Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 7, 2022 - Louder with Crowder

01:13:37

DON’T TRUST THE EXPERTS: WHY DID LEFTISTS SAY I WAS RIGHT? | Louder with Crowder

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thanks for watching!
	Yeah, he can get a little moody, but you know, he's got a lot on him.
	Yeah, it's just one tree though.
	Yeah, but he's stressed.
	He shouldn't be worrying about this.
	I'm gonna say something.
	Hey Jesus, you know this fig tree thing?
	Really, it's not that big a deal.
	Well, it's not just about the fig tree.
	Right, I know, yeah.
	You've got a lot on your plate.
	We can really just take care of this stuff for you.
	It's allegorical is what I'm trying to say.
	Right, but if you need some figs, if you really need some, we can just go get you some.
	We can buy you figs.
	You want figs?
	We can go to the temple and buy you figs.
	Hold on.
	They're selling figs at the temple?
	Yeah, where the Court of the Gentiles used to be.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	But not the dog.
	The dog is a monster.
	We have a lot to get to today.
	Yacouz is sick, so we wish him a speedy recovery.
	A lot of people in the office right now are getting sick.
	Could be the COVID, could be anything else because, you know, you're not really testing when you go into the emergency rooms anymore.
	But we have a lot to get to today.
	Before I get to that, look, there's obviously a story right now that's breaking.
	We don't have all the information regarding Senator Ted Cruz's daughter.
	He's been on the show.
	I don't want to even have to address this.
	It's a private matter.
	This is someone who is not of age.
	But when you have people on the left right now, they're saying, oh, you know, hey, our heart goes out to Ted Cruz and his daughter doesn't deserve this, but this is what happens when you create anti-trans legislation.
	You're politicizing it right there.
	Just shut up.
	I don't know.
	That's all I want.
	Can everyone just shut up about it?
	That's all I want to say.
	I don't want to say anything else.
	Just don't be an asshole your whole life, okay?
	So, what else do we have to get to today?
	Time announced as Person of the Year, and surprise, it's not a surprise.
	Something else we want to get to today is, this is going to be the theme, you know I've always said this to you, don't trust the experts, and by that I don't mean Don't believe that there are people who have expertise, but I mean do not simply appeal to authority.
	Do not defer to experts, because all of the experts got everything wrong as it relates to Twitter.
	We're talking about the file updates.
	We're talking about Wikipedia and what they are doing.
	It's this circular feedback loop of authority and expertise.
	And everyone got the Iran morality police story wrong, except Nadia.
	I wasn't even here that day!
	Except us.
	And now journalists are quoting us.
	And I'm not saying that I'm an expert.
	Please, I am not.
	And certainly not the alternates.
	No offense.
	No, I didn't even know the story.
	I just read what was in front of me.
	Right.
	And then Gerald knew it.
	Yeah.
	And then you guys got it right.
	I'm in the picture for some reason.
	And then the rest of the media picked it up.
	They're like, how did we get this wrong?
	Because you didn't read one paragraph down.
	It was tough.
	We'll be talking about that and more, but Gerald A. is here.
	How are you, sir?
	I'm feeling good about myself.
	Big J Journalist over here.
	Yes, there you go.
	Big J Journalist.
	I don't know what that means.
	Sounds like a horrible nickname.
	And you know him, you love him.
	Fastest man on his feet.
	He is in Detroit this weekend.
	It's December 8th at Mark Ridley's Comedy Castle.
	Dave Landa, how are you, sir?
	Ahoy.
	Good.
	How about you?
	I'm better.
	Are you feeling better?
	Yeah, I had an acid reflux bout.
	Oh.
	Yes.
	I have a thing called Barrett's esophagus.
	It's fun.
	That doesn't sound very fun.
	I don't need to overshare.
	That's what I do.
	What is Barrett's esophagus?
	It's when you spend your teen years drinking and smoking cigarettes and then later in life, well, you pay for it.
	Yeah, it's just for me.
	It's somewhat self-inflicted.
	Yeah, that and I just come from a long line of acid-y people.
	So, asymmetrical genes.
	Yes.
	Dave, that's the gift that keeps on giving.
	Yes, it burns.
	It burns.
	Can you use it offensively?
	Like a Dilophosaurus?
	Boy, I never tried, but maybe.
	I think you just bought yourself a segment.
	Oh, there you go.
	Dilapidated.
	There's a bodega store owner down the street who's been pissing me off lately.
	I want to see if you can blind him.
	Ouch.
	So my question to you, before we get to everything else, is if you could name any one person of the year, who would you name person of the year?
	If you were Time Magazine, and you're not, and neither is time.
	Frank Stallone.
	That's for you, Norm.
	No one, no one sings by a, by a drum fire as well as Frank's.
	Before we get on to any of that, uh, I don't know if you know this, but a TikToker, uh, now is saying, and this is a culture we live in, that if you do not want to date a trans woman, and of course this is not new, but this TikToker explain, this TikToker, TikToker, those words sound weird coming out of my mouth as though it's a thing.
	TikToker.
	Did I say that?
	You did.
	But I hate myself!
	You do.
	You should.
	Ugh.
	This tick-toggerer is explaining to you why if you do not want to date a trans woman, you are transphobic.
	It all makes sense now.
	Trans women are women.
	So if you're heterosexual and you're a man and you said you wouldn't date a trans woman because it's a preference, that's just transphobia.
	Period.
	The majority of the time, our preferences are rooted in something problematic.
	It could be trauma.
	Biology.
	Racism.
	Transphobia.
	The list goes on.
	It's been asked why it's transphobic to not want to date a trans woman.
	Already starting off on the wrong foot by referring to cis women as regular women.
	Then says something about trans women not being able to carry children.
	If that's your sole reason for dating someone, keep that same energy for all the women who are infertile.
	You know what?
	I'm gonna give her this one.
	I'm gonna give her this one.
	If that's the case, yes, I guess in this case I would be transphobic.
	If it were wedding night, and you know, you go to the chambers, and there's a swinging penis and testicles, I would find myself fearful.
	I guess that would be phobic.
	It's science.
	Yeah, it would be strange, you know, I guess when you go to the doctor and you're like, we're having trouble conceiving, and they're like, we can't figure it out either.
	She is a woman, technically.
	I don't know if the reason that you can't have children is because you're morbidly obese but proud of it, so that's brave, or the fact that babies don't come out of wieners.
	I don't know.
	I don't know what it is.
	We've had a lot of anal sex but not any luck with child.
	I don't know how this works.
	I've even stood on my head.
	It doesn't work.
	Fine.
	Do you think they're doing that?
	Do you think that a trans individual is like, ah, I'm on my ovulation cycle!
	I want to find the Mormon trans, or the Catholic trans, natural family planning couple.
	If you exist, comment below.
	I will host you.
	Because that is commitment, and that is to be respected, even if it's crazy.
	Steven, that's not ovulation, that's just gas.
	What was that?
	Was she trans?
	I don't think she was trans, right?
	No, she seemed to be a regular.
	I mean, cis.
	I hope she's not trans because then I would feel very confused.
	Well, I'll tell you what, then I guess I wouldn't be transphobic.
	There's what they call the barely passables.
	She's what they would call the super passables.
	Yes, I've only been non-transphobic twice.
	I was very drunk.
	Yes, very, very drunk.
	She said all of our preferences are rooted in something problematic.
	She said they can be.
	Are you sure she did that?
	Can we watch it again?
	Did she say they can be rooted in something problematic?
	Are you sure you want to watch it again?
	No, of course not.
	No, she's an idiot.
	Trans women are women.
	No.
	So if you're heterosexual and you're a man and you said you wouldn't date a trans woman because it's a preference, that's just transphobia.
	Period.
	The majority of the time our preferences are rooted in something pragmatic.
	So the majority of the time our preferences are for waffle fries.
	Is that rooted in something problematic?
	Well, if a trans woman is a woman, then why are you putting the word trans in front of it?
	Well, also, when they say, oh, you know, sex is biological and gender is social, uh, male to female trans is the term that they use.
	MTF.
	FTM.
	Right.
	So, the whole thing just, it's, look, it's all ball bearings nowadays.
	Okay.
	We have... Unless you cut them off.
	Yeah.
	Well, yeah.
	I don't know what to say with this.
	I guess you're transphobic.
	Why isn't this ever directed at women?
	Hey, women, if you're a straight, heterosexual woman, would you want to be intimate with a man?
	Sorry, with a vagina?
	Wouldn't you find that a little bit weird?
	Do you think that makes you a horrible person?
	Do you think that means your picture should be on a wall next to Himmler?
	I don't... Yeah, just because you're not attracted to Chaz Bono?
	Yes.
	Chaz Bono, if Chaz Bono were a biological male, I think I can use that term.
	Yes.
	Would be attractive to no one.
	Right, that's what I mean.
	Yes.
	She just looks like Joey Fatone.
	Yes, exactly.
	That's like Guy Fieri.
	Yes.
	But yeah, nobody wants to have sex with Guy Fieri.
	Exactly.
	Just as food.
	I mean, I wouldn't say nobody.
	Everyone has different preferences.
	Well, people do it for money.
	Yeah, sure.
	I mean, yes.
	We're right back to the problematics, see?
	It's just that all paths lead to problematics.
	I just think if your shirt has sparkly flames on it, nobody should touch you sexually.
	Right.
	Especially if you decide to eat a quail that's been soaked in rum.
	Yes, or if you wear Oakleys on the back of your head.
	Yes.
	Yeah, just no reason to touch.
	Well, I think he's trying to throw people off.
	Yeah.
	It's like the same reason he has a Guy Fieri doll next to him so he can use a carpool lane.
	That's true.
	That's not all he does with it.
	Hey, hey, what's going on?
	It looks like there's some breaking news from what I'm seeing on CNN right now.
	Okay, well look, I think you all know this and people aren't happy about it.
	Warnock has defeated Herschel Walker in the Georgia Senate runoff, but in a new development it appears that demon babies are now running wild.
	So who could have foreseen this coming?
	Us!
	We saw it coming.
	We did.
	We tried to warn everyone.
	We tried to warn you.
	No one cared.
	You just wouldn't listen, Mayor of Amity.
	All right, well that's been Breaking News.
	I told you there was going to be a problem with Demon Baby.
	I told you that was my platform.
	I could have solved it.
	When you get bit by one, that's going to be someone else who sucks out the poison.
	But you get bitten by someone, you start becoming smaller like a Demon Baby yourself, like Tom Hanks in Big.
	You're in your suit, and you're swimming in your suit, because now you're just a Demon Baby in a big suit.
	Go ahead and talk to that Warnock fella.
	He has a problem now.
	You're a Demon Baby in that suit.
	You're not going to like the way you look.
	Nope.
	This would not just be...
	This will not just be a quarantine to Georgia, it will spread, and the Demon Baby will be everywhere.
	It will be World War Demon Baby.
	And I will be your president if you let me to stop a Demon Baby.
	I could be a Pied Demon Baby Piper.
	Yep, that's right.
	Because everybody knows that nothing a Demon Baby can't resist.
	There's one thing, that's Hershel Walker playing the Demon Baby flute.
	Follow me, Demon Baby!
	Follow me to Canada.
	Demon Baby hate the cold.
	Your natural habitat.
	We're going to be getting some developments here regarding the Twitter files and, unfortunately, Wikipedia.
	We should have been keeping our eye on them a little bit more.
	Kind of like the United States with Syria for a while.
	It's like, oh, I can't believe we forgot about you guys.
	Now, Time just announced its Person of the Year, and if you haven't been paying attention,
	in case you had lost all your faith in the media, Time's Person of the Year is this guy.
	♪ Yeah.
	Runner up was Carrot Top.
	So Zielinski joins a list of many other esteemed persons of the year, including the Ayatollah Khomeini, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler.
	They can't all be gems.
	Stalin won it twice.
	Really?
	He was a repeat winner.
	Yes.
	Two times.
	Wow, that's nice.
	And not in the good years.
	He was still killing lots of his own people during those times.
	Is time, person of the year, is it like a placeholder for just person who has had some kind of an impact, including super negative?
	But giving it to Stalin twice seems like a real misstep.
	It is a bit of a misstep.
	That was, you know, the time when he was allied with Hitler and then the time when he wasn't.
	I mean, if we don't want to read mass shooters manifestos because we don't want to inspire copycats, you would think putting Stalin on the cover of Time, you know, might have the same effect.
	Maybe just not the mass genocide people.
	I mean, Khomeini... The barrier to entry is too difficult, so they figure they're safe.
	Khomeini's like, I can't really make this list.
	I'd have to kill more than all of the Jews on the planet right now, and I can't get those numbers.
	That's a tall order.
	It is!
	It's a tall order.
	Maybe they should just step back from that a little bit.
	In fairness, guys, it wasn't that long ago.
	It's true.
	That's completely unfair.
	I don't know what you mean.
	Oh, wait, yes.
	So, yes.
	So, that brings us, actually, and you can comment below again who you would like to see as Person of the Year, and hit the like button because it's algorithms.
	As we get to the Wikipedia and Twitter file stuff, we're easing into it.
	We very well could be removed from YouTube.
	I think we have Carrie Lake on tomorrow, too, and she's resulted in us being suspended from YouTube, so head on over to Rumble.
	Head on over to Rumble.
	Head on over to Rumble.
	I don't know how many times to say it.
	I'd love to see the numbers change like Ed Rooney's attendance computer.
	Zielinski, he was given the title after he beat out, actually, some pretty stiff competition, from what I understand.
	And that brings us to a game which we usually play on Mug Club, but we thought it was important because you can play along with us.
	It's Guess the Person of the Year.
	It's far too professional.
	Yeah, it's far too professional.
	Yeah, it really was something.
	It was out of character.
	I feel like a Neil deGrasse Tyson thing.
	Yes, exactly.
	So here's the theme of the game, right?
	I'm going to read to you or I'm going to show you a list of people and you're supposed to guess whether or not they were nominated for Person of the Year.
	I miss it when it was Man of the Year.
	Yeah.
	I didn't take any offense to that.
	The ladies have to ruin just one more thing.
	You're saying that Hitler wasn't Person of the Year?
	No, he was definitely Man of the Year.
	Well, hey, Ava Braun got him to kill himself.
	She should be person of the year.
	They're trying to be politically correct while giving it to Stalin twice.
	I don't think they cared quite as much back then about that, but anyway, alright, so we're going to go through these guys.
	Alright, give me the people and I have to guess if these people were actually nominated.
	You can play along with me and chat.
	We'll start with person number one.
	Drag Queens.
	Or a segment.
	It's a theme.
	I'm going to say no, of course, they were not nominated for Person of the Year.
	Not nominated.
	Not nominated.
	Are you giving me the answer?
	Is this for 2022?
	Yes.
	2022 is Time Person of the Year.
	Time Person of the Year.
	I'm going to say no to Drag Queens.
	I'm going to say yes, because we live in the now time.
	Okay.
	What's the answer?
	Do we have a ding?
	The answer is... Nope.
	No.
	Okay, so I was right.
	Okay, good, good.
	I'm good.
	I'm one for one.
	Alright, next one.
	Well, I'm transphobic.
	Elliot Page.
	Elliot Page, yes.
	I'm going to say Elliot Page was nominated for Person of the Year.
	I'm with you for Person of the Year.
	Yes.
	Z of the Year, yes.
	Z of the Year, yes, okay.
	And the answer is... Nope.
	Come on, alright.
	Looks like the cover of an R.L.
	Stine book.
	Alright, next candidate.
	All right.
	Rupert Murdoch.
	No.
	No?
	No.
	How could that guy be type of person of the year?
	I mean, he's barely walking upright.
	Look at that neck.
	Someone needs to pardon him.
	All right.
	Give us the answer.
	All right.
	The answer is... Nope.
	All right.
	Good.
	So we're right.
	Okay.
	You're doing good.
	Give me a couple more.
	Let's wrap this up because I feel like I know where this is going.
	All right.
	Give me the next one.
	Tim's working on it.
	Gun safety advocates.
	Gun safety advocates.
	I'm going to say yes, because we're very broad with persons of the year now.
	I'm going to say they were nominated.
	What they lost out to is Alinsky playing the piano with his dick.
	Alright, next up, Kamala Harris.
	Kamala Harris, person of the year.
	Here's the thing, if the title was Most entirely useless person of the year.
	And I mean that.
	Some people you really dislike.
	She is a useless human being.
	You ever see her on a panel?
	She contributes nothing.
	She says nothing.
	She understands nothing.
	She's barely even present.
	She actually causes me an existential crisis.
	Well, they had to get somebody more mentally deficient than the president.
	That's hard.
	They had to search far and wide.
	Who was the first candidate out of the primary?
	Kamala!
	There's no way Kamala was nominated for first.
	I'm going to say yes because we live in the now times.
	Alright, and she is not.
	Give me the next one.
	Next one, Xi Jinping.
	Well, you know what, I'm going to say yes because they were such big fans of Hitler and Stalin.
	Yeah, I guess I'm going to follow your lead on that one, yes.
	Alright, and the answer is... Good for him, Xi Jinping.
	He's getting some wins.
	Vladimir Putin.
	If Zelensky was Person of the Year and Xi Jinping was nominated, in other words, there's no reason for Putin not to be.
	He's equally as significant.
	I'm going to say no.
	I'm also going to say no.
	Because his enemy won.
	Right.
	I also am going to say no, but based on opposite of logic.
	Okay, there we go.
	And?
	And the answer is?
	No!
	Was not nominated.
	You thought he should be, though.
	There's one last one?
	One last one.
	One last person.
	Ron DeSantis.
	Nominated for Person of the Year.
	Well, actually, I'm going to say yes, he was nominated, because I would have had to acknowledge DeSantis.
	I'm going to say he's conservative, so no.
	Okay.
	Alright, the answer is?
	There you go!
	Hey, you know what?
	Time wasn't all that bad.
	Okay, there you go.
	This has been Time's First of the Year.
	We are guessing it.
	When more time goes into the stinger than the game.
	Yes, exactly.
	Hey!
	I'm sorry.
	So!
	I think you got them all right, though.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	7 for 8.
	7 for 8, that's impressive.
	So here's the theme of today, okay?
	And it's, not only, people often use the term mainstream media.
	And this has almost become a trope, like, mainstream media, the demoncrats.
	Look, the issue is this.
	People want you to believe and consistently defer to experts.
	And when they say that, when they do that, what that does is, well, two things.
	First off, it assumes that you cannot become an expert in a topic, right?
	It makes it something unattainable.
	And it also absolves you of doing your own work as far as doing research for yourself.
	And so that brings us to the theme of today.
	We want to walk through all of these stories that the experts are wrong.
	Most of my headphones are wrong today.
	Alright.
	So, it keeps going like number 9 from left ear to right ear.
	I don't know what's happening with this.
	I think I hit it with my knee?
	Alright, there we go.
	So, Monday.
	Remember what happened on Monday?
	I wasn't here on Monday.
	We told you here though, and by that I mean Gerald and Dave, that the mainstream media outlets like the New York Times were misreporting that Iran disbanded the morality police.
	And by the way, people on the left and on the right reported this incorrectly.
	And just so you know, this is one of those things where we read these stories sometimes, and we see the New York Times, or we see people on the right, we see these authoritative sources covering it, and we're going, It's so obvious there must be something we missed.
	Clearly they read the next paragraph that we think they missed, that there must be a third or fourth paragraph.
	Right, or another speech that was given or a quote that we just don't have.
	Because even us, here, sometimes we're gaslit and go, well they are experts.
	And then we realize, oh no wait, they can't be bothered to read beyond the title.
	And I can't even say that I was right that day because I wasn't here, so, and I don't mean any disrespect, but Louder with Crowder This show, the alternates got it right before the New York Times that day.
	Yesterday, the New York Times reported that Iran will be abolishing its so-called morality police.
	Comment if you've seen this out there right now.
	All of the news organizations have been covering this and we feel like they have been covering this incorrectly for whatever reason.
	Mohammed Javda Montazeri, right, where he said the morality police Was abolished by the same authorities who installed it.
	So that's what they took and ran with and basically thought, OK, well, Iran is taking some positive steps here and they're going to abolish the morality police.
	The only problem is it's not true, right?
	Here's the actual full quote from the Iranian attorney general.
	The morality police has nothing to do with the judiciary system, the same source that created it in the past from the same place it has shut down.
	Of course, the judiciary system will continue its surveillance of social behaviors across society.
	In the same sentence, he basically said, yes, yes, from that same source, it kind of shut down, but they're going to continue to monitor your behavior across society.
	Hey, you guys?
	Yeah.
	Good work.
	Yeah.
	Thank you.
	I was just listening.
	To everyone else, you're about as useless as Kamala Harris.
	That's a low blow.
	Well, he's right.
	So, we put this out there, and then journalist, an actual journalist, Sanaa Ibrahimi?
	Yep.
	Kareem is some young guy.
	So, actually caught wind of our coverage, retweeted it, saying, Crowder Bits YouTube channel, it's just a secondary YouTube channel, Crowder Bits YouTube channel talking about the fake news published by a very familiar name on the New York Times.
	And so this was someone who's been reporting on this quite a bit, who knows what's happening there, and probably watched in frustration as the New York Times and as other sites on the right who often get their cues from New York Times and just rehash it with a little bit of a hat tip and some kind of commentary there about the lamestream media.
	She was probably frustrated because she didn't have enough of a platform.
	Thank God you guys, while I wasn't on Monday, decided to be accurate because she said I'll draft in behind- and the comments below it, below everybody's tweets, are hysterical.
	Yeah, they really are.
	Because some of them are liberal.
	So like here's someone, aka Matthew1, tweeted, imagine how far legacy newspapers have strayed that Steven Crowder is the sensible guy in the room, for now.
	I'll take the one where I can get it.
	And you weren't even in the room!
	And then someone else responded, I know, it's so frustrating!
	This is someone who does not like me.
	Then Hanoi Vogue wrote, let's be fair, they're not wrong here.
	And by they, I mean Dave Landau.
	Good, shout out to you.
	I saw that.
	One person knew who the photo was of.
	One person finally said, Mad Abzu questioned, what is so awful about him?
	And then there are a bunch of responses.
	Look, there's a lot that's awful about me, but I wasn't even there that day!
	It's not even your fault!
	Well, the funny thing is, they're blaming the New York Times, because if the New York Times runs this story and everybody else in the media picks it up, all of a sudden people stop focusing on Iran quite as much in the United States, because that's a world away we got our own problems to deal with, right?
	Oh, I guess they're taking steps to correct this.
	Fine.
	Ah, protests, whatever.
	That makes them lose steam.
	That makes that movement kind of die out a little bit, at least from international pressure.
	And that means people die.
	Exactly.
	That means people get executed.
	Yeah, that's the part.
	It's people are being murdered, and you have no problem reporting that it's not happening.
	That's a serious issue.
	Yeah, hey, you know what else, too?
	While we're talking about this Hunter Biden thing, which we'll get into in a little bit, it's not just about the corruption with the big guy getting 10%.
	Obviously, that pertains to our national security interests, the liability for former Vice President Biden.
	But while we're talking about this, with the Iran story, people can die.
	Hey, with Hunter Biden, at the very least, when you know that there were Pornographic pictures, some very clearly of people underage.
	Hey, how many sex trafficking rings could you have busted?
	How many sex slaves could have been saved if the FBI decided to, I don't know, pick up a laptop?
	If the New York Times decided to, I don't know, cover it?
	People say, well, this is ill-gotten gain.
	Okay, let's assume that that's true for a second.
	This is something no one else is talking about, and I don't know why.
	Let's assume that it was ill-gotten gain, which it wasn't.
	He's a dumbass who was so high he forgot to pick up his laptop at Geek Squad.
	But even then, were you working behind the scenes?
	If you tried to throttle it in front of the scenes saying, well, these were nude pictures and that goes against our policies, did you see the underage girls?
	It's not about virtue signaling what you do in front of the scenes.
	You could stop it.
	You could save some women out there.
	There are more slaves than ever, ever in recorded history on Earth right now.
	Over 40 million.
	That's because a lot of them are sex trafficked.
	You mean to tell me that you can't find any leads based on what Hunter Biden did?
	Spare me the bullshit with your sex trafficking charities and your nothing but nets for malaria over in West African countries.
	You don't give a rat's ass.
	Okay, let's say you banned it on Twitter and on Facebook.
	Does anyone else... You know what?
	Comment below.
	Would anyone else like to see our intelligence agencies when they're given a layup?
	Go after the sex traffickers?
	Can we find common ground on that?
	That we don't want underage girls sex trafficked?
	Or boys?
	Do you remember how many other people were molested or assaulted by Dr. Nassar after the FBI had been tipped off by several girls at Michigan State?
	And they were like, well, we'll get right on that.
	And I believe, I'm going by memory here, but I think it was like substantial, 30, 40, 50 potential additional people that we know about were molested.
	I believe that's roughly the number that the FBI did such a bang up job of getting on that story.
	Yeah.
	Well, and you also say ill-gotten.
	What is the policy of the store where you dropped off the computer as far as kiddie porn is involved?
	Right.
	Yeah.
	I would imagine that they have to report it, so that would make it completely not ill-gotten.
	No, exactly.
	It's pretty much take a laptop, leave it to laptop policy.
	Right.
	If it's after 60 days.
	Yes.
	Unbelievable.
	It really is.
	It's one of those things where we sit here and we talk about it as though people want to make a difference, and then your intelligence agencies raided Rudy Giuliani's apartment as part of a PR stunt, and they avoided Hunter's laptop like it was Adam West's shark repellent.
	And you mean to tell me that there's nothing you could do there to shut down the worst of the worst on earth who are trafficking underage prostitutes?
	Hey, is anyone here doubting?
	Is anyone disputing that Hunter Biden had prostitutes?
	No.
	Is anyone disputing that there were sexual interactions with people who were underage on Hunter Biden?
	No.
	No one's disputing any of that.
	There's nothing you can do?
	That's why we gotta disband the FBI and CIA.
	I get it.
	I get it.
	You guys want to be buddies with the IRS and give them glocks.
	How about you go after actual criminals?
	How about you go after people who are causing irreparable harm and destroying generations of families?
	Not even talking, not talking about the drug war.
	Give these people, the drug war, man.
	It's just, okay.
	Do you think we shouldn't have a law against sex trafficking?
	Against selling women into sexual slavery against their will?
	Sure, these are the same people who were silencing the stories.
	Hey, I wonder how many gigs of pedophile pornography, of underage pornography, was found on CIA computers?
	Remember we covered that story?
	Quite a bit.
	Oh, it's a conspiracy.
	Don't believe your lying eyes and ears.
	With Nassar it was actually 70 more.
	Geez.
	Oh, so just a couple.
	Just 70 more people after they were tipped off.
	After.
	By the way, do we know... Is that guy still walking?
	Has that guy not been executed?
	He's not been killed in jail and I'm not sure why.
	Yeah.
	Well, look, when we get to, what is it, Ghislaine Maxwell?
	I always mispronounce her first name.
	Did we find out all the people that went to the island that were taking part in this?
	Because we had her on trial.
	I mean, she has the black books.
	She was there.
	She knows the list of people.
	We could probably put an end to these rings from the very top around the world with the guest book that they had at that island, right?
	Yeah.
	I mean, that should be coming out soon, I think.
	Just, hey, how about this?
	How about you just save some of the puberty blockers that you give to all the trans kids who you're saying are being abused, and you use that same exact chemical, which is what we used to use before, to chemically castrate all the pedophile rapists at Epstein's Island.
	How about you use it to chemically castrate anyone involved at any point with sex trafficking?
	Well, really, any kind of sex trafficking, but certainly underage sex trafficking.
	And this is, this is, it brings us to Twitter.
	Can you load a gun with the pill?
	Just saying.
	I don't know.
	I've seen guns that shoot like gumballs.
	I saw a clown, he would shoot another clown and he'd catch it in his mouth.
	Really?
	Wow.
	Sounds like heaven.
	Your imagination.
	That's the limit to the possibilities.
	And they really should crack open the black book.
	I don't understand why there would be plea deals and bargains for something so disgusting.
	Right.
	Just an opinion.
	I mean, we'd like to know who's in there because somebody knows who's still walking around that likes to have children.
	Is there a way for this tree to not be lighting up?
	It's distracting me.
	I keep thinking it's trying to strobe me in.
	You could shove it in the Michigan State guy.
	What were you saying there?
	Just a little bit of silver lining for Larry Nassar.
	He was assaulted in prison.
	Not silver lining for him, silver lining for us.
	I hope he was assaulted with silver.
	No.
	Yeah!
	Just so it was an expensive assault.
	Well, that's true.
	Just to make sure he's not, you know, he's not a pedophile werewolf.
	I don't know.
	Look, call me old-fashioned.
	I really do think I support execution for serial child sex offenders.
	You can comment below.
	I agree.
	I mean, how many hundreds of people does it take?
	At what point do you say, yeah, this guy can't be in the camp anymore.
	And at what point do you say, hey, maybe they're not incompetent.
	Maybe the FBI's complicit.
	I mean, maybe they're incompetent with underage girl number 1, 2, 3, even 4.
	That's what we call the grace underage sexual assault for the FBI, okay?
	But when you get over the 50s, the 60s, the 70s, how shitty are you at your job that you can't stop the molestation of more girls as girls are coming forward?
	How shitty are you at your job that you can't just look into Hunter Biden's laptop and find out who's trafficking those kids?
	Not saying it's some underground cabal of people.
	I'm saying it's out there in the open.
	And the most egregious sin here is the FBI, your intelligence agencies, doing nothing about it.
	Nothing about it.
	But hey, hey, they'll be looking into January 6th.
	Alright.
	Sorry, I had to get that out of my system.
	Let's go into the Twitter files update.
	And by the way, this is a live show Monday through Thursday, 10 a.m.
	Eastern.
	You can watch it here.
	You can watch it on Rumble on Mug Club.
	We'll be playing Stephen Knows Sports World Cup Edition.
	I have not cheated.
	I know nothing other than the United States and Iran.
	We're playing in that.
	And it's soccer and you hate it.
	I love it.
	That's it.
	Alright, so if you're wondering why there haven't been more of the Twitter files released, well, we have some answers.
	So yesterday, Matt Tebe, Tybee, how do we pronounce it?
	Twitter Deputy, uh, Deputy General Counsel, I think is the term.
	Another stupid made-up... So Jim Baker was let go by Elon Musk.
	Here's a tweet.
	On Friday, the first installment of the Twitter files was published here.
	We expected to publish more over the weekend.
	Many wondered why there was a delay.
	We can now tell you a part of the reason why on Tuesday, Twitter Deputy General Counsel and former FBI General Counsel...
	Oh, there it is!
	You're batting 100, you pedophile enablists.
	Jim Baker was fired among the reasons vetting the first batch of Twitter files without knowledge of new management.
	That's interesting.
	So he was vetting the files before they were released to Tybee and Barry Weiss.
	So a guy that used to work at the FBI was vetting files that likely would incriminate people at the FBI for censoring information.
	You mispronounced absolutely but yes I'm with you.
	Yeah sorry that's my bad it's just a different dialect.
	And so he's the guy that was secretly vetting files before they were sent to the reporters.
	Also, little key bit of information here.
	He's also the guy who encouraged flagging the laptop story as hacked material.
	So the guy who clearly screwed up at his job, either because he was incompetent or because he was dishonest, was then in charge of vetting whether other people were Incompetent or dishonest, and of course there's the FBI connection.
	Are you starting to get the picture?
	When people try to say it's an extremist view to say defund, disband the FBI.
	No, no, no.
	It's not an extremist view.
	It's a given, unless you're a moron.
	He wasn't incompetent.
	He was very competent at the job he was given.
	He did it very well, unfortunately.
	I was trying to give him the benefit of the asshole doubt.
	Yes, I know.
	I know.
	I should agree.
	No!
	No.
	I appreciate that I get to play good cop.
	You get to go in and be like, ah, he's a piece of shit.
	Yeah, I agree.
	Thank you.
	I was just saying I agree that he's an asshole.
	Yes.
	And I agree with you that he was not incompetent.
	He was complicit.
	Yes.
	Oh, very much so.
	Look, and if he did this stuff right now while Elon Musk was the CEO owner of Twitter, what do you think he was doing to information prior to that?
	One can only speculate.
	Correction.
	He is both complicit and incompetent.
	The fact that he was doing this while Elon Musk had taken it over, what did you think was going to happen?
	He's a 4chan autist with a mission to destroy you.
	You think he wasn't going to find out?
	That's how arrogant these FBI people are.
	For the same reason that 74 girls, gymnasts, get diddled by Larry Nassar because they're going, eh, you know what, no one's going to figure it out.
	We're the final say.
	That's all I want.
	Maybe if 70 more come forward, we'll look at it.
	I mean, come on.
	We could put them on leave until we investigate, but that's paperwork.
	We can't be chasing down every 74 people leads.
	Yeah.
	Nobody's got that kind of time.
	That's half the Arena Football League!
	If you see something, say something 70 times.
	Just not to the FBI.
	80's the magic number for the FBI.
	By the way, hit the like button if you think we need to disband these intelligence agencies.
	I'm not saying that we do not need some kind of national intelligence, but we need it to actually be intelligent.
	So, when Baker worked at the FBI, he was, by the way, of course, pivotal, trying to tie Trump to Russiagate.
	So this, again, incompetent?
	You think you'd be right on some shit accidentally.
	In other words, you have a 50-50 shot to say the Hunter Biden laptop story is true or it's not.
	Keep in mind, at that same time, the guy from the computer shop was saying, hey, hey, I'll confirm it.
	Hey, I'm willing to be under oath.
	And the FBI was like, ah, you know, we'll get to it.
	Giuliani's saying, I have the laptop right here.
	And it's, you know, it's Hunter.
	Of course, he's committing a crime.
	There's also a picture of him putting M&M on his cock.
	And you were like, we don't care.
	He had a 50-50 shot probably about on a hundred separate occasions with Russiagate to get it right accidentally, Baker!
	So, he was instrumental in trying to tie Trump to Russiagate.
	Here we have a quote from the New York Post, when Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman wanted to plant the bizarre false claim of a secret communications channel between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin, Baker was his go-to speed dial contact.
	Yeah.
	By the way, also a major role in the prosecution of Michael Flynn.
	Oh, you mean the erroneous prosecution.
	I like that word.
	Of Michael Flynn.
	Yes.
	This guy's a dirtbag.
	Yes.
	Absolute dirtbag.
	That would be an insult to Bags O' Dirt.
	Yes, it would.
	Yes, it would.
	This is a guy that's working at Twitter.
	And scum.
	He's had his hand in all of these things.
	And by the way, these are examples.
	Russiagate.
	And we say that.
	Do you remember living through the time where it was Donald Trump is basically bought and paid for by Russia?
	He's a plant.
	He's kind of a Trojan horse in the American society for Vladimir Putin.
	He's a stool.
	All of these things were coming out with no factual evidence.
	Did you just say he's a stool?
	Stooge.
	He's got a much stronger stool than Joe Biden.
	The best stool.
	I guarantee you it's more firm.
	It is.
	A stool sample.
	He's more of a softener.
	Yes, exactly.
	But I mean, we were living through this time where these intelligence agencies were giving us this information and making Donald Trump's life a living hell because they didn't like him.
	They'd spied on his campaign.
	That was proven.
	And then they were saying, oh, he was bought and paid for by Russia.
	Hillary Clinton's denying that the election results were legitimate because Russia interfered with the election.
	That was all good.
	Does that not impact our country?
	Does that not impact our president's ability to do his job?
	Listen, if he had been influenced by Russia, fine.
	Make his job a living hell, because it should be.
	He's doing something illegal.
	I get it, right?
	But that didn't happen.
	These have real moral consequences.
	What happened with Mar-a-Lago?
	Remember that?
	Oh, that's right.
	Na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na.
	Yeah, we knew.
	Merrick Garland was right on the case.
	He's just waiting for 74 more people to come forward.
	No, but they made it look good for them.
	Right.
	That's all they needed.
	Yes.
	So here's the thing, and this brings us to, I think, probably the most important component of all this, is now Wikipedia.
	Keep in mind, Wikipedia Wikipedia, right, in the name.
	You used to have to buy encyclopedias by door-to-door salesmen.
	Yeah, not anymore.
	Wikipedia is the biggest portal to information that, obviously some people know it's not fully reputable, but it's generally regarded as reputable by people who don't really know how to do proper sourcing information.
	That's why we make all of our sources, by the way, available at loudearthcrowder.com, link in the description.
	And the irony's not lost on me, that the next source I'm going to present to you, the next reference, is Wikipedia, but that's because it's a story about Wikipedia.
	So it has to happen.
	Yes.
	So just hold your comments before you admonish me.
	Wikipedia has now indicated that they may just delete the whole article of the Twitter files to begin with.
	Ah, I see.
	They said initial news reports may be unreliable and, you know, it's funny, we've often talked about Facebook and Twitter and YouTube and Google and all these fake news, but this whole time we really kind of haven't paid enough attention.
	Wikipedia's been right there!
	They've been there this entire time.
	Huh?
	I never saw that.
	I never saw that.
	Yakuza's not in the soundboard today.
	It's okay, Keegan.
	That was the computer, not me.
	Now here's the beauty of what happens, right?
	You have the FBI saying, oh, Twitter's legit.
	You have the FBI saying, oh, Facebook's legit, oh, YouTube's legit.
	You have the CDC saying, oh, this information is legitimate.
	Anyone who disagrees is illegitimate.
	Then you also have this with Wikipedia.
	This is the circular feedback loop.
	You have these intelligence agencies and you have these major platforms who say that a story, they will claim that a story is not legitimate if it cannot be verified by what they Quote-unquote consider it a legitimate outlet.
	Like AP, they've never screwed up.
	Or Reuters, they've never screwed up.
	Or New York Times, they've never screwed up.
	And so then, their friends say, well, we're not going to cover this.
	And they say, well, then I guess it doesn't exist.
	So some of the reasons that were given from Wikipedia, and there's some interesting twists here.
	Did they let anybody edit it?
	Well, not this one.
	They have super editors.
	Right, but still.
	So these are some of the reasons the editors are giving.
	RayWus92, one of the editors, wrote, what an effing nothing burger and embarrassment for Tybee to think Twitter taking down revenge porn was a political scandal, but it doesn't need a standalone article.
	Then wrote, this was generally ignored by the media with good reason, talking about, of course, Twitter's silencing of the Hunter Biden laptop story.
	was ignored by the media with good reason and thus failed to establish notability.
	Another editor wrote, many news networks avoided covering this as there is no there there.
	For instance, the New York Times, as of now, has published nothing on this.
	So, because the New York Times didn't publish anything on it, and because the other mainstream outlets didn't publish anything on it, they claim that then it must not be legitimate, but the reason that they're not covering it is because it's So it's all the same shit!
	Yes.
	Yes.
	Exactly.
	Yeah.
	The New York Times didn't cover it, therefore it's not true.
	And the New York Times says, well, how do we know if it's true?
	And they say, I don't know.
	We were waiting for you.
	And they said, well, we were waiting for you.
	I guess let's just not cover it.
	No, they were basically just saying, because the New York Times chose not to cover it because they don't like how it paints the political party that they support the most, we will use that as cover and say, well, it's not a real story.
	Right?
	So those things were given as reasons why this story, not that it shouldn't have prominence, not that it shouldn't be promoted, that it shouldn't exist.
	And you know why New York Times didn't cover it?
	You know why New York Times didn't cover it?
	They were reporting a fake story about the Iran police?
	Yep, that's another one.
	They're busy.
	Also because Twitter and Facebook, right, they labeled it as potentially misleading information.
	Why?
	Because former FBI official Jim Baker was working there saying, oh yeah, no, this isn't real.
	The people who avoided, the people who managed to miss Larry Nassar sexually assaulted 70, 73 young girls, 70-something young girls, it's hard for me to keep track, it's over 70 people, right?
	The same FBI, they had officials there, and by that I mean our brightest and best.
	Working at Twitter saying, this is not legitimate, this should be throttled.
	So the New York Times said, oh, okay, there's no story there.
	That's what all these major press outlets said.
	And then Wikipedia says, well, since these major press outlets didn't cover it, it must not be legitimate.
	Right.
	And then they're saying, oh, it's revenge porn.
	It's like, oh, okay, I'm sorry, we've talked about this.
	Did James Woods post a penis picture?
	Is that what he got removed from Twitter for?
	No, I don't think that's what it was.
	The other guy that we covered the other day who was kind of anti-China, we found that out, like anti-Chinese Communist Party, is that what he posted as well?
	Was it just pictures of Hunter Biden's penis that we were all concerned about?
	No!
	It was a much bigger story than that.
	These are the people that are controlling what information that other Wikipedia users get to see.
	And they're saying, it's nothing there because I don't want anything to be there.
	And I'm going to focus on one little piece of this.
	And by the way, it wasn't just them.
	That same verbiage was used by almost everybody I saw trying to discredit this on Twitter.
	And I'm talking about all of our favorite bad actors on Twitter coming out and saying that there was nothing there.
	They were using the exact same information.
	And by the way, Talby got attacked by all of these same people.
	Talby, he's a journalist.
	He's an absolutely bonafide God-to-hand-to-God journalist, there's some still out there, and he's being accused of being the PR person for the richest person on the world.
	Again, really strange how every single one of these accounts uses that exact same phrasing.
	It's like these guys get together and come up with a crap story because they don't like what you've said.
	No, you're absolutely right.
	It's the exact same language.
	And this is where when people say, oh, it's a private company, they can do whatever they want.
	Shut up, dummy!
	Shut up, you moron!
	Really?
	You mean to say, hold on a second, you mean to say it's a private, it's a private platform, they can do whatever they want, it's not the government censoring anyone?
	Hold on a second.
	Do you mean to say that when practicing doctors, clinicians, are removed, de-platformed from Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google, giving medical information based on what they've observed in their practice and clinical data, because of the commands from the top down, coming from the highest paid, longest standing, unelected official in our government, Anthony Fauci, that it's a private platform?
	You mean to say that when the actual state of your constitutional republic hangs in the balance...
	Because of the death of objective journalism.
	Why?
	Because the FBI, intelligence agencies, and people who are the figureheads, the de facto leaders of the Democratic National Committee telling every single major tech platform that they need to remove you and punt a story, that that's a private platform.
	And that's not even to get into the argument that these private platforms enjoy the luxury of being treated as a public utility so they have reduced legal liability.
	If I say something deliberately defamatory, I'm liable for it.
	Twitter isn't.
	Facebook isn't.
	YouTube isn't.
	Why?
	Because they're treated as utilities.
	So, not even getting into that, they are doing the work directly of the government.
	Fauci says, get rid of that doctor.
	YouTube says, okay.
	And Facebook says, okay.
	And then you say, private company, they can do whatever they want.
	What part of that is a private company?
	FBI says, you can't cover that.
	Which turns out to be true, by the way.
	And Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google, Alphabet, they all say, okay, you can't cover that.
	What part of that is a private company enforcing their own policies?
	Stop being dumb.
	Yeah, and by the way, just for all the people out there with parents right now, this just happened, I think, just the other day.
	This ties into this.
	I think Pfizer is getting another emergency authorization for their fifth booster.
	For kids under five years of age.
	If I'm a parent out there and I'm worried about anything like this, I'm looking for information on every single thing that goes in my kid's body, including medicine that I'm giving them just for whenever they're feeling bad.
	As a parent, you're trying to take care of your child.
	These information platforms, these people are basically saying, no, you can't have the opposing view out there.
	You can't have people say that maybe there's some concerns at all.
	And I'm being careful because I'm on YouTube.
	We're on one of the very platforms that will remove you for saying information that's widely available from the CDC in California, which I quoted and got this show banned.
	Do you realize every single instance in the last year, every single instance in the last year and a half that we've been suspended, Later, we have been 100% verifiably correct.
	The things that you can say now, but when we said it, you weren't allowed to say it.
	Even though, by the way, the data didn't change, the information didn't change, what was permissible is what changed.
	You saying that the flu, the standard flu, on a year-to-year basis is more lethal to children.
	Well, four out of the last ten years, according to the CDC, is more deadly for children 19 and under.
	The flu.
	You can say that now because now they've come out and said it.
	Yeah.
	I still feel awkward saying it because I'm afraid of making you get in trouble.
	For example, us saying the Hunter Biden laptop story when Giuliani showed the laptop.
	That was another reason why we were suspended.
	The other one, Carrie Lake saying, hey, you know what, we don't have the best systems in place
	for the elections in Arizona with the primary that she won.
	Do you realize that every single instance of us being removed this last year, suspended on YouTube,
	you can now say because it was verifiably correct.
	They didn't do their due diligence.
	It was just inconvenient.
	By the way, Elon weighed in saying, uh, most of the...
	He was saying most of the earth, meaning what most people think.
	The mainstream media is biased, and Wikipedia basically cites mainstream media sources to confirm this claim.
	Wikipedia has a non-trivial left-wing bias.
	Here's the thing.
	It's so true.
	All of this is, this is why I said the experts are wrong.
	This is an intellectual fallacy that you will learn about very, very early on in university if they're teaching you critical thinking.
	Okay?
	It's logical fallacy alert time right now.
	I hope that you guys are paying attention.
	It's the appeal to authority.
	Okay, let me read this for you.
	It's insisting that a claim is true simply because a valid authority or expert on the issue said it was true without any other supporting evidence offered.
	That pretty much can describe any of these stories.
	All of them, in fact.
	Let me give you some other examples of stories that didn't happen.
	The Twitter files didn't happen, according to Wikipedia.
	Or, most likely, didn't happen.
	What else didn't happen?
	The Hunter Biden laptop obviously didn't happen.
	We already touched on that.
	A lot of people didn't see it happening.
	That's my way of proving it.
	Hey, you know what else didn't happen?
	Some of you thought that there were violent riots, right?
	Billions of dollars in damages, thousands of officer casualties.
	No, no.
	Those didn't happen because legitimate news outlets, right?
	The authority.
	No, no.
	You're misremembering.
	The mostly peaceful protests.
	What you're seeing behind me is one of multiple locations that have been burning in Kenosha, Wisconsin over the course of the night.
	A second night since Jacob Blake was shot back seven times.
	Fiery, but mostly peaceful.
	How do those two words exist in the same sentence?
	What's so funny though is that it isn't even a little peaceful.
	It's just Armageddon behind him and he's like, it's mostly peaceful.
	It's not like a hobo around a fire in a 55 gallon drum fire.
	It looks like the future in Terminator 2, but it's mostly peaceful.
	And by the way, your producer hates you.
	He sent you out with a paintball mask and a tank top.
	And, yeah.
	And pink headphones.
	Yes.
	Yeah, Burning Man is more peaceful.
	And print on the back of your shirt that says, please kick my ass and take my stuff.
	Why would you send someone there?
	You know what else didn't happen?
	Whitmer didn't send young people with COVID into old folks' homes, right?
	Governor Whitmer didn't do that.
	We had a protest that involved thousands of people on the Capitol lawn in Michigan.
	They said hundreds.
	I was about to say, that didn't happen either.
	That was only hundreds.
	Well, then later they said thousands when they tried to tie me to the kidnapping plot, which also was not a real plot of Governor Whitmer.
	Well, you'll take the number increase.
	Yes.
	Because at least attack.
	Take the wins.
	And there was never anybody that were people that were in gangs beating the crap out of the elderly that had COVID.
	That never happened.
	Of course, never.
	According to the FBI.
	Yes.
	The most trusted name in intelligence.
	Governor kidnapping.
	Yes.
	It was only 21 out of the 22 were FBI agents.
	This is real.
	And by the way, the Wikipedia editors, who of course are very left-leaning, they've been deleting and censoring truths they don't like for a very, very long time.
	So remember in 2021, we talked about this, they nominated the topic mass killings under communist regimes for deletion five times.
	Wow.
	Five times.
	And by the way, we did our own video back then, where we posted truth on Wikipedia, verifiable truth, with sources, to see if it would be taken down.
	We ran our own experiment.
	You need to include these points of view and you certainly need to include arguments made on the legal record and with medical substantiation.
	What we added was what should have happened as a result of a failure to comply.
	Now this isn't my opinion.
	Or 500-edit Wikipedia administrator consensus opinion, this is the law.
	What happens if you do not comply with a subpoena?
	Let me read you the law.
	According to the Arizona Statute 41-1153, Disobedience of Subpoena as Legislative Contempt.
	Now that's the law.
	What did Wikipedia say to this addition?
	The only edition that would actually have legal standing, by the way, they took it down, saying, it might be true, but no secondary source.
	Wow.
	Square Bear caught this.
	Let's show that clip again.
	Show overlay five.
	One of those names in that clip is familiar, right?
	Soy Bangla?
	I don't know how to pronounce it, and I don't care.
	Soy Bangla?
	That's the same editor!
	Arguing to delete the Twitter files page right now.
	Wow.
	Right now.
	Bring up Collage F. That's right now.
	It's the same person.
	It's the person right there who had truth removed is now saying we should get rid of the Twitter files.
	Un-freaking-believable.
	I think that might have been, uh, yeah.
	There we go.
	I had to bring it in.
	Same person.
	What a coinkydink.
	Same person.
	You might be biased.
	You need a secondary source for the law?
	Yes.
	How do they handle the Constitution?
	Well that's just not... I don't know.
	Did anybody else say all men are created equal?
	I don't see it elsewhere.
	What about all the signers?
	Those are gonna be forged.
	Ah, Declaration of Independence, sorry.
	His name's John Hancock.
	Here's a picture of the parchment.
	Ah, you could just take some modern printing paper, put it in, uh, put it in tea, stain it.
	I know that old trick.
	That's a national treasure.
	Come on.
	Come on.
	A lot.
	I've seen it a lot.
	You think I'm gonna be fooled by John Voight's coaster nap?
	Mm-mm.
	Maybe.
	I said nap.
	Either way, I feel like Jon Voight is taking a nap right now.
	He takes a lot of naps.
	Here's the thing.
	They blame you for being radicalized.
	They blame you for not trusting your institutions.
	And by the way, if you don't trust your institutions, share this show right now.
	Because an institution that exists is YouTube, Alphabet, Google.
	Let me ask you this.
	You're radical.
	And the reason that you are considered to be radical is because, like today, you probably get pissed off.
	You probably get pissed off because many of you out there feel, or know, I don't want to use the word feel, you know that you're unheard.
	And so you shout.
	Sometimes, this has been an expression that's been used, men have to shout to be heard, often in relationships.
	That's why you often see men, you know, rage is a masking of emotion because they don't necessarily know how to deal with pain or they don't necessarily feel that they're being listened to.
	It's true!
	So you are angry, and I know you're a very angry man, Dave, we all are here.
	But you're angry.
	You're blamed for being angry.
	Okay.
	You're an extremist.
	Right.
	And why are you an extremist?
	Because you're saying that you don't trust anything.
	Well, hold on a second.
	Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Google, in tandem with the FBI, removed stories that you knew were verifiably false and would have altered the course.
	of this country for the remainder of its history.
	They all removed these stories.
	Stories, by the way, that sometimes your experience... Let me give you a very specific scenario.
	Let's say that you're a man, okay?
	Let's say that you're a man who, I don't know, owns a computer repair shop.
	Or you own the store next to the computer repair shop where Hunter Biden drops off a laptop.
	You see what's on the laptop.
	You see that it's made available to authorities, you see that the authorities say that they have no interest in said laptop, and then you see all of the media suppress the story about the laptop.
	All the while, around this point in time, generally speaking, your store is being burned to the ground by mostly peaceful protesters, and you reach out to people in positions of authority, people in the intelligence community, people in media, or certainly try and express your experiences, be it through videographic evidence, or sworn affidavits, on big tech platforms and that too is removed. So you've
	been ignored by all the mainstream outlets who the big tech platforms rely upon for verification. You've
	been ignored or suppressed, completely removed, by all the big tech platforms and you
	know that they are working alongside intelligence agencies who have a vested interest in one
	political party achieving complete, absolute, unfettered power. Where do you go? Where do you
	go? And then you get called an extremist because you yell a little bit.
	Because you tend to be a little bit pissed off.
	Let me ask, genuinely, people out there, if you're on the left, where the fuck do these people go, huh?
	My store was burned down.
	Hey, this is happening right now.
	Hey, there's a riot in the corner of Fifth and Oak.
	Removed.
	Hey, look, I got this underage sex trafficker.
	Removed.
	Hey!
	My daughter was raped!
	My daughter was raped by someone involved with the Olympic Training Center.
	My daughter was raped by her coach!
	Nah.
	FBI says, we'll look into it.
	And that happened 70 however many more times.
	Over 70.
	You're a parent.
	Where do you go?
	You're a person whose life is destroyed.
	Where do you go?
	You're a doctor who's removed because Fauci has a stick up his ass.
	Where do you go?
	You're a parent whose child could be raped.
	Maybe you're a parent of a child who's being sex trafficked.
	Hey, that might be relevant, certainly, if you have evidence of people in positions of government authority, or relatives of people in positions of government authority.
	Engaging in sex trafficking.
	Hey, you know what?
	Where do you go?
	You're just an extremist.
	The level of gaslighting is not only clinical, and I don't just mean it as far as gaslighting, we're not friends anymore.
	I mean, you are being gaslit to a degree that, in a very tangible way, very quantifiable way, leads to the deaths of people speaking out for freedom in Iran.
	It leads to girls being silenced, whether they're being raped, fondled, sexually assaulted by a coach, Or being trafficked to Epstein Island or to Hunter Biden's penthouse.
	And then you have no idea where to go.
	And they want you to believe that you're an extremist and you're alone.
	Hey, guess what?
	You're not.
	You're not.
	There's a reason that this show is the size that it is.
	There's a reason that when we go and do these live shows, many, many, many thousands, you are not alone.
	Believe me.
	You are actually a far bigger portion of this country than they want you to believe, and that's why they are working absolutely overtime to try and remove verifiable truth.
	If you know what we do, I don't want to peddle in conspiracy theories.
	And even if I'm wrong, I make everything as transparent as I possibly can.
	I provide all the references every single day.
	Make mistakes, absolutely.
	And I'm not saying that you shouldn't, just to be clear, I'm not saying that you shouldn't trust people with expertise.
	What I'm saying is that you need to aggregate information from, by the way, both experts and the layman and the peasant.
	I cannot tell you how many times in my life, growing up, I learned something from somebody who I never would have even imagined.
	Could have taught me, whatever level of insight it was.
	I had a mechanic one time, but he didn't have any teeth!
	This guy taught me, not about cars, this guy actually taught me about the way some of these DMVs would work, or the certification for these toll tags.
	He gave me some insight, not insight information, he gave me information that I didn't know.
	He also talked about family.
	I remember sitting there going, wow, you really can learn something from anyone.
	Not saying you just rely on a toothless mechanic.
	You told him about, uh, gingivitis.
	I did.
	And then I told him I want a tune-up.
	Change those spark plugs.
	Yes.
	Stop trying to wax poetic there, toothless mechanic man.
	I'm like, wow, you can talk really good for not having any teeth.
	There's no this at all.
	Want to tell me you like candy?
	Yes.
	Well, he did.
	Meth.
	Now he likes straws.
	But Fauci, sure, include Fauci, maybe include the doctors who've also seen thousands of patients.
	Only one side says, only trust Fauci.
	I'm saying, take into account what Fauci said, the CDC, the WHO, and, and, acknowledge Taiwan as a place that actually exists, and acknowledge doctors who are actually, you know, actually practicing doctors right now who are seeing patients, and look at the data that's available internationally.
	I'm saying, hey, you know what, yeah, sure, of course, New York Times, we use them as a reference sometimes, mainly because we know that if we use a right-wing reference, you will simply accuse us of bias, and I understand that, so we'll use New York Times, we'll use Washington Post, and we'll say, by the way, we were able to verify it with this other resource, and sometimes the more reliable resource is not the expert.
	Well, the experts run Twitter, at least they did.
	The experts run Facebook, the experts run the New York Times, the experts run Wikipedia, and the experts run the FBI, CIA.
	And the NSA and the IRS.
	I don't even want to ask, is that a group that you trust with information?
	Think of that group that I just told you.
	Let's put faces to them.
	Bezos, Cook, Zuckerberg, Baker, whoever else with the CIA, Comey, Dorsey, Nasser.
	Not only do you trust them, This is a real question I want you to answer below.
	There's no hyperbole here.
	Do you trust them with relaying to you accurate information?
	No, my question is, would you even trust those people alone in a room with your children?
	Those are the experts?
	Why are you an extremist?
	Guess what?
	If you're seeking truth, you're an extremist.
	By default.
	Uh, and uh, by the way, from what's going on here, um, I keep- I think I hear some- Yeah, something going on outside?
	Yeah.
	Oh, is it the- they're doing their office gift exchange.
	Oh, is it time?
	Yeah, it's the annual gift exchange.
	Oh. Yeah.
	so so
	so Gross!
	Get a Manscaped Lawnmower 4.0 for her this Christmas by visiting manscaped.com slash Crowder to receive 20% off and free shipping.
	You really should take care of that.
	Just as that was happening, right now on CNN.
	Bring it up, bring it up.
	Full screen, full screen!
	Justice Department report outlines mistakes leading to the beating death of Whitey Bulger.
	Whoopsie!
	Yeah, trust the institutions guys.
	Well, I think Whitey Bulger was already kind of connected to the FBI anyway.
	Sure, he was for sure.
	It's just a hilarious headline.
	Mistakes leading to the beating death.
	You mean arresting him at 80?
	Mistakes leading to the beating death is not a mundane detail, Michael!
	So you guys beat him to death, right?
	Uh-huh, uh-huh.
	There were so many missteps there.
	Did you keep him in isolation?
	Well, no, no.
	Did you put him in general population?
	Yeah!
	Did you out him as an undercover narc?
	Yeah?
	Yeah.
	Do you see where you're wrong?
	Yeah, did you tell everybody he was Whitey Bulger?
	We did.
	We did, yeah.
	And then you let him shower with the public?
	I see.
	I do see your point.
	You know, that's going to be a three-star rating, not a five this year.
	I'm sorry.
	I see what we did here.
	You think we shouldn't have let the other gang members know who he was.
	Well, it's just a risk you don't need to take.
	Huh.
	Swing and a miss.
	That's our bad.
	I'm a dumbass.
	Which also, by the way, reminds me, you don't need to be doing judo by the fireplace.
	You could just move to the middle of the room.
	Oh, I understand, yeah.
	Well, why take the risk?
	There's plenty of space over there.
	You're less warm, though.
	Yeah, just don't tell them who he is.
	God, do you have the witness?
	He was beaten to death.
	When?
	Right after we arrested him, basically.
	It was weird.
	I don't know.
	Hold on a second.
	It was somewhere after I yelled through the bullhorn.
	But before... I'm pretty sure it was after the bullhorn.
	What did he yell into the bullhorn?
	That's Whitey Bulger.
	There goes Whitey Bulger.
	Get him.
	Get him.
	But we did have a team look this up.
	He did die after the beating.
	Yeah.
	Yes.
	So, yeah.
	And if it health matters at all, I mean, he suffered a great deal of time.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	Can we have Mission Control look up the circumstances related to this for Muck Club?
	It'd be kind of funny to see.
	He was old.
	I mean, he probably died before the beating was over.
	Yeah, that's fair.
	We believe that he died mid-beating, which is what we call, uh, apex beating.
	Yes.
	Because it's the perfect time, because it's, you know, it's not as long and drawn out as it could be, but you still have enough time to think about what you've done.
	It's a split the difference.
	Yeah, it's the last James Bond installment, perfect time to die.
	It is the Goldilocks of dying mid-beating.
	Yes.
	It's a misstep.
	Now if you'll excuse me, my daughter has an appointment with a doctor to be a gymnast.
	Yes.
	Jesus.
	I don't have much time to talk about this.
	I'm busy investigating parents who don't want chicks with dicks in five-year-old girls changing rooms.
	Look, I can't save the whole world.
	But I will say monsters are real.
	Yes.
	They live amongst us.
	They're real.
	This guy.
	FBI.
	Oh, by the way, by the way, we also want to give the IRS guns.
	Yeah, just to be clear.
	Yeah, that's our new proposal.
	That's how we think we can fix all of this.
	And more people.
	Lots and lots and lots more people.
	More people, more guns, more power, more authority, and you know what, really, like, I just think we should do away with, you know, the people who aren't us.
	Hey, and by the way- Whitey Folger was hiding from authorities so he didn't die.
	The guy hid for like 25 years.
	Yeah.
	Sorry.
	At least 10, 15.
	Oh, sorry, it's just so funny to me now that I think about it.
	You got beat up over a parking space, Dave.
	Come on.
	Yeah, yeah, that's what happened.
	You can't, it's like- It's just hilarious, though.
	I mean, it's, I mean, well, yeah, it's hilarious.
	I'll stay with it.
	And guess what?
	No one else is going to, uh, no one else is going to ever assist the authorities.
	It's like, no, no, don't worry, we'll take care of you.
	Yeah!
	Sure you will.
	Sure.
	I sure did.
	Is witness protection still a thing?
	Yeah.
	His brother was a senator, a congressman as well.
	Like, it's pretty amazing.
	Hey, have we heard everything about the Pelosi story, by the way?
	Oh yeah, all the details have come out.
	Oh, all of it.
	It was a guy.
	Hey, wasn't one of the most deadly shootings ever, the Vegas shooting?
	Do we have all the information on that?
	Well, not all.
	No, okay.
	That one went away pretty quickly.
	Unrelated, but the reporter that was actually pushing back on all of that was killed, I think, within the last six months.
	Weird.
	Unrelated.
	Right.
	You're a conspiracy theorist.
	You should be dismissed out of hand because Wikipedia says you're not a real journalist.
	Stop connecting dots.
	We have dots and that's it.
	I don't even really need to connect dots like with Larry Nassar.
	I don't really need to connect dots so much as just a lineup of 70 plus women who said they were sexually assaulted by him.
	After the FBI was informed about it.
	That's just the after count.
	It's not the total.
	330 total.
	330 total. 330? Are you serious? 330.
	330?
	Wow.
	I mean, that's the human rape equivalent of Don King stealing a hundred million dollars from Mike Tyson.
	Where you're like, okay, you'd think you'd notice it at about 20 million.
	Somehow it got to a hundred million.
	You'd be like, okay, some of that, right, at a certain point you'd think you'd know.
	How did the FBI not notice after 50?
	100?
	200?
	I'm trying to go prices right without going over and I can't lose!
	You can't.
	No.
	All right, look.
	That made Cosby blush.
	Yeah, for crying out loud.
	He was working with him, by the way.
	That's, by the way, not true.
	Don't fact check that.
	It's completely made up and it's completely outside of the realm of possibility.
	It's absurd, right?
	None of us would... I don't have to state that because you might actually believe it.
	So you went with 230 reports and that wasn't good enough.
	That's what that means.
	Yeah.
	Potentially.
	I don't know that 230 came forward, but after all of this stuff... How many do you need before you put a guy on?
	That's just to the 300 low round, by the way.
	Yeah, we've had three.
	We've had three people come forward and say some shenanigans are going on.
	So what we're going to do is we're going to take your parking pass and your building access and we're just going to put that on pause for a minute until we can investigate this situation.
	Not even that?
	Yeah.
	I mean, you don't have to arrest the guy and haul him off in a paddy wagon.
	All you have to do is say, no more hanging out with chicks and giving them unnecessary internal massages in front of their parents in some cases.
	How about we just pause that for a minute?
	How about you put him in Fauci's Beagle flea helmet at least, like just for starters.
	Just to hold him off till the trial.
	Yeah, exactly.
	At least give him a flea helmet.
	Make him uncomfortable.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, we have, oh for sure, we have hundreds of reports.
	Well, call me when you get thousands and then maybe we'll think about it.
	What's the opposite of hospice care, where you try and outdo hell as a precursor?
	Oh boy.
	You mean when you make it completely uncomfortable?
	Yes.
	That's why I feel like if you don't want to have cruel and unusual punishment, we should at least make a deal with another country where we're like, well I guess we're gonna have to sentence you to life in Mexico.
	I think it's a gulag.
	No, this is like Escape from L.A., right?
	This is exactly like that.
	You just send somebody to a- Hold on a second.
	Hold on a second.
	CNN.
	CNN, right now.
	This is what the intel- By the way, the intelligence communities who are paramount.
	January 6th committee chair confirms criminal referrals will happen.
	Oh, good.
	Today on CNN, they were still saying that officers were killed, by the way.
	This morning.
	They were still talking about officers being killed.
	That's where your intelligence committees Your intelligence agencies are doing their work.
	And of course we'll have Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney.
	People are going to say, we absolutely need to respect our intelligence agencies.
	They're the true heroes.
	No.
	No, they're not.
	Sorry.
	They're absolutely not.
	The same day that they figured out that a gangster getting beaten to death under their watch a decade ago may have been a misstep.
	There's no separation between big tech and the intelligence agencies.
	That's, that's the problem.
	Why is this life?
	You know what a judge should do when he sees these criminal first be like, yeah.
	What?
	What?
	What the?
	What is this?
	You just figured this out now?
	This is not a crime!
	There's no crime here!
	You guys just had political theater for months!
	Well no, the good thing is they have all of our intelligence agencies investigating the criminal trespassing as opposed to the sexual assault and or rape of over 300 underage girls.
	Good to see the FBI has their priorities in check.
	Same thing with the CIA.
	And good to see that they are the most trusted name in fact-checking for Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.
	Hey, do you feel free?
	Shut up with the private company, can do whatever they want.
	Any Republican who comes out... You know what?
	I'm not... There's the whole back the blue thing, which I've never been on board with.
	I have said that, generally speaking, local police departments obviously are required, they're necessary, and there are a lot of good cops out there, and they have some tough jobs to do.
	We're talking about cops on the beat with guns.
	That being said, unless we see enough people, and this includes both local police And national intelligence walking out, speaking out, and making their voices heard.
	Never gonna riot.
	Of course, never going to burn anything down.
	I'll be pretty damn anti-authority, pretty damn anti-cop.
	How about that?
	Peacefully.
	But if I see one more video of you shutting down someone's business whenever the next pandemic hits, and not enough police step forward and say, this is wrong, guess what?
	You've now made my enemy list.
	FBI?
	Come on.
	CIA?
	All of you?
	I'm not on board with the Black Lives Matter, where they're targeting your families, of course, and they're being violent.
	But I'm saying, peacefully, I will fight you every... Because you know what?
	I think we kind of all want the same things, right?
	You have these people...
	And by these people, I mean people who are Black Lives Matter activists, right?
	The people who are embezzling millions of dollars.
	And you have Antifa.
	They're saying, defund the police!
	And by the way, the people who are hurt are those communities, but are kind of coming full circle.
	They're saying, defund the police.
	We should be regulating our own communities.
	Hey, you know what?
	I'll make that deal with you.
	Okay.
	If the police are going to come in and shut down businesses, if the police are not actually going to put pedophiles in prison, guess what?
	Let's regulate our own communities, and thank God we have the Second Amendment.
	I would love a little more self-regulation as it relates to that, if that's the alternative to the police making criminals out of law-abiding citizens and letting criminals get off scot-free.
	By the way, to end this on a more positive note, we are going to go play, of course, Stephen O Sports, but we reached out to some of you about giving gifts this Christmas for the Crowder Gives Back.
	Uh, segment.
	You know, we did this last year with, uh, we provided some families with their children's Christmas wish lists, but we also can provide food.
	Um, here's one thing.
	Check your inbox, check your junk inbox, and reply back.
	Because we had people reach out.
	And we replied.
	We replied saying, yeah, yeah, we'll give you all the stuff that you want.
	And then you disappeared.
	They ghosted us.
	Where are you?
	I am just waiting to give you my money.
	Are you man enough to take it?
	Are you man enough to take it?
	Candy canes are for closers.

▲