.
	That's not how that works.
	You can't do something more and more and more and then expect to have none of it at the end.
	It's Oh, I hate it so stupid.
	Anyway, if we don't dismantle the racial hierarchy which gives status and power to whiteness, this new version of America won't really be new.
	It'll be just another updated version of white supremacy with a tan.
	Unbelievable.
	Did you skip over the bit where you said about, uh, you deny your mother?
	Well, I had to skip that.
	I've got to mention it, because it's just too good.
	In which he talks about, there's been a long debate in the multiracial community about how to express ourselves in the boxes, about where do you tick.
	And he said to his father that he describes himself as black, not mixed.
	And his father responded at the dinner table, when you say you're black, you deny your mother.
	And then he was like, yeah, but if I click these boxes, I might help white supremacy.
	I was like...
	Look, what?
	His black father.
	If we accurately represent ourselves in the census, we're upholding white supremacy as well.
	Yeah, but his black father's saying, don't deny your mother.
	Yeah.
	And he's like, yeah, but white supremacy and the black father must have been like, idiot.
	What the hell's wrong with my kid?
	What did you do to him?
	Unbelievable, isn't it?
	Anyway, let's go to the video comments.
	Logos, part five of five.
	Carl, I think the Greek word logos may be the word you are looking for to firmly contextualize and ground any conversation about the concept of freedom, which does not have the same impact in English.
	Logos is reasoned argument, thought, free speech, freedom, logic, intelligence, a person's state of being that lends access to truth.
	Logos is freedom from ideological possession and enslavement.
	Logos is freedom for the creative and inspirational act.
	My suggestion is just to use the word logos to express all this.
	Don't even bother to translate it.
	Just stick with the Greek word and it will carry the weight on its own.
	That, I'm sure, is good advice if I was speaking in a sort of academic fashion to intellectuals, but what we need to do is use common terminology that already resides in people's minds, I think, to be able to express concepts.
	I don't think we should academicize ourselves like the left has, because then we're constantly fighting an uphill battle, but if we use the tools that are already present in people's heads to communicate these concepts, I think we'll have a much easier time with it.
	It's also the worst thing of interacting with political people when they start using Latin words.
	I have a special word that you need to learn.
	And we're all guilty of it.
	Like, everyone learns a Latin word or something and thinks it's useful.
	Or Schadenfreude, for example.
	But for the common person listening to that, you're just being like, shut up, you nuts.
	No, I don't care, yeah.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Sorry for the delay.
	Carla, you wanted to know about making your own deodorant.
	Mine is an equal proportion of baking soda and coconut oil with a few drops of tea cherry oil, which is a natural disinfectant.
	Each person's body is different, so you may have to try a few recipes before you find what works for you.
	I actually had one where the coconut oil seeped out and I didn't realize because the container was on its side.
	And when I used it, my armpit hair didn't grow back for a month, which was freaky.
	So be careful.
	Sounds useful.
	Well, if you don't want an armpit.
	Yeah, if you're a woman.
	Yeah.
	But I mean, I'm at the point now where it's like, look, I'm married.
	I don't have to use deodorant now, so...
	Suffer, wench!
	I wash, but like...
	No, no, the thing is, I think if I started wearing deodorant, my wife would start getting suspicious.
	Oh, okay.
	Where have you been?
	Yeah, exactly, you know.
	You started smoking again.
	Yeah, well, you know, who is she?
	Who are you wearing this deodorant for?
	I mean, obviously I can keep myself very clean, but if you want a perfumed smell, it seems a bit suspicious now, doesn't it?
	I just love the idea of bullying your wife.
	Hello, wash why?
	How was my wife?
	I find it funny.
	Anyway, let's go for the next one.
	I think self-pity may be the root of leftism.
	Once people feel sufficiently sorry for themselves, they begin to resonate with people and stories that reflect this perilousness they feel.
	Once this isn't better enough, they hate and envy people who, through action, prove their assumptions wrong and seek a saviour.
	And if that isn't God, then it's the ethical state.
	Karl Callum, what do you think of this idea?
	I think self-pity is probably at least a significant component, if not the very root But there may not be any one such route to identify.
	It could be a combination of components that form, like, the sort of foundation of it.
	But I think self-pity is definitely an aspect.
	I don't really have anything else to say.
	It's about right.
	Morning, guys.
	So this is day one of being...
	Eco-communist.
	Not feeling any particularly noncey feelings yet, but I'll keep an eye on them and keep you posted.
	Extra points if you can figure out what I'm standing in.
	And I'll see you later.
	I cannot.
	What do you think he's standing in?
	No, I've got no idea either.
	What?
	I was thinking one of those old gas pumps, but they're not vertical, horizontal, so I don't know.
	I have no idea.
	Guess is in the chat, I guess, to try and figure out.
	But return to tradition, that's what I'm saying.
	Well, back to the old guy.
	Yeah.
	That's what I'm used to.
	Well, I mean, Leo made the point that oil is technically renewable.
	Give it 100,000.
	Good point, yeah, sure.
	Let's do the next one.
	The first morning that I'm on my holiday, I find a Japanese-style cafe.
	Go there, order chicken, katsu, curry, just as a bit of a meal.
	SUWs and also weebs like to go there a lot, and it's really popular there.
	The weebs will not shut up about weebery and start talking about Attack on I opened my mouth.
	This was a big mistake.
	So to annoy the weebs and the SJWs, I say, add some English bacon and eggs to my cooking and imperialise and colonise my dish, please, chef.
	Chef looks a bit confused, but says, fine, fine, I'll do that.
	I have to pay the extra amount.
	And then the SJWs get really angry with me.
	That's genius, actually.
	Imperialise and colonise my plate.
	Bacon and eggs.
	Because there are a bunch of SJWs around, they hear this.
	So if you're asking them to colonise your breakfast, the word triggers them.
	That's fantastic.
	So this is what I do when listening to the Lotus Eaters podcast.
	I walk this route.
	And I've actually been walking this route since January, where I was very, very depressed.
	And suddenly I realized, if I don't get up now, I don't know when I'll get up, if I'll get up at all, and I might even end up doing something really, really stupid.
	If you are depressed, you don't have to run.
	You don't have to lift weight.
	You just have to get out and keep doing it.
	And eventually, you're going to feel fantastic.
	I swear.
	I agree with that completely.
	Change of scenery as well.
	Yeah, it looks nice.
	No, but just the weird psychological effect I think that is true of just what you're looking at changing.
	Yeah, yeah.
	The fact that you walk somewhere and you don't see the same thing, suddenly it just, you know, you're less depressed with where your room is.
	Every weekend I make my kids go for a walk in the country.
	Gotta do it.
	Hey, so I'm glad people have been enjoying the random edits I've been making recently.
	They're actually a lot of fun to make.
	I think I saw in a chat yesterday somebody was asking if there's a link to the video, and the answer is yes.
	I've actually been uploading them to a YouTube channel I created called Based Ape.
	I have one subscriber, and that's me, so you might have to dig a little bit to find it, but the videos are there if you want them.
	And yeah, I don't know if they're any good, but I've been having a lot of fun making them, so I'm going to keep making them and keep sending them in until you tell me to stop.
	Although they are kind of hard to make because Googling controversial banned YouTubers for quote mining is not so easy, but we'll see.
	Ciao!
	They're really fantastic.
	I've been enjoying them a lot.
	You just got your second sub from me, but looking forward to more of them.
	And yeah, I don't really know, how do you get around the whole Alex Jones bit on YouTube?
	Because on Twitter you can post Alex Jones all you want.
	Like you quote him, you know.
	I don't think YouTube actually bans mentions of Alex Jones.
	Like, you know, he clips of him and stuff like that.
	There are still loads of them on YouTube.
	Eh, maybe then, yeah.
	Did you see that?
	I sent you it for this.
	I don't know if you saw it.
	He decides to take ivermectin live on air.
	And then he put the horse head on.
	Yeah, and he's like, I've turned into a Democrat.
	I'm a horse now.
	Anyway, let's get the next one.
	On Friday's podcast, it was discussed that a woman's mileage, so to speak, is useful information for her potential partners to have.
	It was also discussed how panicked American leftist women are over the Texas bill surviving SCOTUS. The common thread that I see here, and this is going to sound coldly academic, is resource management.
	Like it or not, a woman's eggs are a resource which must be carefully managed, similarly to a man's time and wealth.
	And if a woman's mileage and previous owners are high relative to her age, this suggests that she is negligent in managing this most precious of resources.
	Sorry, does mileage affect eggs?
	I don't know.
	Does it just age affect eggs?
	Yeah, I would assume so, but I think that there probably is something about resource management, but I wouldn't have framed it in the terms of eggs.
	I would have framed it in terms of...
	Purity or something.
	Yeah, I was going to say sanctity, you know, because that's the thing, isn't it?
	It's about taking care of your reputation as a woman, I think, is what's important there.
	Yeah.
	Hey, Lotus Eaters.
	As a tenant of dadism, Father's Build.
	Thanks.
	Oh, that's basically number one.
	Father's Build.
	That's exactly right.
	The hell is that sprinkler doing in the background?
	Making things wet.
	Why?
	It's just like a huge pool of water there.
	He's obviously got reasons.
	Well, I'd like to know the reasons.
	Well, I suppose, but we'll assume he knows what he's doing, you know?
	Yeah, yeah, we're just asking.
	Show us more.
	But no, you're right.
	Building stuff is important.
	I've seen Tony Day and Little Joan trying to explain Ron Paul in 30 seconds.
	Ron Paul was the libertarian candidate for the president in 1988.
	He's a Republican congressman from Texas.
	Tried to reform the Republican Party from within.
	Had some success with that.
	Was influential a bit with Ronald Reagan during his heyday.
	He definitely had a shot at being the nominee against Romney, but the GOP changed the rules.
	But mostly Ron Paul is about Austrian economics.
	That's the key.
	And I'm putting up some links of various places, including Ron Paul's Liberty Report, where you can find out more about him.
	He is the heart and soul of the libertarian movement.
	He is the one that can explain it better than I can.
	Hang on, you're telling me we could have had Obama versus Ron Paul instead of, you know, wet fish Romney?
	Obama would have still won.
	I don't care.
	I just want to see the debate.
	I mean, if you platform a candidate, it's also their continued legacy and all the rest of it.
	I mean, like, Mitt Romney still gets quoted and whatnot and is seen as someone who's important.
	He's like, for what?
	You know, wearing strange underwear.
	But, you know, even just running in that position would have given Ron Paul more longevity than he's had.
	It's good that he's still on YouTube.
	I thought he was banned, actually.
	I think it may have just been suspended.
	Imagine getting to a point where Ron Paul gets banned.
	Medical misinformation, that one.
	Oh, God.
	Because, of course, it is.
	Oh, I like it.
	The more legislators they ban from their social medias, the more they'll take notice.
	Oh, that's a good point.
	I mean, plebs upon plebs.
	That's a very good point.
	The personal gripe I have with Rhys Mogg, actually, where he wasn't in support enough of Dankula in a way that I found satisfactory, because he didn't think it was a serious issue.
	Well, it's a pleb problem, isn't it?
	Yeah, but then I'm just like, your opinion on abortion, like, I don't have a problem with it, but Section 127 does.
	Joseph says, Hey Carl, I'm in Australia and I'm terrified of how far we've fallen.
	It seems that most of the population is blind to what's happening.
	Do you have a strategy of how we can escape this free fall into totalitarianism?
	Not one that I can broadcast on the internet.
	No, jokes aside, I don't know, man.
	I mean, I honestly don't know.
	If your legislators are doing this to you, I guess you've got to vote for different legislators.
	John, what's that thing underneath Google today?
	Join virtual talks and more to celebrate diversity and allyship.
	The hell is that?
	Let's click on it and find out.
	Sorry!
	The hell?
	I Am Remarkable from September 8th to 15th.
	Join I Am Remarkable week and celebrate your achievements.
	Second Global I Am Remarkable Week from 8th to 15th September is a digital experience featuring virtual talks, online workshops, and confidence-boosting challenges.
	Join us to celebrate the power of diversity, inclusion, and allyship.
	So it's just the latest in the, you know, it's going to change.
	It's Google patting themselves on the back of their new church service.
	Promoting the secular religion of diversity and inclusion.
	They never will shut up, will they?
	No, they won't.
	Sorry.
	I saw that and I was like, what the hell?
	Kevin says, Dear Conservatives, have you truly learned nothing from the horrors of the 20th century?
	No, they haven't.
	For 12 to 15-year-olds, the vaccine provides almost no benefit to them while potentially having some long-term risks.
	The benefits are only slightly reduced transmission rate, which will reduce the impact on the rest of the population.
	Given that minors cannot consent to these vaccines, this is exploiting the children for the sake of a small portion of the population at risk of impairing the children's lives for many decades.
	At least the other vaccines they receive are for the sake of their own health and have decades of evidence.
	That's a good point.
	Chad Kuala says, These comments indoctrinating other people's kids sure don't like being exposed, like cockroaches when you uncover their hidey hole.
	That's correct.
	Henry says, I feel uncomfortable being in the room with a terrorist flag owned by a suspected terrorist.
	What an awful fascist that kid must feel like.
	Yeah, I love that.
	Yeah.
	He called the child a fascist.
	Yeah.
	Why do you align with fascist values?
	Like, I don't.
	I just, I'm not a terrorist.
	Yeah, I'm not pro-terrorism.
	Or communism.
	And literally, you don't have to be a fascist to oppose communism.
	Pete says, how on earth could the school not notice this happening?
	The writing's on the wall, for God's sake.
	I mean, literally.
	Oh, we had no idea.
	Well, it was reported to you.
	Well, we did nothing.
	You should have come in private.
	No, we have to go public.
	Come on, it's like there was a symbol somewhere and that was it, or one of his tattoos or something.
	Everywhere.
	Multiple flags, multiple posters, multiple tattoos, and then just the recordings of him.
	In saying he's indoctrinating his students with this, that, and the other.
	I was like, well...
	I refuse to believe he never mentioned it in the staff room as well.
	Oh, God.
	Can you imagine?
	He was just like, oh, hi, guys.
	You want a cup of coffee?
	Yeah, he just made tea in the morning.
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, I watched whatever TV show we all watched.
	You saw the game last night.
	Yeah, exactly.
	There's no way.
	There's no way he's looking like that.
	Yeah, I don't believe it, you know.
	Ignacio says, the school system, especially state-funded schools, are disgustingly infected by communists and socialists, and it's unbearable to see the next generation get its mind poisoned by this.
	Ignacio is completely right, right?
	And this is a real problem that conservatives, for some reason, don't want to be teachers.
	It's like, well, who do you think is going to teach kids?
	Because the communists love being teachers.
	Because they know it gives them access to small, malleable minds, that they can literally turn into revolutionaries, as they say themselves.
	If you're a conservative and you think, maybe I'll be a teacher, you have to be a teacher, okay?
	You've got an obligation to the next generations to do it.
	Anyway.
	Teachers have been allowed too much freedom and they've exploited it for political aims.
	It's about time the West cracks down and cracks down hard on teachers.
	Yes.
	Drew says, Carl, bro, when the teacher said, as a white person we don't understand racism, I had the same reaction you did.
	It is so cringe and venomous.
	I don't think we can call this toxic anymore with its predatory nature.
	It's something else.
	That's a good point.
	Kevin says, actually, the journalist did try to speak to the school about the interview before going public and the school refused to speak to him and threatened to call the police on him.
	Yeah, I did see that, actually.
	I should have mentioned it.
	So, Angel Brain says, so Gipe, the communist, isn't a teacher, he's a recruiter, an open recruiter.
	I mean, how is it different to having literally the military in the classrooms, you know, saying, join the US Army and bomb Afghanistan, you know, blah, blah, blah.
	Join Antipar and bomb America.
	Yeah, exactly.
	It's no different at all.
	Kevin says, well, that's already happening.
	Racism is on the increase dramatically in the USA. It's just that when the racism against whites, the left don't quantify it as racism.
	It's now called anti-racism.
	Or affirmative action.
	Or just, whites need not apply for jobs, as we have demonstrated with the UK many, many times.
	I mean, it is.
	I mean, I call that racism because I'm not a communist.
	Sorry, but racism, by whatever woke name you want to give it, is still racism.
	When racism was an issue in the USA, hundreds of years ago, if a black individual...
	Well, not quite that long, but...
	If a black individual sided with the whites against the blacks, they were castigated by the black population.
	Now, however, the white people can be seen as racist against the majority of whites who are actually accepted as allies by the POC for now.
	Remember, the left eats its own.
	But even then, like, Larry Elder is now the latest white supremacist.
	I still can't get over the POC as an actual acronym, but it sounds like the PLA or something.
	Yeah.
	You know?
	It's like, this is the People's Liberation Army.
	And there's also BIPOC as well.
	Oh, yeah, I just...
	It's still better than Jukka McMurr.
	Barely.
	Anton says, Today in Swedish schools, my third year in high school class has a collaborative project with the Gender Studies course meant to promote feminism, gender studies and human rights.
	The head professor in gender studies advocates knitting graffiti, attacking statues of racists, of which she showed pictures of having done herself and being proud of it.
	Sorry, do you remember that Brass Eye episode where they're like, here's a picture of a child?
	now for you and me this is very normal but you show this to a pedophile and they'll actually try to attack it I show them a picture of Winston Churchill and they're just like ah Her rhetoric was sickening.
	Her attempts at propagandizing the school environment turned my stomach inside out.
	How am I supposed to get through this with a straight face?
	Feel free to challenge her if you're able to do so.
	Feel free to criticize and critique if you're allowed and watch her get very upset when she can't give you a good answer.
	Noah says, honestly, if I give anyone under the age of 30 advice, it would be move out of the West.
	The party is over.
	Go find a based country and add your skills to an up-and-coming nation.
	Make that place a free and better nation.
	Well, if we do that, then we've definitely lost.
	If we all just flee, then we just leave our countries to the communists.
	The hell are we going to, either?
	Yeah, exactly where?
	Poland and Hungary, okay.
	I can't understand their languages.
	The languages are just too hard.
	Yeah, I'd rather resist the communists.
	Omar says, when you've done nothing of note and have zero interesting things to say about yourself, finding fractional differences in long dead ancestry might be the only way they can cope with being a nobody.
	That's a great point.
	Why would you talk about, like, you know, your historical ancestry if you're doing things that are exciting?
	There's nothing in your life.
	It's like, yeah, well, my mother was from this, and my grandfather was from that, and my dad was this, and it's like, yeah, but no one cares.
	Most people talk about the things they're up to.
	Exactly.
	These sad sacks can't even change themselves for the better because they've formulated a system that equates exceptionalism with racism and whiteness.
	It's a really, really well-framed statement.
	Student of history, a vanguard of a new anything order is a massive red flag.
	Yeah, anyone who describes themselves being a vanguard of a new order...
	I mean...
	A new racial order.
	Yeah, a new racial order.
	Like, yeah, exactly.
	Hell's March playing.
	I just can't help but see the goose-stepping parades.
	Like, that's what a vanguard of a new racial order sounds like, you know?
	And Omar again, it's hard not to be a white supremacist if you ascribe to any and all positive qualities that lead to good meritocratic outcomes, to whiteness.
	That's a great point.
	If they say that everything good about the world is white, and therefore whiteness bad, for some reason, and you don't want to be white supremacists, do you?
	So you've got to oppose good things.
	It's like, why did you ascribe all the good things to white people?
	You could have said they were just neutral.
	Racially neutral.
	There are good things in non-white countries.
	Because that's the capital white, right?
	So you've got to wonder what they describe capital black as?
	Well, presumably it's the antonym of whiteness.
	So I'd love to hear them list it.
	They never do.
	And this thing, so in this critical race theory book, 500 pages and I was waiting for a definition of blackness.
	Not once.
	Not once.
	That's the question.
	If anyone works the critical race theorist?
	Get them to define blackness.
	In the same way they define whiteness, being individualism, meritocracy.
	Get them to do whiteness first.
	And they'll listen to it all.
	And they'll be like, right, so define blackness.
	Yep.
	Go on.
	Let's hear it.
	Let's hear it.
	And yeah, exactly.
	They are pretty racist by that standpoint.
	Could you imagine having Robert D'Angelo to your company?
	Get her to do whiteness and be like, right, blackness now.
	In front of a live audience.
	Film it.
	It'd be worth the speaker's fee.
	It'd be worth the 20 grand.
	The left are literally setting up non-white supremacists for failure, and I'm not entirely sure it isn't on purpose.
	How else have they ensured themselves a place in the ruler class than the deranged idea of a communist utopia?
	That's a great question.
	Chet says, We're
	good to go.
	Allergies, immune disorders, concerns over side effects or being injured by the first dose are all completely valid reasons for not getting or wanting these particular vaccines.
	For me, it's just that they're demanding it.
	How do we know it's not Bill Gates' microchip?
	Well, we don't, and I'm not taking that risk.
	I'm joking.
	Yeah, obviously.
	But the point is now, for me, it's just like, look, it's the way you're going on about it.
	Yeah.
	It's totally unreasonable.
	And it's clearly now coercive and authoritarian.
	And for that reason, I'm just not doing it.
	I haven't been vaccinated, obviously.
	I've never even had a COVID test.
	I'm not going to.
	Anyway.
	Right now says, Wow, that's a depressing point.
	But true.
	Can't refute it.
	Student of history, if America is so white supremacist, why haven't they chosen to go to a non-white supremacist nation and live there free of the spectre of the white man?
	They did.
	It was called Liberia, and they made a racial caste in which the ones who came from America were on top.
	Presumably they get called white supremacists.
	They don't care what you call them, because they're on top.
	It was the Afro-Liberians, the ruling class, and then the native Liberians were the underclass.
	Oof.
	David Fisher says, Possibly.
	I mean, that's definitely something that's possible.
	And to that, my advice would be pick an identity.
	Pick one.
	That's what I've done.
	I'm horrifically mongrel in my background, but I just, you know, identify as an Englishman because I'm partly English and that's just how I feel.
	Like, you know, the values and culture and identity of England.
	I just feel English and not like St.
	Helene or Welsh, you know?
	It's really funny, on the interview I did on New Culture Forum, a couple of the comments were like, this guy doesn't look like an Englishman.
	I was like, yeah, I know, mostly I'm not.
	But partially I am, and I just happen to feel that way.
	So, yeah, I'm not letting you go.
	It's tough.
	Are we out of time?
	We are.
	Okay, well, if you want more from us, go to lotusseasons.com, get access to all the premium and the free stuff I mentioned in the intro, of course, especially the speech you gave at Academic Agents Conference.
	But other than that, we'll be back tomorrow, 1 o'clock.
	Thank you and goodbye.

▲