All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 24, 2025 - Louder with Crowder
56:17
🔴 Breaking: ICE Facility Shot in Dallas - Another Left-Wing Attack? 2025-09-24 18:04
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Something happened between then and now because his audience is gone.
And his talent, quotes, was never there.
It was never there.
Why would they want someone back who does so poorly, so poorly, who's not funny, and who puts the network in jeopardy by playing 99% positive Democrat garbage caps?
He is yet another arm of the DNC.
And to the best of my knowledge, that would be a major illegal campaign contribution, frankly.
I think we're going to test ABC out on this.
I think we'll test them.
Let's see how we do.
Last time I went after them, they gave me $16 million.
Wow.
It's a lot of dollars.
This one sounds even more, frankly, lucrative.
Maybe even more than $16 million, if that's possible.
Wow.
A true bunch of losers let Jimmy Kimmel rot in his bad ratings.
I don't really know if that's the type of oxygen-deprived environment for rotting, or I guess.
What is it?
Which one's the vegetable drawer?
Which one's humidity and the fruit one?
Fruit is humidity and vegetable is dry, or is it the other way around?
I put them in the same one and that's wrong.
Yes.
You don't.
Yeah.
I also don't.
Especially don't put them in with cheese.
Rotting happens in, you know, air.
Yeah.
So, oh, this also matters.
Again, returned, but some ABC affiliates, the ones managed by Nexstar, Sinclair, did not air the show.
It was initially before all this, right, the controversy.
I believe it was 64 markets.
Wow.
Said that they weren't going to be running the show.
And back to Jimmy, that's about 3,200 employees.
We've done the math now.
About 3,200 employees.
Let me ask you, why do their jobs not matter?
Do you think that a station locally running Jimmy Kimmel in that time slot, if they're running against any other station, let's just count it as three networks, right?
That's often what you have as far as affiliates.
You think they stand a chance to compete?
Do you think that maybe the local affiliates know, hey, this isn't going to work with our audience?
And by the way, this is at the point where this show is not acting in the public good like these networks have to when we're talking about alphabet networks and their syndicators.
So their choice is bankruptcy, lose your business.
Well, Jimmy Kimmel gets a $15 million salary, whatever it is, and all of his employees, but you lose it in Poughkeepsie.
You lose it in Tulsa.
You lose it in Kansas City.
You lose it in Temecula, California.
A lot of people don't realize a lot of Republicans there.
You lose it.
You lose those jobs because you have to run Jimmy Kimmel, despite the fact that when you do, you post a rating of 0.0.
Does Kimmel care about them?
I know they don't live in Los Angeles or New York, but what about them, Jimmy?
And these networks took a stand.
They preempted Kimmel's return for something funnier.
She killed it.
She killed it.
She killed the chicken.
Oh, my God.
Oh, my God.
I didn't mean for it to kill it.
I didn't mean for it to kill it.
I just wanted it to be quiet.
It was a baby.
Keep smothering her own baby.
I mean, you know, it's like it's borderline, but I'd say funnier than Kim All.
It's technically a comedy show.
It's getting there.
Yeah.
Now bring out Klinger.
Yeah.
I really like the lower third.
Yeah, thanks.
Gerald had to turn his head away because he still can't watch that tonight.
I unplugged my headphones as well, so I couldn't hear it.
It's one of the fucking things ever on television.
Ever done.
Gerald was so traumatized and run through.
He's like, what was it?
Like, that's the point.
It's funnier than Kim.
I just sometimes you miss it.
So Josh has a history with me on this particular clip.
He's like, dude, you've got to see this.
I'm like, what?
This is hilarious.
And I have never seen that before ever.
And I'm watching it and I'm horrified.
Yeah.
Because I'm like neck deep in studying like pre-World War II, what's going on and all this stuff.
And all the, and I'm just like, I can imagine this.
I was like, Josh, why would you show me that?
And then I see it this morning.
I'm like, Josh, I'm just not going to laugh.
I'm not going to pay any attention to your.
Well, I showed you because I was pitching a new open for the show.
Yeah, no kidding.
Where it was a mug that gets broken.
See, that would be funny.
Where it's like a chicken.
You killed a chicken?
You go back and it's not a baby.
It's a mug.
But it's not funny because a baby has been killed.
No, no one's saying mother.
It's funny because Alan Alda's performance was hilarious.
Also, I think we know the root problem of this.
I mean, things don't go well when you try to study.
That's fair.
Gerald.
That's really the root cause.
Remember the Saving Prophet Ryan coffee commercial where we had the mamas and with the IV drill?
And then, yeah, but I'd have been fine with that.
People weren't.
Oh, speaking of mamas, speaking of mama, the second choice for that clip was What's Eating Gilbert Grape?
Yeah.
Oh.
Wayne comes in from his job and he's like, Mama.
Yeah.
Wake up, mother.
It's so sad.
Yeah.
I've never seen it so sad, not funny at all.
I have a really good funny parody of basketball diaries.
Oh, really?
I would like to see it.
All right.
Hey, guys.
It's gift to sub.
It's time to celebrate.
So many over 73 of you did.
Jeez, you got to read all of them.
I have to read all of them.
I'm going to start with the ones who gave a lot.
10 gifted subscriptions.
Holiday Statistic, Bat Praying, Matthew Sabia, Annie M. Laguna.
Yeah.
Honky Tonk Hitman 01.
Brewster with five.
Pekinette McGroin with five.
Hondo 24601 with five.
Bearded bazooka with five.
I doll with five.
I am We Todd did with five.
Now I'm going to read the rest who gifted one or approximately big Osso5150.
Joseph R86.
D. Anderson 24.
Hose Chenk.
Toma Lama 23.
John H2004.
Psycho Beta Beatdown.
Spidus McGroin.
8-Bit Kid.
Jackson Arnold.
Smarty Pants.
Drucco 2003.
Prouder with Crowder.
Bongs, Not Bombs.
Drancosaurus Rex.
Zolldock 23.
MDMB.
Dr. Pat Sometimes.
Previously Leon LWC.
Rick Astley.
Barry McConaker.
McCockiner.
Oh, my God.
999.
Jay Kersenick.
OKami 3.
Professor Savage Dad.
Draco FG.
FJB.
Mike Spass.
River Girl 25.
Overlord John.
Hipless Does It.
Lathias, Chelsen, KDH14.
Made at SM, Cynthia HLS, Dave Angel, Swear I'm Normal, Crippled Cowboy, Jimmy Three Step, Fatal Cookies, Desiree 0613, Scrub Lord 1027.
TX Nurse 1993.
JP54321 A Day in the Life 36.
Dumpster House Tylen, Profile and Baraki.
Kate Rog 15.
Cap DC Chargers.
L Half A 27.
Spitfire 531.
Peter Uptuck.
Oh, that's a good one.
Damian Knight, Ginger Because, Mr. Khill7111, Matthew Vought, Far Right, David, TJ from Reno, Matthew Sabia, War, Garble, Four.
I already did those ones.
Hey, that's been giving a sub.
I feel like now they just want me to have to read the names.
For all of you who just had a stroke or a seizure, we're sorry.
Tim got a little crazy with me.
I don't get to see it because I'm reading.
That's true.
Well, you're not going to want to see it.
It was silly.
All right.
Nice job, guys.
Wow.
Thank you, guys.
Fantastic.
We really appreciate it.
What was the one you liked?
I already crumpled the paper.
I can't go back.
It's Barry McCockiner.
Oh, that's a good one.
That was Peter Uptuck.
Oh, that was the one he loved.
Yeah.
I don't know that I feel like I coined Uptuck.
I don't think you did.
Okay.
All right.
I just did way prior to you.
The term uptuck?
Yes.
Okay.
All right.
Never mind.
I'm talking about.
All right.
Never mind that I didn't.
I never heard it when I said uptuck.
How dare you?
I dare.
I often dare.
One of my favorite things dares to study.
One of my favorite things you did in stand-up was when you're doing an impression of Caitlin Jenner.
That's her name.
His name.
You're doing a Caitlin Jenner impression, and you're talking about Tucker Carlson.
Bruce.
That's her nickname.
That's right.
I was going to call her Tucker.
That's probably why because he talks her up to her.
I talk her.
That's right.
Tucker.
I'm really prominent with my dirt.
Anytime there's a woman, I have to talk my dirk.
Tucker.
I don't remember you.
It's been a long time.
I was saying we have other segments that we have so many.
We have fact-checking, fact-checkers, but that's a long one.
Do we want to have some good chats?
Do we want to take chats today?
Because I know anytime there's a major news story like this, there's often a lot of questions.
And I know we also, you know, we could, it's a short one.
We could do the Pokemon one really quickly.
I think that would be fitting.
Okay, let's do it.
Pokemon.
In case you don't remember, yesterday we showed you this ad from DHS using the Pokemon theme song.
Here's a shortened one, but it's a banger.
I want to be the very best team no one ever wants.
Take it on, gotta catch up, get you and me.
It's still funny.
It's right up there with MASH finale.
It is.
It's close.
So, of course, there were cries right away for the Pokemon company and Nintendo to sue DHS and Pokemon and Nintendo.
They have yet to address it.
I don't think the Japanese are getting right on that.
That's a proper response.
Yeah, they're usually pretty busy.
No time for the bullshit.
Oh, sushi.
Sound like a good idea.
Now coming to a Game Boy Pokemon Black.
What?
Wait.
Huh?
Pokemon.
They had.
I don't want to explain it, but they had Pokemon red and blue as the originals.
Then they had Pokemon yellow, then gold and silver and bronze.
They used to label their games by colors.
I just don't understand the black.
Is it a racist reference or a black girl reference?
I don't know.
I just came up with it on the spot and I came up with a color that I knew they didn't already do.
But I might be wrong.
They might have done a Pokemon Black.
I'm not sure.
They might have been.
Oh, yes, I want to break into American Urban Market.
Do Pokemon go to Spina Chain?
Pokemon go through the hood.
They just plug the carts in the back of your Game Boy.
Yes, Rito Black Boy.
I like very much.
They already have a Pokemon named Blow.
It already exists.
Oh, geez.
That's why.
See?
They already did it.
They beat you to it.
The Japanese are very industrious people until they jump out of highway.
Advertising.
Yeah.
You made a joke about something that already exists.
You send yourself to Suicide Footage.
The Suicide Force.
There's a documentary where a guy goes in to try stuff.
I talked about this.
Doesn't really do anything.
He doesn't do anything.
Like a guy in a pup tent.
It's like a guy in a pup tent with a rope.
He's like, hey, maybe I don't want to do this.
The guy's like, thank you.
I'm going to do it.
Okay.
Okay.
Yeah.
Okay.
So sorry, Fobarov.
I'm the rope salesman right outside of Suicide Forest.
Like, that rope's not going to hold.
You want this rope.
You sell like glow ropes, like those necklaces that are driving.
Go ahead and stand with this rope.
All right.
Last thing they're ever seeing around your neck.
Make sure it's nice.
So, go with a neon so your family can find you.
Air tags are extra.
See, I can laugh about this.
You see a bunch of guys with nooses that couldn't handle the structural weight that are neon and cotton candy.
Like, oh, that's a very good confection stand.
Yeah.
Jokes on them.
I'm going and getting the rope back after they're done and reselling it.
Pecano with your cinnamon.
No, I never have.
Use a Twizzler.
That way, you could die with a snack.
You asshole, you use it to put in peel, Twizzler.
They still make those porn kids.
I feel Poland Peel would probably have a better pencil strike, you know?
Because there's more, it's multiple ropes.
Yeah, I would think weave together.
You would think that would be stronger than a Twizzler.
Science.
The truth is, I have no idea.
But anyway, that's how the Japs handled.
Whoa, okay, Grandpa.
Wow.
Calm down.
I mean, it's just calm down, Charlie lover.
All right?
It's such a not racist term, Charlie, when you think about it.
Like, this is not offensive at all.
Jap also.
It's just a shortened version.
Yes, it must have saved a time.
Very clever.
Like, no one got mad about Brits.
No.
Yanks.
Packy wasn't considered a racist term until George W. Bush is not.
Pakistani, you would say, you know, can't be.
Packies.
And they were like, oh, whoa, whoa.
It's like, yeah, it's just shortened.
You know, it's confusing too because you go, Packy, that's racist and wrong.
Right.
Pakistani is right.
It's fine.
Afghan, correct.
Afghani, not correct.
Really?
Yeah.
Afghanis?
Yeah, it's that's you're not supposed to say Afghani.
It's Afghan.
I don't care enough to care about that.
Well, no one cares about.
I'm just saying, it's basically the same place, but we yeah.
And then they get mad at you.
You're like, hey, you got it all wrong.
Like, how was I supposed to know?
Two miles over, you say the same thing.
We'll just play it safe and we'll call you Pajminas.
Yesterday.
Is that it's a throw similar to an Afghan.
We call him Hodge.
That was my Pokemon black.
So you didn't have to do one.
It's just, you know, it's just so much death out there right now.
I get it.
It's tough.
So that happened.
That's how the Japs responded.
All right.
But then yesterday, DHS, they dropped another immigration ad, and this one featured Theo Vaughn, different response.
Heard you got deported, dude.
Bye.
States, they simply stopped coming.
They're not coming anymore.
We're getting a lot of credit, but they're not coming.
And unlike Nintendo, Theovan did respond.
Now, to be clear, Theo Von, very funny, very talented comedian.
And I like a lot of the content that he puts out there.
But he did respond to this in stark contrast to the Japs at Nintendo.
He said, Yo, DHS, I didn't approve to be used in this.
I know you know my address, so send me a check.
They're not really necessarily doing this for profit.
I don't think they have turned on on their account.
He said, and please take down, please take this down, and please keep me out of your banger deportation videos.
When it comes to immigration, my thoughts and heart are a lot more nuanced than this video allows.
Buy.
So, and I get that.
And he's a comedian.
He should be obviously afforded the grace of sometimes doing things that are not meant to be taken seriously.
But I do want to.
What is your nuance?
Theo, we see this a lot because people often say, well, actually, it's not black and white, it's nuance.
Okay, explain the nuance.
The context in that video is I believe someone gave him their phone.
You were saying something.
Yeah, and for this, you know, there is nuance to it because he was on the street, supposedly.
I don't know if it's scripted or whatever, but it didn't seem like it.
Somebody goes, hey, Theo, our friend got deported.
Right.
I think they're kidding or whatever, but he grabs the phone and goes, hey, dude.
Heard you got deported.
Yeah.
Bye.
And then everyone laughs.
He gives the phone back and he walks down the street on his way.
Sure.
I think it was all just a silly little thing that he did on the street once with somebody.
And I think he's upset that the, you know, that the White House and the government seems to be.
But you'd think, again, as a comedian, you'd get like, these are the people, the same department that did a Pokemon mashup.
Like, right?
Like, come on.
At a certain point, I mean, if you're going to be afforded, and I think Theo Vaughn should, then you also should give them that grace.
They're obviously trying to raise awareness and when they're being vilified as gestures, but a little bit of levity helps the situation.
But here's one thing.
You see a lot of comedians entering into this space late, and it'll be a half-baked opinion, and then they'll hide behind nuance.
Well, clarify it.
Don't just be offended.
Don't just be outraged.
Clarify the nuance.
What is the nuance?
I think we're at a point in this country where if people are going to step into these waters, if they want to swim in the deep end, then you have to be willing to substantiate what it is that you say.
Either don't enter into the arena or explain it.
I would love to hear a lot of these people in this sphere.
What's the nuance?
Because they'll question people for stepping out and taking a risk, for actually expressing an opinion.
And you'll often get people go like, well, that's just mine is more nuanced.
And almost invariably, you don't hear that explained.
So I would love to see that because I know that people like Theo Vaughn obviously influence impact a lot of people.
That'd be great.
That'd be great.
Yeah, he should definitely do that.
Now, I also, I have a little bit of a, I don't know, maybe, maybe I'm wrong.
You guys can tell me.
But when you're somebody who has a nuanced view on this and you care enough to post back and say, hey, I hope you guys take this down or send me a check.
Don't include me in your videos.
If somebody came up to you on the street and said, hey, our buddy got deported.
Now, maybe there's other context.
Maybe they were joking around beforehand.
So that's where I could be wrong, right?
Sure.
But what if somebody comes up and they're kind of joking around?
If you have a nuanced take and you're Theo Vaughn and you know that this is going to get out there and make the rounds and you're going to have to defend this, don't you approach it a little bit more carefully because you have a nuanced take.
Not that you have to.
You can make a joke, but if you have a nuanced take.
I don't think I would say that.
He's a comedian.
He's walking down the street and some guy who's a fan goes, hey, Theo Vaughn, blah, blah, blah.
And he's just being a comedian.
Hold on, hold on.
Hold on, hold on.
I'm going to stop both of you because you're both missing.
You're missing a part of this equation.
And so are you.
I left around.
And I'm the one person who's kind of had to bridge this.
Here's the thing.
Yes, you're right.
You are wrong in the sense that he doesn't have to express a nuanced view if he's just doing a shout out video right to someone.
In other words, he can say whatever he wants.
The problem is he's waded into this space and he doesn't have the awareness to understand that now if you go out, for example, and talk on issues like, and not jokes, but actually talk on issues like Israel or you talk about issues like politics, right?
Once you've done that, it doesn't mean that it's right for someone to take you out of context, but you need to understand that when you take a political stance, you will then need to be very prudent because this is the kind of thing that will happen.
He wants to be half in, half out.
A comedian, great, a comedian who just does come, I get it.
But you have a lot of these comedians who also sometimes present themselves as, I don't want to say thought leaders, but thoughtful people.
It shows that he doesn't know what he's entered into and he's not really equipped to deal with it.
But I don't think there's anything wrong with him just making a joke.
He could say whatever.
No, no, I don't either.
I'm saying in light of the fact that he has a nuanced take on this, he said something in a way that I thought was funny.
And I honestly thought it's funny and he also could be completely anti-deportations and be fine.
It's still funny.
You know what I mean?
I think it's hilarious for him to say it like that.
But he did invite the criticism because he knows that clip is going to make the rounds.
And now he's going to have to defend it.
And I think what you're saying is he didn't foresee that that was going to happen.
He definitely did.
Even before the DHS put this out there.
Well, it's just like when Josh said, you know, we had so many comedians at the club.
The first time they needed metal detectors, first time they needed, that's one thing.
These people aren't aware of what that's like.
And so they don't appreciate the potential pitfalls.
And so I would hope that he matures and he gets really mad with the gotcha journalism overall.
Yeah.
Just say what your take is, too.
Like, I think people would be curious about it.
If you have a take, just say what it is, and, you know, everybody can move on.
But yeah, you're both because you haven't been in the comedy realm.
And then also there are a lot of comedians.
Well, I mean, you haven't done stand-up comedy.
I mean, a lot of comedians haven't actually taken a stand.
They've had to put their money at home.
And then your son tries to kill me.
Well, that's part of the performance.
Yeah, that's because you're showing them the mash finale.
I literally, I literally mimed it for him.
I think it's just him coming out and saying this is just him, his way of saying, hey, hey, everybody, I made a joke.
I didn't think that the DHS was going to use it for.
Right.
Yeah.
I don't want to say the word propaganda.
I don't even call it advertising.
I don't know what to call it.
It's a social reel.
A social reel, yeah.
And by the way, they should definitely be monetized.
Yeah.
They should.
They are propagating.
Any chance to use less tax dollars?
Let's do it.
You're not putting out these videos.
And they need their $18 on X. The DHS is scrolling through.
That could have been fun.
No, and I agree.
You're right.
You should be able to do it.
The issue is when you say, I have a much more nuanced view.
Well, now you've put up a smokescreen.
Just say, hey, take this down.
For example, Cheech and Chong.
Remember, they used the Change My Mind meme to sell Cheech and Chong's, whatever, gummies.
Oh, that's right.
And we, at that point, had a sponsor that was a CBD sponsor, CB Distillery.
And we just reached out to them and said, hey, could you not use this for, you know, and actually for-profit for the company?
Because we also have a competitor.
And I think Bill sent a funny letter saying, if you send us a case of Cheech and Chong gummies, we'll, you know, when they saw a giant bag of weed, which was weird.
Yeah, it was weird.
But we just asked them to take it down.
We didn't say, like, and by the way, we also think there should be a more nuanced take on the sale of hemp product.
Once you do that, people go, okay, well, now I'm listening.
Yeah, talk to me about it.
So just say, hey, we just say, do you mind taking it down?
Because it's just actually a conflict of interest with the business.
And I think these people don't necessarily know that.
Joe Rogan was very surprised to see the hit pieces on him on Ivermecton.
Yeah.
Yeah, he didn't think you could be touched.
No, no, he didn't think that that was going to happen.
You don't realize that someone's been putting together a reel to try and destroy your name and career until it happens.
Guarantee you, someone is putting one together right now on Theo Vaughan.
And by the way, I hope it's an effective, and I hope he continues to be successful.
I just think he might be a little unaware of some of the potential threats surrounding him.
And it's largely from the left.
Once you say nuance, ooh, boy.
Yeah.
And I think that's part of it, too.
He's like, hey, I see what's happening from the left.
Yeah.
I see what's happening to people that are aligning themselves over there.
And I don't want people to think that I'm this, you know, ice mascot.
He could have just said nothing, too, and it probably would have been easier.
But whatever.
Yeah, who knows?
Maybe he was getting some messages or maybe he was getting added by people or something.
We have some more updates if you want to do that really quickly.
I think we should.
Okay.
So we'll go back to the one I was going to go to before.
Go to Jill's Mike.
Yeah, sorry.
So is this 100% the guy?
Like, that's what I need to know, guys.
Apparently, Shooter had two marijuana-related arrests in Texas in 2015 and 2016.
Have we confirmed or has media confirmed that that is the person?
Let's go ahead and take it down.
I just need to know that.
I assume.
That is the person.
I assume that.
You're saying that's circulating.
We cannot confirm that that is the mugshot, to be clear, right?
So the Daily Mail.
Okay, so that's what I mean.
Daily Mail is saying that this is that person.
Daily Mail is saying that this person.
So we are not confirming that this is the person.
We are saying that this is the Daily Mail saying that this is the shooter head.
And I can say, just to be clear, because we have been sued in the past where someone else posted it and they are saying this.
And some of the original sources did not get sued, but yours truly.
And we admitted the mistake.
Yep, okay, we had the right name, wrong mug shot.
So we always have to say this is what the Daily Mail is saying that they maybe haven't verified right now because only one person gets sued.
That's something we also have to.
Yeah, absolutely.
So go ahead and pull that back up.
So this is the person.
So marijuana related arrests in 2015 and 2016.
Yeah, so age, what, 29?
Current age.
I can tell you that person does not look like a conservative.
I know some do, as a general rule.
Either way, listen, I heard some reporting on this pretty early about the age.
It's like, gosh, these young guys doing really stupid, stupid things.
Well, guys, we need to have this conversation.
I've glossed over it, but we need to have this conversation too.
I am not saying at all that you should not be able to purchase CBD gummies or even THC, you know, in a state if you are of age.
And I'm not even saying that it's harmful to you if you are a grown adult and use it for sleep or every now and then the way that someone might drink a couple of beers.
I think that everything comes with potential negative ramifications.
But we do know beyond any shadow of a doubt that particularly heavy concentrated THC use can trigger mental illness that already would be sort of dormant specifically in the developing brain.
And people will compare it to alcohol, but here's something I would say.
And in almost all these recent shootings, they tended to be steeped in quote-unquote cannabis culture.
Not all of them.
But if you take someone who is already mentally ill, someone who is already unstable, and you give them what is effectively a hallucinogen, if it's a 90% vape pen, and this is a chemical that is stored in fat and your brain, it's largely made up of fat, and it continues to develop, particularly the frontal lobe until you are 25.
That's why you need an extra daily rate, like the underage insurance, if you want to rent a car.
And you create a culture, which we never had with alcohol, of wake and bake, it's medicine.
Here's the thing.
Since I've grown up, sure, kids have consumed alcohol at parties, right?
Because, okay, they do it and equivalent parents.
Parents say you shouldn't drink, but it's fine, man.
You know, you might have a hangover.
We never once had messaging to us as teenagers that actually alcohol is 0% harmful compared to whatever, crack, heroin.
Cannabis came in and said, it's actually 0% harmful and it's medicine in comparison to alcohol.
Remember, we always heard, I never see anyone beat up their wives.
I never see anyone go commit crime if they're, you know, smoking a joint.
Maybe if you're a bag of potato chips, that's the old kind of hack joke.
I don't think that's true.
And we have a culture where people are seeing billboards, young people, wake and bake, it's medicine.
Get it.
Get the prescription from your doctor.
And then you're not having people drinking on the weekend and binge drinking is wrong and it's bad and it's bad for teenagers.
How many people do you know who smoke all the time?
Like in the morning?
Because I've been told if you go to a weed shop, it's this is a good morning strain.
This is a good midday strain.
And then this is a good sleep strain.
There's a strain for every time of day and every activity you have.
And it's been presented for a very long time as completely harmless in comparison to alcohol.
We're probably going to have to re-examine that.
Not re-examine the legality, but re-examine the messaging that has often been targeted at young people, considering that there are a lot of things young people shouldn't be using or consuming.
There's a legal age for firearms, and that differs from state to state.
There's a legal age for alcohol, and I don't necessarily think that it should be 21.
It has to be consistent across the board.
Marijuana products and cannabis with 10 to 20 times the concentration of THC than you would see at Woodstock are flavored, packaged, marketed, in many cases, to a teenage market, and consumption is up dramatically.
Let me give you just some math on it, okay?
And I've kind of been doing this, and I'm not blaming this at all.
I'm just saying it is a contributing factor, and this doesn't mean that I think we should outlaw it.
I know people say, oh, freedom's scary.
I'm not saying that marijuana should be federally banned.
That's not what I'm saying.
And it certainly shouldn't be classified alongside heroin and fentanyl.
I get that.
But if you go back to the 60s, where I'm just going, I'm just going to present you with some general figures.
This doesn't mean they're accurate, but as an example, 10%.
Let's say 10% of the population uses THC.
Okay.
And the average concentration of a THC product back then was around 1%.
Two, three would be getting up there.
Okay.
And we know that there's a certain percentage of people in the United States who will trigger mental illness with marijuana.
That's not really in question, to be clear.
It's a small percentage, but it exists.
Now, quadruple that percentage.
Let's say we get it to 40%.
It could be five and it get to 30%, but quadruple it and then octuple the strength and reduce the average age of people using it.
Let's say in one example, you had a few thousand people who might trigger paranoid schizophrenia or hallucinations.
Now you have a few hundred thousand people who also think they're furries.
It is a contributing factor.
And we need to be honest about that.
Not about the legislation, but about the messaging.
Hey, man, it's less than a drink.
It's not less than a drink to someone who may have a history of hereditary mental illness.
And that has been fostered.
I hope you guys understand it's a confluence of all these things.
Mental illness has been relabeled.
It's been fostered because they are useful pawns to the left.
And they've been told, wake and bake.
Don't believe big pharma, who also stand to gain the most financially from big weed and China.
And so we'll find out more information about this.
Obviously, we're digging into who this person was, what their social media stuff looks like, all that.
But we wanted to at least get out to you that it seems like these have been identified according to the Daily Mail.
Also, really quickly, Theo Von had a, he didn't respond to us directly.
Some other people did respond to our post about, you know, here's your opportunity to take it down.
I'll get to that in just a second.
But Theo Von actually came out and said in response to somebody else, it's crazy to me that they would think that this is okay.
What if someone attacks me tomorrow because they think I'm some final boss on deportations or something?
That's funny.
No, I think it's funny, but if it's a genuine concern, it's like, yeah.
And hey, what if somebody comes and attacks me because I'm an ICE agent and I just deported somebody who was in this country illegally and killed two people in the country that they were fleeing from and I just helped save Americans' lives potentially.
But you'll never know that.
You'll just know that I'm an ICE agent.
Like, I think that's the thing.
Like, I get that he's a comedian, and I understand that.
Yeah, and I will say this.
This is one thing, too, because I've lived through this quite a bit.
And the attack that the left will make is like, well, you're not really coming.
I don't see you at my clubs.
Why do you think that is?
That's how it started.
Josh knows we have to have metal detectors and we have to have security armed to the teeth.
The left will often say, actually, the thing is, no one really cares if you're left or right, so long as it's funny.
That's not true, though.
That's not true.
If you hold a right-leaning political opinion, it doesn't matter if you're a comedian or if you're Charlie Kirk.
They will label you as violent and then you're on stage blinded by lights and you have to have the budget for security.
I've lived on both sides of this equation and a lot of people in comedy are blissfully unaware.
It doesn't matter so long as you're funny.
And then they label you conservative comedian.
No, no, no.
I can't, people, even Dennis Miller went through this.
Nick DiPaolo has gone through this.
You can't perform to a general audience, a two-drink minimum coming in because of the risk of violence.
So yeah, that's a horrible thing.
And of course, there should never be a risk of violence for Theo Von making a joke or recording a video.
But hopefully maybe this is a learning experience where he realizes this is how we live.
This is how anyone on the right lives.
It's not, it doesn't matter so long as you're funny.
No, one side is attacked.
One side is targeted, hunted, regardless of how funny it is.
That's the truth.
And I really, really hope that he does not find himself amongst people like us and Charlie Kirk and Tim Poole and every conservative content creator or comedian who has had doors closed.
And I don't just mean doors closed in the industry, but doors closed where you lose a part of your life.
There are things that you used to do that you can't do anymore because you have an opinion.
That's not the same for the left.
It's not.
I'd love to see you go talk to Theo about this because I think you'd bring a perspective for him that maybe he's not really had to live or consider as much that he is kind of experiencing right now.
And I believe it's completely unfortunate.
Like it shouldn't be.
I think his heart's in the right place if he's a daring smart guy.
He's definitely lived through some threats and some really nasty things.
There's been a few things in his career that he's done or said in the name of comedy where people have come after him.
I mean, there was an N-word thing that he did.
I think it was with Druski, which is so funny because Druski loves that kind of stuff.
He did the whiteface thing recently at the NASCAR event.
And it was something he was like, I say it when I'm by myself or whatever.
Yeah.
But he got a bunch of threats from that.
He's gotten threats from a lot of different things.
Comedians get threats about weird things.
Dude, people hate me.
There are people out there who hate me because I'm fat.
Yeah.
And that's, I'm like, I didn't do anything to you.
I just saw too many cupcakes.
I don't know what that has to do with you.
Well, they wanted to eat those cupcakes.
They're not serious threats and stuff, but Theo Vaughn is a good idea.
I promise you fair cupcakes.
Well, don't leave them out, stupid.
Yeah, you're not a professional taste tester.
Yes, that's true with Theo Vaughn, but now take that and add it to every single opinion you hold ever.
Ever.
In other words, you can be a political comedian on the left.
You're not risking violence.
Whether it's the Greg Frups of the world or the Mark Marons of the world or, I mean, even now Bill Bird.
Mark Marin came after Theo Vaughn.
Yeah, I know.
I don't know if you saw his new special of comedy.
Yeah.
He did a whole segment where he said, he said, if Hitler were alive today, he would do Theo Vaughn's podcast.
Yeah.
And then did a whole act out of Theo Vaughn basically platforming and just sidestepping Hitler in an interview.
And it's like, well, and I guess now it's coming.
This is the same guy, Mark Maron, who on Bill Maher's show on HBO said he wanted to hate fuck Michelle Bachman.
Ah.
Now.
How did it go?
Usually that's called a rape.
Yeah.
Well, he got mad that I made fun of him.
I kept calling him like Count of Monte Cristo, making fun of his hipster mustache.
And he got really mad.
And at the time, he was a big name and I wasn't.
But again, imagine someone on the right saying, yeah, I want to, again, context.
He said, just so you fast forward or rewind 30 seconds, Mark Marin said, I want to hate fuck Michelle Bachman.
Now picture someone saying on a mainstream network, HBO certainly was at this point, very big ratings.
I want to rape Michelle Obama on principle.
I want to hate fuck AOC.
Again, Mark Maron said, I want to hate fuck Michelle Bachman, who, by the way, is almost a living saint.
People may say she looks weird, but she'd adopted some like six, seven, eight kids.
Oh, wow.
And he said that.
And I guarantee you, he was blissfully unaware or unconcerned with any type of consequences.
So you can be a left-wing comedian.
You can go out and advocate Marxism and say you want to hate fuck women who hold positions as heads of state.
I think she was a senator, Michelle Bachman, not a con.
Yeah, I think she was a senator.
You guys can let me know if I'm wrong.
Sam will chime in.
You can do that.
No consequences.
Yeah.
Every opinion we express, including not transitioning children, they say it's punching down.
And by the way, that's saying that we are oppressors.
When comedians say you're punching down, they're accusing you of being a fascist oppressor.
And they, of course, that kind of rhetoric leads to your life being at risk.
I hope that Theo Vaughn doesn't end up having to live that kind of life.
And I hope he's aware of what he's waiting into because there are two standards.
Did you have another update?
Yeah, so I had a couple, actually.
So really quickly, it was a congresswoman.
Michelle Bachman was a congresswoman.
So I didn't even have to prompt Sam.
Sam, just like, sorry.
I said, Senator, I, my apologies.
It was a good one.
So here's the post.
I want to go to the post that we put out on X first, where we basically made a collage of all these different posts and gave people an opportunity to kind of walk it back.
So here's the post that we put out, right?
So interesting.
And they are verifiably wrong.
In other words, this is their equivalent to an admonish button, which I did at the outset of this show.
It shouldn't be hard.
Right.
Okay.
Here's what Angry Staffer, with the opportunity and the facts, replied with.
These are really the anti-ICE messages.
You don't have any questions about this, really?
Well, hold on.
That's not what you were saying before, Angry Staffer.
You weren't saying there are questions about the motives.
Now it's a conspiracy theory.
Now it's something else.
But it gets worse.
MSMDC has now come out and said basically that these guys are just copycatting the right wing and it's all started with us.
Is there a clip?
Yes.
It's certainly a concern.
The irony with the writing, the first time we really saw that was Brenton Tarrant in the Christchurch shootings, shooting in a mosque in New Zealand.
And he was a fierce white supremacist and neo-Nazi and wrote all over his weapon and his rounds of very hateful information.
So to see this coming from potentially the other side of the political spectrum is a little strange because it is not something if you are trying to carry out some kind of message countering more extreme right-wing stuff.
I don't know why you would use a tactic that a famous white supremacist who has been revered and copycatted over the years by other white supremacists.
This man is nonsensical.
That's enough.
But also let's fact check.
I think people are misremembering that the Christchurch shooting, the manifesto left, said that he was radicalized by Candace Owens and Ben Shapiro.
There was a lot of trolling.
Now, this person may have been right-leaning, but I don't remember if we got to the bottom of that.
If this person was a white supremacist, obviously there was quite a bit of trolling and misdirection saying, I'm a white supremacist who was radicalized to be this way by Candace Owens and Ben Shapiro.
So even their example is not one that is rock solid, to use as a jumping off point.
The first time someone's written messages on ammunition was the Christchurch shooting.
It wasn't any bombs or artillery shells in the last two centuries.
Yeah, exactly right.
I think George Washington wrote on his lead ball, eat shit, King George.
Yes, I think he did.
I think they even brought up, they brought up an artillery shell that was engraved when they landed on the moon just for fun.
Don't you remember?
Oh, my gosh.
Yeah.
So they said, yeah, to the Candace part.
They're checking on the Ben part about it.
And I know Candace has gone a little, you know, since, but I don't know that back then she was really, you know, doing anything that could be called radicalizing anyone.
Yeah.
So it's one of the, like, yeah, that was something that was designed to create chaos, to misdirect people, but this is what they do.
It's someone beating you up, saying, look what you made me do.
That's what the left is doing.
You can't point me to it.
We have the ABC affiliate, this, Charlie Kirk.
There are several other examples, obviously, bomb threats.
I don't know that you can point me to any substantial right-wing equivalent in the last two weeks at all.
And they go, look what you made us.
There's no off-ramp from this guy.
They're giving you their playbook.
They're going to continue doing this.
They are allergic to accountability.
This is not a logical leap.
ICE is Gestapo.
ICE is rounding up American citizens and they're beating them and violating their civil rights.
ICE is the modern SS.
And then someone believing exactly what you said.
It doesn't require red yarn or connecting the dots.
Like Gerald said, it's a straight line.
This guy's crazy.
He thought that they were the SS.
He thought they were Gestapo.
This guy's obviously a lunatic out of one out of the million.
Who could have seen this coming?
Oh, man.
Anyways, the Gestapo was attacked today at 7 o'clock this morning.
Exactly.
Yeah.
I said Gestapo 18 times?
Huh?
That's, I guess why.
I meant to do 25.
And so Ed Krasenstein didn't have the balls to respond to our post to show how stupid he is.
But he did put out another post that said, who writes anti-ICE on a bullet just before shooting three immigrants detained by ICE?
Again, going back to that, and by the way, I don't think immigrants are the right word, but we'll get back to that.
Suddenly, those who never trusted the FBI are suddenly convinced by this.
You said suddenly twice.
You are a moron, sir.
But nonetheless.
Who would do this?
I don't know.
Maybe somebody who wants to attack ICE because he hates them and is also going to kill himself.
Yeah.
Wants to make it clear?
He wants to make it clear after he kills himself that this is what he was doing.
And I'm fighting the good fight.
And oh no, I hit the wrong people.
Yeah.
Yeah.
But you forgot that mass killers/slash suicide, whatever, artists.
I don't understand.
They don't leave notes.
That's not common practice.
They don't leave notes.
They don't leave manifestos.
This is that.
They never do that.
Right.
Also, what is the definition of a manifesto?
We don't know.
We don't know what a woman is.
But have you guys seen this ICE detention facility?
Is it all glass?
Are there signs?
Are there neon signs, like live nude signs that point detainees located here?
Agents here.
Yeah.
I mean, when the shooting.
Who in your right mind thinks, okay, they shot the ICE facility.
Obviously, they were going for the people that were being detained inside.
Right.
It makes no sense to me.
It's just this is one already believe in the FBI so quickly.
All you guys.
No, we don't trust the FBI, but it's pretty clear.
Yeah.
But if the FBI says, hey, a guy attacked the ICE facility and we think he was targeting ICE, we're going to go.
Yeah.
Yeah, that makes sense.
Especially if it's in.
The mouse went after the cheese.
Yeah.
And you think his motive was cheese?
I believe that.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It doesn't make any sense to me that they would be killing somebody who, let's say that you hated like every person who was in this country illegally.
They just like had bloodlust and hated these people.
And they got to get out of my country, right?
Got out of the country.
Well, ICE has them.
They seem to be on a fast track out of the country.
Exactly right.
Step in at that point.
Seem to be clear.
But instead of taking this opportunity to say, this is wrong.
Every single listen, bookmark these.
Bookmark these as more information comes out about this shooter.
When something undeniable, because apparently I guess the motives being written on the ammunition is not undeniable enough.
Something else comes out.
Hey, guys, here's another opportunity.
I know you didn't believe the picture from the FBI, but maybe you'll believe social media post, report from a friend, or manifesto if we see that.
One of those things.
They just won't take that chance.
You don't want to stop the violence.
You absolutely do not.
You could care less about the violence as long as it's targeted at people you hate.
That's it.
That's what's clear.
Yep.
The only other reasonable explanation that one could find.
Why am I monitoring?
Because you've been talking very long.
No, because Gerald said he could care less.
He could not care less.
That's true.
Oh, that's true.
Well, you have the capacity to care less, so maybe care less.
Yeah, exactly.
In other words, that doesn't give me an accurate gauge.
Okay.
Now you're careful.
How much could you care less?
Yeah, how much?
How much is left in the tank?
Yeah, if you say I couldn't.
How much care is left?
Right.
If you say I couldn't care less, that means this is at 1% care.
If you say I could care less, well, it could be anywhere from one to a hundred.
Yeah, show me on the Grinch's heart chart where you are.
Yes.
I'm grokking it.
You hold on.
I'm 100% wrong.
I'll give you that.
Grammatically, I'm not defending myself.
My wife is probably going to correct me if you're not going to be able to do that.
The correct phrase is I couldn't care less, which means you care so little that it's impossible to care any less.
While I could care less is widely used, it is grammatically incorrect and logically means the opposite.
Guys, you're seeing it in real time.
Gerald sees this as a win.
Yeah.
He's the left.
I don't know how.
Look, when I made the mistake, when I made the mistake, I don't know if it was eight years ago and I said chomping at the bit and Chail said it's champing.
It's an equestrian term.
I was like, okay, good.
I was glad to be corrected.
That's true.
Your ego's out of control, man.
We in half of America that says could care less.
Yeah, he was just chomping at the bit.
Yes.
That happened to him.
Also, by the way, I will say this: false flag is usually something when people use that.
It's usually used for an endgame, right, to spur some kind of action.
Yeah.
Why would ICE, why would the feds stage a false flag so that ICE could continue exactly what it is they're doing in record numbers, to be clear?
And I actually have these numbers right in front of you.
What is this?
Because we were doing the fact-checking the UN for four straight months, there have been zero, zero releases, meaning these types, that's how they gauge interactions at the border.
Zero.
Compared to Joe Biden, 112,000 over the same four-month period.
The border has been almost entirely secured.
And we are seeing record deportations right now.
They should be a little bit higher, but ICE wouldn't need a false flag to get people to support deportation.
No, it's almost, it's actually the dumbest of all theories that I've heard because if you want to say there's some kind of attack on ICE so that you can ramp up ICE, all you have to do is flip the page back a couple of months and a couple of weeks in some places.
You've already got all the attacks.
You don't need more false flags.
Exactly.
Yep.
I don't understand.
All right.
Let's grab a couple of chats because I got to get going.
And I will not see you tomorrow.
All right.
First chat from the monadnock.
I know we don't know right now, but do you think these attacks are now being coordinated, including the group menacing and fist fights, or are these all just wind-up toys going off?
A little of both.
I mean, you just saw where was it?
Was it, was it Portland yesterday where it was something like 60 Antifa members who surrounded an ICE facility, and there were a few who were arrested.
This was taking place last night.
Antifa is an organization.
There's also a great video.
I think it was in France.
I think it was in France of nationalists beating the shit out of Antifa.
It looks like Westside Story with masks.
So it is an organization.
And it's not just Antifa.
Antifa, I would say Black Lives Matter was absolutely an extension.
It was a money laundering operation.
We know that now beyond any shadow of a doubt.
These people coordinate.
They may not be, for example, like Hell's Angels, where there's an official chapter initiation process.
In some cases, there is.
But in a lot of cases, these people operate, they coordinate in Discord, channel, Discord servers, Reddit, then they take it to encrypted messaging apps.
That's what we experienced in Utah.
An encrypted messaging app was created, and there was a post out there on social media and some forms where then you see 20, 30, 40 people on an encrypted messaging app, and they have different units or different chapters across the country.
So it is organized.
Would I say it's organized in that Elizabeth Warren is calling and saying, Red Sparrow Flies Tonight, and they're like, Got it, boss.
Not exactly.
And then there are, but even more of a threat, are the sort of satellite, the people who are being indoctrinated, propagandized by the left.
So there are just as many lone wolves out there who believe that they're going to be exterminated by J.D. Vance as there are members in Antifa chapters.
Both are an equal threat because they are mentally ill.
They are unhinged and they can justify any of their actions because it's predicated on the idea that all of your views are violent.
So a little bit of both.
Next chat.
All right.
Let's see.
Next chat from Curtin147.
I still believe that Theo supports Trump, but he clearly didn't want to be part of the main light of government ads.
At what point can we see conservative comedians have some brass balls?
There are quite a few now.
There are more than there used to be.
And it's certainly not, I mean, it used to be a comedic witch hunt where when George Bush was president and when Barack Obama was president, all of a sudden there was nothing funny about the guy.
There were a few people who always did it, obviously, like Nick DiPaolo.
You have people like Dennis Miller.
I'm trying to think of others.
There have been more who've come around lately.
But you'll have a lot of people like in the Joe Rogan sphere who will express sort of right-leaning views.
But yeah, they still don't want to alienate a portion of their audience and they don't want to be the target of violence.
So I'd like to see more of it, but I'm never going to tell someone what kind of view they should hold.
Yeah.
Next chat.
I don't think it's fair to call someone ballist because they don't want to be used on a campaign.
Yeah, I understand that.
I think I certainly wouldn't say that about Theo Vaughan.
I would say it about a lot of people now who they just sort of, it's like they see the trend and they're going, I can kind of be rebellious and present myself as conservative, but never really take a stand.
I don't know that that's Theo Vaughan.
I think he has taken some risks, but I understand why some people, considering how bold the leftist comedians were, considering if you look at the last comedy specials that have won awards, right, for Special of the Year and what was expressed, it's probably about 90-10 as far as outwardly, proactively left-wing versus, and that 10% would include people who might sort of in a passive way be more conservative.
That's kind of the dynamic that you see.
Final chat, and then I got to get going unless you have some really knocking out.
You got some dynamite stuff?
Got some dynamite?
All right.
Final chat from G Drunland.
Black cats.
Question for the crew.
Not to start a conspiracy theory, but do you think this is a plot from the left to brainwash these people to commit these crimes to say, see, guns are bad?
No, I think that's what they will go to.
So, in other words, and this is one thing, too, and this is what I mean.
There is no common ground with these people because they don't rationalize their position.
They don't Socratically go through these situations and try and be intellectually consistent.
And I say this because there is no intellectual consistency to the left.
I'll prove it to you.
Right now, it's considered an act of evil to the left if you don't help your child transition to the point where there are sanctuary states that will hide your children from you and give them puberty blockers because you are committing an act of cruelty.
All right.
The savior to the left, Barack Obama, 2008, he went into office against gay marriage.
The only president ever elected who at that point in time, when he was elected, who was pro-s-sex marriage to some degree, Donald Trump.
And I don't agree with him on it, but that's a fact.
The left, if you, people will often say, well, the left, you know, is it has gone really far left and the right has gone far right.
No, no.
Everyone has gone significantly left.
JFK would have nothing in common with Democrats.
I would even say more apt is Ted Kennedy, who is still alive.
The Ted Kennedy of the 2000s would share nothing in common with the Ted Kennedy of the 80s.
Not even close.
Are we really that far from, let's say, Nixon or Ronald Reagan?
You go to the war on drugs.
You go that Reagan was kind of weak on immigration.
But overall, no.
No, it's not that radical of a departure because progress for the sake of progress is not a value.
It's not.
It's simply a box to check in action.
Well, always err on the side of progress, always err on the side of destroying the structures of whatever, patriarchy, Judeo-Christianity, Western civilization.
It seeks to destroy, and they do that under the guise of progress.
You do have to defend your views as a conservative because there is a fundamental worldview.
There's a fundamental worldview based in Christianity.
You cannot separate it as far as the United States, that you are created by God, that you have rights that are inalienable as endowed.
You've been endowed with them by your creator.
These are things that are written that are very, very clear.
The government doesn't exist to grant rights.
I mean, they can't just make them up.
They exist to protect rights that are recognized as birthrights.
We have to be somewhat consistent.
You can have state border variations, more on drugs or maybe top marginal tax rates, income tax versus fair tax, flat tax, of course.
But you don't find conservatives who were radically against same-sex marriage today saying transition children.
You don't.
You do find plenty of Democrats who were against same-sex marriage.
Your most notable president, who now does advocate for that?
It's just not the same thing.
So they're remarkably inconsistent as far as what they prescribe as values.
They are remarkably consistent in the response to the wake of their destruction.
It's very predictable that they will blame guns.
I say this to bring this back around where we look at these.
We go, okay, the ABC studio, Jimmy Kimmel.
All right, someone shot in there.
ICE facility.
Okay.
We see what happened there.
Tragedy.
Okay, Charlie Kirk.
All right, we see.
So we look at the motive.
We look at the reasoning.
We look at what could have possibly inspired them.
And then we even look at Zarutska and say, all right, this was a knife.
Okay.
Soft on crime.
We go, what is the commonality?
Now, we would look across these the last couple of weeks and say, well, obviously either direct leftist influence or it's directly a byproduct of the left's crime policy in the Zarutska case.
And that would be very consistent.
The left goes, guns, inanimate objects.
And they lie about everything else that is far more consistent.
This guy believed the Gestapo propaganda.
Person with Charlie Kirk also believed the Gestapo propaganda, the fascist propaganda, the Nazi propaganda.
The man who shot into the ABC affiliate also believed FCC, Gestapo-like censorship, fascism.
How do we know?
Because they said this.
Because they said this.
Same thing we could apply to Summer of Love, Chaz, Mike Brown, those riots that were taking place, right?
We go, okay, well, let's look at this.
The consistency here is the ideology, is the idea that cops are bad and that they're hunting young black people and that they can use that to justify violence.
The left goes, they must be unheard.
Unheard on all the issues?
Because we're hearing them pretty consistently on the issue.
We're able to spot consistency because we have to live to some degree consistently.
The left does not.
So they are not consistent at all in their values.
They're not capable of that.
But they are consistent in their response.
And the reason that they are consistent in their response is because it absolves them of having no values.
It absolves them of accountability.
They don't think they ever have to face the fact that they labeled all of you, all of us, as Gestapo, Nazis, racist, homophobic, transphobe, wanting to erase trans people, not caring about the deaths of children in school shootings, being First Amendment free speech absolutists, which leads to violence.
And of course, at the end of it, well, silence is violence.
To put a finer point on it, the left has, and I would say this as a majority, by and large, labeled the position Of not, and I don't mean opposing, of not supporting Juneteenth as a national holiday as violence.
So, if you can't just sit this one out, Juneteenth national holiday, I don't know, I don't really care.
If you can't do that and not be accused of violence, I think you know the leftist playbook.
It's one area where they may be consistent.
Let's make sure we call them on it.
We'll see you not tomorrow, maybe some people here, but it won't be me, but maybe it'll be me.
I don't know.
Well, cut me out.
That's what I know.
▲
Export Selection