All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 15, 2025 - Louder with Crowder
52:30
🔴 251 Racist Slurs: Politico's Bombshell Leak is a Massive Nothingburger 2025-10-15 18:04
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
You mean they were allowed to do that before?
And then he wrote, done.
Pentagon now has the same rules as every U.S. military installation.
That makes complete sense to me, which we also went over this and went over this with our lawyers this morning.
Something that is leaked to us by someone internally, for example, the bullet engravings, that is a legitimate form of investigative journalism.
It doesn't change what we do at all.
Here's the other problem, is we have seen time and time again.
Maybe we could pull that Geraldo Rivera clip where he basically gave away the coordinates that put troops in harm's way.
You know that those in the press will flagrantly disregard classified information, even if it puts military strategy or important information or, God forbid, troops in harm's way if it gives them a scoop.
And then they will ignore legitimate investigative journalism if it runs counter to their narrative, like bullet engravings on the assassin's gun for Charlie Kirk, like the Nashville manifesto, like Chippewa Falls for kind of Chippewa Falls, what happened there in Wisconsin that you went down.
That's a bigger story than a private group chat between some Republican buddies.
They don't care.
And so setting some standards makes sense.
Of course, completely unhappy about this gross violation of journalistic rights is Brian Stelter.
Ah, he's got me.
All right, Toolman, you brightened my day, but can you run the real clip now, please?
Yeah, okay.
It's an infringement on First Amendment rights.
It has the potential to criminalize acts of journalism because so much of what reporters learn about the military, some of it comes from leaks.
Some of it comes from sources who are not technically authorized or allowed to provide the information.
But they're sharing that information in the public interest.
This new document, this new so-called pledge, would potentially criminalize that kind of coverage and put journalists at risk of prosecution.
Yeah.
I think what Mr. Hekseth is doing is quite nice and generous.
Right.
We would have put him on a train.
Right.
Yeah.
I know you guys didn't really handle the press.
Why would we?
No, that makes that.
Yeah, you know.
That's fine.
Right.
Oh, wow.
Yeah, Hitler's bad.
Very bad.
Still bad.
The worst of it was when they were told to get their press badge, they have to work for one week as a National Guardsman guarding an ICE facility.
So they're pretty upset.
And Brian Stelter would show up in solidarity.
Yeah, he's there.
I hope the ice is on my nipples.
Does that the stelter sound right?
Yeah, but he's got a wife.
Yeah, he loves her super hot pod.
Oh, my God.
Have you ever been here when we've gone through his Instagram?
Oh, God, no.
It's the gayest thing ever.
He's like, the only thing that I like more than brunching is my wife's super hot pod.
It's like, what did you see an axe commercial once?
And you think that's how heterosexuals act?
You ever said, I love brunching as a straight male ever?
No, but I did say this phrase in a bother my friend.
I said, that's a nice top you have on you.
Oh, no, yeah.
That's one of those.
I've never worn a top in my life.
I've worn shirts.
I'm trying to write a bit about that.
A guy saying to another guy, nice top.
Yeah, it's a dead giveaway.
Coming out of a fitting one.
That's a nice top.
And I don't think you've ever said super hot pod.
It just seems like something a gay guy thinks straight men would say.
Like, hey, Nick, have you checked out the super hot bod on that lady friend?
No.
I like the vagina.
I say, like, what a hot tamale she is.
Right, yes, exactly.
But because you're multicultural.
What a moxie.
What is this brunch?
You have breakfast and you have lunch.
I know they hybrid.
You have to keep them separate.
Segregated, kill some order in your life.
Yeah.
It's also very expensive where you pay like $20 for eggs.
Yeah.
I'm out of fan.
You just get my eggs from outside.
Yeah.
That makes sense.
If you have chickens, but not everyone here does.
I don't have chickens.
I just find them.
Oh, I hate them.
That makes sense.
You do it the hard way.
From a Jewish one.
It's resourceful.
What did you say, Gerald?
You had something?
I wanted to clarify one point in this.
So, people are getting hung up on one thing.
and I don't know if Stelter really addressed it very well there, but it's not that they can't report off.
Okay, it's not that they can't be leaked information and be able to kind of claim some protections under the First Amendment to be able to publish that information.
It's that they cannot solicit that information.
Right.
And that may weigh in, you know, you can kind of look at the bottom there.
Such conduct may weigh in the consideration of whether you pose a security or safety risk.
If you're encouraging people to break the law and to go out and get this, so there's a little bit of a difference.
So what we do is, hey, if you have information on something that's going down and you're a whistleblower or something like that, we're here, we're available.
And somebody else going, hey, man, you should go get me a file on this.
Yeah, exactly.
You should go do this.
That is a different situation.
I think that's really all that Pete Hegseth is trying to do.
And I don't know why news organizations are so anti signing onto this.
Who did you say you said didn't cover it well?
Brian Stelter.
I will tell you this.
There are a few things in life that make me happier.
Not even the smile of my children, which is like looking into the face of God himself.
It doesn't make me as happy as when I see a generic threat about Brian Stelter out there and someone posts that.
Put it everywhere, boys.
I want a flat screen of that on my tombstone.
And just on a loop.
God, is it creepy?
The Hitler makes me hungry, though.
I became happy, Hitler, when I saw that for the first time.
I know.
It's just, it really does bring joy.
Put a smile on my face.
Maybe we could.
Hey, you know what?
Maybe we take chats.
We could just check in real time Brian Stelter's latest Instagram post.
Oh, my God.
He's giving me a socks now.
He's got a nice.
All right.
You can't do it every time.
There are limits.
Yeah.
I'm sure we could do that later.
I think I asked for something else from Mission Control, but I don't remember what it was.
The Geraldo Rivera review.
Oh, yeah.
Did you guys find it?
Did they send you that?
The Geraldo Rivera.
Remember that when Geraldo Rivera gave away the coordinates?
He was like, I think he was embedded with some troops in either Afghanistan or Iraq.
As you can see here, we're on the northeast side of this mountain.
Here's a couple of landmarks turn left at the fig tree.
And then you could, like, the guys behind him were like, the fuck is wrong with him?
He's like, all right, we got to move, guys.
We got to move.
All of a sudden, there was a mushroom cloud behind him.
Yeah, thanks.
Thanks, Geraldo.
Gosh.
Yeah.
He's an idiot.
Now, if we can find that, it was Cliff.
I remember was really, really clear that he gave away actual, if not coordinates, pretty close to it.
It's like Clarissa Ward.
I think it came up because she was back on talking about the peace deal, and I'm like, they still let her have a job.
She jumped in a ditch because a bomb dropped three miles away with her crew.
And then she also found a Syrian prisoner that was left in a cell that was obviously not a Syrian prisoner.
Of course, I get sucker punched by a union thug five times, right, directly in the face.
People saying they're going to kill me with a gunfight, and they go like, you're fine.
You're a big guy.
You can handle it.
You were in a country where a bomb was also dropped one time at some period and you're claiming that you're in danger.
Like, you're the worst.
I don't have anything more to say on that.
Let's grab some chats.
All right.
First chat from Monsterette.
Question for all.
What is your favorite Hitler joke of all time?
Oh my gosh.
I don't know of any.
I don't really know of a joke.
Oh, gee.
Who's there?
Nobody!
Don't worry about it.
Opens the door.
You're going to die.
Oh.
That one.
That one's a little less.
That's right.
Yeah.
Funny than threatening.
Do you know any Hitler jokes, Dick?
Don't you hate that one?
Like, you're a comedian.
Tell me a joke.
It's like, I don't know jokes.
Yeah, I do material.
Right.
It's the difference.
And how do you not know that?
Stand-up's been around 60 years.
There they go.
Oh, yeah.
I'm really funny.
It's like, well, great.
Go try it.
Yeah.
Sorry for thinking comedians could be funny.
Yeah, see, you would.
I'm thinking of trying it.
Yeah?
Yeah, I get up on stage.
I got a tight five.
Right.
Well, you know, you might want to smooth over some rough edges.
We can go over it with you.
Oh, is that the, did I forget to shave?
No, no, not that.
I would imagine that would be off-putting to some folks out there.
Let's grab.
I don't know any Hitler jokes.
Maybe, does anyone here know any good Hitler jokes?
I have Holocaust jokes.
Not Hitler.
They only seem to go on my side.
Right, yeah.
They kind of go one direction.
Go in my favor.
I think you might be misinterpreting the joke.
If someone can think of one, we'll bring it up in a little bit.
Let's grab another chat.
Do we have any chats for Hitler, by the way?
For nice Hitler?
There must be chats for Happy Hitler.
It's Happy Hitler.
We have several, actually.
It's Happy Hitler, you stupid idiot.
All right, it's okay.
Let's stay on the happy mode.
Sorry, I get a little worked up there.
I get it.
That's what happens with the cocktail of methamphetamine and heroin.
Yes.
All right.
Tim Holzbar asks, question for Hitler.
I like the new mustache.
Do you think the world has gone too far towards communism/slash socialism?
Well, thank you.
I got a new style sent to me from my Mexican friend.
Oh, really?
You have Mexican friends?
That's most likely.
Well, they're more work for me.
Right.
Yeah.
That's right.
But there was a friend between.
Yeah.
And he advocated this style.
Yeah, it's a little bit longer, I think.
But yeah, I think, well, I like it that way.
I have a weird lip.
Oh, is that what it is?
People don't know that about me.
Really?
Yeah, it's a weird lip.
It's not a hair lip, but a higher lip.
I've thought women say they don't like to kiss me.
Right, yeah.
Well, that makes sense.
But yeah, I think that maybe there's too many communists and socialists.
I prefer national socialists, obviously.
Right, yeah.
But I should be the only one in charge, really.
What's the primary difference between socialism and, like, national socialism?
Because it's still...
All right.
Aside from that through your current fault, it's pretty much the same, just with a little more racism.
He looked at me like I was Himmler.
I was like, oh, you're the PR guy.
Come on.
I always trust my Italian friend here.
That's true.
Until he turned his back on me.
Right.
Well, you know, you didn't treat me.
They were on our side.
Then they're like, oh, sorry.
It was an ego.
They want to dime you off now.
Right.
Yeah, I know.
Does that press secretary?
Yeah.
Dime you up.
A payphone replacement.
I know.
All right.
Sorry.
Next chat.
All right.
Next chat.
Question for the crew.
Didn't Doge find that U.S. taxpayers were paying for politico subscriptions?
Why are they not being prosecuted for this?
I don't remember.
From what I remember of that story, it wasn't necessarily that they were paying for political subscriptions.
It was at some organizations that were journalist outfits, right?
They pay for subscriptions.
That's part of their operational budget.
And I could be wrong, but we have that here too.
For example, we have subscriptions to New York Times, Washington Post, to Politico.
And then every now and then there will be one.
I'm like, ah, Vulture.
I'll be like, hey, guys, do you know if we have one of these subscriptions to Vulture or something that I have to read or Vice?
So that's pretty common for journalistic outfits.
And my understanding was that was rolled into the budget.
Now, I don't disagree with the principle of it.
Those organizations should be receiving no money whatsoever.
But my primary gripe wasn't that they had a politico subscription so that they could cover it.
Yeah.
All right.
Next chat.
All right.
Next chat from Why a Wild Man?
Question for Happy Hitler.
Knowing what you know now, what would you do differently?
And tell your friend Josh, thank you for your service.
Well, he's not taking my calls.
Right, yeah.
I know it's kind of.
He never picks up mine calls.
Yeah, you guys kind of have an up and down.
Did I have any, was I doing anything different?
Well, yeah.
Yeah.
I can think of at least one thing.
Well, maybe increase the size of the showers.
Okay.
Yeah.
That's a hard question.
There's so many things.
Yeah, there's so many things.
I think I know D thing.
Maybe I wouldn't have married David Braun.
Right.
Yeah.
In retrospect, that's a big mistake.
He lasted like one day.
Well, that's what he killed us.
It was worse.
It was worse than the Russians.
Right.
I can't imagine.
No army killed Hitler.
Marriage did.
Yeah.
Did you have a pre-nuptial?
Did you have a pre-nuptial?
Is that a thing?
I don't understand the pre-nuptial.
That's where you make it.
I did like to touch my nipples.
Yeah, that's not Robert.
No, that's.
But, you know, we get a little hairy and that's a pre-nuptial.
Yes.
When in Munich, right?
No, I don't.
And I'm like one of those things.
Yeah, I don't even know what that means.
You hook it up to a Mercedes back.
Okay.
All right.
Wow.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, I think I understand and I don't like it, but next chat.
Yes, we're going to be able to do it.
We're going to have the Geraldo.
Oh, Geraldo?
Yeah.
This is what they want to avoid.
He drew a map in the sand.
Oh.
Yeah.
It's worse than I remember.
That's right.
Let's watch it.
That's Kuwait.
That's where our forces are based.
That's where the invasion of Iraq emanated.
From Kuwait, a major highway coming up here to the Iraqi capital of Baghdad.
This is the route used by our 3rd Infantry Division in their major push.
And that was the original Waze app.
And then if you go down these stairs, Zap reviews a bunker that I will be hanging out on in a sand table.
I'm sorry, I have to break character for a second.
I know.
It's like he was playing risk.
It's called the sand table.
That's part of an operation order.
You go, hey, guys, this is where we're going.
That is what we're going to do.
You guys will be here, and you're going to flank on this side.
What a fucking idiot.
Yeah, just put all the IEDs on this road.
Yeah.
There's been a possession of happy Hitler.
I think he got it out of the system.
Yeah.
He went to Columbia.
He's a bit of a lib.
I don't know if that was an accident.
Yeah.
Looking back on it.
I used to do his show.
I used to do a show on Fox News.
I actually was on the road with his brother, who was a pretty nice guy.
He played football in college, just kind of a normal dude, masculine guy.
And I'd go in and I do Geraldo's show.
And it's one of those things where you just, you know, you look into the eyes and you realize the lights aren't on.
You know what I mean?
Nice guy.
He was very nice with me.
Oh, always very polite.
But I was like, this guy is barely walking upright.
I got into it with him the first time I ever met him.
They had that show where we were streaming.
Oh, yeah, Studio B. They used to call him.
Something like that.
And it was like my first time on.
And he's sitting like two people away on the panel.
And I started blaming the media.
And we didn't even know each other.
That's so typical of you.
He must know me from Tough Crowd or whatever.
You always need somebody to blame, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
And just went off on me.
People were writing about it online.
It was great.
I just sat there and fucking took it.
Him and Shepard Smith attacked me.
Oh, my God.
At the same time.
How many queers can you fit in a room?
No, exactly.
Yeah.
And then he felt bad about it because he saw me a couple weeks later, the same show comes in, starts rubbing my shoulders.
That's, I think, that's why.
Shepard did or no?
No.
Oh, no.
Geraldo.
No, Geraldo.
But then he had me on a show.
He had a Sunday night show for a while.
And he asked me, Greg Giraldo had just died.
He literally, this is what an egomaniac is.
He thought Geraldo had taken his name as a stage name.
Really?
He's dead serious.
And he called Geraldo, you know, you and him are like insult comics.
And I go, no, we're not.
No.
And then he goes, but then he dies in a hotel.
Yeah, that's where entertainers die.
Yeah, I mean, that's where he was meeting to die.
Yeah, where was he supposed to be at a spa in Bermonte?
Yeah.
No, he's just, he thought he stole it.
It's like, it's not even a good name to steal.
It makes zero sense.
I know.
I would steal Britt June's name before.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Also, you know, the rumors about him.
Next gen. All right, next chat from Does It Matter One?
Question for Stephen and the crew.
When do you think President Trump will start taking Islam as a serious threat against Western values, particularly in the United States?
You know what?
Presidents always have to, and I don't like this, they always have to be careful and walk that fine line because of our relationship with Saudi Arabia and the dependency on foreign oil.
So I don't think you're ever going to see someone actually address the value system and what was espoused by Muhammad.
They can't do that.
Now, they have to say like, oh, not all Muslims.
Well, we obviously know that, but over 150 million Muslims on earth believe that violence is at least sometimes justified for apostasy, or I think for infidels.
I think that poll is specifically on apostasy, leaving the faith.
There was another number on blaspheming.
And I think the number of people who believe that violence is often justified, it was still well into the tens of millions.
Yeah, I think it was around 50 million people.
Yeah.
I remember.
It's been a while since I've looked at the number.
It was 100-something million believe it's sometimes justified, and it was 50-something million who believe that it's often justified.
Like, that's just not the same as you see in the Christian world.
And here's the thing, too.
We were talking about this because of the India poop thing.
And there's this island right off a coast there in India that's the most, I guess, untouched, insulated people on earth, right?
Like these people have not had any encounters with technology.
And the Indian government protects them.
I think there was a YouTuber who died trying to go to tape a video.
No, it was a missionary who died, but the YouTuber was arrested from the Indians and forced to poop outside.
Right.
Okay.
Well, that doesn't seem like much of a punishment.
That's just the poop in the toilet.
Yeah.
And that's so funny.
No, no, don't make me.
I tell you what you want.
Poor.
They have the Fabrize.
No.
So paper.
And I will tell you this.
I think it would be fun to go to that island and with an old Polaroid camera and be like, got your soul.
They speak English.
They don't speak English.
They don't understand.
And so you can't even go and be a missionary because they don't understand the concept of Christianity or God.
Here's the thing.
When you look at a lot of these cultures, and this is when people talk about the Crusades.
Let me preface this too, because I was doing some research on Columbus.
I don't know if you guys know this, Columbus Day.
So I grew up in the era of, hey, everything Columbus said about cannibals was propaganda, right?
They vilified him.
They said, Columbus, there's no way that actually he would have encountered cannibals.
They told you it was a language sort of miscommunication.
The Caribs were the tribe that were cannibals, but they actually never made their way to the West Indies, you know, the Bahamas, and I believe Cuba.
So this is just propaganda at people bought.
So we grew up, I grew up, where we were taught Columbus was evil.
It was propaganda, and he just started calling natives.
But the truth is in 2020, there was some new archaeological evidence that came out that said, absolutely, it is now no longer in dispute.
The Caribs, who were the cannibals, did make their way up.
They were part of the third wave of immigration.
So now the argument is, well, sure, it happened, but, and they were sometimes candles, but it was mostly ritualistic.
It wasn't like they were farming people like Columbus said.
But let me ask you, how could he have possibly known about the tribe that were cannibals?
And does it, let's also just walk through this logically.
I think the main group he encountered was like the Arawak.
I'm pretty damn close.
He said, a greater people I've never known.
He said, these are great people.
He said, but they feared these cannibals.
And he talked about how these cannibals would pretty much only eat men.
They didn't eat women.
They would enslave the women, right?
Use them as sex slaves.
Sometimes, I guess they would eat babies, but they would usually, if there were pregnant women, raise the babies, sever their sexual organs until they were men so they could eat them.
Oh, the stealth attribute.
Right.
So he wrote about this.
And let me, they go, oh, and it was overblown.
If you're Columbus back then, and let's just say you land on the northeast side of an island and there's 100 cannibals, that's what you would think the island is.
There are no cars, there are no trains, and you're not getting past this wall of human cannibals.
But now the argument is, well, we don't want to focus on this because it might have negative ramifications for the indigenous populations.
So now we know that he was right.
And does that change the idea of the original sin?
They'll often talk about Christian conquerors, and this goes back to the Crusades.
The practice was you had to kill their leaders and convert the people to Christianity.
That's not evil to me, because here's what you have to understand.
I'll use an example, like apocalypto.
The people who are being sacrificed, the people who have their son or their daughter's heart cut out as a ceremony, ritualistically, and thrown down a pyramid, they would be very amenable to the idea of Christianity, just like Columbus encountered the peaceful tribes, and many of them immediately said, wait, you find cannibalism reviling?
We'll go with you.
But the leaders of these tribes or civilizations who had convinced the people that they themselves, in fact, were gods, would of course never allow Christianity to spread.
So you have to kill those leaders in order to evangelize to the people.
But instead, when we lie and say, well, they weren't cannibals, so can you believe that these people came here, whether it's the Pilgrims or Columbus or whichever wave, and that they killed some of their leaders?
Well, yeah, yeah, I can.
Because they wanted to help the people who were enslaved.
You still have to kill the leaders and convert the nations to Christianity.
And that's what you see happening, for example, with the Crusades.
That's what would have to happen very likely if you wanted these people who are acting like savages, an island off of India, if you wanted those people to have some kind of quality of life.
When you remove context historically, you make it seem as though Christians are responsible for the original evil when in fact they were responding to it.
And there has been historically a response to Islam.
But in the instances where this has not happened, where leaders have not been killed, well, the people can't be evangelized to.
You can't.
Their leaders won't allow it.
They'll imprison you if you're a missionary.
They'll imprison you if you try and evangelize.
So short of killing the corrupt, awful leaders of Islamic nations that oppress their own people, you're not going to be able to convert any of them.
But we've said that that's evil.
And so we allow the evil to continue to flourish, where women can't drive, people get thrown off of rooftops, Christians get burned alive in cages.
And it will continue.
It will continue unless the leaders are killed, taken out so that the people who would be amenable to a better way would be free to convert if they want to.
They're not free to do so right now.
They're not free to do anything.
I just don't know.
I mean, I have some, I understand the thought, but that's not historically how Christianity has been spread.
Right?
Nations, yeah.
I'm not talking about pockets and people, but nations, yeah.
Nations where they've turned into Christian countries.
Yeah, yeah, we didn't have to take out.
The biggest one was Rome.
I mean, we didn't kill any of the leadership at all.
It just spread.
That's different when it's starting because they're an extreme minority, right?
And so what happened was there was a corrupt leadership.
And this is different because Rome had a republic, right?
It was somewhat somewhat resembling of a democracy.
I think they utilized the Christians to take advantage of them a little bit.
I don't think this leadership of this uprising, we might as well catch this trend while it's rising here so we can use it with the people.
But that's not the same as warlords.
That's not the same as people who oppress their...
I think that makes a lot of sense, though.
I don't know that you would kill them for the purpose of evangelization.
I think you would go and basically just say, like, listen, this is not how this is.
Well, we're not Islam.
We don't spread it by the sword.
That's not how Christianity does spread.
That's not how you do it.
But when you try and evangelize and you come back and you just see a wake of dead bodies from people who said, I want to be a Christian now, you go, oh, wait a second, maybe we have to actually.
They've done that.
But that has historically happened in South America and Indian tribes and stuff like that.
And people have gone over and over and over and evangelized to these people and have had some success.
But either way, I think your point is actually broader than that.
It's like, well, these people are oppressing these people.
And we're like, hey, don't.
Right.
And they say, well, no, we want to.
And it's like, well, now we're going to fight.
Right.
So I think that's essentially what was happening.
Well, they perverted everything.
You know who was a Christian?
Pocahontas.
But instead, the left goes, no, no, no.
She was gang raped on a ship.
Never heard of that.
Yeah, that's you can find the article.
You're a friend of friend Liz Warren.
Yeah.
Pocahontas.
As soon as you said gang rape, I knew it wasn't her.
Yeah.
We went, you know, we started off with, okay, Native Americans were savages.
And then the left overcorrected and said, well, they weren't all savages.
And actually, they're a peaceful nation that had horseback culture.
And none of that was true.
And now the pendulum swinging back, like, you know what?
Most of them were savages.
And I'm glad that we're not still in a perpetual state of warring tribes in this country.
And when you understand the context that Columbus came over, had a heart for the peaceful tribes who were oppressed and farmed as human meat, you go, oh, maybe he wasn't that evil if he kind of reached his limit with the cannibals.
Yes.
So kill their leaders, convert them to Christianity.
Next chapter.
North Sentinel Island is the name of that.
Oh, is that what it is?
Yeah.
And you were right.
The Arowoks were the ones.
The Airwalks were a fool, yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Sounds like a new sneaker.
You'd be waiting in line.
Meh.
I'm waiting for the new Airwalks to drop.
What?
All right.
It's the same as the old Airwalks.
It just got a red stripe.
$400.
Skateboarding shoes.
He was like, I have 400 pairs of sneakers.
It's the same sneaker with a slightly different color pattern.
There actually is a shoe brand called Erwacht.
Yes, there is.
Yeah, I do.
Yeah, they sell them at Pellas.
They used to be a real skate brand and they just went, you know what?
We're just going to be sold at Pellas.
Airwalks.
Yeah.
Airwalks and vans.
Airwalk arms.
I was right on with that.
But Arowalk.
It's not airwalks.
Stupid happy hunting.
Come on culture.
Thanks.
Cultural differences.
All right.
Question for Happy Hitler from Timbo Sparks.
Are you working on any art projects at the moment?
Well, I was working on a self-portrait, but apparently they say you're not as thin as you used to look.
And so I've been reworking that.
But yeah, I'm working on a musical right now.
I'm hoping to take it to Broadway.
What's so funny about that?
Yeah.
What's it called?
What's it called?
Yeah.
Do you ask me to give away all my secrets?
Yeah.
I think it's off.
It's probably an off-Broadway prediction.
It's called Under the Bunker.
And it's really a love story.
Right.
There's this pain, this conflict.
But our protagonist, me, he ends up triumphing and changing his stars.
Oh, wow.
That's.
I was guessing death of a Jewish salesman.
Oh, I like the way you think.
Maybe there's a sequel in the works.
Rent.
I think the only men's have one on History Channel.
525,600 Goodens.
How many Goodens till the problem is solved?
How about Zykla?
All right, next.
Please!
All right.
That's a different show.
Had a nice theme to it.
It's like the Lion King, but a little different.
Yeah, that's the gayest play ever.
What?
The Lion King play.
I remember as a kid.
I was like, I want to go sit.
And it's like, wait, it's just a bunch of black chicks with like hair around their neck.
And now we have furries.
Thanks.
Yeah, exactly.
It's all the fault of the Left King.
I'd rather be clockwork orange to watch James Cordon and cats.
Next chap.
All right.
Next chap from Blakeney 1794.
Question: Isn't this incident with the young Republicans just another attack on comedy?
Because humor is such a devastating instrument of truth.
No, I understand what you're saying.
I don't think this is an attack on comedy.
It's an attack on masculine culture.
It's an attack on, you know, because men, we've lost our, we've lost a lot of our spaces, right?
We've lost a lot of our places where men can go and be men.
And I think women should have their own places.
Kitchen is perfectly suitable.
Oh my God.
Like, think about it.
Like, we had men's, but you can't have, like, you have curves.
There's no male equivalent because it would immediately just become a gay pickup spot.
But we used to have a third place where it was okay for men to be men.
And women kind of accepted.
They used to say, oh, boy talk, right?
And then when people would say, oh, Donald Trump, that was locker room talk, the left is like, there's no such thing as locker room talk.
Sure, there is.
Sure, there is.
Of course, there is.
Yeah, sometimes guys, we say things we don't mean.
Of course.
In closed spaces.
Yeah.
So a great example of that was a few years ago in pro baseball.
I think a Toronto pitcher called a guy a faggot during the game.
Sure.
And was voted for, you know, suspended and fined on a baseball field.
When I was a kid.
Who does a pitcher say it to us?
A catcher?
You get that one?
I get it.
But when I was in sixth grade, my best friend was Jonathan Katz.
We were arguing in class, and I go, oh, shut up.
This is a friend of yours?
That's a true story.
Is he hiding as a floorboard?
And this is sixth grade.
I go, shut up, you fucking Jew.
You know, he would call me WAP.
I'd go, shut up, you Joe.
And my teacher, Ms. Spray, goes, Mr. DiPaolo, that language belongs on a ball field.
Right.
Which is where, so that's not even a safe haven.
Yeah.
And then you're like, okay, your wishes might come in.
Swing faggot.
Hey, faggot, hey, fat, hey, faggot, faggot, hey, faggot.
So wing.
So wing faggot.
So wing it.
He swings both bases.
No, I had a friend.
You know, I did a tribute to him when he passed away.
I lived with him for a while.
A guy named Seymour.
He was a left-leaning Jewish guy.
He was a non-practicing Jew.
And he would call me often like Gentile Faggot, and I'd call him Big League Jew.
And we'd go to Costco together because he was disabled.
He actually had like a, he had a spinal injury, so he couldn't move his left leg.
And I lived in an apartment that was being renovated above him.
And I'll say this: when a lot of conservatives and people from the church that we used to attend had no place for me to stay, and I was sleeping out of my car, I stayed with him, and we were constantly insulting each other.
Constantly.
I loved the guy, and he loved me.
And he was a liberal.
And he would be like, oh, well, these people are just so hyperly sensitive.
I often wonder what he would think about these people nowadays, or since he lived in Hollywood, if he would have gone along with it.
I don't know, but I will say this.
Unless other people in the chat are horrified and someone's saying, hey, stop.
I don't want to be a part of this.
And someone is pursuing them.
And even then, it's just like hash it out like men.
But that's not what happened.
This is an attack on comedy.
That's not what it is.
It's an attack on masculinity in a society where it was permitted.
Yeah, it is.
It's a part of bonding.
I won't tell you that the darkest joke I ever heard in my life was about someone's own stillborn that my friend made.
And I didn't know how to react because, and that's what kind of, and this wasn't that long ago.
I remember thinking, oh, wow.
I know that's the most painful thing this guy's been through.
And he made a joke about it because it's his way of processing.
That's right.
And who am I to judge what he thinks is funny?
It doesn't always have to be meaningful.
Sometimes it's just funny and it's just bust and shot.
Fine.
That's what it is.
This isn't about people going out doing, you know, performing comedy.
Now they want to remove it from your private lexicon.
That's right.
And the biggest takeaway for me for this is just shows right now how desperate the left is.
Yeah, exactly.
You know what I mean?
To make this like a national story.
Yeah.
Guys in a Republican group messing with each other.
To run with that as your narrative for the week or whatever.
Just shows they have nothing.
Yeah.
Nothing left.
Well, there's so many people who are out of it.
It also shows me the leadership, how out of touch they are.
I mean, was it recently?
And I don't want to talk.
Yeah, that bugged me too.
I don't want to talk trash in him, but was it Glenn Beck who recently said he was going to apply for Israeli citizenship?
So there's a video.
So I was on with Elijah Schaefer the other night, and we were talking about this because Glenn got that question about, you know, is he America first or is he Israel first?
It's an easy question from somebody yelling over somebody else.
And they played this clip for me to show me.
It was like a letter, I guess he had written or he was talking about a letter he had written, something like that.
I need to get more context for it, but saying, I want citizenship in Israel.
And I was like, no more American citizenship.
I was about to say, if that's the case, that's fine.
You can do that.
You have the freedom to be able to move to another country and assume citizenship there, but you don't get to keep yours here.
You can't have dual loyalties like that.
Like that was a problem to begin with for people.
So yeah, that kind of stuff is the old party.
And that is what I think is under attack more.
So, I mean, no whataboutism to play here, but just think of the hypocrisy of the left and some of the things that they say and defend and speech that they're totally fine with.
And then how they cover this.
Now, go look at the number of views that this has gotten and then look at the Jay Johnson views and the coverage that it's gotten on media.
I think it was like 68 or 80 seconds of coverage that the Jay Johnson tweets had gotten on the main networks, CNN and MSNBC and all that stuff.
He's actively saying, I want these people to die.
I want them to be shot in front of their children.
With someone saying, hey, I really don't like this.
I told you I don't like this talk.
I'm uncomfortable with it.
And it's like, no, I need you to know this.
Exactly.
It's like, no, man, the gloves are kind of off.
Me joking around and kind of singing the second verse to rent there.
None of us have any hatred toward Jews in our hearts because most people, when we go out and we start posting on X, it'll be like, oh, is that another 7,000 for you?
You Jewish shell.
It's like, oh, okay.
At this point, I just don't care.
I do not care about any of it anymore.
It does not matter.
Mine apologies, but what is Israel?
Yeah, that's kind of, you know, if you haven't really done some research after your time, it would be a little bit confusing.
But they were given a safe haven internationally after what you pulled, and they have their own country.
That was some crap.
Oh.
Yeah.
And they're actually pretty effective military.
Maybe they have harboring some bad feelings for me.
Angst.
I would imagine so.
Yeah, I would imagine they're not big fans.
Yeah.
Oh, but in that case, I have to go.
All right.
All right.
I can finish.
Okay.
All right.
Okay.
I didn't know.
I'm still quite quite a fan.
All right.
Next chat.
All right.
Next chat from MP Tiger T. Question for crew.
Why does the right have so much infighting?
I find it to be valuable as well, as we are all open to conversation, but there seems to be some bad actors who sabotage success.
Yeah, no, I agree with you.
And that tends to be people who are new to it.
That tends to be people who, you know, you have people, for example, who've come in post-COVID and they go, okay, I was lied to.
Therefore, I must be lied to about everything, insert moon landing, insert gravity.
And I mean, this is not hyperbole.
There are people actually think that.
And then they go, therefore, anyone who espouses these opinions must be lying to me.
So it's good that we can have these discussions.
The left won't have discussions at all because their ideas don't stand up to scrutiny.
I will say this, though.
What I've often, I've only ever had one true infight, and people obviously know that with someone who was never my friend.
Jeremy Boring at Daily Wire.
I've not had this with Shapiro or Knowles or Claven or anyone.
And people know why, because that, for me, met the threshold where Toolman knows this.
There are plenty of people in this office.
There are people who like Ben Shapiro and there are people who do not.
And there have been people who say, hey, I want to do this segment, you know, because Ben said this.
And I go, you know what?
I agree that he misspoke.
That's ridiculous.
But I said, you know what?
I think that the country is better off with a Ben Shapiro in that spot than another, whatever, young Turks.
I go, the overall, it's net good.
For me, it has to meet the threshold of, is this movement and is this country worse off for someone putting on our team jersey and acting that way?
And that threshold was met when it was a company doing the bidding of YouTube and big tech and punishing conservatives and locking them down, their name, image, and likeness forever with penalties on behalf of big tech.
I thought something has to be done because my God, people are going to sign these contracts.
And I've not really discussed it again since.
That's why.
And that's why I've never picked those fights outside of it.
I've invited Candace Owens on.
I've invited Dave Smith on, people with whom I disagree.
But yeah, the infighting is usually people who just want to sow chaos.
For example, even with the Glenn Beck thing, two things can be true.
That should be a really easy answer.
Are you America first or America first?
They shouldn't even have to finish the phrase.
But then you also have people who are trolling where they go, oh, what about the USS Liberty?
It's like, well, that's not what we're talking about right now.
I get that that's your thing.
Like if I do a change of mind, I'll have someone sit down and go, well, I want to talk about this.
Yeah, but you're sitting down where this is the topic of discussion today.
Go do your own.
And I think it's also exacerbated by the clickbait culture.
I think it's exacerbated by the fact that a lot of profiles out there are pay-to-play.
How else do you get 20 or 30 influential accounts pushing for Coca-Cola to remain on Snap?
Like, how is there that much of a disconnect between you watching and the people doing that?
You know, a few hundred dollars a post and you can get them to post whatever.
And that wasn't the case when I was coming up.
When I was coming up in 2008, 2009, YouTube had a most watched list.
YouTube had a most discussed list.
They had a list of like most controversial, you know, most liked, where the algorithms were, they were really based on organic reaction to content.
That's not the case anymore.
There's someone who's picking and choosing, as we've seen with the Facebook expose, with the Twitter files being released, with what happened at YouTube.
So yeah, it's exacerbated by bad actors for sure.
And I think sometimes you get some people who are new and they're overzealous and they make their niche the entire meaning of the movement and anyone who doesn't go along with them must be lying to them.
And that's not a good place to be.
That's not a good place to be because the left is bereft of morals.
So it's win at all costs.
That's not really the case with the right.
We deeply hate lying, dishonesty, right?
Swindling, generally speaking.
So people have to hide it a little better.
I will tell you, the extortion in this movement is extraordinary that takes place.
Conservatives all want to knock the other one off of the perch.
That happens a lot.
And that's not emblematic of you, the viewer.
So we try and stay out of it and try and call balls and strikes and be very straightforward when we have an opinion and it's presented.
The left has a real doozy of an infight right now, though.
Yeah.
With the radical wing.
And, you know, the problem is that radical wing is in charge of the party.
That's right.
Yeah.
And that's a big rip.
Republicans do some infighting, but it's also blown out of proportion by the left-wing media coverage.
Right.
Right.
That happens too.
It does happen too.
There are some people out there, though, who just exist.
For example, if you don't follow lockstep with their view, they swat you.
They dox you.
They tell everyone that you're bought and paid for it.
People have tried to do that with me.
Like, ah, he's bought and paid for.
I was doing it for no money for the longest time.
Like, none.
A blue bet you can see with an it wasn't even a digital eight camera.
I think it was a high eight camera, if I'm not mistaken.
Then I moved to mini DV.
So you can make a lot of claims.
I'm bombastic.
I'm insensitive.
Sure.
But the idea that I did it for money, no, I forwent money, management, agents, representation early on.
And yeah, bombastic.
Yeah, so really quickly, just something that's coming out right now.
It looks like Milo might have gotten an affidavit, like a sworn affidavit signed by Michael Bartles, who is claiming to be the victim of Gavin Wax's blackmail op to get information on.
So it seems to be like this is so he said points four through seven.
Maybe give me those in the chat if you guys will.
Point number four, I was demanded to provide a full log of RestoreYR chat, the logs by Gavin Wax over a dispute about related matters on August 16th.
The demand was made via telephone, and to my knowledge was not recorded.
When I attempted, so point five, when I attempted to resist that demand after providing some of the requested information, Wax threatened my professional standing, raised the possibility of potential legal action related to an alleged breach of non-disclosure.
My position within the New York Republic Young Republican club was directly threatened.
Point six, after this conversation, when I did not provide the logs, I was removed from access to most NYYRC communications channels, leadership chats, and my NYYRC email.
Mutual contacts also began to receive alleged details of my personal life from WAX.
I don't have point number seven, guys, so if you can see that.
After these events took place, I provided Gavin Wax's associate, Nathan Berger, with the archived logs of the group text.
Yeah, that sounds about right.
If all of that, that's an affidavit by this guy, so we can say that.
But listen, this is if in a scenario like this, somebody who's supposed to be on your side is jockeying for position or power within an organization and takes this information and goes, ah, you know, the best way to use this is I'm going to give it to Politico or I'm going to give it to somebody who can give it to Politico or however this does in this hypothetical situation.
That person should never be anywhere near our party ever again, ever, in any way, shape, or form.
And I think Republicans need to be aware right now.
They're not winning on ideas.
They can win on infiltration and trying to miscast what you're saying and what you're doing and trying to infiltrate and push people's ideas that maybe wouldn't otherwise be pushed.
I think that's something we have to be careful of as a party.
We've got to get rid of the old guard to a large degree right now.
The people, all the people who responded the wrong way, look at J.D. Vance, look at Texas.
We talked about that.
That's how you respond to something like this and you move on with your day.
All of those people need to be gone, but we have to be very careful about what we put in their place.
Can't be people that would turn over information like this just to get some power.
Right.
No, you're absolutely right.
And obviously, we went through it, right?
We went through it.
You think it all happened?
All was happenstance the same day that former employees talking to New York Post about seeing my balls and edited videotapes from ring camera and people making claims that were denied outright from the opposing party in court and a judge allowing a suit regarding extortion to go on, which was dropped as part of a settlement.
People don't know that I was met with a financial offer the night before the smear campaign started.
The day before.
Something that was extortion.
Yeah.
Hey, a judge said that there was enough reason for it to go on.
And we knew all of that.
We knew all of that.
We had a long time and we couldn't talk about it.
But it's stuff like this that happens behind the scenes.
You've got to be very careful.
Yeah.
It does happen a lot.
It does happen quite often.
All right.
Final chat.
Then we're going to send you on to Tim Poole for the rest of the lineup and the day.
All right.
Final chat from Amanda the Nice One.
Question for the crew.
What does the future look like for Gen Z with the men who broke for the right and the dating pool now politically unbalanced?
Do you think the men can swing the women?
No.
I don't.
I really don't.
I think women are going to have to swing the women.
And I don't think that most women have it in you.
I'm sorry to say.
What's happening is men are adapting and saying, you know what?
There are worse outcomes than loneliness.
And the most obvious outcome that's worse than loneliness is an awful spouse.
And feminism has made that the norm, has made that the rule, not the exception.
And men have more options, tools at their disposal to deal with loneliness.
Male friendships, bonds have actually never been stronger.
I was reading a study.
Japanese dolls.
Yeah, that's part of it.
That's part of it.
And you know what?
The void was created.
So you have men going, wait a second, I don't want anything to do with this because feminism has permeated.
Put it this way, the red pill sphere, of which I'm not a part.
And by the way, Andrew Wilson isn't a part, like there are traditional conservative Christian men who also are pushing back against feminism.
But even take the worst, the red pill sphere has nowhere near the influence that a generation of professors and media and entertainment propaganda have had in indoctrinating women to become all feminist by default, to be clear.
So I'm much more worried about that than the pushback.
You guys have to push back against it.
You guys have to be less worried about the ostracization from your social circles than you are, you know, having to, at the end of your life, face the accountability of what you did, what decisions you made, what stands you took.
Women need to be able to police their own.
And that's why I've also said, like, men, we'll check out of the biological men and women's sports.
No men wanted it.
And then you'll get women who go like, yeah, well, I'm a woman and I don't want it.
Sure, but most did.
And that's why you have it.
Yo, I'm a woman and I didn't want soft on crime.
Sure, but most did.
And that's the only reason you have it.
Yeah, but I'm a woman and I didn't want the COVID luck.
Sure, but most did.
And that's why you have it.
I think gender studies is silly.
Sure, but most women didn't.
And that's why you have it being taught.
And here's something I remember talking with, and this is just a thought exercise.
So yeah, I think there's a divide.
By the way, Gen Z males could swing back because they're still young enough to be bought, right, if you appeal to their selfish interests.
So I want us to be really mindful of that.
It's not like this is something that is solidified, but it's a very good start.
We're already seeing that divide, right?
Young women are still very liberal.
Here's a thought exercise.
And I was talking to a woman the other day, an older woman who's a Christian woman.
And she was just appalled.
This was actually when Charlie Kirk had been assassinated.
And she said, I can't believe it.
And what I see.
And, you know, the state of the country.
And hopefully we're going to go the right direction.
I'm just so scared.
She said, I'm just so scared if, you know, like we swing back and we have like another Obama or a Biden because after this, I don't know that the country would be able to handle it.
I said, okay, let me ask you this.
I said, what if I could wave a magic wand and I could tell you that I could guarantee you, guarantee you that there would never be another Democrat, let alone a Biden or Obama or Clinton, elected ever again.
What would you say?
It's like, well, great.
I said, okay.
If I could guarantee you that, but you had to do one thing, forego your vote, would you?
She said, well, what do you mean?
I said, forego your vote.
In other words, go back to pre-women suffrage when most women opposed it.
Would you?
If you did that, which meant that women forego the, it's a thought exercise, forego the vote.
I said, you would never have the leftist infestation in our country again.
I could guarantee it.
She said, well, no.
I said, why not?
She said, because, well, my vote is important and, you know, I want my voice to be heard.
I said, okay.
You want it to be heard more than the future of the country.
She said, well, you know, she said, but it's also, she said, it's different too, because like, my friends aren't that way.
You know, they're all Christian women.
I said, yeah.
Okay.
Let me give you a startling fact.
And she goes, actually, you know what, though, I just lost a friend because she was saying Charlie Kirk kind of deserved one.
And she was kind of going off.
I said, okay, let's focus.
That surprises you.
But I'm going to tell you, that's actually not all too uncommon.
Most of your friends, or a good portion of your friends who say they're Christian conservatives, a lot of them still don't vote the same values you do.
I said, you go to a church, right?
A pretty big church.
She said, yes, okay.
Next time, I want you to do this.
I want you to go to the church, maybe go to the front of the church, look back at those pews.
It's okay.
And look at all the women and understand that a statistical reality is more of those women in that church that you are looking at right that moment will vote Democrat than atheist men.
At best, it's a split.
And that's your cavalry coming over the hill.
She said, Really?
I said, Yeah.
She said, Oh my God.
She said, Well, then I guess, yeah, we got into the history of women's suffrage.
And we got into the history of the fact that not all men had the right to vote, right?
If you weren't a landowner, if you didn't pay taxes, if you weren't enlisted in selective service, yeah, if you didn't perform bucket duty, which was mandatory voluntary firefighter service.
And then there was a period of time where still not all men had the vote because of these responsibilities.
They had to be met, but women did without having to meet those responsibilities.
And they got corrected.
And that's why most women opposed the vote.
A, because they didn't like the socialist influence.
They also thought that women could have more influence in the household without getting into the dirty game of politics.
And they didn't want to have to, for example, be eligible for the draft until some socialists, and by the way, corporate fat cats who wanted to double the labor force so they could enjoy the benefits of cheap labor and they convinced you that you'd have your own allowance and a dual-income household was better.
When that happens, by the way, you're not going to have to have any of these responsibilities.
It was the first time that votes were purchased.
It was the first time that votes were purchased, meaning the votes were purchased off of people who had to fulfill responsibilities, who had a dog in the fight, who had skin in the game.
They were used, right, as political clout to give people the vote who weren't.
Now, I'm not saying that women shouldn't have that.
I think I've laid out the plan as far as what you should have for voting.
You should have to meet not only voter ID, but you should have to meet certain thresholds as far as paying taxes, being gainfully employed, right?
Showing that you are a net contributor as opposed to a net taker.
This idea that everyone gets a vote in this country is still, it's a very new thing.
People who did not contribute, who took from the country, they were never included in voting historically.
I don't know why we live in a country where someone can perpetually be unemployed and cost the taxpayers, let's say, a net $40 something thousand dollars a year in EBT, SNAP, welfare benefits, do it for over a decade, and they get to vote where your taxes go.
And if it's a woman, get to vote where you are sent to war if the draft comes back, which, by the way, is a very real possibility in our lifetime.
You understand that.
So most women, if you speak with them, don't know any of this history.
And I'm not saying that women shouldn't have the right to vote.
I'm saying that a lot of men shouldn't have the right to vote.
It's not a right.
It's a privilege.
And you have to be a contributor to take part in it.
And so that's a mindset that's important.
If I have that conversation with men, I'll tell you this.
If I have this conversation with men and just take gender out of it, I go, do you think it would be reasonable to say you have to have ID, maybe like a civics test, paying taxes, or at least be employed for, let's say, three years?
Men go, yeah, yeah, I think that makes sense.
And some men go, well, what if someone's unemployed?
And we kind of have a conversation.
I go, well, if it's sort of transient, that's different.
Someone's unemployed for nine months.
And they get, of course, that wouldn't be included.
Okay, we could kind of fill in the gaps.
If I have that same conversation with women, even regardless of gender, they go, no, it's too important because my voice.
It's a different mindset.
We don't approach these the same way.
We don't approach the state of the country.
We don't approach patriotism the same way.
And our roles aren't the same.
And so men are not going to be able to communicate this to young women in a way that would be effective.
It requires women to do it.
It requires women to police their own.
It requires you, women, to be just as ruthless as men are in holding other men accountable.
Could it happen?
I hope so.
I haven't seen it yet, but I pray that you do because if that man, man, if that nut gets cracked, hey, you'd never have a Democrat again.
Is that worth it to you?
Get to work tomorrow, black and white on the gray issues.
It gets rough.
Return up the truck.
He's getting the socks.
Now we're sky things great.
Return up the socks.
Oh my God.
Turn up the slack
You're a strange gentleman.
▲
Export Selection