LIVE DEBUNK: Hasan Piker's Cuba Lies Feat. Real Cuban, Spanglish Generation
Spanglish Generation debunks Hasan Piker's Cuba lies, while the host critiques AIPAC's $127 million influence and defends Netanyahu against context-stripped quotes. The episode addresses declining American support for Israel among youth, refutes claims of bias regarding Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson, and condemns appeasement tactics following the Bondi Beach attack. Ultimately, the discussion frames modern misinformation as a tool for political manipulation that undermines factual discourse and national interests. [Automatically generated summary]
It's just webbing when you won't let me marry your puffy old.
I help your body talk about grandpa.
Waking up, talking about Kindle My Christmas.
It's just an arm.
It's just webbing when you won't let me marry your own puffy old.
I help your body.
Talking about grandpa.
Waking up, talking about Kindle My Christmas.
Love the flow.
69.
Now it's time for new, believable people.
And we must do it.
If we don't control insiders, this will be over and over.
To lead it by an innate, big, fat love, find common ground to hold the spread of lies.
And we must do it big, fat.
Love, it's on common ground to hold the spread of lies.
And any America first, America first.
Non-fatal.
We want to build a much better, believable people.
And we must do it.
Non-fatal.
Communication very much higher.
America first.
To lead it by an 8 insiders fighting for insiders.
Time to stop.
Insiders fighting for insiders.
More of insiders fighting for insiders.
Time to stop.
Insiders fighting for insiders.
America first.
Love the flow.
69.
Now it's time for new, believable people.
And we must do it.
If we don't control insiders, this will be over and over.
To lead it by an innate big, fat love.
It's on common ground.
To hold the spread of lies.
And we must do it big, fat.
Love flying common ground to hold the spread of lies.
and join now for $99 annually or $9.99 a month to get the entirely ad-free experience and an ever-expanding roster of content, creators, and free speech.
The Chuck Norris Cameo00:04:01
Hi there.
Glad to be with you.
You know, usually Friday shows, if you're watching, it's a love letter to Mug Club, to OG Rumble Premium.
But today we are going to be actually still doing this whole hour-wide.
And here's why.
We have a guest coming on.
You know her as Spanglish Generation.
Every now and then we just sort of stumble across.
I don't want to say diamond in the rough because I don't want it to be anything other than complimentary, but in discussing Cuba, this is a Cuban-American here now who's been addressing some of the misinformation out there.
And I tell you what, after discussing it this week, a lot of Cubans, Cuban-Americans have reached out and said, please, thank you.
So let us correct this.
I don't know that I've ever met any of them who are not patriotic and hate communism militantly.
So we're going to have her on, and I wanted to make sure that you guys could hear it straight from her because Hassan is on his way with a flotilla or private jet to deliver some aid to Cuba.
Outside of that, we're going to talk about micro-penis microaggressions and some misinformation regarding Netanyahu and some quotes today.
Jesus.
And Jesus Christ.
Yeah.
Jesus Christ, the, you know, if you deny him, whether you're Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, one of the other religions that doesn't really matter, I think you're wrong.
Oh, before I introduce you, well, hold on.
Captain Morgan, CEO.
Thank you for being here, sir.
And in the future, because Josh is actually in the bustling metropolis of Fort Wayne, Indiana right now, go see him live.
We have in third chair, I descended from the balls of him.
It's Pops Crowder.
How are you, sir?
Thanks for the vulgar introduction.
It's not vulgar.
It's not vulgar.
It's like a descriptive.
Yeah.
It's like a biology textbook.
It is.
It's very sterile.
It's medical.
Yes, that's exactly right.
I'm sorry.
Did he burst forth from your loins?
Well, now you added first.
It's not an energy drink commercial.
Son!
All right.
And I hate to start this on a downer, but you know what?
I actually ran into this man like maybe once or twice.
Never really spoke with him or spent time with him, but of course, an American legend, a good man, by all accounts.
Chuck Norris passed away today at 86 years old.
So obviously our hearts go out to the families affected.
I know a lot of people loved him.
A lot of people had their lives impacted by him.
And so we wanted to just show you one of our favorite Chuck Norris clips.
And how you doing, little partner?
Fine.
And it's Little Visitor Now.
Adewoyoli is how you say it in Cherokee.
Oh, well, pardon my French, but I'll be damned.
Walker told me I had AIDS.
Does he also see dead people?
He will soon.
That's the director's cut.
That's the director's kind of sixth sense.
He finds out that he's the one who had AIDS all along.
I'm Chuck Norris.
You mean from that men's restaurant?
Chuck was on an Apple box there, by the way.
Not a big man.
Yeah, exactly.
Not a big man, but I tell you what, not one of the, he wasn't one of the Hollywood fake martial artists.
You need to know that it's right honestly.
Did combat karate, which wherever you line up on karate, but he also became a black belt and judo.
Jiu-Jitsu was one of the first.
He really was very open-minded, cross-trained.
He brought jiu-jitsu to Dallas, really.
There was nothing here.
Yeah.
Yeah, he did.
Yeah, he was with Machado.
So, what's your favorite Chuck Norris joke?
You guys can let us know.
Maybe we'll read some in the chats later, as we do every show, weekdays at 11 a.m. Eastern.
By the way, I forgot to also mention because we were discussing your nether regions.
Tell me what, you know, shoutout.us.
That's what you just like a non-communist cameo, basically.
Yeah, I hate that you use the cameo, like that reference of the competition.
Okay, it's like a pro-communist cameo.
That's right, yeah.
That's all it is.
Words, Genetics, and Ethnicity00:03:48
No, new people coming on every day.
You know, we've got a lot of, there's a scroll there, a lot of guys that are on the Rumble lineup kind of downstream from us.
Yeah.
The very fetching Gerald Morgan is on there as well.
And for those of you who don't know, you can tip your favorite creators, content creators, and they'll send you a personalized message for a birthday, anniversary.
Or heckle you.
I mean, just whatever you want.
You have 12 hours.
If you haven't been roasted by Nick, you haven't lived.
Yeah.
Probably request that one anonymously because if there's any, if you've got any ethnicity in you, that's going to be part of the happens a lot.
All right.
Let's move on here.
This woman, this is just really funny for a multitude of reasons.
Here's a lady dropping a disturbing detail according to her regarding genetic testing and decided to broadcast this to the world like the good little haram feminist, nose-ringed, screeching banshee she is.
Okay, so I just did blood work for genetic testing because I just met with my genetic counselor.
I'm Palestinian.
I'm from Ghaza.
All right.
A lot has happened in the last three years, but something to note is that my parents are first cousins.
Decided to do my blood work, and she shows me my family tree.
She's like, You don't say.
I just want to make sure it's right because it's kind of crazy.
And then at the very bottom of the page, it says, Ashkenazi Jewish with a check mark, and it says yes.
I'm looking at it.
Imagine that.
I'm like, I don't like that.
This is the regular day in the life of a Palestinian American.
I go home, find out news that more of my family members have been killed and murdered.
Go to school.
I'm a teacher.
But even as a student, go to school, act like everything's normal.
Go to the doctor, act like everything normal.
She's looking at me horrified and is just like, I'm so sorry.
And I'm just like, so sorry you're part Jew.
There's literally nothing I can do.
Like I said, makes sense from a genetic counselor's point of view.
But to me, I don't want to see those words on my paperwork.
Now, here's the confusing thing.
You would think what she's saying, I don't want to see those words.
What would be the upsetting words would be that your parents were cousins.
First cousins.
It's not even distant.
Yeah, it's not out of the family tree doesn't split.
No, it doesn't.
Instead, she doesn't want to read that there's any potential Jewishness in you from a historically Jewish race.
Like you're basically the same people ethnically.
And a lot like this just shows they haven't, they have no problem, no qualms with being inbred.
She skims past it.
Like, okay, so like, you know, whatever.
But then I saw Jew.
By the way, when reached for comment, her father had this to say.
True. True.
But who has a genetic counselor in their roster of services?
A feminist who claims to be Muslim, who also has a nose ring and wears makeup in public.
How often would you have to seek their counsel?
Just once.
Well, probably a lot now because she's how Jewish am I?
Can I remove it?
You know, like I have a, what, like 1% Sub-Saharan African in me.
So, you know, I'm not going to lie.
I wasn't thrilled about it.
Hey, we all have our thing.
God, this poster describes herself as a baddie from the blad, which is Arabic for country, and an educator who stands against all forms of oppression.
Oh, really?
Yes.
All forms of oppression.
Yeah.
Don't like reading that I have Jew in me.
She doesn't know what to do now.
Should she become an oppressor?
She's an Ashkenazi.
That's right.
Ah.
See what she did there.
Oh, thank you.
And she loves being camera ready.
You know, she could not live in a country where that had to be hidden.
Separating Truth from Lies00:15:50
That's true.
Messiah on crutches.
All right.
I'm just really tired.
That's a better way of saying it.
Yeah, I don't.
Well, because the Jews don't think so, like, they're still waiting for him.
Which, you know, means you're hellbound.
But it doesn't mean you're a bad person.
Don't worry.
He's going to give you an opportunity to, you know.
Yeah, yeah, we all get a chance.
We try.
So let me go to the next one here.
We really do.
Look, we try and call balls and strikes on this show.
And I do have kind of one thing that's a big leg up on most people in this space, and I can't claim credit for it.
It's just that I pretty much had no other options.
I've been here the longest, and you can go back and see a blue bed sheet and me in 2008 on YouTube and 2006.
And I've always believed these things.
And I was always fighting against legacy media and the corruption therein.
And early on, I would always really make the case there are no gatekeepers anymore.
And that's a wonderful thing because we used to think the cream would rise to the top, but then we realized that that wasn't the case.
It was often the people who would play ball, the people who owed favors and they were being paid back.
But I will tell you this: there's no value in what we once called new media if it just becomes exactly that which we are replacing.
Meaning corrupt, meaning chasing headlines, meaning trying to tell people exactly what to think or risking exclusion rather than helping people think more effectively, more critically.
If we withhold resources or warp or edit or lie about resource rather than providing resources and references, I always believe that that was the stark contrast.
But that's not always the case right now.
And so this brings us to some of these conversations right now regarding Israel.
Look, I've caught a lot of flack because there are serious criticisms that need to be discussed.
APAC, I mean, yeah, it's a problem.
It's the largest PAC contributor to Congress.
And I also know that Qatar, that China, that they lobby with more money overall, but they do it in different ways.
It's not a PAC.
There is a specific hold.
There is a specific influence that is very unsettling, that is exclusive to APAC in many ways.
They're the largest PAC contributor to Congress, $127 million.
Now, another criticism, and I think like this is a problem.
I just think they should, you know, they need to pick a lane.
In 54, APAC was founded by a registered foreign agent, Isaiah Kennan.
And it was specifically founded to avoid Farah.
That's not something that's in dispute.
Now, we can discuss whether it's Americans who, you know, a coalition of Americans who want to look out for the interests of Israel, which I also think is kind of antithetical to America first.
I agree with that.
I don't think that any other nation should come before the United States, and that's why APAC rubs me the wrong way.
If we look at Israel and what people see, you know, that Israel is the number one destination that's paid for as far as congressional travel.
I have been offered those trips.
I don't know if it came through these official organizations.
I have declined.
And here's the crappy part, though.
I would love to go to Israel as a Christian to visit the historical sites.
I don't like that I have to, you know what, though?
Since I've been impartial my whole life, I have to be careful that people don't accuse me of not being impartial.
Personally, I would love to go sometime.
Has nothing to do with the Israeli government.
I also have a problem with the fact that a lot of congressional representatives get a paid-for trip.
You know, it's kind of like Jewel or these social campaigns, influencer campaigns, these products, they get created and they go, hey, here's a party.
Let's invite some influencers.
Let's give them some cool places to take pictures.
That rubs me the wrong way.
I don't like that Israel is ambiguous on whether they have nuclear weapons.
I don't like that they have, in many ways here, and President Trump thankfully called it out, undermined our strategy in Iran.
We can have a vested interest, a shared interest in a non-nuclear Iran in an impotent Iran, but we also need to take our own self-interest into account how we approach it.
And Israel has put that at risk.
That's a problem.
I mean, President Trump wrote it.
Does this seem like he's the one who's being led or he's leading the dance?
This is why I like that President Trump spoke forcefully on it.
And I'd like him to do it more often when Israel acts up.
He wrote, The United States knows nothing about this particular attack, and the country of Qatar was in no way, shape, or form.
None of those things involved with it, nor did I have any idea that it was going to happen.
No more attacks will be made by Israel pertaining to this extremely important and valuable Shathparsh field.
Great.
Those are all not only legitimate critomists, not only legitimate criticisms, say that five times fast, but ones we've issued here and caught flack for from people saying that we must be paid by Qatar.
I will take an oath, and like I've said, I will open the books to any other influencers or shows out there.
We don't take any money from a foreign lobby, never have, not even nonprofits.
We're supported by mugs, not a foreign caliphate or a PAC.
That being said, new media can't replace old media in being just as dishonest.
It's of no value.
So we need to separate legitimate criticisms that are really, a conversation is necessary regarding those.
And I'm really bothered by people who say we can't have those conversations.
That's a huge problem.
Let's separate that from the lies that are going on as well.
I'm just as upset about lies circulating on social media.
Even if those lies would support my line of arguing, it's just as much of an affront to what we do here and always was to those on the right, conservatives, nationalists.
That brings me to this clip.
It's gone viral.
Netanyahu, again, has a lot of problems.
He has a vested interest in keeping this conflict going.
And I don't know where it ends from, but I don't think it ends well once this is all said and done.
But people have clipped this comment from him out of context and ginned up outrage.
And so I want to show you what has circulated and then give you the context as well as the original author he was quoting so that you can be made aware that there are people lying just like CNN.
Here's the first clip.
Well, history proves that, unfortunately, and unhappily, Jesus Christ has no advantage over Jinnis Khan.
Because if you are strong enough, ruthless enough, powerful enough, evil will overcome good.
Aggression will overcome moderation.
So you have no choice.
If you look at the world as it is today, you have to be blind not to see that the democracies led by the United States have to reassert their will to defend themselves and to oppose their enemies in time while there's still time, before the jarring gong of danger wakes them up and wakes them up too late.
So that was circulated and a massive reaction ensued saying, see, these people are evil.
He said that Jesus Christ is no better than Genghis Khan.
He says it like John K. That's not what he said.
Now, if you were to hear me saying, if you were to see a clip me going, and Jesus Christ is a crazy person, he's of no value because he's just going around making crazy claims and have that reaction.
And then you were to extend that clip and me going, either Jesus Christ is the one true Savior, which of course I believe, or he's a crazy person and of no value because he's making a bunch of crazy claims saying that he's divine.
And Muslims are effectively saying he's a crazy person.
Does that change the context?
If I'm quoting someone else, comment.
Would it change your view if I was saying, if you heard me say, Jesus is nothing but a crazy person?
And that's all you saw.
And someone said, that's what he said.
And then you saw me say, some people say Jesus isn't divine.
He's nothing but a crazy person.
Would it change your reaction?
That's exactly what Netanyahu was doing here.
He was quoting a Catholic author specifically on the context of the evil of the world, doesn't have a prejudice toward Meaning.
They don't care if you're Christian, because the world is evil and the world is about survival, and so we need to, as Christians, acknowledge the evil that is in the world and protect ourselves.
He was quoting a Catholic author, Durant.
This is the actual quote.
Nature and history do not agree with our conceptions of good and bad.
They define good as that which survives and bad as that which goes under, and the universe has no prejudice in favor of Christ as against Genghis Khan.
Now, that's the original quote from the Catholic author Durant.
Here's the contextual clip of Netanyahu.
You know, if people want to be naive, then they don't see the kind of world we're living in.
In this world, it's not enough to be moral, it's not enough to be just, it's not enough to be right.
You know, one of the greatest writers of the 20th century, someone that I admire a lot, was the historian Will Durant.
Now, he wrote many volumes.
I read most of them.
He also wrote the Lessons Of history, very brief, 100 page book, in which he said, well, history proves that, unfortunately and unhappily, Jesus Christ has no advantage over Jenny's Khan, because if you are strong enough, ruthless enough, powerful enough, evil will overcome good, aggression will overcome moderation, So,
you have no choice.
If you look at the world as it is today, you have to be blind not to see that the democracies led by the United States have to reassert their will to defend themselves and to oppose their enemies in time while there's still time before the jarring gong of danger wakes them up and wakes them up too late.
So, let me ask you: is the clip out of context dishonest?
What do you guys think?
Yeah.
I mean, everybody that I saw commenting on this was just saying Jesus versus Genghis Khan.
Yeah.
That was the quote in every single.
And I was like, man, first off, I'm kind of a little fan of both, but I mean, first off, you mean to tell me that somebody who doesn't believe that Jesus was the Messiah would speak negatively about Jesus?
I was like, okay, that's not really a shocker to me.
I expect atheists and Jewish people to do it, Hindus to do it, Muslims to do it in different ways because they still revere Jesus, but not as the Son of God.
They completely deny who we say he is.
That wasn't the shocker.
I was just like, I don't really think that he was saying that.
Let me just see what the clip actually is.
And I was like, he's obviously quoting an author trying to make sure that the United States does what?
America first thing.
Well, the other more important than that, he's going out of his way to say one of my most respected moral teachers, a Catholic author.
And the author, by the way, is also the inspiration for a lot of the films that you see.
Well, first off, obviously you would see other Christians throughout history, like the Crusaders, the retaliatory action, the Reconquista, which we talked about, William Wallace, the Patriot, right?
Christians who were pacifists, and then saying sometimes a shepherd has to protect his flock.
He's pointing to a Catholic author making the point about Christians not being lambs to the slaughter, saying, contextually, he's one of my favorites, and he's right.
Your faith, your righteousness, isn't enough to defend itself.
You have to defend that.
You can disagree with that point.
Correct.
Don't lie.
What do you think?
I think it's a flat out lie.
Yeah, it is, and it changes everything.
But the world doesn't care.
The world doesn't care.
Jesus or gangster, they don't care.
Of course not.
Why did Jesus say, hey, they hated me first?
Of course, they don't.
Right.
Yeah, they're not in his camp.
So, I mean, no, it changes everything.
And we have to be better or alternative media has no value.
Right.
That's exactly right.
It's like, what are we doing here?
Okay.
I'm just going to start again to drive this home, the phrase, and then I'll say clip.
Because I know that I've said something to this effect.
Look, Judaism and Islam, they both share a fundamental problem or disagreement with Christians in that they deny the divinity of Christ, which is foundational to our religion, to our faith.
And also, Islam tries to claim that they revere Jesus, but the truth is either Jesus was divine, either Jesus was the Messiah, or Clip, Jesus was a psycho or a liar because he claimed all those things, right?
And if he's, well, he's not the Messiah, so how can he say that?
Clip.
Yeah.
I'd be pissed if you did that to me because I've had it happen.
You've had it happen.
You were on CNN on Don Lemon and a highlight reel going, queer, queer, queer, queer.
So it's like, well, as I do.
Yeah, so you do that.
But it makes it harder to have the real conversation about being very frustrated with how he prosecuted that war in Gaza.
Even if you supported Israel, you can look at like, oh, Netanyahu, what the hell are you doing?
You're probably going to be brought up on war crimes, maybe rightfully so in this case.
Like you're going to have a really big issue with that.
Instead of doing that, now you've given people who want to support them outright.
Well, you lied about this clip.
You're obviously just lying about him because you just don't like him.
And now we can't have the conversation.
You can't have the change that you actually want.
Right.
And then it changes.
And I will say this generationally, you have a lot of young people who they don't, you know, they consume short-form content.
And you see many of them believe some things that are fundamentally untrue.
I think it would be fine to see an even split on generally supportive or not supportive of Israel's policies.
I don't have a problem with that.
I think it's reasonable because I know reasonable people on both sides of that.
But the perception that Israel hates America, that Israel is America's greatest foe, which we're seeing in a lot of, that to me is worrisome because I know it's predicated on quite a few lies like we saw today.
So the views on Israel as far as like positive, in 2023, they were 47%, now they're 32%.
And it really depends on age group.
Like if you look at older people, it's 59 or 64% positive.
If it's like 50 to 64, 65 plus.
And then with a lot of young people, it's only 26%.
Not saying you need to have a supportive view of Israel.
Well, it's gone down to 13% is the point.
Modern younger people is 13%.
That's right.
Sorry, it was 26% and 23.
It's now 13%.
Yeah.
Right.
It's gone down across the board, but particularly with people who live on social media and they'll watch that clip and go, oh my God, he said Jesus is just like James Khan.
By the way, here's something else.
You don't know everything there is to know about Genghis Khan.
I'm joking when I say I'm a fan.
But kind of?
I mean, in some ways.
In some ways?
Protecting the Conversation Place00:05:16
Horrible.
Believe me, I get it.
But there are some cool things.
Like you could wear a silver platter on Silk Road.
Why?
Because if you touched a messenger under Genghis Khan, I mean, you were torn limb from limb, but it made sure that their postman Pat was okay.
He doesn't have to worry about looking over his shoulder.
Yeah.
Also, I should note, there was one group when polled that showed 100% support for Israel.
Jeez, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus.
I don't think they.
Enough of that.
Nothing like rooting for the home team.
I mean, the black goes.
That's really all Sam?
Yeah.
They're all the same.
He was forced to do his own photos.
That was cruel.
Yes.
You know who else we defended?
Because we defended the fact that that clip was not quite accurate and people should go back and look at the context.
Nick Fuentez.
We did the exact same thing for him on something that we don't always agree on.
It was like, hey, that's not fair.
That's not what he said.
If you want to attack his arguments, fantastic.
Do it in context.
Yeah.
Anytime.
Doesn't matter if it's Bibi Netanyahu or Nick Fuentes or Donald Trump saying, you know, peaceful protesters on the bottom.
You know who else I've defended?
Tucker Carlson.
Yeah.
Remember when he had the interview with Putin?
Everyone said this means he's a shit.
I said, nope.
I said, look, we may or may not find out at some point in time that he's compromised because I don't know if anyone is.
I know that there are some people who are because we've seen it in the past, right?
But I said, but you can't say that because he's interviewing the most significant foreign head of state.
At that moment in time, I said, by the way, I think it's not only fair.
I gleaned some information from that interview.
I don't trust Putin any further than I can throw him.
Defended that, to be clear.
And then I have a problem when he says there are more Christians in Palestine and they're treated better than Israel.
Well, that's not true.
So like, again, what are we doing here, guys?
And here's why it matters.
We need to have this conversation, of course, regarding APAC.
And I think it's dishonest when people just say, well, there are other lobbying groups.
Well, sure.
But we know that there's something that's a little bit unique about APAC.
And we know that the Christian church, the evangelical church, has received a lot of dollars from the Israel lobby, where my problem is that they're teaching things that aren't theologically correct.
I think we would agree with that.
Yeah, and they're pushing both sides.
They're giving Hakeem Jeffries money, and then they're giving Republicans money as well.
Well, my primary agreements with APAC is that it's clearly not America first because for the same reason I hate Act Blue, they gave a ton of money to Hakeem Jeffries.
Don't care about the United States of America.
They care about Israel more than America.
You can't care about America and support Hakeem Jeffries and Elizabeth Warren or Debbie Wasserman Schultz, whoever you can't.
You just cannot.
Just like you cannot support America and support the Castro regime in Cuba.
Here's why.
That conversation should take place.
Another conversation that should take place that's pretty important, which is now being presented as a psyop, is that Islam is not a problem.
It's a religion of peace.
And we should align with them because they have more in common with Christians than any other group.
Here they are trying to mob the Australian prime minister, sounding a lot like the people who wanted to beat and rape the man's servants in Sodom and Gomorrah.
guys remember that.
Here it is.
Respect the fight.
There's your religion here.
Watch this.
They built some more mosques.
Why is protecting him?
One guest.
Why are you protecting him?
by the way just in case anyone thinks well if we align with them you know that that's the government right australia after the the bondi beach attack that said it wasn't religiously motivated right No appeasement will suffice.
None.
We need to be able to have those conversations and we need to be able to have them in good faith, honestly.
That's also why we provide all the references.
You can check them out for this show as we do every single show.
And we can keep the lights on and call balls and strikes because of your support.
If you want to click that button, join Mug Club, Rumble Premium.
No caliphates, no nonprofits, no $7,000, no Qatari investment funds.
It comes from you.
So whether you agree or not, at least, you know, everyone serves somebody.
I'm happier to serve you than to serve someone else with a separate interest.
And I'm glad he experienced that.
I'm glad the Australian prime minister got to see exactly what he's been importing.
Right.
You know, if you want to kind of like, you know, flick the jad at being woke and try to make sure that, oh, no, everybody's the same, it's peaceful.
The Micro-Penis Attack00:03:00
And you have zero experience with this.
You have zero historical understanding of it.
I'm glad you go sit there and try, and that happens.
I'm glad it was just that because it usually gets far worse than just like running you off and saying we don't want you here.
Right.
You have to get to the point where you have your exploding pretty fast where you realize this can't be fixed.
Yeah.
That's the place to start.
This can't be fixed.
Right.
So how do we deal with it?
There's no fixing this.
Get away from them.
Yep.
It's that simple.
All right.
Here's the next thing I want to discuss before we have because I know I can't use it.
Spanglish generation.
Yeah.
Before that, if you watch the, I highly recommend The Ash Wednesday, not because I'm in it, but because of the guest that Rachel Wilson was on last week.
She's great.
And we talked about, you know, she runs into quite a bit feminists and she discusses them and she's really quite versed in the history of feminism.
It's roots in pseudo-spiritualism, socialism, the occult, for lack of a better term.
And she talked about how often then they just have these women, they go, you got tiny jack, micro-penis.
So I actually want to present the case to you that any woman out there who uses the attack of micro-penis, and I'll give you a five-point case as to why.
Anyone who uses that line of attack is a feminist, even if they claim to be conservative.
They are acting as a feminist micro-penis.
Scream that out when you can't win the argument.
Men in the MAGA movement have small penises.
Micropenny.
ego micropenis like it's so small And I know, and by the way, I already know, you'll see this in the comments.
They're like, really, someone that I've said about it, that's something that someone with a micropenis would say.
Be that as it may.
The point still remains.
When facts and logic cannot win a debate, you know, we're still discussing feminism.
You can simply revert to the feminist line of attack.
And anyone who uses it is a feminist or a subversive femcon.
Just, they'll use the line of attack.
Micropenis.
Tangy dick.
So he is running around with a micropenis.
Energy.
Hey, what are we doing?
What are we doing?
This gives small energy.
This gives important vibes.
She has maintained steadfast that she believes that a lot of the men in the MAGA movement have small penises.
Not only energy, little energy, but also micropenis.
That's what you do when you have a micropenis.
When they go low, we go micropenis.
Now, this segment could be really short, and I could prove my point by the second you hear micropenis, to yell, Canyon, cut.