Who Are the Real Bolsheviks & What Do they Want with America?
Louder with Crowder critiques a BuzzFeed article on conservative women before analyzing the Bolshevik Revolution, noting that while 28% of early leaders were Jewish due to Tsarist discrimination, no practicing Jews supported the movement. The host details Lenin's 1903 Marxist origins, the Red Terror's violence, and Stalin's atrocities, arguing Bolshevism remains exclusively left-wing today. He warns that diluting Christian doctrine to align with Islam or equating all religions mirrors Democrat tactics, suggesting such ideological shifts threaten national stability. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Welcome to the Lineup Live00:03:14
I'm so glad you're here.
Have you seen anything like that before?
Welcome to the lineup live.
The Bolshevik Revolution Today00:04:17
Yeah, I think we might need to take those down.
I don't know if something's wrong with my eyes.
Am I going blind?
Do you start seeing halos before you go blind?
I have no idea.
But I know they're not angels.
Speaking of not angels, Bolsheviks.
We're going to talk about that today.
I've talked about it quite a bit in the past the Bolshevik Revolution.
If you follow this channel for any significant period of time, now it's sort of made a resurgence.
People are talking about it, but they're discussing it wrong.
And I wonder why that is.
I've always asked, why can't we talk about Leninists?
Russia, the Bolshevik, you know, sort of post Bolshevik revolution Russia, Stalin.
I never learned about that in school.
Did you?
Why have we not learned about it considering the atrocities?
Take a guess.
We'll get into that more.
Also, the Pope and Trump, Trump and the Pope, pump and tropes.
Who's right?
Who's wrong?
It may not exactly be who you think.
Also, BuzzFeed wrote an article on how to spot a conservative woman.
They think that's a bad thing.
We'll talk that more on the show.
So organized.
Everybody's having a great Pride Month.
It's like a space where no one judges anyone.
Racist, homophobic, transphobic, piece of spoiler.
We will premium
and join now for $99 annually or $9.99 a month, to get the entirely ad-free experience and an ever-expanding roster of content, creators, and free speech.
Ad-Free Content and Free Speech00:15:44
We'll just
get.
Just get right to it.
I know it's 11 a.m. on a weekday, which means we're here with you.
That's the sound that you hear.
I've unfortunately confined myself.
I've tethered myself to the slurp for the rest of all time.
But we have a heavy lift today.
We're going to get into the Bolshevik Revolution as well as this sort of, should we say, schism between the MAGA movement and the Vatican, the Catholic Church, which can't we just all get along?
The answer is no.
Captain Morgan, CEO, how are you?
Fantastic.
It's going to be a fun show.
We're going to piss everybody off, I think.
It's a lot to get to.
With truth.
Go ahead.
Do you good?
You get it out of your system?
I think.
I don't know.
Maybe it'll come back later.
Friday, Saturday, April 24th, 25th at Comedy Avenue in Lawton, Oklahoma.
Josh Firestein.
Hey, hey, how are you doing?
I'm good.
Oh, yeah.
Just ready for a really fun show.
Guys, let's just try and restart.
You were all a little flat.
We were all a little tired.
And nothing that you both just said inspired confidence or the way you said it.
I was waiting for you to talk again so I could interrupt you like Gerald.
Oh, okay.
Well, that would have, yeah, that would have aggravated me and that'd bring the energy up.
Yeah.
It doesn't really aggravate me when you do it, though.
It aggravates me when Gerald.
Why?
That's not for you.
You just did it now.
No, I did it.
You just did it now.
Discipline your tongue.
We're about to.
Discipline your tongue.
All right.
Bring me my Just Jewett shirt.
Yeah.
Just kidding.
Oh, well, you know what?
You'll be buried in that shirt.
Yeah, maybe.
Yeah.
We'll hang it from your mausoleum.
What is it?
Laundry day?
What's going on?
Why are there so many Jew shirts?
Gerald seems like the kind of guy who already has his mausoleum built.
Yeah.
Well, I do, so I don't want to judge.
Oh, okay.
I told you this story.
People were like, how do you, how do you, you know, what do you want to have done to you when you die?
Which people ask me more frequently than they should to someone in their 30s.
I don't care.
I said, leave me out for the trash on Tuesday.
They're like, come on, that's disrespectful to people.
I said, okay, you really, I really don't care.
They're like, you have to commit matters for your loved ones.
I said, okay, fine.
Mausoleum, biggest one we can find, and I'm going to turn it into a haunted house.
Yes.
Perfect.
So you guys made me do this.
How do you want to be buried?
That's the question of the day.
You want a mausoleum or do you want to have your ashes scattered at sea like a bitch?
You should use it like a regular house in a neighborhood.
Yes.
The rest of the neighbors have to just know that there's an empty house with a dead body in there.
Yeah, I'll just grease some palms at the HOA.
There you go.
You don't have to tell them.
They're not going to come by.
No.
They're going to knock on the door.
Who's going to answer?
Not you.
That's exactly right.
It could be me.
Probably Gerald.
He's haunted.
Caretaker.
I have no idea.
Hey, speaking of haunting, the spirit of Kat Abugazugadala.
Remember her?
Kat Shabugamu, who was running for office in Illinois.
Well, she's no longer on the front lines there.
You know, the front lines against ICE in Chicago.
These are, by the way, these are very difficult front lines.
And I will say, I respect anyone who's willing to go out there and risk life and limb to protest ICE, as they do in Chicago now, using dildos.
Oh, it's a four legged race.
Everything from the left just has to be degeneracy.
I spent money on a trophy.
Double sided dildo.
Oh, I get it.
The pinata climax.
Idiots.
Oh.
I don't know how they managed to take giant rubber pink purple dildos and make it not funny.
They made it somehow unfun.
I didn't see any of them going, ah.
No, it's just everything is just like, hey guys, isn't this clever?
No, it's not.
Also, I don't really remember when people talk about ISIS, oh, they're the Gestapo.
I don't remember Jews having fun protesting the SS.
Yes.
Ribbing them.
They weren't playing cornhole.
No.
No.
Oh, Himmler, does this remind you of anything?
No, you stop.
Hey, or you need gobbles to come pay you?
That's a rumor.
Stop it.
That's a rumor.
Just takes the bait every time the Jew.
Like, ooh, gobbles.
Ooh.
Hey, that's not, I'm not a lady.
Stop it.
Weren't they like doing trans experimental surgeries on people too?
They were doing all kinds of weird stuff.
Yeah.
By the way, this was all leading up to, I should tell you, the championship event at the anti ice protest, the pin the dick on the tranny.
Yeah, which I will say, I'm on board with that one.
Oh, yeah.
That looks like it is, too.
Surgery.
Ouch.
We should play that here.
Just like, you know what?
Here's the thing.
Just whenever you see the next ice lady get shot because she's trying to run a police officer over with her car or someone assaulting her.
Just remember how you, when you watch this, and you know that deep down, of course, I mean, figuratively, like, can't someone just hit them with an SUV?
Here they are using the dildos later on.
Yes, a bunch of white privileged socialists throwing rubber penises at black police officers.
That'll show them.
Or black ICE agents.
Black Nazis.
You know, this was funnier when you throw them at the WNBA games.
All these people obsessed with sex and.
Nobody wants to have it.
Ow, ow, fudge.
Want to get AIDS?
By the way, just for reference, those are the Bolsheviks.
Just to keep in mind, we're going to get to it.
There are still Bolsheviks around.
Did you guys know that?
They're still around.
Wherever the left exists, you get modern Bolsheviks.
Yeah.
Anything else we want to?
Dildos?
The Bolsheviks?
Of course, they would have been executed by the Bolsheviks once the revolution took place, but they'd be useful idiots.
For the beginning.
Yeah, just like intelligentsia.
They didn't have dildos to throw.
They threw coal.
Yeah.
It was a long time ago.
I mean, I don't know if they had dildos back then.
It was probably just some kind of an apparatus.
Some wood, a cucumber.
I don't know.
A pirate's peg leg.
Yeah, it is.
Well, the Egyptians did have that.
The Egyptians did.
Really?
What?
They created those apparatuses, and then actually, they would create these long apparati that would be somewhat, they would have slits in them so that they could.
Homin' to them and it would act as a vibration device.
That's right.
They also.
This is true, though.
I'm not joking.
And they also made batteries.
The Egyptians first make batteries.
I'm talking about the.
I forget what it's called.
It's the something battery.
Ah.
Yeah, they.
Well, I need quite a bit more to go on.
They made batteries and light bulbs.
Yeah, so they can make it light up.
We had momentum for a minute, and then it's gone.
No, we still have momentum.
This is totally a real thing.
No.
Science.
I know some people talked about how the pyramids might have been used to generate electrical current.
Yeah, it's a power plant.
Okay.
Oh, boy.
Yeah, it's a giant power plant to help map the world for Baghdad.
True.
Now it explains why the.
The Baghdad battery.
Thank you.
The Baghdad battery.
What?
Yeah, it's a real thing.
They were able to make batteries and store energy.
Okay.
Yeah, they found it at a dig.
I don't believe it.
All right, no, moving on.
That thing.
Neat.
Yeah, see, that's what powered ancient vibrators.
Before the desail.
New battery.
Steven's making life choices right now.
And Cleopatra, she would have a gourd and fit bees in there.
Did you know that?
She would use that.
Really?
Really?
That was the old Cleopatra.
Kidding, you're the bees?
Let's just be honest.
Cleopatra, when people try and point to history for a strong woman, they pick an opium whore.
That's who they're picking with Cleopatra, who basically created the old school Hitachi wand where she put bees into a gourd and.
That's kind of awesome.
Although she did run one of the greatest empires in history to the ground.
Well, yes.
She didn't really run it, it was like her four year old brother.
All right.
Right.
But she was married to him.
We digress.
So, you guys want to keep going?
No, I don't.
How to spot a conservative woman, according to BuzzFeed.
So, I saw this article.
I was like, okay, who's writing this?
Then I realized it's a black guy.
And then I realized all the things that they write are meant to be like negative.
So, actually, I wish we had this thing where we're saying the same thing now that I think about it.
Let's talk about vibrators.
Give me a second.
How to spot a conservative woman?
She doesn't have a gourd full of bees.
There you go.
Well, or she doesn't protest ice with a bunch of dildos.
And she still likes men.
Yeah, she's doing things that mean something.
You got that sting me?
Sting me.
All right, so hold on a second.
I'll set this up.
There we go.
Okay, guys, guys, we're all going to.
All right, let's get this on track.
How to spot a conservative woman was an article written on BuzzFeed, and I thought, hey, who's writing this?
Turns out it was a black guy in this week's installment.
If we're saying the same thing, Same thing.
So check the references as we provide every day, weekdays, 11 a.m. Eastern.
So they want you to identify the secret signs that a woman may be conservative.
Now, keep in mind, this is written by seemingly a black guy.
I don't know, fully black.
It's just the name, minority guy.
It's a he, him.
It's a he, him.
And they want you to view this negatively.
And then we're going to get into the concept of synonyms and antonyms at the end of this.
So I want you to read this and just kind of put yourself in the headspace.
Of those who are agreeing with this article.
How to spot a conservative woman, which is a bad thing, and these are some secret signs.
So, some tips in there from a, if you want to take relationship advice, a 40 year old non binary person from Texas wrote Women who are conservative tend to be cagey around answering how they voted or say they are, quote, not very political and feign being moderate.
Honestly, all conservative folks can have a tendency to do this if they think their honest answer won't be well received.
Yeah, yeah, you know, that's very interesting that you say that.
I've said this for a long time.
If someone in Hollywood, Says, I don't want to discuss politics or that's not my role.
It means they most likely lean right because it's only a net benefit in the monolith that is Hollywood to speak out as a leftist.
This also tells you when he goes, Oh, it may not be well received.
It's true.
Conservatives will keep it to themselves if they believe that they are in the presence of someone who may answer or react violently.
Yeah, they want to keep their skin, keep their jobs.
They want their skin on them, not to become your suit.
Right.
I might be poorly received.
And women try to be more agreeable.
That's the problem.
Women try to be more agreeable.
And so they'll probably keep it to themselves.
29 year old woman from Salt Lake City wrote If a woman doesn't like the Barbie movie or Taylor Swift, ask why.
This is great that this is how you're screening for fundamental values.
Why the hell don't you like Taylor Swift?
Yeah.
Because I don't.
Because I'm like a huge portion of population Earth.
How about that?
Usually that will give you your answer.
It's okay to have different tastes.
Well, thank you.
Mighty gracious of you.
But if the reason you don't like them is specifically that they are overtly feminist or for women and girls, then we have a problem.
So this must be a lesbian, right?
From Salt Lake City?
It's got to be a lesbian.
So this is, it's a problem.
Yeah, it's a problem.
If you're a conservative woman, then we have a, it's not like how to spot one, it's how to spot the problem.
Yeah.
Yes.
And what are they going to do next?
Exterminate it?
Actually, not liking feminism is great.
My book.
Well, again, but not from BuzzFeed.
You have to understand from their perspective, these are cardinal sins.
Someone who was anonymous wrote, If she gives girls smaller servings of food than she gives to the boys, first off, I don't know that that happens.
Second, if it does, she could just be keeping it for herself.
Let's be honest.
That's one of the.
Yeah, thank you, Toolman.
Yeah, you're right on it.
What's wrong with me?
Yeah, they're not giving her enough, huh?
Don't worry, she'll take it.
Slide it, get it.
Where does this happen?
Now, are the girls smaller?
Are the girls younger?
Do they eat less?
I have a twin boy, twin girl.
My son eats more.
I know, it's a crazy notion.
He eats more, and so I tend to give him larger portions because I try not to give them.
A portion that they can't finish, you know, with kids, it seems insurmountable, and I just look at it and move it around.
So I give them what I know they will finish and then potentially second helping.
So she gets a slightly smaller portion because she almost never finishes it anyway.
This is the part where we ignore biology.
Ah, got it.
That's the through line here.
Ignore biology.
Let's just call innate human characteristics.
Let's just call it a warning sign or a red flag.
Here's another hot take a 63 year old man from Oregon.
A 63 year old man from Oregon is giving a tip on BuzzFeed on how to spot conservative women.
Think about this for a second.
He still uses AOL.
Yeah, my mom is a 60, almost 63 year old woman.
And she doesn't know what BuzzFeed is.
Yeah, it's just everything about that phrase is wrong.
If this is where you are going for advice, he wrote this.
He wrote, one red flag is when you get in their car with them and when they turn it on, there's an AM talk show with Michael Savage or Sean Hannity on the radio.
That's not a red flag.
That's not a red flag.
It's not, and by the way, it's not secret.
It just means they listen to that.
That's their political persuasion.
Like these people act like they're cracking a code, like they're Colombo.
Like that wouldn't be.
Sean Haley on the radio, would it?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, no.
I don't listen to that, no.
He said, my ex would usually turn it off and say something like, I listened to NPR too, but the reality is, I never heard NPR on her radio.
Here's the thing, too.
Let's again go along with this logic.
NPR, I believe, was 92% of employees at NPR.
I'm going by rote here, donated directly and exclusively to the Democratic Party.
92%.
They receive a lot of their funding, obviously, federally, and NPR leans incredibly left.
Would they have a problem if someone exclusively listened to NPR?
And do you think that NPR is somehow less biased on the left than AM radio is on the right for most people?
Do you think that MS Now or CNN is less biased toward the left than Fox News is toward the right?
Do you think Blue Sky is less biased on the left than X would be on the right?
And by the way, by bias, I mean just everyone is free to post.
This is what they use as their logic.
If the problem was, I hope that I have someone who's politically educated, so I hope they're actually absorbing information from all sides like we do.
The references we provide tend to be left leaning because we don't want you to be in an echo chamber.
That's not what the left wants.
The left, if you look at this advice, the first one is they might keep it quiet if they know it'll be ill received.
They want to silence and suppress anyone who doesn't share their point of view.
They shoot, they kill, they maim, they run over with cars.
They want to suppress information that they don't agree with.
It's not about collecting information from as many resources as possible to make the best inference you can.
They just don't want half of this country to exist.
48 year old man from Texas wrote, Sometimes a sign is if she says she loves, quote, masculine men.
Well, I guess we found the twink.
Masculinity, Immigration, and Change00:18:07
Yeah.
And no one at BuzzFeed just said, hold on a second, this may not be good advice.
In other words, we may not want to tar and feather all women who like men who are masculine.
Because I don't know if you guys know this, I know this might be surprising to you.
All women since the beginning of time have tended to prefer men being masculine.
But that's the quiet part out loud, isn't it?
It's intentional.
This is not what it seems.
This is a guidebook.
This is a, hey, ladies, just so you know, If you listen to AM radio, we will judge you and we will not be with you.
If you like masculine men, then.
Let's go.
Okay, so masculine men.
A synonym for that would just be once upon a time, men.
But let's go the antonym route.
Okay, so then if they're saying masculine men, right, this is a red flag.
This is a warning sign.
If a woman likes masculine men, according to BuzzFeed, that's a red flag.
All right, so that's bad.
So then the positive, right, an antonym to masculine men would be feminine men?
And that's the point.
There is no LGBTQAAIP without feminism.
It's all part of this unholy mutation, doing away with the idea of men and women.
Why?
Because they're Marxists and they hate the nuclear family and they hate strong communities because stronger communities are more difficult to control.
I'm not, this isn't a logical leap.
Someone who says, I think it's a problem for a woman to like masculine men.
That's someone who doesn't want relationships to be reproductive in nature.
It's that simple.
It's evil.
It truly is evil.
It is a perversion of the natural in all facets.
And sometimes you do the masculine thing and try and reward a friend, to be clear.
Masculinity is not always an endeavor that's thanked.
Try and maybe reward a friend, a male friend, only to be shut down.
Hey, Nick.
Sorry, I just want to say I really like that thing you said about the Red Sox on your show the other day.
I want to show my appreciation with a little tip.
Is it a check?
Yeah.
My fucking Western Union?
I don't even think my bank takes checks anymore.
Now I'm going to have to go to the Walmart Money Center.
I'll get hit with more fees than actual money that I'll receive.
Wait, three bucks?
Three bucks?
Let's even buy two bucks.
Am I supposed to get like a half a Big Mac with this?
I guess if they're 86, the middle bun, I could save a little money.
Get the fuck out of here, Josh.
Come on.
Good hands.
Thanks.
I told you, you should use Rumble Wallet to tip him.
I know, I know.
It's a non custodial wallet with end to end encryption that allows me to tip my favorite content creators quickly and securely.
I don't know, I just thought a check was more personal, you know?
Look, it's got my address on it.
You're a moron.
Seriously, download the Rumble Wallet and step away from big banks for good.
No fees, no middlemen, none of the crap you have to deal with where you go in and they say you have some cone.
Here's an account, but it's some guy who wants to tell you about Bitcoin and he's doing mining.
Lyle, go to wallet.rumble.com today.
And you can also support your favorite creators.
Step away from big banks.
Rumble Wallet.
Wait, that's my address.
That's my check.
Josh, how did you get my checkbook?
Josh, Josh, Josh.
All right, now we're going to wade right into it.
Let's do it.
Thank you for the raid, everyone.
Welcome to the show.
We're glad to have you.
Very much appreciate it.
The lineup on Rumble has been a great thing.
To send people on down the line and help some medium creators along the trail.
So, President Trump and the Pope.
And I will, for the sake of this discussion, include those high up in the Vatican in positions of authority as well.
Let me ask you who do you agree with on this one?
Not do you like the personal commentary or do you think that it was appropriate for Donald Trump to post what he posted on Truth or using that venue.
But I think we are at the point now where we can very clearly see a contrast.
I want you to take your personal religious lens off of this, and I just want you to look at this through a political one, a national policy one, as a conservative, as a MAGA person, America First, nationalist, whatever you want to call it.
You want open borders, or do you believe in strong borders?
Do you support deportations of illegal aliens, or do you think that's cruel?
Do you support a bigger welfare state or do you think we need to be more fiscally responsible?
Where do you line up on these fundamental issues?
Do you think that we should be tolerant of Islam and welcoming or do you think that maybe it's run its course as far as Western tolerance being used against us?
Do you think it's a good thing that President Trump spoke out against genocide in certain African nations or do you think that it's just kind of the equivalent there, whether they're Muslim, whether they're Christian?
It's just, it's all the same and we should help all people.
I think now you do have to decide where you line up on this argument.
Then hopefully it can be a fruitful and productive argument.
So let me start this off with right now what is going on between the Pope and President Trump.
And then I want to go back a little bit because this is a long time coming the history and the disagreements therein.
So obviously, you know, Monday President Trump criticized Pope Leo for being weak on crime, bad on foreign policy.
Here you go.
We don't like it.
We don't like a Pope that's going to say that it's okay to have a nuclear weapon.
We don't want a Pope.
That says crime is okay in our city.
I don't like it.
I'm not a big fan of Pope Leo.
He's a very liberal person, and he's a man that doesn't believe in stopping crime.
He's a man that doesn't think that we should be toying with a country that wants a nuclear weapon so they can blow up the world.
I'm not a fan of Pope Leo.
Obviously, for those who've been following us, Pope Leo responded while on his way to Algeria.
A good place to vacation if you're looking for recommendations.
I do not look at my role as being political or politician.
I don't want to get into a debate with him, and I will continue to speak out loudly against war, looking to promote peace.
I have no fear of neither the Trump administration nor speaking out loudly about the message in the gospel.
And that's what I believe I am called to do, what the church is called to do.
We're not politicians.
We're not looking to make foreign policies.
The issue is that he did reach out and speak on foreign policy.
And not only that.
He also has spoken on domestic policy.
If he believes what he says there, then there's no world in which it's appropriate for him to condemn our deportation policies or our strengthening our border policies.
But he did.
And my issue here is, of course, not at all with Catholics.
And I get that some Catholics may find themselves in an awkward position.
You let me know if you're Catholic.
Comment below because you don't want to speak poorly of the Pope.
And he may be, by the way, and very likely is a very decent man who's simply wrong.
He would be just as wrong as AOC on immigration policy.
Or let's go more moderate just as wrong as George W. Bush, Paul Ryan on immigration policy.
That's okay.
And it's not trashing the Catholic Church.
To say that.
And I had quite a bit prepared for this, but I figured that the most effective way to highlight this, because I know sometimes people will shut off if it's their thing and they feel offended, is just to give you a side by side.
This is a long time coming.
This president, the one who many of you elected, and the MAGA, the America First, the right wing, the conservative movement, has been in diametric opposition policy wise to the Pope, this current Pope, and the current Vatican.
On nearly all fundamental issues.
It's an abominable regime and it should be removed.
But this is a war of choice.
We do have some work to do with Iran.
They can't have a nuclear weapon, it's very simple.
You can't have peace in the Middle East if they have a nuclear weapon.
If people are in the United States illegally, there are ways to treat that.
There are courts, there's a system of justice.
But when people are living good lives, and many of them for 10, 15, 20 years, To treat them in a way that is extremely disrespectful, to say the least, and there's been some violence, unfortunately.
I think that the bishops have been very clear in what they said.
Is it your plan to deport everyone who is here illegally over the next four years?
Well, I think you have to do it, and it's a very tough thing to do.
You know, you have rules, regulations, laws, they came in illegally.
For security zones separating us from our neighbors, for the exclusionary mindset that.
Tragically, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms.
Communion between Christians and Muslims takes shape under the mantle of Our Lady of Africa.
Here in Algeria, the maternal love of Lala Maryam gathers everyone as children within our rich diversity, in our shared aspiration for dignity, love, justice, and peace.
In a world where division and wars sow pain and death, living in unity and peace is a compelling sign.
Hashtag Apostolic Journey.
For the first time in its history, the Vatican has set aside a prayer room for Muslims inside the Apostolic Library.
All nations must stand together against the evil forces of radical Islamic terrorism.
The creation is crying out in floods, droughts, storms, and relentless heat.
One in three people live in great vulnerability because of these climate changes.
Climate change.
Because if it goes higher or lower, whatever the hell happens, there's climate change.
It's the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world, in my opinion.
In his first major document, Pope Leo dove right into poverty, saying God has a special place in his heart for those who are poor, oppressed, and discriminated against.
In a continuation of the teaching of Pope Francis, the Chicago native denounced an economy that kills and dramatic imbalances of wealth.
The USA is the economic engine on the planet, and when America booms, the entire world booms.
And you can check out all the references as we provide every show, 11 a.m. Eastern on weekdays.
Let me just ask you this.
Were you happy to hear that Donald Trump withdrew when it happened, President Trump?
Is it what you voted for when he said, no, we're not going to do the Paris Climate Agreement?
We're not going to do that.
We're not going to reduce our own energy use and skyrocket the costs so that China can screw this all up and not actually take part anyway?
Were you happy then?
I was.
And I know that deportations or apprehensions have gone down a little bit this month.
I'm disappointed in that.
But when I saw deportations increase, And I saw border crossings go down to the tune of 96 to 99%.
Is that what you voted for?
It's what I voted for.
I was happy with that.
When you're talking about any of these other issues as it relates to, for example, let's talk about foreign policy.
Let's talk about foreign policy as it relates to poverty, because that's an important one.
He says, God has a special place in his heart for the poor, the oppressed, the discriminated against.
Well, certainly the oppressed and the discriminated against, and if that's the reason that they are poor.
God, if we all serve the God of the Bible, the Christian God of the Bible, God also has a very special prescription for people who are poor because they are lazy and recognizes that that's a significant portion of it.
Not all of them.
What is it?
Is it praise or is it condemnation?
Is it called out specifically?
And if he wants to discuss poverty, why does he consistently go after, meaning the Pope, the country that has brought more people out of poverty than any throughout all of human history and has more class mobility than any country on earth right now?
Yes, that includes even those.
European nations that you love to point to on a regular basis that have the population of Rhode Island and entirely homogenous.
Yes, more class mobility here.
What has thrust more people into poverty than communism, than Marxism?
How much of a discussion is there centering around that?
Matter of fact, I don't know that there's anything this Pope seems to enjoy discussing more or has more of a proclivity to address than American policy specifically.
Is that what you voted for?
Because this is what I voted for.
I didn't vote for this pope.
It almost seems like the cardinals who did vote for him voted for an American so that they could have an American, you know, talking head saying the things that they wanted to say from the Vatican.
Yeah, we shouldn't, you know, there's a system.
He says, it's also just uninformed, by the way.
The pope, I'm just going to say that politically, I'm not talking about theologically or on issues of the gospel, politically, is about as dumb as a writer from BuzzFeed.
I mean, well, the thing is with illegal immigration, there's a system and there's a justice system.
Yeah, it didn't work.
People skipped out and didn't show up, and they were given carte blanche.
And one party in this country wanted to create an entire new class of voters, purchasing them on your dime, the American worker.
There's a system.
Great, there is right now.
Hey, Pope, $2,600.
All expenses paid.
Come back the right way.
Right now, CBP1 app.
Yeah.
The other thing that I notice is they say, well, of course, something should be done.
So, of course, this regime is terrible in Iran and they should be removed.
But no war is ever right.
Yeah, but how?
How do you remove?
How do you remove?
Whether you agree, and that's one where maybe you agree with this Pope.
Maybe you agree with this Pope over Donald Trump on Iran.
And I know that there are people on both sides that I think reasonable arguments to be made on both sides of that issue.
Not if you claim to be conservative or America first on immigration, on taxes, on the border.
I also haven't seen him speak out particularly against the evils of feminism and LGBTQ and the destruction of the nuclear family in the same way, not with the same zeal.
Islam.
Yeah.
A designated prayer room for visitors?
Can Christians, can someone fact check me?
Can Christians, are they allowed to go to Mecca now?
I think you're allowed to kiss the black rock, the black square.
Yeah, if you're not.
I don't think so.
I don't think they have a designated prayer room there.
So just in the Vatican, they have a designated prayer room for Muslims.
Right.
That are visiting scholars.
There's this weird alliance.
And I just seem to remember something about truth dividing.
I didn't come to bring peace but a sword.
The truth is going to divide us.
And you're going to tell me that.
I guess Vatican II is what really ushered this in that the God of Islam and the God of the Bible are the same God?
They're not.
The attributes are completely different.
It doesn't make any sense to me.
Why this alliance, especially making these comments in Algeria?
Why?
For people who are complaining about the fall of, for example, Hungary, Viktor Orban, by the way, losing to someone who's to the right of him on immigration and on some social issues and more moderate on some other issues, certainly as it relates to the international community, where's the outrage here about someone?
Pumping the message of globalism ad nauseum.
That's what this Pope does.
When he talks about climate change, he's talking about international treaties with godless heathen nations, secular humanists who think that they can fix the world by getting rid of people.
You know the reason that we have a birth rate problem, right?
The primary reason?
There are other contributing factors.
The left will tell you how could you bring a child into this world when overpopulation is a problem?
We grew up with that nonstop.
Climate change.
We have to curb the population.
Remember, Bill Burr even had a bit about that, right?
Just using sort of an uneducated rube on these issues is a good sort of bellwether.
He goes, No one wants to address this issue, right?
Because no one wants to admit that, like, half of us just have to walk off into the ocean.
People believe that for a long time.
And now we're facing the crisis of not actually replacing our populations.
So for someone like that who comes from a religion, a worldview of be fruitful and multiply to the point that they are, you know, Quite adamantly against contraception in comparison to other denominations.
How do you buy into the internationalist agenda of climate change, which was predicated on the idea that there are too many human beings on this planet?
I got to tell you, I'm not seeing the fruits of the spirit there.
Or it could just be a lack of education.
But that's my report, Captain.
Anyone else want to take a crack at it?
Because I know, I know, it's like, oh, we know we're going to, this is not anti Catholic.
It's anti political positions of this Pope.
Well, Gerald was saying, I don't know why he would say that in Algeria.
It's illegal to, I can't say that.
Proselytize.
Yeah.
I always want to say prostitute.
Yeah.
I mean, proselytize.
That's probably illegal too.
Yeah.
We can't do either one.
Yeah, you can't do that in Algeria.
It's a crime.
So, you know, you go there for whatever reason, you have to be respectful and you can't say, oh, Islam sucks and you guys are terrifying.
Divine Claims and Lost Faith00:07:06
Well, the issue too with the Pope, I will say.
Well, Gerald, you were about to say something.
I was going to say, how does Islam treat Jesus?
Pull the tweet up from Tucker Carlson, real quick.
I guess this just came out from Tucker.
Just the top part.
The people in charge don't want you to know this, but Muslims love Jesus.
Pause before we get to anything else.
Before we get to anything else, do they believe Jesus was divine?
He died on the cross and rose from the dead?
No.
They say that never happened.
No.
Okay, you're a Christian.
Was Jesus the son of God in Islam?
No.
But it's as simple as this they love Jesus.
Someone says, I love Jesus.
And they go, but he wasn't crucified and he didn't rise from the dead.
How would you refer to that?
A Christian?
No.
Someone who loves Jesus?
Okay, just apply the same standard to Islam, but continue.
But nothing else needs to be addressed, but let's continue.
Exactly.
No, that's exactly the point.
Yeah.
The question in Didi Ryan was he divine?
He claimed it.
You can't have him be a prophet.
We've gone through this before.
I don't want to go down this road.
But this weird alliance where the Catholic Church is trying to do this, and people don't want to tell you that Muslims love Jesus.
Yeah, they completely deny his divinity, which is completely antithetical to Christianity.
So I don't care what they think about him outside of that.
Fine.
They think he's a prophet that's subservient in their religion.
Okay.
Fantastic.
What does that mean to us as Christians?
I'm not going to go fight him necessarily for that, but we are not the same.
Stop it.
We are not the same.
You could easily prove this, by the way.
You could easily prove this.
They love Jesus.
Go to an Islamic country, a country under Islamic rule, and very publicly, in the town square, respectfully, respectfully, you can have a megaphone or not, your choice, respectfully say, Muhammad was wrong.
Jesus is divine.
He did rise from the dead.
Three days later, and he is the only way, the truth, and the light.
No one gets to the Father except through him.
And to deny the divinity of Christ is to accept the hellfires that are inevitable.
Just go and say that.
Muhammad was wrong.
Jesus was divine, was crucified, and he rose three days later.
Muhammad is wrong about this, and you need to follow the divine.
And Muhammad can be an auxiliary prophet if you think he had some good teachings, but the divine is.
Is Jesus Christ right, Jesus lovers?
You say as they behead you, straight to jail, straight to jail in Algeria.
I can't see it.
Yeah, yeah, test it.
Do you think the people saying this don't know that?
I can tell this is exactly the kind of propaganda I was getting at the Muslim club, the college, I think it was Islamic College Association, where they were handing out Qurans.
And the first thing they said was, and just so you know, we believe in Jesus.
I said, Oh, really?
Well, what do you believe about Jesus?
I said that he was a great prophet.
I said, uh huh.
But that's not the primary defining characteristic of Jesus because there are a lot of prophets, by the way.
And as Christians, we also believe there were prophets before Jesus.
But we don't follow them as our savior.
That's why it's called Christianity.
So was he divine?
Well, no.
Well, we don't believe he was a prophet.
We believe that he was Son of God, God in the flesh, Father, Son, Holy Spirit.
Where do you guys line up on the Holy Trinity?
I remember this and it tripped them up.
Well, okay.
I guess we disagree.
So we disagree on the foundation of our faith.
And it's even worse than that because Islam subverts it and says, by the way, you can't trust any of the texts, the Old Testament or New Testament, because the people of the book lied about it.
But I'm here to correct it.
Yeah.
By the way, according to Islam, Jesus should be stoned.
He's a prophet, right?
What was the penalty for a prophet prophesying something that didn't happen in the Old Testament?
They were stoned.
Don't worry about the divinity argument for a second, just in case they want to side.
Step that and say Jesus never claimed that.
Did he say he was going to be killed and rise again three days later?
If he swooned on the cross and faked it or didn't rise again three days later for any reason, he lied and should be stoned.
Well, they just say that's the text where.
Doesn't matter.
Doesn't matter.
Give me the text.
The Jews in early Christians.
They don't even make the claim.
They don't make the claim.
They just say he swooned on the cross.
He didn't actually die.
They don't ever address the claim where Jesus said he would do that.
This generation isn't going to get a sign.
You're going to get the sign of Jonah.
Guys, I will tell you this.
Beyond the infighting, beyond the horseshoe right, If Christians let Islam in the door and say we're all the same, it's done.
You lose your country, the fight is lost.
It's that important.
Just so you understand.
Anyone who tells you we're all the same, and actually, did you know, like some kind of Saturday morning special, did you know that Muslims, yeah, I know everything that Muslims, not everything, but I know what Muslims dreamed about 20 years ago.
They replaced the more you know music with like the call to prayer.
Yeah.
Yeah, but it's.
LeVar Burton.
But you don't have to take my word for it.
No.
Because I'm not allowed to speak.
It's all lost.
If you allow Islam to get a foothold here, it is all lost.
And I don't mean secular Muslims or moderate Muslims in the United States.
No.
I mean, if you allow Christianity to be diluted with Islam, as though we are one and the same or close enough, you might as well just register as a Democrat for the rest of your life, and you might as well call yourself a Bolshevik.
Like many Democrats do in their quiet time.
And there's a lack of transparency.
I noticed, too, the same thing with the Pope.
He never has to answer for it.
Yeah, nobody gets to call him out.
The people out there who put these things on social media, we just mentioned Tucker, he doesn't have to answer for it.
He's not going to answer to someone who goes, Well, do they deny the divine?
Yeah, that's a really simple question, right?
Well, I don't know if they deny the divine.
Well, I do.
The Pope isn't going to answer for it.
You know, it would be great if the Pope actually, if he ever just sat down and had a conversation with someone who doesn't even have to be, I mean, it doesn't have to be George Will or Charles Krauthammer, God rest his soul.
It could be anyone who's moderately educated on the border.
Yeah, but you understand that it costs the taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars, and you understand that there's a crime issue, and you understand that Americans are struggling, and it's actually not our duty to simply let anyone into this country who wants to.
He never has to answer for those questions.
And say what you want about President Trump.
He may answer ineloquently, but he is constantly answering the press.
I certainly would take what are you, New York Times fake news over silence.
Don't follow someone who doesn't get into the fight.
Ever.
Ever.
That's the trend that I'm seeing.
And it is all lost.
It is all lost if we just say, yeah, Christianity, Islam.
Basically, the same thing.
The Pope being weak on border security is crazy because God has the best border.
Leadership Trends and Socialism00:15:28
Effectively.
Yeah.
It's either in heaven or literally burning for eternity in hell.
Yeah.
There's literally a guest list and gates.
The Catholics believe in a waiting room or whatever.
Right.
Lobby, so to speak.
Yeah.
The study.
But, uh, yeah.
I don't know if your name's on the list, sir.
And I also would say, if they don't get into the fight, also transparency.
If someone says, you know, they believe they love Jesus, oh, really?
What's your basis for that?
If someone doesn't give you an answer, and especially if it's theology, it needs to be scripturally based.
If it's policy, it does need to be factually based, data based.
There's a real lack of transparency, which I thought would go the other way.
If you were to ask young me in 2008, 2009, starting with a blue bedsheet on YouTube, we're saying we can circumvent the gatekeepers and we'll be able to get the information directly to people.
But now it's not just a culture of censorship as we used to see in.
Legacy media or mainstream media, it's a culture of self censorship.
The FCC used to say you can't say poop.
You can't say something scatological.
Yeah, if it really, you could say, ah, crap.
What you can't say is the guy took a crap.
All these, but you kind of had these rules in a game of cat and mouse.
Now it's a culture of self censorship.
And at one point that was cancel culture.
Now that's the algorithm.
That's the clickbait where you might as well be canceled if you don't just feed the beast with something new and something novel, regardless of how truthful.
As a matter of fact, You're punished for being transparent.
Here's what I mean by that.
If you're being transparent and you provide the references, the data, the evidence, it's never going to be as sensational.
Sometimes.
I don't want to say never.
It's rarely ever going to be as sensational as a claim that can be made without substantiation.
So, it's actually a net negative for people looking to pursue clicks, looking to pursue traffic, to pursue a policy of consistent transparency.
Case in point, I mean, it's a good time to, the only other company that I've created, that I run, Foundation.
You can go to foundationdaily.com.
It's a multivitamin.
And I've been taking this stuff for years.
And you see all these fitness influencer trends out there, right?
They go, How did I get ripped?
Transparency would be trend balone.
And instead, they go, I drank this tea or I took this pill.
Right?
It's actually a net negative to be transparent because people will know that you are full of crap.
If you have a perfect diet, you exercise, eh, you know what?
Maybe you don't need it.
But if you want to cover your bases, you want a foundation.
They also have clinical doses of clinical ingredients like turmeric, curcumin in there, garlic for heart health, for blood pressure, for inflammation.
It's all in one pill that you can take.
You take several pills, but one bottle every day.
And it's lab tested where you can actually go and see the results for yourself.
FoundationDaily.com, you get 50% off your subscription.
Wanted to create a company.
Now, this is special.
Normally, it's 40% off.
We wanted to create a company just like this show, where we provide the references.
There you go.
Lab tests available.
There you go.
Everything on the list, on the ingredient list, is exactly what you get.
We don't make grandiose claims.
We don't make false claims, but you can actually, on the website, look at the clinical research and the results they're in.
It'd be a lot easier, right?
In other words, I could say curcumin, turmeric, in this.
I'm just using this as an example.
I know this is a plug, but it's a perfect chance to do it.
Turmeric, curcumin.
Very studied supplement.
Outside of creatine, probably one of the most studied ever.
The anti inflammatory effects are about comparable to Advil if you take it daily without some of the negative side effects.
In the right amounts?
Yeah, in the right amounts.
Now, I provide that on the website.
I could tell you, as many people who are social influencers, guys, I took this thing and all my pain is gone.
I wouldn't be incentivized.
As a matter of fact, it would be a self defeating argument to say that and provide you with a reference that said 15 to 24% reduction in inflammation and pain.
The truth is helpful, but the truth is very rarely sensational.
So that's why we created it, foundationdaily.com.
And let's go on to the next one where we've seen some sensationalism.
Yeah.
The Bolshevik Revolution.
Let me ask you this.
How familiar are you with the Bolsheviks, revolutionary Russia, which of course paved the way?
You had Lenin paved the way for Stalin.
I have consistently discussed and maintained that it's very bizarre that this is not discussed at large, that we learn about World War II and Hitler bad.
To be clear, Hitler was bad, but we very rarely learn in school.
I never learned in school about Mao.
I learned almost nothing about Russian involvement.
Yeah.
Mao, Stalin.
Yeah.
None of it.
Why?
Well, now some people are asking those same questions, only they're providing you with answers that are verifiably wrong.
But for the record, this is something we've discussed here for a very long time.
Stalin.
A lot of people, we asked young people, they were not familiar with Stalin at all.
And of course, that's interesting because Stalin, Hitler, same period of time, Stalin certainly killed more people.
But if you spend all of this time learning about Adolf Hitler in school, you would think that you would learn just as much about Stalin.
We kind of skimmed over Stalin.
So they always compare to Hitler, but not only is barely any attention given to these other horrible dictators who, by the way, cost many more lives.
We'll get to that.
Communism, socialism, they have to be careful.
We hear a lot about Adolf Hitler, and we don't hear a lot about other people who I would argue are not only just as bad, but historically equally, if not more significant.
People like Stalin, people like Mao.
Pol Pot, I think, is the worst.
As a matter of fact, we did a series, The Great Diktoff.
Mm hmm.
Dictators throughout history.
The purpose of that was to highlight that every single one of them, with the exception of maybe Pinochet and the left, would argue Hitler, far, far left.
I think the winner was Mao.
Might have been Pol Pot because Pol Pot was a greater percentage.
So we've been covering this for a long time.
You can go back and look at old videos that cover the A to Z on Karl Marx.
I believe we either did Trotsky or Lenin.
But today I want to specifically address the Bolshevik Revolution because some people have just recently discovered it.
Now, first, let me concede it is true.
In the Bolshevik Revolution, there was a disproportionate percentage of Jews in positions of leadership early on.
Okay?
I'll get into the context as to why that is the case, but anyone who uses the term Bolshevik, Jew, interchangeably, is uneducated or lying to you.
And here's why that matters.
Please, just listen to this, hear me out, go check the references.
There are still Bolsheviks today, they still want the same things.
And if you misidentify the drivers, the motivators, or the threats, well, then you'll let the wolves in the door, like Islam, or link arms with the modern Democrat Party, who, by the way, is an extension of Bolshevism.
Still a statue of Lenin, right now, 16 feet high, in the United States.
We'll get to that.
Where do you think it is?
Who do you think supports it?
This brings us to right now, people new to this, internet intellectuals, however you want to refer to them.
Bolshevism is synonymous with Jewishness.
In Russia, like millions and millions of Christians were being exterminated by the Bolshevik Jews up there.
The funny thing is, the Bolsheviks were everything that they told you the Nazis were.
And they had proven it.
They had already made Christianity illegal, they had made religion illegal.
They'd also made it, by the way, illegal to criticize.
Well, people think that the.
Greatest mass murderer was Adolf Hitler.
And no, actually, if you want to talk about genocide, the fact that people in America don't know about what the Bolsheviks did to Christians, where did the idea of a concentration camp come from?
The Bolsheviks.
And by the way, that is true.
That is true that they did persecute, kill Christians, because Bolsheviks, and especially if you look at the leadership of Lenin, was distinctly anti Christian.
Now, if we're going to say, They were all Jews.
Well, I'll get to the numbers.
It was about 5% of the Bolsheviks were Jews.
They made up anywhere from 2% to 5% of the population.
More of the leadership.
But some of these places include people like Lenin as Jew.
He did have some Jewish ethnicity in his family.
His parents, they'd converted to Christianity before he was born.
He was distinctly atheist and he wanted to destroy the idea of God.
Peace without God was one of their slogans.
Now, if you think that observant, practicing Jews.
Are out there destroying religion because they espouse peace without God.
Fine, there's no convincing you.
But I want to go through a couple of things how the Bolsheviks came to be, who they were, and what they ultimately did, because it is important.
We've talked about it quite a bit.
This is remedial for those of you who have been here a while.
Bolsheviks, radical Marxist faction, right?
Early 1900s in Russia, specifically formed in 1903.
There was a split, the Russian Social Democrat Labor Party.
You had the Mensheviks, and you had the Bolsheviks, which, funny, Menshevik means Minority, Bolshevik means majority, even though they ended up kind of oscillating where sometimes one would be the majority, one would be the minority.
And the Bolsheviks were led by Vladimir Lenin.
This is one of those things, well, Lenin read a book on Marx, just so you know how badly it's permeated culture as though people aren't horrified by that American pie.
Also, something interesting the Mensheviks were effectively socialists as well, but they believed because Russia was so poor that they would go through the legal process and they would need a period of capitalism.
To generate some kind of wealth and then hand it over to the state.
They always do.
They always need a little capitalism first.
When they seize the means of production, seize the means of whatever, it's because it existed because of capitalism.
Well, that's where the Bolsheviks said, no, no, we don't need that anyway because the state won't exist.
And through quite a bit of violence early on, then we'll do away with state violence.
And of course, it just led to abject poverty, failures by any metric, and of course, mass death, which the Nazis would have been jealous over.
So, if you look at the Bolsheviks, you know, Lenin, it was basically the difference, narrow party, narrow party leadership than the Mensheviks.
They believed in elite leadership.
They didn't believe in democratic decision making.
They said a conversation will take place, but everyone gets in line and marches once they have orders.
So, it's almost a self defeating argument at this point.
But they believed in radical political revolution.
And it was distinctly anti God, distinctly anti Christian because of the Russian Orthodox Church at that point.
Party, I think, formalized, I believe it was 1912, conference in Prague.
Okay.
That's how it came to be.
Who were the Bolsheviks?
Well, it was mostly like people from intelligentsia, as you would know them, like academia now.
By the way, you see a lot of Bolsheviks in academia to this day.
That's where you see a lot of socialists, a lot of people who say communism in theory works.
Factory workers, peasants, very similar to the alliance that we saw before the restructuring of right and left under Donald Trump.
It was intelligentsia and then kind of big unions.
This brings us to were they all Jewish?
Were they mostly Jewish?
They started a higher percentage of Jews, around 10% in the early 1900s.
And a big reason for that, just to be clear, is because Jews were specifically discriminated against under Tsarist Russia.
So they were naturally going to be more inclined to take part in revolutionary politics.
On average, about 5%, though, Bolsheviks were Jewish.
And on average, Jews made up about 4% of the total Russian population.
So that's pretty representative.
Yeah.
Ethnic Russian, about 78%.
Also, you can look at other groups, too.
People will say the Jews, they'll say they were disproportionately represented at the beginning of.
The Bolshevik Revolution.
Sure.
Now do Latvians.
Now do Georgians.
Why?
Because people who had an axe to grind would try and ride the coattails of any revolutionary measures at that point in time.
Let's say during the American era of slavery, there was a party that specifically came about and said, you know what?
We are going to free the slaves.
Well, of course, that would be the party they support for a very long time.
Yes, I just described the Republican Party.
So that's why.
The context does matter.
Now, they did make up quite a bit of the leadership, Jewish people, of the Bolshevik leadership, about 28%.
Ethnic Russians, 42%.
Other category would be somewhere around 30 something percent.
But here's the thing the reason for that, too, is that Jews made up a significant percentage of all of those involved in politics in that inter revolutionary period.
Why?
High literacy rates.
Big part of that is they were limited in certain jobs that they could do.
So a lot of their jobs involved literacy, a lot of their jobs involved intellectual endeavors.
They were discriminated against, to be clear.
And it doesn't justify anyone taking part in Bolshevism, to be clear.
Hate it.
I've been talking about it for decades.
Jews made up about 10% of all political elite.
Check the references.
I make this all available to you.
Ranging the whole political spectrum, by the way.
So people say Jews made up a disproportionate amount of the Bolsheviks.
Well, no, as far as total Bolsheviks, 4% of the population, about 5%.
They made up a huge percent of the leadership.
Numbers are muddied because you have people who may be ethnically Jewish.
The one thing of which you can be certain is there were no faithful practicing Jews who wanted to maintain their practices with synagogues and the right to worship who were Bolsheviks.
They were secular.
Very much in the same way that comparing Ben Shapiro to Harvey Weinstein wouldn't be fair.
Or people celebrating Passover, their local synagogue, local temple would not be comparable to those who are involved in the UN or the WEF who don't believe in God at all.
Here's some actual proof of that.
The 1918 constituent elections, there are about 417,000, 490 something thousand, depending on the numbers you use, votes for Jewish parties.
They mostly went to Zionist parties, about 80,000 of which went to socialist parties.
Bolsheviks were not even amongst the top three supported by Jews in Russia.
So there were far, far more Jews in Russia who were opposed to Bolshevism than those who supported it.
Yes, disproportionate percentage of those in leadership were Jewish.
Here's a fun fact, too the term Jewish Bolshevism, to try and confuse you and believe that the problem is Jews, not Bolsheviks, who are Marxists, communists.
Lenin was effectively Karl Marx.
He was Karl Marx in a position of leadership.
It was popularized directly by those involved with the Nazi Party Dietrich Eckhart, founder of actual Nazism, Alfred Rosenberg, Nazi official.
And then, of course, you had Henry Ford, who was writing letters to Hitler, like, hey, hey, pen pal.
Great making cars, not so much on this issue.
Right.
What did the Bolsheviks do?
So, this brings us to who they were, who they weren't.
And really quickly, I've again said this for a long time why don't they talk about Stalinist Russia?
Leftist Biases and Historical Deaths00:07:20
Concerned that far more people were killed.
For the same reason, they don't want to discuss Maoist China.
They don't really want to discuss Pol Pot's Cambodia.
Because the left doesn't want to direct you to the history of the left.
Because they still exist.
They're still trying to convince you that Bolshevism, Marxism could work today.
So they don't want to point you to the hundreds of millions, historically, of deaths at the hands of the left.
People simply now say, well, it's because Jews don't want you to.
It's because the left doesn't want to direct you to the founders of their feast.
Here's what the Bolsheviks did 1917, that was the October Revolution.
They seized power from the Russian Provisional Government.
There was the Red Terror.
You guys have heard of this.
People who are new here, they just kind of throw that on you.
1918 to 1922, 200,000 people were executed by the Bolsheviks during this consolidation of power.
I'll read it to you directly.
According to Lenin, he said, We set ourselves the ultimate aim of abolishing the state, all organized and systemic violence, all use of violence against people in general.
The 200,000 notwithstanding, as we start this thing, you need to break a few eggs.
We do not expect the advent of a system of society in which the principle of subordination of the minority to the majority will not be observed.
In striving for socialism, however, we are convinced that it will develop into communism and therefore that the need for violence against people in general for the subordination of one man to another and of one section of the population to another will vanish altogether since people will become accustomed to observing the elementary conditions.
Of social life without violence and without subordination.
But for right now, you all subordinate.
Yes?
Yes, and violence.
Yes, and a little bit of violence.
Also, we cannot have God because if we have God, we have strong families, we have strong churches.
These are communities.
We cannot have communities because, dear nothing, they might fight back.
And if you want to know where Bolshevism still exists today, some Jewish people, sure.
To be clear, I've said this in the past, and this is the case for tribalism.
I'm going to disagree with Jews on a lot, certainly theologically.
I'm going to disagree with the left on everything.
I'm going to disagree with many black voters in this country a lot, probably more than we agree.
I'm going to disagree with the left on everything.
I'm going to disagree with women.
In the Western world today, a lot.
I'm going to disagree with the left on everything.
I'm going to disagree with Muslims quite a bit.
I'm going to disagree with the left on everything.
And today, Bolshevism exists exclusively, as it always has, on the left.
And they are not hiding it.
Identify the drivers of that which ails this country.
It's funny.
Sometimes American journalists talk about how bad a country is because people are lining up for food.
That's a good thing.
Our main project is to unite the working class in this country against a fascist agenda.
Stay calm.
All of the workers are all right.
None of the rich will survive, though.
We will draw this city closer together.
We will replace the frigidity of rugged individualism with the warmth of collectivism.
But then there are also other issues that we firmly believe in, whether it's BDS, right?
Or whether it's the end goal of seizing the means of production, where we do not have the same level of support at this very moment.
The reason this matters, if you are starting off where you have said the through line is Jew.
I will say this secular humanist Jews have presented quite a few problems for the United States.
I will not disagree with that.
And I agree as a matter of foreign policy, by the way, that we need to look out for the interests of our country first.
And APEC can go screw themselves with a wire brush.
But if you are starting off looking at the threat and saying, okay, where do the remnants of Bolshevism still exist?
And you've predetermined Jew, you've just ignored atheists, Muslims, secular Jews like Bernie, Buddhists.
But there is one through line that is remarkably consistent.
They're all leftists.
And you don't see it anywhere on the right.
Least he didn't for a very long time.
You need more proof?
Modern day Lenin acolytes, a lot of celebrities.
They love to venerate another Marxist, another Bolshevik of another flavor Che Guevara.
Stamp it on a t-shirt and sell it for 29 bucks.
Now, if you see all that and go through line Jew, you may need to check your biases.
Let me give you another example.
Lenin, we're talking about the Bolsheviks.
Led by Lenin, to be clear, there's still a statue of him in the United States today.
Matter of fact, it's a statue that they refused to erect in Russia.
They actually brought it down, they brought it from Russia to the United States for American Bolsheviks to be able to enjoy.
Where?
Seattle.
The first leader of the Soviet Union seems like an unlikely figure to be immortalized in the U.S.
But this statue of the Russian revolutionary Vladimir Lenin has sat at the Seattle intersection since nineteen ninety six.
The Czechoslovak Socialist Republic commissioned and displayed Emil Venkov's work, but then a year later the Soviet Empire collapsed.
Like many other depictions of Lenin, it was soon taken down.
Years later, Washington native Louis E. Carpenter, now living in Slovakia, discovered it laying in a scrapyard.
He argued the statue's artistic merit to the Slovak government.
A deal was made for $41,000, in which he mortgaged his house to fund its purchase and transport.
In August 1993, it arrived in Carpenter's hometown of Issaquah.
Sadly, though, only months later, he was killed in a car accident, leaving the statue's status in limbo.
A couple years later, local artist Peter Bevis facilitated a deal to display Lennon here in this intersection until the family finds a buyer.
That was almost 30 years ago.
So, here it sits, an unlikely Cold War era landmark in a city that played a huge role for America during World War II.
Now, I know someone's probably going to find a banknote or someone who co signed a loan.
Modern Bolshevism in Seattle00:03:30
Ah, see, Jew.
Okay, sure, fine.
But Jews make up about 2% of the greater Seattle area.
So they wouldn't be able to be the reason that that statue, that has four and a half stars on Yelp, you know what may contribute to it if you're looking for modern day Bolshevism?
King County, where Seattle sits, is one of the bluest counties in the country.
So, if you're trying to identify the drivers of modern day Marxism and Bolshevism, yes, you will find quite a few Jewish Americans because you'll find a lot of them in intelligentsia and a lot of them in endeavors that involve the mind as opposed to the hands, not a very robust physical people.
But with that statue, they just don't want to.
You're far less likely to run into this.
Far less likely to run into that than you are to see this.
Yeah.
And here's the thing, too.
And I know we're going to have to leave you.
And this is one of the.
No one wants to wade into these conversations right now because I know someone will say, You're paid by the Jews to say this.
Of course, people will say that.
You know what?
You sound like a liberal.
You sound like a Bolshevik.
I've been around here a long fucking time.
You know what people used to say?
Oh, you don't support the Kyoto Protocol, first the Montreal Accord, then the Paris Climate Agreement.
You must be paid by big oil.
And that is two degrees of retarded, lazy arguing.
First off, It's not something that can be proven or disproven.
So that's lazy.
It's not a good argument.
Second, you could be paid by big oil or have received a check from and still be right in saying a 0.3 degree Celsius increase in temperature over the next century will not have catastrophic results to the point that we believe the WEF should be in charge of what we drive.
It's two layers of lazy arguing.
And I've said, I will open this up to any commentator who's willing, we can have a third party.
Auditor, look at the books.
I can tell you not only have I never received a dime from any foreign entity, any foreign country, we also don't receive money from nonprofits who undoubtedly have a lot of influences that may be both domestic and foreign.
It's the only place.
Like I said, I'm going to disagree with Jews on a lot, the left on everything, blacks on a lot, the left on everything, women on a lot, even feminists on a lot, the left on everything.
And the threat still exists.
There are still people pushing it right now because it's not going to be done at the tip of a bayonet.
But what were the Bolsheviks seeking to destroy?
It wasn't just the SARS and it wasn't just the ruling class.
They knew that to destroy a society, in order to have a culture, in order to have a society where you could say there was no subordination because everybody was subordinate, you had to destroy, and I don't mean institutions like academia or the entertainment industry.
You had to destroy godly institutions like the family, like community, like moral absolutes that were agreed upon as a society.
Destroying Society to Replace It00:01:01
You have to do away with all of that, deconstruct it so you can replace it with a new deity.
And that deity, that new God, is always the state.
So be aware of it and understand who it is that you're fighting.
You let me know if you think that's fair.
If you're not a member yet, the reason we're able to discuss these issues, and we always will, whether it's the popular position or not, we strive to be right.
We're able to do that because of your support.
That's where we actually, that's who signs our checks.
You, Rumble Premium, $99 a year.
You get this wonderful hand etched mug, 100% more show, everything ad free, or $9 a month if we've moved you, inspired you, informed you.
If not, hey, you're going to go on and watch Haley Coronia for free.
Free content all day and let us earn your viewership tomorrow at 11 a.m. Eastern.
I'm curious to take some chats, but we have to play Hipster or Hobo.