Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 13, 2021 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:35:44

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #174

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Hello and welcome to the Podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 13th of July 2021.
	I'm I'm joined by Josh.
	Hello.
	And today we're going to be talking about the anti-communist action taking place in Cuba.
	Also Jamaica finds out that reparations are very profitable.
	And also the UK social media license, which the right-wing and the left-wing here is apparently saying we should have.
	Which is embarrassing to see.
	I expect Labour to do this, but I did not expect right-wingers Yeah, the entire country's gone mad.
	I don't know what's going on.
	God, we'll get to that.
	I'm very, very black-pilled about the whole thing, but a couple of good things to mention first.
	So, first thing to mention is the interview Hugo did with Michael Malice, which is premium on Lotuses.com, so go and check that out if you're a premium member, or go and sign up to get access to that, which is, I am told, very good.
	And also, the next thing, which is what we put out yesterday, this is free, the Your Scars video, which...
	The new chat Michael was also helping out with in the editing.
	So this is Carl's argument about what's Essentially, he used the case of abortion to be like, look, you need to be prudent with your decisions, because even though you can use science to remedy the whole situation, you know, killing the baby, it's still going to leave you with a scar, in which case prevention is better and you should be prudent with your decisions, which is true, and it's not always about abortion, but abortion is a great example to make that point.
	So go give that a watch, because I think it's very well argued, even though I'm biased, but I actually think this is one of Carl's better ones, so go and check that out.
	Also, a thing to mention, which I've been asked to, which is the video comments, please keep them to 30 seconds for the comment per day, because otherwise it causes problems, but otherwise I'm sure it'll be fine.
	So, let's get right into the first story of the anti-communist action taking place in Cuba.
	So, the phrase freedom is now an anti-government slogan, which, just going to go out with it, libertarians are right about this, it is, by definition.
	Yeah, that's exactly what I said yesterday.
	So I don't know what to say, but we'll get into this.
	So this is the first article from CBS talking about why Cubans are rising up against the Cuban government, who are communist.
	And they say in here that thousands of Cubans marched on the island Sunday to protest food shortages and high prices amid the coronavirus crisis.
	Yeah, that's what they're protesting about.
	That's why they chant freedom.
	In one of the biggest anti-government demonstrations in memory, many young people took part in the afternoon protest in the capital which disrupt traffic until police moved in several hours and broke up the march when protesters threw rocks.
	Police initially trailed behind as protesters chanted freedom, enough and unite.
	One motorcyclist pulled out a US flag but it was snatched by others.
	Not sure what this has to do with food.
	I mean, maybe.
	Maybe America is a symbol of food in comparison to socialism.
	But they're just like, yeah, they're protesting because of a food crisis.
	Well, this is an inevitability of communism, isn't it?
	Eventually, you run out of food.
	So, I mean, technically, it's a crypto way of saying socialism bad from CBS here.
	So they take a quote from someone who says, We are fed up with the queues, the shortages.
	That's why I'm here, one middle-aged protester told the Associated Press.
	He declined to identify himself for fear of being arrested later.
	Cuba is going through the worst economic crisis in decades, along with a resurgence of coronavirus cases, as it suffers the consequences of US sanctions imposed by the Trump administration.
	You can take that line straight from the Cuban propaganda department.
	It's like, we have these problems in Cuba.
	Huge shortages.
	What's that for?
	It's because the US. The US did this.
	I was like, hmm.
	Okay, okay.
	There's no other reason this could be the case.
	No one else could have done this.
	There's filthy capitalists with all their food.
	Yeah, yeah.
	American outlet saying this.
	AP journalists counted at least 20 people who were taken away in police cars by individuals in civilian clothes.
	Who do you think they are?
	That would be the secret police, wouldn't it?
	Because they don't have police written in capital letters across their chest.
	Unlike the secret police who went to Portland.
	I don't know if you remember they were complaining that the secret police are putting people in vans.
	It's like, right, they have the word police written on their chest, their backs, on their sides, unit number.
	Yeah, it's not very secretive, is it?
	It's not very secret.
	Like, people in plain clothes arresting people and disappearing them, that's what a secret police force looks like.
	Many Cubans were left disappointed last month when the Biden administration declined an opportunity to reverse the harsher policy instituted against the nation by former President Donald Trump.
	Good on Biden, I suppose.
	He's upholding so much of Trump's policies.
	The Biden White House has not lifted a flurry of additional sanctions imposed by Mr.
	Trump on Cuba right before he left office, and the US stood almost alone on June 23rd in a vote by the United Nations in a resolution condemning Washington's six-decade embargo on the island.
	I love that they leave that in but fail to mention that this is the 29th year in a row in which the US has just vetoed the whole resolution.
	Because why wouldn't they?
	They're the US. This is how the UN works.
	But the fact that they're like, oh no, they stand alone this time.
	No, this time.
	Sounds a bit bad, doesn't it?
	But this is not new at all.
	It's just US doesn't want stuff going to Cuba because they're communists.
	I don't know why I have to argue this point.
	Like, you don't trade with North Korea, you don't trade with the Soviet Union, you shouldn't trade with China.
	This wouldn't have even been a discussion in the 60s, would it?
	No, it's just communist bad.
	What do you want?
	But I love how they phrase this as just like, oh, they're protesting against the food crisis.
	Yeah, so here's the footage of Cubans out chanting, we want food, or, I don't know, communist government pretty good, but bad at food management.
	No, they're chanting freedom, and some guy's pulling out the American flag, because this is obviously not just about, oh, I don't know, socialist government could do a little bit better.
	No, socialist government, bad, because they're the ones causing the crisis, fundamentally.
	So, if we go to the next one, there's an article in which the New York Times also had this.
	Cubans denounce misery in biggest protests in decades.
	And they say in here, shouting freedom and other anti-government slogans.
	True?
	True?
	I mean, not just in Cuba?
	I don't disagree.
	Yeah, freedom is an anti-government slogan.
	Around the world, it's not just the socialist governments of the world, this is anti-government, it's against all governments, let's be frank about it.
	Hundreds of Cubans took to the streets in cities around the country on Sunday to protest food and medicine shortages.
	Yeah, they're not protesting the food and medicine shortages, though, are they?
	They're protesting the government.
	That's why it's an anti-government slogan.
	In a remarkable eruption of discontent not seen in 30 years, the protests were set off by a dire economic crisis in Cuba.
	Caused by what?
	Where the coronavirus pandemic has cut off crucial tourism dollars, people now spend hours in line each day to buy basic food items.
	Many have been unable to work because restaurants and other businesses have remained on lockdown for months.
	That sounds a bit like Venezuela.
	What is that thing that Venezuela has in common with Cuba?
	I can't quite put my finger on it.
	Well, I mean, there's also the point that the Cuban government has apparently locked down the place and therefore people are protesting against them because this causes economic misery.
	I mean, we've all seen this.
	Everyone's seen this.
	Part of the reason why they're so awful.
	And the idea that it's unique to Cuba here with the lockdowns Eh, not, no.
	Like, we should all be doing this.
	And I'm glad to the people in London, for example, who did the Freedom March, who were doing this.
	And they keep doing it, so keep up the good work, lads.
	Since the start of the fiscal year last October, the US Coast Guard has intercepted more than 512 Cubans at sea, compared to 49 for the previous year.
	On Saturday, the Coast Guard suspected, uh, sorry, suspended the search for nine Cuban migrants.
	Cuban migrants.
	Well, if they're fleeing Cuba, they're refugees, surely.
	What happened to that language?
	No, they're just economic migrants, aren't they?
	But they're fleeing the socialist government, so I'm imagining...
	That would be admitting that socialism is the cause of them fleeing.
	They're never going to do that.
	I suppose so.
	Whose vessel was overturned on West Quay in Florida.
	They say, I can't pronounce this name, and Donis Milan, a theatre director from Havana, said the extreme conditions became too much to bear.
	There's a quote from him.
	This is no longer a question of freedom of expression, it's a question of hunger.
	What do all the socialist governments have in common?
	Yeah, it's a running theme.
	I really can't put my finger on it.
	Yeah, why do people have to eat their children in China, Soviet Union and North Korea, I wonder.
	So he says, people are hitting the streets and they are asking for an end to this government, to one-party rule, to repression and the misery we have lived through for 60 years.
	Well, it's not a question of hunger, then, is it?
	Yeah, they're definitely talking about the government there.
	It's obvious.
	I don't know.
	The one-party rule.
	We're against hunger.
	Well, I mean, it's a good admission that the one-party rule of the socialist government just calls hunger.
	One thing, at least.
	A few hours later, he called back sobbing, saying the internet had been cut off and that anti-riot squads were in the streets and that a number of artists had been arrested after they demanded airtime on national television.
	Yeah, because it's a communist country.
	There is no freedom of expression.
	There is no right to protest.
	ACAB does not flourish in Cuba.
	ACAB gets beaten in the face in Cuba.
	So if we go to the first language, the memes.
	I do enjoy the memes coming out of all of this.
	I mean, it is a serious situation, but I love AOC there.
	We'll get to AOC organization's opinion on this in a minute.
	There's also footage of the people throwing rocks at the police.
	Because, yeah...
	They're enforcers of the socialist state.
	Screw them.
	I have no sympathy whatsoever.
	And if we go to the next one, you see the military being deployed.
	Presumably this was after the protests did what they did.
	And then the socialist government decided to send in the military.
	Because of course they did.
	And then we have the next thing, which is the protesters getting beaten by the cops.
	So people were uploading videos of their TikToks, and you can see someone here who's covered in blood, presumably after a fight there.
	And you can see other footage that I've seen online of the people in plain clothes who are clearly secret police or police officers themselves just beating people who are protesting, which...
	It's truly awful, isn't it?
	Yeah, what happened to all the ACAB, all cops and bastards?
	Like, what happened to all that?
	It's gone, isn't it?
	So then we have the next link here, which is just someone posted the descendants of Castro, and you can see them flexing at their pool parties and showing off their expensive cars, because this is socialism.
	Like, I love that meme.
	I'm sure you've seen it where it's like, oh, capitalism, and then it's like people living in slums, and then there's a wall, and then like mansions.
	No, that's socialism.
	It really is.
	Well, I mean, you only need to look at the Soviet Union where the people who lived lavish lifestyles were the party members and that was it.
	No one else was able to do so.
	This is a perfect modern example of it in which you've got average people struggling to even get food and then you've got the rich here in their pool parties with their expensive cars.
	I mean, what do you want to prove the point?
	Anyway, so one of the responses from the United States is, of course, the socialist response, which is that nothing is going wrong.
	So this is the first person here.
	Hands off Cuba, Cuban flag, verified checkmark.
	Victims of communism?
	You mean Nazis and landlords.
	What does that even mean?
	So everyone we kill.
	Everyone we kill and starve to death, they're just Nazis.
	Cuban people.
	Nazis.
	Don't know where they got their Nazism from.
	Living under a communist country for 60 years, but okay.
	Guess so.
	So this is a socialist activist.
	I mean, you might expect this, but the DSA, DSA more close to the Democratic Party, yeah, they're also in solidarity with the poor oppressed Cuban regime who is having rocks thrown at them from the people they are starving to death.
	So DSA stands with the Cuban people Okay.
	And their revolution in this moment of unrest.
	Yeah, that ruins it a little bit.
	Like, we stand with their revolution.
	Right, so you stand with the party.
	You stand with the government of Cuba.
	Which is in opposition to the people, really.
	The one they are protesting against, chanting freedom, pulling out the American flag.
	You don't stand with those people who are starving to death.
	You don't stand with the poor.
	You stand with socialists.
	Because, well, you're the Democratic Socialists of America, aren't you?
	And just to remind yourself, the DSA is not some nothing organisation, although I wish they were.
	Like, they actually have Congress people?
	Is that the term now?
	Congress men, women?
	Congress people works, I guess.
	God knows.
	Yeah.
	So there's the list on here, the current serving members.
	So we have Rashida from the River to the Sea, Tlaib, who of course is one of the congressmen.
	If you can scroll down, there's a list there.
	And then you have Alexandria, Concentration Camps, Cortez.
	And also Corey, Black People Still Aren't Free Bush.
	There's also some other guy, but I don't recognize him.
	Interesting middle names.
	Yeah, well, that's the phrase they're known for in my eyes, so I thought I'd add them.
	There's their nicknames.
	A.K.A. From the River to the Sea.
	So, Biden's regime, government, administration, I don't know what the right term is, has made a response to this, and the response is pretty petty, pathetic.
	I'm not in...
	All of this, in which they just refer to Cuba's authoritarian regime.
	Authoritarian, that's the only thing that makes Cuba an asshole, is it?
	There's no ideological problem with Cuba.
	I think they're trying to shore up the democratic socialists in their own party.
	I imagine they don't want to annoy them because Biden's already doing enough to do that so far in maintaining many of Trump's policies.
	Trump would not be a child about this.
	He'd just be like, yeah, communist, bad.
	Therefore, government, bad.
	Therefore, the whole thing, terrible.
	But they're just like, no, they're just authoritarian.
	Nothing wrong with the socialist part here.
	That's the thing I get from that.
	I didn't even mention it.
	It's a long way from what Reagan would do, where he'd talk about the evils of communism.
	This is very tame in comparison, even though a comparable situation is...
	Although there is the point he calls it authoritarian, but socialism inherently is totalitarian, because you cannot change your wealth freely.
	You can't exchange it with anyone.
	The entire system controls that, in which case it is total control.
	Totalitarianism.
	So, it's not even just authoritarian.
	Socialism in and of itself is totalitarian.
	Even you get the libertarian socialists, in which we'll communally own all the wealth and control it, and it's like, right, but what if I want to do something you guys don't want?
	What if I want to go against the commune?
	Well, you can't do that.
	Oh.
	Yeah.
	So there is no freedom.
	This is also a totalitarian system.
	Although this line of logic in which you don't mention the socialism has been taken further.
	So this is the Acting Assistant Secretary for the US Department of State's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs.
	She gave a statement on this in which she says, the Cuban people exercise their right to peacefully assemble to express concern about the rising COVID cases slash deaths and medical shortages.
	I was like, That's not what they're saying, is it?
	I'm sure the medicine shortage is a part of it, but...
	You know what the phrase freedom is?
	That's a call for medicine.
	Again, just not mentioning the socialism.
	They're just protesting about the rise in COVID cases.
	This is COVID concern protests, is what these are.
	Surely you wouldn't be protesting if you were concerned about COVID. The last thing you'd want to do is, yeah, we want lots of people in a crowded space.
	How does that make any sense?
	It doesn't make any sense.
	But it's just, again, why the sheepishness of just saying socialist?
	That's the problem with the Cuban government.
	But the Biden regime, and also the spokesman here, just not mentioning it, Why?
	And this isn't just them, of course.
	The corporate media have also jumped on the bandwagon and just been like, it's just about COVID, fellas.
	So this is CBS. They're reporting here on a large crowd that has gathered in Miami to protest the Cuban regime, because why wouldn't you?
	Trash.
	I don't know much about the situation of Cubans in Florida.
	I know there's a huge population there, so this obviously makes sense.
	So they say in here, a crowd gathered in Miami, Little Havana, on Sunday to demonstrate solidarity with the anti-government protests being held in Cuba.
	The Cuban government has been criticized for the country's economic crisis as well as its handling of COVID-19.
	What?
	No.
	They're being criticized for being socialists.
	That's fundamentally the point.
	They've been criticized for their economic crisis.
	They're socialists.
	The entire economy is within the state.
	It is owned by the people collectively, don't you know?
	In which case, if the crisis is of the economy and the whole economy is in crisis, who follows it?
	It's the socialist government.
	They're the ones who run the damn thing.
	You can't just say, oh, it's the capitalists who run the place.
	They're not there.
	They're all dead.
	Remember?
	So there's also the footage from the Miami rally, which is quite good to see.
	So this Republican mayor of Miami here, out there with the lads, protesting against them.
	So he says, this is a movement for freedom in Cuba.
	It cannot wait any longer.
	Getting to the point.
	It's about freedom.
	It's about overthrowing the socialists, because socialists are anti-freedom.
	But I love to see that the Democrats overwhelmingly just couldn't mention that.
	Either just ignore it or just say it's about medicine or something.
	That's why they're protesting.
	You only need to listen to what the actual people are saying to know it's against the government.
	It's obvious.
	They say so explicitly.
	And the fact that they're trying to be like, oh no, it's just an economic crisis.
	Oh, it's because of COVID. They're just making excuses and it's so transparent.
	But it's also a good example of how the Biden administration does kowtow to the extreme left within his own party by refusing to call out the part which is the socialism part of the Cuban government.
	So I thought we'd just check in with the Cringe UK because a report has come out about Britain's views on socialism, which is really depressing, I've got to be honest.
	So this is a review of Britain's Young, in which they found that 67% of young Brits want socialism.
	I doubt many of them even understand what it is, to be fair.
	I think they have an idea in their minds, but they have never looked at it for more than three seconds, or looked at a socialist country for more than three seconds.
	But this, you know, why has this happened?
	Well, let's be honest, because of the universities, because of the system in which we live, and it's utterly depressing to look at.
	So they say just under 2,000 people aged between 16 and 34 in the UK was the survey in which it was carried out between February and March 2021.
	They found that 67% say they would like to live in a socialist economic system.
	I wonder how the Cubans feel about this.
	Yeah, I doubt it would even be that high there, would it, really?
	I mean, they've obviously got...
	What do you mean it's going to be 0% in Cuba?
	Probably 1%.
	Just the party members.
	Yeah, the 1% who runs Cuba are like, yeah, it's fantastic, what's the problem?
	Everyone else, could I have some food, please?
	So, 75% agree with the assertion that climate change is specifically a capitalist problem.
	What?
	What levels of idiocy do you have to go to?
	It's like, China is the biggest polluter on the planet.
	Capitalism did this.
	Yeah, I think China pollutes more than Europe and North America combined.
	And they don't care.
	They have absolutely no care whatsoever.
	Like, I love all the hubbub that's made about the Paris Climate Accord, in which everyone submitted what we're going to do to stop climate change, and the Americans and the Westerners were like, oh yeah, we'll butcher our economy, and that's, we'll save the planet.
	And the Chinese came to it and went, some good proposals you guys got there, we're going to do nothing.
	We've also signed the Accords.
	That's why the Americans left it, because they were like, we're not going to butcher our economy if they're going to do nothing.
	And then everyone's like, oh, how dare you do this?
	And then they've ended up rejoining under Biden.
	Whereas because everyone else who wasn't a Westerner just wrote, do nothing, don't worry, I've signed it.
	I'm a good boy.
	I'm going to stay within the Accords and do nothing.
	Because it costs nothing to do nothing.
	So, I also hate the, as we've seen, the, what is it, the OSHA being on fire, being blamed on capitalism, even though it was a state-run company.
	But I mean, just look at the Soviet Union, there are endless examples of environmental pollution that are not the capitalist problem.
	In fact, most of the solutions to this problem seem to be coming from capitalist countries.
	I mean, the European countries, for example, becoming incredibly energy efficient over the last few years.
	78% blame capitalism for Britain's housing crisis.
	Not entirely wrong.
	I mean, the mass immigration is here to satisfy the needs of big business.
	When I say needs, demands, it's not needed.
	Profit margins.
	Yeah, so maybe agree with them on that one.
	72% support the re-nationalization of various industries, such as energy, water, and the railways, because of course they do.
	And 75% agree with the statement that socialism is a good idea, but has failed in the past because it has been badly done.
	Great.
	If only I was the dictator, I would have sold everything.
	It's unbelievably depressing.
	So it's 75% agree with the no true socialism argument of, oh, we've tried it, but it's just never worked because it's been done badly.
	Yeah, everyone else who's ever lived, who's ever tried socialism just hasn't done it quite right.
	I would fix it.
	So there's hundreds of millions of people, you know, they were just wrong.
	They're just doing it wrong.
	They just need to rethink.
	They need British socialism.
	That's what's going to solve the problem.
	Depressing to look at.
	I don't really know what else to say about it.
	The UK is an asshole in this regard.
	I don't know why we're allowing our enemies to teach our children nonsense, but that's the results.
	But as for the Cuban people, again, they're getting a dose of reality, aren't they, about socialism?
	Absolutely.
	Well, I hope it all resolves anyway.
	As in, they get some food and get rid of their government, hopefully.
	So, some more annoying stuff is, again, from the Caribbean, actually, is the Great Jamaican Grift.
	And this is what I've dubbed it, anyway.
	They're planning to ask the UK for about £7 billion in compensation for the Atlantic slave trade.
	For some reason.
	I mean, I don't know why now.
	I mean, they've had a very long time to do this.
	And so it's been estimated that by the Library of Jamaica that 600,000 Africans were shipped to Jamaica between the years 1533 and 1807.
	So if we actually ended up paying this, if we also spread our repayments over...
	The 274 years, we'd end up paying them about £2.3 million a month in reparations.
	So how much did they want in total to be paid, I presume, up front?
	I mean, I don't know how they wanted it paid.
	I don't think they're getting quite that far ahead of themselves, but it was £7 billion, roughly.
	Right.
	And who's that money going to go to?
	I don't know.
	They didn't specify, funnily enough.
	Probably the government.
	Exactly.
	I mean, this is always the point.
	You have this problem with the Americans debating this now.
	It's like, none of the slaves are alive.
	They're all gone.
	And I even ran through, I think we did an episode on this, where it's like, well, if you go for direct descendants, you could make an argument, and you can divide the money between them, and it ends up about, what was it, like 25 grand per descendant you can find, on average.
	And that could be done.
	But in the case of Jamaica, what?
	Like, we're just going to give it to the state, and the state's going to blow on gender programs, probably.
	I mean, it's ridiculous as well because it's being imposed on people that have never lived under slavery or even anyone in living memory has.
	I mean, if this is valid, we can claim reparations from the Romans.
	Yeah, I mean, I want the reparations from Germany and Japan.
	Why not?
	I mean, at least they did stuff to my grandparents.
	I mean, I've got more of a claim than they do to get reparations from us.
	Don't you have a right to claim reparations from the English as well with your background?
	What?
	Because of the council.
	The Scottish ancestry.
	Yeah, I need reparations from pretty much everyone.
	So are you in favour of this?
	No, of course not.
	No, reparations are obviously a terrible idea.
	If it's hard to the direct people, then it's...
	I mean, I'm not necessarily against, you know, paying a fine if someone who is alive has done you wrong, but the ancestors, you don't inherit ancestral guilt.
	That's not how it works.
	You're responsible for what you as a person do, not other people.
	But anyway, they were saying that we are hoping for a reparatory justice in all forms and that one would expect they are...
	They are to really ensure that we get justice from injustices to repair the damages that our ancestors experienced.
	Sorry, it's a bit confusingly written.
	Sorry, but that's also an injustice, what you're demanding?
	It is, yeah.
	You're demanding that the British people, who are currently paying taxes, who have never owned slaves, you steal money from them, because taxation is theft, and then just hand it over to the Jamaican government because people in the past there were slaves.
	That's also an injustice.
	There's also the fact that I've actually traced my family history.
	No one owns slaves.
	Why should I have to pay money?
	You can get a tax rebate then, can't you?
	So yeah, I wanted to go through a little bit of the history to just further reiterate why this is a load of rubbish, because we were probably the country in the world that did the most to end slavery, and we paid a lot of money to do so, just out of a moral crusade more than anything.
	We were the social justice warriors of...
	We're the justice warriors, not social justice warriors.
	Yeah, actually, yeah, fair enough.
	So we actually captured Jamaica from the Spanish in 1655.
	So it wasn't even us that, you know, colonized it.
	It was the Spanish.
	But of course, they're not asking for reparations from Spain.
	But also who wants to be owned by Spain, so that's technically liberation is what I'm going to call that.
	So yeah, in 1807 we prohibited the slave trade in our empire, which Jamaica, of course, was under, and formally abolished the practice in 1834.
	And in 1837, the slave owners who were in our empire were paid approximately £20 million to free the enslaved people, because I know people have a go at us, like, well, you paid the slave owners and not the slaves, but it was the only peaceable resolution here.
	I mean, £20 million.
	It's not even that.
	You are literally buying the slaves' freedom.
	That's what you're doing.
	Like, the government paid all the slave owners, not because they just want to give money to them or something...
	They were like, right, I will buy the slaves off of you.
	Right, you're all free now.
	Done.
	That's essentially what happened there.
	In which case, the British taxpayer freed all the slaves.
	And we only finished paying this off in 2015, the actual interest on the loan we took out to pay this.
	So if you were paying taxes up until 2015, you have contributed to freeing slaves in the UK. And it's as simple as that.
	So this reparations nonsense.
	Is exactly that.
	So, just to further hammer the point home, because this is really irritating me, of course Britain went around the world trying to end slavery.
	We didn't just end it in our own empire, which was, of course, 25% of the world at the time.
	But we also pressured former colonies of other European powers, such as the Portuguese colony of Brazil, in which the entire economy was based on slavery.
	None of the white people actually worked, and the Africans were the ones that did all of the manual labour.
	And what we did was we seized all the ships in the Atlantic Ocean and captured a couple of ports until they complied with ending slavery.
	The thing in my mind is like, oh, none of the Brazilians worked.
	Well, I still don't, so...
	It's a joke.
	So yeah, there was a recent...
	Well, not necessarily that recent, but in 2011, there was a poll about Jamaicans' attitudes towards the British Empire, and it says the following.
	Jamaica is getting ready to celebrate 50 years of political independence from the United Kingdom next year.
	Most Jamaicans are of the view that the country would have been better off had it remained a colony of Britain.
	Base.
	What was the percentage out of interest, you know?
	I believe it was, yeah.
	60%.
	Yeah.
	Polster Bill Johnson, who conducted an island-wide survey among 1,008 people, found that 60% of Jamaicans held the view that a country would have been better off under British rule.
	That doesn't sound like people who want reparations to me.
	I don't know.
	You can't really have imperial guilt and blame the empire when at the same time being like, yeah, it was better.
	Like, they should still be ruling us because the country would be better off.
	It's a bit strange.
	Yeah, and it's not like it's a small minority of people either.
	60%, that's a decent number.
	And I mean, of course there'd be people who were undecided and didn't know as well on top of that.
	So very few people actually disagreed, I would imagine.
	Let's go to Venezuela.
	Poll them about how they feel about, well, these days, being under Spanish governments probably would be better.
	They should probably say Colombia or Bolivia or something.
	How do you feel about Spanish governments?
	Yeah, definitely not.
	But yeah, only 17% actually thought that it would be worse off under British rule.
	So that's a tiny proportion, really.
	So then Prime Minister Bruce Golding proposed that Jamaica actually remove the Queen as the head of state.
	This is when...
	It was enormously popular, so big disconnect from the government here, which we might be seeing with this.
	Is he a Marxist?
	I'm not sure.
	Makes me sus.
	I think they have their own Labour Party, so that might be an explanation.
	I didn't look into the Jamaican politics.
	Jamaican people are like UK-based, God save the Queen, and the Prime Minister's like, yeah, also, let's get rid of the monarchy.
	Yeah, well, there's also some interesting stuff with the current Prime Minister, which I'll get onto in a second, where it's very confusing, where he's been critical of Queen Elizabeth, but he's also joined a Privy Council as of four days ago.
	So I don't really know how that works.
	But to read the quote from the former Prime Minister, Bruce Golding, transforming Jamaica from a monarchical to a Republican state means no disrespect and must not be interpreted this way.
	I've long believed that if I am to have a Queen, it must be a Jamaican Queen.
	I would not wish to see us celebrate 50 years of independence without completing that part of our sovereignisation from want of a better world.
	And I can kind of understand where he's coming from, where he kind of wants a republic.
	Why don't you hold a referendum if it's not about insulting?
	Forget the insult to the Queen, the insult to your own people.
	If they don't want this, why are you doing it?
	Well, yeah.
	It seems very strange that there is such a disconnect between the people who are ruling and the opinions of the public.
	So I love the chats being like, I can imagine the Jamaicans being like North FC. I can't do a Jamaican accent but just being like, I love the Queen.
	Simple ask.
	So last year there was a renewed effort to remove the Queen as the head of state.
	It didn't succeed.
	But this was because Barbados did so and they wanted to try and carry on that thing.
	But I just saw you making a face at the headline, which is God dumped the Queen.
	Jamaicans ruled by monarchs like Jews under Hitler, says lobbyist.
	What?
	Yeah, I know.
	It's ridiculous, isn't it?
	Under Queen Elizabeth II as well.
	Wait, so...
	She might be a bit German, but that's a bit of a stretch.
	She didn't holocaust the people of Jamaica.
	I don't know why that's news to this guy, but...
	Yeah, it is obviously ridiculous, but this anti-colonial campaigner, as he calls himself, Bert Samuels says, It is more than time for our people to experience true independence with the decolonisation of our constitution, the justice system, and also to remove those whose predecessors enslaved us from the pinnacle of our constitutional arrangement.
	There is no way that a Jewish state would tolerate a descendant of Adolf Hitler being the apex of its constitutional arrangement.
	It doesn't make any sense.
	Yeah, it's really not comparable, is it?
	So the idea that the people there were enslaved by the British means that they were owned by the Spanish before, I'm going to say that the Spanish probably had their slaves there.
	In which case, no, actually, the British monarchy is the thing that liberated slavery from existing to not existing.
	We abolished it by force and paid a lot of money.
	Exactly, yeah.
	So, as I mentioned earlier, the current Prime Minister, as of four days ago, has joined the Queen's Privy Council, which is a very select group of people.
	You've got former Prime Ministers, you've got people like Jacob Rees-Mogg.
	So have they just established the Queen as the...
	No, they actually didn't go around to doing it.
	They failed?
	Yeah.
	Thank God.
	Yeah.
	And he says, Her Majesty the Queen has been graciously pleased to approve, oh no, this is her spokesperson, sorry, the Most Honourable Andrew Holness, ONPC MP, Prime Minister of Jamaica, be appointed a member of Her Majesty's Most Honourable Privy Council.
	That doesn't sound very anti-monarchy to me.
	And he attended a meeting in which he affirmed his loyalty to the Queen.
	However, in the past he has said, You are independent, and that's fine.
	Yeah.
	I mean, Canada doesn't think, oh, you know what?
	Our head of state is Queen Elizabeth.
	We've got to rise up.
	Well, I mean, given the statues are being torn down.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, I suppose.
	But it's not a widely held view.
	Certainly not being said by Trudeau.
	He's not saying, you know, we need to get rid of the Queen.
	Well, I didn't give it time.
	Yeah.
	It's not beyond him, I don't think.
	No.
	So, obviously this is a bit of a strange thing.
	The government's been relatively critical of the Queen and he's joined the Privy Council.
	Is this like a thing to do where he's looking for some degree of, like, Bargaining power, where he's like, yeah, we want the reparations, because of course it's his government saying it, but also...
	Because that's the funny transition here, between British Empire was good, also governed us well and we'd like them back, but also give us reparations because you evil, and it's like...
	No, one of these things is not in line with the other.
	Yeah, you can't have it both ways.
	But rather unhelpfully, the UN somewhat staring the pot at the minute with the whole reparations thing, which I think is...
	Typical.
	Yeah, of course, nothing new here.
	I think this is why Jamaica might be asking for reparations.
	They've seen, particularly Germany, when they're giving reparations to somewhere in Africa recently, or being asked to, or something along those lines.
	Yeah, I think it was.
	Yeah, that's right.
	That was pretty messed up.
	Me and Carl looked up the guy in charge of the colony and then is blamed for the first genocide of the 20th century.
	First of many.
	And he's an actual nutjob, like a full-on comic book villain.
	It's not just the German name of Heben von Liebentrop or whatever the hell his name was.
	But he was just talking about like, yeah, the people have attacked us, therefore all of them must be destroyed.
	What on earth?
	Like, what on earth is wrong with you?
	Which is why it's such a disconnect from anything British.
	Like, even when you look at British imperialists, they don't talk like that.
	Whereas the Germans openly are just like, yeah, kill them all.
	Right, okay.
	Yeah, when the Germans were doing that, we were the ones trying to end slavery, just like, yeah, this is inhumane and unhuman and unchristian.
	So you could make an argument for reparations from the Germans, because the Germans are not great political rulers, but the British...
	Well, it's still not the current Germans doing it.
	It's not the people alive now that were doing that in Africa.
	That's a fair point.
	I mean, as much as it amuses me to talk about reparations from Germany, I don't actually think it's a good idea.
	I think as a policy in general, no.
	Actually, the Germans should have to pay reparations for existing.
	As long as there are Marxist governments, it's their fault.
	They love taxes, so I'm sure they'd be happy to pay another one.
	Marxist tax.
	If your country came up with an ideology, you have to pay a tax for the damage it does.
	That's basically Germany and France bankrupt.
	Yes.
	So this UN human rights chief said in the presentation on human rights, ironically, fully fund and comprehensive processes need to take place on a wide range of reparation measures to address the legacy of slavery, colonial rule and racial discrimination.
	And she, and I'm reading from the article here, Bachelet told the council in Geneva that research could not find a single example of a state that has comprehensively reckoned with its past or accounted for its impacts on the lives of the people of African descent today.
	I mean, how do you determine that?
	What is the threshold?
	There's no metrics whatsoever.
	Yeah, it's just like, once you have spent X amount of money, you are now reconciled.
	You're free.
	You're free.
	No, because it's original guilt and you're going to be with it forever because that's how leftists think.
	Yeah, but all of this reparation nonsense is just being imposed from people like the UN and leftists where it obviously just doesn't belong in Western society.
	I don't think anyone should be paying any reparations.
	But also, when does it stop?
	I mean, let's say we don't pay reparations, and then we wait a hundred years.
	Still owed?
	Two hundred years?
	A thousand years?
	Yeah, how far back in time do we have to go?
	Do we need reparations from the Italians for their invasion?
	That's a point, but I mean more in the sense of, like, they're saying that Jamaica has this problem because of the legacy of colonialism and whatnot.
	But I have to wonder, well, how does the makeup of Jamaica look?
	Like, if we get to the point in which, let's say, every white or mixed-race person has left Jamaica, and then it's got problems of corruption and, you know, high crime rate as it does, is that still colonialism's fault?
	I mean, when does it not become colonialism's fault?
	What do you have to do to stop that from happening?
	It's just a way of making excuses for yourself if you're in government, isn't it?
	It's just like, well, we did all we could, but we've just inherited all of this I may have embezzled billions of dollars, but this is Britain's fault.
	I may be rich, but now it's all Britain's fault.
	But anyway, she recommended that countries, this is the UN advisor, reinforce and fully fund comprehensive processes with full participation of affected communities to share the truth about what was done and the harms it continues to inflict.
	Continues to inflict.
	Name them.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Okay.
	Name one.
	Point to them and say this is directly as a result of British policy that British people today have done.
	What are they going to do?
	We speak English?
	Is that the complaint?
	Well, there can be an argument made that in Jamaica they speak their own kind of version.
	Like American English.
	It's not really English, is it?
	So the final quote I wanted to read out because...
	The final ridiculous thing is establishing truth about these legacies and the impact today and taking steps to address this harm through a wide range of reparation measures is crucial to healing our societies and providing justice for terrible crimes.
	And she says, measures taken to address the past will transform our future.
	Yeah, it'll make everyone in Britain very bitter towards people because we're paying for things that we had nothing to do with.
	And I, for one, definitely will not be paying reparations.
	I'll be moving if they make us pay this.
	This is ridiculous.
	But I would like to think that the government has enough sense...
	I'm going to hold you there.
	Yeah.
	Well, it's probably going to come back to bite me, but I think they have enough sense to say, listen, this has nothing to do with us anymore.
	Look at what we did as well to end slavery.
	We've reconciled with it.
	We're fine.
	I don't know why we don't just laugh at it at this point.
	Yeah, we should make fun of it.
	That's the best way to get rid of it.
	You're just looking for money.
	Just say you want a free handout, because that's what they're doing.
	Like, I can imagine, like, the Spanish today being like, we suffered under the moors or something.
	They are as reparations.
	Morocco, pay up.
	I mean, you just look at them and start laughing, because, like, what on earth are you talking about?
	It's just weak, isn't it, really?
	Just, like, hundreds of years ago.
	Yeah, corruption in Madrid.
	Morocco did this.
	Doesn't make any sense.
	No.
	But anyway.
	Alright, so this is the thing I've really wanted to get forward to, because I'm mad.
	So I wanted to talk about how Labour always win, and it's utterly depressing, and this past day has really blackpilled me.
	Except in elections.
	On the whole situation, except in elections, but that apparently doesn't matter, because if you win the culture war, who cares?
	So I suppose I should preference this with racism bad.
	Stunning and brave, I know.
	I don't know what else to say, because apparently that's mandatory, as if people don't believe this, but whatever.
	So the first thing I wanted to bring up was the Darren Grimes tweet that he did, which made him trending and got, what was it, like 16,000 salty comments from people?
	Because he dared to say, honestly though, Marcus Rashford, penalties, not politics from now on, aye.
	He missed the penalty.
	His politics is socialism, therefore it's trash.
	I mean, I said more or less the same thing when I was just watching it on my own.
	I was just thinking to myself, well, maybe if he spent less time playing politics and more time taking penalties...
	Sure, but what's controversial about this?
	That's what I don't get, and I'm yet to have someone properly explain this.
	It's just like, yeah, he said that the guy missed his penalty and his politics are...
	I think because of the supposed racist comments, I haven't actually seen anything.
	Yeah, I wouldn't doubt that there are legitimate comments, but in that kind of environment, people are very touchy about criticising them at the minute, and I think in that climate where...
	I think this should be fine to stand alone, but...
	In that climate, people are like, well, they're already getting dogpiled as is.
	You should not be criticising them anymore.
	I don't agree.
	That's a pathetic argument because it's like, well, if this guy's getting criticism, you can't criticise him.
	It's like, alright, that's not an argument.
	Anyway, moving on from that.
	But just something I wanted to mention because I just found it ridiculous.
	And one of the things I wanted to mention was, as you pointed out, people have said the N-word online, and therefore all rational thinking apparently has gone out the window for every wing of politics in the UK, which is mad.
	So the Labour Party, spending their last few months trying to raise racial consciousness by advancing Black Lives Matter, which ideology is inherently racial socialism, along with critical race theory, And they have stoked this, and then their solution to the England team losing a game, and then people online, presumably in other countries by the data, have saying the N-word online is that we need more censorship in the UK. So, late party tweet.
	The racist abuse that members of the England football team are facing is appalling.
	The Conservatives need to crack down on the social media companies that allow this...
	Sorry, they continue to allow this hatred to spread.
	Condemnation is not enough.
	We need tough new laws against racist abuse online.
	We already have Section 127, which criminalises being grossly offensive.
	Nothing's ever gone wrong with that, has it?
	The Malicious Communication Act, which criminalises causing anxiety, which nothing has ever gone wrong with that either.
	But no, not enough.
	we need more laws to crack down on people saying the n-word online who aren't even in this country majority by the looks of it i don't even know what to say like you kind of expect this from labor and whatever but then there's the the other stuff coming out of this so we go to the next one you have boris who in response to the the n-word trending on twitter which is twitter's fault no one else's saying shame on you i hope that you crawl back under the rock from which you emerged yeah i mean boris says racism is bad I don't know what you were expecting.
	Stunning and brave.
	One of the weird things here is, fundamentally, this is a political trap, which is to get him talking about this, and therefore he can be tacked on lines that you said, Marxism bad, therefore you're a racist, which is what they have been saying for the longest time, and now you've put yourself in a position...
	In criticising players taking the knee, which is obviously Black Lives Matter...
	Gesture.
	They're like, yeah, you are allowing people to be racist.
	Which doesn't make any sense.
	The problem here was the racialization of politics, which the Labour Party and left-wingers are entirely to blame for.
	When you say in critical race theory, textbooks, we will need to raise racial consciousness, that's not the liberal position, that's not the conservative position, that is the leftist position.
	So when they set up the football game for win, a win equals that diversity makes the superior ubermensch, and what does lose mean?
	Well, what does lose mean?
	Well, it means that society is racist and we need more power to push racial socialism.
	So the response, of course, is that Boris Johnson said racism is bad.
	Well, therefore, he also booed the players.
	Therefore, he is also bad.
	So Keir Starmer attacking him on this point.
	Boris Johnson failed to support players taking the knee when they were being booed.
	His words now ring hollow.
	That's so ridiculous because it's suggesting that you either support Black Lives Matter or you're racist.
	Just like there's no alternative.
	You can be against racism.
	That's the Labour narrative, which is that you support socialism or you're racist.
	So when you say it's racist and bad, well then you get pulled into the trap where you booed socialism, therefore you as a racist.
	So he's also getting attacked.
	The players are also attacking conservatives on this, so Priti Patel saying racism bad.
	And then for that, she's getting attacked by the football players.
	You don't get to stoke the fire at the beginning of the tournament by labeling our anti-racist message a gesture politics and then pretending to be disgusted when the very thing we're campaigning for, sorry, campaigning against happens.
	Freudian slip, because it is what you're campaigning for.
	Sorry to break this to you, but raising racial consciousness leads to racism.
	Who would have thought?
	Like, this is what your gesture politics was, and why it was bad.
	It was not just gesture politics, it was racist politics.
	Racialising society is not a good thing, and doesn't lead to a tolerant society.
	I don't know what on earth you people were thinking.
	And then you're like, oh, the people condemning us for raising racial consciousness.
	They're the real racists.
	Oh, I'm sick of it.
	Absolutely sick of it.
	But I kind of expect this stupidity from the socialist camp, because that's all they do.
	What I was not expecting was the elitist response to this, which I probably should have been expecting at this point.
	So the first one here, Piers Morgan.
	Social media firms must end all anonymous accounts.
	If you want to spew vile abuse, you should be forced to do so publicly under your genuine identity, not while hiding behind the cloak of billionaire-backed secrecy.
	All the Pepe accounts, they're all Jeff Bezos bots there.
	So he's saying that because you have anonymity on social media, therefore this causes people to say the N-word?
	Doesn't make any sense.
	Also, the stupidity of being like, yeah, we'll just abolish anonymity on social media.
	This will have no negative consequences whatsoever.
	There's no reason to be anonymous online, ever.
	Yes.
	Whistleblowers.
	Journalists.
	People who are victims of crimes who want to keep their identity hidden.
	Talk about the grooming gang victims for a second.
	You really think they want their identity online?
	Think they should be forced to?
	If they want to make an account and talk about what's happened to them, they need to hand over their driving license or passport to Twitter or Facebook and therefore have their name on the front.
	I mean, for God's sakes, Piers, you're a journalist.
	You used to be a journalist.
	You used to film people and you keep their names hidden because they asked for it.
	What was the reason for that?
	Because they're racist, I presume.
	It's just unbelievably stupid.
	I mean, I've seen Piers Morgan, what was it, the Leveson Inquiry?
	Like, he went to the Leveson Inquiry and refused to give the names of sources who had given him information because he respected their anonymity.
	He's like, yeah, but if you want to use social media, no anonymity.
	It's ridiculous as well.
	And obviously I'm against calling people names in general.
	It's not a productive thing.
	It doesn't do anyone any good.
	But at the same time, ending internet anonymity is hugely disproportionate to what's actually happened.
	Some people have said the N-word online, therefore end anonymity online.
	That's ridiculous, isn't it?
	Stupidest thing.
	Also, someone made a comment which is right, which is just ask peers, well, why do we vote anonymously?
	Out of interest.
	What's the value in anonymity?
	That's a good point, yeah.
	So also, no more leakers, no more meme makers, because if you make a meme and it's politically incorrect, it doesn't have to be racist, it can just be politically incorrect, the political left don't like it, you can lose your job if you do that on social media with the real name.
	No more of that.
	Crush all that, because that's the world we want to live in.
	We want to live in a world of full-on cancel culture, which you can say nothing.
	There's also the point of when the N-word was trending on Twitter, one of the comments that made that trend was because a guy who worked at some company had his real name and tweeted, you know, N is the reason we lost tonight.
	A horrible thing to say, but he did it with his real name.
	So the point that if we make everyone have their real names online, this will end.
	Just not true.
	It's just going to make everyone who says it unemployed, apparently.
	And it's one thing, but it's more about the point of there's that.
	You can say, oh, I don't want racists to have jobs.
	Who's a racist?
	Who's a racist, Piers?
	Political left would say you are.
	Moron.
	Like, you've been accused of this.
	Everyone's been accused of racism at some point because they don't believe in goddamn BLM or something.
	So everyone's going to goddamn prison.
	There's also the absolute brainlets.
	So you've got Katie Price here, some pointless thought, who's tweeted out a petition.
	And if we go to the petition, which is the next link, make verified ID a requirement for opening a social media account.
	That's racist.
	611,000 signatures.
	Wow.
	At least we have a number on the number of stupid people in this country.
	Apparently...
	Could you get anything more blackpilling, though?
	It kills me to look at.
	Oh, it's going up.
	Yeah, it just ticks up by the second.
	So you can see in the text here, the online harms bill doesn't go far enough in making online abuse a specific criminal offence.
	The online harms bill is basically communist.
	It's a censorship bill which our government is going to cast.
	Terrible, yeah.
	I wrote an article about it, by the way, on our website.
	And doing what Harvey's Law intended, to make the law work, needs the removal of anonymity to ensure that users cannot cause harm by using online platforms to abuse others.
	Stupid takes.
	I mean, just as a second as well, as John mentioned earlier, these people are so dumb, they don't even know that the internet is not something you can control via government.
	You can just make an anonymous account anywhere else.
	Or you can just make up a name, or you can just lie on your ID. Yeah, use a fake ID. Now what?
	Anyway, so, I mean, brainlets, Piers Morgan, what do you expect?
	Didn't expect the next one, though.
	So the next one is George Galloway and Richard Tice backing this.
	So if you can scroll up, you can see Richard Tice, the leader of Reform UK, the party that is, you know, used to be Brexit party, Nigel Farage.
	They're back in this.
	So Richard Tice said, Boris and Parliament could stop online racism in its tracks by passing legislation forcing Twitter, Facebook in the UK to have only named accounts, checking people's details and banning anonymous ones.
	Happens in betting shops, etc.
	So why not on social media?
	Come on Zuckerberg& Co.
	Goddammit, man.
	The comparison to betting shops as well?
	It's so ridiculous.
	Online betting you have to show an ID, therefore to speak you should have to show an ID. Isn't the idea just to see if you're over 18 as well?
	And also your real name and all the rest of it.
	So you can't have a fake name or just anonymity at all.
	And then George Galloway, absolutely correct, Richard.
	No.
	No, George.
	Not absolutely correct.
	This is the dumbest thing.
	What's irritating as well is we had Richard on and he said in the interview with me, he was like, look, the police should spend less time dealing with online mean comments and instead go after the people who are stabbing each other.
	Stabbing's haven't stopped.
	They've gotten worse.
	He knows this.
	And I just find it dumbfounding that he could say something like this and be like, yeah, that's a priority.
	That's something they should be doing.
	When he knows full well, you know, he's not an idiot.
	The rest of them are goddamn midwits, but this guy isn't, from what I saw.
	He understands that you shouldn't be spending police time on this, and yet, end online anonymity.
	Same with George Galloway.
	It's embarrassing to see.
	It's not the worst one, though.
	If we go to Dan Wooten at GB News, anonymous postings on social media should not be allowed.
	GB News.
	Conservatism right here.
	Yep, at least we near the compromise now, even.
	Just a dumb take.
	Just a real dumb take.
	But not the worst one.
	Worst one so far is a conservative, Mike Graham.
	Mike Graham decided to say that racists should not only not be able to have accounts, not only should go to jail, but should lose every human right imaginable by the looks of it.
	So let's play this clip of him this morning.
	And I've got a plan.
	The time has come to not only find these people, not only to prosecute them for their lawless behaviour, but also basically to excommunicate them from our society.
	So forget about locking them up.
	Forget about throwing away the key.
	Forget about banning them from football stadiums, right?
	I've got a better idea.
	Instead, let's make it impossible for them to actually have a life.
	No bank account, no ability to travel, no passport, no benefits, nothing.
	Forget kicking out.
	Let's kick them out.
	We don't need them.
	Britain doesn't need them.
	Adios!
	Amigos!
	And you don't like it because I've said that in Spanish.
	Sure, disenfranchising people is going to make them so much more moderate and reasonable.
	Destroying their entire life, I'm sure, is going to make them really sympathetic to your viewpoints.
	Hey, we got this racist guy who really hates black people.
	What are we going to do?
	We'll get rid of his passport, his bank account and all the rest of it until he do nothing.
	I mean, social credit's custom there to try and combat racists.
	Sorry to say this, I don't know how this is controversial.
	Racists are humans and therefore have human rights.
	Just like the communists.
	Communists, evil ideology, evil people for believing in it, same thing, except they are still humans and therefore have human rights.
	We can't just take away all the rights of the communists or the Nazis.
	It's not a thing you can do in a liberal democracy.
	But who cares?
	Someone wrote the N-word online, so I guess abolish freedom.
	I don't get it.
	I don't know how on earth you can get into this position and be like, yeah, I'm a conservative.
	But I mean, someone said the N-word online, so I mean, socialism.
	We're going to have to do socialism now, because someone said the N-word online.
	It's so ridiculous.
	I don't know what it is.
	Something emotional happens, and they just lose their heads.
	No thinking whatsoever, just abandon any reason.
	This is not the only thing.
	There is some other stuff which is just weird.
	So this is the first one here.
	So this comedian, Andrew Lawrence, I've seen him before.
	He does some good skits.
	So if we go to the first image here, if you can click on the image in that tweet there, in which he was responding to the thing, and being a comedian, he makes edgy jokes, because that's what a comedian's meant to be.
	I don't know why that's controversial.
	So he says in here that his first response is after seeing the penalties, all I'm saying is the white guy scored, and then equality, diversity, S penalties.
	S word, penalties.
	It's like, yeah, okay.
	Edgy jokes.
	I don't know what else to say.
	Like, let's...
	Okay.
	What do you want?
	So his shows have all been cancelled, which is what they're demonstrating next.
	So all of the shows he had lined up have been cut off because of this.
	And if you go to the next link, there's another joke that he told in response to this.
	So we go to the next link, sorry.
	Which he says, he retweets the thing after people were getting upset at his joke.
	I can see that this has offended a lot of people and I'm so sorry that the black guys are bad at Penelope.
	Again, edgy, but clearly a joke.
	I don't know what to say.
	And you can be mad.
	You can not want to go to his show.
	Sure, whatever.
	That's your freedom.
	But the idea that this guy needs to be completely destroyed over it.
	I mean, remember.
	Remember the Labour Party saying, this guy, this guy for making this joke, he should go to jail.
	And what's embarrassing, they don't even need to pass legislation.
	We already have the legislation.
	This guy's already guilty under the Minister's Communications Act and Section 127 of the Communications Act.
	That man's a criminal for making his jokes.
	Regardless of what you think of them, you can hate the jokes, go for it.
	But that doesn't change the fact that we've criminalized that.
	So I guess he can enjoy his prison sentence of up to a year, which is more than you get for blasphemy in Kuwait.
	So if we go to the next one, which is just to remind people where they're written by the petition, Section 127.
	This is why I'm very blackpilled, because, I mean, you can look at, hey, we should get rid of this censorship law.
	We got the 10,000 signatures and the government was like, get stuffed.
	And yet you have, yeah, let's just abolish freedom, 600,000 signatures.
	Like, we are never getting a First Amendment, are we?
	It's never happening.
	If anything, it's going to go further in the opposite direction at this rate.
	So what are the Conservatives saying about this?
	Are they fighting back and being like, no, I know someone said the N-word online, but that doesn't mean we abolish freedom?
	Of course they're not.
	No, so let's go to the next one.
	So the government will tell tech giants to immediately hand over details of the racists who accused England players, sorry, abused England players, so the government can make examples of them.
	Who are they going to be making examples of?
	It's going to be people that post stuff like this.
	Don't know.
	Don't know.
	I guess we'll find out.
	Because if you're still naive enough to think that hate speech laws are a good idea, let's go to the next tweet.
	Someone's already been arrested.
	Don't worry.
	We're getting them, boys.
	Who we got?
	12-year-old boy.
	12-year-old boy.
	That's who we're going after.
	We're going after children online.
	Protecting those poor vulnerable footballers from those horrible children.
	They're out to get them.
	Oh no.
	Like, sure, he said some gross stuff.
	So, as you can see here, the 12-year-old boy from Birmingham, can't say the name because it's difficult, has been arrested after a string of vile racist messages that were sent to Crystal Palace footballer Wilfred Zaha.
	So he sent Zaha photos of the Ku Klux Klan and told the winger, quote, You better not score tomorrow, you black C-word, or I'll come to your house dressed as a ghost.
	Yeah.
	It's racist.
	It's gross.
	Didn't kill anyone.
	So the 12-year-old has been arrested.
	12-year-old has been arrested by the police.
	For sending this, because that's a normal world.
	We arrest children for saying something mean online.
	It's gross.
	You can be upset about it.
	I am.
	It's not a nice thing to say.
	No one died, though.
	No physical harm was done to the millionaire footballer from the 12-year-old from Birmingham.
	Just hurt feelings, I think.
	And of course, I too disavow the child, but at the same time, getting arrested is a little bit far, isn't it?
	There's a difference between don't like and illegal.
	And the position the UK government has, and even the right wing seems to be adopting right now, is anyone who says this, no matter if they're a child, no matter if it's a stupid comment, is illegal.
	Send them to jail.
	I mean, this kid could be facing up to a year in jail under Section 127, presumably not as a child, he'll end up with a fine like Dankula, because this country is a free country.
	So we go to the next one as well.
	So in case you're like, oh, okay, no, come on, I still agree, that was a racist comment, therefore, arrest the child.
	Send him to jail.
	Maybe you still agree with that.
	Okay, then we'll take it to the next step because this is how it works.
	This is why we are against hate speech laws in the right of Britain.
	So this is the next story.
	Hate crime investigation after reports that a street preacher used homophobic language.
	Quoted from the Bible.
	That's homophobic language.
	So you gotta investigate.
	Remember this?
	This is the same thing.
	This is what you're advocating when you advocate for hate speech laws.
	Where do you think that's going?
	Well, it never stops there, does it?
	It doesn't stop at the homophobic language of the Bible.
	It goes to the next one.
	If we go to the next one, being investigated for gender-critical views.
	Have you people lost your memories?
	Like, a week ago, everyone was able to understand this.
	A week later, someone said the end one online.
	Kill freedom.
	It's over.
	It's just embarrassing to see.
	But one of the things that I didn't expect is a Labour MP being on our side, weirdly.
	Wait, what?
	In a weird way.
	Of course, not purposely.
	Accidentally.
	She says in here that the Tory hate speech bill back in Parliament today, which threatens student societies' freedom to choose who speaks at their events and the ability to protect students.
	I love it.
	When it's a Tory hate speech bill, it's an abridge of free speech.
	It's something bad.
	When it's a Labour hate speech bill, that's not an abridge of free speech because that harms the racists.
	I mean, could you get any more transparent?
	Hate speech is not a legitimate method on which to censure speech.
	But I guess we don't care.
	And to end this, I suppose I should mention GB News.
	So this is a guy on GB News this morning who, in response to people saying the N-word online, has decided that socialism, fair enough.
	So remember, players take the knee, they do the socialist salute, and everyone's like, yeah, we don't believe in socialism, take that out of sport.
	And he's like, you know, everyone backs up on that.
	He's like, yep, social isn't bad.
	But then someone said the end one online in response to losing.
	Therefore, I mean, fair enough, we'll just have to do socialism, mate.
	What else are we going to do?
	We could just continue to be a free country, or you could be like, nah, I'll do the socialist salute live on GB News.
	Goddamn embarrassing.
	And I am blackpilled to hell.
	I don't know what else to say, but...
	It's not a good day for positive news, really, is it?
	No, but that's the news.
	Send that there, I guess.
	Idiots.
	Idiots.
	Goddamn idiots.
	How can you not get this?
	One emotional thing happens and everyone just loses their heads.
	They're like, yeah, okay, well, I guess socialism.
	What else are we going to do?
	I'm past anger at this point.
	I'm on to kind of grief.
	Several stages through.
	Let's go to the video comments.
	Hey there Lotus Eaters, it's Anti-Propaganda here.
	So on my channel I recently made a video discussing how the Prime Minister of Australia went against the Vaccine Health Advice Authority and promoted the AstraZeneca vaccine be given to people aged 40 and below and that doctors have immunity.
	And just today a 72 year old woman died of blood clots directly linked to the AstraZeneca vaccine.
	How long do you think people can stand being given this vaccine?
	Well, that's a difficult one to talk about because I don't know what we can and can't say.
	But I know there are lots of concerning side effects coming out.
	I saw the Johnson& Johnson one had some kind of neurological damage, which, as a psychologist, scares...
	Claims of this.
	Yeah.
	That absolutely terrifies me.
	I'd much rather have COVID than permanent neurological damage.
	That's for certain...
	I suppose the answer is what Michael actually said to me yesterday.
	I don't know how you say it.
	The drug beginning with I that's been tested by Oxford.
	Ivermectin?
	Is that it?
	I'll talk about that on YouTube.
	They'll ban you.
	Not that one.
	That one is bad and you shouldn't take it.
	Disavow everything Donald Trump and Oxford University have said, I guess.
	That's how we're going to end that.
	But you get what I was about to say.
	Let's go for the next one.
	Hey Carl and Callum.
	I'm a new Gold Tier subscriber and I'm here at the University of Toronto campus.
	And I am a student of the U of T and there's a new course at the classics department called Greek and Roman colonialism.
	What?
	No, I'm not going to take that class.
	See ya.
	Could just be a reframing of Greek and Roman history, because, I mean, they did take over.
	Did you say Greek and Roman colonialism?
	Yeah.
	So it's got to be, what, Roman Empire and, like, Eastern Roman Empire and Greeks taking over.
	No, go.
	Go and take the class and demand that the Anglos get reparations from the Italians.
	Come on.
	Come on, I want to see the argument.
	I don't know what to say.
	I just kind of want to see that.
	Sorry to hear that you're at the University of Toronto, but best of luck to you.
	Could be evergreen.
	Behold, the face of a real homophobe.
	Yes, that is what they called me, and I found a picture of my younger self.
	So, yeah, here's the thing, though.
	As I kind of proved the point back then, with all the nonsense that went round a couple days ago about essentially you're not a real man unless you've got a beard, I simply have this to say.
	If you're not a real man without the beard, then you don't deserve the beard in the first place.
	You don't need one to be a man.
	Just look at me.
	I was one from the get-go.
	Yes.
	As someone who's clean-shaven, yes.
	No, disagree.
	Nonsense.
	Pro-beard propaganda.
	Shakespeare has solved this question long before.
	You know the quotes in Shakespeare's...
	What are they?
	Plays.
	I forgot all the words.
	I was going to say poems.
	We talked about the beard is the evidence of manlyhood because it's the evidence of puberty.
	You'll get that one day.
	Happens to everyone late.
	Hang on a minute.
	I'm older than you.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Hello again from your eminent sire.
	Callum, I want to start by thanking you for respecting my pronouns.
	I have removed you from my extradition request list for violating Canada's C-16 federal pronoun law.
	You are safe for now.
	Carl, I'm still waiting for you to bend the knee.
	I mean, it's not that hard.
	Even CPAC, the House of Commons, and Rebel News bend the knee.
	Surely you can.
	Over the next few days, I'm hoping I'm going to be able to submit arguments on why sexual identity and leftism is a distinction without a difference.
	The three primary arguments being 1.
	Reclaiming your sexuality is by its nature identity politics, a color of leftism.
	2.
	LGBTism is exclusionary and destructive to the family unit, hence it being a bosom body of Marxism.
	3.
	Conservatism and sexuality are antithetical to each other, e.g.
	Milo Yiannopoulos and the LGBT Tories.
	I'll end with a bonus comment about, are you really born that way?
	I am interested.
	I mentioned earlier we're going to have to keep the 30-second rule for the video comments because it's becoming something we have to think about.
	I would recommend, if it's going to be quite long and a detailed explanation, probably put it in the comments underneath because we do read them.
	Also, we take them and keep them.
	Also, some of the funnier ones or the interesting ones we sometimes don't read out because of time and whatnot.
	But we do actually have on the Discord, so we all end up reading them.
	So if you put it there, we'll definitely read it because it sounds like it is going to be quite a detailed explanation, I imagine.
	But otherwise.
	Let's go for the next one.
	Three things.
	One, Callum, US military gas masks are compatible with mustaches but not beards.
	Two, Carl Callum is right about taxes.
	And three, the government keeps sending me this stuff in the mail.
	How do y'all feel about that?
	He's got big arms.
	I heard about the door knocking they're planning to do.
	Is that actually happening?
	Or did they suggest it and everyone mocked them by saying they were going to shoot when everyone comes to their door and then it stopped or what?
	Because I saw a bunch of Americans just like, look, if you knock on my door, I'm going to come to the door with my gun.
	Like, what do you want me to do?
	Agents of the government are going to knock on every door in America.
	Yeah, I wouldn't suggest that would be a good idea.
	This is a great idea, because we can get them distracted, and then they can stop harassing us in other ways.
	Well, them.
	I'm saying us, so I don't live there.
	What do you mean?
	A government's got unlimited resources.
	They'll waste them to no end.
	There's no problem with that.
	Well, they have unlimited resources because they have the people's resources, so they're going to steal and then use.
	Yeah, I don't know how else to feel about that.
	Let's go for the next one.
	So when I was preparing for my Politics of Attack on Titan video, I noticed a scene of a gay man approaching Eren Jaeger, and that just really reminded me of my own life experience.
	Now Carl, Callum, you too should watch anime, but don't listen to any of those subs over dubs people, you know?
	If you end up watching the sub, you have to re-watch the anime the equivalent of seven times to figure out what they're saying, so...
	Subs over dubs is just nonsense.
	Just don't listen to those people.
	You need to do an oil guy next.
	I want to see that.
	Also, I'm getting closer and closer to just declaring anime haram, but...
	I'm already at that point.
	Inshallah.
	Let's go to the next one.
	I don't watch European soccer at all.
	I don't follow it and I don't really care.
	But when I heard it was England versus Italy, I knew Italy was going to win because Italy is always on the winning side.
	And if they're not, they just switch teams.
	I made that exact joke.
	You know what's interesting?
	I haven't seen the response from their team yet.
	Because, of course, the UK can't just be normal.
	So we're like screeching and hitting each other.
	I wonder what the Italians make of the stupid S show that is the political response.
	The Italians don't care.
	Have you seen the state of Italian fans in football?
	They're throwing things on the pitch that are not politically correct and saying horrendous things in the stands.
	Yeah, which is weird because they're not white anyway, so whatever.
	What?
	Italians are white.
	Don't adopt the racial language.
	Italians are not white.
	I will fight to the death on this.
	They're definitely not white.
	If we're going to buy into this leftist racial worldview, which apparently is mandatory now, then, well, none of the Mediterranean is white.
	I don't care about race whatsoever.
	It's irrelevant.
	Neither do I, but if we are going to go into this world of lesser thought, Italy won.
	Italy's not white, therefore diversity still wins.
	I don't know what everyone's complaining about.
	Let's go for the next one.
	So, as for yesterday, I think the most important thing is that from the very beginning of learning about COVID, there's been no reason to really freak out.
	Yeah, sure, it's new, but we have our general response to illness, which is rest, water, food, patience, and then seek assistance as desired.
	The thing is, is it's not Ebola.
	This is a book I had read in high school biology over a decade ago.
	It talks mostly about smallpox, and it gets into the response to Ebola.
	That's what I think the World Health Organization and everybody else is trying to do is eradicate COVID, whatever.
	Anyways, I do have some new reading material that comes free.
	I think if we're being charitable, sure, that is what seems to be their goal, but at the same time they're openly saying they're not doing that.
	But I'm getting closer and closer to Carl's position that this has to be about the money.
	I don't know what else it's about.
	Why have we abandoned all knowledge in favour of full-on lockdowns?
	Everyone loves Xi Jinping's policies, apparently.
	He's very proud of it.
	Again, emotional response.
	Lose your heads.
	Do something socialist.
	I'm a conservative.
	Let's go for the next one.
	So I work for my local property tax collector.
	And so the taxes we collect directly impact the communities.
	It goes for the roads, the schooling, etc.
	And so everyone gets the benefits from these different things that are in place through the taxation, but not everyone wants to pay for them.
	But that's a requirement.
	And so there has to be repercussions for not paying the taxes.
	A lot of people think taxation is evil, but I think the biggest problem lies in the people's responsibilities for not holding the representatives responsible.
	They elect these people in and they pass these laws and use the funds in these different ways and they get mad about having to be paying all these different things.
	It's like you have to hold the representative responsible because you put them in place to be able to do this with the money in the first place.
	Based.
	True.
	Especially true.
	Democrats who are fleeing Democrat assholes, isn't it?
	Mm-hmm.
	It's like, well, we put these people in place, but it costs too much to live here.
	I wonder why that is.
	Anyway, let's go to the next one.
	Morning, guys.
	Just wanted to make a quick recommendation.
	For those of you with access to a Prime account, I suggest you watch the 2016 movie, No Men Beyond This Point.
	The storyline is basically women develop partner genesis and only have female children as men die out.
	It's quite a bit of interesting...
	Sounds hilarious.
	Stop watching that.
	Feminist utopia.
	That sounds fun.
	I can probably get it.
	I'm going to watch that tonight.
	That sounds like a good one.
	You know, party really wants to drop internet anonymity just, you know, like for three months or something, just so we could see, you know, how many of these racist comments are actually made by people from this country?
	How many are actually made by lefties trying to push their agenda?
	How many rape threats are actually coming from women?
	I know it would be terrible in the long term, but it'd be interesting to see, right?
	How many of the comments that are racist against the England players come from people in England?
	Funny.
	We were looking at this, weren't we?
	And even when you break that down, how many of them are from the white English, which I presume are all the gammons, as the left likes to call them?
	It'd be interesting, wouldn't it?
	I saw someone sent me a study before we started.
	I wasn't able to verify the source, so we didn't use it.
	But the study shows that, what was it, almost 50% of all of the insults, racial slurs online that categorized slurs referenced by the Southern Poverty Law Center or insults against England players on the basis of race, 50% of them were from Indians.
	The next biggest group, what was it, like Iranians?
	I think it was the United Arab Emirates.
	United Arab Emirates, Iranians, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Turkey.
	Indonesia.
	Where do all these slurs are coming from?
	Yeah, many of these countries have something in common.
	I can't quite put my finger on it.
	It's almost if England in literally every survey ever done on racism is the least racist country in Europe or the least racist on the planet.
	It's funny.
	Funny.
	It's almost like it's not the people here who are like that.
	Also, to mention that I have seen a few accounts in which someone's been like, you know, pictures of an English flag in their name, English name, an English picture being like, ah, they're saying something racist.
	And if you just scroll back on their account, you can find them celebrating Eid and saying they're a Muslim from Pakistan.
	Yeah, funny how that works.
	But I guess that's something we'll have to figure out another time.
	If anyone does have a link to that study, please send it to me because I would like to look through the data and also present it.
	Sure.
	of history yes freedom is anti-government government is the number one destroyer of right rights liberty and freedom throughout human history the only issue is us as westerners have conned ourselves into a lie a lie that the government gives a solitary damn about our rights or freedoms it's just that the mask has finally come off and the fist of iron and the jackboot have dropped all they want is power and your rights and your tax money
	and they show every time and the tax cows get upty and have the audacity to backtalk them as for the cubans standing against the tyranny that held them uh in the 1950s i have one thing singular thing to say the Viva Cuba, al inferno con los castros, y el comunismo.
	Long live Cuba and to hell with Castro and communism.
	Sorry I butchered the Spanish.
	shouldn't have lost the armada if that was it's not there technically it's the spanish but the the point there yeah totally true i mean nothing worse on this than the british government in my view because we were thinking about this the other day in which you read the statements just the talking statements no table talk about politics from the founding fathers and you never ever hear You never hear a Democratic politician talk about that about rights.
	You get, like, half of the Republicans, you know, the good ones, who will talk about rights like this, be like, no, they're founding, they cannot be infringed, you know, and so on and so forth, and they bang the table, and there's not enough of them.
	But the fact that there are no people like that, I see in British politics, who are that fervent about, like, no, shall not be infringed.
	There's us.
	We're not nobody.
	We're not politicians.
	No, that's true.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Matthew Wilson, while Cuba is rebelling against communism, Canada is being subverted by the secret son of Castro, dear leader Justin.
	Yeah, I saw a bunch of all the...
	I'm convinced.
	I'm getting closer and closer.
	Matthew Hammond, can we start an exchange program with Cuba and China?
	We take their people that are waving US and UK flags.
	We'll send our commie political leaders and their supporters to their countries.
	I think everyone would be happier there as well.
	It's a win-win.
	Everyone wins.
	They get more socialists, we get more freedom lovers.
	What's the problem?
	And we get rid of the communists.
	Actually, no, because they can suppress their freedom lovers, whereas we can't suppress our socialists.
	Therefore, it's a net win for them to have a bunch of infiltrators in the West, rather than having them all in Cuba.
	I suppose.
	That's how they'd say it anyway.
	Have the Cuban freedom movement considered telling everyone that they're Burmese?
	What?
	Yeah.
	I don't get that one.
	No, I don't get that one either.
	Sorry.
	My apologies.
	Grizzly, I'm really getting to the opinion that in the same way Nazism is banned, so should communism, socialism.
	Plenty of evidence to show just how destructive and evil socialism, no matter the flavour.
	I don't believe in banning beliefs whatsoever.
	No, but if you're going to ban one, you have to ban the other.
	It's a fair point.
	If we're going to have this situation where we ban Nazism because racial socialism is bad...
	Well, then Marxist socialism also bad.
	And also state socialism.
	There's no problem with banning these things if you're going to ban one.
	But then I have to ask the question of, like, well, what happens to gender socialism?
	The wokists.
	What happens to all you people?
	Well, you're also on the banned list.
	Didn't start the banning war, but if you're going to start it, you're going to end it in the gulag.
	Fitting place for a communist.
	Liberal gulags, don't worry.
	They'll be very nice, but...
	No, no, no.
	I mean, I've spoken about this before, but if there is no...
	I'm yet to find a reasonable argument about why you can't do this, which is to set up a section of land, which is huge, and call it a socialist camp.
	Not this again.
	And anyone who identifies as a socialist goes to the camp, and we will not interfere with them.
	You can build whatever you want.
	Well, I think it's got a bit of a marketing problem in the fact that you've got all these socialists in a concentrated area.
	Well, it's not small.
	It's huge.
	Like, the size of Wyoming.
	They can build their own socialist state.
	And the only condition for leaving is you have to agree never to vote.
	Well, that's more land than they'd ever own privately, so you're doing them a service more than anything.
	Let's see what they build.
	I want to see it.
	I want to see them all admit, yeah, this was a terrible idea.
	It'd be a criminal utopia, is what it would be.
	They'd just carry out communist raids on...
	My point being proven.
	So what's to lose?
	What do you mean, what's to lose?
	A lot of sanity and stability, probably.
	It's not within our country, it's in within their country.
	Just annex them some land.
	Just like, here you go.
	Get rid of them.
	You're free to come and go.
	You can leave all you want, but you just have to admit that socialism is evil.
	Well, if it's not, then you'll stay at the camp, won't you?
	I don't agree with this.
	I disavow you, Callum.
	Not an argument against it, though, is it?
	I don't want to get into my argument against putting lots of people in a camp because of their beliefs.
	Well...
	By the wayside, isn't it really?
	They can leave.
	What's the point?
	You don't like socialism, you're leaving.
	Back to the capitalist hellhole.
	What's that about?
	I need the new iPhone.
	We're not going to force them to stay.
	No force involved.
	Actually, you know what, I just thought, Christiania, this has already been tried, in Denmark.
	In Copenhagen, they set up a piece of land, and they made it no laws, like, no policing of the area, and it turned into a place where you could buy weapons and grenades, and then they shut it down.
	If it turns out like that, then...
	Yeah, if it turns into Ancapistan, net win!
	That's my kind of autonomous zone.
	Alcibiades Nuts.
	Great name.
	The Cuban people are ousting the communist regime would be the biggest white pill of the millennium so far.
	Here's hoping.
	I mean, it's obviously not a nice thing that they're without food.
	Although we have lost Nepal in this millennium already to communism.
	The Maoists took over Nepal.
	Something that never gets mentioned, but yeah.
	We lost one country to communism so far.
	We've not gained any.
	Chad Kuala, if the God Emperor gets back in power, he needs to get started on building Liberty Prime, get it speaking Spanish, airdrop it into Cuba and liberate it from communist tyranny.
	If the Cubans wish for themselves and their land to join the US and create a more perfect union, they should be admitted.
	Yeah.
	I'm all for Cuban statehood.
	Those people are not going to be voting Democrat Socialism, are they?
	I like your fallout solution to problems as well.
	I love discussions of fallout.
	More fallout comments.
	Caffeinated century name.
	Isn't economic crisis a feature of socialism?
	That's exactly what I was saying.
	You can't have socialism without the economic crisis.
	Benjamin Charles.
	The only difference between Nazism and socialism is you never hear post-adolescent halfwits screaming in the streets about how real Nazism has never been tried.
	Natanzism is a form of socialism.
	It is racial socialism.
	The equality part is among the German race.
	That's the part there.
	And I would highly recommend watching T.I.K. Tick's video on Hitler's socialism in which he goes through every argument about the whole thing on the planet Earth.
	This is why it's three hours long.
	He has the timestamp to go to the argument you think is relevant to what you want to learn.
	But it's undeniable when you look at the speeches and the actions of the Nazi Party that they are socialists.
	They're just not Marxists.
	There are different forms of socialism and they are one.
	Yannels J. Mullock, 67% want socialism.
	I doubt any of them have ever had a good look into what socialism entails and its effects on the people.
	I can only say that they've been brainwashed in schools, colleges and universities, being told the arbitrary good points of socialism while omitting the extensive failures it brings, which we can point to throughout history.
	Which is why they should have the opportunity to experience it.
	In a camp.
	That's what I mean as well.
	If they're like, oh no, I can't just walk off into the woods and start socialism because it's the capitalist world.
	Okay, well here's a place you can go.
	You don't have to.
	You can leave all you want.
	But if you want socialism, it's right there.
	We should send them to North Korea and say, here you go, all you can eat.
	No, because they'll claim that's not real socialism because they weren't in charge.
	So if we give them a place where they can be in charge, it's like, oh, it didn't work for you either.
	Oh, how funny.
	And then there's no debate.
	They're either in socialism, in which case, goodbye, or they come back to sanity.
	Or you could teach them economics.
	That would be nice.
	There's no teaching these people.
	You can't just give up.
	I'm very black-pilled on socialists.
	James Stevens, big surprise, 67% of British youth is economically illiterate, just like half the population, all of the socialists, ignorant and arrogant control freaks.
	Thomas Sowell and Milton Friedman needs to be mandatory reading.
	Yes, is all I have to say.
	I like the Russian solution, which was to make Gulag Archipelago mandatory reading for all youth.
	I was like, this is the immunity to communism here.
	You read Gulag Archipelago and you're eternally depressed for the rest of your life.
	Yeah, but you'll never trust The Socialist.
	I couldn't finish that book.
	It's so, so hard going.
	It makes my faith in humanity just erode to, like, nothing.
	It's like, this is the worst thing I could possibly read ever.
	Good.
	I mean, it's good for you, but also makes you really miserable.
	It's just like, I sat outside on a really sunny day and I was like, yeah, people are awful.
	It ruined my day.
	Reality.
	Like, radicalised into reality.
	Like, oh, look, what if you let these people do what they want?
	I mean, I didn't need to read about the gulags to know that they were awful, thankfully.
	Yeah, you did.
	Well...
	You kind of do.
	You kind of have to read the stories and be like, okay, yeah.
	It's not just...
	Like getting an old man to stand in a corner for three days and if he moves off the spot, he and his family get shot.
	Stuff like that.
	It's just so unbelievably cruel to the point where...
	It makes you despair for humanity.
	But it's personal.
	That's the thing.
	That's the power of it, I think.
	Because you can always say, you can always bang the table as, you know, I'm going to criticize PragerU, but PragerU is like, yeah, 100 million, 50 million, 30 million.
	You say these things, no one listens to that.
	Unfortunately, no one gets that point in their head, because large number.
	But if you tell them the personal stories of people living in this, people can empathize with that a hell of a lot more.
	It's why when you tell a Holocaust story, you don't just bang the table and say 6 million.
	Like, you make a movie about what it's like to be in Sobibor.
	Anyway.
	Marcus Horne.
	I'm very anti-socialist, but let's face it, if Britain did do socialism, we'd probably nail it like we do everything.
	Well, socialism doesn't work.
	It would be Ingsoc, English socialism.
	Well, you need to look at post-World War II Britain up until, like, Thatcher.
	That's when we did socialism, and it didn't work.
	Yeah, good point.
	We did try it.
	Power cuts.
	Rubbish on the streets.
	The NHS. Yeah.
	Does need a healthy bit of defunding.
	So, Kekistani Freedom Fighter.
	Let's pay the Jamaicans right after receiving reparations from Italy, Denmark and France.
	Yeah, we'll pass along the money.
	Yeah.
	I mean, we've been at war with lots of countries in Europe.
	We could get reparations from pretty much all of them at this point.
	Just like, yeah, we've been in conflict with you at some point.
	You have oppressed us.
	I don't think we can do the Roman solution of being like, every war we've been in is defensive.
	Student of history, there are three options to ending slavery.
	Britain's root of gold, America's root of iron and blood, Haiti's root of blood, just blood everywhere.
	Or the Saudi root of just not.
	Yeah, that was Jay Mullock.
	Reparations for slavery.
	Two people who were never slaves.
	Okay, but didn't we, England, finish paying off a debt of ending the slave trade a few years ago?
	Funny how people easily forget such things nowadays.
	I did end up talking about that.
	Yeah, 2015.
	I imagine most people in England don't know, though.
	I know, it needs repeating.
	What we did to end slavery is something we should be proud about, and not enough people know about it.
	I wonder why.
	It's kept pretty down low, isn't it?
	We were the enlightened force in the world at the time.
	There's no doubt about it.
	If the education department, the conservative education department, run by a conservative, they want to do some good, that would be the thing they need to do.
	They hinted at it with the race report in which they mentioned, what was it, the retelling of slavery narrative or something, the wording they used, and the left was like, oh, they're going to say slavery's good.
	No.
	You retell the history to be accurate, which is the major event of the history of slavery from the British, is the abolition by force from us against slavers who are foreigners.
	Like, that is the narrative you tell.
	You tell the story of the King of Benin, and you tell that to every school kid in the land, and make them feel some serious pride about how the glory of the people of Benin, according to the King of Benin, was slavery, and the glory of the British is abolishing it.
	Absolutely.
	And I even studied the British Empire in school.
	We didn't even cover anything like that.
	We just covered all the battles, which I obviously enjoyed, but it was nice.
	It made me very patriotic.
	Anyway...
	Partially foreign.
	Interesting name.
	My whole family on the one side are Jamaican and we all pay taxes.
	Why the hell should our tax money go to pay for real operations for them?
	I think you must have meant reparations.
	Welcome to the slave race, I suppose.
	It doesn't matter what your colour is, you're just part of the slave race.
	We were the slavers, all of us.
	If you live in Britain, even if you came from Jamaica, too bad.
	You're a slaver now.
	It's inherited.
	The air we breathe is just slavery.
	Even the West Africans.
	Well, actually, the West Africans were slavers, so...
	They're the ones we brought them from, so...
	Small L, libertarian.
	Did Jamaica have the big blacks like in Haiti?
	Did they have full-blown chattel slavery?
	I don't know what that really means or what that's referring to.
	I don't know enough about the slave trade, really.
	In the specifics of Haiti.
	Yeah.
	I think he might be referring to the idea that the stronger types or perceived to be stronger were taken to the sugar islands, but I don't know.
	I don't know if that's true or if it's a myth, so I don't want to comment.
	Andre Budgen, I think.
	Sorry if I mispronounced your name.
	Reparations is not about slavery.
	It's just like climate change.
	It's about wealth distribution.
	Yeah, I can certainly see that argument.
	I hate how socialists ruin everything.
	There's no reasonable debate to be had about climate that doesn't involve some socialists.
	You're just S-ing everywhere.
	The only thing is, I'm quite in favour of renewable energy and preserving the environment.
	But as soon as I talk about it, everyone's just like, oh, leftist.
	Do you include nuclear in your idea of renewable?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, okay.
	I'm saying yes.
	Yeah.
	I've seen people who are...
	There's a YouTuber I like who used to work in an immigration office in Germany and he understands...
	The things he understands are the things he's had interaction with.
	What is it?
	Conquest law that people are conservative about the thing they know most.
	And yeah, when it comes to climate, he's strange.
	He's massively pro-green, but then when it comes to nuclear, he's like, don't trust it.
	I'm like, it's a renewable.
	Okay.
	Well, most of France is powered by nuclear energy, isn't it?
	Like, a majority of their power comes from nuclear.
	I wouldn't be surprised.
	Yeah, so it's not like it's dangerous or that harmful.
	No, they're incredibly high standards in Western Europe for a good reason.
	We don't have much land.
	Yeah, we're not the USSR. We don't have a Ukraine to sacrifice, so...
	It's always Ukraine, isn't it?
	Every time.
	I feel bad for the Ukrainians, man.
	Alex Ogall, Reparations A. Europe must be owed gargantuan sums by the caliphate whose Barbary slavers denuded European coasts of people with their frequent raids to forcibly take slaves.
	Absolutely.
	People just don't know about it.
	And it's frustrating to think that we as Europeans are portrayed as the evil slavers and, you know, it's something that's going on in the entire world for most of history.
	Also, the oil wealth of the Arabian Peninsula has to also go to Zanzibar, so I don't know how they're going to feel about that.
	Oh dear.
	Radical centrist God, what a bizarre statement on Jamaica.
	From what I understand, Jamaica has a great deal of cheerful and very polite people who are very welcoming of Britain who don't feel oppressed or feel the need to make such absurd demands.
	The lobbyist is an idiot.
	Yes, he definitely is.
	Yeah, I can believe it.
	It takes a long time to recover from essentially having to build your institutions from scratch.
	It's not an overnight thing.
	I'm seeing some of the...
	We don't have much time left, so I'm just going to skip to the parts about the abolishing anonymity.
	I'm so mad about this, I'm sorry.
	Yeah, me too.
	Well, it's finally time to get that VPN. Because here's the thing as well.
	They will say, Mike Gray will be like, yeah, they're racist, we'll get rid of them.
	Everyone, according to the left, is a goddamn racist.
	White people for being white are racist.
	Black people who are not leftists are racist.
	Everyone and their mother is a goddamn racist to these people.
	So, not only if we're gonna get them all locked up, like, and got rid of all their human rights, we're just gonna turn everyone in this country into a serf.
	Because, I mean...
	Is this guy saying, like, I don't think this guy's going to be posting the M-word anytime soon, but just saying that, hey, I don't think socialism's a good idea.
	And, yeah, time to get a VPN, I guess.
	Although we're not sponsored by a VPN company.
	Maybe we should.
	We should reach out to NordVPN.
	I mean, I already use their service.
	I'm not a sponsor.
	Well, we're not paid to say that, just to mention.
	Yeah.
	We're only paid by Carl.
	Anyway, we're out of time.
	Well, paid by these guys.
	Well, the audience, yeah.
	So, we're going to end the show.
	If you want more from us, go to lowseas.com.
	If you want to feel depressed, go to twitter.com.
	And then, I don't know, hang yourself.
	Don't do that!
	After reading these people, I'm so depressed that the British public is apparently this censorious.
	I sent the clip to Dankula, and I'm just like, I don't even know what to do anymore.
	I'm not even sure if it's worth fighting for.
	I'm sure something could give me a white pill at some point, so hopefully someone sent us a white pill, but...
	Otherwise, go to locius.com, sign up.
	That's how we keep the show running.
	Also, you get access to all the premium content.
	There's bloody tons of it.
	Also, go and check out Cole's new video, Your Scars, which is really worth listening to.
	And we'll be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock.

▲