EXCLUSIVE IRAN WARZONE COVERAGE FEAT. RICHARD SPENCER | KNOW MORE NEWS - ADAM GREEN
Richard Spencer dissects 2026’s Iran-Israel-Ukraine flashpoints, warning Trump’s pro-Zionist nationalism risks destabilizing the Middle East while sidelining Ukraine—benefiting Putin via energy chaos. He mocks regime-change fantasies (e.g., "Cyrus Accords") and accuses analysts like Ritter and Mearsheimer of Kremlin-aligned shifts, framing Iran’s defeat as temporary but its collapse as a recipe for nuclear proliferation or radicalization. Spencer ties U.S. military strikes to evangelical apocalypticism, dismissing Dugan’s eschatology as Russian propaganda, while critiquing Israel’s unchecked influence—even under Trump—as a bipartisan failure. The episode ends with a tease of Myth to Power, positioning it as a counter-narrative to Judeo-Christian geopolitical dogma. [Automatically generated summary]
Thank you for joining me today, Wednesday, March 4th, 2026.
Huge show, huge show today.
Big guest, Richard Spencer, is here to talk about the exclusive war zone coverage, Iran, everything unfolding geopolitically.
You know, I've had him on a few times now, and I'm pretty sure if we were to go back and check what we, if we did a stream before the election, which I believe we did, how that would have aged with some of these predictions.
Because I know I got a saved tweet, Richard, where you were very publicly before the election supporting Kamala because you said Trump was a Zionist that's going to bomb Iran.
More likely to bomb Iran.
More likely to.
Yeah, I didn't do a full-on Professor Jang style prediction, but I should have because the good thing about predictions is that if you're right, you're declared a genius.
And if you're wrong, people forget about it.
That actually often does occur.
So it pays to just throw shit against the wall and see what sticks.
But no, I like to be, you know, sound and calculated and not hysterical.
But it's funny.
I was talking with you on the phone and you mentioned this.
And I was like, oh, I sort of forgot I was talking about that.
And so I did a search just on my own profile and I started retweeting this stuff.
And yeah, it holds up like quite a bit.
And my point was not that Kamala Harris, you know, is a Stew Peters subscriber and wants to destroy Zionism and the Frankest, Frankish Turkish Empire or something.
I mean, I'm not saying anything approaching that.
I think Kamala Harris presented herself as a sort of centrist neocon, a Hillary Clinton person.
But clearly with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, they are more than willing to push back, however hesitatingly, however ineffectively, to be honest, they are at least willing to push back when Israel does things like, you know, bomb a food truck that's delivering resources to Palestinians, et cetera, when they go a little bit rogue,
when they're spreading chaos in the Middle East.
And Donald Trump is something altogether different.
And we can talk more about Trump as we go along.
But, you know, there's this idea that I see among Alex Jones types.
You see it less among Fuentes, but he would talk about this kind of stuff previously.
You definitely see it among the sort of like millennial podcast Dave Smith sphere, that kind of stuff, which is that the evil globalists want war and the nationalists don't.
And that was the line basically in 2024 that, if not decisively, was a sub, if not decisive, was a substantial contribution to Donald Trump's victory.
You know, just is what it is.
The evil globalists want to take you to war.
So we've got to jump on the Trump train, get with a nationalist who's going to maintain peace.
And this is something that they never articulate directly.
They do articulate it directly sometimes, but they never really interrogate it or think about it.
And my assessment is that the globalists don't, in fact, want war and nationalists might.
What I'm saying is that the globalists, and I'm not endorsing any of these people, I'm sure they don't like me and I don't like tons of stuff they do, blah, blah, blah.
But globalists want to maintain globalism.
They want to maintain this, you know, third iteration of Brett and Woods and Pax Americana and peace and security and meeting in Switzerland every winter to pat each other on the back.
They want to maintain that.
And wars that become too chaotic, whether Russia, Ukraine, whether Israel-Palestine, Israel-Iran, Israel-Lebanon, et cetera, that threatens that big party that they have going.
They are not fundamentally incentivized to blow up the war.
They're not actual Satanists.
It's not World Economic Forum that wants to have war, all apocalyptic end times wars.
It's the nationalists.
That's what you're saying, right?
Exactly.
And so on the other hand, you have people like Bibby Netanyahu, who is a nationalist, who is ruling over a hold on one second.
I'm going to, I might pop out there for a moment.
I noticed that my feed was a little bit slow there.
So I'm going to, I just plugged into the internet.
I think it's been pretty good so far.
It's been pretty good.
I mean, my feed to you.
Okay.
Oh, that might be the case where it's like, it's too many things going on at the same time.
Anyway, I'm plugged in.
I'm jacked into the matrix.
So we won't have any problems at this point.
But yeah, Bibby Netanyahu, what is he if not a nationalist?
He presides over a coalition that's very similar to MAGA, that includes religious fundamentalists, that includes Mizrahi Jews, that includes Russians who might actually not exactly be Jews.
But as Putin said just last year, who speak, there's so many, you know, we couldn't possibly go to war with Israel.
There's so many Russian speakers in Israel.
It's like our vacation home in the Middle East or something like this.
So he presides over a coalition of fundamentalist illegal settlers, fanatics, morons, and, you know, additional deplorables.
Much like MAGA is, as Hillary Clinton said, a basket of deplorables.
Now, these are the types who are most eager to confront their neighbors violently, most eager to go to war, most prone to Be taken in by apocalyptic fantasies of the end times and the establishment of a new Jerusalem so the Jesus can come back or the moshiak or whatever.
This is who, this is what the right is fundamentally.
The left, if we want to call them that, or just the globalist new economic forum types are not incentivized in those ways.
They're actually disincentivized.
Let's remember it's country club Republican, Episcopalian, former Planned Parenthood board member George Herbert Walker Bush, who in the early 90s was pushing back against illegal settlements by Israel.
Ditto Bill Clinton.
Ditto George W. Bush, who actually was like his father in some ways.
We'll leave that there for the moment.
But it's actually the far-right nationalist whack jobs who are most likely to get us into war.
And again, with Kamala Harris, there was a lot of talk about World War III in terms of Ukraine.
Well, in my opinion, Biden and Harris didn't do enough to support Ukraine.
They weren't aggressive enough.
They were too quick to dismiss notions of like a no-fly zone over Ukraine, too quick to dismiss strategies of attacking Russia within Russia, etc.
I think they held back a little too much for my taste.
Do you think Biden never spoke to Putin or met with him?
Do you think he should have negotiated with Putin?
Or does that have been a bad idea with Biden?
I don't think you can negotiate with Putin because Putin is invading Ukraine based on a notion of reestablishing a Russian world that must, at the very least, include Ukraine, which is one of the very few parts of mainland Russia where you have like non-Arctic sea access and so on.
I mean, Crimea is hugely important for Russia, but he also clearly views Ukraine as, I don't know, another little Russia as part of the whole story, et cetera.
I don't think you can negotiate with someone who isn't willing to walk away or isn't willing to give something up.
You know, it's like it's different if I want to buy like a house and I said, well, you know, would you take 200 grand for this house?
And they're like, no, I won't settle for anything less than 300.
And it's like, well, I don't got 300, so I have to walk away.
It's very different if it's like, this is my childhood home where, you know, my grandfather lived there.
He wants me to always have that.
It's this precious thing that you must have.
And it's like, then it's like, oh, yeah, 500,000, 600,000.
Oh, yeah, whatever you want.
A million, let's go.
There's an emotional intensity to Vladimir Putin's conception of Russia and Ukraine as one people.
And he actually outlined this in a article that occurred in the winter of 2021 before the war.
So I don't think there's really a negotiation there if you have fundamentally differing conceptions of the world.
Trump hasn't been able to make a deal.
Trump and Witkoff and Kushner haven't made a deal thus far with Putin.
They haven't made a deal thus far as well.
But they promised on day one, too.
Yeah.
I mean, I think the deal is that they want to write off Ukraine or they want to write off at least a substantial portion of it to Russia and move on.
And again, I've seen this with some of these guys who I had real, you know, I had different like philosophical bases in these people, but Drew Pavlu and, you know, my friend Gunter, who's like, you know, the NATO kind of cringe, hilarious and interestingly intelligent guy.
And they're, they're big into supporting Ukraine.
I don't doubt their sincerity in supporting Ukraine in the slightest bit, but they sort of have this, you know, like anything that's pro-Western or pro-America must be good.
It's almost like a mentality from the 90s or something.
I don't know what it is exactly.
I like it.
And they're both supporting regime change in Iran and getting rid of the Ayatollahs and all that kind of stuff.
And, you know, on some level, I get it.
I don't really like Iran either.
But they're not viewing the fact that, again, the Lakudist nationalist MAGA people, they don't care about Europe.
JD Vance, who is the vice president, who's the next MAGA once Trump goes away, who clearly has influence, who's connected to the Silicon Valley right, he explicitly says, I don't care about MAGA.
In a speech he gave, I believe it might have been with the American Conservative magazine, he said, oh, well, Israel is different because Israel is part of our national internal.
All he's saying basically is that he cares about the Jewish state.
He doesn't care about European states.
He has made that explicit.
Many other people in the White House think in those ways.
Now, Rubio, he gave that bold pro-Europe speech recently.
I don't even know what to make of him at this point, but I tweeted that I would vote for him after that speech, but I have, I recant.
I take that back.
I will not vote for Rubio after what he's doing in Iran.
But these people have, the sort of pro-West, pro-American, pro-NATO people like Gunter and Drew, they have to realize that you can't do everything.
It's a matter of focus.
And there are trade-offs with every single thing you could ever possibly do.
The fact that I'm talking with you right now means that I can't eat lunch right now.
I can't go to the gym right now.
Everything has a trade-off.
And you make that calculation.
I can eat lunch later.
I'm very happy to be with you, be with you here, Adam.
But what I mean by this is that the MAGA, the Trump administration is going to focus on a Middle Eastern war.
You already have people within that coalition who are willing to abandon Ukraine.
And this now gives them the greatest excuse in the world.
I am afraid that they are going to do that.
That doesn't mean Ukraine is going to fall because there is continued European support.
And there's just the pluckiness of Ukraine and the incompetence of the Russian army.
I'm not saying that Ukraine is going to fall, but clearly the wind is blowing in a particular direction.
And that is to return to the terror war paradigms of the Bush era, of the auths, and to get away from the pro-NATO, pro-West paradigm that, again, the liberals and the globalists are much more comfortable with and much will much are much more likely to support.
So I think this situation is very good for Russia.
Another aspect of this is that the Straits of Hormuz are being closed to some degree or another.
I'm not sure it's fully blocked up at this point.
But I've heard a lot of reports of insurers of ships just calling back the insurance.
It's canceled.
We can't guarantee anything because of wartime.
Natural gas, petrol is spiking.
All of that is good for Vladimir Putin.
That is his bread and butter.
That is how that state survives at all is basically through high gas prices.
There is going to be a push in Europe to reopen Nordstream.
Let's start, you know, yeah, Russia sucks.
Straits of Hormuz Crisis00:10:30
We don't like him.
We love the Ukrainians, but I can't fill up my car.
I can't run my business, et cetera.
And I don't know.
I think what we are seeing right now could be disastrous for Ukraine, NATO, European security.
And I think it could be just a massive gift for the expansion of the Soviet Union or, oh, did I misstate that?
The Russian world.
Well, you're right.
Economic Times, Bloomberg, and Reuters are all saying it's going to give Putin's oil prices a boost.
Also, though, my friend in the chat, Jocelyn, just suggested that Russia is unable to now give any support to Iran because they've been depleted in Ukraine.
But also, you made the point, Trump did the true social about our ammunition supply.
And he said Biden stupidly gave it to free to Zelensky, who he called P.T. Barnum.
He's a circus act or something.
It's completely insulting.
I want to see Trump or JD Vance not flee a country when it is being invaded by a nuclear superpower with 10 times its population.
You know, like you can disagree with Zelensky.
You can be one of these like trad people who's like, oh, he was a comedian.
He dressed up like women or whatever.
Yeah, he was on the equivalent of SNL in Europe.
I mean, of course he dressed up like women and whatever.
Yeah, he's a fucking comedian.
That's what he is.
Does that mean he can't be brave?
And I hate to break the news to you, but your own dear leader is a comedian at the end of the day.
I mean, Donald Trump was a reality television star, and you basically look over that, but you want to bash him for being a comedian.
He's one of the funniest celebrities there is.
Oh, yeah, totally.
He remains a stand-up.
His stand-up routines remain funny, even though I can't stand him and won't vote for him.
Interesting point about how it is framed in the conspiracy internet world that it's the globalists that want to do all the wars and the grand chessboard, but it really is like the nationalist Putin, Netanyahu, Trump, Iranian Muslim countries, religious Abrahamic nationalists.
But that's almost like a misnomer because those are all globalist as well.
Those are all different flavors of messaging.
Globalism.
Yeah, there's no doubt about it.
And maybe you could even say that like everyone has some sort of universal principle or something.
So in a way, we're all globalist or whatever.
But I guess the distinction, and that's certainly true for me, the distinction that I'm making is between when they say the globalist, they might be, you know, implying Satanist and witches with cauldrons with, you know, baby's blood and potions.
They might be implying that, but they're basically talking about the World Economic Forum, capitalist and centrist and liberals in Europe and North America and thereabouts, who basically want to maintain neoliberal capitalism.
And what I'm saying is those people are in fact not incentivized in the slightest bit to pursue chaotic wars, global wars, and death and destruction.
They are highly incentivized for the wars to be very small, precise, humanitarian, and to maintain this good thing that they've got going.
So they are just the least likely to engage in an Armageddon war.
And the nationalists are not incentivized.
They don't like any of this stuff.
They want to change the world order.
They want to destroy global trade and neoliberalism.
And they want tariff regimes.
They want everyone staying at home.
They want to destroy their enemy neighbors.
I mean, they just have a totally different incentive structure and they're going to act in different ways.
And so, yeah, I mean, look, I have my own ideals.
I have my own sort of opinions and so on.
And I have my own, you know, sort of academic way of looking at things, blah, blah, blah.
But then there's just like where the rubber hits the road and the question of whom should you vote for.
That whom should you vote for is not this like deep thing where it's like Kamala Harris expresses my inner longing and hope for the future.
No, she doesn't in the slightest bit.
I think I'm not really a democracy type guy.
I don't think I think democracies anyway, I think voting is shallow.
It's a shallow decision.
It doesn't express my hopes and dreams or my like world outlook.
It's just a calculation of who is better for maintaining peace, security, and prosperity over the next like two to three years.
That's all it is.
And when I think of it that way, and I don't think of it in terms of culture war nonsense or, you know, is this a guy I want to have a beer with?
Or whatever.
He mogs.
Yeah.
Oh, he mogs.
Well, I mean, maybe that's even better.
Anyway, no, I take your point.
If you don't think of it in those culture war ways and you just think of it as like, yeah, what will be like slightly better than the other one over the next two or three years?
Then yeah, I vote for Democrats seven days a week.
You see Neil or Nick and Alex Jones saying that they're going to vote Democrat in the midterms.
Well, this is the thing with all these people because Nick will, I think he now will vote for Democrats.
So what happens is Spencer does something in 2020 and then by 2026, Nick doesn't.
But he has better timing than I do.
I'm way out in front on these things and he does them sort of right at the right time.
So in 2015, don't vote for Trump.
You know, fair enough.
I think he did that after Vance was put in there because it was just sort of like, I can't, clearly something is happening here.
This is not, this is not like a nationalist revival.
This is something else.
Anyway, 2024, don't vote for Trump.
2026, vote for Democrats.
You do harm the other party much more by telling people to vote for their opposition as opposed to abstaining or withdrawing.
Now, in terms of these guys like Alex Jones or Owen Scheuer or the whole like anti-Semite sphere that you, that, that you're always at loggerheads with, I guarantee you, these people will vote for Trump.
Like they'll, they'll come around to it on some weird way.
I mean, I've been.
Just like they did in 2024.
They acted like they didn't know that it was a good chance he'd go to war in Iran and be a huge Zionist, you know?
Yeah.
Well, I mean, I talked about this with Owen Scheuer where he's, he, he's saying some things that are clearly true, which is that there's a lot of energy on the Democrat side.
Yeah.
And I think the war added to that, actually.
Many other factors, kind of similar to 20, when was it 2021, where after Roe v. Wade was overturned, I think?
There was a lot of energy on the, maybe it's 2023, excuse me.
It doesn't matter.
There was a lot of energy on the Democratic side due to something.
And yeah, I think the read the polls.
85% of Republicans support the attack on Iran.
And what is it?
30% of Democrats support it?
It's totally polarized and flipped, but it's dramatic.
You can go look up the polls.
I tweeted those out too if you're just like scanning my feed.
But yeah, Democrats are going to get motivated by the fact that Donald Trump is risking World War III.
Yes, surprise, surprise.
But he's saying it like, oh, we're going to lose.
We're going to lose Republic.
We're going to lose Republicans.
The base is going to revolt against us if we do this war.
And it's like literally 90% of MAGA supports Trump and any fucking thing he ever does.
They will support an attack on Iran.
They will support tariffs.
They will support Trump A drag show with himself as the lead singer.
There is Cardi B.
Yeah, he'll start a war for the Jews in the Middle East.
It's like amazing.
Yeah, I mean, he, they, they will support him.
So, again, what Owen show Owen Shori's logic is that, like, you know, like, the base is against this.
The base is for it.
Why don't you, why don't you elect Democrats, particularly these sort of like wishy-washy, goofy progressives, like the guy who defeated Jasmine Crockett in Texas, who might actually stop this war, which, according to your own words, is threatening peace and civilization.
They just won't do it.
So, I was tweeting out these like circular logic of these people where it's like, we need to elect JD Vance to stop the Iran war or something.
Like, we need to make sure that the forever wars don't become forever wars by electing J.D. Vince.
They will do whatever sort of pretzel-like contortion is necessary to do what they always want to do, which is vote for the Republicans because the Republicans are like down home and they care about family values or whatever.
Believe in Jesus.
Yeah, they love Jesus.
They're Christians.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Now, we now have Democrats who love Jesus.
Believers and Botchers00:02:44
What is this guy named Terrico?
Or forgetting his name at the moment.
Not sure.
Joe Rogan, he's kind of a Democrat.
Turned MAGA that's supporting Jesus.
Oh, yeah.
Yep.
Yeah.
So everyone loves Jesus, actually, in the political spectrum.
The whole politics loves Jesus.
So what's your fucking point?
Why don't you just vote for the Democrats or the Libertarians?
Jesus is a superstar.
It's like everyone loves Jesus in America.
So like, what's your deal?
Even the demons love Jesus.
Whenever they attack somebody in their sleep, they just want to go read the Bible and believe in Jesus.
Right.
That's what happened with Tucker.
Right.
So I want to get your take on all of these coping takes that we're seeing from like Sneek and Scott Ritter and all of the fake AI videos.
And they're saying Colonel McGregor also, he's like, Iran's going to win and America's, oh, this Professor Zhang guy, everybody's, he's blown up and he's saying we're going to lose to Iran with some really stupid arguments, by the way, I think, from the clips I saw from his video.
We can talk about that.
You can play those clips.
I think Jiang is a, I think he might very well be a Chinese propagandist, like the Chinese Dugan or something.
But that doesn't mean that he's not interesting or wrong.
I would just.
Oh, no, he's right about some things, but then he spins it and says evolution is a satanic conspiracy.
Or he'll say, there's nothing wrong with Judaism.
It's only Zionism.
Or he'll say it's secret saboteine Frankis in the Illuminati.
Frankist and then like the Illuminati, and my eyes started to roll back in my head.
I was just like, God.
Yeah.
Or Khazarians, too.
He's doing their secret Khazarian thing.
All the typical.
I pinned him a few months ago as soon as he started to get popular as a part of this Russian op.
And now he's retweeting that Dugan's his favorite and, you know, on every boosted through all the anti-Israel, like pro-Russia channels.
Yeah, it's worrisome.
I actually interviewed him.
I should release that interview on YouTube or something.
Yeah, I would like to see that.
Yeah, I interviewed him like back in July or something.
I remember.
It was a good conversation.
It's kind of funny.
I think he probably did some basic research on me and didn't.
He might have mentioned secret societies.
I think he sort of knew that if he starts talking about Frankism or something, I'm just going to be like, dude.
Look, I said this Russia.
Oh, he does all these videos about how Putin is the uber mensch and like the West is going to fall and a mishmash of all the conspiracies you've been hearing about online for like the last 20, 30 years.
Jews Criticize Israel00:04:06
Yeah.
And it's, it's, I think it's astroturfed and botted and just, you know, the low IQ, low anti-Semite dupes out there just like are eating it all up.
Look, here's the Dugan's pushing them.
Judaism, watch this one.
Israel before.
You have anti-Semitism over the internet.
Now, I have criticized Israel before, okay?
But anti-Semitism is not the same as anti-Zionism, right?
Zionism is a belief that Israel is a Chosen people and the promised land and all that, okay?
But Judaism as a religion, it's perfectly fine.
So why would people not care about the difference between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism, okay?
Here you, you and I are in this rather odd position where in a way we agree with that congressional resolution that anti-Zionism is anti-Judaism.
You know what I mean?
Like, it's very odd.
I don't like resolutions like that because obviously there are Jews who criticize Israel.
Obviously, there are people, non-Jews, who criticize Israel who have Jewish friends or don't really want to attack religion in general.
So it is wrong on some level, but I think it's actually correct on some deeper level, which is that I've read the Torah.
And, you know, it's not a bunch of platitudes about loving everyone and being kind and doing good things.
It's really not.
Now, you can find some of those in there, but even those are sort of like sinister on some level because they're, you know, welcome the stranger in the way that, you know.
due to the fact that you were a stranger's in Egypt or something.
They're all kind of embedded in a self-serving narrative.
But anyway, I shouldn't even go into that.
Fundamentally, the Torah is a story of the creation of the universe, you know, the covenant, Abraham's covenant with God and all of that jazz.
Then a people that after Joseph makes a beachhead in Egypt, the rest of the Jewish community moves to Egypt.
Fast forward, they're slaves or something in Egypt.
They're oppressed and they have to flee and they eventually go to the promised land that was promised to Abraham.
Yahweh didn't promise Abraham that one day you could be a good person and treat everyone with loving kindness.
He promised him that his descendants would be like stars in the sky and that you will have a land of your own.
And we have Moses, Joshua, we have the judges who are where you have all this sort of internecine infighting and lack of subservience to Yahweh.
They're brought high, they're brought low, etc.
Finally, you have the establishment of a king of the Jews, Saul, David, etc.
You have the story of the fall of this thing, the splitting into two different entities in effect, Judea and Israel, blah, blah.
I could go on.
The Torah is the story of Zionism as we know it.
The Torah is about a promised land that is kind of metaphysical on some level.
And I think that's very important, actually, but also is soil.
So yes, to be anti-Zionist is to be anti-Judaic.
The Torah's Duality00:15:16
Maybe that's a good way of phrasing it.
If you are opposed to the Zionist project, you are on some fundamental level opposed to Judaism.
And that's okay.
And we're allowed to oppose a supremacist religion that wants the Messiah to rule the world.
We're allowed to not want to go along with that.
Exactly.
Also, just, I hate this like Goofy sacrine notion that like all religions are wonderful or something, you know, like, oh, yeah, I think even Sneeko one time I saw something where it's like, Judaism's just a beautiful religion.
It's like, is it?
That's my clip.
Yeah, I clipped that.
Is it actually?
Is it a beautiful religion?
Do you read the Old Testament?
You're like, oh, wow.
What a bunch of nice guys.
He affirms, dude, just recently, Sneeko said, like, he believes that God gave Jews the Torah.
Yeah, that's good.
Yeah.
You're a little low on there.
Yeah.
Well, I just want to.
Yeah, you keep moving.
Yeah.
So I've heard this is where the head should be in the shot.
Oh, I got it perfect right now.
You got it perfect now.
After I changed it, you're welcome.
No, you were at the very bottom of the frame the whole time.
And I was trying to lift you up because I didn't want to hype mog you on the screen.
Right.
You didn't want to mog me on.
Height mog you.
Yeah.
That's better.
Yeah.
Well, you do hype mog me.
I, it's rare that I'm around people who are taller than myself.
Dude, when I'm around anybody taller than me, it's very odd.
It's very weird for me.
Yeah.
I didn't like it.
Yeah.
So I wanted to look at this.
Look at Tucker and Mersheimer.
So number one, the Copes, like McGregor, Ritter, Mersheimer, Jeffrey Sachs, Tucker, like clearly this pro-Russia, now anti-Israel kind of faction.
They've been wrong about Ukraine.
They were wrong about Hezbollah and Hamas and everything happening.
They've been saying Israel is going to be done in like two weeks.
Wrong about Trump not going to war with Iran.
Exactly.
And now they still want to act like they have credibility.
And now they're all saying that America's going to lose and Israel's going to be destroyed and Iran's going to win.
And did you see the Ritter thing where he was like, oh, it's 4D chess?
The Supreme Leader wanted to sacrifice himself and become a martyr to mobilize everybody.
He can't be serious.
What is going on?
And all the fake AI videos, it's like, why are you pretending, like deluding yourselves and just giving everybody false hope that you're actually winning when you're getting pummeled and destroyed?
I agree.
So what's happening?
I it's funny with Mearsheimer.
I actually was Mearsheimer's student to some degree in the sense that I took a class from him when I was at U.S. Chicago.
University of Chicago.
Okay.
Yeah.
What was the class on?
The Jewish Lobby?
What?
The Jewish Lobby.
That's his book, right?
The Jewish Lobby?
No.
The Israeli Lobby.
Before that book came out.
That book came out in like 2007, I believe.
And then this was in 2002.
He was teaching like an intro to international relations type thing.
I mean, he does not remember me nor should he.
It was like a big thing.
But anyway.
Well, let's play this clip.
30 seconds.
Look at what they're doing here.
Okay.
Oh, I thought you were done.
Sorry.
The guy is really brilliant.
The Walton Mersheimer book is very well done.
He has another book called The Tragedy of Great Powers.
The guy is very good as an academic and understanding the past.
I think after 2022, he got a little too narcissistic about being a kind of truth teller and pundit.
And he got brought into that world in some shape or form.
Maybe it's just he's paling around to these people, or maybe he does have a handler or some sort of payment structure going in there.
I'm not necessarily accusing him of that because I think you could easily explain it by he likes to be on TV in the sense of he likes to get interviewed by Tucker Carlson and millions of people talking about you.
I understand it.
That's why we do this too.
But I do feel like Mearsheimer has just fundamentally lost credibility at the very least in terms of his a way to assess current events and the real world.
And whenever I hear these people, McGregor was doing the exact same thing that McGregor and Scott Ritter were saying about Russia, they're now saying about Iran.
It's just like flip.
They just like, it's like mad libs, basically.
They just like change a word and they're now, this is now their opinion.
And so this actually leads me to the fact that Mearsheimer, Ritter, McGregor, et cetera, are all saying this leads me to believe that Iran will lose this war over the coming month or so.
Now, remember, Saddam Hussein lost in, what was it, a month?
I mean, a remarkable effort by the U.S. military to invade, put boots on the ground, invade Iraq, and topple his regime in a matter of weeks.
I mean, it does show the power of the U.S. military, which we should never underestimate.
But needless to say, that wasn't the end of the story.
The mission was not accomplished at that point.
So I do think Iran is going to suffer a defeat.
I don't think that will be the end.
And I think we're going to be pushed into a realm of unpredictability very shortly.
Probably by May of 2026, we're going to be in a new realm of unpredictability, very much like we were with Iraq.
Trump did say that his worst fear is that they somebody new fills the vacuum and they're even worse and they're even more of a nuclear threat.
Very possible.
I mean, again, it's interesting.
Someone said this on my podcast the other night, and I thought it was a very good way of thinking about it, which is that there's a sort of selection that goes on where you go and you kill a bunch of leaders.
Like you knock off Hamas's leadership.
Maybe that is a good idea from your strategic outlook in the short term.
But you might very well be engaging in a sort of Darwinian selection for people who are either more wily and are not getting killed, the sort of outsider who's more radical, who has less to lose in a way.
So there actually are some serious problems with this kind of decapitation.
Now, it can work.
Decapitating Maduro based in Venezuela and basically threatening his party and the Venezuelans and being like, listen, buddy, you're going to play ball.
Okay.
Like, I think that will be a success.
And it just is what it is.
Venezuela is very different than the Middle East.
Right.
But in what they're doing with Iran, where they're not just doing a little like strategic maneuver to change personnel, wasn't even a regime change, personnel change.
You're not doing that in Iran.
Donald Trump promised to annihilate the Navy so that they can't close the Strait of Hormuz, at least most immediately.
Now, the Strait of Hormuz seems to be closed or closing at this moment.
So that has failed.
He just literally called for regime change with this sort of abstract, reified notion of the Iranian people are going to rise up and they're going to like establish democracy and vote a humanitarian and poet into office, and then they'll all be rich and prosperous.
Did you see him deny the Shah?
Shockingly naive.
He said he didn't think the Shah's son was going to make it in.
He just wants the people to have an uprising and then join the sea with that and Shah's.
I don't know if they can do it.
They want to join the Cyrus Accords.
Interesting.
The Cyrus Accords.
So they're going to build the third temple, I guess.
The Neo-Cyrus is going to build the third one.
Yeah, they'll do the Cyrus and the Abraham Accords.
That's what they were suggesting.
Speaking of the prophetic stuff, oh, and by the way, yeah, they're calling all those guys, Ritter and Merseheimer and them, the Jim Kramer of geopolitical comedy.
That's what it is, yes.
Now, look, there are always problems of using someone as a reverse moral compass.
Like, does David Fromm think this?
Well, I think the opposite.
I remember actually, this was many years ago now, like 2009, when I was working at Takis Magazine and Justin Ramondo, who died actually, he was a libertarian writer.
I don't know if you've ever heard of him.
Extremely prolific, but sometimes when you're so prolific, it just means you're shallow.
Like you're cranking out three articles a week.
Like, what are you really, are you just saying the same thing over and over again?
Anyway, I liked the guy.
He was just this funny libertarian gay who lived in San Francisco.
But he told me, he was like, this is what you need to do to be a writer.
So you go and you look at the weekly standard, which existed at that point, and you just take the opposite position.
It's like a policeman in an interrogation where you just assume the person you're interrogating is guilty.
And so you just go in and say, all right, why do they like this?
Why do they want this?
Well, that can work.
But at the same time, like David Fromm and I agree in Ukraine, and I don't care.
I don't care.
I mean, he's right on that.
David Frum and I agree that a high protein diet and exercise are keys to good health.
I mean, I don't know what to say.
So you can't always do that.
However, in this case, the fact that Ritter, McGregor, and Mearsheimer are all saying the same thing.
They're just doing this like third worldist romanticism about the glorious Iranian or Russian regimes.
I actually do think that they're a Jim Kramer.
You can just basically say, and they're like Jim Kramer, because remember, Jim Kramer is probably in bed with like deep, dark forces within Wall Street who wants him to be doing this.
They want to get the Rubes buying the stock at this point.
So you got to go buy, you know, Theranos, you know, three months before Elizabeth Holmes is arrested or whatever.
Like you, you, they want you to pile in so that they have buyers that it means that they're sellers.
And again, this is just an allegation.
Don't want to be sued for slander here, but like I could imagine that this is possibly occurring with Jim Kramer.
And I could imagine that this is possibly occurring with Mearsheimer, Scott Ritter, and McGregor in the sense that they are on some level Russian agents.
They are kind of being assets.
They're being burned in a way.
Russia doesn't care if you lose all credibility.
This is the line that they want pressed.
The line that they wanted pressed in 2021, in December of 2021, was Russia, Russia's never going to invade Ukraine.
Like, you know, it's only NATO that wants a war.
NATO might invade Russia.
That's more like, that's the line that they wanted at that point.
All of those people, Hazan Piker, Haas, Jackson Hinkle, I could just go on.
Just the Russian shill network.
They all have the possibility.
The Kremlin does not give a flying fucking ability of Jackson Hinkle because you can find like 10 more Jackson Hinkles over the course of a weekend if you need to.
You can go invent some chick with like big boobs who wears a MAGA hat and works construction in Texas.
Have you seen this girl actually?
Yeah, I've seen.
I know who you're talking about.
You're obsessed with her.
You brought her up last time.
I don't know if they like literally exist, but anyway, they can go find some like someone with a room temperature IQ who's cute to say talking points.
They can find that person.
They don't care about your credibility and they can go burn Mear Sheimer for the third time.
So here's a question I have for you.
So Putin has said before last year he didn't help Israel or help Iran because there's so many Russians in Israel and they're clearly some type of Chabad Netanyahu thing going on.
But now that this is happening and it's looking like we may do regime change and then start shipping the oil our way and it could hurt Russia losing one of their top allies.
Do you think that they're going to do anything to help?
They didn't help with Assad.
Are they going to do anything to help or are they just going to say you're evil and satanic and you killed another leader and you're the evil West and you start all the wars that okay.
Yeah, I mean, I, if past is precedent, then that's what's going to happen.
I mean, the whole axis of resistance or bricks, it's just all bullshit.
And Russians don't like they like to work with these third world people.
This is something that, of course, goes back to the Soviet Union days as well, is propping up these tin pot tyrants as like, you know, pro-humanity and whatever.
And then Dugan, Dugan's like trying to agitate, incite them all to like believe the Dajal is about to come and like it's the end times and there's going to be apocalyptic wars and Jesus is going to return.
Well, someone said like the idea is not to die for your country.
It's to have the other guy die for his.
And that's, I think, the calculation.
Like Dugan doesn't actually care about these third world people.
Like certainly Putin and the Kremlin don't.
Or he doesn't think the religions are real either.
I doubt he's just using it to his advantage.
It's not Muadib.
I keep Mahdi.
The Mahdi.
Yeah.
The Mahdi will rise up and Jesus will bow and convert to Islam and the end times are upon us.
Yeah, they like saying that kind of stuff.
But again, this image you're just showing right here, like Putin loves this.
This is Tehran, they're saying.
Why Religions Are Misused00:16:10
Yeah.
You think he loves it?
I think he loves to see this.
I do not think he cares at all about these allies.
I think he cares about the Russian world specifically.
He likes the allies to the degree that they might help him out, or there might be some arrangement of either they're giving him some forms of energy that he needs, or he's more likely because Russia's natural resource, you know, rich.
Yeah, and it's shifting our resources away from Ukraine over here also.
Exactly.
That's what he loves.
Yeah, we're going to get into an Iraq-style quagmire, but it's going to be worse because Iran is not Iraq.
Iran is like a civilization and Iraq is just a country.
So it's going to be worse.
And we are going to take our eyes off the ball.
We are going to be totally dedicated to winning this unwinnable shit show.
And he's just going to slowly take up Ukraine bit by bit.
Yeah, that's what he loves to see that shit.
He doesn't give a shit about his Iranian bricks partners.
I mean, give me a break.
Okay, next question.
Did you see this story going around everywhere yesterday?
That the commanders, the generals are hyping up the troops to go fight.
And they're saying that Trump is part of God's plan, that this is linked to Armageddon, and Trump is anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon.
Yeah.
It's funny how nothing ever changes.
Like my entire adult life is going to be dominated by the global war on terror with like as few episodes in between.
But this is the paradigm.
This is the dominant post-Cold War paradigm is Israel, the Middle East, and terrorist, basically.
And we are just back.
During the Bush administration, the biggest trend, it wasn't like wokeness or MAGA nationalist in politics or what that was not what people were concerned about.
It was about the evangelical Christians entering politics.
They had people in the administration who were dedicated to pandering to them, placating them, and even implementing their ideas into policy.
The U.S. military is the same thing.
Sadly, I mean, it's sort of heartbreaking, but these Banshee retards just love to go fight wars for the Jews.
For Jesus.
I mean, again, it's something that they have heard every Sunday for their entire lives.
And also, to their credit, there is a kind of Scotch-Irish component about it.
I component to it.
I think that might be overestimated at this point, but there is a just type of white dude that wants to be cool.
Like he wants to be a soldier.
He wants to like take orders and give orders.
He wants to have that camaraderie of the platoon, which is the greatest male camaraderie you could ever experience.
He wants to be a badass.
He might even want to kill some folks, in the words of Barack Obama, just because it's so damn cool.
So he has some good natural instincts.
I'm not criticizing any of those instincts.
In fact, he has good natural instincts, but they're also married to a corrupt regime and they're also married to Book of Revelation style nonsense.
So it's ultimately extremely flawed and ultimately a bad thing.
Okay.
I know I'm pretty sure we've talked about this before.
We talk about it all the time, but here's another perfect example.
RT with the anti-Zionist Jew Miko Paled is blaming not Judaism for these wars.
They're attacking them on the remembering Amalek Purim holiday day, and they're bragging about how it's connected and it's all symbolism.
And they're calling him Amalek and they're calling Trump the anointed one to go fight in Armageddon.
And then this, but the Russian networks and anti-Zionist Jews always love to never blame Judaism.
They say Zionism is not Judaism.
Netanyahu's Polish, Milikowski, and they're Khazarians, and it's the Talmud and not the Torah.
And they're look at these Jews over here are anti-Zionists.
And they're blaming white supremacist imperialism.
Watch this.
This is white supremacist imperialism, you know, all over the world.
This is absolutely what it is.
And again, I'll say, I think with Iran, Iran is a bridge too far, and they're going to be, they're going to be learning a very difficult lesson.
Oh, he thinks we're going to lose too.
Yeah.
Listen, you just subversive dumb fuck.
No, it's actually Judaism.
It is your religion that is doing this.
And to blame this on white supremacy is just the most absurd thing I could ever imagine.
And like Judaism's not a problem.
Yes, it is.
As I've just outlined, the story of the Torah is the story of Zionism.
If I could sum it up in one sentence, it is that.
The story of the Torah is the story of Zionism.
So yes, you are to blame.
You, you, a man, you're a Jew who believes in Judaism and follows Yahweh.
You are to blame.
White supremacists, you can criticize them all you want.
They didn't do this.
You did it due to your God and your holy book.
Period.
End of statement.
I am sorry.
You cannot escape responsibility.
And you, that man, I've never heard of him before, but he looks like a sort of smart, reflective man.
You are going to have to go undergo serious introspection about your religious faith.
And I think this is one of the great things that you're doing.
And certainly Mark and I are doing with REM.
Like one of our target audiences is not white supremacists or European colonialists.
It's actually Jews themselves because most all Jews sort of have this fuzzy notion of their own religion.
And it is about like kindness and tolerance and blah, blah, blah.
And they, it needs to be revealed to them how sinister, diabolical, and in other ways, how complex and sort of amazingly powerful their religion is.
But that needs to be revealed to them, to these people who just sort of go with the flow of what they've been doing every Saturday for all their, all of their lives.
And so I think one major mission of mine and Mark's, and I imagine this is a mission of yours as well, is to liberate Jews from Judaism because it isn't like, you know, Jews are a kind of ethnic group and a lot of the stereotypes people might have about Jews sort of fit the bill.
And I could come up with just as many, if not more, you know, like casual anti-German critiques or casual anti-American critiques.
You know, the Germans are the Irish.
The Germans are all cold and autistic.
Americans, we think everything is a Big Mac.
I mean, like I could all day long engage in a kind of casual anti-Frenchness, anti-Americanism, anti-Russian, anti-Irish.
It's all sort of fun and it's all superficial because it's not really meaningful.
Yes, people are different.
But what, so I don't care about Jews.
I don't care about the fact that like they might be cheap and nebbish and greedy or what that's just irrelevant.
You know, viva la difference.
It's good to have different people around.
What we need to be attacking is Judaism itself.
That is not the people, the book, and the ideology or philosophy, or whatever word you might choose to describe it.
And in so many ways, we want to liberate that man from his own religion.
Like we want to break the chains.
Yahweh has power over you.
You are obedient to Yahweh, and we want to release you from his grasp.
So in a way, like the first people that, you know, the first like beneficiaries of the work that we're all doing might very well be intelligent Jews themselves.
And I not initiates, not the people who fully understand what this religion is about, but the sort of wishy-washy, high IQ, but liberal Jews who think that their religion is like a mystery or it's about tolerance and kindness and being good to one another or whatever.
We want to go after them and release them from Yahweh's grasp to break the chains.
And I hope that someone like this man who's a rabbi or something will actually just open his ears to what we're saying so that he could live a better life and he could start.
I think he's probably on the right side, quote unquote, in the sense of I agree with him on the Iran war or whatever.
But I want him to be on the right side of history.
I want him to be on the right side of philosophy.
I want him to be on the right side of truth.
I want him to fully understand just how diabolical the holy Bible is.
I'm not no, I don't think he's a rabbi.
I think he's a secular Jew that his dad was like a general in the IDF.
His book is called The General's Son.
Interesting.
But they all do it.
Rabbis, you know, reform rabbis will do that type of thing too.
Yeah, he's still not fully liberated.
He's liberated from this like hard-edged Israeli nationalism, but he's not liberated from God, from God, as he calls it, Yahweh, Hashem, whatever name you want to use.
He's not fully liberated from this fictional character who is dominating his mind.
So Tucker always loves to do this thing too.
Like, oh, Judaism is great.
Orthodox Jews, great.
It's just the evil secular, you know, the ones that aren't following Judaism properly or the Talmud only.
He thinks like that a bunch of Jews just follow Torah.
He's like, is he a religious Jew?
It's like, yes, Tucker, to answer your factual question, he's clearly a religious Jew who goes to temple.
Like, what the fuck are you talking about?
He said that.
Yeah, that's the problem.
He's not Jewing enough, Jewing hard enough.
And he's not a real Jew.
Right.
I mean, give me a break.
I don't question the like, I don't know, sincerity of people who are going to church every Sunday and like, you know, taking the Eucharist or something.
You know, I think they are sincerely doing it.
I'm not like, oh, you're not doing it enough or something.
And if you were, you would have a different political opinion.
It's just so shallow and cheap.
Okay, I want your take on this one too, because I see this all the time.
Watch this, Merchheimer, and Tucker, what they say here.
Very important to understand.
It is not a Jewish lobby.
And it is not a Jewish lobby because many Jews don't care much about Israel.
And many Jews are opposed to what Israel or the Israel lobby is doing.
Including many religious Jews, Torah Jews, sincere God.
Sincerely Jewish Jews disagree.
I know some.
So I know.
Absolutely.
There are a large number of Jews who are anti-Zionists, I'm aware, right?
So very important.
Yeah, congratulations.
I don't know what this proves.
It's obviously a Jewish lobby, and Christianity is Judaism 2.0.
It is a Jewish-derived faith.
Judeo-Christianity, whatever you want to say about it, whatever uses that was put to politically is a coherent concept.
You know?
Yeah.
No, they say they're Baal all worshipers.
They're Satan worshipers.
It's Khazarians.
It's Frankists.
Literally no one on earth is worshiping Baal.
I think I could safe to say, like, what are there?
Eight billion people.
Like, literally no one worships Baal.
Judaism is predicated on opposing Baal and worshiping Yahweh.
They'll never criticize Yahweh.
They'll say Zionism's not Judaism.
They'll say it's white supremacists or they'll say Israel is the proxy of America and we're just using them or it's the secret Babylonians and they're the middle management and they're just being scapegoated.
It's the secret occult Babylonian Nazis.
Like this is what we hear.
This is the pervasive, like prevalent Candace Owens Dugan pushing Tucker, Alex Jones.
This is the same or they're secret demons, interdimensional demon, time traveler, clockwork elves.
And we just got to believe in Jesus to save us from all this demonic Satanism and Luciferians.
Yeah.
No.
What percentage of the world population worships Yahweh?
What is there?
800 million Muslims and like over half.
No, no, it's like 4.4 Christians and Muslims, billion.
So about half the world.
Billion Christians and Muslims.
And then there are tens of millions of Jews.
Yes.
So well over half of the planet is worshiping Yahweh.
Yet apparently Baal is to blame.
Like, I mean, this is kind of a weird.
Or Dugan, look at who Dugan blames.
Absolutely.
Scapegoating.
Look at what Dugan says.
Dugan says the West dethroned Christianity five centuries ago.
The atheism and materialism triumphed there long ago.
God is dead for the Western for hundreds of years.
Epstein, they're all calling it Epstein's war.
Like it's not like a Jewish apocalyptic, like Israel war.
The modern West is anti-Protestantism 500 years ago?
Probably, I guess.
It's not the schism.
The nailing of the theses on the doors of the chapel.
I mean, Protestant Reformation.
This just sort of, I don't know.
I mean, I was raised in the Episcopalian church and I still have an affinity, you know, with these things.
I don't think they're all bad.
I understand some positive aspects to the communitarian aspects, let's say, of Christianity.
And I'm not really against those.
But like, this is just like Protestants are to blame for this.
Like, I don't know even what to say.
Like, the best thing about Protestantism is that it was a genuine inspiration to go and read the Bible for yourself.
And ironically, that led to criticism of the Bible.
Protestantism's Paradox00:06:19
You know, interestingly, like, Jesus mythicism is not some new thing that emerged on the internet.
It's actually fairly old.
The documentary hypothesis is all coming in the early 19th century.
That is, that is looking at the text and coming up with different dating and authorship concepts of the Holy Bible.
All of these things came out of Germany.
Why?
Well, Germans are smart and industrious.
That's one reason.
But I think the other reason really is Protestantism in the sense of like this impulse to not just look at stained glass windows or some beautiful piece painting or architectural achievement, but to actually read the text and interpret it for your own.
You know, as Tyndall said, the boy at the plow will know more about the Bible than a cleric.
I think there are a lot of positive things to that type of sentiment.
And at least with regard to some mysterious religion like Christianity.
And I don't know what to say.
Like Protestantism brought us back to the text and helped us better understand it.
And we weren't relying on these sinister priests who told us that it was all a mystery or just obey orders.
Here's the dogma, etc.
We could actually interpret it and examine it.
That's one of the reasons why I think I would give like one or two cheers for the Protestant Reformation.
But secondly, like even according to Dugan's own value system, Protestants are more likely to support Donald Trump.
Protestants are more likely to vote and Mormons.
Protestants and Mormons are more likely to be socially conservative.
Protestants and Mormons are more likely to oppose abortion.
I could go on and on.
So even according to Dugan's own values, like Protestantism was good.
But according to my value system, also, Protestantism is, I guess you could say, ironically good.
The crazy thing that I see here, though, is that he's blaming atheism and materialism on like what's going on in Iran and the West.
And then he says it's Antichrist and civilization of Baal.
And this is, they're all really exploding with this based on stupid bullshit like the Baal bank account that wasn't, that Epstein never had and was not called Baal.
And it's like, where is the call?
He'll say Judaism is awesome.
He won't criticize Judaism.
He'll say Zionism's not Judaism.
And he won't criticize like it is Judeo-Christian Yahweh Trump supporters and Jews that is doing this stuff.
That's what's in charge.
Scapegoating atheism.
They always like to say Israel's the secular state of Israel.
You know, it's founded by atheists.
They're blaming atheists for like a Zionist Judaism messianic project.
Exactly.
Exactly.
They're just scapegoating.
They're scapegoating, ironically, the people most likely to be liberal opponents of the Iran attack.
There are atheists in the United States.
I know many of them.
They are more likely to be liberals.
They're more likely to be educated.
They're also more likely to have fewer kids and be unmarried.
I mean, it is what it is.
Yeah, these are the liberal eggheads.
Say what you will about the materialist atheist, but they are the most prominent ones to oppose the attack on Iran.
Who are the most likely people to support this attack?
The Christians.
The MAGA people, even if they don't go to church and even if they don't know anything about the Bible or very little, they identify as Christians.
They wear a cross around their neck.
They resonate with all this kind of stuff.
They are the most likely to be supporting this war.
Materialists, atheists are the least likely.
Yet apparently, according to Alexander Dugan, like the atheists are to blame for this.
I mean, it is just so absurd.
I just, I can't even, it's just totally unserious as well.
Like, what does it feel like, Dugan?
I mean, you get a lot of, you know, retweets.
You're a sort of evil specter in the minds of the American population, or at least the media and educated people.
Congratulations.
That's great.
But like, what does it mean that you just can never be taken seriously?
Yeah, he is becoming a low-cost.
He's obviously wrong.
No, he thinks Candace Owens is sincere and brave and beautiful as always.
She's on the right side of the cosmic battle always.
Yeah.
Yeah, they're pumping chaos and confusion and disinformation and demoralization.
That's clearly what the strategy is here.
And all of it anti-Western, using the religions to whip people up into a manic, messianic mania, apocalyptic frenzy.
He's retweeting Sneeko saying the Dajal is coming.
It's like he thinks he's the Benejessarit and Doom.
He's the equivalent of Jesus in the book of Revelations.
Or the book of Revelation, I always mess.
Everyone messes that up.
So Jesus.
Oh, the Dajal is the Antichrist.
Excuse me.
See, the Majab is the equivalent of Jesus.
Jesus himself occurs in the end times fantasy of Islam.
Equivalent Of Jesus00:07:08
He's calling the West Amalek as well.
This almost makes me think he's like a secret Jew or something.
Well, he says he loves Kabbalah, so he knows about all these different eschatologies and he's trying to take advantage and utilize them to because he wants to destroy the West.
Judaism and then like turned it around for his own ends.
So it's like the West, by which he means like the golden billion and in Putin's terms, that basically Europe and North America just whites.
Like we are Amalek, we're Esau, and he's Jacob.
I mean, no, it doesn't work that way.
You can't just take something with a very clear meaning and just kind of like twist it towards your own ends for fun or something.
I mean, give me a break.
So this new guy that's just absolutely been exploded.
He started his YouTube channel three years ago and already has like 1.4 million.
He's on every big platform.
He's blowing up everywhere.
And now he says Dugan is the world's greatest geopolitical strategist.
And look at what he says here.
Is that there is a geopolitical theorist named Adjana Dugan who's turned this eschatology into a master plan for Vladimir Putin to implement?
If you don't know who Azana Dugan is, you have to watch his interviews.
You have to read his books because he's probably the most important geostrategic thinker we have today.
I'm going to put his videos and his books in the description below.
So please make sure you spend enough time to actually research him because so much of what he says helps us understand the world as it is today and how the world will develop over time.
So I need to have, look, I interviewed Professor Jiang, and I guess maybe I should have been more antagonistic in the interview.
He didn't mention Dugan when I interviewed him, but do you believe the eschatology is real?
Like when I interviewed him, I'm going to post the whole thing on YouTube after I get off with you because I want the, first of all, I think there'll be a lot of interest in it, but I think the world should know in a way.
But he said that if I'm remembering correctly, and it was over six months ago, is that it's like there are these narratives and systems that are literary and fantasy and they're put into our heads.
And then we sort of enact them in the real world almost in a Gollum-like manner where the word of God is placed into the figure's head and then he's sort of holy at least for a time, but he can go rogue and he needs to be deactivated, et cetera.
But you understand that point.
So he was making that type of argument, an argument that would definitely appeal to me because that really is REM theory.
I mean, if I could sum it up REM theory, it is that there are these stories that are placed in our heads and the stories become real as our behavior adheres to the stories.
But the only problem is it's almost like now that clip you played seems to imply that Jiang believes in Jewish and Christian eschatology.
Otherwise, what are you saying?
Is he a brilliant propagandist or is he a brilliant theorist or analyst?
Let's use that word.
So is he analyzing the situation or is he propaganding the situation?
If he's propaganding the situation, that means that he is furthering the narrative and getting people in this sort of mind frame where they're going to act in a certain way.
If he's analyzing the situation, he's basically saying the book of Revelation is true.
This is how it will happen.
You are guided by forces you don't understand that are beyond your consciousness.
And thus we can analyze, use the book of Revelation as a template to analyze the world.
Which one is he saying?
Because I can't imagine that Jiang, who's, I believe, Yale educated, he's now a high school teacher in China.
And he is, you know, well-read, et cetera, interesting man.
I can't believe that he actually believes that the Bible is real.
Like, I don't, does he believe in God?
I didn't press him on this.
I just assumed that.
He says that secret societies are promoting, satanic secret societies are promoting evolution so that we don't know our true history.
Oh, God.
The big bang, evolution, neuroscience.
It's to teach us that there's no God.
There's no purpose.
It's all just random.
It's all just material.
So how do we get this to this point?
But why?
Okay, stop it right there.
Okay, that's enough.
How is this?
Does this not go against the ideals of the Chinese government?
Well, he's meant to pander to a Western audience.
So he's giving them all these kosher, satanic conspiracies and telling them Putin's the ubermensch and the evil West is going to be destroyed in the multipolar world.
I mean, is not what is China if not an atheistic materialist society and regime?
Good point.
It's just weird that he would be promoting this.
And he is, again, correct me if I'm wrong, but he's a high school teacher.
So he is a officer of the state.
I don't know what high school class is teaching kids something like this.
What is the class called?
It wasn't much.
Illuminati 101 or something.
I know, because he does, like Jordan Peterson, he seems to be instructing this.
Like, this is quite, this is like AP.
It's like the AP of the AP of history.
Like, I mean, I don't usually like I remember taking some AP art history or whatever.
It was really great, actually.
We had all these slideshows, but it was basically like, this is the Vatican.
There is a guy named Michelangelo.
You know, it wasn't, there's an Illuminati conspiracy to turn you away from God through the theory of evolution.
I mean, I can't imagine that in a high school curriculum.
And then I can't imagine China tolerating that.
But keep in mind, he's speaking in English.
And maybe there's your answer.
Exactly.
As is Dugan.
We always get straw man.
Like, they go, Dugan's a crank.
He doesn't have any influence in Russia.
Like, well, that's not the argument.
He clearly is having influence and he is meddling amongst our discourse to cause chaos, his chaos magic.
And look who came out as a big Dugan stand the other day.
Gavin Newsom's Bot Controversy00:15:27
E. Michael Jones says Dugan is right.
E. Michael Jones.
Yeah.
Yeah.
The Jews killed Jesus guy for 30 years.
Yeah.
And whites don't exist.
That's his other big line.
The last stand against Ba'a.
They were total idiots until they were given the Bible.
They were rolling around in the mud until the Bible taught them to be civilized.
You see your boy Newsom coming out, stronger and stronger rhetoric against Israel in Iran in the Iran War.
Yeah.
I mean, look, the liberals are going to do this.
And it's sort of, I guess, the benefit of the polarized system that we live in.
I mean, I'm older than you are, but I think you still remember this.
During the Iraq war, a little over 20 years ago and during 9-11, 25 years ago, and in the late 90s, Israel was not a polarized issue at all.
Everyone loved Israel.
Even people who were actually strong voices against George W. Bush in the Iraq war, like Keith Oberman, was pro-Israel.
So it was not polarized.
That was sort of the impulse of AIPAC as well, which I remember watching some of these.
Excuse me, a little hiccup issue here.
Yeah, it was weird.
I remember watching these APAC commercials where they were showing all the people attending APAC, and there was like a transgender woman and then like a Republican from Oklahoma.
And then there was like a centrist, and then there was like a libertarian.
There was old people, young people.
It was like everyone is Goya.
You know, like everyone is here.
We love everyone.
So long as I love Israel.
And it was not polarized.
And I think what has happened after 2023 is that the issue of Israel, first off, Israel's support has declined across the board among everyone, which is remarkable.
A.
But B, the polarization is really intense.
And so I think it is safe to say that Israel is losing moderates.
It might even be past that 50% threshold, but they have lost the left.
So, whether you are a kind of neoliberal Kamala supporter, whether you are a far-leftist Mamdami supporter, or even if you're a moderate who might vote for both parties on occasion, this vanishing population of people who do that, you are now against Israel.
You're the very least against their campaign in Gaza.
You are considering shutting off aid and military aid, and you might even be considering anti-Zionism.
Now, on the Republican side, they are still supportive of Israel.
The evangelicals, despite their relative decline, are still around, still powerful.
This sort of new like halo app or hollow app using teal verse Catholic, but the new passion of the Christ is about to come out as well.
Yes, they're all pro-Israel.
Give me a break.
And I know Mel Gibson's there, but whatever.
They're all, he's, I don't even know if he's anti-Israel.
Might just be anti-Semitic, which is anyway.
He'll say, he'll probably believe the normal Catholic trad cat line that it's the antichrist and Jesus is going to come and defeat them, but they gotta, they gotta have their mark of the beast and all their prophecies first.
Right.
But anyway, it is polarized.
Israeli support has dropped across the board, but it remains polarized.
And at some point, someone like Gavin Newsom, because he is a politician and he sways in the wind like a reed, he is going to change on this issue.
He would not have been doing this 20 years ago.
Sorry.
No worries.
Sorry.
Oh, I'll have to call them back.
The Orthodontist called.
He sways with the wind and he is going to start to be heavily critical of Israel.
He's not going to be anti-Judaism.
He's not going to be anti-Zionist in the sense of delegitimizing the state of Israel itself, but he's going to be like the Pod Save America guys who are like, you know, unless we can have a balance of power in the Middle East and unless we can stop an outright genocide, we are going to, until we have a balance of power and until we can stop an outright genocide, we are going to withhold aid and support, which is very interesting.
And again, like all of these Groypers or millennial infotards or, you know, online right anti-Semites, like, okay, guys, it seems like this is your top issue, right?
This is it, which it's, it's Zionism.
This is your big thing.
So here you go.
Who's the lesser of two evils?
Who is it?
Is it Gavin Newsom or is it JD Vance?
All right, it's clearly Gavin Newsome.
So, what is the question at this point?
Like, what are we talking about?
If you think foreign policy is something you want to vote on, which people like Rothbard would say, foreign policy is the top issue, and he voted for Democrats as well.
That's sort of my top issue.
One of the driving issues for voting for Kamalo is actually the Ukraine crisis and my fear of JD Vance getting power and the people around Vance, the Silicon Valley right, Sachs and Musk, and Teal and so on.
But anyway, did you catch this clip?
My buddy Seeth all found.
I'm sorry, were you not done there?
What's the point?
Oh, vote for news.
Okay.
They're talking about you.
This rabbi was talking about you.
Okay.
It's a little long.
Did you have a thought on it or something?
They take forever to get to the point, too.
They don't say very much.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's the white Zionist.
I basically said, like, look, buddy, I don't believe that your book teaches tolerance and love and understanding.
I think your book is a foundation for Jewish supremacism and power and nationalism.
So don't tell me that you're going to like lecture me on racism when your foundational text is the Torah.
Give me a break.
And they agreed with me.
It's good.
They agreed.
Okay, so what is Newsom saying?
He's saying...
Just listen to it if you want to.
We're going to have to consider a lot of Democrats have the Netanyahu regime and felt like, you know what, we don't like the trajectory he's on.
It's time to rethink the U.S. relationship with Israel, especially military support.
He's making that easy right now.
Let's talk about that.
But the issue of BB is interesting because he's got his own domestic issues.
He's trying to stay out of jail.
He's got an election coming up.
He's potentially on the ropes.
He's got folks, the hard line, that want to annex the West.
Knock out Newsome.
I mean, let's go.
Are they talking about it appropriately?
They're sort of an apartheid state.
They couldn't even, I mean, we're talking about regime change.
For two years, they haven't even been able to solve the Hamas question.
Burn.
So this is, I mean, you know, I want to be careful here, but, you know, in so many ways, that influence in the context of the conversation of where Trump ultimately landed on this is pretty damn self-evident.
And so Rubio may have been saying something else in the context of what he ultimately said in terms of being sort of pulled into some of these things.
But I will say this, didn't surprise me in this context.
I don't know if it's Napoleon or whoever said about a sword, the only thing you can't use a sword for is sitting on it.
And when you bring two aircraft carriers out there and you assemble the kind of military force that Trump did over the last few weeks, it didn't surprise me ultimately that they moved that direction.
Do you think, looking down the road, that the United States should consider maybe, you know, rethinking our military support for Israel?
It breaks my heart because the current leadership in Israel is walking us down that path, where I don't think you have a choice but that consideration.
I mean, to say this is in America's interest at a time when affordability is at crisis levels, where you had an administration who literally got elected saying this is exactly opposite of what they would ever consider doing.
The fact that we are in this now regional war, all these proxies, the fact that we, you know, and all the grift and the corruption, it's also marks a huge part of this.
And that's a real conversation we need to have, this board of peace, and the peace that the Witcoff family is getting, and the peace that Kushner is getting, and the peace that Trump Jr. is getting.
Let's go.
Does anyone watching this disagree with what Gavin Newsom said there?
Now, they might have, some people in your audience might say it more strongly or whatever, but like, is he not on the right track?
Is he not like 60% of the way there?
I saw a clip recently, too, where he was like, the Democrats need to be way less on the social issues and the wacky, extreme leftism as well.
Oh, yeah, he totally gets it.
It's like gay marriage was sort of sellable, but once you pass that, it becomes extremely alienating and absurd.
And yeah, he's just, he's a politician.
He knows which way the wind is blowing.
Are paying for their crime.
Yeah, they're making it easy on him.
They're lobbing them softballs.
They are.
It's funny.
They're like, he's made.
What he basically said is Bibby is making it easy for me to change my position.
Yeah.
Which is kind of funny.
Under the leadership of President Donald J. Trump, the rogue Iranian terrorist regime is being absolutely crushed.
47 years of tolerating and enabling the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism are over.
Iran's murderous terrorist leaders are paying for their crimes against America, and they are paying in blood.
Under their leadership.
All right.
I think we hit most of the big parts here.
The old clip, Israel wants America to fight Iran for them.
That's funny.
They're going to try to blame this in Scapegoat America, though, or white imperialism or some shit, or Satan worshipers.
I've noticed that's the big talk.
The Russian spheres have really been pushing.
It's the Epstein war, and it's about Baal worship.
Those are the two big talking points I've been seeing.
Even though Epstein, like, I think he took all sorts of positions or probably didn't have an ideology, but if he did have a position on Israel, it was sort of like the liberal Zionist Ehud Barak.
Let's be better stewards of the Palestinians.
Like, if anything, he would be, if Epstein were alive today, he would be opposing this.
Ehud Barak says that Netanyahu and the ultra-Orthodox want to ignite the Middle East and cause Armageddon and hasten the Messiah.
And Ehud Omart, also another former prime minister, also saying the same thing.
So it's like, let's finish with the super chats.
We should jail that man because, you know, he screwed some 18-year-old model or something.
Oh, yeah.
He's he's the bad guy.
Let's finish with these clips everybody's sharing of Alex Jones saying Trump's an errand boy for Israel.
RT shared it also with Nick.
And then we'll do super chats and then we'll close it out.
I don't think there's been too many super chats, so it won't take too long.
But let's start with this one that your co-author of your upcoming book.
Have you told everybody the title yet?
Myth to Power.
Myth to Power.
Mark Brahman shared this clip of Nick.
Let's see.
I don't think made for an awkward segment because Alex Jones is one of the ones that is most responsible for kooky magical thinking theories.
I don't think they're necessarily being controlled.
I mean, you never know, but I think that a lot of it is just like you said, they're chasing the algorithm.
And I think a lot of them are just have a reckless disregard for the truth.
And as I said, I don't think they have any kind of ideological foundation.
It's people that got red-pilled a few minutes ago and they don't know what's up and down and they don't know what's going on.
And then these are people that are just getting, it's only in one direction, more extreme, more crazy, more out there, more far-fetched.
With Candace, I don't even think it's bots.
I think that maybe people just underestimate how many dumb people there are in the world that have an appetite for this crap.
It's that, and the bots help the dumb people gravitate to the mental illness, also.
I think it's both.
There's definitely bots.
Is this speaking of bots?
Like, is this just me?
Like, there was like a face swap AI that made me look like Nick Fuentes and sound like him so I could go on Alex Jones.
Yeah, I know.
This is what I've been saying too about Nick, for one, in his Christian anti-Semitism.
And Alex, clearly, Nick knows Alex is the number one promulgator of all this stuff, too.
He's the OG kooky Stew Peters, Candace Owens, like conspiratainment, you know, fear mongerer.
It's the satanic Luciferian cabal.
They're drinking the babies, they're eating the baby turkey.
They're worshiping Moloch and Ball.
Clockwork elves.
I've never interdimensional shapeshifting.
Joe Rogan.
Let me tell you, Joe Rogan takes DMT and everybody, every ancient civilization takes the DMT.
I learned it from David Icke 20 years ago.
They all see the same entities.
They're praying and feeding off your negative vibrations in the inner dimensions.
And at CERN, Professor Zhang also says at CERN, they're opening up portals to the demonic alternate universe.
Oh, no.
Also.
But yeah, he's right.
George W. Bush and the Neocons00:13:44
He's right about all of this.
The low IQ peasant anti-Semitism, right?
I want to hear about, you know, time travelers and aliens and, you know, everybody secretly transgender at the highest levels.
There is a huge appetite.
Illuminati.
The right wing is this is like literally everything Alex Jones has been saying for 20 years.
Yeah, Jones is just like, oh, I think you may got to make it a good point.
People believe that.
It's like, dude.
That's so funny.
He knows it too.
He knows this.
It makes it a little awkward of a segment here for these guys.
I've been wondering because I've been seeing Nick say this stuff, which, you know, the rhetoric I've had for years dealing with all these crazy conspiracy.
And it's like, Jones is the number one guilty of this.
Call him out.
Don't just call Candace out.
Call him out by name.
So he is kind of doing it to his face on the show here.
And it's pretty good.
Over the years, the right wing has cultivated this audience of people that it's the QA non stuff.
It's this crazy conspiracy stuff.
Jones promoted QAnon very early on.
Him and Jerome Coursey promoted QAN in like 2018.
Yeah.
Very early on.
Yeah.
They springboarded it.
And there are no guardrails.
And now, well, the lunatics are quite literally running the asylum.
Like the biggest, dumbest lunatic is running the asylum with all the idiots gathered every day for the latest conspiracy.
And like with this Charlie Kirk thing, I said the other night.
It just keeps getting bigger.
It starts out with a conspiracy that maybe someone at Turning Point embezzled a million dollars and they took him out to hide it.
Then it turns into, well, Israel killed them because he was going to go against Israel.
Then it's, no, Israel and France and FBI killed him because he was going to do something to change global politics.
I can't believe one thing.
The reason that she's on Twitter with a check mark, I can't.
Okay, yeah, she's never had any censorship.
Actually, has an ideological okay, yeah.
Jones is extremely guilty of all of that.
So, so funny cultivated this conspiracy kooky mindset early.
Here's the other one: does Jones turn what did he get off the Ozimpic?
He's like back to being fat.
He's gaining it.
Wasn't he kind of strangely thin for like four months and then he's fat again?
I'm glad he's fat.
I think that's more on brand.
The bottom line is, is that I've confirmed that Israel is basically in control of our foreign policy by our own posture to be allied with them.
And that is uncontrovertible because now they're trying to damage control.
Oh, no, Trump gave the order.
No.
I called in and said all this to Jones in like Trump's first term, and he called me a Nazi.
This is the thing.
I don't like the, despite everything we've just said over the past hour and a half, I still don't like the idea of saying that like Israel is in charge because it lets off the hook all of the people who are doing this.
There is not like an action, a rabbi with a gun at Trump's head telling him to do this.
I'm sorry, there's not.
There is a great level of consensus and elective affinities complicit accomplices.
And just like, I don't like this.
I don't like saying like the Jews are in charge.
It is low IQ.
It's black and white thinking.
And it ultimately is letting people off the hook.
And I think I tweeted this about.
Letting Trump off the hook.
That's what he's doing.
He's trying to absolve Trump from any wrongdoing.
And he's being controlled.
Mark Levine's war.
It's like Mark Levine has fewer followers than you do.
So what is that?
I don't know what to say.
Like, why didn't you stop it or something?
And saying that, like, it's Mark Levine's war if it's Israel's war.
So it seems to be setting up this argument that they're going to make in two years, which is like, Iran was bad, but our hope now is that we've learned some hard lessons from this campaign.
And JD is the man to take us out of this.
It's just bullshit.
Bullshit.
And I'm just sick of it.
Yeah, and Jones is the one that was the biggest cheerleader and influential of legitimizing Trump to like the libertarian conspiracy Tea Party world to a large degree, him and Roger Stone.
And then now he wants to still act like he's the author.
So you've been wrong all your last decade of shilling Trump, both of these guys.
Now you're admitting you're wrong.
Well, guess who was telling you all along from the get-go?
Our very doctrine is: if Israel is attacked, we attack.
And so, thank God Russia's not following its agreement with Iran or China, or we'd be in war with them right now.
So, it is a fact.
And then, the neocons, the Israel lobbies all over here and attacking anybody that points this out and tries to say it's not the case.
Well, Netanyahu brags about it.
So, I mean, that's the big news.
I'm not even defending Trump.
It actually makes him worse that it is now literally true.
What I claimed, well, I wanted to claim wasn't true because I didn't want to believe it.
Yeah.
That Trump is an errand boy of Israel.
And how do we deal with that, Nick Fuentes?
Well, if Trump is an errand boy for Israel, then you got to shut down his government.
And that means you got to go into the midterms and you got to get the Democrats in.
And the Democrats hopefully will impede the administration.
That's what they're going to do.
They're going to launch investigations, subpoenas, select committee, all that kind of stuff.
And they're going to grind it to a halt.
And, you know, if Trump is an operative of a foreign government, consider that he's forfeited his entire mandate because his whole basis of support is that he's America first, mad guy.
He's not like the other politicians.
Okay, well, if you're an errand boy for Israel, if you're a puppet of the Jewish state and you're bringing us to war for them, that's not like a small thing.
That's not like a little bit of foreign aid.
We're going to war on their behalf.
He has to be opposed.
And a lot of people don't want to take it there for one reason or another.
But, you know, I don't know what the option is.
I don't know how you work with that.
If you're America first and Trump is Israel first, well, that's not exactly a divide that can be bridged.
And that's what I tried to tell him for 10 years.
You can't be anti-Zionist in America first and keep supporting Trump when he brags every day about being the greatest president for Israel ever.
Correct.
Just like you can't say you oppose Jews while you're worshiping the Jewish God.
Same thing.
Just like we're right about Trump.
We're right about Christianity, by the way, Nick and Jones.
Do you think Nick will come to our side on the religious question?
Dude, I don't know.
Maybe if you can be nice to him.
Whisper in his ear enough.
Nick.
Yeah.
Definitely attack.
The right way is to praise him for what he's really good at and praise him for his performative abilities, which are obvious, and not to just endlessly attack him.
I don't think you really.
But I do genuinely like him.
I think he offers some sound analysis and he can be very funny.
I mean, RFH sent me that, like that pirate Dan Crenshaw thing where he's like, I made, can I get a good word for Israel?
You might have to walk the plank if you're anti-Zionist by me.
Like there'd be frigger over it.
He just lost.
Did you see that?
He just lost his primary.
Yeah.
Crenjo.
That's remarkable.
It's surprising.
It is.
Okay.
Let's do the power chats and then we'll close up hopefully before the two hour.
All right.
Oh, where is it?
Liam Jarrett.
Liam, thank you.
Why is Richard being Bush Jr. on neocons lately?
I am jester max.
So the question is, why is Richard glazing George W. Bush and the neocons?
I think that's a fair criticism.
I am jester maxing to some degree.
I'm at least pointing out important differences, which is actually.
Oh.
Can you hear that coming through?
It's beeping over and over again.
Okay.
I'm going to beep through all of them and then I'll go through them one by one so we can skip.
Hail underscore Apollo Sancho.
I don't have a power chat doesn't have a pause.
Okay.
I think that's it.
Okay.
All right.
Go ahead.
I am glazing George W. Bush and the neocons to some degree, and I also am jester maxing a bit, but I'm making a point by doing this, which is that at least George W. Bush had an ideology that was compelling, which is like, we will bring about global democracy.
Every human heart wants to be an American.
What did they say in Stanley Cooper's full metal jacket?
Within every gook, there's an American just waiting to come out.
It was basically that, but at least that's something.
And there is something compelling about the neoconservatives.
They also spent at least a year talking to people about what they were about to do, as opposed to the Trump administration, which just acts.
I don't know what to say, but there's still something to be said for Bush and the neocons.
Right.
The bit was, is like, oh, now we miss Bush.
Trump is so bad that now Bush doesn't seem so bad by comparison.
When he started his campaign that like, oh, they went into Iraq, they're idiots, you know, foreign wars, all that stuff.
And then now he's bringing it all.
So it's like, miss George Bush.
I'm on record.
I mean, I worked for the American Conservative magazine in 2007.
Like, I'm on record opposing the terror war.
So I don't really know what to tell you.
Like, there's proof that I was opposed to George W. Bush.
So I don't know what to tell you if you think that I like now love Bush or something.
I have an ironic, sincere but ironic admiration for Bush and the neocons.
Funny.
All right, here.
Let's do another one here.
Mimetic Warfighter sent $20 a name.
I was looking forward to the new blonde and black pilled show coming up, and you lads come and take my attention.
Cheers.
Oh, is that happening today?
Did you hear that big news?
Black pilled and blonde are teaming up for a show.
She left Dave Riley in the backlash.
I did hear about that.
Had you been on there?
No, you hadn't been on there, huh?
I've talked to Dave Riley, and they record the backlash not too far away from where I live.
So I was thinking about going on.
I really don't have a problem.
I might change my tone and maybe articulate things a little bit differently when I'm talking with a sincere Catholic, but I don't have a problem with honesty.
Like, I don't have a problem politely having a philosophical discourse with someone who's a sincere Catholic.
You know, you respect me, I respect you.
It's all good.
Yeah, yeah, me neither.
And given how Catholic he is and how anti-Christian I am, I say we're pretty, we get along pretty well.
Yeah, it's remarkable.
All things considered.
Okay.
And Blonde is awesome.
Wannabe had sent $5 out of all the schizo stories.
My fave one is: actually, Europeans are the lost tribes, man.
Oh, yeah.
They're secret Khazarians.
They're Edomites.
We're the real Israelites.
We have the covenant.
We're the true Israel.
All mental illness.
They wore Greek people's intestines as belts and now celebrate that as a holiday for wanting to put a Zeus statue in their temple and now are destroying nations part of the Axis alliance during World War II.
Yeah, and now they replaced the pagan.
Yeah, I didn't, I missed the connection between the first part and the last part.
Yeah.
Okay, let's go.
Next one.
Thank you, though.
Let's see.
Where was that?
Gooning over Bush, Blonde and Black Pilled.
Here we go.
bull slaw let's play bull slaw come Come on.
Oh, it's frozen.
He says, why did you say that you don't give a fuck about Ukraine, Adam?
You made me sad.
Boleslaw, I care about any injustice in the world, right?
What I meant is, like, I'm not invested in Ukraine.
You know, I'm not a Ukrainian patriot nationalist.
I'm not, you know, that's on the other side of the world.
I've never been there.
I don't know any Ukrainians.
I don't know what I'm a Ukraine stan.
You are, yeah.
Yeah, but you don't have to be.
Did you say that?
Don't give up about Ukraine, Adam.
You're right.
Oh, that was in response to Troll saying that I love Julinsky and stuff, or that like, you know, which is misrepresenting the actual position.
You know, I'm not like the Russia shills that go and visit Moscow and praise Putin every day and that type of thing for Ukraine is the point.
Beef Jerky and Beef Talk00:04:46
Okay.
Same with Russia, too.
It's not like I hate all the Russian people or something.
Just, I can see subversive Russian chills spreading a bunch of disinfo in our discourse.
That's the biggest issue.
Demoralizing, anti-Western, subversive disinfo and propaganda.
That's the problem.
If the Ukrainians were doing that shit too, I would call it out just the same.
All right.
Does that clear things up for you?
All right.
Let's go.
Where's the last one?
I think there's a couple more.
Sorry.
Thor's rune.
Thor's rune sent $5 on Rumble.
I met Miko Pellett when he was invited to SDSU by a Pro-Palestine org to counter an IPAC-sponsored IDF soldiers speaking tour in 2010.
He may still live here in San Diego.
Interesting.
I didn't have any idea he lived around here.
Sober Jeff Hardy sent $5 on Rumble.
What is new advice Richard could give me as a 25-year-old proud white man in a world with so much blatant anti-whiteness?
I don't like this whole giving people personal advice.
I don't know your situation, and I'm sorry.
That's not your fault.
Super chat is limited, but I don't know.
Like, go to college and get married and make money or something.
Don't turn to me for Dave Ramsey stuff.
Take care of yourself, get a family, and yeah, that's general good advice.
Yeah.
All right.
Here we go.
Oh.
Jocelyn Hates sent $20.
Jocelyn, thank you.
Thanks for coming on, Richard.
It's always interesting to hear your perspective.
Yes, appreciate all the time.
monopod sent five dollars adam when i uploaded my review of your paperback and kindle book to amazon uk i was surprised to find only 40 other reviews had been added such an excellent piece of work deserves more sales and reviews i believe it says like 60 something reviews for mine and they're very good And I want to thank you also, Richard.
You bought the book and shared it.
That means a ton to me.
I'll be the first in line when your book is available and into read.
We appreciate that.
Super green-pilled.
Green-pilled aura.
Okay.
Where is it?
Christian gets the Christian question.
The big issue.
Okay, here we go.
Adam Green's BWC sent $5.
Richard should switch to the beef jerky diet.
Less mushroom Swiss burgers.
Is he referring to the beef jerky diet that was outlined in the Epstein files?
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, cannibalism is obviously healthy.
We all love beef jerky.
Human meat, low in fat, high in protein.
I was eating beef jerky last night, dude.
You work out, you need protein, beef jerky, wagu.
Oh, dude, so good.
Right.
Epstein was on to something with the beef jerky diet.
No doubt.
Dude, every time I'm a place, a burger place, and there's mushroom and Swiss, it makes me think of you, by the way.
I'm currently reading Adam's 399-page masterpiece.
It's really well written.
I'm looking forward to reading Myth to Power.
When is the release date?
Ooh.
It's coming.
I know this takes us too long, but we actually, Mark has been gone for a little bit, but we actually are at the end stages.
Very soon.
Yes, it will be out when it's out.
I don't, you'll know.
Well, also, you're going to be mad because when it's actually released on Amazon, we're going to have like a month-long lead up to when it's actually going to be delivered and available.
So it will be out.
The first volume is done, and then we have all like the next two volumes that are in a very late stage of development.
So it's going to go a lot more quickly.
But yeah, you can criticize me all you want, but at the same time, I want to put it out when it's really as close to perfect as it can be because I know that it's going to be subject to a great deal of attacks.
And we've got to cover all the bases and it's got to be right.
And it just is.
Substack Revelation00:04:18
It's not like, it's not like just some political book where it's my opinions or like a story of my life or whatever.
Caramelized onions.
It's not that.
This is like the release of Das Capital or like the interpretation of dreams by Freud or like you can't rush a masterpiece, guys.
Well, it's not you, whether it's a masterpiece is up to you.
It is a, I think it's very clearly, objectively, a paradigm shift in the way that we look at religion, culture, and even history and civilization.
And it is that type of thing.
It's not just like my opinions on things or colorful writing or hot takes.
It's not that.
It's something bigger.
This is something that you apply to everything in the world and your life.
As what sent $5 on Rumble, how to deal with NASBLs in your organization?
Well, they all, NASBOLs, like, or is that Eric Stryker or something?
They all hate me anyway.
So I don't have to, I don't have a problem with them because they hate me.
Yeah, yeah.
They all got the knives out.
Yeah.
Sweeping for Chabad and Putin and Dugan and Candace and Tucker.
Yeah.
Okay, let's see here.
A few more.
Okay, here.
Wannabe Yid must be a Christian.
Wannabe $20 out of all the schizo stories.
My fave one is: actually, Europeans are the lost tribes, man.
Yeah.
You've been hearing that one for a while, right?
Oh, yeah.
It used to kind of be like the fringes of bit shoot and like message boards, and now it's kind of like too prevalent.
All right.
Well, thanks for coming on, Richard.
You want to give any plugs?
Your sub stack is the best place.
Substack and Twitter.
Just look up Alexandria on Substack.
We also, we do have a YouTube channel where I've been releasing clips.
Now, maybe you should view those before I get banned again.
I don't know.
I'm just sort of playing.
I mean, we don't use harsh language.
I mean, it's all, we don't, I don't, or I rarely use harsh language to begin with, but I don't know what will happen here with the YouTube, but I'm not counting on YouTube.
No O-bombs on YouTube, Richard.
Correct.
O-bombs.
O-bombs.
You know what that is?
No.
Octagons.
Oh, O-bombs.
I will refrain from O-bombing.
That's the only time I've ever heard that word before, since, and before or since then.
It's kind of a Louisiana thing, so it shows a little bit about my family history, but no O-bombs.
But yeah, Substack is the place.
And also, there's Richard B. Spencer on Twitter.
I'm actually going to create an Alexandria Twitter account where I'm going to give power to that to some other people as well in the group so that they can upload clips and so on.
So I've been like hiding on Substack in a way because I wanted to make sure that we had an audience that could support this going forward.
But I'm definitely more eager to put out clips and stuff and sort of directly influence people.
So yeah.
All right, cool.
We'll be in touch.
Thank you.
And thanks everybody for watching, supporting.
Give us a comment below.
Link the show.
Share it.
You guys know what to do.
Buy the book.
Keep your eye out for Myth to Power.
What a cool title name, too.
Oh, yeah.
Myths are power.
All right.
All right, guys.
Thanks for watching.
And I will see you guys again tomorrow.
David Scurbina on Friday.
We're going to be talking latest news unfolding and Jesus deception, Jesus hoax stuff.
It's going to be very good.
All right.
Take care, Richard, and I will see you guys all tomorrow.