Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 28, 2021 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:32:16

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #120

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 28th of April 2021.
	I'm joined by Carl and today we're going to be talking about the French generals warning about the civil war in France.
	What else are we talking about?
	I've forgotten off the top of my head.
	The based Florida man.
	Ron DeSantis, based Florida man, yep.
	And also the child soldiers that the primary schools of Britain are trying to create, which is really sickening, but we'll get into that.
	So the first thing I wanted to do was some shilling, so I'm just going to shill some good stuff we have.
	So firstly, the premium podcast we did about Tucker Carlson's Anglo-Saxon political traditions, the defense of Anglo-Saxon political traditions being America's political traditions, because they are, but also how it intersects with him and his conversation with the ADL about voting rights.
	Yeah.
	Yes.
	Mass immigration.
	So go and give that a watch.
	Also, premium content, we have an article from Dr.
	Michael Richtenwald talking about whiteness as a scapegoat.
	So essentially the scapegoat of the left.
	Really interesting.
	This ties into the Anglo-Saxon political traditions one as well.
	Because what is being called whiteness is really English inheritance of America.
	Yeah.
	Something that seems to have slipped by the American wocus.
	So, well, they know it, but they don't want to admit it.
	Right, yeah.
	There's also an article from Josh, he's written here, about the Central Park Karen.
	So you might remember the lady in Central Park, it was like, help, help, there's a black man in the park.
	And she called the police, and the police turned up and were like, okay, we're going to charge you with wasting police time.
	And they gave her an option.
	It was, you can go to jail, you can pay a fine, or you can go for re-education.
	And the re-education was this critical therapy in which she just went through a bunch of gibberish nonsense.
	It's going to be leftist critical theory nonsense.
	Yeah, so she chose the re-education, because, I mean, who wants a fine or go to jail?
	Who wants to be re-educated?
	Yeah, so weirdly, it gave her an out, though.
	I mean, that's easier than a fine or a jail.
	I mean, I'd do it.
	I mean, you'd probably have a laugh doing it, but it's complete gibberish nonsense, and Josh goes through, with his psychology background, of why it's complete nonsense, so go and give that a read.
	Yeah, I added a thing.
	So after this, we've hired Bo Dade, and you guys may be familiar, because Bo's actually got some of the most well-read articles on the site, because he's a historian, and he's a degree in history, loves history.
	We've done a bunch of podcasts on YouTube, on his channel History Bro, and I thought, well, why not make it a permanent fixture?
	And so this afternoon we'll be recording a...
	I don't know if it's going to be premium or not.
	I don't know what we're going to do with it.
	But we're going to put it up somewhere at some point.
	So we're going to be doing these history podcasts.
	And the first one is going to be about Hanno the Navigator, the Carthaginian admiral who mapped out and explored a large section of North Africa.
	I'm really looking forward to it.
	We've got some really great little things about it.
	It is more than North Africa.
	He went down to West Africa.
	Yeah, he went right across down to the Congo.
	It's crazy.
	Yeah, two and a half thousand years ago.
	And it's a huge journey.
	And we're going to talk about it.
	Because we have his logs.
	So we know what he encountered.
	And we know how things were.
	So we're going to talk about that.
	And I'm really excited for it.
	You can probably tell I'm really excited to do this.
	So we better get on with the boring stuff, which is the politics.
	No, it's not boring.
	It's good stuff.
	But I love the chat.
	I love the chat today.
	It's just like, yeah, bonga, bonga, bonga, bonga.
	Yeah.
	Exactly.
	For people who don't know, we covered a story yesterday.
	This guy, Bonga, getting screwed up by this girlfriend who only wanted money.
	Bonga did nothing wrong.
	She got what she deserved and Bonga got what he deserved, which is freedom.
	Free Bonga.
	Anyway, so the first thing I want to talk about was the French generals who are warning of a civil war in France, which, okay, didn't know things were getting this bad in France, but, I mean, I knew they had the big problems, but civil war...
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	I didn't know France had an army.
	So, I guess the French just want to win a war.
	So, I mean, they'll declare one of themselves, so they can get some of their dignity back.
	Yeah, but paradoxically, they're still going to lose that war.
	Yeah.
	Anyway, so this is the article.
	I mean, I got sent this a little while ago.
	I've got...
	France has actually got quite a distinguished military history.
	I'm sorry, France.
	They lost the big one.
	That's why they get so dumb.
	What, the Hundred Years' War?
	No, we lost.
	Second World War.
	So this is the Daily Mail reporting here.
	French generals who call for military rule if President Macron cannot stop Islamists from disintegrating society will be punished, government declares.
	And you might think, as is just like the Daily Mail or whatever they mention here, Published on the article in which they're calling for military rule was published on the 60th anniversary of a failed coup d'etat by generals opposed to France integrating independence to Algeria.
	So they tried to stop Algerian independence.
	And okay, it might be the Daily Mail.
	It's not just the Daily Mail.
	This is a real thing.
	So if we go to the next article, the Times also reporting on this.
	So it slowly got over to the Anglosphere.
	You can get the Times link up.
	Sorry, there's not the right link.
	Anyway, so the Times link, they just mentioned that the defense minister says there will be consequences, naturally, for those who have signed this.
	Because, I mean, yeah, that makes sense.
	Like, if you're serving in the military, you're not meant to be openly political.
	So, I mean, calling for a coup while you're steering the military, yeah, pretty out there.
	So, also, they have Le Pen's response to this.
	Apparently, Marine Le Pen decided to say, I invite you to join us in taking part in the coming battle, which is the Battle of France, to the people who signed this letter.
	Pretty spicy.
	Okay, so just to be clear, I don't follow French politics on a daily basis.
	So whenever we get these kind of updates from France, they come in big chunks, and it's always way more radical.
	But I'm sure there were a sensible set of steps...
	Presumably involving many terror attacks that led up to them saying, well, look, actually, France is falling apart and only military rule is going to save it.
	Yeah, this is going on for a while.
	If we can get the next one up, so this is the Times article talking about the, quote, terrorist kills Paris policewoman.
	Quote terrorist.
	Yeah, apparently this is what was in response to this, you know, why the generals decided they'd warn about civil war.
	So a policewoman was stabbed to death by a terrorist as she returned to her station on the outskirts of Paris.
	I just love that the British press here are like, terrorist, I'm not too sure.
	But if you just go to France 24, you know, just any French outlet, they mention in here a source told the outlet that the attacker shouted Allahu Akbar during the attack.
	Ah.
	That's how you know it's not terrorism, you see.
	He's BLM. He's just anti-cop.
	That's a new slogan for BLM, I guess.
	Anyway.
	But as you were pointing out, this is not just a one-off that's then caused this.
	This is a huge problem France has been facing for years upon years.
	So we can get the first image up.
	This is from the Global Terrorism Index, showing that between 2014 and 2019, the number of ISIL-related terrorist attacks and deaths in the West...
	And you can see France, number one, I mean, making up more than 50% of all the deaths caused by terrorism.
	Yeah, it's not been a good time for France these last few years.
	They've been really suffering.
	But it's not just that, is it?
	It's the ghettoization.
	Yeah, terrorism's just the peak of the iceberg.
	Yeah, it's essentially the sort of colonization of these areas, though, and the fact that they...
	I mean, a few years ago, we saw the riots that were happening in these ghettos, where it's just, you know, huge gangs just...
	I mean, it looked like they were having battles, actual battles in these areas.
	And it's like, right, okay.
	So, I mean, France does appear to be falling apart.
	And a couple of years ago, I went to Disneyland Paris, and just walking the streets was just...
	You know, squads of soldiers just with guns.
	You've got your six-year-old girl and then the massive two-army guys have to protect you from the diversity, I guess.
	Yes, that's the enrichment of France.
	There's necessitated military rule, apparently.
	I mean, I've had the same thing when I went to Paris with my girlfriend at the time to go and just see what it was like.
	And you're just walking around.
	Every attraction we went to, even like the bus stations, they've got military guards, there are signs up everywhere.
	Be aware of terrorism, you know, take precautions.
	It was the same in Strasbourg when we went to the European Parliament.
	This isn't normal.
	Like, this is very strange.
	I mean, you can see on there the United Kingdom and we've had our problems.
	But good God, I mean, compared to the French.
	It's literally like six times worse in France.
	But, I mean, France kind of seems like an occupied country at this point.
	And as you say, it's not just the terrorism.
	I mean, we mentioned before, it was government policy of the British government, multiculturalism, the idea we would destroy British culture and place it with multiculturalism, which means every culture on the planet.
	This was also French policy, and I think it was, what was it, Sarkozy or someone, at the end of their term admitted, yeah, multiculturalism has failed.
	Yeah, Merkel said the same thing in 2011.
	Yeah, at the same time that David Cameron came out and said it, because everyone realized, yeah, this don't work.
	Why did we agree to Tony Blair's idea again?
	Surely you wanted the people who come to France to become French and integrate, not form ghettos?
	In France, it's a particularly strong impulse as well, because the ethos there is everyone in France is French, whether they like it or not.
	So, if you're going to...
	I mean, the idea of multiculturalism in France is actually kind of anathema to the idea of the republic itself.
	I mean, I'm not here to defend French republicanism, but...
	I mean, they are right.
	I mean, why aren't you guys, you know?
	Yeah, exactly.
	I don't know why the French state decided to do this stuff.
	But why did we decide to do it to ourselves?
	Yeah, I don't know why we did it either, but at least we didn't do it as bad as the French are.
	So that's why their politics is so radicalized by the looks of it.
	So if we can get to the article itself, so this is the petition that they signed.
	It's all in French, so I've had to run it through Google Translate.
	So sorry if some of it's incorrect, but I can't run it in French.
	It's the way you say it.
	It's all in French as if they didn't do the decency to do it in English, like a civilized country.
	Am I wrong?
	So anyway, so this is titled, For the Return of the Honor of Our Rulers, 20 Generals Call on Macron to Defend Patriotism.
	And this is a bit long, so jump in whenever you want to say something.
	Sure.
	But it's good.
	And I'm going to abridge it as well, because it's just way too long.
	Mr.
	God, I'm loving this.
	This sounds so much like French revolutionary rhetoric.
	I mean, this is genuinely like 17th, 18th century sounding stuff.
	Our tricolour flags are not just a piece of cloth.
	They symbolise the tradition, through the ages, of those who, whatever their skin colour or their faith, served France and gave their lives for it.
	On these flags we find gold letters, the words honour and fatherland.
	However, our honour today lies in the denunciation of the disintegration which strikes our homeland.
	I mean, you can see this is definitely, what would you call it, colourful language or very emotional language.
	It's not flippant at all.
	No, no, this is very sort of, you know, high-minded, deep and thick concepts that we're having laid on us here.
	These are excellent.
	So he lists some of the forces that are causing the disintegration of France.
	Discrimination through the, sorry, discrimination which, through a certain anti-racism, is displayed with a single goal.
	To create on our soil a malaise, even a hatred between the communities.
	It is the racial war that these hateful and fanatic partisans want.
	They despise our country, its traditions, its culture, and they want to see it dissolve by taking away its past and history.
	So basically, you could summarise the French general statement as Sargon was right about leftism.
	I know, right?
	That's exactly what I've been saying the whole time.
	This is the position of you and, you know, the, let's say, dissident rights or dissidents of the UK, criticisms of the Conservative Party and all the rest of it.
	And it's interesting that this seems to be now the mainstream of French politics, that, yeah, these people are awful, they are trying to destroy France, and we need to stand against them.
	And they're not even asking for anything radical in here.
	They literally just say, enforce the laws we already have, but if you don't, civil war.
	Yeah.
	So he continues.
	Discrimination, so another one of the reasons, which, with Islamism and the suburban hordes, yikes, leads to the detachment of multiple plots of the nation to transform them into territories subject to dogmas contrary to our constitution.
	So the mass Islamist ghettos that are promoting Islamism instead of being French are saying you should not integrate into France.
	Yes, because they didn't integrate into being French.
	Because they were invited under the rubric of multiculturalism.
	So you can have your Islamist culture and we'll have our French culture and why would we want that?
	I don't know if it's the translation, but the very politically incorrect characterization of suburban hordes.
	I mean, good God, France is a different place.
	So, he continues, another point.
	Discrimination because hatred takes precedent over brotherhood during demonstrations where the power uses the police as an auxiliary, agents, and scapegoats in the face of French people in yellow vests, expressing their despair.
	So the fact that Macron's been, you know, using the police to bat down the Yellow Vest protests, it's very a French thing.
	The Yellow Vest protests that went on for like a year continuously that nobody reported on.
	Yeah, I mean, France is a place where protests go on all the time and can be violent all the time, so I can see some of the argument for not covering it so much, but the fact it was so suppressed was strange.
	But otherwise, I mean, there's two points that the Islamist immigration hasn't been perfect, and also the fact that the far left here, the anti-racists as they call them, are trying to destroy the country and its history.
	Yeah, totally true.
	Islamo-leftism is cancer.
	So they continue.
	Perils are mounting.
	Violence is increasing day by day.
	Who would have predicted 10 years ago that a professor would one day be beheaded when he left college?
	That's a great question.
	It's a great question.
	And the thing is, he is just the latest in a long line of people who have been just murdered in the most medieval ways.
	There have been so many examples of priests and nuns being murdered by Islamists, and you can't pretend this doesn't have religious dimensions in the minds of the people doing the attacking.
	You don't kill a nun unless you're attacking Christianity itself.
	And then you've got the cathedral.
	What was the cathedral?
	Notre Dame.
	Notre Dame, that's it.
	The mysterious fire.
	People have suspicions about it.
	But the priest one you mentioned, I mean, that was a guy, I think it was like an Algerian teenager, killed the priest and then slowly cut off his head with a pen knife and then, you know, to stand up with the head.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, normal things.
	I can't help but agree with the generals.
	They are right that these problems exist.
	When I was in Russia, I met a guy called Mikhail Svetov.
	He's a libertarian party guy in Russia.
	Back in your teenage years.
	And he made the point that he used to live in Paris, and now he's back in Moscow, Russia.
	He made the point, he was like, if you told me 10 years ago, Paris would be less safe than Moscow, I thought you were crazy?
	And now he's out there living in Russia, and he's like, what is the West doing?
	Because it's embarrassing to him as well, trying to promote liberalization of Russia.
	It doesn't exactly present the strongest case, does it?
	When we're at the point where we're chopping off children's genitals and allowing terrorists to run rampant in the streets.
	And the immigration officials are like, yeah, come on, come on, more, please.
	Would you like some Western liberalism?
	No, thank you.
	This is what Western liberalism is, shoot me.
	It doesn't have to be this way, but anyway.
	So they continue, the generals in here.
	Those who lead our country must imperatively find the courage necessary to eradicate these dangers.
	To do this, it is often sufficient to apply existing laws without weakness.
	Again, what we have been saying since day one is just if you apply the laws fairly, then all of these problems go away because the communities to which these laws are being applied realise they don't have a special pass anymore.
	You know, they get treated like everyone else, and they will change their behaviour.
	It should not be a privilege to be an ethnic minority.
	Yeah, that's exactly right.
	We've seen this continuously.
	I mean, the grooming gangs is the worst example, in which there were Pakistani men grooming young girls and raping them.
	And every inquiry we've had into this issue up and down the country, routinely the criticism from the police, why didn't they act?
	Because, I mean, that's the biggest crime, which is why the state didn't act, even though they knew.
	And routinely we get from the officers, because I didn't want to be called racist.
	Yeah.
	I don't care.
	Apply the law.
	It's not difficult.
	I mean, these are rapists.
	Why is this difficult?
	It doesn't even matter if you are a racist.
	Let's assume all of the police are racist.
	Okay, so you're a racist.
	But when you see a man raping a child, you still have to arrest that man.
	Don't care how racist you are, don't care how brown he is.
	Don't know why I have to say that.
	I'm sure the French generals are the same.
	Why do we have to say this?
	Don't shoot the terrorist, he's got brown skin.
	I mean, it's a ridiculous standard.
	So I assume similar things have been found in France.
	So they end with this.
	There is no more time to procrastinate.
	Otherwise, tomorrow, the civil war will put an end to this growing chaos, and the deaths for which you will bear the responsibility will number in the thousands.
	Whew!
	And that's 20 generals, many of them are ex-generals, and then I think it was a thousand members of the army, some of them ex, some of them in the army.
	So, I mean, that's the big, like, members of the army saying this, officers, have written this petition and then obviously sent it to the French government.
	I mean, you can't really just ignore this.
	This is pretty serious, and...
	I mean, what a bombshell.
	Yeah, it's massive.
	It's staggering.
	I mean, I remember when we went to Poland, we interviewed Korven Miki, and we were like, you know, it was in the middle of the Brexit thing.
	We were like, we don't know what's going on.
	Like, the politicians are trying to stop Brexit out of the democratic vote.
	And he sort of jokingly responded, just try to convince some generals.
	Yeah.
	We want to laugh, but like...
	He wasn't joking.
	I guess he wasn't joking!
	The French are going to do this instead.
	They're going to convince some generals, and that's how they're going to solve the problem of Islamo-leftism if the government doesn't just employ the law.
	Good God France is radicalising.
	But the thing is, look at the death rate.
	Look at the number of atrocities that happened.
	Look at the scale of it.
	France has had more immigration than we have, and we have it bad.
	So it's like you can see that things are getting really serious.
	And they're absolutely right.
	It's an attack on the Republic.
	It's an attack on France itself, which means it's an attack on French people.
	They have to do something about it.
	They're obligated.
	They are duty-bound to do something about this.
	And it's not like it's a conspiracy theory.
	The Islamo-leftists will literally tell you, we hate France, we want to destroy its history, tradition, that's why we tear down the statues and whatnot.
	We want to create a new world.
	That's why Macron's government is just openly saying Islamo-leftism is killing France.
	Yeah, I mean, a big surprise.
	Yeah, I mean, at least they can all agree on the problem.
	Yeah, which is nice.
	It's a shame that, I mean, not even the so-called right, the Conservative Party, can agree on this problem in Britain.
	Again, it's embarrassing.
	God save France.
	I mean, these people at least understand the problems.
	And remember, what was the school where the Muslim guy said, you know, you either allow us to do this or we become like France?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, that was up north.
	I can't remember the name of it.
	It was.
	I can't remember the name of it.
	But it was just that line that struck me.
	It's this, or we become like France.
	And I'm like, oh, well.
	That's an interesting statement.
	That's a threat.
	Yeah.
	That's him saying, look.
	Yeah, it was because of the Mohammed custom.
	We will just start murdering people in the streets.
	Yeah.
	Wonderful.
	I'm glad we imported loads of you people who want to be Islamists.
	Fantastic.
	Mm-hmm.
	So the response to this, I don't know very well because, of course, we're not French.
	We're not in tune with French political culture.
	But I have seen some documentation in English of what has happened.
	So this is Bloomberg here, who have a very biased article in which they're against Marine Le Pen.
	But they do have some quotes that are true.
	So they have the fact that no one really takes this as evidence that a coup d'etat is imminent.
	Like, they're not...
	No one really expects this is true, that they're going to be like, right, if you don't do nothing, we're going to do a coup.
	I mean, sure, it's not nothing, absolutely, but many of these generals are ex-generals.
	They're not currently serving in the army.
	And there was a point being made by the defence minister that they're not taking this too seriously, the government, or at least that's their public line.
	Yeah, that's their public line.
	Because you're all ex-generals, therefore this is your opinions and you represent just yourselves, not the army.
	But we're also going to crack down on all the people in the army who did sign this.
	It's like, right, but who do they represent then?
	You can't fob them off.
	But, I mean, they must know enough about French revolutionary history to know that you can't simply say, well, you're an ex-general, therefore you're a nothing.
	You know, these people can quite often raise troops.
	You know, it's...
	It seems maybe bigger than they're making out, but no one really...
	My understanding is no one really took it as, like, they're literally threatening a coup.
	So her response when she says, well, march with us, if you do take it as being a literal threat to a coup, then it does look kind of bad.
	So the argument is, is she kind of miscalculating here because she's going to run for president next year?
	And if she's calling for a coup, they don't look great, but that's a matter of opinion, I suppose.
	So she says...
	Well, hang on a second.
	I mean, how do we think the French public feels about this?
	They might be pro-coup.
	Yeah.
	They probably are.
	I mean, they're French.
	Yeah, exactly!
	That's what I mean!
	I'm not even joking!
	Marine Le Pen gave an interview with France Invo on Tuesday and denied that the officers had effectively threatened a coup d'etat.
	So she was sort of trying to back down on the idea that they were really saying that.
	And then she starts going down on the polls.
	LAUGHTER So how are the polls?
	So all I have is just the polling, because it's not for a year that the presidential elections are taking place.
	But if we go to the next link, the Politico polling, and if you can scroll down to the second bar graph, so this is just approval of Macron, and here you can see Marine Le Pen 26%, Macron 25%.
	So I mean, neck and neck, pretty much.
	I mean, it's not like she's some fringe candidate.
	She's the main candidate for the opposition to Macron, and she's endorsing this letter.
	And from an outside perspective, it doesn't even look good for Macron either, because it seems that he's essentially adopted her political position.
	Yeah, because as we've been documenting, he's coming out and saying, actually, Islamo-leftism is destroying France and we need to crack down on it.
	And didn't he imply that she was going soft on Islam?
	Yeah, so, I mean, Macron comes out and he's like, yeah, Islamo-leftism is a problem, we need to crack down on that.
	And Marine Le Pen's like...
	It's my opinion.
	You're stealing my...
	Calm down, Macron.
	They've got human rights.
	So the...
	What was it?
	I think it was the Interior Minister went on a debate with Marine Le Pen on TV and started bashing off about how Marine Le Pen was soft on Islam.
	It was really weird.
	And then Marine Le Pen turned around and was like, well, hang on.
	They have civil rights.
	We're not going to force them to convert or anything.
	They're human beings, Macron.
	At the point of a gunpoint.
	Next propaganda thing is noted Islamophile Marine Le Pen.
	You know, like...
	Anyway, sorry.
	Muslims have civil rights too.
	But it's, I mean, she's right.
	I mean, if you want to come out and say...
	She's right, they do have civil rights.
	If you want to say we're going to convert them at the point of a sword, I mean, Macron, I think that's a bit too far, lad.
	I mean, there were also claims from his government that they were looking into giving, what is it, Muslim children a number each so they could track whether or not they would become radicals.
	I mean, does he think Muslim children are suicide bombers, all of them?
	Oh my god.
	I mean, giving them numbers as well.
	I mean, it's very Holocaust-esque.
	Yeah, it's not good when you need to tattoo on their forearms.
	I mean, I'm just saying, don't.
	Yeah, I mean, Jesus, the level of radicalization in France, I mean, it does reflect the level of terrorism and social problems they've got.
	It is extreme, but it's extreme for a reason.
	It's not coming out of nowhere.
	It would be nice to not get to that point and just democratically solve these problems elsewhere, using France as a terrible example.
	British politicians.
	That's our future if we don't do anything about it.
	I mean, that's what you're looking at.
	But anyway, let's see what happens in France, I guess.
	Let's move on to Based Florida Man.
	Yeah, I wanted to talk about based Florida man Ron DeSantis.
	My boy Ron!
	Really liking DeSantis, actually.
	I didn't really know who he was until fairly recently, in the last year or so.
	But he's been really impressing people.
	He's been really impressing me.
	So I thought I'd go and have a look at his Wikipedia article, because where else are you going to start?
	And I was really quite surprised about how firm he was on a certain set of policy positions.
	Now, in many ways, he seems to be a really...
	Excuse me.
	I don't know what's going on in my throat today.
	In many ways, he is a pretty predictable Republican governor, in fact, in most areas.
	He's not, like, you know, obsessive about weed, but he opposes it recreationally.
	He opposes abortion and Planned Parenthood.
	He's pretty based on Congress, saying if they don't pass budgets, they shouldn't get paid.
	He's been named a taxpayer superhero by the conservative think tank Citizens Against Government Waste.
	He generally seems to want to lower taxes.
	He opposes increased federalization, prefers localism.
	He opted out of his own congressional pension and then attempted to eliminate pensions for congressmen.
	That's pretty great.
	Yeah, this guy sounds awesome.
	Yeah, I know, right?
	And the way he said it as well, right?
	He was like, after introducing the End Pensions and Congress Act, DeSantis said, the Founding Fathers envisaged elected officials as part of a servant class, yet Washington has evolved into a ruling class culture.
	Good point.
	Great framing.
	A-plus rating on gun control from the NRA, which means no gun control.
	And he also proposed an anti-mob extension to the pre-existing Stand Your Ground law in Florida that would allow gun-owning residents to use deadly force on individuals they believe are looting.
	Not necessarily your stuff.
	You're losing, are you?
	After the 2018 Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida, DeSantis expressed his support for hiring retired law enforcement and military veterans as armed guards for schools.
	In 2021, he obviously signed his executive order prohibiting vaccine passports in Florida.
	And asked the legislature to pass an identical statute.
	He opposes mass immigration, sanctuary cities.
	In 2015, after the Paris attacks, he called for urgent recognition that Islamic extremism is to blame for the Paris attacks and should be seen as an enemy of America.
	The enemy is an ideology rooted in militant Islam.
	And the prudent policy, of course, when talking about refugees, is to err on the side of protecting the American people.
	Who is this absolute legend?
	Everything there, correct.
	I mean, I can't go over how that's a contentious point, though.
	The idea that Islamism is an enemy of America.
	I mean, why are you in Afghanistan, then, if it's not?
	I mean, they do just openly say it.
	If that's not enough, what is?
	Chanting death to America.
	I'm not sure about this.
	Well, that is the position of the Democrats.
	I don't want to stigmatize the Muslims.
	Well, hang on.
	Why do they represent all Muslims?
	You know, why are you taking them as the representative of Muslims in America?
	But anyway, he also has a zero rating from the human rights campaign for his voting record on LGBT-related issues.
	Does he put that in his campaign literature?
	I presume he does.
	But the thing is, with regards to this, he just seems to be like a modern Republican.
	Because he just said, in 2018, he said, look, I don't want any discrimination in Florida.
	I want people to be able to live their lives, whether you're gay or whether you're religious.
	Don't care.
	So it's more about him opposing the lobby group, that is, the LGBT rights lobby group, it seems.
	He was obviously opposed to the Russiagate conspiracy investigation, very much pro-veteran, and the biggest flaw that he has really is that he's a Catholic.
	We'll overlook it this time.
	Yeah, we'll overlook it this time.
	I mean, the French are Catholics as well.
	We've got to overlook that too.
	But you say he's a typical modern Republican.
	He doesn't look like a plant pot with a Republican logo on it.
	Well, yeah, I should have been more delicate.
	He's a much better, you know, above the grade, let's say.
	Well, what I mean is he doesn't seem to be an empty suit.
	He doesn't seem to be a bought and paid for corporate man.
	He actually seems to have some convictions that are sort of modern Republican convictions, which are not like, you know, old school Republican convictions.
	And he seems to be doing a great job.
	And so, of course, in the light of Black Lives Matter and all of this going on, he decided he's not taking any of their S. He signed a law on April 20th, or just before, That was a bill that would increasingly punish people who violently riot,
	loot and destroy properties and punish cities that don't protect the lives and properties of those people who attempt to, of the cities from the, you know, the presumably Democrat governors of these cities who try to redirect funds from law enforcement to elsewhere.
	So all good things totally justifiable, right?
	But detractors say, as Yahoo News tell us, that the law violates the First Amendment rights to free speech, like you care, communists, and targets black communities, which really seems to be a damning indictment, doesn't it?
	No looting law.
	Well, you're a racist.
	Disapportionally targets black people.
	Does it now?
	I mean, I did say that.
	Yeah, you said that.
	You know, the mask is suddenly off.
	But, I mean, you know, it's a strange way of admitting that he is right, that there's a moral problem with the behavior of the people in these communities.
	He signed a bill that, obviously, it was on the day of the trial of Derek Chauvin, where they were coming to a conclusion.
	And it just allows him to actually do something about these things.
	So, you know, increase legal charges for anyone who assaults people, particularly law enforcement or damages property during a riot.
	Allow businesses that are damaged or destroyed in lootings or riots to sue the cities that failed to provide law enforcement and protection.
	Why not?
	You pay the taxes.
	Exactly.
	You pay the taxes.
	The police are supposed to be there to protect your business because of it.
	And if a mob of people that the left will describe as Black Lives Matter supporters come in and burn the thing down, then someone's responsible for it.
	I mean, if the Democrat governor, I mean, say, like Portland, the Democrat mayor, saying don't intervene, stand back, don't use tear gas.
	Minneapolis, we've defunded the police.
	Well, I'm suing you now because you defunded the police.
	And then I'm moving, because screw you.
	But yeah, so it seems that he's making really good decisions, actually sensible decisions.
	I mean, you know, prohibiting, defacing, injuring or damaging memorial or historic property, including flags and stuff like this.
	So yeah, they can't just run around the streets burning things down.
	Good.
	And yeah, so he's remarkably good on this sort of stuff.
	And the way he frames it as well, some local governments are telling police to stand down while cities burned, while businesses were burned, and while people were being harmed.
	That's a dereliction of duty.
	He was referring to Portland there, Seattle and Minneapolis, which he's right.
	Somehow this has become a political punt issue, and I don't know how it's political to say, I'm going to protect law enforcement, we're going to protect people's properties, and there's going to be rules of engagement if you decide to riot.
	Why is that controversial?
	Like, this totally normal, like any sensible person.
	And the point is as well, again, it's not a partisan issue.
	It shouldn't be a partisan issue, because surely, you know, people who vote Democrat who want their property protected as well.
	I mean, you'd hope so.
	Why wouldn't they?
	But then why are they voting Democrat, I guess.
	That is the, I guess, guilty consciences.
	But I love this, right?
	So in Florida, they have one lone statewide elected Democrat, which is the Agriculture Commissioner.
	And she ridiculed DeSantis, saying that this defies free speech rights.
	Republicans love to talk about the Constitution, but they're shredding with bills like this.
	Silencing speech and blocking the vote is what communist regimes do.
	HB1 should never have been signed.
	Shut up, communists.
	Shut up, you communists.
	You hate free speech.
	You hate your constitution.
	You hate property rights.
	Everyone knows it.
	That's why you're a Democrat.
	Shut up.
	But anyway, so the most recent thing, of course, and the most interesting thing that he's doing recently is in response to the banning of Trump, which, of course, we covered on Lotuses.com, which Trump was just removed from Silicon Valley platforms in a day, and it showed that, in fact, this was a monopoly, and they can act in a cabal, which they are.
	Which they've done previously, but in this instance it was also for something which he didn't do.
	But even worse, I mean, it's one thing the cabal deplatforming just a pundit like Alex Jones, but it's another thing the cabal deplatforming a sitting president at the behest of things like the Washington Post and Michelle Obama.
	It's not even like, if it was other elected officials, okay, maybe...
	But also based on a charge which, as we've seen...
	That was false.
	Which is false.
	Yeah.
	And so DeSantis was not taking this lying down.
	So this article from The Independent is from a couple of months ago, if I recall correctly.
	Yeah, from February.
	And where DeSantis basically proposed this.
	He said, look, why don't I just put forward a bill that means that Florida, any political candidates for office in a Florida election, if they are banned from social media by Twitter and Facebook and any others...
	Then we're going to fine them $100,000 a day for every day that they're banned until their accounts are restored.
	It's like, go on.
	I'm listening.
	I want to hear more.
	You know?
	What?
	No, I just think it's cool.
	So, what began apparently with this is that, he just says, it used to be that consumers were trusted to make their own decisions about what information to consume, about which leaders to follow, about what news to watch.
	Now those decisions are increasingly being made by nameless, faceless boards of censors.
	In Florida, we're going to take aim at those companies and pull back the veil and make sure those guys don't continue to find loopholes and grey areas to live above the law.
	Under our proposal, if a technology company deplatforms a candidate for elected office during an election, the company will face a daily fine of $100,000 until the candidate's access is restored.
	Excellent.
	What's wrong with that?
	I think the only thing here is it will end up going before the Supreme Court and they'll shoot it down on the free speech rights of the company because they'll say we have a right to get rid of anyone for any reason we want to.
	Maybe.
	John, what's that clicking then?
	Maybe eventually, but the point is something has to be done.
	Something has to push forward.
	I mean, this is the method Poland's been going for.
	And so they've got an easier time there, legally, of course, because it's Poland.
	Yeah.
	And so the bill has been presented, and it has passed through...
	This is the bill.
	Not very exciting to look at.
	But it has passed through the Senate, and now it's going on to the House.
	What's very interesting about this...
	We can go to the next one, John.
	Is that the vote was almost exactly along party lines, which goes to show you who feels that they control Silicon Valley.
	Why wouldn't the Democrats want to have some legal recourse that prevents their own candidates from being arbitrarily deplatformed by a social media platform or a cabal of social media platforms?
	Why wouldn't they want that?
	Because they know their candidates will never have such treatment.
	Exactly.
	Or at least they think that candidates will never have that treatment.
	But they do think that their opposition candidates will get that treatment.
	In fact, they've got lots of examples.
	The apex example of the president, the sitting president as well.
	I can't emphasize this enough.
	How dare Silicon Valley think that they have the authority to tell the American people, actually, you don't need to give them president?
	You don't need to hear from him.
	That's our job to decide that.
	I think it's awful.
	But anyway, you can see exactly how the Democrats are.
	And I would defy any Democrat who opposes this measure to explain why.
	Because the only thing they can do is appeal to the First Amendment, but they hate the First Amendment.
	So what now?
	You're pro-banning.
	Do a debate with Ron DeSantis.
	Tell me why.
	I want to see that.
	I want you to explain, just in real time, why that's bad.
	Would someone please think of poor Google...
	I know, right?
	Like, the Democrats once again leaping in the way of the biggest, most tyrannical companies in the world.
	Like, there isn't a bigger censor than Google.
	Are they a trillion-dollar company these days?
	Oh, probably.
	Multi-probably.
	But the point is that there is no bigger censor than Google.
	Like, YouTube and Google, my subsidiaries, they're used by literally billions of people.
	More people are censored by Google than by China.
	People have to understand, these things are enormous, and they have such unbelievable power, and there's very little that it seems that anyone can actually do to rein them in.
	They play this game in the United States when they get called before Congress and whatnot, oh no, we care about free speech, we're very interested, blah blah blah.
	Bull!
	I mean, not only do we know it's bull in the Western context, but whenever they go East, they just do it.
	They don't have any qualms about it.
	They don't think about it.
	Like Google in Pakistan, completely compliant with the Pakistani censorship laws.
	Google in China, I mean, they were happy to make a search engine for them until the relationship fell through.
	And now they're like, oh no, now we hate China, we swear.
	Shut up.
	No one believes you.
	Yeah.
	But yeah, again, listening to the Democrats object to this is embarrassing, though.
	That's the thing.
	Because, I mean, the Republicans just make great points.
	Pointing to the dominance of a handful of tech companies such as Amazon, Facebook, Google, a sponsor of the bill called Ray Rodriguez said big tech is not a free market and the state has a role in regulating such companies.
	Yes, it does.
	This is a cabal.
	This is a monopoly.
	And therefore, this is something that antitrust laws should be applied to, right?
	Don't forget our Democrats saying that.
	No, no, that was a Republican.
	That was a Republican.
	The response to this from the Democrat, from Senator Jeff Brands, who was a Republican who joined the Democrats in voting against the bill, he was like, well, this is a bill you'd see in countries we don't want to talk about.
	There's some 90 miles south of here and from some of those a little further south alluding to Cuba.
	It's like, what are you talking about?
	What the hell are you talking about?
	In Cuba, they force social media companies to not de-platform people, do they?
	I don't think they do!
	You dunce!
	Castro's like, we must platform the capitalists!
	Exactly!
	I don't think they do!
	And so, it's just like, all of the...
	It's so bizarre.
	The imperialists have rights to.
	It's so weird.
	Like, oh, this is the sort of thing they do in China.
	No, it's not.
	They literally just de-platformed feminism in China because it was having an effect on the social structures of the country.
	So they were just like, no, you're gone.
	So yeah, the arguments against this are just paper thin and appealing to the Republicans, basically.
	But don't you care about their free speech rights?
	What, their free speech to silence us?
	The free speech extremists known as the Soviet Union.
	So stupid.
	But you'll notice how soft it is.
	Well, this is a bill you'd see in countries we don't want to talk about.
	Yeah, I know you don't want to talk about it because it'd make you look ridiculous because you would never see anything like this in these countries.
	I mean, do they even have bills in these countries?
	We can repackage that statement.
	Countries you don't want to talk about are like Poland where there's no terrorist attacks.
	There's no mass immigration.
	And also the culture is protected.
	What's going on there?
	Really makes you think.
	But yeah, so hopefully this goes through.
	But as you say, of course, it probably will get shut down in the Supreme Court.
	And if Joe Biden packs it, then it definitely will be.
	But the point is, it's nice to see someone at least doing something, even if it looks like it's doomed to fail.
	And DeSantis is so unbelievably based that he has his own Twitter account.
	Not his personally.
	It's people whining about Ron DeSantis online.
	19,000 followers!
	Like, a surprising number of people follow this.
	And if you scroll down, John, you can see, like, it's just people just whining and whining that DeSantis isn't going to cuck.
	And it's like, okay, here we go.
	Look at that face.
	The absolute worst.
	Yep, that's good.
	Ron DeSantis, when the communists are calling you the absolute worst, that means you're doing a great job.
	Amazing.
	Beast Florida, man.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, Florida looks like it's going to be the last bastion of freedom in the United States.
	Florida man saves the West.
	But that's what's happening!
	Yeah.
	Oh my god.
	Poland and Florida man save the West.
	Do you want him to run for president or not?
	I'd love it.
	I think he'd be great.
	So if Trump was to pick someone, you...
	I think Trump, DeSantis, I saw some polling about this a little while ago, a couple of months ago, that showed DeSantis was basically the favourite after Trump.
	And Trump, you know, as much as I love the God Emperor, and obviously I have my own MAGA hat and whatnot, but he is going to be like 78.
	I think it probably would be better if Trump were to just endorse and campaign with someone.
	So Trump comes on, gives a speech, and then DeSantis comes on and then gives his speech.
	That would be good, I think, and would be able to recapture the entirety of the magazine.
	I mean, Trump probably loves him as well.
	Oh, yeah.
	Trump has a house in Florida.
	Yeah, he lives in Mar-a-Lago.
	So is that like his main property as well?
	So he's probably in contact with him.
	I think it's his winter holiday home or something.
	But he owns property in Florida.
	And I imagine Trump and DeSantis, I don't know, but I imagine...
	Where would he live right now as well?
	You want to go live in New York?
	Exactly.
	Screw that.
	Exactly.
	So the last thing I wanted to end on is we're just going to go through with some of the dispatches we have on the website.
	So if people do know, we have a little dispatch page, which is like, you know, breaking news, more and more time sensitive things.
	But this is one, there's been a few actually about just, what do you call it?
	The march of social justice through culture in which they're just forcing people to join the ideology.
	We call it subversion.
	Yeah, I mean, and the worst example here is when they go after kids.
	Because they can never win with adults, they can't convince people, so they just go after your children.
	And this is a school which decided to turn all of its children into child heroes, as Orwell would say.
	So in 1984 there's a concept in which the children will denounce their parents for being thought criminals, and the child is then dubbed a child hero for doing this.
	And they're doing the same thing with the children of this school.
	So primary school introduces rewards for kids who report quote sexist language such as let's go guys.
	Ah, yes.
	The most sexist of language.
	Guys.
	I mean, the thing that's really keeping women down.
	It's caused the wage gap, it's caused all of the patriarchy, let's go guys.
	And the funny thing about it, though, is I genuinely see the phrase guys as just being gender neutral.
	Yeah, you think.
	Informal, referring to a group of people who with I am personally familiar and have a good relationship.
	I mean, you think it would be the best term for them.
	They'd be like, yeah, this is the gender neutral term for non-binary.
	I was like, no, no, this is sexist language.
	Jesus Christ.
	Anyway, so it says in here, children at a school in Birmingham have been taught to vilify teachers and fellow students for using sexist language.
	That's where the child hero comes into this, because they're denouncing their own teachers for daring to wrong think.
	In their defence, though, their teachers probably are commies.
	Maybe.
	So maybe they should be denounced.
	Children as young as three years old at Adderton Park Primary School have been instructed to hold up posters rejecting the use of sexist language, which includes banned words and phrases such as let's go guys, man up, grow a pair, and boys and girls.
	Boys and girls is sexist language.
	Unreal.
	I just...
	I just can't wait for the French generals to take her.
	You can invite them to England afterwards.
	Yeah, I will.
	I personally will.
	Jesus.
	I mean, if your definition of sex is just includes sex, I mean, defines them as male and female, sure.
	But obviously this is thought to crime because it is sexist language and therefore horrible.
	And the kids will stand up to their oppressive teachers who call them boys and girls.
	Yeah.
	This is unreal.
	Yeah.
	I just, like, I mean, I don't want to just be like, yeah, well, this is Awellian, because they're training kids to be informants for the state.
	I mean, it is the spies from 1984.
	But that's exactly what it is.
	It's cliche, but why else do you compare it?
	Yeah, this is literally the strategy of Ingsoc to terrorise the parents and now the teachers.
	And they've always got to use the kids, because the kids are the most vulnerable to this kind of extremism.
	Well, they don't know that it's wrong.
	How would they?
	They're kids.
	They have no moral compass on such an issue.
	So children are also taught to monitor their reading books and worksheets for sexist stereotypes and look out for language such as calling an assertive girl, quote, bossy, or saying boys don't cry.
	So, I was looking through CounterPoint's Twitter feed the other day, and she had tweeted out, feminism was the centre of the discourse five years ago.
	Why don't we talk about it now?
	And there's a reason we don't talk about it now, because it has moved past the discourse.
	Is this right or wrong?
	And it's just gone straight to indoctrinating children.
	Let's not have the debate anymore.
	Let's just indoctrinate children.
	So says the feminists.
	As far as the feminists are concerned, they won.
	I mean, if calling an assertive girl bossy or saying boys don't cry is unacceptable, this is like cliche boilerplate feminism from like five years ago.
	It's embarrassing how quaint and antiquated this appears to be.
	But it's also the neo-Marxist types in fiction there, where all references to sex are inherently sexist.
	We must all be persons.
	Yes, exactly.
	Everything has to be neutral.
	You can't have any of the sort of deep human concepts that we talk about.
	But anyway.
	Yeah, so they continue.
	According to the Times, one member of staff at the 500-pupil school was summoned to a professional conduct meeting for telling pupils that boys don't skip.
	The children ran into my office one playtime and said, Miss, miss, something terrible has happened, reported the school's head teacher, Sarah Hewitt Clarkson.
	One of the supervisors has just taken a skipping rope off a boy and said boys don't skip.
	They were absolutely right to be horrified.
	It was brilliantly, sorry, it was brilliant that they ran in and told me.
	That's awful.
	I mean, don't get me wrong.
	I don't agree with the idea that boys can't skip boxes.
	Yeah, exactly.
	I don't agree with that, and I don't think the teacher should have gone on and taken the skipping rope off a boy for skipping.
	But it's also equally horrifying, or even worse, that the kids run and go, oh, miss, miss, this guy committed an act of sexist unorthodoxy against the party.
	And she's like, oh, well done, children.
	Professional conduct meeting.
	Yeah, it's awful.
	I mean, you would have thought a word would do.
	Yeah.
	Oh, by the way, no, don't do that.
	It's alright, you know, it's not a problem, but no, no, no.
	That's disciplinary.
	So, Hewitt Clarkson, who invented the so-called anti-sexism program at Anderson Park, said, The phrase, good morning, boys and girls, is not to be used in this school.
	Instead, teachers say, good morning, everyone.
	Girls have posters they hold up every time one of the teachers says, come on, guys.
	The poster says, sir, I am not a guy.
	Why not?
	Why?
	Why not?
	Why can't there be a guy?
	What's wrong with the girls also being guys?
	God, I hate this.
	There's little signs they hold up.
	Sometimes the teacher still forgets and slips it out, because our training here shows that if you are resolute, you can stamp this out.
	Oh, good.
	Stamp what out?
	No.
	The use of gendered language.
	Non-gendered language in this case.
	Yeah, I mean literally gender neutral language for most people.
	Yeah, but just good morning boys and girls is not used at the school.
	This is what leftist sharia is.
	There are prescribed words.
	But again, sorry to be cliche, but it is Orwellian.
	They're literally just taking like, let's cut down the language.
	Get rid of boys and girls and replace it with everyone.
	Literally new speech.
	You know, replace mother and father and replace it with parent.
	Eventually you won't even be able to have these thoughts at all.
	Just as the party wanted.
	Oh boy.
	So she continues, and this is probably the best bit.
	The head teacher, she asserted that stereotypical language has power, and described sexism as a spectrum, which extends from a teacher using the word guys to the rape, torture, and murder of women.
	I don't think it's fair to put those on the same spectrum.
	They're all same in the fact that they're sexist, I think that's our argument, but Jesus Christ, put those in the same category.
	I mean, yeah, these are all similar.
	How many times do I have to call you guy before I've committed the same sin as rape?
	I mean, what are you talking about?
	Rape, torture, and murder of women, and then guys.
	Not going to make that joke, no.
	John's written a foreboding joke.
	So she continues, so many people use running like a girl, and they think that's funny, said Miss Hewitt Clarkson, a humorless brat.
	But no one would say running like a black.
	LAUGHTER Eek.
	I think I'm just going to leave that one there.
	There probably are people who would say that, Miss Hewitt Clarkson.
	Yeah, and they're probably progressives.
	Oh, man.
	All these things are part of a jigsaw that suggests girls are lesser than boys.
	We have to unpick all the ways that this idea is drip-fed into our consciousness.
	No, we don't.
	No.
	This is, again, the social constructivist view that everything is socially constructed.
	It's like...
	Yeah, no, biology exists.
	Like, there's a reason boys are boys and girls are girls, because of biology.
	I think it's clear that Miss Hewitt Clarkson is just a confused little lady who needs to go back to the kitchen, to be honest.
	I mean, actually would do her better than what she's currently doing, which is propagating anti-science nonsense.
	Or she'd be like, my kitchen's sexist.
	You bet she would.
	She'd become a Guardian journalist and start writing stuff like that.
	Anyway, as reported by the Times, Hugh Clarkson has decided to speak out about these policies that she put in place after the murder of Sarah Everard last month.
	So, some woman gets murdered by the cops.
	Sorry, by a cop.
	Not the cops.
	Wasn't it a cop and his girlfriend or something?
	I don't think it was proven that the girlfriend had involvement.
	So a rogue cop decides to murder a woman, and the response is, we need to get rid of the word guys, because these are connected.
	The word guys was responsible for the rape and torture of Sarah Everard.
	I don't think she was raped, or at least there's no evidence of that.
	But her murder was caused by, you know, when he was growing up, he would hear statements like, come on guys, and this is what caused him to murder her.
	I'm sure.
	We got the same response when we went down to the protest.
	No, there was even more nonsensical response.
	Yeah, like these, you know, me making a joke about something is...
	So we went down to a protest in Swindon, well, you did, and it was the Kill the Bill guys.
	And you were just going to ask them, you know, why here we agree the bill has flaws that are bad and should get rid of.
	And they responded by saying what?
	Oh, I can't remember exactly what it was now, but it was something like, my joke had caused the death of Sarah Everard.
	Yeah.
	And I was like, well, how?
	And they wouldn't explain how.
	And then, where they were like, you've contributed to a culture, and I was like, right, so Jimmy Carr killed Sarah Everard too.
	Yeah.
	They were like, no, he didn't.
	Why?
	I'm not talking to you anymore.
	I was like, yeah, pathetic.
	So, they continue.
	The headteacher's anti-sexism program, which encourages vigilance about behaviours as well as language, requires boys and girls to be mixed in assembly lines and in sports teams.
	Hmm.
	Yeah.
	I look forward to that being applied to the Olympics.
	Mixed in sports teams.
	Yeah.
	There's not going to be a Women's Olympics when we're done with it.
	I literally saw a headline go past on my timeline today that said that girls suffer more football head injuries than boys.
	In fact, it was Stephen Knight.
	I shared it to my Facebook page.
	Because it just seems that studies show that from headbutting a ball, like, you know, obviously it's moving quickly, it's, you know, an object with mass, it hits your head, you know, there's an impact, it does some damage there.
	And apparently girls suffer more damage than boys.
	And it's like, okay, well, that's just social construction, just identify as a man and then you're fine.
	Right?
	But that's the point.
	If we're going to abolish gender distinctions, well, I don't know why, but there's a certain kind of person that we can't name or identify that's suffering more damage from the sports that we're going on, but we can't identify what the reason is because we're not allowed to use the language that would be used to describe the differences.
	And what now?
	One of the things I can't get over as well is, like, this ideology is so nonsensical.
	I mean, we're able to tell this is obviously nonsense and whatnot, but how the heck is so many people convinced of this?
	Like, how is this head teacher convinced that this is true?
	Social constructivism.
	Oh, John just got up.
	Double the concussion risk of boys.
	So by mixing together the girls and boys football teams, there's going to be like a 50% increase in the number of concussions, and that will be hard to explain.
	That's real feminism.
	That's real feminism, yeah.
	Getting girls concussions is real feminism.
	Anyway, so she continues in here.
	Suicide is the highest killer among young British men, said the head teacher.
	We should not expect any teacher here to say that boys don't cry.
	Those harmful stereotypes are part of the reason for a very high male suicide figure.
	She doesn't know that.
	When we interview anyone for a job at the school, we always ask, what would you do if a boy said, I'm not using that pink highlighter pen because it's for girls?
	Based.
	That's what I'd say.
	Good kid.
	Good lad.
	Have a sweet.
	The idea there that because in our society we have the motto, boys don't cry, that's why men are the ones who have one when we made up the suicides.
	It's just not true.
	Well, come on.
	It's the same.
	Well, how does she know?
	It's the same in every culture on planet Earth.
	Well, not entirely.
	That men are the majority of suicide.
	Oh, probably, yeah.
	So it's just the idea that this is socially constructed, again, it's just obvious nonsense.
	I mean, as Jordan Peterson points out as well, the extremities of gender get worse.
	The more egalitarian the society gets around gender in Scandinavia.
	But what I find really amusing about this is all she's really saying there is that boys are more competent at committing suicide, which appears to be the case.
	But more importantly, how does she know?
	You should reference that.
	So apparently men and women commit attempt suicide, but men are more successful.
	Yeah.
	And it could well be that women are a cry for help, and men it's genuinely not a cry for help.
	But the point is, she doesn't know that Boys Don't Cry has any causal connection to suicides, and it could be the complete other way around.
	It could be the fact...
	I mean, like, the very notion of Boys Don't Cry, this is not to say that no man has ever cried or must never cry, but what it is is a kind of a request that you have control of your own emotional state, right?
	Because boys are measured, their value is measured on their use, their usefulness, and what they can contribute.
	And if you're a blubbering mess, you can't contribute anything.
	And you're not competent.
	Exactly, you're not competent.
	And so it's not good for you, and other people's opinions of you, if you happen to be a blubbering wreck when you're actually needed at a particular time.
	So it's actually a really good maxim to have, as you know, boys shouldn't cry, because you shouldn't.
	You know, someone's got to take care of you.
	Expand the franchise.
	Girls shouldn't cry.
	Yeah.
	There we go.
	No, no, I'm totally down for it.
	Girls shouldn't cry either.
	Yeah, I'm not joking either.
	If you want to be the equal of men, you shouldn't be blubbing either.
	Enough of that.
	Think of some old English school mom.
	What would she say about blubbing?
	No blubbing here and then rack you across the nails with a ruler or something.
	A wrist with a ruler.
	No blubbing in class, goddammit.
	So this headteacher has apparently got herself in controversy previously.
	So in 2019, she requested that a Birmingham High Court issue an order banning protests by parents of an activist after she ran a No Outsiders LGBTQI plus education program in Birmingham.
	So you'll remember the Muslim mums who were upset about what was being taught in their school.
	Muslim dads.
	Sorry, Muslim mums and dads.
	Yeah, who were upset about what was being taught there.
	She requested a high court ban protest in response to criticism from the Muslim mums and dads.
	Which is exactly the policy of Ingsock, yeah.
	Yep, so there's just some data here.
	81.5% of the pupils did not speak English as their first language, in a large section being of a Muslim background.
	So, I mean, big surprise, surprise.
	That is an insane proportion.
	It is a huge proportion.
	81% of the pupils are foreigners.
	Well, don't speak English as the first language.
	Yeah, that means foreigner.
	Well, they could be born here, grown up, but live in a, you know, a closed community.
	You have a colony.
	Yeah.
	You live in a colony.
	If you live in a country and don't speak the predominant language as your first language.
	Sure.
	That's no question of it.
	That's not integration.
	Anyway, so they continue the last bit here, which is her saying, her quote in response to seeing the protest.
	When I see those pictures of 200, 300 people in one afternoon standing outside my school, I look...
	I look at that like an observer from a foreign land.
	That's not my city.
	That's not my school.
	This is an extension of my...
	This isn't an extension of my home.
	Wow.
	This is sounding a bit alright.
	To be honest.
	Jesus.
	The Muslim mums and dads protesting outside and she's like, this isn't my city.
	This isn't my school.
	This is foreign land.
	Okay.
	Christ.
	I mean...
	True.
	Interesting perspective.
	She also got, just the last bit here, she got sent death threats and had to move school and then continue to her propaganda.
	So I mean, horrible that she got sent death threats, but horrible person as well.
	Like, I'm sorry, but you're teaching absolute nonsense.
	And also just far left propaganda in this next school you went to, which you're trying to get rid of all gendered language.
	Literally promoting the ideology of Ingsoc and then turning around and going, why are there so many foreigners around?
	It's weird.
	Oof.
	Anyway, that's the story of the child heroes in that school.
	But I just wanted to go on here.
	You have something here about the Tesco pronoun.
	Yeah, I was going to, but we'll leave people to go to the dispatches on the website.
	It's just on the front page of the website.
	Can we show people?
	Can we show people?
	So this is a problem going on in Tesco's.
	No, just the front page of the site, if that's alright, Jim.
	I was just going to show people this as well.
	Oh yeah.
	So one of the dispatches to go and read.
	So Tesco not using preferred pronouns constitutes harassment.
	Yeah.
	Yay.
	Thank you, Tesco.
	According to Tesco's leaked materials that were sent to us.
	And this is training materials for the staff.
	It just means it's going to constitute harassment when you fail to use someone's preferred pronouns.
	Do you have any milk in?
	Can we go back to something, the issue, about the fact that you're a staller?
	It's Matt.
	Well, they're lecturing the staff on pronouns.
	That won't be long before they extend it to the conference.
	That's no doubt.
	But anyway, we've got a few others, but I won't go through them for time's sake.
	But you can find them, of course, on Notices.com.
	Okay, so let's go to the video comments, so we can go through that, and then we'll go to the comments on the site.
	So the left expects us to be sexually attracted to trannies.
	They also think transgendered children have to use puberty blockers so they never have to go through puberty.
	Uh-oh.
	Does this mean that they literally expect us to be attracted to prepubescent?
	Woodchipper goes...
	What was that last bit?
	The woodchipper goes burr.
	I honestly can't refute that point.
	If they are happy for people to suspend puberty indefinitely, and they also think that trans women are women, then what they are saying is prepubescents are women.
	Not exactly how I'd define a woman.
	I'm going to stick with the traditional definition of dishwasher.
	God damn you.
	They absolutely stay up for that.
	I'm sorry ladies, I'm just teasing.
	I'm so sorry.
	My wife's going to hear this and kill me.
	Let's go for the next comment before you say anything more.
	Man, these materials taste great.
	Hi there, Carl.
	I just thought I'd mention a chap called Cedric Purcell.
	He's a small-time YouTuber who recently released a video called I've Become a Keto Chat, and he references you directly in his lifestyle change.
	If you could just drop him a short comment on there, I'm sure you would make his week.
	Thanks.
	I was literally about to until you ate that potato.
	Alright, video commenters, we need more of you eating carbs.
	No, this is...
	You're going to lead the revolt.
	I'll get my shame bell out, you know, if I have to.
	Okay, look.
	You've got to have it on standby now, just in case.
	Yeah, I am.
	Just in case.
	Maybe I need to get out.
	Let's go for the next one.
	Regarding the question of flight, I suppose a better definition of...
	For color, it's the frequency of the photon, which means that if you change the speed of the observer, you can change the frequency, thus changing the color of the light.
	But the color is still intrinsic to the light.
	Is that correct, Mr.
	Physicist?
	Yeah, if you change the frequency, you change the wavelength, which changes the color.
	Which means it's definitely in the light and not in the object.
	No, because that wasn't my philosophical point anyway.
	This is another argument you had with yourself.
	And I won!
	I'm sure you did.
	I'm sure you did, son.
	I'm just saying I did.
	Look at that, you know?
	No, the argument was whether or not it's intrinsic to the light or the observer, because it's essentially the version of the sound question, which is if a tree falls in the woods and no one's around to hear it, did the sound exist?
	So there's a whole conversation to be had about that.
	But it's...
	My understanding is the literature is meant to be that there is no real solution to this, because it's philosophical and not really the realm of physicists anyway to bother themselves with such things, in which case it's up to the physicists to waste their time with.
	Sorry, the philosophers.
	Well...
	No, but that's not that's not strictly true because like these things matter because your impression of your ideas of what it is you're seeing dictate the kind of experiments you do and they dictate the way that you receive the data that you have and if you're viewing it incorrectly then you...
	The problem was when you view something you seem to be able to change it especially when we're talking about the quantum world so for people who might not know the very basic example is So the light slit experiment.
	There's two slits.
	You fire photons at a very slow rate so you can see where they're going.
	And you leave the two slits.
	If you don't measure it, you end up with a diffusion pattern.
	And if you measure it, the photons go through the specific slits and you end up with two lumps instead of a diffusion pattern.
	So by observing the experiment, it changes the outcome of the experiment.
	So then it brings up a whole bunch of questions about can we even observe something and have it work?
	Because in the quantum world, everything's crazy.
	And I don't claim to know everything about this.
	I'm bad in quantum physics, but I understood the basic concepts because quantum physics is a crazy subject.
	But the question that was asked is, is colour an intrinsic property of an object?
	And the answer is no.
	What?
	It could be or it couldn't be.
	I don't know the answer.
	I don't know if anyone does.
	How could it be?
	This philosopher says no, and that's an opinion.
	How could it be if it's the wavelength that detects the colour?
	I don't want to get into the argument because I don't care.
	See, I'm just taking this.
	Everyone's going to keep bringing this up in the video comments.
	Hello, my friends from the Lotus Eaters.
	I hope we are well met today.
	I am Prince Mbappe of Agbaloo, an entirely non-fictional country in Western Africa.
	I have since adopted the wisdom of keto fascism and applied its tenets to the governance of our people.
	The results have been nothing but revolutionary.
	We have become the world's largest exporter of sugar, for we deny such vices to our people, not to the heretics of the world.
	My Uncle Raka...
	The fool disagrees with the path our country has embarked upon, and so he has gathered a cadre of like-minded idiots for a coup.
	I do not know which of his is the greatest sin, usurper or infidel.
	I need your help, my friends.
	There is an account with the sum of 30 million British pounds.
	Money to be used in finding safe harbour as my country stabilises.
	I am seeking your permission to remit these funds to your account.
	Your commission shall be 30%.
	I will need delicate information and so I need you to notify me of your acceptance to do this business urgently.
	Godspeed, Lotus Eaters, from a first talking black viewer.
	Thank you for all that you do for the world.
	I am grateful and certain only one of many.
	Man, my cheeks are aching.
	That was so good.
	The commitment to the bit.
	That was so good.
	But yeah, no, I approve of Keto Sharia and obviously being a carb infidel is way worse than Aku.
	So easy question to answer.
	Yeah, John, I sent you a link on Discord.
	I wonder if you can get it up just so I can show the image.
	Because when he's describing himself as the new dictator of keto-fascism, like, there's a certain African dictator I'm imagining he looks like.
	Like, there we go, this guy.
	Mukasa.
	So this is the Central African Republic.
	I think he was a French officer during the French Empire.
	And then when Central Africa got independence...
	He declared himself emperor of the Central African Empire, and then this was his coronation in which he dressed like Napoleon in sweltering heat.
	He's got all this, like, fur on him and stuff.
	I mean, this is basically what the Quito Empire will look like.
	This is what Quito fascism looks like, huh?
	This is the aesthetics you want.
	What's wrong with these aesthetics?
	It's pretty awesome, but I... Exactly!
	What are you talking about?
	If I remember correctly, he spent like a quarter of the yearly budget on this ceremony, and then it collapsed like three years later because they went bankrupt.
	But it's such a meme.
	He should have helped his sugar exports, to be honest.
	Yeah, that's the one thing he did wrong.
	Poison the world with sugar and bring in the money.
	Anyway, let's go back to the video comments.
	I love it again.
	This study collated 50 years of mental health data and cross-referenced it against how individuals mark themselves on a left-right political spectrum.
	The findings showed a significant correlation between left-wing political identity and mental illness, both self-diagnosed and clinical.
	The fact that someone identifies as extremely liberal is a reliable indicator that they have been previously diagnosed with a mental illness.
	Did this guy make the COVID video from yesterday?
	I imagine he did.
	Did we get confirmation of whether I can put that out or not?
	Yeah, he's making a longer version, so it's not just 30 seconds.
	No, but 30 seconds is great.
	I think it was going to be like a minute or something, but either way we can use...
	Yeah, great, because I'll put it out on my non-YouTube platforms, because these videos are great.
	I don't want them to go to our tiny audience.
	I think other people should.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Those things should be going viral.
	I look forward to more.
	Those are amazing, man.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Hi guys, it's Anolo.
	Outdoor comment.
	I'm just wondering what you think about this.
	I've been piecing this together.
	You know how the BLM people after Chauvin was charged, or convicted rather, they all said that George Floyd, that justice would have been George Floyd going home to his family.
	Also that oil guy.
	How was your day at the pub on Monday?
	Mine was great.
	Justice sounds a lot like necromancy.
	It literally can't be done.
	Raise him from the grave and send him home.
	Sorry, we can't do this.
	I wonder where that chap's off to.
	Is he off to the pub as well?
	Yeah.
	I have the idea in my head that literally every day, the Scotsmen, all of them go to the pub.
	Anyway, let's go to the comments.
	Yeah, so Charlie the Beagle says, Hey Carl, in the worlds of comedian Al Murray, if we had no rules, where would we be?
	France!
	If we had too many rules, where would we be?
	Germany!
	We shouldn't insult the French, of course, because they're not here to defend themselves and we know they aren't good at that.
	LAUGHTER Archibald says, Hi, French guy here.
	Just to give a hint about that open letter, I don't think it's France being based.
	I think it's widely viewed as a political move from the far right, so it ensues backlash.
	The only thing it shows is that discontent is growing, and inside the police and army as well, I'm saying, because...
	That because we may be loud, but in the action, progressivism is still winning hard.
	It's the same here, though, to be honest.
	Some of the conservatives are like, ooh, this is bad.
	And yet, here we are brainwashing children and abolishing gender.
	I mean, the reason I didn't consider it a move by the far right is my understanding...
	I mean, again, I'm not French, so please correct me.
	But the outlet that published this had previously interviewed Macron.
	It had been considered a definitely right-wing outlet.
	And also the fact Le Pen had endorsed it.
	So, I mean, I know National Front and Le Pen used to be considered that, but they're practically seeming to be the centre ground of right-wing thought, at least by the polling.
	So, I mean, it seems to be that France's Overton window has shifted, and that is now considered part of it.
	I mean, correct me if I'm wrong.
	Only because of Macron going, you know what, To hell with Muslims.
	Macron's even far right in these letter writers here.
	Jupiter rising.
	MEP Flyboy says, Viva la France!
	Viva la République!
	This powder keg has been smothering for some time now in some cafe where I used to live.
	You would have all sorts of people mingling.
	Now they are commandeered by diverse male-only groups.
	I'll never go back.
	Yeah, I've seen this sort of thing happening where it's Muslim-only cafes and they weren't allowed women in.
	And I was like, oh, tell me more.
	I also love that one there, if France fights France, France is guaranteed to win.
	Yeah, we already addressed that.
	They're also guaranteed to lose, as usual.
	The French general's letter is reminiscent of Powell's rivers of blood speech.
	It kind of is, though, to be honest.
	I mean, if it becomes as true as some of the claims in his rivers of blood speech, if it becomes prophetic, that's the term.
	We can once again say, you know, Powell's wrong.
	It won't be a third of Birmingham that will be immigrant.
	Yeah, it won't just be a civil war, it'll be an internet.
	I'm joking.
	I hope I'm joking.
	Would it be a French civil war or a second revolution?
	Thoughts?
	Well, I mean, the French are on the fifth republic at this point.
	How many revolutions have they had?
	Well, if a new republic is established after every revolution, five.
	But that's not just that revolution.
	You've also got the counter-revolutions against the republic.
	You do.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, I mean, since the 18th century, France has just basically been a perpetual state of revolution.
	It's unresolvable, in my opinion.
	David English says, My worry is that if slash when France does take a stronger attitude to radical Islam, the other elements of immigrant societies that also seek to colonise rather than integrate, then there will be an exodus to the nearest soft-touch country, the UK. No, no, no.
	The nearest soft-touch country is Germany.
	Which, that's fine.
	Yeah.
	We've already seen what happens when the Netherlands...
	They can welcome the new Germans, you see.
	The Netherlands made Somalians feel unwelcome.
	Anyway, going into the Florida Man.
	Student Fishery says, Florida Man is always based.
	Beanie Man thinking of becoming a Florida Man.
	I'm waiting for the based Beanie Gator.
	Based Free Bonga.
	Demosthenes Philippics sound quite familiar if you swap Sparta, Thebes, and Macedon with Russia, Iran, and North Korea and China.
	And do I hear the Sixth Republic or Third Empire?
	Maybe.
	Can you hear the people sing?
	Third Empire.
	I love the bonga meme.
	It's just such a silly name as well.
	Yeah, I don't know why she chose Bonga, but Bonga did nothing wrong.
	It's like Berlusconi's Bonga Bonga parties.
	Yes.
	Gary says, DeSantis signing a law saying his own cities can be sued for not protecting businesses and property is a fantastic flex.
	Yeah, it's amazing, isn't it?
	Karl made a fundamental error assuming that Democrat voters care about wanting the state to help protect their property.
	That's a good point.
	I did make that assumption.
	They're either so rich they can afford a house in a gated community with private guards, or they don't have any property and are now burning down everyone else's because they haven't been given enough gibbs.
	Yeah, but that's kind of the point though, isn't it?
	You know, me saying, well, if you're a reasonable moderate Democrat, then surely you'd be concerned about them burning down property too.
	To which the Democrats go, pfft, we don't resemble that remark!
	And it's like, well, there we go.
	Point proven.
	You're either ultra-elite or you're part of the underclass who wants the Gibbs.
	And that's not good for Americans, is it?
	Regular, normal Americans.
	I certainly think this is true of the politicians and the activist base for that party.
	But I must say, of the general voters, I've got more sympathy, though, because a lot of people will probably just be dipping out of politics and they don't really know much about it.
	Yeah, but if it helps, they probably all died 100 years ago.
	What do you mean?
	Don't worry.
	It's a joke I'm not going to get, is it?
	What do you mean?
	It's a joke about the legitimacy of the election, Callum.
	Oh, oh.
	James Stevens.
	I'll never be able to mock Florida again with DeSantis showing everyone up like this.
	I know.
	I know.
	It's mad.
	Florida man is making sense, what fresh hell have we arrived in?
	Screw it, let's go!
	Yeah, I mean, let's...
	The Floridian Empire.
	Let it rise, that's what I say.
	Because I love the meme as well, because the meme is, isn't it in Florida you can't report names, so people have to put Florida man does X? No, no, no, it's not that.
	What it is, is in Florida, in most states, police reports aren't public, but in Florida they are.
	So if the journalists are just having a slow news day, they just go and look up the police reports, what's happened?
	Florida man caught shagging gator, you know, or something like that.
	But the meme is that the Florida man is a single man.
	So not only has he shagged the gator, he's done all the rest of it, now he's running for Congress and he's going to run for president.
	Yeah, but I mean, if another state had this, it'd be Oklahoma man does X, but you don't hear about all that because it's not public.
	But in Florida, it's like, okay, well, Florida man's on the march.
	But I love the idea that the Florida man is the same man throughout.
	All the crimes, all of them, and then also Ronda Santos is all the same guy.
	Live the hell of life.
	Kelly says, dishwasher is delightful to be compared with...
	is delightful compared with individual with cervix.
	Yeah, that's a great point, actually.
	Like, you know, I'm making, like...
	Person who bleeds.
	Yeah, cheesy, old-school, like, you know, Bernard Manning-style jokes.
	You know, silly stuff that's ridiculous and obviously has no teeth to it.
	But, like, I actually hate the left-wing language.
	Yeah, individual cervix.
	Menstruator.
	You know, just call them, you know, wet-ass...
	The UN tweeted out, what was it, people who bleed?
	I saw women retweeting this, like, just call me a whore.
	I'm done with this.
	This is ridiculous.
	Anything is better than that.
	Person who bleeds.
	Yeah, but that's Kelly's point.
	Individual with cervix.
	Oh, God.
	You know, the left has the opposite effect on me.
	They've got me reminiscing about old-school misogyny, like, ah, those were the days.
	I'll set up and get back in the kitchen now.
	I'll tell you, one of my favourite things is the young women, like on TikTok and Instagram and stuff, being like, you know, I could be baking banana bread right now, but no, I have to write a 10-page essay, you know, because I just wanted to get married, and I'm not allowed to do that now because someone wanted equality, women, meh!
	And then, you know, as they go off to the...
	And it's like, yes, you know...
	You have to understand it's the feminists.
	My wife calls her friends bro.
	Anything can be gender neutral if you don't stick it up your butt.
	That's a good point.
	It's a good point raising the gender discussion.
	Why is it the boys being told it's okay to cry like girls rather than girls being told it's not okay to cry like boys?
	Let's knock men down but raise women up.
	Exactly.
	John says, I can't even tell them to get back to the kitchen because I'm a better cook.
	Oof, rough.
	Ladies, are you going to stand for that?
	Are you going to stand for John out-cooking you?
	Come on.
	Let's get some dinner going on and I'll be the judge.
	I mean, you've got to think like, no, I'm not going to make that joke.
	I'll tell you that one after.
	Women are also more likely to get serious knee ligament injuries in football.
	Well, you see, we can't distinguish between men and women now, so that's not a true statement.
	According to research, they are more likely to occur during that period, higher levels of estrogen being listed as a contributing factor.
	You know it must be true, as even the woke BBC reported on it after Jordan Nobbs ripped her ACL in 2018, meaning she missed the 2019 World Cup.
	I... I have no idea because I don't follow football, but yeah, I mean, it's just, unfortunately, one of those facts of life that women are just not built as robustly as men.
	I'm sorry that nature is counter-revolutionary.
	Brian says, in Texas we say good morning y'all.
	Texas, leading the world in non-gendered language.
	Are you sure?
	Because I get the feeling with all of those Californian colonists you've got.
	You probably say something in a much more whiny, nasally tone and complain, presumably, about Republicans.
	Chris Simone says, when I was growing up, my dad taught me not to cry, not because I'm a guy and I'm not allowed to show emotion, but because being able to control one's emotions is important.
	Why is that hard for people to understand that?
	Exactly, Chris.
	Exactly.
	You're no use to anyone else.
	You've lost control of yourself.
	Get control of yourself.
	It's good for you because that's good for everyone else around you.
	Kekistani Freedom Fight says, if I go back to the country of my birth, my children would be brainwashed with Islam in the school system.
	If I stay here, they'll be brainwashed with cultural Marxism.
	What should I do?
	I don't know.
	I don't think we have a good answer.
	But I hear the French generals are recruiting, so, you know, I'll see you there.
	Henry Ashman says, I want to say that child heroes are why it was a mistake to ban beating disobedient kids, but that would only make it worse as the communists doing the indoctrination would be able to beat the communism into them.
	Also, I've seen the Olympics.
	I wish I could run like a black.
	I disavow.
	Isn't there an Olympic commentator who got fired for saying something like that?
	Like, I think it was one white guy, and then a load of black guys doing, like, the 100-meter sprint, and he was like, yeah, good luck to the white guy, and then you're fired.
	Oh, man.
	And a black person won the race.
	Yeah, they did, actually.
	Yeah, of course they did.
	Oh, man.
	Ross Diggle says, there would probably be even more than a 50% head injury rate in mixed football teams to the women, as males put more power into the football than the women will.
	Ooh, that's a great point, actually.
	And not just that, other collisions and tackles and things like that.
	There's probably going to be way more injuries.
	Christopher says, Hi chaps.
	The 30 year old, recently single, future HGV driver here.
	Hello again.
	Following yesterday's dadism sermon, you pondered mistakes that men can make.
	Having had time to reflect on my 8 year relationship, I realised I wasn't really very happy for the last 3 years of it.
	I'm sure my ex would have said the same.
	We were so used to each other's company, while not really wanting to advance the next stages of marriage and family.
	I made the mistake of giving in to mediocre comfort that felt good at the time, but did not benefit either of us in the long run, and now I wish I had the mental fortitude to end it when it became obvious we were going nowhere.
	As the father of dadism states, That's true.
	Good points.
	Rowan says, Guys, I'm thoroughly enjoying the commentary.
	Enough to consider upgrading from bronze to silver or gold.
	Would you be kind enough to spend a moment to mention the perks of both?
	Thanks in advance.
	What perks do we offer for silver?
	John, can we get that up on the screen so I can see?
	I can never remember.
	We're supposed to think of something to do for the silver perk, the silver upgrade, but I can never remember what it is, and we've got nothing sensible to do.
	Yeah, something not terribly good.
	We need a better one, right.
	I mean, I love the way we're saying no advertisements.
	You don't have any advertisements on the entire site.
	So, you know, you get no advertisements for free.
	The tracking of the articles.
	Guys, give us ideas of what we can do for silver-tier subscribers.
	Because the bronze tier, obviously, you get access to all the premium content.
	You get to leave your comments on the articles.
	Good stuff.
	The Silver Tier, you get track artists who've read, which is not a brilliant feature.
	But the Gold Tier, of course, you can send us the video questions for the podcast and live streams, and all of the other things before.
	So that seems like a fairly decent amount, right?
	And then you can join us for the Gold Tier Hangouts as well.
	And so we need something for the Silver Tier.
	On the advertising front, I wanted to mention the conversation we had before we started.
	Stop putting fake adverts up.
	They haven't paid us to put these adverts up.
	Yeah, just start putting up fake adverts and being like, I'll take these down when you pay me.
	It's just like, yes, this podcast is sponsored by Yorkshire Gold.
	Yorkshire Gold, the drink of the...
	The drink of the far right.
	The drink of the anti-woke brigade.
	And they're like, no, no, you can't do that.
	We'll pay us.
	I don't know if that's illegal or not, though, so it would be funny.
	But yeah, so the silver, we're still struggling to think of something, but the gold is much, much, much better because you can join our monthly Zoom calls and you can send us video comments.
	Honestly, I'm so glad I thought of the video comments thing because everyone's making such good use of them.
	I really appreciate it.
	Anyway, White Hot Peppers, hey dude, she says, I'm not sure if it's true, but there are rumours going around that GigaChad has died from a car accident.
	What?
	I'll check.
	How can the emperor of mankind die?
	I've seen several articles saying he's died, but no verified articles so far, so I'm sceptical.
	His name is Ernest Kalimov, and he's a towering 6'8", and only 21, and he is a Russian bodybuilder, obviously.
	Let's hope he's okay and will get to live the rest of his life in giga-chan peace and keep wetting pussies around the globe.
	6'8"?
	With a chin like that?
	It's not true, is it?
	I don't know.
	I can't find any sources confirming it.
	But just...
	I mean, if anyone was a prime candidate for being the future emperor of mankind, it would have been him.
	Rumbled.
	Yeah, Chris Wolfe.
	As displayed by the COVID response, society has forgotten its will to fight.
	I'm curious of how big an impact World War II has on the genetic pool of the planet.
	An enormous proportion of men and women who display grit and honour have their genes removed from the gene pool.
	Has there been another war that has drawn so many conscientious people from the gates of hell?
	Could it be that that black hole of honour has seriously crippled our global will, albeit subconsciously?
	I wouldn't say that that's the case.
	I would suggest that...
	The problem is demoralization that has happened.
	I don't think it's actually that there would be less conscientious people.
	It's just they're not allowed to be patriotic and conscientious in that way.
	Ross says, does the Olympian woman know that Bonga is possibly single?
	He will probably earn less than her, but as she said herself, she only has a year till her face melts.
	I think Bonga's got probably a girlfriend by now.
	He seemed like a great guy, that was the thing.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Right, so this is all just a rumour.
	Hopefully...
	I mean, he'd kill the car anyway, so...
	Yeah, how can he be killed in a car accident when the car would be destroyed by his presence?
	Yeah.
	Jordan Chandler says, That is a great point, and one that I think we did make in the podcast.
	It is...
	It's unbelievable that they can look at the history and political philosophical development of Europe and be like, yeah, white.
	Imagine saying that about Africa.
	Just black.
	I might just say Asia, just Chinese.
	I mean, Americans, I mean, sorry to be rude, but they can be difficult at the best of times with not discriminating.
	So, I mean, like Africa as a country, which you've seen sometimes, it's just like, oh, God, please stop.
	It's a very big country.
	And the same with, like, the European Union's a country, right?
	I mean, like, in the less intelligent parts.
	But also there is this problem, of course, as you say, that it's just white culture.
	It's like, what are you even talking about?
	You'd never say that about black people.
	Actually, they probably would sometimes.
	But you would never say that in Europe either.
	Like, if you come to Europe, you're not like, ah, I'm enjoying white culture.
	What?
	Where are you?
	I'm in Prague.
	You know, it's exactly the same as Valencia.
	What are you talking about?
	Yes, well, I went to Sicily and I felt like I was in Scotland.
	Shut up, dunce.
	There is something weird about the cultural remoteness of the United States.
	Yeah.
	Regarding the Aussie woman from yesterday, I don't think the issue stems from being the higher earner in the household.
	I do concede that the man being the breadwinner is desirable, but the problem in that story comes from her being a disgustingly materialist person focused on the opinions of others and her inability to communicate with her boyfriend.
	Any woman that falls for her hypergamous instincts while in a fulfilling and long-term relationship marks her as an undesirable human being that should not be trusted.
	I mean, basically true, but...
	I don't really disagree with any of that, actually.
	And I agree that it's not inherently because she earns more money than the boyfriend.
	It's because the boyfriend...
	If, say, she's on 50 grand a year and the boyfriend's on 40 grand a year, they can probably live quite a high lifestyle, and that's probably not the problem.
	So I agree that that's not the case.
	But I think that, just generally, if the situation had been reversed and the boyfriend was significantly higher earning than she was, This may have been avoided.
	But, I mean, that would have been bad for Bonga.
	So it's good for Bonga that this did happen.
	It's good that it happened and now Bonga is free.
	Yeah, don't be sad that it's over.
	James Cole says, Carl, have you ever considered how your keto sharia is in fact anti-English and anti-British?
	Yes.
	You are openly discriminated against the institutions of fish and chips.
	Well, hang on a second.
	So I was like, oh, fish and chips, that's proud British culture.
	But then I was told that it was brought by Jewish immigrants.
	I was like, well, that's gone.
	Yeah, the method of cooking was created in a Jewish ghetto in London, actually.
	Yeah.
	And so I just basically listened to the left and then like, shepherd and cottage pies, steak and ale pies, Victoria's sponges, all which helped fuel this country and its empire.
	Yeah, but unfortunately, James, the thing is, I spoke to the leftists and they were like, yeah, well, none of these things are British.
	And it's like, well, there we go then.
	Which is, of course, nonsense.
	Of course it's nonsense.
	Just because some Jews in a ghetto invented the method of cooking, it comes from Britain.
	There is no other place you can say it came from.
	Yeah, I've got to stick to chicken tikka masala.
	But, I mean, that's probably fine.
	Yeah, that's probably fine.
	And the rice, though?
	Well, the sauce and the chicken, that's all fine.
	I can't have rice, but try growing rice in Britain.
	Well, you're going to be like, rice is traditional British food.
	Of course it's not.
	But I'm not going to repent my keto, James.
	Rose says, I've been pondering your comment from yesterday that people are not born with moral sense and must be taught it.
	Yeah, that was me really channeling Heimline.
	That's his view.
	And I actually totally agree with that, to be honest.
	What the hell's going on my throat today?
	Certainly, I agree that many, if not most people, have no innate sense of morality.
	However, I wonder, if no one does, how did we as humans come to have moral standards at all?
	How did the first moral principle become established in our infancy if our species of no human being had a nimble sense of right and wrong?
	In the same way that we learned how to read and write.
	It was useful.
	Or anything new.
	So an invention of this era is something that is new.
	You invent it.
	Yeah.
	And you develop it.
	And, you know, it's a technology.
	Morality is a technology.
	And like all things, the thing is, though, right, so I don't want to just be so cut and dried, because there probably is something like an innate sense of morality or an innate sense of, like, Well, biological things can make that, like empathy, for example.
	Most humans have some level of empathy.
	Good and bad, and just desirable and undesirable.
	But that's not enough.
	Yeah, that's not, like, moral philosophy.
	And, like, really early on, like, kids really do have to be taught, you know, to share and to not steal and to not push each other over and stuff like this.
	You know, it's because they're just walking bags of ego.
	Well, but even though there's many, many adults...
	Oh yeah, who definitely need those lessons too.
	Never mind when you have a society that doesn't have any of the inbuilt institutions like Britain or the West has, and then the entire society is still like those children.
	I mean, John's pointing out that children's first instinct is fairness.
	If you give a kid more than...
	Another kid, then they'll know that this is unfair and it's been selfish.
	Yeah, that's true.
	But what we would consider to be a rational moral standard is definitely not innate.
	We've got to develop those.
	You know that selfish kids just don't give a toss?
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, I mean, most toddlers...
	When they're two or three, they don't really interact with each other.
	They don't think about each other in the way that adult friends think about each other.
	They're just things that exist, moving objects that exist in the world.
	My mother used to call it the mine stage, in which they're just like, that's mine, this blanket is mine, this is mine.
	Yeah, they're very capitalist.
	It's very imperialist, actually.
	Like, none of this belongs to me, it's mine now, why?
	I'm here.
	Possession is knight under the law, Dad.
	Annie says, A friend called me a person who menstruates the other day as if it's a normal thing to say.
	Oh my God.
	That's just awful.
	Pretty jarring and gross hearing Twitter language IRL, especially in a little northern town.
	Could you imagine that conversation?
	Because usually you'd have, I don't know what the conversation was, but maybe it was...
	What do they call men?
	No, but like a discussion in which, like, oh, as a woman, how do you feel?
	Imagine if they turn around, oh, as a person who menstruates, how do you feel?
	It's like, what?
	What?
	Yeah, but if we allow this, what are they going to call us?
	So, Callum, as a person who ejaculates, how do you feel about this?
	God.
	What a disgusting...
	Definition of yourself.
	Yeah, exactly.
	You are your bodily fluids.
	You excrete.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Yeah, okay.
	Which bodily fluids do you have again?
	It's awful.
	It's such a gross way of describing a human.
	And again, reducing you to merely your bodily functions is totally materialistic.
	As far as I'm concerned, Annie is a person.
	Is that not gendered language, though, still?
	Like saying a person who menstruates?
	No, it's describing a bodily function, isn't it?
	Yeah, but a person who ejaculates...
	So they could say you can apply gendered language to that.
	So I could apply...
	A person who menstruates could be a man.
	Man being a piece of gendered language.
	A person who menstruates being the scientific language.
	Sure, but I think the intersectionals are making a mistake there if they do want the fascist world that they're aiming for.
	Which is you want no gendered language whatsoever.
	I feel like that explanation isn't in line with the revolution.
	It's not...
	There's nothing that...
	concept of man and woman that requires menstruation right women at points in their lives or females at points in their lives you know people who call women don't menstruate and when they get to certain ages and things like this and so it's just i just hate the fact that it's reducing someone to merely their biological function because then you're saying that the the mind the will the the essence of the thing the consciousness of the person is actually not very important
	you know because that's when you say man and woman you're not referring strictly speaking exclusively to their just raw biological material Child bearer!
	Come here!
	Exactly!
	Exactly!
	And that's why Annie was always like, just call me a dishwasher, you know?
	I think there's more dignity ascribed to the individual.
	It sounds like the most barbarian patriarchal society, which is just like, yes, person who births a child.
	That's all you are to me.
	Jesus Christ.
	Anyway, we're out of time, so we're going to end off here.
	But as I say, go over to lodoses.com.
	You can sign up for premium for £5 a month on the bronze tier.
	They get you access to all the premium content, such as the articles I was mentioning.
	The funniest one, I have to say, with Josh's.
	The fact that that lady who called up the cops was like, yes, help me, there's a black man, and then got annoyed about it.
	So also, we did an interview with Richard Tice earlier today, which we'll be putting up.
	Also, you did an interview with Calvin Robinson.
	Yes.
	Get the name wrong myself as well, which we'll be putting up when they're edited.
	Also, God, so much stuff this week.
	It's been good, hasn't it?
	We went down to the Freedom March, me and John, and we filmed it.
	We've put together an abridged version of that for people who didn't get to go.
	That should be on the site and the alternative social media platforms.
	Won't be on the mainstream ones because they'll ban it.
	And that'll be up at 3pm.
	But otherwise, God, we have too much stuff to plug.
	I'm just going to end.
	We will see you tomorrow at 1 o'clock UK time.

▲