All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 13, 2022 - Louder with Crowder
59:36
TWITTER FILES 5: THE DAY DONALD TRUMP WAS BANNED! | Louder with Crowder
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We love you.
Did you guys hear that?
What was that?
Ho ho ho!
Gun Santa!
In the suit!
Ha ha ha!
But how'd you get in here, Gun Santa?
We don't have a chimney.
Ho ho ho, Steven!
Gun Santa doesn't need a chimney!
Now, Steven, I heard you were a very good boy this year.
Thank you, Dad.
Bye!
Wow!
It's the new Walther PDP!
I don't have this one!
What's wrong, Steven?
This is great and all, Gunsan.
I just wish that all my friends could have perfect triggered and ergonomic, class-leading firearms, too.
Oh, but Steven, they already do.
Woah!
Woah!
I got a Walther PPS!
I heard it's the best one.
Walther PDP?
It does exist.
Woah, I got a PPS too!
We're gonna be so safe now.
I got a Walther PPKS!
And bullets!
Thanks, Gun Santa.
I've never held a gun before.
Ho, ho, ho.
What's your name, little one?
Carlito.
Gracias por el Walter, Senor Gun Santa.
That's no problem, Carlos.
Where are you from?
Juárez.
Juárez, Mexico.
Okay, maybe next year, son.
Open up, you racist scum!
We've finally found the right secret hideout!
Stephen, you have a show to do.
Let Gun Santa handle this.
This is a stand your ground stage.
I was running a little late.
What I had is with my iPad, it's not working because of my greasy fingers.
Not again.
No, it's not greasy, it's banana.
What is it on a banana?
Bananas aren't fatty, but they feel oily.
What is that?
What makes a banana so slimy?
Is it just moisture?
I eat three at a time.
Do you?
Your potassium levels must be optimal.
Off the charts.
Ew.
He's the potassium king.
Ew.
He eats his bananas raw.
Comment below.
Why are bananas, why do they feel so slick and oily?
I have no idea.
We have a lot to get to today.
And by the way, there might be some, we have some major updates, of course, to Mug Club going on in the new year.
We'll talk about them on Mug Club today.
We'll actually probably be doing some extra shows next week.
I'm thinking Monday we'll do, you can't say that on YouTube, and it'll be exclusive on Mug Club.
Yeah.
I feel like we need to purge at the end of the year.
Merry Christmas.
And let all of it out regarding the freest, fairest election of all time.
Yes.
The vaccine that is beyond criticism because it's, I mean, it's God's gift to man.
I meant Pfizer's gag gift.
It's like exploding chewing gum.
Only your veins.
That's a joke.
YouTube, I love the vaccine.
I'm quadruple-vaxxed.
That's actually not, wait, that's not satire.
That's the real thing.
I'm octuple-vaxxed.
Yes, correct.
They want you to be quadruple-vaxxed.
At one point that was a joke!
I've been vexed four times, like, get out of town!
That's the minimum!
Okay.
So we have a lot to talk about today.
Sam Britton, the transgender, beautiful and brave, nuclear waste specialist, fired because, like Winona Ryder, a kleptomaniac.
And we also have something I want to talk about.
We have the Twitter files.
We talked about this yesterday.
Dump number five.
took place and I know it's hard to sort of, you know, kind of cut through the fog.
There isn't as much here as there was in the last two dumps, but there really,
there are two main takeaways and all references are available at ladderscutter.com. Of course,
Cambridge just changed the definition of woman. So we'll be talking about language today and
changing language.
That's the key takeaway from the Twitter files, too.
I don't know if you know this, Patriot means terrorist.
Oh!
And then Jean-Pierre called Elon Musk dangerous, which is not the first time she's called anyone dangerous.
And by the way, what she really means is, you, the Patriots, you are dangerous.
And by the way, if there does happen to be a terrorist organization who has Patriot in the name, I'm not talking to you.
You were thinking what I was... No.
I'm just talking about actual patriots.
Okay.
We will get to that and more.
So let me ask you this.
What punishment do you think the Twitter executives should face?
Of course, I would never imply treason because we know the penalty for that.
So maybe just, you know, like a minimum security prison.
The worst one.
Minimum.
How are you, Gerald A?
I'm doing well, how are you?
I'm good.
I realize I get the vertigo when it starts raining.
The atmospheric pressure, yeah.
There's two of you.
Don't ever move to Washington.
But they're both equally unattractive.
And you know him, you love him.
Fastest man on his feet.
And you can see him on his feet this weekend in Syracuse, New York, and then, oh, I guess also, oh, New Year's Eve, Toledo, Ohio.
Mr. Dave Lindo, how are you, sir?
Ahoy, good, how about you?
Okay, aside from the spins.
Yes, I should say you got a bit of the vertigo.
A little bit of the Vertigo and a little bit of the Renz.
You're at a place called Vertigo?
What?
Don't, don't just, don't do that right on the outset.
Oh, I guess you and I both have a touch of the... Oh, do you?
I have IBS.
I just always have it.
Wow.
That's the least cool disease ever.
Isn't it?
If you had AIDS, you'd buy some street cred.
Yeah, exactly.
People are like, well, he likes to party.
With IBS, you're like, wherever you go to dinner, you have to, like, gauge how close you should be to a good toilet.
Right.
Yes, exactly.
And also, people have to give you special food.
Yes.
They have to chew it up first, like you're a baby bird.
No, well, that's true.
I do like it when a waiter spits in my mouth.
Compliments to the chef Three people just threw up on the street. Yeah, that's fine.
I don't care. They're probably those Patriots we were talking about now
Let's before we get to everything else is Sam Britten update
And before we get to the Twitter files before we get to Jean-Pierre in the state of our country
And I don't know if you know this it's not great This trans person and here's something I actually share
something in color this person not what you think it is Yeah, this trans person is
Has a whole thing to tell you about not having nipples You wanna know one of the weirdest things about top surgery?
Nope.
My nipple is so itchy right now.
I don't have nipples.
How do I deal with it?
I stand in front of a mirror with my shirt off and I scratch the area and kind of turn to the side to show my brain that there's nothing there, which is the same thing that amputees do to deal with phantom limb.
I have ghost nipples.
No, you probably have a ghost dad.
Martin Pete is just getting weird.
What?
I'm sorry.
I didn't know you had to go sans nipples to do the top surgery.
No, it's a choice.
Oh!
Yeah.
What?
The nipples are an add-on.
She's just poor.
That's the most offensive part.
Yeah, that's an insane... But you already have them!
Your nipples get itchy, though, because of the winter.
Does that not happen to anybody else?
No, that's just the IBS migrating to the nipples.
Is it because I pinch them so hard when I'm on the toilet?
Yes, exactly.
While the waiter spits.
Look, here's the thing, I will say this.
I have more in common with this person.
Like, I had the surgery, right?
Like, the surgery here where they actually cut.
But I can see your nipples from here.
I got the nipples here.
But I, you know this, I told you it feels like bee stinging.
I had three titanium rods put in my ribcage.
You have nerve damage!
Just to be clear, they did a fantastic job at Mayo.
I'm bigger than most people who undergo this surgery.
Rather than one steel bar, they had to put in three titanium rods.
They had to basically pop open my ribcage, and now I have an inner corset.
And it does feel like, you know, beehives around my armpit nipple.
That's nerve damage.
That's not a good... I did this because I needed to do it to protect my lung and heart.
You're doing it cosmetically, and now you have ghost nipples.
What you should have is tremendous shame.
Phantom nipples will haunt her forever.
Yes, and you could have kept the nipples.
I just want to go back to that.
I mean, unless they were like dinner plate nipples.
Yeah, but the phantom nipples are going to be played by Billy Zane in the film.
Big saucer nipples haunting our journey tonight.
Shattering on the wall.
Milk dripping on it.
Oh no.
That guy's more of a tea saucer.
Why would you look at that after you paid someone money and go, this was worth it.
This is good.
I like how I look.
The best plastic surgeon that EBT can buy.
No nipples warehouse.
Yes.
You're gonna like the way you look.
Not the way you feel.
I mean, it's gonna be your own personal hell.
You'll have ghost nipples.
Do you think they fill you in before this?
Like, hey, yeah, so, you know, the side effects might be depression, suicidal ideation, ghost nipples.
Wait, hold on.
Go back?
What's the ghost nipple thing?
Ah, it's really not much to worry about.
Your nipples will hurt for the rest of your life.
But let's move on.
Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa!
And we want children to do this!
Alright.
Your fake nipples that aren't really there will hurt.
Just don't even worry about that part.
Yeah, just don't worry.
Here comes the anesthesia.
Nom nom anesthesia.
But I'll be a boy?
Yeah, whatever the hell you want.
Yes.
Let's go with that.
Sure.
So this brings us to someone else who is of course the epitome of stability.
Sam Britton.
Is the N silent?
Someone told me the N was silent.
I don't believe that.
I don't care.
It's there.
Pronounce it.
So this is former vice...
I'm done with Silent Murder.
I'm done.
You're not allowed to have that anymore.
Former Vice President Biden's non-binary nuclear waste guru, I guess.
Sam Britton has now been fired from...
I just can't believe someone who looks like that would be mentally unstable.
stealing luggage a second time.
And then this also included $1,700 worth of jewelry.
I just can't believe someone who looks like that would be mentally unstable.
Or a criminal.
It's always the ones you least suspect.
Yeah, it really is.
And here's the thing, it's too bad because this person was actually making some revolutionary changes, let me say person, I have to be careful, some revolutionary changes at the Nuclear Waste Department, I mean particularly in the realm of branding, they had some forward-thinking ideas, they did very well for themselves before the theft, and we actually have exclusive footage of Sam Britton's, some other incidents, had done more than just stole, that's why Sam was fired, I'm really trying to not say he or she or zee, there's no way for me to get this right.
This person Stole more than just jewelry and luggage.
You actually brought this to our attention.
We have exclusive footage of the other... I was able to find this for you.
It's pretty damning stuff.
Thank you.
the Sefton question here.
It's good power to have, though.
So, here's the thing.
We obviously like to make fun, but we see Sam Brinton as a worthy adversary.
So we want to wish Sam a fond farewell, best of luck in future endeavors, but for Sam Brinton, it's
time to close.
I had AIDS.
I was the only gay person left in the world because the government found all the other gays and killed them as children.
And for me, it's the first openly gender fluid person is the most important word there being openly
time to close. Endings and beginnings are ending and beginning now.
An Energy Department official caught on camera allegedly stealing luggage, according to a warrant first obtained by
eight News Now.
I'm a logical person again and it shines through.
Now as we first reported yesterday, a warrant is issued for Britain for a felony charge.
I know that it's time for things to close.
And you thought that saying all cultures aren't equal was only racist.
Now, by the way, it's a live show Monday through Thursday, 10 a.m.
Eastern.
You can watch here, of course, if you're on YouTube, but I recommend that you all go over and watch on Rumble.
We have something like 7 million subscribers on YouTube and Crowderbits.
I would love to see every single one of you go over to Rumble, subscribe over there.
We make the choice available to you, but you have to migrate.
I get it.
You're used to YouTube.
It burns!
Head on over to Rumble, and of course, Mug Club.
We have some major announcements there on Mug Club today.
Are we playing a game on Mug Club today?
No, that's right, we have an extra segment.
Let's move on from this, and please do, by the way, hit the like button.
That helps with the algorithm.
YouTube wants to tell you that we are dead.
It's not true.
It's not true.
Not dead yet!
Our nipples are still here.
Yes!
Well, they're over there.
Where are they?
They're in the take-a-nipple-leave-a-nipple box.
Oh, yes, I see those.
What are those?
People only leave nipples.
They never take them.
I know.
Piles of nipples.
I don't know why.
What are you gonna do with them?
So care... Jump, yeah!
Oh, apparently that person has no use.
Yeah.
What am I supposed to do with this?
I don't even use this.
I mean, it's fine.
Just cut it.
Whatever.
What a creep.
I know.
Yes.
And not because the person is trans, but because the person willingly got rid of their nipples and said, I have gross nipples.
Okay, no-nipple-claw.
I'm going to give Inspector Gadget so many nipples.
And they're all going to itch.
Go, go, Gadget Areola!
No!
I'm a child.
It's the end of the year.
What do you want?
Today's theme is language.
Look, if you can control the language, you can control the populace, okay?
And so we'll be talking about what happened in Twitter and how they banned Trump, which, by the way, flew in the face of even the advice of other heads of state.
That, I think, is what's most damning there.
And we'll get into Cambridge changing the definition of woman.
But this brings us to Jean-Pierre's worst White House press correspondent.
What's the term?
Press secretary.
I would have thought we would have changed secretary.
No, yeah, it's still there.
Yeah, because secretary, you think of someone, you know, someone you slap them on the behind and, you know.
Ask for a Cosmo.
Very dated.
Yeah, if there could be a Secretary of Defense, I think we can have a Press Secretary, okay?
Yeah.
I don't like Secretary of Defense.
It doesn't instill fear.
Title.
You think that's gonna work with Putin?
Like, oh yes, no, I'll get to write on that!
Madam, I mean Mr. Secretary!
It's like male flight attendants.
Sure, they exist, but do you want to be one?
Right.
Especially now that he's from Toronto.
Right.
Kidding, guys.
Kidding.
Agent Zero.
So Monday afternoon, Jean-Pierre...
Fielded some questions regarding Elon Musk and what's been happening on Twitter and his call for Fauci to be prosecuted.
And this really is, it's terrifying how flippant Jean-Pierre is here.
As you know, Elon Musk launched a series of attacks on Dr. Anthony Fauci over the weekend, calling for his prosecution, and then he shared some other memes about him, suggesting he's lying about the origins of the coronavirus.
What's your response, first of all, specifically to the attacks on Dr. Fauci, and second, how is your view of Twitter As a sort of public forum and a forum for yourself and for the President and many other officials here, how are those views evolving?
So look, we've been very clear about this.
These attacks, these personal attacks that we've been seeing are dangerous on Dr. Fauci and other public health professionals as well.
They are disgusting and they are divorced from reality.
And by the way, before we go on with this, go to CNN right now.
There's a poddling on CNN who is discussing the Clean Energy Holy Grail.
Again, these are incredibly dangerous, these personal attacks that we are seeing.
Tell me that's not a puddling!
It is.
That's a puddling mid-soulsuck.
Michio Kaku.
It's the dude from the television thing.
This is Poltergeist 2.
Go to the light.
That guy could use some sunlight.
Yes, he could.
We're talking about fusion and using graphics from 1998.
That guy goes into sunlight, he's getting skin cancer in four seconds.
Yeah, he's going to burn up like Hartnett at the end of 30 Days of Night.
What do you think his vitamin D levels are right now?
Negative 5.
He might be allergic to it.
So, okay, if you listen to Jean-Pierre, Jean-Pierre Lafitte, that's what we're going to call him now.
Jean-Pierre Lafitte.
That was a wrestler, Canadian, I think Canadian wrestler.
No, no, it's not a personal attack.
Calling for the criminal prosecution of somebody in an investigation is not a personal attack.
Personal attack is saying that Fauci's a butter-soft little bitch who can't pitch a baseball.
And kills puppies.
Yes, tortures them.
I don't know if he killed them.
Well, I'm sure they died when their faces were eaten.
Yeah, or their vocal cords cut out.
But, you know, who's to say?
You don't know.
They could have lived a very rich, fulfilling life after Fauci tried to kill them.
Or an awful one.
It could have been that, too.
You just never know.
That's most likely.
I just didn't want people to tune out because they were left with no hope.
But if you are a dog in Fauci's care, there is no hope.
None.
So, she says this is dangerous.
First off, it's not a personal attack.
It's not ad hominem.
And let me tell you what's dangerous.
Is someone in the government determining who is dangerous?
You know who else determined who was dangerous?
I'm not saying that she's... Stalin.
Hitler.
Guevara.
Batista.
Castro.
You can go to Maduro.
You can go to Chavez.
Take your pick.
They determine who is... The government should not determine who is dangerous based on speech or opinions.
Someone is dangerous if they commit a crime.
She's saying that Elon Musk is dangerous because he is saying, with information that he now has that we don't, by the way, he is saying, hey, we need to investigate.
We need to prosecute Fauci.
That now makes you potentially a domestic terrorist.
I guarantee you, Elon Musk, I would bet my life is on a watch list at this point.
Oh yeah, absolutely.
By far.
I have no doubt in my mind.
Let me ask you, comment below.
It's a sliding scale.
Who determines what is dangerous?
What should be the litmus test to determine who is dangerous?
I think that it should always be the law.
If it's a crime, someone commits a crime, okay, that's dangerous.
If they're speaking and you don't like what they have to say, sorry.
Change the channel or, you know, online.
Just open a new tab.
I don't know, we used to say change the channel.
It's not really relevant anymore.
Just, you know, open a new tab.
Well, he's leaking facts.
Yes.
That seems to be the real problem.
Yes.
And he, by the way, he didn't say, you know, gather him up with pitchforks with everybody in the center of a town and just have a mob rule.
He's saying prosecute.
That's a legal process.
Right.
Right now what you're doing with Donald Trump is saying, oh, he's got to go to jail.
He's got to be convicted of this.
He can never run for president again.
He did this.
He did this.
Put him in jail.
But that's totally fine.
It's not dangerous to say that about a former president and the probably one of the top people running for the presidency again in 2024.
It's not dangerous to say that about your political opponents?
No.
Really?
That's interesting, KJ.
No, there's nothing wrong with wielding power as you stand up there.
I can't contract the names.
KJ, KJP, Jean-Pierre Lafitte, everybody.
It's all Jean-Pierre Lafitte these days.
Well, she says it's dangerous.
Who's it dangerous to?
She says to Fauci.
Why is it dangerous to Fauci?
Because it's actual information coming out about things that he did.
Stop breaking the law, asshole!
Yes?
You can't call Fauci a piece of shit.
Why?
Because he's clearly a piece of shit.
It's true.
Please stop pointing at the piece of shit.
What a pile of shit.
I apologize.
Like I said, PG-13.
I don't know why you guys have like 8 year olds watching this show.
They shouldn't be.
It's not our fault.
Well, I think that it's fair that even 8 year olds know what he is.
Yeah, that's true.
That's true.
We should probably say poo.
He's a piece of poo.
He's a piece of poo, children.
Remember that.
Now, let's go through some of the things that I would argue are dangerous coming from Jean-Pierre, who, by the way, of course, gets to wield the power of the government.
Here she is discussing the recession and, of course, being factually incorrect, lying to the American... either lying or incompetence.
I'm willing to bet lying because no one buys that we have the strongest economy in modern American history.
Here's Jean-Pierre being dangerous herself.
When we look at where we are economically, and we are stronger economically than we have been in history.
When you look at the unemployment numbers at 3.6%, when you look at the jobs numbers, more than 8.7 million of new jobs created.
That is important.
Okay, so we've done a whole segment rebutting this.
When she said that in July, inflation was at best at 8.5%.
If you were using the same metrics that we would have been using during the Carter and during the Reagan administration, it would be well into the double digits, the worst inflation that we've seen ever in modern American history.
Just to give you an idea, grocery prices were up well over 13%, the highest price since 1979.
So you know that that's not true.
What do you think happens when someone in a position of authority says, this is the greatest economy that we've seen?
And someone else speaks out and says, oh, that's a lie.
That's dangerous.
That's dangerous.
You're sowing mistrust in institutions.
This is all predicated on the idea that it's dangerous to sow mistrust in your medical institutions.
By the way, the medical institution is Fauci.
How do I know?
He said that denying him is denying science.
Remember, he said that.
He said, people who are against me are really against science.
Thank you, Judge Science.
If they say the economy is great, and you say, actually, no it's not, because I'm living it, that's dangerous, that's dangerous.
You're sowing mistrust in this administration, and the economic experts, the advisors.
So basically, anything that goes against what they want to tell you is dangerous.
You're a MAGA extremist.
Remember, that's actually something that former Vice President Joe Biden said.
Here's another dangerous example of Jean-Pierre.
This is her, I believe, on gas prices, that they were going up, and she of course tried to deflect.
It's a lot more nuanced than that, right?
Peter, you know this.
There have been global challenges that we all have dealt with, when I say all meaning other countries.
I'm a grave robber of the stars.
There's been a pandemic and there's been Putin's war.
And Putin's war has increased gas prices at the pump.
Yeah, okay, that's bullcrap.
But let's go to Biden right now, because she just said it's the strongest economy.
Let's see what former Vice President Biden, nothing up my sleeves, live right now, saying we need an economy that's not boom or bust.
Let's see what he has to say right now.
$400 a month.
That's a genuine savings for seniors.
This matters so many families with loved ones who have diabetes and rely on insulin to survive, going from an average of $400 down to $35 a month.
In January, they won't have to choose between paying their insulin Paying for their insulin and in many cases putting food on the table.
It matters.
I don't know if you know this, the first president in modern history to bring down the price of pharmaceutical drugs was Donald Trump.
Hold on, hold on.
When he started talking, I think the Dow was up over 300 points.
It's now only up 226.
The more he talks, the lower it goes.
Oh gosh, it's still going down!
Let me hear what else he has to say.
The people behind him look like they've been hurt.
Well, they're sold.
Ah, okay, there you go, that's enough.
She just said it was the strongest economy.
For a lot of folks, things are still pretty rough.
So let's tell you that you're saving, seniors are saving $400.
Yeah, how much more are they spending?
And what about not just seniors, what about the rest of Americans?
So, right there in real time, she just said it was the strongest economy.
He just kind of admitted saying for some people, it's really rough.
What he means by some people is the vast majority of people in comparison to the previous administration.
So, we just had her talking about gas.
Hey, I think that's dangerous.
Because she just said, oh, it's because of Putin.
Well, gas prices were going up well before that war.
And by the way, the United States is the world's top crude oil producer.
Just to be clear.
And you know why that's dangerous?
Because if you tell people, hey, gas prices are going up and the reason we're being squeezed is because of Putin and his war, then you have more Americans who support tens of billions of dollars being given to a war that they don't need to be involved with.
That, to me, is dangerous.
The dishonesty that could lead us into war.
No?
How about when President Biden said that gas was $5 a gallon when he came into office?
I'm like, what?
What is he talking about?
It wasn't even that at the time.
No, he got it there, though.
He tried.
He gave it to the college truck.
He did give it to the old college truck.
Close.
At least for premium, it went way over.
Yes.
And here she is, by the way, talking about the Griner, Grimey as she liked to be called, the Griner Prisoner Swap.
I've talked about this, and I'll say this again.
Here were our choices.
Our choices was Brittany or no one at all.
Bring home one American or no American at all.
None at all!
I choose none at all!
If it means releasing the Merchant of Death, aka Lord of War, none!
Nobody!
None!
You gave one of the most dangerous people alive for an idiot.
Yes!
He's free, but offended by the trade value.
Yes!
He's a little pissed off, like, really?
That's all I got?
You gave away one of the most dangerous criminals on Earth Even if you gave a Russian that's here in America in prison for coke, it wouldn't be an even trade.
No, it wouldn't.
That's true.
That's a very good analogy.
Astonishing.
When is she sprouting?
Okay?
I don't know how to get through this.
Even if you gave a Russian that's here in America in prison for coke, it wouldn't be
an even trade.
No, it wouldn't.
That's true.
That's a very good analogy.
Astonishing.
Yes.
Just to be clear.
No person at all.
Also, think about this.
What she's basically saying is Russia gave us the ultimatum and we had no negotiating power.
Why?
Well, because this guy's retarded.
Have you seen him speak?
Yes.
Have you seen him speak?
Yes.
Soup just leaked down his face and we took it as a yes.
It wasn't really so much soup as it was a blended steak.
Yes.
It was, well, it was the best.
Everything he drinks is a form of milkshake.
He's the same waiter as you.
By the way, hit the like button.
Hit the share button right now.
Sharing is caring because the algorithms on YouTube, they all care about the likes and whatever.
Go watch Unrumble.
Okay.
Also, wonderful sponsor to the show, Walther Firearms.
They're the official firearms sponsor of Lighthouse Cutter Studios.
I actually went to them, just so you know, because I carry their firearms, and it's a match made in heaven.
You can go look up their PDP.
Just do this, waltherarms.com.
You can go online, find a dealer.
All I ask is just go and try it.
If you're looking for Christmas for maybe a firearm, try it!
Just try the Walther.
And they're fine with me saying it.
I don't need to say anything else.
Run a search.
Search anything.
Were they using Bang, that bent back paper clip?
I don't give a crap.
The Purple Gorilla, what was it, Bonzo Buddy, early on with the internet?
You can go ask Jeeves, Walther, PDP, review, see what people are saying, try it.
That's all I ask.
If you don't like it, well then what the hell's the difference?
Let's go on.
So the Cambridge Dictionary, and I always want to say Cambridge Analytica, it rolls off the tongue, Cambridge Dictionary just changed the definition of woman.
Really?
Yeah, which brings us to the segment this week, the experts are wrong.
Yeah.
So.
Feels good.
Let's go back just so you see how words are changed, right?
Dangerous, that's the word that's used now for the patriots out there.
We'll get to that in a second.
But now woman, if we change the definition of woman, that's how you have new YouTube policies.
Yeah.
We just could have been banned accidentally over not genderings Sam written properly.
Correct.
Think about this.
Think about where we are as a country.
Sure.
That if we said he, accidentally, I'm not saying that we say he.
No, no, no.
But if.
Sometimes I say he.
But if we said he, be removed from YouTube!
But you can upload content about your ghost nipples!
This is where we are!
This is what happens when you change language.
Trust the science.
Trust the experts.
Well, the experts have said that, by the way, how we've defined woman since the beginning of modern history, I know some people say, oh, there was some Native American tribe that had a third gender.
Shut up!
They just decided they were wrong about that.
And here's the thing, remember in school you used to have to show your work?
A lot of hillbillies that had a third gender.
Several eyes.
Well, that was a third foot.
Flipper hands.
Remember when you were a kid?
You had to show your work.
You couldn't just give the answer.
You had to show how you got to that answer.
Hey Cambridge, show your work!
Show your work.
What changed?
How are you wrong for all time?
Show your work.
So let's go back to then, how Cambridge defined a woman for most, and by that I mean all of human history.
This is in the way back machine.
By that I mean two days ago.
An adult female human being.
A wife or female sexual partner.
Huh.
That was, those were the definitions of a woman.
They even gave some examples.
Unless you say, well that's out of context.
Like, wife could be anything.
Let me give you some of the examples.
Can I hear it in a phrase?
Sure.
Origin, it's Greek for you're an asshole that you're asking for it.
All references are available.
You're an asshole!
So Cambridge, here are some examples.
She's a really nice woman.
Apparently, Jeff has a new woman.
She is Ireland's first woman equals female president.
Ooh, that one's problematic.
That's rough.
Because it's basically saying that female is a synonym for woman.
Oops.
What happened to biology and gender?
They're separate!
We were wrong!
I'm pretty offended here.
Yeah, well, you know what?
So am I, as one who has respect for the English language.
Yes.
You know, and meaning for words.
Former respect, I should say.
Formerly had respect.
Former meaning.
That's then the definition, which brings us to now!
Here's the change, okay?
Cambridge, they added this new definition.
In addition to the other ones, this is an addendum.
An adult who lives and identifies as female, though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth.
Right.
Sources say.
Yes.
Good.
I don't understand this.
Here's some examples.
Can I hear it in a sentence?
Sure, you psycho.
She was the first trans woman elected to a national office.
Wishful thinking.
Hold on.
If it's woman, why do you have to say trans?
Yeah, they don't even respect their own rules.
No.
Because I thought the definition covered that.
Excuse me, sir, but you're breaking your own law.
People have had a meeting about this.
I've been bamboozled!
Name that movie line.
It's Christmas, you should get that one.
Comment below.
I think you know it, right?
All I know is they're taking the dick out of dictionary.
The Burgermeister Meisterburger?
Sorry, what?
The Burgermeister Meisterburger.
Oh yeah!
It's a difficult responsibility!
All right.
I don't have an out here.
Mary is a woman who was assigned male at birth.
Again, we've just made up another term here, so now we've changed the definition of woman, we've changed the definition of dangerous, as we just talked about there, Jean-Pierre, and not really changed it, just broadened it to mean anyone who disagrees with me, but right here there's also been something else in this very example that has been changed.
Mary is a woman who was assigned male at birth.
We never use the term assigned.
That is goofy, dumb, dumb, trans activist language.
Doctors don't assign anything.
If you have someone, I don't know what the science is of studying Turtles.
I don't know.
Are turtles asexual?
I have no idea.
The point is, they turn it over, they don't assign the genitals, they recognize it.
They identify it.
No one's assigning anything.
No one's assigning male any more than they're assigning brown hair.
Yeah, you assign homework, and if that was the case, I would a-school.
Yes.
No nipples, though.
They also kind of paint themselves into a corner.
Go back to the definition a little bit.
They say... No.
Sorry.
Sorry.
Keeping a straight face talking about this is difficult.
Go back to the definition.
They say that you actually identify and live or live and identify as.
So, somebody who just identifies as a woman but doesn't necessarily always live as a woman.
Aren't you kind of now...
Excluding a certain group of that population?
Because don't people kind of float back and forth sometimes?
Yes, they do.
You're a luggage thief.
Yes.
Yeah, exactly.
Right?
You don't always, you don't always live with a woman.
The luggage thief, his, her, whatever.
The daily schedule was, win female beauty pageant, drop a deuce in the men's bathroom, and steal a Samsonite.
Yes.
And then claim it was yours the whole time.
Yes.
This is my jewelry.
Yes.
Just stop screwing up words.
This has always been my jewelry.
This was, this was given to me at my, uh, bar mitzvah.
Yes.
What?
What?
You don't, you don't attend Sado?
Of course that's my, that's my kippa.
Why?
What are you saying?
My sweet 6-3ne.
Yes.
I invent everything.
I have AIDS!
I'm the last gay person on the planet?
It's AIDS brain!
Yes.
Stop it.
Stop it, Casey.
I'm in charge of something that makes no sense.
Hey it's- **laughter**
What is- Uhhh...
**laughter** What-
Did they re- Did they change the definition of male?
Probably, but this is designed to accommodate people like Sam Britton.
People like the ghost nipple guy.
This is what it's designed to accommodate.
You are now dangerous if you disagree with it.
Why?
Why do you mistrust your institutions?
Cambridge, the most respected halls in higher learning and those making dictionary.
Not anymore.
No.
Oh, they haven't been for a while.
Come on.
You get an A, whatever you feel is the answer.
Yes.
Congratulations.
You're a graduate of Cambridge.
Same people who say, trust your institutions.
Hold on.
Johns Hopkins says that we're not going to perform it anymore because of the COVID.
They don't trust the science.
Oh.
How did it change?
Show your work.
I will tell you this, definitively.
There is no work.
There is no work.
When we're discussing the trans issue, there is no work.
There is no evidence that someone can be born into the wrong body with the wrong brain, which, by the way, entirely deconstructs the idea that gender is a societal construct to begin with, because there should be no male brain or female brain.
That's what they used to use, but now there are 72 genders.
Are there 72 different brain types?
There is no evidence that exists.
You can take one small study They conducted it again with a larger sample size.
We have the references available at lightearthcreditor.com, the Swedish study.
The changes in the brain only occur after cross-sex hormone replacement therapy.
They can't show their work because there is no work, so it makes it just a lot easier to say you're dangerous and shut up.
Yeah.
All right.
Which brings us to the Twitter Files part five.
I almost said fart five.
You are a child, aren't you?
I really did.
You know what's funny?
I was just talking with a friend the other day.
Sometimes Dave and I do this.
We're so alike.
And this friend said, you know, it really is important to, you know, obviously in life to have an attitude that, you know, obviously that would represent that you're grateful.
I said, you were about to say attitude of gratitude.
You didn't want to be cliche.
That's exactly right.
I know the exact thought process.
Alright.
Gratitude in that attitude.
Yep.
That's what I say to everyone.
Twitter dump.
Fart5.
Fart5.
You see, you stopped yourself.
I know.
I did it anyway.
You weren't happy with it?
I wasn't happy with it.
I wouldn't feel good about myself.
You were disappointed in yourself and you're like, I need to let that out.
Major announcements on Mug Club coming up.
So Part 5 of the Twitter files, right, they dropped on Monday after our show.
We covered Parts 3 and Parts 4, and there's a lot here.
I don't think there's as much to go through as Part 3 and Parts 4.
We'll be talking about Yole Roth tomorrow.
I know we said we would do that today, but it's a really long segment.
It will be most of the show.
It'll be a solid 40 minutes, and we just didn't have time for it today because Sam Brinton is hilarious.
Now...
We had to fit it in.
So we now know a little bit more about the removal of President Trump from Twitter.
Okay.
So let's go through some of the most egregious evidence that we have.
And again, you can comment below.
If you think that we've missed something really important, we can always revisit this tomorrow.
There'll probably be more Twitter dumps every day this week, or certainly a couple.
So on January 8th, this is when President Trump issued only two tweets since his last message on January 6th, right, to go home in love and peace.
So to be clear, that was, we talked about that yesterday.
Trump's first tweet, right, it's at 646 a.m.
and this is what it says.
The 75,000 great American patriots, that's key, we're talking about language today.
Oh, I always have to do that, right?
The 75,000 great American patriots.
Million, sorry, the quote's truncated.
What?
75 million, Mr. President.
Oh, the 75 million.
But did he write... I think I wrote 1,000.
Did I mean to write million?
You may have meant to write... Shut up.
It's million in the tweet.
Oh!
That's us.
Fake noose.
That's us.
Fake... noose.
I don't think so!
The 75 million!
Thank you, Gerald.
You ruined the... Look, you ruined the first half.
I would never say that to people.
That's what people tell me.
They say, he ruined the first half.
But he came back.
He redeemed himself.
Good for him.
He's one of the... He's one of the patriots, right?
You're one of the patriots.
I know.
I love you.
You're one of the patriots.
The 75 million great American patriots who voted for me, America First, and Make America Great Again, will have a giant voice long into the future.
Long into the future.
They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape, or form.
Then we have at 744, the key word there is Patriot.
744 AM, President Trump tweeted, my vocal cords will be spent.
No Gilbert Gottfried on the Mug Club segment today.
To all who have asked, I will not be going to the inauguration on January 20th.
You've heard me say this since 2015.
He always passes it off as somebody else.
Nobody asked.
Nobody asked.
So many people asked me, I say no.
They say won't you, I say I'm not going, I won't go.
I can't look, I'm tweeting this because I'm tired of you people always asking where I'm not going to go to the inauguration.
So stop asking.
All the people who ask.
So many people.
He does it all the time.
So funny.
And by the way, you can clearly, I think we can all agree, nothing Dan worthy there.
No.
Not even close.
He's saying he's not going somewhere.
He's saying he's not going somewhere.
And the first tweet, again, where he said, the 75 million great American patriots who voted for me.
And by the way, that also, the reason that shouldn't be banned is that's the count.
Right.
In other words, he didn't inflate the count and say, I know it's more like 200 million.
In other words, if you take his number, he's using the count that you have given the public, which would mean at that point in time, and certainly with that tweet, he is not arguing fraud with the election.
Right.
He's also not singling out any particular group of that 75 million, which is important information for what comes next.
Right.
This is what the Twitter staffers said, and by the way, they came to the same conclusion.
Spoiler alert.
So this is an identity redacted, I believe.
Is this on their Slack channel?
This is on their private communications.
All the references are available at loudestcrowder.com.
You can always read all of this.
I recommend you do, but it is pretty boring, some of it.
They said, I think we'd have a hard time saying this is incitement.
It's pretty clear he's saying the, quote, American patriots are those ones who voted for him and not the terrorists.
We call them that, right?
From Wednesday.
I don't even want to say terrorists.
I'd say trespassers.
Let's be clear about this with January 6th.
As someone who has been guilty of a lot of trespassing, I'm still not allowed at the Juiceland in Austin.
Really?
Yeah.
You don't want to go there though, do you?
No, I don't.
I can get my green juice nowhere else because I would never buy it anyway.
Let's compare them to the hijackers.
Let's compare them to someone like the Unabomber, to McVeigh.
They have a plan, and they have weapons.
People didn't have those things!
Even the people who were trespassers, who were disruptive, who should probably be charged with trespassing, maybe vandalism, they didn't show up with weapons and an actual plan to do anything.
You can go and watch our entire episode on January 6th.
They did have a forefoot gallows, though.
Yes, they did.
No, forefoot is being generous.
That is generous.
Their gallows couldn't hang Willow.
It was for squirrels.
Don't steal nuts.
It was more of a snare, really.
Yes.
So here's another staff member here.
Anita Navarroli.
I hope I'm getting that right.
I need one too.
Anita Arioli.
That lady has none of them.
Guy.
She has no variolis.
How are those ariolis?
Not very good.
They're not there.
So Anita Navarroli also didn't see a violation.
I also am not seeing clear or coded incitement in the Donald J. Trump tweet.
Now, this is pretty important because they often use this term, coded language.
That's code.
That's a dog whistle.
Go back to Andrew Breitbart.
You can go and watch him when he was interviewed by, I believe it was Martin Brashear.
I think Martin Bashir, Bashir, I can't remember his last name, but he was trying to trap Andrew Breitbart and say, this is coded language, isn't it, Andrew?
He said, what?
You think there's some kind of a Rolodex?
He asked him then, he said, what's your relationship like with alcohol?
Why are you asking me that?
There was no one better at understanding the media than Andrew Breitbart.
Not talking about Andrew, not talking about Breitbart the trademark, Andrew Breitbart the man.
They were trying to imply he was an alcoholic and he was a racist.
He mocked them for the comment about coded language when they said, what's your relationship with alcohol?
He said, why are you asking me that?
You turn it back on them.
And even, this is important because right here they're saying, no clear or even coded incitement.
And they really wanted to be able to claim there was coded incitement.
Now here's something else.
You had the Twitter sort of in internal consensus, okay?
They said, doesn't seem like there's something there.
Well their head of legal, and now on the unemployment line, Majaya Gadd, decided to go forward with a ban anyway.
Here we go, here's a quote.
The biggest question is whether a tweet like the one this morning from Trump, which isn't a rule violation on its face, it's a rule violation on its back, is being used as coded incitement to further violence.
So they said it's not clear incitement.
It's not even coded incitement.
And this person is saying, while it's very obvious it's not a violation, I'm going to say it is coded.
Again, language.
Language.
If you just say, well it's not racist, it's coded.
It's not incitement to violence, it's coded.
These are the same people right now who are trying to round you up ideologically.
I don't mean round you up and put you in FEMA camps.
I have the files!
I mean they're trying to round you up ideologically, put you on a watch list if you disagree or you mistrust your institutions.
Because that's coded extremism.
That's coded militia warfare.
Language.
Woman is not a thing.
Male is not a thing.
Assigned no longer means what it meant.
Patriots no longer means what it meant.
And Donald Trump's tweets, when taken on their face, even though they were acknowledged across the board on Twitter as not being incitement to violence, and most people even saying, no, I don't even think it's coded, well, polled rank.
Coded.
So now coded.
That's the new catch-all.
Everything is coded.
And he was 100, he was very clear in this.
He didn't say to these groups of American patriots.
He said to the 75 million.
That is everyone who voted for Donald Trump.
So that tells you one of two things.
She doesn't believe that this is coded language or in her mind all 75 million of the American patriots are terrorists.
Yeah.
I'll even distill that.
The vast majority, by vast majority, I mean 99.9999% of people who were there on January 6th, hundreds of thousands of people were entirely peaceful, probably because they followed President Trump's advice to be peaceful.
Exactly.
Peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.
Coded!
I'm sorry, that's coded language for go burn stuff down?
No, that was BLM.
I'm sorry, that was when they were burning stuff down.
No, it means walk into a place and then a woman gets shot and no one does anything about it.
Right, yes.
I believe that's what he, that was coded.
Mantis coded.
It's a dog whistle.
Yes.
Very loud dog whistle we all can hear.
It is Little Orphan Stelter decoder ring.
That's correct.
And by the way, so we had hundreds of thousands of people January 6th.
Fraction of them even went into the Capitol.
People charged about 960.
Oh, there you go.
You have the Newsweek overlay.
All references are available at loudmouthcutter.com.
So, this is what they're saying is the coded language is the term Patriots.
Now, to be fair to Gad, we do actually have a photograph of these dreaded American Patriots.
Just to be clear.
Yeah.
Oh, well, yeah.
Seems like we should have seen it coming.
Yeah.
Huh.
Yeah.
See why you... So odd he wanted to make it great again when he hadn't even gotten there yet.
I know.
He was a clairvoyant patriot, I mean terrorist.
Always was, and great terrorist.
Yes.
Make George great again.
So here's the thing, you have people at Twitter who don't, who, every single person, including the people who had Donald Trump removed, acknowledged that there was no incitement to violence.
That there was no clear violation, that there was no violation at all.
Every single person, including Vijaya, whatever.
Everyone, the vast majority of people, agreed that it wasn't even coded.
One person who wields the power to remove the President of the United States decided to break ranks and say, you know what?
I'm going to say it's coded.
Hold on a second.
Let me ask you this.
When we talk about democracy and we talk about power, Donald Trump, then President, one person removed the President's voice.
Bajaj Yad.
Hey, Bajaj, what have you done?
Were you elected?
Ever?
Do you represent the American people?
Have you ever been voted into anything?
Have you ever been, you know what, has an American ever asked you to represent their voice?
Sitting president, removed from one person.
One person.
And by the way, this is pretty important because there are other heads of state who are also assholes, but in this case, agreed that Donald Trump should not be removed.
Let's read some quotes here.
This is, again, in the leaks.
You have Angela Merkel, right, from Germany.
And that's Germany!
They suck!
this angle the Chancellor considers it problematic that the accounts of the US
president have now been permanently blocked and that's Germany. They suck!
Yes. They did some stuff back in the 40s.
By the way, they're no fans of Donald Trump.
None of these people are.
You have French President Emmanuel Macron saying, I don't want to live in a democracy where the key decisions are decided by a private player, a private social network.
I want it to be decided by a law, voted by your representative, or by regulation, governance, democratically discussed and approved by democratic leaders.
And if you want to wait, we may have some flights, we could put you on standby.
Mexico's president.
Andres Manuel Lopez.
Sorry, I was thinking of the guy who did Hamilton.
I like it when my founding fathers rap.
Yes.
It's funny, because they didn't do that.
I didn't do it.
No, it turned out to be historically inaccurate.
Yeah, it did.
I didn't know that, though, the whole time.
I didn't know it was appropriation.
No.
Manuel Lopez Obrador said, uh, I can tell you that at the first G20 meeting we have, I am going to make a proposal on this issue.
Yes, social media should not be used to incite violence and all that, but this cannot be used as a pretext to suspend freedom of expression.
That's weird!
Holmes!
So you've got three leaders of countries, people who do not like Donald Trump, Germany, France, Mexico, saying this is wrong.
This is wrong.
And by the way, they don't even believe in freedom of speech in these other countries.
They actually still do believe in hate speech, just so you know.
They do not have freedom of speech enshrined in their constitution as we do.
They were saying it's wrong.
Everyone at Twitter said it was wrong.
And then the one person, Vijaya, said, well, okay, I agree with all these people.
There's nothing clear.
And the only way I break is I disagree with everyone else.
I say it's coded so.
Bye-bye, President.
I say this again, if you would take the power of Washington, D.C.
over that of Hollywood and Silicon Valley, you need a CAT scan.
You need a CAT scan!
And it's why conservatives need to stop fighting the wrong fight.
Sure, you need to vote, but if you're just focusing on voting, guess what?
It's hopeless.
It's lost.
When people try and say, oh, this culture war bullshit, it's far more important!
But Jaya had more power than the President of the United States, and completely disregarded The leaders of three other major countries.
And by the way, this November, I believe this was, was this the Mexican president responded to Musk's poll about reinstating Trump?
Was this the, is this the Mexican president still?
I think it's still the Mexican president.
He said, I already voted for Trump to be able to use Twitter!
The Statue of Liberty must not remain an empty symbol!
He just has the top button buttoned with that tie.
Alright, it's time to do presidential!
Oh, what?
Look at that guy disposing of nuclear waste!
Looks like Matt Damon, but grosser!
He might be loco, but he said it, prez.
Don't send it here, no!
Don't send it over here!
No, not the nuclear waste!
We're fine with that!
Don't send that, dude!
Where's my car if I'm stopping?
While we're doing this next part here, I want to make sure that the research page, guys, pull me the part where Vajaya actually says what triggered her in that, that could be coded language, in that.
Oh yeah, the word of Patriots.
Yeah, that's important.
It's American Patriots, and then it's one other thing that she has in there.
Pull that tweet where she's like, specifically I'm referring to these phrases.
Pull that for us, because I think that's really important for people to be able to see what she actually... I do agree.
While they're pulling that, hit the like button right now, or hit the rumble button if you're on rumble, because, you know, the algorithms definitely do not want you to.
And by the way, let me be really clear about something, too, while we're talking about this.
If you think Twitter's bad, you just haven't had someone who's opened up the floodgates with YouTube.
Oh gosh.
And Google.
It's far, far worse, and they have far more control.
Facebook.
Oh, by far, yeah.
They removed people for interviewing!
Donald Trump, President Trump.
Keep that in mind.
Remember when they pulled off DeSantis, who had three doctors from three top institutions.
I think it was Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford.
Doctors, hand to God, these guys are doctors, talking with an elected representative to the public on health information.
And they pulled the video.
And then they talk about the state of democracy being on the ballot.
Hold on a second.
Floridians elected DeSantis.
Not you, Wojcicki.
They didn't elect you.
They elected that guy overwhelmingly, by the way, and why do you hate Hispanics?
Why do you hate Hispanics in Florida?
They overwhelmingly elected DeSantis, and DeSantis decided to actually have a discussion regarding science, which at that point was barred, at that point was not allowed, and now is accepted as part of the science.
Yeah, we're dealing with that.
Yes, we are all answering for this.
Florida was right.
They elected him.
They didn't elect you.
They elected Donald Trump.
They didn't elect Vijaya.
They elected DeSantis.
They didn't elect Wojcicki.
Think about that for a second.
And they want to convince you that they're the carriers of the flame of democracy.
They hate you.
It is a tech oligarchy.
And Wojcicki, by the way, has done nothing.
Let the guy from Google sleep in her garage.
Now she gets to ban a governor.
Work that one out.
So let's compare Trump's tweets to actual violent threats, by the way, from heads of state on Twitter that were never banned.
So they say, did we get that, before we go into this, did they get the coded language of patriots?
I think we might have just got it.
Okay, let's bring that up because then I want to go to the comparison of people who were not removed.
All right, hold on, Tocanawa, he's gonna be bringing this up here.
He's sick.
He's recovering, by the way.
Yeah, Tocanawa's sick.
I thought it was.
No, that's just Britain.
No.
All right.
The last person on the planet.
I see, I see.
You got it there, Tocanawa?
I think it's this right here.
Okay, what does it say?
If you have any context or insight, we should consider I'm all ears.
Example, use of term American patriots and they will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape, or form.
Yeah.
Yeah, that's it.
Use of the term American Patriots.
So the removal.
Think about this.
The removal of... I want to distill this for you.
And please hit the share button, comment, or hit like if you haven't had it communicated this way.
Sometimes you have to bring something down to its rate-limiting factor.
You have to bring it to a finer point.
The removal of Donald Trump, then-president, And to many people, right?
The People's President.
That's what people would call it.
The People's President.
Like they say, People's Champion.
People like him.
People don't like Joe Biden.
The removal of President Trump came down to one person, which I again, vetoing everyone else, including Prime Ministers and Presidents across the world, and her own employees, acknowledging that there was No clear violation of guidelines, but it all came down to the removal of President Trump from the public sphere, because then it was followed, of course, on YouTube, everywhere else, Facebook.
The removal of President Trump came into one person, which I get, and the word patriots.
That was the justification for the removal of a sitting president.
He said American patriots, and one person said, that's coded for terrorism.
Do you feel free?
You think these people are the carriers of the flame of democracy?
That's what it comes down to.
Now let's compare that!
Him discussing American patriots.
Go home in peace and love.
Let's compare it to the actual violent threats that were never removed from Twitter.
So this was from June 2018.
Ayatollah Khamenei of Iran.
Israel is a malignant cancerous tumor in the West Asian region.
That has to be removed and eradicated.
Well, that doesn't seem coded.
Oh, jeez, he eradicated?
Yeah.
That seems pretty... They didn't even delete the tweet!
They didn't even delete the tweet!
Well, it's not really a dog whistle, it's just calling for murder.
Yes, exactly.
Did they put a label on it at all?
Maybe like a, you know, hey, Jews aren't bad kind of thing?
Yeah, I was gonna say, is it misinformation?
Do you have any idea how problematic that is to use your term?
People are gonna read that and go, well, I guess Israel is a malignant cancerous tumor.
Twitter says it's fine.
Now we have in October 2020, the former Malaysian Prime Minister, who oversaw some record numbers of church burnings, said, Muslims have a right to be angry and kill millions of French people for the massacres of the past.
What?
Hey, I know, look, I know what that, but at least it didn't say American Patriot.
True.
That would have been... I don't like French people either, but I'm not willing to go that far.
Right.
I mean... Because that would be illegal.
Because they gave us mimes.
Yes.
A special place in hell for mimes.
Here's October 2021.
Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed called for citizens to take up arms against one of its northern states, the Tigray region.
Literally calling for violence.
Get your guns!
Get your knives, get your machetes, and go to this region.
That's exactly what they did in Rwanda.
The radio station... Good hotels.
Exactly.
Great place.
The radio station basically was like, hey, go and hunt them down.
Here's where they are.
That's exactly what he's using Twitter for right there.
He's basically saying, hey guys, we should go take up arms against these people and kill them.
and twitter thought that was okay to leave up and probably because they had a
policy in place that said if a world leader is speaking out, somebody who's
elected it's going to have to cross an incredibly
big red line for us to be able to remove that or even do anything to throttle
that from getting out to other people and in this case I can't even go back to this enough. If he had just said
American patriots will not be disrespected blah blah blah It would still not cross the line, but at least you could go, well, there wasn't surrounding context.
In the same freaking tweet, he said the 75 million.
He defined the American Patriots in the tweet.
Yes.
So there's no ambiguity.
There is no dog whistle.
If somebody took it as a dog whistle, they're looking too hard for it.
Yes, exactly.
They're the guy in the basement.
He called me to ask As opposed to someone saying we have to eradicate the Jews.
Yes, exactly.
I don't think you need to look for it.
It's just there.
It's just right in front of your face.
Hey, what happened to your face and your hands?
They're missing.
Yeah, but I did stay at a Rwanda Inn Express last night.
They don't have frequent stay points.
No, they don't.
We'll leave the light off for you.
And this also proves one more thing, too.
Because what's the primary difference?
And I don't mean the primary difference that, like you just said, President Trump, then-President Trump, of course, the sitting president, did not call for violence.
And that there was no coded language.
Sure, of course that.
But there's another difference.
Malaysian Prime Minister.
We're talking about that.
Ayatollah Khomeini.
We're talking about the Ethiopian Prime Minister.
These people are actually calling for violence and genocide.
Tells you that not all countries are equal.
Not all cultures are equal.
Twitter doesn't believe that.
Twitter doesn't believe that!
If an Ethiopian Prime Minister screams in the forest, but there's no one there to hear it.
These other countries have never gotten it right.
They've never gotten it right.
So at the same time, while they condemn a sitting American president for America First, for referring to Americans as patriots because he loves this country and believes that it's the best country in the world, and they say that's coded language for terrorism, they inherently believe it because they decide to treat these other actual world leaders who call for violence as the insignificant stooges of the world that they are.
May not like it.
Is it arrogant?
Sure.
Does the United States of America and the rest like the shortened intro for Gilligan's Island?
And if you don't like it, well, you are probably a terrorist.
That's not, well, that's technically coded for asshole.
Hit share, like, all that stuff, because the algorithm absolutely hates us.
We are about to go to Mug Club exclusive.
Thank you so much, Rumble.
YouTube, if we're still there.
Are we still there right now?
Yes.
▲
Export Selection