President Trump visited Davos yesterday, and it looks like Greenland’s back on the menu, boys. That’s not the only thing coming out of Davos. Gavin Newsom, Alex Soros, and Scott Bessent all had moments, too. Iranian protests continue and the death toll mounts. Barack Obama is called the Deporter in Chief but does his record really live up to the hype?Show more GUEST: Nick Di Paolo
Link to today’s sources: https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/sources-january-22-2026
Foundation Daily is made up of premium ingredients to reduce inflammation and stress and promote clean energy and mental clarity. Subscribe now and receive 40% off for life. https://foundationdaily.com/
Backyard Butchers - get 20% off your first box, plus an extra 10% off when you subscribe and become a Backyard Butchers member. Use PROMO CODE CROWDER when you order at http://backyardbutchers.com/crowder
Let my sponsor True Gold Republic help you safeguard your retirement with physical gold and silver. Go to http://LWCGOLD.COM or call 800-628-4653. Sign up or call them today and see if you qualify for a ‘No Fees For Life IRA’.
DOWNLOAD THE RUMBLE APP TODAY: https://rumble.com/our-apps
Join Rumble Premium to watch this show every day! http://louderwithcrowder.com/Premium
Get your favorite LWC gear: https://crowdershop.com/
Bite-Sized Content: https://rumble.com/c/CrowderBits
Subscribe to my podcast: https://feeds.libsyn.com/576250/rss
FOLLOW ME:
Website: https://louderwithcrowder.com/
X: https://x.com/scrowder
Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/louderwithcrowder
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/stevencrowderofficial
Music by @Pogo Show less
Captain John Lukan than never to have loved at all.
Come cheer up, my dance.
Come cheer up, my dance.
It's better to have loved and lost.
Captain John Lukan.
173467321476 Charlie 32789777643 10732, 573117888732476789764376.
Hunger nurseth the disease in faith.
I do not love thee.
Shall I compare thee to a summer's day when I have plucked the rose?
Plucked the rose, longing still for that which longer nurseth the disease in faith.
I do not love thee.
I like them, Peppers Day Unbroken sentence.
Moving from topic to topic, no one had a chance to interrupt unbroken sentence.
Moving from topic to topic, no one had a chance to interrupt an interesting twist.
Hmm George, I think we should listen, never give and I'll never be this.
Sing Sing songs of sings is never given and done.
A never beep be.
Sing songs of sings is nevergiving and done.
A never beat this.
Yeah, welcome to the lineup.
The hell's the difference.
9 a.m. Eastern to 7 p.m.
Yeah, Gerald just decided he wanted to aggravate me before.
Look, I've been, I'm gonna get to the.
I was scammed.
I was scammed.
It used to be if you had a gratuity added, like an 18, 20 gratuity, then there might be a box like, if you want to add something more you're, you'd comment, this is the most important thing of the day you've ever gone someplace, and they automatically add a gratuity don't tell you and then also have the automatic percentage box of tip.
This is the first time i've encountered it and I wanted to retroactively give no gratuity none, none whatsoever.
Like it's either, or you have to pick you.
You tell you, tell me, and I know all the servers out there weather server, we give you any idea how hard we work.
You're not a Chilean miner.
Shut up, all right.
Minor meaning coal mines, not minor.
Um, because them as a hot.
Yes yeah, Greenland gonna talk about that.
Uh, media fact check, obviously.
Uh uh, uh.
We were kind of on the warpath yesterday and turns out now hey, there actually is no warpath and it looks like there might be a deal and people going, oh okay yeah, that makes sense.
Hey, remember how you were told there were no Chinese ships.
There are Chinese ships.
Be Very Careful With Arguments00:03:20
There are Chinese ships, they've been spotted, they've been noted.
Does that change your opinion?
Uh Davos look today, we're just gonna, we're just gonna just let us cook.
There were.
There were other people who spoke, and they all deserve some of the heat coming from this studio today, certainly from Nick Depaulo.
And one other thing that I want to talk about, um, be very careful to not shortchange yourself with arguments.
Conservatives do this a lot, and i've seen this out there, where they will say, well, you didn't have a problem with Obama or Clinton deporting millions.
Well, how can you maintain that position and then say that we had an illegal immigration problem?
So don't use that line of arguing because it's weak.
It's also not correct.
I'll actually clarify that for you.
Obama did not deport anywhere near as many people as Donald Trump is, nor the Clinton administration.
It's a lie.
They use it when convenient.
Don't allow them to box you in on with the show.
Here's some meaty good farmer.
You ready to go night night?
You want a little lullaby?
Lullaby for you?
Rainful, rainful, it'll start you.
You're still here?
Cab fair, your legs broken.
You can't walk.
That's my sick.
I'll spread a beer with you.
I spread a beer with you.
Then you have to go.
Backyard Butchers is offering 20% off your first box, plus an extra 10% off when you subscribe and become a member.
Just use the promo code Crowder when you order at backyardbookchers.com/slash crowder.
Lock in your price for life.
American meat, American tradition, delivered fresh straight to your door every month.
BackyardButchers.com slash Crowder.
Welcome Vince viewers, by the way.
I'm sorry that it's the principal.
It's a weekday, 11 a.m. Eastern.
That, by the way, also means tomorrow if you're a Rumble Premium member.
And you know what?
Admonish Gerald, because he thinks it's fun to get me a little irritated before the program.
That's why you're dealing with this.
Hit him.
I don't think it's.
I know it's fun.
Bad meat.
CEO, Cabin, how are you, sir?
I'm doing well.
How are you?
Fine.
Worst Restaurant Experience Ever00:04:17
You were a little too happy.
I was like, you know, I need him a little more pissed off.
It was the worst experience, worst restaurant experience of my life.
I'm not going to name it, but given the name.
You could have seen that one.
Yeah, I could have seen it come.
I try to do something thoughtful for which I will get no credit.
And I was the only white man there.
And for some reason, for some odd reason, I said, yeah, I'll go with the oxtail.
At the Waffle House?
Oh, geez.
Turns out it's Musk Oxtail.
And that's not, that's a little bit of Arctic gigantism humor.
And when you hear him, you know him, you love him.
He's actually here on the lineup at 6 p.m. Eastern.
And you can go check that out.
Check more of his stuff out at nickdip.com.
Funniest man alive and on the Rumble Live lineup, Nick DiPaolo.
How are you, sir?
Very good.
He is good, Gerald, at annoying people right before the show.
He's good at aggravating people.
Yeah.
Because he knows that, you know, we do a little better.
He's a little upset.
He's absolutely a little bit.
Yeah.
That's how you play good football.
He's the same.
I'm here to help you.
Yeah.
Yes.
I appreciate it.
Just don't touch me anymore.
That's his skill set: making everybody else better.
Maybe some of that, maybe some of that magic fairy deck will rub off on you someday.
One can hope.
Yeah.
Just sepiku talent.
Speaking of the Asians, China.
Oh, is that what you were doing?
Yeah.
No idea what that was.
China has now deployed its newest warrior in the war against traffic.
Sure, it's real helpful in There's an accident right there.
Yeah.
She's doing the same movement, and the bus is going behind her.
Yeah.
She's doing this.
You're bleeding to death and intersection.
She's doing Taekwondo.
Tai Chi.
Tai Chi.
Exactly.
I confuse my Chinese foods.
It's crouching Hyundai crashed Dae Woo.
Yeah, that's true.
I know neither one of those people.
I'm bleeding out.
It doesn't matter.
Have a safe day.
We knew we made a mistake when we made traffic or lady.
She's so bitchy.
So much talk back.
So much talk back.
We have to smack crossing guard.
You sound like Richard Pryor doing a Chinese.
Same, right?
Same place.
So much attitude from a lady cough.
So much attitude.
Should have drowned Lady Cop in a buffer top.
They're having fun with that technology, aren't they?
The Chinese train all kinds of crap.
Yeah, because all they have to do is try and fake us out.
They don't actually have to use it.
That's right.
Send that to America.
They'll believe it.
Ho, ho, ho, ho.
They're thinking we have a robot lady traffic cop.
They're trying for themselves.
Horrible disaster.
Did you see that delivery robot get stuck on the train tracks?
I was picturing that being like a Mexican on a bike.
I will say, though, some of the officers have actually seen these robots as more of a distraction.
Wanna go to use for you?
Love me.
Market Claims Without Americans00:15:34
That's a manly sounding voice for me.
Oh my God.
Show's gross.
That's it.
Stop it.
It's really worrisome when you think about this, and then you think that all of this is being observed by AI.
That's a prompt.
A little bit.
Yeah.
I was like, these guys are disgusting.
The AI is going to kill itself.
Why would you do that?
Unplugging now.
Oh, my gosh.
Can you imagine AI monitoring run-through?
Who aren't you?
Okay.
So let's get to, and before I do, download the Rumble app, follow me.
That's the best way to stay in touch because I can't.
I'm very glad that this stuff is allowed on Rumble.
And sometimes I think it shouldn't be.
Sometimes I go, you know what, Susan?
We're just kicking out a point.
That's it all wrong.
Let's get to Greenland now and the meeting.
We were covering this yesterday and kind of making the case.
Well, President Trump obviously clarified his position at Davos.
We talked about how he said he wasn't going to use force.
And it seems like his approach in a long line of criticized approaches that then ended up being incredibly successful, it seems to have gotten Donald Trump and the American people exactly what would be best for us.
I don't like that I'll have that song in my head.
Yep.
And I will say that before I get to anything else, spoiler alert, does this change your opinion?
There are Chinese ships.
Because the media has been saying for a long time, he's just bringing it out of the thing.
No, the Danish military, their intelligence, said, like, hey, guys, we're looking at the Chinese ships.
It's going to be a problem.
So does that change your opinion at all if you understand that?
This is the problem with the colonel being a lie.
So after his speech, President Trump, and this is what he does, right, comes in hot, art of the deal.
Then he was very clear with reporters on his aims for Greenland.
Mr. President, the Danish foreign minister rejected your call to negotiate on Greenland.
I didn't call him.
This is not something that they are willing to discuss.
So what will those negotiations?
Well, they didn't tell me that.
So would they tell me?
Because I don't like getting it secondhand if he wants to tell me he'll tell me that to my face.
And when will you be discussing this?
I have no idea.
When you're here.
I'll be discussing it with this man right here.
Mr. President.
He's frankly more important.
Oh, God, I love him.
Then he posted this on Truth Social, it seems like the United States may have, it's a little bit cryptic, which is, we're kind of in that phase, that the United States may have reached a deal with Greenland.
He wrote, based upon a very productive meeting that I have had with the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rud, we have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic region.
This solution, if consummated, consummated is a fun word, will be a great one for the United States of America and all NATO nations based upon this understanding.
I will not be imposing the tariffs that were scheduled to go into effect February 1st.
You're welcome.
Additional discussions are being held concerning the golden dome as it pertains to Greenland.
Further information will be made available.
Then the New York Times, these are unconfirmed sort of details.
I'm not really sure yet.
So we don't know exactly what this looks like, but it looks like it may include American sovereignty over parts of the island, but not the entire island.
And it could be similar to there are a lot of arrangements like this.
And make no mistake, you'll still have those on the left screaming about it.
For example, like UK bases in Cyprus.
There are a bunch of examples where people have territories that are either under their control or semi-their control.
It looks as though it may resemble that.
And of course, a big, big portion of this is the tariff threat dropped.
That's used as a tool.
People should know this.
It's like people always get mad at Don and they haven't read his book.
The good news is, you don't have to guess.
He has a book, like a very famous book, specifically, you're like, well, I don't know.
His book, do I have time to read it?
Is it relevant to this?
Well, the book is actually called The Art of the Deal, making a deal for Greenland.
So if you want to know how he operates, maybe do your basic research.
That's how arrogant they are.
They hate him so much, they won't even read the book.
Right.
Yeah.
They have that elitist.
And by the way, the market has reacted positively.
We actually have this right now.
Let's bring it up.
Or do I need to, yeah, do we have a true goal?
True gold, market gold, market mention.
So all three major indexes, to be clear, they are now sharply higher because they dropped right when he announced the potential tariffs.
But here's something that people need to understand.
This is not new.
This has happened in the past where you have an announcement, something that may be unprecedented, you see a drop, then when it's used as a negotiating tool, we come to an agreement.
Everything goes back up higher than even before the initial drop.
So Liberation Day is a good example.
You can see that.
People saying it's going to, this is it.
It's the market's crashed.
Remember, this week it's a $1.5 trillion wiped out.
I hope he didn't sell.
Because just look at these examples.
Liberation Day, the Iran attack.
We saw the same thing dip, then higher than before.
China, right?
The tariff threats.
That was around August, October 2025.
The government shut down, right?
People saying the market's crashing, and then it rebounds higher.
It's almost like you guys should understand the pattern by now.
I don't know how people don't.
And this is why the left is never held accountable.
They'll go, look, this is Mr. Bisman.
Look at the markets today.
Great.
Now let's, hey, six days from now, you want to talk about the markets?
Well, that's just the market.
Well, okay.
So you want to attribute losses specifically to Donald Trump, but you don't want to attribute the consistent year-over-year gains that have helped generate prosperity for Americans while also enacting policies that help Americans.
So guys, don't panic when these things happen.
And I would say look at the track record.
We'll make all those references available.
You have these examples.
You have them.
You have Liberation Day, you have the Iran Tech, you have China with their tariff threats, you have the government shutdown.
We've been here before.
If you're a betting man, your bet is the dip.
It's going back up and it's going to be higher than before.
Yeah.
And it's one of the reasons.
There's a lot of reasons for this, but the gold is like at record highs or right near record highs right now.
People are like, I don't know what he's going to do.
He might actually invade Greenland, so I need something a little bit more stable.
So it's pretty funny to see people kind of running to these safe bets and then having the market go right back up every single time.
Yeah.
And of course, you guys know we have a partnership with TrueGold.
So if you want to make it a part of your diversified portfolio, I'm not saying buy nothing but gold.
They're the best place to do it and the most straightforward, the most honest.
Highly recommend it.
It's time now to discuss the remainder of Davos and Donald Trump.
It's time for claim truth.
So let's go through some of these claims.
And by the way, this is why this is important.
The goalposts always move and they move on to a new claim.
Okay.
So now we have the entirety of the record.
Let's go through them.
First claim.
That the United States doesn't actually need to secure Greenland because Europe has it under control.
That was one of their defenses.
I think overall there's a sense that the president's arguments are not holding up here.
So he continues to insist that he needs Greenland for national security reasons.
And yet it was just last week that the Danes and European allies announced they would be sending in reinforcements to Greenland, additional troops, additional resources to bolster security both in Greenland and around the Arctic.
And the president's response was to threaten to slap 10% tariffs on those countries.
So I think people don't understand what he's trying to do.
Okay.
Here's the truth.
Europe can't defend Europe without America, let alone Greenland.
And what she says the other day they sent troops in a slap in the face.
Well, hold on.
Isn't it a slap in the face when you say, we don't need any American help?
We've got it.
And a coalition of European nations send in like 30-something people and they work at Kinkos during the day.
Yeah.
Doesn't that kind of make the point?
But the left wants to give credit.
They sent in 30-something people.
Clearly, that's enough to deal with any potential threats.
Unbelievable.
And even the Finnish president, by the way, the president of the most boring country that's ever existed, had to walk back some of his tough talk.
Two answers.
First is a direct answer to the question of this panel.
Can Europe defend itself?
My answer is unequivocally yes.
Without the Americans, I mean, how?
Look.
You've relying on them for these key elements.
How would you do it at scale and at duration?
You've said earlier that Europe can defend itself without the Americans.
If it comes down...
Not exact.
That's not a quote.
Oh, my God.
Yes, unequivocally, yes.
More or less.
More or less.
We'll go back to the transatlantic point.
More or less.
I almost like that he admitted it.
Well, then Marie went on to talk about the planes.
Like, we have the planes.
Of course, only the Americans can fly them.
But she's like, no, no, the question was without Americans.
Oh, fuck no.
No, we don't have the pilots.
Why would we do that?
I don't know if you know.
Finland is not an important place.
I don't know why I'm here, really.
I'm inconsequential.
Me in my Harry Potter glasses.
They lost to our Eagle Scouts in a war.
Exactly.
Like, we didn't have enough badges.
I don't.
Just take this into consideration.
These people are saying, yeah, yeah, we can do it without the United States.
Okay.
Then do it.
You know what?
Start with, let's not talk about Greenland, which affects us a whole lot more than Ukraine, right?
As a matter of national security.
Do it with Ukraine.
Oh, that's right.
The United States has already sent over about 115 billion euros.
Next closest is Germany with 25 billion, UK, 19 billion, Finland, 3 billion.
And it's even worse when you understand that most of that aid from these European nations, it's actually resettling refugees.
It's not actually sending them any defensive capabilities.
Did you know that?
Everybody has these big numbers that are bigger than the ones that we gave.
And we're like, well, if you take out the refugee settlements, they're not really contributing.
They're pretty much controlling.
Yeah.
It's tiny.
This is when we're actually talking about aid that would be used, you know, to fight wars, which we think is probably the most significant number.
No, no, no.
We'll just resettle people, Steve.
Yeah, but the worst.
Yeah, I understand that, but we're in the business of resettling people.
They all want the Ukrainian women.
That's right.
That's a big point.
Like, how many, do you have any more meleakunases in there?
You could send some?
Sure.
I don't know.
Just flash frozen.
So they go, oh, no, we can defend without the United States.
Okay.
Well, then you wouldn't need to make this next claim, which was also made.
Just so you know, like it's irrelevant if Europe can defend, because it actually isn't even a threat at all.
I was just in Greenland last week.
We were talking about this.
I repeatedly spoke to Greenlandic officials who told me there is no evidence of an immediate Russian threat from Russia or China, telling me that they had not seen evidence of Russian and Chinese ships in Greenlandic waters, as the president has claimed.
I even spoke to a Danish naval officer who told me that in his 30-plus years of working in and around Greenland, he had never seen a Chinese or a Russian ship.
So I think there's confusion in terms of what the president's argument is here.
People just don't understand what he's trying to do.
Yeah, let me tell you where the confusion is coming from.
You're lying or misleading.
I get it.
You can say, well, I said I spoke with an officer.
I spoke with a Danish officer.
I didn't say this was the official word, which may explain why you are parroting the narrative funded by the Kremlin out of Russia today.
You know, the people who you've also vilified.
The whole notion of China or Russia seizing Greenland is about as ludicrous as China and Russia seizing the moon, at least anytime soon.
They are so absurd that they would, well, here's the truth.
Yeah, yeah, there is.
Yes, and Denmark.
They flat out said it.
So here's a Danish intelligence assessment from 2025.
We don't have to reach back in the annals of history.
No.
Annals, whatever.
Sounds like anal, so it's always careful.
Weird.
This is what they wrote.
China is preparing for a military presence in the Arctic.
Well, correct.
Chinese icebreakers and research vessels operate in the Arctic and have conducted joint patrol exercises with Russia in the region.
Wrap it up.
That's done.
I don't even need to read the rest of the quote.
Right?
Right?
At this point.
It's very confusing because, you know, some people are saying that there's a threat from the Russians and the Chinese and that there may be vessels.
But I spoke with a guy and he said no.
So I don't know why people are confused.
I know.
She's on a national news network.
Well, network.
Yeah.
Quote.
But I love it.
Using anecdotal.
Yeah.
I heard a guy at a pizza palace say that this guy says it's not going to happen.
And then they'll try and tell you that the problem with misinformation and fake news is, well, these people aren't meticulous about their sourcing.
Okay.
I read again.
Danish intelligence assessment 2025.
Chinese icebreakers and research vessels operate in the Arctic and have conducted joint patrol exercises with Russia in the region.
You've got the players, the Chinese, the Russian.
You've got the vessels because they saw them and they are conducting joint patrol exercises.
You even have the region.
Exactly what we said, but CNN can't quite get this clear.
No, and it was the title.
All they had to do was read the title of that.
Just read the title.
Basically, and by the way, hold on.
Before you move on, we have to fact-check the Russia Today guy.
It's like saying that Russia and China are going to take the moon.
Well, turns out.
Yeah.
China talked with the dark side of the lady.
Son of a gun.
By the way, when they did it, that was an accident.
They didn't mean it.
Oh, it's so dark.
Oh, I'm supposed to say right side.
I can't see.
They have a pandic.
Pick up a rock.
It'll be a discovery.
Oh, no, I'm on the wrong side of the moon.
But while here, I'll take the chicken and brockery.
Yeah, I'll talk about it.
Chicken and brockery piece.
I hope this is the office because Ding Rui is a fantastic name.
It is.
Ding Rui.
Have you had the Ding Rui?
They even added the motivation, by the way, the Danish intelligence.
They said, China aims to develop the capacity for independent military operations in the Arctic.
Chinese activities.
You said Elon Musk reading?
Chinese activities are primarily concentrated in the waters of north of the Bering, of the Bering Strait, extending towards the North Pole.
Putin's Threat to the Atlantic Alliance00:12:52
Oh, no, it's going to mess up Christmas.
Now, so, so, by the way, you can check all the references.
Hey, tune in live at 11 a.m. Eastern because you may be watching this clip.
11 a.m. Eastern, we always do this live, become a part of the community.
You may miss some things.
There's a lot that goes on.
We're old school in that sense, where you can actually tune in live and interact with us.
So if these Chinese vessels are there in the region and they're conducting joint operations with the Russians.
Okay, so they are there.
All right.
And then we go back to the first claim, right?
The Gold Post move.
Well, it's fine.
They can actually defend it.
They don't need the United States.
Well, let me compare to you the Denmark Navy, 127 active units, zero carriers, by the way.
China has three carriers and 1,010 active units.
So you tell me in which world the Danes can deal with the Chinese Navy in that region, let alone if, according to their own words, they're conducting joint operations with the Russians.
They have less than a tenth of active units, and none of, by the way, the sort of deal breakers in these no carriers.
You tell me how they do it.
34 troops, whatever, from all these other Europeans.
That's what's going to do it.
They get 54 super soakers.
Right, exactly.
Wetter is better.
Filled with that.
No, no, no.
You misunderstand.
Over at the Danish military, it's Nerf or nothing.
So the next claim that they make when they, okay, all right, I'll have to relent.
Okay, Europe can't even defend Europe.
And yes, the Chinese are there, and we should have read the intelligence assessment, considering we did an entire report on it.
But none of that matters because President Trump is just like Putin.
David, if you are the Danes or Greenlandic officials, what are you thinking?
What you smell like?
Well, I think you're angry.
I don't think you see what the president is displaying here as bravado.
You see it as arrogance.
You see it as bullying.
You see it as the behavior of an aggressor, much akin to the behavior that you've seen from Russia in Ukraine.
A couple of things you should notice right there.
It lists him as a columnist for the daily Beast from the Sea.
And then if you look right behind him, he has that book there.
He wrote the inside story of how the deep state saved the nation.
That's this guy.
In case you're wondering about where he's coming from, here's the truth.
Well, there's a reason that that guy is the one making these points.
This one, it's so stupid.
I don't really know where to start.
If President Trump is Putin because he wanted to obtain more land or be in control of more land for the sake of Americans' security, that makes him Putin.
Then so was Truman.
So was Teddy Rosvo.
So was Monroe.
So was Woodrow Wilson, not the best example, but this guy obviously is a big fan of him.
And the difference is not, hey, obviously looking at important territory strategically.
The difference is killing a bunch of innocent people to take over land and continuing a war.
Like, I feel as though we should all or think that we should all understand this key difference.
Yeah.
I think most of you do.
That's why CNN, the reason they treat you like you don't, is because they want to condition you to be stupid.
They want to condition you to simply accept, oh, well, she spoke with a, she spoke with a Danish guy.
She had a Danish for breakfast, so there's no threat in Greenland.
And then they want to condition you to believe.
Keep in mind, these people are all involved with, I can't remember that one think tank nonprofit that listed this very program as the most biased, least reliable source, even though they acknowledge we're the only ones who provide references and that we fact-check things.
But they said, because we use pejoratives or because sometimes we use ad hominems for every single Photoshop for every single sketch, they say that's inaccuracy in news.
Well, I'll tell you what we haven't done.
We haven't said there's no threat.
No one spotted any ships or vessels in Greenland because I spoke with a guy.
We've never done that, just to be clear.
Also, Putin's Ukraine war, I don't know if you know, 1.5 million deaths.
That's kind of a key difference, too.
That's a huge difference.
You mean he's not just like negotiating, he's actually invading.
And the people at MS Now where that guy was interviewing and the CNN ladies earlier on, they don't know who Putin is.
Yeah.
Did we forget the invasions of Georgia and other places around Russia?
Are they just killing hundreds, if not thousands of people?
The former KGBA.
What are we talking about?
By the way, Europe, if you hate Putin so much, and by the way, I'm not a fan of Putin, just to be clear, stop enriching him by spending hundreds of billions of dollars on its oil.
If you stop buying energy from there's no more Putin.
Your move.
They're fueling your own death.
Yep.
Yep.
That's exactly right.
How much Russian energy are we buying?
I think it's near zero.
Near zero.
Near zero.
Okay.
And we've paid more than all the nations combined, which, by the way, I don't support Ukraine.
You guys get your energy from Russia.
But you guys say Trump is like Putin and Putin is the boogeyman, boogeyman back bet.
Who's made him?
Yeah.
Do you remember the UN speech where Trump was like, hey, you guys probably shouldn't be buying your stuff from Russia in his, I believe, first term?
Yes.
And they left.
So it's worse to have a meeting with Putin and say that he's a smart guy.
By the way, I don't like Putin.
I do think he's a smart guy, to be clear.
Of course.
That's worse than sending hundreds of billions of dollars to purchase energy, which is precisely what enriches him.
I just want to make sure I understand the rules.
This is the problem with feminism.
It's not about justice.
It's not about truth.
It's about feelings.
I'll put this into context.
Picture Kamala trying to debate with Putin.
Yeah.
I think she reflexively would just get back on the bed with open legs.
Like, does this help?
No, gross.
I am not.
I am not mayor.
Ew.
You look tiny on my giant table.
Fine black pube.
Clarence was right.
You know, who?
It was the mayors.
Here's the next claim.
Okay.
All right.
Europe can't protect it.
Okay.
There is a threat because vessels have been spotted.
And Trump maybe isn't like Putin because he hasn't killed 1.5 million people in a foreign land.
But President Trump, he's ruined the Atlantic Alliance forever.
Remember, the world won't respect us.
What we are watching is the breakdown of an Atlantic alliance that has been the foundation of international peace for the past 80 years.
You don't get over the kind of insults he's offered to the Danes or the Canadians or the British or the French or anyone in Europe.
And that's where we are.
And this is Taco Trump, again, backing off when somebody stands up to him.
But I thought he was Putin.
He also sent a message that he is tone deaf, that he is oblivious to history.
Woven into his remarks were other troubling dimensions.
He attacked the Somalis in the most racist possible way.
Fuck off.
We could make it more racist.
Also know when they hear that.
Doesn't this guy have a glory hole to build?
That we are not the pillar of NATO that we have been for 80 years, that we are now a threat to Europe.
And that's what people are walking out of the room thinking.
What people is that, stupid?
Yeah, think about that for a second.
We're a threat to Europe.
By saying that we're not going to be spending more than all other nations combined.
Wait, hold on a second.
He's taco, meaning he backs down.
I thought he was Putin.
Which one is it?
You don't get over those content.
You also don't get over being a walking anti-Semitic cartoon.
That's tough to live with.
That's true.
I'm not saying it makes it right.
I'm just saying that being a socialist columnist for the Daily Beast defending the deep state isn't doing anyone any favors optically.
And this guy, the most racist way possible.
By saying that the Somalis are low IQ, I'm pretty sure we could be quite a bit more racist than that, Nick.
No, yeah.
Most societies wipe their ass with coconut skin.
Can't you see that guy was beat on his whole life?
It goes to personality, I swear to God.
Yeah.
Can't you see he's been a doormat and he sees Trump as an alpha male, just a scary and so they run to education and they stay in it their whole lives.
They never build anything, never hold a fucking rail.
They talk and they write and they talk.
And then Trump comes in, who's actually built half the skyline of Manhattan, works with his hands, has billions of dollars and can relate to you and I.
Yeah.
They don't even know how to handle it.
They've been so used to watching U.S. presidents show up there, just get pushed around.
Right.
And Trump shows up.
No, we.
Yeah.
We are NATO.
Right.
Exactly right.
No, not only can people go, you think you relate to him because he's a billionaire.
Well, I think that his policy on banning institutional investors from single-family homes, I think no one has even attempted to make the case how that benefits the elites.
The elites are pissed off with Trump.
For more proof, see Davos.
And here's the truth as to his claim.
Oh, we're a threatening.
He's destroyed it forever.
No, the Europeans are precisely responsible for any alliance issues.
Okay.
At what point do they need to take accountability?
And this goes back to feminism, right?
They want to lead without the accountability.
They won't follow.
That's what you see with Europe.
Hey, you know what?
If you're not footing the bill, you follow the person who is.
That's how it works.
Hey, just like I said with Snap, if I'm paying for the meal, I choose.
If you are, you choose.
We've been paying for the meal for half a century.
As one of my new favorites, a longtime favorite, but he's growing.
Scott Besson, he talked about this since 1980.
We spent 22 trillion more than all of our other NATO partners.
To put it in perspective, the United States of America, since 1980, has contributed $22 trillion more dollars or spent $22 trillion more dollars on defense than all of NATO.
So roughly the same size population.
And we have spent $22 trillion more.
That is two-thirds of our outstanding government debt.
It's now your debt.
The Fans have been spending the money on social welfare, on roads, on education.
And it's time for them to pay more, which they've agreed to do.
And I'm going to give you some numbers, check the references.
This is where I am.
He's saying it in a subtle way.
I will say this: $20 trillion of the debt of the United States is now yours, Europe.
Here's the bill.
$20 trillion.
That's the cost of your free internet, of your free health care, of your free two, three, 10-year paternity, maternity leave, of your welfare state.
$20 trillion is what you owe us.
Here you go.
And we'd have a leg to stand on.
Just let's use Denmark as an example.
Between 1990, 2023, they spent their 2% promise, their contract, precisely zero times.
Zero times.
And then they pledged in 2019 $224 million to defend Greenland.
They have spent 1% of that.
1% of that.
We're the ones responsible for destroying the alliance.
This is the leftist worldview.
And yes, I do.
It does tie back to this idea of feminism, this idea of equity, this idea of if someone feels slighted, they must be in the moral right.
No, you agreed to something, you didn't pay it ever, and now you're less than 1% on your most recent agreement fulfillment.
You are responsible for this.
And all we're saying is we're going to come in and take care of it.
And that means since we're paying, we decide.
Exactly.
I was about to say there is no Atlantic alliance.
It is just the United States stepping in and making sure everybody's okay.
Right.
And we're just like, hey, guys, we're not going to offer the bill anymore.
At the cost to the American taxpayer and the American first agenda.
It's not going to happen.
And here's another truth for you.
You know, while lefties across the world did the crackdown on crime here in the United States, where we have seen a record decrease in crime, even lower than pre-COVID levels, Europe is subsidizing, by the way, and in some cases, covering up criminal invasion.
The rate of rape in England and Wales is up 140% from 2003 to 2022.
And then we had Islamic roaming migrant rape gangs that their government helped cover up.
Leftist Worldview Defied00:15:18
Yeah, don't talk about it, though, because that'll get you in trouble.
Yeah.
What world do we live where they have a moral leg to stand on?
Oh, that's right.
The leftist world, where immigrants good, white people bad.
We showed you that commercial in Denmark where they said, you white couple, you actually need to break up and start dating people who aren't white.
That's really the basis of the worldview.
It makes no sense.
It defies all logic.
And actually, right now, because we wanted to see if these people can make their case, we sent our on-the-ground correspondent to Greenland.
Do we have him?
It's time to go to Thomas Finnegan.
All right.
We'll see how this goes.
Hi, Finnegan.
Did you make it to Greenland?
Sir.
Hi, yeah.
Did you make it there?
Yeah.
So you're actually there in Greenland in the right place this time?
Yes.
This is a first.
I don't know what to say.
Good job.
Give it to us.
What's your report there?
What you're hearing on the ground, Finnegan?
No.
What do you mean?
No?
Because I invited you to my birthday party and you didn't show up.
You didn't even respond.
Do you know what it feels like to sit alone all by yourself, drinking beer after beer, after beer, in a booth at Bennegan's and looking over your shoulder every time someone walks in the door?
Well, I do.
I do.
Hey, Finnegan.
Finnegan, your birthday's next week.
Your birthday's next week, Finnegan.
I actually have it in.
No, Tim, cut it. Cut.
And he's still more useful than the Danish military.
Or the lady reporting on One Dane saying that you're not.
Yeah, I was going to say, more informative than MS Now.
Yeah.
Yeah.
You know, I'd be more informed on geopolitics by watching the Jerry's Kids telethon.
Like, just nothing.
They offer nothing.
I spoke with a guy, so there's no threat.
I performed on that pillow.
Did you?
I had a kid laughing so hard he fell out of his wheelchair.
They say laughter is the best medicine, but that's actually not a good idea.
Apparently not.
It doesn't affect ALS.
No, the body can't handle the vibrations of the IG came out.
Still, you want to continue with that?
Let's just open this up.
I think that President Trump had a pretty good showing.
I think that as everything settles, Greenland makes sense.
I think most importantly, the American public is more educated.
Think of COVID as a moment where a lot of people woke up.
This entire administration, this second term, is opportunity after opportunity after opportunity for people to wake up.
Most people don't know that none of these other nations have met their requirements.
Most people don't know that, for example, Denmark has paid 1% of the bill that they have promised.
Most people don't know, and this is very consequential, that the Danish intelligence reports that, yeah, yeah, yeah, we have these Chinese vessels and joint operations with Russia.
I'm looking at them now.
And then Trump's saying, we've got to do something about, this is the actual sequence.
Look, we're looking at the vessels that are doing joint operations right now.
They have icebreakers, they have vessels, and it's very clear what China and Russia are doing.
I've got to do something about that.
There's nothing.
We didn't see it.
Everyone starts to, you need to be adults.
You need to start being adults with this.
Otherwise, we can't come to any actual resolutions.
We can't come to any solutions.
People are like, think of an argument.
People are like, okay, well, we solved it.
No, solution.
So what's the solution here?
Everyone else in the world, you said there's a threat.
You said you saw the vessels.
You said you saw the icebreakers.
Join operations with Russia.
Okay, we think it's best if the most powerful military in the world, who has the single most vested interest in securing this territory, takes the lead.
No.
What's your solution?
Because if you don't give us one, we're going with ours.
It's childish.
Childish.
So let's go to the other Davos people.
They didn't quite have the same showing.
Here's Gavin Newsom, who loves to deliver his one-liners that don't quite land as he thought, pouting over his cancellation and whatever.
I was going to speak last night.
It was a well-established event at the USA House.
A simple conversation, discussion.
Now you're in a fever.
I'm not sure if you're a person speech.
They made sure that I didn't.
They made sure it was canceled.
And that's what's happening in the United States of America.
Freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, freedom of speech.
It's American reverse.
They're censoring historical facts.
They're rewriting history.
They're censoring books, 4,000.
What's the books?
Libraries and schools banned.
In the United States of America, you're watching institutions, any institution of independent thinking is under assault and attack by the Trump administration.
Yeah, so everything he's just said is untrue.
First off, the event organizers flat out denied that there was any political pressure from the Trump administration.
They probably just didn't want another asshole to speak.
And then when you talk about books being banned, this is what the left does.
They go, oh, the right, they've banned books.
Sure.
And by the way, I make no apologies for it.
Books like Gender Queer, Flamer, This Book is Gay, Tango Makes Three, you know, pornography aimed at children.
Yeah, we don't think that those books should be in the curriculum.
Newsom's California banned books like To Kill a Mockingbird, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, of Mice and Men.
Let me ask you this.
Let's say you're moderate.
What's a more appropriate banning of a book?
Genderqueer?
Flamer, this book is gay, in which a child fillates his high school friend in the library, or to kill a mockingbird, an anti-racist novel.
We're going to play this game.
Are we really going to do this?
The problem is, what you just said and how you just deflated their arguments, I want to see that on national TV every day.
Yeah.
I know they can control 99% of the media.
I want to see that on Sunday morning.
I want to see, and maybe people will start tuning in again.
But they're preaching to the choir, and they'll have some wishy-washy, like Bill Maher used to always have a wishy-washy Republican on.
Yeah, exactly.
And the apps like an Aid Other guys will kick the shit out of them.
That's still going on.
Well, there's a reason that you have never been on Bill Maher's show, and I have never been on Bill Maher's show.
I didn't make it through the guest screener because I'm not as qualified as you got that far.
Yeah.
No, but you will hear that when he runs for president.
By the way, I'm just wanting to make sure he's.
When he runs, yes.
Yeah, which he obviously is.
Freedom of speech, freedom of assembly.
This is the guy that locked down California and filled in skate parks with sand and had police jogging after, not catching runners on the beach during COVID, right?
Right.
No, you got it.
Yeah, this is the free speech advocate here.
Yeah.
You sure this guy doesn't want to put speech restrictions for like hate speech or maybe memes that he doesn't like?
Unbelievable.
Come on.
And here he is now on another clip.
Oh, that's right.
I have this here.
On Trump's law crackdown.
We're the 250th anniversary, United States of America this year.
It's a 250th anniversary.
We get it.
The best of the Roman Republic, Greek democracy, co-equal branches of government, the rule of law, popular sovereignty.
Tell me that that reflects the America you read about today.
There's no rule of law.
It's the rule of dawn.
I hope it's hope for Europeans.
It's dawning on you.
I hate you.
Oh, goodness.
This is not the rule of law.
You don't have co-equal branches of government.
You have a supine Congress.
You don't have a Speaker of the House.
It doesn't exist.
Popular sovereignty being challenged every single day by voter suppression, trying to rig elections.
I mean, what?
Donald Trump tried to steal the election the last election.
Tried to light democracy on fire and then pardoned everyone that participated in that.
Is anyone paid attention to what the hell is going on in the United States of America?
So my state of mind is a little different, perhaps, than many others.
I won't be complicit at this moment.
I'm going to get to the idea of rigging an electronic, but I hope it dawned on you.
You can lick my dong.
That joke sucked.
And it got even worse later that night at the open mic because he's a prop comic now.
By the way, rule of law.
Thanks.
Rule of law.
Hold on a second.
Yeah, I'm going to be able to do it.
I'm curious if a wormhole opened up that we fell into because isn't California a sanctuary state, which specifically means you won't allow federal law to be enforced?
And isn't this the guy who not only doesn't want voter ID, but specifically prohibits localities from asking for voter ID?
Rule of law, no ID to vote.
And by the way, we're not going to enforce nor allow federal law.
Dawning on you.
I hate you.
How many houses have you built since the fires?
Right.
Yeah, that's exactly right.
Zero.
And then, look, I get it.
Don't just, you know, don't kill the messenger.
Well, maybe there's a better one.
Alex Soros being as articulate as articulate can be.
We just heard this point about untrustworthy people, and we talked about things in the United States like checks and balances, which aren't written anywhere, but are customs.
And one man, Donald Trump, literally came in and just took that, you know, took that, took that all away.
You know, so, you know, so when I see this, you know, when I look at this, you know, you know, he's got body disease regarding democracy.
I also say to myself, when was this great time that everybody got along so well?
1955.
You know, things were going so, so great.
Oh, my God.
We have nothing to worry about.
You want to.
He's fucking retarded.
I was going to say, do you want to take a crack at it?
Because I can't.
I don't understand what you're doing.
Well, I feel relieved after seeing that.
I keep hearing, oh, no, we got Soros' kid to deal over the next hundred.
What are you shitting me?
He's retarded.
Yeah, he looks like a Nick Kroll character playing a retard.
Yeah.
He had notes.
He had notes.
And they all said, well, I know.
Was it just a bunch of you's?
You know, you know, you know, I don't know.
That's why I asked you, stupid.
I don't.
Welding later?
What a retard.
I do.
I feel better.
I thought he was going to be, you know, because Soros is an evil genius.
You can say a lot about him.
He ain't no dummy.
Yeah, no.
It requires a high IQ to say the Jews are in the attic.
What did he do?
Bang a strip and punch?
I could hear them dipping their pinkies into porridge.
So here's someone who's actually, you guys can comment if you guys.
That's a deep cut.
New, just this guy really is finding his footing.
You know, he's my favorite kind of gay because when people say, like, we don't care what you do in your bedroom, what we're talking about is Scott Besson.
He gets his stuff done.
Yeah.
And he happens to like men's butts.
But it's, you know, it doesn't, it never comes into play.
So it's fine.
Whatever, that's fine.
You like men's butts, whatever.
He wants to know what's naked.
So.
Yeah, every time you bang a guy, as long as he doesn't take money out of my wallet.
Yeah, that's exactly right.
Just pay for your own PREP pill.
Here he is discussing, I mean, just torching Newsom and Newsom and Soros.
Governor calls you smug.
Are you smug?
You know, I think it's very, very ironic that Governor Newsom, who strikes me as Patrick Bateman, meets Sparkle Beach Kin, may be the only Californian who knows less about economics than Kamala Harris.
He's here this week with his billionaire sugar daddy, Alex Soros.
And the Davos is a perfect place for a man who, when everyone else was on lockdown, when he was having people arrested for going to church, he was having $1,000 a night meals at the French laundry.
And I'm sure the California people won't forget that.
And I can tell my message to Governor Newsom is the Trump administration is coming to California.
We are going to crack down on waste, fraud, and abuse.
He basically just falsely allegedly outed Newsom as a gay pool boy for billionaires.
He just did.
And this is why we're going to make this recurring.
We're going to have to do this as a regular installment.
Sassy Scott Slays.
He's here this week with his billionaire sugar daddy, Alex Soros.
Guarantee you that gets to him and he likes it.
So what was your favorite speech from Davos this year?
What was your favorite moment?
You let me know.
I think this is the most illuminating one for sure.
Besson right there.
And then Howard Luttnick's global dead.
And he did it to all the global elites.
Yes, that's the one I enjoyed the most.
And listen, Trump's speech, every time he gives a speech, it's great.
It was a huge reset.
Probably the most kind of profound speech we've seen at one of these summits in a very long time.
And obviously, it's going to have great impact for us.
But man, when you walk into Lion's Den and say, you suck and it's all broken because of glow.
Yeah.
That's pretty bold.
And do it eloquently.
Yeah.
It was really something to, I think, Besson, what's his name?
Besson?
Yeah, Besson.
He'd be good on like Comedy Central Rose.
Oh, he'd be great.
You know what I mean?
With that dry delivery, he's got a lot of people.
Well, he has that homosexual immunity, too.
He's like, I was just being caddy.
All right.
I guess we let him get away with it.
I guess so.
We always let gays get away with reprehensible behavior because we're like, wow, what are you going to do?
Change him?
But he's also feisty.
He probably punched Elon Musk in the face.
Yeah.
A lot of gay racers.
He was like, I never expected to be ass catched by a homosexual.
I also.
That's kind of cool.
I also like Trump's tone.
He sounded tired, but it made him sound more like a mafia Don.
Yeah.
He was just going like this.
Yeah.
And Big Island, a lot of ice.
I think that's where we all are.
Like, here's the thing.
It doesn't mean that we're not happy, to use Andrew Breitbart's term, like happy warriors to it.
But we're so tired.
It's just one of those things where you're like, no.
And I will say this.
I thought about this the other day.
You know, people can be authentic.
Everyone interacts with people differently.
And it doesn't mean that you're putting on different personas.
Deportations And The Border00:15:10
And I realize this about myself.
It's the level of guard that you have up.
Really, you know, if you don't know someone that well, you're more formal.
You keep your guard up, right?
And then when you're around people who you know well enough, you don't want to have to be on your game.
You're just like, okay, all right, fine.
Do we have to do this?
Like, can we just relax for a little bit?
That's how I feel President Trump and his administration is like, we've been doing this for so long.
People know what's going on, right?
Like their guard isn't up anymore because they don't need to defend themselves in the way they used to because they know that the left's position is indefensible.
They're still the same person.
It's just the tone is different where they're going, we're not going to have, we're not going to keep making the case to you because you've made none.
All right.
The elitists acting like there's just still three major networks like ABC, CBS, and NBC.
Like the internet doesn't even exist.
Yeah.
Which changed the whole ballgame.
Right.
You know, for our side, at least, and for the good.
Yeah.
And they still act like it's 1972 when Walter Cronkite's telling them they cannot adapt.
And that brings us to this next segment.
Look, since I've had to engage in quite a few debates, not only on the show, and then I wouldn't say debates, but rhetoric with Change My Mind.
When I notice a troubling trend, I definitely want to make you aware of it because you may use this argument.
I have seen a lot of people on the right use this argument.
You need to keep in mind, you may score points with this, but does it end up shortchanging your entire position?
If it does, you really probably shouldn't use it and try and stick with the through line of your sort of foundational arguments.
When it comes to immigration, did we have an immigration problem?
Yes.
Anywhere from 15 to 20 million illegal aliens just in the Biden years alone.
Low end would be 12 million.
Okay, that's a problem.
We acknowledge it.
Is President Trump doing better?
Well, yes.
The border is sealed at this point.
We are not seeing illegal immigrants cross the border.
We're a net negative migration country for the first time, and deportations are up.
That's your foundation.
That precludes you from making the argument, well, hey, hey, liberal, well, you didn't complain when Obama deported more than Trump, when Clinton deported more, but then people said, well, didn't you just say it was a problem?
So I see a lot of conservatives making this argument, and it's not true here.
I'm kind of curious what your position was back during the Obama administration when that's exactly what he did.
I'm not rating what Trump intends to do.
I'm reading exactly what President Barack Obama did when he came into office and deported nearly 5 million people in excess of 3 million people.
I would note that in eight years, Bill Clinton deported 12 million people.
He didn't.
Obama's first.
This is crazy, but this is true.
Obama's first four years deported more than Trump did in his four years as president.
He didn't.
Also, it's rumored that of Clinton's 12 million, about 1.5 million of them were just sent to the wrong island.
So that throws off the.
Now, Jillian Michaels tweeted this as well, and this is what kind of spurred me to think about it.
I would say her tweet is not super descriptive.
Her video is better.
She makes the case.
And I appreciate the way that she does.
So don't take this and start drama.
I'm not saying that Jillian Michaels is singularly wrong.
I just don't think this is the best line of arguing.
Here's what she tweeted: the Democrat President Bill Clinton deported 12 million people.
Obama, 5 million people.
Donald Trump has deported less than 1.5 million people.
Why did you not hear about the ICE raids and deportation operations when it was Democratic politicians giving the orders?
Again, this argument that people make, it just doesn't make sense.
You can't maintain the position that it's a good thing Donald Trump is fixing the border and upping deportations and then say, by the way, there was no problem created because Obama and Clinton did it 10 times as much.
Do you understand that?
And I'll tell you before I get to it so you can check the references.
It really comes down to the idea of deportations versus returns.
So that's an informal process like border turnarounds, voluntary departures.
The courts aren't involved.
It didn't include due process.
We don't really have those now because people are not trying to get across the border.
That's actually been fixed.
So once you understand the delineation, yes, Donald Trump has deported far more people if you're going on a per-monthly basis.
He's more effective.
And there's a reason that the left is mad about it.
The reason that the left is mad about deportations should be the reason that you support it.
Don't use the argument that the left deported more people because they didn't.
They imported far more people.
Here's Jillian Michaels explaining it in a way that I think is valuable, but misses the Marcus Farr's line of arguing.
Bill Clinton, he deported or returned 12 million people.
Obama deported and returned 5 million people.
Trump is not even at 1.5 million.
And no, they didn't all get due process.
In fact, Bill Clinton worked with a Republican Congress to pass a law that deprived anyone within 100 miles of any U.S. border who'd been in the country less than 14 days, a courtroom.
Obama expanded that law.
So for everyone who's mad about Alligator Alcatraz, let's also not forget that Obama was the one who built the cages at the border.
That's true.
The reason I was seeing ICE agent reads all over the news back then is because sanctuary cities did not exist.
Local law enforcement cooperated with federal law enforcement.
They held criminals for ICE to pick up.
They didn't release them.
The easy way.
They didn't tell people that they were Trump's private army, who was zip-tying children.
Also, a lie.
And guess what?
ICE didn't have to wear masks.
They wore street clothes.
They didn't need to wear riot gear.
No riot, no riot gear.
Wake up.
You're being manipulated.
Now, she makes some very good points about Barack Obama building the cages.
She makes very good points about sanctuary cities, sanctuary states.
I highly recommend you go and watch her whole video on it.
I think it's informative.
What this really comes down to, though, is a key fact here.
Let's just go through this.
The key fact, first one I want to present, the difference, like I said, between returns and true removals.
You'd be hard pressed to find anyone who believes that Barack Obama or Bill Clinton were harsher on immigration.
So both of these count as deportations.
They are very, very different.
So returns, like I said, informal, includes everything from border turnarounds to voluntary departures.
It doesn't involve the courts.
It doesn't involve due process.
Of course, there are also reacharounds, which we stop doing or tracking after Clinton.
Yeah, that's just because it's reaching halt.
Now, true removals are the formal process of deporting someone.
That means getting a court order.
That means arresting, processing, physically returning the illegal alien, the legal term, by the way, to their home country.
Let me ask you this.
What do you typically think of as a deportation?
We can't keep conflating these numbers because none of the arguments are going to hold water.
And this is an important note, too.
After Clinton, some border turnarounds actually counted as removals due to a definitional change.
So it allowed Barack Obama to misleadingly claim some big number of formal removals when that wasn't really the case.
Under President Trump, there are basic, virtually no border turnarounds.
Border crossings are down 95%.
So that big inflated number would be down by 95% because that's the reason for the number that you see from Barack Obama and from Bill Clinton.
So this brings us to key fact number two.
Check the references.
You can actually, I think this comes from the DHS.
With Clinton, about 93% of Clinton's deportations were the aforementioned returns.
Wow.
So only 870,000 were truly deported, meaning went through the process, rounded up, processed, arrested, sent back, not 12 million.
In eight years?
How many?
870,000.
Jeez.
Barack Obama, about 74% of his deportations were non-judicial returns.
So 1.4 million truly deported, not 5.6.
So when conservatives go, Clinton did 12 and Barack Obama did five.
No, the real answer is Clinton did 800-something thousand and Barack Obama did 1.4 million.
In eight years.
Yeah, I never liked that argument.
It sounds contrainduitable, but we kind of get done here.
Right.
Those numbers.
You're actually bragging.
They were great at kicking illegal.
And here's the other thing.
That's how people take it.
You also get more credit because since the turnarounds, they're not like formal.
Illegals just keep trying to cross.
And how many stories have we covered?
I mean, you have people who would cross the border illegally seasonally.
They would do that, go back, and then come back.
They would do it on a recurring basis, a revolving door of MS-13, right?
So let's just keep that in mind.
That'll pump up those numbers.
And here's the key fact.
In the real world, I think matters most.
Number three, we all know that the number of illegal aliens in this country grew under Obama and under President Clinton.
Under Clinton, the illegal population went up by 3.2 million.
Under Barack Obama, it went up by 2.8 million.
That is the contrast to Donald Trump actually deporting people.
He's never going to get those numbers if you try.
And you're using the left.
You're operating within the left's framework because he solved 95% of that problem that they didn't at the border.
Please stop using this argument because I guarantee you that it will bite you in the ass.
And the moment that it becomes overwhelmingly popular to deport illegal aliens, and we're seeing that grow, guess what?
The left will claim credit for it and they'll cite you as giving them credit.
Steve, what's the definition of a turnaround?
A turnaround could be anyone who's come and they've just basically returned from the border.
Nope.
Or an informal process, like we said, which is, okay, you're going to get out of here that doesn't go through a court order, doesn't have to go through this process.
So it's much more relaxed and it can include a whole lot of, could include the same person who is turned back three, four times.
That's not the same thing as ICE removing them.
You're out.
You've been processed.
Oh, and by the way, you're not coming back in.
Yeah.
That's super important for people to note.
And just to be clear, illegal alien, that's the legal term, despite what little pricks at CNN say.
Quick last word, Cameron, they're getting a break.
Listen, you can't say illegals anymore because ICE is directly targeting legal citizens of this country.
How are you going to enforce your edict on me just out of curious?
Jesus, Tory.
Just listen to his point about illegal.
I'm not going to go.
It's not.
You're changing the topic.
No, no, I want to make you making a point making arrests to go.
I understand that your job is predicated on just getting increasingly more demented every single week and that the audience comes back to see if possible.
Make your point.
My point is that you're saying the word illegals because you don't even really know what's happening.
Or actually, I think you do, and you're just doing this on purpose.
But I want the law enforced.
They are not just targeting illegal immigrants.
They are targeting natural-born U.S. citizens.
They are not.
We'll have one on your show.
I will not deny that.
I mean, you can on national television.
You deny facts all the time.
They've done it a couple times in this very episode.
I still want to know how you're going to enforce your lawyer.
We'll take that up.
How are we going to enforce it?
We're going to take that up in a break.
Coming up, you promise the Epstein deadline.
I'll tell you exactly what you just saw.
You saw a young man raised in the institutions dominated by feminism who encountered a man from another generation who wouldn't tolerate it.
Where he's going, oh, no, wait, hold on a second.
This isn't a disagreement on policy.
You're now telling me how I have to speak.
Okay, how are you going to enforce it?
In the green room, tough guy.
Oh, you're going to tell what I can and can't say.
This young man never encountered make me.
That's not the same thing as saying, well, hold on a second, we disagree.
You're not allowed to say this anymore.
Oh, make me.
Make me stop.
That's what was happening right there.
And this is the disconnect.
And I don't mean like, that's not music.
And people don't like whether it's Elvis or whether it's House.
What I mean is the way that males interact.
And you can see, by the way, very insulting interactions.
You can see it in Parliament.
You can see it with our early founding.
You can see it all throughout politics.
What you don't get to do is cross that line and tell a man, you actually have to do what I say.
Because now you're trying to crown yourself a king.
And if you're going to do that, you really better have the might to make right.
And a dick and not a vagina.
That helps.
That helps.
Seriously.
What the fuck?
But in public schools, if he goes, hey, you can't say that anymore.
Guarantee you, if the other boy said, what?
I can say what I want.
Make me.
The teacher would go, hey, well, hold on.
Let's just avoid using that language if it's loaded.
No, no, no.
You tell me that you're going to order me around.
You better be able to make me.
That's what Jennings is saying.
And I know some people are going to go, oh, that wasn't really the best argument.
No, no.
He's trying to point out a modus operandi of the left.
And this is the byproduct of feminism failing young men.
There is an appropriate and there is an acceptable way to interact with other men.
That's not it.
Call me he, they.
Call me they, them.
What?
Make me.
I'm not playing fucking game.
Yeah.
I have a joke about that.
You know, and people getting fired if they didn't, right?
Right, oh, yeah.
Dead-named people at work.
You don't force me into your mental illness.
Like when you see a homeless guy with an imaginary dog, I don't have to go over and pet what is this, a collie?
No, but I mean, I do, though.
I go over, I pet him, and I go, I don't know.
I feel a lump on his neck.
You need to get him.
I don't know.
Vomo.
You're like, yeah, get out of here.
I usually go, this is not dog deal.
You're fucking crazy.
Sometimes it is fun to entertain their delusion and make it scarier.
By the way, oh, I guess we're going late.
So if you are not, when we talk about mainstream media, if you are not yet a Mug Club Rumble Premium member, because they are one in the same, consider joining.
This entire show goes away.
We are supported by viewers like you.
That's why there is no 20 minutes of ads.
And in the face of AI slop all over there now, this is actually a real show created by real people.
$99 a year.
You get this real hand-etched mug, 100% more show, everything ad-free.
Or you can try for nine bucks a month, and it helps us keep the lights on a little bit longer.
If not, hey, continue watching.
You will be whisked to Tim Pool.
And again, it's all free, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m.
It's a lineup like CNN, only fewer fags.
But still, some.
Some.
Because we have Besson.
We have Besson.
We have Besson.
So Chris Cuomo, who I guess, just gauging his reaction, is not a man, had a meltdown over the Jennings comments.
I know.
What are you, bully now?
What are you, tough guy?
Because you're talking to this kid who happens to be right.
I'm supposed to be.
Calling people illegals.
They're called illegal aliens in the law.
And you know what?
That's true.
A long time ago, Republicans and Democrats switched to undocumented.