All Episodes
Previous
Nov. 18, 2025 - Louder with Crowder
47:13
🔴Steven Crowder is a Deep State Agent 2025-11-18 18:06
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
To have some form of, you know, decorum with people who are terrible and don't have it themselves.
Yep.
I mean, do you think you're going to change these people or help kind of change the situation?
I think is really what I'm trying to say without ever meeting with them and talking with them.
That's what Trump does.
He was just laughing when he was talking.
What do you think?
He was saying, wow, you're always prepared for a picnic.
I didn't think you guys wore that stuff outside of Saudi Arabia.
Let's check your magic carpet to the new banquet in the building.
That's right.
Yeah.
Look.
Big haul.
If you go into the woods today, that's where the teddy bears, frankly, they have their picnic.
It's a problem, but I don't think you'll be having picnics with teddy bears.
Wow, lots of picnics here.
Lots of picnics.
Picnic baskets.
Didn't like boo-boo, was weak.
Low energy boo-boo.
Small.
Oh, look at this lady.
Yeah.
Same as her skin color.
That's the kind of monochromatic.
Yeah, that's the kind of woman Michelle Obama wants us all to declare beautiful.
All right.
Hey, come on.
She's kind of a cutie.
Yeah, sure.
Yeah.
We're still on that body positivity kick.
I'm sure we'll have a lot of chat to take because the change of mind went up yesterday.
What were your thoughts on it?
Change my mind?
Yeah, yeah.
It was later in the day.
On the snap one.
On the snap one.
It was later in the day.
So the problem is I kind of had to run.
And then we had some security issues where there were conversations.
I got pulled out midway.
They kind of got cut.
So I talked to the security team.
Obviously, we do kind of recaps of all this.
And he told me exactly what happened.
So when his hand touched you, what went through your mind in that moment?
I thought, all right, here we go.
Yeah.
And I said, okay.
And you get that little jolt inside because they don't grab you that way.
They don't touch you.
So we got to go unless there's something pretty serious.
And I will say, the kid, maybe we'll run that as a bonus, who I was talking with.
And it was just sort of a broad conversation.
It had evolved into what it meant to be American.
It was a really nice kid, didn't agree with me, but was a really good kid.
And I just looked at him and I said, hey, I have it.
He goes, I get it.
Yep.
And then it's just kind of that that's always the scariest part is waiting when you're in an armed vehicle and you don't really know when you see a bunch of movement and people on communications.
I mean, it's not fun.
It shouldn't be that way.
And then you get mad.
You're like, because I know that those in the left don't have to deal with this, let alone multiple times.
Yeah.
And he basically was telling me, like, I grabbed him in a way, like, you didn't know this in the moment, of course, but he was not going to allow you to do anything other than what he wanted you to do.
Right.
Yeah.
You know, it's one of those involuntary, you are leaving right now kind of moments.
It was as close as I felt to being the lady in officer and a gentleman.
Like, I thought he was going to be like, come with me, lift us up where we belong.
Exactly.
You can argue if you want, but your feet may not hit the ground.
No, exactly.
That's a little emasculating.
You're like, I can't protect myself, but this burly guy can.
But nobody made any really substantially good arguments for keeping snap.
No, they wanted to talk about something else like the Jews, or they wanted to try and discuss anything other than Snap because once you sort of got them into it, they go, oh, what about the, I go, yeah, look, cut the $3 billion to Israel.
We spend $9 billion a year on Snap.
They go, what about the military?
I go, well, it's still actually not as big as entitlement programs, but we can fix that too.
We can make that more efficient advocate.
But right now, we're talking about something in front of us that would be an easy one because we already know.
We've already tracked a huge portion of the corruption, a huge portion of the fraud.
So you got to start somewhere.
And that's something that really is a problem too on the right right now, where you see these people who aren't acting in good faith, where you go, okay, this is something we should all find some common ground on, where we need to seriously reform or just outright end a lot of the entitlements out there, the ones that have proven to not be fruitful at all.
And instead they go, yeah, what about this?
It's like, shouldn't we have a starting point?
No one's saying that everything else is flawless.
This is just one where we have an airtight case here that we got to change it.
And when people do that, it just doesn't seem like they don't, it just doesn't seem like they want any progress.
It seems like they just want to sow chaos and division.
It came at the perfect time because the left, they're amidst their death throes right now, figuratively.
And instead of finishing the left off politically right now, the right decides to start infighting.
Where how do you move forward if you go, okay, well, 9 billion on soda, let's do away with that.
And then 100 into 130 billion, I guarantee you we could trim two-thirds of that if we just go to a food stamp program.
Netanyahu, the Jews, fine, fine.
I want to cut that $3 billion.
I get it, $4 billion on a big year.
I absolutely want to, and all that foreign aid.
But right now, let's start with this.
Well, yeah, but what about the military?
Of course.
Yeah.
Let's start with this.
It's airtight.
Then we can go on to auditing everything else.
And they don't want to start.
And so basically, it's like, all right, so you just want to bitch.
Yeah.
You just want to bitch.
And I think, you know, it does go back to Israel and a lot of these conversations.
We talked about this.
We have to get off of this topic being the topic for every single conversation because they're very easy solutions.
Like you said, okay, cut that.
Fine.
Can we move on now?
And I think, unfortunately, with Donald Trump's administration's handling of the Epstein files, it's just fed into that.
Yeah, I feel like this would be far less of a story.
It would still be a story.
Right.
But far less of a story if there wasn't like, oh, you know, the Epstein files aren't being released and Donald Trump is owned by Israel.
Because there's a lot of these connections with the money that he was receiving and going over to the Knesset and speaking and all of that.
All of that stuff, I think, would be lessened if they had handled this properly.
Yeah, what I will say is this is what I see a lot of out there: I see it start with a kernel of truth and then people misdirect you to something that they try and portray as a common denominator.
So, for example, like I heard Tucker say, and by the way, the work that he just did with Miranda Devine, she might be on the show tomorrow, was great work regarding Crooks.
Looks like there might have been a digital footprint.
Yeah.
And you know that we've always been critical of the FBI, the DOJ.
We're not huge fans of them.
But he'll say something like, and of course, you know, when you call your political opponents a Nazi, then that, of course, justifies violence against them.
And that's what we see.
I agree with that.
That's a problem left.
And he goes, and then, you know, Bonhoeffer, you know, had to abandon his Christian principles because he wanted to kill Hitler.
I said, well, hold on a second.
That's not true.
Calling someone a Nazi for political gain is dangerous.
It's wrong.
It's dishonest.
And it really should have no place in our discourse.
That's the kernel of truth.
It doesn't mean that there were no Nazis at any point in time or that the Nazis were anything other than bad.
And they'll take that and then they'll go, and Nazis, people, because of liberal propaganda.
What's wrong with nationalism?
Nothing.
Nothing is wrong with nationalism.
But that's not, it's not the common denominator that's the problem, nationalism.
You could say Hitler was a nationalist, nationalist socialist workers' party of Germany.
That's what Nazi stands for.
You could say Hitler's a nationalist, sure.
And then you could say that Trump is a nationalist.
I'm a nationalist.
Sure.
So the problem isn't nationalism.
Let me walk you through an exercise.
Malay, Argentina.
Yeah.
Would we all agree that in the sense that he's looking out for the interests of his nation, his people first, he's a nationalist?
Yes.
Okay, sure.
Wouldn't we say the same of Maduro that he claims he's looking out for Venezuela?
Yeah.
He's an actual.
Okay.
So the problem isn't nationalism.
The problem is the differentiator, not the common denominator.
It's the socialism.
You can have a nationalist who wants a free market economy, who wants liberty for their people, and they want to preserve that nation.
Great.
And you can have a national socialist.
The problem is not the nationalism.
It's the socialism.
You would have to say that Stalin in most ways was a nationalist.
Mao, great leap forward.
Of course, a nationalist.
You could say it about Pinochet.
You could say it about Pol Pot.
For sure.
You could say it about a bunch of modern leaders, too, who are looking out.
You could say it about Hungary.
You could say it about Poland right now.
The issue is not nationalism.
So they go from something we agree on to then go, and the left just wants to demonize nationalism.
For I mean, was it really bad for Hitler to be a nationalist?
No one has ever said he was bad for looking out for his nation.
Yeah exactly, the problem was the genocide, the problem was the executions, yes.
And then you get those people who go, yeah, I've been lied to about COVID and so nothing is true.
And it's really easy to mislead them.
And I see that and I some people don't know better and some people do know better I still do actually think that the national socialists of Germany were bad.
Doesn't mean I'm paid by the Jews to say that.
And also, when you look at these people, I will say this, think of all your disagreements in your home, domestically or, as you know, as a family, it all.
The difference is almost always the starting point of the conversation.
In other words, maybe you have an argument where you blow up and then your woman goes like well, you reacted this way, like yeah yeah, but it was the three months preceding that where I didn't and I was trying to bring something up and this is what was bothering me right, so it depends where you start.
That's what determines the villain effectively.
And so people will go out, like with the Jews, and they'll have some legitimate gripes.
They'll say, well, the Jews were moneylending at crazy high interest rates and they were only charging Non-Jews those interest rates and not Jews.
Okay, that's true, and that's why Hitler had a problem with them and that's why a lot of Europe had a problem with him.
That statement in and of itself is largely true.
Okay, but then if you extend it, you go.
Well, why were the Jews primarily moneylenders?
There were a lot of professions that weren't open to them, owning, running companies, a lot of the trades they weren't allowed to do it, and so one of the professions that made the most sense was moneylending.
And it's true, Jews wouldn't charge other Jews the same kind of interest.
They're not allowed to, neither did Christians.
Christians couldn't charge Christians interest.
People of the book.
Two different interpretations, a different start and end point.
Christians could charge Jews interests or Non-Christians, but not Christians.
Same thing with Jews.
They went into the limited profession that they had been corralled into doesn't mean that there weren't some Jews to aggregate power and to misuse it.
But if you just change the starting off point, it changes that context and you can pick the villain, and that's what I see a lot of.
And then you see some people who claim to be on the right, where they pick a starting point and make the United States out to be the villain.
I mean, look at, we talked with Dave Smith.
Are any presidents not war criminals?
His answer was no, aside from George Washington.
And that just must be because he didn't know what George Washington was about, probably the worst war criminal compared to everyone else.
I mean, he was a war thug.
Yeah, he was.
He liked it sure yeah, he loved.
Come on, give me a reason.
My teeth hurt.
I want to die, taking you with me so then I could are.
Have any wars been justified?
And I've heard people say World War II was not.
It's like okay well, we were doing what you guys said right, a nation of playboys.
Remember that that was.
We were largely non-interventionists.
We got attacked at Pearl Harbor and did Germany declare war on the United States the?
It was either the day before, the day after Pearl Harbor.
It occurred within 48 hours of it.
It's like, so at that point, is it?
If that's not justified, then no war ever is justified right after, if it yeah, I think it Was the day after.
If a force that is moving forward and has said, we are looking for global domination, like a cartoon villain, what are we going to do tonight, Adolf?
Same thing we do every night, Schwanzi.
Try to take over the world.
That's what happened.
And then you get attacked and thousands of your people die.
And then the other major enemy declares war against you and they're marching through Europe.
If you say we were the bad guys, well, then no war is ever justified and you just have to let bad guys take it.
And then you've turned the bad guys into the good guys.
Or at least you're a patsy for them.
Well, that's how they look at the world, right?
Oppressor, oppressed.
Yeah.
So you're either oppressed and you're miserable and you're a good person, or you're not miserable and you're an oppressor.
You're a bad person.
And that's the horseshoe where these people on the right go back.
It's like, oh, it sounds like you hate a lot of America.
Yeah.
And I think it's just understanding history.
We've lost the ability to do that.
And so there's a lot of people coming around to this idea and going, oh, I haven't looked at history from this lens.
And it's like, we've, I remember in high school when we were talking about Adolf Hitler and we were talking, because we read Mein Kampf, we actually watched in class Schindler's List.
It's not exactly the most fun movie to watch over several classes for history.
And they were teaching us stuff about, you know, what was going on.
And you can say, oh, that's propaganda.
You know what we also talked about?
The things he did right.
Yeah.
Because it wasn't like we were just trying to take one thing.
It was like, you know, we talked about the Autobahn and things like that, that he was trying to get Germany to uniforms.
Exactly.
Hugo Boss, fantastic.
Come on.
They did a good job.
So it's not like that conversation about what he's done right and what he did wrong never happened before.
It's just now they're like, oh, you guys say is just how bad Hitler is.
And it's a legitimate grievance to say, but I never really learned about Stalin.
Right.
Killed four more people.
That's true.
I never learned about Stalin.
High school, grade school, college.
High school for me.
Never learned it at all.
Never learned about Mao.
Never came up.
I knew Stalin.
I didn't know about Mao and Pol Pot.
Yeah.
Right.
Well, I knew about them when that came from other knowledge.
It wasn't taught to me by our schools.
I had never heard the name Pol Pot until a smartass friend of mine used it as a joke and I was 17.
I was, well, yeah, no, I was 15 years old, 15 years old.
Same.
I didn't know about the Khmer Rouge until I had Cambodian friends tell me about it.
Right.
That whose parents fled Cambodia in the 70s.
I didn't know until I went there.
I was like, wow.
Wow.
You were like 38.
No, I wasn't.
No, but so that's a legitimate grievance.
Like these people have hidden this from you.
And we all know why, because they don't want to point for the same reason that Bernie Sanders honeymooned in the USSR.
They don't want to point to the evil that hits closer to home.
They're the Jews.
Yeah.
Why don't you learn about Che Guevara?
Well, because people said that the extension of Guevara, Castro, Communist Cuba, was a great success story.
So that's true.
There is propaganda.
In other words, they hold the Nazis out as though they were uniquely responsible.
It was a singular evil at that point in time.
It's not.
No.
Stalin was, you could argue worse in many ways.
And I think it's a valid argument to make.
But to then say, what's wrong with a little nationalism?
Right.
That's not where we have a disagreement with the left.
And so it's weird to me where they'll often use the premises of the left and they'll use it against the right.
Like my problem is the same that it was in 2009.
You can go see it as it is today.
Was the socialism was the actual communist, Marxist, socialist fascism, whatever you want to call it.
That's the same problem I've always had.
And it seems like a lot of people, that's what people have abandoned.
They also start attributing motive to reasons for this.
So let me just give you an example.
Like when we go through history classes here in the United States, from what I remember, people don't really like to pay attention in history class.
It's not like everybody's favorite subject.
And so you do some ancient history stuff.
You hit the high points, right?
You don't talk about everything that Xerxes did wrong.
You talk about some of the things, right?
You don't talk about every single event that happens everywhere.
And so when you finally get to a point where you're talking about World War II, it's such a big subject that people go, okay, well, when you talk World War I and World War II, sometimes you have to hit the high points and move on.
We didn't talk about China.
We didn't talk about what was happening in Japan.
We didn't talk about what was happening in Southeast Asia anywhere else, right?
We just didn't cover those things as much.
And there was no motive behind it.
So when you miss the Holodomor in Eastern Europe, in Ukraine, perpetuated by what they would say with the Bolsheviks, which were controlled by the Jews is what they would say.
And it's not completely accurate.
They'll say there's some truth to it.
But yes, there's that kernel.
They'll say it's because the Jews didn't want to give up the card that they've played of the Holocaust forever as being the most oppressed, the most hurt people ever.
Look at the people that endured the Holodomor, and it was at the hands of the Jews is what they would say.
And it's like, no, you're starting to attribute motive here.
Like the Jews control our teachers and our textbooks, and that's why we didn't cover it.
There's a reason we didn't cover a ton of what was going on with Stalin.
People's attention spans and what they teach in school.
It sucks.
I'm not saying that's a good thing.
No, I would disagree.
I would say it's because they don't want to point people towards the evils of maybe the solid social death or something.
I would say the communism.
But I think that's what it is.
I think you have to be careful of attributing motive where it isn't.
I think you have to be, but there is some truth.
And I say this because I was speaking with an Armenian Orthodox priest.
People will say, and the Jews deny the Armenian genocide.
And he goes, well, he goes, that's technically true.
He goes, it's technically true in that they didn't call it a genocide, but they never denied the atrocities.
He said they didn't consider it a genocide.
They considered it more of a war, you know, in conquering our people.
And he goes, and there's a disagreement where some people think that's because they sort of want to have a monopoly on genocide.
So there's some truth to that.
But the idea that Israel denied the atrocities that took place in Armenia, well, that's not true.
And I think the motivation there might seem pretty clear.
Why would you acknowledge the atrocities and not call it a genocide?
Because maybe you want to kind of have the leg up on the genocide conversation.
But that doesn't mean that Israel has denied the plight of the Armenian people.
There's always a kernel of truth and then a warping.
Kind of like this, Lane really wants us to talk about this, talk about warping, you know, food influencers.
Okay, well, this lady takes it to a whole new level by just warping it a little bit.
Meet Pei Chung.
She's a 34-year-old influencer who loves luxury goods and dine and dashing at New York City's top restaurants.
I think her name is DoesNotPei Chung.
Yeah, exactly.
I wonder how Lane found it.
I know Pei Chung.
So, yeah, exactly.
I wonder how.
She's been arrested five times for dining and dashing in the Moderna Pizza, $135 tab.
Lavender Cake, $97 tab.
Peter Luger's Steakhouse, $146 tab.
And she allegedly offered sex instead of cash there at Peter Luger's.
For $146.
Nice.
I know my wife.
Too bad Lane wasn't the manager.
Well, here's the thing.
She's like Marv.
From Home Alone?
Yeah, she leaves the trail.
Oh, the great to have their calling cards.
She documents it.
She went to a restaurant named Francie and posted a picture of the food that she allegedly stole.
She wrote, Michelin dinner at Francie, foie gras, canel, carpaccio, buccatini, colorado lamb, hot chocolate mousse, lemon verbana, grease, what?
Lemon verbana, grease.
I don't even know what that means.
She ran up a $188 tab, refused to pay.
The restaurant declined her offer to settle the bill in exchange for social media posts.
Then she snuck back in and ran up another $84 tab.
I respect it.
I refuse to pay.
I respect the change.
And she was recognized by the cops, who, according to the New York Post, said, oh yeah, that's her.
We know her.
Dude, she is Marv.
Yeah, she is.
She's a dine and dashed damsel.
Well, she just keeps having sex with cops, apparently.
So she gets arrested, but released.
Yeah.
I don't think that's sad.
I think they just let people go.
And she posts about her shoes.
She posts about all of these high-ticket items.
The problem, too, with social media is that it's made sociopaths very, I guess, very within reach.
You can connect with them and it's made them wildly entertaining.
That's right.
And so we emboldened them.
You used to be like, oh, yeah, it's that prek who dined and dashed.
I do respect that she went back in.
At random, another tab.
It's just about the challenge.
That's impressive.
It is.
And you know that no guy gets away with it.
No.
She gets away with it because people are like, all right, okay.
Well, also, they all look alike.
Yeah, it's tough.
Is that her?
Is that her?
Is the same mage lady from earlier?
I don't know.
I don't want to be racist.
Think about someone giving the police sketch artist a description.
It would describe like half of the restaurant.
It's the person in the kitchen.
It's the person at the hose stand.
So, anyway, I don't really, it's just funny.
All right.
Good for you, no paychong.
Let's grab some, let's grab some chats.
All right.
Let's see.
First chat from Kendo Extendo.
Question for Steven: Is it unreasonable to expect any and all immigrants to handle their finances and not receive government handouts?
We only want the best of the best coming here.
Is it unreasonable?
No, I don't.
I think it's entirely reasonable.
It's what should be the expectation.
It's what should be the standard.
And we need to legislate that into being the case.
In other words, there should be no way that someone who is here, did they say undocumented or illegal aliens?
Just all immigrants.
I think it's immigrants.
I mean, I'm on board with all immigrants that have the same policy.
Yep.
I think immigration is something that's part of our country, but I'm not giving you anything.
No.
Why am I going to incentivize this?
Why should I bring something?
I don't need to bring you here.
No.
It's the circular logic of the left.
And I had this at the snap thing before.
And I think this might have been the conversation that was interrupted.
It's like, well, this is like, you know, these people want to come here.
It's the greatest country in the world.
You know, that's the thing.
I said, okay, great.
So you're saying it's really valuable to be here.
They said, yeah.
He said, so we got to make immigration easier.
I said, can you tell me, point me to any other scenario where something that is incredibly valuable is not devalued by removing the price of admission?
Gold, diamonds, expensive clothes, car?
How does it, how are you treating it as valuable by making it free for all?
You're devaluing it.
So you can't say it's the most valuable citizenship there is.
It's a golden ticket, which, by the way, should cost and require nothing.
It's a self-defeating argument.
Yeah.
And that's the litmus test for bringing people here is that you can contribute, you can add to what we are, not just come and take from it.
So it makes no sense to bring somebody here that you would necessarily have to, at least in general.
Maybe there's some outlying cases where somebody did something for us and we're rewarding them bringing whatever.
Different thing.
Yeah.
But it doesn't make any sense to just bring people here.
Like, yeah, yeah, yeah, come to our country.
You get in as opposed to these people, but hey, government dole, there you go.
Right.
Doesn't make any sense at all.
No, absolutely not.
And so it used to be like, yeah, let's stop illegal immigration, but make immigration easier.
I don't agree with that.
Now, and by the way, that's a perfect example of where I think it's reasonable to have changed your position when you understand just how corrupt our immigration system is and how fleeced people who actually want to contribute, how fleeced they are in trying to get to this country going through the legal routes.
I think we need to put a halt on almost all of it outside of examples where it's really, really clear that they benefit the interest of the American people.
I want it to be easy for the people that we want to come here.
Right.
I want it to be very easy, a very simple process, a very easy process for people to go to if you're the person that we want to come here.
Right.
If you're not, I don't want it to be easy at all.
I want it to be a no, a quick no.
Right.
Like a, hey, try again next time, right?
But not right now.
Yeah, exactly right.
Next chat.
All right.
Let's see.
Next chat for.
By the way, I may have missed something in this as he's pulling it.
I'm sorry I didn't mean to interrupt, but like apparently when we were looking at the pictures of her shoes and things like that, the headlines that were in there, one of them was like, did I pay overprice for my housing three years ago?
Yes.
Can houses purchases?
Can houses purchasing get tax deductions?
Yes.
Has the U.S. refunded me all my taxes yet?
No.
Who has problems?
Like completely out of her mind posts justifying expensive shoes.
No, not even justifying.
I'm not even sure it's.
I thought you were saying, I steal shoes because until I get tax refund, I continue to steal shoe.
It's just this person is crazy in a lot of ways.
Yeah.
It's like, take the insanity of Asians and then add Western entitlement.
It's bizarre.
Yeah.
So they don't have the bridling of being locked in a basement and bull whipped if they don't praise their dear leader.
Like you got to have both facets for them to function.
All right, let's grab the next chat.
Next chat from Dosoklakos.
Question for the crew.
I feel like I'm living in idiocracy.
What should we do with feminists who only base their opinions on emotion, refuse to accept facts, and laugh when you prove them wrong?
Ask Andrew Wilson.
Yeah.
He deals with them a lot.
And you make an example of them.
What I mean is, is with those people, don't waste your time if you know that you're not going to get anywhere.
That's where I would cut to the chase.
Just bring like a dog.
And I'm not saying women are dogs.
I'm saying like a dog where we have to put his face in his mess, go, here, whether it's Snapper, here are the facts.
This is the problem.
What would you do about it?
And don't let them answer your question with a question.
Don't let them move the goalposts.
Don't let them present red herrings and make sure that other people see how unreasonable and illogical it is.
The problem is, and I don't know how to fix this.
I mean this.
I don't know how to fix it.
The problem is men will see that kind of a conversation and go, oh, well, this was a clear walkoff.
You'll still get 50% of women who think that she's right because they felt that she emotionally appealed to them.
That's the problem.
That's how you end up with fat celebrities telling you, hey, I'm happy and you should do what I do and women following suit.
It's a sisterhood.
I was talking with my lady who's possessive, who is Latina.
I mean, honestly, she's Mexico's Brazilian Portuguese.
We find out she's from the area that's like 90% Italian.
So she's basically a guinea.
But we were watching this movie on Netflix Nana's with Vince Vaughan.
And I guess it was based on a true story where this restaurant, I think it was in Staten Island, hired Italian grandmothers to do the cooking.
And it's still there, like 15 years later.
And there's a scene in the film, Spoiler Alert, where Vince Vaughan's character finds out that his best friend sold his dad's classic car that like meant everything to him to fund this restaurant.
And it's a really kind of touching scene.
And my lady says, see, that's the thing, like men do that.
She goes, women, she said this.
She said, women would never do that.
Because women would never just sell the most important thing that you own to help someone else.
Well, here's, I said, here's how there's some truth to what you're saying.
That doesn't mean no women.
I said, I want you to think of all the best women in your life, the women you're closest with, the women who you like, who you trust.
Think of them.
How many of them do you think, honestly, would sign up alongside your other female friends to die next week?
She said, not one.
I said, men do it all the time.
Every time there's a war.
I think the thing that feminists are most jealous about is that men are better at friending.
Men can have a blow-up, makeup.
They can forgive each other.
Not all, not all.
Some men hold grudges.
But in general, men have to resolve conflict because conflict, if it gets to the point of distracting from your purpose, and whether that's war, whether that's hunting, whether that's building, innovating, you do have to take the greater good of the unit into consideration and sort of assess and agree with a leader.
Like men know that.
We have hierarchies.
We have pecking orders and we understand that we play a role and we're willing to die.
Men are willing to die for ideas and die for their friends on a regular basis.
Not all, not all, but that is far more common among men than it is among women.
And so, you know, I think it's a matter of policy.
Those people who are going to be sent to die, who are willing to die, they should have greater sway in the vote than the people who send them to die and want to leave this country in the first place.
Well, I don't know.
I think some women are willing to die, like the one lady who was willing to die just to get some photos with her and some poor Sri Lankas.
I don't know if Dick Slap qualifies.
That Instagram post is good.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Look at me and my decadence and these poor people until they pull a dick out and all of a sudden they're bad people.
Now I'm on itch.
Yeah.
They're all itch.
I was aegyan.
I thought it was going to be funny.
He prayed love.
I didn't think he'd have his dick out.
His little deke.
Now when I go to Sri Lanka, I say, hey.
No, dicks.
I say are you Mr. Dickenpoles?
That's what I call him.
Hey, Dick.
Hey, Dickhead.
Dickhead.
Your dick's always in your hand.
I don't know why you pronounce it like that.
It sounds smaller.
It does.
My dick.
Yeah, no one's like, I've got a really impressive dick.
I don't believe you.
I don't believe it's small.
You're saying deke.
I think it's deck in me.
Right.
But if someone said, like in a Russian voice, like, he has huge dick.
You're like, yeah, he does.
Yeah, I'm sure.
I'm scared of it, actually.
That's why I'm going to be able to do it.
Don't bring it along with me.
All right.
He just solved it.
All right.
Next chat from R. Rubino94.
Question for Crowder.
Is Ozempic also a vaccine for racism?
I was told racism makes black people fat.
That's true.
That's true.
The obesity rates are due to the fact that they've heard the N-word once.
And heart disease.
Yeah.
So that's actually a good point.
Yeah.
We found the cure to racism.
There we go.
Was that Jamalman who said that?
Well, I don't know.
That's dangerous.
Now people are going to be going out there calling people the N-word and going, ah, forget about it, throwing a syringe at them.
Yeah, exactly.
Get over it.
They're going to be like, it's been 160 years, black people.
Get over it.
And throw a Zempic at them.
Hey, look, the black Hebrew Israelites are protesting or us.
Call them a dartboard.
Blow gun.
We have that.
We need to find our blowgun.
We had a real blowgun here somewhere.
What was it?
Maybe two.
Maybe two.
It's pretty impressive.
When you actually do it against the dartboard, you're like, ooh, that dartboard is not going to stand up to this for that long.
That would hurt.
It's a very powerful blowgun.
We'll go find it today.
Let's test it on someone.
Yeah.
No.
Yeah.
Let's test it with an Ozempic syringe.
Yeah, on me.
We'll see if it works with the hunger.
We need to drop Josh into a vat of Ozempic, like the ooze.
See, like Ninja Turtles 2.
Yeah.
Come on.
Or like Who Frame Roger Rabbit.
Well, it melt away.
Melt away the fat, the bones, the tendons.
For some reason, in my mind, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, I conflate with Dick Tracy, and I don't know why.
It's because they're old school.
That's like PI.
There's a PI in the movie.
He dresses like Dick Tracy.
Yes.
All right.
Dick Tracy was hot lips, right?
That was a bad guy.
I think so.
All right.
Next chat.
Next chat from Eeyore Tega.
Dick Tracy.
I think they parody Dick Tracy in that movie.
What?
I think they parodied Dick Tracy a little bit in that movie.
Oh, that must be.
Because there's somebody with hot lips in that movie, too.
Yeah.
Yeah.
He's a Sri Lankan.
Hot lips.
Hot Tracy.
Little Deke.
That's what I call him now.
Mr. Dick.
It doesn't sound big.
Next chat.
Next chat from Eeyore Tega.
Should it be considered a red flag in any relationship slash or intimate slash business if someone doesn't want to do the work and just take the magic pill slash shot?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Now, not if it's used again as a tool.
Because here's the truth.
There is, people have different genetics.
If people didn't have different genetics, then, you know, whenever men's health goes, get the Ryan Reynolds body, then everyone could do it.
You can achieve the best body that's possible for you within your genetic parameters.
In some cases, there are limitations.
If someone has lived a life of sloth and then decided to take a pillar and injection and lost weight and wants credit for it, to me, I would say that is indicative of a character that would tend to be lazy.
Well, I think Ozempic's not free.
I might be wrong.
I don't know if there's subsidies for this or if there's a way to get it for free.
There's just an advantage.
It's not free.
You have to be able to afford it.
So people are out there working hard, doing something so they can afford this.
I don't think everybody just taking Ozempic is lazy.
I think that is an easier way to do.
I'm not going to be taking it because I want to feel good about myself.
Well, see, so then you believe it's a cheat.
I do think it's a bit of a cheat, but I don't think we should be, you know, saying everyone is lazy, though.
I'm just going to say, just credit somebody for it.
I mean, no, what I'm saying is if someone has not, Amy Schumer has not put in the work.
I can tell you that definitively because I've seen her cooking show where she makes fun of her retard husband.
No, she hasn't.
And she's also been on the record being like, being fat is beautiful.
And I would never want to, yeah, so that's a lot different.
Like if that guy, I just forgot his name, My Name is Roll Guy, if Ethan had done it when Ozempic existed and he lost 400 pounds.
Well, that's not just the Ozempic.
But if someone is just sitting around doing nothing, and you know, a big part of it too is you can see if there's muscle.
Women don't need to build muscle.
That's a big thing, too.
It's really, really difficult to build muscle.
And women, I will say, are often blissfully unaware.
They're like, oh, I just took creatine or protein shakes.
Like, no, no, no.
No.
You can expect in your first year or two of weightlifting, if you're doing it diligently, to maybe gain like eight to 10 pounds of muscle would be a lot.
And then they say like your second or third year, a few.
And after that, two pounds is astronomical.
You're more than likely only going to be gaining about a pound of muscle a year.
It's very, very difficult to build muscle.
Much, much harder to build muscle than to lose fat.
And that's not really a requirement of women.
And if you look at the BMI charts, you know, I'm obese.
Gerald's obese.
Yeah.
Lane is close to obese.
Lane, the brain is close to obese, but we're all overweight because I'm supposed to be 180.
That's insane.
Yeah, I'm about 225.
So I would say that's a good idea.
I tall you look at 6'2.
That's insane.
Caller end of 16.
That's what it says to be ideal.
Now, for a woman who's five foot nothing, she'd have to be 145 pounds or so to be obese.
Well, how many women at five foot nothing are so muscular that they're becoming that heavy?
The answer is very, very few.
So if you're looking at someone who just loses weight and you can tell through the physique that they haven't built up any muscle tone, that it's just weight loss overall and they haven't put in the work.
They're not going to the gym.
They're not dieting.
That's very different than someone who's using it as a tool who's an athlete or someone who is taking stock of their health.
So that's what I say is, yeah, that to me, if it's someone who's going like, yeah, I didn't need to do anything.
I just started taking Ozempic, I would think that's a temporary fix.
And, you know, I would imagine it's not great to be on it for your whole life.
So there's probably some rebound weight.
So I would imagine that someone like, here's the litmus.
If this person stops Ozempic, are they going to go right back to their previous weight?
If the answer is yes, then I would say it's the lazy way.
If the answer is no, I would say, okay, then it's a tool.
Yeah.
Yeah.
The question was, is it a red flag?
Yeah.
And I think maybe your answer to your question is, your question should be worded differently.
Is it a red flag if somebody used to be fat and they did anything but work hard to, you know, and exercise to get it off?
If it was a tool and they did work, then no.
If they just did it and there would be rebound fat to right where they were left off once the pharmaceutical was no longer included, then I know guys that done that too, to be clear.
I mean, I'm one of those guys.
I used to be in the best physical shape that I can imagine.
And I didn't use supplements.
I didn't use steroids.
I didn't use Ozempic.
I just exercised every day in Afghanistan and at home because I was a loser.
I had nothing going on.
Yep.
Then I got fat.
So it happens to people who don't take Ozempic too.
So I think what your red flag is just might, your red flag just might be people ever being fat.
You might just want to just look for a person who's always been thin for yourself.
I think I'm talking about like a business relationship.
I would say if someone has like a completely messy fat has anything to do with business.
No, they're talking about someone getting up and going the extra mile, someone you can trust, discipline as an employee.
It's just another example of does it permeate every facet of their life?
Discipline is something that is all-encompassing.
And people who value discipline value it across the board, right?
You'll get some people who are just vain where they only focus on their pecs.
But generally speaking, in my experience, balanced human beings, if they're disciplined, and I don't mean they have to be a model, they're within striking distance of being in shape.
They're usually also reading, learning.
These are people who like self, who focus on self-improvement.
There's also a red flag of somebody who's like really fit.
I run into this all the time.
I'll get into an argument about ideas or politics, and then someone doesn't, I disagree with somebody, and then they go, oh, well, you're fat.
Like, oh, okay, but that has nothing to do with my opinion about immigration.
No, nothing at all.
I mean, aside from the thing that ringing, nope, nope, I won.
You're fat.
Right.
You're wrong.
Like, what?
That doesn't.
Okay.
And then it'll ask you not to judge them.
And I will say, too, it is a red flag if someone is incredibly vain.
Like, we don't, well, now we do have the one mirror because it's on the Jacked Fitness Rack, but we don't have mirrors there because I don't, it's, it's a self-improvement room, the office gym.
It's not go in there and look at your pump and take a picture for the grim.
It's, hey, you want to get stronger?
You want to get more fit?
You want to get healthy.
This is the place for you.
Sign the waiver so you don't sue me if you drop a weight on yourself.
And it's open to you to use.
I think there's a difference between pure vanity and wanting to live a balanced, long, and healthy life, especially if you have family.
Next chat.
All right.
Next chat on the subject from Warman 10.
Question for crew.
I'm 20 pounds down on my weight loss goal.
Congratulations.
Doctor told me to keep calorie intake around 1,200, but working out makes me more hungry.
Any tips to help fight the cravings after workout?
Warman, could you tell us if you don't mind your general sort of size, like height and weight?
Because 1,200 calories is pretty low.
Very low.
That's breakfast.
Yeah.
And I would, yeah.
And I would say, unless you're really short and not that large, that might be a little bit severe.
I don't want to go against it.
Does your doctor know your workout regimen?
Yeah.
Your doctor's recommending 1,200 calories.
That might be on a sedentary lifestyle.
I don't know if I'm saying that work.
Yes, no, you're right.
It's very, very different.
Yeah, it's very different.
As a matter of fact, it can actually be counterproductive if you have such a low caloric intake that your body is not able to, if it's trying to build muscle or trying to recover, where it can actually impede your.
And there's a cascade of effects.
You can get elevated cortisol or you'll store more belly fat.
Like it's better if you can.
And there are ways to do fast weight loss.
Like, let's say you have to do it for a sporting event, a wrestling meet, something like that.
These guys are masters at cutting weight.
Most of it is dehydration.
There are ways to do it.
Some of them, but there are ways to do it.
Ideally, you just sort of have a few hundred calories below maintenance.
And especially if you're training hard, then you definitely need to be closer to maintenance calories than dropping it too fast because you'll feel like crap and you'll be tired.
So I don't know what your size and weight, unless you're like five foot five or something like that.
1,200 is very, very low for assuming you're a man because it says war man.
Again, does your doctor know about your fitness regimen?
You could probably do it.
What do you say?
5'8 ⁇ , 286.
And yes, he does three one-hour cardio workouts a week and two strength.
Okay.
So, and someone we could probably put it in a calculator, like your maintenance at that point, probably if you're 286, would be pretty high.
Yeah, I don't want to give direct, but I think if you're feeling really crappy in your training, you could probably do better to talk with your doctor, increase some calories that would help with recovery, you know, good types of carbohydrates, obviously proteins, healthy fats.
If you're feeling like crap losing weight, it's always going to be tough.
The one thing for me is if I'm losing weight, I don't sleep because your metabolism, that's the one thing that I notice, and it really sucks.
It's not fun.
And the more severe your calorie deficit, the more crap you're going to feel.
I would say an hour of cardio is a lot.
Yeah.
It is hard.
I've been dealing with this for most of my adult life.
It is hard.
Sometimes you go hungry.
Yeah.
Not go hungry like you're starving, but sometimes you just feel like that.
You just feel like, man, I just, I really want to eat.
And that's one place where Ozempic, it does its, that's what it's supposed to do, is it, it quells your hunger.
I don't know what, you know, what's helped what beneficial supplement other than that that quells hunger.
I mean, I drink a lot of water.
That's my go-to.
And I'm, when I'm hungry and I'm trying to cut, just chugging water.
That's probably not healthy.
No, there's nothing wrong with it.
But just filling myself with water all day.
Yeah, you could probably up your calories, I would say.
And I would say if you're doing two times a week, that's enough strength training.
You could do three times a week.
And your cardio, if you're just looking to lose weight, doesn't need to be that intense.
Just increasing long walks.
The ideal cardio for fat loss is a kind of cardio that you can take part in and still have a conversation.
So for your heart, for athletic ability, interval training and things like that, high-intensity cardio, there's a value to it.
But for fat loss, you don't really need that.
You just need to move a significant amount more.
So three, because I know if you're doing three hours of cardio each week, like that's a lot of time to take up.
But it might be easier to go for a walk, put your headphones on, walk the dog.
I always say with cardio, if you're trying to lose weight, it's about increasing that activity and doing something that's sustainable.
And you could do two or three days of strength training.
But that seems like I can understand why you feel tired.
So talk with your doctor, but you could probably add in a few calories and still do okay.
Final chat.
And the foundation daily, zero calories, right?
Actually, that's a good question.
It's not, I don't think there's any calories in here.
I mean, it's just vitamins, minerals, unless there's like some calories from garlic, because it might constitute some sort of measure of energy.
Cheap way to.
But it is good.
I would recommend it too, especially if you have aches and pains in your joints.
The garlic is really good for your lipid profile and blood pressure.
I can say that and not be sued because there is clinical data.
The only other supplement we're looking at maybe doing is creatine, which you can get from anywhere, but you want to make sure you're getting something that actually is what's on the label.
Aside from that, there aren't many supplements that make a huge difference.
So next chat.
All right.
Final chat.
Final chat from Taj.
Question for the crew.
Do you think there's an actual problem of anti-Semitism in the youth?
Or does it seem like or does it seem more like youth embracing being called Nazis, racists, spigots, et cetera?
A pushback against leftists.
Yeah, I think it is probably more a pushback.
You know, we grew up as millennials where everything was, you know, because the president was George W. Bush, it was rock against Bush.
It was screw you dead.
You don't know what it's like.
And I think that particularly with young white men, they've been accused of this for so long that it's natural for them to want to rebel.
I'll tell you, in talking with young people who might be considered more radical, right, none of them disagree with my position on it.
When I talk to them, I go, is that a reasonable position?
Whether you completely agree or disagree, does that make me in the pocket of the Israeli lobby or the Jews?
I don't like APAC, screw them with a wire brush.
I think they need to be more transparent.
And we should cut funding to all sides of this war.
Is that reasonable?
Every single one says yes.
And by the way, so do all my Jewish friends.
Every single one.
They may not agree with it wholesale, but none of them think it's anti-Semitic and none of them think that it means you're a shill for the Jews.
You only see it online where I think there's a lot of, you know, sort of trolling and edgelording.
I do think that it's been anytime you make a topic somewhat forbidden, and I think it's been accelerated by this government, the optics of we're really clamping down on anti-Semitism on campus, which to be clear, I think if people vandalize a campus in the name of Palestine, if they're here on a student visa, they should be booted.
I don't think that they should be booted if they have problems with the Israeli government.
That's very different.
But it seems like there have been some talking points, and Pam Bondi's an idiot, so she always reiterates it in the wrong way.
We're not going to tolerate anti-Semitism.
Actually, as a country, of course we do.
You have the right to be.
And then we can have a discussion.
And I can determine if it's baseless or you have some legitimate gripes, as people can have with any demographic of people.
But of course, we tolerate it.
You have to tolerate all kinds of speech with which you disagree in a free society.
I think with young people, a lot of them is, a lot of them are rebelling.
I mean, you have to take into account, these are people who miss their proms, people who missed their graduation, you know, people who missed their senior year because of COVID, because of being locked down.
And they look at it and they go, wait a second, who?
And they look at the Schumers of the world and go, oh, okay, the Soroses of the world.
And then they have people telling them, by the way, you're not allowed to criticize any of these people because they control all the institutions.
And they go, oh, well, I should be allowed to criticize anybody.
And that's true.
You should be allowed to criticize anybody.
That doesn't mean that you should only criticize one.
So that's my position on Israel.
But I will say this.
I certainly believe that Islam is a greater threat to Western civilization and Christian society.
Keep in mind, you still have 200 million Muslims who believe that violence is often or somewhat justified against apostates, against infidels.
And I can tell you this, when people say, ask yourself who you can't criticize, I have been under threat of death since 2009, going back to the Quran challenge, where I read the Quran on YouTube.
I remember because there was a guy who was an editor at Fox News Digital who said, I have your family call me when you're dead.
Then that's a story.
They didn't really care at that point in time.
I've never once been under threat from the Jews.
I can say, Jews, hey, many of them are annoying.
They're not a particularly attractive brood in many cases.
Their mothers are overbearing.
I can say anything that I want.
Jews annoy me.
Guess what?
That's it.
It starts and ends there.
If I say anything about Islam, you can bet that there's going to be quite a bit to pay.
There's a big, distinct difference between Judaism and Islam, and it's that one of them wants the world to be them.
Right.
They want to change the world and convert the world, and the other one doesn't care.
Right.
They're not going out.
They don't send missionaries out to convert people to Judaism.
Right.
Yeah.
This is for us.
We're the chosen ones, not you.
Well, and I know what the left will, and I don't have time to get into it, but I know what people will respond to this, right?
Those on that side, they'll go, yeah, well, okay, so Islam, but who's the one who's pushing for opening and importing all these people from the third world from these Islamic countries?
I'm sure there are some Jews on some humanitarian boards who have taken part in that.
But what about almost all Islamic governments outside of these actual governments from which these people are fleeing?
In other words, you look at the Islamic world.
Hey, who actually welcomed people from places like Syria, places like Iraq, right?
As ISIS was springing up, Barack Obama and less than 1% of them were Christians.
And who had the Muslim travel ban?
So I think you'd be pretty hard pressed to say that the Republican, the MAGA wing of the Republican Party have been pro open borders and letting in Islamic refugees because they're controlled by the Jews.
It doesn't add up.
I'm sure some leftist progressive Jews, yes, have taken part in that.
But we can't absolve Islam of their own misdeeds.
And we can't absolve the left of what it is that they have been pushing as far as open borders.
For crying out loud, almost 20 million people, depending on which numbers you use, under Joe Biden alone, that's a huge threat.
And 200 million Muslims who want you in one capacity or another dead.
I can say this because I've criticized every single group, demographic that I can think of.
And only one always results in serious death threats.
I've lived it.
Anyone who tells you any differently is just not being honest, regardless of whether you agree or not.
We'll see you tomorrow.
We must go.
Go on to this next show.
That's what I know.
▲
Export Selection