All Episodes
July 29, 2024 - Louder with Crowder
01:04:50
DÉJÀ VU: Google is Rigging the Election Against Trump AGAIN and Here’s How
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
the brilliance and the impact of Black Lives Matter.
History is going to show was an inflection point.
It's going to be a lot of fun.
For too long the status quo thinking has been you get more safety by putting more cops on the street.
Well that's wrong.
Defund the police.
It's not just a moment, it is a movement.
They're not gonna stop.
Defund the police!
Oh my god!
They're not gonna stop.
And that's, they're not, this is a movement, I'm telling you.
This is part of a movement.
This movement will not be deterred.
I'm tired of my black men and my black women being shot!
All right, this is getting serious.
Oh, oh, oh my goodness!
Defund the police.
Some of the success that we've been able to achieve around criminal justice reform would not have happened in recent years were it not for Black Lives Matter.
And everyone beware, because they're not going to stop.
They're not going to stop before Election Day in November, and they're not going to stop after Election Day.
And that should be, everyone should take note of that.
Black Lives Matter has been the most significant agent And we should not.
Join Mug Club today for $89 annually or try it Mugless for $9 a month.
You can sign up at ladderwithcreditor.com slash mugclub for the entire catalog including Nick DiPaolo, Brian Callen,
the Hot Twins, Mr. Guns N' Gear, and of course Alex Jones along with 100% more of this show.
Thanks for watching.
Ah, wonderful.
It's Monday, but I look forward to that.
What do you look forward to on Monday?
Comment below.
I'm kidding.
Wouldn't that suck as a comment?
Like, hey, comment, subscribe, like, love me!
On Mondays.
Let's go to the rundown.
A lot to get to today.
First off, we will have Clay Travis on as a guest.
Looking forward to having Mr. Travis on as a guest.
You know him.
Most of you love him.
Some of you don't, but I don't care.
We're going to get into the freest, the safest, most fair election of all time with Google, the most powerful company in the world right now, by proxy YouTube, completely memory-holing the Donald Trump assassination attempt, as well as a lot of AI programs out there.
And the Olympic ceremony, I don't know if you noticed, pretty gay.
So we're going to be talking about that, but we can't show it on YouTube.
We cannot show on YouTube the Olympic ceremonies or the debauchery therein because of the IOC and because of the copyrights.
So if at any point today you see this, head on over because there's a lot of gay stuff on Rumble that we need to show you at the Olympics so you understand.
That's not a good advertisement!
And along with the memory holing, look, today we are going to go through the top great lies, misquotes of Donald Trump that people still believe.
The very fine people on both sides, the bloodbath comment, the comment about injecting bleach.
Comment below, which one do you think is the most egregious example?
Which one sticks out in your mind when you talk to a leftist and you discuss Donald Trump?
What do they say?
You mean the guy who usually praised neo-nazis?
You mean the guy who called for an insurrection?
We're going to show you the clip that the media has run, along with the full context, because invariably it is incorrect.
It's a live show.
Weekdays, 10 a.m.
Eastern.
If you don't tune in, if you miss it, just tune in live.
That's the best way to watch it, because we have no idea how long we'll be on YouTube.
Number two, Gatton Morgan, CEO.
How are you?
I'm good.
How are you?
I'm okay.
Yeah?
Yeah, I'm fine.
Yeah, you have a good weekend?
I had a good weekend.
And Josh, when you hear him, you know him, you love him, you hear this music, that means it is him.
It's me!
And you can follow him on Instagram.
Josh underscore Firestein.
How are you, sir?
Yeah, I'm good, I'm good.
That intro reminded me of the new Ghostbusters movie, I just watched it.
Did you?
With my kids, and yeah, it was pretty mid.
It was pretty mid?
It wasn't bad, though.
That's better than an affront, like the Leslie Jones version.
Oh, that was so bad.
Yeah, that one, they put that out of the universe.
They were like, let's just make new ones and put kids in it instead.
Yeah, yeah.
They said, let's just act as though this one didn't happen.
Kind of like Halloween 3.
Yeah.
My kids are cute, though.
You know how they have little fake phones?
He's always, like, talking to them.
Like, who are you talking to?
Usually it's Grandma.
Now it's Ghostbusters.
Wouldn't that be weird?
Like, why are you calling it Ghostbusters?
Because there's ghosts out there.
Yeah, well that's also because when he talks to you, the grandma's dead, so that's weird.
Your son may be a medium.
Well, there's multiple grandmas, but yeah, he might be.
We might have to bust his ghost.
Yeah, he might have to.
I hope she's alive and a lovely lady.
Okay.
Let's get to, I don't know if, who could have seen this coming?
That the French were going to make something really gay.
No!
So, now it's not lost on me that the Olympics originally were pretty gay, okay?
To be clear, before you start getting into the historical context, I get it.
The Greeks, like, one of their events was just...
Take it out on this 12-year-old.
That was it.
How did you meddle?
They were just graded on style points.
That doesn't change the fact that we are now at a point where it is family viewing.
It is synonymous with, to a lot of people, patriotism.
And the opening ceremony is incredibly viewed in the middle of prime time television across the globe.
Now I want to be clear.
Some people have been wrong and have been misrepresenting the Olympic Opening Ceremony, but it's still pretty bad even when you do understand the context.
Unfortunately, I can't show you this on YouTube if you're watching there, so you're just going to see the Rumble button, and we will be showing all of this on Rumble because thank God they're not removing it.
So here, let's show you the IOC Opening Ceremony and see if you can spot the French gayness.
Rebecca Romijn in dirty work when she was a bearded lady.
Someone can bring up a side-by-side.
It's very circusy, for sure.
By the way, there were kids there.
Yes, of course there were kids there.
And if you look close enough at this cast of characters, speaking of cast, it ends up being like cannonball run French Olympics.
You can see this dude's balls.
Most likely.
Most likely.
It could be a stocking run.
It could.
Well, that's not, I mean, what's better?
Saying that my ball was out or Yeah, the dude's pantyhose had a rip in it.
Yes, true, yeah.
You know, that's normal.
Guys with their pantyhose are ripped.
And here's the Olympics, they came out and they tweeted this regarding the blue man.
Because this was seen as a mocking of the Last Supper, I still would argue that it was, because when they defended it, they didn't deny it at first.
They tweeted out, or X'd out, the interpretation of the Greek god Dionysus makes us aware that the... I don't know, he sounds German.
The absurdity of violence between human beings.
Yeah, it makes us aware of the absurdity of the violence between human beings.
Uh, I don't know if you've looked into, like, the first gods of Olympus, or, then they also talked about the Bacchnelians, and I guess it was a, some people said it was a Bacchus.
Like, they would have orgies until people lost limbs, uh, drugs.
Orgy!
Yeah, orgies with children.
So it doesn't make it that much better.
And you have to ask yourself, do I buy their defense when they say, oh, this has nothing to do with being sacrilegious or the Last Supper?
And, you know, that's not a pale horse, which, again, I want to focus on the drag queen issue because it's not art.
It's kind of art if your art requires no talent.
The ceremony designer, the artistic director, Thomas Jolly, is queer.
Here you go, that's how this person identifies.
Oh, let's just call him Jolly.
And yesterday they organized this apology to Catholics and Christians.
Clearly, there was never an intention to show disrespect to any religious group.
How about parents?
On the contrary.
I think that Imagineer really tried to celebrate community tolerance.
That was his word yesterday.
Looking at the results of the polls that we shared, we believe that this ambition was achieved.
If people have taken any offence, we are of course really, really sorry.
To quote Nick DiPaolo, maybe ISIS had a point.
One point.
Our point.
You watch this, you go, oh really?
So we really think it's about tolerance?
So drag queens and balls and small children around sexual degenerates.
What does this have to do with sports?
And by the way, I say this as somebody who knows very little about sports.
All I know is when I tune into the Olympics, I watch Olympic diving and I rate it by the splash.
That's all.
I see something, I have no idea what they're doing, the flips, I just look at it and there's no splash.
I go, 10!
And they put up their signs and I'm right.
And then I see a guy like jump and then there's like a little bit of pshh.
Zero!
Doesn't matter.
We'll see.
I am an expert.
I'm going to throw some bets out there.
We'll see.
You throw your pen.
You threw your pen again.
That's all I know about it.
No splash on that pen throw, by the way.
Nope.
No splash.
10 out of 10.
What a culture is supposed to do with the opening ceremony is highlight stuff within their culture.
France just basically said we're full of degenerates.
Striking lack of Muslims there.
France, be real.
Come on, Paris.
Look at what London or the London games in 2012.
It was hilarious.
It was Mr. Bean and a bunch of other stuff that was, like, British.
That was great.
The Chinese one was cool.
Yeah, Beijing was pretty awesome.
Beijing was really cool.
They had the 2008 drummers.
Kids making iPhones.
Atlanta was awful.
Atlanta was really boring.
I heard it was the bomb.
It was good.
The funniest part was Joe Frazier saying that he would push Muhammad Ali into the Olympic torch if people would move out of the way.
He still hated him to the day he died.
Like, how do you put that behind you?
No, man, I still want to push him in.
They were like, OK, Mr. Frazier, we're going to go back to these ceremonies.
And I would take that over runs and stockings and French balls around children.
This is where we are.
You can do it.
Does it offend me as a Christian?
No, I don't really get offended.
I just, it's mediocrity and it's disguising mediocrity with shock value.
That's the issue.
And of course it's not age appropriate.
No one's saying that you can't go be a bearded lady on your own time in your silly gay bars that you can do now as often as you want because, you know, PrEP pill's a thing.
But it shouldn't be done on primetime television.
This is the big thing, too.
Remember back in the day, like, South Park?
South Park, I was there when Matt Stone was addressing UT.
My brother used to go.
And he said, Christians never tried to ban us.
They just didn't want us on at 8 o'clock or 9 o'clock at night.
And we agreed with them.
The only time we ran into trouble was when we did the episode about Muhammad and Comedy Central refused to air the episode, so we told them, okay, but it's going to be a three-parter, and one of the episodes, now three, that you're paying for this season.
Christians don't try and ban anything.
They simply point out the double standard.
And Charlie Hebdo's not lost on me.
France learned their lesson.
Of course, they would never include that in these ceremonies.
No.
No.
The last jihad?
I don't think so.
No.
And here's something I will say.
Look, if you are a conservative, a Christian, someone who values, you know, any type of norms or traditions, If you won't boycott the Olympics, right, they come around once every four years, when this kind of display takes place, then just be honest, you're never gonna put your money where your mouth is.
I don't know how many people go, I'm tired of the NFL, but I gotta watch my Pats!
I don't know why they sound redneck if they're Patriots fans.
That is weird, yeah.
What are you willing to sacrifice?
Every four years, you know, I would have tuned in really just to wrestling, probably the judo.
Pretty funny story, there was a Muslim who refused to shake a Jew's hand, got his arm broken the very next match.
Oh, I love that.
Shoulder popped out.
Love that good karma.
Peace man.
Well, sorry.
What are you gonna stand for?
Alright.
And by the way... I think it just sucked, too, by the way.
I thought the Mary Antoinette and Gojira was pretty cool.
Okay, yeah, the metal bit.
What's it called?
Gojira?
Gojira.
Gojira.
Yeah, that was cool.
It was pretty epic.
On the little windows, you know, schools.
But the rest of it, I mean, that guy, it was like... It was terrible.
It was like... It sounded like a Brazilian beauty pageant.
That's exactly what it sounded like!
And it was like a... It was a bad song.
It wasn't exciting.
It was a bad guy.
I think that's the opening ceremony.
That's close.
Yes.
It was a bad guy in mediocre body paint and an even more mediocre body.
There was nothing required to make that art happen.
Like, hey, maybe you're an artist where your body is the sculpture.
You know, you're a bodybuilder.
Or you're an artist where your voice is your tool.
Or maybe you have an unbelievable makeup artist.
Someone just slapped some Home Depot paint on you on a chubby dude and called it a day.
There's spots missing, the beard's not...
We have better performances at the Macy's Day Parade, or Macy's Thanksgiving Day.
Are we too spoiled as Americans?
Is that it?
Am I asking for too much?
Well, our biggest export is pop culture, and no one likes to admit it.
By the way, speaking of pop culture and exports, you can go to CrowderShop.com and show people where you stand.
In style, go to CrowderShop.com.
You get everything that we wear here, you can wear there, and the Fight Like Hell shirt with Donald Trump.
Is that okay?
I'm horrible with plugs.
Alright.
I want to touch on something we'll have Clay Travis on in a little bit and then we'll talk about Google and the top five misquotes here on Donald Trump because they're making the rounds again.
A lot of people are now showing the enthusiasm for Kamala Harris.
They're saying, you know, look at this new poll and you're going to see this going all the way up until election time, just to be clear.
Because people on the left will say, and it's a Fox News poll no less!
I want to shine a light on something here.
A new Fox News poll.
Okay, first off, it kind of showed this race between Trump and Kamala being pretty tight, and it showed Kamala Harris winning in states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, or at least Hyde.
Right?
Yeah.
Wisconsin, I believe Trump is still up plus one.
Here's the thing.
People are saying, it's a Fox News poll.
So that shows you actually, you may not know this, Fox News, their polls, first off, they're not really legitimate polling agency.
And they actually are arguably the most far left According to the data.
So I want to be really clear, when people say, Fox News, therefore this is a conservative poll, they actually lean to the left of CNN on polling, and they are one of the least accurate pollsters.
So real clear politics, they even have ratings where they look at different pollsters, their margin of error.
And as far as national polls, 80% of the Fox News errors favor Democrats.
And in the 2016, those are generic ballot polls, in the 2016 and 2020 elections, just to be clear, the presidential elections, 100% Error rate in favor of Democrats with Fox News.
100% of the time, if they got a poll wrong, it lined up on the side of Democrats.
100% of the time.
So don't allow people to tell you, oh, this is a hate, what, are you denying reality?
Even the Fox News poll.
Just take away the word even.
Be like, well, of course, the bias, the propaganda, or the poorly conducted Fox News poll.
So do not allow this to demoralize you.
Don't become complacent.
But if anyone says, well, a Fox News poll, no less, as though it's conservative, you can dismiss whatever they say next, because they have no idea what they're talking about.
Right.
I know we're going to talk about this in a minute, but really quick, bring up, bring up CNN.
I guarantee you, I don't even have to look.
Ah, fudge, they just changed it.
So what they were saying is Trump again praises Hannibal Lecter.
I guarantee you that's going to be one of those things where it's like, of course he didn't praise Hannibal Lecter.
I do love that the anchor on CNN wore a nice bathrobe.
Oh, well, you got to do what you got to do when you're running out the door.
She looks like she had to rush to answer like the mailman.
Yeah, and they're trying to go with Vance is weird.
Okay, Hannibal Lecter.
Whatever.
Okay, we'll get to that.
This is what they're using.
You had guys with breasts on White House grounds.
And I say guys because they had a penis and breasts showing them on White House grounds.
And Vance is weird?
Yes.
These are classical definitions, by the way.
Guys because of a penis.
Just to the uninitiated, we used to refer to people with penises as guys or men.
To the new viewers.
Now we call them penis holders.
Yes, exactly.
We're all penis holders here.
Exactly.
Which isn't fully accurate because sometimes, you know, you are a penis holder, but temporarily if it's not your own.
own, but the point remains, we're not talking about the French Olympics anymore.
That guy was more like a nice roll of a wheel of brie.
Okay.
So here's something else.
While we talk about election interference, it happens a lot of ways.
We're not just talking about Dominion voting machines.
We're not just talking about mass mail-in voting, but the election interference happens now.
It happens now when you see pollsters trying to demoralize you.
It happens when you see pollsters trying to actually shape public opinion as opposed to reflect public opinion.
That's one way.
Another way is that you see the media choose not to cover certain stories or choose to misrepresent stories, right?
That can affect whether it's a Hunter Biden laptop example or, for example, the talking points that I saw across every single CNN show that came directly from the DNC regarding Kamala Harris not being the border czar but actually part of the Northern Triangle.
I was dumbfounded that all of them came out with the same talking points until I saw that it was from the DNC.
So, you see that.
That, in my opinion, you can comment below if you disagree, is election interference.
And then you see it from big tech.
You saw it from Big Tech, of course, when we were talking about, you know, COVID happened, and they wouldn't allow you to question some of the narratives.
They wouldn't allow you to actually show the clips of Donald Trump saying that the virus could have leaked from a lab.
These things were actually removed from platforms.
Do you think that might help inform the voting population?
Well, right now, And this is scary.
You're seeing it happen with Google actually memory-holing the assassination attempt on Donald Trump.
So, according to a bunch of posts on social media, Google will actually not auto-populate search results surrounding the Trump shooting.
We tried here multiple prompts, and you can check all of our examples at ladroscreditor.com.
We provide all references, link in the description.
The examples included attempted assassination of Trump, searching Trump shot, Donald Trump shot, and it wouldn't actually provide.
Relevant details.
Nothing at all.
It would pull up other assassination attempts.
Yes.
Truman.
It's a T-R-U-M, right?
So, Truman.
I even spelled out Trump one time.
These aren't my results, but I did it individually when this happened yesterday.
Right.
I couldn't make it give me... It gave me Donald Duck before Donald Trump.
Yes.
Who tried to assassinate Donald Duck?
Nobody!
That's the whole point!
I'm just saying.
Chip and Dale, actually.
I mean, they tried to assassinate him many times.
Like, they actually... I've watched them put sticks of dynamite in his mouth.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I should have saw that coming.
They were serial killers, Chip and Dale.
They were adorable.
And I tried to stick dynamite in my brother's mouth and I got in trouble.
That's a bit expensive.
No, they don't really make M80s anymore.
It's the little cheap ones.
So, he's fine.
Then you have these results from Meta AI and we'll have people, we're actually confirming with people right now, there were screenshots out there.
It's since changed.
That doesn't change the fact that they tried to get away with it. So screenshots of Meta.ai showed
that it wouldn't even acknowledge the Trump assassination attempt. Jeez. And then that was
changed. That happened with us and Alexa a long time ago, asking about Jesus and Muhammad and
Thanksgiving. And this is why I cannot confirm fully that the Meta.ai screenshots are accurate,
but I do know that the source is legitimate. And I was accused of lying when those results
were changed with Alexa over the weekend of Thanksgiving, I believe it was 2018.
So I know how that happens, and then they just hope that everyone accuses you of being a liar.
Here's the thing, we also saw Google Trends.
It shows you that the interest in the story, Trump's assassination, dropped to zero just days after the shoot.
There's no way.
Yeah, that's bullshit.
It's absolute, and it shows up in social media too, like on X. I used to see the day after, a couple of days after, it would be nothing but posts about this, the investigation, what's going on, how did this happen, and now it's like it never happened.
No mention on the Google News homepage of the assassination attempt.
Zero, zero, zero.
No, none.
I know you're thinking, some?
No, none.
None?
Zero articles on the homepages of CNN, MSNBC, AP, Reuters, NBC, New York Times, Washington Post.
This is absolutely election interference, to be clear.
And Google, you said they just recently issued a statement saying that it was in line with their policy.
And I have to, I'm gonna have to go and check this, so guys in research, if you can confirm this, I saw Google issued a statement that said basically that they don't allow anything with political violence, right?
And so this is in line with their policy and so the system is working just as it should.
What happened to never again?
No, I don't think so.
You know, when people say, whenever there's a tragedy, they go, never again!
Okay, assassinating a sitting president, or some people say former president, I say sitting president, a presidential nominee, never again.
Now you say, hey, never again!
Well, what?
I don't know.
Well, what should never happen again?
I don't know what you're talking about.
You just said never again.
Uh-huh.
Well, what's never?
What is the never in the again?
I can't find it!
You keep saying never again!
What does that mean?
That's where we are, because as long as it is politically expedient for them, they will memory hole it.
And here's another example, this is what the media does.
They throw something out there, and they couch it in words like maybe, we don't know, allegedly, so they can eliminate their liability, and then later on, and that gets covered everywhere.
The next day the truth comes out, or that same day the truth comes out, but it's buried all the way on the fifth page, or it's in the opinion section.
This is exactly what happened last week.
We were with you, our last show, on Friday, and Christopher Wray was the person, you know, FBI, who said, you know, we don't know, Trump may have been shot, may have been prompted from glass.
Well, there was an update, which a lot of people didn't hear about, but here's the initial claim that was heard around the world.
As I said, I think with respect to former President Trump, There's some question about whether or not it's a bullet or shrapnel that, you know, that hit his ear.
So it's conceivable.
As I sit here right now, I don't know whether that bullet, in addition to, you know, causing the grazing, could have also landed somewhere else.
But I believe we've accounted for all of the shots in the cartridges.
So let us... It's my understanding that the very first one was the one that hit the president.
Is that the very first shot or is that not accurate?
I don't, as I sit here right now, I don't know the answer to that.
I believe we know the answer to that.
I just don't have it in front.
So that was front page news everywhere.
If you go to Reddit, Reddit politics, millions of members, that's still, it's still amongst the most popular articles.
They still believe that Donald Trump wasn't shot.
Now they're showing pictures of his ears healed, saying it's confirmation of what Chris Wray said.
He clearly wasn't shot.
What you may not know is within two days of that, the FBI officially confirmed it.
Like, oh yeah, by the way, he was shot.
That didn't make the news.
But that didn't make the news.
CNN said something a little bit ago, don't go to it, but they said something a little bit ago, like, more information comes out from the FBI about the assassination attempt.
They didn't say, hey, he was shot.
Yes.
Which would have been the natural thing you would say to confirm that, you know, a bullet hit somebody's ear.
He says it, and this is, working in media, this is what happens, he says it in video form, he says it on a live broadcast in front of a lot of consequential people, he knows that that will be parroted across All of mainstream media.
So they choose that venue, they choose that platform, they choose that medium very carefully, they make sure that everyone will cover it, and then in a written statement on a news day that people may not be paying attention at that point in time, they go, oh yeah, we know he was shot, it was a bullet.
What point is it?
Hey, if people don't think Donald Trump was shot, let me just paint a parallel universe for you.
People can't find out if there was an assassination attempt, right?
If they search it, the meta AI, right now we've seen those manipulated results.
It may change in the future, but you can't find it.
Okay, then let's say you manage to find the information, and what will you find from the news?
Donald Trump probably wasn't shot.
It could have just been a graze.
And then all the news articles saying Donald Trump exaggerated.
He was using it for political sympathy at this point.
What a piece of crap.
Can you believe that a man may lie about being shot?
Do you think that may affect your opinion?
Do you think it may affect your vote?
Because I guarantee you that's 90% of the uninitiated, the politically uninformed.
They search for it and then they don't get to, let me hold on, let me really dive into this.
Oh, six pages buried, less than two days later the FBI said, yeah he was shot.
Which means he's actually the good guy in this and they're all the pieces of human garbage.
No, that is election interference.
And they're so bold.
About it, right now, with the memory-holing.
Well, and it wasn't just the memory-holding, you know, really quickly, and I know, but they didn't just memory-hold that.
They basically said everything was false about the shooting and Kamala Harris.
Kamala Harris.
Just forcing that into your timeline.
So, I know.
I'm sorry.
No, but there's... Sorry, I just had to... No, you're right.
You are right.
And that's a big part of why they have to do this.
They're so bold because of a lack of accountability.
They're so brazen with the memory-holding that actually, now, they're even launching a service for just that, for the average man.
More and more of what you do in real life ends up online.
In our digital age, it's nearly impossible not to leave a footprint.
But Google's new Memory Hole in 1.0 changes everything.
Are you running for PTA, chairwoman, but can't seem to escape your OnlyFans past?
Google Memory Hole it.
Trying to get rid of that viral video of you getting beat up by the shortstop at your daughter's softball game?
Google Memory Hole it.
We've helped everyone, from former political figures trying to distance themselves from their sex-fiend friends, to mid-level managers who totally exaggerate their college sports achievements.
Whether you're trying to escape or obfuscate, Memory Hole is here for you.
Very nice spread, no expensive.
And Gerald, how are you going to be recovering from that sick burn?
It's more of a second-degree burn, you know?
It's not the worst, but it's the most painful.
All right, I didn't exaggerate.
And I'm covered.
I've got the wellness company by my side.
Throw anything at me that you would like.
Please go to TWC.health slash Crowder.
Basically, you get this entire kit for the cost of a single visit to the doctor.
Enter promo code Crowder, get 10% off and free shipping.
And also, maybe there's a company where they can give you poison to kill other people.
It's not this company.
Maybe you just kill the people in your office.
Well, that's a pretty good deal.
I'm not going to lie, but you're still a loser and a liar.
Not this company.
The Lotus Company doesn't do that.
They still lie, though.
Recover.
You still lie about it.
We actually used some of the antibiotics.
Yeah, he won the, uh, he actually won the Leisman Trophy.
Yes.
Back in Notre Dame.
He's just stiff-arming the truth.
So anyway, they're trying to collude.
I can't see with the lights.
That was a bad throw.
Dude, did you see how bad that throw was?
I know.
So let's go through this because I've been doing this for a long time and I know that we've covered these individually.
I don't know that there's been one segment putting all of these together.
And often you will see this not only parroted in media, but you will see this in your real, in your day-to-day life.
So hopefully this helps prepare you for your conversations in your day-to-day life.
The rebuttals that you'll most likely hear about Donald Trump and why people don't like his personality.
Alright, so this right now we can lead in with, do we need to lead in with his Christian thing?
Do we think so?
Do we think it matters?
I think so.
Okay, this is the latest example.
It's not the most egregious, but the media tried to make it sound as though Donald Trump said that he was not a Christian, something something, here you go.
Could this be America's last election if Donald Trump wins?
Listen to what the former president told a Christian group at the Turning Point USA Believers Summit in West Palm Beach.
The former president telling the crowd that if they re-elect him to the White House, they won't have to worry about voting ever again.
And again, Christians get out and vote!
Just this time!
You won't have to do it anymore.
Four more years.
You know what?
It'll be fixed.
It'll be fine.
You won't have to vote anymore, my beautiful Christians.
I love you, Christians.
I'm a Christian.
I love you.
Get out.
You gotta get out and vote.
In four years, you don't have to vote again.
We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote.
He said it three times.
No, he didn't say I'm not a Christian three times this week.
And he didn't say I'm not a Christian, he said, you guys are great, you beautiful Christians, I'm a Christian.
That's it, it's a word whisker.
That's like Brian Kilmey didn't say colored sorority, he said college sorority.
When people talk about how much they hate the modern era of clickbait, this is what they are talking about.
But this is one that kind of died down because most people were able to say, okay, in context I can see that that's not really what he said.
But there are other examples that stuck.
Because they keep throwing crap at the wall and they hope that some stick.
And again, you can comment below which ones stick out in your mind as far as the greatest misquotes that they've tried to use to paint Donald Trump's legacy.
Here's five.
All references available at loudmouthcracker.com.
Big one.
And this is why we have the shirts that we do at the shop.
So the claim that they made.
And they echoed for a very long time, is that President Trump riled up his supporters and encouraged and called for an insurrection by saying and using the words, fight like hell.
They were considering whether any of the speakers had a legal jeopardy in terms of incitement to riot, which is a charge.
If you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore.
Writing as demonstrated in our hearings, we have assembled an overwhelming evidence, including from dozens of your former appointees and staff, that you personally orchestrated and oversaw a multi-part effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election and to obstruct the peaceful transition of power.
We fight.
We fight like hell.
That idea comes up in the two quotes included in the article of impeachment.
We fight like hell.
And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore.
So insurrection, fight like hell.
Well, here's the truth that the media doesn't cover.
And this is election interference.
President Trump said at that very same rally that people needed to make their voices heard peacefully and patriotically.
Believe your lying eyes and ears.
Do the right thing and only count the electors who have been lawfully slated.
Lawfully slated.
I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.
But I said, something's wrong here.
Something's really wrong.
Can't have happened.
And we fight.
We fight like hell.
That would seem pretty clear.
Cut and dry again with the context.
Let me provide some more context.
Fight like hell is only a call to violence when Donald Trump says it.
You know that it's an expression people use, and here are a bunch of people in politics using that expression, not calling for violence.
I'm using every tool at my disposal.
I'm going to fight like hell to protect this right for women.
We're going to fight like hell and we're going to ensure that Joe Biden's the next president so that the working class keeps moving forward.
And we fight like hell to achieve it.
Hi everybody, it's Gretchen Whitmer.
I've been fighting like hell for working people and basic freedoms in Michigan my entire life.
To use the term fight like hell repeatedly in its proper context where no one has a problem with it and then to weaponize it against President Trump is election interference.
Clear?
Let's go through another one.
Here's the claim that they made.
We run into this a lot.
People still believe it, that President Trump said, as it related to Charlottesville when someone was killed and there were some neo-Nazis who happened to be present with tiki torches, that Donald Trump praised neo-Nazis, calling them very fine people.
Let's play some of the sound of President Trump back in 2017 saying, he had said today that he answered the question perfectly.
Let's take a listen.
The president continues to believe, against all the evidence, that there were very fine people on both sides at the alt-right neo-nazi white supremacist Unite the Right rally.
Charlottesville is also home to a defining moment for this nation in the last few years.
Very fine people on both sides.
Okay, here's the truth.
Again, all references available.
We provide them for you publicly every day.
There were some neo-Nazis and white supremacists who happened to be there in Charlottesville, but it started as a protest regarding people wanting to tear down statues that they saw as, you know, indicative of a confederacy of pro-slavery past.
Which, by the way, moved on to removing statues of Abraham Lincoln.
You can see that sort of logic trail.
And then there were people saying, hey, even though these people, some of these statues are of people who were imperfect, it's a part of our heritage.
Those were the two major groups clashing in Charlottesville.
And then off in the distance, there were some extreme neo-Nazis and white supremacists.
But here's the good part.
Thank God Donald Trump explicitly condemned by name neo-Nazis and white supremacists in that same clip!
And I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally.
But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay?
And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people.
That is media malpractice, and that is election interference.
What do you think happens with Jewish American voters, black American voters, when they hear, oh my god, the president praised white nationalists and Nazis?
Then it also makes it acceptable to say that he is a Nazi.
Well, why wouldn't he be a Nazi?
Because he praised Nazis, now it's time to kill Nazis, and you have a Trump assassination attempt that, by the way, Google has memory hold and you can't find any information about.
It's election interference.
Also, why did Biden really run?
Can you comment below?
He's like, that's one of the reasons.
Really?
You were inspired to run by the guy who said, I'm condemning neo-Nazis and white nationalists?
That was your flash of old prick moment?
That was his last straw.
Okay, here's another one.
The famous quote, uh, the bloodbath, right?
Here's the claim from the left.
Trump allegedly said, uh, that if he was not elected, according to them, if Trump is not elected, he is threatening a bloodbath in America.
A lot of people still believe this.
Former President Donald Trump is taking heat for the language that he used at a rally in Ohio over the weekend, including his warning about what will happen if he does not win the election.
The race for the White House and former President Trump's campaign now on the defensive after his fiery rhetoric at a rally in Dayton, Ohio on Saturday night.
Trump warning while discussing the economy that there would be a, quote, bloodbath if he is not re-elected in November.
During a campaign rally in Ohio on Saturday, former President Trump promised to place tariffs on cars manufactured abroad if he's re-elected, and made a dire prediction of what would happen if he is not.
Now if I don't get elected, it's gonna be a bloodbath for the whole, that's gonna be the least of it.
It's gonna be a bloodbath for the country.
Okay, so, bloodbath, bloodbath, bloodbath, bloodbath.
If I'm not elected, it's gonna be a bloodbath for the country.
Here's the truth.
And that last man kinda mentioned it.
He was talking about trade with China and how China are dumping cars in the United States.
And he was saying that for the automobile industry, if Biden, at that point, was still the candidate, were to be re-elected, it would be a bloodbath for the auto industry.
But, believe your lion eyes and ears, here's the clip in context.
Those big monster car manufacturing plants that you're building in Mexico right now, and you think you're going to get that?
You're going to not hire Americans and you're going to sell the cars to us?
No, we're going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line.
And you're not going to be able to sell those guys.
If I get elected.
Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a bloodbath for the whole.
That's going to be the least of it.
It's going to be a bloodbath for the country.
That'll be the least of it.
But they're not going to sell those cars.
Just like the Fight Like Hell example, Bloodbath, it's something that has been used repeatedly.
This is election interference.
I want to be very clear.
The media malpractice has now, it's now veered into election interference.
We saw with the Hunter Biden laptop story, what you don't see is this kind of malpractice happening every day.
Here's another one, another claim that you have seen from the left, that Donald Trump If you believed them, he flat out promised to you that he was going to be a dictator.
Donald Trump reacting to reports about what a second term would look like and concerns that he would govern as an authoritarian.
Donald Trump is no longer merely suggesting he'll be a dictator should he win a second term.
Now, he's just coming right out and he's saying it.
Last night in a Fox News town hall, Sean Hannity asked Donald Trump twice, coaching him along as he often does in these interviews, if Trump planned to abuse his power if elected to a second term.
Trump told the Iowa audience he would not be a dictator except for on his first day in office.
Overnight during a tape town hall in Iowa, former President Trump mocking questions about turning the presidency into a dictatorship.
Moderator Sean Hannity asking Mr. Trump if he had any plans to abuse his power or break the law if he were re-elected or to seek retribution against others.
I love this guy.
He says, you're not going to be a dictator, are you?
I said, no, no, no.
Other than day one, we're closing the border and we're drilling, drilling, drilling.
After that, I'm not a dictator.
So if you watch the mainstream media, legacy media going, oh my God, he said he's going to be a dictator.
He praised neo-Nazis.
Here's the truth.
Well, first off, President Trump obviously is not a dictator.
Otherwise Biden wouldn't have been sworn in.
Yeah.
I don't know if you see what's going on in Venezuela, a little bit of a different picture, and he made a tongue-in-cheek remark about closing the border, drilling, it was clearly a joke, and people who see it in context would know that!
Under no circumstances, you are promising America tonight, you would never abuse power as retribution against anybody.
Except for day one.
Except for?
He's going crazy.
Except for day one.
Meaning?
I want to close the border and I want to drill, drill, drill.
That's not, that's not, that's not retribution.
I'm gonna be, you know, he keeps... We love this guy.
He says, you're not gonna be a dictator, are you?
I said, no, no, no, other than day one.
We're closing the border, and we're drilling, drilling, drilling.
After that, I'm not a dictator.
Which, by the way, also if you understand contextually, 89 executive orders from Biden on the border undoing what Donald Trump did, and of course, executive orders on Federal leases for drilling.
So it's not really a dictator type thing.
It's actually one of the few issues that falls itself legitimately under the presidential purview, which you've seen from George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden.
But the media wants you to believe that he would be a dictator, because I guess they don't understand the separation of powers.
Here's another one, because Joe Biden just quoted this in the recent debate before he unceremoniously dropped out.
Here's the claim.
That President Trump said during COVID it could be cured by injecting bleach into your arm.
Clean up in the Oval Office.
President Trump is finding it hard to explain away his dangerous suggestion that Americans could inject themselves with disinfectants as a cure for the coronavirus.
I just reminded you of when President Trump floated the idea of injecting disinfectants to knock out coronavirus.
Medical experts are warning people not to inject themselves with disinfectants after President Trump pondered at last night's White House briefing whether that could be a potential method for fighting the virus.
The disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute, one minute.
And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning?
All right, so we want to bring in Major Garrett.
He's standing by at the White House to sort of just walk us through what the president had to say.
Not the White House.
And the talking points from the DNC which go to the media are then echoed by former Vice President Biden at that debate where he took it one step further along with MSNBC and the Young Turks and he said, this is the guy I told you to inject bleach.
He said those actual words.
Here's the truth.
President Trump never suggested that people themselves inject bleach or themselves inject disinfectant.
He was talking about during this period of time, and by the way, he was also right.
People mocked him because he said there may be ways to re-sanitize masks because we were throwing them out.
that became a thing. People started using effective methods of steam, steam closets to
re-sanitize masks. And he was talking about other forms of interventions that could possibly treat
the COVID virus. And yeah, he's not a doctor in context.
I would like you to speak to the medical doctors to see if there's any way that you can
apply light and heat to cure. You know, if you could.
And maybe you can, maybe you can't.
Again, I say maybe you can, maybe you can't.
I'm not a doctor.
That was another thing he was talking about.
I don't know if you know this, they do use sometimes UV light.
They do use sometimes as a disinfectant.
There are methods where they actually try and use sometimes infrared waves, UV light.
He's just not, he's not a doctor.
He didn't tell anyone to inject bleach.
Here's another one, kind of a bonus one, where they claim that Donald Trump referred to countries as shitholes.
But in a private meeting, a proposal to restore protections to immigrants from Haiti, El Salvador, and certain African countries, who were until recently protected from deportation, reportedly prompted the president to question, why are we having all these people from f***hole countries come here?
Now that one's true.
Still funny.
He really said that one.
Because it's true.
Oh, Neil Gavin.
I like it.
Full of Gavin.
I say it all the time.
What he really meant was countries that are comparable to holes of shit.
Like Haiti, for example.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And they shit in holes.
Or the Congo.
That's another one that he... Well, you know what?
See, there is a pattern.
That's what they often do.
So let's put this all together.
If you are a voter who tunes into legacy media, or if you rely on Google, on Facebook, on a lot of these big tech platforms, you believe that Donald Trump tried to overturn an election, calling for an insurrection, telling people to fight like hell and violently, as opposed to what he actually said, which is make your voices heard peacefully and patriotically.
You would believe that he praised Nazis, he praised Nazis and white supremacists, calling them very fine people, as opposed to him actually condemning them.
You would believe that he said he was going to be a dictator day one, even though, of course, there's no truth to that whatsoever.
You believe that this man said, there will be a bloodbath if I don't lose, if I don't win this election, sorry, if I lose this election, there will be a bloodbath, which, of course, would lend itself to the idea that he is a would-be dictator and an insurrectionist, even though none of those things are true.
And that kind of rhetoric, which we now know to be untrue, is what inspired somebody to attempt to take the man's life.
But if you search that on Google, you can't find it either!
This is no longer a free country.
And I don't want to hear BS about the First Amendment protecting these big tech platforms.
This is election interference.
It affects what people believe.
It affects the vote.
And it affects people being killed in the streets, including The will-be president of the United States.
They cannot win an election fairly, and they know it.
And on election night, we're going to be here with you, November 5th, 2024.
None of it happens without you supporting us.
lotterworthcrowder.com.
It's $89 annually.
You get twice the show, you get a Friday show, you get all the other shows on Mug Club, the undercover unit, and on election night, we are actually going to be calling states.
We are going to be the place to tune in.
We will have boots on the ground in every major swing state, every major city.
We are going to have all the news wires that we need to not only cover the media, but call states ourselves in addition to real-time live data analysts.
It's the election livestream of the century, the rumble on rumble, no more tricks, We're even going to have the electoral integrity map for you that will be interactive where states will be called and you can see any tomfoolery taking place in real time.
It's been an infrastructure investment in the seven figures for this company because we don't want to be caught flat-footed again and these people, meaning those who run Legacy Media and Big Tech because of course they link arms, they need to go away.
They need to go away and we can't do that every day.
But we can guarantee you that they go away on election night because we'll be here with you.
And now we go to our wonderful guest, of course, the host of the Clay Travis Buck Sexton Show.
And by the way, also a famous receiver of death threats recently.
Let's bring on Mr. Clay Travis.
Having me.
I've probably gotten most of my death threats over the years, like you, electronic in nature, which I'm kind of used to, Twitter, Instagram, whatever else it might be.
Yeah, but we got an actual handwritten death threat saying they're going to kill me in 10 days, sent to the house Saturday.
Well, you have to appreciate their punctuality.
Punctuality.
I thought, you know, the fact that they wrote a date at the top to let me know what day they were going to kill me was helpful.
Yeah.
You know, because, you know, it's not very common.
You know, if you remember when you were like in grade school, you would write the date at the top of your like handwritten assignment or whatever.
And so the guy wrote like the date and then said 10 days from now, I'm going to kill you.
Kind of remind me, remember the Billy Madison like death list?
Yes.
Like Steve Buscemi.
One of the great scenes.
Yeah, and I kind of felt like, oh, well, he's letting me know on August 2 or whatever it's going to be, I'm done, so I can get my affairs in order, I guess.
Does it make it less scary because most serial killers, they don't send out a save the date.
Yeah, well, I mean, look, I think for what we do, you have to just presume that there's lots of kooks.
And if you let those people kind of impact your decision making, then you've let them win.
I will say, you know, the police came to the house and I tweeted this out, but my nine year old He thought I was in trouble for jaywalking because I don't really respect crosswalks all the time and his mom has been on me for some time that I'm sending the wrong message to the kids by just crossing the streets whenever there's no cars whenever I want to.
And so he thought the police were coming to the house because he thought dad was finally getting taken down for the jaywalk.
I do that.
But I did have to explain that somebody wanted to kill me.
Well also you can explain to him that it's okay for you to jaywalk because you're white.
I do the same.
And I just go to the officer, I go, no, white guy!
He's like, ah, you rapscallion.
And by the way, I want to make sure I put, of course, the Clay and Buck radio show that is syndicated across the country, and people can follow you, Clay Travis, on X. Not Twitter, I keep making that mistake.
I'm sure we all do, those of us who've been around for a very long time.
Hey, I wanted to ask you.
Because you're plugged into this, and I know you cover these kinds of things quite a bit.
What do you make of the sudden enthusiasm surrounding Kamala Harris?
We talked about the Fox News poll.
Ironically, the most left-leaning polling agency out there.
A lot of people don't know that.
But all of a sudden, without having really done anything, it seems like everywhere on social media, people are saying, oh, this is Barack Obama 2.0.
There's enthusiasm in the DNC.
But how?
Yeah, so it's the same people who told you that Joe Biden was sharp as a tack behind closed doors and have been telling you for some time that Kamala Harris was actually a drag on Joe Biden and he should consider dropping her.
All of those people have suddenly decided that she is the greatest political candidate, to your point, since Barack Obama.
And it was all self-evident.
I mean, we talked about it on the radio show.
Is it less gay than the Olympic Opening Ceremony?
Less gay than the Olympic Opening Ceremony.
fan and you feel like sports has lost its mind if you haven't seen it. I like to think we're winning
some battles for sanity in the world of sports, which is where I came from initially. Is it less
is it less gay than the Olympic opening ceremony? No runs and stockings and blue balls? Less gay.
Okay, less gay than the Olympic opening ceremony. That's our new tagline.
We, we, I said that they were going to call Joe Biden, George Washington, which is maybe the
the craziest, you know, analogy to ever draw.
But that's what's going on.
What I love to watch, and I don't know how much time you spend on it, I like to look at the polls as kind of snapshots and get an idea of what they're saying, particularly in the battlegrounds.
But I'm a gambler.
And I love looking at the gambling odds on this, because I think it's a more reliable approximator of real money.
And this morning, like, I don't know, 20 minutes ago, right before I sat down to talk to you as part of my prep to get ready for my show, 61% chance that Trump is going to win, 37% Kamala.
That feels about right to me.
You know, like Trump as roughly a touchdown favorite if we were sitting around right now and kind of prognosticating where this thing is going to go.
And I actually think Kamala has peaked.
I think that they've said everything nice they can about her.
And she still hasn't done a sit-down interview.
She still hasn't come off the teleprompter.
She's going to fall apart when she has to do that.
I think she'll try not to do it.
But I actually think she's probably peaked because They wanted her to come out of the gate strong, and if you look at the gambling markets, her odds got up to around 40%, and now they've come back a few points to start this week.
Well, I would disagree slightly.
I think she may see another bump with the DNC, depending on how they handle it.
Maybe the VP, depending on how that goes.
Exactly.
But I think the challenge they really get into, and I was watching your segment where you went through all those comments, and I thought it was really well done, playing it for everybody.
The problem they have is, once you've called Trump Hitler, they can't say anything else bad about him, right?
Like, he's defined.
I think she isn't.
So I think Trump is a known quantity.
I think she's gonna end up getting torn apart because she's actually super left-wing, not particularly smart, and embraced a lot of idiotic things that Biden didn't, right?
Biden never said defund the police.
Kamala did.
Kamala raised money for rioters.
I mean, these are outlandish far left wing things that I think as people become aware of them, they're going to like her less.
They don't like her much now.
Well, yes, I agree with that.
And you know, they call Trump a Nazi.
And of course, of course, Clay Travis did not say this, but I refer to Kamala Harris as a lying whore.
But to be clear, it's only because she's lied.
She had sex with people for political gain, so by definition.
But that's not encouraging any type of assassination.
We all know many lying whores.
Some of them are very nice people once you, you know, sort of cafeteria compartmentalize out the lying whoredom.
But let me ask you this.
What I'm getting to is like, you see this all over social media.
Is it astroturf?
Because I don't see a lot of enthusiasm, and this is anecdotal, in real life for Kamala.
Even Democrats go, well, we had to get rid of Biden, and I would have liked anyone but Kamala, but this is where we are.
So it seems like this is astroturfing from the media rather than being organic.
I think that's accurate.
I also think when you have a corpse as a candidate, when you actually have a live person, people are like, you know, this live person's a lot better than the corpse we did have.
And I do think, you know, the analogy I made, again, I love football.
I'm a sports guy at heart.
It's like a backup quarterback coming in.
When you know you have a crappy starting quarterback, what does the crowd do in a stadium?
They get excited for the backup quarterback.
And if the backup quarterback comes in and he completes a couple of passes, you turn to your buddy and you're like, oh, this guy should have always been playing.
This guy's really good.
Then what happens?
A lot of times he comes in, he's a backup for a reason, he throws a couple of picks, and you're like, man, our team sucks.
I think the picks are coming and our team sucks and unfortunately I've got a lot of experience with that because I'm a Titans fan.
Unfortunately that realization I think is going to set in with Democrats as they start to become aware.
There's a reason they were talking about removing her from the ticket.
I mean Lester Holt sliced and diced her and Lester Holt is like the least threatening interviewer on the planet.
And he just completely disemboweled her on an interview and they didn't do interviews for like a year after that because she couldn't handle Lester Holt.
I mean, I think she's again going to get roughed up some when she actually does start to do interviews and interact in the media to the extent she will.
Well, I think because of that, I think we'll probably see the Biden campaigning strategy that we saw in 2020.
They blamed it on COVID, right?
I think she's going to stay in the background as much as possible.
It would be smarter to do this, to let the media carry her water, to let them venerate her publicly and for her to talk as little as possible.
I think she knows the more she talks, the more people go, ugh.
Yeah, I think that's 100% right.
Now, to your point, they were able to use COVID as the excuse.
And I think this is important, too.
I think they took the wrong lesson from their selection of Joe Biden.
The reason Biden won, in addition to the rig job and what you were talking about with Google and big tech, like all of that, certainly with covering up Hunter Biden's laptop, we all know what they did to keep Biden's true essence from being revealed to many voters out there.
But also COVID.
If COVID didn't happen, Trump would have won, I really believe this, a comfortable election win over Biden.
He is an accidental president because, remember, he had the nomination before COVID happened.
And then they used COVID as an excuse to be able to hide him in the basement and keep him from actually having to campaign.
But they terrified everybody.
They made you all think you were going to die.
Every suburban mom out there thought that their kid needed to have eight different masks on.
To your point, Trump was telling people to inject bleach.
They spread so many lies.
But COVID was the essence.
They were able to use that fear porn associated with COVID to convince people that Biden would solve these issues.
He hasn't.
I wish Biden were the nominee instead of Kamala, to be clear, because I don't think there's any way he could win.
I'm not sure he'll be alive.
Frankly, by the inauguration, which is sad to say, but it would not stun me.
And I don't mean somebody's going to kill him.
I mean that he doesn't have the mental or physical health.
No, I think it's pretty safe to bet that no one is assassinating Joe Biden.
Even the craziest actual, you know, small percentage of like neo-Nazis or militiamen are like, don't kill Joe Biden.
Don't screw this up.
Just let him go of natural causes.
I don't think there's anyone who would want to do that.
They took the wrong lesson.
I think they took the wrong lesson.
And I think that's what's going to happen with Kamala, who they have another selected candidate.
And they think, oh, we're geniuses.
We picked Joe Biden and he beat Trump.
Now we're going to pick Kamala and she's going to beat Trump.
I think that's wrong.
I think Trump is going to beat her comfortably.
And I actually think I saw you guys were doing your election night special.
I actually think Rachel Maddow is going to be curled up in the fetal position crying on MSNBC by 11 p.m.
Because it's going to be self-evident Eastern Time that Trump is going to be elected president on Election Day.
And I hope it doesn't happen because it's a husky cry.
It's an unattractive cry.
It's like where the wild things are.
You're like, oh, I thought we were going to sleep in a pig pile.
I don't think we talk enough to Rachel Maddow's credit.
You know, she gets $30 million a year and does one show a week.
Can you imagine one show a week?
I mean, I don't hate her for getting that salary.
I don't think it gets talked about enough.
She's probably, per hour worked, the highest paid person in media history, which is pretty wild to think about.
It is really crazy.
You know, I will say this.
I noticed that those on the left versus those on the right, they certainly live a lot of these hosts as the elite, far more than people on the right.
For example, she gets significantly lower numbers than we do.
I've never even come close to $30 million in my life.
Like, she could cut that in half!
and pay her staff more. And in this case, we pay her staff far more than Rachel Maddow does.
But I'm a conservative, where I don't think that a CEO should not make more than five times the
lowest paid employee. She espouses that. But that is kind of the point where she adds no value.
She costs, she knows that she costs that network money. She costs them money. There's no way
they're giving her $30 million and they're not losing money on that pumpkin pie haircutted
chain gang lesbian. That's my argument, by the way, for a long time. Like,
If you really go out and produce a ton of content, Sean Hannity, Colin Cowherd, Stephen A. Smith, you can go across the lineup of guys who really put out really original, interesting content.
Good for them.
They should get paid as much money as the market can possibly bear.
We just got the two big NFL contracts with Tua and Jordan Loeb, right?
Both those guys are making over $50 million a year.
I want everybody to make as much money as possible, but you should have to work for it a little bit.
There's no way, to your point, MSNBC is remotely recouping her salary.
And to your point, I bet there's nobody on her show that makes more than $350 a year.
I mean, she's like, whatever the math is, $30 million a year, destroying everybody else on her staff's overall compensation.
It's not even remotely close.
Yeah.
Plus, I don't like her.
Let me ask you this.
Do you think, to go back to politics, do you think that Kamala, let's say if she picks Josh Shapiro, Some people think Mark Kelly with Arizona, but I don't think so.
I think that that's kind of as close to a lock as you get on the swing states with Donald Trump.
But do you think if she picks Josh Shapiro, that locks up Pennsylvania for her?
And do you think Arizona would be in play if she picks someone like a Mark Kelly?
I would pick Shapiro if I were sort of looking at that because there's no map that the Democrats have that they can win without Pennsylvania.
You know, Trump has theoretically multiple routes.
If he wins one of the three, what I call Big Ten states there with Wisconsin, Michigan or Pennsylvania, he's going to be president of the United States.
I think he'll win at least one of them, which is why I think he is.
But if I were Kamala and I were trying to make a strategic decision, and she's probably not making the decision, whoever the brain trust is there to the extent there is one, I think Josh Shapiro has to be the pick.
I actually think the most, and Mark Kelly barely beat Blake Masters, like this idea that he's wildly popular in Arizona, I just don't buy.
And I don't think he would put Arizona in play.
I think Shapiro probably helps in Pennsylvania.
But I do think that this is a major issue.
You were talking about Charlottesville.
There's not enough discussion, in my opinion, about how anti-Semitic huge parts of the Democrat Party are right now.
And so, if she takes Shapiro in Pennsylvania, does that actually hurt her with Arab voters in Michigan?
Because Michigan is a state she has to win to.
And think about how much discussion there would be.
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
Think about how much discussion there would be if Republicans weren't picking somebody because anti-Semitism was so prevalent in the party that they couldn't win an election if they picked a Jewish guy or gal.
I mean, that was a huge story!
Like, that is the essence of, if you're gonna talk about Charlottesville, like, they can't even pick a Jewish guy because they got too many anti-Semites and you're gonna call Trump a Nazi?
Like, their party, actually, to a large extent on the left, hates Jewish people.
That seems like kind of a flaw of the party's identity politics worldview that doesn't get discussed anywhere near enough that if it were Republicans would be talked about all the time.
Oh, I guarantee you, if even just, if Donald Trump were asked and commented on this, they would say it's anti-Semitic.
Like, if they said, what do you think about Kamala Harris picking Shapiro?
Like, she's a, he's a Jew!
They'd be like, what?
I can't believe it.
They have a problem with Jews because they support Hamas.
I was at one of the biggest churches in Texas yesterday.
There were people with Palestinian flags outside protesting Christian churches in Texas.
It's absolutely nuts.
And by the way, of course, all of them also had stickers
as far as getting out to vote.
I wonder which way they line up.
They didn't have Kamala signs, but that's a good point too.
She could win Pennsylvania, but she could lose a lot of the Muslims,
or pirates in Minnesota.
And of course, Michigan.
I'm going, by the way, to Israel on Friday with the radio show.
I'm going to be live in Israel next week because I think it's important for our audience to understand exactly what's going on there without seeing it through the prism of the way the media covers it here.
I want to see it for myself.
But yeah, look, you talk about good and evil.
If you're not comfortable with knowing whether the people People who butcher 1,200 innocent Jewish people, the biggest killing of Jews since the Holocaust.
If you can't decide which side is right in that scenario, your moral philosophy and worldview is broken.
And I think it just is evidence of identity politics and how it destroys everything that it touches.
I really do believe that.
I think you're right.
I also think, though, there is a silver lining there, because it is the second, unfortunately, worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.
But!
Going from six million to twelve hundred, it's all bad, but those are baby steps.
It's a lot better than six million.
I forgot that we have to go to Milk and Beer.
Let me continue with you really quickly.
It is Clay Travis on X, the Clay and Buck Show.
Can people go and find where it is on their radio station, Clay and Buck Show?
Yeah, we're in all 50 states, 500 stations all over the country, so hopefully they can find it.
You can go to clayandbuck.com and find your local affiliate if you don't know.
Alright, well Clay Travis, stay in the line.
We're going to continue with him.
If you're watching on Rubble, click that button.
Join Mug Club.
If not, I don't know.
There's no helping you.
YouTube, piss off.
Export Selection