Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 9, 2020 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:26:22

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #13

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Today I'm joined by Hugo and we have a huge show planned out for you today because it seems that the Trump campaign has launched a giant multi-front offensive on the media narrative and the assertion that Joe Biden is the president-elect and has won the election.
	Man, am I glad to be going through all of this stuff.
	This is huge.
	So, up until this point, it seems to the outside observer that the election has very much gone Joe Biden's way because of various anomalies.
	And the media confirming him, in their words, as president-elect, and the transition process at least beginning, funds being unlocked for his campaign, so it seemed like things were in process.
	But this is where it comes to a kind of screeching halt, and then things get ground down into the legal process, which I think is a very, very good thing to happen.
	So, we begin with a judge in Pennsylvania blocking the Pennsylvania certification, because this happened the day before yesterday, I believe it was.
	But Judge Patricia McClellan, I can't pronounce that, ordered the state not to take any further steps to complete the certification of the presidential race, which the state announced on Tuesday, and blocked the certification of all other election results.
	And going over to Nevada.
	Again, this is important because a bunch of lawsuits had previously been thrown out for not having evidence or things like this.
	And it looked a lot like, frankly, it just didn't want to be seen.
	So it's good in the next one that Nevada court has allowed Trump to actually present this evidence.
	A judge set a December 3rd hearing date and is allowing 15 depositions.
	And the campaign plans to present evidence that could result in the rejection of tens of thousands of mail-in ballots in Democratic-Clark County, where Biden ballots outnumbered Trump ballots by 91,000, according to the Washington Examiner.
	It's all fantastic.
	The Gateway Pundit has published an article that says that Pennsylvania, Michigan and Arizona are going to announce election fraud hearings.
	So they're going to hold election fraud hearings in the coming days.
	These were three swing states.
	In Pennsylvania, for example, Trump was ahead by nearly 700,000 votes at midnight, and the Democrats came back by a million votes by the next morning.
	So there's definitely good reasons to be concerned there.
	The Michigan Supreme Court has recommended an independent audit.
	Ruth Johnson, Michigan's immediate past Secretary of State, who testified that given the very concerning allegations and issues raised by plaintiffs, she believes that it would be proper for an independent audit to be conducted as soon as possible to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the election.
	And no matter how you vote, all you really need is to make sure that the voting system has its integrity.
	So this should not be a partisan concern.
	In the article they say, So, excellent.
	She's indicated her agency will conduct a post-election performance audit in Wayne County, which is all good.
	Then we have Trump legal adviser Jordan Sekaloo announcing a new election fraud litigation in Georgia.
	This is going to be filed next week.
	He says Monday or Tuesday and hasn't given us any specific details, but he says it's nothing that we have talked about before.
	It's not related to what you've heard in the press conference either, which we'll talk about shortly, Giuliani's Gettysburg Address.
	This is something completely separate, but I'll have to tell you the new litigation.
	The Lieutenant Governor of Georgia, the Secretary of State of Georgia, they're in for quite a shock on Monday and Tuesday about how poorly run and they ran.
	There's going to be proof of how poorly they ran the elections in one of their major counties.
	This is coming Monday or Tuesday.
	So, very exciting stuff.
	And then you have another Trump lawyer called Lin Wood, who is subpoenaing the CCTV video footage of the Georgia vote count videos, because he claims to have seen the videos of election fraud taking place on the tape.
	The video camera does not lie, as he says.
	And so, yes, it's important also to point out that this thing in Georgia that you just talked about, that's, as you said, something different from what Giuliani does.
	And what Giuliani does is also something different from what Sidney Powell does.
	And that's what I'm going to talk about later as well.
	Yeah, yeah.
	So this is a screeching halt.
	The brakes have been put on.
	the sort of media cavalcade to try and rush biden ahead as swiftly as possible um this is not being very well reported but we won't talk about how the media is reacting to this yet um we'll move on to rudy giuliani's gettysburg address where he he lays out his case now this was a what three and a half Something like that.
	Hearing.
	And this was actually a genuinely amazing watch.
	I stayed up late to watch it last night because I was actually kind of enjoying the atmosphere of it.
	It was very interesting how it provides a kind of top-to-bottom section of...
	All of the people who are very concerned about what's happened here.
	I mean, in the hearing, you have elected officials, senators, election observers, then you have expert witness testimony, then you just have the regular people who are there trying to cast their votes and the testimony from them about how their ballots were being essentially stolen from them.
	And then, about two-thirds of the way through, three-quarters of the way through, Donald Trump calls in from the Oval Office, and they have to put him on speakerphone, but he gives a sort of ten-minute, just an overview, but a kind of...
	But he lays down the fundamental points of the narrative, and it's important, I think, that all of these people who are very important, they're elected representatives, and presumably they know what they're doing, are just openly calling this fraud and saying that the election was stolen.
	This is definitely the sort of narrative the Republicans should be running with in the face of the vast amount of evidence that seems to have been presented.
	I mean, in this hearing, they go through loads of different stuff.
	Hundreds of thousands of ballots were added without being observed.
	This is illegal.
	Poll watchers were intimidated and made unable to observe by being kept at a large distance from what they're supposed to be observing.
	One woman, who I think she said she was a Democrat, but obviously not part of the club, says she was bullied and intimidated.
	And the Republican poll watchers had to essentially step in to protect her, because she was told to sit down and shut up and know her place.
	You know, just let this happen, is the phrase she used.
	There were allegations of the servers being connected to the internet, that malware was found on them.
	That one Pennsylvania voting station was broken into, 30 USB sticks were stolen, and a laptop was stolen.
	So really, really, really bad concerns.
	Can we go to the next one?
	I think it is.
	So this is a great clip from the thing.
	If we can just play that, please.
	Cheating that went on here.
	I'll give you one other enormously puzzling statistic.
	You sent out, in the state of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1,823, 148 absentee or mail-in ballots.
	You received back 1.4 million, approximately.
	However, in the count for president, you counted 2.5 million.
	I don't know what accounts for that 700,000 difference between the number of ballots you sent out and the number of ballots that ended up in the count.
	That number, 2,589,242, was on your government website until yesterday.
	And yesterday it was removed without explanation.
	I'm going to be very interested in hearing what the explanation is.
	And I can't imagine you could possibly certify without knowing the explanation of that.
	As well as the explanation to the 22,686 mail-in ballots that were returned on the day they were mailed.
	That's a trick.
	Okay, stop in there, because this in and of itself is just monumental.
	Trump was down by 700,000.
	He was ahead, sorry, by 700,000 in Pennsylvania come midnight.
	And like he says, where do these other 700,000 come from, especially when it exceeds the number of mail-in ballots that were sent out?
	I don't know how this goes on, but I noticed the very uncomfortable smirk of the guy of Mastriana.
	I don't know who that is either, but apparently he's a representative of Pennsylvania.
	Well, no, he's the Pennsylvania senator who organized this hearing.
	So, you know, I don't think he's part of the clique that's against it.
	But yeah, I mean, this just seems like you couldn't certify that kind of election.
	What are you going to do?
	How do you explain it?
	It has to be explained.
	That you can get 700,000 more ballots back than were sent.
	That's just...
	It's ridiculous, isn't it?
	It's just ridiculous.
	It's clownishly transparent how falsified this appears to be.
	But then we get this clip from the hearing, which, again, is another...
	One of those clips where it's like, you just...
	You can't say there's no evidence.
	Let's go for this one.
	so at the very very beginning of the uh the chart where there's a circle it says on election day uh what that indicates is there is a spike in uh loaded votes uh 337 000 plus or minus of some votes that were added in there in one big batch so that was an anomaly in the reporting normally you would expect to see A smooth curve going up, not any big spikes.
	That's kind of what Greg was talking about, the anomalies of loading and uploading those votes.
	So that big spike that occurs there is a prime indicator of fraudulent voting.
	And that's 604,000 votes in 90 minutes.
	Is that right?
	Correct.
	This is 337,000 votes in that period of time.
	Yes.
	And when you look at this entire curve, with all these spikes, can you calculate how much of a vote that accounted for for Biden and how much for Trump?
	Close to $600,000.
	I think our figures are about $570,000 that all those spikes represent over time.
	For Biden?
	Correct.
	And how much for Trump?
	I think it was a little over $3,200.
	The reaction of the crowd says it all.
	It's a ridiculous, ridiculous proposition to suggest that, in Pennsylvania as well, which is not an anti...
	If this was California or something, or New York, you'd be like, okay, maybe.
	Maybe that could be the case.
	Maybe Trump is just that unpopular in those places, even though I would dispute that.
	But 570,000 for Biden with 3,200 Trump is ridiculous.
	Then we get to Trump calling in.
	I don't think we actually need to play Trump calling in because you know what his position on this is because he's said it many times.
	But it was the way that everyone...
	Again, there was a definite feeling of solidity to this.
	This was the elected representatives, the president himself, the regular people, all getting the younger looks.
	Something really stinks about this.
	And so we have to actually be serious about taking proper action about this.
	It also looked way more professional and organised and representative than the thing in front of the garage.
	Yes, it did.
	Although, I've got to say, part of the charm of watching this that I really enjoyed, and I realise this is just me talking personally, was the fact that there were several technical glitches or several appearances of regular folk who just...
	Here's my testimony.
	And one was a little old deer who...
	She was just speaking normally.
	She wasn't trying to be professional, so she's just outraged.
	And someone's like, yeah, that's my mum.
	And it felt very domestic, and I mean that in the highest compliment, rather than the soulless corporate presentation Biden and Kamala Harris have.
	This feels real.
	These are all real human people.
	It felt like the revolt of the Americans against the internationalists.
	Which is a very, very gratifying scene.
	It needs to happen.
	They have to understand.
	I mean, Rudy Giuliani isn't from Pennsylvania.
	He's not like someone from Georgia.
	But all these people are sort of understanding they've got to be on the same team.
	But speaking of Senator Doug Mastriano, who organized it, Twitter decided...
	Sorry, I moved this link earlier, but don't worry about it.
	Twitter suspended his account after the hearing.
	I don't actually know why, but it's just, okay, you're gone.
	So there we go.
	That's that.
	And there's been a bunch of other evidence that's emerged and allegations that have come out that I think is worth going through just at the end of this.
	This isn't necessarily part of the hearing, but it's worth doing.
	Lin Wood, again, one of Trump's lawyers, posted videos that he alleges shows that ballots are being destroyed.
	These were sent to them by workers at a company called A1 Shredding, That was hired by Democratic politicians to shred some ballots, allegedly.
	But the response from the Cobb County authorities is that this was actually non-germain materials.
	These just weren't relevant.
	It's nothing that's relevant.
	Don't worry.
	Don't look at the pictures of the ballots appearing to be shredded.
	These were just envelopes, or this is something we just didn't need, whatever it is.
	By the way, has the disclaimer always been red in the dark mode?
	No, I think it's been made new.
	So it was moved from blue to red to make it more eye-catchy?
	Yes, I think so, yeah.
	To make it more alarming.
	Yeah, that's how it looks, right?
	If you scroll up, John, a little bit, you can see the...
	Up a bit, sorry.
	You can see the disclaimer being in red.
	It's now in red, not in blue.
	Yeah, that's interesting.
	That's a very recent change, I guess.
	But yeah, again, I'm not sure whether it's just a night mode thing.
	But as you can see, a statement issued by A1 Shreds.
	We believe strongly in the democratic process and feel all Georgians and all Americans have to have confidence in the process.
	So they contacted Georgia's SOS Division of Elections as well as the FBI for assistance.
	But again, the Cobb County authorities just said, no, this is all stuff that wasn't relevant.
	Just trust us, bro.
	It's like, I don't think I will, actually, since you're the one being accused.
	It was just McDonald's lunch receipts.
	Yeah, exactly.
	That's exactly it.
	This just wasn't relevant.
	So it's like, hmm, I don't think I will.
	The next one is Matt Brainard, who's a Trump campaign strategist, tweeted out that there have been claims that the postal facilities have been disguised as apartments in Georgia that were used for absentee ballots.
	So, like, when they say, oh, this is an absentee ballot from this apartment, that apartment, from the postal studies, actually, no.
	Like, this appears, again, to be very suspicious.
	Just adding to the general stink.
	The former Attorney General of Kansas said that in Wisconsin, they found more than 10,000 Republican ballots that were uncounted, more than 10,000 GOP voters who had their ballots requested and filled in by another person, and around 100,000 illegal ballots that were counted anyway.
	That was reported by the Epoch Times.
	This is Night Mode 2 and it's blue, so...
	Yeah, well, that's interesting, yeah.
	Then you have concerned citizens who found that they could check the open data on Pennsylvania, I think this was, and found that a bunch of ballots, and Giuliani mentioned this in his press conference, but the reason I'm bringing this up is a bunch of ballots he found that were returned before they were sent, but the reason I'm bringing this up is a bunch of ballots he found that were returned before they were You know, I don't know how they did this.
	But shortly afterwards, that data set was just removed from the website.
	So it's just like, okay, just...
	Don't worry about that.
	Nothing to see here, folks.
	Move along.
	So we will move along.
	There was another chap who found that...
	He went through the New York Times' data on election night and found...
	And this was in Pennsylvania, I believe.
	And yeah, Pennsylvania, which Dominion serves 14 of the counties in that state.
	And they just actually took the calculations and the count from the New York Times, individual stamped entries, and you can see that Trump is losing votes at different points.
	On the third, he loses 17,000 and Biden gains 17,000.
	Then you can see that the grey graph is where the vote count updates and Trump loses votes, and Biden gains votes correspondingly.
	It's just...
	Really makes you think.
	How do you lose votes when literally all it is is addition?
	Like, when you're counting votes, there's no subtraction.
	So how does this happen?
	It's 100,000 too.
	Yeah, it's a huge, huge number.
	So it's one of those things where it's like, right, well, and this, we're coming up to the crack and stuff in a minute.
	This makes, it just really makes the noggin jog, doesn't it?
	It really gets you thinking.
	And then you have to ask yourself about the accusations around a one Eric Kuma, Which, what a name.
	What a name.
	So, apparently, Eric Coomer was the Dominion Voting System's Vice President of US Engineering, and he apparently spoke with Antifa members on conference calls, reportedly assuring the other participants when they were asked that Trump was not going to win.
	He was listed very recently on Dominion's website.
	If we scroll down a little bit, you can see him listed on Dominion's website, but this has recently been scrubbed.
	And again, the constant scrubbing of public information, this, to me, is you know you've been caught.
	But in an interview conducted with Michelle Malkin, the FEC, the Faith Education Commerce United founder, Joe Altman, reveals how he infiltrated Antifa.
	While working undercover, Altman said that he was involved in a conversation with Antifa members, When he discovered that Eric from Dominion, who was allegedly part of the chat during the week he was in, when someone asked, what are we going to do if fucking Trump wins?
	And Altman paraphrased how Eric responded.
	He said, don't worry about the election.
	Trump's not going to win.
	I made fucking sure of that.
	Very interesting.
	There's a YouTube link that's next that is Eric Kuma explaining how the ballots can be adjudicated by hand with Dominion, as in whoever is controlling it can manually alter the votes on there and things like that.
	But that's not really the interesting part.
	I mean, you know, that might be absolutely nothing.
	It might be all above the board.
	Because, I mean, if we were going to be alleging any kind of malfeasance here, it would be buried in the software, so it wouldn't ever see human eyes, right?
	Human hand would never touch it.
	I just wanted to point out that the source previously shown was Neonetal.
	That's not exactly a credible website in most cases, but this information has also been confirmed independently as well.
	Actually, in the Kraken, a lot of the things are mentioned there too, so this is not just something that should be discarded just because it's there.
	I feel I should speak in Neil Nettles' defence here.
	I've seen multiple articles of theirs where I've checked it myself, and they've been sound.
	And they are just presenting the allegations here.
	They're not saying that this has been confirmed or anything like that.
	They're actually being quite reasonable, so I just wanted to...
	Speak in their defence.
	There's nothing inaccurate about the reporting as far as I can tell.
	But yeah, the thing with Eric is that he seems to be one of those people who is suffering from extreme Trump derangement syndrome.
	He appears to be a radical leftist.
	I mean, he's had loads of Facebook posts and various other social media posts.
	If we can go to the next one, it's incredibly blurry because, again, he seems to have purged his social media.
	But as you can see, he's...
	I mean, I disagree with you Trump supporters on many philosophical grounds, but respect your opinions.
	Only an absolute fucking idiot could ever vote for that windbag, fucktard, fascist, racist fuck.
	No bullshit.
	I don't give a damn if you're a friend, family, or random acquaintance.
	Pull the lever, mark an oval touchscreen for that carnival barker.
	They keep using that phrase.
	Unfriend me now.
	I have no desire whatsoever to interact with you.
	You are beyond hope, beyond reason.
	You are controlled by fear, reaction, and bullshit.
	Well, that sounds like projection, doesn't it, Eric?
	So, there's that.
	Basically, orange man fascist.
	Cheeto Hitler.
	If we can get to the next one...
	You can see him posting things like, what was it, Fuck the USA, which is a nice patriotic song that he posted, and there is also a defense of Antifa that he has posted to his social media if we can go to the next one.
	Not that one, but it's okay.
	He, uh...
	What's...
	Yeah, so...
	It's, um, this is, like, the most suspicious set of circumstances that you could devise if you were writing a script for a movie or a book or something.
	Like, you would be putting these things in in order to indicate to the audience this is the guy...
	This is foreshadowing.
	This whole thing is transparent.
	This guy clearly has the motive and he has the access.
	He seems to genuinely be a part of something highly suspicious.
	In words he is alleged to have said, he made sure of it.
	And so at this point, I think we've set the stage sufficiently to go on to the Kraken.
	Yeah.
	I mean, this came out just for the Americans at about midnight last night.
	Yeah.
	And so we had to read through it and we'll just present what's in there.
	So this is going to be kind of a summary of what it is, what is there, and most importantly what they allege, right?
	They have some...
	Witnesses, some kind of evidence of all the things that they are saying, but this is for the court to decide whether that's credible or not.
	Obviously, from just their statements, you can't tell what they left out and things like that.
	So this is...
	Just to be clear as well, I haven't read through this yet.
	I spent my morning preparing the other stuff.
	So Hugo's right there.
	So this will all be a surprise to me.
	Yeah, so I just wanted to preempt it with saying that this is not confirmed.
	This is what the one side is saying.
	So this is without the defense's case.
	This is the first step into the courtroom, yeah.
	Exactly.
	So the plaintiffs are Republican electors and members of the local Republican Party from various counties in Georgia.
	So this is all happening in Georgia and this is basically limited to that state.
	It's the defendants who are they alleging against.
	The governor of Georgia, the secretary of state, and then the people who were kind of involved in the election and in the counting process.
	In the beginning, they say that the standards set by the Georgia Supreme Court for this case Based on some previous precedent is preponderance of evidence, which in this case means that they need to show that enough votes were irregular to make some kind of a difference.
	They don't need to show how the votes would have been or who they would have voted for if they were actually regular.
	That's not what they need to show.
	show, they just need to show that there were irregularities convincingly and that it was not just like two or three votes, but something that actually matters.
	Right.
	Right.
	And so I'm going to go through the evidence point by point.
	It's a lawsuit, so it's numbered paragraphs, so I'm going to be saying the number of the paragraph and kind of saying what each paragraph contains.
	It's not going to be all the paragraphs.
	I picked out the ones that are interesting or important in my opinion.
	So you guys can read along at home, basically.
	Yeah, so the document is public.
	You can read it.
	It has 200 paragraphs, something like that.
	Most of it is legalese stuff, as you would expect.
	And so, as I said, I'm going to present the things point by point, and then at the end we'll summarize it as they had done as well at the beginning of the document itself, so you can cross-check it as well.
	I also want to say at the beginning that this is my interpretation of what this means.
	So if I'm saying something wrong, fact check me, whatever.
	This is all warranted because this is all new and I won't be correct about everything.
	This is, just to be clear, very much breaking news that we've been working very hard on.
	If we mess something up because we're not Americans, we may have got something wrong, do leave us a comment in the description and we will correct tomorrow.
	So, in paragraph 48 and 50, they lay out what the legal procedures are, what should be followed in handling absentee ballots and how the ballots that are deemed to be insufficient or to be rejected, how the procedure is supposed to be there.
	And then they are alleging in paragraph 51 that these haven't been followed.
	They haven't been followed because Georgia set different standards.
	Basically Georgia's officials agreed with the Democrats to make the procedure different, to make it easier for the mail-in ballots to come in and to be counted.
	Basically, it changed the signature requirements, I'm quoting, to a broad process with discretion rather than enforcement on the signature requirement as statutory required.
	So that's paragraph 54.
	So what this means is basically they changed the procedures.
	And they changed it without the authority to do so, allegedly, because the state law says something else and they didn't change the state law.
	They made an ad hoc rule.
	So paragraph 60 says that Georgia made rules allowing early counting in violation of state laws.
	That's also one other point.
	So it's not just about signatures.
	This is another case.
	So they shouldn't have been counting the mail-in ballots before the election night, but they were because they made a rule for that, but they didn't have the authority to make that rule.
	So on the screen now, you should be able to see paragraph 67, which says that in Democratic majority counties, the Trump campaign had, quote, no meaningful access or actual opportunity to review and assess the validity of mail-in ballots during the pre-canvassing meetings.
	While in the audit or recount, they witnessed Trump votes being put into Biden piles." So this is basically one of the serious allegations.
	And I should also say that a lot of the serious allegations are quite similar to the ones that you mentioned in relation to the other states earlier in this podcast.
	So, it's kind of similar.
	This is the Georgia Kraken, but similar things may be coming soon for the other states, and it all kind of looks the same.
	It looks very similar.
	And this really reinforces Giuliani's point, that this does appear to have been the product of conspiracy.
	Because, as he was saying, what are the odds that on the same day all of these four counties came to the same decisions on what appeared to be illegal actions, just independently?
	What are the odds?
	It does suggest that there's something more at work here, doesn't it?
	So paragraph 69 says that two affidavits have set forth various, quote, federal crimes, clear improprieties, insufficiencies and improper handling of ballots by county officials and their employees, unquote.
	And this was allegedly observed personally by the two witnesses.
	Paragraph 72 says that GOP poll watchers, when they were actually allowed in, observe multiple issues.
	Notably, voters not being allowed or able to cancel their mail-in vote and vote in person instead.
	So that's something that you should be able to do.
	That's, I think, a federal law, or at least state law, that you can cancel your mail-in vote by just coming in on Election Day and saying, I don't want my mail-in vote to be counted, I'd rather vote in person.
	And so they were denied that kind of option or they were said that someone else is going to do that later without them being there.
	There were witnesses at Giuliani's Gettysburg hearing that were saying things like that as well.
	I think that was what the little old deer was talking about.
	So, paragraph 73 says that poll watchers didn't see any signatures being verified.
	Paragraph 74 says that in some counties, quote, hand recount was actually done by machine.
	So, are we saying that they took the ballots that are being accused of being fraudulent and just re-ran them through the machine?
	Yeah, in the same way that they had been run before.
	Wow, okay, yep.
	That's definitely something I would object to.
	And so, on the screen now, there should be paragraph 75, which says that it is one of the major allegations, saying that there were clean, pristine ballots among the mail-in ballots.
	And so what it's about basically is that if you get mail-in ballots, you expect them to be kind of a bit handled, right?
	Because they were mailed in, right?
	Something was happening with them.
	But these poll watchers were saying these were very clear, very undamaged.
	It looked suspicious.
	And so I'm quoting, in my 20 years of experience of handling ballots, I observed that the markings for the candidates on these ballots were unusually uniform, perhaps even with a ballot marking device.
	Right, so these are the very well filled in dots, are they?
	I think so.
	Yeah, I think, yeah, right.
	And so it's not just that someone was filling in ballots by hand that hadn't been actually sent out and back in, but it's actually that they were processed by machines.
	Yeah, so you've got perfect looking ballots that have got very, very uniform markings on the things.
	It does imply that they've been through some kind of printer.
	Right.
	And just that.
	Right.
	Yeah.
	And so approximately 98% of those ballots went to Biden.
	That's what the person reports.
	This watcher only observed two.
	Two.
	Not two percent.
	Two.
	Those are going to Trump.
	I misread that.
	I thought it was two percent.
	No, no, it's two.
	Right.
	Jesus Christ.
	If you're going to cheat, at least make it look realistic.
	Come on!
	Right.
	Okay, yeah.
	Okay, yeah.
	Not 2%, just 2%.
	Okay.
	In paragraph 76, the workers were alleging discrepancies in procedural rules that were supposed to follow.
	The workers were asked to sign off on receiving the voting machines before they actually got them.
	So normally they would get the voting machines on Friday, they would be delivered on Friday, they would be required to sign off on it on Sunday, and then on Tuesday there's the election.
	But now, they were required to sign it, but they hadn't arrived on Friday.
	And some of them actually arrived on like 1am on election day.
	And so, that was kind of weird because...
	It's not supposed to be like that.
	It's not important, but it's an indication of something going on.
	So, that's basically what we just listed, was basically the discrepancies in the processes of counting and things like that.
	So, kind of the human errors, right?
	And so, this other section is called Why It Was a Fraud and Not a Mistake.
	And so, paragraph 78 says that voting machines that were received by those officials were unsealed and the serial numbers didn't match the documentation.
	Wow, that's massive.
	I mean, if you're working in any kind of company, and I'm sure a lot of people watching will know, if you received machines on order where the serial numbers didn't match, you would have to speak to the company that supplied you these things and get this fixed.
	I mean, if you're in just a private company and there was nothing at stake, you'd be like, okay, well, an error has been made.
	These aren't for us.
	But that's huge.
	Yeah.
	I mean, that just sounds like they've been intercepted in transit, they've taken out the machines, put new machines that presumably have been fixed in, and sent them along.
	That's just...
	What else are you meant to infer from that?
	Yep, yep.
	So this is one of the more serious things.
	And again, these are allegations.
	Yeah, yeah.
	This is not...
	This is what the claimants claim.
	Yeah, yeah.
	But we've got no particular reason to think the claimants are lying.
	No particular reason, but at the same time, there could be something else.
	As the court case goes on, maybe other evidence will be prevented.
	Who knows?
	Just people who started watching now, it's important to mention it over and over.
	These are allegations.
	This is not proven.
	Yeah.
	So, paragraph 79, it's a testimony which says, quote, I personally witnessed ballots cast for Donald Trump being placed in the pile for Joseph Biden.
	And then he specifies, unquote, And he specifies the table where that happened, so we know exactly.
	Paragraph 80, the same guy, same testimony, says that the reverse did not happen at all, so no ballots were actually...
	So Biden would put Trump's pile, yeah.
	And also, that person said that when he brought it up to the superintendent, the superintendent reacted with hostility and with extreme hostility.
	That's the quote.
	Yeah, and that's very similar to the Democrat woman from Giuliani's hearing, where she was bullied.
	I mean, she said she was just bullied and intimidated.
	People had to step in.
	And again, I don't want to have to infer anything, but if the people controlling the ballot counting are unreasonably and irrationally hostile and aggressive, then it makes it seem like they've got something to hide.
	Yes.
	So, paragraph 81, it's another testimony, It's not from the same guy, it's another guy.
	And he or she says, signatures were not being verified.
	Basically, this is something that had been alleged before as well.
	So, on the screen now, there should be paragraph 83, which is another testimony.
	I'm quoting, Sorry
	about the reading and writing.
	The whole thing is written kind of...
	It's a mess.
	So this hasn't been...
	It's clearly been done in haste.
	So this hasn't been proofread or anything like that.
	So I'm quoting directly, so I can't really edit what they say.
	Paragraph 84 is a democratic testimony.
	There's actually a guy who's a Democrat, but he's part of this lawsuit.
	He says basically that the same thing as the previous witnesses said, that he witnessed that too.
	So on the screen now should be paragraph 88, which is another testimony, and quote, I noticed that almost all of the ballots I received were for Biden.
	Many batches went 100% for Biden.
	I also observed that the watermark on at least three ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballots were counterfeit.
	The ballot was counterfeit.
	I challenged this and the elections director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers.
	Many ballots had markings for Biden only and no markings on the rest of the ballot.
	So no down ballot votes or anything like that?
	That fits in with the things that had been alleged as well, that a lot of the votes for Biden were only for Biden and not for the other Democrats who were running for Senate or House.
	Previous numbers I'd seen about a week ago now suggested that Trump had about 1.2% where it was just Trump and no down ballot, whereas Biden had 34%.
	Yeah, something like that.
	Something like that, yeah.
	Highly suspicious.
	I mean, if you're in a hurry, why waste the time marking those down ballots?
	Yeah, so these were basically the notable paragraphs or the most notable paragraphs.
	There are many more allegations and many more points being raised, but these were kind of the most notable ones.
	And so most notable ones out of this section, which was why it was fraud and not mistake, were basically showing that these things were done intentionally.
	This was not something that was overlooked.
	Just how people are treated and it's not something that you would kind of make an error about.
	No, and it just seems like the thing is being done in bad faith.
	Like anyone who thought they were genuinely running an honest election wouldn't act this way.
	They wouldn't intimidate people.
	They wouldn't be trying to prevent people from actually seeing what's going on if everything was above board.
	It just implies that it's not.
	Why would you resist?
	Why would you be so angry?
	But sorry, carry on.
	That's also why Sidney Powell is putting this into this section, saying this was fraud, this was not a mistake, because it shows kind of intent, right?
	It doesn't show just like something happened, it also shows why, or at least purpose.
	Purpose to show why.
	Yeah, shows intent is a good way of framing it.
	And so now we come to the section that is focused on the voting machines themselves, because that's a huge part of the lawsuit is actually with the tech and with the software and hardware, how it's done, and not just how the counting process was handled by the staff.
	And so paragraph 93, an expert says that Dominion software is not reliable.
	Quote, "Ballots can be tracked inside the software system for Dominion." So basically, you can actually do stuff, do something manipulated when the ballots are actually in the software being counted.
	Yeah, and we saw Eric, well, we didn't watch the video because it was like two minutes of him explaining it, but I watched the video prior to the podcast.
	And Eric Coomer, I still can't get over that's his name.
	Eric Coomer just explains how they can be adjudicated and changed by whoever's manipulated.
	Yeah, I'm actually going to get to that because it's actually mentioned here in a couple of paragraphs below.
	And so paragraph 94, the same expert as before, says that, quote, central operator can remove or distract batches of votes, unquote.
	They have an option to accept batch or discard batch.
	Yeah.
	So that's an option presented to people.
	So they can just do it.
	I guess we just trust them.
	We just trust them to do it honestly.
	When they're screaming in the faces of the poll watchers saying, get out.
	In paragraph 95, he actually says that it's, quote, very vulnerable to malicious administrators, which is what I'm saying.
	And so also in paragraph 95, should be on the screen, the same expert says, quote, it is possible for an administrator to view and delete any individual ballot scans from the, quote, not cast images, unquote, folder.
	That's where unclear ballots are put by the software.
	By simply using the standard Windows delete and recycle bin functions.
	So he literally has a folder where you have the files with like ballot one, ballot two.
	And those are the ballots that are filtered by software because the markings were not clear enough.
	So they cannot be 100% sure it was for Biden or for Trump.
	And so these ballots are put into the folder.
	The administrator just pulls out the folder and can do anything with it.
	I guess they can just get rid of them all.
	Yes, they can if they want to.
	So, paragraph 98 says that a big problem of the whole system is that there is no paper backup of Dominion results.
	That essentially means that, quote, recounts are meaningless.
	Yeah, there are no pottery shards to go over.
	Exactly.
	Like, this is crazy.
	Yep.
	And the claimants also say that this is illegal, that preservation of paper votes is mandatory.
	This is under US law and under Georgia law as well.
	And officers or custodians failing to comply can face a thousand dollar fine and or one year prison sentence.
	Good.
	So, they specified this.
	I don't know if for the other offences that they allege, if there are similar penalties.
	Don't know about that.
	This is the only one they list.
	Paragraph 99 and following, there are more concerns raised over the safety and integrity of the electronic voting systems.
	So, basically saying over and over the same things, but more people saying it, more witnesses coming through.
	Yeah, multiple witnesses.
	I mean, how many witnesses in total, would you say?
	Like, ten?
	I can't say, because sometimes they repeat them, and sometimes whole passages get repeated in the document, which is quite confusing as well.
	Right.
	So, you can't really keep track.
	But it's multiple witnesses?
	It's multiple, yeah, it's multiple.
	It's less than 50, more than 10.
	That's all I can say.
	Right, okay, okay.
	So, paragraph 99 and following, as I said, multiple concerns about safety and integrity.
	On the screen now should be paragraph 101, saying that Dominin was denied certification in Texas because of, quote, lack of evidence and accuracy and to be safe from fraud or unauthorized manipulation.
	So it turns out that in 2018, I think, Texas was trying to get Dominion systems for them as well.
	But there was a review and they concluded that the systems are too unreliable to be used in Texas.
	And so they threw it out.
	And what's interesting as well is that Georgia only introduced Dominion voting systems in 2019.
	Exactly.
	That's actually one of the points that is raised by Paul as well.
	She's way ahead of me, isn't she?
	She was saying this was very rushed and this looked like it was done on purpose.
	Of course, you could say that this is a major election.
	You want to have it in place if you're going to do it.
	It could be legit.
	So, paragraph 102 says that, quote, glitches only go one way.
	They only seem to have done, don't they?
	The important thing here, though, is they cite this based on press coverage and on analyses of independent experts.
	So this can be, like, hearsay.
	So they're not saying someone, some credible person came forward and saying this.
	It's just, it's clear from the press that...
	But, I mean, have we identified one case of it going towards Trump?
	No, no, no.
	I mean, I'm not saying she's not right.
	I'm just saying she's citing the press, which is kind of But the point is, I can't point to an example where they've reported, oh, by the way, this went to Trump and had to go back to Biden.
	And if anyone has any of that, leave us a link in the comments, because I just haven't seen it.
	So, on the screen now should be paragraph 103, which says, the witness in his sworn testimony explains he was selected for the National Security Guard detail of the president of Venezuela, and that he witnessed the creation of Smartmatic for the purpose of election vote manipulation to ensure Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez...
	Never lost an election, and he saw it work.
	Wow.
	Right, so...
	We got to this part.
	Christ.
	Right, so...
	I mean, a security guard of Chavez saw this being created and saw it in action, and he has a sworn testimony for them.
	Wow, that's huge.
	And actually, they have more witnesses.
	They have multiple witnesses that say that they were part of the Venezuelan process and Venezuelan elections, and that they basically say the same thing.
	Man, if I had committed a crime, any kind of crime, and there was this level of witness testimony and strange occurrences surrounding whatever I was being accused of, I would feel that my defense was very weak.
	I would feel like I was completely surrounded.
	They've done a good job so far.
	Yep.
	So paragraph 106 basically says that in 2006 there have already been concerns about Smartmatic, about the security and integrity of the elections that use this software and these reviews were coming from academic institutions and bipartisan people and non-partisan people.
	This was not political back then.
	So it's notable that even then it was a big deal and not just now.
	It's not just being brought up after the election by the people who criticized the ostensible outcome.
	So in paragraph 107, the Wall Street Journal actually wrote a piece on Smartmatic criticizing it.
	That was in 2006 as well.
	Paragraph 109 says that there has been another witness to the Venezuelan election problems and this whole process that basically confirmed what the previous witness had said.
	Paragraph 110 lists a lot of things that are mostly media reports or independent reports.
	It's not something that is happening now, but it's been happening in the past.
	I think we've covered a lot of these in previous podcasts, where it's a place like the New York Times and whatnot saying, oh, these voting machines are really concerning, because they could be easily hacked, easily manipulated, and let's hope you don't end up getting a batch of voting machines that have been unsealed with mis- and wrong data Serial numbers, et cetera, et cetera.
	Yeah, so the point about the voting machines being connected to the internet was actually brought forward by Motherboard Tech by Vice.
	So they list that as the source for these concerns, saying that this is not safe.
	If you're connected to the internet, you're exposed to a lot of risks that are unacceptable.
	And so, in December 2019, Senators Warren, Klobuchar, Biden, not Biden, and House member Pokan wrote about, quote,"...particularized concerns that secretive and trouble-played companies having long skipped on security in favor of convenience." Now, if there is a conspiracy, I would suggest that these people aren't in on it.
	Because otherwise, why would they be complaining about the...
	Well, hang on, isn't this a bit suspicious?
	Because these are Democrats as well.
	These are not Republicans complaining about this thing.
	And the thing is, when you think about it, is Amy Warren the sort of safe pair of hands you'd entrust for a conspiracy?
	I wouldn't say so.
	I wouldn't think so.
	But anyway, sorry, I'm just speculating there.
	Let's carry on.
	So on the screen now should be paragraph 111.
	I'm quoting an analysis of the Dominion software system by a former US military intelligence expert concludes that the system and software have been accessible and were certainly compromised by rogue actors such as Iran and China.
	Wow.
	I have to kind of I'll dismiss this a little bit, because the way that he phrases it is very typical of how you would phrase these things in a legal context.
	If you read between the lines, he actually says, or I think what he says is that these systems are vulnerable, and so if it is vulnerable, you can kind of expect that they have breached it because they have lots of resources, and they do this all the time.
	And so if you can do it fairly easily, they've probably done it.
	And then he says rogue actors, so those who they are often most concerned about, such as those and those.
	But he, such as Iran and China, when he says that, he means those as examples of rogue actors and not necessarily the actors that have hacked into the system.
	This is not as strong as it seems.
	No, it's not.
	But I mean, it's not like you couldn't say that Biden wouldn't be the choice of both Iran and China.
	Sure.
	He's already taken money from China.
	As he said, China isn't going to eat our lunch, folks.
	In contrast to Donald Trump's China is going to eat our lunch.
	And obviously the Iran deal where the US is giving lots of money to Iran, well, Trump stopped that too.
	So anyway, sorry, carry on.
	Yeah, so this is what is alleged, but it's not as explosive as it seems.
	It's something that might happen, might have happened.
	It's plausible.
	Yeah, it is plausible.
	It's not something that is going to be...
	Neither is it something that he's going to be taken up on.
	But you certainly wouldn't, if you wanted a secure election, you certainly wouldn't leave this door open.
	No, you wouldn't.
	This is crazy.
	You definitely wouldn't.
	And anyone who's operating these systems will know that this is a risk.
	They know that this could happen.
	So if you're going to leave this door open, then you must be doing it on purpose.
	And so then paragraph 112 lists just, it's a long paragraph as well, lists multiple additional concerns about the software.
	More people are coming forward with stuff that is problematic.
	And point two on the paragraph 112 says that USB sticks with votes have been found and added to account throughout the process.
	And this is very kind of weird and casts doubt on the overall result of the election, basically.
	Yep.
	Right.
	And so we got to the end of the system or software or machine part.
	And so another section is additional specific fraud.
	That's what they call it.
	It's basically saying beyond all these things, this is specifically what we can point to.
	That is definitely fraud.
	And what the first thing is, is paragraph 118, which is that we all know about the incident with the pipe burst in Fulton County in Atlanta.
	So they actually say it was an alleged pipe burst because it was not true.
	That's according to them, obviously.
	I don't know yet.
	But it resulted in everyone being sent home.
	And only six people, and then later only three people, stayed behind and they still processed the ballots, even though they had said that there wouldn't be anyone processing them.
	Wow.
	That really makes you think, doesn't it?
	So if what they're saying here is true, then this is going to be very open, very...
	Should be fairly easy to confirm whether a pipe burst in the building, because there's going to be a record of calling out...
	Exactly.
	Someone to fix it.
	Exactly.
	And that's what they're saying as well, is that they checked whether there have been any fixes, fixing plumbing companies, whatever.
	And so I think that's the source.
	They don't say it explicitly, but it looks like it.
	But it could also be that they had someone in houses, just like a random Joe in the basement who just came to fix it, right?
	Or it could be a way of getting everyone else to go and then staying back and, yeah.
	I'm just laying out all the possibilities.
	Laying out possible scenarios.
	I'm not saying it's likely by any stretch.
	No, no, no.
	So now we get to the interesting stuff.
	So paragraph 120 says that the security executive of Dominion...
	It was Eric Coomer.
	And that he has ties to Antifa.
	And then he also said, quote, don't worry, Trump won't win the election, we fix that.
	And they covered that in the lawsuit as well.
	He also published multiple social media posts.
	We wanted to go through them, but...
	Not enough time like this.
	We've seen a few already, so yeah.
	We can go through them tomorrow maybe or something like that, but there's unfortunately not that much time to.
	Since you've read them, how Antifa would you say he is?
	I haven't actually read them.
	Oh, you didn't even read them?
	I think there was just Josh and Callum.
	All right, okay.
	It's all right, it's all right.
	Yeah, so maybe we can cover that tomorrow.
	But he's made many social media posts basically saying the US is evil, I hate Trump, everyone's crazy.
	He sounds like a really sane person.
	Certainly not the kind of guy who's going to cheat in an election, stop Donald Trump getting re-elected.
	You can take that to the bank.
	Sorry, go on.
	Right, and so they allege a couple of more specific fraud instances, but they quote just experts now, which is, I don't see that as too reliable, but why not?
	It's just adding, you know, the strength of the evidence might be weaker than the previous evidence, but it still adds to the pile.
	So one expert says that more than 30,000 ballots were mailed in but not counted.
	Another one says that tens of thousands of ballots were received when not requested.
	And another one, or maybe the same one, says that more than 20,000 votes of people who had moved out of state were counted as well.
	And so these are just instances of something being alleged by experts who have studied the data in the same way that you listed some of the social media posts before this segment.
	Right.
	And so there is a certain Russell Ramsland who is being quoted.
	It's a bit weird because there is no other information in the lawsuit about him.
	It's just his name.
	In contrast with the other people who you always have some information about them.
	Who they are, what they do.
	Name Calmer of this and this organization of this context, right?
	There's nothing like this with him, so it's a bit weird.
	Josh found out that he's a credentialed person.
	He worked for NASA. He has an Ivy League degree, I think, like a tech degree.
	And he ran for Senate, I think, or for House in Texas for the Republicans.
	Other than that, He's a cybersecurity expert or something like that.
	He might be legit, but it's weird that he's listed in this way.
	And so what he says is that 96.6 thousand mail-in ballots were, quote, illegally counted as they were not cast by legal voters.
	So that's very broad and you don't know whether that covers something that the others already alleged or not, whether he's summarizing or saying something extra.
	No way to tell because they make it very short.
	Sure.
	But they make it bold, which is also weird.
	Which is one of the things that is really weird when you're reading the whole thing.
	Which is the formatting is awful.
	Sorry, yeah, we realise there's quite a lot to go through.
	We might have to run over time.
	But that's okay.
	Yeah, I'm actually not going to go to the photos of the document.
	So we're not that far from the end.
	Yeah.
	But there's important stuff to go still.
	Yeah.
	Okay, go on.
	Yeah, so if you go through this whole document, there's stuff in bold and stuff in capitals and weirdly mismatched things.
	Boomer formatting.
	Exactly, and then stuff repeats in different formatting and it's just a mess.
	But I understand that they needed to put it up quickly, to put it together quickly, so this might be just a result of that.
	So, that's actually the end of the additional specific fraud instances.
	And so now, what are they actually alleged in a legal sense?
	So, there's five counts of some kind of breach.
	So the first one is violation of the electress clause, which those are things that we already kind of mentioned before, that there were rules created in violation of state law without the authority to do so.
	Account 2 is that the 14th amendment was breached, specifically the denial of equal protection.
	Account 3 is the same thing, 14th amendment, denial of due process.
	Account 4, also 14th Amendment, denial of the due process on the right to vote.
	And so these things are just, they list details of why they alleged this specific breach, but it basically repeats what we have already said.
	Yeah, but these are the specific legal violations that are pointing to and say, this is how it's connected up to being an actual crime.
	Mm-hmm.
	And then count five is last, which is basically ballot fraud being done under the definitions of the Georgia state law.
	So that's specific, but it's important as well.
	And so at the end, they ask the court to do some things.
	That's what you do at the end of the lawsuit as well.
	So they ask to decertify the result, stop the transfer of the result to the Electoral College.
	That's what you expect, right?
	And then to impound all voting machines for inspection.
	At least until the serial numbers match up.
	And then an emergency judgment that voting be seized for a forensic audit.
	All fair.
	All totally fair.
	So they also ask for no votes received by uncertified machines, uncertified under federal or state law, be counted.
	So they want them all to be scrapped.
	They want, basically, they obviously want judgments on all the counts that we listed to be said that this just happened, this was legit.
	And then they also want 36 hours of security footage of all rooms where the counting was being performed to be produced by the court or by someone else.
	And so that's very reasonable kind of expectations, I think.
	And so it's not ambitious in what they want to do.
	It's ambitious in what they allege.
	Yeah.
	Well, it's just what the evidence seems to suggest, though, isn't it?
	Yep, exactly.
	And so I want you to kind of present a summary at the end, because that's what they do in the lawsuit at the beginning.
	If you go through the first, I think, like 12 pages, you've got point by point what they actually then go through in detail in the rest of the document.
	And so it's going to be just point by point, basically what we already said but summarized.
	So Dominion and Smartmatic were founded to computerize ballot stuffing abroad in Venezuela.
	Smartmatic manipulated Venezuelan elections for Chavez.
	Whistleblower says Smartmatic software is made to hide manipulation of votes from audits.
	Smartmatic software allows unauthorized users the opportunity to add, modify or remove entries.
	Under industry standards, Smartmatic's, quote, logs, which are open to manipulation, cannot serve as proper audit logs.
	Voting machines were connected to the internet, which is both unprofessional and illegal.
	The Fulton County, quote, water leak was a lie.
	A few unsupervised workers carried on working throughout the night.
	Dominion purchase in Georgia was rushed.
	Georgia disregarded the 2018 Texas concerns about Dominion, due to which Texas rejected Dominion.
	Industry expert claims that 7 minutes and a screwdriver is enough for him to hack into Dominion voting machines.
	Former military intelligence analyst says the Dominion software was accessed by China and Iran agents.
	An expert says that US intelligence agencies have tools to infiltrate voting systems, including Dominion.
	Another expert says hundreds of thousands of votes for Trump were transferred to Biden.
	An allegation is made that 96.6 thousands of ballots were requested and counted but not returned, which means that it must be disregarded.
	The memory stick votes incidents undermine the reliability of the overall result.
	Poll workers facilitated, either knowingly or unknowingly, fraud by dominion, by refusing to follow safeguards for absentee ballots, which means signatures and envelopes, and by bearing challenges from observing the count.
	While the above is enough to place the election result in Georgia in doubt, and therefore the court should set aside the Georgia result.
	And then there is this kind of addendum to that, which is case two basically.
	The court should set the results aside anyway due to the failure to observe legal procedure in the counting of the absentee ballots, leading to 50,000 plus illegal ballots counted.
	So that's the summary.
	It's a hell of a good case.
	That strikes me as a very...
	When the media are mocking Sidney Powell and saying, oh, look, she's a crackpot conspiracy theorist.
	Well, it doesn't sound like it.
	Not anymore.
	Not anymore, no.
	I mean, like, she had talked to big games saying this was going to be biblical.
	And, okay...
	She delivered.
	Fine.
	I agree.
	This is pretty damn biblical.
	And again, all I can see in my head is if you're at the beach and you drag up some seaweed and all the slime that's attached to it, that's what it feels like is going to happen from this.
	And man, I hope it is.
	Because I think that there appears to be a concerted effort to engineer the elections in the United States.
	And it would be nice to purge all of this filth out of the system, wouldn't it?
	But anyway, man, great job going through all of that.
	Because we've been really rushing this morning to get everything done.
	I'm sure we're going to have more about this to talk about in days coming and see what the left-wing media reaction to this is going to be.
	I mean, I've already seen some of it and it's quite annoying because they're just denying any of this as evidence and it's just nonsense.
	But anyway, let's get to the Super Chats.
	SNI Draco about Hume's guillotine.
	Yeah, I'll talk about that another time.
	We'll try and stay on topic for now if that's all right.
	But I will do a video about that.
	Jesse Martin, prediction Trump will prevail but will be blocked by a few faithless electors.
	Well, let's hope he's not blocked.
	EC Morgan says, happy Thursday, Colin Hugo.
	Well, it is a very happy Thursday today, isn't it?
	It's a very good day.
	Very good day.
	MilkMyMantus says, G'day from down under, your boom of flocks.
	I should have guessed it was an Aussie.
	Time to crack open some bush chook tinnies and enjoy your show.
	Good luck, lads.
	Loving the pod so far.
	Thank you so much, man.
	I hope you're having a good day in Australia.
	What's that?
	That's an Anglicanism, right?
	It's an Australianism.
	That whole thing was an Australianism.
	But no, it's nice to see patriots from across the Anglosphere all tuning in to watch the Americans crush the globalists.
	Because honestly, that is what might happen.
	And it really is down to the sort of...
	The internationalist types who think that America has a responsibility to every other country but itself.
	I mean, literally, we're going to take away the America first foreign policy and replace it with an everyone else first foreign policy.
	Things like this.
	You can see where this is going.
	And I think Trump is right when he says, look, we hold up our model as a successful system.
	But we'll cover that in another podcast, talking about the Great Reset, because this is what Trump addressed at Davos.
	But anyway, I won't go into it now.
	Do you want to read a couple?
	Okay.
	Ripperman says, remember, remember, the 3rd of November, the Democrat treason and plot.
	I see no reason why the Democrat treason should ever be forgotten.
	Yeah, this is going to be, if all of this comes out as it looks like it is, and is confirmed in the course, and this is going to be a hell of a stain on the Democrats.
	So, Wargrim says, money, thank you.
	A sticker?
	Yeah.
	Nathaniel says, the B word with a lot of I's.
	Redfogsmoon says, is you a French?
	And they sound two dollars from Norway.
	So you sound like you're French to a Norwegian.
	You sound like you're German to the Americans.
	Is this like other Sidney Powell allegations?
	Yeah.
	Not so stealthy, Eddie.
	Big fan in the U.S. Happy Thanksgiving.
	I'm thankful for your success and your voice.
	Service guarantees citizenship.
	Yes, it does.
	Tim Cornish says, The accolades of Eckhart are strong.
	The mail-in ballots worked as designed to suit chaos and stirred media and cheap narrative.
	Yeah.
	I mean, wasn't it like 44% of the votes were mail-in ballots?
	I think it was even more.
	I might be wrong about that.
	I think it was around 60, but double-check me on that.
	Yeah, I saw a figure that said 44.
	But let's say it's around half of the ballots cast this election were mail-in ballots.
	That's massively suspicious.
	It's just ridiculous.
	And it suddenly explains how Biden got 80 million votes.
	So Justin Wood says, money, thank you.
	Thank you.
	They can't possibly be that stupid, right?
	Counting more absentee votes than were requested and blatantly adding thousands of votes is criminally stupid.
	Yeah, now this is the...
	I can't remember where I saw this.
	I saw someone tweet this.
	And it sounds like it was Donald Trump who said it, but I don't think it was.
	In 2016, Hillary didn't cheat enough, and in 2020, Joe Biden cheated too much.
	But that really summarises what we're seeing is, like, Giuliani keeps saying that it looks like they didn't expect the magnitude of Trump's support from And so they effectively had to pause the counting, print out a bunch of new ballots, and then stuff them in, without double-checking just, you know, whether this is going to take them way over the state totals.
	Because, you know, we're 700,000 down.
	Well, Christ, we'd better print 700,000 ballots.
	But, idiots, that's not going to tally.
	Like, that's certainly 700,000 ballots for Trump just magically turned up, for Biden just magically turned up.
	It's like, right, okay.
	That has to be explained.
	That just has to be explained.
	Otherwise, we don't have a grasp on what's going on.
	So, anyway, sorry, Ken.
	Right, so Happy Lion says, My pre-election prediction was Trump wins in landslide unless the Dems, Big Tech, and the media get away with ruining the election.
	I guess I was right.
	Well, it seems like something like that happened, but also there is no option in the proposition for you to be wrong, so...
	Well, unless Trump didn't win a landslide.
	But the thing is, by every other metric, it seems that Trump did.
	By all of the down-ballot votes and all of the local legislatures and stuff like this, it seems that Trump was winning in a big landslide.
	And Trump got, what, 74 million votes?
	In total?
	I mean, that's 5 million more than Obama got.
	That's a hell of an...
	And Obama didn't even increase his vote share as well in his re-election.
	No, he lost like 7 million votes.
	I think it was 69 and then...
	Oh, 69 and 65 he got.
	And so Trump getting, I don't know, whatever it was, 65 or whatever it was, and then increasing it to nearly 75.
	We're not adjusting it to population change, but still, the difference is that.
	But even then, the population change is not so great as a percentage of the electorate.
	It's more about turnout.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	It's much more about turnout.
	And Trump really seems to have got the turnout.
	And we saw this in his campaign leading up to this.
	Trump was the guy who got the turnout.
	Come on.
	Everyone can see it.
	And I'll tell you what, and what's nice as well, happy line, my prediction was true too.
	Trump landslide.
	I just didn't expect the Democrats would cheat to this extent.
	Thank you, Silverstacks, and thank you for just a random guy.
	Engme says, the AP has declared you're starting to be just in fact.
	Well, if Pravda say so, then it must be so.
	No, Svatinek is president-elect, but I haven't seen him today.
	Dova says, the Congressional Research Service outlined the 2020 election in regards to the Electoral College.
	How do I go about passing that information on to you?
	Like this, but I don't know what that means.
	Well, you can email tips at lotusceters.com, can't you?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Tips at Lotus Cedars for journalistic tips and contact at Lotus Cedars for general comments.
	Lotus Cedars.com as well.
	Yeah, sorry about that.
	That's all right.
	So just a random guy again says, oh, he tried to buzz on the first message, but he's exceeding.
	Sorry about that, but thank you for the 10 pounds.
	Looking forward to the site going live.
	Please try to get an Islamic imam on the show.
	Show everyone how non-compatible their views are with Britain.
	That's a good idea.
	That is a good idea.
	But we are waiting.
	The website has apparently been in testing and it hopefully is very soon.
	And everyone will get a coupon to make sure they don't get charged for the month that they didn't get to use it.
	Again, I'm really sorry about this.
	So Will says, no way I don't buy this.
	This is too perfect.
	Right!
	Yeah, this is Sidney Powell's case.
	This is not something that's proven.
	It's possible that on many of these points and things she's going to be thrown out and it's going to turn out that these are not true or not exactly accurate.
	But it's also more than likely that at least on some point she's going to be proven right.
	It's not too perfect because it's still a process.
	The thing is, nothing about what she's saying strikes me as being implausible.
	No.
	That's the thing.
	It seems plausible that all of these regular people, the poll watchers, the multiple corroborating testimonies, all seem to line up in exactly the same direction and support the same position that she's laying out.
	And it really makes the thing glow in the dark, doesn't it?
	It's still a process.
	And like you say, it's too perfect.
	Yeah, if you were writing a movie, this is the kind of script you'd write.
	But I guess life is imitating art.
	So Dooku says, what do you think the SJW is saying?
	We should say Jermixen, Jermixeny, and not German, Germany.
	We should be Jepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepepep Yeah, we shouldn't be using gendered language.
	Let's go and ask Justin Trudeau about his opinion.
	Nightmarish Vision says, Hey, I want you to ask if you think that an action can be illegal if its constituents' actions are not.
	Like, if it's legal to drive and legal to be drunk, should drink driving be illegal?
	Isn't that pre-crime?
	No, it's perfectly coherent.
	You can...
	Exactly as you said.
	If it's legal to drive, that's fine.
	If it's legal to be drunk, that's fine.
	But driving and drinking at the same time can quite consistently be made illegal, and with good reason, because your reaction time has slowed you much more likely to injure someone, blah, blah, blah.
	There are very good reasons for it.
	It's not pre-crime.
	That's just a condition, a state you may find yourself in, and it's perfectly valid to create laws around that.
	But also it doesn't have to make sense.
	You can make laws around anything.
	You can make anything legal.
	But the categorization is more than the sum of its components.
	It's not just, oh, I was drunk, oh, I was driving.
	Drunk driving is a thing.
	But sorry.
	So Bartosz says, I think the most damning thing about all the election fraud allegations is that it always goes one way.
	Zombie vote and irregularities, all one way.
	Yeah, I mean, apart from the Night King being able to raise the dead.
	And apparently...
	They voted more in person.
	This was...
	Was it Josh?
	Did you find this earlier?
	That the dead walked to the polls rather than flinging mail-in ballots.
	I don't think that was...
	It wasn't you, right.
	Okay.
	Someone said it earlier.
	But, yeah.
	So, you know.
	But, yeah.
	This is the thing.
	If these allegations were going from the Biden campaign against Trump and you had this preponderance of evidence...
	The world would be on fire.
	It'd be nothing but this in the media and everyone would have already come to the conclusion.
	But because it's Joe Biden...
	White Hot Pepper says, anyone in the army will know that if you have a piece of equipment with a serial number that doesn't match what your paperwork says, no matter how small, you have to buy a new piece of equipment even if it's the same thing.
	Dollars, dollars, dollars.
	And again, any company...
	I've worked in tech companies where you would receive equipment.
	If the serial number doesn't match, then you have to log that.
	You have to send it back.
	It's not, oh, we'll just use it anyway.
	And also, in a lot of contexts, there's a legal requirement.
	You can't just have unauthorized things that don't match.
	Here's an unsealed voting machine and it doesn't match the serial number.
	Nothing to see here, though!
	Like, come on!
	That's ridiculous!
	Rob says that I look like Jonas Knight.
	I don't know who that is.
	This guy.
	I don't think it is.
	Who reads the hair?
	Pistols at dawn, Rob.
	Okay.
	Tyler says, at least in Michigan...
	We missed that egg mirror here.
	Dude, where's my vote?
	Good question.
	I mean, you sent us Euros, so I'm guessing you didn't get one in this one, I'm afraid.
	Oof.
	Tyler says, at least in Michigan you can vote a straight ticket.
	Vote for every Democrat on the ballot.
	You can do that easier than just President, but then every downed ballot, Republican has legal standing to challenge.
	Interesting.
	Willem says, when I was a parts manager, the software and paperwork I used to track on nuts and bolts did a better job, making sure I wasn't stealing them.
	This is wild.
	Yeah, it's amazing, isn't it?
	Like, that to me, the voting machine serial number thing is staggering.
	Uh, Cockidus says, "Happy Thanksgiving European heretics." What does that mean?
	What does that mean?
	Okay, so he's not from an English-speaking country.
	He doesn't get it.
	Basically, you're lucky that the natives took pity on you, and you get what you deserve.
	No, no, no, it's fine.
	Well, the question is, what corn pop administration?
	Daniel says, last time Georgia went blue, 92, and Clinton.
	That year, Ross Perot won 90% popular vote.
	The time before that was Carter in his own state.
	The time before that was Kennedy.
	Georgia's not blue.
	Yeah.
	Good point.
	And again, literally in 2019, they got this machine and suddenly...
	Also, I just remembered that one of the points in the Kraken was that some votes were taken from Joe Jorgensen and given to Joe Biden.
	So she might start saying that they stole the election from her.
	Well, maybe they did.
	We don't know that all of those Biden ballots weren't actually Joe Jorgensen's ballots.
	I mean, she was a firm Black Lives Matter supporter, after all.
	Exactly.
	And that's popular.
	I'm so sorry, Libertarians.
	I'm sorry this happened to you.
	Ron Paul can still win, man.
	I'm telling you, he can still win.
	But the rest of them aren't great.
	I think it's quite a small portion of the Libertarians who actually support the Libertarian Party.
	I know, it is.
	That's why I'm apologising to them.
	I empathise.
	I would like to support the Libertarian Party.
	I think it's something that we need, but they're just never any good.
	So, Saga says, October 1st, 2020, voting programming USB was stolen from a closet.
	Yeah, we covered that a bit earlier.
	There wasn't just one, either.
	There were something like 30 USBs in Pennsylvania stolen, and a laptop.
	So it's, again, just concerns.
	But Miss Violet says thank you.
	Thank you.
	Thank you for the sticker.
	Perishing Chaffee says, Old Man Britain, I'm starting to think the French boy that is no good for us.
	The engaged few says, we will run out of piano wire and meat hooks before we run out of Democrats to hang.
	I'm afraid I have to disavow that, obviously.
	Nick Taylor, wait till low-tier officials realise they're taking the fall for this.
	No honour among fraudsters.
	Yeah, that's the thing, isn't it?
	Because when this starts all coming out and people's names start getting put on the chopping block, it ain't going to be Biden or Pelosi or Kamala who are going to take the fall for this.
	They're going to throw you under the bus.
	Am I Mexican?
	No.
	As you can see, they just switched from yesterday's German to today's French.
	Well, what's amusing about this, though, is that Americans assume that everyone has Mexicans because America and Mexico are right next to each other and have a giant border that's very porous.
	But, like, there are zero Mexicans in Britain.
	Is it my shithole country accent?
	I guess it is, yeah.
	But there are zero Mexicans in Europe or Asia or Africa.
	Well, probably South America, to be honest.
	Like, it's only...
	And probably Canada.
	Like, it's only the United States that has a really load of Mexicans.
	So, Luke, this is wealth transfer staging for Agenda 2030 from the UN and Trilateral Commission.
	If you plan on having guests on the show, ask James Dellingpil.
	Well, we will if we ever get out of our tyrannical lockdown.
	Um...
	I'd love to have James Danlin poll on.
	I'd love to have a lot of people on.
	But we covered this in a podcast we put out the other weekend, and we're going to record another sort of weekend podcast talking more about the Great Reset, because we've got loads to talk about now, because it's not a conspiracy theory.
	They're just open about it, and Trump is directly challenging it on its own terms.
	It'll be a really good podcast we'll go through, but we will do that another time.
	Okay.
	Yeah, a bit up.
	Great.
	What do you think will be the biggest consequence, global or otherwise, of Biden victory?
	Hard to tell.
	I don't know.
	The biggest consequence?
	I mean, it'll be the continuation of what we can just call the internationalist agenda.
	So, I mean, we'll all get waxed from the internet because no one's going to hold Silicon Valley to account.
	It'll be continually selling out your industry and your wealth to China and wherever else.
	It'll be just the continuation of that policy that will bring our countries to ruin.
	But basically, in areas where Trump hasn't done really anything, you're not going to have any change because it's going to be the same as Obama.
	That's basically it.
	That's our president-elect.
	Thank you.
	Nona to give...
	Okay.
	It says, exploited.
	Interesting choice.
	Last time I checked the skinhead music.
	Oh, are they?
	Neo-Nazis.
	What?
	Skinheads are Neo-Nazis, aren't they?
	Yeah, they are.
	Well, I mean, I've never heard of this band before, of a song called Fuck the USA or anything.
	I don't know who they are.
	But maybe, you know, if that's what the Antifa guy is posting, again, just lends credence to the theory that they're just kissing cousins, doesn't it?
	The horseshoe theory.
	Though it ends up being true.
	It's true!
	Just, where's the lie?
	Just, where's the lie?
	So, Morkai says, head on down to Kiki Farms.
	Okay.
	Alejandro says, 2020 is by far the best Marvel movie ever.
	Tell me about it.
	Like, I mean, I tell you, it's been a rollercoaster of emotions.
	You guys probably saw the stream, the remoralization stream, and were like, Christ, guys, this is looking bad.
	Man, it's looking a lot better today.
	And the guy's name is Eric Coomer.
	Yeah.
	It's like he's an exemplar of the pod people.
	Biden wants to turn you all into pod people.
	It's not just him, but the agenda is to turn everyone into just a person sat in a room eating the bugs.
	Watching the TV, consuming drugs, just on your own forever, when no one loves you.
	That's what the future is that they're offering you.
	Trump is offering you at least a sort of family-based future, which is much more preferable, in my opinion.
	But anyways, I won't carry on.
	Let's keep going.
	Thank you, Vikazupa.
	Dilo says, it's nice to hear an international view on politics from America.
	Well, it's nice to be able to give the Patriots some support, to be honest.
	Bulmus says, make Ireland Great Britain again.
	You mean famine again.
	To be honest with you, Bulmus, we have enough problems with the Celts that we have.
	The Welsh Assembly and the Scottish devolved parliament are just a pain in the arse.
	An Irish devolved parliament on top of that would just be like, oh god, more people telling us that we're the problem.
	I don't know if we need that.
	And they also have the Euro, right?
	Yes, yes.
	Let Ireland become part of the European Union.
	Let them understand what it's like to be under the boot of the German for once, and then we'll see how things are.
	So the seventh candidate says, what is the moral good to weight against the independence argument of the devolved parliaments from Erie?
	Ireland.
	Yeah, and no one can read Irish.
	Yeah.
	What is the moral good to weigh against the independence argument of the whole parliament?
	Well, I mean, I don't want to get into it because it's quite a long series of arguments to have.
	But ultimately, it's whether you think that Britain as a political entity has been a force for good in the world.
	And I think that it has overall on balance, although there are doubt there's going to be lots of Irishmen who say the opposite.
	But there we go.
	Thunderstorm says, gosh, it's almost like the machines that don't match the serial numbers.
	It's for the company to track their rigged machines.
	Yeah, really makes you think, doesn't it?
	I don't know.
	It's too much, I think.
	Unsealed with a non-matching serial number.
	Why would you want to track them, though?
	Well, I mean, I don't know.
	I don't know.
	Who knows?
	I wouldn't say it's the company.
	I would say it's the people who are...
	It just sounds like they've just got them in a warehouse, fixed a bunch of machines, shoved them in the new box and then sent them out.
	Well, I think that actually, at the moment, because of the success that Trump has had in the courts, I think the legal option is actually very, very strong at the moment, and I would recommend that we stick with that.
	It looks like Trump's got a hell of a good case.
	Is he Czech?
	Is it a Polish?
	I don't know.
	Are we saying that you've been found out here?
	Are you a filthy bohemian?
	You can't admit to it, can you?
	No, he's from Austria.
	Sorry, I can't just change my identity when I've been promoted to a French now.
	Right, okay.
	Thank you.
	I did not, but that's exactly the kind of thing that you want to see.
	If goods don't cross borders, armies do.
	Who was it that said?
	Was Adam Smith who said that?
	Thomas Jefferson?
	Someone like that.
	But yes.
	Yeah, multiple people have said something to extend.
	It's been a long-running theme.
	Yeah, but you know that Biden would just reverse all of these policies, go back on everything that Trump has done.
	And, I mean, I think Trump's done a great job with his Middle Eastern foreign policy.
	I don't see how you can argue the opposite.
	So, last one.
	Evil Zombito says, I fled South Africa to the States after watching the policies Biden wants to enact and destroy my home nation.
	Kind of sucks watching it happen twice.
	I think there are probably a lot of people from Cuba and Venezuela in the United States who say exactly the same thing.
	But anyway, thank you everyone for joining us.
	I don't doubt that we'll have more on this tomorrow because this was our preliminary reading of what had happened because we got there before everyone else because of the way time zones work.
	So we'll see you again at the same time 1pm UK time tomorrow with doubtless an update and thank you all for joining us.

▲