All Episodes
Previous Next
March 19, 2025 - Louder with Crowder
01:03:56
JFK Files Dropped: Examining the Biggest Claims & Trump Putin Call Breakdown
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, Bongino Army, now Vince, all caps people, to the third hour of the lineup here on Rumble.
It's live.
You just get to continue watching like a network with people who love this country, who love you.
I don't know you, but I think I love you.
And continue watching after this because you'll get Tim Pool, you get Quartering, you get Russell Brand, you get Viva Frey.
Russell's coming back next week.
Really grateful these shows have all been number one in their time slot in the country and on Earth for the last two days.
Thank you.
You are the mainstream.
That's what this is about.
We appreciate it today.
We're going to get into the JFK files.
This is where legacy media and, unfortunately, clickbait both on the right and the left meet.
What is new?
Is there anything new?
What is breaking?
What is a revelation?
A lot of misinformation out there.
We're going to go through a pretty thorough claim truth.
But before that, here's a little more info on the lineup and something else.
Hi, I'm YouTube.
And I'm Rumble.
Did you know that YouTube is dead?
Whoa!
You cannot mention death on YouTube.
I'm gonna have to issue a strike.
I don't give a s***.
It's not like I'm reveling in it.
Hey!
R word!
Can't say that!
Strike two!
What are you?
Some kind of gay umpire?
That's it, buddy.
You're out of here!
This is exactly why Rumble is eating your lunch on live streaming.
You know what?
One more thing that I gotta say to you.
YouTube is dead.
Rumble did it.
Watch the new Rumble Live lineup Monday through Friday, including Lightworth Crowder at our new time, 11 a.m. Eastern.
Now, this just in.
The Fed has dropped interest rates.
Now, hang on.
Let me make sure I'm getting this right.
Yep.
There it is, folks.
American financing can help you refinance.
Boy, that sure would have been nice when the old missus left.
Took the kids up to Wisconsin, and I had to buy that junior suite.
Uh-huh.
Hold on.
There's more coming in.
Bear with me, folks.
This is news to me as well.
The Roach Motel, they called.
Pipe down!
Oh, I have no one to talk to.
It's just me and you here.
Uh-huh.
One moment, folks.
I want to make sure I'm accurate with this.
She took my dog, too.
The kids were talking to her.
For God's sakes, change your pants.
Hold on.
Turns out, yep, American financing has helped thousands of Americans.
Save an average of more than $800 a month.
They never charge any upfront or hidden fees.
And if you start today, you may be able to delay up to two mortgage payments.
Do you think they could delay my divorce?
I'll delay your paycheck.
Well, that's not going to bring my wife back.
Call 1-800-974-6500 or go to AmericanFinancing.net slash Crowder.
I believe that's some sort of inner website.
What's that?
It's in the inner circle with email.
That's right.
You heard it here.
You heard it here first, folks.
Right here today.
On this broadcast, what a day it has been for American financing, and what a day it has been for the American people.
Wowza!
What a day.
What's NMLS 182334 mean?
Call American Financing today at 1-800-974-6500 or visit American...
Slash Crowder.
No upfront fees.
Closing as fast as ten days and you could even delay up to two mortgage payments.
NMLS 182334.
Don't say our run-through was anything less than innocent, Captain Morgan.
Are you out of your tree, sir?
Are you out of your tree, sir?
We'll get into the JFK files.
There's nothing!
No, there's not nothing.
We have a lot to get to today.
The JFK files are out.
Look, there's some interesting context, some interesting insight, and I want to hear from you.
Are you disappointed in seeing legacy media and influencers, clickbait artists intersecting now where it's hard?
And it's hard for me to sort of parse through this and get to the truth.
There are kind of three timelines.
We'll go through their claims being made right now.
Okay. Then some of these claims being made right now are about people who made claims well after the shooting of JFK, which of course occurred under suspicious circumstances.
And then there's the timeline as to when it actually happened.
So there's three layers of potentially misleading you.
And I really do think we have the best segment put together on it here today.
Laying the brain has worked very hard.
George the Greek.
So we'll talk about that.
But we all know.
Some claimed truth.
I know.
We all know.
Apparently he was a part of the plot.
We all know that he was right over Oswald's shoulder.
That's right.
He was on the grassy knoll.
Do it.
Do it.
Be a mensch.
Now.
Donald Trump, President Trump, and Vladimir Putin had a call.
Where are we with ceasefires?
A lot of misinformation out there on that, too.
So we'll be discussing that.
And we appreciate you being with us.
Please share.
Like this stream because coming Monday on the 24th, it's D-Day.
We cancel YouTube.
We will not be streaming to YouTube anymore.
It's time for the Exodus.
The 24th, YouTube is dead.
Rumble did it.
You'll have Tim Poole after this.
This is the lineup.
Number one in the world each hour yesterday.
That's you.
You are the mainstream.
Don't be gaslit into believing otherwise.
But for the remainder of this week, we still have this.
So if you are watching on YouTube, I don't know, for God's sakes, why, you may see this.
Go to Rumble.
It's a live show weekdays, 11 a.m. Eastern.
Comment who you think killed JFK.
Hold the Jews comment, please.
Just don't say that.
They're not going to hold it.
I know, I know.
We'll get into that, Mossad.
We'll get into Israeli intelligence.
We'll get into what is in these documents, what has been redacted, what has not.
Captain Morgan, CEO, I hope you're well, and not underscore Firestein.
Is how they find Josh Feierstein on X. And I hope they find JFK.
I don't think he died.
Really?
Yeah.
Yeah.
I hear he's in Argentina.
Yeah, I think he survived.
I believe he's with Hitler, apparently.
That's right.
Tim Kennedy is still hunting him.
Yes.
I think someone else got it first.
Elvis as well.
So, this is...
Oh, this is fun, just to set this up, because we're going to be spending a lot of time on JFK and Putin.
President Trump's second term has, of course, been a whirlwind.
The left is exhausted.
And he's making a lot of changes, updates.
One that we are particularly, we're quite fond of this one, is some new changes and a rollout to the CBP app, which used to be for immigrants to go in and help themselves, help themselves to our taxes.
Now it's how to go home.
Now my administration is launching the CBP home app to give people in our country illegally an easy way to leave now.
And self-deport voluntarily.
The CBP Home app is now available free across all mobile app stores.
And I encourage those who have violated our laws to use this option today.
Do it right and come back into our country.
Do it wrong and you'll never be back again.
Now, to be clear, Donald Trump, he...
You know, he throws cluster bombs.
This is part of a multifaceted approach, including the very successful tamale hand trap.
So that's something that's also led to a lot of, just let go!
Let go of the tamale, Pedro.
Can't do it.
You made your own...
Can't do it.
Those are rock-solid tamales.
He made his own corn tortilla bed.
He has to lay in it.
They're about three weeks old, Tim.
I got tamale chew toy.
It's not coming out.
That thing is solid.
Now, this is, of course, it sparked a bunch of outrage from people on the left, and it has created a little bit of chaos at the border.
We actually go now live to our exclusive footage on the border.
Where are you?
It's, you know, when you see the real cost.
Never going to find them.
You can use a CBP home app to find your maracas.
Yes, yes, I believe you can.
Guess where they are?
They are not here.
That's right.
Not here.
Sorry.
A couple countries over.
So, Gavin Newsom has this new podcast.
And by the way, it's going gangbusters.
A total of 50,000 views on his most watched.
So, there are more of you twice that this second.
Follow the money.
But he interviewed Governor Tim Walz.
Remember him?
Don't say who.
Wait.
Yes.
That's the hardcore mechanic?
Yeah, I think so.
I don't know what that means.
Coach.
Yeah, Coach.
So he was on Gavin Newsom's show, and he made some outlandish claims, which brings us to this segment, We Watch So You Don't Have To.
Anything but the more than an apology.
Any one of us can find ourselves being reported.
That audio was so effective, you guys saw.
I took off, I'm like, wait a second.
It's a very effective movie.
I thought the voices had come back.
Yes.
No, Charlotte.
Later.
Just don't respond.
We do have a lot of production here.
We didn't see that until just now.
That was hilarious.
Perfect.
There are no expense.
It's not going to be another podcast where we just do radio talking to a camera.
There's a lot going on.
Some of it's disgusting.
So Gavin Newsom did this show with, and it's just a banger, this podcast with Walls, where Walls made threats of violence.
But a few key takeaways here, okay?
Most notable off the top is that Gavin Newsom is clearly gay.
You can look at the reasons why we've had this sort of dialectic.
Over the Me Too movement.
We've had this dialectic even prior.
Now, for those of you who missed it, in case it wasn't clear enough, pay close attention.
Hey, baby.
I'm going to take the money.
Hey, baby.
I'm going to take the money.
Hey, baby.
Comment below.
He's gay, right?
It looks like he's saying, me dude, me like the cha-cha.
Slate week!
Who is getting some dick?
It is me!
Bring it over here.
Now, Walls had a lot to say, but let's just show you his threats of violence, which he got wrong, but are still funny, in his own words.
How do you fight it?
I think I could kick most of their ass.
But I don't know if we're going to fall into that place where we want to, okay, we challenge you to a WWE fight here type of thing.
Okay, now first thing, I'm quite certain he meant to say UFC, mixed martial arts.
Unless he meant to say I want to have a fake scripted fight.
Right, yes.
It doesn't really even work.
And I think that Gavin Newsom gets it.
He's just too afraid to call walls out.
And that's kind of the theme of Gavin Newsom's podcast is he's afraid to call people out.
Other people are afraid to call them out.
It's very clearly controlled.
I don't want to say controlled opposition, but a controlled environment.
He's not going to risk at any point looking like he's been caught flat-footed.
But Walls will risk looking like an idiot in tighty-whities in a wrestling match.
Yes, he will.
He will.
And a lot of people think that that was poor form to threaten violence.
Some people have taken it as an affront.
Most notably, and I believe we have on the show, former governor of his home state, Minnesota, Jesse the Bodventura.
Yeah, I heard what Wolves had to say, and I say, bring it on, tough guy.
You and Newsom want to pick a fight with strangers?
I've fought strangers for 40 f***ing years.
You want to fight me?
Come on over, Chief.
Mi casa es su casa.
Got it, compadre?
Or are you too busy being a guardsman who pretends to be a sergeant major?
Let me tell you, I've got a sergeant major problem with that.
I was in an underwater demolitions unit, muchacho.
The only thing more underwater are your poles as governor.
You're going down faster than that time you were a stable boy, me perverted amigo.
You better fill your hands, you son of a bitch, because this is one horse that won't be whispered.
Two men, don't cut off my mic when we have guests.
Wow.
I had questions.
I'm sorry, he started so quickly.
Jesse doesn't have time for you, man.
No, he doesn't have time.
No, he's got amigos to go hang with.
He was talking before I went to him.
I know.
Well, you know, that's how you're known as...
There's only one, the bod.
And it's clearly Jesse.
Just look at him.
I mean, some would argue walls.
Let's go back to that guy.
So he made another astute statement during this interview.
Well, I'll let you be the judge.
My identity is not hunting.
My identity is not football coaching.
My identity is not, you know, a beard and a truck.
I like all those things.
Do you?
But how did we get to this where, have they figured it out that the identity piece of this is more important than the actual substance behind it?
Well, they've been doing it for decades.
What?
Did I just hear him say that conservatives, Republicans, are obsessed with identity politics?
You think that a beard and a truck is more important to the Republican platform than, I don't know, chicks with dicks in girls' sports to you?
Or patriarchy?
Or white supremacy?
Or anti-colonialism?
The left isn't the reason you lost!
is because you are exclusively focusing on ideas.
Inmates, what is your problem with your beard and Ford F-150, buckaroo?
Yeah, my identity is not working on trucks or beards in trucks.
My identity is authoritarianism and keeping people in their houses.
That's right.
Yeah, or football coaching, which is how no coach has ever described their job.
Well, that's how I describe my job.
See, there you go again with the identity.
You don't determine my identity, pal.
It's coaching football or being a football coach.
It is not football coaching.
Why don't you run that pick six play again, Walls?
I don't even understand what you're saying because you're a tall white guy with blue eyes and it makes me uncomfortable.
You should.
So, let's go on here to President Trump and Putin.
President Trump, right, has come into office.
He's made a lot of promises.
Has he delivered on all of them?
You'd be the judge of that.
I think he's delivered on more promises than any president in recent memory, and I would argue the same could even be said about his first term, but he's turned it up to 11 this go-around.
It doesn't matter what he does.
His critics are always up in arms, and that brings us to this topic right now.
There was a call between President Trump and Putin, right, where they were discussing a potential ceasefire.
President Trump spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin Tuesday.
The phone call lasted about 90 minutes, according to the White House.
The two leaders both said they agreed to begin negotiations immediately to achieve a full ceasefire.
They also discussed efforts to strengthen the relationship between the U.S. and Russia.
So I'll give you a snapshot as to what President Trump said regarding the meeting, what Russia, what Putin has said effectively regarding the meeting, and then the claims that the media is making.
And how they are misleading.
As always, references are available.
Links in the description.
We do that with every show.
I highly recommend that all other shows out there follow suit.
Trump wrote this about the meeting on truth.
I gotta get a breath.
My phone conversation today with President Putin of Russia, in case you forgot, was a very good and very productive one.
A very productive one.
We agreed.
To an immediate ceasefire on all energy and infrastructure.
That'll come back.
There'll be a callback to that, as comedians say.
With an understanding that we will be working quickly, very quickly, to have a complete ceasefire and ultimately an end to this very horrible war between Russia and Ukraine.
Now, Russia, for their part, they also basically echoed this, saying that it was largely positive.
And this is one of those situations.
Actually, I think we need the stinger here for claim truth.
This is one of those situations where what has actually happened has been met, at least from the legacy media and a lot of new media, with outright lies.
It's time for some claim truth.
All right.
So, here's the claim.
And this one, I believe, is made by none other than Jimmy Kimmel.
that President Trump got nothing out of this deal, and he was played by Putin.
Old fart of the deal spoke with his pal Putin by phone today, which that seems like a bad...
Putting Trump on the phone with Putin is like putting your grandma on the phone with a Nigerian prince.
This fellow is so charming.
Putin agreed to nothing today.
People keep asking if Trump is getting played by Putin, which is like asking if Havana Gila is getting played at a bar mitzvah.
Yes, that is the answer.
Mediocre.
Here's the truth.
Not only did President Trump not get played by Putin, they were quantifiable victories.
Links in the description.
For example, a prisoner swap.
175 Ukrainians for 175 Russian prisoners.
They agreed to dealing with injured Ukrainians.
23 severely injured Ukrainian prisoners of war.
They'll be transferred to Ukraine.
Big one, they agreed to a 30-day ceasefire regarding strikes on energy infrastructure.
That's a big one.
The media has been trying to misrepresent that as, oh, it's not all...
This is about energy infrastructure.
It's a 30-day pause.
That's a big deal.
Yes.
These are all good things.
Yeah.
Especially for the first step in a ceasefire deal with working on a more kind of comprehensive ceasefire.
Now, you may not think it's enough.
Fine.
But to say that he got screwed, President Trump, and that nothing took...
It's just not accurate.
Brings us to the next claim.
And this one is very easily verifiable as far as it being a falsehood that Vladimir Putin made Trump wait for an hour to talk.
So a bunch of people on X, including one, which has 2.8 million views, said that Putin is making Trump wait again.
The two leaders were supposed to have met already, but Putin is still at some conference.
When Putin is reminded of the meeting, everyone starts laughing and they're literally making fun of Trump and his convoy.
Here's the truth.
That is not what happened.
And honestly, this just sort of This is why you have to get off of these social media ghettos sometimes.
This happened in the span of about two, three hours yesterday, and then sort of disappeared.
And there were clips taken out of context of the video that I'm about to show you.
All of this, this claim, is based on this video that you're about to see.
"Po заявлениям Дмитрия Сергеевича Пескова, ваш разговор должен состояться до 18 часов с Дональдом Трампом.
Не знаю, насколько он...
"Пескова работа такая".
"Ну не знаю, сейчас надо посмотреть, что на эту фразу скажет Трамп.
Он любит интервью давать, может уже...
"Трампа не упоминал, я Пескова".
"Не-не-не, он узнает, что у нас дискуссии есть".
He says in the video, I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about Peskov.
He went out of his way to clarify that.
Peskov, it's his press secretary.
His press secretary didn't know the actual time of the interview.
They were supposed to have their call between 4 and 6 p.m., and he was still on stage at 4, but he was joking about how his press secretary...
It's his joke.
He'll take care of it.
Yeah, he'll take care of it.
This is not new.
Remember last week, the press lied about Putin making the envoy Steve Witkoff wait for nine hours during his trip to Moscow.
Remember that?
Yeah, it turned out that wasn't true either.
And look...
Jeez.
I think Putin's a totalitarian prick, to be clear.
I also don't like Zelensky.
We'll get into the demands that are being made.
That doesn't change the fact that the media is not acting in your best interest if they are lying to you.
And why do the lies always line up on one side of the aisle to try and make Donald Trump, your president, ergo the United States, look weak, look like a patsy, look like it's under the thumb of Putin?
Do they never get a lie incorrect the other way?
Or a mistake?
When has there been a mistake that benefits Donald Trump?
When has there been a mistake made that somehow elevates the American conservative taxpayer?
You, the worker who subsidizes the rest of the free world.
I haven't seen it.
You can comment below.
Maybe I'm missing one.
I think it's a good thing that President Trump is able to speak with Zelensky.
I think it's a good thing that he's able to speak with Putin.
A lot of this remains to be seen, but the tenor is good.
We actually have exclusive leaked audio.
From the call between the two.
Hello, Putin residence.
Vladimir speaking.
How may I help you?
Vladdy!
Vladdy, what happened, Vladdy?
What?
Problem?
I called, I called.
No one picked up.
I was getting worried that...
It's no problem.
Assistant and Kremlin make mistake with time.
He's gone now.
Oh, gone where?
He, uh, he quit.
Okay, look, we need to talk about Ukraine.
What is Ukraine?
Don't play dumb with me, Vladimir.
Everyone knows you're smart.
I tell everyone that about you.
You're very smart.
Okay.
We will talk about Ukraine when you tell me who killed JFK.
Wait, wait, wait.
How about this?
If the Jews did it, say nothing.
Well, look, I can't tell you anything.
I knew it!
But I didn't say the Jews did...
I knew it!
Nikolai, go get the vodka!
Yes! Yes, the good vodka!
It's the bottle that says "Only drink if Jews kill JFK!" Look, frankly, I wouldn't celebrate just yet, laddie.
it was...
Russian Jew?
No! No, it wasn't a Russian Jew.
Zorova! Pass me the vodka across expensive giant tables!
You could argue it's disrespectful.
I mean...
It's not as referential as it should be.
They'll use any reason to celebrate.
They really will.
Yeah, and they'll use any reason to create giant tables for no reason.
No reason whatsoever.
Mission Control, can you say that for new viewers who are coming?
I don't know if you're aware of this.
They have absurdly, cartoonishly large tables in Russia, and I don't understand it.
Is it a cultural thing?
And only two people.
Only two people.
Every day is Thanksgiving in Russia.
That's right.
With an empty table with two individuals on it.
By the way, right now Zelensky and Trump are apparently speaking as well.
This seems like good progress.
Conversations going on.
That's nice, right?
Yeah.
That's how you come to a ceasefire and stop the killing.
By the way.
I know this is small and anecdotal, but do you know who really likes this peace deal right now?
The 175 people coming home, especially the 23 severely wounded people who probably thought they were going to die in Russian captivity.
They're probably pretty happy today.
It's a small first step, but it's important.
And Russian prisons, I mean, they make our state prisons look like resorts.
It's about as bad as it gets.
The gulag is nice!
Yeah, it's nothing but starvation and back tattoos.
Let's be honest.
You ever seen Eastern Promises?
By the way.
It's that without the creature comforts.
It's the only scene I've ever seen where you see a guy's Johnson in a fight.
I'm happy for these guys.
Going home back to Ukraine?
Yeah.
Good for them.
I hope they get a couple weeks off before they can conscript it back to the front lines.
Yeah, I know.
You have the table?
You have the table?
Show the table to people.
I got a couple for you.
There's one.
Oh, that one's the best.
There we go.
There you go.
I said, could you pass mashed potatoes?
He slides the borscht over.
Hey, you spill it!
Everywhere!
Come on, that's not how we treat borscht.
He smells.
I need large tables so I don't smell him.
Hey, who added extra chair?
It's going to be too crowded.
I like to spread my...
There is one random chair.
No!
This is two-seater!
Why would you put him all the way down there?
That's the best part is that it is a coop and it should have all these chairs lining it.
You know, he's using that as leverage.
He's like, this chair.
Could be you.
Yes, one day.
I don't think.
Is it you one day?
Maybe not.
Maybe?
Maybe not.
You'd be my left-handed man.
Let's play musical chairs.
That's right.
Stop music when only I am near a chair.
Maybe you go sit it.
Kids' table.
It is the size of banquet hall.
It's for the table.
Yes, the wedding table.
Yes, that's right.
It's got a little surplus, okay?
Somebody had a good idea about tables.
And here's another claim.
It's a dirty bomb that goes off from the media.
Their attacks aren't just reserved for Donald Trump.
Caroline Levitt, right?
The accusation now is that Caroline Levitt doesn't understand geography.
So CNN, a lot of mainstream media said this, and then a bunch of ex-users, sort of Ukraine activists like Jay and Keefe, posted, Seems Putin convinced Trump that the Zafarisia power plant is on the border of Ukraine and Russia when it's actually hundreds of kilometers inside Ukraine.
Well, that would be really stupid if she didn't know that, right?
Here's the truth.
She was referring to the border as it relates to the lines of control, meaning where the fighting is.
That border has shifted.
Let me give you an example.
If the United States, let's say, were to, I don't know, conquer Canada.
Pretty easy.
And they would have a war, and the borderline of control moved up to midway through Alberta, right?
That doesn't change our national borders, but we're discussing this issue in contention because that's where the fighting is taking place.
And it couldn't be more clear when you understand the context, and watch it yourself.
The president referenced power plants with a conversation with Vladimir Putin.
What is he referring to with power plants?
What is that?
There's a power plant that is on the border of Russia and Ukraine that was up for discussion with the Ukrainians, and he will address it in his call with Putin tomorrow.
The nuclear plant.
Correct.
And that power plant is located right there on the Russian side of the lines of control, which really have not been moved a whole lot.
Nope.
So, pretty clear.
All of this is just fluff.
I just think it's, well, from the media, because they don't want to focus on what is actually going on.
I want to get to this.
Could a ceasefire be reached?
All right.
Russia came in.
They have some preconditions here.
Let me read them for you.
They have demanded that Ukraine stop conscription, meaning forcing people into the military, mobilization, moving their military up to those borders.
You want to ask the question, okay, will Russia stop?
They didn't say that they would.
They are demanding, Russia is demanding that all foreign military aid and intelligence to Ukraine is stopped.
Okay?
Question would be, will Russia accept those same terms as far as China helping them?
Now, I want to be pretty clear here, because if I were Putin, I don't like Putin, Putin bad, to be clear, I also would come in hot.
Why?
Because you have to remember that Zelensky...
He went out there and just had a laundry list of demands.
Remember?
His laundry list of demands for him to even sit at the table was restore all Ukrainian territory.
He wanted security guarantees from NATO.
And he didn't talk about the concessions that they would make.
So Putin is coming in going, okay, I want this.
That's where we are.
He's not going to tip his hand and say, and we'll be willing to do that too.
They're both coming in and laying demands.
That's where we are at this point.
The media wants you to believe that Putin is not willing to make any concessions.
No, he just hasn't listed them yet.
He goes, you have demand?
I have demand.
Let's hash it out.
Let's talk.
Yes.
That's the whole part of this process.
I don't know why people misunderstand this and say Putin is just dictating the terms.
Nobody's accepted his terms.
Right.
Just like we didn't accept all of Zelensky's terms for this and say, yeah, exactly.
We're going to do that.
How about, what do you want?
What do you want?
All right, let's get in the room.
You said this.
You said this.
You're going to have to give somewhere.
Let's go.
Right.
Very simple.
And I think a really simple question to ask that I think everyone needs to, you have to sort of take your emotion out of this for a second.
All right.
You don't like Zelensky.
I don't like either of them.
I think Russia is corrupt.
I think Ukraine is corrupt.
I don't think it's our war.
Okay?
That's my opinion.
Fine.
Take your emotions out of it.
All right.
What's the alternative?
So you're mad about Putin listing demands.
What did you think it was going to do?
What's the alternative?
Not have a conversation?
That only guarantees, with 100% certainty, Continuing war with no changes.
So a genuine question to people out there who have a problem with this meeting taking place, what would you prefer to see happen?
More spending from the U.S.?
More spending from Europe?
Don't get into the pie in the sky.
Well, Russia should just give everything.
That's not going to happen.
Any other scenario, by the way, I don't know if you know this, Ukraine has changed hands back and forth quite a few times.
This has been a conflict for a while.
If the rest of the world did not get involved, Ukraine is now Russia.
So what's the alternative?
I hear a lot of people bitching.
We don't even know what the ceasefire will look like yet.
This is the phase where they're both listing their demands.
I would be willing to bet that if Zelensky was not an entitled, spoiled prick, and rather than just listing demands, also listed the concessions, the compromises, Putin might as well.
Putin doesn't see himself as fighting Ukraine.
He's pissed.
I guarantee you, put yourself in the mindset of Putin.
Doesn't mean he's a good guy.
He's going, this used to be between you and me, Ukraine.
Why can't you fight me like a man you have to bring in NATO and you are a pussy boy?
He sees himself as fighting the entire Western world.
Because he is.
Yeah.
It's not until recently that supporting somebody financially and giving them arms wasn't seen as a sign of war.
I know that we did that in the World War era.
I get it.
In World War II, we did the Lend-Lease program and all that stuff.
I get all of that, but it's not the same thing.
I mean, Russia takes a loss in the global war on terror.
No, I know.
I mean, it's common, but I'm just like, how is that not at war with somebody?
I would be so pissed if I was the leader.
I'd be like, you're not fighting me, but you're giving him the weapons to fight me.
Right.
It's the only reason he's still there.
No, that's exactly right.
He's furious about that, and Zelensky is basically grandstander going, and we will have never-ending support from...
All of these countries.
I don't know if they say that.
Well, you know, it's just...
Loose translation.
It's a loose translation.
I don't want to get admonished.
Yeah, no.
Don't you dare, Tim.
They say it.
I guarantee you someone has said nanny, nanny, nanny, nanny, boo-boo, boo-boo.
So I'm...
Admonish him.
Admonish.
Take it.
Take it, how cool it comes to you.
Well earned.
Yes.
Shoot.
So, President Trump understands this.
He understands the alternative.
He's not stupid.
He also knows...
What we're dealing with as it relates to Iran.
Please give me a second here.
Because I know that you have people online now saying there's propaganda trying to basically drive us into a war with Iran.
No.
I don't believe that we should be destroying Iran's potential nuclear reactor sites.
But no one's actually discussing that.
To then take that message that people would mostly agree with.
You're watching right now.
I'm willing to bet that you agree.
You don't want us to get into a nuclear war with Iran.
And then somehow use that to make the argument that Iran's not a threat at all because they've never killed an American on American soil.
I don't understand it.
Iran every few years.
I mean, they have an ass-kicking coming their way since 79. Let's be clear about that.
But more importantly, every few years they're like, we're going to break the whole system.
We're going to burn it all down.
And they're always on the path to nukes.
Now, how close they are, it seems like that's been a moving line.
They keep getting closer if not for the Israelis.
Yeah, it's like the Monty Python when they're running over the hill and then you realize it's the exact same spot again.
But they're using an abacus to do their equations.
Yes, exactly.
So I am seeing people on the right, though, who are like, oh, they're no threat.
This is propaganda.
Iran's great.
Well, I don't want war with Iran, but they're awful.
Okay?
Last week, President Trump threatened...
Iran.
He said that if they kept supporting the Houthis, they would have hell to pay.
He wrote this on truth.
He wrote, to Iran, support for the Houthi terrorists must end immediately, and if you do, beware.
You're in for a scare.
Because America will hold you fully accountable, and we won't be nice about it.
Which I thought went with, beware.
What is a nice way to do it?
But now you have this new campaign online denouncing war with Iran.
Well, who's talking about war with Iran?
Oh.
Iran?
The usual suspects, they're not talking about war with Iran in a vacuum.
They're saying we're fighting Israel's battles for them.
Why are we controlled by Israel going to war in Iran?
We have no issue with them.
Yeah.
Shut up, Jake Shields.
I don't think we should be going to war with Iran over Israel.
I agree with that.
That doesn't mean that Iran has not expressly threatened the United States repeatedly, and that through a series of policy missteps, certainly the Obama administration, they are a potentially increasing nuclear threat.
We need to be aware of that.
I hope I'm clear.
Russia, Ukraine, not our war at all.
Iran, we shouldn't be at war with them right now, but I absolutely think that we should put some pressure on them.
And by pressure, I mean, you know, things.
Let's start with reversing, for example, the billions of dollars that were unfrozen under the Obama and Biden administration.
Is it enough pressure?
I mean, that's heavy to carry those things.
Yep.
Yep.
But here's the thing.
What you're seeing now from these factions on the right, I don't know if you know this, and I'm curious to see where you line up.
I think that, again, you are the mainstream.
There's a reason that so many of you tune in.
You don't spend your days on X and on Facebook engaging in just social clickbait.
You actually have jobs, right?
Most Americans think, hey, yeah, I hope Israel beats Hamas, and I think we're probably sending too much money, and Israel's certainly not perfect.
That's a pretty reasonable opinion.
Everyone I talk to shares that opinion.
If you go online, it's the Jews can do no right, the Jews can do no wrong.
Very few people line up that way, and I'm not.
Falsely, I'm not misrepresenting anyone here as a moderate.
I'm saying...
Because Democrats have been saying this exact same thing, only they were doing it after the killing of Soleimani in 2020.
Donald Trump ordered the killing of Iran's top general.
What happened to peace, huh?
When most people break their resolutions, they eat ice cream instead of working out.
This guy rained down fire on these motherfuckers.
He ate ice cream while doing it.
Look, I don't know what the president's motivation here is, but I think it was a reckless decision that increased the risk to Americans all around the world.
We're getting more bogged down in the Middle East, more endless war.
It's the same guy.
Nothing to really gain from.
And in that sense, I think Trump's talking points on this issue are not incorrect, but he is not acting on those talking points because he's now...
Taking us to the precipice of war, and we may actually end up in a war.
Just think about it.
Remember Barack Obama debating Mitt Romney?
He said, no, no, no, the 1980s called.
They want their policy back.
So now the Democrats think that Russia is the greatest threat, and now you have people on the right saying that an Islamic regime who, by the way, openly says they want to see the destruction of all Western civilization is not.
And the talking points are strangely similar, almost verbatim.
Is anyone else having their eyebrows raised over this?
And I would imagine, by the way, dealing with all the chatter, probably pretty tough for President Trump.
Good news is, former President George W. Bush has been on the trail here, giving some ex-presidential advice.
Here's some advice.
Trust me when I tell you, being president is tough.
Foreign policy is hard.
Economy goes up and down.
War sucks.
It's more important to find time for yourself.
They might be saying bad things about you on television, but if you finish the course at six strokes under par, who gives a shit?
Take yourself to the bar.
Have yourself a couple of drinks on dick.
Maybe go home, squeeze your wife's tush, give her some lovin', some much-needed lovin', and take her out to the ranch and show her how a real horse bucks.
Gross.
Wasn't the best president, but he's...
I'd have a beer with him if he still drank beer.
Absolutely.
Seems like a guy you could kind of hang out with.
On the war with Iran thing, right?
We already said how the media is kind of overplaying this, but people were actually saying, and I think I even quoted it, so maybe I need an admonishment for this, Tim.
About three carriers being sent.
To Iran or to, you know, in proximity.
You did say that yesterday.
False.
I did say I'm not 100% sure.
I didn't make it with absolute certainty.
Well, that's a map of the world.
Oh, is that where all the carriers are?
Thanks, Gerald.
It's really small on my screen.
I was like, what are those little dots?
Oh, okay.
That says carrier.
Okay.
So people are just, they're kind of drumming this up into this much larger thing than it actually is right now.
Not just the media, mainstream media doing this, but people on the right, on this far right fringe that's going out there and throwing this out there like it's the only thing that we're going to war with Iran.
No, we're not.
He's negotiating.
This is what he does.
Yeah. Why did you give him room when he said stuff like this about the economy or he said stuff like this about what he was going to do domestically?
And you won't give him the same kind of space to do it internationally.
This is what he does.
Right. He did it his first term.
It was very successful.
Leave him alone and let him do it.
As far as terrorism, look, Iran, I'd argue Qatar.
Probably the greatest threats, certainly the biggest funders of terrorism.
Yes.
As far as economically, who we have to be worried about?
China.
And we do want to sort of keep on our radar an unlikely alliance that could form between China and Russia.
There are some concerns there.
We want to avoid war, right?
Not at all costs, but at most costs.
And we need to be able to identify which ones are worth fighting.
Being anti-war doesn't mean no war.
And being anti-war doesn't mean no strategic strikes.
Being anti-war doesn't mean living.
In a utopia where you believe you have no enemies.
Iran is certainly an enemy to the United States.
Doesn't mean we need to nuke them.
I don't know who it helps to not recognize them as the evil.
And threaten them a little bit.
Yeah, a little bit.
By the way, do some research on Iran, people, before you start commenting.
This is a death cult.
Yes!
The only way they bring about the end of the world in a positive way, read up on the 12th Imam and what they have to do.
There has to be chaos and global conflict for it to happen, so when you're pursuing a nuclear weapon and you have that ideology, not the people, the leadership, the people in charge, that's kind of scary!
You're trying to have the weapon...
That's not even real!
That's not even real!
That was for the carriers.
That's why the better!
Because you just made some really salient points and it was all discredited in one strip motion of the finger.
To those of you who are new and you ask, is this an abusive work environment?
Absolutely.
And we would have it no other way.
I'm glad you did it because Gerald's put me to sleep over here.
I was out and I was like, oh!
The world, nuclear bombs.
Boring.
Next time when I can't sleep I'll count EMOMs.
There's only twelve.
You won't get very far.
Hope you're asleep at three.
That's about as far as I can go because I wear socks when I sleep.
One imam.
And uh.
That puts me to sleep.
By the way, do download the Rumble app.
Please, if you are watching right now, the lineup, Tim Pool is going to come up after this.
Number one shows in their time slot.
This is work.
It's an experiment that is working voluntarily, banding together so that you get more content.
Download the app.
Follow.
Me on the app.
Well, that's joining Rumble Premium, but there you go.
Download the app, follow me, you get notifications.
Rumble, we own live.
We're going back to live broadcasting.
Remember that?
Where it's not all just a pre-tape and a short clip and a short clip and a short clip and a short clip until your brain is mush?
Yeah, and these people used to be on islands, too.
We're all in a lineup now.
Just keep watching from us to the next people and go.
Yep.
My brain's already mush.
Keep it live, baby.
Yep.
What?
Sure.
I'm still just so happy about Gerald's admonishment.
It's hard for me to move on.
It brought me great joy.
But we have a lot to get to here.
The JFK files.
Oh, this will be fun.
Okay, they're out.
Let me ask you this.
You think that maybe we just got Epstein'd again?
And by that I mean there's been well over half a century to change, alter, delete aspects of these files.
And the primary question is, Is there new information?
Is there new evidence?
Have we been given something here that is groundbreaking and changes what we thought we knew regarding the assassination of JFK, to be clear?
Now, before we get into anything else, there clearly, I'm not telling you that there, I'm not trying to sell this any other way.
There clearly was something suspicious about a president of the United States driving down
Downtown in a convertible, which, granted, was even recognized at that time as heard by the newly leaked audio from the Secret Service themselves.
Wait, are you telling me that we're putting the President of the United States in a drop-top convertible in downtown Dallas driving slowly?
Do I have that right?
Oh, God!
Told ya.
It was self-explanatory, like this, and that it couldn't be explained.
It was buried forever.
It was buried forever.
Honestly, it leaves more questions than it answers, one could argue.
So, here's the thing.
There were 80,000 pages, give or take, released yesterday, on top of the 5 million pages, effectively, already released.
Here's a clip.
Thousands of pages from the JFK assassination files released tonight at the behest of President Trump.
We have a tremendous amount of paper.
You've got a lot of reading.
I don't believe we're going to redact anything.
I said, just don't redact.
You can't redact.
That was him yesterday at the aptly named Kennedy Center.
And yes, we all have a lot of reading to do now.
1,123 new files worth of reading, all posted by the National Archives.
And no, we have not gone through each and every page yet.
All right, we get it.
You want us to know you can read.
We're going to get through these claims that are out there.
And I hate, there's a lot of misinformation out there.
You have legacy media, and then you have clickbait.
And there are several different timelines.
I want to set the stage here.
Remember, we told you this, so nothing up our sleeve.
We told you this yesterday.
Okay.
There's a starting off point as to what we already know.
And we were clear about it.
That's important because we need to compare what we know today.
This was yesterday.
So, what we do know, Lee Harvey Oswald was there.
Okay?
Right.
He was there at that book depository.
There's physical evidence on the sixth floor window of the rifle that he bought.
There were multiple eyewitnesses placing Oswald at the scene.
And here's what we also know.
The CIA and the FBI definitely knew about Lee Harvey Oswald.
He was on the government radar when he defected to the Soviet Union in 1959.
He was a person of interest.
They had been tracking him depending on the time period.
So he was there.
Some people say he's not the only shooter.
Okay, we'll get to all that.
And the FBI, the CIA, knew about him.
Okay, so we already knew that without this release.
Anything new, that brings us to another installment of Claim Truth.
All right, a big claim circulating right now.
Yeah.
Claim.
Groundbreaking.
Revelation.
Meaning new.
Former CIA operative Gary Underhill was killed for exposing the plot.
We just found this out yesterday.
Okay, here's the truth.
There's nothing new here.
This is old.
This is not new, according to these documents.
Now, I'm not saying that there is nothing suspicious about the death of Underhill.
Correct.
What I'm saying is that the memo that is now going viral, that you believe is from yesterday's dump, Is actually from 2017 documents that were released on JFK.
Under Donald Trump as well.
Under Donald Trump as well.
I think that's an important one, again, to set the tone here.
I'm not saying that this information is irrelevant.
I'm not even saying that it's untrue.
What I am saying is people are presenting this to you as though it is new.
Reason being?
This would be more of a bombshell than anything that was found in there last night.
If you want to discuss it, fine.
But people have been discussing this for quite a long time.
Not just the memo in 2017.
You can find old magazine articles, books from 1967, Ramparts Magazine, 1992, Destiny Betrayed.
This just proves...
Here's something else.
Is this new evidence?
Some people are saying, well, there's new evidence that proves Underhill was killed.
No.
What you see in the documents, it's just...
It's just Underhill's claim that he made to officials.
Well, and it's sort of.
It's through secondhand.
It's basically the people he was said to have left very hurriedly to get out of town, and he went to stay with people in Jersey and made this claim to them.
And being interviewed, those people said, he said this.
Yes.
So, okay.
But it has to be put in the file.
Yes, and also an investigation has to take place, which, you know.
Exactly.
So this has been something that's been known, and people have been suspicious of it since 1967.
You can draw your own conclusions.
And by the way, I think there are different conclusions to draw.
This is a problem because our government has not been transparent with us.
Yeah.
Okay?
Circumstances around his death are very, very sketchy.
Yes.
But anyone telling you that this is new or groundbreaking or a bombshell is either lying to you or they have been lied to.
When I see something circulating since 2017 presented as though it was just released last night, ooh, okay, I have a problem with it.
Comment below if you agree.
And it matters.
It does matter.
It doesn't matter because the left will use that to discredit anything that you say.
Here's another claim that's been circulating.
Revelation!
We just found out that JFK called Joe Biden a traitor.
Okay.
Here's the truth.
Stupid.
No.
Now, I'll clarify.
We know now that it's JFK Jr.
I know that.
But some people didn't present it as JFK Jr.
When I saw this last night, again, upon the initial release, I just did some math in my head.
I said, wait, JFK, hold on, we're going back to 63. Biden would have been in his early 20s, college or law school.
There's no way that this could have taken place.
And so I was able to discount it as clickbait.
Now, what actually...
Is kind of included there is that JFK Jr. called Biden a traitor.
That's what people are claiming.
But here's another truth.
It doesn't seem like JFK Jr. did that either.
Well, come on.
Again, the image floating around that you believe is from this new dump from more than seven years ago.
Now, it's been debunked if you believe Congress.
They said this is not true.
It's a hoax.
If you don't believe them...
That's fine, too.
All we have, as far as proof, is that someone sent Biden a letter calling him a traitor and listing JFK Jr.'s name.
That's what's in here.
It's not new.
You can believe that it's true or not, that it's a hoax.
It seems relatively inconsequential.
Again, JFK Jr. not liking Joe Biden at that point in time, who likely would have been some kind of political opponent.
This is the standard here.
What insight does this provide into the assassination of JFK?
Thank you.
Anything.
Anything.
Because people here, we really are.
We're fixated on truth.
And we got screwed on the Epstein files.
And I feel like we're being screwed with this.
Suspicious circumstances?
Yes.
Do I think we'll ever know the full truth?
Probably not.
It doesn't help, though, to fill our news feeds with lies.
Here's another claim.
Boo!
The CIA exclusively requested the elimination of any and all mentions of Israel.
That would be a bombshell.
But the truth is that there have been plenty of redactions surrounding other countries.
And by the way, there were more redactions as it relates to Israel in previous documents than here.
And you see Israel mentioned.
Are there some?
Sure.
But the same can be said for the USSR, for Cuba, for Mexico.
In some instances, they're redacted, and in some, they are not.
Now, can you say there's something there as far as a redaction?
Sure you can.
Can you make the claim that the redactions only apply to Israel?
Well, we know it's not true, because you're literally listing where Israel's mentioned!
This is so stupid.
Sources and methods.
Protection.
If you look at what was being talked about in some of the stuff that's going around right now, they're like, look, they didn't want to say Israel.
They wanted to say the information came from something else that's more nebulous.
Yes.
Because if you say it came from a certain place, it makes it easier to identify that guy.
Do you want the information to keep flowing?
Or do you want it to stop because he got killed?
I don't know if you understand this spy versus spy kind of stuff that was going on at the time.
There were spies in the United States that could have gotten that information potentially and gone and killed the source.
And by the way, spying has gone on between governments.
Let me simplify this.
Oh, you mean nations have national interests?
Oh, what a nightmare!
This has been going on.
That's so stupid!
France has been spying on us!
We got caught spying on France!
They kicked out American spies!
We were like...
We were surprised that France had any capability to do anything.
Like, how'd you find them?
Did they tell you?
Good one, France.
Good for you.
We bugged a baguette.
So, again, sure, sure, Israeli intelligence could have been involved at some point.
But it's not true to say that only redactions for Israel and all mentions of Israel.
Because here's another truth.
There are plenty mentions of Israel-ness that are...
Not redacted.
As a matter of fact, things that were previously redacted, that reference Israel, are now unredacted.
So, if Donald Trump, and I see this, if he's an Israeli shill, wouldn't it still be redacted?
If this was a cover-up to protect Israel, why would he release new documents that undo the redactions?
It's no longer redacted.
And by the way, there's a good reason that it's not redacted, because there's nothing super consequential there.
There's claims in some places that are very spurious at best, but I'm sorry, I thought he was owned by Putin.
Is he also owned by Israel?
Is there anybody else that owns Donald Trump that we need to know?
Oh, Xi Jinping, that's right.
He's pretty soft on China.
It's like a timeshare.
I don't really understand this now.
Right.
It's getting confusing.
Jiang Un owns him a little as it...
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
As opposed to every Democrat who's run for office who have like 10 mega donors.
Or Bernie Sanders and Big Pharma.
More donations than anyone with small donors.
Shut up.
Here's...
The next claim that we're seeing going around, right?
Again, breaking!
Oh my god!
Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald met prior to the assassination.
Here's the truth.
In no way is this breaking.
And it's a spurious accusation, I guess, at best, and there's no new evidence that solidifies it one way or the other.
You can...
You can draw the conclusion that you want, but it won't be based on new information.
Okay, there was the Warren Commission report.
There were subsequent investigations.
They didn't find any evidence of Ruby and Oswald even knowing each other.
Since at least 2008, the report of this Ruby-Oswald meeting before the assassination, it's been spoken about for a very long time.
There hasn't been a smoking gun so far, and there is no significant smoking gun here.
Maybe they could have!
But there's nothing here that says they did, and there's nothing new!
Maybe Oswald went to Ruby's Bar Mitzvah or something.
Maybe he went to Ruby's before they went bankrupt.
Ruby Tuesdays.
Oh, Ruby Tuesdays?
I've never been.
Is JFK shot on a Tuesday?
That would be a coincidence.
That would be mind-blowing, dude.
Especially if there was someone at the salad bar with a yarmulke.
Why'd you take all the tomatoes?
Yes.
I don't know cherry tomatoes.
I don't trust them.
You don't know they're bad until they explode in your mouth.
I only eat Roma.
Were you about to say something, Noodles?
Was it Tuesday?
I'm verifying right now.
He laughed and he's like, maybe it was.
I was laughing because I thought it was mind-blowing.
Oh.
You're sick.
That's twisted and you're sick.
I'm glad you got that one.
Thank you.
I had no idea I made that joke.
I'm trying to see how much more we have here.
Okay, good.
By the way, Rumble Premium, that's what allows this all to happen.
You notice only one sponsor per show.
Rumble Premium is Mug Club.
Mug Club is Rumble Premium.
$99 annually or $9.99 a month.
We're going to continue for another 45 minutes to an hour for Rumble Premium members.
You get everything ad-free.
You get this entire lineup that you see.
not only the free lineup, but even more.
And I believe right now you can get $20 off if you use the promo code RUMBLE.
Yeah, RUMBLE.
That's right.
That's a great deal.
I don't know if I'm missing anything.
Do we want to go on to what it is that we actually have learned?
No, I think so.
And by the way, he was killed on Friday, 11-22, so November 22nd.
That's just what the Jews would want you to think.
That's a bummer.
Come on, that's not a Jewish conspiracy.
Well, maybe Ruby Tuesday has some kind of deal with TGI Fridays.
Yeah, there you go.
Exactly.
Owned by the same company, and guess what?
They're Jews.
Yep.
I was wondering about TGI Shabbat.
You had a TGI Fridays in Kandahar.
Really?
I swear to God, dude.
Do you guys understand this?
The Sabbath starts Friday at sundown.
I know.
Oh, no.
And that was the last sundown.
For one guy.
Now.
What do you think we're trying to be?
I didn't kill him!
Come on!
Uh-oh.
Take it up with, I would say, Lee Harvey Oswald, but whoever you think, I guess, at this point.
Uh-oh.
Give it a whirl.
So what did we learn?
Well, like we said yesterday, the CIA clearly knew about Lee Harvey Oswald.
That's suspicious.
It really comes down to, is it negligence, or did they play a role in it?
I lean towards role.
I'm not so sure that Oswald was being very secretive.
I don't think it was like, hey, we got a hot tip on this Oswald guy.
He defected to USSR.
The USSR media even talked about him by name.
I don't think that he was low-key about hating Kennedy or hating the United States.
Especially his...
I'm going to kill Kennedy bumper sticker.
Only one sold.
And then right underneath it, no, I'm serious.
Presidential assassin on board.
Student driver?
Student hitman.
No, he definitely wasn't low-key.
But they were, I believe, keeping tabs on him like 59 days before the assassination.
Really pretty close.
It does seem like they were more concerned about him.
Then, certainly, you were let on to know initially.
Right?
There's kind of a different timeline.
There's what you were told initially, where you have to understand, at that point in time, pretty much no Americans were given the side of the story as far as the CIA.
That came out.
Now, that's come out over the course of the last half a century.
There's nothing new there.
But yeah, the American people were initially lied to, which, of course, you see now that breeds conspiracy theories in the absence of truth.
You saw the same thing with COVID.
And the problem is, there's a lot of truth to some of the conspiracies regarding COVID.
For example...
Hit the YouTube dump, because they won't let us say this there anymore, even though we don't care, so we're going to be streaming to rumble.
The fact is, the complications are significantly higher for particularly men in their 30s, and far fewer children have been killed by COVID total than a single flu season.
That's true.
The idea that Bill Gates has created a mind-control chemical chip that is being injected into you so he can take over farmland, not so much.
And so, when you understand the government has lied to you...
It's reasonable to try and fill in the gaps, but I would also caution you, just please be prudent, because yesterday's conspiracy theories are today's truth, but you can also go too far.
That's why I have this shirt on today.
Alex Jones' right shirt.
Some things that I do find interesting, though, like Oswald did, he visited, spent a lot of time in the Soviet Union.
Cuban embassies, by the way, too.
I believe he, both embassies in Mexico City, weeks before the assassination.
To explain why Mexico might have been redacted in previous documents.
Yeah, might explain it.
There was a KGB agent, Nikonov, who was tasked with investigating Oswald's KGB connections.
He determined Oswald was not a KGB agent.
He was watched, Oswald, closely while visiting the USSR.
In other words, they were concerned about him, so that would provide some context.
Hey, if they were concerned about him in the USSR, seems our own intelligence community should have done a better job.
He was on everybody's radar.
He was on everybody's radar?
Hey, Kennedy, you might want to watch out for this guy.
Yes.
Except for the Dallas police.
Hey, Kennedy, I just got a phone call from this guy Lee.
He says he's going to kill you.
It's weird.
It's weird.
I don't know why he called me, but heads up!
Heads up?
Really?
Yeah, yeah.
I'd avoid convertibles in major cities anytime soon, but you know that!
Heads back into the left.
I mean, there's a lot...
My take, if I had to guess still, CIA knew they were in no rush to sort of quell any threats.
To JFK, it's well known that he did not like the CIA, especially the intelligence community after the Bay of Pigs.
We know that.
Something very interesting to me, though.
Not only is there no overt evidence that Cuba or the USSR was behind the assassination, the more you read this, it's actually, it's quite clear that they didn't, as far as I would wager, Cuba, because they were concerned.
That the CIA had carried out the assassination to frame them.
Yeah.
Oh no!
They're gonna pin it on us, bro!
Yeah, that's exactly right.
Like, that to me is most interesting.
It's not Cuban.
In other words, when you look at the communications between Cubans, they were going like, oh my, this has CIA written all over it, they're gonna try and blame it on us, and they're gonna try and use it as an excuse to bomb us.
So, that to me was probably the most enlightening moment, going, okay, because I thought maybe the Cubans, there could have been something retaliatory.
It makes sense.
Seems they were concerned with covering their own asses, and the Cubans believed the CIA was in on it to frame them.
We can't confirm that the CIA was in on it to frame them, but that was their concern.
That's interesting and worth exploring to me.
Yes, Noodles?
I was just going to say, in overlay, they went so far as to say that they thought, therefore, a third world war will start.
Yeah.
Yes.
Yeah, the Cubans really did think that.
Which, again, wouldn't make sense if they were involved with it.
There is a theory that, like, three or four different governments were involved and three didn't get the hit.
There's that, yeah.
Ah, they got them first!
Right.
Yeah.
Like, he was on a lot of radars for people.
They were trying to find a way to kill him.
Well, he was on the radar.
You mean Lee Harvey Oswald?
Yeah, of course he was on the radar.
He was the president of the United States.
He was banging every model in D.C. That's true, because it's true.
It's true.
And we won in Denver.
What?
John Denver?
Why would you go to Denver for that?
He swung both ways.
That's not true at all.
No, what I'm saying is that there were a number of nations that wanted to take him out.
Oh my gosh, I didn't realize we're going late.
Okay, we're fine.
Here's something else.
There was an interview in there with Sergey.
I don't know if I can...
Now, this is going around where people are saying, oh my gosh, we now have proof that they knew about the MLK assassination because this guy, Sergei, actually told authorities, ah, here's the thing.
He made the claims well after these events had taken place, claiming that he had gone to the authorities before the events had taken place.
So he said, at 9 a.m. on August 19th, 1963, in Washington, D.C., I went to see Mr. Kipping and Department State.
I told the director that I have information about President Kennedy.
I said, Mr. Lee Harvey Oswald will be killed after Kill Kennedy.
I said, I will take truth drug to tell the truth, because I know you won't believe me because I am Russian.
And I sound drunk.
And then he said, and about MLK, I said...
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. will be killed.
Who will kill Dr. King Jr., Negro leader?
I'm saying it.
These are his words, not mine, though I don't have a problem with it.
I said a man who is in prison at this time.
Now, people are going back saying, oh, there was a guy in prison who did kill MLK Jr.
Okay, fine.
But he made these claims, I believe, you guys can let me know, in 67 or in 68, he was claiming retroactively.
It's like a psychic claiming they called it back then, but you don't have any proof of it.
He also claimed he was harassed, tortured by the Secret Service and FBI.
Oh, no, wait, sorry.
I have it right here.
1978.
1978.
He said that he went to them in 1963.
Many, many, many, many years.
Again, these are the layers.
What you're being told is new today, what is being presented as evidence, and when things happened.
People today are telling you, hey, this is new evidence from when it happened.
The truth is, it's not new, and the evidence is actually a claim made.
You know, 10, 15 years after it happened.
Everything has to be included in this report.
That's kind of how it works.
And by the way, there's been over half a century to destroy, to alter, to delete.
Did anyone think we were actually going to get something groundbreaking?
I didn't.
What bothers me more is people preying on you and taking advantage of your good graces for viewership and hopefully we've done a good job of helping you, educating you.
We're going to continue.
We're over time, right?
We are one minute over time.
I'm going to send it to Tim Pool because I know he's going to talk about this too and have some questions.
Absolutely.
So if you are watching, if you're not a Rumble Premium member, just keep watching.
You will be taken to Tim Pool.
Show him you love him.
And if you are a Rumble Premium member, you get to continue with us for the next 45 minutes.
Oh my gosh.
We're going to actually...
Toolman, can you cut me right at the end of this because I need to tell people what we're going to play.
But cut it at that last word.
Want me to run the stinger and...
Cut it before.
▲
Export Selection